The Next Three Days are the x86 Days
Pinky wrote in to note that "Today, tomorrow and the next day are the only days we'll get dates like this:
2/8/6
3/8/6
4/8/6
like the x86 computers :-)" And yes folks, in the August news cycle vortex, even this strikes my fancy. In recent years we've seen numerical giants like 3/1/4, 6/6/6 and 1/2/3, but now really, what do any of us have to look forward to? Is our future dull and meaningless without cool numbers in dates? Oh the humanity of it all ...
In Canada, where m/d/y is more common we already experienced this on February 8, March 8 and April 8, respectively.
Life is good living three steps ahead of the taco.
Personally I look forward to the lucky 7's, 7/7/7, a day where CmdrTaco and I can celebrate our slot machine winnings together.
"today, tomorrow and the next day are the only days we'll get dates like this: 2/8/6 3/8/6 4/8/6 like the x86 computers :-)"
That all depends on your locale settings - other people had thier x86 days several months back
At some point, somewhere, the entire internet will be found to be illegal.
Instead of getting dates of their own, Saturday and subsequent days will be known as "Pentium", "Pentium II", "Pentium IV", "Pentium 5", "Pentium 6", and of course "Xeon".
Like the USA? I thought Slashdot was unappologetically US centric.
(insert "We don't use dates like that, you insensitive clod" comment here)
Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
Abolish weird date formats!
Ummm... you mean this century right?
I'm still surprised this made the front page. I mean, I'm a geek, but even I think this is lame.
Falun Dafa is good!
The 80186 was also an Intel processor, wasn't it?
http://www.w3.org/TR/NOTE-datetime
Concur.
I still remember 12:34 pm on May 6, 1978 as the best such thing of all time. It was 1234 on 5/6/78!
Sorry, but here in Europe, where the current calendar system was invented, we put the day first, so today is 2/8/6!
The i586 DOES exist. Same as the i686. I don't care what Intel marketing pushed down people's throats, I still call them 586 and 686 systems. So does the Linux kernel...
-"...bad old ideas look confusingly fresh when they are packaged as technology" - Jaron Lanier (Digital Maoism on Edge.o
It's sad that these are the only kind of dates we have to look forward to :o(
Nuh-uh! They ran a story about this back in 6 too, but back then we were still pretty bummed about jesus' death, so we didn't really celebrate it much.
"today, tomorrow and the next day are the only days we'll get dates like this: 2/8/6 3/8/6 4/8/6 like the x86 computers :-)"
Has Y2K taught you nothing? Using a single digit to store the year? You are among programmers! Hang your head in shame!
Modern copyright is theft of culture from everyone and it retards the progress of the useful arts and sciences.
January 2nd, 2010 (01/02/2010) for Americans, February first for the rest of you. Last one was October 2, 2001 (10/02/2001) here - I threw a party (any excuse, really).
Poor means hoping the toothache goes away.
So okay, this is news?
Every year March 10th comes around and we don't get a bunch of news posts from Nintendo fans because it's MAR10 day yet again.
It can't be that slow on a Tuesday in August. What is the world coming to?
dragonhawk@iname.microsoft.com
I do not like Microsoft. Remove them from my email address.
Well, there will be math coprocessor day next year, at least.
It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
I look at it differently again, so perhaps we have to agree to disagree...
:)
2006/8/2 is I agree then "best" way to represent a date - The majority of human-use number systems put the least-significant information to the right hand side. This has the bonus that sorting on a computer (mechanical or electrical) is simplified. Systems that include this are HH:MM:SS and good 'ol decimal numbering Hundreds-Tens-Units.
An alternative in the LSB/MSB world is 2/8/2006 - Computers can be (and are) architected to deal with this type of reversal. Humans can deal with the LSB being at the left hand end of the information. This is still "useful" as processing left-to-right and right-to-left are not really that different. I consider this to be "next best" as it retains a certain amount of logic.
The final option is to ignore whether your data has an order or significance, and just jumble it up. How is MM/DD/YYYY differnt to YYYY/DD/MM ? Would you consider YYYY/DD/MM valid or useful? I am afraid that I personally would not, and but the same token consider MM/DD/YYYY to be not-useful. Perhaps we should just switch to MM/YYYY/DD for fun?
I would be seriously interested to know where/why the different system in the USA originated, and by what measure you determine the USA system to be next-best and the European system to be "Fucked up"
Enjoy Y2K? Roll-on Year 2037!
You don't say whose military or government. The US DoD, at least, is large enough that there are multiple "standards". I've seen MM/DD/YY (08/02/06) and YYYY-MMM-DD (2006-AUG-02) most often, I think. The ISO date form is YYYY-MM-DD (2006-08-02) or YYYYMMDD (20060802).
Personally, I find the mixed number/letter forms like "2006 AUG 2" and "2 Aug 2006" work best when dealing with other humans who speak the same language. It's unambiguous -- there's only one sane way to interpret it -- and the letter/number distinction stands out more than dashes. For computers and other kinds of filing, though, the ISO form definately wins. It makes sorting so much easier.
dragonhawk@iname.microsoft.com
I do not like Microsoft. Remove them from my email address.
I'm a Mac user, how long do I have to wait for 6/80/40?
Comment of the year
The trouble with 'AUG' or 'SEP' is that these make no sense in many languages, whereas the numbers translate well. YYYY-MM-DD makes the most sense. Most significant digits first, just as in the rest of our entire number system.
2006/8/2 is the only logical and correct format.
Close, but it doesn't sort alphabetically, and the / character has a double meaning on Unix systems and in URLs. 2006-08-02 is better, with the added bonus that it's part of the ISO standard.
Of course, it's harder to get interesting date numbers when you've got 8 digits to work with, two of them can't take many values and two or three more only change values very infrequently. 2011-11-02 20:11:11.02 is coming up, I guess.
As a "crazy American" who has lived overseas, I get completely confused by this and never can remember how I am supposed to write it when I sign documents.
As for sorting in a list, I think dd/mm/yy would be really confusing, you'd end up with the following list:
10/11/03
11/11/01
12/11/06
13/11/97
Since I'm cunfused about how to write it anyway, on the computer, I write the date as yyyy/mm/dd, which will actually sort to a chronological list. It's confusing to others who see it, but it's my documents, so at worst it will confuse people who shouldn't be looking at them anyway.
Interesting side note about sorting on computers. Some OSes will actually ignore the leading 0 and treat the number as a whole number, while some don't. Compare the two following lists:
8.jpg
9.jpg
10.jpg
11.jpg
or
10.jpg
11.jpg
8.jpg
9.jpg
The second list is comparing only the first number while the first looks at the whole number and then compares it.
I suspect it is from the old manual/paper based days of business. You'd keep separate years in separate filing cabinets, so the year becomes irrelevant. Thus using month/day makes it a lot easier to sort.
When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
3/14/15 9:26:53
Mmmmmm.... pi...
See, there's still stuff to look forward to!
"Lawyers are for sucks."
- Doug McKenzie
Again, don't confuse international dates (ISO 8661) with European dates.
Sometimes when I am updating some code documents with dates, I will replace the US Y99 dates with international dates,
So:
01/02/03 - code creation
becomes:
2003-01-02 - code creation
2006-08-02 - fixed a bug
International dates are significantly in order, as times are.
The US did once use the dd/mm/yy form. This is still evident in "4th of July".
Today is 1154536012. None of this mm/dd/yy bullcrap.