Slashdot Mirror


Lithium-Ion Batteries Linked to Airplane Fires

smellsofbikes writes "The National Safety Transportation Board thinks it's possible that lithium-ion batteries caused a fire that destroyed a United Parcel Service airplane on Feb 8, 2006. The FAA already bans non-rechargeable lithium batteries from air shipment because aircraft don't carry fire suppression equipment capable of extinguishing lithium fires. The interesting thing is: these batteries aren't being used or charged, they're just being shipped: spontaneous battery combustion. Is this something that happens in the back of computer stores, or just on airplanes?"

244 comments

  1. squished? by P3NIS_CLEAVER · · Score: 2, Interesting

    is squishing a lithium ion battery enough to make it catch fire?

    --
    Please sign petition to restore sanity to our banking system!!!

    http://financialpetition.org/
    1. Re:squished? by jabber · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My thought would be depressurization or freezing.

      --

      -- What you do today will cost you a day of your life.
    2. Re:squished? by ResidntGeek · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Nope. Lithium is an alkali metal. Alkali metals ignite on contact with water. The more active ones (Cesium most of all) violently explode. I imagine a small puncture in a battery could let in enough atmospheric water vapor to ignite a battery.

      --
      ResidntGeek
    3. Re:squished? by treeves · · Score: 5, Informative

      That would be a plausible explanation if the battery contained elemental lithium. They don't. They contain compounds of Li.

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
    4. Re:squished? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nawwww ...
      It's part of the pile stuff theories. When enough "stuff" accumulates, spontaneous "stuff" happens.

    5. Re:squished? by tomhudson · · Score: 2, Informative

      The problem is that already-charged lithium batteries contain a lot of energy, and if they short out, they will heat up fast.

      A new, uncharged rechargeable battery, on the other hand, is basically a dead battery. Short it out and nothing happens.

      Here's something you can try at home if you're a total skeptic: charge up your cell-phone battery, remove it from your phone and drop it in your pocket along with some change or a set of keys, and go for a walk. You'll KNOW when the battery shorts ut.

    6. Re:squished? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you seen what a punctured lipoly battery does?! It's a thermal party!

    7. Re:squished? by ResidntGeek · · Score: 1

      Shit, you're right. I thought Lithium-ion batteries had lithium metal. My bad.

      --
      ResidntGeek
    8. Re:squished? by johnny+cashed · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Excellent point, but Li-Ion batteries are damaged if discharged below a certain point. So even discharged (in normal usage) Li-Ion batteries still have some energy in them.

    9. Re:squished? by kfg · · Score: 1

      When enough "stuff" accumulates, spontaneous "stuff" happens.

      WWI in a nutshell.

      KFG

    10. Re:squished? by treeves · · Score: 1

      Heck, I've (inadvertently - of course) done that with NiMH batteries and gotten a "hot pocket" real quick!

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
    11. Re:squished? by markana · · Score: 1

      Not to mention the Manhattan Project....

      or Chernobyl...

    12. Re:squished? by tomhudson · · Score: 3, Informative

      The article pointed out thes are non-rechargeable lithium batteries - the disposable type you put in cameras, etc. They're fully charged when manufactured, so there's no way to ship them in even a partially-discharged state. When a new one goes, either from design defect, poor quality control, or mishandling, it REALLY goes.

      Also, you CAN completely discharge a rechargeable lithium battery and then recharge it. (How do I know it was completely discharged? Stupid me put it in my pocket with change and keys - so you KNOW that it got shorted out at some point - but it was totally dead, so no harm done). The recharging circuitry isn't supposed to let you recharge a completely dead battery (the battery will get REALLY warm, for example), but I've done it. That particular cell phone battery is now 5 years old, been through well over its rated maximum charge/discharge cycles - 500, and still keeps a 50% or greater charge (though for a while it would keep hardly any charge at all).

    13. Re:squished? by Directrix1 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Let me just say that a Lithium-Ion battery can do some pretty nasty stuff. I had one out of my camera (a small Nikon digital) sitting on my bedside table next to my camera. One night I dropped it on the floor. I don't know what that did to it, but it started to bulge and become untouchably hot. I put it inside a pyrex container on the kitchen floor for the rest of the night in case it went poof. By morning it was fully discharged, but still had the bulge in it. I thought that thing was going to explode for sure, but luckily it didn't.

      --
      Occam's razor is the blind faith in the natural selection of least resistance and in universal oversimplification. -- EF
    14. Re:squished? by Amouth · · Score: 1

      "(Cesium most of all) violently explode"

      lets not forget Francium.. not only does it violently explode but it is radio active ..

      good thing it is the worlds rarest element (not counting man made crap in partical coliders)

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
    15. Re:squished? by P3NIS_CLEAVER · · Score: 1

      Many lithium compuounds, particularily the hydrides are pyrophoric and/or exothermically react with water.

      --
      Please sign petition to restore sanity to our banking system!!!

      http://financialpetition.org/
    16. Re:squished? by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Also, you CAN completely discharge a rechargeable lithium battery and then recharge it. (How do I know it was completely discharged? Stupid me put it in my pocket with change and keys - so you KNOW that it got shorted out at some point - but it was totally dead, so no harm done).

      Assuming you're talking about a fairly modern battery, it probably wasn't completely discharged. Most modern Li-Ion batteries contain a voltage regulator and a low-voltage cutoff. If the voltage drops below a certain point, they cut off power flow out of the battery to prevent you from destroying it by fully discharging it.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    17. Re:squished? by deathy_epl+ccs · · Score: 1

      Here's something you can try at home if you're a total skeptic: charge up your cell-phone battery, remove it from your phone and drop it in your pocket along with some change or a set of keys, and go for a walk. You'll KNOW when the battery shorts ut.

      OK, in all seriousness... for the thinking impaired: DO NOT ACTUALLY DO THIS!

      This public service message brought to you by the Society to Protect Stupid People.

    18. Re:squished? by Jan+Brunner · · Score: 1

      The batteries they talk about here do contain elemental lithium. See here for example: http://www.theodoregray.com/PeriodicTable/Stories/ 003.2/index.html

    19. Re:squished? by s13g3 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I had something very similiar happen to me as well, though it was not the battery for my nikon (long discharged and no problems), but rather the battery for my Audiovox 6600 PocketPC. I had cancelled the service for which the phone was branded and purchased a different a different device to use for the phone purpose. While out one night and without a charger, the phone died, and I didn't charge it for a day. The next day, upon trying to remove it from the metal case/shell, I found it wedged tight. When I finally managed to remove the thing, I discovered a bulge in the plastic on the back of the battery, and on removing the battery, the foil casing on the underside swelled out, making the battery nearly twice it's size. I, too, dropped the battery into a pyrex container with a lid, and then that into a ceramic jar (I have an 50's era college chemistry set that came in very handy there... The s/o finally quit complaining for me to throw it out that night ^.^).

      --
      "Inveniemus Viam Aut Faciemus" 'We will find a way... Or we will make one!' --Hannibal of Carthage
    20. Re:squished? by treeves · · Score: 1

      Well the TFA title was Lithium-Ion Batteries. . . , so the word "ion" should be a clue that Li metal is not *supposed* to be involved.
      The link you offered specifically says, "Note that this is only true of new, unused disposable lithium batteries." i.e. not rechargeable Li-ion or Li-polymer cells. I guess some elemental Li can form if the batteries are overcharged but this should be prevented by the charging circuitry.
      Lastly, the electrolyte contains an organic solvent that presumably could start to boil if the temperature gets too high, causing a rupture.
      And, as someone else mentioned, Li hydrides will react spontaneously with water or moist air, so the puncture theory is reasonable.
      LiAlH is used as a powerful reducing agent in industrial and laboratory organic reactions. Nasty stuff.

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
    21. Re:squished? by RetroGeek · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This public service message brought to you by the Society to Protect Stupid People.

      Whatever for?

      --

      - - - - - - - - - - -
      I am a programmer. I am paid to produce syntax not grammar. Deal with it.
    22. Re:squished? by rrohbeck · · Score: 1

      Nope. Lithium is an alkali metal. Alkali metals ignite on contact with water.

      If you crush a battery it will short out internally. Since, as another poster mentioned here a few days ago, the energy density of modern batteries is about a quarter that of TNT, a short will yield a very high power release. No, it won't explode since it takes seconds to release the energy, as opposed to microseconds for a detonation, but it's still going to be some nice fireworks, just like that Dell laptop recently.

    23. Re:squished? by deathy_epl+ccs · · Score: 1
      This public service message brought to you by the Society to Protect Stupid People.
      Whatever for?

      Uhm...

      Uhhh...

      Oh, man, I knew I shoulda read the charter closer!

    24. Re:squished? by dattaway · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That would be a plausible explanation if the battery contained elemental lithium. They don't. They contain compounds of Li.

      I've taken apart a few lithium coin batteries. They have a soft metalic square of what I believe lithium on one of the plates. The metal is soft, can be easily cut and oxidizes from its shiny appearance to a dull grey in seconds. It can be easily ignited into a very bright light which seems brighter than the sun. Also, it can be dropped into a cup of water and it skeeters around like a little motorboat. Seems like pure lithium if I ever saw it!

      The other lithium batteries seem to be some kind of oxide roll which gets very hot with exposure to air. Haven't been able to do pyrotechnic experiments with these yet.

    25. Re:squished? by pmancini · · Score: 1

      So you are saying they are Gremlins(tm)?

    26. Re:squished? by treeves · · Score: 1

      OK, but see my comment above #15734168 (not my first comment)
      The current story involves rechargeable Li-ion batteries that don't contain Li metal.

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
    27. Re:squished? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your put a bulging, hot, Li-ion battery inside a pyrex container? Lucky it didn't explode and detonate your homemade grenade!

    28. Re:squished? by PayPaI · · Score: 1

      Well shoot. I just spent all night farming the Badlands for [Elemental Lithium]. I already have the rest of the mats for [Crude Lithium Battery].

    29. Re:squished? by dfung · · Score: 2, Insightful
      This public service message brought to you by the Society to Protect Stupid People.


      Whatever for?


      If it wasn't for the Society, there would be nobody to get "First Post"!

    30. Re:squished? by Chrispy1000000+the+2 · · Score: 1

      I hate people saying it's explosive. Have you ever seen it explode? Ever hear of it exploding? NO. You haven't. It might not even be explosive, as we can't test it. There's probably never been 2 atoms of the element within a centemeter of each other since the creation of the planet.

      --
      Sig
    31. Re:squished? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "is squishing a lithium ion battery enough to make it catch fire?"

      If the battery is Lithium Polymer, it's rather easy to get it to catch fire, as many modelers know.
      Overcharge it. Overdischarge it and then attempt a normal charge. Short it, even for a surprisingly short time. Puncture it. Squeeze or hit it enough that it balloons, then ignore the fact and use and charge it as normal.

      LiPos are dangerous. There's a reason why it is generally acknowledged that their ideal charging place is a concrete block with a hole in it, or just on lots of sand (with a bucket containing more sand close at hand).

      I can easily imagine boxes containing LiPo cells (and possibly other, sharp items) being bumped around while boarding the plane...

      Read up.

    32. Re:squished? by Directrix1 · · Score: 1
      Your put a bulging, hot, Li-ion battery inside a pyrex container? Lucky it didn't explode and detonate your homemade grenade!

      It wasn't really a container per se, there was no seal at all. It was actually two pyrex liquid measuring cups one cupped on top of the other. Neadless to say if there was a sudden compression of the air it would more likely flow through the gaps between the two dishes, and probably at the most knock the top one off. More than anything I was trying to shield my house from fire until the morning came around and I could dispose of it properly (neighbors garbage can :-P).
      --
      Occam's razor is the blind faith in the natural selection of least resistance and in universal oversimplification. -- EF
    33. Re:squished? by Directrix1 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I was just happy that I finally got to find a real household use for Pyrex :-P.

      --
      Occam's razor is the blind faith in the natural selection of least resistance and in universal oversimplification. -- EF
    34. Re:squished? by v1 · · Score: 3, Informative

      So called "deep cycling" a liio battery (or nimh actually) is not good on a battery. I don't know the exact nature of the damage, (whether its an irreversable chemical change, drying out of the electrolyte, or possible plate damage) but I've read in many places with my electronics work that deep cyclng liio and nimh batteries damages their ability to take a charge. Such batteries that are completely discharged for a period of time tend to not accept a new charge at all, rendering them bricked. I have ran into this problem more than once myself. If you have any small products that use liio or nimh batteries and you have let them sit in a clothset for several months you will find that they are fully discharged and very often they will refuse to charge at all. (nicd do not appear to have this problem, or at least not to the same extent) This is why ALL liio/nimh batteries you will find their documentation says they ship with a "partitial charge" to avoid an extended wait in the warehouse resulting in a DOA.

      I doubt the liio batteries are catching fire due to taking on water. They WILL however explode if placed in a fire, as all rechargeable batteries have a warning label on them to not dispose of in fire and that is why. If the pack is badly designed and somehow several of the cells are allowed to short, such as if the recharge control chip shorts out, this can lead to the batteries dead shorting. (this is only an issue if the cells are charged, which as I mentioned is pretty much assured) Any rechargeable battery (liio, nimh, or nicd) will get extremely hot when dead shorted while charged, as all the energy of its charge is rapidly released. (most laptop batteries are around 50 watts normal discharge, which can translate easily into 200-300 watt discharges when shorted) Liio carries the additional penalty of being more prone to explosion when superheated, and this can lead to them exploding if shorted.

      Though in this article it does not sound like explosion was an issue, more fire. This probably means a pack shorted out (defective, failed) and overheated, catching its battery case on fire due to heat. The burning case eventually helped raise the battery temperature enough to lead to the ignition of the battery electrolyte. (the lithium itself) Once a pallet of liio batteries starts on fire, fire suppression really doesn't matter any more. When the fire department has to deal with things like that they don't try to put it out - they just get everything flammable away from it and cover it with water to suppress the heat until it burns itself out. Once the lithium goes from merely hot to actually burning, you cannot smother it with water, it will rip the oxygen right off the water molicules to continue to burn. So the plane's fire suppression system would have actually fed such a fire. Foam (or something solid) is about the only thing that has a chance of suppressing a lithium fire, and even that is not very effective due to the intense heat of burning lithium vaporizing the foam. (it takes a lot of foam)

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    35. Re:squished? by Ravenscall · · Score: 1

      Pyrex WILL burn if you get it hot enough, I have done it.

      --
      You say you want a revolution....
    36. Re:squished? by bigkahunafish · · Score: 1

      Great Video from the series "Brainiac" http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-213426665 4801392897

      --
      Eat a Chicken, You know you want to.
    37. Re:squished? by shimavak · · Score: 1

      While I agree with your point that there is such a woeful lack of Fr available that one cannot easily test its explosive properties, I submit to you that to claim it is not would be disregarding all of the advances in elemental science we have made.

      There is absolutely no reason to assume it would act any different from its predicessors in the Ia group, and it has the absolute lowest electronegativity of any element we've ever seen. This suggests that it would simply be a continuation of the tendencies of its fellow family members.

      --
      "[Physics] has nothing to do directly with defending our country, except to make it worth defending." -- Robert Wilson
    38. Re:squished? by Amouth · · Score: 1

      no offence but comments like "Have you ever seen it?" just makes me think.. have you ever shot your self in the head.. how do you know it hurts..

      based on it's atomic propertys it would more than likly do just what the other elements in it's group does.. it would explode and more than likly more violently than the rest of them..

      somethings don't need to be tested to be understood to the point of knowing basicly what it does. would i want to test it sure .. just not within an AU of me.

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
    39. Re:squished? by EyelessFade · · Score: 1

      Cesium? So you havend tried Francium? :-D

    40. Re:squished? by walstib · · Score: 1

      My lawyer will be in touch.

      --
      The most dangerous strategy is to jump a chasm in two leaps. - Benjamin Disraeli
    41. Re:squished? by coopex · · Score: 1

      None of the alkali metals explode. They will release hydrogen and lots of heat on contact with water, but that's a hydrogen fuel air bomb exploding, not the metal.

      --
      The road to hell is paved with good intentions.
    42. Re:squished? by Jan+Brunner · · Score: 1

      You're right, they're talking about the possible dangers of Li-ion batteries. I was only reading the second link of the FAA which talks about the ban of non-recharcheable batteries. Sorry.

      I can imagine that LiAlH can be quite dangerous. I've never used it myself but heard of it in a lecture.

    43. Re:squished? by Amouth · · Score: 1

      enjoy splitting hairs?

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
  2. Environmental stress by morcheeba · · Score: 5, Informative

    It's not just spontaneous, it's environmental stress. A cargo hold is a cold, low pressure, high vibration environment . This may be the first time a newly-made battery is exposed to these factors, causing infant mortality flaws in manufacture to become aparent. Even after the infant mortality portion of the bathtub curve, reliability calculations typically rate one hour of cargo flight time as worth 10-20 hours on the ground. That flight from china may be equal to 10 days on the ground.

    1. Re:Environmental stress by schnikies79 · · Score: 4, Informative

      The main cargo area on UPS jets has standard cabin pressure. The lower cargo areas on select planes are not pressurized.

      --
      Gone!
    2. Re:Environmental stress by chrisfrd · · Score: 1

      This is NOT true. ALL areas of an aircraft are pressurised.The floor of a plane is not sealed, as if it were (a large, flat surface) it would EXPLODE! Lower holds are used to carry pets and such - I don't think they would live at FL 300. The only parts of an aircrafts airframe that isn't pressurised are the wheel wells and the condensor side of the air-conditioning units. The wings aren't pressurised by cabin pressure (but they are pressurised by pumps to get the fuel out.

    3. Re:Environmental stress by morcheeba · · Score: 1

      Good point. That makes sense, because the jet was probably designed to operate with the skin under a little tension.

      Cabins are still pressurized to 8000 feet, which is 70% of the pressure at sea level. It's still 4.4 psi.

    4. Re:Environmental stress by schnikies79 · · Score: 1

      I should have been more specific. You're correct that all the cargo areas on a jet are pressurized. What I meant by select aircraft was the small, prop-driven single and dual-engine four-passenger planes that they use from time to time. The cargo area on them is literally a metal box attached on the belly with a hinged door that is in no-way air tight. They don't fly at an altitude where it would matter.

      --
      Gone!
    5. Re:Environmental stress by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      70% of 14.7 psi = 10.29 psi

    6. Re:Environmental stress by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You're correct that all the cargo areas on a jet are pressurized


      If I recall, they are pressurized at about 5,000 feet, not sea level, to reduce the strain Quite breathable (About Denver atmosphere), but still capable of putting a strain on containers. Plus, Cargo planes != passenger planes, cargo pilots fly right through most turbulence to save on feul, they could be pressurizing less and flying higher.

    7. Re:Environmental stress by edflyerssn007 · · Score: 1

      4.4 PSI happens to be difference in pressure.
      -Ed

      --
      So you see what had happened was....
    8. Re:Environmental stress by schnikies79 · · Score: 1

      That sounds about right when it comes to what pressure the cargo area is at and how the pilots fly. As far as cargo planes not being passenger planes, they aren't, but most of them were at one point. All UPS jets were previouslly passenger planes except the Airbus A300-600, and possibly the McDonnell Douglas MD-11's, but i'm not positive on that one.

      --
      Gone!
    9. Re:Environmental stress by phliar · · Score: 1
      A cargo hold is a cold, low pressure, high vibration environment.

      It's a popular misconception that pressurized airplanes have un-pressurized (and unheated) cargo spaces.

      Why are airliners cylindrical, while buses are not? Pressurization. In a pressurized fuselage, what will happen if there are two chambers separated by the floor -- the pressurized passenger compartment above and an unpressurized hold below? Boom.

      If an airplane is pressurized (basically anything that flies over 18,000', i.e. every commercial airplane, is) so is the cargo hold. It's the same environment as the passenger cabin.

      --
      Unlimited growth == Cancer.
    10. Re:Environmental stress by Chrispy1000000+the+2 · · Score: 1

      Also, could you imagine the what a crosswind would do to a flat surface on an airplace? Or a up/downdraft? Near the ground? That's why they are circular.

      --
      Sig
    11. Re:Environmental stress by Deadstick · · Score: 1

      As another poster says, it's sea level pressure minus 4.4 psi...the pressurization is actually engaged before takeoff to put a slight positive pressure in the airplane. That makes the fuselage a bit more rigid, reducing the amount of structural fatigue it gets in the takeoff roll. If you're wearing one of those digital watches with an altimeter feature, you'll see the reading go somewhat below the ground elevation.

      rj

    12. Re:Environmental stress by AJWM · · Score: 1

      That's why they [airplanes] are circular.

      What, you mean like these?

      --
      -- Alastair
    13. Re:Environmental stress by Kombat · · Score: 1

      If an airplane is pressurized (basically anything that flies over 18,000', i.e. every commercial airplane, is) so is the cargo hold. It's the same environment as the passenger cabin.

      1. Airplanes require oxygen above 13,000 feet MSL, not 18,000 feet MSL. You're confusing the upper limit of oxygen-less flying with the base of class A (IFR-only) airspace.

      2. Most small-to-medium sized pressurized passenger planes do not pressurize the cargo hold. Larger planes do sometimes have a separate, pressurized hold for transporting pets and other pressure-sensitive cargo.

      --
      Like woodworking? Build your own picture frames.
    14. Re:Environmental stress by Kombat · · Score: 1

      That's why they [airplanes] are circular.

      What, you mean like [the F-177 Stealth Fighter]?


      No, I think he means airplanes whose fuselages are pressurized.

      --
      Like woodworking? Build your own picture frames.
    15. Re:Environmental stress by tyler_larson · · Score: 1

      The main cargo area on UPS jets has standard cabin pressure. The lower cargo areas on select planes are not pressurized.

      Even the cabins of pressuized planes are at low pressure at cruising altitude. Pressurization systems maintain a pressure differential of up to n PSI; not a fixed cabin pressure. So as altitude increases, cabin pressure still decreases, just not at the same rate as outside.

      Your average commercial jet is pressurized to about the equivalent of 8000 ft elevation when cruising at around FL 35.

      That's one of the primary reasons why air travel makes you tired afterward (especially you people who are used to living at sea level), no matter what timezone changes you do or don't experience.

      --
      "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. However, this is not necessarily a good idea...."
      RFC 1925
    16. Re:Environmental stress by ET_Fleshy · · Score: 1
      the pressurization is actually engaged before takeoff to put a slight positive pressure in the airplane
      Actually, I'm quite positive that the outflow valve is setup so when the squad switches are engaged (the airplane is on the ground), the valve fully opens, releasing all pressurization in the airplane. This is a big deal when considering that if you don't unpressurized the plane before landing it "pops" which can cause a lot of pain.
    17. Re:Environmental stress by ET_Fleshy · · Score: 1
      Exactly, especially if you
      1. Smoke
      2. Have been drinking
      3. Are flying at night
      On a side note have you ever been in a pressurization chamber? I think the most drastic moment for me was when we did the night tests. We had to read down a page which had a progressively darker background (with black letters) and you had to see how far down you could read before it was impossible. I didn't get too far and I didn't even think that I was feeling the effects much but when I put on my O2 mask I literally though somebody had turned on the light switch or something, it was that drastic of a change. The scary thing was that we were only pressurized to around 12,500' or so for that test. Makes me think every time I go on a long distance night cross country.
    18. Re:Environmental stress by Starker_Kull · · Score: 1
      This is NOT true. ALL areas of an aircraft are pressurised.The floor of a plane is not sealed, as if it were (a large, flat surface) it would EXPLODE! Lower holds are used to carry pets and such - I don't think they would live at FL 300. The only parts of an aircrafts airframe that isn't pressurised are the wheel wells and the condensor side of the air-conditioning units. The wings aren't pressurised by cabin pressure (but they are pressurised by pumps to get the fuel out.

      Be careful with the word "all". Most jets typically have a pressure vessel that is not the entire interior of the aircraft; for instance, every jet I know of, the APU is outside the pressure vessel. In particular, in the EMB-145, not only is the APU not in the pressure vessel, the entire cargo compartment is NOT pressurized! The main outflow valves from the cabin dump into it. This is a relatively small A/C, so its cargo compartment is not under the pax compartment - it is the entire cross-section of the fuselage at the aftmost stations, so structurally the engineers felt it was easier to cap the pressurised section before the fuselage began to narrow near the tail.

      As to collapsing floors due to depressurization, that is exactly what took out a DC-10 many years ago: http://www.airdisaster.com/cgi-bin/view_details.cg i?date=03031974&reg=TC-JAV&airline=Turkish+Airline s

    19. Re:Environmental stress by Starker_Kull · · Score: 1
      1. Airplanes require oxygen above 13,000 feet MSL, not 18,000 feet MSL. You're confusing the upper limit of oxygen-less flying with the base of class A (IFR-only) airspace.

      2. Most small-to-medium sized pressurized passenger planes do not pressurize the cargo hold. Larger planes do sometimes have a separate, pressurized hold for transporting pets and other pressure-sensitive cargo.

      This is not quite correct - you are thinking of Part 91 ops, and the section you are grasping for is the following:

      91.211 Supplemental oxygen.

      (a) General. No person may operate a civil aircraft of U.S. registry--

      (1) At cabin pressure altitudes above 12,500 feet (MSL) up to and including 14,000 feet (MSL) unless the required minimum flight crew is provided with and uses supplemental oxygen for that part of the flight at those altitudes that is of more than 30 minutes duration;

      (2) At cabin pressure altitudes above 14,000 feet (MSL) unless the required minimum flight crew is provided with and uses supplemental oxygen during the entire flight time at those altitudes; and

      (3) At cabin pressure altitudes above 15,000 feet (MSL) unless each occupant of the aircraft is provided with supplemental oxygen.

      Air carrier ops have stricter requirements, generally kicking in around 10,000 feet pressure altitude - see FAR 121.329 if you are interested.

      As for pressurized A/C, I'm not sure what your idea of "small-to-medium sized pressurized passenger planes" is, but it is probably worth noting that just about every western airliner in existence B737-500 sized and higher has a pressure vessel that encloses the cargo compartments. Mind you, these compartments are frequently not HEATED - this is what tends to take out Fluffy.

    20. Re:Environmental stress by Kombat · · Score: 1

      This is not quite correct - you are thinking of Part 91 ops, and the section you are grasping for is the following:

      My bad, I mistakenly assumed the US regs were the same as Canada's. In Canada, the regulations are as I said. See the relevant section of the CARs, 605.31.

      --
      Like woodworking? Build your own picture frames.
    21. Re:Environmental stress by ckd · · Score: 1

      UPS has bought purpose-built freight aircraft, though these are freight variants of passenger airliners like the 757-200 Freighter. Many of the MD-11s are probably passenger conversions, since airlines like Delta seemed to get rid of their MD-11s pretty quickly.

    22. Re:Environmental stress by Marillion · · Score: 1

      Actually, the lower cargo area is pressurized, otherwise "fluffy the dog" couldn't survive. The lower compartment is neither well heated nor well ventilated nor well lit; so "fluffy" usually does not enjoy the flight. The reason for pressurizing the lower compartment is not for the benefit of all the "fluffies" in the world, but to limit the number of rigid angles the pressure container has to maintain. By keeping the pressure container as cylindrical as possible, it reduces the amount of strong material required to maintain an irregular shape thus it lowers the overall aircraft weight. Pretty much everything in the main fusilage between the nose cone radar and the rear APU is inside the pressure container. The notable exception to that rule is the landing gear.

      --
      This is a boring sig
    23. Re:Environmental stress by phliar · · Score: 1

      Airplanes require oxygen above 13,000 feet MSL, not 18,000 ... You're confusing the upper limit of oxygen-less flying with the base of class A (IFR-only) airspace....

      I'm well aware of the oxygen regulations; I'm an instrument-rated pilot. It's really bad form to be pedantic and then get it wrong. There is no mention of 13,000 in FARs 121.327-335; are you thinking of something else?

      A cruising altitude above/below 18,000 is a good rule of thumb for pressurized vs. non-pressurized airplanes. The only exceptions are turbo non-pressurized airplanes like the Bonanza, C-210 etc. -- hardly something an average Joe is likely to ride in.

      Most small-to-medium sized pressurized passenger planes do not pressurize the cargo hold. Larger planes do sometimes have a separate, pressurized hold for transporting pets and other pressure-sensitive cargo.

      You are mistaken. Ordinary people think of anything smaller than a 737 a "little plane" but even airplanes like the DHC Dash-8 [twin-turboprop, about 35 passengers] have pressurized cargo holds. (I think you need to go down to the Metroliner (ugh!) level before you get storage outside the pressure vessel.) It is true that large airliners have multiple cargo areas, but they are all one pressurized space. The floor and any walls separating cargo areas cannot withstand an 8 psi pressure differential.

      --
      Unlimited growth == Cancer.
    24. Re:Environmental stress by Deadstick · · Score: 1

      The squat switch tells the pressurization controller to limit the cabin differential to a small positive value to provide the fuselage stiffening effect.

      If you landed with substantial pressure in the airplane and the squat switch just triggered the valve open, you'd bust eardrums. The pressure has to be bled smoothly all the way down to ambient, and the controller accomplishes that...if you have an electrical failure, you have to open a manual valve.

      You can't get a "pop" by opening the door, because with pressure in the airplane you'd never get it open.

      rj

    25. Re:Environmental stress by Starker_Kull · · Score: 1

      Oops, and I mistakenly assumed you were refering to US regs - thanks for the link for when I go north of the border...

    26. Re:Environmental stress by ET_Fleshy · · Score: 1

      While I am not an airline pilot and have received no "official" training, I was instructed during my "turbine transition" cousrse that landing with a pressurized aircraft can and will cause massive pain and possible eardrum damage to its passengers so that's where I got my information from. Thanks for the update!

  3. Too slow? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why does it take several months for the FAA to find the source of the fire, when firefighters track down the offending source in days?

    1. Re:Too slow? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Never apply logic to the real world, it will only disappoint you!

    2. Re:Too slow? by cat6509 · · Score: 5, Informative

      It is the NTSB that researches things like this, not the FAA per se. They are very methodical and precise with their work. They are slow to publish thier findings, this doesn't mean they are slow to identify the cause, just very carefull that they have come to the correct conclusion. Check out the NTSB aircraft accident database, this contains detail over every aircraft accident reasearched by them for several decades ( 1962 ) http://www.ntsb.gov/ntsb/query.asp

      --
      "Tolerance is a virtue of a man without convictions." G.K.Chesterton
    3. Re:Too slow? by scdeimos · · Score: 1

      When you've got hundreds of miles of Kapton wire in the average cargo plane the point of ignition could be anywhere - especially if the plane is now dispersed over many square miles of crash site.

    4. Re:Too slow? by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      This plane didn't crash, though. It made an emergency landing with all hands treated for minor injuries. The plane simply caught fire in midair. It did not explode or fail in any catastrophic way (air quality notwithstanding). Five months does seem like an awfully long time under the circumstances....

      That said, perhaps LiIon batteries should be treated like petroleum products and be restricted to surface transit only. I'm sure it would make a lot of electronics companies pretty mad, but if they can't make the batteries a lot safer, they really should not be allowed in a cargo hold....

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    5. Re:Too slow? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, the NTSB is very good at determining the root cause of airplane accidents - if it wasn't on the NTSB's site itself I don't think I'd believe the cause of this one.

  4. Nope, it happens in plenty of places by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Flashlight geeks have been dealing with this issue for a while.

    http://www.candlepowerforums.com/vb/showthread.php ?t=78843

    http://www.candlepowerforums.com/vb/showthread.php ?t=124776

    There have been several documented "venting with flames" of primary CR123A batteries. Rechargeables seem to be a lot more stable, occasional Dell laptop conflagarations notwithstanding.

    1. Re:Nope, it happens in plenty of places by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Flashlight geeks?

      Where on the geek scale does *that* fit?

    2. Re:Nope, it happens in plenty of places by rco3 · · Score: 3, Funny

      "Flashlight geeks?

      Where on the geek scale does *that* fit?
      "

      Oh, they're some of the brightest geeks you'll find.

      --

      Ce n'est pas un vrai mouvement de robot!
    3. Re:Nope, it happens in plenty of places by Andrew+Kismet · · Score: 1

      It doesn't. I think of them in the same way as I think of -1 Kelvin.

    4. Re:Nope, it happens in plenty of places by dpaton.net · · Score: 5, Informative

      A majority of CR123s aren't designed for contsant discharge at a relatively high rate. They are marketed to the photo market, where there are pulses of high power and long periods of very low draw. They do function at higher draws, but with reduced lifespan. This is hidden deep in the spec sheets, where the pulsed current recovery and discharge profile math is. I'm not terribly surprised that people have problems with lithium primary cells (NOT Li-po, Li-Ion, or any of the rechargable Li chemistries) in use for high current loads like the high power miniature flashlights out there like the Pelican M6 (the example cited in the second CandlePower link). The Xenon bulb version will suck the power out of a pair of CR123s in 1 hour. Calling the batteries 1300mAH (an average, according to Google), that means they're being loaded to about 1.3A each. That's a ~1C discharge rate. Most cells I found data sheets on didn't show a 1.3A discharge curve, instead showing a 1A curve or 1200mA pulse discharge measurement, using a 3s on / 7s off (30%) duty cycle. 10% can mean a lot in these cases. Odds are a lot of those cells are being used on the edge of or well past their design envelope. Beating up batteries like that can cause trouble, especially for cells that are fragile. Of course, not all are. The Energizer E2 photo lithium CR123 shows a capacity of 1.5AH and a 1000mA discharge life of 1.2 hours. It's probably the one used by Pelican to reach the rating of their flashlight, even if it looks like they did push the cells a little past their design limits.

      Lithium primary cells generally do not have construction compatible with fast discharge. Often it can be gotten away with if the discharge is under 0.6C or is of a pulsed nature. Continuous discharge will kill them tho, a flaming, explosive kill.

      Batteries have ever-increasing power densities, and deserve respect from designers. Just tossing 123s in is a BAD idea IMO. I was an engineer on a project where someone did just slap one in without consideration. When we put the test unit through its paces, blammo. Pulling 2A out of a 1.5A battery for 7 seconds is OK in NiCads and NiMH cells and even rechargable LiPoly prismatics if you know what you're doing. This was a dime store photo battery, and it went off like a small cannon after a few seconds.

      People don't think about the design envelope for batteries as much as they should any more. It's unfortunate.

      My US$0.02 as an engineer.

      --
      This is not a sig. this is a duck. quack.
    5. Re:Nope, it happens in plenty of places by FuzzyDaddy · · Score: 2, Informative
      --
      It's not wasting time, I'm educating myself.
    6. Re:Nope, it happens in plenty of places by Dread_ed · · Score: 1

      Nice post with extra chunky detail. It made my inner geek cry and sing. Thank you.

      Since you understand that not respecting the specifications on a Li battery can have some seriously detrimental effects, just imagine what this could do in the hands of Joe sixpack.

      How do you spell "BZZZZT!" anyway?

      --
      When the only tool you have is a claw hammer every problem starts to look like the back of someone's skull.
    7. Re:Nope, it happens in plenty of places by modecx · · Score: 1

      It's been a while since I've cleaned my monitor., I have to admit, so thanks for giving me a reason!

      --
      Constitutional rights may be respected, repealed, or modified; but they must never be ignored.
    8. Re:Nope, it happens in plenty of places by Aussie_blue · · Score: 1
      Lots of good information. The examples on CandlePowerForums are all of 2xCR123 configuration, There seem to be a number of Pelican M6 plus an assortment of others including Surefire and Goldston and a range of battery brands. There are a number of folks over there who have been trying to replicate the problem with mixed success, seems the issue is far more prevalent in units where the state of charge is mismatched, that is one cell at 100% and the other at something like 40% in generally hot conditions. There is speculation of some reverse changing issue as well as it seems that the 100% cells are the ones than tend to vent. You also identified that these are usually occurring on Xenon type lights where the draw on the cells is extremely high. So far we have yet to see an example of a single cell light or a LED light (most draw less current through a regulated driver of some sort) causing this problem.

      So really for the Lithium primary problem in flashlights it seems to be limited to a set of pretty specific circumstances.

      It is still possible for these batteries to explosively vent if damaged. There was a fire at LAX when a forklift punctured a container load of these things and of course some other folks are selling safer chemistries and using this demo video to reinforce their claims:

      http://www.a123systems.com/html/tech/safety.html

      You are right though, careful design perhaps was not always done with some of the cheaper lights.

    9. Re:Nope, it happens in plenty of places by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You may note that the Pelican is a multi-cell light. There are other lights out there that will suck a a single CR123 cell dry in 20-25 minutes (HDS Systems, for one). That's 3C - 2.5C current, and I've never heard of a single issue with that light regarding the battery.

      The problem isn't the current draw, it's what happens when a cell gets reversed or otherwise damaged - reversal can only happen in a multi cell light. One particularly weak battery amongst some good batteries can ruin your day in a multi-cell light.

      This is bad for rechargeables too, it just so happens that with matching and protection circuits and the other precautions taken that it is much much rarer for rechargeables. The primaries don't really have these precautions and it's not cost effective to implement them in a one-shot cell. You also have people mixing runs of cells, getting cells that are not as well matched.

  5. The question I'm more interested in is.... by LordPhantom · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...can these be modified by someone with nasty goals in such a manner that they might actually bring down an airplane? Disturbing thought if true....

    1. Re:The question I'm more interested in is.... by autocracy · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Yes, and every time I forget to stash my Swiss army knife in my luggage... or anything else stupid that gets confiscated, I'm rolling my eyes while I think of the two lithium ion batteries I'm bringing abord and how nastily they'd react with water.

      False sense of security? Hell yes.

      --
      SIG: HUP
    2. Re:The question I'm more interested in is.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      possibly. CR123A batteries contain nearly as much "bang" in them as dynamite.

      http://www.molalla.net/~leeper/lithexpl.pdf

    3. Re:The question I'm more interested in is.... by fm6 · · Score: 1
      A false sense of security is better than no sense of security at all. Think of the children!

      (I no longer carry a pocket knife.)

    4. Re:The question I'm more interested in is.... by P3NIS_CLEAVER · · Score: 1

      drop them on lebanon

      --
      Please sign petition to restore sanity to our banking system!!!

      http://financialpetition.org/
    5. Re:The question I'm more interested in is.... by stevesliva · · Score: 1
      or anything else stupid that gets confiscated
      Such as camping stoves or lanterns without the butane/propane canisters attached. Friggin TSA idiots.
      --
      Who do you get to be an expert to tell you something's not obvious? The least insightful person you can find? -J Roberts
    6. Re:The question I'm more interested in is.... by j_w_d · · Score: 1

      The primary article points to a report concluding that LiON batteries destroyed a UPS plane. Any battery that fails catastrophically on board an airliner could be a very serious problem. And camera batteries are only one source. Lap top batteries are a lot bigger. And what kind of batteries do iPods use? Depending on the chemistry, some of these batteries discharge Hydrofluoric acid when they fail. That is seriously nasty stuff. I would really hate to be in a plane cabin at 30K feet or so and have any kind of lithium battery fail. So the answer to your question is "YES." The really important footnote though is that they don't HAVE to be modified, just abused. It won't require anything but a maroon who has abused his laptop battery to cause real problems for a whole planeload. Statistically, you hazard is from the roadwarrior with a laptop, teen with an iPod, or every day tourist, or even the air marshall with a radio. Terrorists are a trivial risk factor in comparison.

      And yeah, the TSA continues to worry about pocket knives, cabin crew wince at nail files and clippers, while they let road warriors light up their laptops.

      --
      ------ The only greater hazard to your liberty than n politicians is n+1 politicians.
    7. Re:The question I'm more interested in is.... by winkydink · · Score: 1

      You are confusing elemental lithium with a molecule containing lithium. A lot like saying elemental sodium and sodium chloride are the same thing.

      --

      "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    8. Re:The question I'm more interested in is.... by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1
      Such as camping stoves or lanterns without the butane/propane canisters attached. Friggin TSA idiots.

      Well, I suppose you could beat someone over the head with one in a pinch... :g

      -b.

  6. UPS = Ooops by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 4, Interesting


    Given how some of my UPS packages arrive looking like they were dragged to my house behind the truck, I would say that it is pretty likely that UPS is doing things to the batteries that my computer store doesn't.

    1. Re:UPS = Ooops by CheddarHead · · Score: 4, Informative

      Back when I was in college there was a brief period where I payed my rent and got beer money by working at a UPS facility. I worked loading UPS semi trailers with packages. The packages would come off of a conveyor belt, and our job was to load the truck as fast as possible.

      To make a long story short, we were not particularly gentle with the packages. In fact if you saw the way the trucks were loaded, you'd be surprised at what good conditions your packages are in. I still use UPS, but I always make sure that things are packed very, very well.

    2. Re:UPS = Ooops by steveo777 · · Score: 1
      I used to work for UPS for the same reasons. Those trucks are packed so there's almost not wasted space. Sometimes not enough room is left for a few extra microbes the way we needed to shove stuff in there. I still use UPS too. Like the parent poster said, however, everything is handled rather rough, which is okay for most computers because they've got pleanty of shock-proof styrofoam.

      Granted, they will take care to make sure your small, fragile looking packages sit on top, this doesn't mean a lot because they don't always end up on top. We didn't try to damage anything, but we didn't care either.
      *shrugs*

      --
      This sig isn't original enough, it's time to come up with something witty...
    3. Re:UPS = Ooops by suffe · · Score: 1

      Clearly you haven't been to my computer store.

      --

      Karma: 2.71828182846 (Mostly due to small, fun pills)
    4. Re:UPS = Ooops by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      And for those who are wondering what this guy means, what he means is that the back of the truck gets loaded, with boxes stacked. Then the front of the truck gets loaded, by throwing boxes over the top of the boxes right in the back of the truck.

      One of my buddies used to work for UPS in Santa Cruz, CA. They had a chute that the packages came down, about ten feet long, and crashed onto the conveyor belt, from which point they threw them at the trucks. The chute had a big nasty bolt sticking down in the top of it, and occasionally large packages would get stuck on the bolt, gouging big holes in 'em. Someone would have to climb up the shaft, and unclog it.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    5. Re:UPS = Ooops by rrohbeck · · Score: 1

      Given how some of my UPS packages arrive looking like they were dragged to my house behind the truck, I would say that it is pretty likely that UPS is doing things to the batteries that my computer store doesn't.

      Not just UPS. Add Lufthansa, United and American checked luggage - and I'm sure the others aren't any better. I've had clamshell Delseys and Samsonites crushed. Now imagine what could happen to a battery in such a case.

    6. Re:UPS = Ooops by Napoleon+The+Pig · · Score: 1

      I worked at the UPS Hub in Raleigh, NC for about a year while in college. Your loading technique is dead wrong. The trucks are all loaded front to back stacking as you go with the ideal situation being all available space used up floor to ceiling. Does stuff get thrown on top? Of course, but you don't fill the back of the truck first then throw the packages towards the front, that's a complete waste of space. I don't know about hubs out in CA but if we did that our managers would have our asses since they didn't like calling for new trucks multiple times in one night.

      What you are right about though is the conveyor belts. Those would do more damage to packages than any human could ever attempt to do with their bare hands. There were many nights when I'd just run up and down the conveyor belt breaking jams of packages (yes walking on the conveyor belt would get you fired too but most people turned a blind eye to it since they wanted their numbers for the shift and didn't care as long as people could still load the trucks). I actually got bored one weekend and came up with a few design modifications for the belts and slides that would minimize package jams, but what did they do? "We can't spend money to retrofit all these belts, it's a nice thought though."

      So the next time your box comes from UPS (or FedEx, or DHL) looking like an accordian, it's most likely not the loader's fault.

    7. Re:UPS = Ooops by ahsile · · Score: 1

      Similar story, but replace UPS with Purolator. Always put extra packing in the box.

  7. FAA is inventing stuff to limit laptop use! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Impossible! Why would the batteries not catch fire in a store, yet catch fire on an airplane??? The FAA is nuts!

    Clearly it couldn't be physical battery damage, because shipping things almost never results in damage. And clearly it couldn't be due to air pressure related leaks, because airplanes are pressurized at 1 atmosphere.

    Right? Isn't the FAA crazy for thinking of such nonsense?

    1. Re:FAA is inventing stuff to limit laptop use! by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      They're talking about non-rechargeable batteries - and some of them WILL fail before they reach the store. Internal shorts (say from vibration) aren't as likely, and won't cause as much localized heat buildup sitting in an open-air display as the would densely packed in a container on an airplane.

    2. Re:FAA is inventing stuff to limit laptop use! by Deadstick · · Score: 1
      airplanes are pressurized at 1 atmosphere.

      No. The cabin altitude in passenger service can be as high as 8,000 feet.

      rj

  8. Pressure? by reality-bytes · · Score: 2, Interesting

    TFA doesn't say whether the one that caught fire in the hand luggage was after landing or not but the rest seem to be post-flight.

    Now, when you're on a commercial flight cruising along at 33,000ft, you may only be pressurised to 9,000ft and this, of course, includes your hand luggage.

    Is it possible that the depressurisation to 9,000ft alt and the repressurisation on landing resultant expansion and compression cycle of the lithium batteries and causing them to somehow fail?

    --
    Ripping an new rectum in the fabric of spacetime.
    1. Re:Pressure? by terevos · · Score: 1

      For a well produced battery, I highly doubt that even the air pressure of 33,000ft would do anything to it.

      But it seems there have been some poorly produced batteries lately. Maybe one of those rare instances just happened to be on that plane and just happened to be triggered by either the flight, the handling, or perhaps even the air pressure change. But my bet is on the handling or the rigors of the flight rather than the simple air pressure change.

  9. Close Call... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 2, Funny

    The good news is that it wasn't an exploding MacBook.

    1. Re:Close Call... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or a Dell.

  10. sometimes a roll of the dice by virchull · · Score: 1

    Manufacturing errors can cause a lithium ion battery to explode. Reputable manufacturers do tests to screen out defectives, but on rare occasions, test errors occur and a bad battery can sneak through.

  11. tick...tick...tick... by Clancie · · Score: 1

    ...just waiting on the announcement that notebook computers, portable DVD players, i-pods and cell phones have been banned from commercial aircraft.

    1. Re:tick...tick...tick... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Ban everything except naked humans.

      Safety at all costs!

  12. Warning... by CaseM · · Score: 4, Funny

    Oxygen linked to fires...time to take ACTION!!

    1. Re:Warning... by RingDev · · Score: 1

      Dihydrogen-Monoxide can help prevent those issues, but it is responsible for thousands of deaths every year!

      http://www.dhmo.org/facts.html

      -Rick

      --
      "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
    2. Re:Warning... by Thuktun · · Score: 1

      Oxygen is one of the MAIN COMPONENTS of the DEADLY COMPOUND known as DIHIDROGEN MONOXIDE! Why hasn't our government BANNED these substances yet?!

    3. Re:Warning... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Lithium, Magnesium* , Sodium -- there's a nice pyro animated GIF over here , and if you don't mind having your MPEG downloads monitored at work ... they'll see you are a terrorist downloader (foreign link too!) instead of just an ordinary porn downloader

      * FYI, the support frame on notebooks is magnesium

    4. Re:Warning... by DamnStupidElf · · Score: 1

      "Dioxide is everywhere, in your house, in your car, in your children's lungs! Dioxide has a bluish color in liquid or solid form, but is found in the gaseous state in nature. It is highly flammable (with suitable reducer), lethal in high concentrations, and often combines with other trace elements to form dihydrogen monoxide, trioxide, and other dangerous substances!"

    5. Re:Warning... by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      FWIW, DHMO can not help with LiPoly and Li Primary cells. It can *only* make it worse. ;)
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    6. Re:Warning... by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      Completely OT, but...
      What is involved in making solid oxygen? I know the "poor mans LOX" is by boiling LN2 in a metal container and LOX will form at the underside of said container (even better blowing Oxy on it). How do you freeze it? That would be wonderfully fun to play with.
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    7. Re:Warning... by Amazing+Quantum+Man · · Score: 1

      Yes, we should use the much safer Oxygen Dihydride :-)

      --
      Fascism starts when the efficiency of the government becomes more important than the rights of the people.
    8. Re:Warning... by PlusFiveTroll · · Score: 1

      http://www.jaeri.go.jp/english/press/980624/supp.h tml

      That site has a little info on solid oxygen. I dont think your going to get the chance to play with it though... It forms a solid under 1/2 million atmospheres of pressure. I do think that if you quickly move it from the pressure chamber to our atmosphere that it would violently decompress and oxidize everything around it.

  13. They are charged by Solder+Fumes · · Score: 1

    Lithium-Ion batteries are always kept partially charged, as they last longer this way and it can be dangerous to attempt charging a battery under a certain voltage. So a laptop battery contains a significant amount of stored energy, meaning any internal short from stress, damage, or manufacturing defect could easily result in fire. It's not really spontaneous, or any big mystery.

  14. Spontaneous Lithium Battery Fires by deathcow · · Score: 3, Informative


    I've seen it with my own eyes. I wrote the embedded software (8051 C) for a robotic bone lengthener / deformity corrector in the early 90's, it was powered by Lithium batteries that ran the motors and provided 5V for all the electronics. On more than one occasion (during development) we had Lithium batteries just go up in fire and smoke, for no apparent reason. It caused us a lot of worry to say the least, especially since any bad and ready to blow cells were packed into packs with surrounding cells.. to add to the fire. This was 12 years ago, so I am sure Lithium batteries are better than ever, but it doesn't suprise me to hear about them going up in flames.

    1. Re:Spontaneous Lithium Battery Fires by twiddlingbits · · Score: 1

      Wow, someone else who wrote code for an old Intel 8051C Microcontroller! I also wrote code for this animal in PL/M in the early 90's. It was a very versatile chip for it's day. We ran all the radio traffic in an airplane with one of these, and added in a TI C30 DSP to add warning tones for altitude, etc. High tech for it's day but we have kids toys with more CPU power these days. Does remembering the 90's make us "Antique Geeks" ?

    2. Re:Spontaneous Lithium Battery Fires by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Does remembering the 90's make us "Antique Geeks"?

      I remember writing code for a Rockwell PPS-4 4-bit microcontroller, not to mention the 6502, 6800, 6809, 1802 and the venerable 8080. That doesn't really make me an "antique geek", though ... just an antique.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    3. Re:Spontaneous Lithium Battery Fires by twiddlingbits · · Score: 1

      Ah, the 6800..Wrote a whole RTOS in 4K of RAM plus an aircraft countermeasures program. 100% Assembler..lets see someone do that today!

    4. Re:Spontaneous Lithium Battery Fires by Angst+Badger · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I can't speak to lithium batteries, but I can tell you that NiMH rechargeables are pretty sensitive to moderately high temperatures. I've never cooked one by putting it under excessive load, but I lit several before I learned the trick of how to solder the solder-tab variety. I had one blow once when I was applying heat-shrink tubing to a series of them and kept the heat gun still a little too long.

      Now, as I said, I don't know much about lithium batteries, but batteries in general use chemical processes to store energy. Transfer that energy faster than the usual chemistry will allow (or physically stress them by knocking them around), and you shouldn't be too surprised if the energy is released through a more expedient means -- like combustion.

      I'm a little surprised we haven't seen more of this. The more energy we insist on packing into smaller and smaller batteries, the more inherently dangerous they become. Combine that with a low-margin market like laptop PCs where there is tremendous pressure to cut corners at every possible point, and you end up with yet another reason not to keep that laptop on your lap.

      --
      Proud member of the Weirdo-American community.
  15. Better yet, banned from cargo. by Hamster+Lover · · Score: 1

    Don't tell me you actually check these items, do you? If they allowed these items only as carry-on that would eliminate a lot of baggage theft, methinks, and also allow for the use of safety equipment if there is a fire. Two problems solved in one stroke.

  16. can you can get lithium out of a lithium battery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Lithium is pretty fun too play with - but until this article I didn't realize that apparently it exists inside the batter in it's fun form.


    I have a bunch of dead laptop batteries here -- if I open them, can I get the fun stuff out?

  17. Yeah! by The+MAZZTer · · Score: 1

    You can start by not breathing anymore. ;)

    1. Re:Yeah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No! Instead breathe as much as possible to convert all the available air to carbon dioxide, thereby supressing any fires before the get started.

    2. Re:Yeah! by Cornflake917 · · Score: 1

      Umm, breathing uses oxygen and produces carbon dioxide. So the action to take is to hyper-ventalate!

  18. Fragile by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 4, Funny

    UPS Dictionary says .....

    Fragile (fra-gil-lay) from early French n. To toss about with reckless abandon.

    --
    Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    1. Re:Fragile by digitalhermit · · Score: 1

      You sure? I thought it was the same root as frag, to demolish to smithereens.

    2. Re:Fragile by SharkJumper · · Score: 2, Funny

      Pssh.

      Fragile (frah-jee-lay). Italian n. Major Award.

    3. Re:Fragile by baerkin · · Score: 1

      Dude,

      Thats not the UPS dictionary you have there its the Cargo Dictionary :)

      I should know I've been working for Cargo Co's since the begining of the 90's

      --
      rushing for nothing
  19. I smell a fire^w new movie plot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    How about another airplane disaster movie? I'm thinking of calling it...

    "Li-ons on planes"

  20. Incapable of extinguishing? by celardore · · Score: 1

    aircraft don't carry fire suppression equipment capable of extinguishing lithium fires.

    I googled it quickly and found this http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0UBT/is _29_18/ai_n6280927. Planes don't carry water??

    1. Re:Incapable of extinguishing? by HaloZero · · Score: 3, Informative

      * Water may be used to extinguish packaging fires if batteries have not ruptured; water is not an effective extinguishing agent for a battery fire.

      * For small fires involving the battery [extinguishing] media such as Lith-X or copper powder may be used, but should be applied with a long handled tool. Do not use CO2 or Halon directly on a battery fire as the exposed surface of the contained lithium may react with these materials.

      * For larger fires involving lithium batteries, copious amounts of water may be applied, from a safe distance, to control the fire and protect adjacent materials and facilities.


      Simply put, water won't do the trick. It may contain the fire (by dousing the flames / removing its heat from the equation), but it won't extinguish it. Also, dumping water onto a battery fire just causes a lot of steam. Depending on the size of fire and the amount of water (since the key term used above is copious), you could turn a sealed airplane into a pressure cooker in just a few minutes, and no one is going to be happy about that.

      --
      Informatus Technologicus
    2. Re:Incapable of extinguishing? by ihaddsl · · Score: 1
      Do not use CO2 or Halon directly on a battery fire as the exposed surface of the contained lithium may react with these materials.


      what's worse is the cargo fire supression system is Halon, which will not extinguish the fire, and may lead to other bad things happening.

      Of course in the passenger cabin Halon is not used, but as you pointed out, the other standard fire extingushing methods (water & CO2) don't work effectively.
    3. Re:Incapable of extinguishing? by Cobralisk · · Score: 0
      Water may be used to extinguish packaging fires if batteries have not ruptured; water is not an effective extinguishing agent for a battery fire.
      Please read the contents of your links before you post them.

      Jackass.
      --
      Waiting for ad.doubleclick.net...
    4. Re:Incapable of extinguishing? by Carnildo · · Score: 3, Informative
      I googled it quickly and found this http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0UBT/is _29_18/ai_n6280927. Planes don't carry water??

      Not in the volumes needed to extinguish a burning battery:

      * Water may be used to extinguish packaging fires if batteries have not ruptured; water is not an effective extinguishing agent for a battery fire.

      As it says, water is not effective if the battery itself is burning.

      * For small fires involving the battery [extinguishing] media such as Lith-X or copper powder may be used, but should be applied with a long handled tool. Do not use CO2 or Halon directly on a battery fire as the exposed surface of the contained lithium may react with these materials.

      Airplane fire extinguishers are almost universally halon-based, as halons don't corrode aircraft components, and they work at low concentrations: you can do things like discharge an extingusher into a running engine, or put out a fire in the cockpit without suffocating the pilots.

      * For larger fires involving lithium batteries, copious amounts of water may be applied, from a safe distance, to control the fire and protect adjacent materials and facilities

      Here, "copious amounts of water" means the sort of water flow that a pumper truck attached to a hydrant can provide.
      --
      "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
    5. Re:Incapable of extinguishing? by P3NIS_CLEAVER · · Score: 1

      Typically metal fires are extinquished with dry sand.

      --
      Please sign petition to restore sanity to our banking system!!!

      http://financialpetition.org/
    6. Re:Incapable of extinguishing? by milkmage · · Score: 1

      Well - the link says copious amounts of water I doubt FedEx hauls thousands of gallons of water onboard their aircraft (where weight is an issue)... any fire suppressing capability is probably in the form of CO2. "For larger fires involving lithium batteries, copious amounts of water may be applied, from a safe distance, to control the fire and protect adjacent materials and facilities"

    7. Re:Incapable of extinguishing? by rubmytummy · · Score: 1
      In general, no amount of water can extinguish a Class D (flammable metal) fire. When I was in the Navy, there was training on what kind of extinguishing agents would work on each class of fire. The "agent" for Class D? Push the burning material overboard; there's nothing else you can do. I gather the damage control specialists had some other, very limited, options, but basically a metal fire is hopeless.

      I never heard how this applies on ships with aluminum-magnesium hulls.

      My best understanding--IANAChemist--is that a metal combustion reaction yields high enough energy, and yields it fast enough, to dissociate water molecules. The resulting gases then participate in the fire. Probably most of us saw a demonstration in chemistry class of magnesium burning under water: Mg + 2(H2O) -> Mg(OH)2 + H2.

      [You get a similar problem putting water on a coal fire. In large enough quantities rapidly applied, water will extinguish coal. Applying the water as fog or spray, however, generates coal gas, a highly explosive mix of O2 and H2. Bad.]

      Perhaps, however, sufficiently gi-normous quantities of water might slow a metal fire, or the rate of the fire's spreading, enough to make time for other measures (see "overboard", above). On the other hand, with the alkali metals, water makes things *way* worse. In that same chemistry class, I got to see my teacher's first-and-last-ever sodium and water demonstration. She decided to stick to films after that.

  21. lipo fires by heli_flyer · · Score: 4, Informative

    Electric RC flyers have been dealing with this issue for a while.

    Here is an informational thread about lipo batteries:

    http://www.rcgroups.com/forums/showthread.php?t=20 9187

    1. Re:lipo fires by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As the RC link in parent indicates, LiPo batteries seem particularly sensitive to physical force. Dropping one from a good height (as could happend in your radio controlled airplain) appears to be sufficient to trigger a delayed "vent with flame" event. It is curious that there appears to be some time delay between the impact and "vent with flame". So, add another reason to the list of "why you should not drop your laptop".

    2. Re:lipo fires by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [blockquote]So, add another reason to the list of "why you should not drop your laptop".[/blockquote]
      What laptop uses LiPo batteries? All of them, at least any within the last several years, use Li-ion batteries. Big difference.

  22. Uh... "Vent with Flame" anyone? by tlhIngan · · Score: 4, Informative

    One of the failure modes of a Li-Ion battery is what the industry calls "vent with flame", or what everyone else calls, a fire. (A very spectacular one, at that - not just ignition, but the fire actually shoots out like a jet).

    Li-Ion batteries are extremely volatile and sensitive, which is why good batteries have a variety of protective circuits on them (or can have) - e.g., physical distortion (detects if the battery balloons), over temperature (charging/discharge), over current, unsafe low voltage (if the battery voltage falls too low, you can't charge it safely), and many more. That's also why their charge regimen is so complex (charge at constant current to ~90% capacity, then constant voltage charge to 100%. Then stop all charging until capacity is around 90% again, then restart CV charge - this is why the first 80% can happen relatively quickly, while the last 20% can often take as long as it took to get to 80% in the first place) since they need charge controllers and "smart chips" to monitor the state of the battery.

    Usually these events happen when the battery is actually used, but there isn't anything to say that it can happen otherwise. Those protective circuits require power, and they get their power from the battery while outside the device. And since you cannot store Li-Ion batteries discharged very well, they are often charged at the factory, during assembly and final sale. A nice short somewhere along the line and battery will vent with flame.

    There's a reason why most LiIon batteries have hard to get at terminals or come with protective covers. It's not for convenience, but more for during storage/shipping, so the terminals don't get shorted.

    Oh yeah, those protective circuits are optional - not all batteries have every one (some may not need it or find a way to protect it in another way - battery distortion can be handled by having the battery having to fit in a slot - if it can't fit, well...). Third party ultra cheap batteries may have *no* protective circuits at all (hence those "Nokia Exploding Batteries").

    1. Re:Uh... "Vent with Flame" anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, lion (rechargeable) should be stored below 50% charge.

    2. Re:Uh... "Vent with Flame" anyone? by fastgood · · Score: 1
      One of the failure modes of a Li-Ion battery is what the industry calls "vent with flame", or what everyone else calls, a fire.

      The failure modes of a H-Hg battery is what Monty Python called the 'Holy Hand Grenade' , or what everyone else* calls, the H-Hg.

      * Fallout2, Worms3D, BardsTale, Buffy, DukeNukem:TTK, et. al

    3. Re:Uh... "Vent with Flame" anyone? by Spluge · · Score: 1

      Rechargable packs are typically shipped at ~30-40% charge.
      This is done partly for safty reasons and partly because it's better for the cell life.
      Storing them at full charge can ruin the capacity if they get warm.

    4. Re:Uh... "Vent with Flame" anyone? by mmclure · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yes, but "below 50% charge" actually means "85% of the maximum voltage." For Lithium-Polimer batteries, the maximum voltage is 4.2V and 3.0V is "completely discharged" (in fact dropping lower than 3.0V runs the risk of permanently damaging the battery and causing "vent with flames" the next time you charge it.) 3.8V is considered the ideal storage voltage in R/C circles.

      R/C circles probably have the largest percentage of failed Lithium Polymer batteries, because they are discharged at pretty high rates, and the protective circuits on most consumer lithium batteries are removed. Most failures are caused by the following:

        - Overcharging due to the use of a bad charger or using the wrong settings on a Lithium-Polymer-capable charger.
        - One cell of a multicell pack overcharging due to being at a higher initial voltage than the other cells in the pack. This is being mitigated with the use of "balancers" which connect to each cell and maintain equal voltages across the pack.
        - Physical damage due to crashes.
        - Shorting out the battery.
        - Allowing the voltage of a cell to drop below 3.0V.

      Many of these have been ameliorated due to technological improvements in the last two years - for example the aircraft-side electronics now cut off the motor at a point where the battery voltage is still safe, chargers have been much improved, and battery packs now come with special connections to allow checking and adjusting voltages on a cell-by-cell basis.

      R/C enthusiasts tend to treat Lithium-Polymer batteries with quite a bit of respect as far as storage and charging is concerned. Many will set up a cinderblock on a concrete floor, place the battery in one of the holes of the cinderblock (the holes in the block are set vertically) and cover the top of the hole with a plastic bag full of sand. In case of a "vent with flame", the heat will melt the plastic allowing the sand to cover the battery and put out the fire. Compared to a couple of years ago, however, the incidence of Lithium-Polymer fires has greatly decreased even as use of Lithium-Polymer batteries has increased.

      This forum thread has a lot of information about dangers and safe handling guidelines for Lithium-Polymer batteries.

    5. Re:Uh... "Vent with Flame" anyone? by Spluge · · Score: 1

      Anything from 10% to 90% charge will be between 3.6 and 3.8 Volts, the discharge curve is not even close to linear for Li-ions or Li-polymers.
      Also voltage is very temperature dependent. The same cell at the same charge can swing by 0.3-0.4V depending on the temperature without going outside its operating range.

      Basically voltage on a Li cell is a meaningless when trying to work out the percentage charge left. Just part of the fun when dealing with them.

    6. Re:Uh... "Vent with Flame" anyone? by triso · · Score: 1
      One of the failure modes of a Li-Ion battery is what the industry calls "vent with flame", or what everyone else calls, a fire. (A very spectacular one, at that - not just ignition, but the fire actually shoots out like a jet).

      Dell calls this a thermal incident.
  23. Exploding fist ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...don't carry fire suppression equipment capable of extinguishing lithium fires. Neither do they carry equipment to extinguish magnesium or aluminium fires. Fires in metals are generally very hard to deal with due to their very high temperature.
    ...and what about my watch battery ?? Will they pay for my damaged hand when my watch explodes ?

  24. Airline Surcharges? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think the airlines will use this as a way to extract even more from us in flight surcharges.
    Imagine surcharges of $10 for an music player ($30 if it's an iPod :lol:), $50 for a laptop, $20 for a digital camera etc. to cover the 'increased cost of safety on board flights.'

    Maybe I should shut up and stop giving airlines ideas. ;-)

  25. More on the destructive power of Lithium.... by Cherita+Chen · · Score: 4, Informative

    Check out these photos here of lithium polymer batteries (commonly used in r/c models) in action... SUPER FUN HAPPY BURN THE HOUSE DOWN TOYS!

    --
    I'm not fat, just big boned...
  26. litte kid asks.. "how did you loose your leg" by absinthminded64 · · Score: 2, Funny

    The War? No. . Motorcycle accident? No. . Slashdot? YES!!!

    "Here's something you can try at home if you're a total skeptic" ..

    Skepticism. . like exploding batteries. . is dangerous. .

    1. Re:litte kid asks.. "how did you loose your leg" by tomhudson · · Score: 2, Funny

      I figure anyone who actually tries it deserves one of these

      Kind of like the oakie who went to the doctor for a vasectomy:

      Oakie: I want to get a vasectomy.
      Dr: Just put a cherry bomb in an empty beer can and count to 10.

      ... Oakie sees 3 doctors, and they all say the same thing ... until finally ...

      Dr: No problem, my secretary can book you an appointment.
      Oakie: Great doc. Hey, can you explain why all the other docs said I should just stick a cherry bomb in an empty beer can and count to ten?
      Dr: Oh, you're an oakie? Sorry, just stick a cherry bomb in a beer can and count to 10. It works.

      Later that day ... Oakie has his buddy over, explains how the docs all told him the same thing.

      Billy-Bod: Youy gonna try it?
      Oakie: Might as well ...

      (Oakie puts lit cherry bomb in tin can, holds can in one hand, starts counting on his fingers with the other hand ..
      1 ... 2 ... 3 ... 4 ... 5 ...

      (runs out of fingers, holds tin can between thighs so he can continue counting ...)

  27. Don't worry too much... by anti-human+1 · · Score: 0

    Unless you fly cargo planes. Lithium batteries aren't allowed as cargo on passenger aircraft. If your laptop explodes (which would hardly be an aircraft-crippling explosion), there are crew present to act quickly.

    1. Re:Don't worry too much... by v1 · · Score: 1

      You are saying they will not allow you to check your laptop bag as baggage? Not that most ppl would trust the likes of TWA to their laptop in cargo, but I thought you could?

      I know when I fly my laptop is in the bag under my seat.

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    2. Re:Don't worry too much... by anti-human+1 · · Score: 0

      Depending on the airline and ticketing agent, it may not matter. They should tell you to remove the battery and carry it with you at least. What they do on the other hand, may be something completely different.

  28. It may not be UPS by mnmn · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've heard of the strangest things blamed for airplane crashes. The fact is that some pretty smart people are put on the investigation of a crash, paid handsomely and given a deadline to produce an answer. Their jobs might depend on it. As the investigation progresses, theres always a 'most likely cause' that changes. When the deadline arrives, the most likely cause of the day becomes the answer.

    Some things only happen on airplane crashes.

    --
    "Give orange me give eat orange me eat orange give me eat orange give me you." -Nim Chimpsky
  29. In related news... by epp_b · · Score: 3, Funny

    Several airlines have just announced that they are banning the in-flight use of Dell laptops.

  30. hmmm... by JayTech · · Score: 1

    Could the batteries possibly be manafacturered by the same reliable company as this notebook? If so, the question is, is it a quantity over quality issue, and could it be happening with more of their product lines?

    1. Re:hmmm... by v1 · · Score: 1

      You'd almost have to open the pack to tell who makes them. I know that Apple uses LG Chemical for their batteries, usually in the "4/3 AA" form factor.

      I think these are the ones: http://www.lgchem.com/en_products/electromaterial/ battery/ion/ICR18650A2.html

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
  31. lithium power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    I have pretty extensive experience with lithium and lithium ion/polymer/prismatic(and otherwise)/LIFn cells)

    They are dangerous. Lithium polymers can create an extremely high temp fire if shorted, dunked in water, etc. Lithium ions can (and will) explode if shorted in water or otherwise. The case on it can't expand like the lithium polymers wrapping which allows it to burn instead of turn into a crappy grenade.

    Lithium cells (like the new 1.5v cells out for cameras and other digital technologies) don't have as high of a current capability as recharable lithiums, but offer extreme weight->low current capacity. They get hot very quickly and catch fire very fast. It is possible that the plastic wrap on the lithiums in question was damaged and shorted on a metal item unless it was dropped. As you see, the cells can be crushed which will cause a fire in very short order.

    And by the way, don't put out a battery fire with water or it will short other batteries out and compound the problem. What kinda moron posts that junk?

    Lithium technology is safe if treated right. I guarantee you the voltage matching or cutoff circuitry is what lead to the dell laptop issues, and that the lithium cells on the UPS flight were wet or damaged in some other way as to cause the problem. I would hate to see lithium batteries be shipped via HASMAT trucks, but unless we start hiring more people that can read english labels that say "do not wet, fragile" they may have to be...

    -JNY

  32. Re:Yes!!! by P3NIS_CLEAVER · · Score: 0, Troll

    you have been penis owned!!

    --
    Please sign petition to restore sanity to our banking system!!!

    http://financialpetition.org/
  33. (Shudder) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know about anybody else, but if I never read the phrase "robotic bone lengthener" again, it will be too soon.

    1. Re:(Shudder) by onkelonkel · · Score: 1

      See, in the old days we didn't have v i * g r a, so we had to use mechanical means ...

      --
      None of them can see the clouds; The polished wings don't care.
  34. 1st, damage/etc in shipping process, THEN fire by Locutus · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That is most likely what they'll let RECHARGEABLE Li batteries onboard but not full capacity non-rechargeable Li batteries. With all the ways the batteries can be damaged before they're put on the planes, there's too much of a risk of fire from latent fires due to damaged cells.

    This is also why there aren't lots of fires in the backrooms of computer stores. All those laptops not only don't have charged batteries but they've probably already been inspected for damaged packaging.

    Atleast that's my theory.

    LoB

    --
    "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
  35. Batteries have been doing this for a long time. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One of the maintenance items on the helicopters I used to fly on (as a passenger) was very careful treatment of the Ni-cad batteries. Someone explained to me that if you didn't look after them properly, they were subject to thermal runaway. The battery would have a certain self discharge current. If that was enough to raise the battery's temperature a bit then the current would increase and warm the battery more which would cause the current to increase which would raise the temperature ... and the battery would explode.

    Some battery chemistries are more prone to thermal runaway than others. Lead-acid, for instance, almost never explodes. Ni-cad can explode. Apparently lithium-ion batteries explode. Of course if we wanted to be safe, we would use lead-acid batteries but then they would weigh a lot more. Ya pays yer money and ya takes yer pick.

    1. Re:Batteries have been doing this for a long time. by deadweight · · Score: 1

      Many (all?) airplanes with NiCad batteries have a battery temperature meter in the cockpit. I think they are obsolete now, since AGM batteries are much safer.

  36. Cheap batteries, mixed brands by Rosyna · · Score: 1

    Flashlight geeks have been dealing with this issue for a while.

    I'd imagine this would be true if they are using cheap Li-Ion batteries or mixing cells from different brands. Hell, it's not even wise to mix cells of different ages of the same brand (old versus new).

    IIRC, Lithium Ion battery charge can creep from one cell to another and due to the fragile nature of these batteries (easily overcome with proper circuitry) it's possible one cell can overcharge another. IE, if one cell discharges faster than another, the charge will flow into the empty cell possibly causing overheating. At least that's what I am getting from wikipedia. If the circuitry on the cells is cheap, overheating can be very likely.

    So I wouldn't become all super paranoid over a few stories like this as it almost always involves cheap batteries or mixing of cells (which may be from using cheap batteries or "Whatever is around the house" in the first flashlight example). After all, you'll almost certainly hear about EVERY single failure but you never hear about the batteries performing their job correctly because when you do things right, people won't be sure you've done anything at all.

  37. Re:Yes!!! by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Quick tip: The reason a lot of FPs are done by ACs is due to the fact that it can quite easily fail, and provide embarrasment (as you can now see). So don't forget that 'Post as AC' checkbox next time, k?

    --
    Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
  38. Or try falling in a river by Flying+pig · · Score: 1

    I did. Every piece of electronics survived except for my phone, which was in my shirt. Which, fortunately, I was not wearing when the battery got hot...river water is not too conductive usually, but this was tidal. Advice: don't try this in the sea.

    --
    Pining for the fjords
  39. So what's the altitude/temperature tradeoff? by smellsofbikes · · Score: 2, Interesting

    One of the reasons I submitted this story is that I just bought a house that's at roughly 3500 meters (11,000 feet) elevation. UPS is shipping jillions of batteries, and obviously this isn't THAT common, but I still wonder about me taking up my laptop, and my friends taking up theirs. I wonder even more about flying up there in a Cessna -- not much higher altitude, but where's the knee of the safe/explode curve? (Is it a curve? or is it linear with altitude? or logarithmic, given that's how pressure drops? I'd expect it'd drop off with temperature, but if that's true, temperature drops somewhat faster than air pressure, so why are these happening at all?)
    With all that said, it's unsettling that a battery has *anything* going on in it when it's just sitting there in a brown paper box. Do Li-ion batteries have vents, like old lead-acid batteries? Can they evolve gas? (If so, what happens to their chemistry afterwards? it's not like they can recapture hydrogen offgassed: do they lose efficiency over time from this?)
    I know much less about batteries than I thought I did.

    --
    Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
    1. Re:So what's the altitude/temperature tradeoff? by kerecsen · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, I would be much more worried about the hard disk. Most HDDs have a design spec limit of 10000 feet of elevation, because the head may not maintain desired clearance above the platter at higher altitudes. So check your hard drive specs before you boot that puppy up...

    2. Re:So what's the altitude/temperature tradeoff? by smellsofbikes · · Score: 1

      I think they must be conservative, coz I've had a dozen or more computers up there over the last 20 years and haven't had a platter crash up there yet. But I *will* go look up some specs.

      --
      Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
  40. Totally Possible... by THESuperShawn · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Just look at any R/C Forum or wbe site (or battery university) for horror stories about these batteries. I use them, but as soon as I see any bulging or swelling of a pack I get rid of it. I personally know a guy who lost his entire garage (and part of his house) from a fire during recharging (you should never leave them un-attended).

    They are great batteries that are light with lots of power, but they are quite finicky. I always charge as slow as possible and use a temp probe to shut everything down if it gets too hot.

    All that being said, I wonder how they could ignite if they are not in a charge or discharge (besides normal dishcharge as they sit unused) while in a cargo hold. I would think (no, I did not RTFA but hey this is Slashdot) they would need to be mutilated or highly disturbed in some way to catch fire.

    --
    Repant. Thy end is sheer.
    1. Re:Totally Possible... by itdood · · Score: 1
      My bet is, something shorted the leads. In the grand scheme of things, it's bound to happen that something metallic gets into the shipment, like a screw or coin. The shipment bounces around and eventually shorts the leads. Or the battery itself just shorts. Or two batteries short on each other. Either way you have an uncontrolled discharge.

      I learned this the hardway once, when I put a 9 volt battery, like the type in smoke detectors, into my pocket that also had a some loose change. THe battery leads rested on a coin and I relaized something was up when the battery almost burned my leg.

      I think Lithium polymer is even more dangerous than Litium ion from what I've read. I've seen video of a LIPO overheating and it looked like an incindiary going off.

    2. Re:Totally Possible... by Rifter13 · · Score: 1

      Yea, Li-Poly are more dangerous. But, Lithium is not a happy metal to begin with. It can do some very cool things, where batteries are concerned... but from a pure stability standpoint... it isn't the most stable of metals. :-) Just have respect for it, and you will be good.

  41. FAA does things without a reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sometimes the FAA does things for appearance's sake. Big surprise there, eh? The ban on cell phones in-flight was the result of unexplained instrument malfunctions. No direct link between electronics failure and cell phones was ever shown. That didn't stop the FAA from banning cell phones which "might" be causing interference. No lab tests ever showed any linkage. I think cell phone use on planes would send many people over the edge, personally, but the FAA's stated reason for the ban doesn't hold water. Why should the situation with these batteries be any different? The FAA will be wanting to give the appearance that they're doing something about the problem, even if it's the wrong solution. THe FAA is the only government agency that hasn't gotten any worse under Bush. That should tell you something.

  42. With fires like these, by NeuroManson · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It makes one wonder why everyone's touting electric/hybrid vehicles that run off of li-ion or polymer batteries. If people (erroneously) thought that hydrogen cars would do a Hindenberg in their driveway, wait til they find out about this.

    --
    Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
    1. Re:With fires like these, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pretty sure most of the hybrids on the market (incl. my '04 Prius) run on NiMH batteries, not lithium-based batteries.

    2. Re:With fires like these, by NeuroManson · · Score: 1

      Yes, but Lithium Ion batteries are the Big New Tech (TM) being promoted for potential electric cars across the board. As Li-Ion batteries become more prevalent, they'll also begin to infiltrate hybrid autos. You can guess the rest.

      --
      Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
  43. Depends on how it is made by Groo+Wanderer · · Score: 1

    The short story is 'maybe'. Read this, it will answer most of the questions.

    http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=14 417

            -Charlie

  44. I hope your pyrex had a good lid by Atroxodisse · · Score: 1

    I know they use to build(and may still) rocket nose cones out of pyrex but last I checked the lids were just tempered glass...and gravity was the only thing holding them on.

    --
    Read my short stories - You won't regret it.
  45. It's been said before by The+Nordic+Beast · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I know I've seen it written here before, but there's an old chemistry saw that certainly rings true.

    "The are two types of chemists: Those who have never worked with Lithium, and those who are scared to death of it."

  46. Laptops on a Plane! by darkshadow · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Coming this summer!

    --
    -Darkshadow (There was a thing called Heaven; but all the same they used to drink enormous quantities of alcohol.)
  47. Why 'EXPLODE!' ? by WhatDoIKnow · · Score: 1

    Even if the plane flew into the vacuum of outer space it couldn't have more than 15 PSI inside. At normal flying altitudes the pressure differential between the atmosphere and the inside of the plane would only be in the 5 - 10 PSI range. Enough to leak out of course, but I don't believe it would EXPLODE!

    :wq

    1. Re:Why 'EXPLODE!' ? by shawnce · · Score: 1

      Visualize a tube sealed at both ends with a flat surface running lengthwise inside the tube dividing it in two (aka the floor in the aircraft above the cargo area). If one are of tube is pressurized while the other is not pressurized then any delta between the two area would result in a force being applied to the surface dividing the two sections.

      Lets say a 5 PSI (pounds per square inch) delta exists... then every square inch of that surface is feeling this force... say 100 feet long by 10 wide and you get 144,000 pounds of force that the floor has to support (that is in addition to the weight of the passengers, etc.). A non-trivial amount of force to deal with.

    2. Re:Why 'EXPLODE!' ? by gumbi+west · · Score: 1

      for reference, the wings on a 737 the wings are 1344 sq. ft. and the maximum takeoff weight is 174200 lbs. At cruising (i.e. when the lift and weight are in equilibrium) that's 0.9 psi on the wings. But I don't know about the lift over weight durring take off.

    3. Re:Why 'EXPLODE!' ? by Speare · · Score: 1

      Many bridges can take huge amounts of stress load from above (pedestrians, cars, trucks, tanks), but cannot take anywhere near the same amount of stress from below. Just because a plane's cabin floor can support the consistent evenly spread pressurized cabin forces, doesn't mean it can support a centralized explosive cargo hold force.

      --
      [ .sig file not found ]
  48. Ahh, pyrex by JazzLad · · Score: 0

    The choice of bomb squads everywhere.

    --
    "If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear." - Every fascist, ever
  49. Pressurized cabins... by TwoScoopsOfPig · · Score: 1

    ...work fine (ever had a non-Dell laptop pull a Dell while you were flying?). The problem could arise from the difference in pressures. Perhaps the lessened pressure allows for odd expansion within the batteries causing strain on the lithium (I don't remember how stable lithium is as an element) resulting in excess heat?

    --
    #include <disclaimer.h>
    #include <beer.h>
  50. If this happens to you by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 1

    The smoke and debris may include hydrofluoric acid. Make absolutely sure that the ambulance crew and the doctor know about this.

    HF doesn't eat your skin and char your muscles the way sulfuric acid does. It seeps into your system through the skin and causes devastating delayed-onset reactions. You can spill HF on you, think you're OK, and be dead two days later.

    Call Poison Control for advice while you're waiting for the ambulance if battery debris hits you. I've seen posts that quote safety procedures as including getting OUT of the affected clothes and applying a calcium gluconate gel pack, but please don't take your safety advice from a Slashdot post by someone with no medical qualifications.

    And when the instructions say never to mix fresh cells with partially depleted ones, believe them.

  51. It's not the pressure by Quadraginta · · Score: 1

    I don't think the modest pressure drop (from 14.7 psi at sea level to 9.5 psi at 3500 m) is going to cause accidents. I think the only reason the airplane angle is important in these situations is that the accident is happening in an enclosed space filled with flammable materials, and people can't run outside to get away from the smoke or call the FD to put out the flames, et cetera.

    Lead-acid batteries can produce hydrogen by electrolysis of the water in them when they are charged. If I had to guess, I'd say this is because if the battery is thoroughly discharged, and not, perhaps, very well designed, then so much sulfate is taken out of the electrolyte (sulfuric acid) solution as lead sulfate that the resistance of the solution rises. Then, when current is applied to charge the battery, instead of the formation of sulfate anions, some of the current electrolyzes the water, producing H2 and O2. I would assume that careful design of your battery and reasonable charging conditions minimize this problem. Note that H2 production is not a normal and necessary result of charging a lead-acid battery.

    The chemistry of Li-ion batteries is totally different. IIRC, there isn't any water in their electrolyte, it's some organic solvent in which a lithium salt dissolves. (I don't think there's any lithium metal in there, either, so the reactivity of lithium with water mentioned above somewhere would seem doubly irrelevant.)

    I think all you need to do is (1) avoid damaging your batteries by abusing them physically, and (2) avoid abusing them electrically, by charging and discharging them in the manner for which they were designed.

    1. Re:It's not the pressure by Kombat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't think the modest pressure drop (from 14.7 psi at sea level to 9.5 psi at 3500 m) is going to cause accidents.

      I don't know if I'd categorize that as a "modest" drop. That's 1/3 of an atmosphere. That's low enough pressure to manifest measurable, visible symptoms of hypoxia in humans not accustomed to the high altitude. Airplanes are forbidden from flying above 10,500 MSL for more than 30 minutes without carrying oxygen. Living at 11,000 full time would definitely affect sea-level folk, and I don't think it's too much of a stretch to consider that it may affect other pressurized items, too.

      --
      Like woodworking? Build your own picture frames.
    2. Re:It's not the pressure by smellsofbikes · · Score: 1

      I guess the reason the article surprised me is that, like I said in the summary, I haven't read about fires from unused batteries just sitting in shipping containers happening in warehouses, just in airplanes. Maybe it's that the airplanes are the ones that make the news. I'm familiar with Li and li-ion fires during use and recharging: I've seen it happen. But it's freaky that this is happening when they're literally *just* *sitting* there.

      My recollection of lead-acid battery chemistry is that the sulfuric acid is there to decrease the resistance of the circuit and to catalyze the reaction; it's only when the battery is overcharged or completely discharged that it begins to produce hydrogen gas. I'd assumed that li and li-ion batteries were similar to the standard zinc-carbon chemistry in C and D cells that doesn't have any gas products, so needs only enough venting to account for thermal expansion.

      So the big question remains: are the li and li-ion batteries exploding because they've been damaged or abused, or because of manufacturing defects? Or are they just exploding? If so, is it because they're in a weird environment in an airplane, or do they do this all the time in the back of UPS vans as well as airplane cargo holds?

      --
      Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
    3. Re:It's not the pressure by Quadraginta · · Score: 1

      Yes, but human respiration is very sensitive to pressure. First of all, it depends on the rate at which gases (O2 and CO2) dissolve in liquids (i.e. blood), and the solubility of gases in liquids at low pressures (that is around 1 atm) happens to be quite dependent on pressure. Furthermore, our normal operating conditions are very close to our lungs' maximum capabilities. Stop our breathing for even a short time, or reduce its efficiency even a little bit, and we have major problems. No engineer would design a product with such slim safety margins.

      So from the point of view of mechanical engineering, it's a very small change. Even your flimsy plastic soda bottle, or generic toothpaste tube, would easily stand up to the change. Hard to imagine anyone would design a battery case that wouldn't. Look at it this way: it's the same amount of pressure rise something would experience being taken to the bottom of your average swimming pool (down 10 feet or so). You'd have to be an compleat idiot to engineer something that couldn't stand up to that kind of mild pressure. Now if a battery depended in some way on a delicate gas exchange with the atmosphere, like lungs, an argument could be made. But batteries don't.

    4. Re:It's not the pressure by Quadraginta · · Score: 1

      Well, you read more about murders and heart attacks and snakes (ha ha) when they happen on airplanes, too. For very similar reasons.

      The sulfuric acid (or really the sulfate anion) is indeed part of the chemistry of the lead-acid battery. If its purpose were to merely lower the resistance of the electrolyte, there would be a lot safer materials to use, e.g. plain table salt.

      I don't think one would vent a battery to accomodate the small amount of differential thermal expansion in its solid or liquid components. You generally don't want battery components exposed to atmospheric oxygen, which is electrochemically active and can change your chemistry significantly.

      Of course current Li-ion batteries explode elsewhere. Here's and example random story on it. Doesn't mention airplanes.

  52. Lots of information about LiPos from RC fanatics by Rifter13 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Li-Poly batteries are used a lot in RC aircraft. Here is a link to a page about LiPo fires (with a link to some videos) Lipo Fire info.

    Lipos are used a lot in RC flying, but you have to be very careful with them. If they short, they will start to buldge a bit, and can catch fire. Also, LiPos can only be discharged so far, until they are useless (I believe under the 3.7 volt level). If you are interested about rechargable batteries, RC people are the ones to look at. (that includes NIMH, NICD, and LIPO)

  53. NOT OFFTOPIC, by Big_Al_B · · Score: 1

    It's a--IMHO--clever joke. Nice movie reference. Too bad the mods are pop culture challenged today.

  54. very interesting by plbg32 · · Score: 1

    an old grunge song, a psycho drug, and a hybrid car, all capable of explosion, sounds like a job for...homeland security man!!!!

  55. Slashdot FUD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Leave it to the "experts" at /. I've never seen more FUD in my life than on the pages of /.

    CR123's have been around for at least 12 years. I had a Canon EOS 10S in 1994 that used CR123's.
    If CR123's were known to cause fires, it would have happened before now. I can't believe you morons are going to blame the battery.

        If CR123's were dangerous, they would have taken down dozens of airplanes.

  56. Irony, or morony? by alienmole · · Score: 1

    A maroon who has abused his laptop battery? I can never tell whether people who misspell "moron" are being deliciously ironic...

    1. Re:Irony, or morony? by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      Maroon is its own separate word. I can see it could have been derived from moron at some point (has a similar meaning, although not quite the same - maroon implies more clumsy than stupid & is less offensive).

    2. Re:Irony, or morony? by alienmole · · Score: 1

      What country/age group etc. does this separate word exist in? Never seen it. Any references?

    3. Re:Irony, or morony? by Stone+Rhino · · Score: 1

      Maroon, in the phrase "what a maroon," was often used in Warner Brothers cartoons, especially by Bugs Bunny. But some maroons just have no awareness of cultural context...

      --


      Remember, there were no nuclear weapons before women were allowed to vote.
    4. Re:Irony, or morony? by Detritus · · Score: 1

      Anywhere kids have grown up watching Bugs Bunny cartoons on television.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    5. Re:Irony, or morony? by alienmole · · Score: 1

      Ah, thanks. So it's 60-year old slang burned into the brains of the Bugs Bunny generation.

  57. Exploding digital cameras by Macgrrl · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Back around 1992, I used to work for a Kodak dealer who sold the Kodak DSC200 series digital cameras. They were a Nikon 35mm camera body with a digital film back and Li based rechargable battery pack.

    My boss was on a client site setting up to run a demo, these cameras cost AU$30k each, it was sitting on a counter waiting to be hooked up when it burst into flames.

    While I wasn't present for the actual fire, I did see the melted unit afterward when packing it to be sent back to Rochester for tests.

    This has been a *known* issue for a very long time.

    --
    Sara
    Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
  58. Re:can you can get lithium out of a lithium batter by nrlightfoot · · Score: 1

    No, the lithium in laptop batteries is in the form of lithium salts.

    --
    what sig?
  59. Exploding laptops by billcopc · · Score: 1

    Could this possibly explain the exploding Dell notebook in Japan from a few weeks ago ? I'm kind of worried because I don't exactly treat my old Inspiron like gold anymore.. hell, I treat 3-dollar-bill-hookers better than I treat my laptop. I don't want the thing to set my GOOD computers on fire from sitting next to them in the searing humid heat.

    --
    -Billco, Fnarg.com
    1. Re:Exploding laptops by Rifter13 · · Score: 1

      LIPOs, when abused (over charged, bumped, bruised, etc) can burst into flames. Be careful with the battery, is all. (That, and hope your charger never over-charges your laptop). From my short time flying RC Airplanes, I am actually quite amazed at how good engineers are, at keeping these batteries from self destructing in a spectacular orgy of flame and smoke. I think it is a real testiment to the manufacturers and engineers, we don't see more problems.

    2. Re:Exploding laptops by triso · · Score: 1

      Yes! It was a battery failure that caused the explosion in Japan. Dell calls this a thermal incident but I call it cutting corners in battery safety to maximize margins. If there is a recall on batteries then WE KNOW Dell tried to skim a few cents buy sourcing cheaper batteries.

  60. National Safety Transportation Board? by schwit1 · · Score: 1

    Musta been the fumes comin' off the batteries.

  61. Terrorists buy Lithium Batteries by erichschubert · · Score: 1

    Since this article appeared on Slashdot, Al Quaida is reported to have been buying large quantities of Lithium Batteries. They are rebranded to "Energizer" and shipped in furry little toy rabbits.
    An Al Quaida spokesman said that they hope at least 1 out of 100 of these rabbits will ignite in an airplane.
    So if they ship one million of them, maybe one or two planes will crash into a major US city.

    --
    Debian GNU/Linux - apt-get into it.
    1. Re:Terrorists buy Lithium Batteries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pshaw, the length some would go to attempt telling a joke. Sorry sir, you're not one bit funny =P

    2. Re:Terrorists buy Lithium Batteries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >So if they ship one million of them, maybe one or two planes will crash into a major US city.

      You might not believe this at first, but it would be the first time al Qaeda has crashed an airliner.

      Do you know how many wargames the Pentagon was running on september 11? And FEMA was sent to NYC on september 10. Rumsfeld announced $2.3 trillion in missing funds on september 10 as well.

  62. Planes are pressurized to 8000 feet by Kombat · · Score: 1

    As another poster says, it's sea level pressure minus 4.4 psi...the pressurization is actually engaged before takeoff to put a slight positive pressure in the airplane. That makes the fuselage a bit more rigid, reducing the amount of structural fatigue it gets in the takeoff roll. If you're wearing one of those digital watches with an altimeter feature, you'll see the reading go somewhat below the ground elevation.

    Actually, airplanes with pressurized cabins are pressurized to the pressure at 8000 feet, not "below ground elevation." If you did in fact have an altimeter watch, as you describe, it would indicate you were at an altitude of 8000 MSL.

    --
    Like woodworking? Build your own picture frames.
    1. Re:Planes are pressurized to 8000 feet by Deadstick · · Score: 1
      RTFP. Before takeoff. Takeoffs are made with a small positive pressure in the airplane, which puts the cabin altitude below ground level. As the airplane climbs, the cabin altitude climbs with it, up to a maximum of 8000 feet. It is always below the altitude of the airplane.

      rj

  63. OT: "Speaks to"? by Kombat · · Score: 1

    I can't speak to lithium batteries,

    Sure you can! Just pick one up, look it square in the terminals, and start talking. It's unable to run away, you can speak as long as you want.

    On the other hand, I don't know if you're able to speak about lithium batteries, because you haven't told us one way or the other.

    Not to pick on you in particular, but have people always used "to" in this manner? It seems like a relatively recent perversion of the word; am I wrong? I don't recall people saying things like "I can't speak to the safety of this car," or "I'd like him to speak to the source of his campaign funding" until a couple years ago. Doesn't it sound funny to anyone else? Is this actually proper English, or is this just another example of people jumping on the "sounds fancy, so it'll make me sound smart" bandwagon?

    --
    Like woodworking? Build your own picture frames.
    1. Re:OT: "Speaks to"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I doubt you're checking back on your post, but what the heck. Yes, it does sound odd, and I don't recall hearing it much (if at all) when I was in college back in 93. (I've been living in Tokyo ever since, so not much of a chance to hear any changes in modern American English.) I'm too lazy to check up on it at all, but I'd say it's a blatant grammatical error, although it is probably going mainstream. Annoying, yes, but most likely to become standard practice in a few more years. Now note how many "grammatical errors" our forefathers would have caught in my post alone! Live languages are cool. :-)

    2. Re:OT: "Speaks to"? by Angst+Badger · · Score: 1

      For what it's worth, a quick search of Google Books shows the usage as far back as 1921. May I have my head back now?

      It's also worth noting that the coupling of prepositions to verbs is fairly arbitrary and, for less common idioms, not very stable in most languages, as well as varying widely between languages.

      --
      Proud member of the Weirdo-American community.
  64. Snakes on a Plane by JestersPet · · Score: 2, Funny

    Someone inform David Ellis & Samuel Jackson! This has "Snakes on a Plane II" written all over it.

    1. Re:Snakes on a Plane by RCO · · Score: 2, Funny

      Batteries catching fire in a long cylindrical object has bad mojo written all over it...

      The jokes alone would put that movie into the soft prOn catagory.

      --
      'And all the monkeys aren't in the zoo Every day you meet quite a few...'
  65. Lithium-poly Fire by Pontiac · · Score: 1

    I'm not supprised at all..

    Li-Poly batteries are popular is the electric R/C hobby.
    The fire danger from over charging or physical damage are well known.

    These are the same type of battery you have in your cell phone.
    Li-Ion is the same type of battery but in a metal case.

    See this video on Google
    Li-poly battery fire

    --
    If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur. --Red Adair
  66. No lithium batteries = no bone healing while away by Cragen · · Score: 1

    The way I read this article, my ultrasound bone stimulator (by Exogen), which contains a non-rechargeable Lithium battery, cannot be taken aboard a plane. I broke my leg this last spring. I was prescribed the ultrasound thingy last month when the osteo-doc decided my fibula was not healing as fast as it should. Fortunately, I'll only be gone over a long weekend, but kinda glad I read the article. I had no idea that these things weren't supposed to go on planes. Makes me wonder how many people flying today and in the future do not know this. One more reason to hate flying. (Guess I oughta see if there's anything on their web site.) Cragen

  67. etymology of maroon by alienmole · · Score: 1
    Aha - from everything2:
    Ma*roon" (?), n. [Written also marroon.] [F. marron, abbrev. fr. Sp. cimarron wild, unruly, from cima the summit of a mountain; hence, negro cimarron, a runaway negro that lives in the mountains.] In the West Indies and Guiana, a fugitive slave, or a free negro, living in the mountains.
    I could see how that word might have taken on the meaning you describe. I'm still curious about where it's used in that way.
  68. Reminds me of the story my brother tells... by rthille · · Score: 1


    He works in auto racing, F1 & Indy cars mostly. He likes to tell the story about the foundry where they were heat treating magnesium wheels and something went wrong. I think it was 8 wheels, for about 80 or more pounds of magnesium. On fire. The fire department wanted to show up and put it out with water. Very very bad idea.

    --
    Awesome furniture, accessories and cabinetry in Santa Rosa, CA: http://humanity-home.com/
  69. iPods, too :) by kerecsen · · Score: 1

    Amusingly enough, iPods seem to be specced for a maximum of 10000 feet as well (http://www.apple.com/ipod/specs.html). I agree that these figures may be somewhat conservative, as I see people skiing and boarding with those things all the time, right around 11000 feet high.

    I Googled altitude specs a bit more, and there are some drives specified for 6-7000 feet. Even considering a nice safety margin, I would hesitate to take those up to where you live.

    1. Re:iPods, too :) by smellsofbikes · · Score: 1

      I'm going to have to put a turbocharger on my car and hook up bleed air to the computer! AND the iPod! That's awesome and funny and scary: thanks for pointing it out. I, and just about everyone I know, have both the laptop and the iPod over 12,000 every single weekend through the summer, going over passes to get to the fun places.

      This makes me wonder about the systems used in homebuilt aircraft glass cockpits. They sure aren't pressurized, and they're flying at 17,000 or higher on a regular basis. Some of those, the instrument-rated people, are flying at 24000-30000 every time they go more than a hundred miles. One would expect to hear awful grinding sounds from both the hard drives and the pilots, when their $20,000 computer takes a dump. So this makes me wonder what's in things like the Garmin 430/530 aviation GPS computers -- custom sealed hard drives, or do they put the whole OS in NVRAM?
      Again: stuff I didn't realize I knew so little about.

      --
      Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
  70. Li Ion batteries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I didn't read all the comments above this one so I'm not sure if I'm being repetitive.

    A Lithium Ion battery is essentially made of folded Aluminum (Al) and Copper (Cu) foils (with a porous plastic seperator between the two). The Cu is doped with graphite, and the Al is doped with the active material (i.e. the Lithium compounds like Lithium Cobalt Oxide or LiCoO). There are different chemistries you can dope the Al foil with; the Cu will always have graphite on it however.

    If you puncture a Lithium Ion battery (with a staple or a nail for instance) you wind up shorting the Al and Cu foils; this leads to a thermal runaway (i.e. the battery puffs up and gets really hot). The size of the puncture, what you used to puncture the battery, and even the location of the puncture all play a role in the volatility of the reaction. As a general rule though, LiCoO batteries will catch fire explosively when punctured. Other (newer) chemistries, like Lithium Iron Phosphate, will only puff up and vent black smoke when punctured (no flames, hooray!).

    So long story short: if you puncture the battery or short the leads with a metal wire or drop it really hard (this could cause the foils in the battery to slip and touch each or even crack some of the foil on the inside) get ready for puffing and possibly a fire.

  71. Somebody set up us the lithium-ion battery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All your planes are belong to us

  72. 'fragile' overuse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It doesn't help that you could order bricks and somebody will ship them to you in a 'delicate instruments' box.

  73. Elemental Lithium in disposables by obtuse · · Score: 1

    Disposable lithium cells as described in the article, contain metallic Li. This fellow made a periodic table out of wood with elements and describes how to extract the lithium foil from a disposable battery.

    --
    Assembly is the reverse of disassembly.
  74. table, wooden and periodic by obtuse · · Score: 1
    --
    Assembly is the reverse of disassembly.