Slashdot Mirror


A Family Collaboration Server?

esobofh asks: "I'm interested in putting together a server for my family that would allow everyone to share & store pictures, movies and music. Whenever we have a family gathering, there are always a ton of digital cameras out and clicking away, so I'd like to have everyone share and submit the pictures and movies they've captured for everyone in the family. I am sure I could roll my own collaboration server, but I'm hoping there is something already put together and pretty. I'd like it to use standard files and directories for storing photos (as opposed to a database), that way the files can easily be moved and manipulated. Is there an application that can handle user accounts, picture submissions (file upload via browser), and other such content?"

76 comments

  1. Wiki by MBCook · · Score: 1

    Sounds like an excellent opportunity for a Wiki. Just host it yourself or buy a web-hosting service contract (try Dreamhost, note that is a referral link) and then everyone can easily edit and upload and such without having to know tons of technology.

    --
    Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    1. Re:Wiki by Pfhreakaz0id · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I tried a wiki.. and what you and I consider easy to use and the masses who aren't really into tech consider easy to use still has a big gap. They said it was too confusing.

    2. Re:Wiki by Chapium · · Score: 2, Informative

      I was thinking the same, however, this would probably rather impractical for uploading videos. Also I've noticed the method for linking to files is somewhat confusing. I'm not sure if thats necessarily the best option.

      But if a wiki were used, here's some info:

      MediaWiki would be a good one, however it uses databases. Dokuwiki can be used to upload files of all sorts. It isnt very helpful in terms of creating a gallery of pictures however.

      Here is a comparison of wikis: Wiki Comparison Table

      A photogallery would be a nice wiki plugin to have ;-)

    3. Re:Wiki by RedWizzard · · Score: 1
      Sounds like an excellent opportunity for a Wiki.
      Got a specific recommendation? None of the wikis I've tried are particularly well suited to handling attached files.
    4. Re:Wiki by Atzanteol · · Score: 2, Insightful

      TikiWiki allows for the creation of image and file galleries. It even allows for one to upload an entire directory at a time. Uses a DB backend though...

      --
      "Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge"

      - Charles Darwin
    5. Re:Wiki by hey! · · Score: 1

      Believe it or not the WikiWord thing is not easy to explain to non-geeks. I'd rather go with something that has a rich text edit capabilities and a simple blog format.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    6. Re:Wiki by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      OWL looks promising. I've played with it a little and it seems pretty well polished.
      It does requiere a database, but that shouln't be a show stopper.

    7. Re:Wiki by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      I just wanted to reply to this becuase I discovered that OWL does NOT need a database. You can configure it to either use a database, or the file system.

  2. Gallery2? by Davus · · Score: 5, Informative

    Gallery2 is nice, albeit a bit resource intensive when scaling down pictures to thumbnails using the 'convert' app.

    --
    The above is most likely humour. Slashdot foot icon goes here.
    1. Re:Gallery2? by porkThreeWays · · Score: 3, Informative

      I can't believe this was never modded up and didn't get more mention. Gallery2 is freakin awesome! It does _exactly_ what he needs. It'll do pics and video extremely well. The author has put A LOT of work into it. There are few web based open source projects I've seen with this level of quality. I know 4 people with home servers using it and they love it. Never had a complaint. Install it. It takes like 5 minutes and you'll see. Our local West Palm Beach radio station uses it on their site and I've spotted it on a few other commercial sites.

      --
      If an officer ever threatens to taze you, say you have a pacemaker.
  3. Re:Share movies/music? by omeomi · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Better make sure you're not connected to the greater internet then. The **AAs would sue the pants off you - after all, a central server is easier to find than a distributed P2P network.

    You do know that many people have video cameras, right? The **AAs aren't going to sue anybody for posting their own pictures and videos.

  4. What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    So far we've gotten a recommendation for a Wiki and Gallery2. Both are poor solutions. Wikis are far too complicated to explain to most regular people who are not very technically savvy. Gallery2 is much easier to use but wouldn't qualify as a collboration server in the way the poster describes. Plus, Gallery2 has artifical upload limits preventing large home-made movies from being shared. I think the poster wants something analogous to SharePoint Services but most family oriented, cheaper, and easier to use. I, too, am interested in this.

    1. Re:What? by delirium_9 · · Score: 1

      If you copy the file to the server first (via ftp or whatever) then Gallery2 will happily import it. I think the upload limit has more to do with whatever limits the webserver has rather than Gallery itself (but I could be wrong, as I almost always ftp the files first and then import them).

      --
      Since your UID is smaller than mine, I can only conclude that you're trolling. -s20451 (410424)
  5. For just looking back by Tribbin · · Score: 2, Informative

    Maybe not exactly what you are looking for, but;

    http://f-spot.org/

    A really fast picture-collection browser. It sorts everything on date by the meta-data that your digital camera put in the files. You can add 'catagories' and the like yourself. Generate albums and such.

    --
    If you mod this up, your slashdot background will turn into a beautiful sunset!
  6. Re:Share movies/music? by RsG · · Score: 1

    Actually, didn't something like that happen a while back? I seem to recall a /. story about somebody who was hosting video files that they themselves held copyright to, and was sent repeated takedown notices because the MPAA was SURE the files were theirs. They followed up with legal threats when the material wasn't removed, despite repeated requests that the lawyers examine the materials that they were told were MPAA owned.

    Not sure if it's exactly relevant here, or if the story was a hoax, but it's certainly plausible enough, what with the companies using webcrawler bots and heavy handed legal tactics.

    --
    Erotic is when you use a feather. Exotic is when you use the whole chicken.
  7. Gallery by forkazoo · · Score: 4, Informative

    I use a gallery2 on my server. Check it out here : http://gallery.menalto.com/

    I've been pretty pleased with it. Add in a wiki for letting other family members post miscellaneous stories and whatnot. I found it easy to setup, and it does everything I need.

    1. Re:Gallery by swillden · · Score: 1

      I second this recommendation. Gallery2 is excellent and easy to install and maintain. I haven't tried using it for video and audio, but I know it supports them.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    2. Re:Gallery by ottothecow · · Score: 2, Informative
      I will also follow up and say that gallery2 is great. You can have seperate users so they cant touch each others albums and it works great once you get it set up (the install was a little trying the last time I had to do it manually). Luckily, now that I am with Dreamhost (note, referral link that gives you $7 back), they have gallery2 (or 1) as one of their automatically installable items. It will be installed, set up and ready to go. They have recently removed ALL cpu-time limits so you have no worries about having a large amount of users on the lowest plan.

      Gallery2 is heavily worked on and it's always been a joy to use.

      --
      Bottles.
    3. Re:Gallery by jakoz · · Score: 1

      I agree with this. I used Gallery2 for my wedding. We had a fairly large wedding, with many people having their own digital cameras there... something like the situation the OP is describing. Setting up the system was a snap. It took no time at all. Everyone could upload their files without a problem. They could then be resized on demand, divided into albums easily, etc. I would recommend it in an instant, and would use it again without a second thought.

  8. Rolling your own shouldn't be too hard by martinultima · · Score: 1

    Not sure about existing solutions, but it really shouldn't be that hard to roll your own – for example, if you use PHP, they have a great manual which not only explains everything you need to know, but it also has very useful examples and stuff. I actually learned everything I know about PHP just reading the manual, and copying the occassional tidbit of information – not very hard at all.

    Maybe Gallery would work? (Forgot the URL, but it's a popular program, won't help with videos but it looks great for photos, etc.)

    --
    Creative misinterpretation is your friend.
    1. Re:Rolling your own shouldn't be too hard by SimplePaul · · Score: 1

      Just what I was thinking.

      If a wiki is too complicated for the non-geek family members then a [b]simple[/b] image/movie sharing site can very easily be made in PHP.

      It's little more than a file-upload form and an image gallery/viewer really. A 1-week PHP project imo.

      This way it can be done to taste as well.

      PHP is a -very- easy language. You can pretty much learn it as you go along.

    2. Re:Rolling your own shouldn't be too hard by martinultima · · Score: 1

      Hell, after my first few rounds of trial-and-error, I managed to write most of the programs running my site in only a couple days (the first Überpage was written literally overnight, and updated to MySQL in even less time – just to name one example).

      --
      Creative misinterpretation is your friend.
  9. Re:Share movies/music? by omeomi · · Score: 2, Informative

    Actually, didn't something like that happen a while back?

    They sent a letter to Penn State astronomy department. They have a Professor Usher, who happened to have an mp3 of him and fellow astronomers singing or something. "Usher" and "mp3" were enough to trigger a warning message, but it didn't go all the way to a lawsuit, and the RIAA eventually apologized.

    http://news.com.com/2100-1025_3-1001095.html

  10. Re:Share movies/music? by Gulthek · · Score: 1

    Just as long as you don't film anyone singing any copyrighted works (like Happy Birthday), you're in the clear.

    And no copyrighted music is playing in the background.

    And no copyrighted videos are playing on the tv.

    You know, basic hazards of modern life.

    Better password protect that site and cover your ass (legally).

  11. phpWebsite by linuxkrn · · Score: 3, Informative
    I use phpWebsite on a few sites, it's got several things, nothing is "top of the line" but it all works well.

    http://phpwebsite.appstate.edu/

    Features from website
    1. Easy, web-based administration - minimal computer experience is needed to maintain site content.
    2. Flexible layout control - site page layout can be changed at anytime.
    3. Topic-based announcements - organize site announcements by category with automatic history rollover.
    4. Interactive content - visitors can post comments, submit announcements and web links.
    5. Full featured event calendar - post events by category and subcategory in a flexible cross-referenced calendar.
    6. Customized user experience - themes allow each vistor to customize the web site for his or her preferences or special needs.
    7. XHTML and WAI compliance - we are committed to meeting XHTML 1.0 specifications by our 1.0 release. Current errors are minimal.
  12. Grab an old PC... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Take an old PC. Stick some fair-sized hard drives in. Install FreeBSD, lighttpd, and proftpd.

    Give each of your family members an account on the machine, so they can FTP in and upload pictures to their directory. They can even create their own directory hierarchies, so as to organize their photos as they wish.

    Set up lighttpd to allow directory listing, and have it serve up content from the directories your relatives can FTP files to. That way they don't have to create a web page containing their images, or anything like that. Of course, if they want to, they're free to do so.

    If they're running Windows, you can easily copy files via FTP using Explorer. It's the same drag-and-drop interface they should be used to using locally.

    The best part of setting up a system like that is that it's very simple, of minimal cost, and doesn't involve PHP, MySQL, Perl, Ruby, CGI scripts, or anything else like that. Not only that, but it can take full advantage of the security offered by UNIX-like systems.

    1. Re:Grab an old PC... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with the parent, FTP is probably the best choice for what you want. If you want to stick to windows, try Filezilla FTP Server, very reliable and easy to use.

      If FTP is not a possibility, you might want to try DC++.

    2. Re:Grab an old PC... by colman77 · · Score: 1

      I don't know what kind of family you have, but I know that MY mother/aunts/uncles/cousins don't have a HOPE of FTPing pictures on their own.

      Just have them email all their pictures to you, and make an easy webpage with dreamweaver or something. It'll take less time in the end, and it'll be easier for everyone.

      Oh, and if your email account doesn't have enough room, get GMail.

    3. Re:Grab an old PC... by Aladrin · · Score: 1

      If they can manage to get the pictures off their camera and into an email, they can use Explorer to copy the files somewhere else. Simply set it up for them in advance and it'll be just like using their MyDocs folder.

      I'm assuming they are using Windows XP, though. If you try to set all that up on 98, me, or linux for them... Well, may God have mercy on your soul.

      --
      "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
    4. Re:Grab an old PC... by colman77 · · Score: 1

      My relatives can email pictures, because someone showed them how and it's familiar. They CAN'T navigate My Computer, though. And cut and paste is outside their talents, believe it or not. They can email pictures but they can't cut and paste... Also, I think the point of this whole thing is to allow people who are far away to share pictures. It's hard to set "all that" up for them, when you're hundreds of miles away.

    5. Re:Grab an old PC... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know what kind of family you have, but I know that MY mother/aunts/uncles/cousins don't have a HOPE of FTPing pictures on their own.

      I think on Fark this is where it would say "Your dog wants ssh"

  13. Are you sure about that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The **AAs aren't going to sue anybody for posting their own pictures and videos.

    They send a letters an file law suits to anyone they think has content, after all, the world is just filthy pirates.

  14. Community Server by theguru · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Allow me to give you a Microsoft based solution (open sourced though!). http://communityserver.org/Default.aspx

    Blogs, forums, files, photos, RSS feeds, role based security, etc. I use it to host a site for all my old college friends. The SQL server database is quite happy on both of the free MS SQL offerings, Microsoft Data Engine (MSDE) and SQL Express. Only the blog and forum postings and settings are stored in the database. The files and photos are stores in the file system.

    1. Re:Community Server by tlhIngan · · Score: 2, Informative

      Community Server is the largest PoS software around, unfortunately.

      One of my favorite websites runs it (The Daily WTF), and there are continual complaints about it on practically every entry. One of the primary problems (improved, but still not completely fixed) is its mysterious ability to take a nicely formatted post, and end up automagically quoting all the < and > in the HTML view. End result is the preview looks OK, but the final post ends up a gobbledegook of HTML. Turns a nice post into an unreadable mess. It gets worse if people use different browsers.

      (And some people complain it's a larger WTF than the WTF's that get posted!). It makes Slashcode look good.

      On the upside, Community Server does look very nice. But the mangled posts tends to be a huge problem.

    2. Re:Community Server by tatonca · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you are going to go the route of hosting a CMS somewhere there are a number of other open source, CMSes that are also free, and are not limited in the same way Community Server Express is.

      My favorite is Drupal, as I've had lot's of experience using it, and I find it gives you the biggest feature set for your effort. The number of plug ins (modules) are extensive, and the end user experience can be whatever you want it to be. There are many Drupal hosting sites available that are fairly inexpensive, and have the shell of your community already configured. You just drop in your customizations and away you go.

      Mambo is also quite useful if you're looking for an 'out of the box' 'set it up in 20 minutes and walk away' solution. I don't prefer it as much as the extensibility seems limited to me and it has some interesting quirks that seem a bit counter intuitive, but that may just be my inexperience.

      There are many other CMSes out there, these are just two I have used/contributed to.

      One additional comment : i find that picking a platform and setting up the technology is the easiest part of a project like this. The harder part is getting your family to use it!! ;)

  15. iPhoto by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    iPhoto has sharing builtin to the program, and if you've got a VPN set up Rendezvous will detect your family's computers automatically and take care of all the configuration issues behind the scenes. Contrary to its name, iPhoto handles both still photos and videos, including AVIs, WMVs, DivXs and XviDs in all their greasy glory (with the right QuickTime plugins).

    It does use a database on the backend, but since iPhoto makes organization so easy with smart albums and slideshows, really, why is this a problem?

    I mean, unless you're a tasteless dweeb, in which case I'm sure many excellent PC-compatible solutions will be written in the coming years, all pilfered from Mac equivalents. YMMV.

  16. Re:Share movies/music? by RsG · · Score: 1

    Actually, if it were me, I'd be more worried about my (hypothetical) kids putting stuff on there that they shouldn't. It'd be really unfortunate if the guy who posted the article was scrupulous about avoiding copyrighted materials himself, and one of his kids went and put all his pirated MP3s on the server. And the OP, while flamebait, is right about one thing - a central server would draw more attention than a p2p network does.

    Either make sure there are no potentially infringing materials at all on the server, or make sure that any such materials can't be found.

    --
    Erotic is when you use a feather. Exotic is when you use the whole chicken.
  17. On a Mac by kponto · · Score: 2, Informative

    iPhoto with iLife '06 lets other users subscribe to your photo libraries. Might suit your needs.

    :ducks:

    --
    This too, will end.
    1. Re:On a Mac by drgreg911 · · Score: 1

      I think that requires you to have a .Mac account, right? Otherwise it'd be great.

  18. Umm... by killmenow · · Score: 1

    Plogger

    Duh!

  19. Yahoo Group by WilyCoder · · Score: 1

    Start a Yahoo Group. That's what my father's family did.

    1. Re:Yahoo Group by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is that a Yahoo! Group is under the control of Yahoo!. If you post pictures of your little sister running around naked on her 4th birthday, instead of going, "Aww, how cute," it's likely Yahoo! will just delete all your files without warning. Rather a big ouch, especially if you're not keeping backups of the individual files. Backing up the whole group is, of course, impossible, because it's all running on Yahoo!'s servers.

      Of course, it's no problem if you just share ephemeral stuff that can be deleted at any time. If you just post your vacation photos to share, and then forget about them, it's no big deal. Just so long as you don't ever post anything that an underpaid drone might be consider a violation of the acceptable use policy, because then you might have the police paying you a visit.

    2. Re:Yahoo Group by BigCheese · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up. It's right on.

      In addition I'd add that Yahoo Groups tend to lose and delay a lot of mail and don't have all that much storage. You're much better off setting something up on a server at home or on a inexpensive web host.

      --
      The obscure we see eventually. The completely obvious, it seems, takes longer. - Edward R. Murrow
  20. Is there...? by giantsfan89 · · Score: 0, Troll
    Is there an application that can handle user accounts, picture submissions (file upload via browser), and other such content?"

    Yes.

    --
    Don't ping my cheese with your bandwidth!
  21. A CMS... by Danious · · Score: 1

    Try a CMS like Drupal (http://www.drupal.org/), gives you users (including security and roles and allowed actions), photo galleries, video upload, articles, tagging, mailing lists, google maps integration, etc, etc...

    I've set one up for my brother to post photo's and videos and news and stuff for his new-born twins, works well, and keeps everyone happy as no-one gets missed from sending out stuff.

    John.

    1. Re:A CMS... by Abstract · · Score: 1

      I just started to play with Drupal too, and I think it's a very nice solution for the problem mentioned. I really like the extra modules like forum, private messaging, galleries, uploads etc. etc. good stuff.

  22. JotSpot Family Site by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Full disclosure: I work for JotSpot. That said, I think JotSpot Family Site is exactly what you're looking for. It's built on JotSpot's wiki platform, so it's a wiki under the hood, but it has an extremely friendly interface built on top. And it's designed specifically for family collaboration: it gives you a calendar, blog, family tree, map, etc, and it's completely free. Sign up and give it a try.

    - Abe Fettig (http://fettig.net/), JotSpot (http://jot.com)

  23. I just built a family server myself... by Valley+Redneck · · Score: 1

    ... for files and music, and thanks to some helpful slashdotters, it's up and running nicely. We took and old PC, smacked an old copy of XP pro SP 2 on it, threw in an extra couple of old hard drives. We put it on the LAN, unplugged the monitor, keyboard and mouse and ran it via remote desktop. Then we put Hamachi on it, set up shared folders, gave everbody the password and are running the VPN peer-to-peer. Everybody can share files on a LAN, the server is made of spare parts and anyone who can use windows file sharing has access to the files they want. And if my crowd can pull this off, anybody's family can. Best of luck.

  24. Use WebDav for images/video by ishmalius · · Score: 4, Informative
    Go ahead and use Wordpress or phpBB or phpWiki or whatever for talking, but...

    Since most of the unwashed masses have Windows, you can use its built-in WebDav stuff. Set up an Apache server with a DAV directory. Then point your friends/family to the URL for the folder, which they merely need add to their "Web Folders." They need not know the underlying protocol to be able to use it. They can then just drag their images and videos onto the folder, and Voila! They are published. It's a no-brainer, and anyone who can drag an icon can use it.

    On Linux, Nautilus can do DAV, too. I wouldn't be surprised if KDE had desktop support for it, also. DAV makes a nice small file server, when Samba or NFS won't work.

  25. It seems like just the other day... by unitron · · Score: 4, Informative

    Perhaps this Ask Slashdot- "Multi-State Family Networking?"-from May 31, 2006 has some replies that will assist you.

    --

    I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  26. Foldershare Works Well by akmolloy · · Score: 2, Informative
    Check out foldershare: https://www.foldershare.com/

    We use it to share Pics and Vids and Music. You just have everyone create a folder on their drive, then give each account permissions. They drop stuff in the folder and eveyone gets a copy via P2P. It's a bit of a pain to setup initally, but a snap to use once it's running.

  27. Get NAS by Sithgunner · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Buy a NAS.
    It's got all the file sharing protocols installed from smb, cifs, afp, ftp, nfs with decent storage size up to 1TB and just let Windows mount the share in a public folder, everyone in the network can see it.

  28. Gallery + Gallery Remote + CMS by pjay_dml · · Score: 1

    And don't forget to mention Gallery Remote, which is a handy little applet, which allows users to upload and manage images with ease.

    Further, you can then extend you site with other features and functions, by integrating Gallery into a CMS, such as Joomla.

  29. Plone by macz · · Score: 1

    Plone from plone.org is good. Like Wiki, but slightly more packaged.

    --
    ...But I digress. TREMBLE PUNY HUMANS!ONE DAY MY SPECIES WILL DESTROY YOU ALL!
    1. Re:Plone by BigCheese · · Score: 1

      Zope/Plone is great if you're running your own server but rather expensive if you get it hosted.

      I use Zope/Plone for my home server. If you want a wiki you can add ZWiki (http://zwiki.org).

      --
      The obscure we see eventually. The completely obvious, it seems, takes longer. - Edward R. Murrow
  30. Clarkconnect is the winner here. by KermitJunior · · Score: 1

    Home version of CC is free and has Gallery, Wiki, Samba, etc all easily setup via your browser. Think of it as a souped up router with optional proxy, etc.

    KJ

    --
    There is a Universal Life Value Check it
    1. Re:Clarkconnect is the winner here. by crath · · Score: 1

      The poster forgot to point you to the ClarkConnect website: http://www.clarkconnect.com/ I've been using ClarkConnect for 3 years and am very satisfied with it.

  31. I rolled my own at first... by bigmouth_strikes · · Score: 1

    I built a custom web application for this, with wiki, blogging, uploads, gallerys etc. It was fun, but really a hassle because of the two-step process of first identifying the file(s) and then downloading them to your machine if you wanted to work on it. The web GUI was great for browsing files, not so great for directly accessing them (apart from viewing pictures, maybe).

    So instead I set up a simple file server with a strict structure (backups, archive, work area, private, pictures, movies, music, incoming etc) and then shared it on the network. Then I installed Hamachi ( dead simple VPN-ish software http://hamachi.cc/ ) on all machines that my extended family has and voila! They get the familiar gui of Explorer and easy copy/paste/edit etc. With some thinking and permissions, it just works with a minimal effort.

    --
    Oh, I can't help quoting you because everything that you said rings true
  32. Coppermine by Propaganda13 · · Score: 1

    Coppermine works fine. Easy to setup and change.
    http://coppermine-gallery.net/index.php

  33. Share and store pictures and MUSIC by Gothmolly · · Score: 1

    So what you really want is a warez server for you and your buddies to stash pr0n and mp3s on, right?

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
  34. OMFG!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can you say flickr? Browser based, globally accessible, easy to use, controlled access, picture storage, comments, and more. Hosted on a high-speed backbone by professional hosters with backups and all. Oh, by the way, it's free!

    The word is FLICKR!!!

  35. Drupal is my tool of choice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Drupal (www.drupal.org) works for me. It provides blogs, images, audio, mmovies, calanders, etc through the use of add-on modules all of which are open source.

  36. FamilyAnywhere.com by slappy · · Score: 1

    FamilyAnywhere was recently released for this very thing.

  37. I built exactly what you're looking for by MattPF · · Score: 1

    I was in your boots about 4 months ago and wrote my own system to accomplish exactly what you're looking for, check it out here: http://www.poulsonfamily.org/news.php Any family member can create an account and: -Blog news entries -Upload photo albums -Upload videos/media/downloads -Add to "Links" section It's all very simple and web-based. If you want the source (PHP/MySQL) shoot me an email: matt@farleyfamily.net -Matt PS - on a side note I'm finishing up a system where uploaded videos are transcoded to flash and played in the page directly (a la YouTube / Google Video)

  38. MyFamily.com by Wilk4 · · Score: 1

    Myfamily.com has some nice features for a quick setup like this. It's not free, but it's quick, easy, and inexpensive and all you do is pick your settings. http://www.myfamily.com/ We're actually using it for a collaboration and scheduling space for a church worship team. (musicians & media creation) jw

  39. Use a Wiki! by charlesTheLurker · · Score: 1

    Heck, I just use a private TWiki. Authenticated, simple, lots of cool plug-ins. Works for Me and my Family.

  40. ssh anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Call me traditional but i say the simplest solution is best. So go with and ssh server.

    Ya I know you said you wanted a web interface but Winscp is looks just like windows explorer. The only really big downside to this is no thumbnails, and that means people will have to name their media files in meaningful ways, I dunno about everyone else but I hate taking the time to do that.

    The upside is you could set it up quicker thank you can say "Holy Secure Shell Batman"

    1. Re:ssh anyone? by Al+Dimond · · Score: 1

      There may be no thumbs/previews built in, but it would certainly be possible to write dynamic pages that scan the filesystem for images, generate thumbs with ImageMagick and put 'em on the page. Then you'd probably want to cache the thumbs to avoid wasting server cycles generating them, store a checksum of the original image in case it was changed, and as an extra feature add a description field to the database so anyone can add a description to non-descriptly named pictures via a simple web interface.

      In principle, I certainly agree with you: a good way to solve this problem is to seperate the "file upload" problem from the "web interface" problem, because it's hard to make intuitive web-based file upload pages.

  41. Viiv by GWBasic · · Score: 1

    Viiv does what you ask for. Just buy a Viiv-based desktop.

  42. Give this little known product a try... by jo42 · · Score: 1
    Give this peer-to-peer product a try: http://www.qnext.com/.

    Runs on Windows, Mac OS X and Linux.

    PS. The new /. look and feel really, really SUCKS real bad.

  43. Better late than never by langseth · · Score: 1

    Check out Ubuntu Center its a LAMP systems but it should fit your needs https://ubuntucenter.bountysource.com/

  44. eGroupware by ElPresidente1972 · · Score: 1

    It's a bit of a pain for a PHP newb to set up. Now that I've learned some things, it's actually fairly easy. You need a web server, PHP, and a database. It will work with a number of web and db servers. You have your choice of file storage via DAV or via db.

    eGroupware

  45. Try this by exes · · Score: 1

    Linux + FTP

  46. Just released by Jotspot by mdm42 · · Score: 1

    http://family.jotspot.com/
    I have nothing to do with jotspot, get no money from them, nor them from me. I've never tried their product, IANAL, YMMV, FTC, RTFM,...

    --
    New mod option wanted: -1 DrunkenRambling