Slashdot Mirror


Advertising Comes to DVR Owners

bill_kress writes "According to Reuters, television studios are finally trying to target DVR viewers with advertising. The effort, however, seems rather backwards — They are extending the same exact image across the entire 30 second commercial so that TIVO Viewers will be forced to view at least one frame. Wouldn't it be better to add value to the viewing experience instead?" From the article: "The advert for its new drama 'Brotherhood' will show a single image on the screen for the entire 30-second slot, and therefore retain its "sales message" when viewed even at the 12-times speeds enabled by Sky+ and other digital recorders, also known as personal video recorders, or PVRs. Advertisers have been racing to find ways to get messages through as higher numbers of consumers watch TV programs when they want using such recorders, often skipping the commercials."

59 of 294 comments (clear)

  1. Wow by CerebusUS · · Score: 5, Funny

    Gee, that won't upset the standard viewing public at all... will it?

    Maybe they could play an emergency test tone over the entire 30 seconds, just to get everyone's attention.

    1. Re:Wow by johndierks · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My Tivo has 60x fast forward... so advertisers will have a 1 in 2 chance of me seeing their single frame! I guess they're the gambling type. In all reality, the bigger problem is the huge ads they're overlaying at the bottom of the shows I'm watching. They're animated and very distracting, which is the point after all. Today, they're for other shows on the network, but I'm sure they'll soon be for other products.

    2. Re:Wow by russ1337 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      In all reality, the bigger problem is the huge ads they're overlaying at the bottom of the shows I'm watching
      I hate those things... I call them pop-ups. The remind me of the old Kazza that was loaded with gozilla ad-ware or some crap. They really piss me off. I take no notice of what they are, or I end up associating being pissed off with what the ad is for.

      No adaware or spybotS&D is going to scrub those things. There is no escaping them. What do we do?
    3. Re:Wow by AxelBoldt · · Score: 4, Insightful
      There is no escaping them. What do we do?
      Get yourself a library card and kill your TV.
    4. Re:Wow by sobachatina · · Score: 3, Insightful
      What do we do?

      Hmmm. Go read a book?

      I think it is amusing that people seem to think that they have to watch TV for some reason. Movies, popular music, and TV are so ingrained in our culture that it doesn't seem to occur to people that you can in fact entertain yourself without them.

      Learn to play an instrument- that will keep you happily entertained for the rest of your life.

      I understand that this doesn't answer your rhetorical question. I wanted to rant and this seemed like a good place to do it.

    5. Re:Wow by Digicrat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I always fastforward through the commercials on my DVR, but the speed is such that I normally see at least a couple of frames of each commercial - and I actually like it that way.

      Every now and then I might see the flash of a commercial that might look intersting and will actually go back to watch it - albeit not often. If they actually made more commercials that were (a) interesting, (b) actually relevant to something, (c) not repeated a zillion times, or (d) didn't include dozens of 'enhancement' and diet commercials that nobody wants to see, then maybe commercials would be more effective, but as it is, most people just ignore the commercials, even when they can't skip them.

      Product placement has definetly been on the rise lately, and will definetly continue to. Commercials are a dying medium - nobody wants to see them most of the time, and on-demand and PVRs are making it easier than ever to skip them. When done right, product placement is unobtrusive and can actually add to the realism of the show, or for that matter video game (an area that's starting to grow exponentially).

      Of course, added product placement will also eventually mean less reruns on tv when networks can't change or re-charge for the ads in old shows . . .

    6. Re:Wow by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 4, Informative

      My Tivo has 60x fast forward... so advertisers will have a 1 in 2 chance of me seeing their single frame!

      Only if TiVo showed 60x fast-forward updating at only 1 frame per second would that be true. In fact, at 60x speed, out of a 30-second commercial TiVo shows you 15 frames of it in half a second.

      To see only one frame of a 30-second commercial without still-storing the frame longer than the standard 1/30th of a second, you'd need 900x speed.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    7. Re:Wow by WilliamSChips · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Books are great but sometimes you just don't want to read. I don't know why that's so hard to understand for some people.

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    8. Re:Wow by Quino · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I've been wondering for some time if the "high" road wouldn't actually be more effective as well: make commercials entertaining.

      It's rare, but there are commercials that are so funny, witty, etc. that I actually find myself rewinding my Tivo to watch them in their entirety, or to show it to someone ("I shove my beer inside the crack of a turkey!").

      Though I cannnot speak from experience, a friend who studied marketting did once mention that this is much more common in Europe: sometimes commercials just have interesting scenes even though they have nothing to do with the prodcut. I know I've seen surreal commercials for British Airways, for instance, that never even showed an airplane. In fact, if it didn't say British Airways (Airlines?) at the end, you would never know who paid for the commercial.

    9. Re:Wow by treeves · · Score: 3, Funny

      I play an instrument, and not to entertain myself. It's enjoyable, but it's not escape, it's work to some degree.

      That said, I don't really give a rip. I don't have a TIVO. I don't even have cable TV. I don't even know why I was reading this. Silly me.

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
    10. Re:Wow by dubiousmike · · Score: 3, Funny

      In the mean time, its people who sit in front of their computer for 14 hours a day who are smarmily telling the rest to read a book. That's like yelling to people who are using a Segway that they should ride a bike FROM THEIR CAR.

    11. Re:Wow by nacturation · · Score: 2, Funny

      Get yourself a library card and kill your TV.

      No, no... the answer is obvious: apply directly to the forehead.

      (I also recommend tagging this story with applydirectlytotheforehead.)

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
  2. The message will be.. by wfberg · · Score: 3, Funny
    The message will be..


    OBEY
    --
    SCO employee? Check out the bounty
    1. Re:The message will be.. by mcmonkey · · Score: 2, Insightful
      The message will be...
      CONSUME
  3. Re:That'll suck... by russotto · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I like this idea. Sounds like a commercial-flagging algorithm could easily detect it and skip every single frame in the recording. Did I mention I have a mythbox?

  4. Go Go! by RyanFenton · · Score: 5, Funny

    Tivo: Go go gadget 30 second skip!

    MythTV: Go go gadget commercial detection and skip!

    Windows DVRs: Uh... Go go gadget DRM! Aw, crap!

    Ryan Fenton

    1. Re:Go Go! by MindStalker · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Oh yes. And remind me what happend to that company? Oh yea they pretty much got sued out of existance.

    2. Re:Go Go! by Guppy06 · · Score: 3, Informative

      "Windows DVRs: Uh... Go go gadget DRM! Aw, crap!"

      Uh... my MCE setup did 30 s skip out of the box. In fact, I've become so used to it that it's become a bit of a problem while watching DVDs (it's the same button as chapter skip).

      FUD much?

    3. Re:Go Go! by dmnic · · Score: 2, Interesting

      way to be offtopic...

      Digital Networks is still in business and they werent sued. they didnt market themselves like Tivo so they didnt make as much money. the ended up selling the company to Digital Networks. while they dont make hardware anymore, but they still release software updates for the existing Replays.

      does the new series 3 Tivo still require a landline for intial setup of the box?
      if you want lan connectivity, do you still have to buy the usb adapter?
      how long did it take Tivo to enable(without hacking) you to tranfer recorded programs from your Tivo to your pc?
      do I need to go on about the superiority of the ReplayTV box or should I stop now?

      having used both, there are 2 things Tivo did better than ReplayTV:
      1) marketing
      2) channel guide layout

    4. Re:Go Go! by amuro98 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Tivo calls it an "easter egg". I think Tivo wanted to make it a normal feature, but decided against it after the TV studios growled at them.

      Anyways, it takes all of 10 seconds to enable the 30-sec. skip on your Tivo:

      Just start playing a program, then hit:

      [select] [>] [select] [3] [0] [select] If you did it right, it'll go "ding ding ding" and then the button that used to skip to the 15/30 tic marks, now just skips 30 seconds forward. The only downside to this is that if your Tivo reboots or loses power, you have to re-enter this code in again.

  5. it would, but ... by joeyspqr · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "Wouldn't it be better to add value to the viewing experience instead?" only if your primary concern was the viewer instead of advertising fees

    --
    +1 fashionably cynical
  6. So... by Mattintosh · · Score: 3, Funny

    So, how long is it going to take for PVR makers to develop software that reads the AUDIO stream and returns you to your regularly scheduled programming when the waveform peaks go from clipped to normal? I don't want to jump 30 seconds forward. I want to skip the commercials.

    1. Re:So... by DDLKermit007 · · Score: 2, Informative

      They allready do, but they look at far more than just audio. Models no longer in production that Replay made did exactly that. They got sued and stopped using that, but there are allot out there still if you want them. I use a Replay with comskip functions and it works roughly 80-90% of the time and still has a 30 second skip button. Only problem really is with autocomskip functions is every once in a while you get a show that a part gets mistaked for a comercial, but it's not something you can't deal with. Just rewind and turn off comskip for that part.

  7. Except for us MythTV owners! by gameboyhippo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I say "Bring it on!" If all advertisers did this, then it will be easier for my DVR to detect comercials so I don't have to see them at all!

  8. When will it stop? by Whammy666 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You just have to wonder just how dense the network executives really are. I wonder when it will finally sink in that saturating your programming with advertising to the point that the viewing audience revolts is ultimately counter-productive. They should take it as a clue that if viewers are willing to spend several hundred dollars to avoid ads using specialized hardware, there is something seriously wrong with your marketing plan.

    --
    When all else fails, run.
    1. Re:When will it stop? by EllynGeek · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I do wonder. How do such dim, unimaginative people hold jobs? You'd think even a TV exec could figure out that

      1. When you've seen a commercial 100 times, you're probably tired of it
      2. Even more so if it's a product you have no interest in
      3. Which is probably 95% of all ads- I don't know the real numbers, but you can look at any random ad and figure out pretty easily that the product will appeal to a small fraction of viewers
      4. Even for products you're interested in, you're not going to watch every single damned ad they run
      5. Making viewers hate you doesn't sell product

      I wish natural selection were more effective.

      --

      we will end no whine before its time

    2. Re:When will it stop? by PRMan · · Score: 2, Interesting

      &gt&gt&gtWhy do people watch Internet Video ads (the ones that come before clips)?

      I don't. I spend the whole 20 seconds trying to figure out how to skip it (and often succeeding).

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    3. Re:When will it stop? by Whammy666 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The networks were able to make profits 10+ years ago when a 60 minute show typically had only 10 minutes of commercials. Now it's 22 minutes of ads in a 60 minute show. I'm sorry, but that's just plain greed talking. Nobody is denying that a non-subscription network needs ad revenue to survive, but there is such a thing as going too far.

      Subscription TV has now become worse than network TV in terms of ad saturation. The end result is that I watch very little TV at all anymore. There are so many ads that most TV shows no longer have any continuity to them because of all the interruptions.

      Saturating the broadcast full of ads does three things: Increases revenue, decreases programming cost because the shows are much shorter as a result of all the ads, and it pisses off the viewers which lowers the ratings of the show which in turn forces the broadcaster to add more advertisement to make up the difference in lost revenue which pisses of the viewers still further.

      --
      When all else fails, run.
  9. Ads Targeting TiVo by lpoulsen · · Score: 5, Interesting

    GE did something infinetely more intelligent a few months ago.
    The last second of their ad was a set of single frames with interesting information. To see what was there, you had to repeatedly watch the ad until you managed to hit pause at just the right time so you could single-step through the hidden content.

    That way, (at least some) TiVo owners ended up spending 15 minutes on a 30-second ad. Now THAT's creative!!

    1. Re:Ads Targeting TiVo by russ1337 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      The last second of their ad was a set of single frames with interesting information. To see what was there, you had to repeatedly watch the ad until you managed to hit pause at just the right time so you could single-step through the hidden content.
      You are right.. that is amaizing. This is the exact type of thing I like to see - innovation! Not the 'cry cry cry, they are fast forwarding our ads, we need a new law' BS! Word up to GE. I'd like to see this example used AGAINST those trying to put through more DRM and laws to back it up... along the lines of......

      "GE managed to get consumers to spend 15 minutes on a 30 second ad with their TiVo, how come your company is trying to stop TiVo's? aren't you CLEVER enough to think of this kind of innovation? - Nah, nah na nah nahhhh! [/teasing]
    2. Re:Ads Targeting TiVo by Arielholic · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "The last second of their ad was a set of single frames with interesting information."

      Then why not extend that and fill the whole 30 seconds with interesting information?

    3. Re:Ads Targeting TiVo by garcia · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I was far more intrigued with the simplicity of the HeadOn commercial (no, the YouTube segment is not skipping -- the commercial is really like that).

      I have absolutely no idea what HeadOn is for or why they are advertising it but it was enough to make sure we stopped the Tivo to watch it. Then we watched it again and again to make sure that we were laughing for good reason ;)

    4. Re:Ads Targeting TiVo by KingVance · · Score: 2

      i would rather have a headache than buy that product based solely on the annoyance and obnoxious factor of the commercial. I do not buy gap clothing for the same reason. Annoying me is the quickest way to get me to not purchase your product.

    5. Re:Ads Targeting TiVo by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm confused. What exactly am I supposed to do with it?

      --
      This guy's the limit!
    6. Re:Ads Targeting TiVo by imthesponge · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think it's some kind of birth control. At least I hope so, because that's how I've been using it.

  10. Wouldn't more interesting adds be the answer? by AndyG314 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If I see a good, or interesting looking add I will stop to watch it. A great example of this is the add with Abe Lincon and a monkey playing jump rope. You can't just wizz by Abe Lincon and a monkey playing jump rope, you have to see what it's all about. Turnes out the add was for sleeping pills.

    --
    If it's dead, you killed it.
    1. Re:Wouldn't more interesting adds be the answer? by Kesch · · Score: 2, Funny
      You can't just wizz by Abe Lincon and a monkey playing jump rope, you have to see what it's all about.


      This would make a good .sig
      --
      If this signature is witty enough, maybe somebody will like me.
  11. Same old, Same old by suprcvic · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Isn't this how it always is though? When Cable TV first arrived it was touted as having no commercials and then they came. We used to have the luxury of not watching commercials at the movie theatre because we paid to be there, now we have to watch the same trailer for the same bad tv show over and over again while we wait for the movie to start. The "no commercials" idea is IMHO a bait and switch maneuver that for some reason always works on consumers. The ridiculous number of commercials is the main reason I don't watch tv anymore. There are some shows I might like to see, but I'm not willing to sit through all the commercials to see them. Of course, it doesn't help that most of the shows are bad shows with excessively overpaid actors which brings us back to the insane amount of commercials, they have to pay for the talent, or lack thereof.

    1. Re:Same old, Same old by michrech · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Isn't this how it always is though? When Cable TV first arrived it was touted as having no commercials and then they came. We used to have the luxury of not watching commercials at the movie theatre because we paid to be there, now we have to watch the same trailer for the same bad tv show over and over again while we wait for the movie to start. The "no commercials" idea is IMHO a bait and switch maneuver that for some reason always works on consumers. The ridiculous number of commercials is the main reason I don't watch tv anymore. There are some shows I might like to see, but I'm not willing to sit through all the commercials to see them. Of course, it doesn't help that most of the shows are bad shows with excessively overpaid actors which brings us back to the insane amount of commercials, they have to pay for the talent, or lack thereof.

      While I'm not old enough to remember not having commercials on Cable TV, I did have a comment about movie theaters.

      The local 8 room theater has a slide show that is sync'ed to an audio track. This plays BEFORE the movie start time. You can avoid it outright, IF you are willing to get into the room as the movie starts. You still have the few movie trailers, but I like to see them because I often see them before they hit TV. When I went on vacation to SoCal to see my father, I went into an AMC and a Cinemark -- BOTH played really annoying full motion TV commercials (LONGER versions) *at* the movie start time. Both my father and I were debating leaving because of it.

      Back to the local theater (to me). I happen to know the guy that runs it (did some PC work for him when I worked for a local PC repair shop). I told him that I would no longer visit his business if he *ever* did that. He agreed that it is annoying and then went into a talk about how expensive it is to run a theater. After he finished, I told him it was not the fault of the studios, but the theater owners -- the theater owners are the ones that are allowing the studios to walk all over them. They need to band together and negotiate with the studios for better pricing or refuse to show the movies. He told me it'd never work, and started in on his thoughts as to why. I interrupted him mid-thought and told him, "If a good majority of the theaters -- chains and individually owned - just stopped showing movies, it will hit the studios bottom lines. If the theater owners provided very simple, clear, and easy to understand information on their closed and locked doors, with phone numbers to the studios, people WILL complain, and things WILL change."

      Will that be easy? No. I think it will need to happen, though. It's expensive enough on theater owners (especially independants) to equip their theaters, they don't need high movie prices to finish them off.

      To bring me back to topic -- My brand new DVR625 (I think that's the model -- it's the newer SD dual tuner Dish Network has) has a 30-ish second skip. The day it no longer operates as expected is the day it gets boxed back up and sent to Dish. I've been a customer of theirs for 6 or so years and won't put up with that. Unlike many TV addicted homes, I will have no problems getting rid of it and buying any shows I currently watch on DVD or getting the rest from 'the tubes'.

      --
      bork bork bork!
  12. Good. by JustNiz · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It sounds like the perfect signal for PVR software to watch for in order to skip commercials automatically.

  13. The Spinal Tap Solution.... by lexsco · · Score: 5, Funny

    .....PVR's that skip 31 Seconds.

    1. Re:The Spinal Tap Solution.... by Kesch · · Score: 2, Funny

      Pfft. The +Funny in GP podt goes all the way to +6.

      --
      If this signature is witty enough, maybe somebody will like me.
  14. Insanity by TheWoozle · · Score: 2, Insightful

    One definition of insanity is repeating the same behavior expecting a different outcome. It looks like advertising companies are functionally insane. Advertising on television is dead; people have moved on. (Hell, I don't even watch or pay for TV anymore).

    Time to find a new way to get paid to annoy millions of people.

    --
    Insisting on "correct" English is like saying that there is only one, definitive recipe for chili.
  15. Their approach doesn't work against Mythtv! by russ1337 · · Score: 5, Informative
    They are extending the same exact image across the entire 30 second commercial so that TIVO Viewers will be forced to view at least one frame.
    Fortunately, this does not work against Mythtv - you can skip the entire ad's with one press: -All you see is the start of the show after the ads! The ad detection algorithm just got an overhaul with Googles-Summer-of-Code (they wrote another version), but i've always found the current one pretty good.

    (I know your all gearing up to whine about how hard mythtv is to install,... then you probably havent tried Knoppmyth, or the Hyams Fantastic How-to )
  16. Honestly by Kesch · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is just stupid. I consider it a brute force attack at DVR owners, however, I still might miss this commercial thanks to the hidden 30 sec skip feature of the TiVo. (While watching a show: SELECT PLAY SELECT 3 0 SELECT. Your skip 30 min button will now do 30s instead. Repeat whenever an update resets functionality.) While these adds might be reach more DVR owners, they are going to need the most entertaining audio script in the world or they are going to be COMPLETELY boring for average TV viewers.

    There is a far more preferable category of commercials targetted at DVR owners: The ones that make you want to stop for them. Some commercials you merely stop for because they either interest you(car commercials when you are car shopping) are are simply well scripted and entertaining(Some of the recent Mac commercials). Then there was also a novel series of commercials that GE was running which had a series of text heavy images that were shown for only a few frames each near the end of the commercial. The point was to create a humorous Easter Egg for DVR owners who would be inclined to pause and advance frame by frame.

    --
    If this signature is witty enough, maybe somebody will like me.
  17. Doh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Just make ads twelve times slower so they are shown with normal speed when fast-forwarding. (-:

    1. Re:Doh! by Odiumjunkie · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What would be better is carefully crafted ads that will have significance at 12x - perhaps even reveal hidden easter eggs only visible by watching them fast, by working out which frames will actually be viewable when watched at that speed. Messages and animations could be inserted that would be un-noticeable at a normal speed, assuming that 12x will skip frames predictably. A variety of steganography, almost. It would encourage DVR users to view them, especially if the easter eggs were clever or funny, revealed a hidden context around the normal ad.

  18. Do it the "stargate" way by captainstupid · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Stargate sg-1 recently featured an online companion to the current episode that was only visible while the show was actually being aired. This seems like a very simple and effective way to encourage people to watch the show as it airs and not to TiVo it for later viewing.

    --
    "Anyway, long story short... is a phrase whose origins are complicated and rambling...." - Abraham Simpson
  19. That's the easy way out by Minwee · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If you really want people to watch your advertisements, make them _want_ to watch. Make them interesting. People will go out of their way to watch them at least once, and share copies with all of their friends.

    Of course, the down side to this is that you may have to actually pay someone to do the job.

  20. Re:Now this is just dumb by kfg · · Score: 4, Funny

    Bah, I'll just keep myself full of beer so that I don't understand the visual even if I see it.

    Budweiser
    Budweiser
    Budweiser
    Budweiser
    .
    .
    .
    Budweiser

    KFG, Brought to you by -- Budweiser

  21. Good thing... by Phillup · · Score: 3, Interesting

    that I watch my shows months after they are recorded.

    I mean, I'd really hate to be suckered in by an advertisement that was actually relevant!

    But, by watching everything months later I can be sure that any shows being advertised will have been shown long ago... and, like every other frikken commercial... of absolutely no use to me.

    So, until I'm:

    1) geriatric
    2) female
    3) senile
    4) stupid
    5) impotent
    6) over weight
    7) bored
    8) unable to solve my own problems
    9) unable to read

    etc...

    I think I'll just keep skipping commercials. Because, at best... they are a complete waste of my time.

    --

    --Phillip

    Can you say BIRTH TAX
  22. First line in TFA says it all by just_another_sean · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "designed to combat viewers using digital recorders to avoid commercials."

    It's on biatch!

    --
    Creationist Textbook Stickers Declared Unconstitutional by CowboyNeal
  23. Re:For G by Phillup · · Score: 2, Informative

    My child is pretty rarely exposed to television advertising.

    Mine actually scream for me to come and ff when commercials come on.

    (The little one cries until the show comes back on!)

    I actually built a mythbox specifically so I could record the kid's shows and edit out all the crap... now I can set them down and let them watch without the commercials.

    I've got one of these that I stuff full of kid shows (and stuff for mom & dad too) for when we go traveling. Very nice to be in a hotel room and not be at the mercy of broadcast television!!

    --

    --Phillip

    Can you say BIRTH TAX
  24. Cost by lymond01 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I pay an extra $10 a month to rent the DVR from Comcast. What do I have to do to not watch commercials? How much will it cost? Do I have to buy a 12-pack of Pepsi, 2 pairs of Levis, a Toyota Camry, and a pack of Charmin Toilet Tissue every month before the advertisers will leave me alone?

    I'm paying money to not watch commercials. I'm not downloading pirated films or rogue recordings. What the hell is the deal?

  25. It's okay to breathe. :-) by Richard+Steiner · · Score: 2, Informative

    No need to hold your breath -- it's been done already by a commercial DVR vendor, and the end result is still very much available. Just check out eBay for any 5000-series ReplayTV unit (not 5500-series, which dropped the auto-skip feature).

    --
    Mainframe/UNIX Bit Twiddler and long time Windows/Linux Hobbyist.
    The Theorem Theorem: If If, Then Then.
  26. Re:For G by PitaBred · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If it takes moving pictures of a certain type to keep your kid happy, it's time to get them outside more and away from the babysitting box.

  27. Re:For G by Phillup · · Score: 3, Informative

    Actually, they are smart enough to know they are watching a specific show... and that they aren't sitting there to have shit^H^H commercials stuffed into their head.

    And, you can't always send the kids outside either.

    There is only one of me... mom works too... and someone has to cook dinner.

    I can't cook dinner and watch the kids at the same time.

    And neither can you.

    So, yeah. Sometimes they get to watch the tube. If you don't like it... tough.

    They aren't your kids.

    --

    --Phillip

    Can you say BIRTH TAX
  28. Re:For G by bill_kress · · Score: 2, Insightful

    And what happened to reading. Kids who read on their own before preschool end up with significantly better vocabularies and tend to be much more articulate--they also have a lot less trouble with schoolwork.

    It requires a lot of work on the parents' part to read to the kid every night from the time they are a baby to get them to take to it, but if that's what it takes to have a smart kid, isn't it worth it?

  29. Re:What I want by ColaMan · · Score: 2, Funny

    a gross classification for the ad (gambling, liquor, sex, stuff I don't care about)

    Bender, is that you?

    --

    You are in a twisty maze of processor lines, all alike.
    There is a lot of hype here.