Slashdot Mirror


Scientists Find Ancient Ecosystem In Israeli Cave

An anonymous reader writes "Israeli scientists said on Wednesday they had discovered a prehistoric ecosystem dating back millions of years. Scientists were called in and soon found eight previously unknown species of crustaceans and invertebrates similar to scorpions. The cave, which Hebrew University Professor Amos Frumkin said is 'unique in the world,' had been sealed off from the outside world since its surface is situated under a layer of chalk that is impenetrable to water."

105 comments

  1. Wow by solafide · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Question is, will these new species be able to survive now that they have been opened up to the outside world?

    1. Re:Wow by l5rfanboy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I wonder what kind of care and concern will go into the study of these creatures, though of course many I'm sure will be taken back for study. I really wonder however if this will be used in the evolution vs creationism debate.

    2. Re:Wow by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      They will probably be raised on farms and sold to pet stores world wide.

    3. Re:Wow by aquabat · · Score: 3, Funny

      I wonder if they taste good...

      --
      A republic cannot succeed till it contains a certain body of men imbued with the principles of justice and honour.
    4. Re:Wow by AuMatar · · Score: 3, Funny

      Evolutionist: "See, they evolved to fit their environment- more proof of evolution".

      Creationist: "See, they were intelligently designed not to have eyes in the first place- more proof of the creator"

      The truth: They were placed there as a joke by his noodly appendage. Ramen.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    5. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      They'll have to, they're already trucking in settlers and demanding the invertebrates and crustaceans leave their land, "or else".

    6. Re:Wow by sita · · Score: 1

      They are treif, so they will be safe...

  2. Fine and dandy except... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 2, Funny

    If they find a bunch of pulsating eggs in the back of the cave, Chest-busters will definitely be a new species to runaway from.

    1. Re:Fine and dandy except... by Tackhead · · Score: 4, Funny
      > If they find a bunch of pulsating eggs in the back of the cave, Chest-busters will definitely be a new species to runaway from.

      Never mind that. The cave has been sealed for 5 million years. It's so dark that everything in it has evolved away from eyesight. We're talking GReat Underground Empire levels of darkness.

      > LOOK
      Nothing to see here. It is dark. It is so dark that you are not merely likely, you are absolutely certain, to be eaten by a grue.

      *** You have died ***

    2. Re:Fine and dandy except... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      OMG! I totally forgot about the grues! Screwed the aliens -- we're doomed!

  3. ...and now it's contaminated by frankie · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Well at least it appears the cave doesn't contain some cryptovirus that none of the surface world's immune systems can defeat. Although realistically the opposite is more likely to be true, and everything in the cave gets killed by invading crickets or something.

    1. Re:...and now it's contaminated by Ibn+al-Hazardous · · Score: 1, Informative

      Virii are pretty much always tailored to bypass the protections of one species. The exceptions (bird flu and possibly HIV) are very rare. Since the new species in this cave have been walled off for millions of years - they are pretty much safe from any modern virus infection.

      When it comes to bacteria and parasites, it may be a somewhat different question - since they are genetically much more complex. Still, I'd say it's probably no big deal. That new ecosystem just isn't compatible with ours (for the time being).

      I'd wager the primary reason they sealed off the cave is to prevent water and oxygen from escaping from the cave, and contamination from the outside comes in as a distant second.

      --
      Yes, I am a biological organism. All rumors to the contrary are just that, rumors.
  4. What have they been eating? by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If they've been in the dark for so long, what have they been eating? You have to get energy into an ecosystem somehow.

    --
    No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
    1. Re:What have they been eating? by Frumious+Wombat · · Score: 4, Informative

      Chemolithoautotrophs, probably. Microorganisms that are metabolising compounds from the rocks to get their energy, then everything bigger eats the next step smaller below them. Similar to deep-smoker vent communities.

      --
      the more accurate the calculations became, the more the concepts tended to vanish into thin air. R. S. Mulliken
    2. Re:What have they been eating? by Nesetril · · Score: 1

      well... the crustaceans ate the scorpions and the scorpions ate the crustaceans. what exactly is the problem? yeah, there is a necessary loss of energy, but that's why there are so few of each type left. another thousand years later and the scientists would have uncovered a perfectly empty cave.

      --
      Jesus said to his disciples: "If you don't have a sword, sell your cloak and buy one" - Luke 22:36
    3. Re:What have they been eating? by east+coast · · Score: 1

      You have to get energy into an ecosystem somehow.

      the article fails to mention that they found a little guy screaming "who run bartertown!?!?"

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
    4. Re:What have they been eating? by gmiley · · Score: 2, Informative

      As stated in the article it is an Ecosystem. Ecosystems on any scale you look at it are presumably self-sustaining in and of themselves. Just like anywhere else you can have bacteria, fungus, slime molds, etc at the primary level feeding off disolved minerals, then the next step up would be tiny micro-organisms living off the fungus and slime-molds, next step up - insects, small critters feeding off the micro-organisms, etc... so on and so forth.

    5. Re:What have they been eating? by Tango42 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's not matter that's an issue, it's energy. Most ecosystems are powered by the sun (via photosynthesis), this ecosystem must be powered by something. I think cave systems are either powered by chemical reactions from volcanic vents, etc, or on biomatter entering the system from outside. They claim this one was completely cut off, so it's probably some chemical thing.

    6. Re:What have they been eating? by schon · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      deep-smoker vent communities

      Hey! Just because you don't agree with their platform, is no reason to insult them!

    7. Re:What have they been eating? by Alsee · · Score: 1

      That's how the cave was discovered. The critters were getting hungry and called out for pizza delivery.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    8. Re:What have they been eating? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      On the underground volcanos the start of the cycle is some bacteria that metabolize the hydrogen sulfide and tend to grow in clumps. Little shimp come along and scrape that off rocks, making bigger shrimp. Oh, and everything else that falls down dead from the volcano, of course.

      IIRC.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  5. Re:Lost World! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it's more likely to find a dinosaur than a slashdotter that reads tfa

  6. stran9e by packetmon · · Score: 4, Informative

    "Every species we examined had no eyes which means they lost their sight due to evolution," said Dimantman. How do the scientists know that considering the so called blind scorpion was dead and the others were live. Perhaps eyes looked differently and evolved into what they now expect. For all they know those creatures could have had some motion imaging sensors that were eyes. Anyhow here is a picture of the scorpion. What that article also failed to mention was that all but one scorpion were found alive:

    The invertebrate animals found in the cave - four seawater and freshwater crustaceans and four terrestial species - are related to but different from other, similar life forms known to scientists. The species have been sent to biological experts in both Israel and abroad for further analysis and dating. It is estimated that these species are millions of years old. Also found in the cave were bacteria that serve as the basic food source in the ecosystem.

    The animals found there were all discovered live, except for a blind species of scorpion, although Dr. Dimentman is certain that live scorpions will be discovered in further explorations and also probably an animal or animals which feed on the scorpions.

    http://www.playfuls.com/news_001136_Previously_Unk nown_Prehistoric_Species_Discovered_In_Israel_Cave .html

    1. Re:stran9e by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      More to the point, how do they know it was evolution? God could have designed them blind! He would know better than to put eyes on a creature that was going to spend all its life in a cave, scraping out a meager living by making clicking sounds in the darkness.

      (Which begs the question of how many Slashdotters still have eyes...)

    2. Re:stran9e by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 5, Funny
      > More to the point, how do they know it was evolution?

      Because there was no Intelligent Designer in the cave with them.

      --
      No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
    3. Re:stran9e by kalirion · · Score: 1

      Is it just me or does the scorpion in the picture have a tail more like that of a fish, rather than the spiky poisonous thing we all know and love?

    4. Re:stran9e by bladesjester · · Score: 1

      I thought it looked rather similar to the crayfish that I used to chase around creeks as a child.

      --
      Everything I need to know I learned by killing smart people and eating their brains.
    5. Re:stran9e by kalirion · · Score: 1

      Yup, this "scorpion" definitely more like a crayfish to me. Or maybe they just got their pictures confused.

    6. Re:stran9e by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Blashpemer!

      Just because you can't see the Flying Spaghetti Monester, doesn't mean he is not with you!

      May you be touched by his noodly appendages, RAmen.

    7. Re:stran9e by Trogre · · Score: 4, Funny

      Haven't you been keeping up with current events?

      The intelligent designer rose from the cave on the third day.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    8. Re:stran9e by justins · · Score: 1

      That's a little judgemental!

      He's not what you'd call intelligent, but at least he's nice and friendly. Fun at parties.

      --
      Now before I get modded down, I be to remind whoever might read this that what I am saying is FACT. - bogaboga
    9. Re:stran9e by teratogenicbenzene · · Score: 1

      In any case, eyes or not, that's not a scorpion, that's a crayfish.

      --
      The Secret of Life: Proteins fold up and bind things.
    10. Re:stran9e by Alsee · · Score: 1

      But how do they KNOW that there was no Intelligent Designer in the cave? Did they do a spectral scan for Invisible Pink Unicorns?

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    11. Re:stran9e by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought he moved to France.

  7. in related news by Artie_Effim · · Score: 0, Funny

    The explorers also found the development team of Duke Nukem Forever, which has also been around for millions of years.

  8. TERRORISTS! TERRORISTS! by Kesch · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    It could have Al-Queda or something inside. We should shove a few thermobarric bombs in there just to make sure.

    Science-whata-you-say? Screw the science! We have a significant terrorist threat on our hands; no precaution is too much.

    (Btw, what do these new creatures taste like? Are they good with garlic butter?)

    --
    If this signature is witty enough, maybe somebody will like me.
    1. Re:TERRORISTS! TERRORISTS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It could have Al-Queda or something inside. We should shove a few thermobarric bombs in there just to make sure.

      That was supposed to be funny? *yawn*

      (Btw, what do these new creatures taste like? Are they good with garlic butter?)

      Cue the Onion: New, Delicious Species Discovered.

  9. Excellent example in favor or evolution by aschoff_nodule · · Score: 1

    They were cut off from light for so many years and 'de-evolved' their eyes.

    1. Re:Excellent example in favor or evolution by Mir322 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Or it was just God going "Nothing for you to see here..."

      --
      "There is always some madness in love. But there is also always some reason in madness."- Friedrich Nietzsche
    2. Re:Excellent example in favor or evolution by Ponzicar · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Nah, the creationists will just say that it shows natural selection is a destructive force and can't create anything, and if you point out examples of evolution creating things, they'll say it's just microevolution and not macroevolution. With a 75% chance of them blabbering something about information theory as well.

    3. Re:Excellent example in favor or evolution by uniqueUser · · Score: 1
      They were cut off from light for so many years and 'de-evolved' their eyes
      How do we know that they did not loose their eyes before accidentally wandering into the cave?
      --
      GENERATION 25: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation. Social exper
    4. Re:Excellent example in favor or evolution by Ana10g · · Score: 1

      And who are we to judge which is the higher form of evolution? I mean, maybe we devolved into having eyes, and they evolved into not having them?

      --
      just an analog boy living in a digital age.
    5. Re:Excellent example in favor or evolution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "How do we know that they did not loose their eyes before accidentally wandering into the cave?"
      Yeah, they could have gouged 'em out and thrown them into the air, shouting "Fly, be free!"

    6. Re:Excellent example in favor or evolution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      perhaps a more appropriate way of looking at is that it's not possible to have valence without some goal you're moving towards

      so devolution is a misnomer, all change is evolution and neither positive nor negative in the sense that you can't measure movement positively or negatively when there's no destination, you can only measure the amount of ground covered

      if I get in a car and am going to the next town over, any movement will either take me closer or take further away, but if I'm just cruising, what would it mean to travel negative 10 miles?

    7. Re:Excellent example in favor or evolution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How do we know that they did not loose their eyes before accidentally wandering into the cave?

      They must've left 'em outside the cave, I surmise...

      To confirm you're not a script,
      please type the word in this image:rescuers (cool!! that's more like it...)

    8. Re:Excellent example in favor or evolution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > And who are we to judge which is the higher form of evolution? I mean,
      > maybe we devolved into having eyes, and they evolved into not having them?

      That is literally the case.

      In a dark cave, eyes are a big disadvantage because it takes energy to build them, energy to keep them running and energy to repair the continual cellular damage within them. In a dark cave, blind creatures are certainly a "more highly evolved" form than seeing creatures. In daylight, the cost of those eyes has to be returned in higher survivability chances - which is easy to understand.

      Evolution is the survival of those most suited to their immediate environment - and in a dark cave, freaky eyeless and colourless critters win every time.

      From the perspective of a cave dweller, we are grossly inefficient and we 'de-evolved' when we got eyes.

  10. good on them by johansalk · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The quarry men who knew to call the scientists.

    1. Re:good on them by MrTester · · Score: 1

      I had the same thought. In this country (the US) they would have just pretended they didnt notice so they wouldnt get thrown off schedule.

      Sad but true.

    2. Re:good on them by Nesetril · · Score: 1

      I don't know, US or not US, but I have yet to hear about a construction project that finished on schedule...

      --
      Jesus said to his disciples: "If you don't have a sword, sell your cloak and buy one" - Luke 22:36
    3. Re:good on them by Nutria · · Score: 1

      I don't know, US or not US, but I have yet to hear about a construction project that finished on schedule...

      The Hoover Dam was completed 2 years ahead of schedule.

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    4. Re:good on them by Suidae · · Score: 1

      Yeah, well, all they had to do was pour some concrete.

    5. Re:good on them by Otter · · Score: 4, Informative

      In Mediterranean countries with antiquities everywhere (Israel, Greece, Turkey), all children are taught that if you find any artifact, bones, cave or whatever, you don't touch it and you inform someone so experts can be brought in. It's like "Don't get into strangers' cars!" in other countries -- they have public service announcements about archeology during cartoons.

    6. Re:good on them by FFFish · · Score: 1

      Ah, to live in a country that has a history...

      --

      --
      Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
    7. Re:good on them by johansalk · · Score: 1

      Exactly. In the US the business culture seems single-minded on the "is it profitable?" bottom-line on every decision they make that such an interruption and sealing-off of a part of the quarry would cause an industrialist to go apeshit over "lost sales". Eyeless spiders? try telling that to a US boss.

  11. Re:Lost World! by Nesetril · · Score: 1

    but it is still more likely that you would find a caveman among slashdotters than a dinosaur in a cave somewhere.

    --
    Jesus said to his disciples: "If you don't have a sword, sell your cloak and buy one" - Luke 22:36
  12. Re:History Validation by Nesetril · · Score: 1

    you see, these here are just some lousy blind scorpions. what you are thinking of is the Dead Sea Scrolls.

    --
    Jesus said to his disciples: "If you don't have a sword, sell your cloak and buy one" - Luke 22:36
  13. Original press release--answers many questions by Haberdasher · · Score: 5, Informative

    http://www.huji.ac.il/cgi-bin/dovrut/dovrut_search _eng.pl?mesge114907691205976587 It's 2-3 times longer than the wire service story and answers the 'what they're eating' question and others.

    1. Re:Original press release--answers many questions by celticryan · · Score: 1

      Doesn't anyone know a crayfish when the see one? This truly looks much more like a crayfish than a scorpion.

  14. Picture by DeadPrez · · Score: 1

    There is a picture of a scorpion linked on this thread

  15. Quarrymen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What the heck did John, Paul, and George have to do with this discovery?

    1. Re:Quarrymen? by jd · · Score: 1

      So THAT is where Eric Griffiths, Rod Davis and Colin Hanton vanished to, after leaving the band!

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  16. Perfect Conditions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They probably found a whole microscopic universe living in one of those long crusty beards.

  17. Probably! by spun · · Score: 1

    If they're anything like these newly discovered critters, then yes, they are delicious!

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
  18. Mod parent up by missing000 · · Score: 1

    Flamebait? Obviously someone has a poor sense of humor.

  19. Re:Lost World! by ImaLamer · · Score: 1

    Cryptozoology?

    That's fun for everyone!

  20. O2 by Nutria · · Score: 3, Interesting


    Even crustaceans breathe oxygen and expel CO, so what transformed oxygen to O2?

    --
    "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    1. Re:O2 by hesiod · · Score: 1

      Microbes, maybe? I wonder if it's really completely sealed off from the outside world. There may be "vents" that lead to open air. Still (as I understand it) would have to have either some O2 creating organism or some way to circulate the air... Multiple vents? If they are up high enough, such creatures would probably not be able to reach it while still allowing oxygen to enter and flow.

    2. Re:O2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Blind plants?

  21. The picture is of one of the crustaceans. by zen611 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Crustaceans are the lobster-like critter in the image.

  22. Don't go in there! by CODiNE · · Score: 4, Funny

    Scorpions? Long passageways? If you find a Mayan temple down there DO NOT GO INSIDE.

    --
    Cwm, fjord-bank glyphs vext quiz
    1. Re:Don't go in there! by KingPrad · · Score: 1

      Score 4: Informative? Is anyone else surprised this would be rated as informative rather than funny? I guess some slashdot readers sat back after reading this and went "Wow, he's totally right. That would be bad." Anyway, I thought it was funny.

      --
      Stop the Slashdot Effect! Don't read the articles!
  23. Food for thought... by FridayBob · · Score: 1
    Perhaps the question should be:
    Will the outside world survive now that we've been exposed to them?
    ;-)
  24. That's easy. by jd · · Score: 2, Funny

    If they're being kept in the dark, then they're feeding off 24-hour news.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  25. No, they were in the main article. by jd · · Score: 1

    Surely you saw the bit on saltwater crustaceans. :) The real reason that DNF hasn't been released is that they've not evolved hands to operate the keyboard. The code was finished five and a half million years ago.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  26. Not that unique... by Starker_Kull · · Score: 3, Funny
    "The cave, which Hebrew University Professor Amos Frumkin said is 'unique in the world,' had been sealed off from the outside world since its surface is situated under a layer of chalk that is impenetrable to water."

    Sealed off from the outside world, probably dark and dirty in that cave, with mysterious life forms growing within. Sounds like a typical /.ers house to me.

    (Ducks)

    ;)

  27. Beer-goggles by alcmaeon · · Score: 2, Funny
    "I mean, maybe we devolved into having eyes, and they evolved into not having them?"

    Good point. If eyes were so damn great, we wouldn't have had to invent beer to overcome them.

  28. Re:Lost World! by ampathee · · Score: 1

    .. who said anything about dinosaurs? Way to attack a strawman for karma.

  29. White scorpions? by phorm · · Score: 1

    Interesting how the scorpions are completely white without any distinct markings, etc. In fact, I believe I've seen other creatures that live in no-light or low-light conditions that were all-white as well

    While the debate that the 'dead' scorpion was blind due to evolution may be one way to think about it, how about the color of the creatures found (so far I've only seen scorpions). Do creatures that live in no-light situations evolve to be colourless as colour is not useful without light? Does this show that other creatures in light-available areas develop pigments etc to serve a function based on their environment?

    To me, it seems to show that evolution works in a fashion (though to those that argue, it does not prove or disprove that men could come from fish or monkeys... whatever your opinion along those longs)

    1. Re:White scorpions? by plunge · · Score: 1

      "To me, it seems to show that evolution works in a fashion (though to those that argue, it does not prove or disprove that men could come from fish or monkeys... whatever your opinion along those longs)"

      Opinions are silly. Evidence says there is no serious argument.

    2. Re:White scorpions? by Tarkadot · · Score: 1

      I believe the general theory is that generating pigmentation has a certain cost to it, however small; therefore, over time, and in a lightless environment where they convey absolutely no benefit, the genes devoted to wasting that part of the organisms time and energy are either shut off or put to better use.

      I could be wrong though, it could really be about the guy who designed them couldn't be bothered to finish the job so swept them under the proverbial rug. Which would also explain why so many caves have things that haven't been colored in, are missing eyes, etc.
    3. Re:White scorpions? by DeanAsh · · Score: 1

      The while colouration of species that don't live in light may have more to do with preventing heat loss. Black things absorb and radiate heat very well, which is why heatsinks are black. White radiates and absorbs heat relatively poorly. If you live in a cave with no heat sources, what colour do you want to be?

      --
      What is the shortest sig that cannot be expressed in fewer than 20 words?
    4. Re:White scorpions? by Emetophobe · · Score: 1

      It looks more like a white crayfish than a scorpion to me.

    5. Re:White scorpions? by Valdrax · · Score: 2, Informative

      Do creatures that live in no-light situations evolve to be colourless as colour is not useful without light? Does this show that other creatures in light-available areas develop pigments etc to serve a function based on their environment?

      Yes, and yes. Pigmentation in water crustaceans is often a matter of camoflage. Producing these pigments has a metabolic cost as does producing eyes. When they are no longer needed for survival, the very slight pressure to conserve energy overwhelms the now missing pressure to disguise oneself to avoid getting eaten.

      This is why nearly all species isolated from light for many, many generations end up blind and colorless. What little color they do have is from the materials they are made from instead of from added pigmentation.

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    6. Re:White scorpions? by Squigley · · Score: 1

      > Do creatures that live in no-light situations evolve to be colourless as colour is not useful without light?

      Apparently goldfish will turn white if you keep them in the dark for long enough.

      I can't cite any sources on this, and can't be bothered to even google it.

      I read it somewhere when I was a kid, and it sounded reasonable.

      Maybe the MythBusters could deal with it.

    7. Re:White scorpions? by phorm · · Score: 1

      What would be interesting is if after exposing a few generations to the sun they started being hatched with eyes again.

    8. Re:White scorpions? by Profound · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It would depend on how the eyes were removed. If it was the equivalent of /* createEye() */ then it wouldn't take much to evolve back. If it was a gradual reduction in power until the eye was effectively useless, then it would have to re-evolve all the way back again.

  30. Obvious answer left out by 955301 · · Score: 1

    He added in that regard that he is hopeful that the planning authorities will enable the company to operate in alternate areas in order to help preserve the scientific site.

    Alternate area to operate in, under sketchy pretenses of aiding science? In Israel? Of course we do! How about a lovely river bank?

    --
    You are checking your backups, aren't you?
  31. Settlements by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Look for the Israeli government to establish settlements in this cave in the near future, along with access roads that will keep the crustaceans and invertebrates from moving around freely.

  32. Re:History Validation by MetaPhyzx · · Score: 1

    Actually I just found it interesting as to where the finding was; there have been very noted public struggles between entities in the Holy Land regarding antiquities and archaeological findings/interpretations. Evidently someone who doesn't agree considers that Trolling, but that's life, no? *shrug*.

    I do indeed wonder what the local spin is going to be on it.

    --
    Blacker than my baby girl's stare. Black like the veil that the muslimina wear. Black like the planet that they fear...
  33. species are millions of years old by rdoherty · · Score: 1

    So many people misuse the statement "millions of years old" when talking about living organisms.. They'd be long dead if they are millions of years old.. They may have diverged from their closest 'outside the cave' ancestors millions of years ago, but this doesn't mean that they are millions of years old.. Evolution never stops, not even in dark/damp caves.. These organisms had evolved and adapted to their environment: the dark, damp, enclosed cave.. Some have adapted by losing sight (due to lack of use), while others most likely gained senses to help them survive in their unique environment. Their rate of evolution may have changed and adapted features may differ, but evolution never stops.

    Also, along the same lines.. Human ancestors probably never looked like 20th century monkeys/apes.. monkeys, apes, and humans have all evolved since human speciation occured.. this means that they might be amongst our closest relatives, but their evolution continued along a different path.

  34. Who cares; let's blow it up by tdavie · · Score: 1

    And show it live on pay per view. Goddam hippies. Tom

  35. Manfred will come to their rescue by Nontagonist · · Score: 1

    We just need some scientist in San Diego to upload the brains of these new crustaceans into computers so they can hack into the Moscow Windows NT user group, then get in touch with Manfred. He can find them jobs in deep space.

    If you have no idea what I mean, try:

    http://www.asimovs.com/Nebulas03/Lobsters.shtml

    Regards.

    --
    There is another theory that states that this has already happened.
  36. Zoonoses by sita · · Score: 1

    Fatal epidemic zoonoses, that is animal originated diseases that have a fair chance to kill you and that spread, almost exclusively originate with domesticated animals (cattle, pig, chicken, ducks and the like).

    The reason for this is that it takes a long time for the zoonoses to evolve into forms that spread to humans or between humans and to do that there needs to be large concentrations of humans and the originating animals in contact for a long time.

    This is the reason that most epidemic diseases developped in Eurasia (most of the domesticable animals originated "here").

  37. Evolution stopping by Baron_Yam · · Score: 1

    True, but in a small closed ecosystem with little to no variance in conditions you will find that speciation comes to pretty much a complete stop once all major niches are filled. At that point, new minor mutations are unlikely to have enough of a benefit to help out compete the existing population.

    While evolution may only have slowed down remarkably, in such an environment we might choose to be a little inaccurate and say it has 'stopped' because no noticable change has occured for [insert really long time here].

  38. Uniqueness by sigmoid_balance · · Score: 1

    I don't have a link to support this, but there was also another eco-system like this discovered in Dobrogea region of Romania, a few years ago. The species were as in this case pretty strange and rare.

  39. This kind of reminds me of The Cave by MagicWayno · · Score: 1

    I just hope those Scorpions aren't too agressive. Check out the details on The Cave over at IMDB if you have no clue what movie I'm talking about. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0402901/

  40. Personal Experiance by mikemind2002 · · Score: 1

    My family used to go to a medium sized lake in the U.S.(not sure of location) for our family reunion. On one of those trips we were on the shore of the lake digging in the sand and we found a white no eyed creature that looks extremely close to the same picture of the animal found in this achient ecosystem. We released it and 10 minutes later or so I was sitting on the sand underwater and was stung or bitten by the same thing we released. Am I just mistaken or is there something that lives in central U.S. that looks just like that white animal?- Happened 3 or 4 years ago when I was 10 or 11

  41. Ouch! by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1
    Chemolithoautotrophs

    Thank you, Mr. Sesquipedalian; I sprained my tounge.

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    1. Re:Ouch! by Frumious+Wombat · · Score: 1

      Look, it's not *my* word, but Scientist Union Rules prevent me from using a shorter one in public.

      --
      the more accurate the calculations became, the more the concepts tended to vanish into thin air. R. S. Mulliken