Slashdot Mirror


China Getting 'Serious' About Spam?

Ritz_Just_Ritz writes "Apparently, the Chinese MII (Ministry of Information) is going to crack down on Spam from within China. This will include training for 1000 mail administrators and recruitment of 20,000 'anti-spam volunteers.'"

157 comments

  1. Wow, short aricle for sure by fullphaser · · Score: 4, Informative

    no need to click the link kids that it pretty much. anyway thank god... now about korea?

    --
    Did someone say cake?
    1. Re:Wow, short aricle for sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Short article...perfect for my attention span... What were we talking about? Oh yeah, donuts. Mmmmmm, doooonuuuts.

    2. Re:Wow, short aricle for sure by iezhy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      An insider at ISC said MII has set up a hotline at 01-12321 for spam-related tip-offs and is preparing to send out one million anti-spam notices.

      fighting spam with spam? :)

    3. Re:Wow, short aricle for sure by Nadsat · · Score: 4, Funny

      Where's the rest of the article? It's so short. I feel like someone censored all the content....

    4. Re:Wow, short aricle for sure by RealGrouchy · · Score: 0
      no need to click the link kids that it pretty much. anyway thank god... now about korea?


      They *were* planning on attacking spammers with a nuclear missile, but *somebody* got into a bit of a tizzie about it.

      - RG>
      --
      Hey pal, this isn't a pleasantforest, so don't waste my time with pleasantries!
    5. Re:Wow, short aricle for sure by RedToad · · Score: 1

      China has a loose handle on external spammers, both Russian and American as seen in this link

      Noted ROKSO spammers like Leo Kuvayev (BadCow) and Christopher Brown / Swank's IP addresses are listed. But there has been little action on China's part to shut out the foreign spamming hordes that besmirch their country's reputation as a haven for the more techno-savvy Russians and Americans who have been raping their unprotected infrastructure with immunity to date.

    6. Re:Wow, short aricle for sure by tinkertim · · Score: 1

      There's some ROKSO spammers for which spamhaus can't produce one e-mail, or evidence that these people done anything but deliberately become a pain in the ass for Spamhaus.

      Bill Stanley is an example. Not coining him a saint, but Spamhaus has been known to be a bit mafia like in the past. They turn a pretty decent profit.

      Looks like romania is about to run out of rackspace in a hurry if they actually (really) do crack down on it.

  2. Great! by drinkypoo · · Score: 0

    Maybe when they figure it out and get the problem nailed down over there, we can hire them for their expertise to solve the problem here in the USA :P

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    1. Re:Great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      There is no big secret here. In line with your typical Chinese legal remedy, first time spammers will be impaled through the back with a bayonette, and shot through the heart at point blank range. Second time offenders are actually rather rare in China.

    2. Re:Great! by shawb · · Score: 1

      Actually, second time offenders are not as rare as you'd think.

      Ever hear the phrase zombie host?

      --
      I'll never make that mistake again, reading the experts' opinions. - Feynman
  3. Translation of the Article by eldavojohn · · Score: 3, Insightful
    I see this article was still in Chinese when I read it. Allow me to translate it into English:
    Ministry of Information Industry (MII), Internet Society of China (ISC) and China Communications Standards Association (CCSA) launched a national anti-spam campaign on June 21, reports Nanfang Daily.
    Translation: "The MII decided it was time to start a campaign that looks like it will help the people. The ISC & CCSA were informed of this decision."
    An insider at ISC said MII has set up a hotline at 01-12321 for spam-related tip-offs and is preparing to send out one million anti-spam notices.
    Translation: "The MII instructed the Nanfang Daily to print this. Like every other government controlled media outlet, the Nanfang Daily immediately complied. The MII has constructed methods for witch hunts and omitted the precise definition of 'spam' or what the criteria consists of. There are roughly one million people the MII doesn't really care for and they will receive notices informing them that they had better go underground or face prosecution without a trial."
    The report said that professional training will be offered for 1,000 email administrators and that 20,000 anti-spam volunteers will be recruited.
    Translation: "One thousand citizens will be trained to point the finger at anyone the government doesn't like using an ISP. This will prevent anyone from speculating that it is just one person or the government doing this. It will also aid in making this look like a benefit for the people. A lucky 20,000 other individuals will learn to play ball for the government and this will go on their permanent records--which might lead to good fortune."

    I'm going to take a stab in the dark and wager that SPAM simply means "e-mailing the way the government doesn't want you to" in Chinese. Whether that be based on the content or motive of your e-mails. The government seems to be implementing laws that have no clear definition in order to devise a method by which they can jail/fine/deter anyone they want. And it will most likely be met with synchronous thundering applause of one billion people clapping robotically togethor.

    Americans lose their freedoms in the name of fighting terrorism. Now the Chinese will lose their freedoms in the name of fighting SPAM. *sigh* Canada keeps looking warmer and warmer.
    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:Translation of the Article by pete6677 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Even if this is true, Chinese people have more freedom now than they did 20 years ago, and things will continue to progress in this direction. Government crackdows are getting harder to pull off, there is a lot of unpublished internal dissent, and the government is begging for a revolution if their response is to just crack down harder. Piss off 1 billion people alltogether, and its pretty hard to keep them contained.

    2. Re:Translation of the Article by iminplaya · · Score: 5, Funny

      Canada keeps looking warmer and warmer.

      Yeah, well, wait till November rolls around. Then you'll be saying, "Screw this freedom crap. I'm goin' to Mexico."

      --
      What?
    3. Re:Translation of the Article by aml666 · · Score: 1

      I need to start posting Anti-American and Anti-Microsoft rants. My CARMA would go through the roof!

      --
      www.thejulingtoncreekplantaion.com
    4. Re:Translation of the Article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Canada you get put in jail using the "Security Certificate". The charges against you are secret and you stay in jail indefinately.

      How? Well, the charges are backed by foreign intelligence agencies, like China or Egypt. They share this info with Canada. Canada thinks it is 100% true and stuffs you in jail. True, this is only against non-Canadian citizens, but still. If you have problems with someone, follow them. Tap their phone. Put spy software on their computer. Do everything with courts warrant behind it to get real evidence. But DO NOT use secret evidence to put people in jail or to curtain their freedom!!! That's freaking crazzy!

    5. Re:Translation of the Article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Piss off 1 billion people alltogether, and its pretty hard to keep them contained.

      Just port over the American "TV, beer, and Cheetos" method. After some cultural modifications, I'm pretty sure it will scale.

    6. Re:Translation of the Article by TheDreadSlashdotterD · · Score: 1

      Aw! How cute! An idealist!

      --
      I have nothing to say.
    7. Re:Translation of the Article by mrbongo · · Score: 1

      Canada keeps looking warmer and warmer. It must be all the strip mining of teh coal sands. That will keep us all nice and toasty.

    8. Re:Translation of the Article by Cedric+Tsui · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I agree with you.
      eldavojohn, I think you're pushing things a bit far. Everyone agrees that the chinese government is opressive. But this is not Orwell's 1984. The government provides stability, which was rarely present in chinese history. There is no mass shuffling of money from the poor to the rich, although there is increasing disparity these days as industrilization makes it harder to make a living in rural communities. The government really does put the well being of its people first. Ahead of their foreign reputation, which is why we all see them as the bad guys.

      I believe China will evolve into a democracy in its own time.

    9. Re:Translation of the Article by B1ackDragon · · Score: 1

      Given the vast resources available to those in power (information control and management as well as the very huge advances in lethal and non-lethal weapons technology (read: crowd control)) it's much easier these days for small numbers of people to control ever larger numbers of others than it was in the past.

      I guess the main weapon left to the masses is that of information dissemination, and the main limitation for advanced oppressive governments is limited prison space.

      Just my measly two cents.

      --
      The snow doesn't give a soft white damn whom it touches. -- ee cummings
    10. Re:Translation of the Article by wmol · · Score: 0

      I opened a fortune cookie after my lunch today, but all it said was "That wasn't chicken."

    11. Re:Translation of the Article by Joebert · · Score: 1

      So much for sending them on a wild goose chase.

      --
      Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
    12. Re:Translation of the Article by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      I don't think it's idealistic, if the populace of a country is pissed off enough they'll just wipe the govt out. Propaganda and indoctrination are effective means to prevent people from ever getting pissed off enough. Offering distractions works well, too. More people care about the next round of Big Brother than the USAPATRIOT Act.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    13. Re:Translation of the Article by Buran · · Score: 1

      Until it runs over your neighbor's DOGMA, and you get sued for all you're worth.

    14. Re:Translation of the Article by Watson+Ladd · · Score: 1

      But the goverment has become better at cracking down down early. If one guy opens mouth and instantly gets shot, you can bet that no one around him is going to be very enthusiastic about a revolution.

      --
      Inventions have long since reached their limit, and I see no hope for further development.-- Frontinus, 1st cent. AD
    15. Re:Translation of the Article by russ1337 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I love it!!!

      "The government really does put the well being of its people first. Ahead of their foreign reputation, which is why we all see them as the bad guys

      So that is why America hates China! They look after their people!

      This statement also holds true:
      "Everyone agrees that the AMERICAN government is opressive. But this is not Orwell's 1984. The government provides stability, which was rarely present in AMERICAN history. There is no mass shuffling of money from the poor to the rich, although there is increasing disparity these days as industrilization makes it harder to make a living in rural communities."

    16. Re:Translation of the Article by Tesen · · Score: 1

      I guess the main weapon left to the masses is that of information dissemination, and the main limitation for advanced oppressive governments is limited prison space.

      Prison space? Uhhh Bodies rott pretty quick...

      Tes

    17. Re:Translation of the Article by Y.T.G. · · Score: 1

      Americans lose their freedoms in the name of fighting terrorism. Now the Chinese will lose their freedoms in the name of fighting SPAM. *sigh* Canada keeps looking warmer and warmer. Where you have no freedoms and government censors everything, but you just don't care ...

    18. Re:Translation of the Article by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      I believe China will evolve into a democracy in its own time.

      I hope they evolve into something better. Majority rule is way overrated. It could easily degenerate into civil war as big as that country is.

      --
      What?
    19. Re:Translation of the Article by emjoi_gently · · Score: 1

      "There is no mass shuffling of money from the poor to the rich"

      Unless they are in a factory making iPod Shuffles, of course.

    20. Re:Translation of the Article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did the global warming joke go over your head?

    21. Re:Translation of the Article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pwahahaaha. Democracies do *not* scale well, as evidenced by the US and other large "democratic" states such as interbellic Germany. Also, stability (in the sense of a centralized government and rigid social structure) was present in China for periods which can only be classified as "geologic time", the odd case of mass dinastic surgery notwithstanding. Conditions are hard in China's villages simply *because* industrialisation cannot proceed if cheap labor (in the form of peasants fleeing horrific, carefully engineered shortage conditions in the countryside) is not available in the cities. You may be able to fool uneducated US-ians, and no doubt you feel proud of that, but you are a liar, sir. I can only hope whoever modded you "interesting" did so in view of how odd it is that you dare lie so unashamedly.

    22. Re:Translation of the Article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      bring back romance of the three kingdoms!!!

  4. Site already Slow.. Heres the article by u16084 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Ministry of Information Industry (MII), Internet Society of China (ISC) and China Communications Standards Association (CCSA) launched a national anti-spam campaign on June 21, reports Nanfang Daily. An insider at ISC said MII has set up a hotline at 01-12321 for spam-related tip-offs and is preparing to send out one million anti-spam notices. The report said that professional training will be offered for 1,000 email administrators and that 20,000 anti-spam volunteers will be recruited. "is preparing to send out one million anti-spam notices" - Oh the irony.

    --
    -- I Dont Deserve A Sig I Have Bad Karma
  5. I wanna volunteer by 77Punker · · Score: 4, Funny

    Where can I sign up? I wanna read people's mail!

    1. Re:I wanna volunteer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      www.nsa.gov/jobs

    2. Re:I wanna volunteer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      www.nsa.gov/jobs

      The correct URL is

      http://www.nsa.gov/careers/index.cfm

    3. Re:I wanna volunteer by Obi-w00t · · Score: 2, Funny

      www.nsa.gov/careers actually.
      You see its not just a job...it's a career!

    4. Re:I wanna volunteer by TheBogie · · Score: 2, Funny

      I wonder if they will let the volunteers attach the car batteries to the spammer's nuts. The "diehard" treatment seems to be a common "reprogramming" technique used by china. I'm pretty sure it will work on spammers as well as it does on the other chinese "troublemakers".

    5. Re:I wanna volunteer by Sinbios · · Score: 1

      If you're not just making stuff up out of ignorance and actually heard that "troublemakers" are being tortured by having car batteries connected to their genitals, then it's obviously FUD. Human skin resistance is around 20KOhms. Car batteries are 12V. I=V/R. 12V/20000Ohms=0.0006A. Guess how much that hurts. Hell, given my choice of torture methods I'd gladly endure this one. Makes me wonder how much Chinese government horror stories is just propaganda.

      --
      Anyone can "stand up for what they believe", but it takes a very brave individual to change what they believe. - Loundry
    6. Re:I wanna volunteer by TheBogie · · Score: 1
      Are you so confident of your math that you would try a live experiment? I know 1+1=2, but I'm not about to bet my sack on it!

      Also, I think attaching the jumper cables is a bit painful too. Besides, who are we to argue with chinese government officials. I am sure they are more versed in the latest methods of torture than we are.

    7. Re:I wanna volunteer by elrous0 · · Score: 1
      It's one of the few jobs where there is only one interview question:

      "Have you ever found yourself wanting to be the bad guy in a Alan Pakula film?"

      -Eric

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    8. Re:I wanna volunteer by GrumpySimon · · Score: 1

      Why not help out Spam Or Ham - a project to help enhance Bayesian spam filters. It contains a lot of personal emails...

  6. I bet their system will be better! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    1. Re:I bet their system will be better! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The body of your argument does indeed raise a strong point. This requires a fertile call to action. Each and every Slashdotter must now take matters into their own hands!

  7. Volunteers by JesseL · · Score: 5, Funny

    Are these 'anti-spam volunteers' real volunteers, or are they volunteering-to-get-out-of-bayonette-testing volunteers?
    Just curious.

    --
    "Prefiero morir de pie que vivir siempre arrodillado!"
    1. Re:Volunteers by dubmun · · Score: 1

      More likely they are just volunteering to avoid being charged with "Crimes Against China" for NOT volunteering.

      You've got to love the communist system of involuntary volunteering.

      --
      (end of post)
    2. Re:Volunteers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bayonete testing its a great job if love Fight Club trust me.

    3. Re:Volunteers by Mikkeles · · Score: 1
      'You've got to love the communist system of involuntary volunteering.'

      Yeah, it's so much more involuntary than conscription.

      --
      Great minds think alike; fools seldom differ.
    4. Re:Volunteers by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Yes, every single party memeber (everyone in china) "volenteered" to join the party.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    5. Re:Volunteers by JesseL · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's so much more involuntary than conscription.

      Or involuntary taxation.

      --
      "Prefiero morir de pie que vivir siempre arrodillado!"
  8. Wake me up by hackstraw · · Score: 3, Insightful


    when the get 'serious' about spam coming _outside_ of China!

    About 50% of my spam has url's resolving back to China or Korea.

    1. Re:Wake me up by planckscale · · Score: 1
      And over 90% of my port scans and attempted ssh login scripts come from a script kiddie in China. Does sending an email to the domain authority ever actually do anything?

      --
      Namaste
    2. Re:Wake me up by Intron · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yes, but it has to be properly worded. It should say:

      "Thank you for your interest in Falun Gong. Information
      is being mailed to you."

      --
      Intron: the portion of DNA which expresses nothing useful.
    3. Re:Wake me up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mine used to until I blocked China/Korea at the iptables level. Now 95% of my spam comes from USA.

  9. "Spam" by buxrule · · Score: 5, Insightful

    With all the censoring China does, it sounds to me like it's just an excuse to hire 20000 people to read through everyone's email and make sure they're not discussing something they "shouldn't" be talking about.

    1. Re:"Spam" by mooingyak · · Score: 1

      With all the censoring China does, it sounds to me like it's just an excuse to hire 20000 people to read through everyone's email and make sure they're not discussing something they "shouldn't" be talking about.

      They need an excuse?

      --
      William of Ockham had no beard. The most likely explanation is that it was chewed off by squirrels every morning.
    2. Re:"Spam" by dubl-u · · Score: 1

      With all the censoring China does, it sounds to me like it's just an excuse to hire 20000 people to read through everyone's email and make sure they're not discussing something they "shouldn't" be talking about.

      You've got it the wrong way round. They're having trouble reading everybody's mail right now because of all the spam. They want to get rid of the spam so that their spies and censors stop trying to sneak penis enlargement devices onto their expense reports.

    3. Re:"Spam" by Dumbush · · Score: 1

      That's just stupid don't you think? Should have just make a big machine to handle that automatically

  10. Defeat Spam with Spam by neonprimetime · · Score: 2, Funny

    is preparing to send out one million anti-spam notices

  11. Ok, but... by tpjunkie · · Score: 1

    when are we going to get Nigeria to crack down on those "wonderful opportunitys[sic]" involving "23 millions[sic] dollars"?

    The vast majority of my spam comes from US, or at least english speaking countries. When can we make some serious headway on fighting that?

    1. Re:Ok, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The vast majority of my spam comes from US,

      Very little of the spam I get comes from the US. A while back a traced some of my spam messages (about 200 ish) and the majority came from machines in China or India. They may not have been generated in thoose countries (SORBS was reporting many of them as open proxies), but thoose where the ones passing spam onto my email providers machines.

      Why don't ALL goverments offer to train email admins? Email based crime is apallingly high, we need to tell people how to avoid allowing spamers to use their system, then they have no excuse if spam orriginates from there systems and can then be prosecuted.

      Hmm, a China story and the captcha word is: comply
      Yay /.

    2. Re:Ok, but... by 6ULDV8 · · Score: 1

      The Nigerian Government has apparently already cracked down on the "wonderful opportunitys involving 23 millions". As a direct result, that balance has apparently grown to over "40 millions". Being a slacker, I dropped the ball and failed to collect. Maybe you can hold out for more.

      As for US sources... I guess existing law isn't enough because rather than criminal penalties, they are merely ignored or fined and sent on their way as their sponsors move to the next huckster.

      We know who most of these people are. We've known for years.

      --
      Pull my finger for my public key.
    3. Re:Ok, but... by oliderid · · Score: 1

      Most spams I received are aimed at US citizens. I live in Europe.

      Spammers are difficult to catch...Ok but you can catch their so called "sponsors" and break the business model.

      For example Mortgage...Sooner or later a real "brick & mortar" company has to appear. Money has to be borrowed from a registered company.

      A lot of SPAMs contain a US toll-free phone number. Why is it so difficult to find the owner/user?

      Cialis (unless they are fake)...I guess you can easily track their origin from the factory to the company responsible for the shipment.

      Things like Porn and illegal softwares are impossible to track. I agree but those proposing "real products" can be tracked.

      Why can't US administrations do that? This is a honest question, i really can't understand their lack of reaction.

    4. Re:Ok, but... by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      Spammers are difficult to catch...Ok but you can catch their so called "sponsors" and break the business model.
      in principle yes, in practice there are a few complicating factors that mean this doesn't tend to happen.

      1: afaict the sponsors tend to by fly by night firms anyway and the spammers really don't care what happens to the clients once they have been paid.
      2: afaict spamming is in itself not illegal in the USA or most of the world, many methods spammers use are illegal (using hacked machines, forging sources etc) but the client can easilly claim no knowlage of those. Also companies can claim that they were told the mailer used verified opt-in (the spammer may indeed have told them this and even if not it would be damn near impossible to prove he hadn't).

      For example Mortgage...Sooner or later a real "brick & mortar" company has to appear. Money has to be borrowed from a registered company.
      alternatively it may just be a way to get bank details.............

      A lot of SPAMs contain a US toll-free phone number. Why is it so difficult to find the owner/user?
      if they are smart the number will trace to a company that just buys toll free service and routes it out of the USA or onto a VOIP network (its not illegal to do that is it?)

      Things like Porn and illegal softwares are impossible to track. I agree but those proposing "real products" can be tracked.
      thats assuming they actually ship anything and don't just take the money and run.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  12. US priorities by electrosoccertux · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I find it informing that our politicians are willing to sanction trade with Sweden because *our* (i.e. Not Their) laws say they are infringing on our IP. But we haven't heard anything of the sort in relation to China and Nigeria over spam (a much bigger problem).

    Regardless of whether or not we have a copy of a blank check signed by the RIAA to [insert politician here], this passive aggression our leaders are so fond of is very telling.

    1. Re:US priorities by wayne · · Score: 1

      I find it informing that our politicians are willing to sanction trade with Sweden because *our* (i.e. Not Their) laws say they are infringing on our IP. But we haven't heard anything of the sort in relation to China and Nigeria over spam (a much bigger problem).

      Uh, duh. China has a huge market for US businesses and nukes. Nigeria has oil. What assests does Sweden have? (Besides ones that would make neo cons uncomfortable.)

      --
      SPF support for most open source mail servers can be found at libspf2.
  13. Let's put the "volunteers" to good use. by Tackhead · · Score: 1
    > This will include training for 1000 mail administrators and recruitment of 20,000 'anti-spam volunteers.

    A little random number generation on the back end, and we're all good.

    550 - Stegospam hash recognized in message body. Thank you for your support of Falun Dafa. Use key responding with #48187 to access payment - U8FDO 4J7D3 5FLI0 0S5DX RTND6

    Let's put those 'volunteers' to good work.

  14. Well, they had better get cracking by winkydink · · Score: 4, Informative

    Current estimates by Trend Micro show China responsible for over 14 billion spams per day.

    --

    "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    1. Re:Well, they had better get cracking by KingPrad · · Score: 3, Funny

      Well that explains my inbox. But how many do they send to everyone else?

      --
      Stop the Slashdot Effect! Don't read the articles!
    2. Re:Well, they had better get cracking by malv · · Score: 1
    3. Re:Well, they had better get cracking by winkydink · · Score: 1

      Not any more. China has recently overtaken.

      --

      "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    4. Re:Well, they had better get cracking by 911review · · Score: 1

      I think 1/2 of those are in my inbox :) The biggest problem is sendinig it in to a 'responsible' preson. either ISP, or upstream i recently wrote to cnc-noc.net about a particular problem i was having. i was getting TONS ofd spam from china, all having cnc-noc.netn in common. there was never an abuse email on the pagew when looking up the responsible IP, or upstream provider. now there is, they finally added this email addy to the whois records... abuse@cnc-noc.net but guess what, it still does no good. you can email the hell out of em, they wont respond. i think they created that addres to make me shut up. many other china ISP's and carriers are the same. Brad http://911review.org/

  15. Will they treat spammers like Falun Gong members? by Nova+Express · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I'll beleive Communist China is serious about stopping spammers when they start treating them like Falun Gong members. You know, like imprisoning them in forced labor camps and working them to death. Or maybe torturing them. But until they're willing to treat spammers with the same harsh methods the Communist Party reserves for those trying to exercise freedom of religion, I doubt I'll see any reduction of spam in my mailbox.

    --
    Lawrence Person (lawrencepersonh@gmailh.com (remove all "h"s to mail)

    http://www.lawrenceperson.com/

  16. Those mail admins will be one in a million by BlackCobra43 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Not in skill or particularity..just one in a million.

    --
    I never spellcheck and I freely admit it. Save your karma for more worthwhile "lol erorrs" replies
  17. Or are they? by Odin_Tiger · · Score: 0

    Crackdown on spam, or just a convenient way to employ 20k citizens while getting good international PR in one fell swoop?

    --
    Unpleasantries.
  18. To tackle "Tiananmen" and "Democracy" spam first by elrous0 · · Score: 1
    The Chinese government will eradicate these notorious spammers if they have to kick down every non-party-member door in Bejing!

    -Eric

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  19. This is good news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It would be great if they would be able to block the US-spam on it's way to Europe somehow...

    I'll check digg to verify if this is really news.

  20. One question by gentimjs · · Score: 0

    Do I need to be Chinese to volunteer? I'd gladly give some time to shut down spammers, regardless of national residence...

  21. Can't solve all your problems that way by BriamKG · · Score: 4, Interesting

    You can't solve all your problems with a great wall. Spam has been a problem for a long time, and it's one of those easily overcompensating balancing acts. Some services are overfiltering, and it's no surprise. There are all sorts of clever ways to try and sort things out, trying to recognize certain words or phrases or check to see if you know certain people, but in the end, there are always exceptions. What about that girl you met last night that really does work for the Mega Ab Destroyer 8000 Co? When it comes down to it, a fairly light filter that you check yourself, complemented with a whole lot of your own personal judgement tends to work. People need information about spamming techniques and what to watch out for, not just hard filtering.

    1. Re:Can't solve all your problems that way by ABoerma · · Score: 1

      "You can't solve all your problems with a great wall."

      Unless it's a firewall. =P

  22. Fighting spam or...speech? by posterlogo · · Score: 1
    FTA: ...hotline at 01-12321 for spam-related tip-offs and is preparing to send out one million anti-spam notices. The report said that professional training will be offered for 1,000 email administrators and that 20,000 anti-spam volunteers will be recruited

    This sounds a lot like their all-volunteer internet morality police at their universities and internet cafes. Self-proclaimed enforcers will tip off the authorities to something they don't like, maybe spam, maybe just free speech. The article doesn't offer much detail, but this program is run by the ministry of information, ironically the ministry in charge of suppressing information.

  23. In soviet China... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Spam crack down on MII !

  24. contacts in china by inet50 · · Score: 1

    contacting chinese isp's and hosting companies to tell them that they're sending out spam, hosting malware, or other *bad stuff* is usually a waste of time... this effort could at very least provide anti-s people in the US and Europe with good contacts in china.

    1. Re:contacts in china by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 1

      Some measures:

      * Forbid the use of users' own machines to send spam (aka blocking port 25).
      * Block open proxies
      * Forbid anonymity in name registries.
      * Clean infected computers regularly

      I'm sure it would be easy for the Chinese govt to implement these measures. I'm also sure that most of the SPAM sent through China is done via open proxies and botnets - not by the users themselves.

  25. Getting Serious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    .. ..
    Come around eleven, and it's time to get home
    I'm going her way, but I can't leave her alone
    But she's looking at me, as if I'm something she owns
    Oh, Hu's getting serious (Hu)
    Hu's getting serious, I've got to do something 'cause
    Hu's getting serious (Hu)
    and I could get serious too .. ..

  26. China has a long way to go by MikeRT · · Score: 2, Informative

    Say what you will about the United States, but at least you can't say that we spend extreme percentages on our military while we have major internal problems. China wouldn't have anywhere near the problems it does today with crime and pollution if it didn't devote so many resources to its military. I get tired of the excuses for their priorities "oh they're afraid of the United States!" Bullshit. We can't even get riled up over Afghanistan, a country that aided and abetted the 9-11 terrorists and protected their ring leader. China would have to do something monstrous like conquer one of the "asian tigers" or Japan to get enough passion to actually fight them. You know what this just proves once again? Big government doesn't give a fuck about the common person unless they're revolting or about to. China's spam problems are only the tip of the iceberg. How about stopping all of those hack attacks against government and industry first? Priorities, priorities.

    1. Re:China has a long way to go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would be better if they just disconnect whole asia from the internet lol.

    2. Re:China has a long way to go by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Say what you will about the United States, but at least you can't say that we spend extreme percentages on our military while we have major internal problems.

      Yes I can. And I do. Fuck, we spend more on prisoners than we do on students, let alone military. And guess what? The military gets more money than the correctional system, which also gets a super shitload of cash.

      You don't know what the fuck you're talking about, especially in the last, oh, term and a half. From surplus to record deficit in six years - specifically due to military spending.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:China has a long way to go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Say what you will about the United States, but at least you can't say that we spend extreme percentages on our military while we have major internal problems. I hope this was intended as irony. See also - http://www.truemajority.org/oreos/

    4. Re:China has a long way to go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I won't argue that the US government doesn't spend too much on the military, but what else would it spend money on? People think that education and healthcare is where all the US gov't should be spending all of its money, but look at the Constitution. The Constitution lists specific things that the federal gov't is supposed to spend money on (like defense, the Patent Office, law enforcement, and roads), but education and healthcare are nowhere to be found.

      The problem is that for some things, throwing money at the problem will solve it (more money buys you more bullets, so you can kill more bad guys), while throwing more money at other things doesn't help.

      For example, look at heatlhcare. There's no limit to how much you can spend to keep people alive, but it's just not feasible. New procedures and medicines will always be invented, which will only add to the burden. Making it free for the users means the providers can charge whatever they want, which causes inflation. Restricting prices to avoid inflation means perfectly good doctors may do other things to make money instead. This is something the market has to take care of in order to keep things reasonable.

      What about education? Again, making it free for the users just causes inflation. The more scholarships the government gives away, the more schools will charge. And what else would they spend the money on? Schools? I don't think there's a shortage of actual schools. Books? I don't think there's a shortage of books either. The problem with education is a cultural one. Inner-city schools are so bad because the parents don't care about their children's education, so the children don't care about it. You can't force children to learn if they don't want to, yet that's what people want. I'm not suggesting that there shouldn't be more state universities or community colleges, but that's not a federal issue.

      Why don't we feed the children starving all over the world, then? Well the important question is why are they starving in the first place. Odds are the kids are starving becaues their government doesn't care about them. Sending aid to their government only enriches the government, not the starving children. The corrupt government then has to repress the people to keep aid coming. The more money you send them, the more dependent they become.

      Surely we can house all of the homeless, right? For one thing, not every homeless person wants to have a stable residence, and some are incapable of maintaining one (like schizophrenics who choose not to be institutionalized). Others will trade anything you give them for drugs, so it's pointless to give them anything. Some people in places like Seattle or San Francisco might be working 2 jobs, but still can't afford a place to live, yet they don't move to someplace cheaper. The more money you give away to homeless people, the more homeless people you will create so they can get a piece of that money.

      Hell, look at Windows Vista. Is it late because Microsoft just doesn't have the money it takes to bring it out on time? Of course not! It's late because of poor management decisions. Or just because it takes that long to make that type of software, kind of like how you can't make a baby in less than 9 months no matter how many mothers you have.

      Quite frankly, the US government should be spending less money on social programs, while state and local governments should be spending more money on those things.

      dom

    5. Re:China has a long way to go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would you PLEASE stop making sense!
      This is slashdot...

      Your post is worth ZERO..
      Want to improve that? Lose the politcal common sense... Start bowing at the alter of Political correctness, and soon? You'll be a slashdot STAR...

    6. Re:China has a long way to go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Say what you will about the United States, but at least you can't say that we spend extreme percentages on our military while we have major internal problems.

      Why can't we say that? It's absolutely true

      The US spends approximately as much on its military as the rest of the world combined. More than any other nation in the history of the world.

      I don't know what counts as a major problem to you, but I'd've thought the destruction of New Orleans and the long delay in rehabilitating the city and returning the tens of thousands of refugees would be right up there. Also, 4% of the US population are illiterate. So don't tell me the US has no major internal problems.

      BTW, the US is also by far the world's largest source of spam.

      In short, you are talking out of a hole in your head.



  27. too bad! by abstractrude · · Score: 1

    Too bad the "Volunteers" will be Falan Gong political prisoners, who "may" will get there havested organs back if they stop enough !!V1aGRa Get Moroe Penil Bigger!!

  28. Nobody seems worried over at Specialham by Animats · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Over at SpecialHam, the forum for bottom-feeder spammers, it seems to be business as usual today. No mention of any crackdown in China. Typical message: "Please give me ICQ UINs of poeple who make installations at trojaned computers. I need to install some software." There's some gloating over the collapse of BlueSecurity. Some new ways to spam Myspace. But no real concerns about enforcement today.

    1. Re:Nobody seems worried over at Specialham by Joebert · · Score: 1

      Specialhams' "please register or login" is done with Javascript...

      I turned Javascript off & was able to read away.

      --
      Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
    2. Re:Nobody seems worried over at Specialham by dbIII · · Score: 1
      I turned off javascript and had a look there. Here's an intersting post there which is dead on topic:
      misluv

      Posts: 29

      Joined: 2/12/2006

      can i use .cn domains? got some chinese regisar who can provide .cn domains for about $3 each, i am not sure if they are bp domains but i think they should be, the question is , can i use those .cn domains? it is some chinese extension, ps: i would like those domains shown in my messenger.

      Perhaps that's one reason why we see so much "Chinese" spam trying to sell stuff to Americans.
  29. 2+2 = ? by Frightening · · Score: 2, Interesting

    *Reads headline only*

    -A while back we were told Taiwan held the world cup for spam (small statue of a devil holding an envelope).

    -Now China wants to crack down on spam.

    -I see only one way they can do this, or am I terribly mistaken? (P.S Yes I am aware issue is cleared up in summary. Just laugh.)

    1. Re:2+2 = ? by zuki · · Score: 1

      I think I get it.

      Since

      -1) China takes great pains to make it obvious that they still consider Taiwan an integral part of their country.
      -2) Taiwan is arguably responsible for such a huge amount of SPAM that they are considered the world's biggest offender
      -3) China has finally decided to crack down on SPAM for real (or so they say).

      The only logical route to really crack down on SPAM will be to invade Taiwan, and make sure to put those shady list operators under lock and key.

      Q.E.D.

      We've seen some more far-fetched scenarios to justify an invasion before, have we not....?

      Z.

    2. Re:2+2 = ? by Frightening · · Score: 1

      Stop modding me interesting.
      China will not invade Taiwan to get rid of spam. I was joking, you know, humor...haha..funny crap...lolz..ROFL...LMAO.. etc.

      For more on humor please see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Humor

  30. I'm sure their solutions will be top-notch by Jim+in+Buffalo · · Score: 1

    I'm sure the Chinese solutions to the spam problem will be top-notch. They'll go around looking for people who appear that they might be some kind of spammer, toss them into the back of a van, and then drive them to the re-education center where they'll have electric shocks applied to their privates until they confess. Meanwhile, the actual problem of spam in China will continue unabated.

    --
    This sig, aah-ah, is comin' like a ghost-sig...
    1. Re:I'm sure their solutions will be top-notch by hkgroove · · Score: 1

      "...looking for people who appear that they might be some kind of spammer, toss them into the back of a van..."

      I believe you're correct, except for the re-education part. Those vans will actually be China's Death Vans

    2. Re:I'm sure their solutions will be top-notch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GOOD - I hope they throw the spammers in jail, and never let them out. Especially the money greedy Chinese ISP staff that takes western dollars (under the table) that allows Greedy american spammers co-location space for their array of spam sending servers... you know the ones I'm talking about, like "chinanet.cn" among others... now if Korea would wake up and do the same thing, I'm sure our spam count would significantly decrease... It's about time the commies would wake up and recognize this global threat... If anyone can do it, I'm sure the Chinese can, as I suspect it might take a fascist regime to really shut down spam.... they are far more practiced then we are in eradicating it....

  31. 'bout time by CFrankBernard · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How many years now have numerous email admins either blocked all email from China or score hits to blacklists such as Blackhole's China & Korea Combined very highly? BTW, China definitely has no right to complain about firewall/gateway censorship.

  32. Serious Spam! by fohat · · Score: 2, Funny

    I thought this was going to be about the new FPS game "Serious Spam" in which the heroine tries to defeat democracy with her spam gun and filtered Google Water (beta).
    But seriously, I hope this cuts down on the number of emails I get with all question marks in the subject line. If China is succesful with this program, perhaps other countries will follow suite. (I'm looking at you, Taiwan! *shakes fist*)

    peace out.

    --
    Is there heaven? Is there Hell? Is that a Tuna Melt I smell?-Primus
  33. Sample spam filter response by ahodgkinson · · Score: 1, Troll
    Yeah, I can see it now. Chinese email users can expect messages like the following:

    Dear Comrade,

    Your attempt to send email has been blocked due to violations of one or more of the following email filter rules:

    Your email:

    • contained unsolicited information.
    • promoted products and services critical of the state.
    • contained inappropriate sexual or religious matter.
    • is detrimental to national security.
    Note that this list is subject to change or amendment without prior notification or warning. Additional stricter criteria may be applied order to prevent inappropriate email from being distributed.

    This violation has been logged by the People's Central Committee and will be carefully investigated. Your presence and full cooperation is required during the investigation, and a full confession will be considered in your favor when your sentence is determined.

    As there are severe penalties, including life imprisonment or execution, for sending inappropriate email, your cooperation with the investigating committee is essential.

    --
    ---- It won't be as bad as you fear or as good as you hope, but it will take twice as long as you plan.
    1. Re:Sample spam filter response by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I only wish I could convince myself that this isn't something that BushCo would try on us after observing its effectiveness in China... Especially since you included the whole "detrimental to national security" part!

  34. The real question.... by GOD_ALMIGHTY · · Score: 4, Interesting

    will spammers get the death penalty? Think I just found the ultimate ethical delimma for the average slashdotter. Is it good if China executes a spammer, but does so in it's new fleet of mobile lethal injection vans and harvests the organs for sale? When cheering the execution of spammers, which at least half the readership here has been waiting for, can you be sure your celebration is for a real spammer or a political dissident?

    --
    Arrogance is Confidence which lacks integrity. -- me
    1. Re:The real question.... by bitt3n · · Score: 1

      harvesting organs from people to whom you've just given a lethal injection.. someone over there needs to retake Police State Governance 101.

    2. Re:The real question.... by TheOtherChimeraTwin · · Score: 1

      Good Lord no! Please don't use spammers for harvesting organs! Burn them completely, it is the only safe way. Then sprinkle Holy Water on the ashes.

    3. Re:The real question.... by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 0, Troll
      harvesting organs from people to whom you've just given a lethal injection.. someone over there needs to retake Police State Governance 101.

      Sadly, it is possible. At least in the US, the lethal injection is actually two injections in series. The first one is a fast-acting general anaesthetic and knocks the victim out. The second one is a poison that stops the heart. Between steps 1 and 2, harvesting the unconscious prisoner's organs is possible without poisoning the receipient.

      Of course, knowing the Chinese, they might not go for such niceties as the first injection. Just tie the prisoner down in a soundproof room, harvest whatever can be removed, and then give whatever is left the second injection.

      -b.

    4. Re:The real question.... by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1
      . Is it good if China executes a spammer, but does so in it's new fleet of mobile lethal injection vans and harvests the organs for sale?

      Ugh. Creepy. Not to invoke Godwin's Law, but as someone whose family was in Poland during the Holocaust (and quite a few of them were killed in the camps), this hits a bit close to home. State-sponsored killing is still killing, no matter how much we try to sugar-coat and medicalize it. Personally, I prefer the bullet to the back of the neck. At least it's honest - there's no doubt that someone's being slaugtered in cold blood rather than being subjected to a 'medical' procedure. Not to mention being quicker and more certain (easier to find the back of the neck rather than poking around for 5 min trying to find a good vein in a convict that's shaking with fear).

      The fact that doctors (who should be healers, not killers) are involved in this perversion in China makes it that much more atrocious. The more I think about it, the more I think that the people running the show in China are the only ones who may deserve such 'treatment.'

      -b.

  35. Gvmnt Servers by jeffy210 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You know, I'm supprised with all the censoring and filtering they do, they just don't mandate all email be sent through government controlled servers and block port 25 on the "great firewall". That way they could say it's in the name of spam (or security, or whatever) and still read what they want. (I know, I know, stop giving them ideas)

    --
    ------
    "And may your days be long upon the earth."
  36. Volunteers by nschubach · · Score: 1, Funny

    China can have Volunteers?

    --
    Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
  37. I was hoping for a follow-up by liak12345 · · Score: 0

    I was hoping for a follow-up that said "China Getting 'Serious' About Gold Farmers?" but then I thought if they did they'd recruit 20,000 volunteers to help gold farmers. It's bad enough that they're hoarding real world resources, but when they do it in our MMO's too... that's just too much.

  38. Re:Site already Slow.. Heres the article by johnMG · · Score: 2, Funny

    So, will most of the analysis be done by Information Retrieval or Information Dispersal?

    Either way, Central Services will probably end up doing all the dirty work.

    My only suggestion: make sure they've filled out a 27b/6 form before you let them lay a finger your server. But then, I'm a bit of a stickler for paperwork.

  39. FYI: Email postmasters, please block 70.252.29.129 by iamcf13 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    FYI: Email postmasters, please block 70.252.29.129 (adsl-70-252-29-129.dsl.austtx.swbell.net)

    The computer at that IP address has been compromised and is spewing 'bozo spam'. I got 3 of them recently for some kind of weightloss product.

    Complete details that fully explain why this IP address should be blocked is here.

    I assure you, this is not a prank, joke, or 'dirty trick' ('joe job').

    Thank you for your consideration.

  40. Wait a minute by notBowen · · Score: 1

    Didn't Chairman Mao like, invent spam with all those "Little Red Book"s he kept jamming down people's throats?

    --
    The few surviving samurai survey the battlefield. Count the arms the legs and heads and then divide by five.
  41. no matter to me by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 3, Interesting

    as each inbound connect attempt (to my ssh port, which I have tightly controlled via tcpwrappers, you morans!) is logged, so is an ipfw (freebsd) firewall entry to block either /24 or - fuck it - /16 from their netblock. IF its from .cn or .tw or .kr (etc). I discover (as they float to my log) and block. full block, not just email.

    fark them. there's zero accountability there and I doubt things will change. I run a very small site and so there is no NEED to allow spam^Hemail from those geo's.

    --

    --
    "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
  42. Bounces by Nikademus · · Score: 1

    Even the biggest chinese ISP doesn't follow RFC (like accepting bounces).
    They don't care about how mail works, I would be very curious how they put an end to spam.

    --
    I gave up with the idea of an useful sig...
  43. Sure... by Beefslaya · · Score: 1

    I'm serious about Chinese spam too...

    *.ch DISCARD
    *.tw DISCARD

    That's MY Great Firewall.

    Welcome to the Internet... Asso...

    1. Re:Sure... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I would think *.cn might be a bit more effective at blocking Chinese spam.

    2. Re:Sure... by Beefslaya · · Score: 1

      Was a little quick on the typing...correct-o-mundo.
      CN it is...
      And I'll also block CH too. :)

  44. This is BAD news by Idiomatick · · Score: 0

    No one wants China to wage war on taiwan but now that they are cracking down on spam taiwan is in trouble. Being the cause of 2/3rds of the spam in the world is just asking for trouble, maybe china will take out a page from the American books and call this "The War on Spam".

  45. Naïveté by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Even if this is true, Chinese people have more freedom now than they did 20 years ago, and things will continue to progress in this direction.
    I'm glad you've created such an impenetrable sense of security for yourself. Obviously there are those of us who disagree with you. So, where's your proof that things will get better?

    Just because you say things will get better doesn't mean jackshit.

    Guns & tanks put an end to Tiananman Square and they'll do it again. I think you're a bit naïve in assuming that China's government is all "love and flowers" about this change.

    Open up your eyes. People in power like to stay in power. It's that simple.
  46. You don't know that by Moraelin · · Score: 5, Insightful

    May I point out that, although totalitarian regimes _do_ violate human rights and mis-use laws against dissidents, sometimes they actually have to solve an actual problem? E.g., even Stalin's USSR and Mao's China at their darkest hour, while they did have a some of the most brutal suppression of dissidents, they also had laws to deal with plain old crimes like theft, embezzlement, murder, etc. They also had plenty of civil laws too, like for example, divorces, inheritance, child support, etc.

    I.e., it seems to me pretty stupid to assume that any law in China is somehow _guaranteed_ be 100% for oppression purposes, and only disguised in a more propaganda-friendly guise. Maybe someone there genuinely got fed up with spam. Maybe a bunch of bosses in the PRC just had one day too many of finding their inboxes full of "H3rb@1 \/i@gr@" emails. Or maybe it was the "Thousands of 18 year old teens waiting for you!!!" mails. China's conservative leadership tends to take a very grim view of pornography, plus they have _much_ higher age of consent.

    Are those volunteers paid to either read other people's emails and to point fingers at demand? How do you know that? How do you know it's not just people paid to register email addresses and use them all over the place, and see what spam lands in those inboxes? Or maybe run honeypots to see who's actually commanding the army of spam-bots with Joe-job faked sender addresses? Or whatever? For the size of China 1000 admins and 20,000 volunteers is a spit in the ocean, if their goal was to read all emails. But to run a honeypot net or to get reliable reports of who's been spamming their inboxes, it may be just enough.

    Basically the D&D mentality that some people are by definition evil, hence they can only ever give evil laws, is so fucking stupid that it's not even funny. _Noone_ defines themselves as evil, sworn enemy of all goodness, and able to only ever do evil stuff, like in retarded D&D-type settings and cheap fantasy flicks. The Real Life isn't divided neatly like that.

    In RL even the most horrible dictator may really think they're only doing just what's good for their country (even if for everyone else it doesn't really count as good), and not just acting out of some Sith-like determination to extinguish all goodness. RL "evil" is more about not caring about collateral damage done than being some sworn destroyer of all that's still good and pure. And sometimes, even if by accident, their notion of "good" may actually be good.

    That's all I'm saying here too. Just assuming "The Chinese government is evil, hence any Chinese law _must_ be 100% for the sole purpose of crushing freedoms and harming people" is just bullshit. We just don't know that. Assuming you can "translate" like that, is just some self-righteous bullshit, nothing more.

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    1. Re:You don't know that by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1
      May I point out that, although totalitarian regimes _do_ violate human rights and mis-use laws against dissidents, sometimes they actually have to solve an actual problem? E.g., even Stalin's USSR and Mao's China at their darkest hour, while they did have a some of the most brutal suppression of dissidents, they also had laws to deal with plain old crimes like theft, embezzlement, murder, etc.

      Except the differences between the penalties under the ordinary and 'political' laws in the USSR (and I am sure Mao's China) were grossly out of proportion. Kill someone? Get 10 years in the camps. Violate Article 58 (the catch-all law used for political crimes)? Get at least 10 years in the camps, or the death penalty. And section 58 also provided for the punishment of violators' families with up to 5 years' imprisonment.

      This isn't even mentioning that political offenders were treated worse than 'normal' criminals in the prison camps.

      -b.

    2. Re:You don't know that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To be fair, even the Sith think they are doing good.

    3. Re:You don't know that by Maelwryth · · Score: 1

      "like in retarded D&D-type settings and cheap fantasy flicks."

      Ast kiranann kair gadunrm soth-arn suh kali jalaran!

      --
      I reserve the write to mangle english.
    4. Re:You don't know that by sfjoe · · Score: 1

      Basically the D&D mentality that some people are by definition evil, hence they can only ever give evil laws, is so fucking stupid that it's not even funny.

      D&D? I thought it was a Republican thing.

      --
      It's simple: I demand prosecution for torture.
    5. Re:You don't know that by Moraelin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I must have been unclear. I'm not saying they weren't evil. Yes, they were evil.

      I'm just saying that even evil people sometimes do good things. It doesn't necessarily make them less evil, but it doesn't make the act automatically evil by association either.

      E.g., Al Capone on one hand ordered some brutal massacres, but on the other hand opened soup kitchens for the victims of the great depression and paid (out of that ill gotten money) for shelter and clothing for them. Was he evil? Yes. Were his soup kitchens evil? No.

      That's really all I'm saying. One can't just say, "Person X is evil, action Y was done by X, hence Y is evil too." Guilt or evil aren't something transmittable by association like that.

      The same applies to the Chinese government too. Is it an evil oppressive government? Yes, certainly. Does it automatically make everything they touch evil? No. It _is_ entirely possible that someone genuinely is sick and tired of spam, or of seeing their country's reputation being tainted by spam. One can't automatically assume (or "translate") that an anti-spam law is automatically just some oppression tool against dissidents.

      --
      A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    6. Re:You don't know that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Age of consent in PRC is 14. "Much higher"? The only country with higher ages of consent than many US states is Turkey, with 21. (not counting those countries where you must be married).

      Thanks for the misinformation, welcome to slashdot.

    7. Re:You don't know that by chickenandporn · · Score: 1

      Follow the Money

      The Party in China is like a multiple-personality dictator. Their goal is to make money for themselves while avoiding a revolution that will change that ability to make money. There might be some members who are keenly concerned with the wellfare of China, but Absolute Power might change that over time.

      Randomly adding laws that are evil, where's the profit there?

      The money-trail for this new work seems like:

      • Virii and spam slow down my worker-drones
      • the H3rb@1 Vi@gr@ anger story (unlikely)
      • Spam might anger my people (revolt)
      • The banned content (wikipedia, et al) might be arriving as Spam (support the Great Firewall of China) -- you knew that Spam Sees a Firewall as an Error and Routes Around it, right?
      • A virus might be a malicious tool of a foreign government, and MII is concerned
      • some other conspiracy theory?

      All I'm saying is where is the profit?

  47. Re:To tackle "Tiananmen" and "Democracy" spam firs by sjwest · · Score: 1

    Looks like china.blackholes.us stays in the mail config then

    then its the sbl, and then spews. == China not good place for internet hosting.

  48. Oh please by BigCheese · · Score: 1

    Sounds like some Chinese trading partner complained so somebody needs to put on a show. The big-time spammers are all paid up with the right officials so they will be ignored. They will punish a few small-timers to remind them they need to pay up.

    When they get another complaint lather, rinse, repeat.

    --
    The obscure we see eventually. The completely obvious, it seems, takes longer. - Edward R. Murrow
  49. Means nothing to me by cardoso · · Score: 1

    I already block China (and Taiwan, to be fair and balanced) using pobox's antispam service.

    --

    []'s Carlos Cardoso - Becoming a brazilian ProBlogger, typo by typo
  50. Chinese food by WormholeFiend · · Score: 0, Troll

    I wouldnt be surprised if the bodies are sold to 'exotic meat' restaurants.

    I remember some years ago, Chinese authorities uncovered a black market for human flesh, after someone claimed a relative's body from which the leg muscles had been cut off.

  51. F1gh7 5Pam and M A K E $$$ by DarthVain · · Score: 2, Funny

    Ho W Wo uld y0u L1k e 2 make B I G $$$

    Si gn UP n0w and B1 of 1000 34rning BIG $$$ gov J0B

    als0 R3crui7ing 20000!!! voleeteer to FIGHT SP4M!

    OK I can't be the first to think that this might be their way to find "volenteers" to do this. Oh the Irony!

  52. Reminder by Aqua_boy17 · · Score: 1
    What about that girl you met last night that really does work for the Mega Ab Destroyer 8000 Co?
    Need I remind you that this is Slashdot? It then follows that your question is completely rhetorical. :P
    --
    What if the Hokey Pokey really is what it's all about?
  53. Serious anti spam effort required by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I look forward to seeing Al Quaida fighting spam.

  54. Defenestration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This would work, but only if China uses these 20.000 to wean people off of spam generating platforms and applications. Nearly 100% of spam, regardless of country, is launched from botnets of exploited MS Windows machines. Now that open relays have been closed up, it's only Window's bad design and unsuitability for the Internet are providing the technical foundation for spam. Clear out Windows and you clear out spam.

    Rather than wasting time sorting messages manually, preventative measures would have more return on investment. Most proactive options necessitate the removal of Windows. In China, BSD and Linux can be obtained for the same price as Windows so that cost shouldn't be an excuse to be running systems unsuited for the Internet.

  55. Please USA, get 'Serious' about Spam too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    See the stats here.

  56. $90bn : $455bn or 4.2% : 3.9% (of GDP) by Tungbo · · Score: 1

    They are the maximum estimates of military expenditures of PRC and USA respectively
    from Wikipedia.
    See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/China's_military_budg et

    Also From CIA Factbook !

    PRC $81.48 billion (2005 est.)
    USA $518.1 billion (FY04 est.) (2005 est.)

    Surely you are the kettle calling the pot black.

  57. Re:FYI: Email postmasters, please block 70.252.29. by Phroggy · · Score: 1

    You're off-topic, since this is an article about China and you're complaining about somebody in Texas. Also, since this IP is already listed in multiple spam blacklists (including cbl.abuseat.org, dnsbl.sorbs.net, sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org, and bl.spamcop.net), anybody who wanted to block spam from this IP is probably already doing so, and they don't need you to inform them. I've never received spam from this IP, probably because I use various blacklists, both to completely deny connections and to add to SpamAssassin's weighted scores.

    So chill out. Spam happens, and this is just one example out of hundreds of thousands. If you're not willing to just ignore it, then call AT&T and see what they have to say about it.

    --
    $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
    $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
  58. Go China by Lost+Penguin · · Score: 1

    Fight SPAM, and send a bill to the (ex)spammers family for the bullet!

    --
    I am the unwilling control for my Origin.
  59. I love it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How amusing when evil gets annoyed with evil.

  60. Absolutely no point by swordgeek · · Score: 1

    As Grandpa used to say, "t'ain't no use closin' the barn doors after all the cattle hescaped."

    There is one thing and one thing ONLY that will slow down spam at this point: A concerted and highly publicised series of spammer executions, taking place over the next two years.

    Alan Ralsky? Bullet to the head. Tony Banks? Same thing.

    Two years of putting _all_ major spammers to death might slow things down. Nothing less will.

    Now I'm not saying that this is the right move, or a noble, honourable, or moral one. However, it's the only one that will stop spam.

    If we wanted to stop spam, we needed to do it back in 1995.

    --

    "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
  61. You can get your answer dynamically, any time by Ilgaz · · Score: 2, Informative

    Hi,

    Click here: http://www.senderbase.org/

    You will notice "top senders by domain". There are some telecoms "shouldn't be" there. They are the spam infested ISPs who doesn't have a clue about managing their services. Sadly it includes my backbone too.

    I seriously suspect China spam is sort of foreign policy. As a spamcop (free,paid)/) user for years I have right to suspect so. Also if ISPs, large ISPs end this "politically correct" crap and enable country wide user selectable blocking lists you will see how they buy those Ironport, eSafe etc. devices by paying 1% of their revenue.

    What about commercial communications? Well you will tell your business partner to find a better managed ISP.

  62. MII? by misterhaan · · Score: 1

    so is MII supposed to be pronounced "me" or "my?"

    --

    track7.org has all kinds of interesting stuff!

  63. a horrible dictator does what's good for themself by aggiefalcon01 · · Score: 1
    I'll grant that it's an idiotic shortcut to say "Beijing = Evil, therefore new Beijing laws = evil" ... it's convenient, but stupid, all the same.
    In RL even the most horrible dictator may really think they're only doing just what's good for their country (even if for everyone else it doesn't really count as good), and not just acting out of some Sith-like determination to extinguish all goodness.
    Umm ... generally the most horrible dictators don't give a damn about anything but themselves, and their own power and amusements; their country, aside from keeping them in power, can eat shit and die for all they care (and sadly, often this's what happens). After all, we're talking about horrible dictators. If that's who we're talking about, we can safely assume their motives are questionable ... if they weren't they wouldn't be horrible, would they? It's quite funny how one can throw a phrase like "horrible dictator" around and then ignore what it means. I know this sounds like oversimplifying things, but I'm calling for consistency. There are good dictators, and there are bad dictators. Those are plain, simple facts, and just because their simplicity all but insults your intelligence, they cannot be ignored or refuted by the offhand assumption that really all dictators are good, and your own morality is at fault for not seeing it. In RL ... moral equivalence has no place.
    --
    Global warming is neither science, nor politics. It is a religion.
  64. USA will be #1 again! by goof21 · · Score: 1

    Now if we can work on the rest of China's exports, we'll be back on top!

  65. Re:FYI: Email postmasters, please block 70.252.29. by iamcf13 · · Score: 1

    Thank you for your help. The information in your post helped to make my program better. :)