Slashdot Mirror


The Mythbusters Construct a Kit Bot

A reader wrote in to mention a writeup of a really great Mythbusters project. Hyneman, Savage, and Imahara went out and purchased a 'Vex' robot kit from RadioShack, and constructed the bot to see what it was like. They were pleasantly surprised. From the article: "Jamie Hyneman: I must admit I was expecting to turn up my nose at a do-it yourself robotics kit from Radio Shack. But guess what? The VEX System kicks butt. In a total of about 12 person-hours, Adam Savage and Grant Imahara (my cohosts on MythBusters) and I were able to build a functional, if somewhat basic, prototype equivalent of an iRobot's PackBot."

148 comments

  1. Vex Robot stuff is 50%off at Radio Shack by jasonw61 · · Score: 5, Informative
    1. Re:Vex Robot stuff is 50%off at Radio Shack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It looks very nice, but why does a robot need safety glasses?

    2. Re:Vex Robot stuff is 50%off at Radio Shack by MPHellwig · · Score: 1

      for the friggin' lasers on their heads?

  2. Radio Shack is going to be selling a ton of them by cavalierlwt · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Good break for Radio Shack, you can't pay for that kind of advertising.

  3. But what myth will it bust/confirm? by wesley96 · · Score: 1

    That government is overspending on military hardware? ;) On a more serious note, Grant had his BattleBot robot and Jamie had that soda can shooting vending machine. No wonder these guys were all over that robot kit. I might need to get ahold of one of those things myself.

    --
    Serving time in Aristotelean prison for violating laws of physics
    1. Re:But what myth will it bust/confirm? by slo_learner · · Score: 1

      The government is seriously overspending. I got to see the packbot in development. Some very creative, very cheap methods were used, at least in the mechanical design.

    2. Re:But what myth will it bust/confirm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jamie also has blendo. He doesnt use it is semi out of control :)

  4. Person Hours? by Salo2112 · · Score: 2, Funny

    They actually said "person hours?"

    1. Re:Person Hours? by Secrity · · Score: 3, Informative

      In TFA, Jamie Hyneman is said to have used the words "person-hours" in a sentence. The term is totally appropriate and it is not out of character for him from what I have seen on his television program.

      A person hour is a measurement of effort. One person who works for one hour will have performed one person hour worth of work. This measure is often abbreviated as PH. http://www.spc.ca/resources/metrics/glossary.htm

      This information was obtained by reading TFA (I searched for "hours" in the page) and by googling for "define person hours".

    2. Re:Person Hours? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is what politically correct people call what the rest of humanity calls a man-hour. These people will also use the word herstory instead of history. I probably pissed the wankers off by using the word humanity in the previous sentance. Well, sod-off if I did.

    3. Re:Person Hours? by Salo2112 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Sounds very similar to what we normally refer to as "man hours" when we are not trying to bend over backwards to appease the goddesses of political correctness. ;-)

      man hour

    4. Re:Person Hours? by nick1000 · · Score: 1, Funny

      What else did you expect. They are the Mythbusters...

      After all, we all know that man months are mythical.

    5. Re:Person Hours? by jolshefsky · · Score: 1
      They actually said "person hours?"
      Of course: it's a more specific term to differentiate from something like "robot-hours" or "woman-hours."
      --
      --- Jason Olshefsky

      Karma: Poser (mostly affected by adding this line long after everyone else did)

    6. Re:Person Hours? by Incadenza · · Score: 1

      I just had to do the accounting of an EC project in PM. That's person month - of course, there's no clear definition anywhere of how many PH there are in one PM.

    7. Re:Person Hours? by DrSkwid · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      the wanker is you

      btw. sentence

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    8. Re:Person Hours? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Similar, but not identical.

      You gotta figure one man-hour is about equal to two woman-hours. So that means 1 man-hour is approximately 1.5 person-hours. Of course these figures are a very rough sort of average. The actual time it takes to complete a project varies widely depending on which individuals are involved, and it often will not scale in a linear way with number of participants.

    9. Re:Person Hours? by springbox · · Score: 1

      Funny how you complain that a term which refers to time needs to be assigned a sex. I would prefer person-* to man-everything when refering to something totally generic like.. I dunno.. Time?

    10. Re:Person Hours? by gstoddart · · Score: 1
      Sounds very similar to what we normally refer to as "man hours" when we are not trying to bend over backwards to appease the goddesses of political correctness. ;-)

      Yeah, except in this case Kari and Scottie are just way too hot in a tank-girl kinda way to be classed under the category of "man-hours".

      But anything which makes me think of those two in the same sentence as bending over backwards, I've gotta thank you for.

      I, for one welcome our new politically correct tank-girl goddess overlords. =)
      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    11. Re:Person Hours? by brunes69 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I love mythbusters too, but if you really think Kari and Scotti are hot, you gotta get out more. They're not ugly, average sure, but far from a "hottie" classification.

    12. Re:Person Hours? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I went to school, we were taught that since the english language had no neuter, in cases where sex wasn't an issue, man was the default. salesMAN, postMAN, fireMAN, policeMAN. I never think of them as being "man" oriented, an more than when I hear an archaeologist refer to "early man" do I think he is only talking about men and not women. I guess if you really are a closet sexist, you feel the need to use "person" because "man" in that context means too much to you.

    13. Re:Person Hours? by gstoddart · · Score: 5, Insightful
      I love mythbusters too, but if you really think Kari and Scotti are hot, you gotta get out more. They're not ugly, average sure, but far from a "hottie" classification.

      Are you kidding me? Kari has that whole Earth-mother, freaky San Fran chick action going on, and Scottie is a tatooed hippy chick who can weld and build stuff.

      Hell, in some of her outfits, Kari looks like a friggin' Anime character, and in a bikini she's amazing -- she's hot like Willow was hot.

      We're talking two protypical geek-girls if I've ever seen 'em. Except they're artists and techicians.

      Are they the protypical fashion hottie? Nope. Does the total package of coolness transcend all of that? Absolutely. They're hot in a counter-culture way that's way better than what Vogue tells us is hot. Like I said, tank girl not fashion model.

      But, beauty is in the eye of the beholder. So your mileage may vary.
      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    14. Re:Person Hours? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Similar, but not identical.

      You gotta figure one man-hour is about equal to two woman-hours. So that means 1 man-hour is approximately 1.5 person-hours. Of course these figures are a very rough sort of average. The actual time it takes to complete a project varies widely depending on which individuals are involved, and it often will not scale in a linear way with number of participants.


      It's true. Which just means that we women have to work twice as efficiently and twice as smart as men, to get the same amount of work done in the same amount of time.

      Fortunately, that's real easy to do.

    15. Re:Person Hours? by rob_squared · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Political correctness is bad enough, political correctness without thinking about it is downright scary. George Carlin said it best:

      "I think mankind ought to be human kind, but they take it too far, they take themselves too seriously, they exaggerate. They want me to call that thing in the street a personhole cover. I think that's taking it a little bit too far. What would you call a lady's man, a person's person? That would make a He-man an It-person. Little kids would be afraid of the boogieperson. They'd look up in the sky and see the person in the moon. Guys would say come back here and fight like a person. And we'd all sing "for it's a jolly good person." That's the kind of thing you would hear on late-night with David Letterperson. You know what I mean? So...so I think it's an exaggeration and I like to piss off any group that take's itself a little bit too seriously."

      --
      I don't get it.
    16. Re:Person Hours? by Literaphile · · Score: 1
      It's true. Which just means that we women have to work twice as efficiently and twice as smart as men, to get the same amount of work done in the same amount of time.

      Fortunately, that's real easy to do.

      Not so easy that you were able to figure out how to create an account!

    17. Re:Person Hours? by wkitchen · · Score: 1
      Hell, in some of her outfits, Kari looks like a friggin' Anime character, and in a bikini she's amazing -- she's hot like Willow was hot.
      That strikes me as not the best analogy
    18. Re:Person Hours? by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 4, Funny

      "she's hot like Willow was hot."

      Erm, I'm into midget porn as much as the next guy, but Willow...?

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    19. Re:Person Hours? by GrodinTierce · · Score: 1

      on the off chance that you're serious, I'll point out that the GP is (hopefully) referring to this Willow.

      --


      Tierce
      Who sponsors your feelings?
    20. Re:Person Hours? by SeaFox · · Score: 1

      I would prefer person-* to man-everything when refering to something totally generic like.. I dunno.. Time?

      Everyone knows time is male. It is Father Time after all.

    21. Re:Person Hours? by Jafafa+Hots · · Score: 1
      If I were a woman, I would be a little annoyed (not a lot, but a little) to have my work units referred to as man-hours. Anyway, it just wouldn't be ACCURATE anymore, right? If work is performed by a woman, then the term "man hours" simply is grammatically incorrect.

      That having been said, I don't care for the sound of "person hours" - it's clumsy. Why not something neutral like "work hours?" And instead of replacing "manhole cover" with "personhole cover" why not "access hole cover?"

      --
      This space available.
    22. Re:Person Hours? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hahaha
      i thought you said "access hole cover", without the "cce"
      hahaha, tehe, giggle
      ya, im ok now, thanks

    23. Re:Person Hours? by Xserv · · Score: 1

      This bit never gets old to me. :) Good stab!

      Xserv

      --
      "I love lamp."
    24. Re:Person Hours? by Aqws · · Score: 1

      Lol, the thing is that she probably does work twice as efficiently because she doesn't visit slashdot enough to consider making an account.

    25. Re:Person Hours? by Zerbs · · Score: 1

      I prefer the phrase "mythical uninterrupted person hours" myself. It makes it clear that the estimates I give my bosses are just that, estimates, not hard deadlines.

      --
      "22 astronauts were born in Ohio. What is it about your state that makes people want to flee the Earth?" Stephen Colbert
    26. Re:Person Hours? by AdamWeeden · · Score: 1

      she probably does work twice as efficiently because she doesn't visit slashdot enough to consider making an account.

      And the fact that, unlike most slashdotters, she actually has two hands free to type.

      --
      I was quoted out of context in my autobiography...
    27. Re:Person Hours? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. Women have to work one hour (equivalent to men), and then an extra hour to fix what you did in the first hour! :)

  5. Science fair projects? by scooter.higher · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I know my son will love this (OK, me too). He has been asking me to get him a robot kit. But I'll probably have to get two kits so I don't take over his project :-)

    Then robot wars!

    Oh, yeah: I for one welcome our robotic overlords...

    --
    Ramen
    1. Re:Science fair projects? by gstoddart · · Score: 4, Funny
      I know my son will love this (OK, me too). He has been asking me to get him a robot kit. But I'll probably have to get two kits so I don't take over his project :-)

      Of course, once you've got two, then you'll need a third so you cannibilize more parts without taking apart his science-fair project. But then he's gonna want another one so he can get a better grade 'cuase little Billy is making a robot too. Then it'll get totally out of hand.

      Then, soon you'll have a houseful of robots doing all manner of silly things. Stop yourself before it's too late, you're playing into their hands and creating our own overlords!

      Run. Run for your lives ... must resist shiny robot mind-control technology ... must resist temptation to go to Radio Shack ...
      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    2. Re:Science fair projects? by RobertLTux · · Score: 1

      a better suggestion would be to get 2 kits 1 programming kit 2 goggles 1 metal/parts kit 1 crystal set and what ever motors and wheels you need

      --
      Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
  6. Re:Radio Shack is going to be selling a ton of the by scooter.higher · · Score: 0

    I hope they don't discontinue the discount as a result of the Slashdotting...

    --
    Ramen
  7. Re:Radio Shack is going to be selling a ton of the by TheHawke · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Or else they actually did pay for them to do just that.

    You have to understand that Radio Shack is teetering on the edge of self-destruction due to piss poor management tactics and poor product placement.
    They are shuttering between 400-700 corporate stores (I don't think this will affect franchise owners, but who knows) and reevaulating where they stand on what products they need to be pushing.

    The robotics kit was a safe bet to do a little advertising without getting wrecked because of shoddy materials or lousy manuals.

    --
    First rule of holes; When in one, stop digging.
  8. Stairs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Adam Savage: Our goal was to see if we could get it to climb stairs. As far as I know, there are few (if any) toys that will climb stairs; and only a few high-end robots like the PackBot and the humanoid Honda robots that can perform this task.

    I guess climbing downstairs doesn't count? :-)

    1. Re:Stairs by chivo243 · · Score: 1

      my slinky would walk down stairs, get caught in my brother hair, become unusable with in a week. There was a truck with star shaped wheels that did ok going up stairs, can't remember the name, the rich kid down the street had one... it was hard to see through the breath fogged window.

      --
      Sig Hansen?
    2. Re:Stairs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The English word for this is descending.

    3. Re:Stairs by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 1

      Climb, as in, to go up.

      Just because you can push it down the stairs doesn't mean it counts.

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
  9. Vex is NOT a robot by Porchroof · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The Vex System is no more a robot than a remote controlled model airplane or my car is.

    A remote controlled device is NOT a robot.

    A robot is a mechanical and electronic device that performs a function(s) under its own control. It is capable of making its own decisions.

    An android (NOT "droid") is a robot with the appearance of a human or animal.

    For further enlightment read "I, Robot" by Isaac Asimov.

    --
    Fata viam invenient.
    1. Re:Vex is NOT a robot by theraptor05 · · Score: 1
      From the American Heritage Dictionary
      robot n. A mechanical device that sometimes resembles a human and is capable of performing a variety of often complex human tasks on command or by being programmed in advance.

      Remote control falls under performing a task on command. You are thinking of an autonomous robot, which is a much more advanced thing and not something I'd expect from Radioshack.
    2. Re:Vex is NOT a robot by DrSkwid · · Score: 1

      You just can't trust somethign that calls itself "American Heritage"

      Try The Oxford English Dictionary :

      robot /robot/

            noun a machine capable of carrying out a complex series of actions automatically, especially one programmable by a computer.

          -- DERIVATIVES robotize (also robotise) verb.

          -- ORIGIN from Czech robota 'forced labour'; the term was coined in K. apek's play R.U.R. 'Rossum's Universal Robots' (1920).

      Perform another search of the Compact Oxford English Dictionary

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    3. Re:Vex is NOT a robot by falcon5768 · · Score: 1
      Sept going by this definition many of the things that the term "robot" was given in the 1920's-1930's or even before the term was even coined would not infact be considered robots, when most scholars do indeed consider them that.

      Thus this definition is far too narrow, especially when even today many of our robots are still human controlled for various reasons. The American Heritage one wins I have to say.

      --

      "Slashdot, where telling the truth is overrated but lying is insightful."

    4. Re:Vex is NOT a robot by dhiebert · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you find out more about the VEX kit and don't dismiss it simply as a Radio Shack product, you will see that it is based on a programmable microcontroller. While I think that RS is probably trying get some of the RC market with their product decription, VEX is capable of running autonomously, and thus would fit the definition of a robot.

    5. Re:Vex is NOT a robot by RobertLTux · · Score: 1

      umm you do know about the PROGRAMMING KIT (btw required for the for fun sensors)
      heck with the stuff 50% off you could get the base and programming kit for less than the original price of the base alone.

      --
      Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
    6. Re:Vex is NOT a robot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you bothered to RTFA you would have found out that it is in fact an autonomous system.

      Apart from that, way to go sounding all authoratative when in reality you dont know a damn thing, you seemed to have fooled at least one person.

    7. Re:Vex is NOT a robot by Porchroof · · Score: 0

      And you are certainly showing your ignorance, kid.

      --
      Fata viam invenient.
  10. it's FIRST, Radio Shack is the front... by jpellino · · Score: 4, Informative

    There was a mini-FIRST made of VEX robots this year. We saw the demo at FRC Hartford last week. Very impressive, makes it more accessible to middle schoolers and they "play" with it less than Mindstorms. The electronics comes from Innovation FIRST, the folks who make the brains for the FIRST robotics teams, and they're also VEXLabs. We're using it for the Trinity College Firefighting Robotics Contest, and we've gotten a chassis built and running under program control and effectors prototyped in record time.

    One thing better than Mindstorms is that you can more easily add other materials, parts etc., and make it more bombproof without resorting to toxic adhesives or plastic-eating tools...

    We're still wondering why RS is having a fire sale - two local stores were cleaned out as of Friday night - we just loaded up the last ultrasound and light sensors we could find. Some have said they're just dropping the retail line at RS, some have said it's just a sale, an eMail to the edu & gov rep at RS Fort Worth is yet unanswered. VEXLabs is still selling at full price. Hope they're just switching horses, but with RS no longer selling electronic parts, this was the sweetest thing they'd had in a while.

    Two heads-ups: the pushbutton inputs use negative logic (thanks, VEX - that was a half hour of "stump the chumps"...) - and there is no "run" switch on the bot - programs (and the wheels they control) run once they complete the download - so either mold some tiny cinder blocks or grab an extra bumper button (or other sensor) and create a latch as the first step in the program...

    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
    1. Re:it's FIRST, Radio Shack is the front... by Emeye · · Score: 2, Informative
      In our rookie year in the FIRST Robotics Competition usfirst.org we got a set of this VEX stuff, but it was labeled a llittle differently, as this was before the stuff was released at retail.

      Basically, it's some really useful stuff for fun little project bots, with a lot of components that are very similar to RC parts. It shares a lot of similar traits to the base chassis and components that we use for FIRST, the only differences being that VEX stuff is smaller and less powerful (The main battery we got with our kit is the same as the backup battery we have on our FIRST bot, which prvides just enough power to keep the controller running.) And whereas our FIRST robot uses motors pulled from a Fisher-Price minibike, the VEX bot we have uses servos and motors from Hitec.

      From the kit we have, they improved the wheels and made the pieces a little more colorful. It didn't help us much with our bot construction, but it's a fun little thing to play around with, or to build smaller robots with.

  11. Call me when they add Kari by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    and some sort of probe to the robot. Then I'll be interested.....

  12. Open Source Robotics? by Narphorium · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Could this be the start of mainstream Open Source robotics? I know this isn't the first DIY robot kit, nor will it be the last but if this really catches on I could see an open source community developing around it.

    Also, I can definately see people developing their own components for these things. Paying $9.99 for a phototransistor is a little ridiculous if you know how to set one up on your own.

    1. Re:Open Source Robotics? by phaggood · · Score: 1

      In a total of about 12 person-hours, Adam Savage and Grant Imahara (my cohosts on MythBusters) and I were able to build a functional, if somewhat basic, prototype equivalent of an iRobot's PackBot."

      Because Imahara's an electrical engineer with years of experience building remote controlled logic boxes?

    2. Re:Open Source Robotics? by Southpaw018 · · Score: 1

      No, one up from that. He built R2D2.

      No, really. I'm serious. ;)

      --
      ACs are modded -6. I don't read you, I don't mod you, I don't see you. Don't like it? Don't be a coward.
    3. Re:Open Source Robotics? by despisethesun · · Score: 1

      Because Imahara's an electrical engineer with years of experience building remote controlled logic boxes?

      That may have sped things up a bit, but I don't doubt that this kit would allow the average geek to achieve a similar result in a longer timeframe. They're kind of limiting, but kits like this are designed to be fairly easy to set up and program (no assembly language here!). A friend of mine bought a robot kit (admittedly it was mechanically simpler than this) and quickly had a robot capable of navigating a maze on its own, and while he's a pretty intelligent guy he's not a seasoned electrical engineer. Something like this might be beyond the capabilities of Bubba Ray, but if the kit is fairly complete I'm sure most of the people here could build a rudimentary machine capable of wandering around a room without bumping into things in a day or two, with more complex functionality coming as they get more comfortable with the system.

      --
      This poo is cold.
    4. Re:Open Source Robotics? by njh · · Score: 1

      Amazing, he was born in 1970 and made props for a movie release in 1977! (WP says he updated the R2D2s for the new movies)

    5. Re:Open Source Robotics? by technoextreme · · Score: 1
      Because Imahara's an electrical engineer with years of experience building remote controlled logic boxes?
      Hehehe... No. Im going to be building a holonic robot strictly from vex robotics parts. I nearly bugged out once I realized how freaking easy it's going to be because well building a robot that can travel in any single direction without turning is prety dam cool. The first robot I started building was actually a cockamamie design that rival in complexity the packbot. I ran into a problem with it but in reality I could have fixed it.
      --
      Ooo man the floppy drive is broken. No wait. The computer is just upside down.
  13. Re:Radio Shack is going to be selling a ton of the by Mr2cents · · Score: 2, Informative

    Erm, yes they can. It's called product placement. If you see a person drinking Pepsi in a movie, do you think that's a coincidence? No, it's someone only job to contact companies and ask for money. Favorite targets are cars, beverages, guns (USA), fast food restaurants, ....

    Anyway, mythbusters has gone infomercial it seems.. Not that it was such a great show, they repeat the same thing over and over again (next we're going to do this .... now we're going to do this .... we're really going to do this .... we're doing this .... we've finished doing this .... we have done this ....). Like if we're idiots with the memory span of a goldfish.

    --
    "It's too bad that stupidity isn't painful." - Anton LaVey
  14. I don't get it by carpe_noctem · · Score: 5, Funny

    What myth are they busting here, exactly? That everything from RadioShack sucks?

    --
    "Quoting famous computer scientists out of context is the root of all evil (or at least most of it) in programming." - K
    1. Re:I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's an advertisment, unrelated to the show. People with IQ <70 get that.

    2. Re:I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No Myth Busting, they were asked by Robot Magazine to test out the kit. These guys have pretty impressive technical backgrounds with a pretty well known celebrity status, so it lends crediblity and publicity to the article.

    3. Re:I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what about those of us with IQ>=70?

    4. Re:I don't get it by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      What the hell are you doing watching television, then?

    5. Re:I don't get it by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 0

      I'm not watching television. I'm staring at the intarweb screen.

      --
      This guy's the limit!
    6. Re:I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      What myth are they busting here, exactly?

      You're right and this really doesn't make any sense. Jamie Hyneman and Adam Savage were put on Earth with the sole purpose of busting myths. God is really going to be pissed when he finds out that they reviewed a product with no myth involved.

    7. Re:I don't get it by DerekLyons · · Score: 1
      What myth are they busting here, exactly? That everything from RadioShack sucks?
      Mythbusters (like Scrapheap Challenge/Junkyard Wars) before abandonded it's theoretical reason for existing pretty early on and replaced it with a chase after flash, dash, and glam.
    8. Re:I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what?

    9. Re:I don't get it by elrous0 · · Score: 1
      flash, dash, and glam.

      Is anyone familiar with this strange bit of slang and what it means? Maybe this means something in a 12th century Welsh dialect, but it's all gibberish to this modern American.

      -Eric

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  15. Re:Radio Shack is going to be selling a ton of the by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > ...the memory span of a goldfish.

    yes, that was a cool episode.

  16. Compare by kurtis25 · · Score: 1

    I want to see a comparison between this and that Lego robot so I know which to buy.

  17. Re:Radio Shack is going to be selling a ton of the by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just goes to show that good ideas can pay off.
    I'm considering getting one to play with. I haven't read more than a little bit of what I call a good experience the mythbusters had with it.

  18. Re:Radio Shack is going to be selling a ton of the by birder · · Score: 1

    In Canada, Circuit City had to rename all the Radio Shack stores to The Source. Some sort of convoluted legal thingy where they owned InterTAN which was the NoN US parts of Radio Shack for 20 years and then Radio Shack Prime decided to cut them off.

    Personally, the new name gives them a fight chance at respectability albeit slim.

  19. What geek doesn't love Radio Shack? by hnsez · · Score: 1

    R.S. has had difficult financials recently so it is a good thing that as proper geeks the MythBusters gave them some well-deserved support.

    1. Re:What geek doesn't love Radio Shack? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Radio Shit deserves bad financials. Can't hardly find a radio in the place anymore. Nor anything resembling the parts you need, as I found out when I made a fruitless search for mounting knobs one day. Ended up going to Home Depot for hex bolts. And forget about finding any employees -- excuse me -- "associates" with technical knowledge. I know former employees who advised me that if I ever applied for a job, don't put anything on the application that implies technical competence, it gets in the way of your real job -- selling junk to the stupid.

      The new mottos of the store --

      Radio Shack: You've got questions, we've got blank stares
      Radio Shack: Wanna buy a phone?

  20. Sure it is. For further enlightenment, read TFA. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
    The Vex System is no more a robot than a remote controlled model airplane or my car is.

    A remote controlled device is NOT a robot.

    A robot is a mechanical and electronic device that performs a function(s) under its own control. It is capable of making its own decisions.

    An android (NOT "droid") is a robot with the appearance of a human or animal.

    For further enlightment read "I, Robot" by Isaac Asimov.

    Did you read TFA? "Also available is a programming module that will allow you to hook your robot up to a computer and download a program for adding autonomous capabilities . You can use the remote control only, let it operate autonomously , or have some combination of the two," and "When an object is sensed, the robot takes over and initiates an automated climbing sequence... " That qualifies as "performs a function(s) under its own control". It has sensors and a controller on board, and you can program it. It doesn't say how much programming you can fit in there (I doubt it will be opening the fridge and bringing you a beer), but it DOES qualify as being capable of performing some functions under its own control. It can decide which climbing algorithm is appropriate for the sensor inputs it has, and it can respond appropriately.

    And finally, the whole thing sounds like it fits very well into both the American Heritage and Wikipedia definitions, which (by the way) do appear to allow remote control devices.

  21. Re:Radio Shack is going to be selling a ton of the by TheHawke · · Score: 0

    Yeah, Ft. Worthless tends to do crap like that.

    For more amusement and if you need to get your blood pressure raised you can see what they are up at at http://www.radioshacksucks.com/

    --
    First rule of holes; When in one, stop digging.
  22. Vex IS a robot (from TFA) by Derivin · · Score: 3, Informative

    From TFA 'Also available is a programming module that will allow you to hook your robot up to a computer and download a program for adding autonomous capabilities.'

  23. Re:Radio Shack is going to be selling a ton of the by Mostly+Harmless · · Score: 1

    The problem with Vex is that it's primarily intended for highschool-aged people - or at least that's RadioShack's stand on it - and how many highschoolers are going to shell out > $300 for a robot kit?

    --
    "`Ford, you're turning into a penguin. Stop it.'" -Douglas Adams, THHGTTG
  24. All Your Robot Are Belong To AI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Artificial intelligence is now available for installation in all robots with sufficient memory space and processing power.

  25. Radio Shack by kilodelta · · Score: 1

    Back in the day RS had some awesome stuff like the 100 in 1 and 200 in 1 electronics kits. They provided all sorts of experiments that could be built upon. I had em' all.

    Probably why I was able to easily diagnose and repair problems on my TRS-80 Model 1 with EI and disk system. So I'm happy to see them succesfully branch out into robotics. I know they've made some half hearted attempts, like that robotic arm they had on the shelves a number of years ago.

    But I lament the fact that RS stores have slid from being geek paradise in some form, to a consumer electronics orgy. Thankfully there are plenty of online sources for parts these days but there was something about being bored on a Saturday afternoon and going to RS and getting the parts to build some gadget or another.

    1. Re:Radio Shack by yellowbkpk · · Score: 1

      RadioShack still has the 100 in 1 and 200 in 1 electronic kits. Usually they're hidden in the back-left of the store near the sound stuff.

      When I worked at RadioShack for a year, I would say that 80% of our customers were those who came in and walked straight back to the electronics drawers and nabbed a few componenets and walked straight up to the cashier to buy them. Admittedly, these were the customers that RS was definitely not trying to sell to (they wouldn't buy cellphones and usually they wouldn't buy accessories for the products they originally bought -- both of which are what make RS money).

    2. Re:Radio Shack by ikea5 · · Score: 1

      I find it hard to belive that selling componenets with 1000% markup is less profitable then selling cellphones.

    3. Re:Radio Shack by RobertLTux · · Score: 1

      umm how could something have a 10000% markup ie you buy a part for $0.005 and then turn around and sell it for $0.50 that would be 99% markup or are you saying markup exist in this field that are 99.99% ie the buy price is .01% of the sell price in which case you are way off

      --
      Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
    4. Re:Radio Shack by dylan_- · · Score: 1
      umm how could something have a 10000% markup ie you buy a part for $0.005 and then turn around and sell it for $0.50 that would be 99% markup
      I don't really get your example, but that's not what markup is. Markup is just the percentage increase. So buying for $0.25 and selling for $0.50 would be 100% markup and selling for $5 would be 1000%.
      --
      Igor Presnyakov stole my hat
  26. I used this for a robotics class at my college... by yellowbkpk · · Score: 3, Informative

    My robotics class here at school used a few Vex kits and accessories to build robots. We came out with three cool robots that all were quite successful in 3 weeks. Check out pictures here:

    http://flickr.com/photos/yellowbkpk/tags/vex/

    Also, we spent a lot of time making custom sensors and modifying the ones that Vex gave us. They are all very easy to get in to and examine (like this one) and interface with (like the switch debouncer that I made). Although the metal parts are just a little "different" then everything else, meaning you have to machine or buy new pieces, some Lego pieces will mesh with the Vex pieces quite nicely (as in this home-made shaft encoder).

  27. Oops, misread that one a bit... by What'sInAName · · Score: 2, Funny

    I seriously misread that as "The Mythbusters Construct a Kill Bot." I was thinking that maybe Radio Shack was prepared to do anything to restore their former glory...

  28. Re:Radio Shack is going to be selling a ton of the by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 2, Interesting

    and reevaulating where they stand on what products they need to be pushing.

    That's good. My local Radio Shack only sells 40-conductor IDE ribbon cables, not the 80-conductor kind that's been required for like the last 5 years.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  29. Re:Radio Shack is going to be selling a ton of the by Hercynium · · Score: 4, Funny
    Like if we're idiots with the memory span of a goldfish.
    Now, now... they busted that one, remember? (the goldfish memory - the jury's still out on the idiots part ;p )
    --
    I'm done with sigs. Sigs are lame.
  30. Um, cool -- but... by FlyByPC · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...aren't Jamie and Grant already quite knowledgeable about robotics? I mean, Grant has experience in competitive robotics, and Jamie built that soda-can-shooting, remote-controlled vending machine. Not exactly your typical RS customers.
    That said, I am looking forward to seeing them build the kit...

    --
    Paleotechnologist and connoisseur of pretty shiny things.
  31. Re:Um, cool -- but... Jamie also made Blendo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From Battle Bots
    Heavyweight: Blendo
    http://www.battlebots.com/meet_the_robots3/meet_te am_profile.asp?id=47

    Grant apparently wasn't involved in the construction according to the site.

  32. Re:Radio Shack is going to be selling a ton of the by SStrungis · · Score: 2
    They won't. Their Mommies and Daddies will.


    I work as a schoolteacher in an affluent NJ district. The MIDDLE SCHOOLERS walk about with iPods, Razors, and Louis Vuitton bags.

    Trust me, $300 for a neat robotic toy is nothing.

  33. FIRST! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    This is NOT a radio shack product, it is a kit robot developed by US F.I.R.S.T. Robotics. They hold competitions every year between teams. If you are interested in the robots, check out Cheif Delphi Fourms. They are a team in pontiac who are rather loud. http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/index.php?. (Nobody really likes chief delphi because most people think they have engineers build their robot and not the students.)

    They also have VEX Contests.

  34. In related news... by timothykaine · · Score: 2, Informative

    The cast of Magnum PI just built a model airplane and didnt even sniff the glue.

  35. Radio Shack in trouble, closing 400 to 700 stores by Animats · · Score: 1
    We're still wondering why RS is having a fire sale - two local stores were cleaned out as of Friday night.

    Probably because the store is closing. Radio Shack is having big problems. Profit is down 62% for the quarter, the CEO lied on his resume and was fired, and they're closing 400 to 700 stores.

    Apparently most of Radio Shack's profits come from selling cell phone contracts.

  36. Re:Radio Shack is going to be selling a ton of the by RobertLTux · · Score: 1

    They are shuttering between 400-700 corporate stores
    the big thing is most of the stores that are closing are
    1 not performing
    2 being moved (may have a shortish period between)
    and anyway with 5000 stores thats only 10% (this number does not include dealer/franchise stores)
    although i will give you that some of our PHBs are pointier than normal (and are now asking "would you likes fries with that?")
    psst btw the stores that are closing will have some "THIS STORE ONLY specials"
    i would think that if Vex lights up then ....

    --
    Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
  37. Re:Radio Shack is going to be selling a ton of the by RobertLTux · · Score: 1

    actually what happened was when CC bought InterTan RS Went to court to be able to buy the
      RS.ca stores to prevent CC from diluting the RS name

    --
    Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
  38. mnb Re:Person Hours? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I was a kid, I thought my younger sisters were so lucky.
    They didn't need to fear man-eating sharks.

  39. Re:Wow, a Mythbusters article by JAppi · · Score: 1

    I think the average intellegence of everyone would have to go down 40% for that to happen.

  40. Re:Um, cool -- but... Jamie also made Blendo by Tom+Rothamel · · Score: 1

    Grant did, however write the book on making battlebots type robots... too bad it came out after the fad had died down.

  41. Laptops with Vex by godavemon · · Score: 1

    I bought one of these when they frist came out and it is great except for one major thing. I bought the kit to hook up to my laptop to experiment with vision and intelligence. I figured the robot would save me a few months and even some money designing my own equivalent and be super easy to modify. Unfortunately FIRST didn't come out with its Programming module for 4 months and when it did it was only windows compatible and was only to program the pic microcontroller. There is no easy way yet to send easy commands out your serial, parallel, or better usb port to communicate with the robot. This is a major feature that they need to include. Computer science laboratories and even highschools now spend tons of money on robots for vision or intelligence applications. They don't want to design the robot themselves, they want to just have something they can set their laptop on, get some physical real world data from and instruct to move it around. The vex would be an ideal tool but there is no interface for this.

    1. Re:Laptops with Vex by JamesGecko · · Score: 1

      I'm inclined to think you don't know a whole lot about what you're talking about.

      "Unfortunately FIRST didn't come out with its Programming module for 4 months and when it did it was only windows compatible and was only to program the pic microcontroller."
      Find a local FRC team and get someone to show you how to set up MPLAB. easyC comes with the mcc18 compiler, all you have to do is tell MPLAB where it is and get a few libraries set up.
      BTW, theres a project to get a Linux version of the compiler too, though I hear the normal windows one works just fine with MPLAB in Wine.

      "There is no easy way yet to send easy commands out your serial, parallel, or better usb port to communicate with the robot. This is a major feature that they need to include."
      What about the Online test code? It's a tab in the download/console window in easyC. I can manipulate all the motors & view inputs from the sensors. You have to download it in advance, you can't use it to interrupt programs already on the Vex controller, but that's because there's so little flash memory.
      I agree the USB adapter that Radio Shack provides is... lacking. However, you can just plug a normal serial cord into the adapter and go. It works about 3x faster then the USB cord, too. Don't ask me why, I've got no idea.

  42. You left port without a full compliment of olives? by dangitman · · Score: 1

    This is all well and good, but how am I going to afford the alcohol to fuel its power cells?

    --
    ... and then they built the supercollider.
  43. Re:still no comments? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    every thought most slashdot readers takes 10 minutes to read the artical before commenting....haha ya right.

  44. Not just the starter kit by Mr.+Freeman · · Score: 2, Informative

    They don't just have the base model kit.
    From what I can tell they have:
    - starter kit
    - Tank tread kit (2X)
    - Ultra sonic ranging sensor
    - Extra hardware kit

    I just bought a vex kit about an hour ago as well, damn cool so far.

    --
    -1 disagree is not a modifier for a reason. -1 troll, flaimbait, redundant, overrated are NOT acceptable substitutes.
  45. Prototype != product by feelyoda · · Score: 1

    What plenty of people don't understand is that building a prototype is not the same thing as building a product.

    Some issues that aren't even on MythBuster's radar:
    Making something work as close to 100% of the time as possible.
    Making the system robust to almost all situation.
    Making the system hardened so that dropping it doesn't matter, for example.
    Making it so the marginal cost of product is far lower than the prototyping cost.

    There are hundreds of serious university homegrown robot that can do some great things. Hobbiests make thousands more. How many companies have robots robust enough for the military to use? A dozen or so...

    --

    Robo-Blogs of the world: UNITE!
  46. Programming kit is $100 even on sale! Any hacks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This thing has a "phone connector" on it marked "serial", but how can I program it with my own cable and (possibly) Linux? Cross compilers for PICs are all over the place for free, and I know how to solder up my own cable, so why do I need to pay $100 for some lame windows software?

    Please post any links to hacks for this. Schematics?

    If not, then I will have to rip out whatever chip they have in there and replace it with a AVR, PIC or even an old 68HC11 board I have laying around.

  47. Re:Radio Shack is going to be selling a ton of the by cloudmaster · · Score: 1

    They don't sell any car radios or the adaptor you might need if you want to hook up the radio antenna in your GM vehicle to your new car radio. The employee told me they don't sell "that kind of stuff" anymore...

  48. Re:Programming kit is $100 even on sale! Any hacks by godavemon · · Score: 1
  49. Oh, that kind of kit bot... by jouvart · · Score: 1

    For a second, I thought that was an FRC kit bot.

    It's a basic robot for the FIRST Robotics Competition, made from a kit from IFI Robotics. IFI also does the backstage work for the Vex robotics stuff. FRC kits are sorta like Vex except with beefier motors and on a larger scale. Too bad the sensors in FRC kits are pretty lame (e.g. the kit has hall effect sensors, but no nice shaft encoders).

    Here's a beautiful FRC robot from team 254 (a Californian team that builds awesome robots): http://www.chiefdelphi.com/media/img/241/24126b018 bfb5d68129376fb53b2b474_m.jpg
  50. Re:Radio Shack is going to be selling a ton of the by infaustus · · Score: 1

    $300 dollars is not that much, especially if multiple people are working on it. The entry fee for the FIRST robotics competition is about $5000, and plenty of teams pay that. Some have other funding sources, but last year most of it was directly paid for by parents. Not really a direct comparison, but people have money.

    --
    Frosty piss posts are worthless, GNAA posts are worthless and hurtful, but they are the least of this site's neuroses.
  51. Re:Programming kit is $100 even on sale! Any hacks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry, the RS dude read the wrong price, it's on sale for $50 but I didn't get one because he said $100 at the time. Good thing, because I found some info that lets you do the same thing with a little work. The interface is a TTL level RS-232 port, and you can get RS-232 to TTL level using a transistor and / or a TL082 op-amp. Just remember it's low level current so you can use resistors, diodes, and most PCs pick up ground as a (-) on the RS-232 port so no reason to go through all the trouble of making negative voltages. Why do people always do overkill on stuff like this? It's a simple inverter and only two signals to deal with! You can even get power directly from the RS-232 end if you like. You can trick the negative voltage if you have to by offsetting the (+) input of the op-amp or other such tricks you should know by now anyway.

    "Vex is a pic controller. It is programmed in C using either Intelitek EasyC or Microchip MPLab, Cbot compiler, and IFI loader." "Computing power for the Micro Controller comes from two Microchip PIC18F8520 CPUs--CMOS processors that fly through instructions at a whopping 10 MIPS apiece and have 32K of program memory. The PIC18 contains a built-in A/D converters, a handful of digital input and interrupt lines, and an RS-232/RS-485 USART for serial"

    https://jvex-robotics.dev.java.net/ToolChainSetup. html
    http://www.vexlabs.com/forum/viewforum.php?f=9

    Here is pinout for the RX1 or RX2 ports:
    Pin 1 - Power +5 volts (the right most pin when looking at the front connector)
    Pin 2 - Receiver
    Pin 3 - Gnd
    Pin 4 - Tether Detect (the left most pin when looking at the front connector)

    RX1 and RX2 are inputs to the Master processor and can not be changed.

    "The TX and RX data pins are on the inside by the marking. Closest to the TX label is data. The center pin is +5V and ground is the outside pin closest to the edge of the Vex Controller. This pattern is true for all the pins in the connector.

    There are 2 Serial Ports on the User processor. One is connected to the Serial Port and the other one is connected to the RX and TX on the Analog/Digital connector. Both these Serial Ports are TTL levels and not RS232. Do not connect RS232 devices to these Serial Ports without level converters or damage may occur. There is no I2C bus available."

  52. Re:You left port without a full compliment of oliv by RobertLTux · · Score: 1

    um it uses 7.2 and 9.6 rc batteries not eth feul cells? btw if you have the two packs get your hands on a 23-440 (its the same charger thats in the vex package)

    --
    Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
  53. Re:Sure it is. For further enlightenment, read TFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I too used to rail against changing usage... and sometimes, in weaker moments, I still do. But a good friend once pointed out to me that it IS a living language - and it lives by changing. I hope that came across with the proper level of "Truthiness".

  54. except first notice of the sale was form rs corp by jpellino · · Score: 1

    we got a heads up from RS edu and govt rep thru first that the sale was on and was only thru their office - then we got word that every store in our area was selling it out and the sale is online too. somthing's up, and it's not just some stores closing...

    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
  55. Hey.... I did by technoextreme · · Score: 1
    The problem with Vex is that it's primarily intended for highschool-aged people - or at least that's RadioShack's stand on it - and how many highschoolers are going to shell out > $300 for a robot kit?
    Ahhh hell. Im in college and if I were to do the math it would come out to abotu $1000 on vex robotics parts.
    --
    Ooo man the floppy drive is broken. No wait. The computer is just upside down.
    1. Re:Hey.... I did by Ravatar · · Score: 1

      So long as that robot can fetch beer for you, any cost is well worth it.

  56. Re:Programming kit is $100 even on sale! Any hacks by technoextreme · · Score: 1
    If not, then I will have to rip out whatever chip they have in there and replace it with a AVR, PIC or even an old 68HC11 board I have laying around.
    Whatever you do don't replace it with any pic microchips. Ironically, that's what's in there. In theory though you should be able to operate the motors and sensors using any microcontroller. The motors/servos are like any regular hobby motor.
    --
    Ooo man the floppy drive is broken. No wait. The computer is just upside down.
  57. Radio Shack - You've Got Questions... by miracle69 · · Score: 1

    We've Got Blank Stares(tm).

    --
    Linux - Because Mommy taught me to Share.
    1. Re:Radio Shack - You've Got Questions... by BAKup · · Score: 1

      ...and cellphones.

    2. Re:Radio Shack - You've Got Questions... by gimple · · Score: 1

      Amen!

      My son got a cheap crystal radio kit for Christmas, which didn't work. I went online and got plans for another radio, and we went to Radio Shack to get the extra parts we would need.

      I tried ask about crystal radios and was met with blank stares. The first guy had never even heard of a crystal radio. The second guy claimed he had built one, but it was obvious he didn't even know what one waw when he offered batteries.

  58. Oh good... by Ekhymosis · · Score: 1

    When I first read this I thought it said that Mythbusters were making a rootkit bot.

    --
    Fighting over religion is like seeing whose imaginary friend is best.
  59. Re:Radio Shack is going to be selling a ton of the by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    They don't sell any car radios or the adaptor you might need if you want to hook up the radio antenna in your GM vehicle to your new car radio.

    Fascinating that Wal-Mart has nearly as good an electronics parts section as Radio Shack, ain't it?

    The employee told me they don't sell "that kind of stuff" anymore...

    While to you and me that means "useful stuff" I suspect to the MBA at Radio Shack who dreamt up this scheme, that means "low gross margin stuff". If you're just dying to find a middle man to sell you phone service or satellite TV, Radio Shack can hook you up. But, even if a nice DPDT switch is marked up 200%, that's only like a $2 profit, and near-minimum wage sales droids could be spending that time selling you America's Top 500 Channels.

    Maybe they can use some of these robotics kits to build us a vending machine for useful stuff.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  60. -1, Naive by Captain+Entendre · · Score: 1
    They DID pay for that kind of advertising.

    OK, so I don't really know that for a fact, but I have a really hard time believing that the Mythbusters team woke up one day and decided to investigate a myth about the quality of Vex robotics kits.

    1. Re:-1, Naive by AdamWeeden · · Score: 1

      I have a really hard time believing that the Mythbusters team woke up one day and decided to investigate a myth about the quality of Vex robotics kits.

      Contrary to popular belief they do other stuff besides busting myths. Robotics being one of them. They are the ones behind the diet pepsi machine football commercials, and Grant Imahara only works for the Mythbusters team BECAUSE of his experience in robotics. So if given an oppurtunity to utilize a preexisting and (relatively) cheap system to make their robots the question would be why WOULDN'T they want to try them out?

      --
      I was quoted out of context in my autobiography...
    2. Re:-1, Naive by mink · · Score: 1

      But is it really a robot (both the soda machine and the VEXX thingy)? They seem to be glorified RC cars at best.

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
    3. Re:-1, Naive by mink · · Score: 1

      I notice now, that I went outside of radio shack that the VEXX is programmable. Radio shack seems to play up the whole RC side of it.

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
  61. Hey, I'm 40% Nickel Cadmium! by dangitman · · Score: 1

    Bite my shiny metal 7.2 volt battery ... I mean ass.

    --
    ... and then they built the supercollider.
  62. Re:Radio Shack is going to be selling a ton of the by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I live in Millburn.

  63. Feh! by kunwon1 · · Score: 1

    Damn! I thought this said 'The Mythbusters Construct a Kill Bot' Now -that- would have been a story.

    --
    Specialization is for insects. -Heinlein
  64. Re:Programming kit is $100 even on sale! Any hacks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Connector pinouts are some big secret? Can't find any info via google so here you go, I used my beeper to trace the routes:

    Master and User are the two processors. You want to pick up the CPU specs here:
    http://ww1.microchip.com/downloads/en/DeviceDoc/39 609b.pdf

    "Serial" connector, pin 1 is on the right as you look into the connector.

    1. User pin 60 "RJ2" through 10K resistor
    2. Master pin 60 "RJ2" through 10K resistor
    3. Master pin 60 "RJ2" through 1K resistor
    4. Gnd
    5. User pin 38 "RX1" - serial receive (TTL levels!) through 1K
    6. User pin 37 "TX1" - serial transmit (TTL levels!)

    Rx1 and Rx2 connectors, pin 1 is on the right as you look into the connector. Both are the same except for pin 2 which is the signal pin.

    1. +5V
    2. signal (see below)
    3. Gnd
    4. Gnd

    Rx1 Signal pin goes to Master pin 57 "RB1"
    Rx2 Signal pin goes to Master pin 43 "RC2" and also pin 56 "RB2" through a 1K resistor.

    On the motor connectors, the signal is the pin closest to the "notch" on the connector. The middle one is +5V and the other is Gnd.

    More info needed, what speed is the serial running at? What commands can we send it? How does one CPU talk to the other? How can we program the EEPROM on them? If I make my own cable, why can't I just download the software when your cost would be almost zero?

    Why would the company want to not release this info and be so anal? It's not really that hard to ohm things out, sheesh! Give us better info!

    Even with this info I will still be buying more motors and sensors, and I did by the kit, how else do you think I got your controller?

  65. Re:Radio Shack is going to be selling a ton of the by cloudmaster · · Score: 1

    Yes, it's amusing that I found the part at teh Wal Mart next door to RS.

    And now that you mention it, I do remember not too long ago being surprised that all of the discrete components like resistors, LEDs, RF connectors, etc all were moved into a set of drawers instead of being hung up on the walls like they used to be. Guess they needed more room for a few more cell phone providers and some junk computer accessories.

  66. Re:Programming kit is $100 even on sale! Any hacks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The factory needs a way to program the chips the first time. There are extra pins inside the case, if you remove the cover, you will find that there are extra .100 center sockets between the "interrupts" and "motors" sections.

    With these pins you can completly re-program the Master and/or User CPU using a standard PIC programmer.

    Between the "interrupts" "slot 1" and "motors" "slot 8" there are 12 pins, in a 4 X 3 configuration. I will number them as shown below for reference, but the only way you will be able to match these up is by checking for the pins that ohm out to +5V and Gnd. Another reference would be that the below pin 1 is the closest pin to the number "1" marking shown on the "interrupts" plastic cover, and the below pin 4 is closest to the number "8" marking shown on the "motors" plastic cover.

    1 2 3 4
    5 6 7 8
    9 10 11 12

    1. Master pin 6 "RG1"
    2. User pin 52 "PGC"
    3. Gnd
    4. Master pin 52 "PGC"
    5. Master pin 7 "RG2"
    6. User pin 47 "PGD"
    7. +5V
    8. Master pin 47 "PGD"
    9. Gnd
    10. User pin 9 "Vpp"
    11. Unknown or N/C
    12. Master pin 9 "Vpp"

  67. Re: Beer Fetching Robot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > So long as that robot can fetch beer for you, any cost is well worth it.

    Not only will the Vex robots fetch beer, but they will also pour for you as well.

    http://www.vexlabs.com/vex-bottlebot.shtml

  68. Re: Beer Fetching Robot by Ravatar · · Score: 1

    ....

    AFK, buying a Vex 'bot.