Slashdot Mirror


Stolen Laptop Calls In! - Will Police Act?

broswell asks: "We rent computer equipment and occasionally our equipment gets stolen. I wrote a little VBS script that calls our webserver every hour (script below) and installed it on our laptops. Sure enough, some laptops went missing. One of the stolen laptops is now calling in from a Verizon Internet account which appears to be in a neighboring town. The Baltimore City Police grudgingly filled out a police report 'so we could collect insurance' but don't seem willing to subpoena Verizon, find the address of the end user, recover tha laptop and prosecute the thief. They seem clueless. The Maryland State police has a computer crimes unit. The have a clue, but they claim they don't have jurisdiction. It is not about the money (our customer signed for the computers and will pay for the stolen items), we just want justice." With all of the necessary information in hand of the proper authorities, how likely is it that the stolen laptop will be recovered?

For those interested, here is the script the laptop used to report itself back to its owners:

Set objShell = CreateObject("WScript.Shell")
Set objScriptExec = objShell.Exec("ipconfig /all")
strIpConfig = objScriptExec.StdOut.ReadAll
myvar = "send=" + strIpConfig

do until 0=1
on error resume next
a=HTTPPost("http://www.yourtrackinghost.com/cgi-bin/locator.pl",myvar)
WScript.Sleep 3600000

LOOP

Function HTTPPost(sUrl, sRequest)
set oHTTP = CreateObject("Microsoft.XMLHTTP")
oHTTP.open "POST", sUrl,false
oHTTP.setRequestHeader "Content-Type", "application/x-www-form-urlencoded"
oHTTP.setRequestHeader "Content-Length", Len(sRequest)
oHTTP.send sRequest

HTTPPost = oHTTP.responseText
End Function

303 comments

  1. Media by MeanMF · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If the police won't do anything, call the local press.

    1. Re:Media by Harmonious+Botch · · Score: 3, Informative

      Good idea, but wrong order. Give Verizon a chance to be the good guy. Call their publicity department first. If they make excuses, then call local media.

    2. Re:Media by Mr.+Byaninch · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I agree. Police aren't very receptive to ordinary citizens solving crimes and then asking the cops to finish the job. I had a friend who had a check stolen from a USPS blue mailbox. The thieves 'washed' the check and rewrote it for enough to cover a bunch of Gateway computers. Gateway had some problem (that I don't recall) with something that was on back order and called the phone number on the order, which (dumb criminals) was the same as on the check. My friend already had found out a check had been hijacked when other stuff started bouncing. So she got the shipping info - address, tracking # and date - and then took it to the cops. All they had to do was go to the address and arrest whoever accepted the package. Guess if they did. NOT. All they did was 'take a crime report'.

      Cops are probably offended when citizens bring them solved crimes. They're a strange bunch. Anyone who knows one will confirm that. Unless that someone is dating or married to one, in which case that someone is also a strange one. :)

      So I agree. Go the police first, and when they won't 'solve' the crime, tell the media. A local news channel's 'Consumer Watchdog' or whatever they're called in your town is the best bet. It's not really news for the normal broadcast, but it's juicy stuff for those 'we help our viewers' segments.

      --
      Sig not available, please try again later. If the problem persists, then the submitter is an idiot.
    3. Re:Media by Bios_Hakr · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And make sure to tell them something realy important was on there. Like the names and addresses of the people who attended last year's Police Ball.

      Or maybe Baltimore police don't have balls?

      In all seriousness, file a "John Doe" civil suit in the ISPs district. As part of the action, ask for discovery on a specific IP address. Since you are filing against John Doe, Verizon will most likely consent. Once you have the name and address of the theif, drop the John Doe case and go back to the police with the guy's name, address, phone number, photos of his house and dog. At this point, either the police press charges, or you lodge an official complaint against the cops.

      Look at the following article about how the RIAA uses IP addresses to find people. You should be using similar tactics. Do some sleuthing once you have the address. Make sure you aren't going after some poor bastard with an open WAP while the real theif lives right next door.

      Going to the press is a bad idea. The theif is very likely to see the story and will move to dispose of the property.

      --
      I'd rather you do it wrong, than for me to have to do it at all.
    4. Re:Media by Ph33r+th3+g(O)at · · Score: 1

      And then make sure you never go one mile an hour over the speed limit, spit on the sidewalk, or park 10.001 inches away from the curb for the rest of yourl life.

      --
      I too have felt the cold finger of injustice.
    5. Re:Media by ryanr · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yeah, I'm sure no one will mind if Verizon gives out customer info without a subpoena. A phone company would only do that kind of thing under rare circumstances.

    6. Re:Media by tgtanman · · Score: 0

      Your website says that your company is in Hunt Valley - wouldn't that put you in Baltimore County? If that's where the computer was stolen from, you could try calling the BCoPD Burglary Divsion at 410-887-6296.

    7. Re:Media by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Good idea, but wrong order. Give Verizon a chance to be the good guy. Call their publicity department first. If they make excuses, then call local media.

      Why do I get the feeling that you think "being the good guy" equates to giving out their customers' private data without a court order? It really isn't their job to substantiate the cover story or judge their customers. We have courts for that.

      Going through the police is the right way. If they're not doing their job, then publicise that fact. If the shop wants an alternative then they should talk to a lawyer about the possibility of suing the John Doe for something (trespass to property?) and getting a court to order Verizon to provide details that way.

    8. Re:Media by linzeal · · Score: 1

      Fuck that, get the press on their ass first. Companies can do the most awesome tricks when they capitulate to popular opinion.

    9. Re:Media by jamesh · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'd be calling your insurance company next. They have an interest in getting the stolen goods back too, in that then they don't have to make a claim.

      The whole situation is pretty silly though. You're basically handing the police a solution on a plate. They won't have to do too much detective work to get a result, and even if it doesn't end in a conviction, at least they's be showing you that 'the system works', and on a slow news day they might even get a _positive_ write up in the local media.

    10. Re:Media by log0n · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's most likely Baltimore Police. There was a big expose here about the BCPD forging or failing to take reports, browbeating victims to not press charges... a lot of really heinous stuff. Apparently it was done to try to keep reported crime levels artificillay low to help the mayor get elected to governor. There's been a lot of stink about it in certain news organizations.

      (tired - can't spell)

    11. Re:Media by XO · · Score: 1

      Someone from Verizon could call the police and let them know that they have reason to believe that stolen hardware is operating from such and such a place.

      --
      "Champagne for my real friends - and real pain for my sham friends!" http://ericblade.postalboard.com/
    12. Re:Media by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      Someone from Verizon could call the police and let them know that they have reason to believe that stolen hardware is operating from such and such a place.

      Just because some guy phoned them up and said so? The correct course here is for either the police or the shop to get a subpoena for the information. Otherwise Verizon should protect their customers' confidentiality.

      It's been 36 minutes since you last successfully posted a comment

      Chances are, you're behind a firewall or proxy, or clicked the Back button to accidentally reuse a form. Please try again. If the problem persists, and all other options have been tried, contact the site administrator.

      Why would not posting for half an hour mean I'm using a firewall? I mean, yes I am using a firewall, but why should that even be an issue? This is ridiculous.
    13. Re:Media by XO · · Score: 1

      i'm just saying that if you could get someone at Verizon to care, then it could happen.

      --
      "Champagne for my real friends - and real pain for my sham friends!" http://ericblade.postalboard.com/
    14. Re:Media by ryanr · · Score: 1

      That's a fair suggestion, depending on Verizon's policies. As long as there is a case number, Verizon could contact the police and provide info.

    15. Re:Media by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I work for a major PD as a Specialist Reserve Officer. My thing is breaking into computers to obtain evidence when the casual attempts fail. After a couple of conversations with a deputy city attorney , it appears that it is extremely difficult to obtain a filing, much less a conviction, unless the suspect is caught in an illegal act and seen doing so by the eyes of several officers. The greatest cases I've seen were never even filed. I've worked with the feds on some cases and we've been extremely careful not to pollute the original hard drives, but our cases don't even get filed because there's an element of doubt in someone's mind, somewhere along the line. We've handed felony cases to the DA that could be called Silver Platter, but they were not filed because they have higher priorities. Their focus is on violent crime, at least where I do this stuff. If you're just an average Joe like me, I think the police don't give a high enough priority on your loss to give you a second thought. I'm sorry for those in your shoes, but I tend to agree with their priorities.

    16. Re:Media by bluprint · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Follow the money. There isn't any money in solving such crimes. They are too busy generating profits via traffic and parking tickets and such. Why bother with an actual crime that will use resources when they can target basically good people for cash?

      --
      A modern day witchhunt.
    17. Re:Media by Mr.+Byaninch · · Score: 1

      You've got a good point. Maybe not always the money, but also the PR.

      And that's why I say take it to one's local news station. That's the way to get it out there that the police are responding to what makes money and what is good PR.

      --
      Sig not available, please try again later. If the problem persists, then the submitter is an idiot.
    18. Re:Media by julesh · · Score: 4, Insightful

      As other posters have said, verizon will need a court order before they can hand out this information.

      But: there's little to stop you from getting one yourself. File a claim for recovery of property against an unknown party. Put a motion before the judge asking for an order that verizon disclose any and all information they have about that IP address, including an explanation of how you know that the IP address is involved. This is as much information as the RIAA have when they make their claims -- you should be able to do exactly the same thing as they're doing.

      Then, once the party is identified, they'll be served with all the relevant documentation. You go to court, claim they have property that belongs to you, and request an order that it is returned, along with compensation for your loss of use of it in the interrim.

      If you do your homework, you shouldn't even need a lawyer for a case this simple.

      Disclaimer: I know little about US civil procedure. What I describe would be possible in the UK, and I understand based on a little reading that procedure is roughly similar in US courts.

    19. Re:Media by k_187 · · Score: 2, Funny

      yeah, verizon does this for the NSA its bad. but they do it so you can get a laptop back and they're the Good guys? Yay slashthink ;)

      --
      11 was a racehorse
      12 was 12
      1111 Race
      12112
    20. Re:Media by WebCrapper · · Score: 1

      No one at Verizon will do anything other than possibly flag the account with a personal note.

      When I worked at an ISP, we would talk to police all the time and time and again, the answer was "Sorry, you must get with our legal dept" and nothing else was given out or said. On the account, we put a note to verify ALL account info before talking to the person.

    21. Re:Media by sjf · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Since when has doing 60 in a 55 zone been "violent crmie" ?

    22. Re:Media by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Oy Oy it's better to posture to be "helping" the children while lying to congress and actually brainwashing 5th graders in ways that make them more likely to use marijuana in the future. Cops can be heroes, but most deserve to be tried for treason for the fraud they have perpetuated on this country since the 1930s and the lies they routinely peddle to newspapers, legislatures, and to congress.

    23. Re:Media by penix1 · · Score: 2, Informative

      You got it right with the exception that it is highly advisable to get a lawyer to handle this stuff. Doing it yourself can save money but can also cost you more in the long run when you screw it up.

      B.

      --
      This is a sig. This is only a sig. Had this been an actual sig you would have been informed where to tune for more sigs.
    24. Re:Media by Yokaze · · Score: 1

      This falls under:
      > unless the suspect is caught in an illegal act and seen doing so by the eyes of several officers.

      --
      "Between strong and weak, between rich and poor [...], it is freedom which oppresses and the law which sets free"
    25. Re:Media by Pharmboy · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Why would not posting for half an hour mean I'm using a firewall? I mean, yes I am using a firewall, but why should that even be an issue? This is ridiculous.

      The main issue is you are AC, and Slashdot doesn't want AC to post every 10 or 20 minutes, a very good change. Since they changed this rule, the quality of posts as AC has gone up considerably. Also, it appears some IPs can post more often as AC than others, or perhaps there is a randomness to the wait period.

      The firewall issue should actually say a firewall/router (or proxy), which would make a big difference if others behind the same firewall/router are posting as AC, since it limits AC by IP address, the only thing it CAN filter by if you are AC.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    26. Re:Media by penix1 · · Score: 1

      "Sorry, you must get with our legal dept"

      That is the correct response to give when faced by anyone asking for personal info from an ISP. If they don't have a warrent or subpoena, then the one asking for the info is wrong. The "flagging" you are talking about is proper too since at some point legal will be involved if it is a valid warrent / subpoena. I don't see a problem with that.

      B.

      --
      This is a sig. This is only a sig. Had this been an actual sig you would have been informed where to tune for more sigs.
    27. Re:Media by thedletterman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Forget dropping the civil case, persue both.

      --
      Any fool can criticise, condemn, and complain, and most fools do. - Benjamin Franklin
    28. Re:Media by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the idea of "police" doesn't work because they cannot actually deal with all crimes, then laws are pretty pointless. I guess people don't value being protected enough or I don't know.

    29. Re:Media by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      yah, if someone makes a comment about verizon doing things for the NSA being bad, then the whole slashdot community must feel that way. So if someone else makes a comment about them doing it to get a laptop back and being good guys, thats a contradiction. Yay slashthink :)

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    30. Re:Media by dgatwood · · Score: 2, Informative

      The police aren't the right approach at all. Call your district attorney. He/she is much more likely to have a clue.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    31. Re:Media by gamlidek · · Score: 1

      Although, they *might* give out customer info with only a simple letter from the NSA. It just depends on who you are.

      /gam/

      --
      "In theory, theory and practice are the same; in practice, they are not."
    32. Re:Media by zippthorne · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You get tickets for 60 in a 55? What're you doing? Looking like a hippie while driving an expensive sportscar trailing a banner saying "Pigs are teh sux?"

      Good gracious man, be polite, turn on your dome light, and don't make any threatening moves. (this is good advice for anyone who is being approached by someone who carries a gun and faces violent offenders regularly)

      It's been my experience that they don't really want to give you the ticket, at least not until they meet you. Most of them just want you to drive safely. But if they can't avoid it (generally due to some stupidity on your part), or you piss them off enough they won't look for a way to avoid it, well you're going to bear the full penalty for your infraction.

      Even then, though, it's not really YOU who'se been singled out for unfair punishment, but others who've been singled out for unfair leniency.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    33. Re:Media by dieman · · Score: 2, Informative

      Ticketing for just over 5mph is becoming SOP in some cities. Some Minneapolis area freeways recently went from 55->60 speed limits, but troopers and police are pulling people over for far less than they used to. Lots more people are going close to 60 rather than going 65-68ish.

      The program is called HEAT -- Highway Enforcement of Aggressive Traffic.

      http://www.dot.state.mn.us/hottopics/speedlimits/i ndex.html

      --
      -- dieman - Scott Dier
    34. Re:Media by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The officers organisation get half the fine, the municipality the offense occured in gets the other half, which makes for some stink-eye being given when a sheriff pulls over a car in the city, so essentialy there is some pressure to write tickets and bring in income; on the other hand crimes go on the departments statistics and look bad

    35. Re:Media by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the police don't give a high enough priority on your loss to give you a second thought. I'm sorry for those in your shoes, but I tend to agree with their priorities.

      Generally these crooks do not still once, but many times to support their drug habit. A whole bunch of little crimes make one large crime wave. Everybody's stuff being ripped off continually should be high on the police' priority list. They should be able to make this connection.

      I feel sorry for citizens of your town, because it seems that the best the officials are capable of doing is protecting the local doughnut shops.

    36. Re:Media by Solder+Fumes · · Score: 0, Troll

      Cops basically are dickheads with guns, many of them were on the other side of the law until they decided to jump to a more stable occupation but still have a testosterone outlet and easy access to drugs. Oh, there are exceptions, cops who really believe they are helping everyone and fight FOR GREAT JUSTICE! I've had to work with many cops related to some issues with very unstable neighbors who were practicing arsonists. I never met a cop who worried about protecting citizens more than where the next donut was coming from.

      Also, the war on drugs? Take this example, gleaned right from COPS (an overwhelmingly pro-cop show): they were doing a day of drug stings. Guys in cars hitting a neighborhood asking for drug deals and catching the dealers. Know what the guy in charge said at the end of the show, tossing a bag of evidence up and down in his hands? "Yeah we are probably going to move on from here, after a couple days you're likely to 'burn out' a neighborhood and not get any more results." OH FUCK, we might scare the dealers so bad we STOP ALL DRUG DEALING in the neighborhood, BETTER QUIT WHILE WE'RE AHEAD or we won't have jobs in a few months! So the idea is to keep the drug dealing going, so you can come back to that neighborhood over and over again, but not crush the market there? This shit makes me want to start a revolution.

    37. Re:Media by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please excuse me for being thick headed, but what is AC? Other than Alternating Current.

    38. Re:Media by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      Please excuse me for being thick headed, but what is AC? Other than Alternating Current.

      AC = Anonymous Coward

      The way you just posted. Anonymously. It is a commonly used expression here, and even on other websites that /. regulars visit. (ie: Groklaw, digg, etc.)

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    39. Re:Media by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (tired - can't spell)

      you obviously meant:

      (tried - can't spell)

    40. Re:Media by darkonc · · Score: 2, Informative
      Someone from Verizon could call the police and let them know that they have reason to believe that stolen hardware is operating from such and such a place.
      Just because some guy phoned them up and said so? The correct course here is for either the police or the shop to get a subpoena for the information. Otherwise Verizon should protect their customers' confidentiality.
      Well, the proper thing to do would be for Verison to call the Police and say that you contacted them about the missing computer in stolen computer -- Police report #WXYZ, and that the physical address associated with the IP address that You say the laptop is calling home from is 123 Main st.

      In conjunction with your theft report, that should be enough for the police to get a search warrent and go knocking on the door of whomever is at the address.

      Alternatively, I guess that you could start a civil lawsuit (or a private criminal prosecution), and swear out the Subpoenas and possibly even the civil equivalent to a search warrent yourself. Once you've proven that you've recovered the laptop at that address, it should be reasonably easy for the police to take on the criminal case.
      IANAL so the details are left as an exercise for the reader.

      --
      Sometimes boldness is in fashion. Sometimes only the brave will be bold.
    41. Re:Media by BrookHarty · · Score: 1

      "protect and serve" has been replaced by "generate revenue and destroy liberties".

    42. Re:Media by Mia'cova · · Score: 1

      Or with finite resources, they'd rather focus on the worst areas and rotate their efforts rather than expend their entire efforts on one small chunk of land.

    43. Re:Media by PiratePTG · · Score: 2, Informative
      The best idea is to call the DA's office, explain to them that the police department has all of the necessary information, and that they are doing nothing about it. Ask the DA's office to please look into the matter so that "you don't have to take the problem to the media". The DA's office will probably look into the matter, since the DA is an elected position, and probably doesn't want the negative publicity.

      If the DA's office doesn't do anything about it, by all means call the media. Call every media outlet in the city and state. Call MSNBC and CNN, too... Give them the names, times, and dates of who you talked to. Someone will pick up the story and then start asking embarrassing questions to the people blowing you off.

      I know this works from experience, both from being a TV Broadcast Engineer for the past 23 years, and from being a party in a civil case where we decided to "play fair" and not involve the media. The ALJ hearing our case blew us off, even when we had the other party admit wrongdoing on the stand. He just didn't want the case in the first place and took the first opportunity to drop it.

      Call the media... Get them to scorch the earth for you...

      --
      The number 1 problem of working in a cubicle - 23 power cords, 1 outlet...
    44. Re:Media by Monkelectric · · Score: 1

      Exactly. I got a ticket yesterday in a part of twon TREAMING with illegal aliens, and a few years ago my house was broken into and we pratically solved the case for them, wouldn't do *ANYTHING*. I've been toying with the idea of writing "I'll pay when you investigate my burglary" on my ticket.

      --

      Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

    45. Re:Media by Technician · · Score: 1

      If the police won't do anything, call the local press.

      Want action? Tell them the company transactions were stolen including credit card numbers. It's even better if some of the police department were some of the customers and recieved a your account may be compromised letter. They need a small bonfire under them to get them moving.

      It's like catching someone in your car taking your radio. You can report the crime in progress, or report you ran across someone in your car and they appeared to threaten you with a gun and if they move you will shoot them. The latter gets instant response.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    46. Re:Media by winwar · · Score: 1

      "We've handed felony cases to the DA that could be called Silver Platter, but they were not filed because they have higher priorities. Their focus is on violent crime, at least where I do this stuff. If you're just an average Joe like me, I think the police don't give a high enough priority on your loss to give you a second thought."

      I think the words you are looking for are indifferent and lazy.

    47. Re:Media by Sparr0 · · Score: 1

      So your IP address is all I need to get the police a search warrant for your house? I love this plan.

    48. Re:Media by darkonc · · Score: 1
      You'd also have to swear out an infomation and expose yourself to a charge of perjury and/or criminal mischief if your accusations prove to be groudless. (not to mention the possibility of a civil countersuit).

      If you think about it, all you have to do to get a search warrent issued against your neighbour is drop by the police department and say that you saw them carrying in pot plants and hydroponics gear, or a bloody dead body, or ...

      --
      Sometimes boldness is in fashion. Sometimes only the brave will be bold.
    49. Re:Media by DDX_2002 · · Score: 1

      The whole situation is pretty silly though. You're basically handing the police a solution on a plate. They won't have to do too much detective work to get a result

      Are you on CRACK? This is a total nightmare for the police. Here's how the trial goes:

      OP: 1. Qualify the OP as an expert witness in the area of computer programming and computer networking. Have him testify as to ownership of the missing laptop, when it was last seen.

      2. Produce hardcopy of the source code of the VBS program that was allegedly placed on the hard drive of the missing equipment

      3. Get OP to testify that that is indeed what he placed on the computer

      4. Get OP to identify the recovered laptop (assuming they find it) as the one that went missing, presumably by serial number since one laptop looks much like another of the same make.

      5. Watch defence counsel rip him a new one.

      A. Watch OP admit that the laptop was out of his possession for some time. It was stolen, after all.

      B. Yes, another programmer knowledgeable in VB could have changed, added or altered the script.

      C. Yes, it IS possible to spoof internet messages. But I really don't thi...

      D. Hackers? Well sure, they're out there. But why would a hac...

      E. No, we have firewall and antivirus software on our computers to prevent someone from inst...

      F. Yes, I suppose the thief could have turned them off, if he's a moro...

      G. No, if the original thief never turned the computer on, it never would have sent the signal we got. I suppose, if he was stealing it for resale, that he might NOT turn it on, bu...

      No further questions.

      Police Officer One

      Yes I took the report, but no, I didn't act immediately. This guy was chattering about scripts and networks, I thought he was an out of work actor or something.

      Yeah, eventually he kept bugging me so I turned it over to our technology crime department. His name's Larry, by the way. Nice guy, not cut out for street duty. Anyway, he talked to the ISP and gave me an address and I went there and found a guy and the laptop. He wouldn't say how he got the laptop. Yeah, I suppose he could have bought it from some guy without knowing it was hot.

      Fingerprints? Are you SERIOUS? FOR A FRICKIN LAPTOP? Ident's a bit backed up, what with the murders, rapes, armed robberies and the like, when I asked about it and was told they'd get around to the laptop in 2007 or early 2008, unless we found out the laptop had been used to bludgeon someone to death.

      No, even if it had fingerprints, I agree it wouldn't show whether the person who sat at the keyboard knew it was stolen.

      Yes, the apartment looked like a flophouse when I arrested the accused. There were personal belongings everywhere, it didn't look like they were all the accused's. No, there were no personal effects like bills or his wallet or clothing right next to the laptop. Yes, it is possible, I suppose, that someone else in the house had stolen or used the laptop.

      TECHNOLOGY CRIMES OFFICER:

      Qualify him as an expert.

      Explain how he got the info from the phone company.

      Explain why he had probable cause to do that, which requires explaining how the VBS worked in the first place.

      Explain in excruciating detail how he examined the computer recovered without changing the contents in any way.

      Explain in excruciating detail where and how he found the VBS.

      PHONE CO GUY #1

      Got request from police. passed it on to right department. Got response back, provided it to cops.

      PHONE CO GUY #2

      Explain how he got the subscriber data for the address in question and provided it to guy #1.

      No, there's no way for our computers to say who was actually using the computer or the phone/network connection at the time. All we do is show where it was being used from. Yes, anyone could have used that laptop and we would have gotten the same information.

      --
      MHO. YMMV. Any resemblance between this post and real persons, or reality in general, was accidental.
    50. Re:Media by elrous0 · · Score: 1
      No, he's right. They're basically just dickheads.

      -Eric

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    51. Re:Media by John+Harrison · · Score: 1

      I've been in a similar situation. My sister's car was broken into and her purse stolen. A week later the purse shows up at a post office, minus the cash plus some other stuff. However it did include a receipt for a gas station half a mile from our house issued a hour after the purse was stolen. Note that the purse was stolen 30 miles away. Note that there was a house key in the purse. She had called the cops initially and I called them when we got the receipt. I had already verified that the gas station would turn over credit card records and video tapes to the cops. The cops refused to do anything. Told me to get lost. It was rather infuriating.

    52. Re:Media by Tweekster · · Score: 1

      Phone companies routinely give telephone records to police without a subpoena. It is a standard tactic in an investigation.

      --
      The phrase "more better" is acceptable English. suck it grammar Nazis
    53. Re:Media by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IANAL, not even close, but I think this is stuff where you file a 'john doe' case in the court house. Then, the court can subpoena the information.

  2. RIAA by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 5, Funny

    Your best hope is that now that you have the IP you can hack into the laptop and install a BT server with lots of nice pop music and videos. Then report the sharing site to the RIAA and watch them take this sucka down.

    1. Re:RIAA by extremescholar · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      What if the person who is currently in possesion of the laptop has no idea it was stolen. He got it from a friend of a friend for a couple hundred bucks.

      --
      Using the Freedom of Speech while I still have it.
    2. Re:RIAA by wizbit · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's still a felony in most states. It's called "receiving stolen property", and ignorance is not an excuse.

    3. Re:RIAA by MBCook · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Receiving stolen property, they are guilty. If they bought a nice laptop for $200 then they had to know it was stolen (especially since it probably had tons of business documents on it, if it's phoning home it hasn't been wiped). I doubt they bought it in good faith. If they DID (say they paid a decent amount that would buy them such a laptop) then they could get out of the charges by pointing out where they got it. I doubt the DA would press charges on them if they pointed out where they got it from and would testify to that fact.

      If they bought it from a pawn shop or used computer shop or something, that shop is liable (I think) and they may still not have claim to the laptop. Both should have questioned the sale of this laptop with all the business stuff still on it (and even more.. selling it like that).

      Still, crooks are, by and large, idiots. I would bet the original thief (or a direct relative/girlfriend/boyfriend) has the thing.

      Either way, you would think the cops would be all over this one. Grand theft (the laptop cost over $1000 new, right?), known location (more or less, but it keeps phoning home), easy catch, and 100:1 odds that this is NOT the first/only crime the guy has committed (probably has a few other hot items near him).

      I agree with one of the other comments. Go to the media. "His laptop was stolen, and he knew where it was... but the police wouldn't do a thing. Why your stuff isn't safe... tonight at 10." Or sue the department (that always gets things moving, just the threat with a nasty-gram should do). Or go talk to the DA. A case like this (likely a slam dunk) you would think they would want to take. They probably don't know about it and could get the police to go do something.

      --
      Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    4. Re:RIAA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It's still a felony in most states. It's called "receiving stolen property", and ignorance is not an excuse.
      What are you fucking stupid? I've heard about lots of people getting "busted" for buying stolen auto parts. But as long as they *really* had no idea about them being stolen, they just got confiscated by John Q. Law. You must live in a really fucking sad country if it's a "felony" to buy questionable shit from a flea market.
    5. Re:RIAA by wizbit · · Score: 3, Interesting

      No, I've been through this with several friends.

      If I tell you I can get you a laptop for $100, are you at all suspicious? Anyone with some common sense will suss out that my source might be slightly less-than-reputable. The problem, of course, is very very few people in these cases are "truly" ignorant.

    6. Re:RIAA by arpy · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yeah - watch out for these dodgy people!

    7. Re:RIAA by timeOday · · Score: 1
      If they bought a nice laptop for $200 then they had to know it was stolen
      C'mon, why would any thief do that instead of getting market price for it on ebay? And if it were missing accessories like the A/C adapter, the customer would probably assume the laptop was from a wholesale lot, or that the seller was taking advantage and hawking the accessories separately.
    8. Re:RIAA by AmericanInKiev · · Score: 1

      When the price of a new laptop is $300, then $100 for a used piece seems not beyond the realm of reasonability.

      AIK

    9. Re:RIAA by wizbit · · Score: 1

      *snicker*

      Can't win, eh?

      I suppose I should've said "top of the line" for a hundred bucks, but I'll just give up at this point.

      Thanks for the laugh, anyway.

    10. Re:RIAA by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Actually not that bad of an idea.
      Install a backdoor along with that script so you can ssh into your rental notebooks.
      Start sending threatening emails to the police from it.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  3. Legal systems cost money. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    "They seem clueless. "

    Yeah. Seems like it. Now try seeing it from their POV.

  4. Depends on the Police Department by rolfwind · · Score: 3, Informative

    For instance, in this case:
    http://www.laptopical.com/lojack-for-laptop.html

    "Proof-positive of LoJack's power comes from such stories as the one out of William Penn University in Iowa. A student there had a college laptop stolen. Absolute Software was promptly notified. And their recovery experts there soon tracked the laptop down to the phone line that the notebook was hooked into the Internet on. The Des Moines Police Department was notified, and officers promptly put down their donuts and coffee and swooped in on the missing PC."

    The lojack program seems to do the exact thing yours does, but then again, perhaps because it is "official", the police may take the information more seriously.

    1. Re:Depends on the Police Department by MindStalker · · Score: 1

      I doupt its so much the officialness of the program as the officialness of the investigators. Absolute obviously already has enough connections that they got information from verizon and only had to give the police the address.

    2. Re:Depends on the Police Department by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The lojack program seems to do the exact thing yours does, but then again, perhaps because it is "official", the police may take the information more seriously.

      More likely, they have at least one person on staff who knows how to "speak cop," and thus knows how to get on their side of the thin blue line. So instead of seeing Absolute as a threat to their control, they are perceived as an ally whom the cops may call upon for a favor in the future.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    3. Re:Depends on the Police Department by anticypher · · Score: 2, Interesting

      LoJack and other professional security companies employ ex-law enforcement personnel for one big reason, to speak "cop", and to work their old contacts inside of police forces. I work with a number of serious security companies who specialise in computer/telecoms fraud cases. They all have a group of ex-cops on staff to make sure when they need to pursue a case once the perp has been identified, things will move along quickly. I've tried, and failed every time, to file cases 'through the front door' with various police organisations around Europe.

      A detective level ex-cop with a good contact book and knowledge of their local system can jump from a mediocre salary as a public servant to private industry with a boost of 5 to 8 times their earnings.

      The OP needs to find a private security company in his area with ex-cops on staff, or just put out some ads for ex-cops to do some free-lance security work for the company. So every time one of his scripts calls home with identifying info, the security consultant files the requisite paperwork with his drinking buddies, and the case ends up directly on their desk monday morning. Recover a few laptops like that (with extra added bonus of taking down some thieves), and the company may be able to renogiate their insurance premiums. Dangle the promise of significantly lower insurance premiums in front of management to get their approval to hire one of these guys for a few cases. In the US and the UK, you can even hire off-duty cops for this kind of work, depending on the jurisdiction.

      the AC

      --
      Hemos is like...sci-fi fans;he thinks technology is cool, but he hasn't bothered to understand the science it's based on
    4. Re:Depends on the Police Department by Dylan+Zimmerman · · Score: 1

      The end of your post is exactly what I was thinking. LoJack is an established security company, so its evidence tends to stand up in courts and holds weight with police officers (in the "LoJack says it's stolen? That's good enough for me." sense). The evidence of a private company's little phone-home script probably isn't enough to get a warrant, and even if it was enough to get said warrant initially, it would be called into question in the trial and would likely be thrown out.

    5. Re:Depends on the Police Department by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here is another link describing the lojack for laptops and how it works.

  5. good luck with that by grapeape · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I had a laptop and 2 desktops stolen from my van in the parking lot next to the police station in downtown KC. One of my side windows as well as the windows of 3 other vehicles were broken out. The police department couldnt even be bothered to walk downstairs to file a report and told me I would need to phone it in, I called and the detective said I wasnt likely to get it back but he would get back to me. Later that night after I was home my work aim account logged itself online. I got the IP called the police department with the info, was called back the next day and reprimanded for "interfering in police work". Anyway I stopped interfering, 2 years later and I guess they are still busy doing "police work" because I have never heard back from them. I guess I learned my lesson, dont bother. Now when I have to be downtown I just leave the doors unlocked, its alot cheaper than replacing the windows. I've actually managed to make a game out of it, I no longer have to take old computers to the salvage place, I just load them in the van and take them downtown.

    1. Re:good luck with that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Bummer. Wouldn't hold out much hope for the Creedence, either. :-(

    2. Re:good luck with that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You owe me a new keyboard. Bastard.

    3. Re:good luck with that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wouldn't have stopped interfering! Are you nuts .... I would have had a go at the bugga .... Ask him to put his reprimand in writing... then call your local tv station.... Then again with people being marched away because they've got CCTV camera's in their foyer - who knows what would happen if you did that!

    4. Re:good luck with that by omahajim · · Score: 1
      I've actually managed to make a game out of it, I no longer have to take old computers to the salvage place, I just load them in the van and take them downtown.

      The City of Omaha does something somewhat similar (or at least DID until they got called on it by a local TV station). The city would load up abandoned vehicles (pickups) at the impount lot with old city computers. Those pickups would make it into the weekly vehicle auction. Since the vehicles are sold "as is", the buyers were required to take the vehicles with all the computers in the bed, thereby transferring the problem of disposing of potentially hazardous waste (CRTs, etc) to the successful bidder on the vehicle auction.

      Haven't seen any update on this story so I don't know if the city has stopped doing this. Also don't know whether these machines had hard drives still in them, etc.

  6. Explained it wrong by Geoffreyerffoeg · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Think they understood the VBS? Now I know that you didn't directly throw that VB at them, but still.

    Explain that your computers connect to the work network and log in, and you noticed that there was a computer trying to "hack in" from another town. Your security people found that the computer was your own computer, one that had been reported stolen.

    Spin it in a way they'll understand.

    1. Re:Explained it wrong by zappepcs · · Score: 1

      I'll give you a big amen on that one. Everytime that you try to explain things to a cop/lawyer/other official, the one thing I see most is that because they don't quite understand, and its not in the normal routine of things, it is considered unimportant. Case in point, my car radio was stolen. Immediately, they said I'm not likely to get it back. I asked if they wanted me to bring the car in so they could get finger prints. No amount of trying to explain that the guy who robbed me, didn't break the window, and left really good grease fingerprints all over the driver's side window... they looked like the ones cops give you when you get arrested. I figure it can't be too much work to try matching those to a database of convicts prints.. but NO, they were not even interested in doing this, no matter how good the prints were... but if you smoke one joint, or stop at the curb to talk to one girl.... well, then, that's a different story. (not that I do these things, but they do seem more interesting to the police)

      I think its all in how you describe things to people to get them interested.

    2. Re:Explained it wrong by plover · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Hate to disappoint you, but no cop will bother with fingerprints for a simple auto burglary. It's a simple matter of priorities. There are way too many things for the police to do than track down petty criminals.

      The biggest reason is that even if they did pull good fingerprints from your window, tracked them to a known criminal, got a warrant, entered his place, and found him along with your stereo in his bedroom, the criminal would get an average sentence of a few days to a few weeks, (most likely suspended,) plus probation and possibly reparations.

      But that entire scenario is highly unlikely, from the first assumption to the last. Too many people see smeary fingerprints taken on CSI and assume that every precint has a "Bat Computer" sitting in the back where they can just upload a print and out pops a name and an arrest warrant. And every one of those people expects the same care devoted to catching a car-stereo thief.

      There's just nothing in it for the lesser crimes. No real punishments, just a lot of work for absolutely nothing resembling justice. Someone might take pity on you if you didn't have insurance, but even that's highly unlikely unless the value of the stolen merchandise was high.

      The cops will definitely take it seriously if there's been a violent crime (again, keep in mind the difference between what you'd consider a serious assault and what they'd consider serious.) And even then, the backlog clogging the BCA labs usually runs over a year before forensic evidence is processed! There are simply too many criminals and too many crimes at this point in history.

      --
      John
    3. Re:Explained it wrong by CAIMLAS · · Score: 2, Insightful

      that's because the police aren't there to 'serve and protect' anymore. there is no more officer friendly. they're there to put the body in the bag, write you traffic tickets, and - in general - keep the citizenry under control. that's why things like pot and hookers are illegal and heavily prosecuted; the government wants to maintain its grasp on mind altering substances and physical pleasure (media and pharmacuticals).

      Sounds crazy and 1984, but it makes sense to my tired mind...

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    4. Re:Explained it wrong by EnderWigginsXenocide · · Score: 3, Interesting

      YOU:
      Hate to disappoint you, but no cop will bother with fingerprints for a simple auto burglary.

      ME:
      Untrue. Careful with broad all-encompassing statements.

      YOU:
      It's a simple matter of priorities. There are way too many things for the police to do than track down petty criminals.

      ME:
      Correct.

      If officers are sitting on alot of crap calls (no crime commited, just bitchy neighbor complaints about barking dogs or music in the daytime hours, etc.) they will often take the five minutes to print a car about the top of the "doorjamb," around the doorhandle, and in locations likely to be touched in the comission of a crime (say a dashboard if a piece of installed equiptment is stolen, think radio, dvd, sat-nav.) If any prints look very good they will take a lift and file them along with their report of stolen property.

      Sure, your stolen ipod won't get shoved to the front of the live-scan line, it will be bumped to the end of the que by just about any other crime with fingerprint evidence.

      Crimes like theft are often commited by repeat offenders, and thus these criminals will have prints on file. A print left in a "low profile" crime can lead to a routine request for an arrest warrant. Of course this won't lead to a SWAT raid on the perps residence, but next time he/she cheks in with their PO, gets a traffic violation, or somehow draws the attention of the law enforcement community, the cuffs will go on and they'll be jailed right away for violating their terms of release and may see additional time from the new crime.

      This process requires very little effort (no major investment of time or money... lifting a print is dirt cheap next to sequencing DNA for example) and makes for an easy bust down the road.

      Now, when you call in your car that's been broken into you might wait [quite] a few hours to get an officer out to take a report because it is indeed a low priority call [no life in danger, not in progress, and not likely to lead to a quick apprehension even when a quick response is made.]

      If a department has, or at some point in the past had, the funding to train the average patrol officer to lift prints then you may receive this kind of service (smaller towns like El Monte CA [higher crime rate] and Fullerton CA [lower crime rate] both do this, neither being particulary large in population [relative to their neighboring cities in the LA Metro area.])

      It's cheaper to have officers collect "basic evidence" than to have an officer wait on scene for a specalist in evidence collection to clear their currrently pending calls and respond to a crime that's quite low priority. When a city dosen't have, or never has had, the funding to do this then you end up with simple theft being a purely paper crime (where the only response to the crime is a piece of paper[a report] and no other action is taken regarding the crime.)

      --
      Blessed are the pessimists, for they have made backups. -- 0 1 My two bits
    5. Re:Explained it wrong by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

      See, this kind of sucks for people who actually care about the ethics of it. Suppose you've got a violent crime, like, say, a murder -- no amount of punishment for the perp will ever bring the victim back. On the other hand, something like this -- especially something that has already been solved -- will, in fact, bring the laptop back.

      Now, you could claim that catching a murderer is better for society, because it prevents them from killing again, but really, how many one-shot murders are there? How many serial killers? Besides, it can't be good for society to have cops constantly losing respect by being lazy assholes.

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    6. Re:Explained it wrong by Ykant · · Score: 1
      It's funny - when I'm at work, I don't get to decide whose problems I want to work on. Some are more crucial, to be sure, but none get vertical-filed, especially if they bring it to my desk with half the work done.

      There are simply too many criminals and too many crimes at this point in history.

      Baloney. Violent crime has been on a downwards trend for at least the last ten years.

      --
      Spelling, grammar, punctuation? We need something that checks logic.
    7. Re:Explained it wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're right, and the simple answer is to allow peole to defend themselves from these petty criminals. If someone keys your car, don't waste time pleading with a cop to find out who. If you care, find out yourself and punish away.

    8. Re:Explained it wrong by TomRitchford · · Score: 1

      "The biggest reason is that even if they did pull good fingerprints from your window, tracked them to a known criminal, got a warrant, entered his place, and found him along with your stereo in his bedroom, the criminal would get an average sentence of a few days to a few weeks, (most likely suspended,) plus probation and possibly reparations."

      Got any source for this extremely dubious claim? There are few places that grand theft auto won't get you a year. If it's a "known criminal" as in your example, and they've committed two felonies before, in many states the "three strikes" laws will put them away for a long, long time, even if the last crime is extremely minor, but there are often mandatory minimum sentences even for first-time offenders.

      Not that I don't agree with the underlying idea, that the cops are lazy and won't follow up on crimes. But it's not because we have "soft on crime" judges out there; it's because the police are basically responsible to no one.

    9. Re:Explained it wrong by winwar · · Score: 1

      "Hate to disappoint you, but no cop will bother with fingerprints for a simple auto burglary. It's a simple matter of priorities. There are way too many things for the police to do than track down petty criminals."

      Absolutely. I mean why would they spend the day doing police work. It's not like its their job or anything.

      And then they wonder why people have a low opinion of them.

    10. Re:Explained it wrong by DDX_2002 · · Score: 1
      The prospect of every officer walking beats doing fingerprint collection scares me, not so much for wrongful convictions (most likely is just a lot of smudged partials that can't be matched to anything) but that crimes that could have been prosecuted can't be because the evidence is screwed up. Identification specialists were trained up as specialists FOR A REASON - there's skill and learning involved. Doing it again and again develops skill and technique, which if you're just doing it occasionally you don't get.

      Moreover, the biggest part of police training on evidence gathering often isn't in techniques but in testimony. When defence counsel asks you why you use the red bottle instead of the green bottle when raising prints off a porous surface, the correct answer is not 'that's what I was told at training but I don't actually know why', it's a long diatribe about oils, natural ridgelines, materials science, basic and not so basic chemistry, etc etc etc. If defence knows the person who took the prints is an expert, THEY WONT ASK because you don't want the CSI science demo convincing the jury. If the cop ISNT an expert, damn straight they'll go after him on training hard and you'd better hope he studied his manuals.

      When defence asks how many times you've lifted prints, the answer the prosecution wants to hear is 'thousands, on a daily basis' as opposed to 'a few times month' or 'twice'. When you ask if they've ever been qualified on an expert in fingerprint identification, again, "yes, dozens of times" is good, "No." is bad.

      --
      MHO. YMMV. Any resemblance between this post and real persons, or reality in general, was accidental.
    11. Re:Explained it wrong by HeyLaughingBoy · · Score: 1

      I think a lot has to do with the cop you speak to. A while back my garage was broken into and a ton of tools, fishing gear and a mountain bike stolen. I reported the crime, but never expected anything to happen.

      Fast forward about 6 months. I'm driving home and I see this guy riding my (very rare and highly modified) bike. After rethinking the original idea of running him off the road and beating the crap out of him, I followed him to his house in an even nastier part of town than I lived in and called the cops.

      Sheer dumb luck, the officer they sent was the same one who took the original theft report. He went over to the neighborhood I told him and came back an hour later with bike in his trunk and the guy in the back seat.

      Turned out it wasn't my bike after all, just the same make/model/color with similar upgrades. Guess it's good I didn't drive into him with my truck like I soooo wanted to :-)
      But the point is, he did what I expected cops to do and I thanked him for following up on it. I don't know how rare that kind of behavior is, but I sure appreciated it.

    12. Re:Explained it wrong by plover · · Score: 1
      You mis-read the post. The guy was complaining that his stereo was stolen, not his car. And taking a used car stereo is not "grand theft auto", it's petty larceny. Unless they've absolutely nothing better to do, cops won't dust for fingerprints for a minor offense like this.

      And I don't know how much the cops have to do in your fair city, but here we've got enough gangs, violence and drugs to keep an awful lot of them busy all the time. I'm not slagging the cops -- they simply are too busy for these little crimes that have a high expense-to-prosecution ratio.

      --
      John
    13. Re:Explained it wrong by TomRitchford · · Score: 1

      You're quite right -- I misread it. My apologies.

      Now, if the police weren't wasting their time on victimless crimes like drugs, they might actually have time to deal with thefts and things like that. The fact that you and many others simply accept the fact that police won't even bother to investigate most crimes shows how low most people's expectations are.

  7. Just curious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What language is that? And why assume the thief won't just install or reinstall the OS?

    1. Re:Just curious by KarmaMB84 · · Score: 1

      well apparently some don't...and if you can recover even a few missing laptops it may be well worth it.

    2. Re:Just curious by TwilightSentry · · Score: 1

      As he said, the language is VBS (Visual Basic Script), a subset of VB (Visual Basic).

      Why would we assume that the theif is computer-savy enough to even know what an OS is? I've had friends who didn't know...

      --
      How to enable garbage collection on a system without protected memory: #define malloc() ((void *) rand())
    3. Re:Just curious by Millenniumman · · Score: 1

      The thief didn't reinstall the OS, so apparently that is a good assumption.

      --
      Stupidity is like nuclear power, it can be used for good or evil. And you don't want to get any on you.
  8. Stolen Sidekick Part 2: The Missing Laptop by SocialEngineer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Start a blog. Link to it from /. (just post a comment). Get worldwide exposure. Post the IP address and whatever information you can find on the user (without resorting to illegal means). Get people interested in your cause, and get your local paper to publish something. It may piss the police off, but they'll actually do something by then, hopefully.

    --
    "Better to be vulgar than non-existent" -Bev Henson
    1. Re:Stolen Sidekick Part 2: The Missing Laptop by RealGrouchy · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and if he posts it as a dupe to this article, it'll be sure to go up!

      - RG>

      --
      Hey pal, this isn't a pleasantforest, so don't waste my time with pleasantries!
  9. Re:Legal sys cost money ... but we already paid! by pbhj · · Score: 1

    Yes it costs money to employ police officers and to have specially trained computer crimes units.

    But, here's the kicker, we already paid for such things.

    So, what this amounts to is some police officer saying ... "they'll get a nice new replacement anyway, why bother tracking the crooks, it's only one laptop".

    Of course the problem is probably one of short-termism in that tax-payers won't (or aren't perceived to) value more money spent on law enforcement now and so long term even more needs to be spent as crooks continue to thieve and without any come back more crooks get in on the game, hey and someone stole my full-stop

  10. FYI by way2trivial · · Score: 3, Insightful

    grand theft, although it contains the word 'grand' means more substantial theft than 1000, and the value is extremely variable on a per community basis..

    http://wordnet.princeton.edu/perl/webwn?o2=&o0=1&o 7=&o5=&o1=1&o6=&o4=&o3=&s=grand%20theft

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
  11. Issue in the script by Dj-Zer0 · · Score: 1

    Lets assume the laptop got stolen and the os remained still there is a problem with the script, if the laptop is connected inside a private network (most of the time these days many house holds are in a nated environment.
    ipconfig will only give you the private IP information,
    you will need to modify the server side script to store SERVER['REMOTE_HOST'] to get the proper outside IP. and if thats the case why bother with all the form post and ip configs, just call a preconfigured url with just GET let the server track the REMOTE_HOST

    --
    http://iesucks.org
    1. Re:Issue in the script by The+MAZZTer · · Score: 1

      We don't see what the server side does. But, I can assure you that it doesn't use $_SERVER, because it's perl, not PHP. :p However it likely uses the perl equivalent (a good script would also DNS the IP to get a hostname and store it as well).

    2. Re:Issue in the script by Lesrahpem · · Score: 1

      The internal IP can be very useful if the person has several computers inside their house, is behind a transparent proxy like some college and office networks use, etc.

    3. Re:Issue in the script by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think perhaps you are forgetting that the script is hitting a public webserver - which means the clients WAN address is reported in the logs there.

    4. Re:Issue in the script by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      you will need to modify the server side script to store SERVER['REMOTE_HOST'] to get the proper outside IP

      Why not have the script traceroute back to the server and submit the whole path in the post?
    5. Re:Issue in the script by laing · · Score: 1

      You may not have realized this, but when the stolen laptop posts the local IP to the tracking server, the tracking server will ALSO LOG THE SOURCE IP. This way you get both.

      --
      Sigs cause cancer

    6. Re:Issue in the script by angel_7th · · Score: 1

      I might be wrong, but I think another important thing with ipconfig is that it provides you with the Mac (Physical) Address of the laptop, so you actually know which system it really is...

      My guess would be that that is the main reason it is used, as indeed, the external IP can indeed more reliably be collected from the webserver.

    7. Re:Issue in the script by budgenator · · Score: 1

      I assumed that when the script did the ET phone home thing the 'puter it called just logged the time and visible IP address and a id number so the could tell which machine it was; silly me would be much better to get complicated and prone to failure.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
  12. Police not doing their job? by bulliver · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The Police seem to be somewhat arbitrary on what they will and won't investigate. A recent anecdote from my part of the world (took place in Kelowna BC, Canada) is interesting: A guy goes to a filling station, pumps $100 in gas, and drives away. The gas station has the guy's face, and his license plates clear as day on security video. They phone the police and get told by the RCMP that they will not follow up this seemingly open and shut case, the reason? The RCMP says it is "too much work" to investigate every pump-and-run, and it is the gas station's fault anyway because they don't require payment up front.

    --
    Support the mob or mysteriously disappear.
    1. Re:Police not doing their job? by pimpimpim · · Score: 3, Interesting
      A situation like this was once in the newspaper in Holland: pump owners had all the date, but police couldn't be bothered. The newspaper coverage increased the amount of pump-and-run cases a bit (hey, if it's that easy...), but it also made it clear to government and police officials that they had to take this seriously, and I guess they improved since then.

      Makes you sometimes wish you were in a corruptable regime, there you could have Police officers at least help you if you gave them money. You'd have to give more money than the crooks of course, but anyway there you know then why they won't help you (if you offer too little), and that is better then not being able to get anything done with the police due to random reasons.

      --
      molmod.com - computing tips from a molecular modeling
    2. Re:Police not doing their job? by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      The irony here is that, just like robbery or any other crime, if a strong enough negative reinforcement for the crime is enforced, the number of attempts will be drastically cut down. Just enforce the damn law, consistently and regularly, and people would stop committing the crime as often for fear of getting caught!

      This is why rape is not common in our society (at least not as common as it used to be, by far): we have DNA evidence, modern forensics, and (usually) very agressive investigative agents who nip it in the bud ASAP. This is why, in states which have allowed citizens to carry concealed weapons and where there are "make my day" laws, there are lower incidences of predatory crime in general (burglary, robbery, muggings, etc.) - the intended victim is legally allowed to protect themselves and their property. This is why people tend to not speed on certain sections of road - because the cops are frequently sitting there with speed traps.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    3. Re:Police not doing their job? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >A guy goes to a filling station, pumps $100 in gas, and drives away.

      I'm surprised he only filled up half his tank on his SUV before he drove away. ;-)

    4. Re:Police not doing their job? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      he RCMP says it is "too much work" to investigate every pump-and-run, and it is the gas station's fault anyway because they don't require payment up front.

      That attitude is what I call "To Serve and Collect" by police. There is no shortage of police on the roads near Kelona where you go downhill (8+% grade) at a posted 100kmh into a 50kmh with 100m notice on a Sunday. Not persuing criminals is why there is so much internet and PC related crime. And BTW, paying for gas up front, as a consumer it lays a person open to fraud. If I leave the card out of my sight because I don't know what the cost will be in advance, then the clerk can copy it a dozen times.

      Take the guys script above, add in a keylogger on the browser and have it call home. Sooner or later the person in possession of the stolen PC will type in enough information you will know who they are. The script idea is good, but needs remote control.

    5. Re:Police not doing their job? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem with governments is they're run by government employees. If the underpaid cop gives you the wrong answer, get his name and ask the city hall public relations person if they would also like to comment on this policy for slashdot.com and digg. If that does'nt work become a Buddhist or make weapons. Or both.

    6. Re:Police not doing their job? by dougmc · · Score: 1
      The Police seem to be somewhat arbitrary on what they will and won't investigate
      Well, to be fair, there is no single `The Police' (except for the band, of course) -- instead, there's thousands of different police departments and divisions out there, all with different priorites and processes. And when you start aggregating anecdotes on the Internet, you get more and more different police departments involved.


      If you can stick to a single police department, I suspect things will become a lot less arbitrary -- given the same cases and the same evidences, they'll probably respond to them in the same ways.

    7. Re:Police not doing their job? by bulliver · · Score: 1

      Well, my poor wording aside, I was specifically speaking of "my" police. That is, the local RCMP. I suppose I should have prefaced "The Police" with "Around here"...
      I do understand your point, however.

      --
      Support the mob or mysteriously disappear.
  13. Yikes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    do until 0=1
    on error resume next

    Yikes.

    1. Re:Yikes by dhasenan · · Score: 1

      What's so scary? If you get an error, it's most likely with the OS, not that script, and it'll most likely be cleared up by the next time the script activates. And if not, the script just sleeps for another day.

      The script is simple. It doesn't contain errors, which is easy to verify in fifteen lines. It isn't providing any user-accessible services, and it depends on an external service (an internet connection) over which it has no control.

      All in all, it seems like a logical way to handle things.

    2. Re:Yikes by Schraegstrichpunkt · · Score: 1
      All in all, it seems like a logical way to handle things.

      Hogwash! The truthiness of the matter is that "on error resume next" is evil. Period.

      With the moral decay that we're seeing on Slashdot, soon people will be committing the most heinous crime of all against nature: using "goto".

      It's Sodom and Gomorrah all over again! The end is near!!

    3. Re:Yikes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, not buying it, that script is fundamentally flawed. Endless loops are bad. Error handling without error reporting is bad. The only thing it does right is get Slashdotters to mod-up spyware authors. But to each his own, at least I know how to tell time.

    4. Re:Yikes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ach,hoer doch auf! ;-)

    5. Re:Yikes by dhasenan · · Score: 1

      Okay, someone just stole your laptop. They haven't connected it to the Internet. Do you WANT the program to pop up and say "Hey, I couldn't connect to the Internet and phone home"?

      But a logfile, you say. Why do you need to know how often the script has failed due to external reasons? Does it help at all? Maybe for debugging, but it's fifteen lines. You should be able to debug that in less than an hour. So a logfile would be useless, a waste of a few kilobytes.

      As for the endless loop, this is a process that should run continuously. How would you write a cron daemon without an endless loop? The script, even with the endless loop, barely touches the processor, and takes hardly any bandwidth.

      And modding up spyware authors? Hardly. It only reports an IP address, and that only to the owner of the device, who installed the program. By definition, I can't spy on myself; by extension, having my computer report its IP address periodically is not spying.

  14. Tell them Terrorists stole it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That'll get there attention. Any local police would love the chance at seeing themselves in the headlines as having caught a terrorist.
    Shit...they'll call in every resource they can lay their hands on.

  15. Re:Legal sys cost money ... but we already paid! by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 1

    Or it may be all of the paper work. It may be the same amount of it for one laptop as it is for 100 of them.

  16. Call the FBI by Joe+U · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You could always call the FBI and have them charged for breaking into secured computer systems, being:

    1. The laptop
    2. The server

    1. Re:Call the FBI by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      The FBI won't help unless the damage done to systems is over a certian threshhold, I can't find a link but I believe that it's $4,000.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    2. Re:Call the FBI by TheLink · · Score: 1

      I thought the US laws only apply to "protected computer systems".

      The definition of "protected computer" includes government computers, financial institution computers, and any computer "which is used in interstate or foreign commerce or communications."

      Well I suppose with a good enough lawyer and a judge on your side you might be able to get away with internet=communications.

      --
    3. Re:Call the FBI by Joe+U · · Score: 1

      It's easy to create a magic number for damages. $4K is pretty simple.

  17. Good luck by AdderD · · Score: 0

    We had a sort of similar case... Our credit card info was stolen. We called the credit card company and the companies through which merchandise was ordered. We got the IP address that things were ordered through. The IP address matched up between various merchants. We then whois'd that IP address and it was for a hotel in the Bahamas. Well, we told the secret service (who are the ones responsible for wire fraud) and they said 'well, thanks but we won't do anything about it because it just isn't enough damage.' Thanks a million! Our tax dollars at work. I know it was the Bahamas but isn't that technically part of the US?

    1. Re:Good luck by CaptainTux · · Score: 1

      I believe the damage has to exceed $10,000 USD for the Secret Service to get involved.

      --
      Anthony Papillion
      Advanced Data Concepts, Inc.
      "Quality Custom Software and IT Services"
    2. Re:Good luck by GhaleonStrife · · Score: 1

      That's no problem, just use the RIAA method of determining damage. Multiply everything by 100. The Secret Service HAS to get involved, then!

    3. Re:Good luck by tinrobot · · Score: 1

      I know it was the Bahamas but isn't that technically part of the US?

      No. It's a separate country... separate government... separate law enforcement.

      Bringing the perps to justice would require extradition and lots of red tape.

    4. Re:Good luck by kfg · · Score: 5, Funny

      I know it was the Bahamas but isn't that technically part of the US?

      Yeah, but only in the same sense that Cuba and Panama are technically part of the US. Something about being independant nations makes them pissy about our law enforcement mucking around inside their borders for some reason.

      Hell, Cuba and Panama have been know to shoot at mainland cops. What's with that?

      KFG

    5. Re:Good luck by joe+155 · · Score: 1

      This is actually a very good idea, although I think you meant it as a joke... he could just legally download and pay for 5 mp3's on each laptop. The RIAA has established through the courts that 1 "stolen" (if they use the word stolen maybe it should count when they actually are, too, not just IP infringement (which so obviously isn't theft)) mp3 is worth about 100,000 USD, so then it would theft of over 500,000 USD and surely enough to get some serious responses

      --
      *''I can't believe it's not a hyperlink.''
  18. if only that were a macbook by v1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    with its built-in camera... mug shot? no we don't need that, we have a printscreen. lets go get him.

    Now when will they put a GPS in these things?

    --
    I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    1. Re:if only that were a macbook by Capt'n+Hector · · Score: 1

      haHA now that's fuckin brilliant. A bit 1984ish, but brilliant.

      --
      Quid festinatio swallonis est aetherfuga inonusti?
      Africus aut Europaeus?
  19. Make Some Noise. by themassiah · · Score: 4, Informative

    First, try and verify that the police department isn't doing anything about it. Talk to a supervisor in a day or two and see where this case is going. Then, if nothing is being done, consult an attorney and ask what your options are. I know that most police forms have complain forms to fill out if you want to start making a stink. Work your way up the ladder, their IS a chain of accountability and if you're persistant and cause enough pain, someone will make the phone call to Verizon or whomever and get the name and address on the account.

    If that fails to produce justice, follow up with the attorney and file civil suit against the police agency. You handed them about 3/4 of the case when you produced an IP address, they should have been willing and capable of filling in the missing paperwork and whatnot.

    --
    - Sometimes you're the pidgeon, sometimes you're the statue.
    1. Re:Make Some Noise. by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Complaint forms? Well I suppose these cops have got to be better than the Florida ones.

      Do a search for: florida police complaint forms

      Try not to get shot while you're at it.

      Cops in my country are crap too.

      Sometimes I'm thinking one might as well just pay "insurance" to some organized criminal organization. Maybe better chance of getting your stuff back.

      I've heard a few "success stories": car gets stolen, guy calls his "uncle", "uncle" calls "some people" he knows. Car ends up back in the same spot where it was stolen from.

      Definitely a lot less paperwork ;).

      Trouble is, if the cops keep not enforcing rule of law, after a while people might start to take things into their own hands.

      Any Government good or bad has to maintain its monopoly on violence in order to survive. If the cops don't do their jobs, things can turn bad pretty fast.

      --
  20. Good luck by PrimeNumber · · Score: 1, Interesting

    The only way you will get you laptop back is if the people responsible are caught speeding while wardriving.
    Police departments these days are mainly interested in are catching speeders to meet 'quotas'.
    Sadly, most cops today are assigned the role of 'stealth tax collectors' that generate additional revenue streams for local and city governments.

  21. Nothing new by dusanv · · Score: 4, Informative

    I had my car stolen when I was in school. 12 year old Honda Accord. Didn't think anyone would bother to steal the POS so I didn't insure against theft (money saving student). After it got stolen I called the cops and the first thing they asked me was whether the car was insured against theft. Since it wasn't, they wouldn't even take a report! Can you believe that? Anyway, I found the car a couple of days later 5 parking spots away from where I left it. The steering column was busted. There was a pair of size 9 rollerblades in the trunk (thief with size 9 feet?) and six jugs of bleach (???).

    This was in local papers: a woman here in town (Ottawa, ON) had her house repeatedly broken into. After reporting to the cops and complaining that she has to buy a new lock each time they told her to leave the door unlocked!

    1. Re:Nothing new by Gordonjcp · · Score: 2, Funny

      My flatmate had his car stolen - an eight-year-old white Rover 820 (looked a bit like a police car, 'cos they used to use those round here for the plodmobiles). We got a call from the police three days later - it had turned up abandoned across the gates of some playing fields in a less-reputable part of town. The clutch had failed, which was on the way out when it was stolen, and obviously they'd just left it. The usual thing is to torch abandoned stolen cars, but they hadn't done that. However, it had been cleaned meticulously inside and out - even down to blacking the tyres and polishing the alloys. It looked like new. It even had a nearly-full tank of petrol.

      Never ever did get to the bottom of that one.

    2. Re:Nothing new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      This was in local papers: a woman here in town (Ottawa, ON) had her house repeatedly broken into. After reporting to the cops and complaining that she has to buy a new lock each time they told her to leave the door unlocked!

      Americans don't have half the issues with home break-ins as do Canadians. I had a person come right though the front door while I was home. I pulled out my fishing knife and chased him off. Never reported it because in Canada I would be the one getting the serious charges. Fortunately, he could not very well go to the police either.

      While Americans, especially in states like Texas could have blown them away with a 12ga. But I think this is why Americans have less house break-ins.

      The amount of crime is equally proportioned to the tolerance of crime by the society around it. Canada has a lot of tolerance. Canaians should riot when a store owner is arrested for shooting a robber in the act of robbing his store.

    3. Re:Nothing new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      In 1989 I bought a one year old car. I was replacing my 6 year old car that I was driving at the time. I had attempted to sell my car in my local newspaper. I had also started a new job at the time and had made friends with one of the security guards upon entry into the building that I was working in. She was my age and I thought she was beautiful.

      One day in the building cafeteria, I saw her sitting by herself eating lunch. I asked if she minded if I joined her. She didn't mind at all. In the conversation she mentioned that she needed a new car that hers needed some serious repair. I told her about my car and she said that she would be interested. It was also an excuse to give her my phone number and address.

      She noticed me now everytime that I walked into the building and told me that she would call me. The following week she called me and told me she would like to come out to my house on the following Saturday and take the car to a mechanic.

      Since she was leaving her car at my house and I knew where she worked, I didn't think twice. She drove over to my house in her 1973 Dodge station wagon with the slant 6 motor leaving a trail of smoke behind it. She hopped in my 1983 Toyota Supra and said that she would be back in a couple of hours. She didn't leave the keys to her car.

      Several hours later, no return. The next day, no return. I went to work on Monday and asked if she would be in. I was told that she quit work the previous Friday.

      I gave her a couple of days, then reported the car as stolen. I didn't keep insurance on a car that I was selling. No word from the police at all. Several months later, luck would have it I was driving into Atlanta for some reason and she comes speeding past me. Cell phones were a new thing then and I called the police. They kept asking my location of the car and I would tell them it was on the interstate. They kept telling me that by the time they sent someone there, the car would be gone. I told them that I wanted to update the stolen car report and when they looked it up, there was no report of it being stolen.

      The next day I went back to the police department and filed another stolen car report and went to the DMV and listed the tag as stolen. Maybe that would help.

      Less than a year later, I came across the car again in a secured parking lot of a building downtown. I called the police. I had the title to the car in hand, I had the registration to the car in hand. When the cops got there, I told them that the car was mine and it was stolen. I didn't have the spare key to the car at the time but I wanted it impounded. I had all the paperwork. They told me that I needed the key to the car. I told them that I lived 20 minutes away and I would go get the key.

      When I got back to the car, paperwork in hand with the key to the car, they tried to arrest me for filing a bad police report. There again was no police report of the car being stolen. The security guard woman that stole my car joined the county police department of where the car was. She was an off duty officer now on night duty watching this building.

      She told them that I gave her the car and I was jealous that she was no longer dating me. She took off with the car again 10 minutes before I made it back with the key. I have never seen the car again.

      Long story short, police protect their own and they do what ever they want to do or not do.

    4. Re:Nothing new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While Americans, especially in states like Texas could have blown them away with a 12ga.

      We Texans really do try to avoid using shotguns in that manner. You wouldn't believe the mess it leaves. A handgun is really much more pratical, it's much easier to keep with you all the time and doesn't stain the drywall as much.

    5. Re:Nothing new by 49152 · · Score: 1

      Sounds a bit fantastic. Why didnt you contact a lawyer or even the media?

  22. OK..let's look! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ..from the cops POV: "hey we can use x-money from our budget to go get some stupid civvies laptop, OR, we can get these new shiny black boots from acme police supply and some of the new 150,000 watt tasers! And with every sale they are throwing in a nifty black badge cover!"

    Yep, I know some cops, that's how they think and act. They *don't care* for the most part, especially on small amounts of stolen items. No promotion potential, no newspaper "tough on terrorism/narcotics" coverage, etc. There's little profit in it for them, just boring drudge work, and they are really lazy guys for the most part. I mean lazy. wired, but lazy when it comes to anything like real work..

      The police business is a growing profitable industry, the big money is in protecting the establishment (the mayor's or chief's laptop would be recovered immediately for example, or if it was personal like one of their own's relatives), and in large drug cases and other high profile cases of that nature. They don't like or want to deal with "little crime" for the most part.

    1. Re:OK..let's look! by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      it's yet another move closer towards a police state. That's what the "war on drugs" was all about, really - semi-militarize police departments so they'd develop a stronger "us vs. them" mentality. If that wasn't the government's intent, then they sure got lucky.

      no, I don't do drugs. I'm just saying it's mighty convenient.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  23. mnb Re:FYI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    In Ohio currently, below five hundred dollars is petty theft...
    1-499 = petty theft = misdemeanor
    500-4,999 = theft = fifth degree felony
    5,000-99,999 = grand theft = fourth degree felony
    100,000-499,999 = aggravated theft of the third degree = (you guessed it) third degree felony
    500,000-999,999 = aggravated theft of the second degree = second degree felony
    999,999 and up = aggravated theft of the first degess = first degree felony

    1. Re:mnb Re:FYI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And that's another reason why the US is retarded. Why draw such arbitrary divisions? "second degree felony" - give me a break! Why not just call it all "theft" and give a punishment suitable for the amount stolen? Seemingly that would be too easy.

  24. This could be fun by RealityMogul · · Score: 5, Interesting

    First off, nice job with the script. Now, take it a few steps further. Let that script connect as it is, but let the server return a status indicator as to whether or not the machine is stolen. If it is - let the script modify IE, Opera, and Firefox configuration settings to use a proxy installed on a server you own. Preferably a proxy that can be set to log EVERYTHING. Just wait for them to log into something with clear text username/password, like most e-mail accounts from major providers use. Shouldn't be much of a leap to get enough info on him/her to pinpoint their street address.

    1. Re:This could be fun by honkycat · · Score: 1

      I'm always naysaying, but...

      I can just imagine a countersuit against you for something (wiretapping, unauthorized use of his services, ??) for doing that. Sort of along the lines of the thief who injures himself while breaking in to a home suing the homeowner for negligence. Monitoring what he does on your machine is probably (?) fine, but I imagine you open yourself up for a whole lot of headaches as soon as you do anything with a sniffed password.

      If you're doing this for a company, run it by legal first... breaking a law in the name of apprehending a criminal is a right generally reserved for sworn officers.

    2. Re:This could be fun by RealityMogul · · Score: 1

      I guess my wording could have been a little better. I don't mean that you should use his username/password to actually login, but his username is enough to get an e-mail address, and a quick google search will probably lead to enough info. If that doesn't work, you'll have a good long stream of online activity that will give enough clues.

      For the monitoring part, it's essentially the same as monitoring employee internet access while they're using company provided equipment. As soon as you use his login to access the person's account, you're right, I think you're in the realm of federal law violations.

    3. Re:This could be fun by honkycat · · Score: 1

      Makes sense -- you're probably ok if you just monitor what's happening on your own machine. At least, I'd hope so...

      Even if you don't track the guy down, it'd be fun just to monitor the slimeball's activities. And if you get lucky, maybe he'll download some child pr0n. That'd get the authorities involved, I bet. Of course, then you'll never see your laptops again because they'll be "tainted" and subject to civil forfeiture. Aaiyee...

    4. Re:This could be fun by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't use the sniffed password, but logging is easily covered if there is a message on the laptop stating that the owner of the equipment reserves all rights to monitor all data contained within. After all, it is your laptop!

  25. Cheap != stolen by davidwr · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It's urban legend but I'm sure similar things happen in real life:
    Disgruntled soon-to-be-ex-wife sells husband's car or other stuff for pennies on the dollar.

    Unless you are a pawn shop owner or otherwise "knowledgable," the fact you bought it cheap is not evidence you "knowingly" received stolen goods. However, you are still in possession of them and that's usually a misdemeanor. At best, you will be out whatever you paid the real crooks.

    BTW, I've received working electronic goods for a very small fraction of their street value, usually because the owner wanted to do me a favor or he just wanted to get rid of the stuff. Now only if I could get a $1,000 laptop for 80% off :).

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
    1. Re:Cheap != stolen by banda · · Score: 1

      Disgruntled soon-to-be-ex-wife sells husband's car or other stuff for pennies on the dollar.

      Yeah, that's actually not legal either... disposing of (or receiving) property that is likely to be subject to a "property agreement" not yet finalized by a divorce. That's a theft.

  26. Re:Legal sys cost money ... but we already paid! by Pantero+Blanco · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "So, what this amounts to is some police officer saying ... "they'll get a nice new replacement anyway, why bother tracking the crooks, it's only one laptop"."

    One of the first things I learned in primary school was that most people in places of authority don't care about dispensing justice unless the incident directly affects them. They'll always rationalize their way out of having to do anything. If you want anything done, you have to call them out in front of a crowd so it makes them look like an asshole if they try to ignore you.

  27. That was a Sad day for me. by WarlockD · · Score: 2, Informative

    Someone broke in my home, stole my laptop, TV and an 80 pound safe. It was painful to see my AIM messagener come up saying someone just logged on under my account. All I could do is just change the passwords.

    Few days latter, it looked like they got my checking account out of my safe and used it to pay the electric bill. Close to 800 bucks. I got the money back from the bank, but the cops did nothing with it.

    People wonder why apathy and cynicism is chronic in our society.

    1. Re:That was a Sad day for me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait, someone stole a safe from you and you didn't close your accounts?

  28. Foolish crooks by feijai · · Score: 1

    If they had any brains, they'd have first taken the laptop to Anchorhead to have its memory erased, and that'd be the end of it.

    1. Re:Foolish crooks by sr180 · · Score: 1

      By nature, criminals are not typically the intelligent people of society.

      --
      In Soviet Russia the insensitive clod is YOU!
  29. laughable hypocrisy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't Verison one of the companies that turned over customer records to the DoJ WITHOUT a warrant? And now they won't cooperate with a theft case... ...I say screw them. Call the local papers, call air america radio (Rachel Maddow and Rhandy Rhodes will snap this up), and get some SPOTLIGHT on this example of corporate hypocrisy! If Verison's stock tanks because of it...GOOD! The company MUST be held accountable for it's actions.

    1. Re:laughable hypocrisy by penix1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yet you would be the first one screaming if Verizon did just hand over the info to an unverified accuser (BTW; IIRC, Verizon was cleared of the allegation you are thinking of AT&T who is still under the gun). That is the whole point of doing "John Doe" suits by the **AA first. This guy should contact a lawyer to handle this correctly. That is what they get paid for. As for the police, that can be handled by filing a complaint then letting your lawyer handle that situation.

      This case aside, jurisdiction is tough to set in computer related crimes because of locations involved. Usually it is the FBI who handles them because they have jurisdiction across state lines.

      B.

      --
      This is a sig. This is only a sig. Had this been an actual sig you would have been informed where to tune for more sigs.
  30. Got supoena? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "Give Verizon a chance to be the good guy. Call their publicity department first. If they make excuses, then call local media."

    Hi. I'm not sure which country you hail from, but here in the United States we have something called "due process". Verizon has to receive a supoena before disclosing that type of information. Does not matter how much a company wants to be the "good guy".

    If they don't, they end up on the front page of the NY Times....

    1. Re:Got supoena? by anagama · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You are quite correct, a subpoena is the ticket. But it's very easy to get this kind of info in the context of a court case, even a civil case. See Here.

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
  31. Oh man by deft · · Score: 1

    Rollerskates and 6 jugs of bleach???

    Sounds like a body with size 9 feet was disposed of to me. :(

    --

    There's nothing Intelligent about Intelligent Design.
    1. Re:Oh man by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      Exactly what I was thinking. Five days time, a vehicle untraceable to him, and evidence plant - just in case they found the body or some shred tracing to him. Pin it on the guy with the shitty car.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  32. Good Job. by breakitdown · · Score: 1

    You just better hope that they don't read slashdot.

    --
    -Michael, AKA Frankie.
  33. net send by BenjiTheGreat98 · · Score: 1

    net send IP_ADDR "Would you please return the laptop you stole? Please?"

    --
    :wq
    1. Re:net send by breakitdown · · Score: 1

      ...because if I had stolen a laptop, and someone told me to please return a laptop, I wouldn't. I'd wipe the hard drive and be done with it.

      --
      -Michael, AKA Frankie.
    2. Re:net send by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could just freak them out by saying "I know you're on a Verizon account, and we're in the process of getting your address from them. If you return the laptop now, I won't press charges".

      I assume they're not savvy enough to determine that you're bluffing, and it would freak the crap out of your average thief to the point they might return it.

      How about VPN/Remote Desktopping to the laptop and forcing a modem dialout (if it's modem connected) to a phone line with caller ID? You could also wardrive the neighborhood you know it's in to find the SSID...

  34. Maybe the mayor can help ? by Dave21212 · · Score: 1


    He's running for Governor after all... might be good press to see this resolved !

    http://www.martinomalley.com/content/26/contact-us

    --
    "Whoever would overthrow the liberty of a nation must begin by subduing the freeness of speech."--Benjamin Franklin
    1. Re:Maybe the mayor can help ? by SeaFox · · Score: 1

      Yeah, call the police and tell them it's the mayor's laptop you were fixing for him. That will get'em on the case!

  35. Whoa! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nice script dude! Thanks for posting it on Slashdot... I might have missed it!

    *deletes script from laptop hard drive*

  36. MOD PARENT UP. by LFS.Morpheus · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    So sad but true.

    --
    The space unintentionally left unblank.
  37. search warrant or it won't happen by agent00013 · · Score: 1

    As sad as it might be, the phone companies never release any information about a phone number, internet connection, or anything else without a search warrant. There are too many lawsuits and too much risk involved for the phone companies to give out information like this, even to law enforcement, without the appropriate legal paperwork to cover themselves.

    1. Re:search warrant or it won't happen by phillymjs · · Score: 2, Insightful

      As sad as it might be, the phone companies never release any information about a phone number, internet connection, or anything else without a search warrant.

      Oh, no, the phone companies would never disclose anything to anyone without a warrant! Haven't kept up on the news much lately, have you? :-)

      I'd say if the guy called 'em up and told 'em he was NSA, he'd have a 50-50 shot at getting the info.

      ~Philly

    2. Re:search warrant or it won't happen by Bloke+down+the+pub · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I'd say if the guy called 'em up and told 'em he was NSA, he'd have a 50-50 shot at getting the info.
      Or any other acronym ending in A. RIAA is the first to spring to mind.
      --
      It's true I tell you, feller at work's next door neighbour read it in the paper.
  38. How to run this script? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For those of us who don't know what to do with a snippet of VBScript but would like to use this, how would one go about installing this? I presume it would be installed as a service so that it would run even if nobody logs in using one of the existing accounts on the machine? But how?

  39. More proof by jafiwam · · Score: 1

    That cops are friggin useless. Just shoot whomever pisses you off, far more effective.

    Or, tell them you have a new PCMCIA plugin card in it and it is supposed to report nitrogen levels in the atmosphere back to a server as hobby. Only now it's picking up lots of nitrates like the thief is handling lots and lots of bags of the stuff.

    You might get your laptop back full of submachine gun holes, but at least the perp will get what he's due.

    1. Re:More proof by sr180 · · Score: 1

      This is a variant of the old addage:

      A man finds some criminals robbing his tool shed. So he rings the cops. The police say that they might be there in a couple of hours. The man politely says thankyou and hangs up. 5 minutes later he rings the police again and tells them that there are two dead criminals in the tool shed. The police arrive in 10 minutes and arrest the live criminals. An angry sargent tackles the man, "you insinuated that you killed these criminals!", and the man replied, "you bastards said you couldnt be here for a couple of hours."

      --
      In Soviet Russia the insensitive clod is YOU!
  40. Gotta love those double standards. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The cops won't help you recover a laptop, but when one goes missing from the Veterans Administration it becomes national news. You should have told them it had a ton of personal information about a large number of customers, or something.

    Here's another double standard for you. The cops won't help you get your laptop back, but if you managed to track it down yourself, went to the guy's house, took it back and laid a beating on him, they couldn't arrest you fast enough for that.

    I say get a lawyer and file a civil suit against John Doe, the person using that IP address at that time. Then you can subpoena Verizon's records yourself. Hey, if it's good enough for the RIAA...

    Also, call your local news station and tell them about how the cops blew you off, and generally raise a stink until the police are forced to get off their fat asses and do their jobs.

    1. Re:Gotta love those double standards. by Detritus · · Score: 1

      The feds have more time and resources than the local cops. That's why it's a very bad idea to commit a crime on federal property. You have a much higher chance of being caught, convicted and spending time in prison.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
  41. Tort: Conversion by anagama · · Score: 2, Informative

    If the cops won't help, see the tort of conversion. File a "john doe" civil suit. Once filed, your attorney would have subpoena power -- use it with Verizon to get the name, address, and phone number of the user associated with the IP. Verizon will have an entire department devoted to processing these types of requests -- you'll have no problem except figuring out what their number is. If you represent yourself, you may have to ask the court to issue the subpoena on your behalf. Once you have the identifier, amend your suit to name that party (probably keep the "john does" at least till you're certain you have all the people involved). Also check your states statutes, there may be something specifically related to your situation. The statutes are certainly available online free -- start at your state's homepage (somewhere burried of course).

    --
    What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    1. Re:Tort: Conversion by grolaw · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Conversion is a start. 18 U.S.C. 2510 et seq., the Electronic Communication Privacy
      Act; 18 U.S.C. 1030 et seq., the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act as amended
      by the Counterfeit Access Device and Computer Fraud and Abuse Act of 1984,
      specifically including 18 U.S.C. 1030(a)(5)(B) would be a far better choice for a causes of action.

      You get attorney's fees, compensatory damages and, there is a collateral criminal charge available. Once your attorney has nailed the defendant the U.S Attorney's office will have some oung turk who will come in and pick up a slam dunk for a notch in his/her belt.

      Conversion is a common law action and it is a reasonable cause - but Trover would be a better action as it reaches the cognizable personal property (data) as well as the machine.

      This is not a difficult cause to pursue. I've done it several times myself. My first was in 1993 and last was 2002. This is neither rocket science nor high-dollar litigation.

      Act fast before the thief kills the script.

      OH, don't forget to ask for injunctive relief - like a LIFETIME BAN ON INTERNET ACCESS.

      It won't take very many lifetime bans before the cost of a stolen laptop gets around....

    2. Re:Tort: Conversion by dougmc · · Score: 1
      Act fast before the thief kills the script.
      Yes, he should act fast, but the ISP should keep records for at least a little while allowing them to correlate an IP address and a specific time to a given user. The script doesn't have to be working *right now* for the police to knock on his door (but it wouldn't hurt.)
      like a LIFETIME BAN ON INTERNET ACCESS
      Even Mitnick was only prohibited from using computers for a while, and he did a lot more than just steal a laptop, and he was the `uber-cracker who could crack your computer just by whistling into a phone (imitating a modem)!'


      Perhaps the courts might have done this 20 years ago when nobody knew about the Internet (but I doubt it, not just for a simple single theft), but now that everybody is at least aware of it, I don't see it happening. It would probably fall under `cruel and unusual punishment'.

  42. "neighboring town" by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That may be part of the problem. The police in the neighboring town get credit for the arrest. Your local police just get paperwork.

    The neighboring town, meanwhile, doesn't have jurisdiction over the theft.

    Aren't organizational boundaries fun?

    You could try reporting a posession-of-stolen-property case at the neighboring town. If you have a lawyer on salary (don't try this by the hour) you could ask about filing a "John Doe" lawsuit for "conversion" and issuing the subpoena yourself. (That's not advice, I'm not a lawyer, all I said was to ask a real attorney).

  43. Tell your insurance company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have you recieved any payout from an insurance company? If so, tell them you have information about the items. They may want to persue it themselves (they have their own lawyers on staff). Anything that can be recovered reduces their loss even if you keep the payout.

    1. Re:Tell your insurance company by sporkme · · Score: 1

      I will ask my government to hunt down a criminal, using all of the reconnaissance methods at their disposal to track a petty or grand theft. I will raise hell when they do the same to stop terrorist attacks. Ask not what your country can do for you, but what your Constitution can. -John Q. America The thief probably resold the laptop, and the investigation will likely be fruitelss despite your ingenuity. Furthermore, if the thief knows how to steal a laptop, they could probably crack the nut when it comes to hijacking an unsecured wireless network. I know your plight. Understand how you have been taken, learn from it, and go on. Good luck with the cops. Call them and tell them someone stole your car stereo. "What else is new?"

    2. Re:Tell your insurance company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you smoking crack? The info is served up on a platter. A simple investigation is all that would have to be done. This has not a damn thing to do with levels of intrusion by the government in so-called terrorism cases (sorry, my local phone calls being monitored by the government does nothing to prevent terrorism other than add more noise to the equation and thus weaken the signal a proper investigation would provide). This person would go on, except he has reliable information about the whereabouts of his stolen property. That the police do nothing about this and you support the police doing nothing about this says miles about your character.

  44. Re: Stolen Goods by Venner · · Score: 2, Interesting

    In the USA, in general...

    You can't take shelter in the title to stolen goods, even if you bought the goods in good faith. (The title is void.) The real owner can come and take it back and leave you with nothing. Your course of action is then to sue the thief (if you can still find them) for the money you paid (if they are still solvent).

    The law favors the real (true) owner in such cases.

    (And before anyone says anything, yes, this is true only in cases of theft. Fraud is an entirely different crime; you give the good up willingly, even if you are misled. In that case, a good faith purchasor buying from the fraudster can acquire good title, even over the original owner.)

    --
    A preposition is a terrible thing to end a sentence with.
  45. Police are only for Making Money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unlike illegal Sandbaging for Speeders, solving property crimes don't make the City/State/etc any money, it cost money to investigate... Don't you know the police are nothing more then another source of revenue for the government??

  46. you're in maryland, what'd you expect? by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

    I hate to be a hater, but... you're in Maryland, what'd you expect? Maryland cops are almost as bad as the DC cops in terms of inneptitude and corruption. Between the high violent crime rates in both DC and Maryland, the police haven't got the time or motivation to deal with a seemingly petty offence - in comparision - like a stolen laptop from a company.

    No, it's not right. But it's the way it is. You should fight it, though - but you won't likely get results. Still, trying to get a response is akin to helping someone when they're being raped - it might be against your interests of self-preservation, but you couldn't live with yourself if you stood by and let the injustice and abuse of power go unquestioned.

    --
    ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  47. I know HOW you should give police the thing.... by jozmala · · Score: 1

    First you should make a video that explains in layman terms how the phone home feature works, and your efforts to find the guy, try making it look like it could potentially be broadcasted to large number of people. When filing the crime report, give them the video too.

    --
    ©God :Copyright is exclusive right for creator to determine the use of his creation.
  48. Baltimore police: laptop theft... try kiddnapping by Tronster · · Score: 4, Interesting

    My current situation: http://www.tronster.com/missing/

    My friend's 3 kids was "kidnapped" yesterday by their father here in Baltimore, their location is unknown.

    After a 4 day custody trial, which ended Friday, he was orded to turn them over at a Police station at 8pm on 8/18/06. He neve showed.

    I've spent the day riding with her to and from multiple Police stations as well as the Towson commissioner's office. Everywhere we go we hear the same thing, "Without a bench warrant our hands are tied."

    Today I learned 2 things:

    1. It's nearly impossible to get a hold of a judge on a Saturday
    2. Commissioner's can be downright cruel and unhelpful

    While working with the Baltimore police, most all have been very friendly (many have agreed with us about Commissioner's!) but none of them are able to do more than write down what we say. We're quickly losing hope; and even if an amber alert goes out... it may be too late if he has left the country. I have almost no faith in the Baltimore legal system and how it interacts with the police is non-existant. (Note: I blame this interaction between the two, not the Police themselves.)

    Regardless, I wanted to tred on the border of being on topic as the Baltimore police and their inability to act on this may cause us to lose 3 children to an unstable man. If any Slashdoter's have 5 seconds, please click on the web-page below I made, and let me know if you see him or the kids.

    With luck and more leg work, we'll get the amber alert up ASAP.

    http://www.tronster.com/missing/

  49. VBS is lame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't use microsoft products, idiot.

  50. Need more details... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We rent computer equipment and occasionally our equipment gets stolen. I wrote a little VBS script that calls our webserver every hour (script below) and installed it on our laptops. Sure enough, some laptops went missing.

    Was the laptop stolen from your office, or from a client? Are the laptops set to automatically log in a user account, or do you provide the username/password to the clients? Is the script set to run on startup or login?

    If stolen from a client, and you give them username/password (on paper? with laptop?) then the thief took the info with the laptop. If you just verbally give the password, then the thief got the password from the client -- are they in cahoots?

  51. Contact the FBI by Knetzar · · Score: 1

    My understanding is that the FBI tends to deal with computer thefts better then local police.

  52. ThatScript v2.0 by entendre+entendre · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Phoning home is one thing, but even better would be to phone home and then download any little executable that it finds there. These could do a variety of things:
    • Upload any non-trivial IP from the laptop to the server, since that's probably the last chance you have to keep it.
    • Taunt your local police. ("Hi, I'm sending this email from a stolen computer and i just wanted you to know that you're never going to catch me because you're all a bunch of fat lazy slobs. Crime does pay, bitches!")
    • Taunt the theives' local police. ("Wanna buy a laptop? I got three more just like this one, ready to go, super cheap.")
    • Install a key logger, get his credentials. Post things all over the internet with the theif's ID (e.g. his next MySpace diary entry will be "so my friends and I stole some computer gear last week...")
    • Append random obscenities into every email that exits the computer ("P.S. I fucked your mom too.")
    • Random pseudo-malware "attacks" on police station web servers - nothing that would bring the server down, but enough to take the IT department's attention. It is possible that their heads are so far up there asses that nothing can reach their brains, but I think there's a fair chance that their IT depeartment can still get through to them.
    • To be continued...
    Surely there is more to add to that list. Remember - you have plausible deniability. Your computer was stolen by an egomaniac hacker who loves to taunt police and do unspeakable things to sheep.

    However I do recommend against the P2P thing suggested earlier. That might just move your computer from the theif to an evidence locker while the RIAA does their paperwork. That sounds counterproductive.

    1. Re:ThatScript v2.0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who says the original thief has not sold the laptop on?

      P.S. I fucked your mom too.

    2. Re:ThatScript v2.0 by pruss · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Wouldn't there be a security problem with executing whatever the server hands back, since then if the server is compromised, every machine connected to the server is compromised? Better would be to have each client check for a password before executing what the server hands back, though then one would need to keep track of a password for each of the clients. (I suppose whoever is in charge of each client could keep track of her own password, or one could keep a printed list at a secure location.)

      So, taking into account the comments here, I think what one might do is the following. perl script, calls in during every hour, at random time (not to clobber servers; or else at a pre-assigned time). Sends `traceroute server.com`. Server responds. If first list of response matches the password hash on the laptop, call eval() with rest of response. If one needs to get additional executables onto the system, the perl script can fetch them.

    3. Re:ThatScript v2.0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Surely there is more to add to that list.
      If the computer is GPS enabled, yes.
    4. Re:ThatScript v2.0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot to add: Setting goatse.cx as the default wallpaper.

  53. CrimeStoppers by Max+Threshold · · Score: 3, Funny

    Call in a tip to CrimeStoppers. Not only will the cops get to feel like they're playing detective and actually do something about it, but maybe you'll get a reward for it.

  54. Local news station by hackwrench · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately, not everyone's nearest news station is that local.

    1. Re:Local news station by JDevers · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This guy lives in Baltimore, they have local TV stations...

      At the same time, most podunk town police would be interested in "solving" the crime (or at least closing the file).

  55. Yup, call the local paper or news channel by Aqua+OS+X · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This crap is -so- common with local police departments.

    I had a guy break into my house after a) threatening to break into my house and b) stealing what he threatened to steal from my house (along with a ton of valuable electronics).

    Did the police even knock on his door? Nope.

    Sure makes you feel safe :/

    --
    "Things are more moderner than before- bigger, and yet smaller- it's computers-- San Dimas High School football RULES!"
  56. I dunno, they do here (Tucson) by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Some punks broke in to my car and tried to steal it. They failed, which says they sucked because it was an old Jeep that was easy to hotwire. They rifled through all the shit I had in it, but decided none of it was worth stealing (they were correct). The police came and took finger prints from likely places. I think they were mine, probably, but they tried anyhow.

  57. Check your state laws by dfenstrate · · Score: 1

    In some states, you can use a certain level of force (threatening to use it will likely be enough) to recover your stolen property. Find out all the details with a john doe lawsuit others speak of, and go armed and with company.

    You'll at least get the justice of scaring the shit out of them.

    of course, corporate exec types may not be thrilled with this approach.

    --
    Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms should be the name of a store, not a government agency.
  58. hmmmm by Kaenneth · · Score: 1

    I actually have a copy of my county payroll database (name, position, salary, SSN...); I should copy it to all my computers, so if one of them gets stolen...

    (well, it's kinda out of date data, from the late '90's; and yes, I had it for a legitimate reason, and yes, it's encrypted, but I'm not gonna track down that one file out of all my old backups)

  59. Did you file a complaint with Internal Affairs? by Schraegstrichpunkt · · Score: 1

    The first thing to do would be to talk to your lawyer and find out if the police actually can do what you want in your jurisdiction. If so, file a complaint with the police department's Internal Affairs office. See what happens with that first. It's possible that some individual cops are just being lazy, and that might be all it takes to motivate them.

  60. John Doe Lawsuit can get you subpoena by billstewart · · Score: 4, Interesting
    If Verizon requires a subpoena to justify violating the privacy of the person whose IP address you're interested in, and the police won't push the case enough to get you one, you've still got a tort action against the people who ripped you off. You don't know who they are, but you can generally file a civil lawsuit against "John Doe", similar to the way the RIAA files them against John Doe file sharers. That'll let you get the court to give you a subpoena, which should be good enough for Verizon's lawyers. You might or might not be able to do that in small claims court, depending on your local rules and the value of the computers; otherwise it'll probably cost you lawyer money, and therefore might or might not be worth it.

    Do move fast - if the thief sold it to somebody, it might stay there a while, but if they're just checking whether it works or seeing what they can find, they may fence it or pawn it.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
    1. Re:John Doe Lawsuit can get you subpoena by eam · · Score: 1

      Since he states the computers were signed for by the customer, and therefore stolen from his customer, doesn't the customer have to file the lawsuit?

      Maybe I missed something.

  61. Justice: You get what you pay for by edward.virtually@pob · · Score: 1

    Of course they have no interest in helping you. There's no profit in it. The US legal and law enforcement systems are about profit, politics and powertrips, not justice. If it's worth it to you, pay a lawyer to get the address from Verizon and then hire some bounty hunters to retrieve it. It probably isn't. A more cost effective form of justice would be to modify your script to hard format the media in case of theft, and would ensure your data is protected from abuse.

    1. Re:Justice: You get what you pay for by jgoemat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If we could just get the legislature to create a "fine" for this, the police would probably be happy to comply as they could collect money for themselves...

  62. Try the DA first... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would go to the DA's office for your area and try there first. I'm a cop and its possible that they dont believe theres a crime as opposed to a civil matter. If you willingly let that person take posession of the property it very well could be civil if they dont return it as opposed to criminal, in which case the police can't do a thing. With rental property the public and the police often have very different opinions as to what is what.

  63. Re:Trust these lazy assholes with guns? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what media sources do you read that you think anyone else here believes guns have any relationship to this discussion? ...much less that the Democratic party is any different from the Republican party on the issue of gun control except for lip service... hint: neither bunch believes the Constitution or its Amendments are worth the paper their written on -- both are your enemy and you help those that are against you by singling out one over the other

  64. Re:Baltimore police: laptop theft... try kiddnappi by potat0man · · Score: 1

    Sorry to hear about your situation.

    I've spent a few days riding along with cops on their shifts to see what things are like and I've seen this problem first hand. On one shift the cop I was hanging out with dealt with 3 seperate incidents of children not being handed over to the other parent of a divorced marriage when they were suppose to be.

    Each time the officer had to explain that he had no power and that the mother/father would have to go to court to get the judge to issue a warrant for the delinquent parent's arrest.

    He would do his best, call the offending parent and negotiate with them trying to get them to stick to the custody agreement, but if they refused, there was absolutely nothing he could do. And these parents had court documents saying that the child/children were supposed to be in their custody at such and such a time. It didn't seem to matter.

    Now, all these incidents were either miscommunications or spiteful parents. But in the case of an actual kidnapping, if they left on a Friday afternoon they would have until Monday morning before anything would be done to them. And you're right, by then they'd be in Italy.

  65. I think he's smoking crack, too. [n/t] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Next year in Mecca!

  66. Too Easy! by Courageous · · Score: 1


    This is tooooo easy. Here's what you do:

    Tell the police that if they don't act, you'll get a subpoena, a gun, and go in and personally repossess your stolen laptop yourself.

    They'll be interested, all of a sudden like.

    C//

  67. one more thing you can try by Rocket_Sci · · Score: 1

    Why not call the insurance company and tell them what has happened. Most likely, they would rather pressure the police to track down the theif rather than simply pay the claim.

    I've been thinking about installing a phone-home system on my laptops myself. Last year I had two stolen from my home. I also had my car stolen and stripped a few months ago. Boston cops are not too helpful either. They just grunt, shrug and fill out forms as slowly as possible.

  68. Re:Trust these lazy assholes with guns? by Travoltus · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    As opposed to Republicans who constantly reward their abysmal incompetence and flagrant negligence with more and more funding...

    --
    --- Grow a pair, liberals... stop letting the Republicans bully you!
  69. More useful? by leftCoaster · · Score: 1
    This script seems to be useless behind a cablemodem/router combination.

    "Officer my computer says it's IP address is 192.168.1.10."
    "So does mine. Does that mean I have your missing laptop?"

    Wouldn't traceroute myserver.mycompany.tld provide better information?

    Any other suggestions for improving the information from the script?

    1. Re:More useful? by gatkinso · · Score: 1

      He will get the ip of the modem (Verizon assigns their modems static IP's in this area atleast they did for me), and you can trace route to that to ge the hostname.

      His method, while primitive, does in fact work.... not that it is doing him any good.

      --
      I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
    2. Re:More useful? by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      Run it using scheduler, rather than at boot and sleeping, have it report a unique ID, and have it take action if the response it gets back from the server says 'hey, you've been stolen!' like resetting passwords, encrypting the drive, setting the hard drive to not be bootable, changing the Windows splash screen to 'help help I've been stolen!' and so on, will at least deny the computer to the enemy.

      That, and, of course, if you're renting equipment out, you're getting a signed statement saying that equipment not returned after X days will be charged, at full replacement cost, to the below credit card number, with, of course, the deposit being forfeit, yes? :-)

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  70. Just don't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do you really think Verizon's log data has any _legal_ value, it wasn't designed for that purpose and can easily be disproven to be of any legal value. I myself got the police after me because they thought log data was valid (it turned out to be complete gibberish). So just don't

  71. This (sorta) happened to me by SUPAMODEL · · Score: 3, Interesting

    A couple of years ago, a laptop (among other items) was stolen from my car. Didn't have any password protection on my user account (nothing good on there) and I had my MSN and ICQ accounts set to autosignin.

    About a week after it was stolen, I came home from University to find that my desktop computer had been signed out of MSN cause someone else had signed in. Turns out someone with my laptop was coming on as me and being annoying to some of my friends. Got a webserver set up that I had access to the logs from, and put on a certain page that no-one else knew about. One of my friends dropped it into the conversation, and bam, laptop user clicks on it.

    I made a couple of sworn statements to the police and took a long time convincing them that I had something useful. Took about 10 weeks for them to act on the information, and unfortunately I was away from home when they did. They traced the IP back to an account registered to some bloke a couple of hours away, and they had him under some suspicion of receiving stolen goods but never caught him with any. So, the police raided and got my laptop (and others) back. They also found a considerable qauntity of drugs, which I guess helps seal a conviction for something.

    The person was aout the 4th or 5th person to handle my laptop within the week, and I believe the police have never nailed the people who originally stole it (over 2 years ago).

    The person actually on MSN that we used to take the bait was this guy's 13 year old nephew. When I got the laptop back it still had all my files on it (although the used a black marker to try to fill in some engraving I had under the battery with my details) and they'd also set up their own user account. This kid had his MSN signin info, all his emails, yada yada yada. Never signed into MSN as him or looked at his stuff, I shoulda. Just reformatted it and started again - never know what shit they had on there.

    So, yes, it can be done. But it takes A LOT of work to convince some low-level police grunt that an eye-pea address has some credibility (I was helped cause I had set my browser to return a really random useragent string, so we pretty much knew it was my laptop).

  72. Use the right bait by Circlotron · · Score: 0, Redundant

    There's your solution! Tell the cops that the stolen computer was a vital part of the only donut-making machine in town.

  73. The law by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Look, don't do a thing. Stay in the system. Don't take control of the computer using scripts, viruses or anything else. When you get outside the normal path of things you connect yourself to the spider web of laws that cover absolutely everything. Try to do anything to that computer over phone lines and, even though it makes sense that you can because you own the computer, Homeland Security or a myriad of anti-hacking laws may apply. You may find yourself in trouble for trying to disable your own computer. The law is an ass. Drop it. Keep your head down. Take the insurance check and move on. That's what the system expects. Do it.

  74. Good News - we located your laptop, Bad News.... by MadRat · · Score: 1

    The Good News is we located the location of your laptop by the current IP and MAC. The Bad News is that its currently connected on your own personal wireless router, dumbass. We'll send the police right over to pick both of you up.

  75. Police often don't understand tech crime by Tinfoil · · Score: 1

    A little while ago, a couple of employees at the company I work for as the sole IT person decided to strike out on their own in a competing business. At the time we had no non-comp agreements or things like that.

    These employees were'nt able to take data directly from the CRM/ERM software, but what they were able to do was take screenshots and email them to their personal email accounts. Alas, we were naive and believed these employees when they said that them starting a competing business was baseless rumours so we didn't discover this until after the fact as I was searching through the employees archived email.

    As a result of the email search, I had a small binder full of evidence complete with message headers of this as well as their discussions with various lawyers and accountants. Amazingly, even though they had hotmail accounts that they could access from work, they used their work-provided email for this purpose.

    The local cops didn't return our calls and the district attorneys said that while a crime was comitted, it wasn't worth their time to prosecute.

    Nice.

  76. Re:Trust these lazy assholes with guns? by TheLink · · Score: 1

    Wow, you two sound like those pro-wrestling commentators/fans.

    Supporting one side or the other, but always supporting the WWE.

    Just brilliant. Really.

    --
  77. Contact your government officials by John+Jorsett · · Score: 1

    The only people the cops will really listen to are the ones who control their budget. Get in touch with your city council member (or whoever your representative is in whatever form your local government takes). It also doesn't hurt to take it to everyone else in elective office, so contact your mayor, member of Congress, your Senators, etc. As others have suggested, starting a blog would be a good idea. You can publish your correspondence with your elected officials (make sure they know you're doing that, since it adds to the pressure). Get anyone else you can find to write letters too. One letter from a constituent gets attention, but 20 or 50 gets a LOT of attention, particularly if they're all unique (i.e. not a form letter). A friend of mine orchestrated a letter-writing campaign on an issue (a complaint about the horrific architecture of a new library) to our local city council. Just a couple dozen letters got the council and mayor very worried that the public was about to revolt, and they called a hearing on the matter.

  78. Freudian police by smithfarm · · Score: 1

    The Maryland State police has a computer crimes unit.

    I first read this (I'm not normally dyslexic) as "The Maryland police state..."

    --
    Om
  79. Re:Baltimore police: laptop theft... try kiddnappi by dr_dank · · Score: 1

    If I see this blurry man with three blurry children, I'll call the police right away.

    --
    Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
  80. insurance company should instigate investigation by chargen · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Since insurance companies are so good at preventing payouts, why not put all the evidence to them and state that you don't want to file a claim as the laptop is still recoverable, but that the police are unwilling to cooperate and that you'll need to file a claim within x weeks if the situation is unresolved. In a way it's too bad it's not a higher value item which might be cause for more action on each party's part. -Pete

  81. I find Dudley Do-Rights sense of justice dubious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is this individual concerned with those that break other laws that he witnesses like speeding? I would bet no. So, leave the police work to the police. Consistancy helps build the case for character and mentioning that you want justice is dubious at best and does not mean that authorities have to do jack shit. There is a cost-benefit or ROI that all prosecutors and police must determine in what they are going to investigate. As it is, not all speeders are busted and I would guess it is much less than 0.1% that are busted for traffic related infractions like running a red light, a stop sign, incorrectly changing lanes, driving in the shoulder to get around traffic, etc. Aren't these type of situations more dangerous than a person that "stole" a laptop as these kinds of infractions lead to accidents with astronomical costs. Do you see the police monitoring all roadways to make sure traffic is completely safe so as to prevent something that can be both life threatening and cost much more money than a laptop that costs little less than $1000 before you buy it? Your laptop is a relic in 6 months at most.

    A good question might be to ask your boss if he considers spending the company's money tracking down the laptop. I am guessing somewhere along the management line, they would rather have you write code than spending company resources doing crap like this. This is why your company made an agreement with the customer they loaned the equipment so that they will pay for the laptop if said laptop is lost.

  82. Email the PD by Big+Sean+O · · Score: 1

    Here's an email I just sent to questions@baltimorepolice.org:

    http://ask.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/08/20/02 0220

    Why won't the Baltimore Police Department recover this business's stolen property?

    This is a black eye to Baltimore's reputation with business, especially small business. How can you attract tech savvy businesses and young professional taxpayers if you have a "who cares" attitude for simple solvable crimes?

    Regards,
    Sean O

    --
    My father is a blogger.
    1. Re:Email the PD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dear Sean O,

      Leave police business to the police. In our investigation, we found that the laptop was left in a public place unattended and because of carelessness, was lost and not in fact stolen. Please remove the foot in your mouth. If you are so interested in justice, than why don't you create an application to monitor the activities of your CEO and business divisions for corrupt business practices as this hurts more individuals. Please divert your attention to crime that hurts society instead of fulfilling your selfish interest in this matter as said party has been compensated for property that is worth nothing the day after it is leased.

      Regards,
      Baltimore Police

    2. Re:Email the PD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dear Baltimore Police,

      Regarding your statement in your prior correspondence: "Please divert your attention to crime that hurts society instead of fulfilling your selfish interest in this matter"

      I would like to discuss further situations with you:

      1) Traffic violations when there are no other vehicles in the vicinity.

      2) Alcohol violations in which there is no apparent threat of overdose, no vehicles without designated drivers, no firearms, and no other threat of danger.

      3) Point 2 with drug violations.

      4) Obscenity violations not including exploitation or abuse.

      5) Public nudity violations not including exploitation or abuse.

      In addition, a list will be compiled of instances when a violent crime could have been prevented if police would have responded when presented with evidence of a clear, strong threat of violence.

      The source of your salary,
      The American taxpayer

    3. Re:Email the PD by Big+Sean+O · · Score: 1

      >>In our investigation, we found that the laptop was left in a public place unattended and because of carelessness, was lost and not in fact stolen.

      As if. Like they even investigated.

      --
      My father is a blogger.
  83. the difference between lost and stolen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How do you know the laptop wasn't lost by said customer? I would be interested to know where the law lands with regards to finding a lost item that was carelessly left somewhere and something that is stolen. There seems to be a big difference, yet your presumption is that it was stolen. Was a police report filed for stolen goods and indeed a crime had taken place or did someone have the good fortune of stumbling across the hardware because of carelessness?

    It is pretty amazing the presumptiousness in several parts on this board. One, people presume to understand the police department. Two, people are presumptious about their notion of justice. Three, people presume to know the details of how said computer was obtained which may or may not matter.

  84. Legal Research by CyberLife · · Score: 1

    I had a similar problem years ago here in California, where a small-town police department did nothing when a roommate wiped my hard drive in retaliation for a stupid personal matter. After a bit of digging, I uncovered the relevant piece of the state's penal code that outlaws such action and reported it to the cops. They immediately jumped into action once they realized it was a criminal offense. Law enforcement doesn't necessarily have every law memorized.

    1. Re:Legal Research by laughingcoyote · · Score: 1

      One would think, though, that they would have the laws against "vandalism" and/or "deliberate damage to property" under their belts well enough? Betcha they know those real quick if someone throws a rock through their window...

      --
      To fight the war on terror, stop being afraid.
  85. Typical cop thinking with head firmly up ass... by bitbucketeer · · Score: 1

    I'll make it really simple for you. So simple, even a cop can understand it. 1. Laptop is stolen. 2. You have an address where the stolen property is. 3. Cop goes to retrieve stolen property. Whether or not the perp is charged with a crime, there is no excuse and no reason for the cops not to recover the stolen property for the victim.

  86. It is not theft, actually by tsstahl · · Score: 2, Informative

    Poster said the laptop in question is a rental. All the 'thief' did is fail to return it on time. Technically, he only owes money for the rent to cover the time it is in his possession.

    I would ask if the company has an AUP that says something like "All equipment kept 30 days past the agreed end rental date shall be considered stolen and reported to proper authorities". Even with some half-arsed statement like that, MOST PDs will see the issue as a civil matter.

    You might try the county sheriff if the local PD won't help. I once saw on the news (Chicago area) where a video store owner was trying to get some tapes back. The local PD blew him off, so he went to the sheriff who turned him on to some little used tactic where a citizen can approach a grand jury to get an arrest warrant. Well, the grand jury issued the warrant, and a beat faced man returned those tapes PDQ. IANAL, YMMV, YADDA, YADDA, YADDA.

  87. The script aint secure enough by fluor2 · · Score: 1

    This script aint no proof. You should try using a 3rd party service that do this job. New Dells have the ability to call back, and this program is in the Dell BIOS. However then you pay for a service that policy probably can trust.

    You have no proof. You just have a claim that you have logs that some computer sent info to your webserver. Even my mother could fake that log.

  88. Future version: audio recording and keysniffing by Nathaniel · · Score: 1

    Suggestion for your next version: Once the laptop is identified as missing, the website answers with a trigger that enables audio recording and keysniffing. Instead of simply checking in every hour, it starts uploading recorded data.

  89. File a civil suit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    File a civil suit. Name defendants as both police jurisdictions, Verizon, and Does 1 to x where Doe 1 is the thief, Doe 2 is the person currently in possession, Doe 3 is the Verizon account holder, Doe 4 is the property owner, etc. Ask for an emergency seizure order to preserve evidence/prevent disclosure of trade secrets/avoid identity theft/etc. Any lawyer can whip up the papers in a few hours and you have enough evidence that a court should be able to assist. Of course, if a civil seizure reveals evidence of a crime, the local prosecutor(s) would have the option of filing charges too.

    Even if police won't help, a civil tort is an official, sanctioned way of seeking redress for financial losses.

  90. Re:Baltimore police: laptop theft... try kiddnappi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apparently internet cookies help in the search also? I am unclear on how this works.

  91. Then file a writ of replevin by Savantissimo · · Score: 4, Informative

    Your linked-to post is quite right, and worth a repost. IANAL but used to just about everything but appear in court working in a small law office in Maryland about 15 years ago. I believe specifically what this guy needs after getting a subpoena for the John Doe's ID is a "writ of replevin" in which the court may order the Sheriff to seize the property after an ex-parte pre-trial show-cause hearing.
    See:
    http://www.courts.state.md.us/district/forms/civil /dccv04br.html - for specific MD instructions and http://www.courts.state.md.us/district/forms/civil /dccv04.pdf - the form.

    If you are not in MD you may make a federal case out of it; the U.S. Marshals serve these writs, too. You might find that has drawbacks - you really need a lawyer's advice, not Slashdot's.

    >>anagama (611277) Sunday August 20, @01:07AM (#15943034) wrote:
    If the cops won't help, see the tort of conversion [wikipedia.org]. File a "john doe" civil suit. Once filed, your attorney would have subpoena power -- use it with Verizon to get the name, address, and phone number of the user associated with the IP. Verizon will have an entire department devoted to processing these types of requests -- you'll have no problem except figuring out what their number is. If you represent yourself, you may have to ask the court to issue the subpoena on your behalf. Once you have the identifier, amend your suit to name that party (probably keep the "john does" at least till you're certain you have all the people involved). Also check your states statutes, there may be something specifically related to your situation. The statutes are certainly available online free -- start at your state's homepage (somewhere burried of course).

    --
    "Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery?" - Patrick Henry
  92. Why VBScript by tgraupmann · · Score: 1

    If you have a unix machine just setup a cron job that runs the command: wget http://www.yourtrackinghost.com/cgi-bin/locator.pl

  93. dyndns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have all my computers (and my print server) registered with dyndns. In case of theft, dyndns.org will have the latest IP address. Moreover, all the PCs run vnc server and the Unix ones run sshd, so in case of theft I'll be able to get in, snoop, install keyloggers, etc. (I'll have to check how legal it is to snoop on a thief that uses one's hardware).

  94. Some cops couldn't give a shit less by davie · · Score: 2, Interesting

    We recently discovered a burning pile of personal effects next to the dumpster at the office. The items included a purse, wallet with some ID, personal mail, make-up and work clothing and name badge (from a local restaurant). Naturally, we called the police. The officer arrived, poked around a little bit with his foot, then turned around to get back into his car and leave. Incredulous, we asked what he was doing and why he wasn't collecting what was obviously evidence of some kind of criminal activity and he told us that "the detectives wouldn't like it he brought the material back to the station because it would get the other evidence dirty."

    --
    slashdot broke my sig
  95. Jesus H., what the fuck planet are you on?!? by jhylkema · · Score: 1

    Fucking pigs won't do anything about a stolen car for fuck's sake. Wait a minute, I forgot, they'll tell you to "call your insurance company." What the hell makes you think they're going to bust down a door to retrieve your damn laptop?

    It's all about money, you see. If the person inside the house where the laptop was "phoning home" from had a half-dozen or so cannabis plants, then they could seize the property through civil forfeiture, so they would go balls to the wall. They'd roll up in their armored personnel carriers wearing their jackboots and Nazi bucket helmets and armed to the teeth with machine guns. "We gets to bust us a grow ahp! We ah'll gits bigger gunz! SIEG HEIL MEIN BUSH!!!"

    But your laptop, the one that contains all of your data and that you worked so hard to get? Gone. Forget it. "Sorry, we just don't have the manpower." Well, they have the goddamn manpower to line the street with cops after every professional sporting event. Oh, and to have "emphasis patrols" out there to pull over anyone who's had a drink or two or might be going two miles an hour over the limit. But for something that will actually help someone? No way.

    1. Re:Jesus H., what the fuck planet are you on?!? by winwar · · Score: 1

      "It's all about money, you see. If the person inside the house where the laptop was "phoning home" from had a half-dozen or so cannabis plants, then they could seize the property through civil forfeiture, so they would go balls to the wall."

      Hmm, maybe he should consider phoning in complaints about a suspected drug growing operation.... If only he knew the address :)

  96. Moustache? Gain some weight? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For some reason most cops, I've noticed, will take your complain much more seriously if you're a large male, especially if you've got a thick push-broom moustache.

  97. In a nation governed by & for the corporate el by Travoltus · · Score: 1

    one can expect the cops to put the common civilian on the lowest priority.

    Profits before people.

    --
    --- Grow a pair, liberals... stop letting the Republicans bully you!
  98. There is a simple explanation for the inaction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All the cops have seen The Matrix. They saw what happened to the cops in the first few minutes:

    "No, Lieutenant. Your men are already dead."

  99. Pass me a doughnut by Supreme_101 · · Score: 1

    The problem here is unfortunate to start off with, but in all honesty, i see some one doing all of the 'thinking' work for me would be fantastic if i was a police officer. but alas, this is not a perfect world. but there are a few alternative things to think about if these police were actually dedicated to solving a computer crime. more than likely you took away their mojo (for lack of a better word). you solved the case for them, you can provide them with all the details (as much as you can in legal avenues) that you are able to get. case solved pretty much. To be honest, it really annoys me that when it comes to a type of computer crime, the majority of times people see them being solved is on a TV show, and most of the time what they talk about is a bunch of bs in the first place. All in all, tell the cops youll take it to the public for letting criminals run free under their jurisdiction, and see what they do, but like many others, alerting the media would definately be a bit of a problem if the thief pays attention to local news. Finally, the simple answer could be that they just snubbed you for a fresh pot of coffee and some doughnuts /sarcasm good luck on tracking it down, would love to hear how this goes in the future, keep us updated!

  100. Lateral Thniking by rtb61 · · Score: 1

    Contact the FBU. Technically speaking they have commited a cycbe crime at they have gained illegla access to a computer i.e. logged in under false creditials etc. Besides it carries a far stiffer penalty than just simple theft.

    --
    Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
  101. And cops honesty is based on what fantasy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How do you know the cops are not corrupt. Maybe they are but the bribery entry level is much higher than you want to approach. Maybe to bribe them you have to bribe the mayor or the chief with a million dollars or so to make it worth their while. Otherwise you just get the procedures claptrap. Hey the crooks are well financed and to them crime is a career so they do this on the wholesale level. You are a dumb-ass retailer. You have beer money so no one will drop a donut for you.

  102. Sick the RIAA on them! =D by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Next time, write a VBscript that downloads illegal music onto the laptop and then if stolen contact the RIAA and say, "ZOMG Help me find this guy." They will be all over him with their ex-SWAT agents with "RIAA" on their black riot gear.

  103. Call the Feds by G3ckoG33k · · Score: 1

    Ask the Feds to take over and the little guys to stop bitching over jurisdictions. It's the same country for dBsfdkjh sake...

  104. What's the point of the script by Mr.+Freeman · · Score: 1

    If you already have the person's signature, address, name, etc. Then why do you need Verizon to track the guy for you? If he's paying for the laptops then I assume you require a credit card in case this stuff happens. The police might subpoena a credit institution for the info if they won't talk to the ISP. It's worth a shot.

    --
    -1 disagree is not a modifier for a reason. -1 troll, flaimbait, redundant, overrated are NOT acceptable substitutes.
  105. Call Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Call Microsoft and tell them there's a stolen copy of their OS being used.

  106. Somewhat similar experience.. by chrispycreeme · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    A friend of mine had her laptop stolen from her home here in Portland Oregon. She managed to find the laptop listed on E-bay with images of the serial number in plain view. I managed to look in the directory of the webserver the guy was using to host images and found images of lots of stolen goods and the thief himself. She bid on her own laptop got the guys address and called the police. She gave them all of this, his address, the image of the thief, the image of the serial number on ebay, and images of all the other stolen goods, and copies of the original receipts from gateway with the serial number on them. They took a week and a half to get back to her and then said that they didn't get some of the evidence because they couldn't figure out how to check their email...

    Eventually (couple of more weeks) after countless phone calls and visits to the police station they did go and repossess her laptop, no charges were ever filed.

    Good luck getting police to follow through on anything more complicated than "some culered feller hanging around lookin 'spicous"

    They simply lack the capacity to understand technology and the desire to solve any actual crimes.

    1. Re:Somewhat similar experience.. by Koatdus · · Score: 1

      The police in Portland OR. are worthless.

      A few years ago someone broke into my rental car while it was sitting in a motel parking lot in Portland. They didn't steal anything but they messed up the door so it wouldn't open and close right. When I called the police I got an answering machine! I left all the info. They never even called me back.

      When I returned the car I told the guy at the counter what had happened. His response was "Ha! They won't do anything." I guess the lesson here is if you are going to break into cars, Portland is your town.

      The sad thing is that it was probably some kids that got away with it over and over until they got into something really bad. When I hear arguments that the police need to work on violent crimes my response is that if you catch and punish the smaller things it will help prevent the violent crimes.

      --
      Every wrong attempt discarded is a step forward - T. Edison
  107. Re:Baltimore police: laptop theft... try kiddnappi by TheSkyIsPurple · · Score: 1

    I've been in a similar situation... and am about to face it again.

    The story I was given was that since the child was with a parent, they weren't in danger, and therefore nothing could be done until there was an arrest warrant.

  108. Script by zero_offset · · Score: 1

    The Sleep function sucks. This way you have the script engine running all the time, and you have to load the script at start-up. Putting this into the scheduler would be far more efficient, and while somebody might think to check the registry Run lines or other common places for stashing startup stuff, few people pay any attention to the scheduler. Or you could whip up a simple Service and name it something misleading and innocent-sounding, and practically guarantee nobody would mess with it. Plus that would give you access to far more interesting and useful information than you can grab with VBS, and depending on how the machines are administrated, you could lock it down quite a bit more aggressively.

    I'm disappointed. I haven't been reading /. at all lately, but I would have thought *somebody* would have responded to the details of the script by now.

    --

    Slashdot quality declines as the number of hot grits posts decreases. - Provolt's Law, Apr-09-2005

  109. Bluff by DeanFox · · Score: 3, Interesting


    My home was broken into three times, three days in a row. It was neighborhood kids.

    I wasn't getting anywhere with the police. First the cop would take a report then a detective would come out and look around. I could tell by their tone that they weren't going to do anything about it. Not, that is, until the third time. Do you know what changed their mind?

    While the detectives were there trying to make it look like they were doing something I faked a call to work and pretended to leave a message that I wasn't coming in the next day. Then I faked a call to a friend asking if I could borrow his "weapon" and that I needed it that night. I turned to the cops and said, they've come in three times, three days in a row, and they're coming back. It's my right and I'm going to protect my property.

    On their way out they were visibly upset. They were convinced there was going to be a blood bath the next day. I got a call 4 hours later that they caught and arrested the boys responsible. 4 hours. And that was after they were already booked and in custody. The arrests had to have been at least and hour or two earlier.

    The detective kept telling me I could go to work after all, blah, blah. It really was the thought of me hiding in ambush that got these police to do their job. It took all but 2-3 hours for them to find and arrest these boys. It took me lying and convincing them I was going to shoot the next person who walked through my door to get them to do it.

    This is one of those bluffs that probably only works once in a lifetime but it worked.

    1. Re:Bluff by The+Breeze · · Score: 1

      Yup, that does work, especially in states with open carry laws.

      We called the police, telling them that a tranisient was going up and down the street, pounding on the windows of every house, pushing the window panes back, obviously trying to get inside.

      "We can't do anything until he actually enters a house."

      Mind you, this is in an affluent neighborhood with very expensive homes. Imagine what the poor people have to put up.

      I didn't bat an eye. I just replied, "No problem, since you can't be bothered to send people out, I'm just going to walk up and down the street with a shotgun, and if I witness someone committing a felony that appears to be "burglary of an occupied structure" I will take appropiate action as allowed by Arizona law."

      Clueless dispatcher: "What does that mean?"

      "Ever hear of the Make My Day law? There's 9 crimes in Arizona that (or at least were, when this happened, back in '93) any citizen can use deadly force to interrupt...rape, kidnapping, attempted murder, arson of an occupied structure...and burglary of an occupied residence.)

      I never did have to get the shotgun. I just sat back and watched as 5 squad cars and the helipcopter showed up and promptly removed the guy. Now, one squad car would have been sufficent, but because the police refused to do their job at first they had to respond in force because they were afraid there was going to be a shootout.

      All perfectly legal, too. Nifty. They still do games like that in Phoenix. Phoenix police lately are nortorious for making it difficult to take stolen vehicle reports because it makes their statistics look bad.

  110. Hire Jasper Rine by TheOtherChimeraTwin · · Score: 1

    He really knows how to present your case. (Ya gotta watch the video version to get the full impact.)

  111. It was theft by MrZaius · · Score: 1

    That's bullshit. If this was a case of just an overdue rental, they'd know who has the laptop and be able to act. This guy's trying to get a name from an IP address, which implies just the opposite.

    1. Re:It was theft by tsstahl · · Score: 1

      It is not about the money (our customer signed for the computers and will pay for the stolen items), we just want justice.

      My rudimentary reading skills translate this to mean that said laptop was stolen while in the care of a RENTAL customer, or the RENTAL customer is claiming it was stolen, but really isn't. All the owner of the laptop can claim is that the RENTAL customer has not returned a laptop on time.

      You can call double BS, or you could realize that the local cops are splitting the exact same hairs so they can ignore the issue.

  112. Dynamic DNS and Remote Desktop by dahl_ag · · Score: 1

    hmmmm... maybe just run a service that updates a dynamic DNS service like dyndns.org. Combine this with something like an sshd or remote desktop service. Now, if your laptop is stolen, you have a lot more power than you would have with just a pre-installed script.

  113. Keep a private investigator on retainer by zorkmid · · Score: 1

    Preferably one that's a retired cop. We've had to do this from time to time and they can cut through the PD bureaucracy and get things done. Even if you're the one doing most of the leg work it goes down better if an ex-cop is fronting for you. Police don't like uppity citizens fending for themselves.

  114. keystroke logger by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Consider upgrading your phone-home technique slightly. Install keystroke loggers on all the laptops which are disabled, and then upgrade your phone-home script so the server can signal it to enable to keystroke logger.

    To get around any legal issues, configure Windows to state that the machine is the property of Xyz Corporation and any use will be monitored.

    You then might be able to hand a lawyer a load of information the thief, or buyer, typed into the laptop.

  115. Just tell 'em you're with the NSA.... by Kazoo+the+Clown · · Score: 1

    That'll get them to open up quick...

  116. Re:Tort: Conversion / Title 18 by grolaw · · Score: 1

    F**K the 8th amendment argument. The U.S. Supreme Court has held that "actual innocence" is no bar to execution given a procedurally proper trial and appeal. Clemency is the only escape. If you can be killed while innocent and not offend the "cruel and unusual" 8th Amendment bar you can certainly have a lesser criminal penalty. However, we are not talking about Criminal Sanctions - we are talking about a Civil Remedy - an injunction issued by the Federal Judge that is reparative in nature.

    Turning to lifetime ban on access to computers and the Internet - I think it is well past time that we started excluding the bad actors from this community. I accomplished the same in the first action I brought in 1993. Two teens are barred from the Internet for life and when and if it ever comes out that they have accessed the internet again, I'll file a contempt action and have their worthless butts locked up - where they can dance with a large man named Bubba.

    Felons, and make no mistake about it - if the Title 18 action is picked up by the US Attorney, the holder of that stolen laptop will be a felon - lose the right to vote, own a weapon, be bonded, hold most government jobs and a ton of private sector jobs.

    Where you have a civil violation of Title 18 - injunctive relief can include an Order barring computer use and Internet access. Why would you (or, anybody) argue for a lesser punishment? The individual has demonstrated their inability to conform to the most rudimentary social norm - don't take things that aren't yours - so why not exclude them forever?

    You don't NEED a computer to make a living in the US. You don't NEED Internet Access in order to make a living in the US: Bar the sucker. If it happens that s/he is an IT professional - even better - let them move to Canada or India where the US bar won't apply.

    As for the rest of the potential business world - my heart bleeds, positively bleeds that the holder of that stolen laptop might have to spend his/her life explaining to their employers that they can't touch a computer or else they risk civil or criminal contempt charges. I've looked carefully at the employees associated with trash-trucks, ditch-diggers, Salmon trawlers, cannery workers, migrant farm workers and the like and I've noticed that they really don't make any use of a computer when they pick up my bagged trash and sling it into the back of the garbage truck (etc.). It's not so bad a punishment - they can live and think about their bad acts every day they live the hard physical life.

    Exactly why are you so concerned about the scope of the remedy? I'd love to hear some good reason NOT to make it far, far worse...

    If my laptop were stolen (a mac G4 al Powerbook) the thief would have to get past the login (18 characters) and /or beat Filevault - but assuming that somebody did steal the laptop and managed to gain access to the data then hundreds of my clients' private information would be compromised; if they could break the Keychain password(s) then they could have access to my bank accounts, retirement funds and credit card accounts - as well as my federal court login ID and Passwords to several of the circuits and to PACER (pay-for-access to all federal court filings that are open for access). What would be a proper punishment for the individual who compromised that list of sensitive data? In a civil suit I'd ask for millions; in a criminal prosecution I'd hope for life without parole and 30 days in the electric chair.

  117. Re:Baltimore police: laptop theft... try kiddnappi by JohnnyGTO · · Score: 1

    Fuck You, you shit covered Ass Wipe

    --
    Si vis pacem, para bellum! For evil to succeed good men need only do nothing!
  118. Re:Tort: Conversion / Title 18 by dougmc · · Score: 1
    F**K the 8th amendment argument.
    No. `The Constitution may not be perfect, but it's better than what we have now.'

    I think it is well past time that we started excluding the bad actors from this community
    Except that it's not really up to you, though you do seem to have more control over it than most.
    Exactly why are you so concerned about the scope of the remedy
    My point was that you can ask for anything you want. It's just that I don't see the judge giving it.


    If somebody were to steal your princess phone, I imagine you'd sue and ask for the judge to prohibit them from ever using a phone too?

    Yes, people can make a living without computers. The Amish seem to do OK, for example. But it wouldn't surprise me if your garbage man example can't really avoid them entirely. After all, there may be a computer in the garbage truck that keeps track of people who need extra billing (around here, if you put out extra trash, you get billed extra.) Or perhaps he has to use a timeclock, but his timeclock is computerized? My car has a computer in it too ...

    Perhaps part of the probation/parole system that the criminal has to use involves logging into a computer somehow?

    (In the post I originally responded to, you explicitly said ban them from INTERNET ACCESS, but in this post, you seem to be going for `ban them from using computers at all'.)

    Like it or not, computers (and to a lesser degree, the Internet) are pretty much now ubiquious, and I don't see the judge prohibiting somebody from using one for life just because they stole something once. And if a judge did, I can see it getting overturned on appeal.

    Two teens are barred from the Internet for life
    And I'd say that the odds are good that they have myspace pages right now ...

    But if not, congratulations! You've personally helped make the Internet better for everybody, by reducing the number of myspace pages by two!

    So what did these two teens do, anyways? Stealing a laptop would be the logical guess, but it's just a guess ...

  119. From now on by GWBasic · · Score: 1

    Lesson learned: From now on you should start adding GPS in the laptop too. When the laptop phones home, it'll tell you exactly where it is. :)

  120. Re:Tort: Conversion / Title 18 by grolaw · · Score: 1

    You seemed to miss the fact that the 8th amendment dosn't apply in this case (civil - not criminal - you are punished in a criminal case - you pay damages and may have injunctive relief in a civil case) and your argument that it does is unsupported by case law.

    The use of telephones has been barred by the courts where the defendant uses the telephone to harass or threaten people. That happens all of the time. People are barred from driving for life after the 2nd or 3rd DUI. People obtain ex parte restraining orders banning all contact with certain people - Margaret Mary Ray the David Letterman Stalker is a perfect example.

    Where felons are barred from voting, owning a weapon, obtaining a bond, working in the federal sector and many private sector positions - for life - what makes you think that a federal judge wouldn't give an injunction barring the Title 18 civil defenant from the Internet and computer use?

    I still haven't heard a good reason from you that argues for a lesser civil remedy. Your arguments that ancillary computer use (timeclocks, etc) would breach the ban are inopposite: they don't apply. What the ban means is that the individual(s) responsible don't have the "personal" right to own or use a computer with Internet access - for the rest of their worthless lives (and, yes I would agree that this should not apply to a minor under 16). That doesn't mean that they can't work at McDonald's where the dummies behind the counter punch pictures of the food on the "computerized" cash register...

    As for the 1993 case: the kids hacked the major ISP for Kansas City, Missouri - got Root and were kind enough to use their own names, phone numbers and addresses applying for rights with warez traders on IRC. They also had a nice collection of kiddie porn (*consider that it is never legal to possess the stuff - I had to obtain a Court Order to copy and transfer the images to the defense counsel to avoid liability attaching to my client and to me for transferring the evidence!*) cracked programs and had created a Trojan help screen that shuttled some users off to a "ssl" encrypted credit card verification page - snatched from the client's own server(s). They were detected within 48 hrs - but they did cause quite a bit of harm.

    We tried to tell the parents - the parents didn't listen. The parents and the kids were sued - and the parents were charged with providing the teens with a dangerous instrumentality - a computer and Internet access. They were served Christmas week. I liked that. I liked that a lot - because I personally called each of the kid's parents and they all denied that their kid could be involved - without so much as a: "would you mind giving me your number and I'll call you back once I've talked with little Cartman & Kyle" - nope, they just acted like idiots and for their stupidity they received a 60+ page federal complaint. I would not doubt that each family paid more than $50,000.00 in defense fees before we settled. Sweet. I hope that it cost all of little Kyle & Cartman's college fund. (NO their names are not South Park names)

    Do they have myspace pages? I doubt it. Why?
    I keep a Copernic search looking for their names and have had it updating the search weekly ever since Copernic came out.

    Why do I want them toasted if they ever violate the settlement? Because one of the repositories of their porn was in a hidden directory under an account of mine: It's personal. I'd just as soon have gone medieval on their a**es and send over a couple of guys to work on the boys and their parents with a pair of pliers and a blow torch.

    If anything, we are way to passive whhen dealing with the people who are intent on destroying the Internet. The fun and financial benefit from misuse of the Internet must be eliminated or we will be gone. Look at /. - how many email address filters and other types of protective code run along with the slash code just to stop the malware / hacks / harvesters? What is the % of wasted p

  121. They're not all that bright... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Two years ago, my desktop machine was stolen from my house. This particular machine was used to host a small personal webserver that I used to test/demonstrate webpages. As part of the webserver, I had a nice little utility (no-ip) which associated my most recent IP with a URL.

    Right after my computer was stolen, I started watching that URL like a hawk. Eventually, the IP changed to a new provider and I logged the time/date/IP address each time I noticed a change. While I didn't have conclusive evidence that the IP provided was actually being used by the thief at that point in time, with some 30 logged IP addresses, and the dates/times given, I had enough to help the detective out.

    Trying to explain that I knew where my computer was was the biggest pain in the rear. The first officer I talked to seemed to give me the standard treatment that a lot of people here are complaining about. (That, and it was interesting trying to explain the concept of an IP address to someone who was not computer savvy). Once I got in touch with the detective though, things went fairly smoothly. He obtained a warrant, contacted the ISP to get access to their records, and was able to come up with a list of accounts, with the thief's account appearing a number of times on that list.

    However, because not every one of those IP addresses resolved to the thief's account, it wasn't as easy to obtain a search warrant. I showed them a picture of my computer, with its somewhat unique case, and they paid the thief a visit. I had my computer back within a month (but not before buying a new one...)

    This occurred in London, Ontario. The "thief" (actually a purchaser covering up their source) ended up with 1 year probation. I should have pursued other legal actions, but I was a student at the time.

  122. Here's my take on the matter... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The IP address he came up with is worth crap since there is no way of knowing that's
    untampered evidence pointing to an actual perp and he's not just getting back at his
    former girlfriend or has some other score to settle. The way I see it, this guy might
    even be in deep shit for outfitting the laptop with the location device in the first
    place unless he's telling his customers about it .. which I doubt for obvious reasons.

    Oh look at that! We've been served another 2/3 of a 3/4 of a case here and we could get this
    guy's home address, kick in the doors and haul all adult household members to the precinct
    because ummmh like we need to ask them questions like. Tell you what, we wont. If he is legit
    and I would certainly want to see at least two attorneys and hear their take on the
    hidden location bug then he can come back and are they going to be happy to see him
    again and hear him whine about justice because that's apparently all he once being reimbursed
    by whoever he lent the laptop to. I guess this guy just wants to divert watts of attention
    to the fact that we just can't go after every little crook and hood on the planet.
    I guess that sucks, but yes the long reach of arm of the law does not extend into the littered,
    smelly bedroom where that guy is probably laying on the bed right now and playing with his
    little dickey while looking at porn on the laptop you have probably already received payment for.
    If anyone should be upset it's the guy who had the laptop stolen from him in the first place,
    I wonder whether he even bothered to come and file.

  123. Hire a Bounty Hunter by Ohmaar · · Score: 1

    Tech crime is the new frontier, so take the old frontier approach -- hire a bounty hunter. Post the IP address to a hacker newsgroup and a bounty amount you're willing to pay for the perp's ID and address (upon conviction, of course). Ask your insurance company if they'd be willing to add to the bounty. Heck, they may even be willing to give up the retrieved laptop, for the positive press alone. Go Web 2.0. If someone can sell a million pixels or trade up a paperclip, surely you can generate some kind of cult interest. Ohmaar

  124. Re:Baltimore police: laptop theft... try kiddnappi by Tronster · · Score: 1

    You are correct...and Monday a warrant was issued.

    The one that is currently out is for the children to be returned (and so the police can now act on this), but not to arrest the father. The judge is hoping that this will provide him incentive to bring them back on his own accord.

    With a warrant you can also get local media involved... a friend of mine (camera geek) who works for Fox 45 might be able to get their pictures up on the news tonight.

    Last thing that I've learned about this who thing... to get the FBI involved in a case regarding kidnapping (and possibly stolen property?) is that there must be proof that the offender has left the state where the crime was committed.

    Thanks for the comments, and I appreciate those who have taken the time to glance at the photos.

  125. Hack the laptop by zaaj · · Score: 1

    I was thinking you could hack the laptop to popup a web form telling them they just won some cool prize, and all they have to do is fill in their name, address, phone, SSN,... Better yet, maybe pop up a window that looks like an IM from a customer service rep at a well known on-line retailer that asks for shipping address confirmation for the even better laptop that the previous owner had "ordered"....

  126. MAC != unique by Paolone · · Score: 1

    MAC addresses can be easily changed nowadays, even for the lowly Broadcomm gigabit NIC I have in my 15£ MSI planar.
    I'm not entirely sure about the CPU-ID tho.

  127. Re:Baltimore police: laptop theft... try kiddnappi by Paolone · · Score: 1

    The good part is that in my fatherland cops are always too happy to step on other people's toes. Unless they are really rich toes, I mean.

  128. Re:Tort: Conversion / Title 18 by Com2Kid · · Score: 1

    So wait here now,

    Back in 1993, before most people even KNEW what the internet was, some kids hacked an ISP (which were rare enough themselves back in 1993), had porn of (presumably) others their own age (the horror! Most people don't want to look at naked pictures of someone twice their age....), and were smart enough to do that much damage in that little time.

    Their parents did not believe their children could have done that much damage, so few people even KNEW about the internet back then, and you call up the parents and tell them that their children have porn (most parents are not going to believe you right there!), and are hacking ("hey isn't that something you do with a axe?") in to machines and got root ("Why is he now talking about trees??") access and used it to steal credit card numbers ("Credit card numbers? What is he talking about, little Johnny plays games and writes book reports on the computer...")

    Ethics training might have been a more appropriate course of action. You know, take some young prodigies and TRAIN them in the traditions and ethics of the technology professions, and about using one's skills for the betterment of all?

    Oh, and why did your system have such crappy security that a bunch of kids managed to break into it?

  129. Re:Tort: Conversion / Title 18 by grolaw · · Score: 1

    "Ethics Training?" What do you do, live in Wonderland with Alice?

    The President and FEMA - nearly a year ago to the day - let thousands of people die when they had five (5) days notice that Katrina was headed into the Gulf. We have Tom Delay and Duke Cunningham as sterling examples of thieves in government (with Duke in the Stir and The Hammer soon to follow)....

    Tell me where those "ethics training" courses are held? And don't tell me "Church" because All OF THE TOP LEADERS of the US Government vigorously claim that they are "true believers." And I haven't noticed a waive of ethics washing over the Executive, Legislative and Judicial branches. (Go see this: http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/0121051judge1 .html/ or this: http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/0928051delay1 .html/ and tell me all about the "ethics" of our leaders.

    You can't teach what you don't know.

    Turning to the porn issue: yeah, I'd agree most people want to see images close to their ages - from about 16 - 28; but, after they get older and flabby most people are interested in pictures of the hard bodies of 18-28 year olds. BUT, that wasn't the case here - this was material that was ILLEGAL TO POSSESS and that was the lure. The porn was for trading for other goods.

    Now, you talk about training prodigies - in the traditions and ethics of the technology professions???! What are you talking about? Wiretapping was invented as soon as Bell had a network up (and the telegraph was constantly intercepted from the day that lines were strung where access could be had without a witness).

    Are you perhaps talking about the traditions of the munitions-makers? Alfred Nobel, the inventor of a stable nitroglycerine (Dynamite), donated a vast fortune made from the deaths of untold thousands - to create the Nobel Prize in the fervent hope that he could atone for the misery and suffering that his invention brought to the victims - while making him rich....HE COULD HAVE STOPPED PRODUCTION - but didn't. Was that the tradition that you refer to?

    How about the Physicians in the US who left untreated Syphilis in black males from 1932 through 1972! See, http://www.cdc.gov/nchstp/od/tuskegee/time.htm/

    As for the skills these kids brought, hmm, is a willingness to invade the private data and personal financial records of as many people as they could a skill that transfers well to modern society? How about trafficking in WAREZ? And, trafficking in illicit pornography? Yep, regular little "G-Men" - ready and willing to set to work for the Homeland Security wiretapping party.

    As for Mom and Pop - well, they had a polite call from a polite attorney and they were just to damn stupid to bother to go look at little Cartman's computer. I know that my clients and I cost them a small fortune in attorney's fees. Damn shame that they didn't get to have their parental rights terminated and thrown in the slammer for the rest of their reproductive years.

    Where do you think the botnet creators came from but idiotic parents who didn't monitor their kids.
    I'm still running my Copernic Searches for their names..... If you are one of the two guys, speak up - I know a nice prison or two....
    For the record, I had an ISDN line in my home in 1993. The Well had a substantial presence as did Byte Magazine through the (mostly UNIX command line) community BIX - and it was dumped in 1993 when McGraw Hill sold it off.... There was a heck of a lot out there in 1993 - try looking at the WAYBACK MACHINE.....
    Finally, when you have been screwed a few more times by nasty little shits - you will adopt my "take no prisoners" viewpoint. OR, tell me how you will solve the SPAM problem with peace, love and understanding? Ball's in your court....

  130. Re:Tort: Conversion / Title 18 by Com2Kid · · Score: 1

    Tell me where those "ethics training" courses are held?

    Accredited Computer Science curriculums for one...

    Aside from that, you have to realize, at that young of an age, telling someone "Hey do this and you get paid money!!!" is really a hard lure. How ethical where YOU back when you were 13? Would you have thought that typing commands into a computer to copy electronic signals from point a to point b would constitute theft?

    Hell, the qustion STILL comes up here at /. all the time, and is constantly debated by (for the most part) grown adults. Indeed, just a few days ago /. posted survey results showing that the majority of teenagers thought there was nothing wrong with copying a music CD they had bought and giving it to a friend, and this is after years of RIAA advertising telling us how wrong pirating is. You expected teenagers back in 1993 to have come to conclusions that both teenagers and adults still cannot all agree on today?

    The President and FEMA - nearly a year ago to the day - let thousands of people die when they had five (5) days notice that Katrina was headed into the Gulf. We have Tom Delay and Duke Cunningham as sterling examples of thieves in government (with Duke in the Stir and The Hammer soon to follow).... ...

    How about the Physicians in the US who left untreated Syphilis in black males from 1932 through 1972! See, http://www.cdc.gov/nchstp/od/tuskegee/time.htm/

    Notice those are all called lapses in ethics. Or when not being so politically correct about it unethical f*ckups.

    You can't teach what you don't know.

    I didn't ask you to turn them over to the government, I have no doubt that in such cases they would continue to follow right on down the path they were already on.

    Heck, I wouldn't trust turning my DOG over to the government.

    Now, you talk about training prodigies - in the traditions and ethics of the technology professions???! What are you talking about?

    I linketh to the jargon file: The Story of Mel.

    THOSE kinds of traditions. Honoring others work and truthfullness in ones actions.

    The pursuit of perfection in what one does, taking pride in one's work.

    Old fashion things like that.

    How about Marie Curie who literally died from her contributions to science? Who donated the metal her nobel prizes to the war effort of the Allies?

    How about Richard Stallman, who forgave the "work until 35, retire a millionaire" life that geniuses of his caliber so often obtain, and instead has chosen to devote his entire life to a cause that he believes will help the world?

    How about the tradition of countless technicians who, unpaid, off company time, explain computers and technology to people all around them, solely so that others can gain a better understanding of computers? Heck if I (or almost any other technically minded person!) was paid the same as motivational speakers for the work we do trying to get people over their fear of technology, I could go out and buy a new sports car right now.

    But you know what? We don't demand that kind of payment. For the same reason we troll newsgroups, discussion groups, and other forums. Because there is an innate feeling, and innate need, telling us that we have been given this "gift" as it where of understanding technology (never mind that it involved hard work and hours of screwing things up then having to fix them!), and that we have a responsibility to help others achieve at least some part of that understanding.

    That is either religion, or a set of ethics. And with the decline of the

  131. Re:Tort: Conversion / Title 18 by grolaw · · Score: 1

    These were sub-16 year olds and they knew exactly what they were doing. They offered bandwidh (stolen) and offered WAREZ at GIGABYTE volume (13 years ago when a 200 meg drive was $7,000) in their application to join the IRC group in cleartext, completE with their full names, addresses....

    Will they put their names out there? Well, they should have been in college by 1997 - at the latest (perhaps their parents' college fund went to their defense attorneys?) and most colleges require some variation on your name for the school email system. By 2001-2 they might have entered graduate school... Still no names....

    BUT, until and unless they petition the Court for a modification of the injunction - sonething that they ought to try - they are still barred. Yes, they may be slipping through the cracks - or, they may be in Iraq - or dead after serving in Iraq - or dead from other reasons (like a car accident).

    They were too young to attend college - so your "solution" does not apply.

    You are anti-government. You are a self admitted thief - your MP3 collection.

    Where I stand - you have exactly "ZERO" ethical standing and your arguments are grossly self-serving - you want a way out of being held liable for your acts.

    If I had a client that had a problem with you I'd drag you into court and through "discovery" expose your strange and unethical view of the law and how it applies to you.

    You should step back from the Regan world where Governments are viewed as bad and start thinking for yourself. Look around - this very medium exists because of Government. If Governments are all bad - go off line and join the people living off the grid and on the land. I reccomend Alaska. That state tolerates all sorts of people who want to rugged individualists. Good luck.

    For the rest of us - the Government is US. We decide what laws get passed and who is elected. If you and your ilk support criminals because they are just kids experimenting - well, that is the road to anarchy.

    Anarchy didn't create the Internet. Anarchy didn't cure Polio and turn AIDS into a chronic, but still deadly disease.

    Neo-Cons have created a pattern of criminality that says the boys at the top pay for nothing and the rest of us must serve them....if you get caught stealing where the RIAA is involved - you are toast, but if you "win" a no-bid contract from the boys in charge - you will not have to complete the contract - just take the money and run.

    The US is a disaster, in no small part because of your values. Some things are simple: don't take things that aren't yours.

    If we do away with governments and Anarchy becomes the norm - I'd expect that sooner or later somebody will get mad at you and you won't have the Courts and Government to turn to to resolve your dispute.

    FWIW - what was the first city in the US to institute Gun Control? Dodge City, Kansas - more than 100 years ago. Why? Because guys off of the cattle drives tended to shoot up the town. The rule was check your guns at the city limits. Now Kansas has passed concealed-carry as well as put Intelligent Design loonies on their state school board (the battle continues) - Anarchy is on the way.....

    Finally - I was 13 in the 1960's and I was marching against the War in Viet Nam, supporting George McGovern for president through my membership in the Hudson Independent Democrats (Just received a box of books from my 80 year-old mother that shows I was a poll watcher in the '72 election). I didn't smoke pot - I did obtain a 1st Radiotelephone License and my General Ticket as an amateur radio operator by the age of 16. I also learned how to fly on the Cessna $25/lesson program out of Teaneck, NJ. I went on to pass the NY Regents exam and entered Columbia at 17. I hold three Baccalaureate degrees - Biology, Chemistry and Art History (triple major) completed by age 20. I don't think that I was the slightest bit "unethical" as a 13 year old.

    I am the son of a physician and an attorney. You can be

  132. In the future: install a back door by jgercken · · Score: 1

    If you can get to the laptop you can install a keylogger and probably obtain their identity. Or if you just start serving up mp3 torrents and send taunting emails to the RIAA knuckleheads. Justice may come in the form of a $10K lawsuit.

    --
    Never ascribe to malice what can be adequately attributed to ignorance. -Napoleon
  133. Re:Tort: Conversion / Title 18 by Com2Kid · · Score: 1

    You are anti-government. You are a self admitted thief - your MP3 collection.

    Read again: My MP3 collection is legal. I have PAID for all my songs.

    You are the one who started spouting off about how evil the government is. I have a tendency to agree, that is aside the point here. Our founding fathers warned us about the evils of politicians, I just happened to listen.

    Where I stand - you have exactly "ZERO" ethical standing and your arguments are grossly self-serving - you want a way out of being held liable for your acts.

    You mean like my helping people for free, or assisting people in learning when ever possible?

    If I had a client that had a problem with you I'd drag you into court and through "discovery" expose your strange and unethical view of the law and how it applies to you.

    Like how I years ago deleted all my illegal software and replaced it with legal copies?

    Wow, some discovery there!

    "Your honor, I am afraid that this young man, at sometime in his life, acquired a moral conscience. This is a horrible thing, we must have him jailed immediatly. We cannot let him continue to pay for products he uses."

    That'd go over great I'm sure...

    You should step back from the Regan world where Governments are viewed as bad and start thinking for yourself. Look around - this very medium exists because of Government. If Governments are all bad - go off line and join the people living off the grid and on the land. I reccomend Alaska. That state tolerates all sorts of people who want to rugged individualists. Good luck.

    I live in America, a country where the government is ALWAYS considered suspect. I am not saying that they don't do good things. Letting a bunch of college students define half the protocols that run the internet was one good thing they did. This medium exists because of smart teenagers and young adults who got together to build something great. The government provided the funding, and was smart enough to step aside for the most part after that.

    For the rest of us - the Government is US. We decide what laws get passed and who is elected. If you and your ilk support criminals because they are just kids experimenting - well, that is the road to anarchy.

    The government is run by a bunch of idiots up on capitol hill who claim to fear God while somehow bringing blasphomy to His name with almost every action that they take.

    I think that what you DID was overreact to economic damage and cause far GREATER economic damage to this country by not nuturing intelligence, which is a valuable comodity that this country (and all countries) are in dire need of.

    Not recognizing misguided intelligence is the road to a bunch of stupid mindless sheep walking around doing exactly what they are told to do.

    I am not saying that they were RIGHT, indeed they did screw up. But to put it bluntly, you where a major dickhead to not at least TRY and see if maybe the teenagers could have the basics of ethics explained the them. Your "sue now, worry never" approach is great for your clients, and crappy for society. It creates a nice happy "Gee we sure screwed those guys over!!" feeling for your clients, but doesn't really help improve the situation on a social scale any.

    Anarchy didn't create the Internet.

    No, an open to discussion Request For Comments process created the internet, which originally consisted of a group of researches typing up some papers and asking for comments on them, and eventually evolved into a bunch of college students typing up papers, passing them around, discussin them, and coming to a consensus on how things should be done.

    Was in anarchy? Well that depends on who you ask. If you ask the gover

  134. Re:Tort: Conversion / Title 18 by grolaw · · Score: 1

    I have really, really bad news for you. There is no "ethics" system out there. There are laws. Sometimes the laws work!

    My first computer was a PDP 11 - my (private) highschool had one. I learned to program long before the ALTAIR came out. I ran Batch Jobs on the IBM 360 (FORTRAN coded keypunch on Hollerith cards.... don't drop your deck!) in my freshman year in college. I had a TRS -80 in 1976 and switched to the Apple II in 1977. Bought (and still own) a LISA and a 128k Mac shortly thereafter. I also had a few dedicated word processors like the WANG - I bought the IBM PC-XT the week it was released. 1200 Baud Hayes Modem, 10 Meg drive and 640k or RAM.... Don't assume that I don't know about computing or networks.

    OH, you live in Seattle. Nice place. I spent a summer on Vashon Island and taught computer law / complex federal litigation at the UW School of Law in the summer of 1999. I like Kings County - but the County Courthouse is the pits. As far as "different" in Seattle - you are wrong. Look around - there are many people who are quite poor - and they are NOT Bill's neighbors on Lake Washington. Nope, they are shuttled into skid row around the Space Needle and out into the edges of town. By the way - I-5 sucks. Damn shame that you let the Mariner's stadium get imploded - at taxpayer's expense.

    You seem to think that my client and I have some duty to rehabilitate a couple of young jerks. We don't.

    You will shortly find out how nasty the workplace can be - and you will find out what a strong lawyer can do to assist you in that workplace.

    Something that you simply haven't grasped yet is that the law is not like coding or science. The Law depends upon so many factors - tangible and intangible as well as real and imagined. The law with regards to these kids was what was known as a "case of first impression" and their actions were not that swift - they simply got root on one Sun Sparc server: after that they simply telnetted in and created hidden directories. They installed a copy of "Security Administrator Tool for Analyzing Networks" a/k/a SATAN and they were little more than script kiddies except for the fact that they were fetching large volumes of data from other servers using my client's frame relay (and, they were saturating 1/4 - 1/2 of the available bandwidth - one reason that they were quickly identified).

    Now, when a Frame Relay - at the time T-3 and upwards bandwidth - cobbled together out of SAVVIS and SPRINT backbone access was saturated by these two kids and clients had their data stolen or overwritten and had their bandwidth choked due to the illegal access these two had - well, the lost revenue amounted to more than $75,000/day in 1993!

    We attempted to work with the parents. I've said that more than once. If I had wanted to be a prick I could just have sued them for my client. Instead - the parents were jerks: Really hostile and nasty jerks. They didn't like lawyers and they didn't want to hear that little Cartman & Stan could be getting into real trouble.

    That was more warning than most litigants ever get.

    SO, if I'm a hard ass - you are about to experience a very different world when you get out of school. Trust me - I'm a sweetheart when it comes to bright kids.

    Let me ask you a little question: My first job out of law school involved a criminal prosecution of an ATF violation. A 13 year-old young black boy was arrested while acting as a guard at a Crack House. He had a "Street Sweeper" as the weapon he was to use to "protect" the "product" and the "profits." A Street Sweeper is a machine-gun shotgun developed in South Africa for killing Black people. (I find this ironic as hell.) The ATF SWAT team had no prior training with that special weapon and so the team leader asked the kid, "How do you unload it?" To which the young boy responded, "Easy. Pull the trigger and wait."

    What would you do where a 13-year old has a shotgun machinegun and is ready to use it against anybody he is told to

  135. Re:Tort: Conversion / Title 18 by Com2Kid · · Score: 1

    There is no "ethics" system out there. There are laws. Sometimes the laws work!

    This is an inane statement. If it were true, people would be incapable of action in regards to matters on which they had not had legal council.

    Since I don't have to get legal counsel every time I fart outside, I am pretty damn sure I, and most people who are not psychopaths, have an internal system of ethics in place.

    Indeed, do lawyers not have a code of ethics which they must abide to? Many professions have ethical codes of which members sign contracts agreeing to adhere to. These contracts are legal only in so far that any contract is legal, the 'law' doesn't care if the ethics contract requires someone to piss on a potted houseplant every day or pay a $1,000 fine to the group.

    (in so far as someone does not go and urinate on a potted houseplant that belongs to another party without consent! :) )

    Saying people do not have "ethics" is ridicules. That right there would lead to anarchy far faster than the downfall of the government!

    Don't assume that I don't know about computing or networks.

    Knowledge and culture are two different things. I know many people who can program a computer, but do not understand the community that surrounds technology.

    As far as "different" in Seattle - you are wrong. Look around - there are many people who are quite poor - and they are NOT Bill's neighbors on Lake Washington.

    People recycle more, there is a strong social urge towards being environmentally friendly. I am not saying it is something that is "absolute", indeed unlike the "law", no one with a gun goes around and forces people to throw paper into the recycle bin rather than into the trash can.

    The glares from surrounding citizens and jabs in the side from friends sure help though.

    Nope, they are shuttled into skid row around the Space Needle and out into the edges of town. By the way - I-5 sucks. Damn shame that you let the Mariner's stadium get imploded - at taxpayer's expense.

    Yah the government here is corrupt. No illusions about that one. Actually they are both STUPID and corrupt, which is really a shame, since it means that even if they do try to do something good once in a while, they will in all likelihood mess it up anyway.

    You seem to think that my client and I have some duty to rehabilitate a couple of young jerks. We don't.

    Your right: you don't.

    That is what separates ethics from law. Legally I can go drink, smoke, and have sex with as many women as I want.

    Ethically I can't.

    Do I have a responsibility NOT to partake of those actions?

    Legally, nope.

    Ethically, yah, I do. My own personal ethical standard requires that I do not behave in such a fashion. The fact that I am not drunk, smoking a cigarett, or involved in an orgy right now seems to refute your earlier point that systems of ethics do not exist.

    Something that you simply haven't grasped yet is that the law is not like coding or science. The Law depends upon so many factors - tangible and intangible as well as real and imagined.

    Have you kept up with modern software engineering practices? Coding is not an exact science. We have to take many factors into account, many of which cannot be measured. Factors such as a customer's request versus what a customer really expects, or what they will be requested tomorrow. The unpredictable changing arena of both hardware and the marketplace overall. Java was a language originally intended for a market that seemed like it was ready to explode at any point, but in reality did not even materialize until eight years after Java was created! (Various set top cable boxes, not even going to go into the fail

  136. Re:Tort: Conversion / Title 18 by grolaw · · Score: 1

    Well, we agree. You said hat ethics come from within - not from society.

    In the US you are correct... In the Scandinavian countries I think that you will find that the social order is quite just and people like Jon Johannsen can, and do fit in. Marriage has declined.

    You know far too little about the technology - Monitors and video cards could show far more detail than 256 colors to an 8 bit depth in 1993. Go lookup ATI's cards.... Then think about TIFF and JPEG - both in existance (along with GIF, PNG and dozens of others) - the image quality was just fine.

    You have avoided dealing with the ethics of harm to many weighed against harm to a few. By any ethical system the harm to the greatest number should bring the strongest response. You simply dropped the ball on that one.

    Answer the question: shouldn't economic criminals who harm milions suffer a vastly greater penalty than the criminal who harms only a few others?

    Seattle is far, far from the nicest place I've lived. (And, you didn't mention I-5 - you must not attend UW or Pacific Lutheran - because you would be stuck in that traffic jam today.)

    Anyplace that has weather reports that include "sunbreaks" leaves a bit to be desired, climate-wise.

    Been to Toronto? Oslo? If clean streets are what you want then Singapore is your wet dream....but don't chew gum there.

    Want a little real world experience:

    Here is part of what I"ve been working on today:

    6. EMPLOYER employed CLAIMANT as an over-the-road driver wherein Employer directed CLAIMANT to present himself at point "A" to collect a vehicle subject to a contract made between EMPLOYER and the holder of the commercial vehicle - for delivery of same at point "B".
    7. CLAIMANT was directed to pick up the commercial vehicle at a specific time and place, was directed by EMPLOYER to deliver the commercial Vehicle to point "B" by a date and time certain.
    8. EMPLOYER required CLAIMANT to provide daily reports of the progress of the transport - at or before noon central time, and required CLAIMANT to use EMPLOYER's COMDATA fuel credit card to obtain diesel fuel and, where no vendor would accept the EMPLOYER's fuel card, the CLAIMANT was required to pay for the fuel out of his own pocket - for which he was not reimbursed.
    10. EMPLOYER required CLAIMANT to abide by all DOT regulations and CLAIMANT did keep and has kept the DOT logbook of his driving time for the entire time that CLAIMANT has been employed by EMPLOYER. Those records are available through CLAIMANT's COUNSEL
    11. EMPLOYER paid for and did provide individual common carrier insurance for CLAIMANT and did require CLAIMANT to provide EMPLOYER with his DOT license and periodical DOT Medical Evaluations which, in turn, EMPLOYER provided to the Insurance Carrier and affirmatively represented CLAIMANT as an EMPLOYEE of EMPLOYER to obtain insurance coverage.
    12. EMPLOYER has never paid FICA/FUTA or state, federal or local payroll taxes on CLAIMANT and has provided CLAIMANT with 1099 MISC forms alleging that CLAIMANT has earned (in the year 2005) nearly Seventy-Thousand ($70,000.00) dollars in gross wages - but EMPLOYER imputes the cost of fuel to the CLAMIANT as income when it is instead an "ordinary business expense" of EMPLOYER.

    This client - a man in his 40's who has an Associate's Degree and 20 years as a Navy Corpsman, spent the last four (4) years being used by a company. He isn't stupid - but he actually earned only $3,200.00/yr WORKING 90-hour weeks 52 weeks a year! No overtime is available thanks to the Motor Carrier's Exception to the Fair Labor Standards Act - enacted during WWII and still on the books. - But the employer created a falsehood: they told the drivers tahtt hey were "independent contractors" and then padded the 1099 to shelter $60k per driver per year from tax. Meanwhile, the employer took the deduction for the fuel card fuel as an ordinary business expense and then took the deduction a second time by wrapping it into the 1099 "rep

  137. Re:Tort: Conversion / Title 18 by Com2Kid · · Score: 1

    You know far too little about the technology - Monitors and video cards could show far more detail than 256 colors to an 8 bit depth in 1993. Go lookup ATI's cards.... Then think about TIFF and JPEG - both in existance (along with GIF, PNG and dozens of others) - the image quality was just fine.

    Yes they could, but they were not common on consumer level home x86 PCs.

    Most of the other platforms had better display technology, but I have seen consumer computers made in 1996 (or even 1997) that could only do 256 colors. I had a 32bit video card in 96, but they were by no means common.

    In the US you are correct... In the Scandinavian countries I think that you will find that the social order is quite just and people like Jon Johannsen can, and do fit in. Marriage has declined.

    This is a bad thing?

    One could say marriage has declined in America is well, but there are too many tax benefits for people to stay unmarried for too long! :) Not to mention that in order to maintain the standard of living that American's expect, it is almost a necessity now days to have dual incomes.

    Indeed at work a week back, a single white male earning I would guess around 60k a year, was asking the rhetorical question "How is a man like me supposed to afford a house now days?"

    To which I replied: "Get married."

    You have avoided dealing with the ethics of harm to many weighed against harm to a few. By any ethical system the harm to the greatest number should bring the strongest response. You simply dropped the ball on that one.

    Ah, but then we get into the more extremist and complicated matters. Check out my journal articles some time on economic justification for shooting everybody who drinks alchohal or does drugs.

    Answer the question: shouldn't economic criminals who harm milions suffer a vastly greater penalty than the criminal who harms only a few others?

    Yes, in general. But I think that intent also has to be looked at. If someone does not have the basic skills necessary to even KNOW how much money they are costing others, and is immature enough to not realize the consequences of online actions... I think often times this is the case. People do not really realize that their actions DO have an effect online.

    Indeed, the RIAA continuously claims economic justification for their actions, but their math seems horribly messed up to everybody else! (As my math likely seems messed up to everybody else as well...)

    Seattle is far, far from the nicest place I've lived. (And, you didn't mention I-5 - you must not attend UW or Pacific Lutheran - because you would be stuck in that traffic jam today.)

    Yah, traffic sucks. We always start major road construction projects in the middle of budget slumps. The engineers come and tell us how many lanes we need, and we end up chopping the number way down. Like our ghetto express lane system. We couldn't afford to REALLY built a system express lanes, so instead we have half a system that goes south for part of the day and north for the other part of the day.

    Or the West Seattle Freeway, that had to be built without time to gather proper funding because some drunken idiot ran into the old bridge. Doh.

    The mayor right now is also an idiot. He wants to reduce the size of the viaduct and shove it underground. Everybody except for those who own property right where below where the viaduct sits, think this is the stupidest idea ever. We need a larger viaduct not a smaller one.

    And of course we have the problem of a city bordered on two sides by water. We also have rather large rivalries between the various metropolitan areas here. The suburbs outside of Seattle don't want to pay for anything improvements to Seattle's traffic infrastructure (even though