Slashdot Mirror


Government-Aided Phishing

Anonymous writes "A Florida county is posting the Social Security numbers, bank account info and other sensitive data of hundreds of thousands of current and former residents on its public Web site, Computerworld is reporting. A county official says there's no problem, since the postings are in compliance with state law requiring public availability of records." From the article: "The breach stems from the county's failure to redact or remove sensitive data from images of public documents such as property records and family court documents, Hogman said. Included in the documents that are publicly available are dates of birth and Social Security numbers of minors, images of signatures. passport numbers, green card details and bank account information."

222 comments

  1. let's open some bank accounts by yincrash · · Score: 2, Insightful

    i think it's time for me to head to the local bank.

    what's going to convince them that this is a bad idea?

    1. Re:let's open some bank accounts by boog3r · · Score: 3, Insightful

      what's going to convince them that this is a bad idea?

      maybe someone posting a link to the broward county public records site...

      --
      signatures are for fools with hands
    2. Re:let's open some bank accounts by boog3r · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well... It WAS working. Then i did a search for 'Johnson' and now the webserver seems to be stuck in never-never land.

      *sigh*

      --
      signatures are for fools with hands
    3. Re:let's open some bank accounts by Hannah+E.+Davis · · Score: 1

      what's going to convince them that this is a bad idea?

      You mean aside from the fact that you just posted your intentions on Slashdot? ;)

    4. Re:let's open some bank accounts by __aaxwdb6741 · · Score: 1

      I think it might have been my fault. =/
      I entered "*" into the search.

    5. Re:let's open some bank accounts by tomhudson · · Score: 5, Informative
      It's still working fine. What's worse, if you don't give a first name, it gives you by last name only, so you can just do a dictionary attack on last names,

      I just randomly picked a last name, and a couple of clicks later I know that (I've removed the names) L.A.P and A.J.P got a mortgage for 141,999.00 on 5/14/2004 from the CITY FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK.

      So, if I were a phisher, I now have two names, and a dollar amount. I already know approximately where, and by clicking on the other records I know that they've been there for about 20 years, and that they also had some legal problems back in 1991, again, I'm leaving out the details.

      W.T.F ?!?!?!?!

      I would be humongously upset that this sort of stuff is available just by clicking.

      Worse, by searching on the same two names + broward county plus a good guess as to another term, I found a link to a dump of 756k from google's cache. http://www.google.com/search?num=20&hl=en&lr=&safe =off&q=www.co.broward.fl.us%2Fdatabase%2Frecords%2 F03-24nme.txt&btnG=Search

      If I were a phisher, a few minutes with perl would give me a decent dictionary with which to start ...

    6. Re:let's open some bank accounts by Sylver+Dragon · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I'm doing a search now to test a theory:
      The site is an .aspx page, which means that it's probably an IIS server back-ended by a MSSQL database. Given that they would want the text search to be case insensitive, it is quite possible that they were sloppy and used a SELECT * WHERE [last_name] LIKE @search_string (ok, they probably listed only the columns they wanted, you get the idea though). It is also possible that there is no limit defined for the number of records to return.
      If all of the above is true, then the search I started should return everything between 1/1/1978 and 4/10/2006 in the database, assuming that their server survives the request. If this is true, this means that getting everything in their database is a trivial task, and that they are exposing a lot of people to identity theft, very easily. Further, even if they go through and redact the data later, it is probably too late, as the data would have been long since scraped. This is one time that I hope a slashdotting kills a server.

      --
      Necessity is the mother of invention.
      Laziness is the father.
    7. Re:let's open some bank accounts by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      If its mysql, if yo don't supply a LIMIT clause, it defaults to 1000 (and I'll bet they changed the default to 50). You should have added a LIMIT 10000 to give you a good start.

    8. Re:let's open some bank accounts by deathy_epl+ccs · · Score: 1

      mysql != MSSQL

    9. Re:let's open some bank accounts by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      oops - me == tired!

    10. Re:let's open some bank accounts by deathy_epl+ccs · · Score: 1

      heheheheheh. Fair enough. I was looking back at my post and thinking "Boy, that came off a bit mean." I can see why Slashdot doesn't allow post editing or retraction, but sometimes it would be nice.

    11. Re:let's open some bank accounts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You don't need to go to your bank. Just print up a "demand draft" on your printer with the holder's account information (available on any check) and home address. If you can get the account holder to answer "yes" to any question about their account (in my grandma's case, "Is your bank account held in this city?"), the banks won't even go after you for fraud. That's sufficient authorization.

      Surely, I must be exaggerating. Sadly, no. See:
      http://wamublamesgrandma.blogspot.com/2006/03/wamu s-response-to-my-letter.html

      Anyway, I've been flogging this dead horse for a while now, but the flip side of institutional laziness with sensitive information is what institutions -- in this case, Washington Mutual -- allow bad guys to do with the information.

      Full details here:
      http://wamublamesgrandma.blogspot.com/

    12. Re:let's open some bank accounts by sootman · · Score: 1

      True. More specifically:
      MySQL > MSSQL

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    13. Re:let's open some bank accounts by Thing+1 · · Score: 1
      Database Technologies (out of Deerfield Beach, Florida) has had this stuff on-line for over a decade now, for paying customers.

      My wife cheated on me with one of their senior developers. She was an accountant there.

      So, phishers: who am I?

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    14. Re:let's open some bank accounts by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      I can see why Slashdot doesn't allow post editing or retraction, but sometimes it would be nice.

      ... but imagine the trolling possibilities if they did :-)

      Back on-topic - I would hope that mssql also has a default limit that's reasonable. If not, forgetting to spec a LIMIT would be pretty fatal to any server that has a lot of records.

      ... well, I googled for "mssql select query limit rows", and it looks like its mostly people trying to find ways to immitate myslq's limit, like here: http://www.planet-source-code.com/vb/scripts/ShowC ode.asp?txtCodeId=850&lngWId=5, and finding that what works in case x doesn't in case y.

      And the second hit was "Microsoft SQL Server: how to make mysql's LIMIT m,n function in Ms-sql" Oh, well.

    15. Re:let's open some bank accounts by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      Let's see ... half of all spouses cheat (and this figure may be on the LOW side) ... so if there were more than two women working as accountants there , consider yourself just one in 1,000,000,000,000. (gee, there's more than a billion just like you world-wide).

    16. Re:let's open some bank accounts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When God hates all the same people you do, its a sign you've created Him in your own image.

      Great signature. Yours?

    17. Re:let's open some bank accounts by mikael · · Score: 1

      California's Bureau of Unclaimed Property do the same with lost bank account transactions. Just enter a surname and city, and you can find a whole list of people from the individual owner search.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    18. Re:let's open some bank accounts by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      When God hates all the same people you do, its a sign you've created Him in your own image.

      Great signature. Yours?

      No, its just on loan (okay - I saw it somewhere and liked it, so I "liberated" it :-)

      The great thing about it is that people of all persuasions, from the hard-core athiest to the INSERT_RELIGION_OR_DEITY_OR_LIFESTYLE_OF_CHOICE can agree with it. Of course, groups like the fundamentalists would tend to be offended because they don't consider it "hate". They "love the sinner, condemn the sin." Somehow, though, it loses in translation from theory to practice. Sort of like how the government's "conforming with all the information privacy laws" means that they're free to splash all your info all over the net and nobody's accountable.

    19. Re:let's open some bank accounts by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      Amazing...I found real estate information about Tony Montana. I thought he died years ago in a cocaine gunfight?!!?!

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    20. Re:let's open some bank accounts by Aqua_boy17 · · Score: 1

      Arrggggggghhhhhhhh! I live in Florida you insensitive clods!
      *sigh*

      --
      What if the Hokey Pokey really is what it's all about?
    21. Re:let's open some bank accounts by whathappenedtomonday · · Score: 1
      I would be humongously upset that this sort of stuff is available just by clicking.

      There's a lot of other stuff available, you just have to find it. I can see it coming, some day clicking will become illegal...

      --
      I hope I didn't brain my damage.
    22. Re:let's open some bank accounts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Why go thru all the trouble of Google cache?

      http://www.co.broward.fl.us/database/records/

      Sigh....

    23. Re:let's open some bank accounts by ishepherd · · Score: 1

      Just for interest... the MSSQL syntax is

      SELECT TOP 1000
      FROM ...

      and there's no default limit.
      Although there is a per-connection option you can set

      SET ROWCOUNT 1000

      --
      fud, notfud, yes, no, maybe
    24. Re:let's open some bank accounts by InsaneProcessor · · Score: 1

      "Science controls nature; religion controls humans."

      Who created the rules of science? Hmmmm?

      --

      Athiesm is a religion like not collecting stamps is a hobby.
    25. Re:let's open some bank accounts by tomhudson · · Score: 1
      ... so what if, after you got the first thousand, you want the NEXT thousand?

      In mysql, its "LIMIT 1000,1000"..

      Then if I want the next batch, its "LIMIT 2000, 1000" and so on. Easy to code in a loop, etc.

      There doesn't seem to be a clean way to do that in mssql.

    26. Re:let's open some bank accounts by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      gee, dont' tell me they're even dumber than I could have imagined ...

    27. Re:let's open some bank accounts by ishepherd · · Score: 1

      Ah, I see. AFAIK there's no way as clean as that, it would be nice though. You'd have to use the WHERE clause against your ORDER BY columns. Restrict them to values > the 1000th value.

      (In some apps they go to the database through some framework, that gives them the feature for free. eg Hibernate/NHibernate)

      --
      fud, notfud, yes, no, maybe
    28. Re:let's open some bank accounts by tomhudson · · Score: 1
      The funny part? It's SO easy to implement in C. fseek(YourDataFile, INDEX_HEADER_SIZE+RECORD_SIZE * NumberOfRecordsYouWantedToSkip, SEEK_SET).

      You can do the same with an index of your own making. Performance-wise, it kicks ass over any general-purpose solution.

  2. next news story by Kwiik · · Score: 1

    Florida county website sues slashdot for launching a distributed denial of service attack (FP!?)

    --
    Vehicle Stars used car search is my current project
    1. Re:next news story by JordanL · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Hmm... posting it on slashdot DEFINATELY won't draw phisher's attention to it...

      What the hell made Florida ever think that this was a good idea?

    2. Re:next news story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny
      What the hell made Florida ever think that this was a good idea?

      I think you answered your own question.
    3. Re:next news story by BigBlockMopar · · Score: 1, Redundant

      What the hell made Florida ever think that this was a good idea?

      The fact that it's FLORIDA. Florida would be a lovely place, if not for the people who live there - especially the politicians!

      This data breach is, without question, criminally irresponsible. Wanna bet none of the inbred morons responsible is ever brought to trial?

      I'm a Canadian computer geek who wants American citizenship - the only thing keeping me from wgetting the entire site and building an identity is the fact that I'm not a complete asshole.

      --
      Fire and Meat. Yummy.
    4. Re:next news story by rainman_bc · · Score: 1

      I'm a Canadian computer geek who wants American citizenship

      You must have a fever or something... Wanting to move to a country like that.

      Certainly devs earn more money in places like NYC, but they also pay obscene amounts of rent too. And due, the Vancouver tech market is booming.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    5. Re:next news story by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      "I'm not a complete asshole."

      But I am :-)
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    6. Re:next news story by Darkman,+Walkin+Dude · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Speaking of attracting undesireables, I appear to have picked up a stalker, nyahahah! Eh any ACs or GuloGulo (959533) that respond to this message, everyone remember the name, this one is truly half baked.

    7. Re:next news story by BigBlockMopar · · Score: 1

      You must have a fever or something... Wanting to move to a country like that.

      What? Of the most friendly people I've ever met (certainly more outgoing than Canadians), with a second-to-none can-do spirit?

      Americans are just like Canadians, but on an individual basis they're friendlier, and the hardware stores have more/better tools.

      Certainly devs earn more money in places like NYC, but they also pay obscene amounts of rent too. And due, the Vancouver tech market is booming.

      Don't care. I'd rather live in rural Iowa than either one of those cities. If more than 70% of the men in a given place don't know how to change a spark plug, I'm not moving there. Bonus points are awarded for women who know what a spark plug does, let alone how to change one.

      --
      Fire and Meat. Yummy.
    8. Re:next news story by BigBlockMopar · · Score: 2, Funny

      Speaking of attracting undesireables, I appear to have picked up a stalker, nyahahah! Eh any ACs or GuloGulo (959533) that respond to this message, everyone remember the name, this one is truly half baked.

      Hah! Stalkers? Gimme a break. Try carrying around my sig and see how many disgusting uncircumcised Europeans or "I was robbed at birth!" wackos hit me up.

      I hope they all get phimosis. Savages.

      --
      Fire and Meat. Yummy.
    9. Re:next news story by corblix · · Score: 1
      What the hell made Florida ever think that this was a good idea?

      Florida doesn't "think". It is not a person. Florida is 16 million people, some of whom think.

      What happened here is that someone did something stupid and someone else called them on it. But now, instead of fixing the problem, they're working on CYA. This is standard practice in any large, dysfunctional organization, nothing particularly special about Florida.

    10. Re:next news story by GrumblyStuff · · Score: 1

      What do you expect? It's America's Wang.

    11. Re:next news story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      disgusting uncircumcised Europeans
      So you're retarded then?
    12. Re:next news story by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      We have nothing to do with those morons down in Miami.

      Jaysyn

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    13. Re:next news story by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      Don't care. I'd rather live in rural Iowa than either one of those cities. If more than 70% of the men in a given place don't know how to change a spark plug, I'm not moving there.

      Why learn how to change spark plugs when you haven't got a car?

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    14. Re:next news story by Firehed · · Score: 1
      I'm a Canadian computer geek who wants American citizenship - the only thing keeping me from wgetting the entire site and building an identity is the fact that I'm not a complete asshole
      You'd only be an asshole if you did something with it. There are plenty of people who have access to thousands' records, so Feel The Power!
      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
    15. Re:next news story by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 1

      Why learn how to change spark plugs when you haven't got a car?

      Curiosity. The real question is how to learn when you haven't got a car.

      Besides, its just saving time learning a skill that will be obsolete when the oil runs out. Plan for the future and learn to wind coils instead.

      --
      Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
    16. Re:next news story by Soruk · · Score: 1

      Why learn how to change spark plugs when you haven't got a car? ..or your car doesn't use them. Mine doesn't.

      --
      -- Soruk
    17. Re:next news story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you'd love my wife. One day almost 25 years ago, I managed to blow
      the engine in my '69 Mustang. I came home from work and walked in to my future
      in-laws house and asked where my wife was. My mother-in-law-to-be informed me
      that she was working on the car. Now I'd just walked past the car and never
      saw her so I went to check. There she was, covered in grease, tennis shoe soles
      pointed skyward, with her torso IN the engine compartment, bolting in the
      replacement engine...

      Gotta love a woman thats not afraid to get some engine gunk under her nails...

    18. Re:next news story by rebelcan · · Score: 1

      I'd have to say that either you don't live in the Lower Mainland of British Columbia, or you do and haven't met many of the right people. I've met tons of friendly and outgoing people here ( and have lived here practially since birth, so I've met a lot of BC-ians ). But of course, YMMV.

      Mabey I'm just biased because on of my all time favorite authors is kind of a local.

      --
      God is dead -- Nietzsche
      Nietzsche is dead -- God
      Zombie Nietzsche lives! -- Zombie Nietzsche
  3. Hmmm by SupremoMan · · Score: 1, Insightful

    This has "stupid" written all over it.

  4. Local Politicians by DigiShaman · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Anyone want to bet information of local politicians have been exempt from this? Hmmm? Anyone?

    --
    Life is not for the lazy.
    1. Re:Local Politicians by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      I'd love to bet, but that's only because I enjoy losing.

    2. Re:Local Politicians by HaeMaker · · Score: 2, Informative

      They are not. Was able to look up records of at least one elected official.

      Make checks payable to... well you can look up that info yourself!

    3. Re:Local Politicians by houghi · · Score: 1

      Nice idea though. Make information you find on decision takers public and see if they still think there is "no problem".

      Do this during a live TV show:
      - So you do not think there is a problem with the release of information
      * Absolutely not. There is no security risk.

      Have a scroller at the bottom with all the politicians information. Have several politicians. The neat part is that they will not know that they are agreeing to have their information on TV at that very moment.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    4. Re:Local Politicians by patio11 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No, they're definately in there. Some quick Googling (heck, one name is in TFA) finds them pretty quick. I was kind of suprised that I could access the site from a foreign IP, as its pretty routine nowadays to limit that (I can't get my own credit reports without using a US based proxy, presumably because they were worried about fraud, and I had a devil of a time reading Dubya's campaign site during the 2004 election) for sensitive sites. Now, generally when we're talking about, say, e-mail delivery I'm 100% in favor of non-discrimination at the institutional level... but could you folks in Flordia strongly consider doing something about this if you start getting a lot of accesses from, say, *.ru?

    5. Re:Local Politicians by utlemming · · Score: 1

      LOL...if only a TV progam had the balls to do it. But it would be rather funny. You wouldn't even have to use real information. You ought to tell Comedy Central, I am sure that the Daily Show could enjoy that one.

      --
      The views expressed are mine own and do not express the views of my employer.
    6. Re:Local Politicians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are all the tinfoil hat people taking a day off from reading Slashdot today? I'm surprised nobody has pointed out the governments desire to finger-print and micro-chip everyone. Now that these SSN's are leaked, all the more justification for micro-chipping or some other method of secure ID. Kinda like how 911 was used as an excuse to strip away some rights and civil liberties.

    7. Re:Local Politicians by aminorex · · Score: 1

      Any system that depends on secrecy is broken.

      --
      -I like my women like I like my tea: green-
  5. Florida: comic relief for a stressed-out nation! by drdanny_orig · · Score: 1

    Really, does it surprise anyone that it's Florida doing this?

    --
    .nosig
  6. FLORIDA by dteichman2 · · Score: 5, Funny

    From the same people who brought you Indecision 2000... here comes Identity Theft-O-Rama. 3 days in the future: 10:00 News: "For what seems to be no reason, thousands of individuals in Florida seem to be buying things online in mass. Oddly enough, none of the orders are being delivered to Florida. We'll have a video for you after the break. Over to you, Bob."

    --


    Silence is golden... and duct tape is silver.
    1. Re:FLORIDA by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Nah, that's just grannies spending spring break with their relatives to get away from those crazy teens partying.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:FLORIDA by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      ... individuals in Florida seem to be buying things online in mass

      I was unaware that the Catholic Church was providing online access for its members. Perhaps you meant "en masse"?

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    3. Re:FLORIDA by lesv · · Score: 1

      At least in Florida, when you declare Bankruptcy you get to keep your multimillion-$ house. Seems like an interesting trade-off. :)

    4. Re:FLORIDA by Money+for+Nothin' · · Score: 1

      Dude, it's Florida. There are enough religious zealots there to make the original writing of the statement "in mass" to be likely. Especially at a Catholic church (where the damned souls buy their way out of their sins; as if God accepts Visa, MasterCard, or a personal check... Is there any more corrupt form of Christianity? Seriously - I mean, these are the same people who molest and fuck little boys because their religion says they can't marry and can't have pre-marital sex... *ducks*)

    5. Re:FLORIDA by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Yes, well ... too bad they can't get their chicks for free. Besides, I think the Church is in dire straits anyway.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    6. Re:FLORIDA by Carbonated+Milk · · Score: 1

      Martin Luther, is that you?

  7. old news by Prophetic_Truth · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Have you ever been sued for a bad debt? If so, chances are your signature, along with your application for whatever loan or credit you defaulted on is all public record. That usually contains a whole lot of personal information, not just limited to your SSN.

    --
    time is a perception of a being's consciousness
    time is your 6th sense, the wierd ones are 7+
    1. Re:old news by Bryansix · · Score: 1

      And that makes it right? If people are goig to use the SSN as a all-purpose ID number then it needs to be gaurded along with birthdates, past addresses, bank account numbers, etc. They should not be just throwing that information around for anyone with no legitimate use to get a hold of.

    2. Re:old news by Adambomb · · Score: 1

      yeah because the 'having a ton of cellphones activated with your info and then having massive balances forwarded to a collections agency and watching your beacon go down the tubes' part where they dont ASK for anything but a date of birth and ssn is just peachy.

      --
      Ice Cream has no bones.
    3. Re:old news by Prophetic_Truth · · Score: 1

      I never said it was "right". I was just saying that this has been an ongoing problem for awhile, but I summed it up in two words. I didn't mean to express that sentiment.

      --
      time is a perception of a being's consciousness
      time is your 6th sense, the wierd ones are 7+
    4. Re:old news by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      I got a bit of a surprise - I sent some registered mail - and now I have an "electronic copy" of their signature, sutiable for cut-n-paste.

      I am NEVER AGAIN going to accept registered mail, or if I do, I'm signing someone else's name. This is getting ridiculous!

    5. Re:old news by Foobar+of+Borg · · Score: 1
      I got a bit of a surprise - I sent some registered mail - and now I have an "electronic copy" of their signature, sutiable for cut-n-paste.
      I am NEVER AGAIN going to accept registered mail, or if I do, I'm signing someone else's name. This is getting ridiculous!

      Well, just don't use your usual signature. Write it with your left hand (assuming you are right-handed) or write as though you are having the shakes.

    6. Re:old news by DoraLives · · Score: 1
      Well, just don't use your usual signature.

      Well you were doing fine and then you kinda stalled out a couple of hundred feet short of the runway. Sign the thing as John Dillinger, sign the thing as Joe Doakes, sign the thing as A.T.Hun. It doesn't matter. Nobody actually looks at those signatures anyway. Try it if you don't believe what I'm saying. Later on, should things get touchy, a completely different name is always better than an altered real name. If you're worried, then sign A.T.Hun scribbly enough to make it less than legible on first glance. It's a signature, after all, right?

      --
      Is it fascism yet?
  8. Identity theft by thomaswahl · · Score: 2, Interesting


        When you are the victim of identity theft you know who to sue: Sue Baldwin,
      Broward County, and the State of Florida. Two out of three deep-pockets isn't bad.

    1. Re:Identity theft by Penguinoflight · · Score: 1

      Broward County and Sue Baldwin are only doing what is required by Florida Law. They cannot be a target, but that does leave the largest of the 3.

      --
      "And we have seen and do testify that the Father sent the Son to be the Savior of the World"
      1 John 4:14
    2. Re:Identity theft by lspd · · Score: 1

      When you are the victim of identity theft you know who to sue: Sue Baldwin

      No no no.... It says right on the mortgage that her name is VERNA Sue Baldwin.

      Personally I love her oath to "uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of Florida." Priceless...

  9. bad year for boward by tehwebguy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    this is the same county who's police intimidated, threatened, and were just plain jerks to an undercover journalist attempting to find a "police officer complaint form":
    http://cbs4.com/topstories/local_story_033170755.h tml (watch part 1 and 2, videos on the right)

    and then retaliated against the journalist after the piece aired:
    http://cbs4.com/local/local_story_086232143.html

    --
    -- lol pwned
    1. Re:bad year for boward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      They also managed to misplace 58,000 absentee ballots.

      Dammit, why'd I have to take a job down here? I did some digging and, sure enough, there are documents about me freely available on the web.

    2. Re:bad year for boward by commonchaos · · Score: 1

      Extra points for using the public database to get information on the police officer referenced in those articles.

    3. Re:bad year for boward by Ph33r+th3+g(O)at · · Score: 1

      Nice. Unfortunately, thugs with badges like that are all too common. The job attracts power-trippers like those in the video, and the low pay pretty much screens out all but the most corrupt or the most dedicataed.

      --
      I too have felt the cold finger of injustice.
    4. Re:bad year for boward by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      Since the corruption goes all the way to the top, the "most dedicated" don't last. That leaves only the corrupt. I sold my last house to move out of a city where the mayor had a police officer call me and threaten me.

      Note to self: When a city is trying to drive residents from their homes, don't take pictures of a hit and run.

    5. Re:bad year for boward by sootman · · Score: 1

      from http://205.166.161.12/OncoreV2/
      "The Broward County Records Division shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for any damages in connection with the use of the information contained herein ." [emphasis added]

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    6. Re:bad year for boward by techno-vampire · · Score: 3, Informative

      Just because they put a disclaimer on it doesn't mean they're not responsible. Back in the '50s, you started to see those "not responsible" signs in parking lots because the owners were tired of paying damages when people's cars were hit. The law hadn't changed, they were (I don't know if they still are) legally liable, but people believd the signs and stopped making claims. Same thing here. If they say they won't accept liability, most people won't try for compensation, even if they're eligable.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    7. Re:bad year for boward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      These public servants are doing more to destroy America than anyone flying into a building could ever accomplish

    8. Re:bad year for boward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean
      Richard L. Brickman
      3510 NW 89th Terrace
      Cooper City, FL 33024

      This address is 3 years old may not be accurate

      Wife: Linda Brickman
      Daughter: Jill Brickman
      Social Security Number: 123-78-9184

      Can I get a glazed donut instead of points?

  10. C'mon, the least Slashdot could do... by jd · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...is post a link to the information! How else are we to know if the data is genuine?

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    1. Re:C'mon, the least Slashdot could do... by the-amazing-blob · · Score: 2, Informative

      http://www.broward.org/records/ great starting point

  11. Devaluing SSN & account numbers by dfsmith · · Score: 0, Redundant

    On the plus side, the more SSNs (not a secure identifier) and bank account numbers (everyone you've ever written a check to has it) are out in the open, the less valuable they become to fraudsters.

    At least, they would be, if institutions recognized that they are pretty worthless identification to begin with.

    1. Re:Devaluing SSN & account numbers by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      You mean, like a driving license as a proof of ID or a proof of a stay permit?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:Devaluing SSN & account numbers by dfsmith · · Score: 1

      In CA at least, to get a driving license you need to:

      1. have your photo taken
      2. have your thumbprint taken
      3. take a test
      4. copies or originals of various identifying documents
      and in return you are issued a card that is difficult to copy. The card's a bit better than a 9-digit number. Item 3 at least must keep some of the identity thefts at bay! B-)
    3. Re:Devaluing SSN & account numbers by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Good in theory. But, correct me if I'm wrong, there is nothing on the license telling if you're actually a citizen of the US. On the other hand, the driving license is the primary ID card.

      Let's put it that way, the border cops near San Diego were quite glad I had my passport with me...

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    4. Re:Devaluing SSN & account numbers by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      But, correct me if I'm wrong, there is nothing on the license telling if you're actually a citizen of the US.

      Of course not. For one, it's a driver's license. That has nothing to do with citizenship or residency. Also, the state issued driver's licenses are not linked to federal citizenship status. If you've ever gotten a job, you know what proves identity, and what proves citizenship. You can use a valid passport to prove both (I think the only civilian ID a natural born citizen can have that proves both identity and citizenship). Without that one document, which you can't use as a driver's license, you have to have two separate documents. Something like a license to prove identity, and something that proves citizenship, like a Social Security card or birth certificate for natural born citizen or the appropriate paperwork from INS for the others.

      Let's put it that way, the border cops near San Diego were quite glad I had my passport with me...

      Did you check the requirements before leaving the country? Even though it is "just Mexico" it still is a completely different country. I was told that an American leaving the US should, at a minimum, take a birth certificate and ID, no matter where they are going. Without that, it is possible that reentry could be denied or delayed. And if you have a passport, it is silly to not take it with you when you leave the country, even for "just Mexico."

    5. Re:Devaluing SSN & account numbers by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Nope, didn't leave the country. I was just driving back up from San Diego to LA.

      I should mention, though, that I do have an accent, being no native speaker. It's not a Spanish accent, though (I was told I sound a bit like the Nazis in the old war movies... makes sense, most of them were German actors who fled the Nazi regime. Must be interesting to play one of those that kick you out of your country...).

      Anyway. I find it highly interesting that the main ID is the DL (I rarely needed anything but it), which is pretty easy to get, even as a foreigner. Now, add that it's not that hard to forge certain certificates from certain countries (and the fact that the people working at the DMV rarely know what a legitimate certificate from some country ending in -stan should look like) and you'll find that it's not so hard to get a valid ID with a false name on it.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    6. Re:Devaluing SSN & account numbers by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      I was just driving back up from San Diego to LA.

      Then you don't have to provide them with a passport. Just state your citizenship and give appropriate ID, like a driver's license. There's no requirement that you be able to prove your citizenship just for wandering around. I hate how we have become a "papers please" country, even though that's supposedly illegal for law enforcement to do.

      you'll find that it's not so hard to get a valid ID with a false name on it.

      It certainly isn't hard, but one thing you'll get with the ID is that they fingerprint with most DLs now, as well as store the picture indefinately. So, you may have ID under a different name, but they can still identify you later. So it may screw them up the first time you misuse the ID, but if you go for more under different names, it may backfire on you when they associate you with the different IDs.

  12. Why am I not surprised. by Sir+Unimaginative · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yeah, hello, Spain? You can have it back now.

    --
    The problem with your idea is that it makes sense.
    1. Re:Why am I not surprised. by Solra+Bizna · · Score: 3, Informative

      I need to get out more, that was the funniest thing I've read in a week.

      -:sigma.SB

      --
      WARN
      THERE IS ANOTHER SYSTEM
  13. They must do it! by mi · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Editing out the SSNs and DOBs is not only not required by law, it, likely, is against the law.

    This info was Public Records since, well, always :-)

    Anybody could go to town hall and browse the registry of deeds and other repositories. It just became more convenient to do it, but it was always possible.

    In a way, we always relied on "security through obscurity" keeping this information (kinda) private, and are now all upset at the obscurity withering out.

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    1. Re:They must do it! by i.r.id10t · · Score: 1

      Yup, its only 'cause someone out there decided that they'd let the govenment generate unique id numbers for their customer/patient/client/whatever database. From then on, it was all down hill...

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
    2. Re:They must do it! by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 2, Informative

      Its not that it was ever private.
      Its that the criminals have found a use for the information.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    3. Re:They must do it! by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      Editing out the SSNs and DOBs is not only not required by law, it, likely, is against the law.

      It violates federal law, which trumps state law. Specifically, the privacy act of 1974

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    4. Re:They must do it! by mi · · Score: 1
      It violates federal law, which trumps state law. Specifically, the privacy act of 1974
      I doubt it, because this supposed violation always existed -- since 1974 anyway.

      It just became more harmful, because of the Internet, but the nature of it did not change.

      So, people, don't let your 2000-election wounds open up again :-)

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    5. Re:They must do it! by product+byproduct · · Score: 1

      This is because showing a number to identify yourself is a stupid idea to begin with. Public cryptography gives methods to prove to someone that you own a secret without having to disclose that secret. THAT'S the kind of ID we should be using.

    6. Re:They must do it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Huh? Your reply makes no sense.

      It violates federal law. Period.

      It cannot be grandfathered or whatever it is you were trying to suggest.

    7. Re:They must do it! by TubeSteak · · Score: 1
      In a way, we always relied on "security through obscurity" keeping this information (kinda) private, and are now all upset at the obscurity withering out.
      The obscurity was never there. Only the stupid or lazy didn't look.

      From TFA: Baldwin added that the information available on the Web is also freely available for public purchase and inspection at the county offices. "Professional list-making companies have always purchased copies of records and data from recorders to use in the creation of specialized marketing lists, which they sell," she said. So too have title insurance underwriters and credit reporting agencies.

      Anyone with the time and motivation could go ahead and do this. How else do you think so many dead people register to vote every year?
      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    8. Re:They must do it! by Detritus · · Score: 2, Interesting
      It violates federal law, which trumps state law. Specifically, the privacy act of 1974

      Wrong. The Privacy Act of 1974 only applies to the executive branch of the federal government.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    9. Re:They must do it! by mi · · Score: 1
      The obscurity was never there. Only the stupid or lazy didn't look.
      And guess who is complaining now?
      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    10. Re:They must do it! by mi · · Score: 1
      Huh? Your reply makes no sense.
      Try harder.

      What I meant was, having a state law patently contradicting a federal one for over 30 years, while possible, is a lot less likely, than a Slashdot user misreading one or both of the laws.

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    11. Re:They must do it! by lspd · · Score: 1

      Business didn't start this nonsence. FDR started it in 1943 with Executive Order 9397.

    12. Re:They must do it! by HiThere · · Score: 1

      Originally the SSI# was for use ONLY by the social security agency. Even the IRS was refused permission to use it.

      This tells you what government promises and safeguards are worth.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    13. Re:They must do it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Criminals have found a use for a lot of things. Should we go around and ban them all?

    14. Re:They must do it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup, its only 'cause someone out there decided that they'd let the govenment generate unique id numbers for their customer/patient/client/whatever database.

      Not cause they are allowed to generate the numbers, there's really not a problem with that. I suppose you could take offense to the fact that they force people to apply for the numbers and then force employers, banks, etc. to collect the numbers, though.

      And yes, they basically do force you to have a social security number. Without a number you can't file taxes (they'll reject the tax return), and if you make more than a small amount in gross income you're required by law to file taxes. So if you want to survive, and you don't have someone to gift you living expenses for the rest of your life, then you're required by law to get a SSN.

    15. Re:They must do it! by The+Cisco+Kid · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that would be nice if that were true. But as I found out on one sad day, that applied only to the Federal government - only agencies of the fed were prohibited from using it for anything except Social Security. It has absolutely no effect on state governments, or private businesses.

      And for the record, you are never required to give your SSN to a business. Unfortunately, they are not required to do business with you, either. And nothing prohibits them from choosing wether to do so based on wether you give them your SSN.

    16. Re:They must do it! by HiThere · · Score: 1

      A definite point. But even so, the promises that the Feds *did* make, even though they weren't a adequate as might be desired, weren't kept.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  14. Maybe not Phishing but... by NorbrookC · · Score: 1, Funny

    I don't know if this could be considered "phishing" in the sense that I'm trying to lure people into giving me their information. It's right out there for all to see without going through all the bothersome effort of setting up a fake website and sending out the e-mails! Just some browsing, and then setting up the bank transfers and charging purchases!

    And to think of all the effort that's being wasted on setting up phishing schemes, when Broward County will do all the work instead!

  15. Re:Florida: comic relief for a stressed-out nation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's a reason the state looks like a flacid dingus.

  16. Bill Gates SSN by ajakk · · Score: 2, Informative

    I remember that this became an issue when someone got credit cards issued in Bill Gates's name. His SSN was listed on SEC filings because he was a majority holder of Microsoft stock. They have since changed the listing requirement with the SEC.

  17. Re:Florida: comic relief for a stressed-out nation by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 2, Funny
    Obligatory:

    <Homer>Florida? But that's America's wang!</Homer>

    --
    If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
  18. From the website itself.... by bvdbos · · Score: 4, Informative

    Defending Yourself Against Identity Theft

    According to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), identity theft occurs when someone uses your personal information such as your name, Social Security number, credit card number or other identifying information, without your permission to commit fraud or other crimes. The FTC reports that there were 161,819 victims of identity theft in calendar year 2002. Florida has one of the highest

    Back to top

    Tips to Avoid Identity Theft
    -Do not respond to phone calls or emails from unknown solicitors seeking personal information.
    -Do not leave documents containing identifying information lying around your house or workplace. Keep them in a secure location.
    -When discarding documents containing your social security number, credit or debit card information, or utility and phone bills, shred or destroy them. Don't just throw them away.
    ...
    -Limit the contents of your wallet. Do not carry extra credit cards or important identity documents (social security card, passport, etc.) except when needed. Never carry passwords or PIN numbers in your wallet. -Photocopy, scan, or make a list of the contents of your wallet and keep it in a safe place. Copies or scans should include both sides of each item. A list should include account numbers, expiration dates, and customer service phone numbers for each item.


    Maybe someone could point them to their own site? And why make copies if you can download for free???

    1. Re:From the website itself.... by id+est · · Score: 1

      I especially liked the fact that within this warning it states "Florida has one of the highest"

  19. Attacking the wrong people by GigsVT · · Score: 5, Informative

    Virginia has your SSN and a lot of information up too, in the virginia courts database that has everyone's criminal record, including traffic.

    Most states have this.

    Don't attack the wrong people, the blame lies squarely with the credit card companies for using your SSN as identification and trusted authentication.

    These are all public records and always were public records. It just saves you a drive to the court house of the respective county (or paying a PI network to do same) to have them online.

    Yeah, I admit Florida is one fucked up state in so many ways, but don't blow this out of proportion.

    --
    I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    1. Re:Attacking the wrong people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Yeah, I admit Florida is one fucked up state in so many ways, but don't blow this out of proportion.


      Well, how about when somebody uses that publicly available data (conveniently accessible from the third world instead of the courthouse) to fuck your identity up and then charge up a shitload of merchandise on bogus accounts attributed to you we ask you not to blow it out of proportion.

      Yes, credit card companies are wrong to use the SSN for authentication and identification, but then again so does.. voila.. social security. And we all know that SS fraud never happens. On top of that, the social security number is the de facto ID number for many organizations so the state needs to adjust. Even my ass backward state (Ohio) have gotten this through their skulls and most if not all government sites have pulled SSNs.
    2. Re:Attacking the wrong people by Money+for+Nothin' · · Score: 1

      Don't attack the wrong people, the blame lies squarely with the credit card companies for using your SSN as identification and trusted authentication.

      You *do* realize that credit card companies are required by law, since the 9/11 attacks (I think it was a provision in the PATRIOT Act), to collect peoples' SSNs for "anti-terrorism" purposes?

      Of course, they were doing credit checks long before then, and SSNs are useful for that too. I'm not certain, but I think the FDIC may impose regulations which require SSN collection as well.

      Regardless, in post-9/11 America, the CC companies can no longer be the root of the blame for SSN and other personal info collection. As is so often the case, the blame traces back to the government...
    3. Re:Attacking the wrong people by Spurion · · Score: 1

      The difference is that if you have to go and ask in person to look at a someone's details, then the county knows who's looking at whose records. It also limits the set of people to whom the information is available, to just those within driving distance.

      Making all the data so widely available in such an impersonal way is going to make it orders of magnitude harder to work out who has abused knowledge of a particular person's information.

      --
      Any sufficiently self-referential snowcloned .sig is indistinguishable from nonsense.
    4. Re:Attacking the wrong people by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      You *do* realize that credit card companies are required by law, since the 9/11 attacks (I think it was a provision in the PATRIOT Act), to collect peoples' SSNs for "anti-terrorism" purposes?

      Collecting SSNs is completely different from using SSNs for identification/authentication.

    5. Re:Attacking the wrong people by JimBobJoe · · Score: 1

      Virginia has your SSN and a lot of information up too...Don't attack the wrong people

      I disagree. States knew just as well as everyone else that the SSN was not intended for identification purposes. Since they decided to use it for identification purposes, contrary to the original promises/intentions.

      Because they took that responsibility, they should have to deal with the consequences of it. (In Ohio, the state supreme court has ruled that the state is liable when they disclose an SSN.)

      The same moronic thinking that led to SSN use by credit bureaus was the same that lead to DMVs to adopt them as well for licensing purposes (late 1960's. Ohio began SSN collection for driver's licenses (and printing them on the license the same year that Virginia did...1967. Credit Bureaus began operating in about 1970-1971.)

      Other than finding the legislator who introduced the legislation (and the guy who thought the SSN would be perfect for the credit bureaus) and beating him, I think the state should pay very dearly for its mistakes.

    6. Re:Attacking the wrong people by Money+for+Nothin' · · Score: 1

      Collecting SSNs is completely different from using SSNs for identification/authentication.

      What? That's nonsense.

      That's like saying "collecting nuclear weapons is completely different from using nuclear weapons for intimidation purposes." If Iran or North Korea were "merely" collecting nuclear weapons, would that be a problem? I think so, and obviously *using* them is a problem anywhere, anytime.

      Does the CC company, or does the CC company not, have your SSN? It is a binary question. Either they do or do not; there is no try.

      If they have your SSN, then they can use it for whatever purposes they want (defined in the contract you sign).

      And yes, CC companies *do* store SSNs in their databases.
    7. Re:Attacking the wrong people by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      Virginia can no longer use SSN for DMV/driver's license, it was banned a few years ago.

      Previous to that you had to "opt-out" of having your SSN be on your driver's license, and half the time the clerk didn't know what you were talking about.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    8. Re:Attacking the wrong people by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      Does the CC company, or does the CC company not, have your SSN? It is a binary question. Either they do or do not; there is no try.

      If they have your SSN, then they can use it for whatever purposes they want (defined in the contract you sign).

      Sure, they can, but just because they have your SSN doesn't mean they're going to let anyone who knows your SSN access your account.

      And yes, CC companies *do* store SSNs in their databases.

      You don't seem to be following the thread. There's nothing wrong with storing your SSN in a database. What's wrong is when someone assumes that just because someone knows your SSN, they must be you.

  20. The more SSN's out there the better? by hsmith · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Look at it this way. SSN's aren't what they were meant to be. They are your "everything" number now. In some respects, is the value of the SSN being diminished because they are so easy to use and get a hold of now? It could possibly be a big plus because now we get into a situation where they just aren't worth using so everyone stops using them for important transactions. Lets hope...

    1. Re:The more SSN's out there the better? by Thing+1 · · Score: 1

      Okay, that settles it: my SSN is all 6s now.

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    2. Re:The more SSN's out there the better? by n6kuy · · Score: 1

      The federal gummint requires you to attach your SSN to all financial accounts. That way they can tax you more efficiently....

      Actually, they're calling it your "Taxpayer ID Number" nowadays, right? And you get one assigned before the umbilical cord is even cut as you come out of your mother's womb.

      Remember when your Social Security Card stated right on it something to the effect that the number was NOT FOR IDENTIFICATION? That was ignored by everybody that wanted to uniquely identify you but was too lazy to make up their own unique identifier in their own ID space for you. Now even the government ignores it.

      --
      If you disagree with me on social issues, then it's pretty clear that you are a narrow-minded bigot.
    3. Re:The more SSN's out there the better? by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      The federal gummint requires you to attach your SSN to all financial accounts. That way they can tax you more efficiently.... Actually, they're calling it your "Taxpayer ID Number" nowadays, right?

      No, a TIN is what you get if you're not eligible for social security.

      And you get one assigned before the umbilical cord is even cut as you come out of your mother's womb.

      It's technically up to your parents. But if you don't give your child a social security number you can't claim him as a dependent or exemption or for the EIC, you don't get the child tax credit, etc. And as your child grows up, he can't work for anyone, get a bank account (thanks to the Patriot Act), lend people money without being subject to backup withholding, etc. And then there's the part I don't fully understand: you can't get a TIN if you're eligible for an SSN; if you don't put an SSN or TIN on your tax return, your return is rejected; but you're required by law to file a tax return if you have a certain amount of gross income. I'm not sure this has ever been tested in the court's though. What happens if you don't have an SSN but you manage to have enough gross income to be required to file?

      Remember when your Social Security Card stated right on it something to the effect that the number was NOT FOR IDENTIFICATION? That was ignored by everybody that wanted to uniquely identify you but was too lazy to make up their own unique identifier in their own ID space for you. Now even the government ignores it.

      It was a pretty dumb thing to put on there in the first place - made about as much sense as those "DO NOT REMOVE UNDER PENALTY OF LAW" tags on mattresses (though it at least doesn't mention anything about there being a law). In fact, if they had just allowed the SSN to be used for identification in the first place, we probably wouldn't have all these problems we're having today.

    4. Re:The more SSN's out there the better? by n6kuy · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it looks like from reading stuff that you don't actually have to provide your SSN to banks or employers under federal law, even though that's what they want you to believe. Apparently the federal government requires your bank and employer to request your SSN, but that's not the same as requiring that it be given.

      Good luck not giving it, though.

      --
      If you disagree with me on social issues, then it's pretty clear that you are a narrow-minded bigot.
  21. No way by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Funny

    You break it you buy it!

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  22. OK it had to be said by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 3, Funny

    Something phishy's going on here.
    *ducks*

    1. Re:OK it had to be said by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Something phishy's going on here.
      *ducks*


      Jeez, don't wimp out. If you're going to be a smart ass, and expect people to hit you, stand up like a fuckin' man for once in your life.

      Yes, I did just finish watching The Sopranos, why do you ask?

    2. Re:OK it had to be said by new_breed · · Score: 1

      ducks? Where's my revolution controller!

  23. PUBLIC RECORDS by Penguinoflight · · Score: 1, Interesting

    The thing is these records are required to be public. A lot of counties in Florida just decide to blank out all important information, or simply not publish the entire document on their web sites. I would have to argue that the county in question is actually do what is required by law, and nothing less.

    It's really not fair at all to say that a record is "Public" if you have to drive to the office and pay $4/hr for a parking spot (if you're lucky enough to find one). Besides, most courhouses have rules like "no weapons", where you will see every officer in the place carrying a gun.

    Should people be subjected to phishing? no. The information that is on record at courthouses shouldn't be enough to make phishing targets, but that's not the fault of the courthouse.

    --
    "And we have seen and do testify that the Father sent the Son to be the Savior of the World"
    1 John 4:14
    1. Re:PUBLIC RECORDS by theRiallatar · · Score: 1

      Thing is, there's a difference between being public record and being out there on the web, for anyone to see.

      Generally if they're available at a courthouse, there's some oversight into who's accessing the information and why they're doing it, while on the web, you get none of that.

      IMO, pull it. It can be public info without being blasted all over the internet.

    2. Re:PUBLIC RECORDS by The+Cisco+Kid · · Score: 1

      If you will read more closely, you will see that the 'no weapons' provision applies to weapons except for 'official purposes', which would apply to, say, police officers, since its their official duty to enforce the law.

    3. Re:PUBLIC RECORDS by Penguinoflight · · Score: 1

      I'm sure rules like the one I mentioned are different from county to county, but the principle is the same. If an average citizen tries to do anything in a courthouse, they'll get confused quickly because thats the way they want it. The signs I read said nothing of 'official purposes', and when you are taking nail clippers and scissors from people, I'd say that an officer should have more reason than a generic one to carry a weapon. After all, citizens are expected to have good higene in a courthouse, and the use of nailclippers, or scissors (hair cutting) can help in that capacity.

      It would be nice if an average citizen could get access to forclosures and reposessions for the purpose of saving money. The current behavior makes it VERY difficult to get at that kind of information, which obviously renders the information non-public.

      Its this very kind of behavior of breaking laws at a lower level that makes laws so confusing and irrelevent. I'm certain that when the Florida congress decided to make records public, the kind of procedure now necessary to gain access to these records was not on their mind. In fact, I would say that this process was just what they were trying to avoid.

      --
      "And we have seen and do testify that the Father sent the Son to be the Savior of the World"
      1 John 4:14
    4. Re:PUBLIC RECORDS by The+Cisco+Kid · · Score: 1

      Regardless of wether the sign mentions it or not, I guarantee you that the actual law that prohibits weapons specifically only prohibits their possesion by ordinary citizens who are not 'officers of the court' or members of law enforcement.

    5. Re:PUBLIC RECORDS by Penguinoflight · · Score: 1

      I would call your bluff on that one. If there is anything in the law that follows what you say (and likely there is), it is likely spread between several different sections with no references from one to another. In Florida, the law gives specific amounts for moving violations and other traffic citations. These amounts are not what you will get charged if you are cited with a traffic violation, the courts take about 30% extra. Nowhere in the same clause is there a reference to this fact.

      This of course is trivial. The right to bear arms (2nd amendment) would allow any US citizen to carry a firearm inside a court room. It's really much more obvious what lower level governments are doing to hijack higher laws in this case.

      --
      "And we have seen and do testify that the Father sent the Son to be the Savior of the World"
      1 John 4:14
    6. Re:PUBLIC RECORDS by The+Cisco+Kid · · Score: 1

      Try it this way:

      The state court has no obligation (under federal law) to permit you to enter at all. The state offers to permit you to enter, if you agree not to bring any weapons (and possibly agree to some other terms)

      I suppose you feel that someone who has been convicted by a state of violating that states laws still has a constitutional right to 'bear arms' when he is interred in a state prison?

    7. Re:PUBLIC RECORDS by Penguinoflight · · Score: 1

      You truely are meddlesome, but I'll take a chance on you not being a total troll.

      How can you consider a Courthouse a public place if there are strict requirements as to who can enter?
      Remember, it is supposed to be owned by the state, and therefore owned by the people.

      Actually many prisons dont allow even guards to hold firearms. As a convicted criminal you are subject to lesser rights, that's the way things are and that's the way they have to be. Laws are already in place to restrict the use of firearms to responsible citizens. Before you can think of bringing a weapon into a courthouse you must hold a concealed weapons permit, which requires a lot of scrutiny. It's fair to say that any citizen who holds a concealed weapons permit is more responsible than your average law enforcement officer.

      Of course the biggest burden is that due to the stringent rules, everyone is searched in some capacity before they enter a courthouse. I think that is very much against the intent of the higher law and therefor I'm against it.

      On the upside, there aren't many state laws which will land you in prison if you break them. State law seems like a place that is reserved for distributed attacks, traffic laws are quite uniform from state to state, and yet they are not federal laws. My guess is this is because they would get shot down if the law was a single entity, and by pushing the laws to states individually the powers that be have evaded any real scrutiny.

      --
      "And we have seen and do testify that the Father sent the Son to be the Savior of the World"
      1 John 4:14
  24. Wanted Posters by rbannon · · Score: 1

    Just yesterday I was looking at wanted posters, and each one had an SS number on it. So this doesn't seem surprising at all.

    1. Re:Wanted Posters by Bill+Dimm · · Score: 2, Funny

      I was looking at wanted posters, and each one had an SS number on it.

      Yeah, but were you really tempted to steal the identity of someone the police were looking for?

    2. Re:Wanted Posters by DoraLives · · Score: 2, Insightful
      were you really tempted to steal the identity of someone the police were looking for?

      What better identity to commit a crime under could there possibly be?

      --
      Is it fascism yet?
    3. Re:Wanted Posters by The+Angry+Mick · · Score: 1
      What better identity to commit a crime under could there possibly be?

      Best make it a worthwhile crime, then.

      It'd suck to steal the identity of a mass murderer and then get pulled over for speeding.

      --

      I'm not tense. I'm just terribly, terribly, alert.

    4. Re:Wanted Posters by DoraLives · · Score: 1
      It'd suck to steal the identity of a mass murderer and then get pulled over for speeding.

      This is silly, but I'll go along. You're only the "mass murderer" whilst committing your crime while using her identity. Identity theft crimes do not involve outdoors mayhem with a mask and six shooter. You're inside, in a nice air-conditioned room somewhere. After you're done committing your crime of stolen identity, you immediately revert to being Jane Normal, and as long as you don't make a habit of going down to the local police station to make an in-person withdrawal from your bogus account, you'll be fine and dandy. Later on, when you get pulled over by the cop, there's no outstanding warrants for Jane Normal, so after signing for your citation, you go along on your merry way. Sigh. People, some of us need a refresher course in "street smarts" here. Or at least just try to get outside and blink your eyes and look around for a few moments every once in a while before retiring once again to your steel bubble.

      --
      Is it fascism yet?
    5. Re:Wanted Posters by The+Angry+Mick · · Score: 1
      This is silly

      Not entirely.

      As you yourself pointed out, "[y]ou're only the mass murderer whilst committing your crime using their identity". If you are arrested while posing as "Jack D. Ripper", the burden will quite firmly be on you to prove that you are "Jane Normal", and that you are not responsible for the list of crimes associated with the name you've borrowed. The police aren't going to take it on faith. You will initially spend a fair amount of time in jail as "Jack" (unless, of course, you're using the identity of someone easily identifiable as belonging to the opposite sex).

      After you have proven that you are "Jane Normal" and are therefore not responsible for "Jack's" tri-state killing spree, then you'll get the chance to explain why you thought it'd be a good idea to borrow "Jack's" identity in the first place. After this, you get to go to jail as "Jane Normal".

      Either way, you're not going to have a good weekend.

      --

      I'm not tense. I'm just terribly, terribly, alert.

  25. Argh argh argh argh! by biendamon · · Score: 1

    It's spelled "definitely." The root of the word is "definite," not "definate." The root of that word is "finite," not "finate."

    There is no 'a' anywhere in the word. Ever. Under any circumstances. If you're going to put something in ALL CAPS, please, for the love of God, people, spell it correctly.

    Other that that, I agree with you completely.

    1. Re:Argh argh argh argh! by JordanL · · Score: 1

      I would be snide and affronted... but that I wage the same crusade with others. I'll go now. /cry

  26. I give up. by ph4s3 · · Score: 1

    You struggle and struggle to protect your own identity and something like this sponsored by our own inept government happens. It's enough to make you honstly consider that 7x9 shack in the woods as a viable alternative to modern existence.

  27. This is good! by Electrum · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The federal government needs to do this on a nationwide scale. The SSA should give a deadline, say one year, then publish all SSN data. SSN is not supposed to be used as an identifier, nor as a secret. Doing this will force organizations to change their procedures, thus hampering identity thefts and other security issues that result from treating a public, non-unique identifier as a secret.

    1. Re:This is good! by ScrewMaster · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No it won't. Congress will have to do it by making use of the Social Security number for anything but governmental purposes illegal. If a corporation wants to assign me a unique I.D. number ... that's fine so long as that number exists only within that organization's database. The credit bureaus like the SSN as a sort of personal GUID that allows them to track us more easily. Tough, I say: they feel entitled to our personal financial data but they're not, and given how badly they're mismanaging it maybe it's time for some changes. The system as it stands is becoming more and more dangerous to individuals every day, and unfortunately we don't really have the option to opt out of it. If you have a bank account you're part of the system, like it or not.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    2. Re:This is good! by gr8_phk · · Score: 1
      "Congress will have to do it by making use of the Social Security number for anything but governmental purposes illegal."

      They already did back in like 1974 I think. Not sure if they've changed the rules or just let all these companies ignore it.

      The government is also making SSN required for lots of things because of the tax system. Why does my insurance company need my SSN? Because my employer covers part of the cost of insurance, and so it is considered compensation and subject to taxes - or some such. I don't remember what the whole story is there, and some of it may be excuses rather than requirements, but the ever expanding tax rules are pushing our "taxpayer ID" into new places.

    3. Re:This is good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The ONLY good thing about living in a bible-belt state is that (in GA, at least) it is illegal to *require* a person to furnish their SSN; legally you are allowed to just spout off some number, be it randon, your driver's license number, etc..

  28. Nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Same thing in L.I. N.Y.
    Several Politicians where there too.

    Funny thing, they are public docments. Altering then to hide the information is illegal.

    1. Re:Nope by The+Snowman · · Score: 5, Informative

      Funny thing, they are public docments. Altering then to hide the information is illegal.

      Funny thing is, you are wrong. The Privacy Act of 1974 covers what to do with private data in government records at the federal level, and many states have similar provisions. Essentially the documents are public property, but specific personal details are not. For example, citing a court case, evidence, its outcome, etc. is public record. Giving the SSN of the person found guilty and the bank account number used to pay the fine is NOT public record.

      Another example is declassified documents. Yes, they are public, but usually redacted. For example, giving information on an old military operation while redacting information that identifies the specific people involved. People that may very well still be in the military performing similar operations.

      Altering public documents to the extent of redacting personal information, which is what this article is about, most certainly is legal and often required. However, you are an anonymous coward -- obviously someone redacted your user account so I don't know who you are.

      --
      24 beers in a case, 24 hours in a day. Coincidence? I think not!
    2. Re:Nope by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Altering public documents to the extent of redacting personal information, which is what this article is about, most certainly is legal and often required. However, you are an anonymous coward -- obviously someone redacted your user account so I don't know who you are.

      If I had mod points I dunno whether I'd give you a Funny or Informative.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    3. Re:Nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look it up in NY Newsday. The problem was deeds. Some attoneries put the SSNs on the paper work (Not required). You could not search by name, but by tax block.
      The county said they could not change the documents by law. If they and the newspaper are wrong you should contact them immediatly. the problem appaered to be a NT state law not a federal one.

  29. Shocking: laws do NOT replace common sense by suv4x4 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "A county official says there's no problem, since the postings are in compliance with state law requiring public availability of records."

    If all things in compliance with the law are perfect, then what the hell we need politicians to change/update the laws for? Fire the bastards.

  30. Privacy Act by jascat · · Score: 1

    Has no one heard of the Privacy Act of 1974? Things such as SSN, birth dates, telephone numbers, addresses, etc are all protected. Somehow, it only makes sense to blank that out, even when it comes to freedom of information actions. I'm ashamed to call Florida my state of residence now.

    1. Re:Privacy Act by Detritus · · Score: 2, Informative

      Try reading it again. It doesn't apply to the states.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
  31. One word describes it all... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dumbfuckistan !!

  32. What's the big deal...? by Gandalf_the_Beardy · · Score: 1

    Can someone explain to a poor Brit just *why* you need to keep your SSN safe - which being as it's publicly accessible seems to be an impossibility. Is it the only thing needed to apply for credit in your name or just a convenient stepping stone to a little social engineering to get what info you would need?

    1. Re:What's the big deal...? by 01101101 · · Score: 1
      Can someone explain to a poor Brit just *why* you need to keep your SSN safe - which being as it's publicly accessible seems to be an impossibility. Is it the only thing needed to apply for credit in your name or just a convenient stepping stone to a little social engineering to get what info you would need?

      Despite that it was not intended as such, being a relatively unique ID it has become the key field for anything financial including credit bureaus. Even a lot of non financial institutions like to track people with it. Knowing a SSN is almost as good as being someone these days. It is a key that unlocks many doors.

    2. Re:What's the big deal...? by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1
      Mainly social engineering. Without it, not much can be done.
      With it, and maybe a name or birthdate...one could get an actual, official SSN card. With that, you can get a drivers license, with YOUR picture on it. After that, the world is your oyster.

      Or, with the SSN and address/name, you can apply for a credit card. Spend all you want, and blow off the bills.

      It's not just the number...it's the number + name or address or birthdate.

    3. Re:What's the big deal...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is that your SSN is used for authentication. As an example, if I know your name, address, phone number, and SSN I can cancel any college classes you might be taking (that only requires a SSN), get a credit card in your name, forward your mail to my house (or a drop box), get just about any other kind of credit in your name, clean out your bank accounts, and really screw you over. Think of a SSN as the secret password that controls access to just about everything in a person's life.

    4. Re:What's the big deal...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It should be pointed out that the Democrats created the Social Security system and hence its number. So, if you think this is F'ed up you know who to blaim.

      Also, in the last 2 years, the Dems stopped the Republicans from revamping this system. The system which we have all known is going bankrupt in the next few decades.

  33. found in five clicks by drkich · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I started searching for my friends and family. I found a number of their documents online with just a couple of clicks. Absolutely ridiculous! I called my senator (state and federal) and I urge you to do the same.

    1. Re:found in five clicks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They might be more impressed with the issue if you call your senator and tell them their SSN.

  34. Class-action suit? by KwKSilver · · Score: 1

    For X-billion dollars. Send a link to your "favorite" law-shark. I presume grotesque stupidity and wanton negligence bordering on malfeasance(?) is actionable. Any lawyers have an opinion on this crap?

    --
    If you want your life to be different, live it differently.
  35. That's easy by btarval · · Score: 1
    "what's going to convince them that this is a bad idea?"

    That's easy. Identify who "them" is, and narrow down all the SSN's, driver's license info, etc. and just publish that for the people who are responsible for posting this stuff. If you really wanted change the situation, just add a few of the high ranking politicians for the county to the list.

    There are even ways of making this stuff a permanent part of the Internet, though I'll refrain from giving the less technically clueful some ideas.

    I have a strong suspicion that the officials responsible for this would change their tune fairly quickly once they became educated on how having too much public information can be abused.

    And, just to be clear, I'm not advocating that anyone do this. I wouldn't advocate this even for those beaurecrats in Florida.

    On the positive side of things, if all the counties in the U.S. did this, it would certainly force the banking industry to change.

    --
    The best way to predict the future is to create it. - Peter Drucker.
  36. Re:Like that's a problem by symbolic · · Score: 1

    Do you think identity thieves and other scammers are interested in people with bad credit?

  37. Whenever I hear a strange story... by Wilson_6500 · · Score: 1

    I'm never surprised to see that it's from Florida. What's with those people? Is corruption and stupidity among governmental officials, like, MORE prevalent there than everywhere else?

  38. Broward County by eZtreme · · Score: 1

    Broward County isn't just any county, it is right above Miami. Ft Lauderdale also is in that county, one of the largest cities in Florida. So this is not about some thousand people in the middle of nowhere, but about a couple of million.

    1. Re:Broward County by cnerd2025 · · Score: 1

      Say, isn't Broward County one of the places where some "voting irregularities" occured both in 2000 and 2004? I smell a scandal...

    2. Re:Broward County by DragonTHC · · Score: 1

      Broward County has a huge democratic base and also a huge black population.

      --
      They're using their grammar skills there.
    3. Re:Broward County by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Broward County has a huge democratic base and also a huge black population.

      You left out, ".. and hundreds of thousands of idiots."

  39. It's sorta obvious if you think about it.. by way2trivial · · Score: 1

    consider a company where the CEO and the division head are brothers...

    if one is an idiot, it hurts everything below.. and due to genetic stats, it's more likely they both are.

    if you work for a division, who's brother is an idiot ceo,

    now- substitute division with state, division head with govenor.. and ceo with president..

    imagine, they are under TWO bushes...

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
    1. Re:It's sorta obvious if you think about it.. by _Sharp'r_ · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's right Broward County, home of all those Republican officials... oh wait, what's that, the county is heavily Democrat without any elected Republican officials, as in all nine of the County Commissioners are Democrats? Well... must be Bush's fault somehow anyway!

      See, when a /. story says something negative about politician's actions, but doesn't emphasize their party affiliation, there's an extremely high correlation that the politicians in question are Democrats. Hence, you wouldn't even have to RTFA, but just the summary, to figure out that the unnamed County and officials are Democrats.

      --
      The party of stupid and the party of evil get together and do something both stupid and evil, then call it bipartisan.
    2. Re:It's sorta obvious if you think about it.. by Wilson_6500 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Stupidity and corruption transcend petty human notions of party lines.

    3. Re:It's sorta obvious if you think about it.. by rob_squared · · Score: 1

      Can't we all just agree that politicians suck?

      --
      I don't get it.
  40. Re:Florida: comic relief for a stressed-out nation by simpleparadox · · Score: 1

    They prefer the Sunshine State

  41. Link to the Information Search Page by tcrown007 · · Score: 1

    Here's the link to search the records. None of this is new information, all counties everywhere have this information "publicly" available. Usually you have to drive there and ask for it.

  42. Re:Like that's a problem by ceejayoz · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Given the huge amount of poor people with massive debt, sure.

    The problem with having bad credit isn't not being able to get credit, it's not being able to get credit at a reasonable interest rate. Identity theives, not planning on paying the bills, don't give a shit about the interest rate.

  43. Older than 1978 by thogard · · Score: 1

    I found a record dating back to 1970. I wonder how much older info is in there. Also a mortgage that was discharged may have info from I'm guessing as far back as about 1958. The one document I found was for a mortgage that was paid off before 1975 but was show as discharged in 1995.

  44. Not just Florida by TheSkyIsPurple · · Score: 1

    Federal Gov't does it too... Pacerweb has all the details of bankruptcies online for a few cents a page.
    (At least, last I was in there a year or two ago)

  45. Good news for the rest of us by smchris · · Score: 1


    Why bother trying to steal ID anywhere else when Broward County has offered itself up as a sacrifice for the surfing?

  46. wamu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I had a mortgage with another institution that was bought out by WAMU (Washington Mutual) while I was still paying it off. Ten years ago, I paid it off, but they neglected to inform the county in which the deed was registered. I went to sell the house and discovered that WAMU had not done this. It then took almost six months (I think it was a week less than six months) to get WAMU to send the damn clearance to the county. I faxed them at least four copies of the same pile of papers over that time - and they kept claiming they'd lost them. Toward the end of that time I was on the phone to someone at the loan department at WAMU at least four days a week. Nobody ever knew what was up and they all managed to point the finger at someone else.

    When they finally did clear it, they didn't bother to let me know.

    I sent them a letter detailing this (and the names of all the people I'd spoken to for the last four months of the process - I was keeping notes) and they never bothered to reply.

    I wouldn't trust WAMU with my pennies.

  47. Re:let's open some bank accounts -- OR... by pallmall1 · · Score: 1

    Fly some airplanes into skyscrapers. Now I know why the 9/11 terrorists went to Florida to reside and prepare for the attack.

    The fact that Florida never stopped providing the perfect data for ID theives is really challenges any notion that Homeland Security is coordinating anything with the states, or that they are competent in anything at all.

    --
    3 things about computers: they're alive, they're self-aware, and they hate your guts.
  48. Re:Like that's a problem by symbolic · · Score: 1

    Touche - interesting point.

  49. Funding by Geekbot · · Score: 1

    Oddly enough, after perusing the website, I have some ideas on how I'm going to fund my letter writing campaign.
    "Can you split that bill up onto these 4 credit cards?"

  50. Why that annoying word "policy" matters by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 1

    One official said "recorders have no statutory authority to automatically remove Social Security, bank account and driver's license numbers". As soon as your organization is so big that nobody will do the right thing unless you specifically order them to in writing, then you need a security/privacy policy. You may need one anyway, but situations like this are why you should fight to stay awake when your security consultant talks about pollcy instead of interesting things like cross-site request forgery.

  51. This is not Phishing by Glowing+Fish · · Score: 3, Informative

    This is not Phishing.

    Phishing is the attempt to get someone to submit information to you by pretending to be someone else.

    What the government is doing is publicizing information.

    These two activities have almost nothing in common.

    --
    Hopefully I didn't put any [] around my words.
    1. Re:This is not Phishing by FirienFirien · · Score: 1

      You're technically correct, but the action they've taken has exactly the same effect as phishing. The phishers no longer need to try to get the information; it's all there for them to take, and it seems fairly likely that they now have. They can pretend to be a hundred thousand different people now, with a lot of backup detail that they wouldn't have got by normal "This is your bank website really, now enter your password" scams.

      While it's not technically illegal, it's still a rampantly stupid thing to do, and vastly enables illegal activities.

      Accessory to theft. Accessory to identity theft.

      --
      Browsing with +2 to insightful posts and a higher threshold makes the average post seen seem a lot more ingenious
    2. Re:This is not Phishing by Glowing+Fish · · Score: 1

      Oh, I quite agree that it is an accessory to identity theft, but that doesn't make it phishing anymore than it makes it spamming or DDoSing.

      --
      Hopefully I didn't put any [] around my words.
    3. Re:This is not Phishing by The+Cisco+Kid · · Score: 1

      No, this isnt phishing. However, it could make it easier for a criminal to better target their phishes.

      Lets saw a person gets a phish email purporting to be from Chase bank, and they dont have an account with them - its easy for even an idiot to recognize that as a phish. But lets say a clever phisher uses the info FL has released, and sends a phish from a bank that the person does have an acct with, and lets say they even include their full name and the last 4 of their SSN. Now that person may be more easily duped into revealing more sensitive info (PINS, passwords) that the phisher doesnt already have.

  52. This may force the end of the SSAN as an password by Animats · · Score: 1
    The dumb thing is using the social security number as a password. SSANs shouldn't be secret.

    What we need is a law that says that any organization that uses a SSAN as a password does so entirely at its own risk and thereafter cannot take any action whatsoever which would be financially adverse to the holder of the SSAN.

  53. SSN shouldn't be used by Ardemus · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I agree, this is a good thing. Let the use of SSN collapse as a means of granting information. Trying to hide a small number from birth to death is ridiculous. It's equally aweful that companies can claim that you did something because that number was used for the transaction.

    1. Re:SSN shouldn't be used by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      Exactly. Imagine if all the places in the country did this. It'd make identity theft a lot harder. A person's social security number should be no more private than a person's name - that's all it is, a way to identify a person. Any bank stupid enough to let someone take out a loan because they know a number deserves to lose their money. The law only needs to make it easier to sue credit reporting agencies for libel when they report false information, and easier to sue the banks for damages when they make you take a day off work to fix your credit report.

      To put it another way, Bill Gates social security number is 539-60-5125. Let's see you use this information to steal money from him...

  54. Florida.Query("Verna Sue Baldwin") by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Links to Broward County's database lead directly to tiff images. To get the full records, copy the bracketed instrument number and search by instrument.

    Broward County Bar Association:
    Verna Sue Baldwin
    Broward County Records Division
    115 South Andrews Avenue
    Suite 120
    Fort Lauderdale, Fl 33301
    954-357-7271 Voice
    954-357-5573 Fax
    sbaldwin@broward.org
    www.broward.org/records

    According to the Broward County Phone Directory, the above phone number is the director's number, not the general dept. number. This is further evidence that Verna is Sue.

    Here is Verna Sue Baldwin's Notary Certificate, notary ID 620591 [92386313].

    In November 1994, Verna Sue Baldwin and David D. McLauchlin (her husband) sold their condo to [name withheld]. Warranty deed [94569014].

    Verna Sue Baldwin then purchased a home:
    4011 Thomas Street
    Hollywood, FL 33021-3540
    Parcel number 11208-11-03500
    Folio number 514208110350
    Warranty Deed for 4011 Thomas Street [94565427].

    According to that warranty deed, Verna Sue Baldwin's Social Security Number is 234-74-8234 [94565427].

    In May 2000, she added a 14x28 swimming pool [100293267].

    In July 2004, Verna Sue Baldwin and David D. McLauchlin paid off their mortgage [104151876].

    Note: I didn't list all of Sue Baldwin's loans. Be sure to do that before ordering her credit report. Equifax uses that information for "security".

    It looks like Verna Sue Baldwin still lives at 4011 Thomas Street. Parcel sales history. 2005 property taxes. Map.

    Verna Sue Baldwin's mother is Dora B. Baldwin, as stated in her Durable Family Power of Attorney document [101676908]. Dora isn't currently married, so Baldwin might be her maiden name. Perhaps try searching West Virginia's public records.

    1. Re:Florida.Query("Verna Sue Baldwin") by Geldon · · Score: 1

      Wow, that is scary. The sad part is that I would normally scold you for posting that kind of personal information on someone on the web for all to see...

  55. Citizenship status by Peter+Mork · · Score: 1

    You don't have to be a US citizen to get a CA driver's license, but you do have to have an SSN, which means you 1) are a citizen or 2) have DHS permission to work in the country.

    Moreover, the feds have threatened that if states don't collect SSN information, you won't be allowed to use that state's DL to board a plane or enter a federal office building. There is a definite push towards linking one's legal ability to operate a motor vehicle with citizenship.

  56. Re:Like that's a problem by VdG · · Score: 1

    People with bad credit have (often) demonstrated an inability to manage their finances effectively. That makes it more likely that they'll overlook strange and unexpected financial transactions, so a fraudster is likely to go undiscovered much longer.

    Somebody with an excellent credit rating might be expected to be paying attention.

  57. Re:This may force the end of the SSAN as an passwo by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

    What we need is a law that says that any organization that uses a SSAN as a password does so entirely at its own risk and thereafter cannot take any action whatsoever which would be financially adverse to the holder of the SSAN.

    We basically already have such a law, but it depends how you see "financially adverse". Is it "financially adverse" for someone to have to spend hours on the phone cleaning up their credit? I guess it is, but I don't think anything stops you from suing the bank that put the information on your credit report for libel. It's just that most people aren't going to go through the trouble of doing that. Maybe what we need is a few really big class action suits.

  58. more details please... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...now that you've moved out - who & where please?

  59. Not our fault! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The thing you have to remember is the vast majority of people of voting age in Florida were not actually born here. Off the top of my head I can think of 5 people I know who are natives and that is including myself and my sibling. So if you northern states (I'm looking at you New York) would stop exporting the shallow end of the gene pool we might have a fighting chance.

  60. Politicians by Fluffyzips · · Score: 1

    I know that if something like this were to come to my attention regarding anywhere I have lived I would look up the names of the politicians; The mayors, city councils, police commissioners and print it out and mail it to them. There's probably more than a couple people who have already started collecting this priceless data about particular people because you know them, have a grudge or just because you can see their mortgages and know how much money they have!! I like government making itself more transparent through these means, in this case someone made a decision about this program without knowing enough about what it would do... I can't believe a politician in this country would do something like that.

  61. EVERYONE, DO THIS!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just simply open up a DOS prompt (if in windows) and type the following command before leaving your computer for the day, or even when you are using it.....
    Start->Run:"cmd"
    Then type:
    ping -t -l 1024 -f www.broward.org
    and be done with their foolishness (in time).

  62. Just a quick thought by elijahmm · · Score: 1

    This is my first slashdot post so please be kind..... It seems with all of the current problems identifying somebody a centralized active identification system is needed. What if the government were to have a verification system with a username, like social security number (public), and password(private) required. The password could be changed at any time by the individual. An individual could go into an office, like the RMV, and the clerk could use the picture on file and/or biometric scanning to verify identity. The interface could be as simple as a web page which simply returns a verified/not-verified field. Since the individual controlls the password it would greatly improve the security of their identity and records could be public without risk of them being used for fraudulent identification. Does this not seem like the type of service a government should provide? I know its rather idealistic but all ideas must start someplace. Any thoughts?

    1. Re:Just a quick thought by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Having a user-determined password works great- as long as you're a portion of the community who knows how to use a password. I know two people who leave passwords taped to their monitors and another who uses a their birthdate. And then you've got people who can't remember their passwords... If the password is used to confirm identity, what'll be the confirmation to confirm identity to have a password reset?

    2. Re:Just a quick thought by elijahmm · · Score: 1

      The confirmation to have a password reset would be physical appearance where a file photo or biometric scan can be utilized. I know it would be a pain to require physical appearance but in reality it is probably the only way to maintain security.

  63. I actually live in Broward by Aqua_boy17 · · Score: 1

    *sigh*
    I contacted both my County Mayor and Commisioner regarding this issue. To date, the only response I've gotten was from an aide to the County Mayor stating that she is unavailable, but that I can take my concerns to the county records office. They say they will fulfill requests to remove personal information on an individual basis. That's fine for me, but what about my family and friends? What about all the other taxpayers who don't even know this is going on. And as another astute reader put it, it's probably too late as the site no doubt has been scraped already. Great to see my tax dollars at work.

    If ever a sight deserved a slashdotting, this one does. Sadly, it looks like I can still negotiate around. Is /. losing its punch?

    --
    What if the Hokey Pokey really is what it's all about?
  64. Cmoe one, come all, into 1984 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hmmmmmm, let's trade a little bit of freedom for some more security....

    Biometric data, that can't be faked (wrong, but believe what they tell you!)
    How about we all get our fingerprints and iris scans and give that to the government.

    No more of this social security ID theft nonsense, right?

    I'm being ironical, just throwing a prediction out there, i pray it doesn't come true. But if you can't see a pattern forming...step back!

  65. Right, that's fine by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

    The problem is they treat it like a secret password. "Oh you know the last 4 digits of the SSN? You MUST be the real deal!" I have no problems with banks wanting SSNs. An SSN is a good unique identifier. A name doesn't cut it, you get collisions with names all the time. Even name and date of birth result in collisions. However name + DOB + SSN and you can be almost 100% certian to have no collisions. But that means, just like your name or DOB, it shouldn't be something you have to keep secret. There should be no power from people knowing it. I don't keep my birthday secret, but I do have to keep my SSN secret.

    That's what the GP meant. CC companies need to find another way of confirming identity.

  66. Florida governor J. Bush data there? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cool... I guess all this data about Governor J. Bush should be available then... I can't wait and see...

  67. Maricopa county in AZ has had it for years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maricopa county in AZ has had this for years, in fact I designed a datamining app for some real estate guys to mine specific documents on a daily basis.
    http://recorder.maricopa.gov/recdocdata/GetRecData Select.asp

  68. NOT phishing.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    More like PHISTING.

    My 2c.