I've spent the last week trying to get the RC working. I started with fresh install and ext4/encrypted home directory. It appeared to work but locked within an hour. (hard lock sometimes with caps/number lock flashing)
I noticed they had a problem with deletes in ext4 and so reformatted to ext3. Then I got kernel oops with what appeared to be the encrypted home directory stuff. So I turned that off as well and still was getting lockups. After days of reading bugs with the kernel 2.6.28, nvidia 180 drivers, and the intel 4965 wireless, I've still not solved the problem. It's hard to troubleshoot as there are no logs and the system is dead even to sysrq commands. I did see an issue with the hpet having problems, so I tried the other modes such as jiffies. Even used noapic/etc trying to get a stable system. Nothing seems to work. Funny thing is that 8.04 and 8.10 were rock solid on my system.
In many cases, running firefox and trying to watch flash video causes the lockups. Sometimes in less than five minutes.
Just FYI for anyone using similar hardware Dell m1730 Intel X9000 @ 3.4GHz 4gb RAM dual SSD 64GB RAID-0 (dual boot with XP) dual nVidia 8800M GTX (SLI) 30" Dell LCD @ 2560x1600 Intel 4965 Wireless Ubuntu 9.04 amd64
For most users, no it will not work. One of the major features of ext4 is extents, which basically reserves space for a file to continue writing at a later date. This will decrease file fragmentation and improve performance.
If however, you disable extents, then yes you can mount it as ext3. And as you know, ext3 can be mounted as ext2 without the journaling.
I agree that the win32 ext2 drivers need updating. I would hate to lose access to ext partitions for dual boot systems.
I'm a huge vi user myself, but the biggest difference is wasd is left handed and hjkl is right hand. Most people are used to using the mouse with the right hand. So you'd be jumping on and off the keyboard to click links/etc.
Looks cool, but I'd pass. Don't get me wrong, I love Star Trek^H^H^H^HWars (joking) as much as the next geek. Just not enough to decorate my home with it.
Before everyone gets all worked up about the great access time (~0.1-0.3ms) and great read times, consider this...
Two issues plague SSD are write times and write wear. Just like thumbnail drives, they will "wear out" with use. Most of the newer models have wear-leveling and that reduces it greatly. But it's still an issue. Don't take the MFG's MTBF specs for face value. Then you have the huge issue with write times. Many reviews show real-world speeds of 3-4 times SLOWER then a typical 2.5" 5400 RPM HDD.
You may think that isn't much, but it can be. Things like moving files around, compiling software (Gentoo:), or just using swap space, will show huge hits in performance.
That said, if your reasons are for battery life and/or durability, then the cost may be justified. However, at the current cost per GB ~$10-15/GB, it's just not worth it in my opinion.
Actually, even though SC is somewhat designed to take advantage of multi-core processors, it doesn't use them very well. Check the gaspowered games forums, you will see people writing apps to re-thread the dll/game cpu affinity.
On my own Q6600, it runs 100% on one core, and about 20-30% on another. The other two cores are not used at all. Multi threaded programming isn't easy, and these quickie games are almost never designed to take advantage of threads and different cores. Hopefully it will change as more are more people get these processors. Simple things as putting AI,UI,and game logic on different cores would make a huge difference.
I did RTFA, and it seems to me they made an oversight in the fact that most ISP/corp sites use a caching DNS server. A repeated lookup to the same domain will return the cached result. Their POC depends on the client doing another lookup and getting a different result. This would attack would depend on the client being able to the attacker's DNS.
Now they do say that the attacker DNS returns more then one A record for each request. But they are ignoring the fact that the serial number of the zone would have to change for a refresh to not get cached. And even if they did create a new zone record for each visit, with the target's IP (seems unlikely), all the servers back to the client would need to respect it. Again, my ISP Qwest, has a bad habit of ignoring the TTL in my zone files.
The only case I can see this working if the zone records contain an IP for some third party source that they want to try and abuse. So say www2.attacker.com points to 10.0.0.1 and that number is static in their zone record. Which appears to be much less efficient zombie scan with IP spoofing.
And finally, this is all dependent on the attacker tricking the client into loading Flash/Java/Javascript from their box. Another win for noscript.
If you RTFA, it says they raided his place and found CDs of child porn. Now it also says he had a roommate and that the IM that got them in trouble was sent from his roommate's account. Which should have made them investigate him as well, but that's another story.
Bottom line here is that there was evidence of child porn found locally at the address connected with that IP. So it's not really "using an Open WAP defense" as it would seem from summary. If they found nothing to collaborate the on-line transmissions at his address, then it would be more believable someone else could have done it.
but this stuff has to stop before companies like EA and Q! drag their product through the mud.
Why? I'd like nothing better then to see the money hungry EA go up in flames. I stopped buying their games because
They release limited feature games, then SELL you an expansion later that the game was supposed to be from the start (C&C Generals, BF2, etc)
Almost all of the games I have from them contain critical gameplay bugs that keep you from completing the game. Tech support ignores you and tells you to reinstall and try again. (Look for Attack Troll in BFM2)(
On-line games such as BF2 have server issues that again, their tech support deny and blame on other things. Tell you to re-install a patch. But if you wait a few days and do nothing they start working with no comments from EA (search for BF2 Auth server was down for days)
Lastly their new money hungry angle to add spyware to games to make even more money off of consumers. (BF2142)
I vote with my money, and they will not be getting any of it. Let them burn. Maybe after the dust settles they might get a clue what they've done to their customers.
Like a lot of people on here, I ran out and bought HL2 when it first came out. I had my reservations about steam but wanted to give them a fair shot. That's what I did, and that's why I'm never buying another one of their products again.
You see, this issue just brings into light the whole concept that is so bad about publisher over-the-net supplied games. Let's compare this to a regular CD/DVD/etc game. Lord of the Rings BFE2 just came out with a major patch that completely changes unit times/strengths, etc. It's almost like playing another game. Not getting into a debate of if it's good or bad, but if **I** decided I don't want to apply it then I can keep playing. As long as others out there don't like it too, I can even play on-line. In CS:S, we are screwed if we don't update. You can't play period. That not only gives steam control over when and where you play, but your game experience. Don't like what they've done now, too bad.
Who knows how long they will continue to support HL2. But without their auth/update servers, the game will not work. I won't be buying anything like this again for that very reason. Anyone else notice this is the new trend. Even MS is moving toward this model. Complete control, and I'm not going to give it. Voting with my wallet, suggest you do the same too.
Well my TV has two. However, many devices, the higher quality ones anyway, have in and out HDMI. For example, some receivers have HDMI switches built into them. Also my DVD player allows you to have HDMI in, and OUT. When the player is on, it shows DVD content, otherwise it goes into pass-through mode.
I use LDAP at work for everything and life is so much better now.
Windows Desktops (Samba PDC and BDC -> LDAP) Linux pam_ldap + nss -> LDAP and NFS shares
You can log into either a windows desktop or linux box and have the same file shares open. Windows has H: and Linux is/home/username. Public drives are mapped as well.
Then for email, postfix + dovecot -> ldap. You can store not only use the same username password as for linux, but you can add unlimited number of real-time mail aliases to each user. Also supports virtual domains.
Directory services for phone numbers, room locations, etc. in ldap. Mapped to email clients search/contact lists.
squid + ldap and apache + ldap, secure login to website.
Squirrelmail/horde both use ldap as well. Auth is done via imap, but horde can do much more with ldap. Both can use it for directory services.
Admin can be done either via CLI smbldap-tools, php ldap admin, gq (ldap tree browser), or ldapmodify if you're hard core. Plus with sync'ing data to other sites they have a copy of the data for their BDC/etc. If I need to add/modify a user there is only one place that needs to be modified. And I can do it from home. =)
I do droks runs in guild wars for a few reasons. I've not only been the runner, but been ran by others myself. In guild wars the lvl cap is 20. You are free to change your secondary class as much as you want. But you cannot change your primary class. This means there are several other builds you could try out. However, before Factions, it took a very long time to get where the good stuff was. Droks armor is highest in stats (not best skin/but AC rating), plus the skills trader has more advanced skills.
If you've already played the game through say 4-5 times then doing it again and again for each new character type is boring and painful.
And before factions, we were limited to 4 characters per account. Which meant you had to delete your old ones before trying out different classes. Guild wars isn't a level grinder like most other RPG games. After you hit 20, that's it. You just focus on better skill combos and different areas. Why make the players go through the entire noob areas again?
If you look at factions, this is what the game devs did. They made it so you can level up to 20 in two days with 3000+ XP quests. In GW1 it took week(s) at 250-500XP per quest.
And finally, running is a quick, not always easy, way to make some money. They have nerfed all the good farming areas and made it so money is much harder to aquire. Granted green/gold drops help, it's a pain trying to do player-player trades. In one droks run I make 10-15k in 35 minutes. When a full suite of nice looking (15k) armor cost me 150k it's still hard work.
And if you're wondering, playing with skills and builds is what it's all about. I just got my ele to do 2,672 damage in one spell hit. (4x-668 damage to lvl 5 guys). =) http://www.linuxlogin.com/public/2672damage.jpg BTW, that's wine 0.9.19 running a test this morning. Why health bars overlap.
Sounds like you're trying to solve a problem that you don't have.
Cluster need special software to take advantage of the disturbed computing. They are built with a specific task in mind. Or do you already have a need and just failed to tell us?
For me, I run my network with distcc (http://distcc.samba.org/) So all of my Gentoo boxes can compile using shared computing power. It cut a typical 33Min app down to less then 2 mins doing this. And works wonders for my slower laptop.
With distcc, all you need to do is have the same tool chains. (glibc, gcc, coreutils, etc) You can even specify how many threads per box you want running to fine tune your network.
On the other hand, if you just want to learn, then you should try them all. The all suit different needs.
That asus is just a standard fan mounted in a case that looks like a jet engine, but it's the same technology.
On the other hand, the HP one uses small blades that are shorter and that spin faster. As such they create more thrust/airflow and reduce noise that normal blades produce from the tips of their blades.
RTFA, it's got a good discription, yeah, I know it's/. but sometimes it's worth reading.
Well, you show me a Windows box that is REBOOT in 60secs with all services. In XP at least, they try to trick the user into thinking the system us up (you can login) but it's not usable or all services are not started for some time after. As someone else here pointed out in their sig, anyone with more then 30 days uptime in windows isn't applying patches.
I happen to have tons of those HP DL380s G4, and they POST around 45 seconds, that doesn't include OS bootup. Just to add drives to the raid array, scan the SCSI BUS, etc.
And for the record, I used to be a MSCP in Windows NT 4, back in the day, and registered beta tested 95 - 2000,.NET, SMS, Visual Studio and many of their other products. That's when I got tired of all the bugs, hidden crap, re-installs, etc.
And I actually started using Linux (Slackware) over 10 years ago as well. As time went on, I saw MS products get more bloated, slower, have more bugs, while Linux and OSS just got better.
Everyone can have their opinion, as most people do. I've used both for many years, and from now on, my server will always be Linux.
How many times to we have to tell people that Red Hat != ALL OF LINUX.
That's like saying Windows 2003 is all of Windows. I still doubt that they played fair in FUD report.
In addition to this, they almost NEVER compare apples to apples. Apache != Linux either, just IIS != Windows.
How many patches require you to REBOOT windows to apply? Service Packs? The only thing you need to reboot Linux for is a new kernel. Did they factor that in as well?
But my guess is these guys either got MS funding from somewhere, or were fishing for some after giving this report.
Like most/.ers I hate Microsoft, and love it when they get it stuck to them. However, this does worry me a bit. Right now MS-Office is the industry standard. For both work and home I use OpenOffice.org and tell everyone else to use it to.
What worries me about this is that OOo has PDF export that gave them a nice "feature" that MS-Office didn't have. Now Adobe is going after MS, I have to wonder if OOo gets popular enough they will demand that it be removed too.
Maybe it's just my cynical anti-big-corporation views, but I don't trust Adobe enough to not use their big stick against OOo.
AH, where are the mod points when I need them. I was just thinking of replying to GP with this. Such typical FUD that fanboys want to use as an excuse that Windows is only infected all the time because it's so popular. Please
Slashdot Mirror
I've spent the last week trying to get the RC working. I started with fresh install and ext4/encrypted home directory. It appeared to work but locked within an hour. (hard lock sometimes with caps/number lock flashing)
I noticed they had a problem with deletes in ext4 and so reformatted to ext3. Then I got kernel oops with what appeared to be the encrypted home directory stuff. So I turned that off as well and still was getting lockups. After days of reading bugs with the kernel 2.6.28, nvidia 180 drivers, and the intel 4965 wireless, I've still not solved the problem. It's hard to troubleshoot as there are no logs and the system is dead even to sysrq commands. I did see an issue with the hpet having problems, so I tried the other modes such as jiffies. Even used noapic/etc trying to get a stable system. Nothing seems to work. Funny thing is that 8.04 and 8.10 were rock solid on my system.
In many cases, running firefox and trying to watch flash video causes the lockups. Sometimes in less than five minutes.
Just FYI for anyone using similar hardware
Dell m1730
Intel X9000 @ 3.4GHz
4gb RAM
dual SSD 64GB RAID-0 (dual boot with XP)
dual nVidia 8800M GTX (SLI)
30" Dell LCD @ 2560x1600
Intel 4965 Wireless
Ubuntu 9.04 amd64
For most users, no it will not work. One of the major features of ext4 is extents, which basically reserves space for a file to continue writing at a later date. This will decrease file fragmentation and improve performance.
If however, you disable extents, then yes you can mount it as ext3. And as you know, ext3 can be mounted as ext2 without the journaling.
I agree that the win32 ext2 drivers need updating. I would hate to lose access to ext partitions for dual boot systems.
I'm a huge vi user myself, but the biggest difference is wasd is left handed and hjkl is right hand. Most people are used to using the mouse with the right hand. So you'd be jumping on and off the keyboard to click links/etc.
I couldn't get to the site, but found these instead.
IGN and Gizmodo.
Looks cool, but I'd pass. Don't get me wrong, I love Star Trek^H^H^H^HWars (joking) as much as the next geek. Just not enough to decorate my home with it.
Before everyone gets all worked up about the great access time (~0.1-0.3ms) and great read times, consider this...
:), or just using swap space, will show huge hits in performance.
Two issues plague SSD are write times and write wear. Just like thumbnail drives, they will "wear out" with use. Most of the newer models have wear-leveling and that reduces it greatly. But it's still an issue. Don't take the MFG's MTBF specs for face value. Then you have the huge issue with write times. Many reviews show real-world speeds of 3-4 times SLOWER then a typical 2.5" 5400 RPM HDD.
You may think that isn't much, but it can be. Things like moving files around, compiling software (Gentoo
That said, if your reasons are for battery life and/or durability, then the cost may be justified. However, at the current cost per GB ~$10-15/GB, it's just not worth it in my opinion.
Actually, even though SC is somewhat designed to take advantage of multi-core processors, it doesn't use them very well. Check the gaspowered games forums, you will see people writing apps to re-thread the dll/game cpu affinity. On my own Q6600, it runs 100% on one core, and about 20-30% on another. The other two cores are not used at all. Multi threaded programming isn't easy, and these quickie games are almost never designed to take advantage of threads and different cores. Hopefully it will change as more are more people get these processors. Simple things as putting AI,UI,and game logic on different cores would make a huge difference.
It hasn't yet. It's at RC2, so almost there.
http://download.openoffice.org/680/
and changes What's new
I did RTFA, and it seems to me they made an oversight in the fact that most ISP/corp sites use a caching DNS server. A repeated lookup to the same domain will return the cached result. Their POC depends on the client doing another lookup and getting a different result. This would attack would depend on the client being able to the attacker's DNS.
Now they do say that the attacker DNS returns more then one A record for each request. But they are ignoring the fact that the serial number of the zone would have to change for a refresh to not get cached. And even if they did create a new zone record for each visit, with the target's IP (seems unlikely), all the servers back to the client would need to respect it. Again, my ISP Qwest, has a bad habit of ignoring the TTL in my zone files.
example 1:
target lookup (T0) -> www.attacker.com
www.attacker.com -> 192.168.0.1
target lookup (T1) -> www.attacker.com
ISP/site cached reply -> 192.168.0.1 (attack failed)
Example 2:
target lookup (T0) -> www.attacker.com
www.attacker.com -> 192.168.0.1
target lookup (T1) -> www2.attacker.com
attacker's ISP cached reply -> 192.168.0.1 (attack failed again)
The only case I can see this working if the zone records contain an IP for some third party source that they want to try and abuse. So say www2.attacker.com points to 10.0.0.1 and that number is static in their zone record. Which appears to be much less efficient zombie scan with IP spoofing.
And finally, this is all dependent on the attacker tricking the client into loading Flash/Java/Javascript from their box. Another win for noscript.
If you RTFA, it says they raided his place and found CDs of child porn. Now it also says he had a roommate and that the IM that got them in trouble was sent from his roommate's account. Which should have made them investigate him as well, but that's another story.
Bottom line here is that there was evidence of child porn found locally at the address connected with that IP. So it's not really "using an Open WAP defense" as it would seem from summary. If they found nothing to collaborate the on-line transmissions at his address, then it would be more believable someone else could have done it.
1) Cache contents of entire hard disk to RAM
2) Claim performance boost in Vista
3) Profit!
How could they miss Yagi Antennas?
It's what every pringles can wants to be when they grow up.
Why? I'd like nothing better then to see the money hungry EA go up in flames. I stopped buying their games because
- They release limited feature games, then SELL you an expansion later that the game was supposed to be from the start (C&C Generals, BF2, etc)
- Almost all of the games I have from them contain critical gameplay bugs that keep you from completing the game. Tech support ignores you and tells you to reinstall and try again. (Look for Attack Troll in BFM2)(
- On-line games such as BF2 have server issues that again, their tech support deny and blame on other things. Tell you to re-install a patch. But if you wait a few days and do nothing they start working with no comments from EA (search for BF2 Auth server was down for days)
- Lastly their new money hungry angle to add spyware to games to make even more money off of consumers. (BF2142)
I vote with my money, and they will not be getting any of it. Let them burn. Maybe after the dust settles they might get a clue what they've done to their customers.Well,
Like a lot of people on here, I ran out and bought HL2 when it first came out. I had my reservations about steam but wanted to give them a fair shot. That's what I did, and that's why I'm never buying another one of their products again.
You see, this issue just brings into light the whole concept that is so bad about publisher over-the-net supplied games. Let's compare this to a regular CD/DVD/etc game. Lord of the Rings BFE2 just came out with a major patch that completely changes unit times/strengths, etc. It's almost like playing another game. Not getting into a debate of if it's good or bad, but if **I** decided I don't want to apply it then I can keep playing. As long as others out there don't like it too, I can even play on-line. In CS:S, we are screwed if we don't update. You can't play period. That not only gives steam control over when and where you play, but your game experience. Don't like what they've done now, too bad.
Who knows how long they will continue to support HL2. But without their auth/update servers, the game will not work. I won't be buying anything like this again for that very reason. Anyone else notice this is the new trend. Even MS is moving toward this model. Complete control, and I'm not going to give it. Voting with my wallet, suggest you do the same too.
Well my TV has two. However, many devices, the higher quality ones anyway, have in and out HDMI. For example, some receivers have HDMI switches built into them. Also my DVD player allows you to have HDMI in, and OUT. When the player is on, it shows DVD content, otherwise it goes into pass-through mode.
I use LDAP at work for everything and life is so much better now.
/home/username. Public drives are mapped as well.
Windows Desktops (Samba PDC and BDC -> LDAP)
Linux pam_ldap + nss -> LDAP and NFS shares
You can log into either a windows desktop or linux box and have the same file shares open. Windows has H: and Linux is
Then for email, postfix + dovecot -> ldap. You can store not only use the same username password as for linux, but you can add unlimited number of real-time mail aliases to each user. Also supports virtual domains.
Directory services for phone numbers, room locations, etc. in ldap. Mapped to email clients search/contact lists.
squid + ldap and apache + ldap, secure login to website.
Squirrelmail/horde both use ldap as well. Auth is done via imap, but horde can do much more with ldap. Both can use it for directory services.
Admin can be done either via CLI smbldap-tools, php ldap admin, gq (ldap tree browser), or ldapmodify if you're hard core. Plus with sync'ing data to other sites they have a copy of the data for their BDC/etc. If I need to add/modify a user there is only one place that needs to be modified. And I can do it from home. =)
It depends on the game.
I do droks runs in guild wars for a few reasons. I've not only been the runner, but been ran by others myself. In guild wars the lvl cap is 20. You are free to change your secondary class as much as you want. But you cannot change your primary class. This means there are several other builds you could try out. However, before Factions, it took a very long time to get where the good stuff was. Droks armor is highest in stats (not best skin/but AC rating), plus the skills trader has more advanced skills.
If you've already played the game through say 4-5 times then doing it again and again for each new character type is boring and painful.
And before factions, we were limited to 4 characters per account. Which meant you had to delete your old ones before trying out different classes. Guild wars isn't a level grinder like most other RPG games. After you hit 20, that's it. You just focus on better skill combos and different areas. Why make the players go through the entire noob areas again?
If you look at factions, this is what the game devs did. They made it so you can level up to 20 in two days with 3000+ XP quests. In GW1 it took week(s) at 250-500XP per quest.
And finally, running is a quick, not always easy, way to make some money. They have nerfed all the good farming areas and made it so money is much harder to aquire. Granted green/gold drops help, it's a pain trying to do player-player trades. In one droks run I make 10-15k in 35 minutes. When a full suite of nice looking (15k) armor cost me 150k it's still hard work.
And if you're wondering, playing with skills and builds is what it's all about. I just got my ele to do 2,672 damage in one spell hit. (4x-668 damage to lvl 5 guys). =)
http://www.linuxlogin.com/public/2672damage.jpg
BTW, that's wine 0.9.19 running a test this morning. Why health bars overlap.
Sounds like you're trying to solve a problem that you don't have.
Cluster need special software to take advantage of the disturbed computing. They are built with a specific task in mind. Or do you already have a need and just failed to tell us?
For me, I run my network with distcc (http://distcc.samba.org/) So all of my Gentoo boxes can compile using shared computing power. It cut a typical 33Min app down to less then 2 mins doing this. And works wonders for my slower laptop.
With distcc, all you need to do is have the same tool chains. (glibc, gcc, coreutils, etc) You can even specify how many threads per box you want running to fine tune your network.
On the other hand, if you just want to learn, then you should try them all. The all suit different needs.
That asus is just a standard fan mounted in a case that looks like a jet engine, but it's the same technology.
/. but sometimes it's worth reading.
On the other hand, the HP one uses small blades that are shorter and that spin faster. As such they create more thrust/airflow and reduce noise that normal blades produce from the tips of their blades.
RTFA, it's got a good discription, yeah, I know it's
Blender is one of the best examples. Read how they raised 100,000 EUR to BUY it from the old company and then turn around and GPL/Open Source it.
Blender History
http://phpwebsite.appstate.edu/
Features from website
Well, you show me a Windows box that is REBOOT in 60secs with all services. In XP at least, they try to trick the user into thinking the system us up (you can login) but it's not usable or all services are not started for some time after. As someone else here pointed out in their sig, anyone with more then 30 days uptime in windows isn't applying patches. I happen to have tons of those HP DL380s G4, and they POST around 45 seconds, that doesn't include OS bootup. Just to add drives to the raid array, scan the SCSI BUS, etc. And for the record, I used to be a MSCP in Windows NT 4, back in the day, and registered beta tested 95 - 2000, .NET, SMS, Visual Studio and many of their other products. That's when I got tired of all the bugs, hidden crap, re-installs, etc.
And I actually started using Linux (Slackware) over 10 years ago as well. As time went on, I saw MS products get more bloated, slower, have more bugs, while Linux and OSS just got better.
Everyone can have their opinion, as most people do. I've used both for many years, and from now on, my server will always be Linux.
How many times to we have to tell people that Red Hat != ALL OF LINUX.
That's like saying Windows 2003 is all of Windows. I still doubt that they played fair in FUD report.
In addition to this, they almost NEVER compare apples to apples. Apache != Linux either, just IIS != Windows.
How many patches require you to REBOOT windows to apply? Service Packs? The only thing you need to reboot Linux for is a new kernel. Did they factor that in as well?
But my guess is these guys either got MS funding from somewhere, or were fishing for some after giving this report.
Did anyone else see this and think System Shock?
Like most /.ers I hate Microsoft, and love it when they get it stuck to them. However, this does worry me a bit. Right now MS-Office is the industry standard. For both work and home I use OpenOffice.org and tell everyone else to use it to.
What worries me about this is that OOo has PDF export that gave them a nice "feature" that MS-Office didn't have. Now Adobe is going after MS, I have to wonder if OOo gets popular enough they will demand that it be removed too.
Maybe it's just my cynical anti-big-corporation views, but I don't trust Adobe enough to not use their big stick against OOo.
AH, where are the mod points when I need them. I was just thinking of replying to GP with this. Such typical FUD that fanboys want to use as an excuse that Windows is only infected all the time because it's so popular. Please