GNU Classpath is licensed under the GPL with an exception:
Linking this library statically or dynamically with other modules is making a combined work based on this library. Thus, the terms and conditions of the GNU General Public License cover the whole combination.
As a special exception, the copyright holders of this library give you permission to link this library with independent modules to produce an executable, regardless of the license terms of these independent modules, and to copy and distribute the resulting executable under terms of your choice, provided that you also meet, for each linked independent module, the terms and conditions of the license of that module. An independent module is a module which is not derived from or based on this library. If you modify this library, you may extend this exception to your version of the library, but you are not obligated to do so. If you do not wish to do so, delete this exception statement from your version.
Would this also mean that people who use GNU Classpath in closed source applications would be required to supply the source? Even though they may never have used the source.
I'm thinking of this differently. I think it states that it is possible to 'observe' the past, but not to actually be in the past. (meaning you could measure the past, but not actually take part in it) (See The Light of Other Days - Clarke/Baxter)
-Or-
You wake up one morning, read to start you're time travel, and notice a new sidewalk with foot prints in it. You think to you're self "Who the hell would walking perfectly good cement?". Only to find out later that YOU put the foot prints in the cement in YOUR future. (like light, time is relative). (See Hitchhikers Guide - Adams, Bill and Teds Excellent Adventure)
Uhmmm... I have been using a Multi-monitored system for a little over a year, I run (or have run) Windows 98, Windows XP, Mandrake Linux 7.?/8. On the Windows machine I have NEVER seen a gap (assuming you mean missing pixels). Windows 98 was designed with support of up to 9 monitors (I am not sure how many XP supports). The nice thing about the 98/XP setup is that it is ONE desktop, you can move windows freely (by clicking and dragging). If you have a crappy setup, dialog boxes may appear in the middle, but most software will move it to the center of the primary (or active) display. The nice thing about the 98/xp stuff is that it leaves some control to the video driver to control the multi-head system, if you want your desktop to appear as a single uncut desktop you can, if you want to have two indepentant desktops you can do that also. (i.e. if you maximize a window, it will only take up one display, so you can have 2 maximized windows)
Don't knock windows dual-head setups until you have tried a good setup. Buy yourself a Matrox G450 (or better).
Oh, and I prefer CRT with a high refresh rate.:)
(I am hitting submit, with out previewing, wish me luck)
Didn't he say "The space elevator will be built about 50 years after everyone stops laughing" I hope he wasn't talking about the average person, because if so, we are a long way off.
Perhaps it looked like this. I have been told that at a distance the B2 - because of its wide wing span, appears to be moving very slow. Slow enough that the person actually said "Slow, Real slow, Fall out of the sky slow". (I was just struck by the fact that I have never seen one at a distance, I have only seen a LOW fly-by near the local DoD contractor.)
I'm not trying to say what you say, but could it have been one of these. You did say 1992, and thats about right for the B2
I would guess not, I am not a scientist, so this is purly a slightly educated guess.
Inorder to gut concentric rings like that with multiple impacts I would assume that the impacts would need to be a couple of hours apart, because the initial impact would still be hot, so it would just make the crater bigger.
Since Earth is rotating (15deg/hour) the asteroids would need to come from different directions, and the chances of that would be very high like, say 1 in 2^276709, so I would say that it was probably not multiple impacts.
Did that make sense?
Re:Flash-only unfortunate?
on
Fahrenheit
·
· Score: 2, Interesting
Most people, ok a not most but some people, advocate text based, or text supplemented web programming because of disabled people (mostly blind). Most web reading software uses the text only version to read to the user. (I believe this is one of the reasons alt tags are required for images)
While I enjoy a good flash animations I rarely see the benefit of using flash as a web page.
Slashdot Mirror
don't forget "That Spells DNA", and "Mandelbrot Set"
When you kill someone you take their life, the question you should ask is how much is a life worth, not how much killing costs.
The original statement said it costs more to jail someone than the DVD is worth.
It did not say it costs more to jail someone than it costs to DOWNLOAD a DVD.
Punishment should be DIRECTLY related to the cost/impact of he crime.
It sure would be nice to see the pictures.
I'll second that dreamhost recommendation.
Not to mention that they also have Aerial photos on the site too.
http://www.ansto.gov.au/info/00images.html
This must be a Thursday, I could never get the hang of Thursdays.
/* No Comment */
I'm thinking of this differently. I think it states that it is possible to 'observe' the past, but not to actually be in the past. (meaning you could measure the past, but not actually take part in it) (See The Light of Other Days - Clarke/Baxter)
-Or-
You wake up one morning, read to start you're time travel, and notice a new sidewalk with foot prints in it. You think to you're self "Who the hell would walking perfectly good cement?". Only to find out later that YOU put the foot prints in the cement in YOUR future. (like light, time is relative). (See Hitchhikers Guide - Adams, Bill and Teds Excellent Adventure)
I have a single post it note under my keyboard that reads "9uL1i613".
<script type="text/javascript" language="Javascript">
function w(link) { window.status=link; }
function c() { window.status=''; }
</script>
The code for those methods is at the top of the page.
Ok, I don't see it written anywhere, but the trailer is 4:20 long...
How can a protocol be rated faster than DSL? Shouldn't the rating be against another protocol? Did I miss something in the article?
On the Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy, The (2005) page they have more casting.
Ford Perfect, Arthor, and Trillian are all listed.
s/thier/their, s/its/it's
Remember kids, preview is your friend!
It doesn't sound like its thier webservers, more the software running Orkut.
What is down about it? I don't see that notice and everything looks like its working.
Uhmmm... I have been using a Multi-monitored system for a little over a year, I run (or have run) Windows 98, Windows XP, Mandrake Linux 7.?/8. On the Windows machine I have NEVER seen a gap (assuming you mean missing pixels). Windows 98 was designed with support of up to 9 monitors (I am not sure how many XP supports). The nice thing about the 98/XP setup is that it is ONE desktop, you can move windows freely (by clicking and dragging). If you have a crappy setup, dialog boxes may appear in the middle, but most software will move it to the center of the primary (or active) display. The nice thing about the 98/xp stuff is that it leaves some control to the video driver to control the multi-head system, if you want your desktop to appear as a single uncut desktop you can, if you want to have two indepentant desktops you can do that also. (i.e. if you maximize a window, it will only take up one display, so you can have 2 maximized windows)
:)
Don't knock windows dual-head setups until you have tried a good setup. Buy yourself a Matrox G450 (or better).
Oh, and I prefer CRT with a high refresh rate.
(I am hitting submit, with out previewing, wish me luck)
Didn't he say "The space elevator will be built about 50 years after everyone stops laughing" I hope he wasn't talking about the average person, because if so, we are a long way off.
1. Start Life
2. Grow Up
3. Think & do nothing but sex
4. ???
5. Profit!!
6. Ultimately Die.
sorry :)
With seperate private rooms, that can be opened or be reserverd for parties or conferences.
Here is an excellent article on the same subject, from wired mag.
I'm not trying to say what you say, but could it have been one of these. You did say 1992, and thats about right for the B2
Inorder to gut concentric rings like that with multiple impacts I would assume that the impacts would need to be a couple of hours apart, because the initial impact would still be hot, so it would just make the crater bigger.
Since Earth is rotating (15deg/hour) the asteroids would need to come from different directions, and the chances of that would be very high like, say 1 in 2^276709, so I would say that it was probably not multiple impacts.
Did that make sense?
While I enjoy a good flash animations I rarely see the benefit of using flash as a web page.
More info