Slashdot Mirror


Germany Accepts Strict Piracy Law

A beautiful mind writes "The TimesOnline is reporting that Germany has accepted a new piracy law, currently the toughest in Europe, which comes into effect on January 1, 2007. From the article: 'Germans risk two years in prison if they illegally download films and music for private use under a new law agreed yesterday. Anybody who downloads films for commercial use could be jailed for up to five years.' Many politicians defended the new law, amongst them Günther Krings, the Christian Democrat legal affairs spokesman, who claimed: 'There should be no legal distinction between stealing chewing gum from a shop and performing an illegal download.'"

71 of 478 comments (clear)

  1. well, if that's what you do to gum thieves by yagu · · Score: 4, Interesting

    From the Fine Article:

    GERMANS risk two years in prison if they illegally download films and music for private use under a new law agreed yesterday.

    Also from the Fine Article:

    Günther Krings, the Christian Democrat legal affairs spokesman, said: There should be no legal distinction between stealing chewing gum from a shop and performing an illegal download

    So, you can get two years in prison in Germany for stealing chewing gum from a shop? Cool.

    This is all rehashing rehashes, but it bears repetition lest we find ourselves slowly and finally boiled in this slowly heating water. It's more heavy-handed power and money grabbing by those who have the money and power (entertainment droids and politicians). I only hope one of the first "caught" with their hands in the downloading cookiejar is some son or daughter of one of the anointed government members. Also from the article (emphasis mine):

    The German music industry also claims to be suffering from piracy. The recording industry suffered a fall in turnover in 2005 for the seventh year in a row to 1.7 billion (1.2 billion). Sales have fallen almost 45 per cent since 1998. The German branch of the International Federation of the Phonographic Industry estimates that the equivalent of 439 million music CDs were copied illegally in Germany last year.

    First of all, what supports their estimates? Secondly, I've still yet to see causal studies whereby there are directly related losses because of illegal downloads. I have seen some convincing studies showing strong correlation between downloading and sales.

    1. Re:well, if that's what you do to gum thieves by commander_gallium · · Score: 5, Insightful

      How much does it cost to keep someone jailed for two years? I'd imagine it costs more than a DVD does.

    2. Re:well, if that's what you do to gum thieves by timeOday · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's been said before, but if you're going to steal, create a company first and make sure to steal millions so you don't get punished. You think anybody served jail time when the music industry was convicted of price fixing? Of course not. You think anybody from Sony will serve jailtime under hacking laws for the rootkit fiasco? Of course not, unthinkable.

    3. Re:well, if that's what you do to gum thieves by A+beautiful+mind · · Score: 3, Insightful

      How much does it cost to kill someone? If someone wants to do it it costs nothing.

      Still, those people who do murder someone should be jailed and it costs a lot of money. Thus, cost can't be a factor in prison sentences. If not cost, then what?

      Justice. It is why this law in Germany is so bad - because it is not just.

      --
      It takes a man to suffer ignorance and smile
      Be yourself no matter what they say
    4. Re:well, if that's what you do to gum thieves by zenthax · · Score: 3, Interesting
      First of all, what supports their estimates? Secondly, I've still yet to see causal studies whereby there are directly related losses because of illegal downloads. I have seen some convincing studies showing strong correlation between downloading and sales.
      Of course they have because the keyword there is losses. Companies do not experience losses by piracy, meaning it doesn't actually cost them anything. Rather piracy deprives them of potential revenue, meaning all this discussing of losing money to piracy is all dependent on a theoretical situation where a person would buy it. Basically if you were to steal a stick of gum, that becomes a loss for the store/company/etc. Because essentially at the end of the year they have to deduct the cost they paid for the gum from their total earning. It would be a big fat red minus on they finances. Where as piracy means that companies aren't able to generate MORE revenue, meaning instead of taking actual losses, they just don't get to make more money. Basically they don't get to add nice black pluses to their finances. Now the losses all these IP companies talk about are NOT the red minuses but the black pluses they MIGHT have gotten. It basically being upset that not enough people decided to buy your product, and then whining to the government to make people buy it. Reminds me a bit of auto insurance here in the States.(Yes I know there are good reason for getting auto insurance)
    5. Re:well, if that's what you do to gum thieves by kz45 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Günther Krings, the Christian Democrat legal affairs spokesman, said: There should be no legal distinction between stealing chewing gum from a shop and performing an illegal download

      copyright infringement is not like stealing an item from a store. It's closer to counterfeiting money. As more and more infringe on a person or company owned copyrighted work, it is devalued over time (less and less people will be willing to pay for it when they can just get it for free from their friend or favorite website). In a sense, copyright infringement does cost a company money..but over a very long period of time.

      I have seen stats from a few mISV owners that I know personally. You can clearly see a pattern when a crack gets released for their application. Sales almost immediately drop (I have seen as much as 75%) and bandwidth is wasted (another side-effect of piracy).

      When an update is made, and the cracks no longer work, sales gradually go back up.

      2 years in prison for sharing is too much. I don't think the germans should be filling their jails with people sharing copyrighted material.

      I have seen some convincing studies showing strong correlation between downloading and sales

      When downloading is made easy, and a non-tech savvy user can easily get a song, sales are directly affected. If it stays in the background (like in the IRC days), the loss is a lot smaller. I feel that the RIAA has won the battle. Most of my friends are too afraid to download music anymore (even through there are many P2P networks still alive and well).

    6. Re:well, if that's what you do to gum thieves by fermion · · Score: 4, Interesting
      One can take this another way. The damage caused by music piracy is about equal to the value of petty theft in a grocery store.

      In the US, quick google lookup shows the average supermarket loses around 2.5% of retail sales to shrinkage. However, only half of that is due to external forces. So, if we use the german analogy, perhaps the true loss to the industry is a little more than 1%. A percentage loss is, of course, better than unit sales as the percentage allows us to judge the impact.

      What is interesting, according to various articles, is that Germany has about 82 million people, but only 127 million CD sales, a nearly 50% drop over 7 years. So each german is buying 1 maybe 2 cds a year. And you are trying to tell me that a country that is so uninterested in music is going to download the equivelent of 5 CDs a year. I mean at the height of the sales they were only buying 3 or 4 CDs a year. I guess copying music over the internet is so much easier than just copying an album from a friend that it encourages the people to steal that extra CD that they did not even want in the first place.

      I guess not that Germany is a completely a western country, they must learn that the best way to grow a bussiness is to supply products the people want. And, of course, if artificial barriers are erected to try to force consumers to buy stuff they don't want, then those consumers will just find another way to get they stuff they do.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    7. Re:well, if that's what you do to gum thieves by arivanov · · Score: 4, Insightful

      TFA does not answer the most interesting question. AFAIK in germany you can copy a copyrighted work as much as you want within your household under fair use provisions. This is supported by an extra levy on CD writers, blank media, etc. Does the new law change any of these provisions in favour of the plutocrats or not?

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    8. Re:well, if that's what you do to gum thieves by MooUK · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I did a small-scale study of my own recently. The results aren't hugely reliable with the study I did - amongst other things it was pure convenience sapmpling - but I did try to ensure there were a range of backgrounds. The study was focused on students at my uni.

      I found that that around 60% of my respondents felt sharing music should not be illegal, and a similar number felt a lot of people actually ended up buying MORE music after finding new bands or artists by downloading their music.

      If you want something more reliable and reputable, the Canadian equivalent of the RIAA released a study very quietly recently that more-or-less says the opposite of everything the industry groups have been saying. It was mentioned on here a week or two ago. Here's a link to the slashdot article: http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/03/18/04 21250

    9. Re:well, if that's what you do to gum thieves by dodald · · Score: 4, Insightful

      When you kill someone you take their life, the question you should ask is how much is a life worth, not how much killing costs.

      The original statement said it costs more to jail someone than the DVD is worth.

      It did not say it costs more to jail someone than it costs to DOWNLOAD a DVD.

      Punishment should be DIRECTLY related to the cost/impact of he crime.

      --
      101010b 2Ah 52o
    10. Re:well, if that's what you do to gum thieves by MKalus · · Score: 2

      True,

      unless there is somse kind of copy protection on the content, in this case you are not legally allowed to copy the CD / DVD etc.

      So, CSS? Sorry, can't (legally) make a copy.

      --
      If you want to e-mail me, use my PGP Key.
    11. Re:well, if that's what you do to gum thieves by Lars+T. · · Score: 2, Insightful
      So, you can get two years in prison in Germany for stealing chewing gum from a shop? Cool.

      Even cooler, in California you can get 25 to life. Did you have any specific point?

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    12. Re:well, if that's what you do to gum thieves by sirnuke · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "Corporation: An ingenious device for obtaining individual profit without individual responsibility" Ambrose Bierce

      --
      Zing!
    13. Re:well, if that's what you do to gum thieves by masklinn · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Give a man a stolen DVD, and one man will have it. Teach a man to pirate DVDs, and it will spread around for a lifetime.

      Tell a man about a new band, he'll know another band. Teach a man how to discover new bands, he'll discover new bands for a lifetime.

      Music sharing is also the ability to know what you may want to buy before you actually buy it, it's the ability to make informed choices about buying the first CD of that little band that isn't aired on TV or radio instead of buying the current top album with a crappy single and 7 even crappier other tracks that get all the air time.

      --
      "The way we can tell it's C# instead of Haskell is because it's nine lines instead of two." -- wadler
    14. Re:well, if that's what you do to gum thieves by Finn61 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm glad you raised that often overlooked point. Of course it is also a pure fantasy that every single downloader would have otherwise paid real money for the product, but that's how they create these crazy numbers. My gut feeling is a lot of downloading is purely opportunistic.

      --
      "Looking good Vern."
    15. Re:well, if that's what you do to gum thieves by Fear+the+Clam · · Score: 2, Informative

      And then Ambrose Bierce disappeared without a trace...

    16. Re:well, if that's what you do to gum thieves by a.d.trick · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Punishment should be DIRECTLY related to the cost/impact of he crime.

      No it shouldn't. That's why we have murder and manslaughter. In both places the victim ends up dead, but the pushisment is different, and rightly so.

    17. Re:well, if that's what you do to gum thieves by Tim+C · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Punishment should be DIRECTLY related to the cost/impact of he crime.

      Someone else has already pointed out the murder/manslaughter distinction, so I'll leave that. There are other distinctions too, where the end result is the same but the exact circumstances of the crime can make a large difference to the punishment.

      Even ignoring that, however, there's another factor that can greatly increase the punishment - the perceived ease of commiting the offence and likelyhood of getting away with it. If it's seen as not really being of any consequence, and is hard to detect and prosecute people, you're going to get more people thinking "why not?" and doing it. To help combat that, you make the punishment harsh; the theory being that people will think "I probably won't get caught, but if I do... it's not worth it". That's part of the reason why these laws all have such stupidly high penalties. It's not just the companies lobbying for unrealistic punishments, it's meant to bea deterrent too.

    18. Re:well, if that's what you do to gum thieves by dajak · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What is interesting, according to various articles, is that Germany has about 82 million people, but only 127 million CD sales, a nearly 50% drop over 7 years. So each german is buying 1 maybe 2 cds a year.

      These statistics make more sense if you approach them from a CDs per household point of view. Married people very often share things like CDs.

      Germany actually used to 'export' CDs from their retail industry: many Swiss and Dutch used to buy CDs in Germany because they are cheaper there. I can imagine this market has largely disappeared because of P2P technology and integration of the European market.

      I guess not that Germany is a completely a western country, they must learn that the best way to grow a bussiness is to supply products the people want. And, of course, if artificial barriers are erected to try to force consumers to buy stuff they don't want, then those consumers will just find another way to get they stuff they do.

      Considering that Germany is the biggest exporter of the world, and that music and film is one of the sectors where they are relatively unsuccesful and foreign (read:American) products dominate the home market, I really fail to see your point.

      If the Germans had a protectionist inclination they would not help the American entertainment industry to collect their money in Germany by discouraging piracy. They would instead legalize piracy and use the (higher) fee collected on blank media to subsidize their own entertainment industry exclusively.

      European countries should have much less worries about piracy than the US if they approach it from a strictly economic protectionist point of view. The English language market always proportionally suffers the most from piracy, because of:

      - economy of scale: finding an uploader of the thing you want is the easiest in the biggest market.
      - lack of empathy: artists in smaller language markets make less money, even if they are equally successful in the smaller market. People are more inclined to pay for the CD of an artist that speaks your language, regularly appears on your TV, and is not filty rich.

      Legalizing piracy probably increases the market share of the non-English entertainment industry in many countries.

  2. Wow by Andy+Gardner · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That's just crazy, two years!? You wouldn't get that if you went out and stole the DVD itself.

    1. Re:Wow by scenestar · · Score: 3, Insightful

      and thats the great part about it.

      It just shows how ineffective and out of context the lobbied laws are.

      real street crime hurts society, wheras "pirating" is more or less socially acceptable. (at least alot more than shoplifting)

      --
      perpetually dwelling in the -1 pits
    2. Re:Wow by BungoMan85 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It IS socially acceptable. But when you have the recording industry lobbying the politicians for laws like this what is and isn't socially acceptable no longer matters.

      --
      Bungo!
    3. Re:Wow by iminplaya · · Score: 3, Interesting

      This isn't about protecting society. It's about protecting powerful business interests.

      It just shows how ineffective and out of context the lobbied laws are.

      For whom? This is going to create great investment opportunities for some. None of these people care whether it's effective or not. This is about cash flow.

      --
      What?
    4. Re:Wow by amliebsch · · Score: 2, Informative

      To play devil's advocate: One of the goals of judicial sentencing is deterrance. When piracy is widespread and enforcement is difficult, penalties must be disproportionately high to have a deterrant effect.

      --
      If you don't know where you are going, you will wind up somewhere else.
    5. Re:Wow by KDR_11k · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, that's a CDU person, they live to serve the corporations and erode civil rights. Usually you hear them spew FUD about all jobs being outsourced or cut if you don't do EXACTLY what they say (which usually involves working longer for less pay, how that creates jobs is still beyond me). Oh and of course they always want our country to be Bush's lapdog (funniest moment was when they supported attacking Iraq* and later made a 180 and accused the government of letting the war happen because "they were so undecided". Yeah, as opposed to full-on warmongering. That sure would have prevented that attack, right?).

      *= Which, BTW, is a violation of the constitution. "Actions that are fitting and executed in the desire to disturb the peaceful coexistence of the peoples, especially the preparation of a war of aggression, are anticonstitutional. They are to be made punishable by law."

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    6. Re:Wow by funkatron · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If it was 'socially acceptable', a wide majority of the ELECTED government in Germany would not have supported it.

      I seriously doubt that any party in the German government even mentioned copyright law when they were getting elected. If it's anything like in Britain they would probably be trying to sell their policies for taxes, public services, employment etc.

      --
      "Welcome to our world. We are the wasted youth. And we are the future too." Yes, I know these are stupid lyrics.
    7. Re:Wow by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Wouldn't it be simpler to just ask people to respect the intellectual property of others and to not download things they have not purchased? Or would that be too much to ask?

      --
      Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
  3. Privacy by slavemowgli · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Darn. For a moment, I read that as "Germany accepts strict privacy law" and said "cool, some good news for a change"...

    --
    quidquid latine dictum sit altum videtur.
    1. Re:Privacy by arivanov · · Score: 4, Informative

      They have strict privacy laws. As strict as it gets. Possibly one of the strictest in the world. Last time I looked you cannot even get a phone bill for a company phone without it being anonymised. Last numbers used to be deliberately scrambled so that the employer can see what is the call pricing category but without being able to see who has been called. So on so fourth.

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
  4. This is not justice by darjen · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is undoubtedly a sad day for justice and liberty in Germany. It's the kind of abuse we generally get when one group of thieves becomes the sole provider of necessary goods and services to the people.

    1. Re:This is not justice by amliebsch · · Score: 3, Funny

      Once all the Germans were war-like, and mean
      But that couldn't happen again;
      We taught them a lesson in 1918
      And they've hardly bothered us since then.

      --
      If you don't know where you are going, you will wind up somewhere else.
    2. Re:This is not justice by heinousjay · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Okay, so here's what I would like explained from your comment:

      Is entertainment a necessary good and/or service in your mind?

      Is this 'group of thieves' (who produces and sells entertainment, that apparently you believe is a necessity) morally worse than people who infringe upon their rights? Is this infringement done in the name of good in your mind?

      What is just about taking the results of someone's hard labor and giving them nothing in return for it?

      I anxiously await your answers.

      --
      Slashdot - where whining about luck is the new way to make the world you want.
    3. Re:This is not justice by heinousjay · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And when those recording artists were forced to sign those contracts, guns pressed tightly to their temples, surely you could have saved them the trouble of believing they even should be paid for what they were doing, since people would just take it anyway.

      Thanks for replying in a rhetorically bankrupt fashion in an attempt to bolster a point that wasn't even related to mine. Hijacking legitimate questions does work against lesser minds. It doesn't work against me. In general, it doesn't work on Slashdot. Go troll Digg with that crap.

      --
      Slashdot - where whining about luck is the new way to make the world you want.
  5. VW Commercials by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I just wish they'd give someone 2 years in prison for those stupid VW commercials.

  6. Re:AAAaaarrrghh! by Philip+K+Dickhead · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Last time I went to the box office, I wouldn't call it "piracy". Somewhere between fraud, misrepresentation and highway robbery.

    Why would I "pirate" something, you couldn't PAY me to see!

    --
    "Speaking the Truth in times of universal deceit is a revolutionary act." -- George Orwell
  7. Re:Two years for stealing gum? by coffeechica · · Score: 2, Informative

    As far as I recall, the law is that theft is punishable with imprisonment of up to two years. But to actually get that, you'd have to steal designer chewing gum sprinkled with diamonds and go about it professionally. For normal chewing gum, you'll pay a fee unless you're a repeat offender.

  8. Correction by nurb432 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That would be 'rich, monopolistic thieves'.

    And dont be suprsied if we dont get those laws here in the US, or worse... Remember the WTO? They will mandate all other members follow suit.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  9. no legal distinction by nurb432 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Except for the reality of the situation that one is theft and one isnt..

    Must be nice to have enough power to go buy your own laws when you feel like it.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  10. Prohibition? by Marc_Hawke · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It seems like an unenforcable law. They are going to have to put 1 out of every 5 people in jail for 2 years, and that's not going to fly.

    If you overstep your bounds against the populace, you'll find that, while they might stretch at first, they will soon 'spring back' and you'll find yourself in a worse position than before.

    --
    --Welcome to the Realm of the Hawke--
  11. Same as stealing chewing gum? by corngrower · · Score: 4, Interesting
    ... them Günther Krings, the Christian Democrat legal affairs spokesman, who claimed: 'There should be no legal distinction between stealing chewing gum from a shop and performing an illegal download.'"

    I'm sorry, but I just don't think they're quite the same. An illegal download doesn't prevent the 'owner' from benefiting from the origninal. Whereas when you steal a physical object, it does. If I steal a loaf of bread from you, you no longer have that loaf of bread to eat. If I copy the recipie for making that bread without your permission, it does you no harm (unless, possibly, you're the proprieter of a bakery.) I'm not claiming that illegal downloads are morally ok, just that its not quite the same thing as stealing a physical object.

    1. Re:Same as stealing chewing gum? by MrDomino · · Score: 2, Informative

      An illegal download doesn't prevent the 'owner' from benefiting from the origninal. Whereas when you steal a physical object, it does. If I steal a loaf of bread from you, you no longer have that loaf of bread to eat. If I copy the recipie for making that bread without your permission, it does you no harm (unless, possibly, you're the proprieter of a bakery.)

      There's a word for something like that: it's called a public good, by definition a non-market item, and the recording industry has spent the last century and millions of dollars convincing people that music isn't one.

  12. Actually, it's not true - yet by theonlyholle · · Score: 4, Informative

    This is not a law yet - it's a proposal that the cabinet agreed on. It will only become law if it finds a majority in parliament, which may or may not happen, but it hasn't been voted on yet and Germany is still enough of a democracy to wait for that to happen ;)

    1. Re:Actually, it's not true - yet by slavemowgli · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Doesn't Germany have a grand coalition right now, though, which controls some 75% or so of the seats in parliament? *If* this is indeed pushed to parliament, I'm not sure I see how it'd fail - even with all the opposition parties voting against it, and even with a couple of defectors, there'd still be a rather large majority.

      Or am I missing something?

      --
      quidquid latine dictum sit altum videtur.
    2. Re:Actually, it's not true - yet by arivanov · · Score: 2, Informative

      Even in this case it can still be annuled by their supreme court which is known to have principles and guts. After all they are the only ones in the world who remembered that the people on board of a plane in a hostage situation have as much of a right to live as the people on the ground and threw out a law that allowed shooting them down.

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    3. Re:Actually, it's not true - yet by hubertus · · Score: 2, Informative

      So called "private copies" (Privatkopie) for family members and close friends that do not circumvent copy protection systems are legal. It's illegal, however, to make these copies freely or commercially available to everybody via P2P networks or to hack the copy protection (it's unclear how to deal with drm systems that work only on Windows but not on Macs for instance). Obtaining files from P2P is (and has been) illegal since everybody knows that these files have been copied illegally in the first place. The news here is that the proposed law will be dropping a previous "de minimis" rule for very minor misuse of that right of private copying, hence the comparison with chewing gums and all the (false) buzz about kids being imprisoned for distributing copies on the school yard the same way real criminals would be.

      The new proposed law in Germany is more about how to "compensate" the music industry (that's what the industry sais) for the fact that these private copies are still legal. It's more of an organisational issue how to raise that extra money (this is the real bad part, but no one complaines...). Possible ways include charging for devices that can be used to make copies, where the exact extra charge depends on how often that device (or class of device) is actually used for this purpose. The maximum amount in question seems to be 5% of the price of the device. The law also states that producers can set licence fees for any new form of usage yet to be discovered. Libraries, museums and such can make digital copies available to their users at no charge (I believe).

      And in reply to comments about German laws in general:
      In Germany, coffee cups don't have that "caution, hot contents", and people do know when the floor is wet. Defendants don't pay legal fees if they are not guilty.

  13. Re:Two years for stealing gum? by slavemowgli · · Score: 3, Informative

    Actually, theft can get you up to five years. But yes, anyone who steals some chewing gum (a regular amount, that is - not an entire truckload) won't get a prison sentence, much less one of two years (and if you did, you could fight the verdict as being not appropriate for the offense). In fact, I'm pretty sure you wouldn't even get a trial - it's just not worth it.

    --
    quidquid latine dictum sit altum videtur.
  14. WWIII Soon? by Firehed · · Score: 2, Funny

    Compare this to France trying to legalize P2P via an 8E/mo tax and it looks like it's about time to get out of Europe.

    --
    How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
  15. germany's copyright laws have been privatized by Lazy+Jones · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Germany's is the first government that has officially conceded to all lobbyism efforts on behalf of the industry and adopted a policy that supports the industry's demands fully while completely disregarding the rights and needs of its citizen.

    Many people believe that this is due to corruption, it can no longer be attributed to "goodwill" towards the industry and stupidity alone. In any case, it goes way beyond being irresponsible and neglecting the government's duty to take care of its citizens and the long-term effect of this will be civil disobedience and loss of respect for laws in general.

    --
    "I love my job, but I hate talking to people like you" (Freddie Mercury)
  16. When lawmakers suffer from future shock by leehwtsohg · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Hey, anyone in germany (including me, I guess) - for two years in prison, click here http://images.google.com/images?q=mickey+mouse&hl= en&btnG=Search+Images. I wish bubble gum would come this easy!

  17. That is outrageous! by SocialEngineer · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Most popular music out today isn't even worth a stick of chewing gum!

    --
    "Better to be vulgar than non-existent" -Bev Henson
  18. Mission Impossible by Toby+The+Economist · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Facts;

    1. It's incredibly easy to copy digital media.
    2. It's done privately.
    3. It harms no one directly and immediately.

    No law in the world will stop this people downloading digital media, unless the power of the police is extended to the point that the download behaviour of every individual is monitored.

    Unfortunately and utterly unbeliveably and to my utter, inexpressible disgust and revulsion, the law has in fact taken that step, with the new European Data Retention Act.

    Welcome to the Police State.

  19. Re:AAAaaarrrghh! by tomhudson · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why would I "pirate" something, you couldn't PAY me to see!

    That's the whole problem - people feel that a lot of the stuff out there isn't worth the asking price. The "asking price", for a couple, is a LOT more than the ticket price ... and it doesn't help that the theatres don't make any money on the screening itself, so they have to gouge on the food concessions.

    Lower the price to $5 a head, give half to the theatre so they can charge reasonable prices for eats, and make it up in volume. So Jim Carey won't get $20 million for his next movie unless its really good. The solution to THAT problem is obvious - make better movies.

  20. Insanitiy and Stupidity and the lawmaking process by Qbertino · · Score: 2, Insightful

    German politicians are very much like every other politician or normal person not awar of the general principles of IT. They are blissfully ignorant of the actual consequences of todays IP laws they pass. The last draft of internet copyright protection law that made it into the real world was a haphazard and naive mess, littered with wrong vocablurary and barely made it not to be a classical 1984 "Thought Crime Law" as the US american DMCA is. This new law is a step closer to that though.
    Brigitte Zypries said it right there though: She can't be bothered bugging the decision boards with such minor details as seperating IP control and access/market control and thus doesn't care about the effects. Politicians have other things to worry about - like the deficit. When asked if it where a proactive DRM circumvention if copying a CD on PC Linux (where current DRM is unaffective) she said something like "Well, in that case I would say, sort of, that if DRM is unaffective it's not there so it's no circumvention in this case." ... No word about that in the law.

    It boils down to the courtroom again, where it's up to the judge to introduce sanity into the process again. I understand there are some US judges that have ruled the DMCA as unapplicable in some cases, as it's against the american constitution.

    Goes to show what we all should never forget: Laws are made by humans and should be subject to perpetual scrunity.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
  21. Star Trek Replicator Thing Defense by Cytlid · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This brings up an interesting thought. On Star Trek, they have that Replicator thing. If Captain Picard wants a steak, he asks for a steak and it seemingly materializes out of thin air. If he wants a million steaks and that replicator thing can create them all, efforlessly, exact duplicatible copies ... is he _stealing_ those steaks? Where did they come from? Did he kill a million cows? (Or more accurately, did 1 cow divided by steaks multiplied by a million get killed? Were they real or virtual cows?)

    So now Mr Picard can duplicate a million sticks of gum and steal them all... _then_ it's just like stealing a million sticks of gum from a shop... right? Well at least it's more like performing an illegal download.

    The materialized steak was someone's idea of a steak... at the very least you may be stealing the idea, not the steak itself.

    --
    FLR
    1. Re:Star Trek Replicator Thing Defense by QCompson · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If Jean-Luc hadn't replicated those steaks, maybe he would have spent some credits on a real steak, which would have benefitted the farmer who raised the cows. Therefore, using content-industry bizarro-logic, Jean-Luc stole a steak from the farmer! That bald bastard!

      Of course, nothing is truly free, as someone earned some credits building and selling the replicators used on the Enterprise, just as many people benefit from movie/music downloading such as hard-drive and blank-cd manufacturers.

  22. toughest in Europe? by user24 · · Score: 2, Funny

    except for russia

    In Germany, you beat piracy,
    In Soviet Russia, a pirate beats you!!

    sorry.
    and, yeah I know the russian dude won the fight.
    i'll go now.

  23. one sided article by tolonuga · · Score: 2, Interesting

    did you notice how the first half talks about movies and the fear of piracy,
    but the second half only mentions the music industry not making as much money
    as they used to?

    well, the german movie industry has their own association with a web site at
    http://www.bvv-medien.de/, and despide a very, very aggressive anti-consumer
    anti piracy campain, they still more than doubled their revenue in the last
    five years: 860 mio euro in 1999 vs. 1747 mio in 2004.

    I guess noone of the german movie industry will read this, but: if I'm in cinema
    and about some movie, and you want to show some ad to me, it should start with the
    word "Danke" (thanks). After all I already paid for the movie ticket. Instead they
    show some anti piracy ad with people send into jail and about to be raped or similar
    stuff.

  24. Re:woah.. by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 2, Funny

    Where are we going to put 45 million expatriot germans?

    Bienvenidos a Mexico! Disfruten su estancia :)

  25. The problem is that it won't be enforced by babbling · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The problem here is that this law isn't going to be enforced properly.

    By sneaking in these laws, they prosecute one or two people in the country every now and then. The laws stay in place, people don't care about them because they figure it "won't happen to them", and the movie/music companies are able to bribe politicians into creating even more ridiculous laws.

    If only they would attempt to enforce this law en-masse, they would end up with at least 10% (probably more) of the population in jail. Then people would start caring about this and everything would be set right.

    Instead, they're going to slowly introduce even worse laws, but only prosecute a tiny percentage of the population. It is an unfortunate situation.

  26. Re:Without Entertainment DROIDS you'd be left with by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    if all the garage bands

    You obviously have not been paying attention - the bands that are helped the most by piracy are the "garage bands" - they make virtually nothing off CD sales anyway, but they gain from the increase in attendance at their live performances due to the expansion in their fan base.

    When music is "free", people are are much more willing to try new things. And new music.

  27. The law is NOT accepted by johl · · Score: 5, Informative

    The article is factually wrong. "The TimesOnline is reporting that Germany has accepted a new piracy law, currently the toughest in Europe, which comes into effect on January 1, 2007." This is not true. Neither has Germany "accepted" such a law, nor is it true that it will come into effect on the date mentioned. On Wednesday, the ruling coalition of Social Democrats and Christian Democrats presented their draft of a proposed law containing many of the things mentioned in the article. This law will be discussed in both chambers of the parliament within the next 6 months. Individual politicians of both ruling parties, as well as many from the opposition have already called for changes to that draft. At this point, one can only speculate how the result will look like and when it will be passed.

  28. Obviously you have never seen the bill .. by RedLaggedTeut · · Score: 2, Funny

    Obviously you have never seen the bill of the Enterprise for licensing fees for steak blueprints.

    I heard you go to a prison planet if you replicate using a blueprint for which you did not pay the license fees.

    --
    I'm still trying to figure out what people mean by 'social skills' here.
  29. my wages havent increased 12% yearly... by cheekyboy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Hello looser evil government people (that dont know what real work is)

    Since my wages havent increased 12% yearly over the last 10 years like many govt people, I hereby
    like to claim a 'stolen' amount of cash of $100,000 . The corporates who earned massive returns
    have the cash, I would like to see them locked up and my cash returned, because in an infaltion economy
    everyone DESERVES inflated revenue, even if their business models are crap.

    So wheres my tax discounts eh?

    --
    Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
  30. According to these laws by _pi-away · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's worse to copy mission impossible 3 than to beat your wife, mug someone, or steal a car.

    Ya, that makes sense.

    --

    "The crows seemed to be calling his name, thought Caw."
  31. Overkill by OverflowingBitBucket · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Two years of jail for copyright infringement? That's pure overkill. I can't even begin to understand the valid reasons for this.

    Even from the other side of the equation it makes no sense at all. I've spent the last couple of years or so working on some games. This is my baby, the result of me working my ass off. The thought of someone depriving me of potential income by downloading a cracked copy does make my blood boil. An appropriate consequence of them getting busted with it? Compensation for the loss, yes. Some sort of fine or community service, yes. But jail time? For duplication of an entertainment product!? You can't be freaking serious.

    This is greed, pure and simple. Perhaps a demonstration of a massively overinflated sense of self importance (defy our will eh?.. off to jail with you, consumer!). It is also a demonstration of the very, very dangerous consequences of letting a powerful lobbying organisation get their way with the laws. I hope this doesn't remain on the books for long.

    PS. Copyright infringement has never been, and will never be, theft. The former deprives someone of potential future income, and the latter deprives someone of something material immediately. Equating copyright infringement with the forced boarding, theft and murder of a ship at sea is an arrogant and flawed analogy.

    Rant off.

  32. Re:Without Entertainment DROIDS you'd be left with by justthinkit · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Ahem. All good bands (i.e. Green Day and, uh...uh...uh) ARE taking a year off. There are almost no good bands. There _are_ some wealthy bands with geriatic performers, yes, but music has become like Disney movies -- locked in "vaults" and copyrighted for the next 5,000 years. First thing we do, we shoot all the copyrighters.

    --
    I come here for the love
  33. Levy should be repealed by Barbarian · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Unless there is also a levy that compensates shopkeepers for stolen goods, the levy on CD writers and media should now be immediately revoked.

  34. Considering that... by Svartalf · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...I don't listen to the radio much any more, nor do I watch TV all that often. I DO listen to things like RenRadio, which is populated by performers that don't give a flying flip about what drivel the bulk of your ilk produce. You know what, I've been listening to real music for about 2-3 years now and I'm not very likely to be turning back any time soon- mostly because the media companies have been strip-mining culture for a couple decades now and it's almost all rubbish these days.

    Go ahead, take a year off. Other people will gladly step up that don't have contracts that seem to love what they do and are actually GOOD and produce something worth listening to/watching for a change.

    --
    I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
  35. Re:Sony will suffer by Travelsonic · · Score: 2, Funny

    Copyright theft? Either I have been smoking some heavy shit lately, or I magically obtained the legal copyright to the works illicitly when I dwnloaded them. 0_o

    --
    If you believe in privacy, and believe you have "nothing to hide" at the same time, you're a goddammed idiot
  36. Ask a librarian. by MacDork · · Score: 2, Funny
    I'm confused though, how does piracy not harm anyone?

    Ask your public librarian. She's that shady little wench down on the street corner handing out free copies of copyrighted works. Books, movies, music... she's ur hook up!

    1. Re:Ask a librarian. by hacker · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Let me counter-propose another VERY common scenario:

      1. I go to the store and buy a movie from my list of favorite movies.
      2. I watch it and like it, and recommend it to a friend.
      3. That friend asks if he can borrow it to watch with his wife.
      4. I loan him my (legal, store-bought) copy of the movie, so he can watch it with his wife.
      5. I no longer have the movie in my posession while he watches it.
      6. Days later, he returns the movie, and thanks me for letting him watch it.

      What we don't realize, is that his kid found the movie on the shelf at his house, ripped a copy, and uploaded it to the 'Net for thousands of others to download and enjoy, for free.

      Who is the violator here? Who gets the bill when the MPAA comes-a-calling? Who broke the law?

      This kind of sitation happens a LOT more than people realize, with not just movies, but music and software as well. Sure, my friend's kid is truly the violator, but since he never "owned" the movie to begin with, and I never broke the law by loaning it to him (only 1 copy in circulation at once), and my friend wasn't an accomplice to the infringement, where do the fingers point?

      Right, back to me.. because I legally bought it and loaned it to him to watch.

      I can't control what people do within the confines of their own homes, nor do I care to. I don't police them, and I don't expect them to police me.