Slashdot Mirror


Linux Laptop from R Cubed Reviewed

An anonymous reader writes "NewsForge (Also owned by VA) has a short writeup on R Cubed's latest laptop, the LS1250-L Linux laptop. From the article: 'My test machine came with Fedora Core 5, the GNOME desktop, OpenOffice.org 2.0, the Firefox browser, and Evolution mail client. The lineup also includes the normal assortment of multimedia players, administration tools, and games. If you prefer, you can choose SUSE 10.1, various flavors of Red Hat Enterprise Linux, and even Microsoft Windows XP.'"

132 comments

  1. Re:fp by evencoolerbeans · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    No wai.

  2. Dell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Dell must be quaking in its boots. And Apple... well let's just say Mr. Jobs should get acquainted with his local welfare office.

  3. A bit expensive for a Linux laptop? by gasmonso · · Score: 4, Informative

    Not trolling here, but the price does seem high... almost as if the MS tax in in there somewhere. Is there such thing as a Linux tax? Consider the Dell XPS M1210 for $1200.

    http://religiousfreaks.com/
    1. Re:A bit expensive for a Linux laptop? by joe+155 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      just shy of $1500 doesn't seem that high, it's only £812, which is pretty cheep really, although as they mention in the article, the premium is mainly for the lack of weight in the system. Although if the XP model doesn't cost any more there is also be a MS premium built in, which would be a shame - because everyone will want FC5 ; )

      --
      *''I can't believe it's not a hyperlink.''
    2. Re:A bit expensive for a Linux laptop? by also-rr · · Score: 4, Informative

      Well this one is 66% of the weight of the Dell (a big deal for me since I travel a lot - in fact being sub 3lb it's amazingly light), by the time I picked out similar specs for both the Dell and the R Cubed the comparison was around $1700 (Dell) vs $2000.

      $300 is easily paid for with the weight reduction and having every bug already worked out so I don't need to spend any time setting it up to run under Linux, in my opinion, but it depends how much you value your time I suppose.

      Anyway it's interesting enough that I'm seriously considering getting one as my next laptop instead of a MacBook Pro as I'm not sure I can face messing around like this to get wireless working again when I could have it all functioning out of the box.

    3. Re:A bit expensive for a Linux laptop? by ColdWetDog · · Score: 2, Funny
      Oh, but you're forgetting the "carbon fiber" {???) case.

      And the special X windows drivers.

      And the fact that it can run "continously for up to 7.9 hours".

      Lots of value added things in here. But does it run Vista?

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    4. Re:A bit expensive for a Linux laptop? by aersixb9 · · Score: 1

      Plus it's made from a 'carbon-fiber alloy'. What's a carbon fiber alloy? (I'm assuming alloys are when two materials are dissolved in acid/water, then mixed...although I'm no chemist...such as carbon-fiber and...) And why would anyone want a carbon-fiber alloy linux laptop, when they could have a stainless steel no-os laptop, then install linux on it for free & fun? This seems to be about as useless a product as a mac...although an ultra-light (or an ultra-durable, waterproof) laptop may be desirable for some people, why put linux on it? Isn't that two seperate products? And come on, kevlar is only $33/yard, why not put that around the laptop? It's lighter than carbon fiber with equal strength, or much stronger with equal weight.

    5. Re:A bit expensive for a Linux laptop? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Most OEMs pay less than $20 for Windows. Also it is not a tax when you pay for a product.

      Is there such thing as a Linux tax?

      Maybe if you understood what you were asking rather than just using a cute catch phrase you would not ask this.

    6. Re:A bit expensive for a Linux laptop? by mochan_s · · Score: 1

      Kevlar on laptops. I can imagine a conversation going like this -

      Person 1 Hey, this laptop is bulletproof.

      Person 2 Yeah, of course. It's got linux on it.

      Person 1 No, I mean literally bulletproof. It's got kevlar.

      Person 2 YOu mean if I shoot a bullet at you, you can block the bullet with your laptop.

      Person 1 Yep. (satisfied grin)

    7. Re:A bit expensive for a Linux laptop? by aersixb9 · · Score: 1

      Actually, those mainboards, although flexable, are pretty dang hard. Although I don't have any data on bullet penetration vs. most mainboards, I bet they bounce off those finely woven metal wires. Ironically, a thin, lightweight piece of kevlar is not bulletproof, yet 10 feet of fiberglass is! (Uh...I'm assuming that second part, data on the first part is from www.theboxotruth.com, in the 'ballistic armor penetration' section.)

    8. Re:A bit expensive for a Linux laptop? by djmurdoch · · Score: 2, Informative

      just shy of $1500 doesn't seem that high, it's only £812,

      You seem to think currency conversion is all that matters. Everything in the UK is priced higher than the same thing in the US. For example, the $1099 Macbook is £749 in the UK (incl VAT). Expect to pay over £1000 for this machine. (Without VAT the prices are closer, but the UK is still higher. In the US prices are always quoted without sales tax, because each state has its own tax rate.)

    9. Re:A bit expensive for a Linux laptop? by tkdog · · Score: 1

      This really looks like a product in search of a market instead of one built for a known market. Lightweight, but outdated. Linux, but pre-configured i.e. non-geeky. Fewer features, but overpriced. Good luck with that.

    10. Re:A bit expensive for a Linux laptop? by spuzzzzzzz · · Score: 3, Informative
      Although if the XP model doesn't cost any more there is also be a MS premium built in, which would be a shame
      On this page, you can see that adding Windows XP to a laptop costs $105.
      --

      Don't you hate meta-sigs?
    11. Re:A bit expensive for a Linux laptop? by Rebelgecko · · Score: 1

      And is it powerful enough to play Duke Nukem Forever?

      --
      CATS/Diebold '08- All your vote are belong to us!
    12. Re:A bit expensive for a Linux laptop? by kullnd · · Score: 1

      You laugh, but over in iraq one of our solders was saved when the bullet shot at him didn't pass through the Panasonic Thoughbook he was carrying...

      THat would be one hell of a story to take home with ya..

      --
      +++ATH0 NO CARRIER
    13. Re:A bit expensive for a Linux laptop? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Having used Linux for several years, but not in the past 2 years since I got a PowerBook, I can't see paying hundreds more for the privilege of running clunky Linux on an ugly generic Asus laptop. I'd just get the $1099 Macbook, and use OS X.

    14. Re:A bit expensive for a Linux laptop? by Fluk3 · · Score: 0

      "This seems to be about as useless a product as a mac" WTF are you smoking? You can do anything with a Mac. You can run any OS and any App and it's laptops are top notch. Suck ball bearings you ignorant troll. Linux is the real useless heap of dung.

      --
      I've been upgraded to "bad"!
    15. Re:A bit expensive for a Linux laptop? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Over the years I've shot numerous laptops from various popular vendors. Lets just say none of the ones I've encountered stopped handgun ammunition, let alone rifle fire.

      When my current Dell dies, it too will get a bullet.

      Strangely, Seagate's massive hard-drives of yesteryear did stop NATO 7.62x51 rounds out of a HK-G3 rifle. The drive itself was obliterated but the bullet did not pass through.

    16. Re:A bit expensive for a Linux laptop? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, did you read your own link? They say right up front that for the non-PPC Macs (like, say, the Macbook Pro) there's a much easier method.

    17. Re:A bit expensive for a Linux laptop? by davidsyes · · Score: 1

      Well, it costs more to have it in black... Don't you see? If they mimic Apple, then they'll be geeks with class... and their customers can joint the elite ranks of the discriminating (as in cool with class) Apple users, hehehe...

      (What's that joke? Many windoze users are smart, but Mac users are smart AND have class, or something like that?)

      --
      Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
    18. Re:A bit expensive for a Linux laptop? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe the price includes reliability? That's something you won't get from dell.

    19. Re:A bit expensive for a Linux laptop? by York+the+Mysterious · · Score: 1

      You really can't count a Dell off the shelf price to anything. They have a 30% sale every week. If you search for a few months you can find 600 off 1200 coupons for 10 bucks on eBay. I've bought quite a few Dell desktops with monitors for $300 that were VERY nice machines (DVD burners etc). That price is very very high. For that price you might as well just buy a Macbook and get triboot. The Pentium M is last years generation. Why would you pay that price to get last years tech.

      --

      Tim Smith - Ramblings from Nerd Land
    20. Re:A bit expensive for a Linux laptop? by arashi+no+garou · · Score: 1

      No, don't consider that specific Dell model. It has an issue with the hard drive controller causing the HDD to not be able to boot. I've seen this same problem with two of these so far from my customers. Granted, Dell was quick to send new HDDs to the customers under warranty, but that's curing the symptoms and not the cause. They should recall that particular model.

    21. Re:A bit expensive for a Linux laptop? by kestasjk · · Score: 1

      While we're on Dell, is it just me or have they made their site completely un-browseable? All there is on dell.com is a link to one product, and the product description is terrible. And people wonder why Apple is doing so much better..

      --
      // MD_Update(&m,buf,j);
    22. Re:A bit expensive for a Linux laptop? by zCyl · · Score: 1

      Over the years I've shot numerous laptops from various popular vendors. Lets just say none of the ones I've encountered stopped handgun ammunition, let alone rifle fire.

      On a hunch, I'm going to say you have aggression issues? :)

  4. Anonymous Coward by Trouvist · · Score: 0, Troll

    This is clearly a slashvertizement.

    1. Re:Anonymous Coward by joe+155 · · Score: 1

      I don't thend to think that this is a "slashvertizement", and even if it was that wouldn't be a problem. We are really here to be on the cutting edge, if I wanted a new laptop I'd want to know what is the latest and maybe greatest linux laptops. This just makes you aware of what you might want to buy but doesn't really do it in such a way that says that you should only look at this. Also the review element is clearly different from an advert... when was the last time you saw an ad and it said "it is a bit expensive..." (aside from maybe stella)

      --
      *''I can't believe it's not a hyperlink.''
    2. Re:Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      What I don't understand about all the "clearly a slashvertisement" comments is how Slashdot is every supposed to post a story about a new product? I agree that sometimes a summary is highly slanted... some obscure piece of hardware is given a rave review and called a "must have for any geek" and the only links are for places to buy it.

      However sometimes the community really does want to know about a new product of some kind. And I would think that Slashdot would care about the goings-ons in laptops sold with Linux pre-installed.

      So while we should always take Slashdot to task for abusing their "position of authority," we should not dilute such arguments by crying wolf every time a product-related story is posted.

  5. Link to the laptop (from article) by pembo13 · · Score: 0, Redundant
    --
    "Thanks for all the money you paid to us. We've used it to buy off ISO among other things" -Microsoft
  6. If only others would follow by lightyear4 · · Score: 1

    From TFA: "The $1,433 suggested retail price for the reviewed model seems high."

    That's for sure, considering the reviewed model was a 1.73GHz Centrino processor with a 533MHz front side bus, 512MB of DDR2 memory, and a 60GB 5400RPM hard drive.

    I like what rcubed is doing and give them lots of credit, but until the likes of Dell and other large vendors offer mainstream factory linux installation (without hidden charges, etc), we're on our own. Modern distributions are savvy enough to handle almost everything you throw at them, but without the blessing of the big vendors, linux will be confined largely to enthusiasts.

    1. Re:If only others would follow by hcob$ · · Score: 1

      Dell does offer either RHEL 4 (at all levels of support) and FreeDOS as options on it's computers... you just have to ask ;)

      --
      Cliff Claven
      K.E.G. Party Chairman
      Founding Leader of: Koncerned for Egalitarin Governance
    2. Re:If only others would follow by lightyear4 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I did ask, several different reps. It's so widely publicized at Dell, that only one our of four even knew linux was an OS. The others believed windows was the only operating system.

    3. Re:If only others would follow by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

      Are you sure about this? I clicked "Configure" on one of Dell's consumer laptops, and it pretty clearly states that you options for "Operating System" are your choice of "Windows® XP Home Edition [Included in Price]" or "Windows® XP Professional [add $149 or $4/month]". See this page, although I'm not sure if the link is stable.

      There is no mention made, nor selectable option for, FreeDOS, RHEL, or anything else besides Windows.

      Are those special "business" options? Because if that's the case, it's a lot less significant, since most people will never see them.

      Until Linux is on the list of options right next to Windows, it's still going to be a 'hack' to most people; something the computer wasn't 'designed for.'

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    4. Re:If only others would follow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only dell sold with similar specs (I.E. sub 3 lbs) is the Dell X1 at 2.5 lbs (I.E. a rebranded samsung Q30). That laptop is actually only 1.1 Ghz, with the 533Mhz FSB, and has a 6 hour max battery life with the extended battery, 3 otherwise (I have one). It also starts at $1200.0, though the $2200.0 model is only beginning to have a reasonable amount of ram (768 meg)

      The are actually pricing in at just about the right level. I'm sure no-one would complain if they could knock it down to the $1000.0 line, but I'm not surprised they didn't/couldn't.

    5. Re:If only others would follow by Wdomburg · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure how they can list sub-3lb on their website, considering they also say it's a Z33A, which Asus lists as 3.3lb. Taking that into account, compare it to the D420 instead;. Similar price but newer technology - Core instead of Pentium M, DDR2-533 instead of DDR2-400, Intel GMA950 instead of the 915, gigabit ethernet instead of fast, WXGA display (1280x800) instead of XGA (1024x768) and you get a Cardbus slot and docking connector with the Dell. Oh, and a three year warranty standard instead of a one year.

      I've installed Fedora, Ubuntu, and CentOS on the last three generations of Lattitudes without any major issues either. The biggest pain was Fedora Core 4 on a Lattitude D600, since the wireless card wasn't natively supported at the time.

    6. Re:If only others would follow by rapidweather · · Score: 1

      As the developer of Rapidweather Remaster of Knoppix Linux, I would want to try and run my livecd linux on any machine, to turn it into a linux box. Problems would be partitioning an existing Windows XP hard drive, so I can have a swap partition, and a partition to do "knoppix tohd=/dev/hda3" for instance. I have QTParted, but have not tried it on a XP filesystem. Might work, might fowl XP up, don't know.
      The other problems might be just getting the sound system to work, on many machines I have no problem, on some laptops, no sound. Strangely, I can plug in USB headphones, and I get sound.
      I have stayed with the 2.4 kernel, so I can run on many older machines. I note that 3% of my website visitors still run '98. They need to try my knoppix remaster and use that instead if possible, for security reasons, viruses, trojans, etc. being a problem with '98.
      I have a HP Pavilion 6330 with 128 MB RAM, and that box does just fine, sound, etc. all working with linux. Tried Slax, it has the later 2.6 kernel, and is very slow, to the point of being almost useless.
      With a desktop computer, one can change graphics and sound cards, and get linux up and running very well indeed. No so with a laptop.
      All sorts of strange problems can come up, I have a Toshiba 4015CDS machine, and my linux will boot on it, and run with the "tohd" cheatcode, but the second time around, it will not run from that "tohd" setup. Why, I don't know. Linux folks often won't talk about little problems like that, I don't see why I shouldn't let that be known.

      The PCMCIA modem in the Toshiba works perfectly, I do use dial-up almost all the time, but do have one machine around here on a Comcast cable modem. I use that to download the competion, and see how they run. Lots of suprises there, some just won't run on many boxes, others are not well put together with useful applications. I have to write a lot of my own applications to get things done the way I want. Eventually, that pays off, and that is the beauty of linux as compared to Windows.

      Windows computers are successful because the engineers work out all of the software/hardware issues, and you just buy it, and turn it on, and there is your desktop, ready to go.

      I have some screenshots in the signature below, I have a time keeping them up to date with the changes I am making. For instance, I do have seven mouse cursor themes now, built-in, these are kde-look.org cursor themes, and one can switch from one to another in seconds, in the default IceWM window manager. The screenshot shows only 6.

      The Getting Started Guidehas 147K of details, that document is hosted on geocities, they provide a sniffer so I can see the OS's, browsers, screen resolution, etc.
      I do note that most use 1024x768 now, so my wallpapers match that.
      Three of the wallpapers can download from rapidweather.com server, so I can change those from time to time.
      I have a wallpaper control center that handles downloaded wallpaper images in a livecd linux setup, allowing easy placement in the "configs.tbz" restoration tarball if need be.

      I have moved on from just getting my remaster to run on various computers, to adding applications, and getting them to release /ramdisk memory once the app is closed.

      I want to be able to run the machine for hours, using each of the three web browsers, and be able to do "df" and show that I have returned to my starting /ramdisk use. If I am not using an application, I don't want leftovers hanging around. That's hard to do, but I am getting very close.

      Guarddog Firewall? On by default, and pre-configured so the user does not have to use the Guarddog interface to set it up.

      We say Linux is more secure than Windows, and we need to be able to provide an OS where "online banking" can be done much safer than on Windows. So, even livecd linux needs a firewall.

      -- Rapidweather

  7. And why would I want to pay the premium by namityadav · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Why don't the no-name revolutionary linux laptop makers understand that unless they sell their laptop for lesser than a similarly spec'd Dell Inspiron, people are going to buy the Inspiron and install Ubuntu instead.

    Yes, I know it's easier to have a pre-setup laptop and not have to worry about searching for ndiswrapper etc for wireless, but the community that the linux laptop makers are targetting actually loves such challenges.

    Okay, now I'll get back to trying to figure out how the heck this BCM4318 is going to work :-(

    1. Re:And why would I want to pay the premium by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 2, Informative

      Heck, right now you can even get a 1.8Ghz Intel Core Due for less than what R^3 wants for the 1.53 Ghz Celeron M. You can't even get an Intel Core Duo on the R^3 model.

      Screw that.

    2. Re:And why would I want to pay the premium by Bazman · · Score: 2, Informative

      Hunt for ndiswrapper? We got ten new Dell laptops in the other day, booted Ubuntu Dapper Live, and wireless worked. Straight. Out of. The Box. As did everything else.

        Although to be honest it was my technical team that did it so I'm not sure if they tested hibernate/suspend or any other real hardcore stuff. DVDs played, sound worked, network fine, wireless sorted.

        I need to make sure the external VGA works (this is a problem with some laptops in linux) since that does cause our students to lose hair when they have presentations to give, and causes some of them to resort to printed or even handwritten transparencies for talks!

      B

    3. Re:And why would I want to pay the premium by caseih · · Score: 1

      As people have pointed out already, by the time you spec a machine similarly from Dell, the cost is very similar. For me the weight, battery life, and the linux compatibility are worth a $300 premium. People also like to complain about the expensive Apple laptops too until I show them that Apple is often cheaper than the equivalent Thinkpad or sometimes Dell.

      Since the masses do think like you do, you are probably right, though. Most folks probably will take the lower-quality Dell over this laptop. This company will probably be a niche seller, but I hope they do well enough. Now that the 12" Apple laptop is no more (no the MacBook doesn't count), I may just abandon the sleek aluminum look and go for a maximum value laptop, such as this one. I could always run OS X on it... ;)

    4. Re:And why would I want to pay the premium by Davey+McDave · · Score: 1

      Added to that, you get a free copy of Windows. I know people swear it's the devil, but it's easy enough to set up a dual boot and only use it for solely-Windows based games or apps, without forking over money for Cedaga or something.

      --
      I've got the spirit, lose the feeling.
    5. Re:And why would I want to pay the premium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why don't the no-name revolutionary linux laptop makers understand that unless they sell their laptop for lesser than a similarly spec'd Dell Inspiron, people are going to buy the Inspiron and install Ubuntu instead.

      No... Pre-installing Linux on a generic laptop will never get this company anywhere, no matter what the price is. Even if the price was comparable, who's to say this company will even be around in a year? Or even three months? And if your product arrives DOA or not as advertised will you have any recourse? Dell's customer service may be a bitch to deal with but at least you know they'll be in business by the end of the warranty.

      Now, there is a way for the no-name revolutionary linux laptop makers to succeed-- offer a product Dell doesn't. Innovate, don't compete on their turf. For example no major manufacturers offer a stripped-down laptop designed solely to run all day (or longer) on a battery charge. Or a subcompact that runs on a flash drive (beat the rumored "MacBook Nano" to the punch, if it's coming at all.) Maybe even figure out a way to use last year's (or even five years ago's) high-end components (which are now in the bargain bin) to deliver a brand new computer that would have cost $3000 in 2000, for $400 now.

      Those may not be the bext examples, of course, but you get the idea. I would definitely think there would be a niche market for a business traveller's version of the MIT laptop, something that would have just enough power to run all weekend without a recharge and run the basic productivity apps-- but still be a notebook, not a PDA.

    6. Re:And why would I want to pay the premium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or you could put it on ebay

    7. Re:And why would I want to pay the premium by blackest_k · · Score: 1

      can i recomend the hp compaq nx6110 an extremely compatable laptop (runs xp osx and ubuntu either at the same time or seperately) and can be bought retail for around £400. HP really got it right with this one.

    8. Re:And why would I want to pay the premium by Wdomburg · · Score: 2, Informative

      The 4318 should be natively supported now by the bcm43xx driver. Not sure which kernel version that crept into, but it's definitely there in 2.6.17.

    9. Re:And why would I want to pay the premium by Pollardito · · Score: 2, Interesting

      so they're supposed to perform a value-add service (installing and configuring linux) for free and sell their laptops for less than the volume leader? they might as well not add a warranty since they won't be in business long enough to have to honor it

    10. Re:And why would I want to pay the premium by contrapunctus · · Score: 1
      Yes, I know it's easier to have a pre-setup laptop and not have to worry about searching for ndiswrapper etc for wireless, but the community that the linux laptop makers are targetting actually loves such challenges.
      I'd rather pay more and get linux preinstalled and hot have to dink with drivers. But I also want a specific distro. Fedora, RedHad, and SUSE aren't what I'm looking for. I'd rater go with a debian based or maybe Gentoo distros. I just bought a macbook (haven't got it yet) using this reasoning. I know I'm paying more than what the hardware is be worth. But having it work out of the box also has value.
  8. Clearly by VonSkippy · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Clearly they are targeting the $900/hr engineers out there. Since I don't make $900 an hour, I'd rather by my own more-powerfull $600 laptop and take an hour and load PCLinuxOS or FC5 myself. Yes it will eat up a hour of my time, but to save $900 and get a BETTER freaking laptop, I think I can deal with it.

  9. pre-loaded linux surprisingly absent by eliot1785 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This article made me think of the overall lack of commercial systems sporting pre-loaded Linux operating systems. It's funny that it would take such a relatively small company as this to even attempt it. In particular, I am surprised that boutique companies like Alienware don't offer their models with Linux or with a Linux-Windows dual-boot. People who are willing to shell out thousands for an SLI notebook are (relatively) likely to be interested in Linux. And if you dual-boot with Windows, what's the loss?

    One of the biggest reasons why Linux has not reached a wider audience is the difficulty of installation and configuration, which involves partitioning, potentially compiling drivers, and other things that can take some time. It also requires a decent amount of technical knowledge. If Linux came pre-installed, casual users would be a lot more inclined to give it a try.

    My guess is the reason they are charging so much is that a laptop preloaded with Linux is very much a novelty, so they can.

    1. Re:pre-loaded linux surprisingly absent by namityadav · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Companies like Alienware have their name in the world of gamers who aren't competent enough (or motivated enough) to build their own machines ... and in case of laptops, those who aren't aware that Alienware does nothing but badge Clevo machines as theirs and charges a premium. So I don't really think that Alienware is going to be the first big-brand to sell Linux based laptops (Keeping in mind that thier biggest selling point is PC Gaming). Lack of PC Gaming on Linux is the reason why I don't buy the argument that "People who are willing to shell out thousands for an SLI notebook are likely to be interested in Linux". SLI is absolutely useless for those people in Linux (Now someone will respond with some uses of SLI on Linux .. but come on, how many people are going to setup SLI and then use Linux?). However a company like HP should have enough reasons to start selling a linux laptop which just works and has all the bells and whistles out of the box. Being considered a linux friendly company is going to be very helpful for them as they'll win a soft corner in the hearts of IT folks (Even those who influence the purchase of machines at their work-places). However since no big company sells a linux laptop (or personal desktop yet), I would have to imagine that they must be saving a huge bundle from Microsoft by staying only Windows. Obviously this must have a 'no dual boot' clause too. What about a company like Novell? Can they be bothered to at least start badging Clevo machines as Novell laptops?

    2. Re:pre-loaded linux surprisingly absent by chmod+a+x+mojo · · Score: 1

      why should i pay HP/Compaq for preloading my laptop with linux when i can just throw in suse 10.1 and everything but the broadcom wireless card works? suspend to ram/disk works ( had to set the suspend to ram config to force, but the acpi config DOES work just fine) HP/Compaq would probably just charge the same as a windows only laptop anyways... why would i pay for them to install linux? now i might consider donating a few bucks if they could provide a wireless driver that actually makes my wireless button light up, and/or the auto volume keys work. unfortunately neither X nor the kernel recognises the key presses.

      --
      To err is human; effective mayhem requires the root password!
    3. Re:pre-loaded linux surprisingly absent by namityadav · · Score: 2, Insightful

      why should i pay HP/Compaq for preloading my laptop with linux when i can just throw in suse 10.1 and everything but the broadcom wireless card works?
      Two reasons:
      1. So that you don't pay HP to preload Windows (Assuming HP won't sell you an OS less laptop because that may add a new cycle in their QA process)
      2. Because then HP will ensure that our wireless cards, suspend, media buttons etc work everytime.

    4. Re:pre-loaded linux surprisingly absent by frostoftheblack · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This is precisely why. I went to buy myself a linux-loaded laptop in early June. I found 4 serious vendors, and 3 of them only had a couple models each, and none were customizable. R-Cubed had a bunch of models and you could pick and choose your components, much like Dell does. The price was expensive, I'll admit, but my grandparents paid the bill because it was a high school graduation gift. I got a nice laptop, not the one in the article though. It has the NVIDIA, a 2.0 processor, gig of ram, 120 GB total space (2 drives), and came with Fedora Core 5.

      I think if I had to pay myself, I would have cut down on the processing speed and saved some money. But overall it's a great system, it looks nice, and it runs fast. I've had no problems with it, and linux integration with the hardware is nearly flawless.

      --
      Do not mark in this space. For official office use only.
    5. Re:pre-loaded linux surprisingly absent by Ruie · · Score: 1
      One of the biggest reasons why Linux has not reached a wider audience is the difficulty of installation and configuration, which involves partitioning, potentially compiling drivers, and other things that can take some time. It also requires a decent amount of technical knowledge. If Linux came pre-installed, casual users would be a lot more inclined to give it a try.

      This is an extremely good point - which makes the fact that Windows XP is sold in boxed versions just so much more astonishing.

      Last time I was installing Win XP on a newly assembled computer it went part way through the installation and refused to continue because it could not find my hard disk. Can you believe it ?

      But that's not all. The manufacturer supplied the driver on a floppy (which I could not read since I did not have any floppy drives), but I downloaded it from the web and copied to a USB stick. Second attempt - windows does not see the driver on the stick. I tried burning it to CD (and tried manufacturer CD as well) - no luck.

      Ended up buying a floppy drive just to install the damn thing.

      And, of course, once you install windows the computer is almost bare - no compilers, no scripting languages, no office suite. I can understand that they cannot install Adobe Photoshop because it is made by a different company, but would it kill Microsoft to include cygwin, gimp and OpenOffice on the same disk ?

      Perhaps the right antimonopoly measure against MS is to prohibit pre-installation and require the systems be shipped with a clean drive, OS install CD and have the installation protocol fully documented. This would decouple the OS from the hardware.

    6. Re:pre-loaded linux surprisingly absent by MarkByers · · Score: 1

      Perhaps the right antimonopoly measure against MS is to prohibit pre-installation and require the systems be shipped with a clean drive, OS install CD and have the installation protocol fully documented.

      This idea won't work unfortunately. Even if the installation process was as simple as 'Insert the installation CD and turn on your computer', this would still be too scary and complicated for many users. 50%* of people would put the CD in the wrong way round (the others just got lucky). A computer should be fully working when you buy it.

      *OK I admit, I'm exaggerating a bit.

      --
      I'll probably be modded down for this...
    7. Re:pre-loaded linux surprisingly absent by Ruie · · Score: 1
      This idea won't work unfortunately. Even if the installation process was as simple as 'Insert the installation CD and turn on your computer', this would still be too scary and complicated for many users. 50%* of people would put the CD in the wrong way round (the others just got lucky). A computer should be fully working when you buy it.

      Except that the computer is usually *not* fully working when one buys it. You need to unpack and to connect the cables. I saw people mix up and plug speakers into a microphone port and then wonder why the sound does not work.

    8. Re:pre-loaded linux surprisingly absent by Trelane · · Score: 1
      I found 4 serious vendors
      Could you share your list with us, please?
      --

      --
      Given enough personal experience, all stereotypes are shallow.
    9. Re:pre-loaded linux surprisingly absent by frostoftheblack · · Score: 1
      --
      Do not mark in this space. For official office use only.
    10. Re:pre-loaded linux surprisingly absent by intruder505 · · Score: 1

      I had the same experience with lack of options when I was looking for a laptop with Linux pre-loaded. R-Cubed had the widest selection and looked like the best deal to me. I bought an XW1550-L from them, not the model in the review. It cost more than building one myself, but I wanted a laptop to run out of the box and that's what I got. All the special laptop buttons function as advertised, and hibernate to hard drive works flawlessly. I've been very happy with it, no doubt in part because I maxed all the hardware upgrades except the CPU (went with 2.0 GHz).

      Unlike the model in the review, mine doesn't have a problem scrolling in Firefox or OpenOffice and I don't need to use the 'Fn' key to use 'PgUp'/'PgDn'. Double-tapping didn't work though, and when I e-mailed tech support they responded the same day explaining that they disable it by default, and told me how to enable it.

    11. Re:pre-loaded linux surprisingly absent by frostoftheblack · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I have a very similar model, and I was very happy with what I got. Everything worked flawlessly out of the box. Hardware support was 100%, as far as I can remember. Sleeping, function keys, laptop closing, booting up - nothing's a problem.

      --
      Do not mark in this space. For official office use only.
    12. Re:pre-loaded linux surprisingly absent by Trelane · · Score: 1

      Sweet. Thanks. I'm always on the lookout for Linux and FreeDOS/Naked PC's.

      --

      --
      Given enough personal experience, all stereotypes are shallow.
  10. Two button touchpad ! by DrSkwid · · Score: 1

    that's just peachy

    Has it got a windows key too ?

    I notice that the Leveno Thinkpads have gone to two button touchpads too.

    I'll be glad when I'm out of computing, it's a lifetime of frustration.

    --
    There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    1. Re:Two button touchpad ! by pimpimpim · · Score: 1

      Well, the non-thinkpad notebooks anyway. Call me an optimist, but hopefully they'll keep the thinkpad line alive for some time to come (at least until I can afford one) :(

      --
      molmod.com - computing tips from a molecular modeling
    2. Re:Two button touchpad ! by BEHiker57W · · Score: 1

      I can't find a touchpad with a third button and/or scrollwheel (usually clickable) on any laptop from any manufacturer today. Three years ago they were available from a lot of brands.

      I doubt anyone even manfacturers such touchpads anymore.

      Which is sad for users, especially Unix users.

  11. 2 Button Mouse? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Am I seeing right? Are they targeting Linux users with a two button mouse latptop instead of three? This would be pretty much ridiculous.

    1. Re:2 Button Mouse? by tehshen · · Score: 1

      Oh come on, *real* hackers don't ever leave the keyboard.

      --
      Guy asked me for a quarter for a cup of coffee. So I bit him.
  12. Most linux users get no OS... by aersixb9 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Wouldn't most people with the technical ability to use/maintain a linux laptop just save a bit of money and get a laptop (probably a 'barebones' laptop) with no OS on it? Especially when you consider how custom linux is, and how advanced most linux users are...I wouldn't want someone else to install linux for me, although I actually am a Windows user...

    1. Re:Most linux users get no OS... by arashi+no+garou · · Score: 1

      Laptops are made to run Windows, which is why it's been so difficult in the past to get Linux working on them. The manufacturers do everything they can to make sure the hardware works flawlessly in Windows because, with the exception of the above company and a couple others like them, the final product WILL have Windows installed.

      There currently is no such thing as a "barebones" laptop (although it's been attempted in the past), unless you are referring to sloppy seconds offered by companies reselling corporate liquidations. Those typically come with a wiped hard drive, and usually without a power cable, working battery or in some cases even an optical drive. They boot, but that's about it. The sad thing is most of the time you'll pay ~$400 for a used Pentium III machine with 256mb RAM, small HDD, no warranty and quite often a scratched screen, when you can spend ~$700 on a new Pentium-M with more RAM, bigger drive and a warranty. Back when the cheapest new laptop was $1200+ it would have been a smart investment if you just needed portable computing, but nowadays it makes more sense to buy new and dual-boot or wipe and install Linux.

    2. Re:Most linux users get no OS... by the_womble · · Score: 1
      Wouldn't most people with the technical ability to use/maintain a linux laptop just save a bit of money and get a laptop

      It does not take a lot of technical ability to use or maintain Linux (assuming you are using a distro like Ubuntu rather than one like LFS)- in fact I would say it takes takes less ability than Windows once installed.

      It takes some ability to install any OS, Linux attracts a more technical crowd because it does not come pre-installed. Selling PCs with Linux pre-installed will (hopefully) make it an option for less technical users.

      The biggest problem with Linux is uncertainty about hardware support. Normally everything works out of the box, but tracking what is wrong when it does not is a pain - pre-installation solves this problem as well.

      Personally I would prefer to install Linux myself, but I would still pay a slight premium to know that all the hardware was compatible - another problem this solves.

      I would also recommend this to family and friends as an alternative to me installing Linux for them - because it means the vendor rather than me can handle any problems that crop up.

  13. Irrelevant... by coutch · · Score: 1

    Still using Pentium M when the Core Duo has been here a while, and Merom just around the corner ...

  14. Forget the software by timeOday · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The tagline is all about the software that comes preinstalled. But really, living with Linux on a laptop is all about hardware support. Can it suspend to RAM or disk - even if 3d acceleration is enabled and I forget to remove my PCMCIA devices first? Can I dock and undock with a docking station - each time switching over to my high-res external desktop display - without rebooting? Does the WiFi work - including support for all the weird security and authorization mechanisms? These are the important questions a linux laptop buyer should ask.

    1. Re:Forget the software by massysett · · Score: 1

      The product page says that r3 patched the kernel with Software Suspend 2, that wifi works, that all the special keyboard buttons (e.g. web browser) works, that they fiddled with the X server configuration to get the video working, etc. But I agree that the review would have been more useful if it had stated this information, as that seems to set this laptop apart.

    2. Re:Forget the software by timeOday · · Score: 1

      "Software Suspend" alone is a bit alarming with no mention of suspend-to-ram (which is much faster). There are many little gotchas. For instance my T40 can suspend to RAM and last for days using APM. When I switched to ACPI, my battery runtime when up substantially, but suspend-to-ram (though it appears to work and shuts of the screen) works poorly, hardly saving any more energy than just shutting the lid. I am not saying that Windows is any better, but I have never seen all the features on a laptop actually work properly, if you count docking/undocking etc. (I suppose this is where some Mac evangelists may chime in...)

    3. Re:Forget the software by HiThere · · Score: 1

      Oogh...which means that the first time you upgrade your system...well, you can expect "interesting" behavior.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    4. Re:Forget the software by philovivero · · Score: 1

      Wow. I notice no-one's replied to you. Those are EXACTLY the questions I'd ask. I can get Linux working on just about any laptop on the face of the planet.

      But I have never seen Linux suspend to disk (or suspend in *ANY* fashion, actually) without hosing on restart. I'm currently running Ubuntu on an IBM (Lenovo) which should have the best Linux support out there, and I can only suspend the laptop once. The second time I do, I have to power it off and reboot. Not useful.

      I haven't even bothered with trying to get 3D working on it.

  15. I know I'm complaining but... by Darundal · · Score: 1

    why couldn't they offer a preconfigured option with Ubuntu? I know they can't offer to pre-install every linux distro out there, but considering it's popularity...

  16. Wow by yet+another+fancy+ni · · Score: 2, Funny

    Firefox! I must have this machine...

  17. So what? by fm6 · · Score: 3, Insightful
    The battery life seemed pretty normal, with a full charge running about 2 to 2.5 hours.

    What's the point of creating yet another laptop with an overpowered CPU and no battery life? It would make more sense to use a less powerful CPU that doesn't suck up power. Especially when the system is designed to run Gnome on Linux — that's a configuration that would run happily on a system with 1/3 the hz.

    Linux people have to stop producing technology whose only advantage over standard Wintel platforms is that there's no OS tithe to Redmond. Go with the Penguin's strengths: less resource hungry, so you can produce cheaper systems that use less power; open source, so you can fix all the usability bugs that Microsoft (and, alas, most Linux app designers) can't seem to deal with.

    1. Re:So what? by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 3, Insightful

      My first hand experience, running OpenOffice on Linux and Office 2000 on Windows 98 on the same older Pentium I laptop, is that it's nearly impossible to run 'productivity' apps on a 'popular' desktop like Gnome on said hardware. Office 2000 was no racehorse, either, but it at least was usable.

      No, it is a misnomer to claim that modern Linux-based OSes are less resource hungry than Redmond bloatware. The modern 'Linuxes' may have caught up to Win98 in terms of usability, but they're resource pigs.

      My tactic is to instead run a 'classic' X environment. In my case, I run FVWM2 but have also run the Window Manager (mwm) in OpenMotif (it's pretty nice, actually) on my systems.

      Object-Oriented-C++/BlahBlah 'modern' environments like Gnome and KDE don't cut it, frankly.

    2. Re:So what? by fm6 · · Score: 1

      Your comparison is based on system that ten years old. When I said "less powerful" I didn't mean "anemic". Aside from having any version of Office without a lot of virtual memory swapping. Hence your slowdown.

      My comparison of Linux and Windows was not theoretical. I used to be a tech writer at Borland, and we were developing a Linux version of our Windows IDE, so I had two machines on my desk. I named them "Calvin" and "Hobbes". Calin was a 350 mhz Pentium III with 256 MB of RAM (wimpy by today's standards, but top of the line then), that I used for writing (standard authoring tool was Word) and for running our Windows IDEs. Hobbes was a 200 mhz Pentium II with 128 MB machine that I used to run the Linux IDE and a lot of other stuff. I used Hobbes to fiddle with all the different Linux desktops, play graphic-intensive games, and run some pretty powerful software. It actually performed better most of the time than its more powerful deskmate, which was always thrashing and crashing (hence the name).

      I wouldn't even dare to run GNOME or your old Pentium I. You need more than that. But you don't need as much as you need for Windows XP, never mind Vista.

    3. Re:So what? by fm6 · · Score: 1

      Gaa! Is my mind going, or did Slashdot eat a whole sentence That second sentence should read, "Aside from having a slow CPU, that old system probably has between 64 and 128 MB of RAM. That's not enough to run any version of Office without a lot of virtual memory swapping."

    4. Re:So what? by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      The laptop in question has 32M of memory and is very usable for light Word or Excel dabbling. Completely unusable with Open Office. And below the recommended minimum for all of the above.

    5. Re:So what? by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I thought the slowest Pentium III that Intel ever made was 450 MHz. That's the one I bought for my first PIII anyway. I remember at the same time having the 'fastest' PII made, which was 450 MHz.

      And I'm typing this on a Dell Optiplex with a PIII 500MHz processor, with NetBSD 3 on Mozilla. (under FVWM, etc.) Go figure. I'm cheap and refuse to waste ANY more money on 'horsepower' when if I have a processor-hungry computing task I can pull another Dell PIII machine out of storage and hang it off a free port on the KVM switch.

      I only have one 'fast' machine for my limited interest in 'gaming' and that's just a shitty Sempron (one of those motherboard/processor combo at Frys for $79).

    6. Re:So what? by kullnd · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yea, your right, your gonna run Winblows 98 better than Gnome on this laptop w/ 32mb of RAM... Linux is awsome with resorces, but lets face it, it's much more advanced than Win 98 and that needs to be taken into consideration.

      I think the basis of comparison here was more towards the current operating systems, i.e. Win XP

      --
      +++ATH0 NO CARRIER
    7. Re:So what? by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      I agree completely that a freenix on that laptop is much more powerful than Windows 98. But as a dumb cheap laptop for word processing and a few spreadsheets it's usable with Windows 98 and Office 2000 and a non-runner with OpenOffice. But it's really best utilized IMO running NetBSD and a light X environment like FVWM, Motif (mwm- isn't it amazing that Motif can now be called a 'light' X environment?!?), or even good old twm (Tab Window Manager rules, comes by default in the X11 distribution, and is 'light' enough that it even runs well on my Macintosh SE/30 running NetBSD). There are decent older tools for such a beast to do a lot of useful work, i.e. vi for writing, etc.

    8. Re:So what? by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      (Your website is 'picknit' so I will nitpick a bit)

      Don't say _any_ version of Office. I have Office 4.3 on CDROM for Windows (3.1 or greater) and also Office 4 on floppies for Macintosh. Both will run quite well on a machine with 4 megs of RAM.

    9. Re:So what? by the_womble · · Score: 1

      OpenOffice is resource hog - that is why I rarely use it (on my Sempron 2400 desktop). If you use a system that old there are other apps that are much better suite to it.

      Even on a newer system, and though I rarely use OOfice it I turned off Java and changed some other settings to speed it up a bit - I really do think that the default settings are silly.

      That said my not particularly powerful desktop runs multiple simultaneous KDE and Gnome sessions (using older PCs as terminals) with fairly heavy apps running (OOffice, Firefox, Thunderbird) without any noticeable degradation in performance. Obviously it is hardly being stretched by running them.

  18. ASUS? by m874t232 · · Score: 1

    That notebook looks just like an ASUS notebook. Did they just rebrand it, or did they actually change it?

  19. Stripped down... it's a terrible laptop. by strredwolf · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Let's get things straight. R Cubed says it's based on the Asus Z33A series of laptops. So let's compare the full Z33A specs on the "ultraportable" as Asus compares. http://usa.asus.com/products4.aspx?modelmenu=2&mod el=606&l1=5&l2=64&l3=0

    It's a Centrino based system. Which means Intel Pentium M or Celeron Pentium M at 1.6 GHz or better and SpeedStep, Intel chipset, Intel WiFi. All supported, so we're good. Everything lines up nicely with much of everything... but there's a few bits that it falls on:

    First, the graphics card isn't ATI or NVidia. It's Intel. That means no native OpenGL support and thus you can't play most Linux games, including Second Life. The graphics memory is also shared with main memory, which means it's going to be slower than anything dedicated. Those two alone is worth ditching the laptop for.

    Second, the screen's only 1024x768. That means for most websites you need to expand Firefox full screen. My HP Omnibook 6000 has older ATI graphics and that's 1400x1050 -- enough screen real estate to run Firefox at 1024x900, a few aterms, and KDE... or KDE and Gimp at the same time. Even OpenOffice.org benifits from more room.

    Third, there doesn't seem to be any word on doubling up on 9-cell batteries on Asus site. Remember, happiness is two batteries in the PC and 4+ hours of runtime.

    This laptop? Not worth it. Go on Nextag or Pricewatch or maybe PriceGrabber, and search for NVidia based laptops.

    --

    --
    # Canmephians for a better Linux Kernel
    $Stalag99{"URL"}="http://stalag99.net";
    1. Re:Stripped down... it's a terrible laptop. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      First, the graphics card isn't ATI or NVidia. It's Intel. That means no native OpenGL support

      Really?

      and thus you can't play most Linux games, including Second Life. The graphics memory is also shared with main memory, which means it's going to be slower than anything dedicated. Those two alone is worth ditching the laptop for.

      You're absolutely correct. Games are all that matter. Any system that doesn't play games well enough for you is garbage that should never have been produced.

      In short, you're wrong. And even if you had been right, it would have been irrelevant because gaming (especially on laptops) is a niche.

      This laptop? Not worth it.

      At least you're correct here. Throw enough darts and even monkeys pick the right stocks.

    2. Re:Stripped down... it's a terrible laptop. by ThurstonMoore · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Seems like the most important thing to you is playing games. If that is the case, why buy a Linux based laptop? Why dont you apply the same criticism to the OS.

    3. Re:Stripped down... it's a terrible laptop. by r_cerq · · Score: 3, Informative

      First, the graphics card isn't ATI or NVidia. It's Intel. That means no native OpenGL support
      Bzzt, wrong! Intel cards do support OpenGL, just not spectacularly. Here I am running XGL on one to prove it...

    4. Re:Stripped down... it's a terrible laptop. by strredwolf · · Score: 1

      Okay, same criticsm to the OS, in comparison to Windows.

      Pro for Linux: Doesn't crash as often, has fine-grained seperation between OS and UI, is much faster and for a professional, better to maintain. Has actual user seperation, limiting damage by viruses. Holes are plugged faster.

      Con for Linux: OpenGL card support isn't quite up to par in all but NVidia chipsets. Need binary drivers, which sometimes lag behind OSS UI's, for faster performance in video. Only a few mainstream games (including id Software's lineup, Unreal Tornament, and Second Life). Half the ports for games are done by Icculus! Different distros force game makers to package their own dependencies.

      Pro for Windows: Recognizable, established UI. More games as they're primarily targeted for Windows.

      Con for Windows: Higher upkeep and vigilence required. Requires broadband. WinXP slower than Win2K unless you trim the fat, and yet also buggier. Remember Service Pack 2! Remember how slow Microsoft was for patching vunerablities! Vista is becoming more and more like Unix... but they should just follow Apple's lead. DirectX is worse than OpenGL, according to John Romero of id Software. Requires external utilities to secure against malware and maintain HD's. Initially cheap, but costs more as more utilities are needed. Possibly a minor cause for male pattern baldness (as a result of tearing one's hair out).

      Do I really want to run an OS that'll have a likelyhood of crashing while I'm playing World of Warcraft? Or an OS that's so rock-solid stable that I can burn CD's, play audio, surf the web, SSH into work to build another site, and be on Second Life, and not have any problems with all three?

      --

      --
      # Canmephians for a better Linux Kernel
      $Stalag99{"URL"}="http://stalag99.net";
    5. Re:Stripped down... it's a terrible laptop. by massysett · · Score: 3, Interesting

      All these arguments show why it's not a good laptop for you, but that doesn't make it a "terrible laptop." First, you're wrong about the lack of OpenGL support. Intel chips do support OpenGL, and what's more, they do it with fully open-source kernel drivers. Compare that to nVidia or ATI chips which require proprietary kernel modules to get the same support.

      Second, the graphics memory is shared, but so what? That does matter if you're playing heavy duty games, but if your laptop use consists mainly of Web browsing, email, and Vim usage (as is true for my usage) then it doesn't matter if your memory is shared. If that's a real concern, throw an extra 512MB of RAM in there, which is still cheaper than going for a dedicated GPU.

      Third, yes, the screen is only 1024x768, but that also means it's small. The laptop is light and fits easily in my bag. Compare that to 1400x1050, which means widescreen and it means having a bigger panel. It's fine if you want that, but to some people portability is more important than screen real estate.

      Fourth, happiness might be doubling up on 9-cell batteries, but to me, happiness is not having to carry two batteries. Weight, weight, weight.

      In short, the laptop is made for someone with basic computing needs who values portability over power. It's not a gamers' notebook. That doesn't make it a "terrible" notebook, it just makes it a notebook not suited to everyone's needs. The same is true of one of those XPS monsters with a huge screen, high resolution, and dedicated GPU: it's a hulking machine that weighs several pounds more. That doesn't make it a "terrible" notebook, even if it does make it a notebook that I wouldn't buy.

    6. Re:Stripped down... it's a terrible laptop. by barzok · · Score: 1
      DirectX is worse than OpenGL, according to John Romero of id Software.
      John Romero hasn't worked for iD Software for 10 years.

      It's Jon Carmack who's said that.
    7. Re:Stripped down... it's a terrible laptop. by Kjella · · Score: 1

      Third, yes, the screen is only 1024x768, but that also means it's small. The laptop is light and fits easily in my bag. Compare that to 1400x1050, which means widescreen and it means having a bigger panel. It's fine if you want that, but to some people portability is more important than screen real estate.

      Well, first off resolution != size, if you look at some of the high-end HDTV cameras you have a 7" 1920x1080 LCD display. The important part is what defines the size of a laptop, my impression is that the two defining parameters are screen and keyboard. With a 16:10 screen, they are of more similar shape and you have less "padding" around the keyboard. For that reason I feel a widescreen laptop beats a 4:3 laptop, either by being smaller or having a better keyboard.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    8. Re:Stripped down... it's a terrible laptop. by strredwolf · · Score: 1

      I stand corrected. I knew it was one of the more progressive folk over at id.

      --

      --
      # Canmephians for a better Linux Kernel
      $Stalag99{"URL"}="http://stalag99.net";
    9. Re:Stripped down... it's a terrible laptop. by pathological+liar · · Score: 0

      To nitpick, they support OpenGL just fine, Vista will run all its shiny effects on an 950 GMA with no problems. The issue is with driver support on Linux, neither the i810 or i915 drivers support pbuffers of FBOs yet (although it is a work currently in progress). That's why your performance isn't so hot.

  20. Same laptop for less by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Buy the exact same laptop here for a lot less? http://www.powernotebooks.com/product.php?itemId=1 232

    1. Re:Same laptop for less by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Their slogan is "We live to serve Him, and you"?? WTF?

    2. Re:Same laptop for less by kfg · · Score: 2, Funny

      Jesus is my OS, but he panicked on boot up so I reformated him and installed Windows.

      KFG

  21. Hot Item? by thunderpaws · · Score: 4, Funny

    Will it explode as well as a Dell?

    1. Re:Hot Item? by d3m0nCr4t · · Score: 0
      Will it explode as well as a Dell?
      Well, if it would, at least it would get you open sores.
  22. Oh No - Linux Is Dying! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is official; Netcraft confirms: Linux is dying

    One more crippling bombshell hit the already beleaguered Linux community when IDC confirmed that Linux market share has dropped yet again, now down to less than a fraction of 1 percent of all servers. Coming on the heels of a recent Netcraft survey which plainly states that Linux has lost more market share, this news serves to reinforce what we've known all along. Linux is collapsing in complete disarray, as fittingly exemplified by failing dead last in the recent Sys Admin comprehensive networking test.

    You don't need to be a Kreskin to predict Linux's future. The hand writing is on the wall: Linux faces a bleak future. In fact there won't be any future at all for Linux because Linux is dying. Things are looking very bad for Linux. As many of us are already aware, Linux continues to lose market share. Red ink flows like a river of blood.

    Ubuntu is the most endangered of them all, having lost 93% of its core developers. The sudden and unpleasant departures of long time Ubuntu developers only serve to underscore the point more clearly. There can no longer be any doubt: Ubuntu is dying.

    Let's keep to the facts and look at the numbers.

    Debian leader Murdock states that there are 7000 users of Debian. How many users of Ubuntu are there? Let's see. The number of Debian versus Ubuntu posts on Usenet is roughly in ratio of 5 to 1. Therefore there are about 7000/5 = 1400 Ubuntu users. Kubuntu posts on Usenet are about half of the volume of Ubuntu posts. Therefore there are about 700 users of Kubuntu. A recent article put SUSE at about 80 percent of the Linux market. Therefore there are (7000+1400+700)*4 = 36400 SUSE users. This is consistent with the number of SUSE Usenet posts.

    Due to the troubles of SUSE, abysmal sales and so on, SUSE went out of business and was taken over by Novell who sell another troubled OS. Now Ubuntu is also dead, its corpse turned over to yet another charnel house.

    All major surveys show that Linux has steadily declined in market share. Linux is very sick and its long term survival prospects are very dim. If Linux is to survive at all it will be among OS dilettante dabblers. Linux continues to decay. Nothing short of a miracle could save it at this point in time. For all practical purposes, Linux is dead.

    Fact: Linux is dying

  23. Are you having scrolling difficulties, too? by r_cerq · · Score: 1

    Yeah, "That's an Asus" was my first thought. Confirmed it by scrolling half a page down the article and reading "Powered by ASUS", nifty logo and all...

  24. R Cubed sells many Linux laptop models by UseFree.org · · Score: 2, Informative

    The model reviewed by the article is just one of several types of Linux laptops sold by R Cubed Technologies, ranging in price from $999 to $1,454. I really think you're getting a better buying one of these Linux laptops than buying a Dell laptop where you have to pay the Micro$oft tax or one of those exhorbitantly expensive Apple laptops.

    The R Cubed Linux laptops have Intel integrated graphics cards for which Intel has released 2D and 3D-accelerated open source graphics drivers that are capable of transparent windows and drop shadows with EXA as well as rotating cubes and wobbly windows with XGL and Compiz! Way to go Intel!

    --
    Get computers and accessories from Linux-friendly manufacturers
    1. Re:R Cubed sells many Linux laptop models by Doppler00 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Umm... Intel "3D-accelerated" chipsets have always been integerated, low end, junk. Great, they release open source for a product that is mediocre. What is impressive about that?

    2. Re:R Cubed sells many Linux laptop models by linguae · · Score: 1
      The R Cubed Linux laptops have Intel integrated graphics cards for which Intel has released 2D and 3D-accelerated open source graphics drivers that are capable of transparent windows and drop shadows with EXA as well as rotating cubes and wobbly windows with XGL and Compiz! Way to go Intel!

      This is the most positive post that I've ever read about Intel Integrated Graphics in all of my 2.25 years of viewing Slashdot. I'm serious here.

  25. Some discrepancy. . . by LunarCrisis · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Something's not right. From the review:
    By itself the 11x9x1.5-inch LS1250-L weighs in at a svelte 3.62lbs.
    And later. . .
    The battery life seemed pretty normal, with a full charge running about 2 to 2.5 hours.
    Umm excuse me? One look at the companies product page yields:
    # Up to 7.9 hours battery life (72WHr. Battery Pack)
    (. . .)
    # Less than 3 lbs (with 24WHr. battery pack)
    I can only draw one conclusion: the reviewer must be lying! After all, who can you trust to know a laptop better than the company itself?
    --
    Mr. Period: Nine is the one that's right by ten!
    Nine: One day I will kill him. Then, I will be Ten.
    1. Re:Some discrepancy. . . by Wdomburg · · Score: 1

      After all, who can you trust to know a laptop better than the company itself?

      The actual manufacturer, Asus, who lists 3.3lb as the base wieght on their spec sheet.

      As for the batter life, 2-2.5 hours is for the three cell 24Whr battery. The "up to 7.9" hours is with an optional (and significantly heavier) nine cell battery.

  26. keyboard.. by orbitalia · · Score: 1

    It's still got a bloody windows key though :(

    Looks like someone took an ASUS laptop , slapped fedora on it , hey presto linux laptop..

  27. Linux Pre-Loaded by STDOUBT · · Score: 1
    1. Re:Linux Pre-Loaded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please mod parent up. Extremely useful information if interested in computer manufacturers who pre-install linux. System76 pre-installs Ubuntu exclusively. System76 also has a Mac Mini look alike.

  28. XP? by smvp6459 · · Score: 1

    It's a trap!

  29. Here are some other pre-installed Linux vendors by cyber_rigger · · Score: 1
  30. where are the news? by evandrofisico · · Score: 1

    OK, one more seller is using GNU/Linux on laptops. Where are the news? even acer (who makes pretty cheap notebooks) is exporting notebooks with GNU/Linux preinstalled on some countries, like Brasil ( I bought one of these) and aparently Polonia. The news are that those notebooks are MUCH cheaper with the same components of these ones.

  31. Re:Here are some other pre-installed Linux vendors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thanks for the link to digg, asshole.

    Is it really too fucking hard to link to the actual site you're talking about?

    The actual link For everyone who'd like to see the list directly.

  32. Yes, you CAN get a Core Duo... by gknoy · · Score: 2, Informative

    All from shoprcubed.com:

    http://shoprcubed.com/products.asp?cat=27

    14 inch widescreen

    15.4 inch widescreen

    Their super-small one (12" I think?) and the top model (which I can't quite see why it's SO much more expensive w/o looking in more detail) both are celeron M or pentium M, but the middle two on the page are both Core Duo capable.

  33. The R Cubed Website by ClamIAm · · Score: 1

    I find it interesting that they're such big supporters of "Linux", yet their website is running Windows Server...

  34. They have other laptops, donkey-butt. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you want nicer screen that's fine. They have a veriaty of other laptops, EVEN DUAL CORE. This one is specificly designed to be lightweight and have a long battery life. It's a stupid idea to give a laptop like that a seperate video card.

    And Intel chipset DOES have OpenGL acceleration. If it's a GMA 900 or GMA 950 (9xxg chipsets) chipset then it's at least as good as a ATI 8500 or 9200. Intel claims parity with the 9600. AND whats more they are supported out of the box.

    Of course if it's the 'extreme blaster 2' (the 8xxg chipsets) then it does suck. I'd recommend moving on to something else.

  35. are you having hallucinations? by m874t232 · · Score: 1

    Confirmed it by scrolling half a page down the article and reading "Powered by ASUS", nifty logo and all...

    The article on Newsforge does not mention ASUS.

    (However, going one link further, R-Cubed's site does say "built on ASUS", but leaves open the question of whether they changed the machine in any way.)

  36. Built on Asus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The picture of the machine on the manufacturers website looks like a black version of my Asus S5N (mines white). I paid $1200 for the machine 2 years ago (windows preloaded :( ). Absolutely everything on the machine works out of the box in ubuntu. The best part about it is the battery life. My (extended) battery lasted the entire flight from Osaka to Detroit. If you are looking for a linux laptop give it a spin (although their price point is a bit high for a 2 year old laptop).

  37. I need features!!!! by tonyr1988 · · Score: 1

    For that price, it better come with 900 hours of free AOL, or 6 months of Norton AV!

  38. WTF? by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    FC5 is the latest version of that distro afaik. So you are completely uninformed there pal.

    As for being fully configured, you are missing the point: even die hard geeks need to get things done.

    I have installed Linux on many laptops. Been there, done that, got the cheap T-shirt. If I needed a new laptop I would be more than happy to get something ready to go to which I can add what I need, but that has the basics (Internet stuff, multimedia, office applications) ready to rock.

    They are aiming for the geek with little time. The laptop is even cheaper if you don't put the OS of the beast on it, which in my book gets lots of coockie points.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  39. Re:2 Button Mouse? It's the only kind that works.. by mnemotronic · · Score: 1
    ... under Linux. I've got several variants of wheel mice, and the distro's I've tried can't seem to handle "the wheel thing" properly - especially my beloved MS explorer optical with the wheel & extra buttons. Fortunately, the web is full of (bad) advice on how to get multi-button mice ~working .... heavy sigh...

    I'm also not surprised that the sleep and WiFi are flakey. It's gotta be tough for an OS to support proper re-initialization on hardware that can be powered off and on. That's not something that OSs typically do ... if it's on, it's on, if it's not, it's broke.

    --
    The Russians have won. They have made the world a cesspool of distrust, greed, fear and hate.
  40. Another option by jpalit · · Score: 1

    I have a LinuxCertified laptop which I have owned for a while and have been very happy with. Wireless performance is great, and hardware is very linux friendly.