Slashdot Mirror


Real Life Spy Gadgets That Anyone Can Buy

Ant writes "Here is a collection of "spy equipment" found for sale around the Internet. Everything listed is completely real, is sold at online stores, and almost any item listed here costs less than $500, and often times can be bought for less than $200. Seen on Compfused."

171 comments

  1. What the hell is wrong with this article by timecop · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What do we have at http://darkcreek.com/detective_equipment/notebook. htm? A few pages with obvious products listed, but without any actual product names, links, or anything except for some google ads, in the hope that whoever reads this trash will be clicking them. What is that page trying to achieve other than ad views? Nothing. Now let's look at this 'ant' (http://aqfl.net/) guy who submits this story. His 'site' is another collection of pagerank inflating spam links. Of course by getting it on slashdot, he's going to make another few hundred $ in ad views. Is it a slow news day that you have to post trash like this to front page? Shame, taco

    1. Re:What the hell is wrong with this article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "... by getting it on slashdot, he's going to make another few hundred $ in ad views"

      Nah. Nobody reads the articles anyway :-D

    2. Re:What the hell is wrong with this article by Odiumjunkie · · Score: 1

      What google ads?

      I don't know if it's because of my HOSTS file or because of FF + Adblock, but I get nada.

    3. Re:What the hell is wrong with this article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's even mostly lame equipment. Any of the hobbiest sites would have been better links with fewer ads.

    4. Re:What the hell is wrong with this article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hobbiest is not a word. For fuck's sake, is it that hard to spell HOBBYIST correctly? You don't even need to modify the root word. Just type HOBBY then type IST. Fuck.

    5. Re:What the hell is wrong with this article by Ucklak · · Score: 0

      Hobbiest is not a word.

      Google isn't a word either according to Merriam-Webster.
      It does appear here and is obviously a branding reference.

      Anchor tags don't seem to work today. References:
      http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/google
      http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=google

      --
      if you steal from one source, that is plagiarism, if you steal from many, well, that's just research.
    6. Re:What the hell is wrong with this article by rednip · · Score: 1
      getting it on slashdot, he's going to make another few hundred $ in ad views.
      Personally I found that site to be interesting, and was a little disappointed that the peep-hole reverser was linked to a 'buy-it-now' button. Guess that I'll actually have to search for it independently (the horror!!).

      True, it is kind annoying when some dumb amateur writes a decent article, manages to catch the editor's interest on a slow-news-day, and ACTUALLY PROFITS from it, SHOCKING!! A website which profits from the placement of advertisements, wow, perhaps I should patent it (sadly, if I worded it right, the patent might be accepted).

      I believe that one can and should should be critical of articles which are 'weak' or just wrong, but this guy wrote a fairly 'nice' recap of some cool technology. Instead you just criticize him for not being a pro, are you an astroturfer for 'old media' interests?

      --
      The force that blew the Big Bang continues to accelerate.
    7. Re:What the hell is wrong with this article by alexandreracine · · Score: 1

      Well... it has been posted by CmdrTaco...

      --
      No sig for now.
    8. Re:What the hell is wrong with this article by rivetgeek · · Score: 3, Informative

      Considering the title itself implies the purchase of said things, one might conceivably think the page would have the links to purchase them.
      And instead of actually doing any real research the poster simply ganked a bunch of product shots from the spy shop online, I'd say on a scale of one to awesome, this rates: toast.

    9. Re:What the hell is wrong with this article by masterzora · · Score: 1

      What does *that* have to do with anything? Besides being irrelevant in every way, Google is a name, anyway, and therefore doesn't have to be a word!

      --
      Remember, open source is free as in speech, not free as in bear.
    10. Re:What the hell is wrong with this article by nacturation · · Score: 1

      Not on the first page, but click the first link on the right for example.

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    11. Re:What the hell is wrong with this article by Ucklak · · Score: 0, Troll
      What does *that* have to do with anything?

      The parent post and I'll quote:

      Hobbiest is not a word. For fuck's sake, is it that hard to spell HOBBYIST correctly? You don't even need to modify the root word. Just type HOBBY then type IST. Fuck.


      and I'll paraphrase:

      Google is not a word. For fuck's sake, is it that hard to spell GOOGOL correctly? You don't even need to modify the root word. Just type GOOGOL. Fuck.


      Besides being irrelevant in every way,
      How so? In regards to the parent post, very relevant. The argument is that Hobbiest isn't a word. My defense is that it shouldn't matter.

      Google is a name, anyway, and therefore doesn't have to be a word!
      Exactly. Hobbiest doesn't have to be a word.
      --
      if you steal from one source, that is plagiarism, if you steal from many, well, that's just research.
    12. Re:What the hell is wrong with this article by masterzora · · Score: 1

      It's irrelevant because, at this point, hobbiest is a mispelling whilst Google is a name. It would be relevant if somebody was trying to say that they had "a google of ideas" or something like that where it would be a mispelling of googol. Google, being a name, doesn't have to be a real word. Hobbiest, not being a name or a word, is nothing and should not be used. Is it really that difficult to see?

      --
      Remember, open source is free as in speech, not free as in bear.
    13. Re:What the hell is wrong with this article by Ucklak · · Score: 1

      Google is a name because of a website. Period. It wouldn't exist otherwise. It isn't a series of reference books or directories.
      Hobbiest is a name most likely because of it's website. http://hobbiest.com/. I'm sure the name wouldn't exist otherwise.

      I fail to see you you can say that Google is a name and hobbiest isn't a name when both are names and URI's of websites.

      Just beacause Google has more money doesn't invalidate what hobbiest is trying to do.

      Zillow isn't a word either but it is the name of a popular real estate website.

      --
      if you steal from one source, that is plagiarism, if you steal from many, well, that's just research.
    14. Re:What the hell is wrong with this article by masterzora · · Score: 1
      There are two ways to acceptably use "Google" according to the English language:
      1. When referring to the company or any of its services
      2. To refer to the function of the company (i.e. to Google something is to search Google for the something).

      Technically speaking, the latter one isn't correct, but it is acceptable.

      Now, there are two acceptable ways to use "Hobbiest" according to the English language:
      1. When referring to the site or any of its services
      2. To refer to the function of the site (although there is no real easy way "to hobbiest something" in our langauge).

      Now, what would be unacceptable would be to use Google when you mean googol or hobbiest when you mean hobbyist. Since that is what occurred, it is unacceptable.

      --
      Remember, open source is free as in speech, not free as in bear.
    15. Re:What the hell is wrong with this article by Ucklak · · Score: 1

      I think you're giving a bad rap to a name because it sounds like a real word but is not spelled correctly.

      Your argument against "Hobbiest" would work with "Flickr"
      Both are real sounding words but are misspelled when used in context of the internet.

      Postnuke isn't a word either yet is was a popular CMS at one time.

      My point always has been that google, hobbiest, flickr, and postnuke are names and are words that don't exist outside of the context of the internet.
      Lilakatorunib isn't a word either but if I brand it and make a website about it, it becomes a name and a word within it's context.
      To say one is a word over the other (except maybe postnuke) is preposterous. Yahoo is a word more so than Google.

      --
      if you steal from one source, that is plagiarism, if you steal from many, well, that's just research.
    16. Re:What the hell is wrong with this article by masterzora · · Score: 1
      I make no dispute about using Hobbiest in the proper context. But to say that it is an appropriate substitute for hobbyist is just as absurd as suggesting that Google is an appropriate substitute for googol or Flickr for flicker. It makes no sense.

      Even better, since the OP said "hobbiest sites" and linked to a site that most obviously had nothing to do with Hobbiest.com, it could be falsely assumed that the linked site, in fact, was part of Hobbiest.com, making the error even more egregious.

      --
      Remember, open source is free as in speech, not free as in bear.
    17. Re:What the hell is wrong with this article by cyberdude191 · · Score: 1

      i get all my spycam stuff at http://www.x-recon.com/

    18. Re:What the hell is wrong with this article by Walt+Dismal · · Score: 1

      'hobbiest' is an illiteracy, and should be avoided. But then, too many lazy techies use stupid illiteracies unquestioningly, like saying "the media" to refer to a single object, when 'media' is plural. And then these illiteracies propagate unstoppably. For example, back in the Amiga days, the computer used a custom chip codenamed "Agnes" after somebody's girlfriend. Except some brainless frickmonkey misspelled it "Agnus" in a magazine article, which then viruslike took over usage as other brainless frickmonkeys repeated it while not bothering to question it. (At least Agnes was spelled correctly in the Amiga OS source code.) I'm sure someone will misspell 'monkey' as as 'monkie' while replying, too. [hitting my head with a brick because it feels so much better than fighting the unwashed hordes. It's Chinatown, Jake, forget about it. Sigh.]

    19. Re:What the hell is wrong with this article by masterzora · · Score: 1

      I've got a feeling that wasn't supposed to be replying to me specifically...

      --
      Remember, open source is free as in speech, not free as in bear.
    20. Re:What the hell is wrong with this article by heptapod · · Score: 1

      Zonk's too busy spending his Slashvertisement windfall on camwhores and baked goods.

    21. Re:What the hell is wrong with this article by big+tex · · Score: 1

      This is a beautiful troll, with a quality missing in a long time.

      Maybe he changed both sites in the last 10 hours, but there's no ads now.
      Rednip, kfury, nacturation, you've been had. Seriously, you took someone with a url of www.gnaa.us seriously?

      --
      I think I need a new sig here.
    22. Re:What the hell is wrong with this article by silverkniveshotmail. · · Score: 1

      someone misspelled a word; big fucking deal.

    23. Re:What the hell is wrong with this article by Walt+Dismal · · Score: 1

      Certainly, one case of misspelling is not a really big thing. Everybody misspells once in awhile. That's not what this is all about, for me anyway. What it's all about is people who don't get things right that others do, and that is what bothers me. There is no way in hell I want to inherit code written by someone who doesn't care about details. I don't want eye surgery from someone who is sloppy. And I don't like to knowing that millions of TV-watching voters are too lazy to check the details, so they vote in smiling lying frauds who bankrupt us while not being able to keep us safe. It's what the misspelling represents, the cultural attitude, not the one piddly mispelling. [unmount soapbox; remount normal drive]. There.

    24. Re:What the hell is wrong with this article by silverkniveshotmail. · · Score: 1
      Certainly, one case of misspelling is not a really big thing. Everybody misspells once in awhile. That's not what this is all about, for me anyway. What it's all about is people who don't get things right that others do, and that is what bothers me. There is no way in hell I want to inherit code written by someone who doesn't care about details. I don't want eye surgery from someone who is sloppy. And I don't like to knowing that millions of TV-watching voters are too lazy to check the details, so they vote in smiling lying frauds who bankrupt us while not being able to keep us safe. It's what the misspelling represents, the cultural attitude, not the one piddly mispelling. [unmount soapbox; remount normal drive]. There.
      You misspelled two words in a row.
    25. Re:What the hell is wrong with this article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "once in awhile"
      "I don't like to knowing"
      "one piddly mispelling."

      Pot, this is kettle. Kettle, pot. I'm sure you'll have lots to talk about.

    26. Re:What the hell is wrong with this article by Walt+Dismal · · Score: 1

      All valid. However, typos from being in too much of a hurry are quite different from being lazy or not knowing correct spelling and grammar. I don't believe the 'hobbiest' guy knew the distinctions, and I still stand by my comments about continual misspellers who ignore correctness. Is it the school system? iPods? Aspartame? Cell phone radiation? I 'dunno'.

    27. Re:What the hell is wrong with this article by willCode4Beer.com · · Score: 1

      Even more interesting is that it worked.

      We should be talking about this as a little tutorial on SEO.
      Look at the Source of the pages. They are very short.
      The Meta description, page title, and headline tags (H1) all have the exact same text.
      Using Google link search, it appears he/she used blog spamming to create lots of links to the site.
      The biggest negative I see is, the pages do fail XHTML 1.0 Transitional even though they are marked as such.

      Just think, $20 + a few hours. I wonder how much this site is really making.

      --
      ----- If communism is a system where the government owns business, what do you call a system where business owns govern
    28. Re:What the hell is wrong with this article by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Maybe it's collecting IP addresses of people interested in spy gadgets... after all, if you're interested in spy gadgets, you must be a terrorist!!

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    29. Re:What the hell is wrong with this article by Odiumjunkie · · Score: 1

      Nope, still nothing. No ads on my box.

  2. Con Air Reference Time! by Kamineko · · Score: 1

    "... my first thought would be, 'a lot'".

  3. Lets Hope Al-Queda Doesnt Get Their Hands On This by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    These spy gadgets could be dangerous in the wrong hands, such as evildoers like terrorists, and others. It could enable these groups to murder more innocent people.

    Lets hope these gadget sales are being closely monitored by the authorities. I would hate to see these things in the wrong hands.

  4. Peephole Reverser! by Achra · · Score: 4, Funny

    Am I the only one that saw this thing and immediately thought of Kramer?

    --
    Each processor would proceed sequentially as if it had been better for them not to rise against Saul.
    1. Re:Peephole Reverser! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pee-hole reverser?

      I can imagine a million uses for such device...

    2. Re:Peephole Reverser! by Achra · · Score: 1
      --
      Each processor would proceed sequentially as if it had been better for them not to rise against Saul.
    3. Re:Peephole Reverser! by rednip · · Score: 4, Funny
      Pee-hole reverser?
      I can imagine a million uses for such device...
      Pesonally, I could only imagine one, but at a million places.
      --
      The force that blew the Big Bang continues to accelerate.
    4. Re:Peephole Reverser! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was thinking now I can peek to see if anyone is waiting to jack me with a sock full of pennies.

    5. Re:Peephole Reverser! by identity0 · · Score: 1

      Um, this is for looking inside. You get ambushed by the people you visit? What kind of Girl Scout/Mormon/Scientologist/Vaccum Salesman are you? You're supposed to ambush *them*, silly!

    6. Re:Peephole Reverser! by kenthorvath · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Actually a peephole reverser is quite easy to make. In most hotels, for instance, the peephole to your door is made of two tubes that thread together. Simply unscrewing the hole from one end allows you to remove it, and when placed head to head with another peephole will allow you to see inside unobstructed. I discovered this once at a hotel that I stayed at when the construction crew had dropped one in the hallway. It's pretty nifty, but the field of view is only a few degrees, so unless the object of interest is standing directly in front of the door, you are not going to see much of the inside.

    7. Re:Peephole Reverser! by NoSalt · · Score: 1

      Nope you weren't ... Kramer was the first thing that poped into my head as well.
      Nothing like laughing yourself sick at work over an old Seinfeld episode.

  5. lame by johnny+cashed · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Less info than a normal Slashdot summary, lame article, lame in general. What the hell is with the compfused link?

    1. Re:lame by antdude · · Score: 1

      It's funny. CmrdTaco just copied and pasted my submission. He didn't even tweak my submission to fit in /. post. In the past, others and him just change words, etc. I think they got lazy!

      The reason why I put sources is because people think I am stealing links, so I have to give credits to whoever posted it where I found it.

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    2. Re:lame by johnny+cashed · · Score: 1

      I can't believe I got modded insightful. I was trying to do a play on the "less space than a nomad" bit. I was going for the +funny. I can understand if someone didn't find humor in my lame joke (no pun intended, the joke was lame). I fully expected the troll and redundant mods.

      antdude, I wasn't trying to offend anybody. At least got a submission on the frontpage.

    3. Re:lame by antdude · · Score: 1

      No big deal. It happens. If this was Digg, then my story wouldn't be up. ;)

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  6. SPAM ARTICLE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Didn't know slashdot editors post news without reviewing the content first.

    Where the hell are the price? How do I buy them?

    The article is just a bunch of descriptions with google ads in them.

  7. Re:Blatant advertisement by jsharkey · · Score: 2, Informative

    Thanks to the Firefox Adblock plug-in, I never saw any ads on the site. :)

  8. Re:Lets Hope Al-Queda Doesnt Get Their Hands On Th by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    dumbass

  9. Re:Lets Hope Al-Queda Doesnt Get Their Hands On Th by empaler · · Score: 1

    No, seriously.
    We would be powerless to stop an army of one with these babies.

    Luckily, the damned site is a complete waste of time and carries no links to any of the items listed.

  10. Adsense made the internet retarded. by rivetgeek · · Score: 3, Informative

    This needs to be renamed to "Real Life spy gadgets that anyone (who has google and a lot of time to find them by themselves) can buy" Worst slashdot, ever.

    1. Re:Adsense made the internet retarded. by mad+flyer · · Score: 1

      Worst Slashdot ever ? You guys forgot the day where a Goatse link made it to the front page...

      That was a bad day...

    2. Re:Adsense made the internet retarded. by rivetgeek · · Score: 1

      that would at least be amusing. This is just spam.

    3. Re:Adsense made the internet retarded. by PhxBlue · · Score: 2, Funny

      Worst slashdot, ever.

      You think it's bad now, wait until you see it again in a few hours.

      --
      !#@%*)anks for hanging up the phone, dear.
    4. Re:Adsense made the internet retarded. by pyrrhonist · · Score: 1
      that would at least be amusing. This is just spam.

      You must be using a new form of, "amusing", that I was previously unaware of.

      --
      Show me on the doll where his noodly appendage touched you.
    5. Re:Adsense made the internet retarded. by rivetgeek · · Score: 1

      Amuse: From the latin "Amose" meaning to expel or regurgitate ones food.

  11. SPAM by Lord+Bitman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Please remove this article.

    --
    -- 'The' Lord and Master Bitman On High, Master Of All
    1. Re:SPAM by hackstraw · · Score: 1

      Yes, this does appear to be SPAM for Ant or compfused or something. But I will say that the http://darkcreek.com/ site does have cool stuff on it. The little cube guys, and the 100 years ago thing, the stacking pennies, etc. The little notebook thing with no information though is pretty lame.

    2. Re:SPAM by BruceCage · · Score: 1

      I tagged it "trashbin", because that's exactly where this article belongs.

      --
      Perfect is the enemy of done.
  12. Clue spray? by Falkkin · · Score: 1

    This "article" is mostly a waste of space, but the clue spray http://darkcreek.com/detective_equipment/clue_spra y.htm made me chuckle. Favorite equipment of BOFHs everywhere?

  13. Proposed new tags by empaler · · Score: 1

    'getagrip', 'rtfa'

    Interestingly, 'slownewsday' was apparently removed - it was there five minutes ago...

  14. Nothing new here... by Wdomburg · · Score: 3, Informative

    I used to see surveillance and security equipment, and glancing through I didn't many products that weren't available when I quit the business years ago, and certainly nothing that isn't available on any of the "spy" stores on the internet (or from a variety of electronics dealers in south east asia, if you're willing to buy in lots. :)

  15. Heh.. Vomit Agent by technoextreme · · Score: 1

    Reminds me of the time Peter bought that stuff from the pharmacy. You know the hillarious results that ensued afterwords.

    --
    Ooo man the floppy drive is broken. No wait. The computer is just upside down.
    1. Re:Heh.. Vomit Agent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The best damned episode of Family Guy ever!

    2. Re:Heh.. Vomit Agent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was freakin' sweet.

  16. slow news day? by MBuhrow · · Score: 4, Insightful

    this is not news.
    it's not interesting.
    there are no links to where I can buy this stuff.
    this is a sorry excuse for a website.
    I'm sure this has been suggested before but articles should be modded just like comments.

    1. Re:slow news day? by irtza · · Score: 1

      This may sound offtopic, but seriously, isn't the topic of this discussion lame/spam submissions? This site was hardly comprehensive giving only a bried description of each type of device with no list of manufacturers or even their workings. It gave no information about the effectiveness of each device, whether the detail of a "spy cam" could be used to recognize someones face or only that someone has broken into your office? I think most people here already knew you could get this stuff and its not like this is anything new.

      modding articles, now there's an idea.

      Give people "article mod points" and let them review story submissions. If they get modded high enough, they get moved into the category page at which point if a decent discussion with high article mod points insues, it is moved to the front page. I mean, most people don't go to the mac section unless they are interested in macs in particular. same for linux, apache....yourrightsonlne... etc. Let the people who know/care about those subjects decide if something is front page worthy. Sure front page stories would be a bit late, but you'll prob have better discussions already started.

      well... I had to rant about this article... it cost me a few neurons. I couldn't leave it alone.

      --
      When all else fails, try.
    2. Re:slow news day? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      in other words.... digg?

    3. Re:slow news day? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      this is a sorry excuse for a website.
      I'm sure this has been suggested before but articles should be modded just like comments.


      That would be Digg then.

      I notice this article failed to make the front page over there..
  17. This reminds me of a Discovery Channel show I saw. by rob_squared · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It dealt with spy satellites. The narrator mentioned that the video surveillance they showed in the program was from the 1960s and 70s and said that the actual resolution and what it could detect nowadays was classified. I'm pretty sure the 1970s shots could identify cars.

    Has to make you wonder, if this is what we can buy, what can the government make today?

    --
    I don't get it.
  18. Private Eye by ettlz · · Score: 1

    There used to be loads of adverts for bugs and so-forth in the classified sections of UK satirical mag Private Eye... haven't been any for a while now, though.

    1. Re:Private Eye by mikesd81 · · Score: 1

      Used to be a bunch in the Pop Sci magazine too. Well at least how to's. They ranged from spying to phreaking to using a pay phone for nothing.

      It's a neat little hobby I guess. Personally, I'd rather collect bladed weapons over stuff like this.

      --
      That which does not kill me only postpones the inevitable.
    2. Re:Private Eye by ettlz · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Personally, I'd rather collect bladed weapons over stuff like this.

      You weren't the dude who surrendered that bloody great bat'leth to the Police in the recent knife amnesty, were you?

    3. Re:Private Eye by mikesd81 · · Score: 1

      Only if I swam over the pond

      --
      That which does not kill me only postpones the inevitable.
    4. Re:Private Eye by ettlz · · Score: 1
      Only if I swam over the pond

      Ah, they don't allow them on transatlantic flights, then?

    5. Re:Private Eye by ElephanTS · · Score: 1

      Strangely enough I am reminded of going out with a girl in 1991 that was PA in a private shop that sold spy gadgets all over the world. I used to go round there sometimes and the stuff they had was fairly incredible. They made a fortune selling this stuff particularly to the Middle East and America (it was based in London W2 btw). Anyway I made friends with the guy that owned it, really decent bloke actually (weird that he made a living selling these things - some of them were weapons as opposed to spy gadgets), and he gave me a radio bug that looked like a 3-way UK plug adaptor. It took it's power from the mains and broadcast on FM for a few hundred metres. I still have it somewhere but never used it for nefarious purposes though I was tempted. I think this guy used to do the Private Eye ads too. I was amazed when I first learned about it and the type of 'conferences' they went on - this article apart from being a spam is nothing new at all.

      --
      spoonerize "magic trackpad"
    6. Re:Private Eye by A+beautiful+mind · · Score: 1

      I don't get why would people surrender knives instead of like..._selling_ them?

      Even though I'm not from the Uk, I don't think it is illegal to own knives.

      After reading up on the article it seems that it is illegal to carry them around in public places, but why would people surrender them for that?

      --
      It takes a man to suffer ignorance and smile
      Be yourself no matter what they say
    7. Re:Private Eye by Builder · · Score: 1

      UK Knife law is odd to say the least. I grew up carrying a knife. At first a swiss army knife, then later a leatherman. At various times I've carried a puma or a Spyderco folding blade. None of these had a blade length over 3 inches, they were all for utilitarian purposes not combat :)

      When I moved to the UK, I was astonished to find that carrying these items may be illegal, but even after asking police officers and checking local knife sites, I've never been able to get a clear answer.

  19. Re:This reminds me of a Discovery Channel show I s by MickLinux · · Score: 1

    Well, the resolution isn't all that much better, since it's limited by the optical radius of the lens, and NASA hasn't figured out how to launch a larger satellite in 35 years.

    However, as the digital technology advanced, they have much improved the filters for detecting and tracking tinfoil hats.

    --
    Correct Horse Battery Staple: 72 bits of entropy. Enter "Correct H" into google. When it generates the phrase, that's
  20. Am I on Slashdot? by q3ctf4 · · Score: 3, Funny

    This was the gayest thing ever.

    1. Re:Am I on Slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      This was the gayest thing ever.

      Okay, you're in the right place, then.
    2. Re:Am I on Slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Am I on Slashdot?
      This was the gayest thing ever.


      -1, Redundant

    3. Re:Am I on Slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This "news" matches the new crappy look of slashdot. Both are just interested in money from advertisements.

  21. Re:This reminds me of a Discovery Channel show I s by imsabbel · · Score: 1

    Well, thankfully, even military spysats STILL have to acknowledge the diffraction limit, so no face recoginition form orbit, ever (at least without a 10+m mirrror.

    --
    HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
  22. What Cold War spies might have killed for ... by timothy · · Score: 1

    Well, OK, so Cold War spies killed for plenty of reasons, but what I'm thinking of is the general advances in electronic miniaturization that can put a tiny audio recorder, camera, heat sensor, pressure sensor, etc., in spaces far smaller than the equivalent device of just a few decades ago.

    Looking through my copy of The Ultimate Spy Book (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0789404435/ref=n osim/102-3417579-5590511?n=283155) -- the affilliate link is for LibraryThing, because that was the easiest way to grab the link - strip as you please ;)), some of the "hidden" devices from the early / mid Cold War years seem laughably huge and detectable, especially cameras larger than many current mid-range digital cameras, meant to be strapped behind ties (?!) and or shooting through false buttons in trenchcoats, etc.

    timothy

    --
    jrnl: http://tinyurl.com/c2l8yr / foes: http://tinyurl.com/ckjno5
    1. Re:What Cold War spies might have killed for ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh the fucking irony. Timothy's trying to get Amazon referral credit by commenting under a Slashvertisement.

      How I long for the bygone days of JonKatz and Junis.

  23. Flatulence Agent by wkitchen · · Score: 1

    A bit of this would be great at one of those thousand-dollars-a-plate political fundraising dinners.

    1. Re:Flatulence Agent by seriv · · Score: 1

      Perhaps for a 14 year old boy who got the stuff out of an ad in some shity magazine. I fail to see how this stuff is "spy equipment" at all.

  24. Oh Dear by ShaolinTiger · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Really really must be a slow day, what a horribly shit excuse for a Slashdotting.

    --
    Share your Knowlege - Kung-Fu Geekery
  25. Re:Proposed new tags---try "adwhore" by Deviant+Q · · Score: 1

    OMFSM, did Slashdot just add a checkbox to my read posts? That is seriously cool.

    --
    "May the days be aimless. Let the seasons drift. Do not advance the action according to a plan."
  26. Update the Definition by simrook · · Score: 2, Funny

    Step One: Hundreds of Thousands of nerds wake up Sunday morning and click on your slashdot story. While discovering your site is bogus, a secret Firefox flaw is exploited and a (AT - Really? AT? Who the fuck uses AT anymore?) keystroke logger is installed on your computer.

    Step Two: ???.. no wait.. Step two is to check your email for CC numbers as they go an order something from a real spy site to make themselves feel better.

    Step Three: Profit.

    Ummm... I think I'm going to go scan my computer for viruses.

    --
    'Truth' is linked in a circular relation with systems of power which produce and sustain it...
  27. Agreed! Remove this spam article by KFury · · Score: 1

    This is just a cheap shot by someone hoping to use the slashdot effect to make himself some quick bucks.

  28. www.supercircuits.com by solitas · · Score: 1

    This isn't a plug for the company - but you can see there all the kinds of cameras mentioned in the article.

    --
    "It's time to take life by the cans." ~ Bender ("Bendin' in the Wind", ep. 3-13)
    1. Re:www.supercircuits.com by ThomaMelas · · Score: 1

      Most of supercircuits stuff is junk. Not all of it but unless you know what you're looking for you're probley going to overpay for junk.

    2. Re:www.supercircuits.com by solitas · · Score: 1
      Oh yeah - a lot of the "surveillance"-stuff (cams in clocks, buttplugs, books, clothing, etc.) seems to be expensive crap, but I've had some good purchases of low-light & cheapo/almost-disposable 'board' cameras for lab use (photogrammetry, hyperspectral, microscopy, & data acq.) as well as personal-property security.

      I've never found anything in my hotel rooms when I travel; but the stuff in the lobbies and hallways is always fantastically obvious.

      --
      "It's time to take life by the cans." ~ Bender ("Bendin' in the Wind", ep. 3-13)
    3. Re:www.supercircuits.com by ThomaMelas · · Score: 1

      It's a matter of distance. If I just want to cover a small area, a board camera is fine. But they suck for long term deployments and if I need differant lenses I have to swap out the cameras. Add to it that they don't don't have things like white balance and don't handle lighting changes well I wouldn't use them for anything more then cheap home security.

    4. Re:www.supercircuits.com by solitas · · Score: 1

      Swap-out the cameras? Wuh? You can mix/match cams & lenses to run the range of fields of view. As for white balance: 99% of what I do is monochrome - I use filters when I need multispectral - and having that Bayer pattern in there unnecessarily doesn't do me any favors.

      --
      "It's time to take life by the cans." ~ Bender ("Bendin' in the Wind", ep. 3-13)
  29. My constant question: where's the digital Minox? by timothy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    In other words, WW007D?

    I want a Minox B. No, I don't want to pay for an *actual* Minox; don't have enough banks robbed yet. Also, tiny film cassettes, finicky jewel-like mechanisms, etc.

    What I want is a modern, digital, Minox-alike that is:

    a) The size of a fat thumb or however you'd describe one of these: http://www.kameramuseum.de/1minox/minox-b.html

    b) Not notably ugly and lo-res like this: http://www.emediawire.com/releases/2005/1/prweb195 316.htm

    (The size of that thing is OK, though, but it's ugly in colors and shape; I could overlook those things, or cover all the but lens with a paper bag, if the resolution wasn't so poor.)

    c) more brick-like than some of Sony's smallest, which otherwise are quite nice; I don't like the roundedness of some of the U-Series, but the the U50 (swivel and all) is close to a digital Minox. http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/specs/Sony/sony_ds cu50.asp I like that it uses AAA batteries, too; a single AA would be even better than 2 AAAs, but life isn't perfect. Maybe I'll find a good deal from eBay on a U50 ...

    timothy

    --
    jrnl: http://tinyurl.com/c2l8yr / foes: http://tinyurl.com/ckjno5
  30. New look, new article submission policy? by gavhall · · Score: 1

    If this is the new type of article that's going to be posted after the new look /. I'd rather we all go back to the old look. That having been said I'm sure this is just a glitch in the system. The average standard for articles here is too high to get too mad and not forgive one mistake but please, please don't do it again.

  31. Shame on slashdot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Shame on slashdot... :(

    Please remove this ad.

  32. Webcams for Security by pipingguy · · Score: 1

    Maybe this is a good opportunity to ask about motion detection and webcams. For those of you that have this working already, what advice can you give to someone trying to set up such a system?

    1. Re:Webcams for Security by Professr3 · · Score: 1

      There are already freeware programs out there that will monitor a webcam, and sound an alarm/start recording when they detect movement.

    2. Re:Webcams for Security by ThomaMelas · · Score: 1

      Yep. Don't use a web camera. Your basic web cam is generally focused about three feet away from the camera. Since this is slashdot I won't be bothered to suggest analog cameras (even though they are better and cheaper with alot more features and robust technology). I would look at Axis, Toshiba, and Sony. Avoid PTZs. As cool as they are, they are ment for 24 hour monitoring, and touring features screw up motion detection. Zoneminder is fine for home use but I wouldn't use it for even small bussiness. And since this always comes up, there are no "professonal" caliber bits of GPLed software out there for this work. If you are thinking of starting a bussiness around this then please for the love of god learn about how lenses work, how light affects cameras, etc.

  33. Often times? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    What is meant by "often times" ????
    The word "often" means, well, often. more than once and more often than not. The word "times" following it has no additional value or meaning and just confuses me while my brain tries to figure out if there is any other meaning than simply "often". If the word doesn't contribute to the meaning, clarity or intent of the sentence, please leave it out.

  34. Re:Lets Hope Al-Queda Doesnt Get Their Hands On Th by tindur · · Score: 1

    Let's hope Al-Queda uses them to make the US into a police state.

  35. Re:Blatant advertisement by buswolley · · Score: 1

    OK. That explains it. I was wondering why every one was complaining so much. The page looked admirably clean to me.

    --

    A Good Troll is better than a Bad Human.

  36. Re:Lets Hope Al-Queda Doesnt Get Their Hands On Th by wjsteele · · Score: 1

    How can these gadget's possibly be dangerous? From the article, you can't even find them. I actually think they're all just Duke Nukem Forwever ware. There are stories about them, but no actual links or pictures. Man, I also wish I could stick a Google Ad right in my comment. I'd like, make a killing, wouldn't I?

    Bill

    --
    It's my Sig and you can't have it. Mine! All Mine!
  37. Poor excuse by bjs555 · · Score: 0

    Poor excuse for a /. article but where do you get the Flatulence Agent? My brother wants it. He's 60 years old and oh so juvenile.

  38. Re:My constant question: where's the digital Minox by zlogic · · Score: 1

    Nowadays mobile phones with integrated cameras, I think, completely replace this kind of stuff. And some Nokia phones are about the same size as the Minox!
    And portables such as the Macbook and some ASUS models have an camera. These display-integrated cameras look pretty small, so I guess that the camera without the notebook, with flash memory and a battery would be the size of a 2-3 times think CR2032 battery (the one you have in wristwatches).

  39. Not /. Worthy by Dj-Zer0 · · Score: 4, Informative

    But after little bit of googling i found a place where you can get some of these suckers.

    http://www.spytekmiami.com/index.php
    (enjoy)

    --
    http://iesucks.org
    1. Re:Not /. Worthy by ralphdaugherty · · Score: 1

      Now that's the site that should have been slashdotted in the first place. Thanks for a worthy replacement link.

        rd

  40. Envelope X-Ray by GigsVT · · Score: 3, Interesting

    That envelope X-ray spray is just dust off. Hold the can of dust-off upside down and spray the envelope.

    Doesn't work well with security envelopes, but works fine with normal ones.

    --
    I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    1. Re:Envelope X-Ray by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No it's not. It's this (Component Cooler): http://www.radioshack.com/product/index.jsp?parent Page=family&cp=2032058.2032229.2032259&productId=2 102648&tab=summary.

      You don't even need to hold the can upside down, and it's much more effective.

  41. Re:Lets Hope Al-Queda Doesnt Get Their Hands On Th by jimktrains · · Score: 1

    What scares me more than terrorists, is the incompetences of our government. One more attack and they will have every exscuse to take more rights away...

    The content of the site was a little weak...

    --
    "You will do foolish things, but do them with enthusiasm." - S. G. Colette
  42. Re:My constant question: where's the digital Minox by morcheeba · · Score: 2, Informative

    qualia 016?... but, going along with zlogic, a cell phone would be much easier to hide in plain site.

  43. Besides the utter lameness of the article... by edunbar93 · · Score: 1

    Um, what the fuck? There's a place down the street from me called "The Spy Store" where you can buy all this and body armour too.

    This is lameness beyond compare.

    --
    "No problem. I have the capacity to do infinite work so long as you don't mind that my quality approaches zero."-Dilbert
    1. Re:Besides the utter lameness of the article... by slashflood · · Score: 1

      There's a place down the street from me called "The Spy Store"

      Sunset Plaza?

    2. Re:Besides the utter lameness of the article... by edunbar93 · · Score: 1

      Sunset Plaza?

      No, Broadway St.

      --
      "No problem. I have the capacity to do infinite work so long as you don't mind that my quality approaches zero."-Dilbert
  44. got hoe? by darkchubs · · Score: 0

    when did slashdot become host to SEO spam links?

  45. report it to adsense... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    The solution is easy... report it to adsense. Google will pull their ads and cancel his account. Then when he gets hit with the hosting for being slashdotted he won't try that crap again.

    1. Re:report it to adsense... by Quinn · · Score: 1

      There's no legitimate reason to pull this guy's ads. I enjoyed the article. Links would have been informative, but I appreciate being denied the temptation to buy any of the items featured. Congratulations to the publisher -- I hope he rakes in a lot of cash for the feature.

      --
      #19845
  46. spy lol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this is like.. the gayest post ever

  47. ISS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There was so called ISS (iirc) in old days, which makes OC-gas sprays to cars, and all kinds of real James Bond stuff. They had office atleast in London and somewhere in states. One of articles was for example a briefcase that allows to intercept GSM phonecalls (it establishes fake cell, and as A5 encryption was purposefully made weak by request of MI5 in 80's it's relatively cheap op to do).

    Nowadays they sell most hardcore items to gov'ts only. But that stuff you can buy from either Russia or China so what's the big deal. I think remote mikes (point-mikes and laser-mikes which you can point light into somebody's window 500ft away and listen conversation) I think are still in everybodys shopping list who wish to do so.

    So I think equip mentioned in above article are still quite tame. Some radioamateur builds better frequency-hopping bug for $20 that's not straightforward to trace.

  48. Did Tacos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Account get hacked or something? What the hell?
    Seriously.
    Worst.
    Story.
    Ever.
    /Simpson s Comic Book Store Guy Voice
    //I didn't put a space in Simpsons
    ///stupid filter

  49. Sony Tie-Clip by thygrrr · · Score: 1

    I have that one, it's a "small" capacitor microphone.
    However, it's not at all inoccuous, it's huge and the clip looks every bit like a microphone and only vaguely like a tie clip.
    This is for legit, non clandestine uses only.

  50. Re:Lets Hope Al-Queda Doesnt Get Their Hands On Th by anagama · · Score: 1

    Plainly, the US needs no assistance from Al-Queda to achieve police state status.

    --
    What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
  51. Wow old Ads, great addition to /. by Jack9 · · Score: 1

    Welcome to 1990 when I ordered mailers to check out pricing on most of these gadgets. /. Article link.
    Site links to ads.
    Profit!

    --

    Often wrong but never in doubt.
    I am Jack9.
    Everyone knows me.
  52. Haha!... HA! Clue Spray by sl4shd0rk · · Score: 1

    Perfect for carrying around with the PEBKAC mallet!!

    --
    Join the Slashcott! Feb 10 thru Feb 17!
  53. Re:Lets Hope Al-Queda Doesnt Get Their Hands On Th by Karma+Farmer · · Score: 1
    Plainly, the US needs no assistance from Al-Queda to achieve police state status.
    No, we definitely need al-Qaeda if we're ever going to achieve our goal of becoming a police state. In fact, if al-Qaeda didn't exist we would have to invent it.

    (Note: the inept criminals and thugs who use terrorism to kill fewer people every year than falling coconuts are obviously real. A vast shadow network of islamofascist co-conspirators is imaginary.)
  54. make Windows more secure than Linux by nacturation · · Score: 3, Informative

    Yes, it's lame. And I'll attempt to hijack this article by posting something actually useful which was rejected as a story in favor of this bullshit.

    Core Force is a free (as in beer) application which provides inbound and outbound stateful packet filtering for TCP/IP protocols using a Windows port of OpenBSD's PF firewall, granular file system and registry access control and programs' integrity validation. These capabilities can be configured and enforced system-wide or on a per-application basis for specific programs such as email readers, Web browsers, media players, messaging software, etc.

    Screenshots here.

    Basically, the way it works by default is much like ZoneAlarm. If an application hasn't been configured, you get an alert saying "XYZ.exe is trying to access 87.65.43.21... allow/deny?" And you have the option to add it as a permanent rule. Unlike ZoneAlarm, however, it's not an all-or-nothing option. You can choose to allow only outbound port 80 traffic to 12.34.56.0/24 from source port 10431 with certain TCP flags and on the 2nd network interface if you choose.

    This also applies to the filesystem. Grant read/write/execute access anywhere from an entire drive, to directories, down to the individual file level. Choose whether or not permissions propogate to child files/directories. Ditto for the registry. As the about page describes, it's a powerful firewall for not just tcp/ip, but also for the filesystem and the registry.

    I ran Core Force on my old machine and it was really interesting to watch just how many times Windows phones home. After a while, I just setup default deny rules for all Microsoft IP addresses. But damn if there wasn't a ton of background communication going on for all sorts of applications. It takes a while to get the configuration right and for trusted applications that you don't want to go through the hassle of configuration everything in minute detail (eg: games where you don't want to have a popup right in the middle of fragging someone), you can just assign it full rights to the system as if you're running without Core Force.

    --
    Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    1. Re:make Windows more secure than Linux by deander2 · · Score: 1

      so you're going to hijack a lame ad with yet another lame ad?
      thank /god we have people like you here to protect us! :)

    2. Re:make Windows more secure than Linux by AnyoneEB · · Score: 1

      Wow, that looks nice. I currently use Kerio Personal Firewall which is free for personal use and I believe is similar to Zone Alarm. It has some problems with responsiveness and generally slows my computer down more than I think it should. The fine-tuned file system access control sounds very useful, but I have to wonder about its effect on the speed of my system? I refuse to run active virus scanning because it kills performance. This is not the same, but it is still doing something on every filesystem access, which sounds like it would have huge effect on any operator working with lots of small files (ex. just copying a folder full of text files). Have you noticed any performance problems with that?

      --
      Centralization breaks the internet.
    3. Re:make Windows more secure than Linux by MustardMan · · Score: 1

      This is EXACTLY what I want....

      except I want it on my mac. Detailed network control PLUS filesystem control. Anyone know of an app that can do this? Preferrably one that is, or will be, universal binary.

    4. Re:make Windows more secure than Linux by nacturation · · Score: 1

      Keep in mind that Windows itself performs numerous permission checks for each file access that goes on. I haven't noticed a really sizeable performance difference myself (on an AMD64 3500+). The exception to this is its learning mode, where it actively scans and logs everything the application does and constructs a set of rules to permit those activities -- that can make it dog slow. Generally, apps such as Windows Explorer you'd grant normal permission to the filesystem anyways as that's not something which tends to access files without you initiating the activity.

      It's more than likely written in C (no source available, but OpenBSD pf is written in C) and performance seems to be generally good. If you have a slower system or you're short on RAM the minor slowdown might be more noticeable. So don't make your virus checker run through tons of checks as you do a full system scan -- just grant the virus checker full system access. And you'll occasionally run into problems where a poorly written app tries to access a part of the filesystem/registry/network that you've blocked -- you'll either have to wait for it to do a lengthy timeout or it might just die with an error message. The good thing is that by default it logs failed attempts and you can always go back and grant specific permissions.

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    5. Re:make Windows more secure than Linux by subnomine · · Score: 1

      I see....so Core Force allows my spy gadgets to see you naked through your flat panel display.
      Allow/Deny?

    6. Re:make Windows more secure than Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Little Snitch can do this. Well, only the networking part. Not the filesystem control.

  55. All IP Addresses Belong to Us... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    all ip addresses visiting the spy site will be logged and cross referenced with the owner's phone records for the last three years... when a phone company or cable rep knocks on your door and starts asking questions... be afraid... very afraid...

  56. Re:This reminds me of a Discovery Channel show I s by cgenman · · Score: 2, Informative

    But since then the ability to extract additional information through software interpolation of multiple images has increased tremendously. With multiple cameras pointed at the same area, or multiple shots from a single camera, you should be able to get enough raw data to create very high resolution images indeed, even if the individual images themselves aren't that great. Use cameras at very different geographical locations, and a full 3d image should be possible.

    You can also use more of the spectrum, compensate for atmospheric effects, etc.

  57. Imageshack by 3p1ph4ny · · Score: 1

    I love how this commercial site is using imageshack to host their images.

  58. Re:Proposed new tags---try "adwhore" by AnyoneEB · · Score: 1

    It was added a couple days ago, but it is just a CSS trick. By making the checkbox image part of the link, they can change the image when the link has been visited, just like the link color changes. No functionality added, it just looks nicer.

    --
    Centralization breaks the internet.
  59. Links? by cgenman · · Score: 1

    Lame article, yadda yadda.

    Anyone have a link to the lockpicking kit in a working pen? That sounds actually useful.

  60. Stun Pen? by Loconut1389 · · Score: 1

    Does anyone know if there is a reputable and inexpensive (hard to find that combo) place to buy a working stun pen? I often drive a bus full of drunken bachelors through bad parts of town and end up staying on darkened busses in empty alleyways waiting for the groups to come back. I can't carry something as obvious as a taser so as not to scare customers, but I wouldn't mind having something concealable as a last resort defense or if I absolutely had to, to subdue a rider as a last resort?

    Seems unlikely that one of these things charged on a triple a battery could generate both the voltage and current necessary. AAA bats are what 1.5 volt 750mAh for a NiMH- wouldn't imagine you could get much amperage at 500kV? On second thought, it's what, 1/4 amp that will kill you? What is the desired amperage to incapacitate anyway? I was under the impression that the voltage in and of itself wasn't so much the incapacitator as it is the frequency of a modulated open AC line?

    Anyway, bottom line is I don't know much, do these things work?

    1. Re:Stun Pen? by dbIII · · Score: 2, Funny
      Does anyone know if there is a reputable and inexpensive (hard to find that combo) place to buy a working stun pen?
      Near the start of the novel "Snow Crash" there is a portion about the foolishness of having high tech weapons that few people can recognise - eventually you have to use them because you certainly can't tell them to keep away or you'll hit them with a bleedingly obvious axe handle.
    2. Re:Stun Pen? by Coeurderoy · · Score: 1

      So would you recommend a chocolate kalacksnikov (obviously non threatening to the drunked batchelors when the board the bus in broad daylight, but could look convincing in a dark alley :-)

      Personally I belive that the only thing the parent need is a quiet chat with the owner of the locale that his clients patronize.
      I guess any street punk knows better than to anger the local night club owner, or is so far gone that even a bazooka might not convince him/her/it of the wisdom of leaving a bus driver to his/her rest.

  61. Re:Lets Hope Al-Queda Doesnt Get Their Hands On Th by Karma+Farmer · · Score: 1
    What scares me more than terrorists, is the incompetences of our government. One more attack and they will have every exscuse to take more rights away...
    This is true. One day, you wake up and realize that the government is so incompetent they can't even arrange and attack on their own soil. It's like the day you realized that Santa Clause, the Tooth Fairy, and Jesus are all just fairytales for children.

    Even a few more attacks in the west would give American politicians power they can hardly dream of today. Their ineptness and inability in the face of such opportunity is astounding. It seems the best the politicians can do is gut and undermine any sensible security precautions, and then wait and hope for some thug or criminal to do their work for them.
  62. Other gadgets on Thinkgeek by J4nus_slashdotter · · Score: 1

    You can also buy the spy cam on thinkgeek :) The James Bond's perfect tools. Big brother is watching you..

    1. Re:Other gadgets on Thinkgeek by cyberdude191 · · Score: 1

      also lots of spy cameras at http://www.x-recon.com/ at better prices

  63. Re:Lets Hope Al-Queda Doesnt Get Their Hands On Th by Stealth+Potato · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yes, god forbid Al Qaeda get their hands on fart powder. Not even George W. "Cowboy" Bush could save us then! :-O

  64. Plagirism... by penguin_asylum · · Score: 1

    The article summary is taken directly from the front page of the website, with no citation...

    Not to be too picky, but if he's going to post something like this he could at least think of his own summary for the site.

  65. Re:Lets Hope Al-Queda Doesnt Get Their Hands On Th by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  66. Re:Lets Hope Al-Queda Doesnt Get Their Hands On Th by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It could enable these groups to murder more innocent people.

    I, for one, was very disappointed at the lack of gadgets that you could use to murder innocent people and/or terrorists. Where are the cigarette blow-guns, laser-beam wristwatches, and poison-gas lapel pins? All this is is a bunch of cameras and audio recorders... they sell this stuff at Radio Shack!

    If this is what our spies have been reduced to, then I'm hardly surprised they're getting their butts kicked by international terrorists. Why, you could barely take on ninja assassins with that stuff!

  67. And cheap to boot. by kunwon1 · · Score: 1

    Your cheapo image shack hosting has turned over and died. Might be time to change the water for those JPGs.

    --
    Specialization is for insects. -Heinlein
  68. Re:This reminds me of a Discovery Channel show I s by Dominic_Mazzoni · · Score: 1

    Government satellites regularly capture images at 1-meter resolution (I've seen many such images) and I think as high as 0.25-meter resolution is possible. (Any higher-resolution images you see online, like on Google Maps, were usually acquired by an airplane, not a satellite.)

    Keep in mind, though, that the satellites with this kind of resolution are in fast-moving low Earth orbit and can only capture high-resolution images at near-nadir angles. So it's not possible to capture, for example, continuous video of an area at that resolution. With several satellites all coordinating, you could perhaps image each area once an hour on average.

    Remember, the higher the resolution, the lower the coverage (in both space and time). NASA captures medium-resolution (250-m) images that provide global, daily coverage of the entire Earth. DOD captures on-demand high-resolution images of specific, carefully chosen targets but miss the rest of the world.

  69. Ads? by antdude · · Score: 1

    My site doesn't have any ads. Show me ads in the sources to prove it.

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  70. A Windows port of pf is a big deal. If they're running one of the more recent versions, load balancing and failover management are core features. And of course the robustness is what you'd expect from the OpenBSD team.

  71. Some useful ones by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 2, Funny

    I don't think anyone outside the porn industry needs the "hidden screw camera", but haven't you ever wished you could flood a meeting with that substance listed under "chemical aids", namely the Clue Spray?

  72. The new internet trend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Check all the major "blog" news sites. A lot of them are constantly running fluff articles these days just to keep fresh content on their front pages. There's a finite amount of stuff out there that's actually worth posting on a given day, and I'd rather have no updates than two lame ones.

    This mo'money mentality is going to destroy internet advertising again.

  73. Re:My constant question: where's the digital Minox by Sam+Nitzberg · · Score: 1
  74. sure, i'd get myself some but... by dword · · Score: 1

    The website explains a bit about the products, fails to give details on pricing/ordering but what use would we have for them if they're only effective in real life?

  75. Re:My constant question: where's the digital Minox by timothy · · Score: 1

    OK, OK -- that one I'd forgotten about when I posted :) However, at that price, while Yes, it is What James Bond Would Carry (at least possibly), it's more expensive than the *actual* Minox B, which was developed as a general purpose camera before it was coopted into espionage use by both sides in the Cold War ... makes me want to see more stuff from the same designer, whose name escapes me for the moment. Strange, I'd always thought it was Swiss, but turns out the Minox came from Latvia ...

    timothy

    --
    jrnl: http://tinyurl.com/c2l8yr / foes: http://tinyurl.com/ckjno5
  76. Ptooey. Phooey. Bah- humbug! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A pox on your x-ray glasses.

      I'm still waiting for my sea-monkeys.

  77. Re:My constant question: where's the digital Minox by timothy · · Score: 1

    Sam:

    The trouble is, the current digitals from Minox all seem to be mediocre rebranded cameras -- nothing like the clean, engineered look of the classic slimline Minox B. Even the 35mm cameras from Minox have all been pretty stylish. Leica's blown a good chance to exploit positive feelings toward that brand name by slapping Minox on some pretty bad cameras. Some of these don't even have expandable memory!

    Ah well, too bad.

    timothy

    --
    jrnl: http://tinyurl.com/c2l8yr / foes: http://tinyurl.com/ckjno5
  78. uh oh... by santaliqueur · · Score: 0

    abort the mission...they have spy tech!

    --
    I do not accept czechs.
  79. Where to get this kind of stuff from... by meridian · · Score: 2, Informative

    www.spycatcheronline.co.uk My favorite is the bullet proof denim jacket

    --
    meridian at tha.net
  80. Re:Blatant advertisement by DongleFondle · · Score: 1

    Here here . . . I'm using Adblock Plus with the Adblock filterset.G updater extension to continuously update known ad url's. Seriously, the internet the way it's supposed to be if you ask me.

  81. Re:Lets Hope Al-Queda Doesnt Get Their Hands On Th by daveb · · Score: 1
    actually think they're all just Duke Nukem Forwever ware. There are stories about them, but no actual links or pictures.

    naaa - they exist. Do a google search and you'll find someone willing to sell them. top of my list were www.spylife.com and www.spysupplystore.com which look like real stores/suppliers. But yeah - crappy crappy article

  82. Not cut out to be a spy by mikefe · · Score: 1

    I don't know about you, but if I used that fart elixer on someone, I'd be the first one to burst out laughing.

    Spy gadgets? No.

    These are for practical jokes!

    --
    There: Something at a specific location.
    Their: Owned by someone.
    Please make sure your english compiles.
  83. Re:This reminds me of a Discovery Channel show I s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You seem to be confusing life with Star Trek. Careful...

  84. Re:This reminds me of a Discovery Channel show I s by techno-vampire · · Score: 1

    I know somebody who had access to those photos in the late '60s. He could recognize his own car in the parking lot. In shots of Soviet tanks, he could even tell which tank commanders had shaved that morning.

    --
    Good, inexpensive web hosting