Slashdot Mirror


A Truly Silent Home Theater PC Built for Linux

slimrabbit writes "LinuxDevices is reporting on a truly silent home theater PC that comes with its own Fedora 5 based quick install Linux DVD capable of installing a fully-configured FC5 system with LIRC, KDETV, TV-Time and Kradio in about 15 minutes. The most notable features are its "church mouse quiet" 14dba power supply, TV-Out (SVideo and composite), component video, DVI and VGA out, and hardware MPEG support(XvMC). The company also supports and engages the Linux community through its sponsorship program. It is sponsoring knoppmyth and the Debian User Project and makes the mechanical drawings of its face plates available under the GPL."

178 comments

  1. Replacement for XBOX by slidersv · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Finally I will be able to replace my XBOX, which is used solely for home theater purposes, with this HD-DVD capable system.
    There is no HDMI, but component and DVI should suffice for most.

    --
    there is no issue with my network
    1. Re:Replacement for XBOX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      1) There is no HDMI on the XBox, either

      2) The XBox cannot record TV shows

      The XBox is just a fancy frontend for you PC (which can sit in another room) - so a HTPC is an upgrade, not a replacement for for it.

    2. Re:Replacement for XBOX by nxtw · · Score: 0

      don't forget that DVI is easily converted to HDMI...

    3. Re:Replacement for XBOX by rm999 · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Sorry, but spending 45 dollars on a cable that literally has one to one connections between the ports (no actual electronics inside) is just stupid.

      I bet you that there is a comparable product out there for under 10 bucks.

    4. Re:Replacement for XBOX by Alkivar · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately for formats like HD-DVD if your not using HDMI everything is downscaled. But I guess if your using an Xbox for your video player your not super conscious of jaggies anyways.

    5. Re:Replacement for XBOX by SuperQ · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's a 25 foot (7.62m) cable. You need decent shielding for the video signal over that long. Monster wants $170 for a 20 foot (6m) cable, that's way more stupid. :)

    6. Re:Replacement for XBOX by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

      Not sure about $10, but here's one for under $20 from MonoPrice. (Hopefully that link is stable...) It's not a "gold plated" one or anything, but I've used their cheap grade stuff in the past and it generally does its job. I'm not sure why most people would need a 25' cable, though. For most people, a $4.95 adaptor and their existing DVI cable ought to do the trick.

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    7. Re:Replacement for XBOX by Millenniumman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why would you get a 25' converter cable? Just get an adapter (no cable), and get a long HDMI cable. It's going to be cheaper, and far more versatile.

      --
      Stupidity is like nuclear power, it can be used for good or evil. And you don't want to get any on you.
    8. Re:Replacement for XBOX by IntergalacticWalrus · · Score: 2, Funny

      ... but... but it's freakin' GOLD PLATED and shit! And shiny! And... oh I give up.

    9. Re:Replacement for XBOX by BoberFett · · Score: 3, Informative

      I realize bashing MS around here scores you points, but please be knowledgeable before you try to bash them.

      http://www.xboxmediacenter.de/

      For people with a modded Xbox, other than lacking TV tuner support it's a pretty full featured system.

    10. Re:Replacement for XBOX by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

      slight correction : the cable you link to is gold-plated ;). and so is the cheap jack/RCA cable between my PC and my amp. A lot of cheap connectors are gold plated, so it's some more reason not to be ripped off buying a $50 or $100 cable.
      As for most people : I tend to think that most people don't own a DVI cable ^

      and, if you put that HTPC right under the TV, why not this $5 cable. it would be quite un-natural to aim for that PC with the infrared remote if it's 7 meter away from the TV, anyway.

    11. Re:Replacement for XBOX by BLKMGK · · Score: 0, Redundant

      XBMC doesn't record either. Despite his tone he is basicly correct - XBMC is a front-end for video recorded elsewhere.

      As it happens I run it myself, it's currently undergoing a ton of bug fixes building to a 2.0 release so it's updated nearly weekly. Highly recommended if you want a SIMPLE way to play video from various share flavors, 'net radio, XBOX games, emulators, and alot more. But no, it's not going to record content for you...

      --
      Build it, Drive it, Improve it! Hybridz.org
    12. Re:Replacement for XBOX by Josuah · · Score: 1

      How is this an HD-DVD capable system? I don't think it comes with the software to support AACS. And without HDMI 1.3 and HDCP, you cannot pass the protected audio stream to your sound system.

    13. Re:Replacement for XBOX by electrofreak · · Score: 0

      Was just linking to the first (shortest) cable in stock at newegg. I agree, it's way too long.

      --
      I need a sig.
    14. Re:Replacement for XBOX by Afrosheen · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Just to let you know, these guys http://www.monoprice.com/ have awesome deals and great quality cables. I'm not an employee, just a fan. I started with a 6' Monster HDMI cable that was outrageously expensive ($120 USD) and monoprice had one for $15. The $15 cable was identical. Zero problems with it for four months. I also bought the 5-line composite cable (3 yb cables and a pair of analog audio rcas all in the same ribbon) and it has been perfect as well.

        HIGHLY recommended.

    15. Re:Replacement for XBOX by SuperQ · · Score: 1

      connectors cause signal loss, I have a longish DVI->HDMI cable to link my PC from the basement up to my TV. This way i don't care how noisy the PC is, and it makes my living room less clusttered. I considered doing a DVI->HDMI converter+HDMI cable.. but I found the one thing I needed, and it wasn't expensive ($30 15' cable)

    16. Re:Replacement for XBOX by suv4x4 · · Score: 1

      Finally I will be able to replace my XBOX, which is used solely for home theater purposes, with this HD-DVD capable system.
      There is no HDMI, but component and DVI should suffice for most.


      Nice, finally someone addressed the niche of people who buy XBOX to not play games on it and are fine with a Linux based home theater.

      I also hope you're ready to spend good money on those noisy poorly transferred HD movies as well.

    17. Re:Replacement for XBOX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It really depends on how long your cable run is going to be. For shorter cables (< 15 ft), the cheap kind work just as well as the expensive ones, but when the cable starts getting longer, the more expensive ones become necessary. And when you get to cable runs of over 100 ft or so, the cost of the kind of cable you need starts going up in a hurry. If you thought $45 was expensive, the good stuff costs more than that per foot.

      But, then again, the people who end up needing this kind of thing are the ones who are dropping > $60k on their home theater setup, so the cabling is still comparatively cheap.

      BTW...IANA home theater installer but I have a good friend who is.

    18. Re:Replacement for XBOX by sachi11 · · Score: 1

      i hope one more great debian related website coming up is Debian Admin it looks really nice and it is having great articles about debian linux

  2. Truly silent? by venicebeach · · Score: 5, Funny

    A truly silent home theatre system? Hope it comes with closed captioning...

    1. Re:Truly silent? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm, 14db != truly silent.Truly quiet maybe...

    2. Re:Truly silent? by elgee · · Score: 2, Funny

      That is just fine. I sleep through most tv and movies anyway and I don't like to be awakened by sound.

    3. Re:Truly silent? by Tumbleweed · · Score: 1

      WHAT'S THAT YOU SAY?

    4. Re:Truly silent? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Main screen turn on!

      We get signal!

      Someone set us up the bomb!


      --- Now I want voice commands for my HTPC.

    5. Re:Truly silent? by FuturePastNow · · Score: 1

      Yeah. It's not even that hard to build a silent PC- a mobile processor cooled by only a large heatsink, fanless power supply and video card, and a single low-RPM fan to exhaust heat out the back. The only noise would be from the hard drive, and that can be controlled with rubber mountings and such.

      And since relatively slow processors and low-end video cards today have more than enough power for HD video, building such a HTPC shouldn't even be that expensive. The costliest component is a nice looking case.

      --
      Give a man fire, and you warm him for the night. Set a man on fire, and you warm him for the rest of his life.
    6. Re:Truly silent? by FormOfActionBanana · · Score: 1

      WHAT YOU SAY!!

      --
      Take off every 'sig' !!
  3. FeForce? by corychristison · · Score: 0

    Did I miss something there?

    Oh I get it! It's supposed to be GeForce. ;-)

    1. Re:FeForce? by Bananatree3 · · Score: 1, Funny

      Fe, Fi, Force, Fum, I smell the blood of a grammer nazi...

    2. Re:FeForce? by Ai+Olor-Wile · · Score: 1

      It's also an ultra quite system. Remarkable, no?

    3. Re:FeForce? by cciRRus · · Score: 5, Funny
      I smell the blood of a grammer nazi...
      It's grammar.
      --
      w00t
    4. Re:FeForce? by aichpvee · · Score: 4, Funny

      Fe, Fi, Force, Fum, I smell the blood of a spilling nazi...

      --
      The Farewell Tour II
    5. Re:FeForce? by drunkahol · · Score: 2, Funny

      The correct spelling in my family is

      GRANDMA Nazi

      (but we don't call her that very often)

  4. Should be great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    for watching silent movies

    1. Re:Should be great by A+beautiful+mind · · Score: 1

      Duke Nukem Forever Silent Edition comes to my mind. Of course since they started to work on it in 1925, they cannot be expected to finish anytime soon. Some of the devs got changed in the meantime and some of them got soultrapped.

      --
      It takes a man to suffer ignorance and smile
      Be yourself no matter what they say
  5. GPL Faceplate?!?! by Brandybuck · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...and makes the mechanical drawings of its face plates available under the GPL.

    Whoo hoo! Striking a blow for freedom! Telling those evil user-subjugating anti-freedom proprietary face plate manufacturers where to stuff it! I want one of these, because I'm sick to death of this nasty Antec case that won't let me distribute its modified face plate...

    --
    Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    1. Re:GPL Faceplate?!?! by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

      1) Don't treat the GPL as sacred
      2) ???
      3) Get modded down

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    2. Re:GPL Faceplate?!?! by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      Actually, while I know it isn't much... shouldn't we be supporting the idea of releasing plans for ANYTHING under an open license? I mean, sure, most of us don't care about the plans for a faceplate, but there's no good reason to keep these plans proprietary, is there?

      It's not a big deal, so don't try to make a big deal of it. But it is a good thing, so don't knock it.

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    3. Re:GPL Faceplate?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think makeing the faceplate drawings available under the GPL is a really neat idea. Anyone who wants to replace their faceplate with one that only has a slit for a slot-in DVD drive, or no card slots or sockets in the front, or integrate a display can easily do so or have it done by a machine shop - and can be certain that the result will fit without problems.

    4. Re:GPL Faceplate?!?! by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

      ...there's no good reason to keep these plans proprietary, is there?

      There's no good reason to slap a heavy handed legal document like the GPL on it either.

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
  6. Good price tag too by growse · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This is interesting - for $300 they've created something that beats me spending my own time and money on building myself. Previously when I've seen "silent" under-the-tv boxes, they've been closer to $800. This is enough to make the average geek think "I'll just build one myself". That, however, takes time and effort, and there's no guarantee that it'll work properly at the end of it.

    To get a barebones, including a nice case and decent psu for this price makes it worthwhile getting over a diy system. Only question is, does it suck because it's cheap?

    --
    There is nothing interesting going on at my blog
    1. Re:Good price tag too by rolfwind · · Score: 4, Informative
      Well, you still kinda have to build it yourself.....

      TFA:
      The Lx8100-MN, available "barebones" (sans CPU, memory, and hard drive) for around $300


      Still should come in under $600, depending on your components though I hope they have guidelines on what is necessary for smooth operation and what that socket lets me install on CPUs.

      But I don't think this system will save anyone that much cash. It looks like it should be easier to set it up than a diy myth TV though, while still having control of the box.
    2. Re:Good price tag too by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1

      $300 + ram, CPU, and hard drive. Bringing it within spitting distance of your $800. It is a good starting point, but not a complete solution at $300.

    3. Re:Good price tag too by Fishead · · Score: 0

      But who doesn't have a spare CPU, HDD, and RAM kicking around? For $300 at least I don't have to buy junk that I already have. The silent PSU, sweet looking case (and motherboard to fit it) and funky control panel are the bits that I prolly don't have stuffed under my couch. Installation DVD with a linux compilation setup for the specific hardware... much more likely that I will finally get Myth working!!! (been working on it for about 2 years now, ha ha ha)

    4. Re:Good price tag too by AnyoneEB · · Score: 1
      TFA:
      • Supported processors -- AMD Socket AM2, compatible with Athlon 64 X2, Athlon 64 FX, Athlon 64, Sempron
      • Memory -- 4 x 240-pin DIMM; supports up to 8GB DDR2 ECC/non-ECC unbuffered

      But the most important feature, which the summary left out, is the parallel port...

      ...

      ...

      WHY!? I don't have an old printer in my living room next to my TV. I don't know about the rest of you. Or maybe it's for loading videos off a SyQuest drive.

      --
      Centralization breaks the internet.
    5. Re:Good price tag too by Danga · · Score: 1

      CPU, plus HD, and RAM will NOT be even close to 500 bucks. If that is really all it is missing then I would say it would cost maybe another 300 dollars. You don't have to get the most expensive CPU or fastest RAM or biggest/fastest HD. So for another $300 you can spend a total of $600 and get something that performs just as well, if better, than the $800+ fully configured system.

      It is a good starting point, but not a complete solution at $300.

      True, it is a starting point. It also is significantly cheaper than the $800+ preconfigured system.

      --
      Hey, there is only one Return and it's not of the King, it's of the Jedi.
    6. Re:Good price tag too by Millenniumman · · Score: 1

      Why must PC makers keep putting those massive, useless plugs on computers?

      --
      Stupidity is like nuclear power, it can be used for good or evil. And you don't want to get any on you.
    7. Re:Good price tag too by scottnews · · Score: 3, Interesting

      http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82 E16856110050
      Here is the equivalent system without the distro. It shouldn't be too hard to configure Linux for this.

    8. Re:Good price tag too by ozmanjusri · · Score: 2, Informative
      Still should come in under $600

      I suspect it might come in under $560, configured with HTPC AMD® 3000+, 250GB HD, 512MB, DVD/CD Combo, TV-Capture, Hardware MPEG. At least, that's what it says in TFA...

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    9. Re:Good price tag too by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      Why must PC makers keep putting those massive, useless plugs on computers?
      Because there's a space reserved for it in the ATX rear panel spec. Seriously, when the difference between including a parallel port and leaving it out is a fraction of a cent on the price of the connector because the chipset contains the interface by default, why not? In this case, they're probably just using a commodity mobo chosen for it's complete smorgasbord of ports. Stands to reason the parallel port would show up too.
      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    10. Re:Good price tag too by daspriest · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Or you could download the configured distro from a link in the article.

    11. Re:Good price tag too by BLKMGK · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I looked at this system not too long ago after having seen some other Myth type article - think it was on Engadget, might have been Digg - cannot find it now. Anyway while digging I found more than one post or scrap of info on the Pundit box from folks complaining that they were having some issues configuring it for Linux. For those of us who aren't really adept at Linux this might be a bit of a bargain if it held a ready to go image of Myth and skipped those issues.

      However reading the article it looks like it comes with drivers and NO Myth at all... Even the "fully" configured one from http://www.lixsystems.net/lix/index.htm doesn't appear to come with Myth installed. They do make the software they've configured available so that's a start. A shame they couldn't have gone just a bit further and made it pretty much complete..

      --
      Build it, Drive it, Improve it! Hybridz.org
    12. Re:Good price tag too by Afrosheen · · Score: 1

      If you have a spare AM2 chip laying around (which is what this supports), then that's rather unusual. Also strange to have DDR2 laying around. Both are so new they'll require a purchase.

        The only thing I see missing from this box, though, is the little piece of aluminum you're supposed to glue to your DVD door. When's the last time you saw a DVD drive for sale with a grain-matched brushed aluminum tray on it? Oh, never. :)

    13. Re:Good price tag too by WebCrapper · · Score: 1

      For the same reason they keep shipping drivers on 3.5inch floppies.

      Because they can.

    14. Re:Good price tag too by arivanov · · Score: 1
      WHY!? I don't have an old printer in my living room next to my TV. I don't know about the rest of you. Or maybe it's for loading videos off a SyQuest drive.

      You need it to drive one of those nasty 7 line LCD panels used in DIY consumer equipment. While I hate LPT as much as you do it is a necessity for a home theater box. This is unless you want to make it 5in thick and stick a 7in touchscreen on the front.

      Anyway, the setup looks rather expensive and very "windows thought process infected" for a linux home theater.

      • Why use an Athlon. A C7 will do the job the same and the noise with a solid state brick power supply will be under 10db. It has a hardware MPEG encoder and AFAIK Via used to supply linux libraries for it. The price for a MB+CPU is around 100£. High end "consumer style" Silverstone case adds up 100£. Once you have added memory the overall spend is around 220£.
      • Via also has the best audio I have seen so far on a PC platform. Very low distortion and no noticeable "PC" noise (I can hear all the way to 18Khz so I usually notice that). I have my doubts every time I hear about Pentium or Athlon based media boxes. On most of them the CPU power regulators generate a considerable amount of noise and very few MB manufacturers have gone through the motions of protecting the audio from that. Some, like IBM, have not even tried to bother and their audio sucks royally.
      • Why have a disk at all. A box like this should boot off network so you can put that nasty noisy 0.5+TB software RAID array in the entrance hall or in the kitchen (not joking, this is where mine is). While this is not an option with Winhoze, it is trivial with Linux. Unless you are living in a single studio flat, having a disk inside a linux PVR/media box does not make any sense at all.
      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    15. Re:Good price tag too by WebCrapper · · Score: 1

      While I agree with you, the article did state that they didn't include MythTV due to possible issues with Copyright.

    16. Re:Good price tag too by DDLKermit007 · · Score: 1

      Because...you don't have to create a buggy software layer to talk to a USB dongle to get to serial. With serial it's a direct connection with an absolute standard. The closest thing to date to that is Firewire. Not to mention as another poster mentioned it's in the ATX spec and leaving it off costs almost the same as having it on.

    17. Re:Good price tag too by drsquare · · Score: 1

      It's easy to find CPUs, memory and hardware that work with Linux. Generally the main problem is getting video cards, TV cards, remote controls etc that work with Linux.

    18. Re:Good price tag too by friedmud · · Score: 1

      I have a brushed aluminum Lian Li case and bought this DVD Writer to go with it:

      http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82 E16827152060

      While it doesn't have the same "grain" you can't tell unless you get up next to it... I was really happy with the way it just blends into the front of my computer (as opposed to a beige or black one....).

      Friedmud

    19. Re:Good price tag too by AnyoneEB · · Score: 1

      I agree. Serial-USB dongles are a pain, but I do not think that computer has serial, only parallel. (Can't tell for sure, but I assume the port next to the DVI is VGA/HD-15, not serial.)

      --
      Centralization breaks the internet.
    20. Re:Good price tag too by Afrosheen · · Score: 1

      That's interesting and a highly rated drive. My point was originally that since they were cutting the hole for the drive, that piece was waste, so they might as well include it as an applique. All it needs is a strip of double sided tape and its good to go.

    21. Re:Good price tag too by friedmud · · Score: 1

      You're definitely right... that would be a good thing to include.

      Just wanted to point out to some of the people out there that might have an aluminum case that that drive makes a pretty good fit.

      And it's highly rated for a reason! I love this drive... it's performed flawlessly for me thus far... even working spectacularly in Linux.

      Friedmud

    22. Re:Good price tag too by LordSnooty · · Score: 1

      I built an almost silent home theatre mythtv box for 250GBP, though admittedly without TV aspect, only MPEG4 etc capability. Throw another £100 for the TV ability and higher spec CPU and it might be equivalent. This unit is good as it might bring Free HTPC setups to those without tech know-how, and it's similarly priced ($600 = £314 today)

    23. Re:Good price tag too by Fallingcow · · Score: 1
      Why use an Athlon. A C7 will do the job the same and the noise with a solid state brick power supply will be under 10db.


      In my opinion, some of the best reasons for building a set-top box yourself rather than buying a Tivo include a number of applications that will require a bit of horsepower.

      Playing back many common codecs at HD resolutions requires a fairly strong processor. There was an article a couple days ago about PCs being better than $2000 DVD players at DVD playback, and someone (in the comments) linked to an article about turning a Mac Mini in to a media PC, and it was noted that even it doesn't have a powerful enough processor to do the job of HD playback from H.234(? is that the right number? I can never remember.)

      NES, Sega, and SNES emulators, plus Stepmania are some of the main reasons I'm thinking about building a machine like this. Granted, the first 3 will work fine on the processor that you mentioned, but I'd bet that Stepmania would stutter (not a good thing for a rhythm-based game!)

      There are also a handful of other games that would be nice to have on there, including the Serious Sam games (the only PC FPS games I know of that let you play multiplayer splitscreen, like a console FPS). I'd err on the side of having a stronger processor, I think. Odds are, it'd be fine, but what if someone comes out with some new game that allows splitscreen multiplayer, too? Assuming it works on Linux at all, it'll probably only work through Wine or Cedega, which will put a bigger strain on the proc.

      N64 and Playstation emulators are making great strides. It takes a VERY, VERY powerful machine to get much out of them right now, and that's probably not going to change much. Some of the simpler games, like side-scrollers, can already be played flawlessly. This will continue to improve, and I'd like to have a machine capable of doing at least some of this, should I decide that I want it to.
    24. Re:Good price tag too by itlurksbeneath · · Score: 1

      Looks pretty solid, just be aware that it'll only take half height PCI cards which limits what you can do with it, IMO. As a MythTV box, it'll pretty much be just a front end, with your back end located somewhere else, since most of the higher end capture cards (a la Hauppage) are full height PCI cards.

      --
      Have you ever considered piracy? You'd make a wonderful Dread Pirate Roberts.
    25. Re:Good price tag too by BLKMGK · · Score: 1

      I saw that and couldn't help but wonder. Myth is an open source effort right? What copyright exactly are they worried about? How hard would it have been to build a standardized hardware config, tune it to a T, and distribute an image for it? They imply that this is for Myth use so certainly they must have set it up at some point right? They could have at least explained what the concern was exactly, they certainly seem to have no issues distributing customized Linux distros....

      --
      Build it, Drive it, Improve it! Hybridz.org
    26. Re:Good price tag too by TheDugong · · Score: 1

      Not only that, the hard drive, processor fan and case fans are generally just as noisy as the PSU fan - if not worse.

      The Lx8100-MN does ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to solve this.

      The only effective way of doing this just for CPUs is to either use low power processors (as mentioned by parent) like Via or use massive heatsinks (e.g. Scythe Ninja - which by looking at the picture will not fit in this case) with quiet, big and slow fans (e.g. Nexus 120mm).

      Hard drives are even trickier to silence. Putting them in boxes like the Scythe Quiet Box or SilenX HDSS or getting very quiet drives to begin with and suspending them or placing them on foam seems to be the only way to do it.

      Without doing either of the above it is not going to be silent. Even being very quiet will be hard to achieve.

    27. Re:Good price tag too by arivanov · · Score: 1

      Playing back many common codecs at HD resolutions requires a fairly strong processor. Nope, it does not. It is a waste of horsepower to do this on a general purpose CPU. For applications like this a specialised decoder will wipe the floor clean with any general purpose CPU. Via from C3 from series M onwards has a hardware MPEG decoder integrated in the video chipset. I have not played with it to be honest so I do not know how good is it in reality. Still, this route is definitely the right approach from an architectural viewpoint. You leave the video do the video (in the widest sense) and the CPU does the general purpose work.

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    28. Re:Good price tag too by WebCrapper · · Score: 1

      I'm not a lawyer and will never be one. But, in my warped mind, if they put together the image to help others possibly break copyright, thats accessory. Originally, Napster didn't break copyright, its users did. We all saw what happened after that three ringed circus. I think this company is just being a little too careful.

    29. Re:Good price tag too by BLKMGK · · Score: 1

      Umm, what exactly about Myth breaks copyrights? Does TIVO break copyrights? Does MCE? Does SageTV? ReplayTV? The list goes on and on. so far as I'm concerned the idea that building a tool makes you an accessory somehow is crap. If I build you a ladder and you falloff am I at fault? Is a gun manufacturer? How about I link to deCSS source, am I now a criminal? Yes, I know that has actually been ruled a criminal behaviour in this country during the 2600 court case but frankly I find that ruling disgusting. Myth simply does what any number of commercially sold PVR packages do, that's not a crime in my eyes.

      --
      Build it, Drive it, Improve it! Hybridz.org
    30. Re:Good price tag too by WebCrapper · · Score: 1

      I have no problems with PVR's like MythTV, etc. I was mearly trying to guess at their reason for not including it. To me, its a shitty reason.

    31. Re:Good price tag too by BLKMGK · · Score: 1

      I agree, it's not a great reason and I'm sorry if I sounded angry with you - I'm just frustrated at the situation is all. In a climate where everyone is suing everyone I guess even a perception that you might get sued is enough to make people doing innovative work think twice. I did notice that the Myth site I've used to get KnopMyth in the past is being given one of these systems and is supporting their effort. If those guys build a distro just for his hardware then I'd be all over it. As it stands now I'm eying an Asus Pundit or some other small box to play with....

      --
      Build it, Drive it, Improve it! Hybridz.org
    32. Re:Good price tag too by ookaze · · Score: 1

      Well, it didn't beat me at all.
      Especially since it lacks the CPU and the drive, and the fact that the noisiest thing in my MythTV setup right now, is that old 80 GB hard drive, as most components were old things I didn't use anymore (Athlon CPU, old DDRAM memory). Of course, I won't just dump the old hard drive, I'll just wait for it to die.
      Unfortunately, it spins everytime, as it's the system disk, the other disk being a SATA 250 GB drive, which doesn't make any noticeable noise.
      Well, actually, you don't even hear that old disks when watching TV or videos.

  7. but? by aztec1430 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    but does it run Li... oh, wait...

  8. why'd they make it so fugly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know about you, but I sure as hell don't want that below my tv..

  9. Three fans + HD + DVD won't be silent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The submitter seems to have confused quiet with "truly silent." In addition to the power supply's 14db fan, there are two more case fans. The CPU lacks a fan, relying on nearby vent holes on the top of the case for air intake - don't set anything on top! It also uses a hard drive, apparently not in an acoustic enclosure, and lacks any noticable means of acoustically muffling the DVD-ROM drive. And in general, fan quietness often comes at a cost of unsufficient cooling. If it's reliable, at $550 for the loaded system, I could still see it being kinda cool. But not silent, and maybe not even all that quiet when the DVD fires up.

    1. Re:Three fans + HD + DVD won't be silent by jpardey · · Score: 1

      Luckily, you won't need the DVD while recording TV and sleeping.

      You will, however, need the hard drive and cpu...

      --
      I have freaks! I did something right...
    2. Re:Three fans + HD + DVD won't be silent by Tavor · · Score: 1

      Honestly, I've seen DVD players and DVRs with the same amount of fans and DVD-ROM noise. If you have it in a under-TV shelf/case thing, it should not be noticable at all, and only normally noticable when listening to quiet orchestral music.

      Watching any recent movie should be fine.
      And watching the Matrix Lobby Scene on volume 11 should (damage your hearing enough to) fix this
      problem completly.

      --
      Windows has detected an undetectable error.
    3. Re:Three fans + HD + DVD won't be silent by martok · · Score: 1

      Agreed, definitely not what I'd consider silent. I built something recently for the stereo cabinet that did actually need to be silent. Was based on the Via Epia stuff, an external power brick, PXE boots over the network with an NFS root. That's the only way I know of to build a silent HTPC presently. Afaik, any pentium-m based system needs fan cooling though I could be wrong.

    4. Re:Three fans + HD + DVD won't be silent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you are absolutely right.

      but on a sidenote, for apartment dwellers, silent doesn't mean better. it just means i hear my stupid neighbors.

      they all need a horsehead in their bed!!!!

      otoh, I really don't mind quality white noise.

      what i do mind? fans/drives/opticals that whine, or make other funky noises that break through my nice consistent white noise.

      After setting up a system for myself, I'll listen to it. If I don't hear nice even background noise, I'll find the offending fan/drive/whatever and replace it.

      e

    5. Re:Three fans + HD + DVD won't be silent by NeMon'ess · · Score: 1

      It's close enough to silent for most intents and purposes.

      The two more fans can be about 15 to 20db.

      For Windows, use Nero DriveSpeed to limit the DVD drive from spinning faster than 4x and it'll be silent.

      For the hard drive, get one that's particularly quiet, then use acoustic management software to silence the clicking noise.

    6. Re:Three fans + HD + DVD won't be silent by Sillygates · · Score: 1

      +HD?? one HD? Whats a media center system without at least 4 500GB drives? Where are you going to store all the media?!?

      --
      I fear the Y2038 bug
    7. Re:Three fans + HD + DVD won't be silent by Kent+Recal · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Correct. The device in the article is not silent.

      If you're looking for a really silent (as in fanless) system then I'd
      recommend to look at an mCubed.

      I have an "HFX classic" myself and it runs my Athlon64 3500+
      perfectly. No overheating, not even in the summer.

    8. Re:Three fans + HD + DVD won't be silent by stan1000 · · Score: 1

      I do not understand this concern with the box and its noise. Why does the computer have to be in the rack? Unless one is lazy or inept with tools there is no logic in putting the case in the same room as the rest of the system. I use a remote blaster good from anywhere in the house as a control. The case is in a closet in an adjoining room. The closet is cooled with an extension of the hvac system. The cables go through the closet floor into the wall behind the home theater. The cd/dvd and sat box feed through the same wall which has hole the same size as an electrical outlet so when I wish to change things I simply put in a fake electrical outlet. Unless you are in the spare bedroom and put your ear to the closet door you can not hear anything from the case. Why the h**l do people think the computer case has to be in the entertainment room? It can be in the basement, adjoining room, attic etc. Just make sure it has adequate cooling. I have 2 15" Tempest subwoofers built into what appears to be a table. Just can not put things on the table or they might migrate about when the cannons go off. Happy Trails Stan

  10. SAA7134? by lemaymd · · Score: 1

    It might not be wise for them to recommend SAA7134 TV tuner cards. I had to hack MythTV's source code (using a patch someone else developed, fortunately) just to get TV audio working. That might not fit in with their plug-and-play philosophy. :-) Other than that, this looks pretty neat!

    1. Re:SAA7134? by r_cerq · · Score: 1

      How long ago was that? For the last year or so, they've been working out of the box.

    2. Re:SAA7134? by lemaymd · · Score: 1

      I'm using the July 8th snapshot on Linux version 2.6.18-rc4 (gcc version 4.1.1 20060525 (Red Hat 4.1.1-1)) #1 SMP, which includes the new ALSA interface to SAA7134 sound. The problem is actually in the SAA7134 ALSA driver, not Myth itself, and Myth probably works just fine if you're using the older OSS interface.

    3. Re:SAA7134? by r_cerq · · Score: 1

      I was actually referring to the ALSA interface, it's been available since 2.6.15. I'm using it just fine with MythTV (via OSS emulation, but it's saa7134-alsa); what problem do you have, exactly?

    4. Re:SAA7134? by lemaymd · · Score: 1

      Well, maybe there's just some quirk with my system, but the audio doesn't unmute when I change channels or start a recording. It's apparently a problem for a number of people, as someone had posted a patch to fix the problem by manually invoking a V4L ioctl to unmute the card when necessary.

    5. Re:SAA7134? by r_cerq · · Score: 1

      You're right, I completely forgot about that problem... I placed a call to "v4lctl unmute" at my rc.local and never thought about it again. Would you mind rolling back that Myth patch and trying a version of saa7134-alsa that does the mute/unmute itself?

    6. Re:SAA7134? by lemaymd · · Score: 1

      I wasn't even able to build v4lctl on FC5, unfortunately. Otherwise that would have allowed me to use the standard RPMs, which would be much easier to maintain and upgrade. I'd be willing to try switching back to standard Myth and hack something into my kernel if you have a rough idea of where the problem occurs. I spent 45 minutes this morning playing around with strace and watching the output of the module with video_debug on, but I still don't see where the unmute operation should properly be occurring. I see that the module ignores the V4L1 calls VIDIOCMCAPTURE and VIDIOCSYNC, but those don't seem to unmute the card in the other, presumably well-formed modules. Furthermore, I've discovered at least one other bug in the saa7134 module, and I reported it to the maintainer some time ago in proper patch format (I've successfully submitted patches before), but he never responded. That kind of discourages me from looking much harder, since my work will probably get ignored anyway.

    7. Re:SAA7134? by r_cerq · · Score: 1

      OK, by parts:

      V4L1 has been marked as deprecated a few months ago, and is currently being phased out. the V4L1 ioctls that still work will probably go away soon.

      I do have a version of saa7134-alsa patched to properly mute/unmute, but will be unable to test it until next weekend... Therefore my previous question.

      As for your patches, the best place to send them would be the v4l list, second best place the v4l-maintainers list (the address is listed at the kernel MAINTAINERS file.). Since you mention a "he", I assume you're talking about Gerd; it's been a while since he handed over the v4l maintenance to another group of people (of which I am one. modinfo saa7134-alsa, compare to my nickname).

    8. Re:SAA7134? by lemaymd · · Score: 1

      I'd be glad to test a patch; I should be able to recompile the kernel and revert to a standard myth installation with little difficulty. You can send it to lemaymd @t lemaymd d.t com. Thanks!

  11. so by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They sponsor some guy's blog and a live CD project which doesn't do any real development. Yeah, those guys must really be aching for money...

  12. Awesome by Wylfing · · Score: 1

    I have been itching to build a MythTV (or similar) box for a long time now, but what has always stopped me is the noise. I have tried to keep up on things like underlocking, rubber grommets, etc. for noise reduction, but even though I can successfully build a low noise PC, it is no where near the level of quiet I desire for my living room. The whirr of my Xbox is almost unbearable, and is a big reason I buy multiplatform games for the comparatively silent GameCube.

    But if there is a truly quiet box on the market that provides these functions, I will gladly fork over the cash.

    --
    Our intelligent designer has never created an animal that we couldn't improve by strapping a bomb to it.
    1. Re:Awesome by BLKMGK · · Score: 1

      Slap an 80mm fan in the XBOX and use XBMC to regulate the temp such that it slows the fan down. It's not too hard to get the bigger fan in there, cost me $8. Had to snap the bottom ears off of it, gring the air guide, and that was it. I can no longer hear my XBOX, it used to sound like a small jet plane. Perfectly silent? Nah but then neither is my DTIVO actually. I'm okay with that, I just turn up the volume a tad. That's exactly what I'd do with a Myth system. I have an MCE HTPC too, that box sits in the other room with a vid cable and IR receiver in my room with the TV. Lots of ways to skin the noise problem....

      P.S. The XBOX is an awesome front-end with XBMC. It can't record which is unfortunate but wow is it EASY to setup...

      --
      Build it, Drive it, Improve it! Hybridz.org
    2. Re:Awesome by legoburner · · Score: 1

      If it is a regular xbox you have, then wait until you see what an xbox 360 sounds like when it is reading from the DVD drive. I would say it is somewhere between a blender and a drill. Definately the loudest console I have, but luckily I have it tidied away far from where I sit to play (wireless controls are great).

    3. Re:Awesome by idonthack · · Score: 1

      If you're going to use Myth, you should build two boxen. Put a server in a closet somewhere you can't hear it, and build a thin client (or multiple thin clients, for more than one room) that boots off the network and thus needs no hard drive to run the mythfrontend. You could even get a fanless VIA processor if you can live with 1GHz. I'm not sure that can play back HD though.

      --
      Why is it that when you believe something it's an opinion, but when I believe something it's a manifesto?
  13. But the question is: by cuantar · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Does it run Linux?

    --
    Legalize it.
    1. Re:But the question is: by bheekling · · Score: 1

      um, RTFA?

      --
      "..."
    2. Re:But the question is: by cuantar · · Score: 1

      I did. This is ./ after all, so it seemed the right thing to say at the time. :)

      --
      Legalize it.
    3. Re:But the question is: by interstellar_donkey · · Score: 1

      Heck, for that matter, imagine your home theatre with a Beowolf Cluster of these things.

      --
      The Internet is generally stupid
  14. For those wanting to do this on the cheap... by ylikone · · Score: 1

    Forget about buying a media system, just dig out some old computer you have, make sure it has a video card with TV-out. Doesn't matter if it has a hard drive or not, as long as it has a CD or DVD player. Download Linux Geexbox boot CD. Hook up your system to your TV and stereo system. Download some movies from the bittorrents. Burn to CD/DVD. Watch movies. Who cares if the system is noise, you won't hear it when you have a movie playing loud.

    --
    Meh.
    1. Re:For those wanting to do this on the cheap... by dhasenan · · Score: 1

      I hope you have five gigabytes of RAM to store a DVD image to burn.

      Or maybe you do want a hard drive after all?

    2. Re:For those wanting to do this on the cheap... by ylikone · · Score: 1

      Not sure what you are talking about. I download and burn the images on my main computer, not the media center computer. It has nothing to do with RAM anyway. You just need hard drive space and K3B.

      --
      Meh.
    3. Re:For those wanting to do this on the cheap... by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      Forget about buying a media system, just dig out some old computer you have, make sure it has a video card with TV-out. Doesn't matter if it has a hard drive or not, as long as it has a CD or DVD player. Download Linux Geexbox boot CD. Hook up your system to your TV and stereo system. Download some movies from the bittorrents. Burn to CD/DVD. Watch movies. Who cares if the system is noise, you won't hear it when you have a movie playing loud.
      Yeah...because HTPC boxes are just used to play DVDs.

      Seriously, you did notice where they mentioned features other than DVD playback, right?
      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    4. Re:For those wanting to do this on the cheap... by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      Who cares if the system is noise, you won't hear it when you have a movie playing loud.

      You're obviously not one of the people who should consider buying one of these. Please try to understand that while you personally don't care about noise, many of the rest of us do. Please don't try to tell us we shouldn't.

      If you have something constructive to say that is pertinent to this discussion, feel free.

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    5. Re:For those wanting to do this on the cheap... by zmollusc · · Score: 1

      This was my cheap ass setup for a few years......
      1. Pentium II 600MHz win2k box in celler(basement, for americans) with tv-out and audio wires running through floorboards into living room tv. Wireless keyboard and mouse in living room that could be put neatly away when not in use. Couldn't hear the PC at all through the floorboards.
      2. Pentium II 350MHz file server with whatever hard disks availible stuck in it.

      I used whatever 'main' computer i had to rip dvd to the fileserver. The 600MHz PII was just good enough to render divx (encoded at full dvd resolution) with lovely lovely lovely VLC. :-)

      All hand-me-down boxes for nothing. No fancy schmancy silent pc bits :-)
      And I could net the intersurf on the tv to watch weebl and bob!
      Still can, although i have upgraded with more hand-me-down abandonware boxes.

      --
      They whose government reduces their essential liberties for temporary security, receive neither liberty nor security.
    6. Re:For those wanting to do this on the cheap... by cthulhu11 · · Score: 1

      I doubt your Linux-du-jour CD would do much for the old computers I have: Sun's AXi's. You forgot to add the bit about the noise from the MPAA's process server knocking on your door. Anyone who downloads movies via bt on traceable lines is nuts.

  15. Truly silent? by sparrowjk · · Score: 5, Informative

    1. The power supply is 14dbA? Yea right. The reviewers didn't even test it. That number is highly unlikely, especially from an unbranded PSU.

    2. What about case fans? What's the dBA on those? What about the CPU fan, which isn't even included? Both of these will have a big impact on the total overall noise of the system.

    3. Not to mention the hard drive! But enough.

    This is not a "silent" HTPC. It's a quickstart HTPC. It should be judged on those grounds. Calling it truly silent is just going to confuse people.

    See http://www.silentpcreview.com/ for real silent computing.

  16. 6150 Mobo? by lordofthechia · · Score: 2, Informative

    Nice that they're prepackaging all this and supplying the drivers and all. But this seems to me to be a 6150 Mobo and case w/ remote. Good Mobo (use a 6100 for 2 Linux WoW machines), though sound was a pain to configure (ended up getting a external card).

    Not sure how much the case is worth but the mobo is only $60-$80. Still guess it may be a good deal for those that don't wanna mess too much getting their own drivers and tweaking them properly.

    --
    Georgia Tech, the leader in Chia(tm) technology.
    1. Re:6150 Mobo? by doofusclam · · Score: 1
      Nice that they're prepackaging all this and supplying the drivers and all. But this seems to me to be a 6150 Mobo and case w/ remote. Good Mobo (use a 6100 for 2 Linux WoW machines), though sound was a pain to configure (ended up getting a external card).


      I had many problems with the same board, but the sound problems are sorted now with the latest ALSA. If you take the latest FC5 respin and install fresh from that you'll have no problems at all apart from suspend support.
  17. Be Quick! by OmegaBlac · · Score: 1
    From the LixSystems website
    $299 (limited time /.Special)
    So this price is only good until their servers are reduced to a smoking heap from the slashdot effect?
  18. FC5? Good luck putting MythTV on it... by jerkychew · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've been battling my MythTV install for the past couple days, and am working on it as we speak, so this article is perfect timing.

    This device appears to be little more than a barebones PC and a lot of marketing induced FUD. Others have already touched on the lack of HDD, CPU and RAM, so I won't bring those back up. What I will bring up is my suspicion of the true reason why it doesn't have MythTV - Because MythTV under FC5 is a serious pain in the arse. To quote Axel Thimm from this posting on the Atrpms-users mailing list:

    "Anyway, all in all currently mythtv on FC5 isn't an easy ride. If you
    don't want to get in adventures, don't upgrade yet. Wait at least
    until the fixed kernel makes it into updates proper."

    I had originally loaded FC5 on my MythTV candidate, only to run into whacky issue after whacky issue. I formatted and reloaded to FC4, following the holy grail of MythTV install guides, and the install has been much smoother. (I'm just trying to nail down the audio / video sync issues - I gotta get my line out to stop playing 'live' audio, dammit!)

    I think you'd be better off speccing out a PC from NewEgg or something, rather than purchasing one of these boxes.

    1. Re:FC5? Good luck putting MythTV on it... by pembo13 · · Score: 1

      All I did to get mythtv on FC5 was `yum --enablerepo=atrpms install mythtv-suite`. I already had mysql installed.

      --
      "Thanks for all the money you paid to us. We've used it to buy off ISO among other things" -Microsoft
    2. Re:FC5? Good luck putting MythTV on it... by mdboyd · · Score: 1

      I know I'm going to get bashed for this, but after an unsuccessful attempt at installing MythTV and configuring it with my tv tuner and video card, I tried installing my own custom version of XP that I stripped down. I then installed a free PVR program called GBPVR and it works nearly perfectly for me. The hardest part about configuring MythTV was driver issues. I spent over 8 hours working on configuring the TV Tuner drivers before I finally got it to work. When I couldn't get video out to work on my ati video card, I gave up and went in search of an easier way. My picture quality isn't great by any standard but you get what you pay for. In this case, I didn't pay much. $80 for the tuner and an old Duron 600Mhz with 256MB RAM.

    3. Re:FC5? Good luck putting MythTV on it... by jerkychew · · Score: 1

      I was able to get Myth to install on FC5, but I ran into lots of whacky problems with my capture card, audio setup, etc. Getting MythTv on the box wasn't the problem; getting it to work was.

    4. Re:FC5? Good luck putting MythTV on it... by jerkychew · · Score: 1

      There's nothing wrong with using a Windows box for the task. I'd be willing to bet it's MUCH easier than the hell I've been going through over the past few days, but I chose MythTV because I want to do more than just record shows. I like MythTV's auto-transcode option, as well as the idea of having multiple frontend boxes talk to one backend server - makes for a neat way to wire the whole apartment building with one server.

    5. Re:FC5? Good luck putting MythTV on it... by rosscoe · · Score: 1

      mythtv can be a pain on redhat, even after I spec'd a box esp for it. I got a shuttle with 512MB ram, 2.5Ghz XP, 160GB HD, from ebay for £315 (just over $200), added an hauppauge TV card for £30, then installed RH AS 4. After cursing mythtv for several long hours I downloaded knopmyth and apart from having to sort out the chan freqs had no problem at all.

    6. Re:FC5? Good luck putting MythTV on it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Might be worth looking at MythDora.

    7. Re:FC5? Good luck putting MythTV on it... by r_cerq · · Score: 1

      (I'm just trying to nail down the audio / video sync issues - I gotta get my line out to stop playing 'live' audio, dammit!)

      Just disable "Capture" for the TV line in the audio mixer (alsamixer will do. Just hit tab twice to see playback and capture devices simultaneously)

    8. Re:FC5? Good luck putting MythTV on it... by d0malaga · · Score: 1

      I've spent some time on my MythTv installation too. Had problems finding a kernel that would boot on my mini-itx, EPIA MII10000. FC2 initial release worked fine, been trying with own kernels since. Own compiles of other code too; myth, ivtv etc. Had some spare space on a hard drive and decided to give FC5 a try. Got a more stable (and simple) machine using plain Fedora packages and atrpm. I think FC5 works great.

  19. This has already been done and for a cheap. by peeon · · Score: 5, Informative

    By following this guide, http://www.silentpcreview.com/article16-page1.html , I have built two machines identical to their setup and modded my power supply cpu with a low rpm fan. These machines have run solid for almost 4 years, until one of my motherboards crapped out. They are quietest piece of hardware I have owned since I sleep right next to them.

    1. Re:This has already been done and for a cheap. by Trillian_1138 · · Score: 1

      I'm interested in building a MythTV box and was wondering what, if any, DVR-type stuff have you done with the machines built from that guide.
      Thanks!
      -Trillian

    2. Re:This has already been done and for a cheap. by peeon · · Score: 1

      In terms of MythTV, I haven't really attempted. With the newer C3 CPU (http://www.silentpcreview.com/article609-page1.ht ml), it might be possible. The CPU does not have great deal of horsepower, but it might have enough for MythTV. Their forums might be a big help if you looking for a silent solution for a MythTV system.

  20. Insane energy consumption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The main reason I am not engaging in any PC-based home theatre appliance is the 350-500 Watt power consumption.
    I am always looking for energy saving, and I think it's insane to use that much power for playing/recording DVDs, music, compared to CD or DVD players/recorders, which consume much less energy.

    1. Re:Insane energy consumption by rollingcalf · · Score: 1

      The power supply might be 350-500W, but actual usage is usually less than 150W.

      Of course, that's still a lot higher than a CD or DVD player. But those don't give you easy access to a hard drive with thousands of MP3s, among the other things that a PC can do. If all you're doing is playing CDs and DVDs, then by all means just get a regular DVD player.

      --
      ---------
      There is inferior bacteria on the interior of your posterior.
    2. Re:Insane energy consumption by Rob+Simpson · · Score: 1

      I doubt it would use more than a fraction of that, even with a P4. With a low-wattage chip, and a laptop HD (quieter, too), a PC can be run off a DC power brick (really, truly silent, unlike this thing) supplying maybe 75W.

      But even with low power, truly silent hardware, HTPCs are a pain. Getting the remote to work properly was an exercise in frustration...and standard remotes work so much better than any cludge I could find for the PC. I gave up long ago and got a Panasonic DVD/HD recorder as my TIVO, and a Panasonic DVD player with the ability to save my place on multiple DVDs.

      The barebones machine in this article is worthless, overhyped garbage. However, I think there is a real market for a silent-as-a-good-DVD-player HTPC that "just works" out of the box and which is unencumbered by DRM. I'd like to see someone make such a system, using the same hardware and disk image on each system...since there's no way I'm going to go through the headache of trying to get a Myth box to work.

    3. Re:Insane energy consumption by mcrbids · · Score: 1

      The barebones machine in this article is worthless, overhyped garbage. However, I think there is a real market for a silent-as-a-good-DVD-player HTPC that "just works" out of the box and which is unencumbered by DRM. I'd like to see someone make such a system, using the same hardware and disk image on each system...since there's no way I'm going to go through the headache of trying to get a Myth box to work.

      It's a free market - why don't YOU do that? If you are right, and there's really a need for this, it'll sell well. Really, it just starts with BUILDING the darn thing - get the right parts together, test them out, make sure you have a source, and then begin promoting it. Start by selling them on Ebay. Get a decent website. Update your /. sig. Etc.

      If, as you say, there is a "real market" for these things, you'll become rich indeed.

      --
      I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
    4. Re:Insane energy consumption by adrianmonk · · Score: 1
      The main reason I am not engaging in any PC-based home theatre appliance is the 350-500 Watt power consumption. I am always looking for energy saving, and I think it's insane to use that much power for playing/recording DVDs, music, compared to CD or DVD players/recorders, which consume much less energy.

      I think it should be possible to do a home theater PC without drawing anywhere near that kind of wattage. I went on a power saving kick a year or two ago, and I discovered my Mac Mini only draws about 40W continuously. I haven't researched it carefully (though I did do a quick google), but it seems possible to build a home theater PC out of a Mini or a similar machine. Sure, you'd need USB peripherals for video capture and everything, but it could be done.

    5. Re:Insane energy consumption by Srikant · · Score: 1

      I use my htpc for many other things like a file server, backup server and even a compute server sometimes. I resolved the silence issue in a trivial way, by running long toslink, keyboard and vga cables from the pc (totally about $50) to my receiver and projector so for the added mess of the cables, I have a truly silent htpc since it is in another room (even there, it is fairly silent but it wouldn't matter if it wasn't).

      --
      "The most incomprehensible thing about the universe is that it is comprehensible" - Albert Einstein
    6. Re:Insane energy consumption by bogie · · Score: 1

      If all you ever do is watch cd/dvds then you have zero reason for a HTPC in the first place.

      --
      If you wanna get rich, you know that payback is a bitch
    7. Re:Insane energy consumption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      You might consider a Mac. The 20" imacs draw 100W going full tilt, and generally much less. Anyone know of comparable PCs, with reasonable processors (ie, Cyrix is out)?

    8. Re:Insane energy consumption by fm6 · · Score: 1

      If you're concerned about energy-wasting appliances, then you probably don't own a fancy plasma display. And if you don't, then a fancy home theater appliance is a waste of money anyway.

    9. Re:Insane energy consumption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      100 watts full out is high, actually. My dual core Athlon64 running Linux draws only about 80 watts at maximum load (fanless 6600 video card and 320GB SATA drive included). Newer machines based around the Core 2 should do even better.

  21. Summarize by pipingguy · · Score: 1, Funny

    10 links in one submission, wow.

  22. old... by Cr0t · · Score: 0

    I don't know for how many years I have been building movie machines with Linux.

  23. how about a bake-off? by HunkaHunkaBurninLove · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'd like to see a thorough comparison between the LixSystems' $560 system

    http://www.linuxtechtoys.com/ltt/product_info.php/ cPath/24_27/products_id/237

    and Interact-TV's $600 system

    http://store.interact-tv.com/store/product_info.ph p?cPath=9&products_id=81.

    And any others that might be out there.

  24. Re:Already done, but better. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Unfortunately, it's uber-expensive, costing around 2500 USD

    $2500? For a 1GHz G4?!? You could buy a used "table lamp" style iMac on ebay or cragslist, rip off the monitor, plug a mini-dvi to S-video adapter into it, and have the same capabilities for 1/10th the cost.

  25. Old and Lame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    This has already been done in the world of OS X:

    http://homepage.mac.com/chamady/MacMiniReview

    1. Re:Old and Lame by ferocus · · Score: 1

      I had the chance to try one of these MiniMac thingies so far it is the best option for a small/quiet/fully featured box in the market i know

      --
      When the race is over, we're all in the same team.
  26. Drop your sig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you were right the first time.

  27. Here's a truely silent system for $245 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    and this one even comes with a CPU!

    http://damnsmalllinux.org/store/Mini_ITX_Systems/M ini_ITX_BareBones_Computer

    I have a silent M10000 system, which is similar to this one, which makes a perfect MythTV front end.

  28. Silent laptop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Perhaps the only draw back is the non-customisable hardware and price, but it's difficult to go pass laptop for silent pc.

  29. Deal: Nice HDTV Case, Mobo, & FC5 Myth $300 by amcdiarmid · · Score: 1

    If you RTFA, this is $300 for a HDTV case, a quiet PSU, and a GF6 video integrated Motherboard. The motherboard is an ASIS a8n vm csm. ($78 @ newegg) The case is some sort of Custom HDTV case, not found with easy trawling, lets assume $100 + $60 for the "Ultra Silent" PSU.

    Not a bad deal for the $300 barebone. Especially as they configure the Linux for non easily installed stuff.

    Linux Install CD: http://www.lixsystems.net/lix/product_files/LX8100 -939BB-A8NVN/installCD/Lx8100-939BB-A8NVN_InstallC D.htm
    (Coincedentally, also the site that is selling the units)

  30. It does not look silent to me. by niceone · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The PSU looks quiet, but it's not fanless.

    There are two case fans - I couldn't see how loud they are, they say "Case fans as low as 1200rpm", but they look pretty small and small fans are usually pretty whiney.

    The model that comes with a CPU seems to use a stock heatsink/fan and there doesn't look like there's a lot of room in there for a quieter solution. Also there are air holes straight above the CPU which are going to let the noise straight out.

    I didn't find anywhere where they quoted a sound level for the whole system - maybe I missed it?

    I have no idea how this compares to other HTPC form factor solution, but it sure isn't "truely silent".

    1. Re:It does not look silent to me. by KillerBob · · Score: 1

      Of course it's truly silent as sold.... A computer without a CPU, optical drives, or a hard drive isn't going to make a lot of noise. :-)

      Silencing your PC is an easy thing to do, though. Just about any PC can be made silent, too... Just replace your case fans with variable speed fans, and your CPU, GPU, and Northbridge fans with passive heatsinks. At the low speed, the fans won't make a lot of noise at all. Even with a "silent" PC, though, there's going to be noise. I mean... here's what I've thrown in my system:

      Case: Antec Overture II
      Mobo: Gigabyte K8NSC-939 (Northbridge sink replaced with a Zalman passive sink)
      Proc: Athlon64 3000+ (Heatsink replaced with an Arctic Cooling Silencer64 Ultra TC)
      VC: Radeon X1300 AGP 256MB (VGA, S-Video and DVI out, with an adaptor for the S-Video for RCA and Component, and a DVI-VGA adaptor)
      HDD: Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 (SATA, 160GB)
      Optical: NEC 3550a DVD-RW (silver)
      Wireless: your choice, really. I went with an Asus WL-138g

      Now. Here's what I've learned from experience... At idle, sitting the same distance from both my PC and my Laptop, the laptop makes more noise. Truly silencing my PC isn't going to be possible for two reasons:
      1, I still need an optical drive. Especially if it's going to be used as a multimedia PC. Silent optical drives do not exist. There's several options out there for *quiet* optical drives, but silent ones do not exist. Aren't even possible with current optical drive design. (Are possible by redesigning the drive so that the laser moves, but the disc doesn't, which would come at a major sacrifice of drive speed). I *could* have gone with a Plextor 716. Would have, too, except that it isn't available with a silver bezel. I went with the NEC for purely aesthetic reasons, and was willing to sacrifice a little to get it.

      2, If I were to dispense with active case fans, I would face a serious heat problem. It's possible to get rid of my exhaust fans, and it's possible to replace the PSU with one that doesn't have an active fan (well, possible on any other case, but the Overture series uses a custom/proprietary PSU), but most stereo/multimedia equipment gets put into a cabinet without a lot of ventilation. Coupled with higher end processors and video cards that generate a lot of heat, you have a problem that needs to be addressed. Passive cooling on a heatsink is only good when there's good ventilation, so you have to decide which fan makes more noise: the CPU fan or the case fan.

      It's entirely possible to build a computer with no moving parts. But that computer will be lacking more than a few things that will keep it from being viable: an optical drive, enough hard drive space to store your movies/music, and a whole lot of power. By contrast, it's possible to build a quiet PC like mine. It's not silent, but it is quiet enough that I can hear a pin drop from across the room when I'm sitting a foot away from it.

      PS: I could also have gotten a quieter system by opting for a different case/motherboard. I made a few choices for aesthetic reasons, though... I still have to live with the thing, and it's eye pleasing.

      --
      If you believe everything you read, you'd better not read. - Japanese proverb
  31. Try this mythtv frontend for 40 pounds by riflemann · · Score: 2, Interesting

    After seeing and discussing a very interesting mythtv frontend at Lugradio, I went out and bought myself (on ebay) a T-Online Vision S100 set top box. These were built for a german VoD service, but they're easily available on ebay.

    It is *totally* silent (no moving parts) and comes with wifi, ir remote, ide slots, a pci slot, tv/audio/spdif out, usb and runs linux beautifully. I can even use it as a Wifi AP. It's only 766MHz and the 128Mb DRAM is soldered on (non upgradeable) but this is all you need for a silent box.

    And whereas most set-top-box PCs are reminiscent of a massive mid 80's VCR, this is actually no bigger than your average DVD player.

    Note I say "frontend". You probably need a bigger case to get a PVR-150 into it, so it might work as a combined back/frontend, but in its natural form factor it's easier as a frontend. Though you can buy USB based DVB tuners, and assuming there's linux support, you've got your backend.

    Requires some hardware hacking if you want to get a DVD drive or a 2.5" HDD into it (mine runs off a 1Gb USB stick), but remember - there are no moving parts, and it's got wifi built in!

  32. Hardware MPEG decoding? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

    What really is the point of this? MPEG is hardly CPU intensive to decode these days. Even an XBOX can decode MPEG4 HDTV streams on it's CPU, a lowly Celeron 750MHz.

    A useful feature would be hardware H.264 encoding.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    1. Re:Hardware MPEG decoding? by fuzznutz · · Score: 1
      What really is the point of this? MPEG is hardly CPU intensive to decode these days. Even an XBOX can decode MPEG4 HDTV streams on it's CPU, a lowly Celeron 750MHz.

      At full HiDef widescreen resolutions (1920x1440)it takes a lot of CPU to decode in real time. I bought a PC-HDTV card for an Athlon 1Ghz machine to run MythTV. Playback stutters on HiDef at 720p or better. I ended up replacing it with a Haupage 150 analog card. Mpeg2 software decoding is great on the Athlon at standard resolutions. I may grab one of these units for my HDTV card.
    2. Re:Hardware MPEG decoding? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Maybe there was something wrong with your PC, or your set-up. An XBOX can decode that on a 750MHz Celeron (downscaled by graphic hardware for output). Even 720p XVID plays okay.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  33. The article is misleading by temcat · · Score: 1

    It's is incorrect to state anything about quietness of the system with such a big unknown quantity as CPU cooler noise level, given that CPU must be supplied by the user.

  34. Been there, done that. by r_cerq · · Score: 1

    3 MythTV boxes (1 master, 2 "satellites"), all running FC5. As someone previously mentioned, just "yum install mythtv-suite" using the atrpms repo.

  35. I've had one of these for a while by JeffTL · · Score: 0

    For a couple years now I've had an HTPC hooked up to my TV that is pretty much silent ... it has a TV tuner, DVD player, various information services, a thingamajig for showing photos and playing music from my Macs. Oh, and did I mention that it runs Linux?

  36. I might just get this by interstellar_donkey · · Score: 1

    This may be just the ticket.

    Currently I've a Windows box with quite a bit of media (both video/movies and mp3s) on its HDD. I have an S-video cable and a fiber optic cable running some 30 feet from the desktop to my AV receiver.

    It works alright, and the quality is pretty decent, but it's somewhat clunky to use as a true HTPC. I literally have to drag media player into the other display and maximize it to watch anything. From where it's situated, I don't have line of sight for the remote in my normal TV viewing location (my Harmony can't even reach it), and even if I could I wouldn't know where to start to find a decent software front end to control the HT.

    This appears to be a pretty decent solution. Just a set top box I can put with all my other A/V equipment that does everything I need. The PVR feature would be a significant bonus.

    However, I'm not too knowledgeable about Linux powered HTPCs, and I'm going off several assumptions which may or may not actually be true:

    1. Out of the box, the system will be configured to send proper audio streams to the receiver, without stripping DTS/Dolby Digital out of the source audio.

    2. The interface (both the GUI and command line) will be clear and readable on the TV if I'm running component video from the HTPC to my receiver and then to the display. It also will allow me to easily browse and select various media I want to play.

    3. I'll be able to network the device and either stream media, or copy that media and store it locally, read from my Windows box's HDD. Also, it'll be able to decode and play various file formats (AVI/MPG etc.) as well as be able to download various codecs (like Divx).

    4. It can run remote shells, just so I can enjoy the novelty of being on IRC from my HTPC.

    If my first three assumptions are correct, I'd say it's highly likely I'll be picking this (or something like it) up in the near future.

    --
    The Internet is generally stupid
  37. a lot of that isn't true.. by YesIAmAScript · · Score: 1

    First, you're forgetting the optical drive. As any Xbox 360 owner will tell you, the optical drive can add a lot of noise to the system. On the 360, although the machine isn't nearly silent without the optical drive on, it gets a lot louder with it on.

    Also, slow processors and low-end video cards today do not have more than enough power for HD video. They would for MPEG-2 video, but not for MPEG-4 or H.264. Only a very few video cards accelerate MPEG-4 or H.264 at all. And most of them are high-end mosters that have fans.

    I have a Mac Mini with a 1.66GHz Core Duo and 2G RAM) and it can't play full screen 1080p H.264 video at full 24fps frame rate (let alone 60fps). It almost can, it'll play it if it is 2.35:1 movie (which means the image is 1920x817x24fps), but it won't play a 1.85:1 movie (1920x1034x24fps) let alone full screen, full temporal resolution (1920x1080x60fps).

    --
    http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/8/20/95
    1. Re:a lot of that isn't true.. by FuturePastNow · · Score: 1

      Most optical drives are no louder than a stand-alone DVD player, and any decent HTPC would be playing videos from its hard drive or even a backend fileserver.

      As for your Mac mini, its processor isn't the bottleneck. Shitty Intel graphics are, and any modern graphics card (Geforce 7- series, Radeon x1k series) should handle MPEG4 and h.264 in hardware.

      --
      Give a man fire, and you warm him for the night. Set a man on fire, and you warm him for the rest of his life.
  38. the reviewers couldn't.. by YesIAmAScript · · Score: 1

    It's actually pretty difficult to test something that is 14dBA. Ambient in almost any room is higher than that, even before you put test equipment in the room.

    I doubt the reviewers could have managed to test verify the power supply was only 14dBA.

    I agree it's pretty clear the reviewers don't really know what they are talking about.

    --
    http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/8/20/95
    1. Re:the reviewers couldn't.. by lkeagle · · Score: 1

      Indeed.

      It costs tens of thousands of dollars to create a room with enough isolation to measure SPL that low.

      It costs even more for the equipment sensitive enough to actually perform the measurement.

  39. a truly silent PC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here you go, http://www.tomshardware.com/2006/01/09/strip_out_t he_fans/ a truly silent PC with additional benefit of cooking french fries while watching a movie.

  40. Pick low power components by WoTG · · Score: 1

    I've actually been trying to spec. out a PC based PVR the last few days -- my total pretax cost is coming around to CAD 450.

    It should be relatively easy to get your power usage to under 150W at load, and half of that at idle. It's still a lot more than a DVD player, but certainly not 350W. The trick is to be selective about components -- you don't need the highest end, most power consuming, hardware for this. Here's a link to an article at Silent PC Review on these things -- note, the system they've tested does not include a TV tuner, and uses a laptop harddrive, so figure on them being on the low side.

    Don't forget, after you've built a PC based PVR, you get a whole lot more flexability that you could possibly get from a standalone device. Imagine 3 years down the road you want to switch to HDTV, use next-gen DVD's, or get multiple TV tuners? Well, each of those will be a simple $100-200 dollar upgrade.

  41. Why Silent? by mikerm19 · · Score: 1

    I built an HTPC not too long ago. The case fans are a little loud, but honestly, I can't hear them over the TV or movie. I don't even think about them. Sure, when it's completely silent in the room, you can hear it. For me though, that doesn't matter.

    I'm actually suprised I didn't see a silent power supply (Thermaltake W0029) in there. It would stick out the back a little, but it would probably fit in there. As for CPU fans, the Zalman CNPS7000B-Cu I have is VERY quiet, and with out the case fans, I can't hear it.

  42. Hello? by Rob+Simpson · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Because I'm TOO LAZY to do so! Try taking Reading Comprehension 101, please. I said in the post that I didn't have enough interest to go through the work and frustration of setting up the system and getting Myth to work ONCE, for MYSELF. Do you really think I would go to the additional difficulty of setting up something for mass production if I'm not willing to do it once?

    I have plenty of money...if someone else sold systems like that working 100%, then I'd happily pay for their services. Me=Part of the market, get it?

  43. I bought one of these by rcw-home · · Score: 2, Informative
    It just came in yesterday afternoon, so I haven't had time to get everything running on it yet, however there are a couple things worth commenting on:

    I talked to Andy, the guy who apparently is LinuxTechToys, a bit before buying the system. He was very helpful in clarifying questions the website created. When I asked him if my old MatrixOrbital VFD2041 display would fit in the case, that was all the prompting he needed to make me custom mounting brackets for it.

    The system came packed in one inch of low-density foam in a cardboard box about half an inch too narrow. As a result, the FedEx ground trip from California to Washington left a sizable dent on the right side of the case, possibly from the slimline CD to IDE adapter which was packaged alongside. I was able to pound this out with a hammer, a block of wood, and some gaffer's tape without any damage to the paint, so no biggie.

    Everything is a very tight fit. I had purchased a Samsung SN-S082D DVD burner for this system. I don't know if this drive is slightly larger than any of the others, but using the included IDE adapter, there was literally about a millimeter of space between the back of the floppy power connector's plastic tab and the front of the power supply - not enough room for the other side of the connector. I worked around this by grabbing an old fan power connector and soldering GND and 5V wires directly to the IDE adapter circuit board. (I needed to make one of these anyway for my VFD2041 anyway.) The 40-pin IDE cable rests snugly on the power supply, and I'm glad that power supply isn't a millimeter higher. There's a capacitor on the motherboard partially blocking the VFD2041's serial port, but that's OK because I only need pins 3 and 5 connected, it's the bottom row of pins that's obscured, and appropriately-sized wires will friction-fit into a female DE9 connector.

    My first message from the system was from Asus's BIOS, which said something like: "USB overcurrent detected. Locate and unplug USB device. System will shut down in 10 seconds." The IR receiver draws its 5V from one of the USB headers on the motherboard - I'm glad they chose this location instead of directly from the power supply, otherwise I could have let the magic smoke out of something. With the IR receiver circuit board screwed in to place between the VFD2041's mounting bracket and the case, there's enough pressure to cause the very end of that 5V line to make contact with the mounting bracket. I removed the IR receiver, covered the entire receiver circuit board in electrical tape, tucked it in next to the VFD, and taped it in place. Problem solved.

    The SN-S082D's tray is, at 13.8mm-ish, slightly wider than the acrylic front panel cutout. I had to sand the front panel quite a bit to get smooth operation. 100-grit sandpaper left the edges considerably smoother than before - they must have been CNC milled and left at that.

    I do not have a dB meter or the appropriate room to verify their 14dB claim, however the system has a total of four fans (CPU, power supply, and two case fans) and the only noise I could identify after powering on was from the CPU fan (which is the stock AMD fan). The BIOS does a good job of spinning these only as fast as they need to go.

    Debian Etch Beta 3 boots just fine on it, however I plan to netboot it (which the BIOS supports) so it'll take me a bit longer to get everything installed.

    Bottom line - the system works, they will go the extra mile for you, but be prepared to put more time into it than you think you'll need.

    1. Re:I bought one of these by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This barebones sounds quite interesting - I need a front-end which will do HD at 1080i and look nice next to our receiver.

      Can anyone tell me WTF they're putting on the VFD? Are there MythTV modules that will display anything useful on it?

  44. Serial by rcw-home · · Score: 1
    I do not think that computer has serial, only parallel. (Can't tell for sure, but I assume the port next to the DVI is VGA/HD-15, not serial.)

    It is a VGA port. There are no external serial connectors, but the motherboard has two serial port headers. Pin 1 on the first serial port is used for the IR receiver.

  45. Not really by ShimmyShimmy · · Score: 2, Informative

    if your not using HDMI

    I'll overlook the minor typo here, but I think you're still missing something. If you're not using a digital signal, the signal will be downgraded to 540p or something similar (about 1/2 the bandwidth). First, this is not going into effect until around 2010, so this won't be a problem yet. Second, the signal downgrade, caused by the Image Constraint Token (ICT), is only for analog signals, namely Component, and devices that support digital signals, but not HDCP (namely computer video cards). Both HDMI and DVI support the same protocol, and both support HDCP.
    Generally, if your TV has either DVI or HDMI, you should be fine. Furthermore, saying "everything" will be downgraded is just not correct. All of the downgrade crap comes directly from the vicious/senseless copyright restrictions of the new DVD generation (bluray/hddvd). Specifically, it does NOT apply to (a) home movies being played back in HD, (b) any HD signals from your cable company or Over-the-Air HD service, or for that matter, (c) any movies/video files in HD that you may have on your computer.

    I appreciate your spite towards DRM and the like, but this downgrading is directed specifically at bluray and hddvd.

    --
    Partial Credit: The Engineer's Best friend
    "Well, the bridge didn't fall all the way down!"
    1. Re:Not really by mrchaotica · · Score: 1
      Generally, if your TV has either DVI or HDMI, you should be fine.

      IF and ONLY IF your TV supports HDCP over that connection. I am under the impression that, while all TVs with HDMI connections support HDCP, those with only DVI connections may not.

      In other words, while it's possible that somebody's DVI-input TV might work fine with HDCP-"protected" content, it's a safer bet that it won't.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  46. I build my Linux Media Center by malex · · Score: 1

    I built my own Linux Media Center based on Fedora Core 5 and MythTV.
    I worked a lot against the noise and now the box is happly working side by side with my TV set. It also passed my wife check. :-)

    I documented all the job on my blog (in Italian): http://www.malex.org/archives/2006/05/linux-media- center-fai-da-te/

  47. Re:Where are you going to store all the media?! by zmollusc · · Score: 1

    ....On your fileserver?

    --
    They whose government reduces their essential liberties for temporary security, receive neither liberty nor security.
  48. Yes, but by Supersonic1425 · · Score: 1

    does it run Windows?

    *ducks*

  49. Quiet??? by jaseparlo · · Score: 1

    Who wants quiet? I want the world's Freakin' Loudest Home Theatre System!

    --
    All available data suggest that regardless of any of this, the sun will still come up tomorrow.
  50. 14dbA? Bullshit. by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 1

    I call bullshit on the "14dbA" power supply.

    1: No distance measurement is given, so the measurement is bunk anyway.
    2: The quietest fan-based PSUs are around 18dBA/1m, and that's difficult to measure - typing, nearby traffic, and just about any other noise can easily muffle a sound that is that quiet.

    The only way to build a "silent" PC is to build one with no fans and no optical/hard drives. Even then, poor power circuitry can make noise.

  51. again, not true... by YesIAmAScript · · Score: 1

    Unless your optical drive is riplocked, it will read the disc at 8X or more. Drives are a lot louder at 8X than a standalone drive that runs at 1X.

    I have no idea how you say a decent HTPC is defined by where it is playing its content from.

    My shitty Intel graphics aren't a bottleneck, they just aren't helping at all. They don't accelerate MPEG-4 or H.264 playback. As to your comments about high-end cards accelerating MPEG-4 and H.264, that wasn't the point. I did allow for this with my comments, but this is a long way from the GP's comment:

    "And since relatively slow processors and low-end video cards today have more than enough power for HD video,"

    A GeForce 7 is not a low-end card. Nor are the Radeons you speak of.

    The GP's argument was wrong about most video cards and misstated how much CPU you need to play HD video. Your arguments do not refute this.

    --
    http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/8/20/95
  52. What MEDIA does it play? by jonesy16 · · Score: 1

    It's interesting that nearly the entire comment/response section for this article is dedicated to the noise factor. Assuming normal TV/Movie/Music listening levels, the sound coming out of the HTPC should be negligible, and if not, it's one of the easiest things to fix. The bigger issue, it would seem to me, is media support. Their website claims that out of the box this is nothing more than a TV/radio box, which is useful to about . . . . nobody. In fact, it doesn't even include a TV or radio tuner, just the applications! Using stock FC5 you can pretty much rule out working DVD playback or MP3 streaming. So as near as I can tell they're bundling a MB/PS/Case and giving you an install that won't sufficiently play back what 95% of people are going to want to play on it. Don't get me wrong, I'd love a linux based HTPC that I can have shipped to my door, plug in, and GO! I just think that this product is misleading since it doesn't appear to do anything.

  53. How long for this to... by Kreylix · · Score: 1

    trickle down to Dell? 10 years? 20? Never? Sorry, I'm just in disbelief that computers aren't dead silent at this point. You would think when customizing, say a Dell, you could choose silence options.