Slashdot Mirror


Trojan Deletes Your Porn, Music & Warez

E. Vigilant writes "The new Trojan/Erazor-A has an interesting twist. In addition to deleting or disabling various security products and competing malware, it deletes any porn, warez and music in your P2P directories. While some opine that this trojan might have good intentions, remarkably few things infect the text files this trojan also deletes. No one yet knows who wrote this or why."

93 of 400 comments (clear)

  1. Altruism? I have my doubts... by TripMaster+Monkey · · Score: 5, Insightful

    From TFA:
    The assumption is that because the Trojan is only deleting certain file types in specific download directories used by P2P programs -- one of the main sources of inadvertent malware infection -- it is attempting to protect those it manages to infect.
    Well, that's a remarkably stupid assumption.

    What's more likely?
    1. The Trojan was designed to protect users from malware by deleting contents of P2P directories,
        - or -
    2. The Trojan was designed to strike a blow against P2P file sharers deleting contents of P2P directories.


    Let's analyze who benefits from each scenario:
    1. No one benefits, since the 'benefits' of having files that might be infected with malware deleted is more than offset by the security problems introduced by the deactivation of antivirus software, as well as the inadvertent deletion of many innocent files. Also, the Trojan writer, (in this scenario, a "Robin Hood" type character), receives no benefit other than a warm fuzzy feeling.

    2. RIAA, MPAA, and various software companies all realize tangible financial benefits as illegal file sharing is dealt a serious blow. Also, the Trojan writer, (in this scenario, a mercenary for hire) takes home a nice fat paycheck for a job well done.


    I pick avarice over sloppily executed altruism any day. I find it intriguing that this alternate explanation apparently didn't even occur to PC World.
    --
    ____

    ~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey

  2. Slashspin by eldavojohn · · Score: 4, Insightful
    First off, this article is pure bullshit spin. They mention several points about a virus and the whole time they attempt to spin it the reader as a "good intentions" virus--even comparing it to Charles Bronson. The Slashdot title reads "Trojan Deletes Your Porn, Music & Warez" but it doesnt, if you RTFA:
    The Windows Trojan/Erazer-A Trojan looks at default folders for downloading MP3, AVI, MPEG, WMV, Gif, Zip graphic and video files, and wipes anything it finds with these extensions in the target locations.
    Gosh, I have plenty of MP3, AVI, MPEG, WMV, Gif, Zip graphic and video files ... that aren't porn, illegal music & warez.

    What they fail to mention is that people who use P2P networks often want those files that they've collected. So this virus is destroying something they want.

    I mean, who installs eMule or Bit Torrent and then wishes that one day someone would come and save them from the files they've downloaded? The very idea is ludicrous.

    I use Bit Torrent. If a virus were to come and delete everything I've gotten from it (trailors, WoW patches, an odd assortment of legal videos and mp3s, etc), I don't know about you, but I would be right pissed. This isn't protection and it doesn't seem to discriminate from virile files and good files so it's pure and utter destruction.

    The only thing "beneficial" is seen from the eyes of the RIAA or MPAA.

    "I don't think this was written with good intentions because it attempts to turn off security," said Cluley. There would be nothing more dangerous than for people to become accustomed to the idea of "beneficial malware" because that might create a false sense of security.
    You "don't think" this was written with good intentions? A virus comes onto your machine, disables security & starts to delete files in directories with a certain naming convention. What more to do you need to say, "holy hell, I've got a freaking virus!"?
    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:Slashspin by Gumph · · Score: 5, Funny

      Gosh, I have plenty of MP3, AVI, MPEG, WMV, Gif, Zip graphic and video files ... that aren't porn, illegal music & warez.

      Excuse me Sir, we've had some complaints from the other clientele, could you hand in your /. ID on your way out.

      --
      'By the pricking of my thumbs, something wicked this way comes'
    2. Re:Slashspin by Fallen+Seraph · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I don't post on /. often but the end of this article forced my hand.
      Or is Trojan/Erazer-A the ultimate social engineering Trojan, one which fools people into accepting its beneficial promise, only to cause major problems when in its next incarnation as Trojan/Erazer-B or C?

      WTF?
      "Accepting it's beneficial promise"? Are there poeple out there with Kazaa or Limewire downloading gigabyte upon gigabyte of porn, illegal music, and movies unwillingly? Are they too illiterate to use the delete key? Do they have some weird sleep disorder where they unwittingly download?

      Last I checked, illegal or not, it's something people WANT. Is PC World trying to imply there's some fuckwit thinking "Oh wow! This virus deletes everything I download! This is great! I'm keeping this!" This virus isn't Charles Bronson "taking the law into its own hands." This virus is Jason Vorhees intruding upon a couple making out in their car.
      The assumption is that because the Trojan is only deleting certain file types in specific download directories used by P2P programs -- one of the main sources of inadvertent malware infection -- it is attempting to protect those it manages to infect.

      Have the writers of PC World ever even USED a computer? Because last I checked, disabling my antivirus software DOES NOT protect me. That's like someone telling you not to have sex and punching holes in your condoms.
  3. the first 'christian' virus? by humuhumunukunukuapu' · · Score: 2, Interesting

    is this the first shot on a new frontier in the war for morality?

    --
    i saw the baby, and the baby looked at me
    1. Re:the first 'christian' virus? by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 4, Funny

      Why the Christians, necessarily? A more likely culprit would be PETA, trying the protect all those cute fluffy kittens from the hand of a wrathful God.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    2. Re:the first 'christian' virus? by tehcyder · · Score: 2, Funny
      To some people Excel spreadsheets and Powerpoint presentations are very important.
      I don't think you're allowed to say that on slashdot are you?
      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    3. Re:the first 'christian' virus? by autOmato · · Score: 2, Funny
      mod parent up!

      Done. Now what?
  4. Finally! by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 5, Insightful
    *Applauds*

    Finally a threat that will make the average joe start to take computer security seriously! I look forward to a safe internet for everyone (I mean as soon as a few botnet node owner's loose their porn, peole will actually clean up their boxes!)

    On a more serious note, quoting the pcworld article:
    The Windows Trojan/Erazer-A Trojan looks at default folders for downloading MP3, AVI, MPEG, WMV, Gif, Zip graphic and video files, and wipes anything it finds with these extensions in the target locations.

    The assumption is that because the Trojan is only deleting certain file types in specific download directories used by P2P programs -- one of the main sources of inadvertent malware infection -- it is attempting to protect those it manages to infect. [emph mine]
    WTF? How could anyone think that it's to attempt to protect users when it doesn't delete executables from p2p folders? (for an interesting overview of real "white hat worms" see this vnunet article and the slashdot discussion on the blaster removal worm)

    This worm is clearly to scare people away from p2p - not protect them from other p2p malware.

    What's the bet that one of the companies that make oodles of money from content are behind this?
    --
    There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
    1. Re:Finally! by hal2814 · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Finally a threat that will make the average joe start to take computer security seriously!" Until a computer virus or trojan can come into your house, shave your eyebrows off while you're asleep, drink all your beer, and leave you with no toilet paper, the average joe will never take computer security seriously.

    2. Re:Finally! by Mayhem178 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      We can change that. All we need to do is modify this virus to delete *.doc, *.xls, and everything in the My Documents folder. Also, it should hijack IE, set his/her clock to January 1, 1900 (Y2K, anyone?), replace his/her desktop wallpaper with Goatse, and delete every link off his/her desktop and start menu.

      That should hit Average Joe User hard enough to make them feel like they got raped by a train.

      --

      "You will pay for your lack of vision..." - Emperor Palpatine to Ray Charles

    3. Re:Finally! by Salty+Moran · · Score: 2, Funny

      and everything in the My Documents folder.

      Considering the people I know, I think you'd be better off deleting documents from the Desktop... :\

    4. Re:Finally! by ajs318 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No. Your "Average Joe User", confronted with that scenario, will simply throw away his old, broken computer, go out and buy a new one, and then start filling that up with crap. And when that is thoroughly full of crap too, and slowing down and going to the wrong web site and crashing and files are going missing ..... rinse and repeat. Because going wrong is just something that computers do.

      Mind you, smart skip-divers probably will benefit from this.

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    5. Re:Finally! by Mayhem178 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Sorry for the double post, I just wanted to add something.

      Because going wrong is just something that computers do. I with you on this one. This kind of mentality is something that I try to quash anytime I'm fixing someone's computer. I always tell people that beyond taking a hammer, magnet, or cattle prod to a computer, it is remarkably difficult to truly harm it. As delicate as modern computers may seem, they are remarkably resilient. It's incredibly difficult to truly lose data (provided you're willing to pay the fee at a data recovery lab, in a worst-case scenario).

      I always tell people to think of viruses, malware, and spyware as an annoyance, not a plague. The motivation for patching, updating, and scanning for these things should be to prevent their spread, not to protect your own ass. Once people get into a "every man for themselves" mentality, then the malware moves beyond being an annoyance, and the writers of such malware have won.

      I remember when Blaster hit. I was working at a real estate office as their only IT guy (small office, about 25 computers total, including servers). Everyone was acting like it was Armageddon. I ended up spending half of my time trying to keep people calm. Time I could have spent solving the problem. Eventually I rounded up everyone (about 10 people) to explain the situation and a give them all a crash course in virus detection and prevention. Still, that particular day I ended up staying long after everyone had left the office so I could unplug every computer from the network, remove all the instances of Blaster (some had upwards of 2000 infected files), and patch the vulnerability.

      I think the real problem is that a lot of people don't view computers as flexible, ever-changing tools. They want to see them as embedded devices. Something that performs a small, finite set of tasks, always performs them in the exact same way, does not require any maintenance to function, and will work the same way 10 years from now as it does today. This simply isn't the case. I don't know if this spawns from laziness, computer illiteracy, or some combination of both. I've known people who simply don't want to take the time to get a basic understanding of how their computer works. They don't know and don't care, they just want it to perform a very limited set of tasks, and to hell with everything else. Of course, these same people are likely to buy a car and end up seizing the engine by never having the oil changed.

      --

      "You will pay for your lack of vision..." - Emperor Palpatine to Ray Charles

    6. Re:Finally! by lloydtesterman · · Score: 3, Funny

      Thank goodness, it was just a virus. I though I had a drinking problem.

  5. Geeks unite! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    All I know is that this is a very important problem we have to fix!! Destroying our financial records and stealing our identity is one thing. But touch a geek's pr0n collection ------- this means WAR!

    1. Re:Geeks unite! by Salty+Moran · · Score: 2, Funny

      I've hired, well, captured and enslaved, 150 people who go over all the code...

      So, basically, what you're saying here is that you're the President of Human Resources at EA Games?

  6. Seems obvious to me. by Jerk+City+Troll · · Score: 4, Funny

    Of course it would delete your porn! Trojan wants you to go out and have real sex.

    1. Re:Seems obvious to me. by mobby_6kl · · Score: 5, Funny

      Trojan wants you to go out and have real sex.

      They're not the only ones...

    2. Re:Seems obvious to me. by Tsen+Wrath · · Score: 2, Funny

      Wow, my harddrive has never had so much free space.

  7. It... deletes PR0N??!! by Noryungi · · Score: 5, Funny

    I feel a great disturbance in the Force... As if a millions Slashdot posters all cried out in anguish...

    --
    The right to offend is far more important than the right not to be offended. (Rowan Atkinson)
  8. Re:Altruism? I have my doubts... by Joebert · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What about the third scenario ?

    3) Virus writers stage this to make it look like the RIAA, MPAA, ect, are "pulling a Sony" in an attempt to pull a classic "Throw a rock at the bee hive the ranger is standing next to so BooBoo can grab the pic-a-nic basket".

    --
    Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
  9. Re:Thank god! by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Thank god! I use linux!"

    I thought Linux supported porn by now.

    --

    "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

  10. 0h n03z my pr0n h4s b33n st0l3d!!!11! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny
    The new Trojan/Erazor-A has an interesting twist. In addition to deleting or disabling various security products and competing malware, it deletes any porn, warez and music.


    This thing could delete the Internet

    As for the Who and the Why. I blame the RI/MP Ass's. of America.
  11. Apple needs to jump on this quickly! by dimer0 · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... and make a new commercial!

    [old guy is coughing, wheezing, ...]

    [young guy] On a mac, you don't have to worry about losing your pr0n and warez!

    [young asian chic to young guys right seductively takes leg and wraps it around young guys waist]

    [cut to pic of imac]

    1. Re:Apple needs to jump on this quickly! by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 3, Funny

      "[young asian chic to young guys right seductively takes leg and wraps it around young guys waist]"

      [young asian chic opens mouth to talk, unsupported audio codec message appears, young guy just shrubs]

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

  12. The next headline on slashdot.... by TheOldSchooler · · Score: 5, Funny

    Storage Space Mysteriously Triples on File Servers around the World.

    1. Re:The next headline on slashdot.... by barefootgenius · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Storage Space Mysteriously Triples on File Servers around the World." So true!

      --
      /. bug #926803 - Why I can post.
  13. Nice to see a destructive payload for once by fatphil · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Without the pain of personal loss, lusers will not be so inclined to tighten up their system. So what if I'm part of a botnet? I'm not using the machine overnight anyway...

    Happy LARTing,
    FatPhil

    --
    Also FatPhil on SoylentNews, id 863
  14. THIS IS WAR! by Progman3K · · Score: 5, Funny

    First they came for my credit card data, since I did not have Visa, I said nothing.
    Then they came phishing for my bank account info, since I did not have a bank account, I said nothing.
    Then they came for my porn...

    --
    I don't know the meaning of the word 'don't' - J
  15. Re:Altruism? I have my doubts... by WidescreenFreak · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I agree with you very infrequently, but this is one of those infrequent times. Either someone who is good at coding is on a major "hoiler-than-thou", ethics spree or this is the result of a bigger source hiring this person. I completely agree with you on the latter.

    But on the other hand, this is not necessarily a bad thing for the rest of us. Most of the people who would be come infected by this - and consequently lose all of their P2P data - are probably Joe User types who don't know any better. So, this might -- I stress might -- actually be a benefit in even minimal ways:

    • Fewer people for the RIAA to sue because their files got wiped out (then again, I like seeing them demonize themselves)
    • Fewer excuses to claim that P2P is taking away oh-so-much estimated revenue (see above statement about self-demonizing)
    • Likelihood of poisoned files getting wiped out also
    • Those who get smacked with it might actually learn something about this trivial thing called a "virus scanner"

    I list the above points with a bit of sarcasm, of course, because I doubt that this will really have any impact on the above. But I don't doubt that the last item will come into play very often, which could actually be better for the rest of us overall.
    --
    The Overrated mod is for reversing inappropriate, positive mods, not for voicing disagreement with a post.
  16. Aiming poorly? by iogan · · Score: 4, Funny

    The Windows Trojan/Erazer-A Trojan looks at default folders for downloading MP3, AVI, MPEG, WMV, Gif, Zip graphic and video files, and wipes anything it finds with these extensions in the target locations.
    (...)
    "The Erazer Trojan is a vigilante worthy of a Charles Bronson movie, taking the law into its own hands. However, it's perfectly possible for the Trojan to aim poorly and wipe out innocent files too," commented Graham Cluley of Sophos.


    Aiming poorly? Yeah, if carpet bombing a country to hit a dart board is what you mean by aiming poorly...

    1. Re:Aiming poorly? by meringuoid · · Score: 4, Funny
      Aiming poorly? Yeah, if carpet bombing a country to hit a dart board is what you mean by aiming poorly...

      Careful with such analogies. There'll be a bunch of loyal American patriots along in a minute to tell you how wrong you are, and that it's not aiming poorly, it's an enlightened foreign policy.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    2. Re:Aiming poorly? by computational+super · · Score: 4, Funny

      If you're not with us, you're against us, and that didn't sound "with us" enough for me. The air force will be preparing your neighborhood for a Haliburton contract in five minutes.

      --
      Proud neuron in the Slashdot hivemind since 2002.
  17. Ain't the first trojan to act like this by Opportunist · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The only "real" news is that it deletes the content of P2P folders (ok, not really "new" either but at least far from usual).

    That a trojan kills other trojans is hardly news. About a year ago two groups actually led a battle where one group tried to stab the other group's trojans (and vice versa) with their updates. Some trojans also use the names other trojans use to ensure those trojans can't install after they're already in. Makes detecting them correctly (i.e. as a different beast, not a new version) not really easier.

    Almost every trojan today has some anti-anti-trojan functions. Killing Kaspersky, McAfee and Norton AV is more or less a standard feature of most current Trojans, so I wouldn't really call that news either.

    The only outstanding feature that's hardly common is the deletion of incoming P2P objects. Which makes one wonder who ... well, cui bono?

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  18. Re:Altruism? I have my doubts... by phyrebyrd · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I see an option 3 here.

    3) A strike against the MPAA, RIAA and any other "law abiding" corporation (who manages to be capable of CREATING those very laws) by targeting the computers that seed the incomplete, misnamed and intentionally infected files and the files on computers that have downloaded from them by users stupid enough to download things under 1kb.

    Any smart P2P user changes the default directories to customize their own bitspace so it's easier for the person using the software to find what they've downloaded, not to mention archive on another device or media those files they truly wish to retain.

    Do note that I did say *smart*.

    --
    "When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty." -Thom
  19. Translation please.. by JamesTRexx · · Score: 4, Insightful

    remarkably few things infect the text files this trojan also deletes.

    Ehmm... What?

    --
    home
    1. Re:Translation please.. by someone300 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Some of my text files seem to be infected with a pox of periods, an abscess of ampersands, or an eruption of exclamation marks

      That's just perl

  20. Re:Altruism? I have my doubts... by casings · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Yea, like the RIAA and the MPAA are going to release a virus on the public, which could cost them billions, look how well that turned out for Sony...

    In actuality it was probably just some stupid kid who, and probably rightfully so, thought the only thing of any value to anyone on their computers are either text files, or have downloaded from some p2p or similar site.

    Honestly if you were looking to cause the most damage to anyones computer, it would be to strike at their heart, their downloaded music.

  21. Avarice by Mark_MF-WN · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Avarice isn't too bad a theory, but I have trouble believing that the RIAA/MPAA could be so dumb. Sony is still in hot water over a badly designed piece of supposedly legitimate software. This is the kind of thing that could land people in JAIL. Suppose the virus gets onto a government computer and erases some legitimate files? What about a military computer? The US military has demonstratibly poor computer security. This could cause them huge problems if it got loose.

    My theory is that this was made by someone who WANTS people to think that the RIAA made it, so that even more people will turn against them and take some heat off of P2P.

    1. Re:Avarice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I can't believe that you can't believe that they are so dumb!

      Sony is still in hot water over a badly designed piece of supposedly legitimate software.

      What hot water? They installed ROOTKITS on their music CDs, not "a badly designed piece of software." The software was well designed, it did exactly what Sony wanted it to. The rootkit was blatantly illegal, breaking several felony laws. You might want to see what happens to an American citizen who installs rootkits.

      I don't see any Sony executives in prison for this, do you? I don't see any big fines or any criminal prosecution whatever.

      Had some Sony execs gone to the slammer, or had Sony been forced into Chapter 13 I'd agree with you. But the Sony fiasco showed the **AA that they can do any damned thing they want, no matter how destructive or illegal, and not get in any trouble whatever.

      No, this was either the RIAA, the MPAA, or more likely one of their members. My money says Sony is the criminal organization that did this. The rootkit fiasco showed that they are not above breaking the law, destroying private property, or shitting on their customers.

      -mcgrew

    2. Re:Avarice by tbone1 · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I have trouble believing that the RIAA/MPAA could be so dumb.

      I don't. I've seen how dumb large organizations can be.

      --

      The Independent: Reverend Spooner Arrested in Friar Tuck Incident - ISIHAC, Historical Headlines
    3. Re:Avarice by 1u3hr · · Score: 2, Informative
      What's more, why porn? Music - RIAA would love to attack P2P music services. Movies - substitue MPAA for RIAA and the same applies. Warez, you got the BSA... But who the heck cares about porn?

      I note that stupid as the article in PC World was, that the Slashdot editors went one better. PCW didn't even mention "porn" or "warez" in TFA.

      The trojan deletes ANY FILES it finds in various standard locations used to share files by P2P. As for "attacking malware"; more anthropomorphic fantasy. If anyone has actually put malware into mp3 or mpeg files I haven't heard of it.

    4. Re:Avarice by Esteban · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I have trouble believing that the RIAA/MPAA could be so dumb.
      I don't. I've seen how dumb large organizations can be.

      I worked for one of RIAA's lawfirms, handling antipiracy stuff in the late '90s, and while I wouldn't say they're dumb, by any stretch, they weren't very subtle, and they weren't very concerned with potential negative press. At least inside the office, there was a feeling of "we're defending the artists!" The concern seemed to be that people pirating music just didn't realize what they were doing. This view is still recognizable in those pre-movie spots the moral of which seems to be "Copying or downloading is stealing."
  22. Re:Uhoh by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 4, Funny

    Don't worry if this thing deletes them. I've got them backed up for you.

    --
    This guy's the limit!
  23. Re:Altruism? I have my doubts... by Bogtha · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The first thing I thought was that it was well intentioned - in the long run.

    The general public have demonstrated time and time again that they really don't care about security. They'll put up with their computer slowing down and crashing, they'll put up with random popup ads, they'll put up with their computer being used to spam people...

    ...but take away their porn and music? The virus seems to be designed to piss the computer user off as much as possible without actually causing any real damage or impairing the computer's operation. It seems to me that the virus writer did it to get people to take notice of viruses in future.

    Removing virus vectors doesn't solve the problem in the long run. Ultimately, only education will do that. This is a form of education, a lesson that will actually sink in.

    --
    Bogtha Bogtha Bogtha
  24. Add option #4 by WidescreenFreak · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Call me cynical, but add:

    4) Write a trojan to wipe out what people apparently consider to be important so that they are more aware of virus scanners.

    Hmmm... would the various anti-virus companies do something like this to advertise the need for their products on people who lose gigs and gigs of files to a trojan? Nahhh....

    --
    The Overrated mod is for reversing inappropriate, positive mods, not for voicing disagreement with a post.
    1. Re:Add option #4 by grub · · Score: 2, Insightful


      Hmmm... would the various anti-virus companies do something like this to advertise the need for their products on people who lose gigs and gigs of files to a trojan?

      I was thinking the same thing, however, the bug actively kills a lot of AV processes. Advertising "Our Version X was killed by that bug, but Version Y is unbreakable!" doesn't instill confidence in the user.

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    2. Re:Add option #4 by Chelloveck · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Even simpler:

      4) Write a trojan to wipe out what people apparently consider to be important just because the trojan writer is a prick.

      --
      Chelloveck
      I give up on debugging. From now on, SIGSEGV is a feature.
    3. Re:Add option #4 by collectivescott · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's a cute arguement, but you're missing the point. With file sharing, the record companies aren't deprived of anything when you download a song (discounting theoretical future sales). However, if someone deletes files off of your computer, you are deprived of your music. If someone broke into your computer and deleted your graduate thesis, I'd bet you'd consider that a crime. Probably vandalism rather than theft, but still a crime. The key point here is deprivation.

    4. Re:Add option #4 by Kadin2048 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Huh? That doesn't make any sense, even in the way you're trying to use it.

      If I copy your file, you have a copy, I have a copy. Nobody has lost anything. Therefore, it can't possibly be called stealing by most people's definitions.

      If I copy your file and then delete the original, then I have it and you don't, that I think we can all agree, is stealing. Likewise, if it's on physical media which only one of us can possess at a time, and I take the physical media, then it's also stealing.

      If I delete something without taking a copy, then it's not stealing, it's just vandalism or destruction of your stuff.

      You are mis-stating the argument you're trying to make fun of (the "it's not physical so therefore not stealing") and so your parody falls flat. The fact that data isn't physical isn't the important part, it's the fact that nobody loses their copy in a typical "pirate" transaction. That's what differentiates it from "theft" in the minds of many people.

      Personally, I think that unauthorized copying is not theft, but might meet the qualifications for wrongful conversion of property, if you take a wide enough definition of 'property.' (So as not to limit it to real property and chattels, but include the value of data as well.) See this page. Normally it applies only to physical goods. At any rate, there are existing sections of law which are more appropriately applied to the reduction-in-value that occurs when data is unlawfully copied than theft and larceny.

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    5. Re:Add option #4 by Trigun · · Score: 2, Funny

      Send me a copy, and I'll be part of your distributed backup strategy!

    6. Re:Add option #4 by mathmathrevolution · · Score: 3, Funny

      No Kidding. I need to pirate a fresh copy of Norton Anti-Virus off some P2P service before I fall victim to such a Trojan.

    7. Re:Add option #4 by tbannist · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Most viruses/worms/trojans now exist to build a bot net for nefarious purposes. Assuming the analysis of this virus is correct and that it does not install a rootkit and/or bot the machine, then either the virus writer has a different motive for making the virus.

      Now given all the scenarios suggested the most least unlikely alternative is that the person who wrote the virus is a jerk who simply seeks to destroy the files that other people spent time downloading. This type of asshat behaviour is certainly not uncommon or unexpected among the expected demographic of the virus writer, ie. young males with too much time on their hands.

      Given that this was previously a common reason for releasing damaging viruses in the past, the current wave of professional viruses does not preclude the occasional amateur releasing his own claim to infamy.

      To me, this appears to be the assumption that requires the least additional supposition.
      It's not necessarily correct, but seems like the most plausible explanation, barring additional information.

      --
      Fanatically anti-fanatical
  25. Dear lord by Rendo · · Score: 3, Funny

    I felt a great disturbance from the Net, as if millions of gigs of porn suddenly cried out in terror and were suddenly deleted.

  26. Re:Where's the FUD now? by A+beautiful+mind · · Score: 2, Funny

    As soon as someone comes up with a good looking GUI for it.

    "Oooh shiny!" [click] [click]

    --
    It takes a man to suffer ignorance and smile
    Be yourself no matter what they say
  27. RIAA STRIKES BACK !!! by unity100 · · Score: 2

    Next : RIAA fleet to plunder coastal towns whose citizens are known to indulgue in p2p.

    Planned : RIAA prison camps full of former p2p people to be used as slave labor in music industry.

    You wont be hiding ... You wont be escaping ... Its coming ... Its RIAA ...

    Coming to a theatre near you this summer ... The RIAA Strikes Back !!!

    Official site : www.riaastrikesbackwithfear.com

  28. Not cool by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 2, Funny
    There is an unwritten law that you do not touch a man's pr0n. Period. He could have slept with your wife and added pictures of her to his collection, and still, you do not touch his pr0n.

    These people have gone too far. If I get infected by this I'm going straight to the FBI, this is too serious to joke about.

    --
    Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
  29. Re:Altruism? I have my doubts... by Zeinfeld · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I think the chance that this is a distraction is much greater than any other motive suggested. It is very unlikely that someone whose moral compass is so broken that they spend their time writing viruses is that upset about other law breakers. I suspect that the author has huge amounts of stolen software and music. More likely this is just a nasty, vicious little perp who is thinking of a way to do something nasty and vicious. Maybe they think that this type of attack is less likely to be taken seriously by the authorities (wrong) or less likely to lead to criminal complaints (right, but there will be enough complaints). Another strong possibility is that the criminals calculate that creating security paranoia is useful for their business and this is a way to increase concern. They will probably follow up with a marketting campaign selling hijacked copies of anti-virus software. Regardless of what immediate damage is caused every trojan has to be treated as if it was intended to be used for phishing.

    --
    Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
    Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
  30. Re:So? by Patrik_AKA_RedX · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If they're not smart enough to use some A/V correctly, why do you assume they'll manage to figure out what a "fileserver" is, let alone how to setup and use one?
    How about we write a malware proof OS. That's orders of magnitudes easier that the above.

  31. The boss by SurfSlade · · Score: 2, Funny

    I fowarded the story to my boss,
    Five min later he ask me for a full back-up of his PC

    I wonder why.....

    1. Re:The boss by dohzer · · Score: 2, Funny

      Because he realised that you've been sitting on your arse doing nothing but read /. posts for the last hour?

  32. PC World couldn't read the Sophos article! by flokemon · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The article on the Sophos website actually puts things as they are.
    The PC World rehash just (deliberately?) misinterprets it.

    Let's have a wee comparison:

    Sophos: - "The Erazer Trojan targets internet users it believes are involved in piracy, but fails to discriminate between the true criminals and those who may have MP3 music files or home movies that they have created themselves. Malware is not the way to fight internet piracy."

    PC World: - "A "vigilante" Trojan, that attempts to protect infected PCs from the effects of malware caught while using peer-to-peer file-sharing networks, has been discovered."

    Now how they came up with that from the Sophos article is beyond my understanding.

  33. New Service by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 4, Funny

    Greetings, all.

    I just wanted to offer my new backup service for all who of you who fear this trojan. Just contact me so we can arrange transfers. Please do not be wary of my generosity, for helping is its own reward.

    --

    "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

  34. Re:Altruism? I have my doubts... by mgblst · · Score: 2, Insightful

    look how well that turned out for Sony...
     
    So what exactly happened to Sony - some bad press, that I only saw on the tv news once. Has anybody stopped buying sony gear? Has their share price dropped? Are they in court? No, no, no... so nothing has actually happened to Sony over this. Sure, we may hate them here and a few over places on the net, but most people don't care enough. I hated them before because of Atrac and their crappy software.

  35. paraphrasing... by Churla · · Score: 2

    Never attest to malice what can be adequately attributed to stupidity.

    In this case I think it's stupidity to create a virus that deletes the files it would be most likely to be able to propogate itself through.

    Maybe some little hacker kiddie got caught wanking it by his mom and she deleted all his pr0n so he's on a "if I can't have it nobody can" rampage.

    --
    I'm a fiscal conservative, it's a pity we don't have a political party anymore
  36. I can only conclude that people at PC World ain't by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I can only conclude that people at PC World ain't got a clue about PC's. Since when can .avi .mp3 etc etc contain virusses or malware?

    If it only deleted .exe .bat .com etc etc then I could understand the logic BUT deleting media files does not protect anyone.

    They almost touch on the simplest explenation. Vigilante. Believe it or not but there are some individuals who feel they have a need to stop others from downloading via p2p.

    They would be intrested in deleting any media files you downloaded via p2p. They would not be protecting you but making your (in their eyes illegal) activity worthless. So that explains why they delete harmless files.

    It also explains why they try to disable security programs, yet another punishment. That way you are far more at risk from using P2P by being infected. The logic being that pirates do not deserve to be safe.

    Vigilante seeking to punish p2p users. Not the RIAA and not some guardian angel. The RIAA would have to have some extremly bad lawyers to have allowed this and a guardian angel would only destroy files wich put you at risk and not disable security software.

    Vigilantes have done stuff like this before. It falls in the same field as those "jezus loves you" posts in porn usenet groups. Or so I been told. Not that I would know anything about that offcourse.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  37. Re:Thank god! by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 4, Funny

    "You are free to look at porn if you want to. Most dont, but you can."

    Most Linux users don't look at porn? Didn't that all change when KDE came along and you didn't need both hands available?

    --

    "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

  38. Re:Altruism? I have my doubts... by d!rtyboy · · Score: 3, Insightful
    The general public have demonstrated time and time again that they really don't care about security. They'll put up with their computer slowing down and crashing, they'll put up with random popup ads, they'll put up with their computer being used to spam people...

    That is so true. I can't count the amount of people I've met that have weatherbug or whatever on their computer and I explain to them that it has spyware, then I remove it and the spyware. Then a day or so later, they're like, "WTF? You deleted weatherbug" and I find they've reinstalled it. People just don't care, and I don't expect to ever understand why.

    --
    ~ So sayeth the wise Alaundo
  39. Re:Altruism? I have my doubts... by BaltikaTroika · · Score: 2, Funny
    I pick avarice over sloppily executed altruism any day.

    In related news, dictionary.com has suffered the slashdot effect after a massive spike in searches for the definitions of "avarice" and "altruism".

  40. Re:I can only conclude that people at PC World ain by d!rtyboy · · Score: 2, Informative

    "I can only conclude that people at PC World ain't got a clue about PC's. Since when can .avi .mp3 etc etc contain virusses or malware?"

    You can stick a virus in a jpeg, so I don't see why you couldn't stick one in an avi, etc. Of course, I'm not the worlds leading virus expert...

    Though I do agree with the rest of your post. I was wondering why they were calling it a "vigilante" virus at all. I thought I was going a little crazy untill I read my thoughts here in the posts.

    --
    ~ So sayeth the wise Alaundo
  41. Re:Altruism? I have my doubts... by Zephyros · · Score: 3, Insightful
    ...without actually causing any real damage or impairing the computer's operation.

    Um, maybe it's just me, but I'd call disabling antivirus impairing the computer's operation. Yeah, sure, it's not installing a spam zombie client, but it is unlocking the door for someone who will...

  42. Add option #5 by Foobar+of+Borg · · Score: 4, Funny
    5) Pat Robertson and Jerry Falwell want to wipe out pr0n from the internet, so they assemble a team of computer experts and tell them, "Pr0n is the 5ux0rs! We need 1337 h@x0r5 to pwn their warez, w00t, w00t!"

    Or, maybe not...

    1. Re:Add option #5 by Foobar+of+Borg · · Score: 4, Funny
      You spelled "teh" and "there" wrong. Or did you mean "they're"?

      You are right (*sniff*). I'm afraid I'm only 1336 (*sniff*)...

    2. Re:Add option #5 by commodoresloat · · Score: 3, Funny

      ... and I, for one, welcome our new Trojan overlords!

    3. Re:Add option #5 by wheany · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Of course he meant they're, he meant to use the possessive form. Possessive forms have apostrophes. Duh!

  43. Where can I find a Linux version? by WhiteWolf666 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Once again, this is Windows only.

    Damn! Obviously, Linux isn't ready for the home user.

    --
    WhiteWolf666 an exBush supporter. All you new-school,compassionate,save the children Republicans can rot in hell
  44. bruce lee kills trojans. by jasonevans · · Score: 2, Interesting

    maybe the person who wrote the trojan, wrote it to be an asshole with no other intentions in mind; besides to be annoying. Many people who are infected with trojans/other tyes of virus' are not that internet/computer savy. When they engage in illeagle file trading they typically use p2p networks such as lime wire, where it is much easier to download malware and what not. Lets face it, the most popular types of files to download are pretty much porn and music. So theres no better way to piss a ton of people off other than deleting what they value most on their computers. Just my thought.

  45. Re:Altruism? I have my doubts... by skarphace · · Score: 3, Informative

    bad press

    Went away already.

    cd recall

    So they could remove the rootkit. However, their key software is still on their disks.

    and class action lawsuits

    Oh yeah, those are going great...

    --
    Bullish Machine Tzar
  46. Add option #5 by Sigg3.net · · Score: 5, Funny

    Not even that:

    5) Trojan not only sentient, but self-sustainable and conventionally biased. Will take over the world.

    Proof of Intelligent Design? You be the judge.

  47. Re:I can only conclude that people at PC World ain by skarphace · · Score: 4, Informative

    Since when can .avi .mp3 etc etc contain virusses or malware?

    Since the people making the media players haven't figured out how to properly code. It is definetly possible to get infected or compromized via a media file. Look at the whole Microsoft image rendering problem a few months ago. One look at a specially crafted image on a website and you're compromized.

    --
    Bullish Machine Tzar
  48. #5. evolution theory. by leuk_he · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Option 5: Delete all competing content from the p2p directories so the upload bandwidth is fully available to the virus and it does not have to share the upload bandthwith with other content (like p0rn).

    It is called evolution theory, this virus kills of the weaker content to spread itself.

    Note that is also stops process like "gator". this virus allows no competition.

  49. Re:Add option #5 ... unless ... by WidescreenFreak · · Score: 4, Funny

    Unless it also displays a dialog box stating that, "The Lord has decided that thou hast broken the following commandments: Thou Shalt Not Steal and Thou Shalt Not Have Naughty Thoughts. Your files have been deleted according to the rights granted to us by God as his Holy Warriors, and your screen saver is now made of publicity stills from The Passion of the Christ. Go with God."

    Then, maybe so... :)

    --
    The Overrated mod is for reversing inappropriate, positive mods, not for voicing disagreement with a post.
  50. Re:Altruism? I have my doubts... by Jeremi · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Then a day or so later, they're like, "WTF? You deleted weatherbug" and I find they've
    reinstalled it. People just don't care, and I don't expect to ever understand why


    People assume that anything that happens on their computer is visible in the GUI. Therefore if weatherbug doesn't pop up a requester saying "I'm spying on you now, please type something interesting", naive people will assume it's not doing that.


    I suspect this misapprehension will change only through hard experience.

    --


    I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
  51. sorry ;) by miruku · · Score: 5, Funny

    6) profit!!

    --
    MilkMiruku
  52. Virtual machines by macdaddy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This also emphasizes why all P2P users should quarantine their P2P software inside a virtual machine. VMWare's recently renamed VMWare Server" product is free and is a perfect way to isolate your P2P software from the rest of your machine. I actually employ this method myself. Much of the documentation I download is infected and this method prevents that infection from getting back to the host server. Plus it's quite easy to rollback changes to a time before the infection and start over.

  53. No way, that would ever happen by budword · · Score: 5, Funny

    There is no way Pat Robertson and Jerry Falwell would ever risk their own secret porn stash. The parent is clearly a troll.

  54. Does anybody know what this is supposed to mean? by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 2, Informative

    While some opine that this trojan might have good intentions, remarkably few things infect the text files this trojan also deletes.

    I've attempted to read that sentence about a dozen times, and I have no clue what the writer's trying to say.

  55. It's not Slashdot where the spin is! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    > First off, this article is pure bullshit spin. They mention several points about a virus and the whole time they attempt to spin it the reader as a "good intentions" virus--even comparing it to Charles Bronson. The Slashdot title reads "Trojan Deletes Your Porn, Music & Warez" but it doesnt, if you RTFA:

    Hi. Just FYI, I wrote the article submitted to Slashdot precisely to correct this idiotic story (Slashdot should hopefully get picked up by Google, etc. and thus be more available to those who will read this). I think the writer over there was trying to find an angle on it and couldn't get past "P2P == bad, viruses == bad" so they fell back on one of the "content" industry talking points (and I use the word "content" loosely).

    To anyone who has a functioning brain, the fact that it deletes your files, installs a keylogger, and disables security products (as well as a few incidental bits of competing malware) is more than enough to realize that it has only malicious intentions.

  56. Re:Altruism? I have my doubts... by Politburo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Weatherbug is what I call "functional spyware" in that it does provide a real function in addition to it's spying functions. Most spyware now fits this profile, but the original spyware, Gator, did not.

    When removing functional spyware you must attempt to provide a replacement application that can do the same function. The user in your scenario can't be bothered to go to a website to get the weather, so you might want to try finding another weather tray tool. I don't know of any off the top of my head but there have to be several out there.

    Furthermore, Weatherbug is a special case as they've managed to grow into a legitimate brand. The weather promo here on ABC in DC is the "Weatherbug Network". For the average user, something like that really legitimizes the software, whether it's deserved or not.

    People just don't care, and I don't expect to ever understand why.

    It doesn't sound like you're trying to understand. From what I can tell (2 mins on google), Weatherbug modified their program and it is no longer spyware.

  57. sounds like an overly elaborate plan gone bust :) by koroviev+(begemot) · · Score: 2, Funny

    ..which makes you connect to P2P again/more often to download "da stuff" again i.e. helping the trojan spread, by increasing online time and P2P time. OR makes you go out and play. tsts. evil geniuses can be beneficial sometimes, when they miss something :)

  58. Re:Altruism? I have my doubts... by iamlucky13 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Dude, people didn't even listen when the blaster worm came out with its bug that would give a 60 second warning before shutting down the computer. We tried to explain to them what was going on, why they needed an AV suite, why they needed to run Windows Update, and why they shouldn't click on popups and stuff, and they ignored it. I was still removing blaster occasionally from people's computers 2 years after Microsoft released the patch. There were people who would ask what all the fuss was about, to whom I would explain, including about how the virus made your computer shut down for no reason, and a week later they would call me up asking if I could figure out why their computer shut down at 2 PM every day. My words went in one ear and out the other. There were people who's systems I reformatted to get rid of blaster, set Windows update to automatic, and installed AVG. Sure enough, give 'em just two or three weeks and they either downloaded an infected file or opened up an unprotected network share (something else I told them not to do).

    A message saying "You been haxored, grow a brain" would just get a "Whatever, my computer still works moron" response (or better yet, "but the Norton scan came up clean..."). If shutting down while a student was typing a paper due the next day (and hadn't saved yet) didn't inspire a little bit of sensibility, I seriously doubt deleting a few music files will. Especially since most users definitely seem to be shifting away from P2P in favor of legal music sources, and probably wouldn't have much targeted by this trojan.

    Crusading against pornography and file-sharing seems far more likely.

  59. What about non porn files? by LinuxRulz · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Last time I scanned my system for porn, all that was detected was LaTex (which isn't porn). I hope it doesn't delete tex files or I know a lot of people who will get frustrated.