Slashdot Mirror


Linux-powered Robots From France? Oui!

An anonymous reader writes "A French start-up created to build autonomous, easily programmable, affordable humanoid robots expects to ship its first product — a humanoid household service robot running Linux — in early 2007. The walking, talking, WiFi-enabled Nao household robot will stand 21.6 inches tall, and will feature 23 "degrees of freedom" of motion — three more than the 14-inch tall Choromet android announced earlier this week by four Japanese companies. Nao's extra degrees of freedom appear to come in the form of gripping hands."

198 comments

  1. 3...2...1... by lbrandy · · Score: 2, Funny

    I for one welcome our new blah blah blah overlords. Please, let your first act be banning this joke.

    1. Re:3...2...1... by Ginger+Unicorn · · Score: 1
      in soviet russia, government bores YOU to death with the same inane "jokes" over and over again,

      also i cant wait for the following tags to help me locate relevant articles:

      fud, notfud, itsatrap, yes, no, maybe, stupid, duh, oldnews, slownewsday

      of particular help with be the fact that searching for either "fud" or "notfud" will return exactly the same search results. (the same goes for yes/no/maybe)

      --
      (1.21 gigawatts) / (88 miles per hour) = 30 757 874 newtons
    2. Re:3...2...1... by Ginger+Unicorn · · Score: 1
      also smart alecky comments that say:

      "something obvious"...film at 11.

      and

      xxxxx fanboys mod me down

      and anything that end with "in 3..2..1"

      --
      (1.21 gigawatts) / (88 miles per hour) = 30 757 874 newtons
    3. Re:3...2...1... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      ie not american.

    4. Re:3...2...1... by srk2040 · · Score: 1

      Can I get mine with a freaking laser mounted on its head?

  2. Re:obligatory by wytcld · · Score: 0

    What amount of plastic explosives can this robot carry? What's its range?

    "Oh look Mommy, a cute ..." BOOM!

    --
    "with their freedom lost all virtue lose" - Milton
  3. Linux bot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But will it run?

  4. Oddly... by The-Bus · · Score: 2, Funny

    This robot runs on free beer.

    --

    Small potatoes make the steak look bigger.

    1. Re:Oddly... by drgould · · Score: 1
      This robot runs on free beer.

      A French robot that runs on beer? I don't think so!

      Free wine perhaps.

      // TODO: insert linux/wine joke here.

      --------

    2. Re:Oddly... by Fordiman · · Score: 1

      I wonder how small you could make an ethanol distiller. Couple it to a direct ethanol fuel cell (google for Acta), and you've got the makings of Bender.

      --
      110100 1101000 1101000 1100110 0 1101111 1101000 1100011 1
    3. Re:Oddly... by Niebieski · · Score: 1

      That would be wine and bread baguette actually.

      In fact, I suspect the extra degrees of freedom are meant to allow carrying the baguette under the arm and to play pétanque.

    4. Re:Oddly... by marcello_dl · · Score: 1
      I wonder how small you could make an ethanol distiller.
      Theoretically the problem would be to have a heat source, in practice just choose the right cpu frequency and use beer as coolant until it evaporates. Neat huh?
      --
      ---- MISSING MISCELLANEOUS DATA SEGMENT --- [sigdash] trolololol
  5. I just need a smaller one by Dark+Paladin · · Score: 3, Funny

    My 4 year old son is obsessed with making his own "Mario angel" (aka - from "Angelic Layer"), and I've started looking for small, programmable robots he can putter with - anything bigger, and I fear for the safety of my household when he tries to program it with a Butt Stomp or some such.

  6. AIEEEE!!! by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 3, Funny

    So many jokes, so little time...
    ...our new rude smelly overlords...
    ...robot army surrenders...
    ...collabrative software...

    --
    No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
    1. Re:AIEEEE!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are an idiot.

    2. Re:AIEEEE!!! by ken95357 · · Score: 1

      How about a Beowulf cluster of these?

      Someone had to say it.

    3. Re:AIEEEE!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about a remake of Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow with these French robots?! I could just see these gigantic surly guys tripping all over each other to be the first to surrender. Now I'd buy that for a dollar!

    4. Re:AIEEEE!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Will they be granted the right to marry?
      Will people be granted the right to marry them?

      Before these things(beings) are released into the general public
      these issues need to be worked out.

  7. Egality, Fraternity, Liberty by ElephanTS · · Score: 1

    Great, but can it strike?

    --
    spoonerize "magic trackpad"
    1. Re:Egality, Fraternity, Liberty by Lawrence_Bird · · Score: 1

      no, but it can raise a white flag :)

    2. Re:Egality, Fraternity, Liberty by pivo · · Score: 1

      That joke just never gets old, does it Larry?

  8. These are not the droids your looking for. by digitaldc · · Score: 4, Funny

    Aldebaran Robotics was founded in early 2005 by Bruno Maisonnier. The company employs about a dozen, is 5 percent employee-owned, and has 17 investors, led by Maisonnier, who holds a 58 percent stake.

    Wait a minute, wasn't Alderaan Robotics completely destroyed by Grand Moff Tarkin a long time ago, in a galaxy far, far away?

    --
    He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
    1. Re:These are not the droids your looking for. by Demerara · · Score: 1

      Wait a minute, wasn't Alderaan Robotics completely destroyed by Grand Moff Tarkin a long time ago, in a galaxy far, far away?

      No, it was AllBran Robotics - for those who like to play fast and loose...

      --
      Backward%20compatibility%20is%20over-rated
  9. Re:obligatory by Timesprout · · Score: 0, Troll

    Not if they make them like their tanks, 5 reverse gears and one foward gear incase they are attacked from the rear.

    --
    Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
    What truth?
    There is no dupe
  10. Re:obligatory by andrewman327 · · Score: 1, Interesting
    These will be the first robots trained to say "I SURRENDER!" in 27 languages! I also think that the 23 degrees of motion and gripping hands will be used to hold a white flag.


    We may jest, but the French do have a long history of engineering. From the Eiffel Tower to Airbus, they have a good track record. I believe that the first ever hot air baloon flight was also there in the 18th century.


    I am not usually a fan of the French, but I have to admit that they do a pretty good job of building stuff. Of course, I still prefer American engineering, but we seem to be lagging in the robot business.

    --
    Information wants a fueled airplane waiting at the hangar and no one gets hurt.
  11. Re:obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Yeah know, this French "rifle dropping" stuff just isn't right. Now if you want to see first class rifle dropping read about the Anschluss Österreichs. It was bad engineering (frontline guns couldn't rotate enough) that allowed the Nazis to get into France, not the lack of courage. The French Resistance had serious testicle fortitude, the Austrians just rolled over and "thank you sir, may I have another".

  12. Yes, but... by carnellm · · Score: 5, Funny

    Will they head-butt their opponents?

    1. Re:Yes, but... by Plammox · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Hello Mods, this Frenchie-joke is actually the only funny one on, right now. If you don't understand it, google for "World Cup", "Zidane" and "Head-butt", you'll see...

    2. Re:Yes, but... by carnellm · · Score: 2, Funny

      Thank you for the vote of confindence. I am just having visions of French Battlebots. They run away from their opponent, turn around and head-butt them, and then say they were antagonized into it. It would be cool! International Battlebots....

    3. Re:Yes, but... by 0xdeadbeef · · Score: 2, Funny

      Only when they refer to them as the "son of a fleshorist Monrobot".

    4. Re:Yes, but... by Fordiman · · Score: 1

      Why does that sound vaguely like the battle strategy of a pierson's puppeteer?

      --
      110100 1101000 1101000 1100110 0 1101111 1101000 1100011 1
    5. Re:Yes, but... by doti · · Score: 3, Informative
      If you don't understand it, google for "World Cup", "Zidane" and "Head-butt"


      Simply head-butt is enough: http://images.google.com/images?q=head-butt
      --
      factor 966971: 966971
  13. Seasonal risks? by ScentCone · · Score: 1

    I mean, this is great - but will they get anything done in July or August? And, during those months, will they be supporting open-source Speedos?

    --
    Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    1. Re:Seasonal risks? by Billosaur · · Score: 1, Funny
      I mean, this is great - but will they get anything done in July or August? And, during those months, will they be supporting open-source Speedos?

      Worse yet, will you be able to fire them when they become lazy and incompetent?

      --
      GetOuttaMySpace - The Anti-Social Network
    2. Re:Seasonal risks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...become?

  14. Re:obligatory by Live_in_Dayton · · Score: 1

    I would fear this army of robots but, since it runs Linux, it can do no harm.

  15. Anti-police robot mods by aersixb9 · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I've seen motion sensitive camera software...how tricky would it be to mod this robot into a motion sensing attack robot with a motion sensitive firearm or bomb thrower? Has anyone attempted this tricky of a project? Is the motion sensing software (and facial recognition software) accurate enough to target soft vital areas, such as the eyes, on a fast moving target? Could these robots be useful as attack robots, especially since there doesn't seem to be any use for robots aside from housekeeping and defusing bombs, and the bomb defusing robots are RC...Is there already a linux project that accomplishes any of these goals, that could run on this or a similar platform? Or even better, an already built weapon with a camera that didn't need any modding...

    1. Re:Anti-police robot mods by Yvanhoe · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't call it easy, but yeah a robot-soldier is technically in the realm of possibility. South-Korea has such a research program. It should produce something (a land-drone with machine-gun) by 2010.

      --
      The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
    2. Re:Anti-police robot mods by Fordiman · · Score: 1

      Ooohhh... Giant Mechs. That's right up there in coolness with orbital fire.

      Yay, orbital fire!

      --
      110100 1101000 1101000 1100110 0 1101111 1101000 1100011 1
    3. Re:Anti-police robot mods by Hairball6494 · · Score: 0

      "how tricky would it be to mod this robot into a motion sensing attack robot with a motion sensitive firearm or bomb thrower?"

      They already invented that. It's in Splinter Cell. you have to hack to control panel to disarm them. duh.

      --
      I think people use 'Ubuntu' in their posts to sound cool.
    4. Re:Anti-police robot mods by Yvanhoe · · Score: 1

      Orbital Fire ? Check in Soviet Russia:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fractional_Orbital_Bo mbardment_System

      USSR : makers of cool stuff that goes BOOM since 1945

      --
      The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
    5. Re:Anti-police robot mods by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, great. Just when robots were getting to be interesting, this comes along and now the US Government will ban robots as they might be used by terrorists. TSA will also ban them from aircraft so you can't take your robot bride with you to a Linux fest.

    6. Re:Anti-police robot mods by krewemaynard · · Score: 1

      USSR : makers of cool stuff that goes BOOM since 1945

      ...including itself in 1991.
      --
      I saw it on Slashdot, it must be true!
  16. the beginning of a Mech? by waif69 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    When will someone take the sensors, gyros and other items used to make this work and upscale it so we can finally have Mech wars?

    1. Re:the beginning of a Mech? by shotgunsaint · · Score: 1

      Hell yes! As an added bonus, someone needs to mod an old Sega Activator (http://www.vidgame.net/SEGA/peripherals.htm) to control it. It'd be just like in Robot Jox!

      --
      The future isn't here until I can type "car keys" into Google and have it say "You left them in your pants last night."
    2. Re:the beginning of a Mech? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Mechanical Nerd here, and mech's are highly unlikely. Scaling up an object doesn't increase stresses linearly, but more like a polynomial. In other words, just cuz it works small doesn't mean making it bigger and scaling everything equally will work.

      For instance, an ant, scaled up to be a foot long, wouldn't be able to hold up its own weight, the legs would be too weak. Thanks Bill Nye ^_^

    3. Re:the beginning of a Mech? by Drooling+Iguana · · Score: 1

      Plus it'd have a hell of a lot of surface area to armour, with a relatively small internal volume. Best to just use a tank.

      --
      ... I'm addicted to placebos
  17. Do we really want a talking French robot? by DieByWire · · Score: 5, Funny
    The software will also enable users to program their android's behavior, emotional expressions, speech synthesizer...


    I see it coming already: "I fart in your general direction. Your mother was a hamster and your father smelt of elderberries."

    Reaches for remote...

    "Now go away or I shall taunt you a second time."

    I'm not so sure this is a good idea.

    --
    Never shake hands with a man you meet in a fertility clinic.
  18. Jolie! by marcello_dl · · Score: 2, Funny

    Let's see if the open source philosophy works with hardware too. For instance, Italian hackers could teach this robot to play soccer, French hackers to do proper headbutts, German ones to make unfunny jokes about other nations, and so on.

    --
    ---- MISSING MISCELLANEOUS DATA SEGMENT --- [sigdash] trolololol
    1. Re:Jolie! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      German ones to make unfunny jokes about other nations? Sorry, another nation has got that covered already.

    2. Re:Jolie! by FusionDragon2099 · · Score: 1

      I'm assuming you're German.

    3. Re:Jolie! by marcello_dl · · Score: 1

      WAS? You missed one star, then.

      --
      ---- MISSING MISCELLANEOUS DATA SEGMENT --- [sigdash] trolololol
  19. Non, non, non !!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Laissé soyez soit le premier à dire...

    I pour un, font bon accueil à nos nouveaux suzerains Linux-actionnés de robot de France !

    1. Re:Non, non, non !!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ouch, that hurt my brain!

      Geeze, did you use the same French translators The Simpsons(tm) writers use? Each time they try to speak French, I just could hear my brain shift without clutching it was so bad!

      But then, using Babelfish-like Gawd-awful mis-translation might be a joke in itself...

    2. Re:Non, non, non !!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      You mean

      Que je sois le premier qui dit,

      moi, comme l'un, je souhaite la bienvenue a nos nouveaux patrons robotique qui font le bang-bang aux pingouins!

    3. Re:Non, non, non !!! by Yvanhoe · · Score: 3, Informative

      I as one am, want merry welcome our overlorded linuxed French robot.

      That should hurt your brain like it did mine :-)

      Je suis fier d'être le premier à déclarer (correctement):
      Bienvenue à nos nouveaux suzerains robotiques tournant sous linux !

      --
      The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
    4. Re:Non, non, non !!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which in actual french reads:

      Laissez moi être le premier à dire que, quant à moi, j'acueille à bras ouvert nos nouveaux maîtres robotiques.

    5. Re:Non, non, non !!! by Arthur+B. · · Score: 1, Insightful

      A good translation would be

      Que je sois le premier a declarer:
      J'accueil pour ma part a bras ouverts nos seigneurs et maitres robotiques.

      --
      \u262D = \u5350
    6. Re:Non, non, non !!! by Geoffreyerffoeg · · Score: 1

      Allowed you be follows the first to say "I" [sic, you didn't even translate that] for one, make good welcome to our new Linux-actioned overlords of robot of France?

      If you're going to abuse BabelFish, you might as well make up the pseudo-French yourself. "Moi, pour un, welcommé ze nouveau ouverlordes du Linux robot!"

  20. so in the next robocup... by Blob+Pet · · Score: 1

    will we have a Nao robot head-butting its opponents?

    --
    "...today consumers have been conditioned to think of beer when they see a bullfrog..."
  21. France is the Kingdom of Robots by eno2001 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Daft Punk fans have known this since the 90s. Witness their latest non-musical project Electroma. It's a beautiful movie that follows two brave robots who want to find out what it means to be human.

    --
    -"...bad old ideas look confusingly fresh when they are packaged as technology" - Jaron Lanier (Digital Maoism on Edge.o
  22. I, for one, by greenegg77 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I, for one, look forward to our new French robotic overlords' surrender.

    --
    --- This .sig for sale - $500 OBO.
    1. Re:I, for one, by kripkenstein · · Score: 1

      "Maisonnier believes the field of robotics to be "perfectly adapted" to the French culture, thanks to demands that include conceptual thinking, theoretical knowledge, practical capabilities, and resourcefulness."

      Good thing they aren't trying to make warbots.

      (Sorry, but the parent post started...)

    2. Re:I, for one, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      These jokes don't translate well outside of the U.S.. Quite the opposite, it gives the impression Americans are typically imbecilic. 'Yuk it up.'

    3. Re:I, for one, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you believe the rest of the world is ignorant of France's tendency to surrender at the drop of a hat?

  23. Sweet! by ThreeDeadTrolls · · Score: 1

    This means the French will be literally assembling an army to take back thier legacy of French Fries from those who renamed them Freedom Fries... and to think.... the only thing standing in thier way is http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/06/20/195 3256 All hail the new linux powered robot overlords with frency mustaches

    1. Re:Sweet! by hey! · · Score: 1

      Well, "French" fries are actually Beligan. Although I have yet to see "Freedom Fries" on a menu anywhere, I suspect the whole thing was rather more an occasion for Gallic bemusement rather than anger.

      A lot can be explained by the probability that American farm-boy GIs had a bit of difficulty with the distinction between somebody who happens to speak French and somebody who is of the French nationality. One wonders how many of them refused to stay "down on the farm" after visiting Brussels.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    2. Re:Sweet! by James_Duncan8181 · · Score: 1
      Let me scare you with a photo on my blog:

      http://jaduncan.net/photos/show/recent/page/1/phot o/freedom-fries-in-the-wild

      Yes, as the title suggests, a genuine sighting. Yes, the USAF is fully inclusive, and now allows views that vary all the way in political stance from GW Bush to Pat Robertson.

      --
      "To any truly impartial person, it would be obvious that I am right."
    3. Re:Sweet! by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      Actually, the name "French fries" comes from the way they're sliced, they're "frenched" or something like that. At least that's what I heard... "potato fries", which is what the French and Belgians call them(albeit translated), makes much more sense though.

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
  24. I for one by TheConfusedOne · · Score: 0, Troll

    welcome our new surrendering robotic overlords.

    --
    --- I wish I could hear the soundtrack to my life. That way I'd know when to duck.
    1. Re:I for one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh come on, that was funny. Redunant maybe, but not Troll

  25. I, for one.... by AragornSonOfArathorn · · Score: 1, Funny

    ah, nevermind. The horse is putrescent. Is there a hose nearby? I need to wash off my boots.

    --
    sudo eat my shorts
  26. Movie Quote Responses by aersixb9 · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Why are most of the slashdot posts movie quotes, or references to movies?

    1. Re:Movie Quote Responses by ThreeDeadTrolls · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Because we are slashdot users. We have nothing better to do.

    2. Re:Movie Quote Responses by aersixb9 · · Score: 0

      Could the intelligent users post more factual, personal experience information, and not BS from the media and TV?

    3. Re:Movie Quote Responses by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      No

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    4. Re:Movie Quote Responses by Carewolf · · Score: 1

      Because most slashdot posts are written by Napolion Dynamite wannabees.

      (Yes, I know the irony of using a movie reference myself ;)

  27. Oui by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Quand est-ce que les modules de grain pour se rendre, mangeant le fromage et sentir de l'ail vont devenir une partie de la distribution de kernel.org?

  28. Re:obligatory by stupidfoo · · Score: 1

    It was bad engineering (frontline guns couldn't rotate enough) that allowed the Nazis to get into France,

    Two responses.
    First: I blame the software guys who wrote the frontlineGuns() routine.
    Second: "The Germans wouldn't dare go through those woods to the north, would they?"

  29. What every home needs by Billosaur · · Score: 1, Funny

    A surly, chain-smoking robot, to not do the work you need to get done around the home, which you cannot fire. Sign me up!

    Disclaimer: Been to France a couple of times and actually the above would more properly be typical of Parisian behavior; the French people outside Paris have always been quite nice.

    --
    GetOuttaMySpace - The Anti-Social Network
    1. Re:What every home needs by J0nne · · Score: 1
      A surly, chain-smoking robot, to not do the work you need to get done around the home, which you cannot fire. Sign me up!

      And here I was, thinking it was an ob. Futurama reference. But you had to ruin it by making it a French joke...
  30. French Joke here..(maybe, no, so?) by DarkDragonVKQ · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I now know why the French surrendered so much. They were building robots to take over the world. >.>

    --
    "I thought what I'd do was I'd pretend I was one of those deaf-mutes" ~ Laughing Man - GITS:SAC
  31. Will the 'bots be able to turn the A/C on? by sponglish · · Score: 0

    So http://www.cnn.com/2003/WORLD/europe/08/21/france. heatwave/index.html/ 10,000 French won't die of the heat this summer?

    --
    "I improvise. It's my greatest talent. I prefer situations to plans..." --Wintermute, William Gibson's "Neuromancer"
  32. just what we need... by sparr0w · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    ...an entire ROBOTIC ARMY of cheeze-eatin' surrender monkeys!

  33. Eurotrip by ThreeDeadTrolls · · Score: 0

    *reminded of cheesy robot battle in Eurotrip* Hahah and I was worried.... ok maybe I wasn't.

  34. Re:obligatory by GotenXiao · · Score: 1

    They also have very shoddy runway maintainence. The Concorde crash was caused by a large piece of debris that wasn't cleaned up after the previous plane took off. Part of the engine housing from a DC-10, if memory serves.

    --
    Goten Xiao
  35. In Soviet Union... by RagingFuryBlack · · Score: 0
    ...robots accept us as their scroungy human overlords!

    Wow, I just had to kill 2 birds with one stone.

    Seriously, A french robot? Come on. Its for sale as a submissive sex partner isn't it? I mean, thats all the french seem to be good for anyways...the submissive part.

    --
    Warning: Corny karma killing post above.
    1. Re:In Soviet Union... by ifrag · · Score: 1

      I didn't see any specs for the "gripping hands". But if it is up to spec, perhaps a lubricant reservoir should be added.

      --
      Fear is the mind killer.
    2. Re:In Soviet Union... by Epeeist · · Score: 1

      > Seriously, A french robot? Come on. Its for sale as a submissive sex partner isn't it? I mean, thats all the french seem to be good for anyways...the submissive part.

      At least the French seem to appreciate sex. Americans, sex - nah, does not compute.

    3. Re:In Soviet Union... by ajs318 · · Score: 1

      There was a study done recently in which they asked 1000 Frenchmen and 1000 American men to name their most favourite records to listen to while having sex. The most striking conclusion to come out of the survey was that all the Frenchmen's favourite records were LPs, and all the Americans' favourite records were 45s.

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    4. Re:In Soviet Union... by RagingFuryBlack · · Score: 1

      I never said it would be an american sex item. I think this one would go on sale in the Canadian Market. I mean, the fleshlight already conquered the american male hand. As for women, who knows. But what woman has intercourse with a robot?

      --
      Warning: Corny karma killing post above.
    5. Re:In Soviet Union... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I recall the study found Americans preferred soloists and time wasn't a factor.

  36. Re:obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Airbus it is NOT French but European. And flies.

  37. Other affordable options. And what IS affordable? by viper21 · · Score: 1

    The HKR-1 has been out for a while now. At a ballpark of $1,500, affordability is debatable.

    Seems like a very similar platform, minus the wifi (which could be added).

    I would be interested to see the price point at which these new linux+wifi bots would be sold. I would be surprised to see a sub $500 pricetag, and probably happy to see a sub $1,000 price point.

    I wonder what this company feels is affordable?

  38. Re:obligatory by andrewman327 · · Score: 1

    You should see the hordes of animals at De Gualle.

    --
    Information wants a fueled airplane waiting at the hangar and no one gets hurt.
  39. To the 101st Fighting Keyboardists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The French surrendered half of their country to the most formidable fighting machine in existence in 1940.

    The United States, with one of the most formidable fighting machines in existence in 1975, cut and ran from a third-world guerilla army who often subsisted on a daily handful of rice.

    Project much?

  40. Robots do cool things: hack and slash and maim by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Remember everybody, Robots are our friends.

  41. Linux powered robots from France by rinkjustice · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    As long as the French don't build them like their prizefighters ;)

  42. Degrees of Freedom? by jmkaza · · Score: 1

    Aren't there only six?

    1. Re:Degrees of Freedom? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, if you are a rigid object in space. This robot is not rigid.

  43. I'm confused by wowbagger · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    So, we are going to get a bunch of surly, lazy, obnoxious robots from France.

    But I thought Bender was Mexican?

  44. Re:obligatory by ElementCDN · · Score: 0, Troll

    Now they will have robots to do their surendering.

  45. Anything useful to add? by kkiller · · Score: 1

    Surrender jokes. It's like Little Green Footballs circa March 2003 all over again.

    Anyone have anything interesting to say? About robots?

    1. Re:Anything useful to add? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Nope. The American contingent is too busy propping up its low self-esteem with pallid jokes about the French. The irony is the jokes are based on France's refusal to acquiesce to American pressure, but that level of subtlety is well beyond the grasp of the majority of simians posting so far.

    2. Re:Anything useful to add? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Correct. This line of humor seems to come from the runup to the Iraq invasion when France was openly skeptical about the presence of WMDs. (It may have existed before, but not in this form.) I don't know who started it, but in a short amount of time all the conservative pundits were parroting this silly joke. Even though we now know that France was right to be skeptical, the joke remains. It's a lesson in the power of viral marketing and groupthink.

    3. Re:Anything useful to add? by krell · · Score: 0

      "Even though we now know that France was right to be skeptical"

      The hundreds of undocumented (i.e. hidden by Saddam's regime) potent WMD warheads found in Iraq in recent years shows that France's lie about them not existing is all the more shameful.

      --
      Where were you when the voynix came?
    4. Re:Anything useful to add? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cite any references more authoritative than Rush or KoolAid? Remember kiddies, we're talking active, deployable, useful military weapons and not the past-due-date stuff Americans sold Saddam when Iraq was busy killing Iranians for y'all. You know, like in the pictures Powell showed the UN.

  46. Re:Yes but ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The French surrendered half of their country to the most formidable fighting machine in existence in 1940.

    The United States, with one of the most formidable fighting machines in existence in 1975, cut and ran from a third-world guerilla army who often subsisted on a daily handful of rice.

    Project much?
    ============

  47. Second glances are scary by sgt+scrub · · Score: 1

    At first I thought, "Cool! Some innovative /.'er will mod this to do cool stuff like wash dishes or vacuum". Then I remembered how nafareous some of you guys are. Please keep in mind. This robot is too short to be a sex toy!

    --
    Having to work for a living is the root of all evil.
    1. Re:Second glances are scary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fry: What's with all the pots and pans? You building a wife?

      Bender: Part of one.

    2. Re:Second glances are scary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not if I'm sitting down, add a fleshlight, a flat head, and recognition software for my favorite porn movies and I'm set. LOL
      Of course I seem to recall someone getting something similiar done with less, just don't remember the name, same price figure though.

  48. Re:obligatory by everett · · Score: 3, Funny

    since it runs Linux, it can do no harm.

    That's because the user will be spending 99% of their time updating to the latest versions of the software packages and being told to RTFM by tech support when it won't turn on.

    But at least it isn't running windows, that would scare me.

    --
    Sig withheld to protect the innocent.
  49. French Surrendering and Casualties by Epeeist · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I know it is an attempt at a joke but it is getting very old.

    In WWII the Americans had 11,200 civilian casualties, the French had 267,000. In total the Americans had 407,300 military casualties from a population of 132 million, the French had 212,000 from a population of 41.7 million.

    1. Re:French Surrendering and Casualties by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good luck with that, posting historical facts and all. Any message beyond 'go U.S.A.' will fall on deaf ears or be karma-punished, Americans are not in the mood for reality. While we're at it, fun WW2 fact number 2: as a percentage of population more Canadians gave up their lives fighting to free Europe than Americans. Further more..."Hey look! Is that a celebrity!?!! Go U.S.A.!!"

    2. Re:French Surrendering and Casualties by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so if the enemy is killing your civilians why would you surrender to them

    3. Re:French Surrendering and Casualties by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, Thats why they have to surrender, they get pwned. At least they don't whine about the snipers and corpse campers.

  50. Freedom by umbrellasd · · Score: 1

    Nao's extra degrees of freedom appear to come in the form of gripping hands. Coochi-coochi coo!

  51. The French and Robots by refriedchicken · · Score: 3, Funny

    Atleast we know Isaac Asimov's Laws of not harming anyone will be followed.

    1. Re:The French and Robots by houghi · · Score: 1

      Ah, yes. Unlike the American ones who will say that these laws do not apply to them, because they are not a robot, but "a mechanism that can move automatically", which is completely different.

      So they can harm whomever and whatever they like.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  52. Re:obligatory by James+McGuigan · · Score: 1

    French WW2 rifles for sale - excellent condition - only dropped once.

  53. Re:Yes but ... by Luscious868 · · Score: 1

    Oh please. From Wikipedia:

    Battle of Dien Bien Phu (Vietnamese: Chin dch in Biên Ph) was the final battle in the First Indochina War between France and Vietnamese revolutionary forces called the Viet Minh (short for Vit Nam Ðc Lp Ðng Minh Hi or the League for the Independence of Vietnam). These forces were part of what is referred to as the People's Army of Vietnam. The battle occurred between March and May, 1954, and ended in a massive French defeat that effectively ended the war.

    The result of a series of blunders in the French decision making process was that the French undertook to create an air-supplied base, at Dien Bien Phu, deep in the hills of Vietnam. Its purpose was to cut off Viet Minh supply lines into Laos. Instead, the Viet Minh, under General Vo Nguyen Giap, were able to surround and besiege the French, who were ignorant of the Viet Minh's possession of heavy artillery and their ability to move such weapons to the mountain crests overlooking the French encampment. Tenacious fighting on the ground ensued, including the use of trench warfare by the Viet Minh. The Viet Minh occupied the highlands around Dien Bien Phu, and were able to fire down accurately onto French positions. The French repeatedly repulsed Viet Minh assaults on their positions, occasionally air-dropping reinforcements in. Ultimately, however, the Viet Minh were able to overrun the base and force the French to surrender.

    It would appear the French didn't have much luck in Vietnam either. If the French had gotten the job done the US never would have had to get involved there. Another fine moment in French military history.

  54. No need to worry. by Majesticsock · · Score: 1

    At least if they decide to go Skynet on the world we know the French robots will never be able to win a war.

  55. mod -1 redundant? by Keyboarder · · Score: 0, Redundant

    In Soviet France, robot overlords surrender to YOU!!! But will it run Linux?^W^W^W^W^W

  56. Re:Yes but ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ah, another famous LGF/Freeper Straw Man argument.

    The point you missed/ignored was France lost to the one of the most powerful armies on earth; we barely got our helicopters off the embassy roof in Saigon before it was overrun by a bunch of third-world commie guerillas. We surrendered/cut and ran/etc. Are we Big Mac eating surrender baboons?

    BTW: why haven't you enlisted to fight in Iraq?

  57. As the first order or business.... by Chineseyes · · Score: 0

    As the first order of business the robots were taught how to wave a white flag.

    --
    I think the invisible hand of the market has its middle finger extended

    --A wise old fart named SC0RN
  58. Humanoid Robots are SOOO Mid-20th Century by eno2001 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The use of humanoid robots will be limited to pointless tasks (greeters at Walmart)in the future. They are difficult to make, difficult to maintain (mechanically) and won't ever match the abilities of humans as long as we keep them "humanoid". The cost will never be less than the minimal benefits. You'd be better off with holograms for greeters once the technology is ironed out. In fact, for virtually any human/sentient machine interaction you're better off with holograms or VR. The only need for robotics is when you're dealing with physical interaction with objects (assembly or dangerous tasks) or people (surgery, sex bots built like spiders with sexy female human legs in black hosiery and the head of Amanda Donohoe, and let's face it... combat). And in every instance, the humanoid form is not that great. I want my robotic surgeon to have lasers built into his multiple tendrils (hopefully a few million of them) and nanoscale filaments that can perform cellular level cuts and sutures. No humanoid android will ever have that ability. Humanoid robots are overrated. Now if you want some applications for humanoid androids, I hear Disney has some openings in the "It's a Small World" display...

    --
    -"...bad old ideas look confusingly fresh when they are packaged as technology" - Jaron Lanier (Digital Maoism on Edge.o
    1. Re:Humanoid Robots are SOOO Mid-20th Century by Yvanhoe · · Score: 1

      I think you are right in the long term, but here and now, 80% of all machines and vehicles are made for humans. You can automate a machine, and this machine will be automatic. If you can create a humanoid robot, it could use all machines. Today I think we need to prove that "it can be done", that some tasks don't require a human brain to supervise the operation. I am sure that a construction droid with a hundred different tools on his body would be more efficient, but right now we need a robot with a hand that can take a screwdiver, can use a vacuum cleaner, can drive a wheel-and-pedal vehicle. Then, only then, investors will be ready to invest in R&D for specialized and efficient robots.

      --
      The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
  59. You should respect France, you ignorant bastard! by thesaintar · · Score: 0

    From wikipedia:
    Main article: American Revolutionary War
    On 10 January 1776, Thomas Paine published a political pamphlet entitled Common Sense arguing that the only solution to the problems with Britain was republicanism and independence from Great Britain.
    On 4 July 1776, the United States Declaration of Independence was ratified by the Second Continental Congress. Note that the war began in 1775, while the declaration was issued in 1776. Until this point, the colonies sought favorable peace terms; a majority did not approve of an outright push for independence.
    The Articles of Confederation and Perpetual Union, commonly known as the Articles of Confederation, formed the first governing document of the United States of America, combining the colonies of the American Revolutionary War into a loose confederation of sovereign states. The second Continental Congress adopted the Articles on 15 November 1777.
    The British continued to blockade the American coast, but French merchants, with funding from the French government, sent in large supplies of munitions.

    British attack the South, 1779-1781

    That fleet was defeated by a French fleet, however. Trapped at Yorktown, the British surrendered their main combat army to Washington in October, 1781. Although King George III wanted to fight on, his supporters lost control of Parliament and the war effectively ended for America.

  60. The surrender jokes are old... by Linkiroth · · Score: 1

    We should use other staples. Yes, it DOES run linux.

  61. Re:obligatory by thesaintar · · Score: 0

    An illegally modified American DC-10 (they used titanium instead of aluminium, which is illegal)

  62. But it.... by jagdish · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...doesnt sound quite the same

    mordre mon âne brillant en métal.

    mordre:bite
    mon:my
    brilliant:shiny
    (you get the picture)

    1. Re:But it.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hahah ... stupid fuck !
      you just asked someone to bite your donkey !

      hahahahaha, ignorant american git

    2. Re:But it.... by Narishma · · Score: 1

      Bite my shiny metalic donkey ?

      --
      Mada mada dane.
  63. wait a second... by zr-rifle · · Score: 1

    > and will feature 23 "degrees of freedom" of motion

    you mean as in "freedom fries"?

    Also, do french robots only move backwards? (hey wait, weren't those italian robots? my bad...)

    --
    Hack your mind out of its sandbox.
  64. All these "surrender monkey" jokes here.. by nephridium · · Score: 1

    ..and most of them are not even remotely funny (I'm not French btw).

    Most people seem to forget that France is the country that epitomized the humanistic zeitgeist in the overthrough of their authoritarian government (which wasn't a cakewalk) and pushed forth the ideal of equality. Voltaire's thoughts had a great influence on the rest of Europe, America ("I don't agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it.") and beyond. People like Jules Verne are sons of that country, especially "techies" and scifi freaks should value his inspiring stories. The same country whose government surrendered in WWII developed one of the finest cuisines and wines that exist. Music by Bizet and Debussy are part of our world's culture (and beautiful examples at that).

    I know this is a wee bit OT, but so are those surrender 'jokes'. I guess my point is, if you have to make fun of another country, make sure it's really funny!

    --


    And when you gaze long enough into the code, the code will also gaze into you.
    1. Re:All these "surrender monkey" jokes here.. by Yvanhoe · · Score: 1

      I am French and I like to nitpick :-)

      The same country whose government surrendered in WWII developed one of the finest cuisines and wines that exist.

      If you ask a slightly proud and biaised french, he would tell you that the government never surrendered, because there were two of them. One was Petain's (Gouvernement de Vichy) the other one was De Gaulle's (France Libre). They both accused each other as being illegitimate. Although Petain's government negociated inherrited from the "control" of the land and of a small piece of the army, today's french government is the continuation of De Gaulle's one, which was then exiled in London and didn't recognize the peace signed by Petain. It had lands too : most of the french colonies rallied him, at that time it was a fairly consequent empire, that made the decision to secede in order not to surrender.


      Now you can mod me off-topic :)

      --
      The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
    2. Re:All these "surrender monkey" jokes here.. by gfxguy · · Score: 1

      No, no monkeys... the joke here is "Cheese eating surrender robots."

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
  65. Cannes it with the French jokes already by ptelligence · · Score: 1

    Most of them are ridiculously lame. If you don't have anything interesting to say.....move along.

  66. Re:I'll bet it waves white flags great by Fordiman · · Score: 2, Funny

    As an italian, I am offended that you'd say french people smell of garlic. That's strictly our domain. And olive oil.

    The french smell more of BO.

    And Paris (literally) smells of dog poo in the summer.

    --
    110100 1101000 1101000 1100110 0 1101111 1101000 1100011 1
  67. So what exactly is the news here? by MaxInBxl · · Score: 1

    Is it that there these are robots? It is because they run linux? Or is because they're made in France?

  68. I want my Persocom dang it! by MagikSlinger · · Score: 1

    And I want it to look like Chii dang it! :-P

    --
    The bitter lessons of a veteran coder: http://bitterprogrammer.blogspot.com
  69. Vive La Robotica Revolucion! by wolff000 · · Score: 1

    I for one am weary of French automatons roaming about freely. I bet we would all be embarassed if our new robotic overlords all wore berets and ran on stinky cheese. On a serious note these bots seem pretty impressive. The fact they appear to be very hacker friendly is exciting. I'm looking forward to playing with one.

    --
    WTF?
  70. Re:I'll bet it waves white flags great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a French, I'm compelled to head-butt you.

  71. Okay... but what do they *DO*? by mark-t · · Score: 1

    Not even two feet tall, it strikes me as nothing more than a toy.

    Not that there's anything wrong with it being a toy, but the article makes reference to them being "household" robots, which should imply that there is a measure of practical usefulness to them in the household.

    1. Re:Okay... but what do they *DO*? by Captain+DaFt · · Score: 1

      I agree. To me, a robot would have to be able to at least see and reach the top of a table or countertop before It would make a good "housekeeper".
      Unless all you want is something to pick up your laundry and empty cans off the floor and put them in the appropiate, very short, containers.

      I mean geez; "Hal, fetch me a beer!" "Sorry boss, I can't reach the handle on the refrigerator door."

      --
      The U.S. really needs an English to Wisdom dictionary.
  72. Re:obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I actually dual-boot Kubuntu and use it for "serious" work (not just trying out new packages), yet Adept is still at the top of my most used programs list.

  73. I wonder.... by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    .... if the UK or the US would have fared any better if they had been the neighbours of the Third Reicht.

    France was overwhelmed, the USSR lost 20 million people. Poland, Austria absorbed almost without any resistence.

    USians and UKians should count themselves lucky and stop the stupid jokes. They are insensitive (like if the French were waiting to surrender, specially after the horroros of WWI) and frankly in very bad taste.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
    1. Re:I wonder.... by ArmyOfFun · · Score: 1
      Poland ... absorbed almost without any resistence.
      Being next to Nazi Germany is bad, true. Being between Nazi Germany and Stanlist Russia is worse. I don't think any nation could've survived a simultaneous attack by Russia and Germany. Poland was defeated in one week less than France was. And France didn't have the USSR to deal with.

      Educate yourself:
      Invasion of Poland
      Polish Resistence
      Warsaw Uprising
      Polish Fighter Squadron
      Polish contributions to WW2
    2. Re:I wonder.... by TerranFury · · Score: 1

      "Between Germany and Russia" has been a bad place for most of modern European history: Poland's woes are simply geo-political. The men of Poland are not Polacks; they are Poles -- and the country that cracked the Enigma code machines does not build screen-door submarines!

  74. In case I'm appraoched by one.. by deadgoon42 · · Score: 1

    How does one say, "Must Kill All Humans" in french. I ndded to know what to listen for.

    --

    Smeghead every day of the week.
  75. Re:I'll bet it waves white flags great by Damastus+the+WizLiz · · Score: 1

    Italians also surrender better.

    --
    I often have trouble remembering which way is out of bed in the morning.
  76. Re:I'll bet it waves white flags great by mlocker · · Score: 1

    Too funny!!! Michael Locker MD

  77. Link to the site, not to the blog by Animats · · Score: 3, Informative

    Please link to the actual site, not the blog. We don't need to read all the blogodreck and ads.

    1. Re:Link to the site, not to the blog by darjen · · Score: 1

      You're missing the point.

      1. Get your article posted on Slashdot
      2. Link to the page with ads
      3. ???
      4. Profit

  78. Re:Yes but ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We surrendered because you tree hugging liberals forced the issue by cutting off funding in Congress for the war. It's hard to continue to fight when don't have your funding for things like food, clothing, weapons and equipment cut off by Congress. Your the worst kind of ignorant douche bag.

  79. Well, Excuse Moi! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (I'm the A/C here who posted the "Non, non, non!!!" comment)

    I don't speak French at all... I just used Babelfish. Still it's pretty neat that I got a +5 Funny from all the /. moderators who don't know French either :-)

    Cheers!

    1. Re:Well, Excuse Moi! by Velocir · · Score: 1

      I'm now meta-moderating you down because I do know French, and your genders are all mixed up.

  80. programmable? by darjen · · Score: 1

    while (drunk == false) { getMeABeer(); }

    1. Re:programmable? by ddig83 · · Score: 1

      you are going to have such a backlog of beer!

      while ((drunk == false) && (beer_can_contents/beer_can_volume <= .25)) { getMeABeer(); }

      you only want it when you're almost out.

    2. Re:programmable? by kat104 · · Score: 1

      This is exactly what I was thinking. Exception made of the dangerous loop. Cron task mebbie?

      if (weekday==Saturday) Prepare("Dry Martini", "shaker");

    3. Re:programmable? by serialdogma · · Score: 1

      No, that exits the loop if the beer can is not 25% full. You want it to to wait till you need one: "while (drunk == false) { if(beer_can_contents/beer_can_volume = .25) getMeABeer(); }", but that still is not perfect you want something like "while (drunk == false) {
      if(current_beer.contents.toDouble()==0)
      {
      current_beer=next_beer;
      }
      elseif(current_beer.contents.toDouble()=.25)
      {
      next_beer=getMeABeer();
      }else{
      sleep(5);
      }
      }"

  81. Re:Yes but ... by Epeeist · · Score: 1

    > We surrendered because you tree hugging liberals forced the issue by cutting off funding in Congress for the war.

    The tree hugging liberals were actually in the army and fighting in Vietnam. You right wing xenophobes were getting deferments because you had better things to do.

  82. Yes but... by Awod · · Score: 1

    "a humanoid household service robot running Linux" Thats all well and good but.. can it shoot lasers?

  83. French... so what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Hey guys!

    I don't know what all of you have against French people involved in Robotics, but France has some top-notch Robotics engineers, including a lot of researchers contributing to the HRP-2 platform (Choromet's big brother). URBI is a French scripting language, too, and French research really *is* represented during Robotics conferences such as ICRA and all.

    So let's trust the engineers behind Nao and see what will happen in 2007!

  84. Re:You should respect France, you ignorant bastard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    The monarchy ruled France until 1789, when the French Revolution took place. So the government that aided the colonies isn't the government he's referring to. The government he's referring to is the pansies that were occupied by Germany twice. A government who's parliament voted 569-80 to dissolve and establish the Nazi run Vichy government. That acquiescence is the reason that, to this day, the French are referred to as "cheese eating surrender monkeys", you ignorant bastard.

  85. lol by doti · · Score: 2, Informative
    --
    factor 966971: 966971
  86. 500 WMD = 500 WMD by krell · · Score: 0

    "we're talking active, deployable, useful military weapons and not the past-due-date stuff"

    So was I. The 500 that have been found in recent years still have potent chemical weapon contents: quite deadly. The rocket part of the shell is "past due", but each of these 500 shells was active and deployable by delivery through other means than launching, or launching on a new delivery system. To accept the idea that they are "past due", we have to use a silly and contrived definition of WMD that includes "if it can't be launched on a missile or artilery shell, it is not a WMD". One of these 500 shells is enough to prove "no WMD!" a lie. 500 is more than enough. That is certain. What is less certain (but very probable) is the idea that, if Saddam were kept in power and the ineffective Blix "inspect only when Saddam sanitizes the place" inspection regime were still in place, these would have NEVER been found.

    And who provided him these weapons? Not the US, but a Dutch man named Frans van Anraat. You can replace the "There were no WMD in Iraq; Bush lied!" claim with your "There are plenty of WMD, but they are hard to launch".... but that is quite a retreat. Now as for Rush and Kool-aid: Rush (with or without Geddy Lee) did not find these WMD. If you think that the contents of the warheads are harmless, I invite you to drink. Just like Kool-Aid, eh?

    --
    Where were you when the voynix came?
    1. Re:500 WMD = 500 WMD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An intelligent reply! Intelligent, but still incorrect:

      http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/43601 37.stm

      Shipments ended before 1988, and yes those chemicals weapons have a defined shelf life. 500 20+ year old chemical weapons are of no battlefield value.

  87. Re:Yes but ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > The tree hugging liberals were actually in the army and fighting in Vietnam. You right wing xenophobes were getting deferments because you had better things to do.

    Prove that more liberals than conservatives fought in Vietnam. You can't can you? Typical liberal. Making statements not supported by facts.

  88. Re:extra degrees of freedom by pete6677 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Don't forget bashing America for being brutal when we show up to save their asses yet again.

  89. Re:You should respect France, you ignorant bastard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The French voted to surrender after defeat was inevitable and in the context of losing tens of millions of lives in the span of two generations to war YOU STUPID FUCK. Americans should be the last to talk after what Chimpy's done to your country's rights and freedoms, and after your acts against two nations, over an loss that would have been a good day for France during either WW1 or WW2. Are all American Rushbots such insular, navel-gazing fuckwits?

  90. Hmmm, looks familiar... by atomic_toaster · · Score: 1

    The Nao is decidely reminiscent of MegaMan, while the Choromet looks like a cross between something from any of the Gundams and Bubblegum Crisis. Is it possible to build a humanoid robot that doesn't rip off a Japanese TV show or videogame, people?

  91. *Short* Humanoid Robots are even less useful by billstewart · · Score: 1
    Fine, they're cool toys, but that's about it. Humanoid shapes are useful for non-specialized robots that need to be able to do a wide variety of things, and two-foot-tall robots aren't able to do many of the things a larger robot could.
    • For instance, if you want the robot to fetch you a beer, it needs to be able to reach into the refrigerator.
    • If you want a robot to vacuum your floors in your uncluttered house, you can get a specialized robot like Roomba, or you can have a general-purpose robot push a vaccuum cleaner that's designed for humans to push.
    • If you want to vacuum the floors in a cluttered house, the humanoid robots's got some advantages, because it can move things around, but it needs to be strong enough to do the job, not tip over much, and able to see things on top of tables if it's moving them there, so again a 2-foot-tall robot isn't useful.
    • If you want a robot to change the channels on the TV after it fetches your beer, humanoid robots aren't really that helpful - a Tivo-shaped robot is better at the job, or you might want voice recognition in your TV or Tivo to tell it to change channels; maybe the humanoid robot can fetch DVDs and put them into the DVD player, but it's probably not worth the trouble, and certainly not compared to a large hard disk...
    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  92. The Gripping Hand by Dan+Slotman · · Score: 2, Funny

    On one hand, I would love a robot. On the other hand, I'll bet they are expensive. On the gripping hand, Moties aren't available for purchase.

  93. Re:Yes but ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I did a quick search for some data, just to see if you're full of crap or not. It turns out that in 2000, 13.7% of Democrats in congress were Vietnam vets. In contrast, only 10.5% of congressional Republicans served in Vietnam. (Sources: VVIC and the congressional directory) Even though Republicans outnumbered Democrats, there were still more Democratic Vets than Republican ones. So there's some data for you to think about.

    Now let's see you come up with proof that the typical liberal makes statements not supported by facts. You wouldn't say something nasty about liberals if it weren't true, right? I mean, you clearly have such a respect for factual data that it's unthinkable that you'd throw around baseless accusations that amount to nothing but a childish rant.

  94. Re:Yes but ... by kat104 · · Score: 1

    I don't remember La Fayette ever surrendred...
    But that's right, Vietnam was a great victory on the terrain for the two armies mentionned above.
    Not to say in 1939 UK had 20 divisions which retreated as fast as history books appreciate to forget it.

    But wait. Off-topic. That robot was simply not built to destroy. Unless someone mounts a chainsaw on it, objective Redmond.

  95. Re:Yes but ... by TerranFury · · Score: 1

    To the "conservative" Anonymous Coward: The "liberal's" comment (dispite his subsequent research) was really a reference to George W. Bush's draft-dodging during the Vietnam War. Either you are feigning ignorance, or you truly did not understand his comment. I will assume that you are not an entirely stupid man, and that you are simply feigning ignorace in order to exasperate the "liberal" poster. You have likely succeeded. Well done.

    Your argument about Vietnam signals that you never had a stake in the war. Let's use an example in which you do have a stake. In many ways, the Iraq War is similar to the Vietnam War: There is no clear end in sight, and no exit strategy. It is a war fought in a third-world country against enemies using guerilla tactics, whose politics we do not adequately comprehend. So: Why are you not fighting? Imagine that you were in the army in Iraq, and that you were killed by a roadside bomb. Your future is gone. Anyone who cares about you is wrecked. Your body has been torn apart. You are dead. Was it worth it?

    (Those who advocate war should be required to fight in it.)

  96. Re:In case I'm approached by one.. by Flying+Betty · · Score: 1

    Je dois tuer tous les humains.

    Glad I could help.

  97. Restaurant by the Maui Aquarium had Freedom Fries by billstewart · · Score: 1
    I was out in Maui about 2 years ago, and the restaurant by the aquarium in Maalea had "Freedom Fries". Maybe some of the US mainlander tourists liked that sort of thing, but presumably the rest of the tourists were annoyed at the stupid American jingoists. And Hawaii is so thoroughly multicultural that it's much more ridiculous there that it would be in Iowa or something, though most of the European-ancestry people in Hawaii are either Portugese or Anglos (or hippies.)

    My mother was appalled - she's a politically active liberal Republican who didn't like either George Bush, and while she'd heard the politicians doing their anti-French rant, she hadn't seen anyone actually believing it back on the East Coast. I hadn't seen any Free Dumb Fries here in Silicon Valley either, but it's a sufficiently blue state that I wouldn't expect to find them much closer than maybe Fresno.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  98. Robots with Linux for long Uptime... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry - I didn't post this, nobody saw me, you can't prove a thing....

  99. Re:You should respect France, you ignorant bastard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Damn straight.
      For my fellow Americans who are stupid enough to buy that there was something wrong with the French government's disbanding, think about what would happen if the Pacific Ocean didn't exist, and Germany's western border was instead along our eastern coast. The Nazi war machine (which in those days was considered somewhat invincible) would have torn through our meager defences and been in Missouri within a month. (Our successes in fighting the Nazis had a lot to do with being able to ramp up a military machine without interference from constant bombing and invasion, as well as the Russians killing all the first string Nazi soldiers, and the second string, and the third, leaving us to fight mostly Hitler Youth regiments by 1944)
      Given that outcome, what do you think the guys all the way back in Washington D.C. would do then, hmm? Especially when there was a Nazi army standing in the streets outside? Surrender, maybe?
      It's not like the French Government had much choice. Indeed, the far right assholes in France couldn't WAIT to put on uniforms so they could start cracking the heads of their more liberal neighbors. There's a group of those kind of fucks in EVERY country, but there are fewer in France today, 'cause a lot of them suddenly got very dead in the days following France's liberation.
      France is not a nation of soft-hearted sissys. They're stubborn, proud, vocal, arrogant, and occassionally vicious when they think the situation warrants it. God bless 'em, they're just like us Americans!
      The right in America actually hates them because France won't kneel down and lick boot, but rather happily tells America when to get bent.

  100. US Surrendered to Bush League by billstewart · · Score: 1
    At least when the French were taken over by the Germans, they had the excuse that a large foreign army had found the flaws in their defenses and stomped on them. When the Republican Party and then the US were taken over by an organization aggressively opposed to the traditional values of liberty, small government, fiscal responsibility, and common sense, it was done by propaganda and money, except for a small attack by foreign enemies and some recycled military anthrax, and the large army, police, and spying organizations that are now attacking the US were all our own.

    There has been a lot of excellent French engineering, though there's also a tradition of central planning by "experts", which led to things like the Maginot Line, attacking Russia in winter, suppression of regional languages, and a lot of the 19th-century mercantilism. Hopefully the robotics engineering will more resemble the social structure of French painting...

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  101. Which Animals at DeGaulle ? by billstewart · · Score: 1

    My initial impression of "hordes of animals at De Gaulle" was the crowds of people waiting in various lines to buy tickets or go through customs or whatever. But you're probably talking about all the rabbits hanging around the outside green spaces? CDG also had *lots* of plane-spotters hanging around when I was last there - kind of a weird obsession, but it was plane-spotters who provided a lot of the evidence about CIA planes hauling kidnapped people around to secret prisons.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  102. Nuff Said by pandrijeczko · · Score: 1
    "Euro-heaven" - British humour, German technology, French food.

    "Euro-hell" - British food, German humour, French technology.

    --
    Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
  103. Gotten *what* job done? by billstewart · · Score: 1
    Maybe you've forgotten, but the French-Vietnamese war in 1954 wasn't "France defending the world's freedom from Communist Domino-Tippers" - it was a colonialist empire getting kicked out by nationalists, just as it got kicked out of Algeria a few years later. The nationalists found they got a better deal from the Communists so they became Commies, though of course part of the deal was "having the huge country of traditional enemies who live next door being on your side". The US went in to "help" stomp out the freedom fighters, without any success either, supported some dictators and assassinated others, and of course down in the south, the Commies were anti-freedom fighters, not that the dictators were all that pro-freedom, and a few decades of war in neighboring Cambodia led to a group of psychotic killers who made Mao's Cultural Revolutionaries look like nice guys.

    At least the French had the sense to get out when it was hopeless, rather than continuing to escalate because backing down would send a message that we were wimps and ensuring that Communism would continue to oppress people for decades afterwords, though it's mostly gone now. All in all, it was another fine moment in militarist history.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  104. Torn between two cliches by tehcyder · · Score: 1

    But the anti-French posts seem to be vastly outnumbering the pro-Linux ones.

    --
    To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it