Slashdot Mirror


Giant Paramount Auction of Star Trek Items

Alien54 writes "The first official studio auction of memorabilia from all five 'Star Trek' television series and 10 movie spinoffs, to be held from October 5 to 7 in conjunction with the 40th anniversary of the original 'Star Trek' series, was announced by Christie's on Thursday. CBS Paramount Television Studios is cleaning out its vaults for the sale, comprising more than 1,000 lots totaling some 4,000 items. Items to hit the block include props, weapons, prosthetics and set dressings unearthed from five Paramount warehouses, as well as many special and spectacular items highlighted in the various shows." Update: 05/21/2006 14:57 GMT by SM Several users have provided us with the direct link to the auction site for easy viewing.

225 comments

  1. The nicest prop by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 4, Funny

    I want Shatner's toupee.

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    1. Re:The nicest prop by HTTP+Error+403+403.9 · · Score: 4, Funny
      I want Shatner's toupee.
      Over.....my.....dead...........body.......Spock.
      --
      I'm not a Troll, it's reverse psychology.
    2. Re:The nicest prop by jack_call · · Score: 1

      I want his kidney stone

      --
      This is my sig. There are many like it but this one is mine. My sig is my best friend. It is my life.
    3. Re:The nicest prop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I want Avery Brook's toupee.

    4. Re:The nicest prop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spock's beard. It's instant evil.

    5. Re:The nicest prop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sulu is going to want the "captains log".

    6. Re:The nicest prop by StarfishOne · · Score: 2, Funny

      Just make sure you get the right thing, after all, he's not a doctor!

    7. Re:The nicest prop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Funny :) But the rhythm is more like this:

      Over my ..... dead ........ bodyspock.

    8. Re:The nicest prop by surrenderMonkey · · Score: 2, Funny

      I bid 350 quatloos!

    9. Re:The nicest prop by kimvette · · Score: 1

      If you want instant evil, you could also become a career politician. ;) There's only one Spock's beard but plenty of public offices for you to run for.

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    10. Re:The nicest prop by Walt+Dismal · · Score: 1

      must have ... green ... space babe brassiere! ... bidding the ... kid's ... college money! Can't stop myself! ... Help me, giant space Lincoln! Help me!

    11. Re:The nicest prop by panheaduk · · Score: 1

      I want Shatner's Bassoon.

      --
      In the beginning there was nothing. Which exploded!
    12. Re:The nicest prop by Big+Hammer · · Score: 1

      I'm simple, I just want one of those overhead pipes of the Enterprise from the STTNG series that has the letters printed on it 'GNDN' which all true trekkies know it means "Goes Nowhere Does Nothing" :)

      JB

    13. Re:The nicest prop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Moderation +3
      80% Funny
      20% Redundant

      Ha! Ha! William Shatner got some mod points.

    14. Re:The nicest prop by triso · · Score: 1

      I wonder if they are auctioning Seven of Nine's catsuit?

  2. I want by dasheiff · · Score: 4, Interesting

    7 of 9's cat suit. :-)

    1. Re:I want by AuMatar · · Score: 4, Funny

      I just want 7 of 9, sans suit. I haven't seen anything creative out of her in a while, she might go for it.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    2. Re:I want by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought it was paint

    3. Re:I want by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She was in Boston Legal's season finale, and Boston Public before that.

    4. Re:I want by drspliff · · Score: 1

      On lighter another note, how many pairs of fake 7 of 9 panties will be put up on e-bay?
      On a much sadder note, how many geeks will actually fall for this and bid on them!

    5. Re:I want by linzeal · · Score: 1

      Would most people here even know what a vagina smells like, let alone hot vagina?

    6. Re:I want by charlieo88 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the problem with 7 of 9's cat suit is that it won't include 7 of 9.

    7. Re:I want by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think so. I saw a picture of one once.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    8. Re:I want by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 2, Funny

      "I haven't seen anything creative out of her in a while, she might go for it."

      Well I don't know about 'creative', but Jeri Ryan was on the finale of Boston Legal. That must have been fun for Shatner. "Your motivation is that you're lusting after her. Just keep looking at her wantingly. Good. We got all we need. ... Cut! CUT!! I said CUT!"

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    9. Re:I want by A+Brand+of+Fire · · Score: 1

      You do understand that Jeri Ryan is not included, right?

      --
      [End of Line]
    10. Re:I want by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "bid on them".
      You misspelled "jerk off"

    11. Re:I want by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Check this out. She might not....

    12. Re:I want by StarfishOne · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry to dissapoint you, but he (Armus) is already `living la vida loca' in the garden of our neighbours!

    13. Re:I want by unitron · · Score: 3, Funny
      "
      I want...The big angry black thing that killed Tasha Yar."

      Sorry, Cheney's soul is already spoken for. Some guy with a contract printed on asbestos.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    14. Re:I want by Haiyadragon · · Score: 1

      7 of 9

    15. Re:I want by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where exactly did you determine what a cold one smelt like?

    16. Re:I want by bheading · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but that thing is no patch on the large flying pancake things that attacked Spock and exposed his emotional side in a gruelling climax.

      If I can't have that, can I have the Crystalline Entity ?

    17. Re:I want by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Might have something to do with the Madam Curie t-shirt he is selling.

    18. Re:I want by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      unwashed...

    19. Re:I want by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      Seems to me, he'd be living "la vida lodo".

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    20. Re:I want by kimvette · · Score: 1

      Once? Oh so you're not the typical slashdotter with a SAN dedicated to porn? ;)

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    21. Re:I want by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 2, Funny

      Does SAN stand for Scratch aNd sNiff in this case?

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    22. Re:I want by kimvette · · Score: 1

      D'oh that was bad!!

      Er, on that note, on a not-so-fresh day a scratch and sniff like that would not be a good thing. (are you puking yet? Well, you should be!)

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    23. Re:I want by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      petrified... in hot grits...

    24. Re:I want by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I want Tasha! 3

    25. Re:I want by LaurenBC · · Score: 1

      Based on the posts here alone, I'd say the $3000 estimate is quite low for 7 of 9's jumpsuit. I predict it will sell for close to the same as Picard's first season jumpsuit.. To some rich, salivating pervert. No offense to any of those types, I quite enjoyed the enticing parts of all the Trek installments!

      --
      I don't need this, I've got a Master's Degree in folklore and mythology!
    26. Re:I want by fm6 · · Score: 1

      On a heavier note, what a low opinion Berman must have of his fans, to design a character around a pair of panties!

    27. Re:I want by pipingguy · · Score: 1


      Your subject line should have been "I want into" (assuming you would have meant something other than wearing slinky, sexy girl clothes - not that there's anything inherently wrong with that predilection).

    28. Re:I want by StarfishOne · · Score: 1

      I believe he is not happy with your comment.. be careful ;) (he's a bit moody, shhhh!!)

    29. Re:I want by Galvatron · · Score: 1

      You're in luck! It's the 7th item (how appropriate) on the "Galaxy of Highlights" page. Christie's estimate is $2,000-$3,000. I think they underestimate the number of geeks with too much money and too few dating opportunities...

      --
      "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than that of whether a submarine can swim" -EWD
    30. Re:I want by ZorinLynx · · Score: 1

      Dr. Scratchnsniff: Stop playing with my bust!

      Yakko Warner: ...Goodnight, everybody!

    31. Re:I want by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      D'oh that was bad!!

      Thank you. It's nice to be appreciated. =)

      Er, on that note, on a not-so-fresh day a scratch and sniff like that would not be a good thing. (are you puking yet? Well, you should be!)

      Don't even try to get into a gross out contest with me! I'm five-time winner of the tri-state "Guess Where My Finger Has Been" competition, mixed doubles division. =X

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    32. Re:I want by jandrese · · Score: 1

      I don't know, that was the most emo oil slick ever.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    33. Re:I want by sharkey · · Score: 1

      Damn, if that doesn't sound like a fetish-porn video...

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  3. Hmm, does this mean... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...Paramount won't be needing these objects anymore because it's only gonna produce prequel movies and series from now on? Let's hope not!

  4. Borg implants? by RockModeNick · · Score: 1

    They went through PLUNTY of them on the recent shows, maybe they would be enough that they'd go cheap...

    1. Re:Borg implants? by Paleomacus · · Score: 3, Funny

      I'm sorry to inform you that Microsoft will be buying up all of the Borg implants. Resistance is futile. We have beeeeeeeeeellionzzz.

  5. I want by yobjob · · Score: 2, Funny

    The big angry black thing that killed Tasha Yar.

  6. LOLZSTARTREKKKK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Eww. A Trekkie yardsale. Reminds me of florida.

  7. Dibs! by payndz · · Score: 5, Funny

    I call dibs on the Enterprise!

    --
    You must think in Russian.
    1. Re:Dibs! by flobberchops · · Score: 1

      Would you like that on DVD or CD sir?

    2. Re:Dibs! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I raise your bid by 10 bars of latinum!

    3. Re:Dibs! by Comatose51 · · Score: 1

      Have the Enterprise and everything else, I call dibs on Seven of Nine/Jeri Ryan.

      --
      EvilCON - Made Famous by /.
    4. Re:Dibs! by fm6 · · Score: 1

      They unloaded the Enterprise a long time ago. Sorry!

    5. Re:Dibs! by coolGuyZak · · Score: 1

      Better hope they're auctioned first...

  8. I know what I'd buy by From+A+Far+Away+Land · · Score: 4, Funny

    A warp core. No wait, a transporter. These things are in working condition right?

    1. Re:I know what I'd buy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope. Refurbished only. Anything not sold at Christies will be sold in bulk at woot.com the following midnight in a Trekkie woot off.

    2. Re:I know what I'd buy by XeroDegrees · · Score: 1
      a transporter. These things are in working condition right?
      yes but they only transport matter
    3. Re:I know what I'd buy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course they are in working condition (Batteries sold separately).

    4. Re:I know what I'd buy by jezor · · Score: 1

      There is actually a model prototype warp core, blue lights a-flashing, along with a picture of the Enterprise-D at Long Island's Cradle of Aviation Museum. It's the final exhibit in the History of Aviation, perched on the wall near the exit to the hall. I always appreciate the joke. {Jonathan}

  9. I want to go... by Bieeanda · · Score: 5, Funny

    Just to see the time-travelling aliens bid furiously on the tox'utat, or however it's spelled.

  10. ahh the smell... by DilbertLand · · Score: 5, Funny

    Can anyone else imagine the smell in the auction room with lots of nervous Star Trek fans?

    1. Re:ahh the smell... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you implying something?

    2. Re:ahh the smell... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would that be teen spirit?

    3. Re:ahh the smell... by XXIstCenturyBoy · · Score: 1

      No problem. Just bring pungent vinegar and tangy Roquefort to block your smell receptors.

  11. boneheads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    There must be something about joining an **AA, lowers IQ or something. This is a pretty valuable collection. Sell it once,you get one pay day. Open a museum, add the props, have movie showings, interactive kiosks, etc, host conferences, what-ever, and have 365 paydays a year, for a *long* time.

    1. Re:boneheads by Detritus · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think you overestimate the general public's interest in Star Trek. Most museums are doing well if they can pay their bills. They aren't money machines.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    2. Re:boneheads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      graceland would be a crude analogy to the concept

    3. Re:boneheads by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      As someone mentioned, there is the one at the Vegas Hilton. I think there is a traveling version too, that moves between cities. Paramount has several warehouses of Star Trek artifacts.

      It is somewhat unfortunate that this auction probably means scattering from one central private collection to numerous private collections, but I am skeptical about the viability of a major museum or theme park.

    4. Re:boneheads by xigxag · · Score: 1

      Paramount's accountants and actuaries probably figure that the value of all this junk is only gonna go down. If they hold out 'til the 50th anniversary, the surviving hardcore Trekkies will be mostly drawing on their retirements and won't be spending on collectibles. So Paramount will reel 'em in now while their 401(k)'s are still fat.

      And, broadly speaking, there is no next generation to replace the old guard Trek fanatics. Sci-fi television was a nice Cold War/Space Age by-product, but today's public can barely be bothered with fiction, much less science. Nowadays, it's all about Idols and Models.

      --
      There are two kinds of people: 1) those who start arrays with one and 1) those who start them with zero.
    5. Re:boneheads by rhyno46 · · Score: 0

      That's a good reason to put it in Las Vegas.

    6. Re:boneheads by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      I beg to differ! I bought the 'Tripping the Rift' DVD box set just last week!

      (I suspect I may be part of the 1% or less of the people particpating in this discussion who can (faintly) remember seeing an original first broadcast of a Star Trek episode. No, none of the 'derivative' series, fine as they may be, count.)

    7. Re:boneheads by Edzor · · Score: 1

      eh, what about attlestar_Galactica? that was [is] pretty successful.

    8. Re:boneheads by Freaky · · Score: 1

      Have you been to Las Vegas lately? http://www.startrekexp.com/ A bar, memoriabelia and a roller coaster all with Star Trek theme. It's a very very geeky place to play. Now, it may be that they need a casino to make it viable, but at least it exsists.

      --
      Timing is everything
  12. At last! by Frogbert · · Score: 1

    Finally the time has come to sell the captains chair I... found.

    1. Re:At last! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod parent up!

      That filthy, stool stealing bastard

  13. Why Kirk is Better Than Picard by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 4, Funny
    FTFA:
    Fans and collectors will have a chance to acquire "Star Trek" artifacts [...] Capt. James Kirk's uniform or Capt. Jean-Luc Picard's jumpsuit [...]
    See? Kirk wore a uniform. Picard wore a jumpsuit.

    'nuff said. :^)
    1. Re:Why Kirk is Better Than Picard by pedalman · · Score: 1
      See? Kirk wore a uniform. Picard wore a jumpsuit.
      At least it wasn't a leisure suit. Whew!!!
      --
      Friends don't let friends line-dance.
    2. Re:Why Kirk is Better Than Picard by sharkey · · Score: 1
      Kirk wore a uniform.

      One word: Velour.

      'Nuff said.
      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  14. The horror by BungeBash · · Score: 0

    So when do you think the lines will start for this auction. I say 3 weeks prior... What a sad and pathetic existence the trekkies have.

    1. Re:The horror by pembo13 · · Score: 1

      I would consider myself a geek. But the whole Star Trek thing is a bit over the top. Stargate...now that's a show.

      --
      "Thanks for all the money you paid to us. We've used it to buy off ISO among other things" -Microsoft
    2. Re:The horror by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      I would consider myself a geek. But the whole Star Trek thing is a bit over the top. Stargate...now that's a show.

      Ye likes yer sci-fi dumbed down, I see.
      But, since it is entertaining, I'll grant you that it is, indeed, a show.

      In fact, I kinda think stargate is the anti star-trek: Every week they go to a different planet and they do the opposite of the Prime Directive.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

  15. Everybody sing along... by Spock+the+Baptist · · Score: 1

    (Sung to the tune of Prince's Raspberry Beret)

    Shatner's scary toupee,
    the kind that you find in a used rug store....

    --
    "Oh drat these computers, they're so naughty and so complex, I could pinch them." --Marvin the Martian
    1. Re:Everybody sing along... by billcopc · · Score: 1

      Ewwww.. now every time I hear that song about losing one's virginity, I'll have an image of Shatner's toupee in my mind.. ewwwwwwwww

      make it go away!!!

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
  16. Transparent Aluminum by hemanman · · Score: 3, Funny

    I sure could use some of that for a new garage door :-)

    -H

    1. Re:Transparent Aluminum by navyjeff · · Score: 1
      I sure could use some of that for a new garage door :-)
      Oh come now, do you really want everyone in your neighborhood seeing either your god-awful mess or your '85 Mustang?

  17. I'll take... by ka0sx · · Score: 2

    captains chair and a replicator... and a couple of phasers.. hmmmm, that would be enough... also the giant viewing screen, old STTNG epiosodes would look great on that!

    1. Re:I'll take... by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      I'll take a Transporter. As for the rest... I'll just "borrow" yours!

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    2. Re:I'll take... by kimvette · · Score: 1

      Screw that, I'll just take the replicator. Hell, I have a new business idea:

      1. Buy replicator
      2. Program it to produce Jeri Ryan replicants
      3. Buy ad space on slashdot
      4. $$$PROFIT$$$

      Ah hell, it'd be easier just to have Jeri Ryan blow-up dolls made and still profit plenty.

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
  18. Imagine Col. Kilgore saying, by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

    "I love the smell of sweaty geeks in the morning. It's that smell, that stale sweat smell. It smells like . . . .dorkiness."

    --
    It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
  19. Why Kirk vs. Picard is stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sisko is a god. :)

    1. Re:Why Kirk vs. Picard is stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn right. He punched Q!

  20. I think modding one of the computer mock ups would by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    be cool.

    Not sure what would happen to the resale value, but putting a lcd display into a prop computer would be cooler than making a nintendo into a dvd player.

  21. Best Part of Star Trek Cannot Be Bought by reporter · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I am a lifelong fan of "Star Trek".

    However, I am not a fan of Star-Trek conventions. 99% of the content of a typical convention is whoring (a.k.a. selling) memorabilia: photos with the aging actors, cards, spacecraft models, etc. The entire convention is lined with booths hawking memorabilia.

    Yet, the best part of "Star Trek" cannot be bought. It is a story about how humankind transcends the suffering and limitations of life in the 20th century and 21st century. The Enterprise's entering warp is a metaphor for our breaking the bonds of our limitations as we soar to a greater, better future.

    The best part of "Star Trek" is the message of hope. (I have read the profiles of many felony convicts and have yet to come across one who is a Trekkie.)

    Hope is not what Christie's auction will sell. This auction is a bigger, more expensive version of a typical convention.

    1. Re:Best Part of Star Trek Cannot Be Bought by Lucractius · · Score: 1

      rather specious reasoning to assume anything from the fact you dont find trekkies among the convicted felons being because its somehow enlightening... a more logical argument would invlove say, ex cons reforming as trekkies inspired by the show somehow... but i cant possibly fathom how myself...

      --
      XML - A clever joke would be here if /. didn't mangle tag brackets.
    2. Re:Best Part of Star Trek Cannot Be Bought by Atario · · Score: 3, Interesting
      The best part of "Star Trek" is the message of hope. (I have read the profiles of many felony convicts and have yet to come across one who is a Trekkie.)
      Not to politicize the discussion, but I'd be fascinated(, Captain,) to see how what percentage of Republicans and what percentage of Democrats (and of the other parties too) are Trekkies.
      --
      "A great democracy must be progressive or it will soon cease to be a great democracy." --Theodore Roosevelt
    3. Re:Best Part of Star Trek Cannot Be Bought by suv4x4 · · Score: 0

      I am a lifelong fan of "Star Trek".

      According to police records, 99% of the arrested pedophiles also are.

      Legal and Moderator Disclaimer: While the fact is true, I'm not suggesting anything, and this is just attempt at a cheap joke.

    4. Re:Best Part of Star Trek Cannot Be Bought by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Good point! Also, a high percentage of child molesters are Trekkies.

      http://www.macleans.ca/topstories/justice/article. jsp?content=20050530_106573_106573

    5. Re:Best Part of Star Trek Cannot Be Bought by kklein · · Score: 1

      Beat me to it. In fact, it wasn't too long ago that we were talking about that correlation on this here internets...

    6. Re:Best Part of Star Trek Cannot Be Bought by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yet, the best part of "Star Trek" cannot be bought.

      The best part of "Star Trek" is the message of hope.

      Hope is not what Christie's auction will sell.


      No, no, check the catalogue. Hope is in there. It's item number 47. This auction really has got everything.

      --
      -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
    7. Re:Best Part of Star Trek Cannot Be Bought by potaz · · Score: 1

      Right. You have a source for that? The closest I've seen is a report about a guy arrested for sex crimes who also had all these Voyager and DS9 posters in his basement. It's funny how "one instance" can become "99%" on THE CRAZY WORLD OF THE INTERNET

    8. Re:Best Part of Star Trek Cannot Be Bought by jdbartlett · · Score: 1
    9. Re:Best Part of Star Trek Cannot Be Bought by nomadic · · Score: 1

      Yet, the best part of "Star Trek" cannot be bought. It is a story about how humankind transcends the suffering and limitations of life in the 20th century and 21st century.

      ...to achieve a future where everyone looks and dresses the same and listens to soulless light jazz. Did you ever hear the music they listen to on Star Trek? Now THAT'S suffering.

    10. Re:Best Part of Star Trek Cannot Be Bought by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      This link was posted by another commenter, I have seen similar news stories at other sources. The findings were not the result of deliberate scientific inquiry, but rather an observation from a team of police investigators. The number of investigated pedophiles who had an interest in Star Trek was neither 99% nor "all but one", but a significant, surprisingly large number in comparison to the general population.

      Note that no one is saying that Star Trek fans tend to be pedophiles, nor that Star Trek in any way turns people into pedophiles. There seems, however, to be statistical evidence that Star Trek appeals much more to the group of pedophiles investigated by that police team than the average population, which might be an interesting factoid about pedophiles.

    11. Re:Best Part of Star Trek Cannot Be Bought by sconeu · · Score: 1

      Did you ever hear the music they listen to on Star Trek?

      "Bitter Dregs...."

      "Headin' out to Eden!"

      and let us not forget....

      KLINGON OPERA!!!!!

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    12. Re:Best Part of Star Trek Cannot Be Bought by CrackedButter · · Score: 1

      You have some weird view on trekkies there mate. Most of them are just plain fucking weird (I should know I use to be one), second. One guy I knew via ebay who I had traded with before (over the collectable card game) actually stole my whole set of cards, I sent them down and I never got the money which was a large sum. Then my windows machine at the time crashed and I lost his details and could never take him to the small claims court. Fucker never paid me. My message of hope is that he dies the best way a trekkie could.

    13. Re:Best Part of Star Trek Cannot Be Bought by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      But don't you, essentially, feel better off now being rid of said 'collectable' cards?

      If you find his info ten years from now, you'll probably send him a thankyou note.

    14. Re:Best Part of Star Trek Cannot Be Bought by fm6 · · Score: 1
      The best part of "Star Trek" is the message of hope. (I have read the profiles of many felony convicts and have yet to come across one who is a Trekkie.)
      Dude, it's a TV show, created by a semi-talented, extremely cynical, Hollywood hack. If the best you can do in the way of "hope" is to fly off on an imaginary spaceship, you're in serious trouble.
    15. Re:Best Part of Star Trek Cannot Be Bought by CrackedButter · · Score: 1

      Oh without a doubt, I wasted so much money on them and it could of been spent on something else. I guess that's what they mean when some people grow up after having a misspent youth. Boom boom!

    16. Re:Best Part of Star Trek Cannot Be Bought by bitt3n · · Score: 1
      I have read the profiles of many felony convicts and have yet to come across one who is a Trekkie.

      http://72.14.203.104/search?q=cache:Fw3etTOxNawJ:s eattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/20022591 11_photos01.html

      toronto sex crimes unit finds pedophiles likely to be trekkies (all but one arrested in a four year span were trekkies)

    17. Re:Best Part of Star Trek Cannot Be Bought by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Selection effect. Obviously, the trekkies were easier to catch.

    18. Re:Best Part of Star Trek Cannot Be Bought by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      Hey, man, you're getting in the way of the process whereby a single anecdote becomes a well known internet fact. Back off before you get trampled by the truthiness.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    19. Re:Best Part of Star Trek Cannot Be Bought by cgenman · · Score: 1

      Yet, the best part of "Star Trek" cannot be bought. It is a story about how humankind transcends the suffering and limitations of life in the 20th century and 21st century. The Enterprise's entering warp is a metaphor for our breaking the bonds of our limitations as we soar to a greater, better future.

      Also known as "convienient plot devices," "silly overacting," and "not acting human anymore."

      I was going to write a humorous response to this, but the fact is that Star Trek is a utopia. There is no need for money, because there are no limited resources. There is no murder, theft, or greed. Territorial battles take place between isolated fringe groups, not real governments. People don't get jealous of other people's power. People don't want more than they need. There is no fashion, no clothing, no showing off. Nobody longs for excitement or thrill. Nobody competes, except for in the occasional intellectual pursuit.

      Surprisingly, nothing is morally ambiguous. The crew is either correct in their logic, or incorrect, but never occupying a moral grey area. They always act in what they believe is the most selfless fashion, reducing a complicated universe of choices to "he did the best he could."

      People aren't like that. Even intellectuals aren't like that. We have limited resources, and history has shown that no matter how much our resources increase, we will scale our greed until resources are limited again. People often wind up in situations that they take advantage of. Not all diseases can be cured by passing a character through a transporter filter.

      Star Trek is not the future. It's an alluring fantasy. But a fantasy with no more ground in reality than Batman Beyond or Atlas Shrugged.

    20. Re:Best Part of Star Trek Cannot Be Bought by patio11 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Forget politics -- I would be fascinated to see what percentage of Trekkies self-identified as human.

    21. Re:Best Part of Star Trek Cannot Be Bought by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and how many of them realise that the ST future borrows quite a lot from socialism and communism...

    22. Re:Best Part of Star Trek Cannot Be Bought by yourlord · · Score: 1

      I'm a libertarian, which puts me more inline with republicans than democrats. In general, republicans tend to lean toward less government but want to control people's lives with the government, and democrats tend to lean toward communism and want to dominate people's lives in every respect.

      I am a huge fan of star trek. I've watched every os episode many times over, and ng episodes more times than I would care to count (each). I watched all of ds9 though from it onward it spiraled into a pit of feces.

      as far as the movies,
      wrath of khan > *

    23. Re:Best Part of Star Trek Cannot Be Bought by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1
      all five 'Star Trek' television series
      This auction really has got everything.

      Except animation cells for the forgotten two seasons of the Star Trek animated series which have yet to make it to DVD (out-of-print VHS only so far).
      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    24. Re:Best Part of Star Trek Cannot Be Bought by OwnedByTwoCats · · Score: 1

      Government spending has increased fastest when Executive and Legislative branches were both controlled by Republicans.

      In general, Republicans love pork-barrel spending, borrowing the money from foreigners, and ineffective government that costs a lot and doesn't solve real problems. They have no problems with bending the truth or killing foreigners when they get in the way.

      Democrats believe in effective government, responsibility, and cooperating with the rest of the world. Military force is a last resort, not the first tool out of the kit. Government should solve problems, not be the problem.

    25. Re:Best Part of Star Trek Cannot Be Bought by yourlord · · Score: 1

      I never said the republican party was worth pissing on if it was on fire. But your interpretation of the democratic party is as off base as I've ever seen. You paint them like they're saints trying to save the world from evil republicans. They are not. They are just as corrupt and abusive as the republican party ever thought about being. The only real difference between the 2 parties is the path to ultimate destruction of freedom and liberty they represent.

      Government IS the problem. That's been understood ever since the founding fathers created this country. They tried (and apparantly failed) to create a country where the government's powers to restrict liberty was curtailed at the foundation. I fear they never imagined how much mankind would excel at redefining words and creating such mammoth bureaucracy that liberty can be easily dismissed, lost in a mountain of red tape.

      The mess we are in today is the fault of the Democrats just as much as it's the fault of the Republicans.

    26. Re:Best Part of Star Trek Cannot Be Bought by schlumpf_louise · · Score: 1

      No, no, check the catalogue. Hope is in there. It's item number 47.

      Now there's a true Trekkie, making reference to the number 47 in their post.

    27. Re:Best Part of Star Trek Cannot Be Bought by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only real difference between the 2 parties is the path to ultimate destruction of freedom and liberty they represent.

      Have you looked at the current admistration at all?

    28. Re:Best Part of Star Trek Cannot Be Bought by b1t+r0t · · Score: 1
      (out-of-print VHS only so far)

      My laserdisc box set says that you are wrong.

      Of course Paramount had to screw it up somehow, which they did by not putting in chapter stops... so to reach the second episode of each side you either have to fast forward 22 minutes, or punch in a seek to 22 minutes.

      --

      --
      "Open source is good." - Steve Jobs
      "Open source is evil." - Microsoft
    29. Re:Best Part of Star Trek Cannot Be Bought by Chris+Tucker · · Score: 1

      I once commented that Libertarianism was the Esperonto of politics.

      I was rightly corrected. More people actually speak and read Esperonto than will EVER vote Libertarian. Indeed, more folks speak Esperonto than will ever take Libertarianism seriously.

      The above bullshit about democrats and communism merely reinforces the image of Libertarians as pathetic assholes.

      Go back to your L Neil Smith libertarian porn.

      --
      Guaranteed! This comment 100% Anthrax free!
    30. Re:Best Part of Star Trek Cannot Be Bought by yourlord · · Score: 1

      If you objectively look at the principles of communism, and then look at the policy that the democrats have pushed for the past 40-50 years, you will see a push toward communism. I'm not saying republicans are saints. They represent as much of a threat to freedom and liberty as the democrats do, only the republicans tend to lean toward theocracy.

      The republicans mantra would be more, you're free to do what you want, as long as it's what we want you to do.

  22. You can look at the catalog online by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 2, Informative

    http://www.christies.com/special_sites/startrek/ov erview.asp

    Tragically it is in Flash.

    I wonder if they have the dilithium crystals from "Mudd's Women"? If you ever need a dilithium crystal there's really no substitute.

    1. Re:You can look at the catalog online by ptbarnett · · Score: 1
      Unfortunately, all you can do is pre-order a printed catalogue. And the "special limited edition boxed set" itself is being billed as a collector's item, for $500.

      The "regular" 2-volume set is $81.

    2. Re:You can look at the catalog online by Monkelectric · · Score: 1

      Yea ... this is complete bullshit. I would love to buy something... but I am not going to New York to do it. I am not going to order a catalog. This is what ebay is for.

      --

      Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

    3. Re:You can look at the catalog online by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      I wonder if they have the dilithium crystals from "Mudd's Women"?

      They don't mention a single object from TOS. TFA says something about some costumes of guest stars. I doubt there's anything recognisable left after all these years. If you watch TOS episodes now the props seem rather unconvincing by current standards.

      I note also Christies are selling the catalogues for $90; or $500 for a "limited edition". Amazing.

    4. Re:You can look at the catalog online by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 1

      There's a worker bee and the model of the NCC-1701-A (Enterprise A from the Undiscovered Countyr). I would qualify that as TOS(except it's the Movies not the TV show). They also have Kirk's outfit from the Search for Spock and the go climb a rock shirt he wore in Star Trek 5.

      --

      Gorkman

    5. Re:You can look at the catalog online by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      Enjoy your 'collectable' PEZ dispensers, then, dood.

    6. Re:You can look at the catalog online by blincoln · · Score: 2

      If you ever need a dilithium crystal there's really no substitute.

      "Here in the engine room of the starship Enterprise, we've secretly replaced the dilithium crystals with new Folger's Crystals. Let's see if anyone notices the difference."

      --
      "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
    7. Re:You can look at the catalog online by Monkelectric · · Score: 1

      Hah, theres always someone on slashdot willing to be an asshole for no reason ...

      --

      Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

  23. Probably no real good stuff by Mike+Peel · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Hopefully, this is a sale of all of the useless bits of junk accumulated over the years - no real good stuff. The equivalent of a garage sale, where you're selling odd bits you no longer want, but keeping the useful/valuable stuff in the house.

    I say this because Star Trek seems to have become an important heritage nowadays, and they seem to keep doing exhibitions etc. about it. Exhibitions would be rather difficult, and not very good, if all the interesting stuff was in the hands of a few thousand fans.

    Of course, if it is decent stuff, I guess a single person / group could try to buy as much as possible, and open up a mini Star Trek museum, or something. That could be interesting.

    1. Re:Probably no real good stuff by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 1

      Useless bits of Junk?

      Picard's 1st season uniform
      Klingon Captain's chair
      Desktop Computer from Voyager

      Maybe useless bits, but still all good stuff....and the best piece:

      The Enterprise NCC-1701-A from Star Trek 5 and 6.

      I would love to have any of these.

      --

      Gorkman

    2. Re:Probably no real good stuff by blincoln · · Score: 1

      The Enterprise NCC-1701-A from Star Trek 5 and 6.

      If you look closely at the auction, it's the mass-market Ertl model, it's just been studio-painted for use in shots where they didn't need the big hero model.

      Some of the other stuff is pretty cool, but obviously the prices will be too high for anyone except those who are both very rich *and* very dorky. I mean, even the Babylon 5 props on eBay awhile ago went for about ten times what I would have been willing to pay.

      --
      "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
  24. I felt a great disturbance in the Force, by gh5046 · · Score: 1, Funny

    as if millions of trekkies suddenly ran out of their parent's basement in glee.

  25. Ressikan Flute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I have a feeling that the Ressikan flute, estimated to sell for $300, will sell for much, much more. That particular episode struck a very large emotional chord from a lot of people, and that flute was the symbol representing the episode. If only I could go. :-(

    1. Re:Ressikan Flute by fuzza · · Score: 2, Informative

      Looks like they've updated it now... $800-$1000.

      --
      Can't find examples of evolution? No matter, neither could Dawkins
    2. Re:Ressikan Flute by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You know, they usually take telephone bids. You don't have to be there in person. But you're right, that flute is going to go for way more than they think.

      --
      -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
    3. Re:Ressikan Flute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      About your sig - I guess neither you nor Dawkins has ever played Boggle.

    4. Re:Ressikan Flute by kahrytan · · Score: 2

      Ressikan flute.

      That would be the only thing I would want. I would even learn to play a flute. It's to bad I don't have 2 grand to spend.

      --
      \
    5. Re:Ressikan Flute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bet you could play the skin flute just fine. And you can probably find one to play for free.

    6. Re:Ressikan Flute by Telvin_3d · · Score: 1

      Please note the part where they list is as 'non-playing prop brass flute'. This is a fancy way of saying that it is a solid hunk of metal with holes drilled to make it look like it is real.

      That said, I too would love the flute.

    7. Re:Ressikan Flute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd be more eager to bid on it if the flute was playable. I know I wouldn't play it much, but sadly it doesn't work :(

  26. U send me star rek plz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Plz send me star trek to me at ur convenience.

    My id 4 to send is startrek@spambob.com

  27. Oh man... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    President Bush got word of this... It seems he now wants to purchase 20,000 shield generators to protect the mexican border, "some of those shuttle thingies" for NASA, and by presidential decree, NO ONE is to sell Dick a phaser.

    -JDS

    1. Re:Oh man... by phyruxus · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but you just *know* he'll locate them outside of the force fields they generate.

      --
      "A witty saying proves nothing." ~Voltaire
      "d'Oh!" ~Homer
    2. Re:Oh man... by sharkey · · Score: 1

      You forgot the pa-hoe-ton torpeedees.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  28. What's better than an Aeron chair in your office? by Wiseleo · · Score: 2, Funny

    A Klingon Captain's chair.

    I think it'll work marvelously in my office. :-)

    --
    Leonid S. Knyshov
    Find me on Quora :)
  29. Re:What's better than an Aeron chair in your offic by jacksonj04 · · Score: 1

    Make sure you get it installed with the viewscreen and navigation console options.

    --
    How many people can read hex if only you and dead people can read hex?
  30. Re:What's better than an Aeron chair in your offic by EtherC · · Score: 1

    "Employees not recognizing your authority at the office?" "Wish you had a self-destruct button nearby... just in case?" "Then bid now on Klingon Commander Kruge's chair and finally get the respect you deserve!"

  31. boneheads? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wrong series... You're thinking of the minbari, that's Babylon 5. ;)

  32. At least Picard by Rhinobird · · Score: 2, Funny

    At least Picard boldy went where no-one in pajama's has went before.
    When I'm in my pajamas, I don't want to step out my front door.
    Kirk had a spiffy uniform. If I had a spiffy uniform, I'd go places too.

    --
    If Mr. Edison had thought smarter he wouldn't sweat as much. --Nikola Tesla
  33. If you leave now... by Rhinobird · · Score: 2, Funny

    If you leave now, we won't get out our plastic phaser toys and wave them menacingly at you.

    --
    If Mr. Edison had thought smarter he wouldn't sweat as much. --Nikola Tesla
  34. That's ok by Rhinobird · · Score: 1

    That's ok
    *SNIFFFFF* - ahhhhh huhuhuhuhuhuh....

    --
    If Mr. Edison had thought smarter he wouldn't sweat as much. --Nikola Tesla
    1. Re:That's ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One day, genetic engineering will find a way to prevent people like you from being born.

  35. Christie Sale 1778^H^H01 by buckleyc · · Score: 2

    Darn; so close. Now it would have been very cool if this had happened sooner. I.e., if these nerdishly cool collectibles (NCC) had been auction sale 1701.
    Ya kno': NCC-1701

  36. RProbably no real good stuff-Set my culture free. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I say this because Star Trek seems to have become an important heritage nowadays, and they seem to keep doing exhibitions etc. about it. Exhibitions would be rather difficult, and not very good, if all the interesting stuff was in the hands of a few thousand fans."

    Oh I don't know. It would shut up all those "set my culture free" people that show up every time we have a copyright story. "Here's your culture. Now go away!"

  37. Transparent Aluminum is real by Hyperhaplo · · Score: 1

    They invented Transparent Aluminum a while back.

    --
    You have a sick, twisted mind. Please subscribe me to your newsletter.
    1. Re:Transparent Aluminum is real by jizmonkey · · Score: 1
      They invented Transparent Aluminum a while back.

      That's a ceramic, which is non-metallic. There are lots of transparent aluminum compounds out there. Sapphire and ruby for instance are aluminum oxide, doped for color. The "crystals" on fine watches are artificially grown transparent sapphire. You can buy ingots of transparent sapphire from Honeywell.

      --
      With great power comes great fan noise.
  38. Gnome Technology; not failure-prone! by freaker_TuC · · Score: 1

    The ultrasafe transporter is in good condition but if you think it will never fail? Better don't wear that red shirt when using it !

    --
    --- I am known for the ones who want to find me on the net. Is that a privacy risk or a privilege? One might wonder..
  39. That $15-20K Enterprise model is a hobby kit!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I thought that $15-20K for the model of the Enterprise (about 8 feet long, originally built for the first movie at a cost of over $250K) was awfully cheap, so I looked it up on the auction web site. It turns out that for an estimated $15-20K, you will get a 20 inch long, plastic hobby model which has been customized (presumably internal lighting and good paint job) for use in "long" shots (i.e. far away) of the Enterprise.

    Caveat emptor!

  40. I want uh...um... by Istahir · · Score: 1

    I want a Phaser and umm...a Romulan Cloaking device....and uhhh....the holographic doctor :P

    --
    Primordial Soup
    1. Re:I want uh...um... by trip_trew · · Score: 1

      A female holographic doctor ?

    2. Re:I want uh...um... by Istahir · · Score: 1

      there was a female holographic doctor ?, which series ?

      --
      Primordial Soup
  41. This can't be a good sign for future production. by YaRness · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Anyone who's watched all the documentaries, Trekkies 1 & 2, behind the scenes, etc., knows that Paramount's huge collection of props gets reused over and over again from movie to movie to show to movie ad infinitum.

    Are they offloading their entire collection, or only part of it? Does this signify any particular decision with regards to future movies or shows?

  42. Re:I think modding one of the computer mock ups wo by valen · · Score: 1


      A guy I know in Sunnyvale, CA bought a bottling machine for his meadery.

      The day he got it, he spent all night pricking around with the interface to it, you know, where you set speeds, cork or screwcap, how much to put in each bottle etc.

      And, then just for the hell of it, he realised you could reprogram it. He added a LCARS type interface, for the main screen. Funny as hell. It really confused the engineer who turned up the next day to show him how to turn it on...

    john

  43. Boston Legal by Animus+Howard · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...should have an episode where Denny Crane buys a phaser pistol from the auction, and starts carrying it instead of his handgun.

  44. the little items by v1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There are basically two variety of memorobilia collectors... those that want the big things, like the captain's chair or a wardrobe item etc, and the people that look for the little nicknacks. Probably the wisest collector would go for the little items, as they can have more of them and display them easier.

    Hmm... I'm not a big trekkie but I can think of a few items that would be nice. That flue of Picard's would be nice. Maybe a few isolinear chips. A comm badge. (STTNG please, those from the movies are gawdy!) Or that huge hunk of crystal dilithium that was in the enterprise's warp core.

    Get a bunch of the touch pads from the doors or holodecks and use them for light switch wall plates. :)

    And of course the computer display props. From what I've read, most of them (the ones that were not animated) were backlit reverse-glass paintings. Those would make awesome wall decorations in a chosen room of the house, hang 'em like paintings.

    I also hear the props in the captain's ready-room are very popular. hah... remember the episode where the enterprise had an alien computer virus and picard ordered tea and got the teacup with the what.. bird of paradize flower in it? "now THAT should not have happened!" That would be a fun one to have.

    Probaly the most fun props to have are the ones that not many people will even be considering.

    Though previous poster is right, that flute is going to go for a lot more than $300. I'd expect it to draw $1500-2500. Key props from emotional/memorable episodes are bound to go for a mint.

    --
    I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
  45. DIBS!!! by Khyber · · Score: 1

    I call dibs on the nuclear wessel!!!!!

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  46. Re:What's better than an Aeron chair in your offic by Kaemaril · · Score: 1

    You're in luck. They're flogging off one from ST:V, estimated price $6000-$8000.

  47. Museum in Vegas by SonicSpike · · Score: 2, Informative

    This already sort of exists: http://www.startrekexp.com/

    --
    Libertas in infinitum
  48. I'd love a phaser but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd really like one of the phasers (dont care which model) but at $1,800 USD$ per?!?
    they're insane. but they'll get it. just not from me.

    there are other small bits like that, but they cost waaay too much!

  49. I for one ... by pgrote · · Score: 1

    .... and distressed that Jean Luc really didn't play the flute. I mean I can understand the Enterprise not being real, phasers being special effects and the transported being fake, but come on. Jean Luc can't play a flute from a civilization that didn't exist?

    What next? Are we to find out that the medical devices they use on the show can't heal heart problems or bad acting?

  50. OY! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was following a punch line. No need to get hostile.

  51. anything left from TOS? by Lawrence_Bird · · Score: 1

    saurian brandy maybe?

  52. Re:This can't be a good sign for future production by kahrytan · · Score: 1

    Exactly. If they are offloading their entire warehouse stock of props, this auction officially marks the end of Star Trek for CBS/Paramount.

      On the other hand, I want NBC to buy back Star Trek franchise.

    --
    \
  53. Kolinahr Necklace by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 1

    OOO....they have the symbols of total logic (Star Trek I).

    --

    Gorkman

  54. Don't sell this individually... by Simonetta · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Paramount is making a big mistake even considering selling this items individually at auction. The collection should be kept whole and rented out to people and groups who want to make low-budget Star Trek movies.

        Since Star Trek fans are different from ordinary movie audiences in their willingness to pay for any filmed episode even remotely related to this genre, the studio should rent the Star Trek sets to low-budget productions. They own the copyright and would make money off any production that uses the Star Trek motif, logos, and fictional settings.

        The reason that they are selling the sets is because they don't plan to make anymore of these films themselves. The individual actors are too expensive or are no longer available due to age (or passing). The promotional costs are too high and the specialized audience too small to justify continued expenditures of $50-$100 million on further 'offical' Star Trek productions.

        So let someone else make a new set of films for the fanatic audience. Hire new actors, write new plots, and establish new distribution channels. The biggest cost for new independent Star Trek productions is the elaborate and detailed sets. And these sets are already built, documented, and vacant. The money that could be made by renting these sets for independent productions is greater than the money gained by selling off the props individually. Especially since the individual props can be sold off to the fans for the same price in the future after the market for low-budget ST productions has been fully exploited.

        For any other film series, selling off the props makes sense. But Star Trek has never been just any other film series. And selling off the props at this time makes no sense.

    1. Re:Don't sell this individually... by TrekkieGod · · Score: 1
      The collection should be kept whole and rented out to people and groups who want to make low-budget Star Trek movies.

      I think you overestimate the quality of the props. Most toys that you buy are much better quality. I believe it was in the "I Am Spock" (or "I Am Not Spock") autobiography that I read this, but Nimoy said that it was easy to spot fake Tribbles being sold at conventions as the actual props used: if they actually looked anything like tribbles, they were fake. Basically, the art department people didn't even bother covering the entire prop with fur, since only sections at a time would be shown on camera.

      --

      Warning: Opinions known to be heavily biased.

    2. Re:Don't sell this individually... by blincoln · · Score: 1

      The collection should be kept whole and rented out to people and groups who want to make low-budget Star Trek movies.

      See the post immediately below yours.

      With *very* few exceptions (e.g. Lord of the Rings), film and television companies build things as cheaply as possible. They are designed to last only just long enough to get through filming, and only just good enough to look convincing on screen.

      I used to work for an ex-Hollywood prop master. He had one of the screen-used hoverboards from Back to the Future II. I could barely contain my glee at holding it, since they are one of my most favourite pieces of fictional technology ever. However, it was also the perfect example of the difference between seeing something on-screen and seeing it in real life. The body of the hoverboard was a chunk of styrofoam painted neon pink. On top was the Mattel logo and an abstract pattern either printed on plastic or laminated paper. The "hover" equipment on the bottom was cast resin (I think? This was awhile ago) painted to look like metal.

      Even if Paramount *could* make money renting out Star Trek props (which is unlikely), they wouldn't stand up to the beating. The best place for them is in a display case, which is exactly where this auction will make sure they end up.

      --
      "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
  55. These won't look like what you think they will. by blair1q · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Anyone buying one of these things remotely will be rather surprised, maybe sorely disappointed, when they receive them in the mail.

    They're very shoddily built. Almost laughably unartistic. Nothing like the realism and solidity and quality they seem on the television.

    An acquaintance of mine, who worked for a company building props for ST:TNG, explained the illusion this way:

    Seeing something on TV is like catching it out of the corner of your eye going 60 mph in a rainstorm.

    So, since time is their least resource, they don't bother with fine detail that would just disappear, and they don't care about alignment, overspray, or fit, which you can't measure or even apprehend, nor durability, since almost everything is used for a very short time in a zero-stress environment by someone whose standing orders are "don't break the props".

    Much of the "metal" will be painted foam or extruded plastic. Controls won't operate. The costumes will appear cobbled together from the cheapest possible fabric and will have strange and coarse alterations, plus any damage that's accumulated since it became junk. Literally all the value left in these items is bragging rights, sentimentality, and ego boost.

    Which is going to have to do.

    Because I want a pair of Spock's ears. Bad.

    1. Re:These won't look like what you think they will. by Wes+Janson · · Score: 2, Funny

      The amusing thing is, you're probably going to get modded down out of spite for ruining the dreams of all the Trekkies here.

    2. Re:These won't look like what you think they will. by davidsyes · · Score: 1

      One reason they could get away with "shoddily-built" props was because even until recently there was no "hi-def" TV to expose the flaws in the smaller props and even in some of the sets. However, for the big screen more care and attention were given, but still, you're right-- many if not 90% of the props will NOT be of quality worth writing home about.

      I hope these purchasers can get full-disclosure photos of the items BEFORE they purchase them to minimize the risk they'll be "stunned" and "mind reaped" if they get uninspiring junk in the mail.

      And, of all places, they could hold the auction in Paramount's very own studios. Why the hell in New York?

      --
      Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
    3. Re:These won't look like what you think they will. by Telvin_3d · · Score: 1

      Why New York? Because the NY offices of the auction house is set up to take dozens or even hundreds of simultanious phone bids from world wide. Paramount Studios? I am thinking not.

  56. Re:This can't be a good sign for future production by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

    We can hope.

  57. Be careful out there... by fm6 · · Score: 1

    Jeez, dude. Half the stories on the shows were about those gadgets malfunctioning! If Paramount had a working warp core or transporter, selling them would be begging for a lawsuit!

    1. Re:Be careful out there... by BluBrick · · Score: 1
      No problem! Sure they were designed to break. But keep in mind that they were also designed to break in the Star Trek Universe.

      All you will need need to do is apply la Forge's Principles of Engineering:

      If it breaks, try the following, in order.
      1. Reverse the polarity
      2. Modify the phase output
      3. Bypass the command protocols
      4. Switch to manual controls
      5. Replace the Beryllium Sphere
      (Disclaimer: One of these actions will not actually work in the Star Trek Universe)
      --
      Ahh - My eye!
      The doctor said I'm not supposed to get Slashdot in it!
    2. Re:Be careful out there... by fm6 · · Score: 1

      I always recharge the dilithium matrix before I try anything else.

  58. I am interested in buying your holodeck... by gijoel · · Score: 0

    ... does it come with the Jessica Alba routine preinstalled?

  59. Nya Nya! by fm6 · · Score: 1

    Your mother was an encyclopedia!

  60. Dibs on the Reiikian flute... by Vthornheart · · Score: 1

    That had to be my favorite Star Trek episode. The Inner Light rocked my socks. I think their estimate on its sentimental value to viewers was quite low... and I've got dibs on it anyways. =) lol =)

    --
    -Vendal Thornheart
  61. Self-sealing stem bolts anyone? by hobbes+vs+boyle · · Score: 3, Funny

    I still got 100 gross in my basement and don't know what to do with them...

    1. Re:Self-sealing stem bolts anyone? by Blob+Pet · · Score: 1

      I'll give you 5,000 wrappages of yamok sauce for the bolts.

      --
      "...today consumers have been conditioned to think of beer when they see a bullfrog..."
  62. What about "Trekker" prisoners? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I recently watched the movie Trekkies, it was interesting and the Trekkie/Trekker fight was LOL. Since prisoners often are troublemakers, I would think I would see Trekker prisoners (those wanting to start arguments).

  63. "Gay" Tag? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah thanks fellow slashdotter(s). "Gay" tag right next to "lame" tag. Real insightful.

    //Not a troll, just a comment

    1. Re:"Gay" Tag? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fag.

  64. Paramount Says It is Not Abandoning Trek by wolverine1999 · · Score: 2, Informative
  65. Entirely off topic... but... by ipsuid · · Score: 0, Offtopic



    I noticed that one of the tags on this article is "gay"...

    I am up to here with this 1984'esque redefinition of words. If you want to say "I hate gay people" then fucking stand up and say that... And if you don't, then why are you absent mindedly throwing around the label of a group to mean something sucks? Words hurt.

    Think about it for a second. Would it be appropriate to say "That's so black" or "That's deaf"?

    And before someone mentions it - yes, calling something "Retarded" really hurts when someone you know has a mental disability. Fuck political correctness --- but there is a difference between hate speech (even "unintentional"), and saying what you mean.

    --
    It appears Ockham lost his razor and grew a beard.
    1. Re:Entirely off topic... but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sorry, but words DON'T hurt. that is, unless you let them. deal with it and stop being so gay.

    2. Re:Entirely off topic... but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yep

    3. Re:Entirely off topic... but... by niXcamiC · · Score: 1

      Remember that gay meaning homosexual is a redefinition too. If some people can redefine it, why can't others?

      --
      Chances are any disscution on Slashdot will degrade into a flamewar about ID/Christianity within 14 posts.
    4. Re:Entirely off topic... but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, what a retard

    5. Re:Entirely off topic... but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck political correctness --- but there is a difference between hate speech (even "unintentional"), and saying what you mean.

      In other words, redefine politically incorrect speech as "hate" speech, so you can then say "fuck PC" without actually challenging it in any meaningful way.

      Do they pay well at the Ministry of Truth?

    6. Re:Entirely off topic... but... by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      Your comment is, um, completely Def. Yo.

  66. /. sci-fi symbol by slothman32 · · Score: 1

    Just think, you could buy the mask used on /. for a sci-fi story.
    Imagine reading Slashdot at work and having the rubber mask stare out at you with it's mouth wide open with the icon doing the same.

    --
    Why don't you guys have friends or journals?
  67. Anyone want... by professorfalcon · · Score: 1

    Spock's brain?

    1. Re:Anyone want... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Brain and brain. What is brain?

  68. Tribbles!!! by DrMorris · · Score: 1

    I'd buy a few tribbles. But I guess they want something like 500$ for each of those cheap fuzzballs...

    1. Re:Tribbles!!! by scottv67 · · Score: 1

      But I guess they want something like 500$ for each

      Well...that's the trouble with tribbles. ;^)

  69. Re:Best Part of Star Trek Cannot Be Bought FANS! by davidsyes · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It would be nice if they'd give some of those sets or rights to the sets to Star Trek Hidden Frontier. I am so sick of the bluescreen background sets that are not proportionate to the characters. I am tired of the characters looking like drop-ins to a set, with the obvious "halo" effect around the actors.

    Tragically, CBS/Paramount and Christies will probably make a killing off of this, but the fan-based Web Trek activities could benefit immeasurably in terms of quality and maybe even respark a whole now surge of Trek fan return. Hiddent Frontier deserves to have better sets, assuming they will have a warehouse in which to store them and the money/donations to pay the storage rent.

    But, Star Trek Exeter (or is it one of the others?) rebuilt the NCC-1701 bridge based on the actual bluepints so that their bridge doesn't suffer the close-up fisheye effect on STHF. I am, however becoming less bothered by HF's drop-in bluescreen sets, and have been enjoying the first 5 seasons over this past week.

    It's amazing the scripts HF, Exeter and the others are turning into fun, tear-jerking, rally-evoking and reminiscence-fueling episodes.

    And these people are doing it though donations or their own money. I think STHF, however, is FANTASTIC in that they put in one season or even one episode all of my favorite ships. They rotate characters, double-bill actors, and touch topics Paramount would NEVER EVER touch, at least not the way STHF does. Moreover, HF has funny intros to each act one or the beginning of each opening act of a complete episode.

    I hope some of the people affluent enough to OWN this overpriced memorabilia will lease or lend it to STHF, Exeter and the other fan-created episodes.

    Fortunately, Paramount has not quashed them. It is almost as inspiring as the judge who slapped down the guy trying his second time to sue/nullify GPL. Thank you Paramount for permitting us to have fan films go where no fan films have gone before. With each STHF and Exeter episode I can freely download and watch, your "generosity" neutralizes a little bit more of my reticence and disdain for "typical Hollywood". (I say that because I am loving the STHF scripts, and I like the fact that EQUAL OPPORTUNITY has extend to "full-figured" bridge crew, ships' captians and so on. REAL Hollywood would probably NEVER financially back and AIR such series divergence from profitability.)

    Hmmm, how apropos... slash image word: "births"

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  70. Re:I want the timeship Aeon by davidsyes · · Score: 1

    This is the opposite of funny...

    I want the Federation Timeship Aeon, and the Baku life-extending enregy rings and some of the Q Continuum powers. Why?

    So I can slipstream my way up and down the Terran timeline and capriciously knock off (or terrorize) a few assholes and the loooong lines of assholes they stemmed from here here and there to make SURE that hegemony, manifest destiny, dynasties and so on don't set back humans. Imagine temporal cop who kicks your ass into line but you cannot do much about it. YOUR RAGE stems from the fact that you cannot BULLY someone who seems to be protected by a Galactic Guardian Angel who is willing to "step in" and do the things the Terran mythical "God" seems to enjoy watching or is too loath to rectify.

    The Trek "Prime Directive" seems nice, but aside from being a moral compass of the 1960s to expose or comment on Capitalism and Communism, it was mainly a story dramatic device. But imagine if today and the past 100 years we didn't have nation invasion that started or contributed to 2 world wars. Visualize a world of today being 300 or 400 years AHEAD of where we are no because we could have averted wars, famine, pestilence, maldistribution of resources and medicines. Imagine if GREED were NOT a primary factor in human (superpower and non-superpower) politics.

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  71. HAHAHAHAHA FOR SURE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What mirth hath you wrought?! I ask of you mirthmaking man, what hath you brought to our heaving guts? I read your comment and I read it again. Could this be true? The funniest TV reference as yet seen on Slashdot? Wow. Now I wish I had watched more TV. I wish that my eyes were rotten from watching TV and it's associated funniness. You have connected a television experience with a Slashdot article about Star Trek. BWAHAHA. I must honestly go for 37 stitches to keep my guts from falling out of my sides. You sir, have set us up the bomb. This bomb has subsequently exploded in pure unadulterated hilarity and covered us in laughter. What say you funnyman? Can you keep up this level of side smashing smirks? The gauntlet has been thrown in the game of absolutely making everyone laugh until the point of urination of one's trousers. I thank you. Through tears of constantly laughing and typing, I thank you.

    1. Re:HAHAHAHAHA FOR SURE! by CrazyTalk · · Score: 1

      I thought it was kinda funny. Maybe not +5 funny, but at least +1 or +2.

  72. Easy viewing ?? by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

    Several users have provided us with the direct link to the auction site for easy viewing.
    Well, if you think that a black screen which doesn't even hint that you need Flash installed is "easy viewing", then maybe so. Even easier to not view it and not waste your money.

    --
    Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  73. I have a feeling too by way2trivial · · Score: 1

    I've read entirely too many news stories about auctions after the fact include talk about an item that went for X times expectations....

    think they may ever undervalue an item to get more ink for the auction house later?

    naahh....

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
  74. Two words: ROMULAN ALE by bmk67 · · Score: 1

    I'll take fifty cases.

  75. Re:What's better than an Aeron chair in your offic by scottv67 · · Score: 1

    "Employees not recognizing your authority at the office?"

    I think you'd be better served by the *lights* from the "How many lights do you see!?!?!" episode. :^)