Slashdot Mirror


Apple and Nike Team up for iPod Shoe Interface

lyonsden writes "Apple and Nike are teaming up to provide runners a system to integrate their shoes and their iPod. A $30 antenna will connect an iPod nano with special shoes to provide pedometer functions."

55 of 300 comments (clear)

  1. Nike+Apple=??? by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 4, Funny

    What would happen if Nike & Apple got together?

    Below is an email correspondence with customer service representatives at iPOD iD, an on-line service that lets people buy personalized iPOD shoes. The dialog began when iPOD cancelled an order for a pair of shoes customized with the word "sweatshop." [get the latest on this story at shey.net]

    From: "Personalize, iPOD iD"
    To: "'W. McFarnby (not really)'"
    Subject: RE: Your iPOD iD order o16468000

    Your iPOD iD order was cancelled for one or more of the following reasons.

    1) Your Personal iD contains another party's trademark or other intellectual property.
    2) Your Personal iD contains the name of an athlete or team we do not have the legal right to use.
    3) Your Personal iD was left blank. Did you not want any personalization?
    4) Your Personal iD contains profanity or inappropriate slang, and besides, your mother would slap us.

    If you wish to reorder your iPOD iD product with a new personalization please visit us again at www.iPOD.com
    Thank you,
    iPOD iD

    From: "W. McFarnby (not really)"
    To: "Personalize, iPOD iD"
    Subject: RE: Your iPOD iD order o16468000

    Greetings,

    My order was canceled but my personal iPOD iD does not violate any of the criteria outlined in your message. The Personal iD on my custom ZOOM XC USA running shoes was the word "sweatshop." Sweatshop is not: 1) another's party's trademark, 2) the name of an athlete, 3) blank, or 4) profanity. I choose the iD because I wanted to remember the toil and labor of the children that made my shoes. Could you please ship them to me immediately.

    Thanks and Happy New Year,
    Wynn McF (not really)

    From: "Personalize, iPOD iD"
    To: "'W. McFarnby (not really)'"
    Subject: RE: Your iPOD iD order o16468000

    Dear iPOD iD Customer,

    Your iPOD iD order was cancelled because the iD you have chosen contains, as stated in the previous e-mail correspondence, "inappropriate slang".

    If you wish to reorder your iPOD iD product with a new personalization please visit us again at www.iPOD.com

    Thank you,
    iPOD iD

    From: "W. McFarnby (not really)"
    To: "Personalize, iPOD iD"
    Subject: RE: Your iPOD iD order o16468000

    Dear iPOD iD,

    Thank you for your quick response to my inquiry about my custom ZOOM XC USA running shoes. Although I commend you for your prompt customer service, I disagree with the claim that my personal iD was inappropriate slang. After consulting Webster's Dictionary, I discovered that "sweatshop" is in fact part of standard English, and not slang. The word means: "a shop or factory in which workers are employed for long hours at low wages and under unhealthy conditions" and its origin dates from 1892. So my personal iD does meet the criteria detailed in your first email.

    Your web site advertises that the iPOD iD program is "about freedom to choose and freedom to express who you are." I share iPOD's love of freedom and personal expression. The site also says that "If you want it done right...build it yourself." I was thrilled to be able to build my own shoes, and my personal iD was offered as a small token of appreciation for the sweatshop workers poised to help me realize my vision. I hope that you will value my freedom of expression and reconsider your decision to reject my order.

    Thank you,
    Wynn McF (not really)

    From: "Personalize, iPOD iD"
    To: "'W. McFarnby (not really)'"
    Subject: RE: Your iPOD iD order o16468000

    Dear iPOD iD Customer,

    Regarding the rules for personalization it also states on the iPOD iD web site that "iPOD reserves the right to c

    --
    There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
    1. Re:Nike+Apple=??? by Aadain2001 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You realize that Nike hasn't run sweatshops for a long time now right? The factories in Asia used to be contracted by Nike to produce shoes, so Nike did not own them. After all the bad PR they moved in and took over the factories and now the people have very nice working conditions and earn a much higher than average wage compared to the rest of the countries over there. If you would like to end sweatshops, try talking to Adidas, Rebook, etc, which still do use sweatshop in Asia.

      --
      Space for rent, inquire within
    2. Re:Nike+Apple=??? by DeadPrez · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You should have just changed your name to "child_labor" as that would be a more formal description.

    3. Re:Nike+Apple=??? by johndierks · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I actually played with that site a few years back to see which terms were acceptable and which weren't, and it appeared that the word 'labor' was not allowed. Strange considering 'labor' is a fitting term to what one might do in running shoes.

    4. Re:Nike+Apple=??? by bertramwooster · · Score: 5, Funny

      Oh. I thought you were going to say Nipple. Never mind.

    5. Re:Nike+Apple=??? by f0dder · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's not like the natives had jobs before the companies came in. Over time what happens is the sweat shop given the right infrastructure, the people become self reliant and form their own companies. Wasn't japan, korea, taiwan once sweatshop to american companies. Now they kick our collective arses in electronics, automobiles & other industries. it's not all the gloom & doom antiglobalization zealot makes it out to be.

    6. Re:Nike+Apple=??? by Chris+Burke · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Interesting. The last time I recall the issue coming up was when Nike was claiming in their advertisements that they had improved conditions for the sweatshop workers and that they were not sweatshops anymore. I remember this because they were sued for false advertising, but the court ruled that while Nike's claims were in fact false, their lie was protected by the 1st Ammendment.

      This was from an article linked by /. a couple years ago, so anything resembling detail is gone. Except the "it's okay for them to lie about sweatshops because of the 1st Ammendment" thing, since the insanity that causes the word "person" in the 14th Ammendment to apply to corporations but not homosexuals (at least until very recently) is a major pet peeve of mine.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    7. Re:Nike+Apple=??? by Hikaru79 · · Score: 2, Funny

      How on EARTH did you manage to get that novel-sized post in as first post? I can't even type FRIST PSTO!!! fast enough to get it, and you're here writing War and Peace... I feel so inadequate.

    8. Re:Nike+Apple=??? by b17bmbr · · Score: 2, Funny

      'labor' is the last thing I'd want to do in Nikes. That's what work boots are for.

      aren't you barefoot during labor?

      --
      My problem? I was perfectly gruntled, until some numbnuts came by and dissed me.
    9. Re:Nike+Apple=??? by MrAnnoyanceToYou · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Intelligent first posts are now a 'subscriber bonus,' really. If you give /. a bunch of cash they let you see stories a few minutes early, and if you happened to have previously requested a mildly inappropriately labeled iPod from Apple (or known where to get text of an order like this) you're suddenly five steps ahead of everyone else. As long as you know how to use a text editor, that is.

    10. Re:Nike+Apple=??? by Orangejesus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I do missions work in third world countries. I see a lot of these "sweatshops" myself, and have to say that it upsets me how backwards americans have it in their bubble little rich world. These so called "sweatshops" that all the americans protest are fantastic for the communities they usually go into. These people have nothing, they make nothing, they barely survive and in often cases they don't. Their lives are extremely hard and sweatshop or not they do backbreaking work from sunup to sundown in order to survive. The "sweatshop" jobs are highly prized with often thousands of people competeing for the most menial jobs. as someone can make litterally 100 times what they were making before. These "sweatshops" allow people to buy basic necessities for their families. It allows them to send their daughters to school instead of selling them into prostitution. And they bring (relative)wealth into the communitites. I'm not saying they are perfect, i'm not saying that it doesn't suck to work in these places, but it is SO MUCH BETTER than what they had before. I'm sure everyone means well, and they have these ideas of 5 year olds being chained to conveyor belts but thats just simply not how it is.

    11. Re:Nike+Apple=??? by Aadain2001 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Sure, in this country $2 a day is impossible to live on, especially for a family. But in OTHER countries $2 has the equivalent buying power for hundreds of $ a day. This is one of the biggest short comings of protesters in America: not every place on the planet has the same level of inflation or equivalent prices for food/objects as in the US. Do some research, find out how much the average livable wage in a country is before condeming a company for paying their employees those wages.

      --
      Space for rent, inquire within
    12. Re:Nike+Apple=??? by Rude-Boy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Most informed people who complain about sweatshops aren't complaining about what we might consider low wages. Rather, they are complaining about the long hours and poor working conditions. Just because these jobs might be better then the alternatives doesn't absolve the company of the moral responsiblity not to work these people like slaves just because it's "better then what they had before".

      If these companies paid a fair wage and provided good working conditions, you would see very few people complaining.

    13. Re:Nike+Apple=??? by JediLow · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Thats bull. Take for instance China (Xining - the capital of Qinghai province), the GDP of an individual was $800... while its a little higher than $2 a day, its not much, and people in that city enjoy clean water, well-built houses, and electricity.

      The American-centric attitude that people have really just makes me sick. Try going to a different country before making all these claims about how we're treating other people so badly - they have the option to take that job or not, and the people that have those jobs are happy they have them (yes, I know people in that situation... and I myself am an immirgrant to the United States).

    14. Re:Nike+Apple=??? by maggot+the+shrew · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The distinction is irrelevant. Nike dictates all the terms to the sweatshops that make Nike shoes and they are specifically culpable for their decision to stop doing business in Korea and Taiwan after those sweatshops unionized to seek out cheaper, more exploitative places elsewhere.

      http://www.globalexchange.org/campaigns/sweatshops /nike/

      You are regurgitating Nike propoganda, which has been demonstrated to be false. Nike is not responding to bad publicity by addressing the problem, they are responding on the cheap by hiring PR firms to "shore up their image."

  2. Why? by cephalien · · Score: 3, Funny

    Not to be a prude about this, but what exactly is the point? How much do regular pedometers cost?

    I know I've seen some for less than 30 bucks. Yeah, sure. There's the wow factor

    (hey, lookee at my over-priced Nikes. Did you know I spent 30 bucks more and they can talk to my iPod? -- wow, I've gone to the couch and back six times in the last hour, logging 50 steps!)

    But not much else. I love technology as much as the next person on /., but there's got to be a better use for it.

    --
    If firefighters fight fire, and crimefighters fight crime, what do freedom fighters fight? - George Carlin
    1. Re:Why? by dontEATnachos · · Score: 2, Informative

      ok, there is actually some cool stuff involved here.

      1) It's not just a pedometer ... if it's anything like the other Nike running gear, it actually uses an accelerometer and some other crazy stuff to figure out how far you're running. Instead of just saying that a single step = X number of feet it tries to figure out how far you really moved your foot.

      2) As others have mentioned, it actually reads the status to you so you don't have to look at your iPod as you run.

      3) Perhaps my favorite: Power Song activation. You can assign the middle button of the iPod to your power song. That way when you need that extra kick from a high energy song it's easy access. Once it's done playing, it goes back to your regular music.

      The only thing that would make this better would be if Nike wasn't so anti-GPS.

      --
      Hahahahahaha, what?
    2. Re:Why? by Kadin2048 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      What would be very cool is if it would attempt to match the beats per minute of your song to your actual steps per minute, so you could run to music at whatever pace you wanted to. I think iTunes has a BPM field, so you could probably at least have the iPod choose songs that were close to your pace (so you could have different pump-up, running, and cool-down music), but I don't know if you can easily alter the playback speed of an MP3 without altering it's pitch to do exact cadence matching. I wonder if it has enough processor overhead to do on-the-fly resampling.

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    3. Re:Why? by FLEB · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Who needs headphones? Duck tape, portable speakers...

      --
      Information wants to be free.
      Entertainment wants to be paid.
      You just want to be cheap.
    4. Re:Why? by Xyde · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The iPod can already do this for audiobooks, i assume it could be done for mp3 as well.

  3. iPhone + Nike = Shoe Phone? by green+pizza · · Score: 4, Funny

    Sounds like a neat idea, but I'm waiting for the iPhone + Nike = Shoe Phone.

    "This shoephone holds over 5 billion songs! ...
    Would you believe 10,000 songs and 5,000 ringtones?"

    1. Re:iPhone + Nike = Shoe Phone? by pedalman · · Score: 2, Informative
      Sounds like a neat idea, but I'm waiting for the iPhone + Nike = Shoe Phone.
      Sorry, but you are years too late. From the following reference: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maxwell_Smart

      "Perhaps the most recognisable 'gag' from the show was Maxwell Smart's shoe phone, which has become somewhat of a comic icon: Smart would communicate with CONTROL using a rotary-dialled telephone concealed in his shoe, similar to a modern cell phone. While such a device was decades ahead of its time in real life, the need to take off his shoe to use it and the loud bell among other design flaws lead to various humorously awkward situations."

      --
      Friends don't let friends line-dance.
    2. Re:iPhone + Nike = Shoe Phone? by dancpsu · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually, when I first read the headline, I thought Apple was doing some mobile DDR with shoe accelerometers connected to the iPod.

      --
      "Scientists don't change their minds, they just die." -- Max Planck
    3. Re:iPhone + Nike = Shoe Phone? by NMerriam · · Score: 2, Funny

      *whoosh*

      talk about missing the joke.

      Would you believe fifty security guards and a bloodhound?

      --
      Recursive: Adj. See Recursive.
    4. Re:iPhone + Nike = Shoe Phone? by Dhar · · Score: 5, Funny

      Missed the joke by THAT much! *holds up almost-touching fingers*

      -g.

    5. Re:iPhone + Nike = Shoe Phone? by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 2, Funny

      WHOOSH.

      I'm sorry, but shouldn't that be "swoosh"?

      --
      This guy's the limit!
    6. Re:iPhone + Nike = Shoe Phone? by Steve+Cowan · · Score: 4, Funny

      Pure speculation. All Apple + Nike development has until now been under the Cone of Silence.

    7. Re:iPhone + Nike = Shoe Phone? by sharkey · · Score: 2, Funny
      *whoosh*

      I think you mean *swoosh*

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  4. I'm scared... by Miaomiao · · Score: 2, Funny

    This is so going to trap those joggers nearby in their own little worlds. Running in circles all day long, running, running, running.

    So can we at least attach some speakers too so they sound interesting as they jog by?

    On a serious note... why do I have a weird feeling sales on "We are the Champions" are going to go up...

  5. Please remove your shoes.... by iXiXi · · Score: 5, Funny

    Can you imagine these at the airport?

  6. I'm waiting for the iPod - Toilet seat interface by JudgeFurious · · Score: 4, Funny

    Put your iPod in a clear transparent (and waterproof, just to be safe) case that adds a wireless connector which then uses Bluetooth to talk to your toilet seat. While you pinch a loaf it weighs you, takes your temperature, scans your dump as it passes the "sensor ring", and gives you helpful dietary suggestions along with playing a preset song that you've associated with one of a half-dozen air freshener options.

    --
    Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
  7. Big feet? by truthsearch · · Score: 5, Funny

    Brings new meaning to the question, "You know what they say about men with big feet, don't you?"

    Big hard drives!

    Thank you, I'll be here all week.

  8. Brilliant by Ritz_Just_Ritz · · Score: 4, Funny

    For the low low price of 99 cents a mile, you can use these fancy running shoes with built-in music. If you stop paying, they break your legs. The RIAA will love it!

  9. Didn't the old iPods have this feature? by Quaoar · · Score: 5, Funny

    I mean, they had a pedometer...running 5000 steps with a first-gen iPod would cause the hard drive to fail... :)

    --
    I'll form my OWN solar system! With blackjack! And hookers!
  10. Price too low by Captain+Perspicuous · · Score: 4, Interesting

    A supersmall step sensor for your shoe with wireless transmitter, a wireless receiver, iPod integration, timer, text-to-speach interface, "booster song with 1 keypress", recording all your trips and comparing them over the internet, and Apple and Nike behind it - I was expecting that gear to cost at least $50 to $80, and I'm pretty sure the people that are interested would have paid that amount without thinking about it - but only $29? That is one seriously low price. Wow, what happened, are they subsidizing this one or something?

    And if they do, how do they make sure we are buying nike shoes? That step counter can be taped to any shoe, can't it?

    1. Re:Price too low by kevinvh · · Score: 3, Informative

      Read the fine print on bottom of the "rock n' run page".. it says:

          The sensor's battery is not replaceable. Battery life will vary
          considerably based on use and other factors.

      So the $64M question is, how long does the sensor's battery last?
      This could explain the low price.. $29 may be cheap, but if you're
      buying a new sensor every year, suddenly it's getting expensive.

  11. Nike + Apple by i+am+kman · · Score: 5, Funny

    And if they really joined forces, they'd need a new name. Hmmmm, let's see, something like: Nike + Apple = Nipple.

    Yeah, I'd definitely buy one of those! Maybe two.

  12. no way! by basic0 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Corporations like Apple and Nike promoting their brands through a synergystic crossover product? Get out of here! Next thing you'll tell me that they're going to get professional athletes and rock stars to promote this thing.

  13. Integration by AAeyers · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This must be part of the wireless patents Apple filed for a while back. I would not at all be surprised if this idea of wireless integration gets incorporated into more and more things. Imagine if you could carry your ipod with you all day and have it work automatically with your home stereo, shoes, car, etc. The ipod could become much more than an mp3 player, and could help collect data (pedometer, etc) and stream music to different sources automatically.

    This seems like exactly the thing Jobs and Apple would pursue, a seamless system of wireless integration would perfectly embody their philosophies of style, power, simplicity, and having things 'just work'. It may be just a new shoe accessory right now, but I for one could see this type of technology evolving into new areas

    --
    "For Great Justice."
  14. Inaccurate, not useful to serious athletes by MBraynard · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Pedometers do not cut it for distance measurement. Almost everyone uses a GPS unit these days. Interestingly enough, the only company still pushing a pedometer-driven system these days is Nike. At SOME point they are going to get on the GPS bandwagon but I'm uncertain why they are taking so long to get 'cutting edge in this area.'

    OT - That banner ad for Crystal Reports just brought my computer to a crawl.

    1. Re:Inaccurate, not useful to serious athletes by cheinonen · · Score: 4, Interesting

      To myself, who I'd consider to be a reasonably serious athlete, I prefer the food pods to GPS for a few reasons. They're typically smaller, but most importantly, they aren't automatically destroyed by large buildings or tree cover. Living in areas where I would run on trails surrounded by large trees, or in downtown with large buildings, I would constantly lose GPS signals and so my distance, pace, and maps of my runs would be way off in areas. The foot pods can be calibrated by you on a track to make them accurate to your stride, and are +/- 1% after doing that typically, which is better than my GPS was by far. Now they have downsides as well (elevation gain typically isn't measured), but they're better than losing signal for some of us.

  15. Nah, I think it's a pretty shrewd move. by DwarfGoanna · · Score: 3, Insightful

    On both their parts. While joggers might not be a huge percentage of total mp3 player sales, I'd bet almost everyone who jogs anymore either has or plans to buy one. Apple may have just swallowed them all up. The data tracking function is probably a much bigger deal to those types than lardasses like er.. us realize. Nike gets to sell people another pair of overpriced shoes (probably moreso than usual) and horn in on Apple's brand recognition. Nike might be big in the shoe racket, but those Nike branded Phillips players didn't exactly take the world by storm.

    --

    "You know why you do not see me styling wit my homies? Because I have no homies!!" -Mojo Jojo

  16. Sync Capabilities by AgentOJ · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Looking at the links on Apple's site, it shows that the run data can also be synced with your computer once you get back from the run. The data includes stuff like speed, distance, calories burned, etc, so you can see your progress over a length of time. As a former cross country and track runner, this is the kind of information that we had to calculate manually (well, at least record the numbers and then crunch them) to get an overall view of our progress and goals. Also, it would be cool to have since I'd already be bringing my iPod on a run, and wouldn't need to bring a seperate electronic pedometer along (and I'd be willing to be the electronic pedometers out there that track the same information and sync with a computer don't work with Macs).

  17. We need a waterproof Triathalon iPod iShoe by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 2, Interesting

    That won't short out when you do the swimming portion.

    And, has anyone thought of having it make your shoes shuffle when you set the iPod on "shuffle"?

    Nike: Just Do It But First Pay Money

    Seriously, though, as a former marathon runner (2 hr 29 minutes back when the world record was 2 hr 14 minutes), I question the practical utility of an integrated shoe to iPod link - sure, it's nice to know your approximate pedometer rating, but in reality that is not a real number, only an estimation based on your running stride and (more likely) walking stride - pedometers tend to fail when you are in hill climb and downhill portions.

    One would be better served by a GPS integrated iPod that has a calculator function that tells you your literal pace, infers heartrate from a standard external monitor, and shows comparison timings from when you do a fast run at increased speed for a shorter practice run as a goal setter, and possibly uses the iPod music interface to tell you useful information such as:

    1. 20 miles to go!
    2. take a drink of water soon (elapsed time indicates thirst)
    3. you are running at/above/below peak training speed (based on prior training or estimated speeds)
    4. hill coming up, duration 2 miles (based on GPS readings and the route/map you gave)
    5. only 4 miles to go! (as you get further on)

    And so on.

    But none of that has anything to do with a shoe. You're far better off with a watch/GPS that connects to your iPod.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  18. Re:Price too low, where is the catch? by guidryp · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The only ones I see.

    The sensor is meant to integrate in Nike shoes.
    The sensor doesn't have changeable batteries.

    I am sure you can figure out some way to attach to non nikes, unless I read this wrong and ceartian shoes come with embeded sensor.

    Batter is a concern until they tell us how long it lasts. If three years then what the heck...

  19. When they build the pedometer into the shoe... by LaughingElk · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...it will become known as "The sole that times men's tries".

    (sorry)

  20. From the Article by Orrin+Bloquy · · Score: 2, Funny

    "The original location for the player holster had to be moved when testers kept referring to it as the 'iPud.' "

    --
    "Made up/misattributed quote that makes me look smart. I am on /. and I must look smart."
  21. Think Different my ass by Udo+Schmitz · · Score: 2, Informative
    Says the BBC: "Although 60% of factories monitored achieved an A or B rating in terms of compliance with agreed standards, a quarter of factories were found to present more serious problems.
    These ranged from a lack of basic terms of employment and excessive hours of work to unauthorised sub-contracting, confirmed physical or sexual abuse and the existence of conditions which could lead to death or serious injury."

    Cool. That means as of 13 April, 2005 only in 40% of the factories used by Nike workers face a lack of basic terms of employment and excessive hours of work, unauthorised sub-contracting, confirmed physical or sexual abuse and the existence of conditions which could lead to death or serious injury. I'm off to by a pair of Nikes.
    Seriously, this is the first major goof since Steve Jobs came back to Apple.

    1. Re:Think Different my ass by Dynedain · · Score: 2, Interesting

      How does a quarter of factories equal 40%?

      Now, while I agree that the sweatshops of the kind used by almost every overseas manufacturer is despicable, your twisting of the argument by fudging the numbers doesn't help your case. Remember, "C" is considered an average rating. If 60% of their factories are above average, thats pretty good. And only 25% fall into the "serious problems" category. That means that 15% are in the average range. If anything, Nike should be commended for making such a turn-around from their historic sweatshop past, and for having the guts to publish this kind of information about themselves. You can't go from horrible to perfect overnight. Lets see how they improve the bad factories in the future.

      --
      I'm out of my mind right now, but feel free to leave a message.....
  22. Apple+Censorship=b1ff by LunaticTippy · · Score: 2, Funny
    This is probably obvious to anyone here, but you can bypass these things by using 1337-5p34k.

    It's embarassing, though. There is that.

    --
    Man, you really need that seminar!
  23. Apple + Nike = New slogan by XnavxeMiyyep · · Score: 2, Funny

    Just do iT

    --
    I put the 't' in electrical engineering.
  24. Re:Sweatshops are good. Really. by Scudsucker · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Privileged, overfed and sheltered children of developed nations may forget this, but at one time in their not-to-distant past, their nation used to be filled with jobs just like the ones in the sweatshop. And eventually, wealth grew and working conditions got better.

    Because workers unionized and forced employeers to offer better wages and working conditions. Kinda contradicts your whole "sweatshops are good" shtick.

  25. Re:Sweatshops are good. Really. by famebait · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Of course, you never see any of the workers or potential workers in those countries complaining, and there's a reason for that: Nike and other "sweatshop" owners provided far better jobs than were normally available to people in those countries. People FOUGHT to get a spot in one of those factories.

    Aren't you skipping the part about if you complain, you're out, and if you try to organize complaints, you're possibly even dead.

    --
    sudo ergo sum
  26. Re:Sweatshops are good. Really. by Rude-Boy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Obviously you can't read, so I'll just say this again:

    Just because these jobs might be better then the alternatives doesn't absolve the company of the moral responsiblity not to work these people like slaves just because it's "better then what they had before".

    Read it slowly if you are having trouble understanding.

    "There is no easy shortcut between being a developing nation with a subsistence agricultural economy and an information age economy. If the rise of the Asian economies in the 1980s-1990s proved one thing, it's that each and every one has to go through the same growing pains that the United States and Europe once went through. And sweatshops are a step along the way."

    The first part may be true, but the poor working conditions these people are forced to endure is not neccessary step. I'm not against companies placing factories in developing nations and I do recognise the good they do for the economy. But just because people in the US and Europe went through a working in similar conditions doesn't mean we can't enforce something better now. If $2 a day is a good local wage, that's fine by me. 16 hour days, 6-7 days a week and unsafe working conditions? NOT ACCEPTABLE.

  27. Business Week says battery lasts 1000 hours by kara70 · · Score: 2, Informative
    http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/may 2006/tc20060523_569911.htm?site=cbs&campaign_id=cb s/ >

    I'm not a runner, so I really don't know. One hour a day, let's say several times a week, that'd be several years.

    Of course, your mileage may vary! Thank you! Tip your waitstaff and try the veal!