Slashdot Mirror


Japanese Lab Creates 'Da Vinci' Voices

Mikki writes "Using methods employed in criminal investigations, the Japan Acoustic Lab has analyzed the skeletal structures of Leonardo Da Vinci and Mona Lisa's faces to replicate how their voices would have sounded." While Da Vinci is cool, I can think of a slew of other deceased notables worth talking with as well.

183 comments

  1. I, for one... by Solra+Bizna · · Score: 5, Funny

    *is brutally killed before finishing the meme*

    -:sigma.SB

    --
    WARN
    THERE IS ANOTHER SYSTEM
    1. Re:I, for one... by DrSkwid · · Score: 5, Funny

      That's ok, we can re-create your typing style from your skeleton and finish the job

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    2. Re:I, for one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod parent funny! it's a reference to The Da Vinci Code!

    3. Re:I, for one... by theTerribleRobbo · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Solra! What are you doing here?! o_O

      Gods, I thought you'd have something more to say than the beginning of some lame meme. :\

      - Tol Kerhys

      (Note to mods: Sorry, he's a chap from some game I play. This post is completely offtopic.)

    4. Re:I, for one... by IndigoParadox · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      What's funny is that I haven't even read that yet and I still got it. =OP

    5. Re:I, for one... by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      But, due to the Japanese engineers who develop the skeletal typographical style, the resulting model re-creation of your typing style will only be able to output Kanji or Engrish.

      --
      You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
    6. Re:I, for one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Calling Leonardo: "Da Vinci" is like calling me: "From Bronx"

    7. Re:I, for one... by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 1

      So you're the only person anyone's ever heard of from Bronx then?

      --
      <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
  2. Ergh - yuk. by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    1) Promotion of lame movie.

    2) IE 6 Only.

    Please don't post this sort of crap (that's so hard to watch) again.

    --
    There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
    1. Re:Ergh - yuk. by jginspace · · Score: 3, Informative
      2)IE 6 Only.

      Huh? TFA opens fine in Opera and IE...

      The "(Leonardon) Da Vinci referece = promotion of lame movie" stance I shall ignore.

    2. Re:Ergh - yuk. by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Huh? TFA opens fine in Opera and IE...

      And the article contains a link to the MSN IE 6.0 only site, where you can actually listen to the clips the article discusses (they appear to be wmp only audio files too)

      Utterly typical of MS to attempt to force their crap software on the world (but thank god its only a link to their crap content).

      --
      There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
    3. Re:Ergh - yuk. by jginspace · · Score: 1
      TFA opens fine in Opera and IE...

      Sorry ... meant to say "Opera and Firefox".

      (And sorry about the atrocious typing.)

    4. Re:Ergh - yuk. by 8ball629 · · Score: 1
      1) Promotion of lame movie.

      2) IE 6 Only.

      Must... destroy.... MS...

      *falls over*
    5. Re:Ergh - yuk. by PFI_Optix · · Score: 1

      Utterly typical of MS to attempt to force their crap software on the world (but thank god its only a link to their crap content).

      God forbid they use the software they developed on the website they created to create the content they're providing to you at no cost.

      It's no different than other proprietary formats like Real Audio. It sucks that they exist, but don't make it into more than it is.

      --
      120 characters for a sig? That's bloody useless.
    6. Re:Ergh - yuk. by chrish · · Score: 1

      It's on MSN, what did you expect? Ads for the new Mac laptops?

      --
      - chrish
    7. Re:Ergh - yuk. by Kimos · · Score: 1
      The "(Leonardon) Da Vinci referece = promotion of lame movie" stance I shall ignore.
      People who cared about art cared about Da Vinci before. Now that the book/movie has hit American (and subsequently lots of other parts of the world unfortunately) pop culture, everyone all of a sudden has an interest in this particular great master. It's sad but predictably true. This would never have gotten the press, or possibly would have even happened at all, had it not been for the book/film. *deep sigh*
    8. Re:Ergh - yuk. by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 1

      It's on MSN, what did you expect? Ads for the new Mac laptops?

      I wasn't complaining about the article per se, but the fact that slashdot linked to it.

      --
      There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
    9. Re:Ergh - yuk. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The whole "Da Vinci code" thing is stupid anyway. It shows how gullible people are by saying it is based on fact. The guy who started that whole thing in the 60's even admitted to it.

    10. Re:Ergh - yuk. by blincoln · · Score: 1

      2) IE 6 Only.

      I started up IE to view the site instead of Firefox, and it seemed to have some editorializing of its own to do. I didn't have the Japanese language pack installed, so all the non-English characters were replaced by squares. On my task manager, it looked like it was yelling "MS Nooooooooooooooooo," Anakin Skywalker-style.

      --
      "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
    11. Re:Ergh - yuk. by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      Huh? TFA opens fine in Opera and IE...

      Not TFA referenced that has the actual content.

      The "(Leonardon) Da Vinci referece = promotion of lame movie" stance I shall ignore.

      From TFA "The voices are part of the intense promotion of the Hollywood film on Microsoft's Japanese site."

      And the whole story is bullshit anyway. The methodology:

      For Leonardo, Suzuki made his voice around the time when he was 60 years old to match his bearded face in the famous sketched portrait. "Because the beard covers his jaws in his portrait, we could not tell his exact skeletal features. We assumed that he had a heavy-jowled face, giving him a nice, bass tone," Suzuki says.
      I suppose it's appropriate to use bogus science to promote a movie based on bogus history.
    12. Re:Ergh - yuk. by Wabbit+Wabbit · · Score: 1

      Agreed. No digg. Ooops, wrong site.

      --
      Nothing is inexplicable; only unexplained -Tom Baker, Doctor Who
    13. Re:Ergh - yuk. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      God forbid they use the software they developed on the website they created to create the content they're providing to you at no cost. It's no different than other proprietary formats like Real Audio. It sucks that they exist, but don't make it into more than it is.

      The ability to do a thing is not sufficient justification to do a thing.

      You can get better results (quality per bitrate wise) by using fully open codecs than by using Microsoft's. They chose to use them, and fully deserve any beratement that comes their way.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  3. Fine, but... by jolyonr · · Score: 4, Insightful

    how will bone structure determine regional accent?

    If you make assumptions about where someone was brought up and who by, this kind of thing could work - but let's see a blind test. Let someone do a recording of their voice, get these guys to analyse their facial structure (in silence) and see if their prediction matches reality. It's easy to say what dead people noone alive has heard sounds like.

    Jolyon

    --


    Please read my Canon EOS tech blog at http://www.everyothershot.com
    1. Re:Fine, but... by datafr0g · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I was thinking the same thing... to add to this - How would one be able to predict that vocal cords are even intact from looking at a skeletal structure??

      --
      "Who says nothing is impossible? Some people do it every day!" - Alfred E. Neuman
    2. Re:Fine, but... by joe+155 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      that's a good point, but even if you did know the region, and even what accent was deffinately in that region at that time (because it's changed so much over the last 400 years) I think an even bigger point is the shape of the tounge; even the slightest change in size would change how your vioce sounded far more than any factor like head size/shape.

      --
      *''I can't believe it's not a hyperlink.''
    3. Re:Fine, but... by Propaganda13 · · Score: 1

      Shouldn't DaVinci and Mona Lisa sound the same?

    4. Re:Fine, but... by JWSmythe · · Score: 2, Informative

      I agree.

          Accents change a lot by the way the local accent is spoken.

          Even my own voice, I know depending on where I am, my voice changes. There are a few places that I've spent a good bit of time, so I easily slip into the local accents. There are a few bad fake accents I do too.

          I will say my nice clear broadcaster voice with a midwestern accent (i.e., plain) is a whole lot different than say my southern drawl. And like when I do my totally bogus 80's valley wannabe, it's like TOTally different.

          And lets not forget the voice on my voicemail. A few people have asked why I haven't changed it from the computer synthesized voice. I have to break it to them that it's really my voice. :) It wasn't intentional, it's just a very flat monotone message, because I wasn't very excited about doing a voicemail recording.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    5. Re:Fine, but... by Eivind · · Score: 2, Interesting
      It's worse than that. The skeletal anatomy is only going to give you a very vague idea, if that. There's just too many variables that are unaccounted for, a short list of examples:

      • Where did the person grow up.
      • What dialect did the people he spoke most to speak (parents, friends, teachers, relatives, neighbours etc)
      • What where his vocal-chords, tongue, lips and mouth like ? (for example, skeletal analysis will not tell you if someone has been smoking for 30 years or not)
      • Was he allergic to anything ? Nose open ? Size and shape of nose in general ?
      • What was his weight ?

      I'm fairly certain the unknowns add up sufficiently to make the entire exercise pointless. My guess is that given ten people with different voices, all raised in the same area, this method would not be capable of analysing their bone-structure and then correspond voice to person. (other than the relatively trivial job of getting the sex of the person correct, most women sound noticeably different from most men.)

    6. Re:Fine, but... by krunk4ever · · Score: 1

      I'm not an anatomist, but it might be the fact that facial structure might give enough information to estimate the tone and pitch. Obviously, you can add in random accents, but accents don't exactly change your tone / pitch that much. It also appears that body height is factor in determining tone.

      I'll also be curious on how they fare when comparing with live demos. They say they experimented on Osama bin Laden's facial structure. It'd be interesting to see how that came out.

    7. Re:Fine, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To distill this entire discussion down into a single Eddie Izzard quote:

      "'ello, we're the Romans!"

    8. Re:Fine, but... by alder · · Score: 1
      other than the relatively trivial job of getting the sex of the person correct

      Umm... There are claims that Jokonda is a prank and it's a face of a man (maybe Leonardo's own). That might actually "explain" her relative tallness (according to that sceletal analysis). At the same time it'll invalidate their assumption that the voise should be of a female.

      ;-)

    9. Re:Fine, but... by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      "how will bone structure determine regional accent?"

      What, you don't think Leonardo spoke Modern English with a thick Japanese accent?

    10. Re:Fine, but... by Sigg3.net · · Score: 1
      And:
      • Did he talk in a silly voice just to piss people off?
    11. Re:Fine, but... by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 1

      Yeah. Plus these cheap Japanese voice reconstructions never seem to match up with the characters' actions onscreen.

    12. Re:Fine, but... by drsquare · · Score: 1

      Obviously, you can add in random accents, but accents don't exactly change your tone / pitch that much.

      Ever heard a scouser?

    13. Re:Fine, but... by node+3 · · Score: 1

      If you'd RTFA, you'd realize they take as many of these factors into account. They're not just using the skeleton (in fact, they *aren't* using the actual skeleton at all. This is doubly true for the Mona Lisa).

      It's very clear that they are using assumptions, and assumptions can be wrong to varying degrees. That doesn't change the fact that it's possible to get a good approximation using assumptions. Whether this works here I don't know, but I do know that people's appearance seems to correlate to how their voices sound. This is demonstrated by the rare exceptions where a person's voice *doesn't* seem to match their appearance.

    14. Re:Fine, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then there is the fact that languages change. Regional Italian dialects today are most likely considerably different than they were in Da Vinci's time.

    15. Re:Fine, but... by theotherbastard · · Score: 1

      This reminds me of the story a while back on how scientists "cracked" the Mona Lisa and told us she was 69% happy, etc... Which is good and all, but unless I'm playing The Sims it really doesn't mean anything to me. Yes, science is good, praise science. But, much like some art I've experienced, sometimes you wonder what the real purpose of it really is. Or more importantly, how can I get ahold of some of their grant money to do research like this.

      --
      Buttons aren't toys.
  4. with them? by iogan · · Score: 5, Funny

    While Da Vinci is cool, I can think of a slew of other deceased notables worth talking with as well.

    Yeah, um.. you won't actually get to talk with them though, you'll just get to figure out what their voices might have sounded like. Sorry if that ruins it for you.

    1. Re:with them? by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1
      you'll just get to figure out what their voices might have sounded like

      In Japanese.

      Maybe.

      The reasoning sounds pretty shaky, though - to the extent that I am curious as to who was rash enough to fund it.

    2. Re:with them? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The reasoning sounds pretty shaky, though - to the extent that I am curious as to who was rash enough to fund it.

      From TFA:
      The voices are part of the intense promotion of the Hollywood film on Microsoft's Japanese site at http://promotion.msn.co.jp/davinci/voice.htm.

      I think this is more of a movie promotion than a serious scientific work. As such, funding is probably not a problem.
    3. Re:with them? by leoboiko · · Score: 1
      you won't actually get to talk with them though


      Actually, he can talk with them as much as he like, and he doesn't even need a special device or anything. He just won't have any answers, true, but he can talk.
      --
      Prescriptive grammar:linguistics :: alchemy:chemistry. Stop being a nazi and learn some science.
  5. Enough said... by nakedforjesus · · Score: 2, Funny

    Mike Tyson ;)

  6. Cool, but by ABoerma · · Score: 1

    I'd rather know what they'd have to than how they'd sound saying it.

  7. Re:Digg -1. by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

    Spam's lame, too.

    --

    "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

  8. Da Vinci by dr_d_19 · · Score: 3, Funny

    No wireless. Less paint than Monet. Lame.

    1. Re:Da Vinci by tiggles · · Score: 1

      I must've seen that joke 100 times, but for some reason I broke out laughing the 101st time. Well played.

  9. What you don't see... by umbrellasd · · Score: 3, Funny

    Probably doesn't work too well for eunuchs either, :).

  10. Just in from Hollywood... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ron Howard hits ceiling, tosses phones, when it turns out DaVinci sounded a whole lot like Harvey Fierstein.

  11. i know what he had.. by nihaopaul · · Score: 1

    he had one of those high pitch girl voices a man shouldn't have!

  12. surely not by celardore · · Score: 0, Redundant

    How would they even know if they were correct? Sure DaVinci was a bright man, but even basic recording was hundreds of years after him.

    1. Re:surely not by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      See, that's why they're getting grants for this. Ahh, research with unfalsifiable results is the best research.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    2. Re:surely not by onedotzero · · Score: 1

      Well, not really. As long as falsifiable test subjects are available (such as other scientists or volunteers) you can fine-tune the algorithms involved to get an accurate output.

      So long as the adjustments are done without bias (to replicate test subjects' voices) the only things you'd have to give up on are regional accents (as mentioned earlier) and outside influences that may have effects on voice (throat/lung disease, smoking or injuries spring to mind).

    3. Re:surely not by whitehatlurker · · Score: 2, Insightful
      No, no, didn't you see the Digg story on this? They have recordings from even earlier.

      (Okay, just between us - it's a hoax, but don't tell anyone else.)

      --
      .. paranoid crackpot leftover from the days of Amiga.
  13. Which is great because.. by Burb · · Score: 4, Insightful
    ... we all know that we way we talk is completely determined by skeletal structure. Your native language, culture, education, temperament, mood, and state of health are completely irrelevant.

    Mind you, it would be funny if he sounded like Tom Hanks.

    --

    1. Re:Which is great because.. by mrjb · · Score: 1

      ...likewise, skeletal structure alone doesn't determine shape of the soft tissue involved in speech (such as the larynx). In criminal investigation, there are huge problems involved in determining, for instance, the exact shape of the nose. These can only be guesstimated. As assumptions need to be made, this whole thing is going to be wildly inaccurate. Also, although modeling the entire physics of the head is definitely a Very Advanced form of speech synthesis, you'd need to model the exact movements of all organs involved in the speech system to even get a natural-sounding result. Sure, speech synthesis technology is improving, and kudos to the scientists working on this, they're doing groundbreaking work - But I call bull on them saying that the resulting speech will sound like Leonardo.

      --
      Visit http://ringbreak.dnd.utwente.nl/~mrjb/growingbettersoftware to download your free copy of the book
  14. Stop the Viral Marketing please by owlnation · · Score: 2

    Could we please please pretty please have a ban on the use of the name "da Vinci" for at least a year?

    I'm totally overmarketed.

    The tragic thing is that I was a big fan of the man himself until that trashy novel came out.

    1. Re:Stop the Viral Marketing please by kkiller · · Score: 1

      Why should the hijacking of an historical figure's name, against the dead man's willing, by a worthless supermarket novel hack stop you from appreciating art? You can't exactly blame Da Vinci for the massification of culture.

    2. Re:Stop the Viral Marketing please by stateofmind · · Score: 1

      I'm afraid I have to agree. Have you tried watching the History Channel in the last couple days? Ugh... Da Vinci non-stop.

    3. Re:Stop the Viral Marketing please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah...supposedly biographical shows with names like "The Code of Leonardo Da Vinci" and the working of the word "code" into the narration ("It was his strict code that drove him to yadda yadda") every 5 seconds.

      I didn't read TFA, but my guess is the supposed voice of Leonardo Da Vinci sounds an aweful lot like Dan Brown...

  15. This is good by spuby · · Score: 0

    Give them 5 years and you'll see humanoid robots impersonating Da Vinci (looking, walking and talking like him) or other deceased personalities.

    1. Re:This is good by sxtxixtxcxh · · Score: 0

      sorta like the philip k. dick android that, ironically enough, seems to have escaped from the grasp of its makers...

      --
      for a minute there, i lost myself...
    2. Re:This is good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do they have to be deceased? I'm looking forward to my Lucy Lui-bot.

  16. Farfetched by suv4x4 · · Score: 1

    Analyze the facial features of what is a Da Vinci painting, make the skeletal structure of a painting, and analyze it to see how would a Da Vinci painting sound if it could say something?

    That sound kinda farfetched to anyone?

    Plus, why take on the easy job? Let'em try and analyze what a Picasso painting would sound like...

    1. Re:Farfetched by c0bw3b · · Score: 1

      I think we ought to analyze Charlie Brown's skeleton, and determine what he actually sounded like.

      --
      ||:|::
    2. Re:Farfetched by tepples · · Score: 1

      With a head like that, how do Peanuts characters put their clothes on and off?

    3. Re:Farfetched by ironring2006 · · Score: 1
      Analyze the facial features of what is a Da Vinci painting, make the skeletal structure of a painting, and analyze it to see how would a Da Vinci painting sound if it could say something?

      I've got a better solution. Get a wizard to copy Da Vinci's painting and the Mona Lisa in magical paint, and hang them up in Hogwarts and let them come to life. but I'm sure Da Vinci will just challenge you to a duel like this guy, and the Mona Lisa won't talk to you until you tell her the correct password.

    4. Re:Farfetched by kfg · · Score: 1

      That sound kinda farfetched to anyone?

      Well, when you put it that way, I guess it does seem a bit out there.

      I might have to reconsider my project to figure out why Scoobydoo talks like that.

      KFG

    5. Re:Farfetched by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With baseball, if I recall correctly.

  17. Stephen Hawking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I want to know what he would sound like :p

  18. Mona Lisa was a man! by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 2, Funny
    Probably doesn't work too well for Unix either, :).

    Well, as other posters have pointed out, the site is IE6 only...

    But apart from that, read this quote, and draw your conclusions:

    A former police engineer who specializes in audio analysis, Suzuki says he assumed the woman in the legendary famed Leonardo painting was 168 centimeters (5 foot, 6 inches) tall, giving her a relatively low tone for a woman.
    1. Re:Mona Lisa was a man! by ElleyKitten · · Score: 1

      A former police engineer who specializes in audio analysis, Suzuki says he assumed the woman in the legendary famed Leonardo painting was 168 centimeters (5 foot, 6 inches) tall, giving her a relatively low tone for a woman.

      How does being 5'6 make you have a low tone? My best friend is 5'6 and she has a high tone. In fact, our voices are so similar (even though I'm 5'2) that people (even my mom) can't tell the difference between us on the phone. I think this whole concept of height = vocal tone is bullshit.

      --
      "What is Internet Explorer 7? Are you saying we can't access the normal internet?" - I love tech support. Really.
    2. Re:Mona Lisa was a man! by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1
      I think this whole concept of height = vocal tone is bullshit.

      IMHO, the whole concept (of skeletal features imply voice) is bullshit.

      As other people have pointed out, there are so many other elements that affect voice (regional access, non-skeletal physical features such as tongue and vocal chord shape, how you "move" your vocal chords and tongue, ...).

      But that Mona-Lisa-had-a-manly-voice snippet was just too funny to pass, hehe.

    3. Re:Mona Lisa was a man! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, Dudes, there's a girl on slashdot.

    4. Re:Mona Lisa was a man! by Martin+Foster · · Score: 1

      That's rather tall for a woman, even in this day and age I know a lot of women that are shorter. Back then, even the men were on average shorter, being average height balooned in the last hundred years or so.

      So this man's assumption on her height is rather flawed by lack of historical reference.

    5. Re:Mona Lisa was a man! by Loquax · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and they don't sound Eye-tallion either! Not one "Forgetaboutit" or "Yo!" in the whole damn script.

    6. Re:Mona Lisa was a man! by masterzora · · Score: 1

      Hey, even if you assume that the GP was telling the truth, there was no conclusive indicator that it was a female... though it's probably better to believe that it was....

      --
      Remember, open source is free as in speech, not free as in bear.
  19. Not a new thing, is it? by smallfeet · · Score: 1

    The Japanese have been weird about the Mona Lisa for a long time. I remember seeing something on TV 10 or more years ago about a device to simulate Mona Lisa' voice. People were getting plastic surgery to look like Mona Lisa (don't think it was just woman either).

    1. Re:Not a new thing, is it? by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1
      don't think it was just woman either

      hihihi!

    2. Re:Not a new thing, is it? by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      The Japanese have been weird [...] for a long time.

      That sentence is universally true. That's what makes them so interesting.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    3. Re:Not a new thing, is it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do people so often insist on using a catch all term like "The Japanese" if they see a *few* Japanese people doing something strange?

      The Americans have been weird about Michael Jackson for a long time. I remeber seeing something on TV 10 or more years ago about a device to simulate Michael Jackson's voice. People were getting plastic surgery to look like Michael Jackson (don't think it was just men either).

    4. Re:Not a new thing, is it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe because most nation states are ethnically homogeneous unlike the United States which is a multi-ethnic society. As a result such homogeneous societies are much more culturally homogeneous than a society like the US. People tend to have very similar tastes and people from such countries tend to ask questions that sound almost nonsensical to Americans such as "what kind of food do Americans like?" etc.

      If you have any doubt about the Japanese being a bit goofy about the Mona Lisa go to the Louvre on any day that they are letting outside tours in and try to see the Mona Lisa. You won't be able to because of the constant glare from the flash cameras of masses of Japanese tourists reflecting off the protective glass. I've been to the Louvre probably a dozen times but I've rarely seen La Gioconda/La Joconde for more than 3 or 4 seconds at a time thanks to the hundreds of Japanese tourists taking what amounts to pictures of the reflection of their own camera flashes.

    5. Re:Not a new thing, is it? by ZeroExistenZ · · Score: 1

      That sentence is universally true

      It is true from your perspective, but not to everyone in the universe hence it's not universal.
      Behaviour of Americans is ultimately weird to me, doesn't mean my perception is universal.

      --
      I think we can keep recursing like this until someone returns 1
    6. Re:Not a new thing, is it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been to the Louvre twice and I concur.

      It's awful freaking hard to take a picture of it anyways, what with the glare from the bullet resistant glass.

    7. Re:Not a new thing, is it? by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      Okay, you're right. I should have said "That sentence is always true". "Always" implies that there's always someone who finds your behaviour weird; "universally" implies that you do so, too.

      BTW, yes, Americans are weird. As are Germans (guess where I'm from). As is pretty much everyone.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    8. Re:Not a new thing, is it? by CheshireCatCO · · Score: 1

      don't think it was just woman either

      Which is not as bad as you may think: I recall reading (perhaps a decade ago) that analysis shows that a fair fraction of the the Mona Lisa's face is really based off of da Vinci's. He probably didn't have the subject sit for him for very long, and then finished the painting without her.

    9. Re:Not a new thing, is it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have been to both America and Japan as well as many other countries and haven't noticed much of a difference in people's tendancies to like the same things (or otherwise) from country to country.

      In the past before the world wide mass communication we have today an ethnically homogeneous country might have lead to a culturally homogeneous society because they would have had influences just from within their own society but today it is not very relevant.

      My own country of around 5 million (who are nearly all from the same ethnic background) has as varied a mix of people with as many varied likes and dislikes as anywhere else.

      I'm not saying that there aren't *any* cultural bonds or shared likes that set countries and societies apart from each other but I am saying that those things are just as common in America as anywhere else.

      To answer your nonsensical question, a commonly held belief is that all Americans like burgers.. (whether or not that is a dumb stereotype is another matter!)

    10. Re:Not a new thing, is it? by stuktongue · · Score: 1
      This looks like as good a place as any to insert my thought... please forgive me if it seems too off base relative to your comment. :-)

      ... and Mona Lisa's faces ...

      When I read this part of the subject post, I read it as Mona Lisa's feces! Eek.

      Okay, I feel better now for having shared. Thank you, sir, for putting up with me.

  20. 45 seconds into the Da Vinci recording by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    he reveals: "Luke, I am your father!"

    His hack of a son, copied his dad in Empire during the jungle scene where he cuts of Vaders head to reveal his own face when the mask blows off in a puff of smoke. At which point, the MPAA stepped in to sue Luke for copy infringment of the Mona Lisa, claiming derivative work. Not to be left out, RIAA is sueing the maker of the recording, Mark Hamill, and the dead grandmother of a nine year old girl who heard the recording as she passed by a neighbor playing to it on their computer. The device used, "ears", have been declared a hacking device of digitial property and hackers are terrorists, so everyone involved will be sent to gitmo. Obi-won wimpers about all being lost but yoda chimes in saying "no, there is another". Not that there's been a poll, but I think he was refering to the cowboy neal because if their isn't a plan b, there's always an option d.

  21. the article and direct link by 0232793 · · Score: 1

    http://promotion.msn.co.jp/davinci/voice.htm

    Cracking "The Da Vinci Code" could have been easier -- well, maybe -- if the characters had enlisted the Japanese lab which has "recreated" the voices of Leonardo and Mona Lisa.

    Using methods employed in criminal investigations, the Japan Acoustic Lab says it has analyzed the skeletal structures of the historical figures' faces to replicate how their voices would have sounded.

    The voices are part of the intense promotion of the Hollywood film on Microsoft's Japanese site at http://promotion.msn.co.jp/davinci/voice.htm.

    "We believe we were able to create the voices that are very close to the real voices. Perhaps it was really how they really sounded," the lab's chief Matsumi Suzuki says on the website.

    A former police engineer who specializes in audio analysis, Suzuki says he assumed the woman in the legendary famed Leonardo painting was 168 centimeters (5 foot, 6 inches) tall, giving her a relatively low tone for a woman.

    "We cannot tell exactly how tall she was. So we analyzed the length of her right middle finger" and looked at the average height of Italian women, he said.

    Suzuki says he gave Mona Lisa a slightly nasal tone because of her relatively large nose.

    For Leonardo, Suzuki made his voice around the time when he was 60 years old to match his bearded face in the famous sketched portrait.

    "Because the beard covers his jaws in his portrait, we could not tell his exact skeletal features. We assumed that he had a heavy-jowled face, giving him a nice, bass tone," Suzuki says.

    Suzuki, who frequently appears in popular media, has used his skills in a variety of fields, such as analyzing voices in purported recordings of Osama bin Laden.

    He also collaborated with Japanese toy maker Takara Co. to create the smash-hit Bowlingual, which is said to interpret dog language.

    For the toy, Suzuki received the 2002 tongue-in-cheek IgNobel Prize in the field of peace for scientific achievement that "cannot or should not be reproduced."

    1. Re:the article and direct link by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 1

      The voices are part of the intense promotion of the Hollywood film on Microsoft's Japanese site at http://promotion.msn.co.jp/davinci/voice.htm.

      Sorry, I should have been clearer - its the http://promotion.msn.co.jp/ site that does not work without IE6 & WMP.

      Thanks for the mirror tho'

      --
      There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
    2. Re:the article and direct link by Fred_A · · Score: 2, Insightful
      "Because the beard covers his jaws in his portrait, we could not tell his exact skeletal features. We assumed that he had a heavy-jowled face, giving him a nice, bass tone," Suzuki says.


      The translation is a bit off there. This should read:

      "Because the Hollywood studio paid us so much money and we didn't have anything to work with anyway, we made it all up."
      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    3. Re:the article and direct link by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      And the accessable link to the actual voice files themselves?

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    4. Re:the article and direct link by WinterSolstice · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No kidding - this article is complete crap. Typically when you "analyze" a skeleton, you actually do some real science. You don't just look at Mike Tyson, examine his face, and produce a voice that sounds anything like his.

      By all rights, he should sound more like Samuel Jackson :)

      Stupid story, stupid stunt, lame page. Thanks, slashdot, for supporting the MPAA.

      -WS

      --
      An operating system should be like a light switch... simple, effective, easy to use, and designed for everyone.
    5. Re:the article and direct link by plate_o_shrimp · · Score: 1
      "We believe we were able to create the voices that are very close to the real voices. Perhaps it was really how they really sounded," the lab's chief Matsumi Suzuki says on the website.

      "We cannot tell exactly how tall she was. So we analyzed the length of her right middle finger...."

      "Because the beard covers his jaws in his portrait, we could not tell his exact skeletal features. We assumed that he had a heavy-jowled face...."
      Translation: This is really how they sounded, assuming that our completely wild-ass guesses based on other completely wild-ass guesses are correct.....
      --
      This sig has exceed its monthly bandwidth allotment.
    6. Re:the article and direct link by hurfy · · Score: 1

      Yup, mike tyson was a good one.

      Likewise i would love to see them reproduce mine, if only i could adopt it as real ;) I really doubt a picture will reproduce my lazy tongue and slurred r's :(

    7. Re:the article and direct link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod parent up. Besides, it is speculated that Leonardo was a homosexual, and we all know what THOSE sound like, right? /MD, PhD.

    8. Re:the article and direct link by WinterSolstice · · Score: 1

      So you're implying that maybe Leonardo DaVinci should be voiced by Nathan Lane?
      Too funny!

      --
      An operating system should be like a light switch... simple, effective, easy to use, and designed for everyone.
    9. Re:the article and direct link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seems to work fine for me on FireFox 1.5.0.3

      Though Davinci has a think Japanese accent LOL

    10. Re:the article and direct link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If that method was realistic, all niggers would sound exactly like apes. Which they only do to a limited, yet significant, extent.

    11. Re:the article and direct link by JebusIsLord · · Score: 1

      As an anthropologist who is still undecided as to whether or not Neanderthals could even speak (despite having lots of complete skulls), I also was like "whaaa? since when can they do that??"

      --
      Jeremy
  22. John 21, 15-17 by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 2, Funny
    15 When they had finished breakfast, Jesus said to Simon Peter, "Simon, son of John, do you love me more than these?" He said to him, "Yes, Lord, you know that I like you." He said to him, "Feed my lambs."

    16 He then said to him a second time, "Simon, son of John, do you love me?" He said to him, "Yes, Lord, you know that I like you." He said to him, "Tend my sheep."

    17 He said to him the third time, "Simon, son of John, do you like me?" Peter was distressed that he had said to him a third time, "Do you like me?" and he said to him, "Lord, you know everything; you know that I like you." (Jesus) said to him, "Feed my sheep.

    hmmm...

    And btw, in that infamous "last supper" picture, there is more than one character that looks like a woman...

    1. Re:John 21, 15-17 by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      I've got it! Jesus is Captain Jack!

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    2. Re:John 21, 15-17 by hacker · · Score: 1

      Pardon my ignorance, but I don't get it. Was Jesus forgetful? Is that what this is teaching us?

    3. Re:John 21, 15-17 by brian0918 · · Score: 1

      "And btw, in that infamous "last supper" picture, there is more than one character that looks like a woman..."

      Now, if only one of them actually had the facial structure and skin tone of an ancient Israelite, rather than a cracka ass Anglo-Saxon, then you might have a case.

    4. Re:John 21, 15-17 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Pardon my ignorance, but I don't get it. Was Jesus forgetful? Is that what this is teaching us?

      It may become clearer for you if you read Genesis 9,13-16 along with it...

    5. Re:John 21, 15-17 by Sage+Gaspar · · Score: 1

      And btw, in that infamous "last supper" picture, there is more than one character that looks like a woman...

      Not to take this in a serious direction, but my favorite part about the amateur symbologists that graduated from Dan Brown University is how somehow a direct correlation is drawn between a painting and the truth.

      Is it more likely that ol' Leo was just having a bit of fun with an androgynous figure in his painting, or that he was a member of a secret organization that knew about the cover-up of Jesus' wife and he decided to release this secret encoded in a painting because... oh wait, why would he do that again? And if the latter, do all the other androgynous people in his paintings hold a secret of enormous portent?

      Come on people, there's a reason why in these documentaries the only people who actually promote any of these theories are second-rate authors looking to peddle their books and TV stations trying to build drama. When they actually talk to real historians they get a resounding no. Hell, even the people who wrote that Holy Blood, Holy Grail book just say it's a nice theory and they have no actual evidence. One of the people who invented the Priory of Sion has done a full disclosure and admitted it was a complete hoax.

      Anyway, just a digression, sorry. Get back to your usual business :P

    6. Re:John 21, 15-17 by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      Actually, from what I can tell, the only people who claim that the Da Vinci Code is supposed to be anything but fiction are the ones selling books "debunking" it. The only thing Dan Brown claims is real is the Opus Dei.

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    7. Re:John 21, 15-17 by Sage+Gaspar · · Score: 1

      Actually, Dan Brown write in the prologue something like all secret societies, rituals, ceremonies, history, symbols, etc., are real. It doesn't just seem to be part of the fiction he's writing.

      If you watched some of the network TV documentaries there were also plenty of "expert authors" they invited on with books supporting the theories that claimed they were true.

      Basically it's just people trying to make more money off of a debate that shouldn't be open on both sides.

  23. Paint and Sound by MichaelSmith · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I remember something from about 10 years ago about people running an LP pickup through the grooves made in paint by a painters brush. The idea is that sound makes the brush vibrate and records the sounds in the paint.

    Apparently they were able to get the sound of the word "blue" out of a patch of blue paint so this painter must have been talking to himself (or somebody else) while he worked.

    1. Re:Paint and Sound by Threni · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > I remember something from about 10 years ago about people running an LP pickup
      > through the grooves made in paint by a painters brush. The idea is that sound
      > makes the brush vibrate and records the sounds in the paint.
      >
      > Apparently they were able to get the sound of the word "blue" out of a patch
      > of blue paint so this painter must have been talking to himself (or somebody
      > else) while he worked.

      It's hard to imagine with half a brain anyone believing for more than a second that this technique would ever be possible.

    2. Re:Paint and Sound by $sjfsjf · · Score: 2, Informative

      Indeed, Archaeoacoustics However this technique has never been used to recover sounds from actual historical pots or paintings. I wonder why not, if their tests have been so sucessful... Maybe it only works if you know what you are supposed to be hearing, 'Here's to my sweet Satan' anyone?

    3. Re:Paint and Sound by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the link. Its interesting that they really only tried low tech approaches. Lasers have more recently been used to digitise phonograph records, and I imagine that you could attack a surface with an electron microscope and digitally convert the profile to sounds.

      Maybe a laser could even detect the original surface of a painting, under coatings which were added later.

    4. Re:Paint and Sound by djdanlib · · Score: 1

      Non-visible spectral imaging (also known as infrared and ultraviolet photography) are typically used to detect alterations to a painting. You don't need an expensive laser, just a nice IR-pass filter and some tungsten lights.

  24. Is it just me... by Symbiosis · · Score: 1

    Or does Leonardo Da Vinci kind of sound like Jabba the Hut?

    --

    -------------------------------------------
    I like nonsense, it wakes up the brain cells.
    -- Dr. Seuss
    1. Re:Is it just me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's just you.

  25. So by nickthisname · · Score: 5, Funny

    We now know what Da Vinci would have sounded like when he said:
    "Someone please shoot Dan Brown."

  26. Has anyone tested this tech? by Zaphod2016 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think this is a neat idea (although an obvious plant by some marketing parasites) but I have to ask: has anyone tested this?

    Specifically: has anyone recorded a voice, recorded an MRI, and generated a voice? Did they match? Were they close?

    1. Re:Has anyone tested this tech? by SpinyNorman · · Score: 1

      You don't need to test it to know it's a lot of bunk.

      It's a given that a female will usually have a "female voice" (not just pitch but formants, inflection patterns etc also), and a male a male one. For physiological reasons larger people tend to have deeper voices, and smaller people higher ones, but not always so. A larger nasal cavity (big nose) will make nasalized phonemes more pronounced.

      Beyond that, a skelton will tell you nothing of the quality of someone's voice, their accent, whether it indeed is a high or low voice (or the spectral details in general), their speech patterns, etc, etc.

      For all we know Leonardo was a castrato who stuttered with a fake french accent and Mona Lisa had a nasty high pitched whiney voice.

  27. Re:Digg -1. by Benzido · · Score: 1
    That is actually what I hate about Digg. The discussions there are just like spam.

    So it's no wonder that it seems like spam when these digg people post here.

  28. Bob 16, 22-27 by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1, Funny

    22 When they had finished breakfast, Jesus said to Simon Peter, "Simon, son of John, do you love me more than these?" He said to him, "Yes, Lord, you know that I like you." He said to him, "Feed my lambs."

    23 He then said to him a second time, "Simon, son of John, do you love me?" He said to him, "Yes, Lord, you know that I like you." He said to him, "Tend my sheep." He said to him, "But I just fed them." He said to him, "I don't care, feed them again."

    24 He said to him the third time, "Simon, son of John, do you like me?" Peter was distressed that he was going to have to feed the sheep again and he said to him, "Lord, you know everything; you know that I like you." (Jesus) said to him, "My sheep need feedin', so get movin'."

    25 To that Peter replied, "Look man, those sheep are full to the brim. I couldn't feed them any more if I wanted to." And he said to him, "So what, I want to see you work."

    26 In that moment a shepherd with a herd of one thousand sheep passe by. And Jesus said to him, "Yo, shepherd! I'm Jesus, the son of God; you might have heard of me. Mind if I borrow your herd for a moment?" And he said to him, "No problem, go ahead."

    27 And Jesus pointed to the borrowed herd and said to Peter, "Those sheep don't look fed to me. Get your lazy ass moving!" And the shepherd said to him, "Whoa, Jesus. You're a real dick."


    Excerpt from one of the Dead Sea Scrolls entitled "Jesus was a dick and unlike those sycophantic apostles I have the guts to write it down", accredited to an author only known as "Bob".

    --
    USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    1. Re:Bob 16, 22-27 by Bohiti · · Score: 1

      Thank you, for some reason that struck me as totally hilarious.

      *wipes tears out of eyes*

  29. Give it up one more time for the Japanese by Thaidog · · Score: 1

    Always using their technologies the right way... wow!!!

    --

    ||| I still can't believe Parkay's not butter.

    1. Re:Give it up one more time for the Japanese by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What, for marketing?

  30. Now let's make a singing trout out of Machiavelli. by Bruce+McBruce · · Score: 1

    Man. The possibilities for humor with technology like this are almost limitless.

  31. Larynx != Bone by Saeger · · Score: 1
    I'm no doctor, but I know enough that our larynx and vocal cords are made of fleshy muscle; not bone.

    In order to accurately figure out what somebody's voice might have sounded like -- minus unknowable unique accent quirks -- would require a DNA sample and technology we don't yet have(1).

    (1) Namely, vastly faster computers that can take some source DNA and quickly "grow" (protein unfolding, etc) an adult human being in simulation, then send the right signals to the nerves to make virtual speech. Complicated, yes, but doable in a couple decades thanks to accelerating progress.

    --
    Power to the Peaceful
    1. Re:Larynx != Bone by IckySplat · · Score: 1

      If you completely simulated a human in a computer
      You it be murder to delete the file?

      --
      Help! help!, the termites are eating my DRAM!!!
    2. Re:Larynx != Bone by IckySplat · · Score: 1

      ^would it

      Damn, friking keyboard :)

      --
      Help! help!, the termites are eating my DRAM!!!
    3. Re:Larynx != Bone by The+Evil+Couch · · Score: 1
      I think that Maxis answered this question in the FAQ for the original Sim City.

      The answer was yes. So you should never stop playing Sim City.

      Apparently, there are 10 million warrants out for my arrest in Evil Couch City.

  32. And what the Mona Lisas voice said.... by Viol8 · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Leonardo , I *really* need to go to the toilet! Now!"

  33. Oddly enough they both said... by Winlin · · Score: 1

    BRAAAIINNSSS!!!!

    Well, that, or "Send more acoustic researchers."

    1. Re:Oddly enough they both said... by iamjoltman · · Score: 1

      Just had to mention that that's a great ROTLD reference!

  34. Count me in! by antek9 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I'd also be rather interested in experimenting on Osama bin Laden's facial structure. With a baseball bat, that is...

    Ok, mod me down as dumb, if you can, but it had to be said. ;)

    --
    A World in a Grain of Sand / Heaven in a Wild Flower,
    Infinity in the Palm of your Hand / And Eternity in an Hour.
  35. The other half of the blind test... by Richard+Kirk · · Score: 1
    An oil painting can record sound. The canvas vibrates with the sound in the studio, creating ridges in the paint left by the artist's pallette knife or brush. I remember some research in the 1970's (?) that claimed to have reproduced some noises, though no intelligible words, from light-slice microscopy of some Dutch masters.

    The Mona Lisa was painted on wood. Not much chance of "enough of the knock-knock jokes, you silly cow, this is supposed to be a serious portrait" spoken with a Tuscan accent.

    1. Re:The other half of the blind test... by TropicalCoder · · Score: 1

      An oil painting can record sound.

      Ancient pottery can record sound too. I read an article in SciAm many year ago about an investigation into some ancient pottery. Seems the spiral groove design encircling the vase from top to bottom may have been created on the potter's wheel with the point of a wire held against it and moved slowly downward as the vase rotated. It was speculated that this could result in a primitive kind of phonograph, as any loud noise would cause the wire to vibrate and those vibrations would be indelibly recorded. The investigators mounted the vase on a lathe and attempted to "play back" whatever may have been recorded. After signal processing, they thought they could here the sound of horse's hooves on the pavement outside the potter's shop. I remember at the time I read this that just the thought of the possibility of bringing back a sound from 2000 years ago sent shivers down my spine.

      A quick Google check yields a site that declares this a recent hoax: Ancient Pottery Recorded Audio but I swear I read about this in SciAm more than 20 years ago. Unfortunately, I am not a current subsciber to SciAm so I cannot look for that article directly.

    2. Re:The other half of the blind test... by TropicalCoder · · Score: 1

      [UPDATE]

      I see further down in the discussion that slashdot reader ~%24sjfsjf replied to "Paint and Sound" giving us this excellent reference Archaeoacoustics which must be what I read about in SciAm many years ago. The relevant quote follows...

      "The Woodbridge experiments"

      "What is probably the first publication on the subject appeared in 1969, when Richard G. Woodbridge, III related four experiments in a letter in the Proceedings of the IEEE1. In the first experiment, he could pick up the noise produced by the potter's wheel from a pot, using a hand-held crystal cartridge (Astatic Corp. Model 2) with a wooden stylus, connected directly to a set of headphones. The second experiment yielded 60 Hz hum from the motor driving the potter's wheel. More interesting were the following experiments, with a canvas being painted while exposed to sounds. In the third experiment the canvas was painted with a variety of different paints while exposed to martial music from loudspeakers. Some of the brush strokes had a striated appearance, and "short snatches of the music" could be indentified. For the fourth experiment, the painter spoke the word "blue" during a stroke of the brush, and after a long search the word could be heard again when stroking the canvas with the stylus."

  36. Question by ajs318 · · Score: 1

    How many real criminals got away with real crimes while the boys in the lab were abusing the facilities for something so pointless?

    Never mind, if the Japanese are anything like the rest of the world, they probably just hassled a few extra motorists.

    --
    Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    1. Re:Question by Flaming+Babies · · Score: 1

      What would the boys in the 'Japan Acoustic Lab' have to do with stopping real criminals?
      They used methods employed in criminal investigations.
      The lab's chief is a former police engineer.
      They aren't the police.
      And as far as I know, Robert Langdon doesn't work in the lab...

      --
      The right to be heard does not automatically include the right to be taken seriously.
  37. Quit screwing with this da vinci crap by skeptictank · · Score: 2, Funny

    and Get back to work on the robotic woman.

    1. Re:Quit screwing with this da vinci crap by zivr · · Score: 0

      This could be useful, I would pay a bit extra to hear my robotic woman talk dirty to me in a historical figure's voice...

    2. Re:Quit screwing with this da vinci crap by Darth_brooks · · Score: 1

      "Oh, yes Winston Churchill, tell me I've been a very naughty boy......"

      Hmm, somehow that's not a feature I'm interested in.

      --
      There are some people that if they don't know, you can't tell 'em.
  38. This is sooooo wrong... by geekbeater · · Score: 1

    ...everyone knows Da Vinci had a lisp, walked funny, and had a penchant for "show tunes"... (eyes roll)

  39. Lets see them analyze the face... by kiwioddBall · · Score: 1

    ... and structure of someone who is still alive and see how close they get.

  40. Do you think Leonardo would have read Slashdot? by iBod · · Score: 2, Informative

    I think he'd have been very interested indeed in the maiden flight of the Airbus A380 yesterday, which received NO coverage whatsoever on Slashdot (stuff that matters!) and would be pissed off by this lame article about some fools trying to cash-in on his name (stuff that matters not).

    1. Re:Do you think Leonardo would have read Slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aye, it flew over my office in Bristol as I was leaving yesterday. It was a really low pass at about 500 feet and was absolutely incredible.
       
      What surprised me was how quiet it was - okay so it's not a whisper jet, but it's much quieter than a 747. It also seemed to be making a weird hissing noise periodically, but I digress...
       
      Yes, you're right, Da Vinci would have been on the cutting edge of technology, he wouldn't have been looking backwards, but forwards.

    2. Re:Do you think Leonardo would have read Slashdot? by DerekLyons · · Score: 1
      I think he'd have been very interested indeed in the maiden flight of the Airbus A380 yesterday
      I think Leonardo would indeed have applauded the maiden flight of the A380 - on April 27, 2005. (The maiden flight of the aircraft was over a year ago.)
      which received NO coverage whatsoever on Slashdot (stuff that matters!) and would be pissed off by this lame article about some fools trying to cash-in on his name (stuff that matters not).
      It's amusing that you criticize Slashdot for not having coverage of an event you can't even get the facts straight on. It must not have mattered much to you.
    3. Re:Do you think Leonardo would have read Slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A year!
      For Slashdot that is new news.

  41. Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Japanese Lab Creates 'Da Vinci' Voices"

    But can the voices correctly pronounce 'Cadillac'?

  42. All right!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Now we're one step closer to ending world hunger and saving the environment and... ...oh wait...

  43. Oh goody! by CamDawg · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now we can look forward to authentic Da Vinci-voiced endorsements for vacuum cleaners. Ah, what a glorious age in which we live.

  44. Listening to da Vinci by ChuckDivine · · Score: 1

    Some people have been listening to Da Vinci for centuries.

    How's that? Da Vinci was a brilliant man who left us not only some wonderful paintings but also a wealth of writings. To listen to the real Da Vinci, all you need to do is look at his art or read his writings -- carefully, with understanding, of course.

    Hearing some lab's claimed reproduction of his physical voice really doesn't help us to understand the man or his thoughts.

    --
    "Beer is proof God loves us and wants us to be happy." -- B. Franklin
    1. Re:Listening to da Vinci by katanan · · Score: 1

      hear hear, if i had mod points right now this would be "insightful" for sure.

      i very much agree with you, sometimes biographical information of a thinker or the prose of a poet can inspire new thoughts about works. but i don't think hearing a voice is too much of a biographical insight.

  45. Don't call him Da Vinci by Buchenskjoll · · Score: 2, Informative

    Please call him Leonardo, only Dan Brown calls him Da Vinci. I don't think Leonardo would have answered to it.

    --
    -- Make America hate again!
  46. I hear dead people! by jimwatters · · Score: 3, Funny

    I hear dead people!

  47. In other news, by ZenKen · · Score: 1

    someone is actually trying to do something important. A time machine would be better.

  48. Re:Now let's make a singing trout out of Machiavel by o'reor · · Score: 1
    --
    In Soviet Russia, our new overlords are belong to all your base.
  49. He's last name is not Da Vinci! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    His name is Leonardo Di Ser Piero (Leonardo, son of Ser Piero), and he's from the town of Vinci (Da Vinci). Calling him Da Vinci is like calling Fred from accounting "From Accounting". Granted, it's no less common a mistake than refering to "silicone chips", and "nucular power".

    1. Re:He's last name is not Da Vinci! by dacileva · · Score: 1

      That said, look at pre-industrial British peers. It wasn't uncommon to refer to them by their holding's name, rather than their own (e.g. Thomas Howard, 4th Duke of Norfolk, often called simply 'Norfolk'). Not that Leonardo da Vinci was in any position of power regarding Vinci, but non-Italians might have called him "da Vinci" (perhaps equivalent to an American calling a Slavic coworker, whose name he couldn't pronounce, "the Russian"). This might have been particularly true for those not speaking Italian.

    2. Re:He's last name is not Da Vinci! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes but:

      1) It's already a commonly known fact his last name isn't "Da Vinci", karma whore.

      2) When referring to "Leonardo Di Ser Piero", nobody would know who the fuck you are talking about.

      3) "Son of Ser Piero" isn't any more of a surname than is "From Vinci".

      4) Look up the origins of the surnames Baker, Smith, Cook, Butler, Fisher, Robertson, Thompson, Taylor, Turner or the million other surnames derived from occupations, towns , relations, (etc . . .) and proceed to explain why "Da Vinci" shouldn't be considered his surname.

      Learn to live with it.

    3. Re:He's last name is not Da Vinci! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      4) Look up the origins of the surnames Baker, Smith, Cook, Butler, Fisher, Robertson, Thompson, Taylor, Turner or the million other surnames derived from occupations, towns , relations, (etc . . .) and proceed to explain why "Da Vinci" shouldn't be considered his surname.

      You might want to look up the naming conventions of latin countrys. The surnames you are suggesting are predominantly english, a product of the english language & english naming convention. Surely they would likely be (perticularly in such times) alien to other cultures?

      Whereas, in Spain for example, the naming convention is aimed towards the family.

      Furthermore "Da Vinci", as established in 1) of your above post, is not his surname. So.. to consider his surname to be "Da Vinci" would be factually inaccurate. You may aswell consider yourself surrounded by glowing pixies.

      Hope that answers your question, have a good day :)

    4. Re:He's last name is not Da Vinci! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To "Yes but:"

      So many words, so little thought. Your point seems to be that you are profoundly ignorant (which I will concede), and you are incapable of remediating your ignorance ("learn to live with it"). While we are all born into ignorance, to stubbornly cling to it is stupidity. I'll try to get the point across in little words, so you can understand:

      Augustin of Hippo - not Mr. of Hippo
      Euclid of Alexandria - not Mr. of Alexandria
      Helen of Troy - not Ms. of Troy
      Hypatia of Alexandria - not Ms. of Alexandria, and not related to Euclid
      Joan of Arc - not Ms. of Arc.
      Philo of Alexandria - not Mr. of Alexandria, and no relation to the other "of Alexandrias"
      Scott of the Antarctic - not Mr. of the Antarctic
      Thasyllus of Mendes - not Mr. of Mendes

      and finally
      Leonardo of Vince - not Mr. of Vince

  50. Out of intrest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Have they tried this on someone alive using like x-rays and what not for the skeletal structure and seen if it's even close?

  51. My top 10 list of dead people to give voice to by Loquax · · Score: 1

    1) William Shakespeare/Shaxberd--I'd love to get a few recordings of the Sonnets by this voice. 2) Julius Caesar--there is a highly detailed bust of him that would be perfect for this project 3) Marc Antony--ditto (with all the Roman Busts, it would be cool to have Shakespeare's play done in the "original" voices. 4) Van Gogh 5) The figure in the Shroud of Turin. 6) Elizabeth I 7) Queen Victoria 8) Oscar Wilde 9) Napoleon (The phrase "I want to see little things hitting each other!" comes to mind. 10) Just as a controll, Ronald Regan.

  52. Not to mention your throat by p3d0 · · Score: 1

    Apparently your vocal cords are also irrelevant.

    --
    Patrick Doyle
    I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
  53. But all the corpses ever want to say is... by Feanturi · · Score: 1

    BRaAAaAaINS!!!! BRAaAAAaAINZZZ!!

  54. If da Vinci were alive today by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... what would he say?

    "Help me out of this box, I can't breathe in here! Help, let me out!"

    1. Re:If da Vinci were alive today by Rod+Beauvex · · Score: 0

      /me glares at the AC.

      Now let's get back to the meeting...

  55. They're made out of meat by passion · · Score: 1
    --
    - passion
  56. What BS by Pedrito · · Score: 1

    I seriously doubt this is even close to what Da Vinci sounds like. The true test of this would be to take someone on this project who has never heard of Mike Tyson, give them a photograph of him, and see if they come close to what he sounds like. I suspect they wouldn't be even be in the same ballpark. I know Leonardo did a lot of anatomical drawings, but unless he managed to do a really, really detailed drawing of his own vocal chords, I suspect they're making a very rough guess.

  57. has any one of you read the article? by DragonTHC · · Score: 1

    for me, all I see is some music clips.

    no voices.

    --
    They're using their grammar skills there.
  58. "Herro, I am Reonardo da Vinci!" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    not PC, but someone had to say it.

  59. Disappointing by wcrowe · · Score: 1

    Embarrassingly, he sounded like Chico Marx...

    "Ha ha ha ha ha ha... you can't-a fool me. There ain't-a no Sanity Clause."

    --
    Proverbs 21:19
  60. I'm guessing their voices sound kind of flat by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    since they're just paintings.

    But, if they had access to Helium back then, now that would be interesting ...

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  61. Netcraft is using this software by Pollardito · · Score: 1

    Netcraft is using this software to see how BSD would sound

  62. Saddam Hussein al-Tikriti by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I always wondered by people called him "Saddam" rather than "Mr. Hussein", but Hussein is a patronomic while al-Tikriti is a village or tribal affiliation with not quite the strength of a family anem.


    I have finally figured this out why many of colleagues from India only want to be called by one name and why one never call them by their last name -- it is a similar system.

  63. Control the fascination by CarpetShark · · Score: 1

    Apparantly, these voices will be barely audible through white noise, and will only be available in japanese video format. I hear that bad things happen when you become too engrossed in trying to figure it all out though.

  64. I, for one, ... am not impressed by Y2 · · Score: 1

    The article will teach you many varriations of "we made it up."

    --
    "But all your emitter and collector are belong to me!"
  65. This is great news!!! by wideBlueSkies · · Score: 2, Funny

    A true advance in science

    I've always wanted to know what Snoopy's voice sounded like....you never hear him talk in the cartoons. Now thanks to this revolutionary skeletal analysis technique, hearing his voice is within our reach.

    And after that, I'd like them to map out Morn from Deep Space Nine. He never spoke either.

    Great mysteries are about to be solved.

    However, when this work is complete, these guys can devote their spare cycles to folding protiens..another worthy cause.

    --
    Huh?
  66. Try it on people with recorded voices. by Angelwrath · · Score: 1

    Well they should try it on dead people who have had voice recordings of themselves to see how well these scientists can recreate a voice.

    So THIS is now Tupac keeps coming out with albums posthumously...

  67. Dog speech translator by 0xC2 · · Score: 1

    This is the guy that did the "dog speech translator". Oooh, amazing science.

    I'd be more amazed if he could match the voice of a living person from photos. Which, of course, could be verified.

    Maybe he could get together with the guy who "records ancient sounds from clay pots". Then we could know what Vincent Van Gogh sounded like from his still lifes...

    --
    Be heard || Be herd
  68. Does he... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... talk with a lisp?