Slashdot Mirror


A New Search for MySpace

garzpacho writes "Businessweek is reporting on MySpace's new strategy. They're going to pit the large engines against each other in a bidding war to provide the popular social networking site with a new search engine. From the article: 'Search is a driver of traffic and advertising revenue for other major Web destinations, but it's a largely untapped source of growth for MySpace and other Fox Interactive Media properties such as online gaming site IGN and sports site Scout. Given MySpace's power, Google, Yahoo!, and MSN are expected to compete fiercely for the right to be the search engine of choice for MySpace and the rest of Fox Interactive. News Corp. won't say how much money it expects to derive from a deal, but industry experts say it could conceivably boost MySpace's annual revenue several times over.'"

146 comments

  1. Quality or quantity? by moron4hire · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Although there are millions of active users on Myspace, most are teenagers with little buying power, that are therefore less likely to click on the adverts that gain the search engines revenue. Also, most searches will be for "html help" or "free layouts", not very lucrative markets.

    1. Re:Quality or quantity? by rmadmin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How about advertisements for games? It seems that the gaming scene is made up of quite a few teenagers that all have nice consoles, or high end gaming PCs. Hmmm.. no buying power? It also seems that every teenager I see anymore has a cell phone. Hmmmm. I've also seen quite a few teenagers with MP3 players.

      They might not have buying power, but they sure know what they want, and their parents sure have buying power.

    2. Re:Quality or quantity? by geddes · · Score: 4, Insightful
      If you think teenagers have little buying power you are crazy. Parents buy so much crap for their kids these days. The First result for 'teen market' in google says:
      1. Teens (13-19) spend $94.7 billion per year, $3,309 per person.
      2. 37 percent of teens' income comes from parents, the rest from jobs.
      3. Online spending projections show teen expenditures are on the rise:
        o 2003: $1.7 billion
        o 2004: $2.6 billion
        o 2005: $3.6 billion
        o 2006: $4.8 billion

      It's not a small market. When teens get jobs, more often than not what they earn is 100% discretionary, they aren't paying rent or buying their own food. I think it is unfortunate that teen culture is so consumption-driven, but that is the way it is.

    3. Re:Quality or quantity? by Silver+Sloth · · Score: 1
      Agreed

      The people with no discretionary income are the teenager's parents - as I know only to well - and I thought a dog was expensive!

      --
      init 11 - for when you need that edge.
    4. Re:Quality or quantity? by MrAnnoyanceToYou · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Okay.

      No.

      Teenage girls drive entire markets. Know American Idol? Brittney Spears? InSync? Backstreet Boys? You think only college aged kids are buying this stuff? No. The music industry is run by teenaged girls, has been since the Beatles / Monkees.

      Ever hear a story of how your co-workers' (or your) girls have like four outfits for everything? Know a girl who works in a shop and says, "Yeah, I spend most of my paycheck right here."

      Many teens are: 1) not set in your was as far as who you will buy from. 2) not responsible enough to think, "Should I save this for a rainy day if possible?" 3) not paying their expenses yet. 4) Capable of moving up to a decent salary within 10 years. 5) More "Herd-Motivated" than most people. (even though most Americans are pretty socialized anyways)

      Those are just the reasons I can think of off the top of my head; companies market like rabid dogs towards teenagers. They just look so tasty as a market.

    5. Re:Quality or quantity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol what?

    6. Re:Quality or quantity? by tehcyder · · Score: 1
      37 percent of teens' income comes from parents, the rest from jobs
      Kids today, eh?
      When I were a lad we didn't work at all...oh bugger.
      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    7. Re:Quality or quantity? by bitt3n · · Score: 4, Funny

      more importantly, if you brainwash a kid into buying your deodorant now, they may mindlessly buy it for years and years to come, whereas most older people are already brand loyal, and even if you do brainwash an 80-year-old guy, he might not finish his first stick before he keels over.

    8. Re:Quality or quantity? by mBytz · · Score: 2, Funny
      The music industry is run by teenaged girls

      That explains the endless bitching.
    9. Re:Quality or quantity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " Also, most searches will be for "html help" or "free layouts", not very lucrative markets. "

      That's not the type of search their talking about! The search I find myself wanting to use on MySpace so much is for people that I know, or an artists that I'm looking for. But MySpace search is TERRIBLE. I'm a MySpace user only because of my band - it annoys the hell out of me that their site is so dysfunctional. When I'm using a website like Facebook, the search is flawless and you can always find who you're looking for, but MySpace virtually never works.

      I think that's what I'm trying to say though - the search they're trying to is a 'who' search, not a 'what' search.

    10. Re:Quality or quantity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok. No. First of all, as all the others on here have already pointed out, teens with part time jobs often have the most disposable income short of the very rich. They do hold jobs, and yet, have little expenses, except maybe a car and lunch money.

      however...you are completely overlooking another segment of myspace users which is very significant. Artists. This group includes me, several of my friends, and several other hundred or so bands that we play with on a regular basis. We use it to keep in contact, find other new artists, look for new band mates, and promote our own music. With addition of movie features, movie makers, like directors, screenwriters, cinematographers, and special effects artists, are also jumping into the game. This is a large segment which is often a bit older (I'm 25), and many of them, like me, have good day jobs, are still young and single (and therefore still live pretty cheaply) and we are also highly motivated to buy production equipement. Advertising to this group could be very effective, if targeted well.

    11. Re:Quality or quantity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I thought the same until I looked around on the site. Myspace is used by a lot more than teenyboppers, it's also a completely free online dating site, where you can check out people's profiles and actually send them full messages with no cost whatsoever. My single friends are loving it. Sites like lavalife are losing a lot of customers.

    12. Re:Quality or quantity? by JimBobJoe · · Score: 1

      companies market like rabid dogs towards teenagers. They just look so tasty as a market.

      Rabid? Tasty? Teenagers?

      I knew I should have majored in Marketing.

    13. Re:Quality or quantity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can tell that you made up your signature. I don't think it's very clever or interesting, and the writing is kind of "blah."

    14. Re:Quality or quantity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I concur...Movies, music, latest gadget, cell phone, ring tones. Teens generally "need" the latest and greatest of something before adult do. They are also big time impulse buyers.

    15. Re:Quality or quantity? by e2d2 · · Score: 1

      Okay, I'm gonna go home and beat my kid now.

    16. Re:Quality or quantity? by MrAnnoyanceToYou · · Score: 1

      Then you're an idiot. Go skullf* a shark.

      I'd tell you to grow some balls, too, but I think the two are mutually exclusive.

    17. Re:Quality or quantity? by macron1 · · Score: 1

      OMG! dont you mean *Nsync? LOL!!!

    18. Re:Quality or quantity? by MrAnnoyanceToYou · · Score: 1

      I'm so cool I don't know how to spell it. How awesome is that?

  2. alternative by brenddie · · Score: 3, Informative

    Even if google doesnt "win" you can always insite:myspace my searches.
    Thats if they dont hide content from other search engines, if they do then its their loss.

    --
    The best test environment is production. - Me
    chrome://browser/content/browser.xul
    1. Re:alternative by yincrash · · Score: 1

      the entire point of a search engine wanting to be on myspace is for their users, not who can search myspace.

    2. Re:alternative by MadMoses · · Score: 1

      Do you mean adding site:myspace.com to your google search parameters?

      I'm not aware of an "insite" parameter.

      --

      Do not be alarmed. This is only a test.
    3. Re:alternative by electronerdz · · Score: 0

      http://www.myspace.com/robots.txt

      User-agent: ia_archiver
      Disallow: /

      --
      Kernel Krunch - Part of a Complete OS
    4. Re:alternative by suffe · · Score: 1

      Their loss is our gain.

      --

      Karma: 2.71828182846 (Mostly due to small, fun pills)
  3. Sexual Predators by dubmun · · Score: 3, Funny
    Some advertisers are reluctant to be associated with the freewheeling site, which has concerned some as a potential hunting ground for sexual predators
    Perhaps this will discourage some search engines from working with mySpace as well?
    --
    (end of post)
    1. Re:Sexual Predators by Golias · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Some advertisers are reluctant to be associated with the freewheeling site, which has concerned some as a potential hunting ground for sexual predators

      Perhaps this will discourage some search engines from working with mySpace as well?


      Better stay away from the shopping malls too.

      MySpace is no different from anywhere else that teens hang out with minimal supervision. If you are worried that Max Cady might be out there in the shadows, teach your daughters not to be stupid about sex. The "real world" outside is vastly more dangerous for children than any social web network.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    2. Re:Sexual Predators by shaneh0 · · Score: 2, Informative

      "If you are worried that Max Cady might be out there in the shadows, teach your daughters not to be stupid about sex."

      Right. The staggering number of sexual crimes against women and girls are because the victim is "stupid about sex" This MUST be why 1 in 5 female undergrads are sexually assulted sometime during their 4(+) years at university.

    3. Re:Sexual Predators by Golias · · Score: 1

      Right. The staggering number of sexual crimes against women and girls are because the victim is "stupid about sex" This MUST be why 1 in 5 female undergrads are sexually assulted sometime during their 4(+) years at university.

      The vast majority of those sexual "assults" on campus? They go like this:

      Girl goes to party, has a couple drinks and some fun.
      Scumbag gets girl drunk and/or slips her a roofie.
      Scumbag takes advantage of nearly unconcious girl.
      Girl is too ashamed to report anything to the authorities, but does check the box in anonymous survey which asks if she was ever raped.

      This has nothing to do with kids agreeing to "hook up" with old men, which is most certainly being stupid about sex.

      Most teen statutory rape crimes would actually be consensual sex acts, if we considered the consent given by a teen to an adult to be legal consent.

      Your daughter might be meeting boys her own age who are every bit as "predatory" as the Dirty Old Men that people seem to think MySpace is brimming over with.

      Besides, sexual predators are easy as hell to catch on sites like this. Here's how:

      1. Make a bogus web page saying you are a 14-year old girl.
      2. Include a couple photos of Medow Sopranno from season 1, claiming that they are you.
      3. Post a few blog entries about how you hate your parents and you're feeling very sexually confused and restless.

      If and when some old dude hits on you, arrange a sting operation with local law enforcement.

      Done.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    4. Re:Sexual Predators by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      www.myspace.com/maxcady

    5. Re:Sexual Predators by Penguin+Programmer · · Score: 2, Informative

      You missed the point. The point was, it's not MySpace's fault that teenage girls post their home addresses and that pedophiles look at them. It's the fault of the girls for posting their information and the pedophiles for taking advantage of it. The parent had a very good point that real life is far more dangerous than MySpace, the only difference is that everyone's been taught not to talk to strangers in real life.

      MySpace is the new full-size van with tinted windows and candy inside. The only way it contributes to sexual predators is as a vehicle.

    6. Re:Sexual Predators by garcia · · Score: 1

      Right. The staggering number of sexual crimes against women and girls are because the victim is "stupid about sex" This MUST be why 1 in 5 female undergrads are sexually assulted sometime during their 4(+) years at university.

      That's because they (and the person that sexually assaulted them) were undereducated about alcohol use/abuse.

    7. Re:Sexual Predators by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The only way it contributes to sexual predators is as a vehicle."

      This comment makes no sense.

      If it is a commonly used vehicle for sexual predators, it is contributing. It does have its valid uses but it still contributes as it hides the predator from the prey.

      As I said before, when a yougn girl sees the 40 year old guy a few red flags go up, on myspace, the communication is not face to face.

    8. Re:Sexual Predators by vertinox · · Score: 1

      Right. The staggering number of sexual crimes against women and girls are because the victim is "stupid about sex" This MUST be why 1 in 5 female undergrads are sexually assulted sometime during their 4(+) years at university... ...by someone they know and met through offline means.

      This stuff isn't new. People are creeps, but they don't need myspace to be so.

      Secondly, these are often people they thought they could trust or even people they are dating.

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    9. Re:Sexual Predators by JimBobJoe · · Score: 1

      This MUST be why 1 in 5 female undergrads are sexually assulted sometime during their 4(+) years at university.

      A statistic which implies that your average sexual predator is basically harmless in comparison to the people sitting around you in your History 101 class.

    10. Re:Sexual Predators by megaditto · · Score: 1

      Let me clue you in: most fathers hate seeing "your daughter" and "sex" in the same sentence, much less using them...

      It's all well and good to wish fathers would take a greater initiative, but, realistically, it's the mothers that bear the onus of having the "little talk" with their girls

      --
      Obama likes poor people so much, he wants to make more of them.
    11. Re:Sexual Predators by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Female undergrads don't fly to Jordan to meet a man they've never met before.

      Apples and oranges. One thing to be assaulted walking to your car, or having a roofie thrown in your drink.

      Another thing entirely to chat up a man online, know nothing for certain about him, and go to another state/country to meet him and (presumably) sleep with him. That's what's meant by not being "stupid about sex."

      (Sidenote: Does the girl deserve to get assaulted? No. However, for the ones doing this thing online - that doesn't make them intelligent people, either.)

  4. Revenue Battle:Content Provider vs Search Engines by ikejam · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This could be the begining of a trend where content providers start to demand more share of the monies to be made of the internet - obviously now only second-tier providers with aggregated content/large-scale hosting have the leverage but perhaps in the future....

  5. RE by Alex+P+Keaton+in+da · · Score: 4, Funny

    I am going to bid for this contract-
    I have developed a search engine that plays music when you load the homepage, is inaccesable between 6-10 pm due to a lack of bandwidth, reeks of emo-cutter desperation, and has little icons of music notes moving around the whole page so the links are hard to find/click. I am thinking we will be a good fit....

    --
    And All I Ask is a Tall Ship And a Star to Steer Her By
    1. Re:RE by Golias · · Score: 1, Funny

      Awww... What's the matter, kid? None of the girls would put you in their "Top 8"?

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    2. Re:RE by Kesch · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's it.

      You're off my friends list.

      --
      If this signature is witty enough, maybe somebody will like me.
    3. Re:RE by larry+bagina · · Score: 1

      The problem is, no guy would put it in his #2.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    4. Re:RE by radish · · Score: 1

      You forgot the "I'm feeling suicidal" button :)

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    5. Re:RE by foamrotreturns · · Score: 1
      Reminds me of a great quote from bash.org:
      Pax: "I wish my lawn was emo, so it would cut itself."
      Here's my own personal contribution:
      Emo Kid: "I hate my dad. Nobody understands me. I'd kill myself but then I wouldn't be able to write songs about killing myself. Does my hair look ok? I dunno. I think it might be too short because I can still see out of one eye. I think my jeans are too loose."
  6. I think I see a market... by ChowRiit · · Score: 5, Funny

    Maybe companies selling razor blades might be able to find a nice niche?

  7. Non-structural markup by illtron · · Score: 4, Informative

    MySpace has got to be an absolute nightmare for any search crawler to dig through. The markup on all the pages is absolutely horrible. Maybe a partnership with Google could help convince them that their pages are built for 1996, not 2006, which is extremely sad for a site that's only been around for two years. Structural markup would make it a lot easier to find the relevant info.

    --
    Slashdot: 24 hours behind every other site or your money back!
    1. Re:Non-structural markup by geoffspear · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm sure it's a hell of a lot easier for a spider to read and index those pages than it is for an actual human to try to read them. For one thing, a computer program can read text that's the same color as the background picture just fine.

      --
      Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
    2. Re:Non-structural markup by illtron · · Score: 1

      Very true. When the revolution comes, MySpace will be a handy list of who goes up against the wall.

      --
      Slashdot: 24 hours behind every other site or your money back!
    3. Re:Non-structural markup by Golias · · Score: 4, Insightful

      MySpace text is black on white by default. If it's hard to read, it's because the teenybopper who customized her site chose to make it that way.

      Bad markup under the hood is a more valid criticism of MySpace pages, but we're not talking about building the next Amazon.com here. We're talking about a service that provides quick-and-dirty tools for high school and college kids to slap together collections of their favorite pictures, links to videos on YouTube, rants about their favorite bands/movies/whatever, and also allows public & private messages, blogging, etc.

      In other words, in spite of the ugliness, it pretty much allows anybody who wants it to be their own old-school BBS Sysop.

      MySpace (along with LiveJournal, Xangxa, and a few others) are delivering exactly what the World Wide Web was originally promised to be: A place where everybody can be a content publisher. IMHO, People who whine about the broken HTML and/or the goofy choices some people make with their pages are losing sight of the Big Picture.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    4. Re:Non-structural markup by geoffspear · · Score: 1
      You're right. It would be impossible to build a site that allows for user contributed content without using horribly broken HTML.

      Someone should tell those fools over a wikipedia that they just don't get it, and that they should do a rewrite to generate nonstandard HTML too.

      --
      Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
    5. Re:Non-structural markup by Golias · · Score: 1

      Wikipedia is an information site in which users are allowed to provide text content (with links ot the occasional picture or media file.)

      MySpace is a GUI-driven interface for slapping together your own personal page, chock full of all kinds of goofy customization options. Furthermore, it's a site where clean mark-up doesn't matter in the least. Nobody is likely to visit your MySpace page other than friends of yours. As long as their browsers can render the page, there's no reason for anybody to care how badly it's coded.

      Show me a simple web design GUI which doesn't produce crappy mark-up, and your rage against MySpace is almost valid.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    6. Re:Non-structural markup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "MySpace (along with LiveJournal, Xangxa, and a few others) are delivering exactly what the World Wide Web was originally promised to be: A place where everybody can be a content publisher."

      Umm right. Because before myspace there were no places where you could host your mental diarrhea, er diary online for free. Your trying just a little too hard to defend what amounts to an even crappier version of geocitites. There is a reason why everyone constantly makes fun of where you host your homepage. If it really bothers you so much maybe you should move your page elsewhere.

    7. Re:Non-structural markup by Golias · · Score: 1

      Your trying just a little too hard to defend what amounts to an even crappier version of geocitites.

      If you also considered Geocities to be a Bad Thing, then clearly personal web pages are something which bother the heck out of you. Why even read this thread?

      Personally, I think all of these services are fantastic. Personal blogs like Girl Friday are endlessly more entertaining than any site which Big Media is putting out there.

      Finally, I think it's sad and pathetic to see people on slashdot complaining about the "mental diarrhea" of free personal web sites. What makes posting here so superior to some teenager blogging about whatever's on her mind?

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    8. Re:Non-structural markup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought the "Big Picture" of the Internet was to promote intelligence and not mindless consumerborg groupthink. But I digress, I'm sure Guttenberg had a similar idea about promoting literacy so people could read the Greek and Latin Classics but instead we got people reading get-rich-quick schemes and dieting books.

    9. Re:Non-structural markup by Golias · · Score: 1

      I thought the "Big Picture" of the Internet was to promote intelligence and not mindless consumerborg groupthink. But I digress, I'm sure Guttenberg had a similar idea about promoting literacy so people could read the Greek and Latin Classics but instead we got people reading get-rich-quick schemes and dieting books.

      GIGO.

      The great thing about neutral communication carriers, like the Internet, is that you can find pretty much anything you are loooking for. The fact that some bloggers are providing information you don't want does not prevent you from getting the information you do. Why get your panties in a twist?

      BTW, I find that Guttenberg rocks if you enjoy H.G. Wells or other public domain authors. Who cares if it also has a lot of books which don't interest me? What's the harm?

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    10. Re:Non-structural markup by irc.goatse.cx+troll · · Score: 1

      No, Myspace has no customization options. You really control none of the content they generate, other than the option of inserting a few style tags and trying to close off some of their tables with ugly hacks.

      I say a few style tags, because well you can't do a link rel to do offsite css, so you're stuck throwing it all in a style block inside their tiny edit box.
      Of course even thats filtered. No @importing obviously, that would work too well. No #tags either, so you can't reference anything by its id(not that theres much properly tagged by id anyways, its all ugly nested tables like the site was designed in AOL's built in editor back in 1996). Also cant use #RRGGBB/#RGB coloring, stuck with using rgb(RRR,GGG,BBB); which can be a PITA if you want to copy/paste some old styles.

      Speaking of having nothing to match, you end up with UGLY hacks that defy the use of css like

      td.text td.text table {background-color:transparent;}
      td.text td.text table td,
      td.text td.text table {height:0;padding:0;border:0;}
      td.text td.text table table td {padding:3;}
      td.text td.text table table br {display:inline;}

      I mean really, whats the point of css if you're stuck using hacks as ugly as pre-css html? The best part is that the edit boxes say you're allowed to use "some dhtml". Well considering you can't use ANY script tags, wheres this dynamic html come in? Someone hear a fancy word like dhtml on techtv and want to sound cool?

      --
      Pain lasts, kid. Its how you know you're alive. Sometimes I think this growing up thing is just pain management-TheMaxx
    11. Re:Non-structural markup by menace3society · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually, I think people whine because they've learned the truth of the old adage, "Just because you can, doesn't mean you should." People's myspace sites aren't just poor html; they're hideously ugly and frequently illegible, with the most obnoxious possible music playing in the background with dubious legality. Myspace would be a much more hospitable place to "hang out" if people had the taste and restraint to make it not painful to see.

      The problem with MySpace is the problem with the Web generally: there's lots of content, but none of it is any damn good.

    12. Re:Non-structural markup by Golias · · Score: 1

      If by saying none of it "is any damn good" you mean that none of it suits your tastes, that's probably correct. But what harm are MySpace kiddies doing to you by having their gaudy, flashy websites full of music you hate? You only see it if you go to those sites.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    13. Re:Non-structural markup by geoffspear · · Score: 1
      I don't think the inventer (in the West, anyway) of the printing press, to whom the GP was referring, had ever heard of H.G. Wells.

      Unless you're suggesting The Time Machine was a work of nonfiction.

      --
      Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
    14. Re:Non-structural markup by e2d2 · · Score: 1

      IMHO, People who whine about the broken HTML and/or the goofy choices some people make with their pages are losing sight of the Big Picture.

      No, this actually makes the big picture easier to see - we are surrounded by fucking idiots.

    15. Re:Non-structural markup by Smack · · Score: 1

      Offsite access to CSS can allow javascript exploits, which can allow people to steal other people's logins.

    16. Re:Non-structural markup by blair1q · · Score: 1

      >there's lots of content, but none of it is any damn good.

      So's the human race.

    17. Re:Non-structural markup by irc.goatse.cx+troll · · Score: 1

      True, but they could at least allow CSS uploading, or get an editor that doesn't make me want to cry.

      For that matter, a better page layout so that css actually has some things to work with rather than messy hacks of trying to find the right table cell (which admittedly would be easier if css did xpath..) Some things really should just be done from the server though, like an option to disable the showing of your friends or comments. A lot of people do this by trying to close off the table then use css to hide the rest, but its as easy as disabling the stylesheet to get around that.

      --
      Pain lasts, kid. Its how you know you're alive. Sometimes I think this growing up thing is just pain management-TheMaxx
  8. I was wondering... by jense · · Score: 1

    MySpace has such a huge amount of traffic these days, but it had been unclear to this point how that traffic was going to be translated into revenue. Pitting competitors is a great maneuver for MySpace, and whatever engine wins the bid (especially if someone"lesser" than Google) can expect a huge boost themselves.

    This is also lucrative in that the demographics are very clear for the MySpace crowd, and should allow for highly-targeted ad campaigns for content providers. Kudos on a good move by MySpace!

    --
    Touting MyEclipse AJAX Tools
  9. Seems like a big waste... by bepolite · · Score: 1

    What percentage of users would really use the MySpace branded search? Are they going to offer more intelligent indexing of MySpace content with real-time updates or is going to just be a rebranding of an existing search offering? I'd hope for the former but we'll probably get the later. When you see this much money flying around it would be nice to see some improvement of the product(s) for the end users.

    --
    Always be polite.
    1. Re:Seems like a big waste... by Golias · · Score: 1

      What percentage of users would really use the MySpace branded search?

      The point is, when people are on their MySpace home page, which engine gets to be the one that gets used when users click on the built-in "search" button.

      I don't know what percentage of web users would use something like that, but I'm going to guess that the percentage of MySpace users who are trying to search MySpace for stuff would approach 100%.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

  10. 2 birds with 1 stone by Mayhem178 · · Score: 1

    I say we use jet engines to put our servers into low orbit. They won't have any problems dispelling heat up there. Which necessitates running many miles of CAT5 cable from low orbit to the surface (with staggered relays to boost signal strength). What does this result in? BAM, instant space elevator! I am a genius!

    --

    "You will pay for your lack of vision..." - Emperor Palpatine to Ray Charles

    1. Re:2 birds with 1 stone by TehBrian · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure this article means what you think it means.

  11. Did I miss the announcement? by blueZ3 · · Score: 1

    Is it "whacky article title day"?

    First "Using jet engines to cool servers" and now "A New Search for Spock", ummmm... I mean, "A New Hope for Myspace", ahhh, that is "Searching for Bobby..." eh, nevermind.

    --
    Interested in a Flash-based MAME front end? Visit mame.danzbb.com
    1. Re:Did I miss the announcement? by Volante3192 · · Score: 1

      And don't forget the earlier classic about Trojan asteroids around Neptune.

      Think the mods are hoping for some good +5 Funnies today...

  12. Wonderful by nura78 · · Score: 1

    Great. So now it will be easier for the NSA to datamine myspace.

    1. Re:Wonderful by Golias · · Score: 1

      Great. So now it will be easier for the NSA to datamine myspace.

      LOL

      Are terror cells encoding their communications to appear as fangirl shrines to Korean boy bands?

      Actually, now that I see it written out like that... It sounds like a pretty clever idea.

      Good thing they don't read Slashdot.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    2. Re:Wonderful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dear World,

      I just can't take it anymore. The pain, the misery, the anguish. My girlfriend broke up with me. She says I act too much like the backpack nuke that will be arriving today on flight 869 allah akbar...

  13. I can see it now... by SimpleBinary · · Score: 1

    ...Myspace overrun with Dora the Explorer and Sponge Bob...

    --
    ...am I supposed to put something here?
  14. So let me get this straight... by Churla · · Score: 1

    We're building a site based on other people giving us all our content in the form of their :

    a) vying for attention/hookups
    b) vying for attention due to need for depression therapy
    c) People looking to hookup for action (legal or not)

    Then we're going to double dip it up by charging a search engine to be the best place to search for hookups and emo-kids...

    Something about the phrase "coming and going" leaps to mind but I can't put the whole analogy out there that easily. heh

    Will Myspace stock drop the next time Merck develops an Emo proofing anti-depressant for kids?

    --
    I'm a fiscal conservative, it's a pity we don't have a political party anymore
  15. Requirements? by RPD9803 · · Score: 1

    Will it have to be written in coldfusion, then rewritten in .net?

    --
    Culture + Technology
  16. Death to spammers by spaceyhackerlady · · Score: 1, Funny

    I don't care what MySpace get up to. They send me spam. Accordingly, they should rot in hell.

    ...laura

    1. Re:Death to spammers by specific · · Score: 1, Funny

      so.... laura, is it? what's your myspace?



      lol

      --
      If you lend someone $20 and never see that person again, it was probably worth it.
    2. Re:Death to spammers by spaceyhackerlady · · Score: 1

      I don't have a myspace account, nor have I ever had one.

      However, I keep getting all these MySpace News emails. Damned if I know why. The usual opt-out garbage, but since I never opted-in in the first place...

      "Death to Spammers" = flamebait? Has Slashdot gone soft in its old age?

      ...laura

  17. Wrong Sector (Yet) by camcorder · · Score: 1

    ...was generating several million dollars a year in profit before News Corp. bought it. However, it's not nearly enough to move the needle at giant News Corp., where money is measured in billions.

    Web is different. You can't compare its revenue power or ROI with other media types. Currently web has comparatively high ROI and also very high competition. Competition is hard, because it's too hard to bind people to web sites. Web is one step further of the fast consuming in media, after TV (first we had books, then monthly magazines , then daily newspapers, and later hour divided (PT1, PT2..) TV).

    People switch services way too fast in here. Another site is one click away, and with a decent infrastructure as fast as the other.

    That's why google is very keen on producing web based services, like mail, spreadsheet, data storage. Because then, people will have harder times to switch a service, compared to search engine, which is very fragile in that send.

    However if we check myspace's position in that race, it's only binding for teenagers, and teenagers are not good users to be trusted. They go for trends, and it would just take months not years to get lure users to outherspace.com (just a dummy site) from myspace.com.

    Currently earning billions would need years of activity on web, and with hard to beat services. And community site is not one of them.

  18. MySpace Search Page Ranking System by jo42 · · Score: 5, Funny
    This be the MySpace search page ranking system:


    1) Dumb
    2) Dumber
    3) Dumbier
    4) Dumbest
    5) Stupid Beyond Words

    ++troll;

    1. Re:MySpace Search Page Ranking System by ABoerma · · Score: 1

      6) ...
      7) Profit!

    2. Re:MySpace Search Page Ranking System by rainbowfyre · · Score: 1

      This be the MySpace search page ranking system:

      1) Dumb
      2) Dumber
      3) Dumbier
      4) Dumbest
      5) Stupid Beyond Words

      Heh! They should totally use the dumbfind.com search engine, then.
      --
      Vericon is coming!
  19. Another reason to avoid these sites, I guess by martinultima · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I don't know about you, but I think that if they're trying to get major search engines – especially Google – to index MySpace, then that's definitely a good reason to avoid those sites (if you don't already). It's already trivially easy to find all sorts of information on those sites, because so many people just post sensitive personal information without realizing the danger they're putting themselves into; by combining MySpace's information with Google's search technology – or whoever wins – they'd basically be saying "child stalkers of the world, HERE YOU GO!" and handing the bad guys everything they needed on a silver platter. I can only hope that these people get their act together and realize the threats of social networking sites before something bad happens...

    DISCLAIMER: I will admit I personally can't stand MySpace anyway, so there probably is at least some bias here – but either way, those sites definitely aren't doing very much good for society, at least as far as I can tell.

    --
    Creative misinterpretation is your friend.
    1. Re:Another reason to avoid these sites, I guess by kyofunikushimi · · Score: 1

      Google already indexes myspace. And does a pretty good (TOO good) job of it. Search for some miscellaneous band or a quote and you will almost certainly find a few myspace pages listed in the first ten results.

      And given that this is myspace we're talking about, these results are garbage and contain absolutely no pertinent information regarding my search topic... I should start appending "-myspace" to my queries.

      Point is, there really isn't any useful information on myspace. At all. So the extent that google indexes it now should be more than sufficient.

      --
      oo
    2. Re:Another reason to avoid these sites, I guess by MadMoses · · Score: 1

      You can search myspace with google already.

      --

      Do not be alarmed. This is only a test.
    3. Re:Another reason to avoid these sites, I guess by JimBobJoe · · Score: 1

      It's already trivially easy to find all sorts of information on those sites, because so many people just post sensitive personal information without realizing the danger they're putting themselves into

      To be fair, I've not actually heard of an incident of a predator who used information from myspace to stalk someone (which is not to say it hasn't happened, just that it's probably very rare.)

      Internet predators don't work that way. If they were ballsy enough to do so (find info off of myspace, use it to stalk), then they'd be ballsy enough to stalk someone in a mall parking lot, which is a lot faster and more effective.

      It's also worth noting that the vast majority of stalkers are exes--and others already (well) known to the stalkee.

    4. Re:Another reason to avoid these sites, I guess by AnyoneEB · · Score: 1

      Ya know, something just occurred to me after reading your post. The Google "Personalized Search" thing is annoying (it uses my GMail log-in, so it is always enabled for me), but having a personalized blacklist for searches would be nice, so you could have searches default to not searching myspace/LJ/etc. I will feel really stupid if it already does that...

      --
      Centralization breaks the internet.
    5. Re:Another reason to avoid these sites, I guess by martinultima · · Score: 1

      Definitely a valid point, and quite honestly I think that the media is overblowing everything at least a little bit – but either way, I tend to be both (a) extremely paranoid and (b) heavily biased against those sites, so I definitely wouldn't want to have a good search engine on there, and I definitely wouldn't want to have them indexed in the "regular" part of the search engine, either. Hell, I never even visit my friends' MySpace/Xanga/LiveJournal sites – I just can't stand the damn things.

      --
      Creative misinterpretation is your friend.
  20. Just to be sure by Rytis · · Score: 1

    > Structural markup would make it a lot easier to find the relevant info.

    Are we still talking about MySpace?

    1. Re:Just to be sure by illtron · · Score: 1

      Relevant is relative. If you're on MySpace, chances are good that there's something there that you want to find. I should probably make the point that the name search is the one thing on MySpace that does function well. This search engine bidding war isn't so much to serve the users better as it is to make some easy money.

      --
      Slashdot: 24 hours behind every other site or your money back!
  21. mySpace needs oversight by cryfreedomlove · · Score: 2, Funny

    Given that most mySpace users are minors, I'd feel better if a government agency participated in hearings to choose the right search engine for mySpace.

    1. Re:mySpace needs oversight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're owned by Fox. This is the real government right now anyways, so this is not a problem.

    2. Re:mySpace needs oversight by DragonWriter · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah. The Department of Homeland Security should keep all those kids safe.

  22. You nailed it by eightheadsofdoom · · Score: 1

    Advertisers flock to sites like Myspace for the same reason they advertise on MTV.. any income teens have is by nature discretionary and whatever budget deficits they may encounter are quite often picked up by mom and dad.

    Hence why any site on myspace is covered by at least 8 advertisements.

  23. Reaching Out For The Pedophile Eyeballs (Eeew) by RobotRunAmok · · Score: 0, Troll

    Although there are millions of active users on Myspace, most are teenagers with little buying power, that are therefore less likely to click on the adverts that gain the search engines revenue

    Teens, schmeens. Fox is going after the fat-walleted 40ish pedophiles who are using MySpace like it was their own web-based rolodex. I was recently part of a tech-and-law-enforcement seminar, and was blown away by how easy it was to (a) locate your underage victim of choice, and (b) find out exactly where s/he would be when (softball/cheerleading practice at Acme Field, Tues and Thu from 3:30 to 4:45, etc.) If you're a perv, than MySpace is a virtual, virtual smorgasbord.

    Fortunately, from what I have recently learned, the Good Guys are stepping up to the plate and starting to educate kids about exactly how NOT to fill out their online profiles and other narcissistic blog droolings. The aim is to make it tougher to find people.

    Now, Fox is going out of its way to create search mechanisms to counter such obfuscations, presumably. Fascinating.

    Gee, I wonder what Fox Interactive's Sister Company Pundit Bill "Who's Looking Out For Your Kids?" O'Reilly what have to say on this topic...?

    1. Re:Reaching Out For The Pedophile Eyeballs (Eeew) by ArmyOfFun · · Score: 1

      Ha! That'd be hilarious if MySpace ads were all targetted to pedophiles. You'd see ads for trenchcoats, fedoras, used work vans, pre-made "Free Puppies" signs, those tiny web-cams, night vision goggles, rope, duct tape, DVD ads for Happiness and Lolita, etc...

      As Demetri Martin said on the Daily Show (regarding MySpace): On the downside, it's loaded with sexual predators. On the plus side, it's also loaded with sexual prey.

  24. Non-structural markup - it's everybody's fault. by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Just to shed a little light on the awful markup..

    To customize your MySpace profile at all, you need to basically type up a full stylesheet to ovverride the existing one. Not only that, but you have to type it into your "biography" infobox, where it'll load with your normal text and be chomped by the browser. As soon as your browser is done completely spacking out at the multiple nonstandard chunks of info being thrown at it from directions not normally expected, it digests it all into something almost, but not entirely, unlike a webpage.

    Now obviously, the kids on Myspace by and large aren't web designers, and even if they take that HTML 101 class in middle school, they aren't going to be the type to slap together a stylesheet from scratch, much less hack one out to Myspace specs. These are the users more comfortable with something like Geocities or Livejournal use, where you can intuitively point-and-click your way through a few templates and customize them to your heart's content. However, Myspace is pretty much uncostomizable unless you use a stylesheet.

    So, the kids who want to customize but can't stomach the various CSS tutorials long enough to misuse that information for evil, turn to a few services that have come up which generate a myspace stylesheet for you point-and-click style, but also insert ads for themselves into the code, which is usually dodgy code to begin with. And that's alongside Myspace's normal pervasive ads, which are annoying and usually badly scripted.

    Then we get to the music and video gadgets MySpace uses, these bloated chunks of Flash that load more bandwidth-and-resource-sucking garbage, usually immediately on page load. Add to this the Google Video, Youtube, Imageshack, and about 47 billion other third-party content hosts, each with their own scripts, cookies, and bugs to add to the page, and their own bandwidth to suck. And on top of all that, Myspace is constantly pushing the bounds of its own resources, so if your page does manage to load at all, some important bits might not show up.

    And this all doesn't even begin to take into account the natural result of non-web-designers designing webpages with no templates or handholding. The overloads of stupid gifs (and I love my own animated gifs so very very much, but have some limits, people!) horrible auto-loading music and video (I admit to embedding MIDIs into web pages in the early 90s, I'm still paying for that karmically. For example, this morning I woke up with my ears infested with fire ants. Lesson=learned!) and neon-green-text-on-bright-yellow-background-itis.

    So basically, the site is broken by design, broken by its lack of resources, with a broken implementation further broken by its users.

    Other than that, it's sound as a pound.

    1. Re:Non-structural markup - it's everybody's fault. by masklinn · · Score: 1

      To customize your MySpace profile at all, you need to basically type up a full stylesheet to ovverride the existing one.

      That would be easy, however as Mike Davidson discovered and showed us CSS hacking a MySpace page together is much much harder than just overriding the default styles.

      --
      "The way we can tell it's C# instead of Haskell is because it's nine lines instead of two." -- wadler
    2. Re:Non-structural markup - it's everybody's fault. by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 1

      Yes, I should have mentioned that on top of everything else, Myspace has their own mutant spec. Such fun..

    3. Re:Non-structural markup - it's everybody's fault. by Angostura · · Score: 1

      What do you think you're doing writing cogent, informative and amusing explanations of what's going on? Away with you, before you ruin the neighbourhood.

  25. Good luck with that search engine by British · · Score: 1

    Try searching for ONE group that might tickle your fancy. Any term you put in, no matter how obscure, will get you THOUSANDS of hits.

    There is no easy search for "Mazda RX-7". Maybe you're looking for a group specific to Mazda RX-7 owners. You'll get thousands of results regardless. There's also a useless 'region' field in groups that often is filled with bogus or wrong information. Give me quoted(strict) search string availability, please.

    A robust search engine for myspace will be a lot of work. If a college kid can do it, they may have themselves a new job.

  26. Is it really such a big problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a question... I'm new to this, so bear with me, but seriously, I don't see how this is such a big problem for MySpace...

    If google can have huuuuuuuuuuuuuuge databases to contain all the websites (that they've cached), and allow billions of people to search their huuuuuuuuuuuuuge databases, why is MySpace having problems allowing millions of people to search their MUCH much smaller databases?

    Am I just missing something here? How many machines does this really take? Think back 5 years, when Google was a baby... they weren't NEARLY as slow as MySpace, and they had TONS of data.... I would think MySpace has as big of a budget as Google had in their early years.... why is this such a dilema?

    Is my math just way off here? I really don't know what's involved...

  27. Potential Hunting Ground?! by kay41 · · Score: 1
    Some advertisers are reluctant to be associated with the freewheeling site, which has concerned some as a potential hunting ground for sexual predatorsSome advertisers are reluctant to be associated with the freewheeling site, which has concerned some as a potential hunting ground for sexual predators
    Potential hunting ground? It is a hunting ground. This following is my favorite story as of late. A girl cons her parents into thinking she's going to Canada, but instead takes a plane to the Middle East to meet a guy she met on MySpace. Fantastic.
    --
    arl with a k - a blog of mine.
  28. Thanks for the tip by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your friend, Al-Qaeda.

  29. Search MySpace? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Try moving the radio button from "The Web" to "Myspace" and searching for a known username.

    You'll see that the current MySpace search can't even find its own members' pages.

  30. Already done by robogun · · Score: 1

    I thought the NSA had set it up already.

  31. MySpace spam by MarkByers · · Score: 1

    I don't care what MySpace get up to. They send me spam.

    You mean you signed up for their daily newsletter? Try unsubscribing.

    --
    I'll probably be modded down for this...
  32. Myspace is very different from other places ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    MySpace is no different from anywhere else that teens hang out with minimal supervision.

    At the mall you can SEE the person you are speakign with. If some 40 year old tells you he is 18 and understands you , when you are face to face with him a the mall a couple red flags might go up.

    Also the very basic social stigma, in real life, if you approach a 13 year old girl, you will get soem strange looks (trust me, I love skeeball and try to give away my tickets at the arcade, when a 30 year old man walks up to a kid with a fist full of tickets and a smile, people take notice. BTW the smile is from playing skeeball...)

    Basically, what it comes down to is that you are WRONG. Myspace is not like other places teens hang out without supervision. (well unless you mean othe online places teens hang out.

  33. My 2 cents. by Nm645908 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Ok so iam going to be honest here i my self have a myspace and i see no use for this service to search for stuff on the site is worth less there is so much crap filled on the pages even my own page is full of HTML and its a mess. It is purely for money and has no true value maybe if some one would explain it to me more clearly then i might like it more but, from my point of of view as a myspace user it is worthless and purely driven for profit i mean dosent the site allready make enough money. And Also i must add that some of the users posting replies in sound like they them slefes use myspace and it is not full of EMO ness most of you have no idea what that is and most people who say they are emo are not cutters get your facts straight the is alot of sterotyping going on in this thread. Iam just standing up for my generation which is more then likely the worst one in American history but give us a break please we will lead America one day and fight the wars and also control Microsoft one day.

    1. Re:My 2 cents. by AndyboyH · · Score: 1

      Wow, I really hope that was satire.

      If not, you (and possibly your generation) really need to learn spelling and grammar.

      --
      Baka Drew
    2. Re:My 2 cents. by OldeTimeGeek · · Score: 1

      Does anybody know of a good barely-intelligible-to-English dictionary?

    3. Re:My 2 cents. by curecollector · · Score: 1

      it is not full of EMO ness most of you have no idea what that is

      I think most of the "emo" kids don't really know what it's about or where it came from. But whatever. I still think it's silly.

      and most people who say they are emo are not cutters get your facts straight

      You just know that in 6-8 years' time, this is going to be somebody's Sociology Bachelor's dissertation...

    4. Re:My 2 cents. by winomonkey · · Score: 1

      I certainly hope that the definition of "his generation" somehow excludes me. Sadly, I do not think that it does.

      Just for the record, there are those of us in the Generation X / Y / Z (someone tell me which one we are using these days) that are capable of stringing together two or more thoughts into sentences. Shoot, some of the more ambitious of us even try to create coherent paragraphs.

      To preface the following, I will admit that I have a MySpace account. I must say that I agree with some of the poster's comments. I think that the overgeneralization and stereotyping of MySpace users is bordering on ridiculous. We are not all Emo Cutters! Some of us are Shirtless Jocks, too! I luv to roll with my boyz in my ride hit me up peeps. Ur hot!

      Seriously, though, I know of enough parents that have accounts (some as a joke, some as an attempt to be involved with their childrens' lives, and some as a kind of sad and desperate attempt to be a part of a new trend), as well as coworkers, friends from college, and other people from the ranks of Professional America to make MySpace a ubiquitous cultural entity.

      There are enough comments about the lack of proper design (both in the layout of the site, as well as the CSS that gets butchered by users), the horrible advertising, and all of those other oft-lambasted traits of MySpace and its consituents, so I shan't add to them.

    5. Re:My 2 cents. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod parent +1 disturbing.

  34. About Time by MadMoses · · Score: 1

    The current "search function" of myspace is so bad that it is practically unusable.

    You're far better off using google with site:myspace.com in addition to your search parameters.

    --

    Do not be alarmed. This is only a test.
    1. Re:About Time by kchrist · · Score: 1

      Much like Slashdot, then.

    2. Re:About Time by MadMoses · · Score: 1

      Haha.

      --

      Do not be alarmed. This is only a test.
  35. social network vistors don't click on ads by TehBeer · · Score: 1

    http://www.sitespaces.net/index.php?viewpic&picid4 71.jpg

    I run sitespaces.net for my company. We had switched from adbright to google in March. This was a screenshot from a few weeks ago. %0.03 CTR.

    Social networks are super for attracting visitors and bolstering your other services or products. They're not so great for generating actual revenue from advertisments.

    I don't think it's any different with the larger sites. If the big search engines are smart, they will know this.
    At least Yahoo can check the stats on the site before committing. They know for sure if it was profitable or not.
    In reality a big search engine would most likely ask them to pay for results ala alexa.com and google web services rather than pay for the privilage.

    Social networking is full of people who simply ignore adverts completely, more than any other type of website.

    1. Re:social network vistors don't click on ads by TehBeer · · Score: 1
  36. Now I finally understand by Sloppy · · Score: 1

    They want their users to have to use a search engine. So that's why my friends list isn't sorted by name.

    --
    As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    1. Re:Now I finally understand by shodai · · Score: 1

      Imagine every emotard on myspace with several obscure characters before their name trying to be first on the list. I don't think i'd be able to handle it, honestly, and I might have to end some(all) of them.

  37. where do they spend the money though? by abstract1 · · Score: 1

    You are right - without rent and food to pay for many teens today have a completely disposable income. However, many do not have bank accounts or credit cards, thus find it difficult to purchase online without the help of mom and dad. Sure, they may be clicking through the ads, but more times than not they are busy buying the newest clothes from Abercrombie at the local mall. Fact of the matter is if you take all that money that is spent by teens (especially younger teens), most of it is spent in local markets and not through the internet. The 4.8 billion number is definitely substantial, but what is this number in comparison to the total amount spent online by all walks of life?

  38. Facebook by NRISecretAgent · · Score: 1

    Actually most college students these days don't even need MySpace, they just Facebook instead. Much more useful. MySpace is much less college and much more mid-high-no schoolers now. Came back from college just the other day and heard someone talk about their MySpace for the first time in 10 months, was a little strange hehe.

  39. Why? by Sunny7L · · Score: 1

    Why should Google or Yahoo pay to improve their site? They need a search feature regardless. Even with the added radio option to "search the web" how does this benefit already well-known search engines?

    1. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod parent up, this is the the best question of them all. Why the heck should Google, Yahoo, or MSN pay for something MySpace needs desperately -- when MySpace's audience probably won't give anything worthwhile back to the "winner"?

      Immediately popped into mind when I read the summary.

  40. Re:Trolling the myspace sting operations by vertinox · · Score: 1

    If and when some old dude hits on you, arrange a sting operation with local law enforcement.

    I've always wanted to troll those myspace sting operations with sometype of guerilla indie film project. We would find a questionable underage teen. Use our underage troller (a kid under 18... to even make it more funny may even make it a girl too).

    Then the troll kid will pretend to be a 24 year old guy and then hit on the girl and then rush in and then we'd rush in with our camera crew and film the shock on the MSNBC guy and law enforement crew on how they were duped.

    --
    "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
    -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
  41. Moot point by megaditto · · Score: 1
    --
    Obama likes poor people so much, he wants to make more of them.
  42. I can't imagine why the ads couldn't work by Nerdposeur · · Score: 1

    Advertisers love to target their products to people who are interested. MySpace is a business where every customer tells you their demographic data and all the stuff they are interested in. They also use it to share their interests with their friends. What could be more ideal from a business perspective?

    The article says MySpace doesn't make much money. Maybe that's because, despite having so much data, they show HORRIBLY targeted ads. I regularly get ads that offend/disgust/annoy me. Firefox's Adblock seems ineffective for this.

    I'd have more fun using MySpace if their ad targeting was better, and who knows, I might buy something. I hope Google or somebody can get the situation turned around.

    1. Re:I can't imagine why the ads couldn't work by TehBeer · · Score: 1

      Well, that's the startling difference between theory and practice. It's also the reason Newscorp bought intermix/eUniverse with little depth of analysis.

      You can target ads as well as can be as google does. But this audience isn't there because of an interest in X topic. They are there to chat with friends and read bulletins.

      Think of how effective an ad campaign on classmates.com would be?

      People seem to forget that social networking and friend network content isn't wholey journalistic in nature. People are not going there to be entertained in the sense that they may check something out. They log in, they check to see if they have bulletins or mail, then they log out.

      Think about how effective adverts would be in the middle of a telephone conversation you have with a friend on your phone?

      Effective or annoying? I have stats and they say annoying. Scale that and you can come to a conclusion of why larger sites can not monetize.
      The entire value behind social bookmarking and networking is mostly artificial.

      Now move on to robots. There are TONS of social networking robots people can purchase for windows. They are cheap, $29. When you view a social network on alexa, you'll see little unique users and TONS of page views. A lot of these are robots people buy to surf these sites.

      Robots can not buy things and usually do not bother to click on ads. I would venture to say that most of the big social network site's traffic is actually generated from non-humans. People uses these apps to promote whatever they happen to be peddling.

      So there are many troubling factors that make this an unattractive market for any search engine. Google has orkut and affiliates with many sites like sitespaces.net, ect.... They know, they have the stats. They won't make a bad call by spending a fortune on this. Yahoo, and MSN...
      Yahoo knows what the stats are, if they were going to make an official offering. They would have done it by now. Myspace has been using their search for years now.

      MSN. They are the most superficial and glam driven. Their windows tech is behind the error proned servers. They're ex-Exec is now the cheif security officer of the company. This whole "Bid for search" is a farce. It will be MSN, and they will PAY NOTHING, except for a token gesture to make it look like this publicity stunt had value.

    2. Re:I can't imagine why the ads couldn't work by Nerdposeur · · Score: 1

      Well, dang.

      I know that this story is out of the spotlight now, but I just want to say that I would mod your comment informative. :)

  43. Re:Trolling the myspace sting operations by megaditto · · Score: 1

    you left out ... and get busted for obstruction of justice part.

    Seriously, leave the police alone; those sting operations are doing one job: clearing the dangerous scumbags off the Web and street. The reason those operations are important is that they target perdators actively seeking out children and not some closeted freaks, so if it's not an undercover officer that the perv hits on, it will be your sons or daughters!

    --
    Obama likes poor people so much, he wants to make more of them.
  44. Profit! by szembek · · Score: 1

    Step 1: Use a third party search engine for your website Step 2: ???? Step 3: Profit!!!

    --
    nothing
    1. Re:Profit! by szembek · · Score: 1

      Doh, forgot break tags.... shoulda previewed. :(

      --
      nothing
  45. Re:Revenue Battle:Content Provider vs Search Engin by larry+bagina · · Score: 1

    I've been wondering why Slashdot doesn't have a deal with google (or yahoo, like sourceforge did). Native searching is almost useless, and searching via google is a blunt tool. The google web appliance would be an improvement.

    --
    Do you even lift?

    These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

  46. Re:Trolling the myspace sting operations by vertinox · · Score: 1

    Seriously, leave the police alone; those sting operations are doing one job: clearing the dangerous scumbags off the Web and street.

    Are you so sure? Police have been known to abuse their power from time to time and take down innocent people.

    Not that all police are bad (I've known quite a few good cops in my time... well to be fair i've known a few good ol' boy cops... and i've known one bad cop), but something tells me we'd be better off solving murders and violent crimes rather than setting up people with theoretical crimes.

    Most of these people have not actually committed a crime that has hurt anyone but only have shown that they are willing to do so. Perhaps the person is goaded into these actions by the stingers and that what irks me...

    Of course then again... Plenty of teens egg others on... But that is other people's problem. I'm more concerned about not living in a state where police make people into criminals rather than go after the ones that are murdering and stealing.

    --
    "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
    -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
  47. They do? by PCM2 · · Score: 1

    I admit (ahem) that I have a MySpace page. I signed up for it with a unique e-mail address "myspace@blahblah." It forwards to a regular address. I get a lot of spam at the regular address but none, zip, zero going to the MySpace address. It may be that you're getting spam *because of* MySpace, but that might be due to something you're doing wrong. MySpace itself, though? I don't see the evidence.

    --
    Breakfast served all day!
    1. Re:They do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes they do.

      Of course YOU can't notice because you _have_ a Myspace account, so when they send you email its not spam, and you can probably unsubscribe by logging into your myspace account.

      They have been sending email to people who don't have a myspace account and have no way to 'opt-out'. They've been listed in spamcop several times recently.

    2. Re:They do? by Donniedarkness · · Score: 1
      Odd... the only time I've ever gotten mail from myspace is when it's something like "X invites you to create a myspace", where X is a real-life friend of mine that clicked some "invite your friends" button. Nothing wrong with that...

      But I have 4 email addresses, 3 of which I use pretty often... hell, I even sign up for things on one of them... and I've never gotten spam from myspace, and never until today have I heard of it happening to anyone.

      --
      Earn a % of cash back from Newegg, Tiger Direct, Walmart.com, and more: http://www.mrrebates.com?refid=458505
    3. Re:They do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And if you get an invite from a stanger to join a myspace group, and you have no way to opt-out of these invites without joining myspace what is that?

      www.spamhaus.org/SBL/sbl.lasso?query= SBL42674

      Maybe I haven't been sent any and you haven't been sent any but that does not mean it isn't happening. I run a mailserver and people have been getting these. Last bunch was about 4 days ago.

  48. Bah by EvilMrSatan · · Score: 1

    Myspace's servers are soo horrible. This new search engine thing might work if they could get their server problems fixed. Sometimes it takes 10 minutes to login.

  49. Myspace is owned by Rupert Murdoch by blair1q · · Score: 1

    That guy, Tom, who still pretends to run the place? He's the new Aunt Jemima or Betty Crocker or Ronald Reagan: a cartoon, owned by a corporate entity to make you feel like you're dealing with something homey.

    All bullshit.

    Your Myspace page is now the property (read the TOS) of one of the kings of the Republican conspiracy.

  50. Re:Trolling the myspace sting operations by megaditto · · Score: 1

    vertinox: clearly, I my comment covered only the sting operations only; I by no means advocate giving the police a carte blanche.

    But also, understand that there is a difference between pervs that have images in browser cache and pervs that are actively soliciting what they believe to be children.

    --
    Obama likes poor people so much, he wants to make more of them.
  51. More than just the markup is broken by Mr2001 · · Score: 1

    MySpace suffers from some horrible design decisions at many levels.

    For example, to post a comment, read a friend's private blog, change your options, etc., you need to be signed in. When you're signed out, clicking a link that leads to one of these pages will take you to a login form instead. But after you log in, you're redirected back to your homepage, not to the restricted page you were originally trying to load! Every other site seems to get this right, but MySpace drops the ball.

    And thanks to the multiple clicks it takes to get *anywhere* on that site, you're better off hitting back, back, reload to get to the page you wanted, rather than trying to navigate there from your homepage.

    --
    Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.