Slashdot Mirror


Charge in 5 minutes, Drive 500 miles?

ctroutwi writes "In the wake of rising gasoline costs there have been plenty of alternatives seen on the horizon. Including Hybrids, Biofuels, fuel cells and battery powered all electric cars. CNN has recently posted a story about a company (EEStor) that plans on offering Ultra-Capacitor storage products. The claim being that you charge the ultra-capacitor in 5 minutes, with approximately 9$ (~$.45 a gallon) of electricity and then drive 500 miles."

319 comments

  1. daddypants email link broken? by adam · · Score: 4, Informative

    I emailed the on-duty editor (regarding this being a dupe), like any good little /. subscriber. Unfortunately my e-mail bounced pretty much immediately. Normally I would resist the temptation to join in the /. circle-jerk that is shouting "OMG DUPE DUPE DUPE!!" but I wanted someone (ScuttleMonkey, etc) to note that the 'daddypants' email link is bouncing.
    ( ERROR: Use of uninitialized value in concatenation (.) or string at... Line 126 ) ..ScuttleMonkey, if you want the full error, feel free to let me know where to e-mail it.

    On a sidenote, what seems odd to me is that not only is this a dupe that is currently visible on the index of slashdot, but that the article summary is almost identical to the earlier submission, and is even from the same submitter. Insert Matrix deja-vu quote here.

    Mods, try to be on the lookout for copy and paste karma whores (man, plagiarism annoys me). Unfortunately with 700+ comments on the last discussion, this may not be easy, haha.

    --
    I am Jack's complete lack of surprise.
    1. Re:daddypants email link broken? by jginspace · · Score: 1, Informative

      On a sidenote, what seems odd to me is that not only is this a dupe that is currently visible on the index [slashdot.org] of slashdot, but that the article summary is almost identical to the earlier submission, and is even from the same submitter.

      Yup:

      500 Miles on a 5-Minute Recharge?

      "In the wake of rising gasoline costs there have been plenty of alternatives seen on the horizon. Including Hybrids, Biofuels, fuel cells and battery powered all electric cars. CNN has recently posted a story about a company (EEStor) that plans on offering UltraCapacitor storage products. The claim being that you charge the ultracapacitor in 5 minutes, with approximately $9 of electricity and then drive 500 miles."

      ...

      Does anyone know if those editors are paid or is it just a labour of love? They really do seem to labour...

    2. Re:daddypants email link broken? by include($dysmas) · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      100's of people posting duplicate messages complaining about a duplicate thread, more productivity to you!

    3. Re:daddypants email link broken? by ricepudd · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      There was almost a 3 hour gap between the latest two stories being published... what was ScuttleMonkey doing in that time? Surely he could have found a few minutes, perhaps whilst drinking his coffee, to actually read the front page of the website he's supposedly editing?!

    4. Re:daddypants email link broken? by JaJ_D · · Score: 5, Funny

      Just to clarify.....

      I emailed the on-duty editor (regarding this being a dupe), like any good little /. subscriber. Unfortunately my e-mail bounced pretty much immediately. Normally I would resist the temptation to join in the /. circle-jerk that is shouting "OMG DUPE DUPE DUPE!!" but I wanted someone (ScuttleMonkey, etc) to note that the 'daddypants' email link is bouncing.
      ( ERROR: Use of uninitialized value in concatenation (.) or string at... Line 126 ) ..ScuttleMonkey, if you want the full error, feel free to let me know where to e-mail it.

      On a sidenote, what seems odd to me is that not only is this a dupe that is currently visible on the index [slashdot.org] of slashdot, but that the article summary is almost identical to the earlier submission, and is even from the same submitter. Insert Matrix deja-vu quote here.

      ;-]

      Sorry couldn't resist

      Jaj

    5. Re:daddypants email link broken? by FST777 · · Score: 0, Redundant

      AFAIK, this isn't even a copy/paste karma-whore: both summaries list the same submitter.
      The only difference is an added link in this summary and a slightly different headline.

      --
      Free beer is never free as in speech. Free speech is always free as in beer.
    6. Re:daddypants email link broken? by karrde · · Score: 0, Redundant

      I think he was refering to people taking highly rated comments from the last discussion, and posting them into this discuss.

    7. Re:daddypants email link broken? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I looked in the other thread for this being posted, didn't find it
      here's a direct link to the cnn video: mms://wmscnn.stream.aol.com.edgestreams.net/cnn/bu siness/2006/09/20/pkg.the.next.disruptors.traffic. wjw.ws.wmv

    8. Re:daddypants email link broken? by morie · · Score: 1, Funny

      There is a difference: Someone introduced the cost/gallon

      Cost/gallon of electricity is a new and fascinating unit!

      --
      Sig (appended to the end of comments I post, 54 chars)
    9. Re:daddypants email link broken? by NekoXP · · Score: 2, Funny

      Neo: Whoa. Deja vu.
      Trinity: What did you just say?
      Neo: Nothing. Just had a little deja vu.
      Trinity: What happened? What did you see?
      Neo: A Slashdot article was on the index, and then I saw another that looked just like it.
      Trinity: How much like it? Was it the same article?
      Neo: It might have been. I'm not sure. What is it?
      Trinity: A deja vu is usually a glitch in the Matrix. It happens when the editors are lazy.

    10. Re:daddypants email link broken? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The email address you need is:

      williambradley@earthlink.net

      thanks!

    11. Re:daddypants email link broken? by maxwell+demon · · Score: 2, Funny

      Matrix?
      Battery reloaded!

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    12. Re:daddypants email link broken? by amliebsch · · Score: 2, Funny

      Boniface: Good evening. Tonight on "It's the Mind", we examine the phenomenon of déjà vu. That strange feeling we sometimes get that we've lived through something before, that what is happening now has already happened. Tonight on "It's the Mind" we examine the phenomenon of déjà vu, that strange feeling we sometimes get that we've ... (looks puzzled fir a moment) Anyway, tonight on "It's the Mind" we examine the phenomenon of déjà vu, that strange...

      --
      If you don't know where you are going, you will wind up somewhere else.
    13. Re:daddypants email link broken? by zaydana · · Score: 1

      To be nice to the editors, I have seen a lot less dupes lately than we were seeing a few months ago. Nobody is perfect.

    14. Re:daddypants email link broken? by conigs · · Score: 2, Funny

      I still have several gallons of electricity from before the y2k scare. They're stocked up in a storage closet in the basement. Luckily, I bought it at $.27/gallon before the price was driven up.

      Hmmm... I wonder what the shelf life of a gallon of electricity is. Maybe I should divide them into quarts or pints. Maybe even sell it off at $.45/gallon and make a profit!

      --
      Slashdot: where repeating an article in a post is "+5 Insightful"
    15. Re:daddypants email link broken? by NekoXP · · Score: 1

      That reminds me of the Amnesia sketch from the Little Britain radio show..

    16. Re:daddypants email link broken? by Sirfrummel · · Score: 1

      Do you have to ground yourself while you fuel up your car?

    17. Re:daddypants email link broken? by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

      Yes, the "editors" are paid. God alone knows why.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    18. Re:daddypants email link broken? by justkarl · · Score: 1

      that's really funny....

    19. Re:daddypants email link broken? by NekoXP · · Score: 1

      It wasn't meant to be funny, though :(

      omg I think I am gonna cry :(

    20. Re:daddypants email link broken? by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      Technically, cost/gallon is a ratio, not a unit. ;)

      Anyway, I think the question we're all wondering is: What's the specific gravity of one gallon of electricity?

    21. Re:daddypants email link broken? by morie · · Score: 1

      I know, and cost is not an unit either, that would be $ or EUR.

      --
      Sig (appended to the end of comments I post, 54 chars)
  2. Dupe, and it's still on the front page by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    500 Miles on a 5-Minute Recharge?

    Glad to see you're reading the site ScuttleMoney.

  3. Deja VU by MrSvenSven · · Score: 0

    It feels like just yesterday I was following a link provided by troutwi. Wait a minute, its the same article.

    1. Re:Deja VU by pasamio · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Hey at least you got to yesterday, its still today...and I thought to myself "I could have sworn I read that this morning..."

      --
      I always wondered where this setting was...
  4. Wow by Unixfreak31 · · Score: 0

    This car can go form 0-dup in 3.4 seconds has to be some kind of record. Thought for a minute they were both on the front page at the same time.

    1. Re:Wow by peragrin · · Score: 0, Redundant

      They are both on the same frontpage for me. I literally scrolled down the front page to see them both.

      What's worse is that there are 5 more articles to go on my front page before that one scrolls off.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
  5. dupe by Wholeflaffer · · Score: 0

    Unbelieveable...still on the front page and everything!! What gives with this ridiculous "staff"?

    --
    Certified Microsoft Notworking Specialist
  6. Dupe by qcs-rf.com · · Score: 0, Redundant
    --
    There are only 10 types of people in the world: Those who understand binary, and those who don't.
  7. How Much Does the Capacitor Cost? by eldavojohn · · Score: 0
    The cost of the engine itself depends on how much energy it can store; an EEStor-powered engine with a range roughly equivalent to that of a gasoline-powered car would cost about $5,200. That's a slight premium over the cost of the gas engine and the other parts the device would replace -- the gas tank, exhaust system, and drivetrain. But getting rid of the need to buy gas should more than make up for the extra cost of an EEStor-powered car.
    Yeah, but how do I know that capacitors that perform at the $9 per 500 miles aren't exponentially more expensive?

    How well do these capacitors retain their charge? How many charges are they good for? The biggest concern I've heard of against fuel cell cars is that their cells are worthless after five years or so.

    Also, I doubt they're hooking it to a regular outlet if they're getting $9 of electricity out of it in five minutes. Granted, you could make charge stations that are similar to gas stations (or add them to gas stations) but you really should list all the materials we would need when considering the cost of this alternative.

    I'm not trying to rain on your parade, just pointing out that it's not going to be adopted by everyone in the United States unless it's obviously cheaper than the current method. On the surface, it appears to be ... but there are a lot of details missing.
    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:How Much Does the Capacitor Cost? by BasilBrush · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Also, I doubt they're hooking it to a regular outlet if they're getting $9 of electricity out of it in five minutes. Granted, you could make charge stations that are similar to gas stations (or add them to gas stations) but you really should list all the materials we would need when considering the cost of this alternative.

      You mean like the "electrical energy stations" mentioned in TFA, from which a 5 minute charge may be obtained?

    2. Re:How Much Does the Capacitor Cost? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You mean like the "electrical energy stations" mentioned in TFA, from which a 5 minute charge may be obtained?
      And what do they consist of? How will this affect the power grids of large United States cities? What are possible cost implications here? My point was that they're not listing the total cost of making this switch.
    3. Re:How Much Does the Capacitor Cost? by GreyPoopon · · Score: 1
      Yeah, but how do I know that capacitors that perform at the $9 per 500 miles aren't exponentially more expensive?
      You don't. But in general, once demand rises for something and manufacturing processes are in place, the cost begins to fall closer to that of the raw materials. I somehow doubt that the raw materials for these capacitors will be more expensive than Li-Ion and Li-Polymer materials.

      How well do these capacitors retain their charge?
      Significantly better than batteries.

      How many charges are they good for?
      A whole lot more than batteries.

      The biggest concern I've heard of against fuel cell cars is that their cells are worthless after five years or so.
      I doubt this would need to be a concern. The biggest concern is how to get the electricity into the capacitor safely in an acceptable amount of time.

      I'm not trying to rain on your parade, just pointing out that it's not going to be adopted by everyone in the United States unless it's obviously cheaper than the current method.
      I think the best method would be to include two separate charging technologies. The first could be a rapid charger that works at a fuel station, and would obviously have to involve thick, well-insulated cables. (although I doubt 5 minutes would be considered safe) The second could be a "residential" charging system that allows you to plug your car into a normal outlet and charge up slowly overnight. In the previous life of this submission (see all the dup notifications), someone mentioned a special charging system that draws on energy during non-peak hours, and then can delivery the charge to the car quickly. I don't feel that a quick charge like that would be very safe at my house, but you never know what new ideas may be developed. However, we could still draw during non-peak hours and then use the electricity to top off the car or charge it over a longer period of time.
      --

      GreyPoopon
      --
      Why is it I can write insightful comments but can't come up with a clever signature?

    4. Re:How Much Does the Capacitor Cost? by MartinB · · Score: 1
      How well do these capacitors retain their charge? How many charges are they good for? The biggest concern I've heard of against fuel cell cars is that their cells are worthless after five years or so.

      This is only a problem if the cost/effort of replacing them is significant. Otherwise, it's part of your normal service schedule.

      --

      The only thing you can accurately describe as "Scotch" is a sticky tape made by 3M. And it's

    5. Re:How Much Does the Capacitor Cost? by Blackjax · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think the parent makes a valid point. A lot of the emphasis here seems to be on how tricky it would be to safely entirely charge one of these from empty in 5 minutes. However I have to wonder how much that is actually the requirement. Most people pulling up to a service station don't have totally dry tanks. In addition, when you can go home and trickle charge over night why would you try to fill it completely at the service station? Filling it enough to last the remainder of your expected use for the day would seem more likely. There is also the question of how frequently most people would actually need a service station given that their vehicles get topped off every night and they start full each morning. If you think about that, it is a markedly different fueling pattern from what we are used to with gas powered vehicles. Moreover, what is to say that you couldn't add an extra boost to the range by starting to integrate solar cells into the tops of the vehicles? They wouldn't be enough to run the car, but they might be enough to give that extra bit of range that gets most people over the charge threshold beyond which they almost never need a service station at all and certainly don't have to fully fill the car while there. Ask yourself how many miles you really drive in a day, then ask yourself why you are trying to fit an electric car into the same fueling patterns that you have with a gas powered one.

    6. Re:How Much Does the Capacitor Cost? by cubicledrone · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Yeah, but how do I know that capacitors that perform at the $9 per 500 miles aren't exponentially more expensive?
      How well do these capacitors retain their charge?
      How many charges are they good for?


      It'll NEVER WORK!! Never Never Never Never!

      la-la-la-la-la-la-la-la-la-la-la-la!!

      No visions! No progress! No new ideas! Be a team player! Join the crowd! Be quiet! Do what the manager wants! Never think! Never try! Never achieve! Because it'll never work! Never Never Never Never!!

      Skeptics are always smarter than everyone else! No visions! No progress! No new ideas! Be a team player! Join the crowd! Be quiet! Do what the manager wants! Never think! Never try! Never achieve! Because it'll never work!

      Progress is exciting, isn't it?

      --
      Business isn't willing to pay for products, innovation and careers, so we get brands, mortgage commercials and layoffs.
    7. Re:How Much Does the Capacitor Cost? by cubicledrone · · Score: 2, Funny

      And what do they consist of? How will this affect the power grids of large United States cities? What are possible cost implications here? My point was that they're not listing the total cost of making this switch.

      Stop thinking! No progress allowed! Be a team player! Team players get food. People who think and speak get fired! Be a team player! No progress!

      --
      Business isn't willing to pay for products, innovation and careers, so we get brands, mortgage commercials and layoffs.
    8. Re:How Much Does the Capacitor Cost? by MightyYar · · Score: 1
      How will this affect the power grids of large United States cities?

      If everyone's car magically transformed into an electric? It would be disastrous. However, worst-case, everyone buys an electric as the gasoline cars wear out. The transition would take 10+ years, and the grid would expand to cope with the increased demand.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    9. Re:How Much Does the Capacitor Cost? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It'll NEVER WORK!! Never Never Never Never!

      la-la-la-la-la-la-la-la-la-la-la-la!!

      No visions! No progress! No new ideas! Be a team player! Join the crowd! Be quiet! Do what the manager wants! Never think! Never try! Never achieve! Because it'll never work! Never Never Never Never!!

      Skeptics are always smarter than everyone else! No visions! No progress! No new ideas! Be a team player! Join the crowd! Be quiet! Do what the manager wants! Never think! Never try! Never achieve! Because it'll never work!

      Progress is exciting, isn't it?
      How the hell does this even have an insightful moderation? Considering the first instance of this story is tagged 'snakeoil', I think there are some valid concerns that need to be addressed. Like how in the world the power charging works out. I think everyone's got a lot of questions, progress is good if it isn't smoke and mirrors.
    10. Re:How Much Does the Capacitor Cost? by cubicledrone · · Score: 1

      insightful moderation?

      Because it brilliantly and accurately illustrates how quick people are to dismiss new ideas by haphazardly flinging one nonsense question after another at them until everyone is so confused that nobody knows what the fuck the idea was in the first place.

      I think there are some valid concerns that need to be addressed.

      Concerns? Forest fires are valid concerns. This is a car that runs on electricity.

      --
      Business isn't willing to pay for products, innovation and careers, so we get brands, mortgage commercials and layoffs.
    11. Re:How Much Does the Capacitor Cost? by LandKurt · · Score: 1

      Solar cells are logical to consider for electric cars, but aren't necessarily cost effective. Remember that we're talking about $9 of electricity for a full charge. Have you thought about how long it will take and how expensive the panel will be to generate that many kilowatt-hours of electricity?

      If you can easily plug your car in at night to top off the charge you're not going to bother with the cost of a set of solar cells. But it might be worth doing if you have a short commute, park in the direct sun all day, and can't easily recharge at home. It wouldn't take more than a few square feet of solar cells to meet that demand, I'd think.

    12. Re:How Much Does the Capacitor Cost? by Guysmiley777 · · Score: 1

      Flamebait much?

      The issue most people are bringing up is the "$9 of electricity in 5 minutes". Mostly by people with real engineering experience. And they have a point. $9 worth of electricity is a LOT of power, enough that if you try and transfer it in 5 minutes, things WILL melt. This isn't some vast conspiracy to keep this technology suppressed, it is common sense.

      FWIW, I think the press release has padded the numbers a lot, like it is really going to be $3 worth of electricity that they will charge $9 for, "5 minutes" really means 15 minutes, and "500 miles" really means 150 miles. But still, it would be a step in the right direction. Now if they can answer how it'll heat a car when it is -10F to keep me from freezing to death on the way to work...

      --
      Coding with assembly is like playing with Legos. Coding an application in assembly is like building a car with Legos.
    13. Re:How Much Does the Capacitor Cost? by ThePiMan2003 · · Score: 1

      Because I like to drive long distances, for trips for instance. Right now, when my tank is empty I can fill it up in a few moments and drive on. If it takes to long to recharge, I'll have to stop for the night when my capacitor runs down.

    14. Re:How Much Does the Capacitor Cost? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      -- Admiring look --. You're a rugged individual, and unique. I want to be unique JUST like you! And I hope lots of people want to be unique just like you. Then we can ALL be unique!... running off to pierce my naval and hang ultracaps in it. Then my eyebrows, eyeballs, nose, cheeks, tongue, spleen.

      Sheep-ish sigh.

    15. Re:How Much Does the Capacitor Cost? by matt21811 · · Score: 1

      Forget about putting one of these ultracaps in my car. I'm getting one for my house. I can buy all the electricity I use in a day at off peak rates, store it in the ultracap and use it throughout the day.
      The payback time for the ultracap is less than 2 years in my area. After that, I get half price electricity. Not to mention, power outages of less than a day would no longer have any impact on me. I cant remember a time when my power was out for more than a few hours.
      The more I think about this product, the more it changes the world. Wind generated electricity gains about 30% better cost effiiency due to the fact that they can sell off peak generated power at peak rates.
      In fact, the idea of off peak disappears entirely, due to arbitrage. All electricity becomes cheaper due to this.

    16. Re:How Much Does the Capacitor Cost? by GreyPoopon · · Score: 1
      I'm getting one for my house. I can buy all the electricity I use in a day at off peak rates, store it in the ultracap and use it throughout the day. The payback time for the ultracap is less than 2 years in my area.
      I like this idea. Even with peak rates disappearing, it would still help to avoid brownouts and such if customers could "stagger" their power usage. Something like this would also be EXTREMELY useful in parts of India where they only have electricity available during certain times of the day.
      --

      GreyPoopon
      --
      Why is it I can write insightful comments but can't come up with a clever signature?

  8. Don't go China by bky1701 · · Score: 3, Funny

    I just hope they don't farm out making the batteries to the same company that makes them for Apple and Dell. A tank full of combustible liquide seems good compared to that.

    1. Re:Don't go China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      All the exploding batteries were made by Sony, jackass.

    2. Re:Don't go China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      They are using capacitors not batteries.....

    3. Re:Don't go China by bky1701 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but with all the dupe posts... I couldn't think of a better joke. So sue me. :P

    4. Re:Don't go China by stienman · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Energy is energy.

      Have you ever seen a capacitor explode? Have you ever seen a large capacitor blow up a screwdriver that shorted across its terminals?

      It doesn't matter if it's gasoline, Li-Poly, Li-Ion, Hydrogen, etc. We use it because it's easy to extract energy from it. It's easy to extract energy from it because it's very reactive. There are many ways to blow up a fuel tank - but we've had a century of design information and now they rarely go up like they could (except in movies). When we have a few decades of experience behind us with these other technologies then they'll be about as safe as we consider gasoline to be.

      Expect to see exploding laptops in movies long after we've solved that problem.

      -Adam

    5. Re:Don't go China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gasoline is flammable, not combustible. Also gasoline doesn't usually have much oxygen dissolved in it, so the possibility of fire is inversely proportional to how full your tank is, although that's not even true since the "empty" space typically consists of gasoline vapors, not air, which again are difficult to ignite without oxygen.

    6. Re:Don't go China by cdrudge · · Score: 1

      Isn't a battery pretty much a larger version of a capacitor?

    7. Re:Don't go China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Isn't a battery pretty much a larger version of a capacitor?

      Maybe you should read up on what a battery and a capacitor is before making an ignorant comment like that. Capacitor stores energy in electric fields, battery stores energy in chemical energy.

    8. Re:Don't go China by feepness · · Score: 1

      Expect to see exploding laptops in movies long after we've solved that problem.

      I knew there had to be another reason they wouldn't let me take my laptop into the theater.

  9. Re:Echo by Psicopatico · · Score: 0, Redundant
    Is there an echo in here?


    Nah, I think this is called RAID-1 (aka mirroring).
    You know, that redundancy, security & back-up stuff...
    --
    Mastering the English language is fucking easy: all you have to do is to put an f* word in every fucking sentence.
  10. Whoa!!! A deja Vu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Damn!!!!They changed something in the Marix.

    1. Re:Whoa!!! A deja Vu by orso · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      mmmm...maybe the "t" in Ma(t)rix???

    2. Re:Whoa!!! A deja Vu by popeyethesailor · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      The spelling maybe?

  11. OMG!My time travel machine worked I'm in the past! by arcite · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Now that I'm in the past, I can use these new lotto numbers I got from the future... I'll be rich!

  12. Energy density by MichaelSmith · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This time around I have thought of something to say.

    As we strive for higher energy density in our laptop computers, electric cars, mobile phones, etc; we are creating devices which can potentially release much of their stored energy in a short space of time. It doesn't have to be a chemical explosion. I have in my workshop a melted bicycle tail light and four cooked NiCD batteries from cycle commuting years past when I put two batteries in the wrong way and created a short circuit.

    So IMHO battery/capacitor explosions are the way of the future, certainly much more than the backyard LPG explosions we get from time to time here in Australia (LPG is a cheap substitute for petrol, but a bit volatile.)

    How is Alan Cox going with his hair? Is it growing back yet.

    1. Re:Energy density by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Guess it's time to invent non-conductive wrenches. The sparks are scary enough crossing a battery with a box wrench accidentally, but the thought of lighting up a whole neighborhood with my burning body will keep me from working under the hood.

    2. Re:Energy density by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      Reversing the flow on a simple lightbulb shouldn't cause any problems and doesn't create a short in and of itself. Was it an LED light? Reversing a diode can cause a short if you overcome the breakdown voltage, although that usually results in a puff of smoke and an open diode very quickly, but not always..

    3. Re:Energy density by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1
      Reversing the flow on a simple lightbulb shouldn't cause any problems and doesn't create a short in and of itself. Was it an LED light?

      No, its incandesent, but that isn't the problem. This unit takes four AA cells but runs at three volts. It has two paralleled pairs of cells in series. Not thinking I put the cells in the "normal" way which meant that each pair was wired + to - in two very short loops.

      The plastic coating melted off all four cells and the plastic case of the light softened with heat, deformed, and cooled.

      When I was a teenager I used to fly model aircraft with friends and we had a few instances of nicads melting their way through the bottom of back packs, etc, when accidently shorted.

  13. Is there any Microsoft Connection ? by Delifisek · · Score: 1

    It sounds promising, too much promising. It look like new Microsoft product AD. It can't be that much good...

    --
    [My english is better than most other people's Turkish, so please point out mistakes politely. Thank you.]
  14. Re:Noo noo noo noo by Patrik_AKA_RedX · · Score: 1

    Great, why doesn't this stuff ever happen on a saturday...

  15. I'll believe it when I see it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are limits on how much energy you can store in a capacitor no matter what you do. The basic trick is to somehow increase the plate area while decreasing the spacing between the plates. You also need a material between the plates that will not break down due to the voltage. But no matter what you do, the breakover voltage goes down as you move the plates together.

    A better approach might be to store the energy as compressed air. http://www.theaircar.com/ Of course the guys making the compressed air car seem to be stalled.

    How about making fuel from turkey guts? http://www.changingworldtech.com/ We got all excited about them and they're sort of economic now.

    How about desk top fusion?

    So, I'm not holding my breath. One of my favorite sayings is: "There are liars, there are damn liars and then there are battery chemists." AFAICT that saying applies to this story.

    1. Re:I'll believe it when I see it. by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      The basic trick is to somehow increase the plate area while decreasing the spacing between the plates.

      Well, we can mount the capacitor under the car. That gives us a few square metres to play with. The rest of your objections, I have no answer to. Ultimately, electirc cars are, and always have been potentially fantastic, except for the huge issue of electricity storage.

    2. Re:I'll believe it when I see it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why can't you increase the plate area by folding it? There's a tennis court worth of surface area in your lungs and those only take up a cubic foot or so.

  16. paid editors, for what, exactly? by Speare · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yeah, I expect there are a bunch of comments to this effect about the dupe.

    What I'm wondering is why these guys call themselves editors. I'm frustrated that ad revenue and subscription fees go to these people who totally disregard all semblance of professionalism. I wish I had a cushy job like that, where I could sit back, press 'Accept' once in a while without even reading the blurb or the front page, and get paid for it.

    --
    [ .sig file not found ]
    1. Re:paid editors, for what, exactly? by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Which is precisely why I'll never subscribe to slashdot. I've thought about it before, but I refuse to reward Taco&Co for doing a ridiculously half-assed job. Were they to actually take their jobs seriously and show some sort of professionalism in what they do, I'd reconsider.

      --
      This guy's the limit!
    2. Re:paid editors, for what, exactly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No you wouldn't. Like more people in the world, you are a cheap ass. If you thought Slashdot sucked that bad, you'd stop coming here. ou just like to have a "reason" for your behavior to justify your cheapness to yourself.

    3. Re:paid editors, for what, exactly? by tehcyder · · Score: 1
      [slashdot editors] sit back, press 'Accept' once in a while without even reading the blurb or the front page, and get paid for it.
      Are you serious?
      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  17. time-warp by Stoertebeker · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Are we going to see this type of knotting in the space-time continuum every time someone charges one of these cars with 1.21 jigawatts?

    1. Re:time-warp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GIGAWATT not jig

  18. More information here by denisbergeron · · Score: 1, Funny
    --
    Ceci n'est pas une Signature !
  19. stupid editors... by scharkalvin · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've submitted a few stories over the last few years, none of which
    were ever accepted. (Ok maybe your standards are higher than mine?)
    But THIS? For crying out loud this story is such a DUPE it appears
    TWICE on the same web page!!!!! This proves the /. editors are
    smoking bananas!

    1. Re:stupid editors... by CmdrPorno · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Agreed... There also needs to be some sort of accountability so that the first person to submit a story gets some sort of credit for it, even if their summary isn't used, as opposed to the current random system.

      In the words of one of my friends, "Slashdot is dead to me." Personally, I am loyal to things long after they start sucking, so I'll probably be here a while longer.

      --
      Sent from my iPhone
    2. Re:stupid editors... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      In the words of one of my friends, "Slashdot is dead to me."
      I hear you. Lately many moderators are really doing a bad job - almost evil. I also get the feeling their points are reinforced because too many meta-mods are just accepting what was dished out. I take the time to read the posts and their parent, and critically assess. If two others meta-mod the same post and just accept the poor mod, mine is probably the odd one out.

      I also get the feeling some if some Moderators find a post and they dont like what you've said, they go mod a few of your other posts too. I've been modded insightfull, informative, funny etc, then after a later post get marked troll (cos it was a controversial issue) someone goes to the earlier post and marks it troll also.

      Your friend is probably ahead of the game. Slashdot isnt quite dead, but it certainly has terminal cancer.
    3. Re:stupid editors... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get a life. So what if there is a dupe once in awhile? Learn to deal with the fact that people sometimes make mistakes. And for heaven's sake please stop posting worthless rants like this.

  20. Give me the other pill by Insipid+Trunculance · · Score: 0, Redundant

    its Deja Vu!

    --
    Wanted : A Signature.
  21. Yesterday called... by SirJorgelOfBorgel · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    ...they want their article back!

  22. 1000 miles? by Spackler · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    So, between this dupe, the dupe editor, and 5 minutes, could I drive 1000 miles?

    Really, do the editors even read Slashdot? You CAN read it at work you know. OSTG won't mind.

    1. Re:1000 miles? by NatasRevol · · Score: 1
      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    2. Re:1000 miles? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Posting lyrics to the Proclaimers is on par with linking goatse. You also failed to mention Soviet Russia, capacitor overlords, Natalie Portman and hot grits.

      6/10 Must try harder next time.

  23. An accident waiting to happen by giafly · · Score: 1
    it will charge up in five minutes and provide enough energy to drive 500 miles on about $9 worth of electricity. At today's gas prices, covering that distance can cost $60 or more;
    Gas prices seem to be about $2.50 per gallon, so this is charging with the same energy as 24 gallons.
    Equivalent to 5 gallons of gas per minute.
    • What if it accidentally discharges at the same rate or faster, releasing the same heat as burning this gas?
    • What if charging is less than 100% efficient, again producing a lot of heat?
    --
    Reduce, reuse, cycle
    1. Re:An accident waiting to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      52 kW*h is about 100 lbs in TNT equivalent conveniently stored behind your back. Wolud you be comfortable driving this thing? How would it behave in case of accident?

    2. Re:An accident waiting to happen by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      To be fair, you have about "100lbs in TNT" behind your back whenever you drive a gasoline powered car. The question isn't how much energy you have to propel the car, which will stay about the same no matter what fuel source is used. The question is can they make it safe by limiting the rate of discharge? Gasoline tanks can and do explode, but it's pretty rare (despite Hollywood).

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    3. Re:An accident waiting to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gasoline is highly flamable, but not explosive. It needs a HUGE amount of oxygen to release it's energy. With all the energy storing devices (batteries/capacitors/hyroscopes) the sutuation is quite different...

    4. Re:An accident waiting to happen by drgonzo59 · · Score: 1
      That's the first thing I thought of. When I was kid I used to have these large capacitors and once in while I had the fun habit of charging them up and discharging them with 'bang'. (Yes, I didn't get out much...) But anyway the "100lbs of TNT" that you speak of will still be right there, behind the driver's back, available to be discharged with a very loud bang.

      But I think if they install fuses right into their capacitor or connect it to a sensor such that when the car flips over/has a major accident/falls into the water/gets attacked my monkeys the capacitor switches itself off (some internal fuse is shorted) it might not be too bad.

    5. Re:An accident waiting to happen by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Agreed, but it doesn't matter whether a nearly empty fuel tank of gasoline vapor explodes behind you or a super capacitor explodes behind you with 10 times the explosive force - either way you are dead. Anyway, they have to have some way of making the capacitor safe or it obviously won't be viable. I'd be more fearful of being electrocuted in an accident, but this would be a fear of mine in any electric or hybrid vehicle, not exclusively one powered by this capacitor.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    6. Re:An accident waiting to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't believe any external fuse could do the job. When the thing cracks, the energy starts to release in the crack vaporising all the protection around... See, the 400 lbs device is equivalent to 100 lbs of TNT, take into the account all the copper required to allow the 5 min charge with it's 5 kA currents. The active ingredient could be filled with energy even more than TNT...

    7. Re:An accident waiting to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not 10 times we are talking about here, it's much, much more. 15-20 gallons of air-gasolin mix will explode, but that would be a really minor explosion. And who cares about you, 100 lbs of TNT - it's about the surrounding buildings...

    8. Re:An accident waiting to happen by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Heh, I realize that. If you had a terrorist device in every car, I don't think that would ever meet national safety standards! My point was that just because there is energy equivalent to 100 lbs of TNT behind you, doesn't mean it will behave like TNT. It will have to be about as "safe" as gasoline - which of course is only safe compared to some other benchmark. I only object to things like this because you hear politicians using stuff like this to scare the masses. "We can't allow this menace on the road! It's like a rolling bomb!" when in fact it has the same energy content as gasoline.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  24. 900KW by TRRosen · · Score: 1

    now all they need to do is create something to supply the 900KW it would take to charge it.

    1. Re:900KW by Christopher_G_Lewis · · Score: 1

      > now all they need to do is create something to supply the 900KW it would take to charge it.

      It takes 900KW to charge the Slashdot Dupe Engine?

    2. Re:900KW by Slugster · · Score: 1
      now all they need to do is create something to supply the 900KW it would take to charge it.
      Don't be such a pessimist.
      All they really need to do is find a place where you can drill a hole in the ground and crude electricity dribbles out.
      ---------

      I did some comparison figures lately for bicycle engine kits, those being available in gasoline-powered as well as electric versions (-you may bow to my L337 nerdiness).
      The gasoline powered version ended up costing the least to operate--the electrics cost between six and nine times as much, figured on a cost-per-mile basis.

      There's a lot of people who have electric vehicles and will brag that "it only costs five cents" or whatever to recharge--but they are ignoring the regular cost of replacing batteries, which has to be done every 300-500 discharge cycles.

      They also tend to point out how "electrics don't produce smog", but if we assume that the price of an item represents the amount of resources that went into it, and that the resources used relates directly to the pollution that was caused when it was manufactured, then as it stands--at the present time, electric vehicles are very-probably doing more harm to the environment than good. You're being friendlier to the environment by using a small 4-cycle engine that has a catalytic convertor. (I went looking for a small-engine catalytic converter and couldn't find anywhere in the US to buy one, by the by) :(
      ~
    3. Re:900KW by AK+Marc · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why does everyone get all stuck on what it would take to charge it? That's the easy part. What we are missing for electric cars is exactly this type of storage. Cost was never a problem (except for replacement, which this fixes). The issue was weight, range, and recharge time. Lead acid sucked for mobile applications. Lead isn't light, and neither is water. The batteries for the EV-1 were somewhere around half the weight of the car. Take the 1000+ lbs of batteries and change them to 100 lbs of capacitors, and you have suddenly increased efficiency, handling, ride, and helped with other design considerations. Make it so the very expensive battery plant will last forever, and you shut up all the people whining about the hybrids sucking for long term maintenance.

      That leaves the two complaints: It will be bad in a crash, and it can't charge as fast as theroretically possible. You are on knee-jerk #2. The answer to that is, the grid *will* be improved to handle the load, as it always has been in the past for all other loads. Yes, California has enough power, they just don't have the agreements in place necessary to get the power where it needs to be sometimes. And, I can think of at least one way to charge this thing in 5 minutes off house power, with no modifications to the power line coming into the house. If you can't, the statement out of your mouth shouldn't be "It's impossible" it should be "I'm glad they took this step forward, I hope to see a implimentation that's house-wiring friendly." Just because you can't think of it does not mean it is impossible or even difficult.

    4. Re:900KW by michaelmaxie · · Score: 1

      Huge (or many) ultracapacitors at the charging stations could be used to supply huge power requirements.

    5. Re:900KW by hardburn · · Score: 1

      You're being friendlier to the environment by using a small 4-cycle engine that has a catalytic convertor. (I went looking for a small-engine catalytic converter and couldn't find anywhere in the US to buy one, by the by) :(

      In the long term, catalytic converters do more harm than good. In the short term, they do get rid of a lot of greenhouse gasses, but the engine has to run less efficiently for them to work. You'd get better gas milage out of your car if you take out the cat and run the mixture a little lean.

      --
      Not a typewriter
    6. Re:900KW by januth · · Score: 1

      You're absolutely spot on. Migrating to electrically powered vehicles is all well and good but all that power still has to come from somewhere. As long as the generation source is still fossil fuels, I'm betting that it's close to a zero-sum game as far as greenhouse gasses go.

    7. Re:900KW by ukemike · · Score: 1

      Everyone is stuck on the recharging because 900kW is a LOT of JUICE!

      Say you have a house and all of the following is on at the same time:
      10 100W bulbs
      1 400 W computer
      1 750 W microwave
      1 1kW washer/dryer
      and through in another kW for good measure


      that house is sucking 3.15Kw
      if you had a whole neighborhood of about 260 houses all running the same appliances that would be an equivalant load to charging one car. Obviously the grid isn't designed for lots of people to be charging their cars like that so these would have to be charged at special charging stations.
      Are you really going to trust Joe Schmoe to attach the power line to his car that will carry 900kW? Each of these electric "gas" stations would need its own damn substation to keep its bank of ultracapacitors charged during the busy commute hours.

      --
      -- QED
    8. Re:900KW by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      I'm still not getting your point. No one says it isn't high electrical draw to pump that much energy into a car. But what are you pointing out? That the number is big? I have to slap a "Duh" on that one. Are you saying that the grid couldn't handle 1000 of them spread around the country, 10,000, or even just 10? Are you saying that it would be impossible for a 5 minute charge to be delivered at a household? Or are you saying that, regardless of the other factors, it would be dangerous?

      I can think of ways that I can charge the system from any regular house with no changes to the electrical power delivered to the house (some changes inside, but none that involve the power company, other than the higher bills). I don't know how many cars could be tossed on the current grid and where, but I expect the number would be greater than 100, and when these cars start rolling off the lines it will be years from now and the grid will have to be inproved and will have had time to be improved. Also, I can think of safe ways to transfer such energy. Well, safe is relative, so I'll say "as safe or safer than the current methods of transferring the same energy in a flamable fluid."

      Each of these electric "gas" stations would need its own damn substation to keep its bank of ultracapacitors charged during the busy commute hours.

      Hey, now you are getting it. So what's the problem. Oh no, we'll have to change some of the way we do things. Yes, we are carting around huge amounts of energy in takers that will have to be carried by the power lines. That will require change. There's nothing hard about that. It's easy. Growing the power distribution system has been happening for over 100 years. The energy involved is no more or less dangerous than the energy in the current system, just different.

    9. Re:900KW by smithmc · · Score: 1

        now all they need to do is create something to supply the 900KW it would take to charge it.

      They're almost there...

      --
      Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
    10. Re:900KW by matt21811 · · Score: 1

      Depending on your definition of close, you would lose that bet.
      Thermal efficiency of a car engine is about 15% to 20%. In thick city traffic, it is as low as 5%.
      Coal fired power stations are always at least 30% efficient. Gas fired power stations can be up to 60% efficient.
      Tansmission loses and other inefficienies for electric cars are not 50%, meaning electric cars are a definite win for greenhouse gases. Potentially up to ten-fold. Posibly a little more when you consider the efficiency gains of regenerative braking that an oil powered car doesnt get.

  25. Slashdot: News for amnesiacs... by jginspace · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    At the top of the page now it's showing:

    Did you know subscribers can see articles in the future?

    Oh the irony...

    BTW: Mods, try to be on the lookout for copy and paste karma whores (man, plagiarism annoys me). Unfortunately with 700+ comments on the last discussion, this may not be easy, haha.

    1. Re:Slashdot: News for amnesiacs... by maxwell+demon · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Even non-subscribers can see articles in the future. I thought the distinguishing feature would be that subscribers can see articles now which others only can only see in the future.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    2. Re:Slashdot: News for amnesiacs... by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      Mods, try to be on the lookout for copy and paste karma whores (man, plagiarism annoys me). Unfortunately with 700+ comments on the last discussion, this may not be easy, haha.

  26. Regular house current (FYI) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Also, I doubt they're hooking it to a regular outlet if they're getting $9 of electricity out of it in five minutes.

    You would be suprised. try running a basically closed loop 220V, 30amp connection for 5 mintues, it wouls be easy to eat up $9 dollars fo juice.

    1. Re:Regular house current (FYI) by AKAImBatman · · Score: 4, Informative
      try running a basically closed loop 220V, 30amp connection for 5 mintues

      220V * 30amp = 6,600 watts * 5 minutes = 0.55 kilowatt hours. You're only a few orders of magnitude off from "$9 worth of electricity", specifically 52 kWhs for EEStor's product. To charge 52 kWhs in 5 minutes, you'd need to be chugging through ~600 kW of power, or about 2.7 kiloamps at 220V.

      Bye, bye wall plug.
    2. Re:Regular house current (FYI) by trailerparkcassanova · · Score: 1

      $9.00 of power based on my 'current' rate, ~$0.08/kWh, is 112.5kWh so it's even worse.

    3. Re:Regular house current (FYI) by Gr8Apes · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm going to go out on a limb here, and suggest that's what the 5 minute at recharging stations are for. Probably running 440 or 480 directly off the power lines? At home I'm sure it will take longer. I also recall seeing something mentioned or implied about a "battery swap" at those stations, so perhaps the charging time is considerably longer, and the swap only takes 5m?

      I also checked their patent, which seems like a reasonable decent use of a patent for a change provided it actually works. Think of the Tesla using this instead of 6381 exploding Sony batteries ;).

      But more importantly, does this remind anyone else of the batacitors from Philip Jose Farmer's Riverworld? If you could only charge them with lightning strikes - free power! ;)

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    4. Re:Regular house current (FYI) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      distribution power lines run at 13.6kV in most parts of the US, the transformers can step that down to 480 in a three phase connection.

    5. Re:Regular house current (FYI) by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      I'm going to go out on a limb here, and suggest that's what the 5 minute at recharging stations are for. Probably running 440 or 480 directly off the power lines?
      Even at 480v that's in the neighborhood of 2000 amps for 5 minutes. A copper cable that can handle 2000A is HUGE.
      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    6. Re:Regular house current (FYI) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I'm going to go out on a limb here, and suggest that's what the 5 minute at recharging stations are for.
      Try viewing at +0, and you'll see why he was modded up.

      I also recall seeing something mentioned or implied about a "battery swap" at those stations, so perhaps the charging time is considerably longer, and the swap only takes 5m?
      1. There are no batteries, ergo
      2. There is no "battery swap"

      Ultracapacitors are extremely fast at charging when compared to batteries. So 5 minutes is not unreasonable if you can provide the power.

      I also checked their patent, which seems like a reasonable decent use of a patent for a change provided it actually works.
      That patent should be struck down for obviousness. Using Ultracapcitors in place of batteries has been under consideration since their invention in the 1950's. All that's changed is that we've come to understand how they work.
    7. Re:Regular house current (FYI) by OlivierB · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A good way to mitigate this surge in power demand at home, it would be smarter to have an equivalent capcitor sit at home and charge over the course of an hour or two and then unload it's charge to the vehicule's capacitor.
      With this method you could even schedule your capacitor to cahrge during the night where electricity is cheaper (at least here in europe).
      What are the advantages vs a battery? Well your local Shell station could be running massive capacitors for you and you could just plug-in real quick without the need to wait hours at a time to fuel up.

      --
      Artificial intelligence is no match for natural stupidity
    8. Re:Regular house current (FYI) by inKubus · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Of course, they could use larger versions of the capacitors at the fueling station to store a "charge" of 52 kWhs. 52kWhs * 3.6 MJoules = 187.2 MJ. The vehicle gets pulled into a stall, the driver gets out, large copper or gold rods drop from the ceiling into sockets which are directly connected to the capacitor. You have a bank of capacitors which switch on in succession, ramping up current (this minimizes switching problems, since 2700A is not fun to switch) with some type of diode in the middle to prevent back flow. In 5 minutes, the car is charged. Meanwhile the capacitors are recharging from mains current. Green light comes on, next car comes in. To make it work, you'd need something a little beefier than a 220 home circuit, possibly a 12.5kV line which is pretty common in commercial areas. You could probably do at least one car at a time, more if you could increase the charging capacitor capacity (which would be fully charged overnight or during off-peak times).

      As far as costs, of course the cost of electricity is going to go up for everyone. However, with transmission lines, you build them (once) and then the power keeps coming. So after the initial investment, you are going to save money over gas. Gas has to be brought in by truck, which costs money in labor and fuel and truck insurance, etc. Then you have pump maintenance, etc which is no longer necessary. On the other end you have a regional distributor who takes a cut, a refiner who takes a cut, a global distributer who takes a cut of the crude oil, and then a producer who takes a cut. Not to mention the people doing the transporting between each of these middle-men.

      With electric, you are going to cut out a lot of middle men. The utility, if fossil powered, will buy in large bulk quanities that will be delivered to one location, probably by ship. So, just by moving energy by transmission line we are cutting back on the total energy use required by the country. It's all a big chain reaction.

      I hope they can make this thing work.

      --
      Cool! Amazing Toys.
    9. Re:Regular house current (FYI) by loose+electron · · Score: 1

      the voltage is 3500 volts,

      read the patent, I posted all the information on it yesterday at the original posting

      sheesh!
      dupe posting and dupe commentary...

      --
      www.effectiveelectrons.com "chips that work" Analog, RF, Mixed Signal
    10. Re:Regular house current (FYI) by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      It appears to be for the means of manufacturing a specific design of capacitors. That should be exactly what patents are for. The same thing would occur for room temperature super conductors, should they ever be discovered. Once known, they'll be obvious, but to initially produce them will be hard.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    11. Re:Regular house current (FYI) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually with an Industrial 3 Phase 220v system used to power saw mills would be sufficient to charge this car in 5 mins. Normally you would use a Capacitor farm to quickly charge it, while the capacitor farm was constantly being charged. Charging the car at home would be imposible. In fact the government would not allow it as a huge part of fuel cost is for government taxes. Road improvements etc. So Charging stations with industrial 3 phase power would be required.

    12. Re:Regular house current (FYI) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well said, I posted basically the same thing in very vague terms. The only issue with this solution is POLITICS! The USA runs on Oil. As long as their are Billions of dollars in oil money flowing any technology that could save the environment and money is considered "Disruptive Technology" as per a lawyer who works for a company that is designing highly fuel efficient cars.

    13. Re:Regular house current (FYI) by Sj0 · · Score: 1

      "Road improvements etc."

      You misspelled war.

      --
      It's been a long time.
  27. Batteries and such by gx5000 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    How long until they're bought out and run to ground ? Last time we had a chance at EV cars, GM bought controlling share of the batterie technology and used their Delco crap. The higher performance batteries never really made it in the cars, just a few got the first line issues. And when GM got out of the EV business, they sold that controlling share to Texaco/Mobile, or was it exxon ? They want us to go Hydrogen and Biodeiesel next. The Electric car won't see the light of day until the Big Oil Profiteers get UberUber Mega Rich... Sad that we let them supplant technology and lie to us... Watch the film "Who killed the Electric car"...and the rest.. Cheers

    --
    End of Line.
    1. Re:Batteries and such by khallow · · Score: 1
      Getting bought out and run into the ground is a common fate of companies in the US and elsewhere. For example, GM is notorious for its incompetence in this area. In particular, it's not conspiracy in itself.

      Having said that, the energy density of gasoline or diesel is still far better than that for electric storage. That more than anything else is why electric vehicles still haven't taken off. In addition to the obvious performance issues, you also can't cram as many power consuming options (air conditioning, power windows, power brakes, etc) into an electric vehicle as you can into a gasoline powered one. The automakers make most of their profit from selling options.

    2. Re:Batteries and such by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Nice theory and all. It may even have validity. But this time around, we are talking about numerous other companies and VCs. It is most likely these companies are going to do the ICE what ICE did to buggy whip manufacturers.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    3. Re:Batteries and such by gx5000 · · Score: 1

      I'll simply say I disagree with you on the "density" issue. They only have release the technology that they have, which makes your statement true. If they were to try and compete, the Electric car would be king. That was the point the film and I were trying to make, as long as they can sell us the oil and gas, they will make sure and keep whatever technologies beat it under wraps and lobotomized. Just like when Intel said their 468 DX50 chips were defective. They weren't, but if they had continued release we would have had 486's with DX4 200's and not the pentium 60's that came out instead. It's all market strategy at our expense. Buy it or do without it, but don't tell us what to sell you, "we" know best. Cheers

      --
      End of Line.
    4. Re:Batteries and such by theBike45 · · Score: 1

      Who Killed the Electric Car? is a hilariously idiotic pack of lies only a gullible youngster could swallow. There was no mystery why no one wanted that piece of shit EV1 electric car. If you think otherwise, I'll get you one and you can pay me the $45,000 it cost to build and $15,000 for the 26 nickel metal-hydride batteries that might last 5 years and just might get you to the dentist and back. People who swallow the lies in that film know zilch about the EV1, the biggest automotive flop since the Edsel. Only dumb Ed Begley and dumber Tom Hanks could voice Chris Paine's often hilariously stupid lies (he claims that GM couldn't kill the EV1 until the zero emission law was cancelled, in spite of the fact that only GM was even offering a zero emission car. He also claimed it gave GM an out for avoiding alternative fule cars, but forgot to mention that GM was and still is developing a zero emission fuel cell car!!! The list of his lies is endless. If the film makes a claim, assume it's a lie and you'll be right every time. Chris Paine is a lying piece of human garbage). Ed (the Fool) Begley claims the car could satisfy 90% of a driver's needs. Unfortunately, less that 50% even had a place the recharge the car, making his claim, shall we say, beyond stupid. Everyone needs a $45,000 grocery getter. Nobody can own just an EV1. You have to own at least one gasolne powered car if you need to go to a destination over 35 miles away, or less on old batteries.

    5. Re:Batteries and such by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One can only hope that the owners of the patent doesn't cave in like the rest of the technology that was superior and yet didn't see the light of day, in large part thanx to big oil companies. What ever happened to the 100mpg carburerator? I think it got lost in favor of the new fuel injection technology.

    6. Re:Batteries and such by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Actually, the EV wasn't killed because it got bought out.

      When the EV was developed, it only sported about a 100 mile range before requiring a recharge, which would typically take between 5 and 6 hours.

      Americans didn't like the idea of feeling like they were confined to such a small radius, even though the range would actually meet over 90% of all urban transportation needs. Owning an automobile has always sort of carried with it the notion of giving you the freedom to go anywhere you want whenever you want. People didn't want to give that up, so most people didn't want to get one.

      The result was that there was no perceived market for the EV, so it tanked.

      If they had just thought outside the box a little bit, it would have gone very differently. If the original EV was good enough for most needs, then that should have been just great, all they'd need to do is throw in a backup (gasoline) system for longer trips that kicks in when the main batteries are too low. That would have taken care of the reasons for low demand completely. And the result would have been that 90% of the time people would have been driving around with virtually full tanks of gasoline in their cars for months at a time, as long as they simply recharged their car every night.

    7. Re:Batteries and such by gx5000 · · Score: 1

      Argh...the POINT IS that if you buy out or supplant the technology needed to offer a car that could go 700+ miles to the charge, then you effectively kill it. Now with that new capacitor car coming out, maybe there's hope. Unfortunatly people will buy what they're told or what they are shown...And if you mass market it, it becomes affordable to all...a lot like the two thousand CD burner of old. As far as "commodities"...I live in Canada, and hydro is cheap and pleantifull...water power rules !

      --
      End of Line.
    8. Re:Batteries and such by mark-t · · Score: 1
      Argh...the POINT IS that if you buy out or supplant the technology needed to offer a car that could go 700+ miles to the charge, then you effectively kill it.
      And my point was that such a statement is hard to verify, since there is no precedent for it in the automotive industry. The EV was not killed by battery technology being bought out, it was killed because even the very best battery technology couldn't satisfy consumer expectations for an automobile.
    9. Re:Batteries and such by gx5000 · · Score: 1

      The Best batteries were never put in, and their next generation replacements held back by the controlling partner, which in this case was GM (which used older and defective Delco models of batteries), and then Texaco/Exxon, that fact is NOT in question.

      --
      End of Line.
    10. Re:Batteries and such by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Ah... the old conspiracy theory... "Oil companies bought out the technoligies behind the electric car and that's why we don't have EV's today"

      In fact, there was no conspiracy at all. Battery technology simply couldn't satisfy consumer expectation of an automobile, which consumers had come to expect was a vehicle that didn't require more than a stop for a few minutes at a time and could take them at least several hundred miles at a stretch.

      The fact that most consumers never actually actually _needed_ anywhere even close to that level of functionality on a day-to-day basis was irrellevant, most potential consumers did not like the idea of being limited to no more than about a hundred miles of travel in one day, which was all the battery technology of the time could reasonably put into a vehicle. The most significant market for the EV were potential consumers that would have used the EV for day-to-day city driving, but kept a gasoline powered vehicle for other occasions anyways,and at the time this segment did not represent a significant enough percentage of the total expected market for home-owned automobiles to justify trying to push the product commercially or waste further R&D on trying to improve it. That it was consumer expectation for an automobile that was the reason for there not being any real market was irrellevant to the issues of the preliminary marketing surveys that were taken for the EV... all they saw was that the market was not as good as what they had hoped, so the idea for the EV was ultimately scrapped... at least for the time being. Big business didn't kill the EV, it was simply people that didn't want to give up the convenience of their current automobiles.

    11. Re:Batteries and such by gx5000 · · Score: 1

      That was almost a troll post. I could debate every point you made but what's the point ? You obviously don't want to see thefacts as they are, you're information is dated. So I'll make this my last post on this thread. It's here, it's ready, it hasn't been properly shown to the public because gas and oil is big business. End point.

      --
      End of Line.
    12. Re:Batteries and such by mark-t · · Score: 1

      I do see the facts as they are... but the real catch to this is that they are not particularly obvious... they are tied in to the way people think, not just the amount of money that a monolithic company happened to throw at it to make it go away.

      It's very easy to blame big companies for things... it is largely impersonal, and unlikely to offend anyone. People have been doing that ever since the idea for the EV tanked instead of accepting that perhaps they themselves and their own expectations played a critical role in how the story evolved.

      You say I don't want to listen to facts... but what I don't want to listen to is baseless finger-pointing. Here are a few of the facts that I do listen to:

      • The EV got about a hundred miles on a charge, using nearly half a ton of batteries.
      • It took several hours to recharge.
      • It couldn't go as fast as many gasoline powered vehicles.
      • It cost more than an automobile (although to be fair, it was projected to come down in cost quickly within a few years as technology improved and they became more cost effective to manufacture).

      Note that not one of these reasons, or even their combination, was a reason that the EV was not "good enough" for most usage. A hundred miles a day could meet most people's needs, so requiring several hours to recharge would not be a problem, as they could simply recharge the car overnight. It couldn't go as fast as many gasoline powered vehicles, but most people do not actually need to drive faster than 80 miles per hour. And of course the cost was not a huge factor in and of itself... it just provided further discouragement from people being willing to have both an EV and a gas-powered car.

      But all these factors played a critical role in making them realize that the EV was not adequate to replace the family automobile (which was what they expected from it, and one could argue that such over-expecation also played a vital part), and thus why there was an insufficient market for it to be commercially viable.

    13. Re:Batteries and such by gx5000 · · Score: 1

      Again I say you still haven't pointed out any "facts" and everything you have said so far is barely hearsay...you want facts ? here you go... http://www.veva.bc.ca/faqs/general/index.htm
      I come here to Learn, inform and banter, not kick around old arguments...
      What's sad is that this is a very fast google search and reply...I've read and
      forgotten much more recent articles since...but this one will do just fine...
      Next thread already ! lol

      Electric Car Facts

      Types

      There are different types of electric cars. All electric cars use an electric motor. Electric hybrids may also use an internal combustion engine or other means to store and convert energy. Energy may be stored in a car in gasoline, diesel, propane, natural gas, hydrogen, batteries, ultracapacitors, flywheels or compressed air. This energy is then recovered and converted to mecanical energy by an electric motor or combustion engine. Cars that use rechargeable batteries only do not emit pollution. Power generation for the grid is more efficient and produces less pollution than car engines. Electric cars come in all sizes and performance. Generally, lighter more aerodynamic cars perform better. Energy stored chemically is lighter than energy stored electrically.

      Charging

      Batteries can be used until they are dead just like gas tanks can be run empty. It is good to watch the gauge and refill them before this happens. Car batteries are recharged just like cell phone batteries. It typically takes overnight to charge a battery. They should not be charged faster than in 3 hours. However, they can be charged as fast as 20 minutes, but then they don't last as long and special charge stations are needed. Charging overnight can be done with any normal electric outlet. Charging in 3 hours requires a 220 Volt Dryer or Stove Plug. Most parking lots in colder climates have normal plug-ins. In Vancouver many private parking lots such as restaurants and parking garages may have plug ins. The infrastructure exists now, it needs to be identified and publicized. Batteries can be exchanged. In Nepal over 400 small electric buses exchange their batteries twice a day and operate continuously.

      Range

      The range of most electric cars is plenty for daily city needs so a second car is not needed, unless you travel long distances regularily. A hybrid electric car can go unlimited distances. According to Statistic Canada the average Canadian commutes 7.5 Km each way to work and over 10 million commute less than 50 Km / day. Delivery truck drivers average 200 Km in an eight hour day. The range of electric cars varies from 50 Km to over 200 Km. 100 Km is typical. Range is affected by weight, aerodynamics, rolling resistance, energy management driving habits and accessories. If a battery is run until almost dead, simply recharge it at the nearest electric outlet, which is usually any nearby house or building. There are more electric outlets in Vancouver than gas stations in the world

      Performance

      Electric cars can go very fast. The current record 1/4 mile drag race for electric cars is about 8.8 seconds and 230 KPH. Three cars nearing production have acceleration of 0 to 100 Kph in about 5-7 seconds (Similar to a Ferrari or Corvette) and 1/4 mile in about 16 seconds and 130 KPH. This is because electric motors have very high torque. Cars that are designed with the batteries low have excellent cornering.

      Cost

      The price of an EV is set by market factors not cost. For equivalent production volumes battery EVs should be cheaper because they have many fewer parts. This also means they are cheaper to maintain. Only the cost of battery replacement every 3-5 years is about $3000. They are less expensive to operate by a factor of ten over gasoline. Hybrids get about double the fuel efficiency of regular cars.

      Size

      EVs are equally as safe as similar sized cars. Due to the low energy density of batteries and significance of weight to range, many electric cars are small.

      --
      End of Line.
    14. Re:Batteries and such by mark-t · · Score: 1
      Yep... those are the facts that I am willing to listen to. Rather than blaming anyone, these facts address the actual capabilities of the vehicle, and I notice there's nothing that actually contradicts anything I was addressing.

      When you weigh it all out, however... you come up with a vehicle that doesn't have a good market. Not because it can't meet most people's needs, but because it can't meet most people's expectations for a car.

  28. It wasn't me!!! by ctroutwi · · Score: 4, Funny

    well... I thought it was an interesting article when I posted it the first (and only) time yesterday... However, I had nothing to do with the encore!!!... This is only the 2nd story I've ever submitted, and the only one to ever get accepted... (albeit twice)..

    1. Re:It wasn't me!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      This is only the 2nd story I've ever submitted,

      Of course it's only your second story; your first one was posted yesterday. ;)
  29. YES WE KNOW!!! by tygerstripes · · Score: 0, Redundant

    There aren't enough "Redundant" modpoints in the world to shut you all up. Just stop yelling Dupe, would you? I think it was pretty obvious from second one.

    --
    Meta will eat itself
    1. Re:YES WE KNOW!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There really is no dupe....

    2. Re:YES WE KNOW!!! by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      There aren't enough "Redundant" modpoints in the world to shut you all up. Just stop yelling Dupe, would you? I think it was pretty obvious from second one.
      If you want to read about the 500 mile capacitor car, go back to the first posting of the article. Dupe postings are for complaining about the idiot slashdot editors.
      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
  30. Re:DUP nothing to see here..Move along by wik · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Different editor. Come on, give 'em a break. You can't expect effective communication in the electronic age.

    --
    / \
    \ / ASCII ribbon campaign for peace
    x
    / \
  31. Re:Echo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    It's fairly obvious that /. editors don't even read /.

  32. So good I read it twice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So good I read it twice

  33. Every 10th by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can somewhat tolerate every 10th article posted on /. being about an energy storage device. . .
    but the same article, come on now.

  34. 1 more please by Plutonite · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I love it when dupes are duped, but 2 on the front page is not quite enough. Can we have 1 more please?

    3 stories about 5-minute charges, all on the front page with slightly different names.. that would be art!

    1. Re:1 more please by KillerBob · · Score: 1

      Ahh... but you missed the finer point of this one... This one has exactly the same title, the same submitter, and the same text as the other one. So either the submitter double-submitted, or Timothy (who approved the other one) screwed up and didn't remove it from the queue. Come to think of it, Timothy probably screwed up by not checking the queue to see if there was a dupe of the article he'd just approved....

      --
      If you believe everything you read, you'd better not read. - Japanese proverb
    2. Re:1 more please by Plutonite · · Score: 1

      No - my RSS feed says:

      500 miles on a 5 minute recharge?

      for #2 it says:

      Charge in 5 minutes, Drive 500 miles?

      There is only a subtle difference, but it's there. Maybe the kind submitter (who should be banned for being such a lame fool) would care to give us #3:

      "For a 5 minute recharge, 500 miles!"

  35. Re:from shocking-dupes department... by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Whoa! Slow down, cowboy! You have to wait between posts to give everyone a chance to dupe. It's been 16 1/2 hours since this story has been posted.
    You may be behind a firewall, blahblahblah....

    --
    "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
  36. Please define by palad1 · · Score: 1

    What is a gallon of electricity?
    Really. I'm curious.

    1. Re:Please define by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      It depends on the material. Let's e.g. see what a gallon of electricity is in copper.

      First, a gallon is 0,0038 m^3. Now copper has a free electron density of 8.47*10^28/m^3, and an electron has a charge of 1.6*10^-19 C. Multiplying this together means in copper, 1 gallon of electricity is 51 MC or about 14 kAh.

      SCNR

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    2. Re:Please define by tgd · · Score: 1

      I'm shocked you don't know.

    3. Re:Please define by NeuralSpike · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't it be most meaningful to define a gallon of electricity in terms of a gallon of hydrogen in its most compressed form? After all, hydrogen is the simplest electron carrying element. Or perhaps one could create a device with a volume of one gallon that can store free electrons compressed to the limits imposed by the Pauli Exclusion Principal?

    4. Re:Please define by rubberbando · · Score: 1

      Probably electricity stored a gallon sized Leyden Jar. :P

      --
      DEAD DEAD DEAD DELETE ME
    5. Re:Please define by nytes · · Score: 1

      About 0.002 Libraries of Congress.

      --
      -- I have monkeys in my pants.
    6. Re:Please define by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      Hydrogen in its most compressed form is called a black hole :-) But even before that, the electrons would combine with the protons to form neutrons, so at that point it would stop being hydrogen.
      I'd guess compressing a free electron gas would finally result in a (charged) black hole as well.

      Of course in practice you'll have a hard time to compress your hydrogen (and even more, the electron gas) that much. :-)

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  37. be a bit bored.... by JaJ_D · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    ...i messed around with anagrams of "ScuttleMoney" and got...

    Yo celment slut
    To clumsy teen

    and my favourate...

    u my clone test

    Jaj

    1. Re:be a bit bored.... by Kamineko · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      What about 'ScuttleMonkey'?

    2. Re:be a bit bored.... by JaJ_D · · Score: 1

      Ah the issues with Dyslexia (why is this so damned hard to spell)....

      Jaj

    3. Re:be a bit bored.... by GrievousMistake · · Score: 1

      "Mutt keys clone".

      --
      In a fair world, refrigerators would make electricity.
    4. Re:be a bit bored.... by kylerimkus · · Score: 0

      Well, if you look at anagrams of ScuttleMonkey, instead of Scuttlemoney, you get:
      LET ME SUCK TONY
      KEEN TO MY CULTS
      SLUTTY COKE MEN

    5. Re:be a bit bored.... by jam244 · · Score: 1

      ScuttleMon K ey.

    6. Re:be a bit bored.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a policy: If you can spell it, you don't have it.

  38. rotflmao!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you suck scuttlemonkey!!!

  39. WOW DUPE ON THE SAME PAGE!!!!!!! by stewwy · · Score: 0, Redundant

    SEE SUBJECT

    1. Re:WOW DUPE ON THE SAME PAGE!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a little late to the party. Tell us something we couldn't figure out from the 60 posts before yours.

  40. Re:Noo noo noo noo by wizbit · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    You mean a "White Hole":

    CAT: So, what is it?
    KRYTEN: I've never seen one before -- no one has -- but I'm guessing it's
        a white hole.
    RIMMER: A _white_ hole?
    KRYTEN: Every action has an equal and opposite reaction. A black hole
        sucks time and matter out of the universe: a white hole returns it.
    LISTER: So, that thing's spewing time back into the universe? (He dons
        his fur-lined hat.)
    KRYTEN: Precisely. That's why we're experiencing these curious time
        phenomena on board.
    CAT: So, what is it?
    KRYTEN: I've never seen one before -- no one has -- but I'm guessing it's
        a white hole.
    RIMMER: A _white_ hole?
    KRYTEN: Every action has an equal and opposite reaction. A black hole
        sucks time and matter out of the universe: a white hole returns it.
    LISTER: (Minus the hat.) So, that thing's spewing time back into the
        universe? (He dons his fur-lined hat, again.)
    KRYTEN: Precisely. That's why we're experiencing these curious time
        phenomena on board.
    LISTER: What time phenomena?
    KRYTEN: Like just then, when time repeated itself.
    CAT: So, what is it?

  41. dupe, use better SQL key by xming · · Score: 1

    It's time that we have fuzzy unique key on the 'subject' field.

  42. I dont know if anyone had heard this... by night_flyer · · Score: 1

    But there is a car that takes 5 minutes to charge and it will go for 500 miles!

    --


    Thanks to file sharing, I purchase more CDs
    Thanks to the RIAA, I buy them used...
    1. Re:I dont know if anyone had heard this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Link please.

    2. Re:I dont know if anyone had heard this... by night_flyer · · Score: 1
      --


      Thanks to file sharing, I purchase more CDs
      Thanks to the RIAA, I buy them used...
    3. Re:I dont know if anyone had heard this... by whoop · · Score: 1

      Would it be so hard to give a 25mpg car a 20 gallon tank (plus a couple spare gallons)? There is your 5 minutes to fill for 500 miles.

    4. Re:I dont know if anyone had heard this... by Zaatxe · · Score: 1

      But there is a car that takes 5 minutes to charge and it will go for 500 miles!

      But...
      1) Is is electric?
      2) Does it cost $9 to charge?

      Like that old chinese saying I just made goes, "the true revolution is in the details".

      --
      So say we all
  43. OT but look what I just found out by saboola · · Score: 1

    "In the wake of rising gasoline costs there have been plenty of alternatives seen on the horizon. Including Hybrids, Biofuels, fuel cells and battery powered all electric cars. CNN has recently posted a story about a company (EEStor) that plans on offering Ultra-Capacitor storage products. The claim being that you charge the ultra-capacitor in 5 minutes, with approximately 9$ (~$.45 a gallon) of electricity and then drive 500 miles."

  44. Not only this, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Would it be so hard to let Slash reject submission with already-submitted links? -- insolit, but the captcha text is "laughs"

    1. Re:Not only this, but... by Headcase88 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Good idea, not only would it prevent super-obvious dupes but it would cut on the number of submissions an editor would have to read. Comparing submitted links to, say, all the links of accepted articles in the last week or so should be possible.

      --
      "When the atomic bomb goes off there's devastation...but when the atomic bong goes off there's celebraaaaation!"
  45. Re:DUP nothing to see here..Move along by jack_csk · · Score: 0, Redundant

    > You can't expect effective communication in the electronic age. ...at least on slashdot

  46. A five minute charge is rarely necessary, by KonoWatakushi · · Score: 1

    except during long trips, where you must recharge on the way. By focusing on this point, it completely misses the real advantages of that these capacitor based cars.

    For day to day usage, you would simply plug the car in at home each night. Existing power distribution is perfectly capable of providing enough power for the typical daily commute.

    One other huge advantage seems to have gone unnoticed in the last thread. With a capacitor, you can recover nearly all of the energy during deceleration. This makes city driving immensely more efficient than with current cars.

    Given these two points, such cars offer the hope of vastly decreasing both energy consumption and pollution. Even without recharging stations, you could build a very nice hybrid by sticking one of these in the back: http://www.propulsiontech.com/apu.html

  47. Those figures do make sense by realnowhereman · · Score: 4, Informative

    I meant to write this the first time the article appeared :-) I had originally thought that it wasn't going to work out; but getting to the end, it turned out they did. Oh well - now I've done it, you might be interested... for your viewing pleasure...

    Supposition: 500 miles on a 5 minute charge, with $9 worth of electricity.

    $9 worth of electricity = 100kWh
    100kWh = 360 megajoules
    500 miles = 804 kilometres

    Force = Energy / distance
        = 360e6 / 804e3
        = 447 Newtons

    (of course the above is only the average force available for that journey)

    F_drag = 1/2 * Drag_Coefficient * Cross_Section * AirDensity * Velocity^2

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drag_coefficient gives Drag as around 0.3 for an average car. Cross-section is probably about 3 square metres.

    F_drag = 0.5 * 0.3 * 3 * 1.29 * v^2
        = 0.581 v^2

    55 mph = 24 m/s

    F_drag_55 = 334 Newtons

    Which is well within the average 447 available; and gives scope for losses. So; it turns out it's not crazy to suggest you can get 500 miles on $9 worth of electricity.

    I wonder how far my house would travel a month...

    --
    Carpe Daemon
    1. Re:Those figures do make sense by ab762 · · Score: 1
      The charging numbers are impressive, though:

      500 kWh in 9 minutes is 3333 kW
      at 115 volts nominal, looks like 28985 amps!

      Electrical code allows 20 amps in 12 gauge wire, 12 gauge is 3.3 mm**2 cross section, we need over 3300 mm**2 cross section - call it sqrt(1000) mm.

      That charging cable's in the neigborhood of a foot in diameter! OR the voltage must be much, much higher.

      So, sounds like you still need a "gas station", or rather "charging station", with a substantial infrastructure. Or, you put a duplicate capacitor in your garage and trickle charge it, then blast it over.

      I don't know about you folks, but I'm not going to be connecting and disconnecting thousands of amps in my garage. Not twice!

    2. Re:Those figures do make sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you are right, you are saying that the average car can travel at 55mph with 8kw of power (337N*24m/s) Thats about 10.5 Horse Power.

      Lets look at these numbers for a gasoline car
      My car (subaru Forrester) gets about 7.1L per 100km on the highway at 55mph (thats measured, not a sales stat)
      that is 7.lL/100km * 88.5km/h * 1h / 3600sec = 1.745e-3L/sec

      According to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_density gasoline is 29MJ/L

      so thats 1.745*29 e3 = 50617 Watts of Gasoline being burned. Lets assume that the motor is only 30%efficient, that would be 15kW of energy at the tires.

      I think your Aero drag number is a little low, and you dind't include rolling resistance. I would expect at that speed about 40% of your total energy (probably about 4kw) is going to rolling resistance. There are small adjustments that car manufacturers could make to reduce the Aero and Rolling resistance so that those numbers could be acheived.

    3. Re:Those figures do make sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, but your assumption falls apart here:

      "Lets assume that the motor is only 30%efficient, that would be 15kW of energy at the tires."

      Typical gasoline engines have 12 - 15% efficiency, the majority of the potential power in the gasoline going to heat.

      15% efficiency would be 7.5kW. 12% would be just 6kW at the tires.

      Hence, the parent you were replying to was about right with his 8kW estimate.

    4. Re:Those figures do make sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      High voltage / low aperage means you can do it over a thinner cable. Like you said, trickle charge a big cap in your garage, then use a step transformer to sent it at some ridiculously high voltage over a 12 gauge wire into the cap in the car (step transform it down once it gets there).

      I'm sure they've thought about this, and hopefully are selling the additional parts necessary to do just that.

    5. Re:Those figures do make sense by michael_cain · · Score: 1
      That charging cable's in the neigborhood of a foot in diameter! OR the voltage must be much, much higher.

      If you look up the patent, the EEStor capacitor charges at 3500 volts. 500 kWh in 9 minutes at 3500 volts is still almost a thousand amps. Don't know how thick the cable is, but I'm not real eager to be standing anywhere near that.

      For the grandparent comment: the figure that is usually tossed around for "mileage" for an electric car is somewhere between 200 and 250 watt-hours per mile. The Tesla roadster claims to be doing much better than that— about 110 watt-hours/mile&mdash but that's a two-seater with minimal cargo capacity. The EEStor patent describes a device storing 52kWh; at 110 watt-hours/mile that's good for 470 miles; under that assumption, you'd only need about 100 amps at 3500 volts to charge in nine minutes, but I'm still not sure I want to be standing next to it.

    6. Re:Those figures do make sense by theLOUDroom · · Score: 1

      F_drag_55 = 334 Newtons
      Which is well within the average 447 available;


      Only because your final number is wildly unrealistic.

      The most basic thing you forgot is rolling resistance, but you also forgot other things like energy loss due to braking, energy loss due to cornering, energy loss due to bumps in the road and the energy required to get up to 55 mph in the first place. Or is someone suggesting that there is a 500 mile long, perfectly straight, perfectly flat, maglev track each one of these will run on? Heck, why don'r we just say the whole thing is on a huge hill and that way we don't need ANY electricity!

      For example, rolling resistance is about ~300 Newtons by itself.

      (I used normal car tires on asphalt and a total vehicle weight of 1000 pounds, including passengers and cargo.)

      --
      Life is too short to proofread.
    7. Re:Those figures do make sense by realnowhereman · · Score: 1

      You're correct I forgot rolling resistance (however, it was only a back-of-the-envelope calculation to see if the numbers where absolutely crazy).

      However, the energy losses I imagined would be taken care of by regenerative breaking. The energy required to get up to 55mph would be gained back when you drop back to zero (excepting the losses of course). I'm not really sure why a bump in the road would lose you energy - if you used magnetic suspension, you could probably gain some energy from the bump.

      Please bear in mind, given that most of my figures are guessed, it seemed a little bit pedantic for me to go into too much detail.

      --
      Carpe Daemon
    8. Re:Those figures do make sense by GWBasic · · Score: 1
      Which is well within the average 447 available; and gives scope for losses. So; it turns out it's not crazy to suggest you can get 500 miles on $9 worth of electricity.

      ...Until the government realizes that everyone is bypassing gasoline taxes. Gas taxes fund roads.

  48. More details.. by stoney27 · · Score: 5, Informative
    There are some good details on this technology on Energy blog

    http://thefraserdomain.typepad.com/energy/2006/01/ eestor_ultracap.html

    A breif run down:

    • It is a parallel plate capacitor with barium titanate as the dielectric.
    • It claims that it can make a battery at half the cost per kilowatt-hour and one-tenth the weight of lead-acid batteries.
    • As of last year selling price would start at $3,200 and fall to $2,100 in high-volume production
    • The product weighs 400 pounds and delivers 52 kilowatt-hours.
    • The batteries fully charge in minutes as opposed to hours.
    • The EEStor technology has been tested up to a million cycles with no material degradation compared to lead acid batteries that optimistically have 500 to 700 recharge cycles,
    • Because it's a solid state battery rather than a chemical battery, such being the case for lithium ion technology, there would be no overheating and thus safety concerns with using it in a vehicle.
    • With volume manufacturing it's expected to be cost-competitive with lead-acid technology.
    • As of last year, EEStor planned to build its own assembly line to prove the battery can work and then license the technology to manufacturers for volume production
    • EEStor's technology could be used in more than low-speed electric vehicles. The company envisions using it for full-speed pure electric vehicles, hybrid-electrics (including plug-ins), military applications, backup power and even large-scale utility storage for intermittent renewable power sources such as wind and solar.
    • They have an exclusive agreement with Feel Good Cars, a Canadian manufacturer of the ZENN, a low speed electric car, to to purchase high-power-density ceramic ultra capacitors called Electrical Storage Units (ESU). FGC's exclusive worldwide right is for all personal transportation uses under 15 KW drive systems (equivalent to 100 peak horse power) and for vehicles with a curb weight of under 1200 kilograms not including batteries.


    -S
    --

    It is said that a child learns wisdom from the parent,
    but the truly wise parent learns joy from the child
    1. Re:More details.. by silentounce · · Score: 1

      Let me get this straight...

      has been tested up to a million cycles

      Consecutive with the same battery? 5 million minutes = 9.5 years

      Ok, let's say they tested a smaller battery with a lower recharge time of say, 30 seconds, that's still almost a year not even counting the time it takes to drain the battery of power. Or am I misinterpreting the meaning of drain?

      --
      There are many tongues to talk, and but few heads to think. -Victor Hugo
    2. Re:More details.. by khallow · · Score: 1

      Consecutive with the same battery? 5 million minutes = 9.5 years

      Don't know how they cycled it, but maybe they had a test rig that could handle really high amp charging/discharging cycles. In which case, you might be able to do a "cycle" (charge up to X% of full capacity and discharge down to Y% of capacity) in a matter of a few seconds.
    3. Re:More details.. by smithmc · · Score: 1

        The product weighs 400 pounds and delivers 52 kilowatt-hours.

      And how is that supposed to be enough to drive 500 miles? A typical car requires something like 25 hp to maintain 60 mi/hr, IIRC. (That's about 34 kW to maintain 97 km/hr.) So, then 52 kWh is enough for just over 1.5 hours, or less than 150 km. That's more than a little shy of 500 miles, ain't it?

      --
      Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
    4. Re:More details.. by hackerjoe · · Score: 1

      Google says: 25 horsepower = 18.6424968 kilowatts; 52 / 18.6 = 2.8 hours, which is closer to the right ballpark. I don't know where your 25 horsepower to maintain 100km/h came from, but you're going to require less energy per kilometer at lower speeds, and they may be making different assumptions about the construction of the car that mean it'll be more efficient...

      And really, we're close enough to the right amount of energy here that if maybe you need to put two of these in instead of one, that's not a big deal. I'm pretty excited!

    5. Re:More details.. by Software · · Score: 1
      FGC's exclusive worldwide right is for all personal transportation uses under 15 KW drive systems (equivalent to 100 peak horse power)
      15 kilowatts is about 20 horsepower, not 100. Or maybe the blog author was referring to continuous vs. peak power. In this case, switching methods and units of measurement at the same time is rather sloppy.
    6. Re:More details.. by ivan256 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Don't get excited until they tell you how long it holds a charge while you're not using it.

      $9 to go 500 miles seems like a great deal (we're talking about cash here, not the environment. That $9 of electricity was probably generated with coal. Renewable sources can't even cover what we use *now*, so they don't stand a chance if we signifigantly increase our electricity usage), but if you only drive 20 miles and then park for three days only to come back to a discharged cap, then you can keep it and I'll stick to my chemical energy storage.

    7. Re:More details.. by skelly33 · · Score: 1

      As I mentioned yesterday - exactly how does 100HP translate to making a 4 door sedan "drive like a ferrari"? At 400lbs for the ultracap itself (about the same weight as a full sized 4-banger ICE, by the way) it's not exactly coming in as an ultra-light contender.

      I have to wonder whether this type of public criticism is exactly why they've chosen to remain a "stealth" company until they have something real and deployable with real world metrics to talk about and back up...

  49. Tonight the super-duper ed's are gonna blind me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...like they always do-pappa......

  50. I am not sure but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't think that anybody has reported it yet, but I think this is a dupe

  51. The math isnt very promising on this ! by Ancient_Hacker · · Score: 1, Insightful
    Er, Um, all these comments, and nobody tried doing the math?

    A capacitor bank to store that much charge (100 to 200 KwH) is going to cost, retail, at today's prices, oh, about $220,000 to $440,000 AND take up most of the space inside a minivan. . It's unlikely these folks have made that much of an improvement in cost and density.

    That much energy stored in a capacitor bank will make Jerry Brukheimer really envious-- every such car out there will explode on impact.

    Most houses are only wired for 100 to 200 amps at 120VAC, which scientists tell us, is only 24KwH per hour. Every house would have to be rewired from the power pole with wire two to five times as thick. And a fusebox and timer able to schedule your time sucking up the amps.

    If EVERYBODY tried to do this, we'd need three to five times the available electic power. No way this can happen, there isnt that much available capital in the whole world to build that many power plants. And oh, those power plats would have to use nuclear or coal, not exactly "clean energy" in the broad view.

    1. Re:The math isnt very promising on this ! by cubicledrone · · Score: 1

      So we reached the pinnacle of technology in 1902. Whew. That's a relief. Now we can play Boggle.

      --
      Business isn't willing to pay for products, innovation and careers, so we get brands, mortgage commercials and layoffs.
    2. Re:The math isnt very promising on this ! by ArikTheRed · · Score: 1
      Rather than reply to parent, I'm going to give it the Wikipedia treatment:

      Er, Um, all these comments, and nobody[verification needed] tried doing the math?

      A capacitor bank to store that much charge (100 to 200 KwH) is going to cost, retail, at today's prices, oh, about $220,000 to $440,000[citation needed] AND take up most of the space inside a minivan. . It's unlikely these folks have made that much of an improvement in cost and density[verification needed].

      That much energy stored in a capacitor bank will make Jerry Brukheimer really envious-- every such car out there will explode on impact[citation needed].

      Most houses are only wired for 100 to 200 amps at 120VAC, which scientists tell us, is only 24KwH per hour. Every house would have to be rewired from the power pole with wire two to five times as thick. And a fusebox and timer able to schedule your time sucking up the amps.[verification needed]

      If EVERYBODY tried to do this, we'd need three to five times the available electic power.[verification needed] No way this can happen,[verification needed] there isnt that much available capital in the whole world to build that many power plants[verification needed]. And oh, those power plats would have to use nuclear or coal[verification needed], not exactly "clean energy" in the broad view[citation needed].
    3. Re:The math isnt very promising on this ! by RMB2 · · Score: 1

      You critize all of /. because "nobody tried doing the math", and THIS was your post??

      First, please actually raed the posts (for this topic, or yesterday's, whichever) and you'll find numerous posts suggesting that the power draw for a 5-min recharge far exceed the supply of most households.

      Next, the point IS that EEStor has made improvements in ultracapacitors, to the point at which energy density in terms of volume and cost are significantly lowered. Just as cubicledrone Wiki'd your ass pretty good earlier, you need a citation on that outrageous $400,000 for... whatever it is you're talking about.

      Also, I never ever want to meet the "scientists" which tell "us" anything about KwH per hour. You see, the point of the kilowatt-hour unit of measure is convienence in paying power bills. kWh per hour??? That's like saying I'm 1.95 Joules per newton tall.

      --
      [/sarcasm]
    4. Re:The math isnt very promising on this ! by Ancient_Hacker · · Score: 1
      >Next, the point IS that EEStor has made improvements in ultracapacitors, Hmmm, well I based my comments on the current state of the art. Which if you plot the progress over the years, on;y increases in performance about 20 to 30 percent a year, over the last 15 years.

      Now they're fuzzily claiming they can get about 80 times the charge per pound, 180 times the $/charge.

      Tis kind of jump has never happened in any kind of electronic technology. I remain skeptical. >kWh per hour??? Yes. You'd like to charge the battery with a certain number of kWh. You'd like this to take a certain number of hours. The unit for this is kWh per hour.

  52. On slashdot, it takes 5 minutes to store article by hcob$ · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    in the editors memories. Buy you only get 500 miliseconds of storage after final submission.

    --
    Cliff Claven
    K.E.G. Party Chairman
    Founding Leader of: Koncerned for Egalitarin Governance
  53. An 18 ton capacitor? Yeah, it would cost a bit by Moraelin · · Score: 4, Informative

    Here's some hard data: these things are low voltage devices. E.g., Maxwell's data says 2.7V for theirs. They also have crap power density: 3-5 Wh/kg. (Yes, I didn't miss a "k" there.) They may have high capacity, but Q = C*V, so low voltage still puts a limit on it.

    So if you want to store about 90 kWh in a bank of those, you'd need anywhwere between 18,000 and 30,000 kg worth of ultra-capacitors. Yes, between 18 and 30 metric _tons_. Not quite a commuter car, you know? I'll also go on a limb and say that buying whole tons of them will cost a pretty penny.

    Also, transferring 90 kWh in 5 minutes means 1080kW power. More that 1 MW. So, yeah, I don't think your average power socket can do that. At 2.7V that means 400,000 A, too.

    So, basically, it's just snake oil. It ranks up there with the promises to make energy out of water by changing the orbits of electrons in hydrogen. Some fraudster figured that he can get tens of millions of dollars VC to pretend to make such a thing. And given the IQ of some VC these days, they probably will too.

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    1. Re:An 18 ton capacitor? Yeah, it would cost a bit by alva_edison · · Score: 2, Informative

      According to the patent (you will find a link to it in this coment), a 52kWh unit would weigh approximately 336 pounds (~152kg). I haven't done a thorough analysis of the patent, so I can't judge its merits (and I'm not a materials expert, which some of the analysis requires); however, it looks plausible.

      --
      He effected a bored affect.
    2. Re:An 18 ton capacitor? Yeah, it would cost a bit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...It ranks up there with the promises to make energy out of water by changing the orbits of electrons in hydrogen...

      I think we should meet-up and discuss this idea further. If you could keep this idea under the lid until then I'd really really appreciate it.

      There are some exciting and marvelous synergies to be had here.

    3. Re:An 18 ton capacitor? Yeah, it would cost a bit by Moraelin · · Score: 1

      Well, I was calculating at 0.1 $/kWh, that's where the 90 kWh figure came from. But 52 kWh isn't really that much better, because noone ever made ultracapacitors that can store more than 5 Wh/kg. So even with their numbers it would be more than 10 metric tons at today's technology.

      Packing that in 152 kg? Ooer. That still requires a 70-80 times improvement in capacitor technology, compared to the best of the best ultracapacitors available today. It's a jump from being 10 times worse than a chemical battery to being 7-8 times better.

      I'm sure you'll understand that I'm skeptical of such ridiculously high jumps. It could happen, but I'll want to see it actually working before I get all excited about it.

      Plus, here's another thing that makes me suspicious: why tie it to electric cars? If someone could make such capacitors, they wouldn't just make cars with them, they'd pretty much own the market for any kind of battery, including laptops, iPods, car batteries, etc. I mean, seriously, think a battery which gives you 7-8 times more hours on your laptop at the same weight as your current battery. Because that's the kind of improvement they're claiming there. Fuck cars, I'd want one in my laptop right now.

      --
      A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    4. Re:An 18 ton capacitor? Yeah, it would cost a bit by andymadigan · · Score: 1

      Please RTFA, they are not using regular capacitors, just something that acts like a capacitor.

      --
      The right to protest the State is more sacred than the State.
    5. Re:An 18 ton capacitor? Yeah, it would cost a bit by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 1

      >And given the IQ of some VC these days

      You usually think of Kleiner Perkins as investing in real things.

      If they're using barium titanate (as a later post mentions) in place of the usual ultracapacitor formulations then they could run higher voltages.

    6. Re:An 18 ton capacitor? Yeah, it would cost a bit by alva_edison · · Score: 1

      The difference between your figures and the ones given in the patent are that you are assuming low voltage. The power figures given in the patent assume a full charge at 3.5kV (yes, that is a k in front of the V). At that figure, the capcitor only has to have a capacitance to weight ratio of .2F/kg. (As opposed to your example, which assuming 12V would be 250F/kg); the high voltage also precludes it's use in personal electronics.

      --
      He effected a bored affect.
    7. Re:An 18 ton capacitor? Yeah, it would cost a bit by gregben · · Score: 1

      Ultracapacitors are inherently low voltage devices because the
      dielectric (insulator) between the "plates" is extremely thin.
      The thinner the dielectric, the more capacitance. Thick dielectric
      means higher breakdown voltage, but less capacitance.

      Apply a little too much voltage to a given capacitor and poof! It shorts
      out/explodes/vaporizes/etc.

      BTW Maxwell has been making ultracapacitors for a number of years
      now. If all of a sudden they have improved performance 100X, watch
      out, they'll be the next Google, only bigger.

  54. Nah, It is 500 discussion threads by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1
    Stop Press.

    Slashdot does 500 discussions on a single news item. In just two days.!!!!!

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  55. Re:dupe by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Even better, the 'tagging beta' seems not to let people tag stories with 'dupe.' I did, and I'm sure a lot of others did, but it hasn't shown up. Fortunately, 'dup' and 'superduper' seem not to have been similarly purged.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  56. Re:Noo noo noo noo by TheLetterPsy · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    So strange. I left work with this story at the top of the front page and when I come back in the next morning, I see only one story has been added since then. All /. could come up with in 16 hours was a single story for the front page?

    Normally, dupes are annoying, but this one caused me some trauma!

  57. But still! Think of how much current it would draw by TrisexualPuppy · · Score: 0, Insightful

    500 miles? Let us say the hybrid has the efficiency similar to Prius, 50 MPG. To go 500 miles you need to store as much energy as there is in 10 gallons of gasoline. 10 gallons of gas, is 37.5 litres of gas, that is 30 Kg of gas.

    Energy content of gasoline is 45 MJ/Kg. That means you are storing 1.35e09 Joules of energy. You are charging it in 5 minutes? So dividing by 300 seconds, the Power rating for the charger is 4500000 Watts or 4.5 MW. If you try to charge it from your friendly neighbourhood 110V line, the amp rating for the plug is drum roll please, 40909 Amps

    Now think when you are pumping 25 gallons of gas into that Hummer in 3 minutes, you have a 8 MW device in your hands!

  58. Feature request already on Source Forge by RingDev · · Score: 1
    --
    "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
  59. This could help a lot by Jerry520 · · Score: 1

    Think of the possibilities....;)

  60. Can't wait for the used/after market by karlandtanya · · Score: 1

    Soon, anyone with minimal technical skill will have their own quartershrinker.

    --
    "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, it doesn't go away." - Philip K. Dick
  61. Dupe it again and it becomes "tripe"... by rsidd · · Score: 1

    and that's an appropriate word for Slashdot.

  62. Biodiesel/EEstor hybrid, for off-road by bumptehjambox · · Score: 1
    The truck picture on the article page got me thinking. A low-revving torquey diesel would be a great generator for a Biodiesel/EEStor hybrid. I would say running a 4cyl Turbo Diesel, like a Mitsubishi Fuso engine, at generator speed for 5 minutes could only use a half-gallon of biodiesel, most likely far less. A typical turbo-diesel engine and this concept, theoretically, could give you nearly a 10,000mile range on about 10 gallons of biofuel, maybe half that if you use the diesel engine for power as well, which I would.

    A great concept would be if they could make a biofuel/EEStor hybrid that could withstand the elements, as well as an offroad 4x4 truck. I'd love to be able to drive something like this all through the mud like a redneck, or in this case- a GREEN-neck! Then you could have an all-terrain vehicle that is capable of driving from Canada to Argentina with maybe three/four refuels depending on your tank size and diesel engine use... man that'd be sweet.

    Oh yeah, and....uh like dupe, and stuff, uhhhhuuhhuhuhhuhh

  63. Slashdot Editors are Assholes by bratwiz · · Score: 1, Flamebait


    They don't care if its a dupe. Slashdot editors are assholes.

    They claim to care about site integrity and good material but are extremely biased with their rejection button.

    I've seen _really stupid_ articles get posted and _very good_ articles get canned for no apparent reason.

    There's no review process and no rebuttal or possibility for reconsideration.

    Okay, so its their site and they make the rules. I can live with that. But they're still assholes.

    (Probably I am too)

    1. Re:Slashdot Editors are Assholes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      indeed, assholes all, especially us for giving them so much revenue through ads!

      Can we fork /. ?

    2. Re:Slashdot Editors are Assholes by bratwiz · · Score: 1


      I don't mind giving them revenue, nor getting paid (even very well, if indeed they are) for their jobs.

      I just object to their arbitrart and capricious use of the "Reject" button.

      But as I said before, its their site, their rules.

    3. Re:Slashdot Editors are Assholes by Sleepy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Slashdot editorial operations is a good old boy buddy system. I've been with this site since it was .org, and I remember the fuss when people's postings were DELETED because they indicated shall we say "room for improvement" with the site.

      Editors used to have recursive macro's to apply -1 moderation to controversial posts, so even if 50 users moderated something up the post would tank.

      Today I think it's more benign editor abuse -- they simply MISUSE the "friend or foe" system so they can sometimes publish their friend's postings first. Sometimes they publish a sensational headline from someone who registered for Slashdot THAT SAME DAY.

      There's no weighting for how long you've been registered, and how much you have participated. I must have a black mark on my account "never allow to moderate", so I stopped participating here. No metamoderation anymore. There's no need to fork /. - it's just an automated news blog and there are better codebases for this.

      I happen to like the Digg site (although they are going the way of "big self-hype like Slashdot" so some foolish dot-com investor can buy Digg for one MILLION dollars).

    4. Re:Slashdot Editors are Assholes by otis+wildflower · · Score: 1

      indeed, assholes all, especially us for giving them so much revenue through ads!

      What ads?

    5. Re:Slashdot Editors are Assholes by bratwiz · · Score: 1


      That's interesting information. It does seem that way. I personally know of quite a few articles that have been rejected out-of-hand that are _at minimum_ equally as worthy as the _least_ of other articles that do get published.

      My experience with this site is that its editorial policy is capricious at best and downright mean-spirited at worst.

      I like slashdot and I thank them for keeping up the good work every day. But I dislike the way they go out of their way to shut out user participation.

    6. Re:Slashdot Editors are Assholes by bratwiz · · Score: 1

      No, its not flamebait - It's my opinion.

      There's a difference.

    7. Re:Slashdot Editors are Assholes by zettabyte · · Score: 1
      ...so I stopped participating here.

      You have 6 posts this month. You stopped participating?

      Not that I disagree with your assessment of how things work around slashdot.

      I primarily use http://www.alterslash.org/. I figure I don't want to give them the ad page views.

    8. Re:Slashdot Editors are Assholes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed, and if an institution is only as good as it's citizens? Then notice the decrease in the number of four number UIDs and less that post to stories, as compared to in the past eight years. Slashdot has a brain drain and it shows. Throw in the slashdot "prisoners guarding prisons" moderation system*, and you have the present train wreck.

      *As compared to a paid knowledgeable moderation staff that has a stake in slashdot's continued success.

    9. Re:Slashdot Editors are Assholes by tehcyder · · Score: 1
      so some foolish dot-com investor can buy Digg for one MILLION dollars)
      BILLION surely?
      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  64. 500 miles until the next charge, by noidentity · · Score: 0, Redundant
  65. A quandry wrapped in an enigma.... by Hillgiant · · Score: 2, Funny

    A dyslexic who likes anagrams. Vaugly disturbing and yet oddly appropriate.

    --
    -
    1. Re:A quandry wrapped in an enigma.... by JaJ_D · · Score: 1

      I'll give you that....

      What's weirder is that I love cryptic crosswords. You may even be surprised to know that it has helped my spelling etc..

      Jaj - Weird and proud of it

    2. Re:A quandry wrapped in an enigma.... by RedOregon · · Score: 1

      Sad part is, his name is actually "Bob".

      --
      Skivvy Niner? Email me!
      HEY! Look left just ONE MORE TIME!
    3. Re:A quandry wrapped in an enigma.... by Hillgiant · · Score: 1

      Well, bob was taken YEARS earlier.

      --
      -
  66. Ok by cubicledrone · · Score: 1

    Cue non-stop flood of "It'll never work" spam.

    --
    Business isn't willing to pay for products, innovation and careers, so we get brands, mortgage commercials and layoffs.
  67. VC backer by citro · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I was quite skeptic initially, but I took notice at the VC firm backing the project.
    Kleiner, Perkins, Caufield & Byers were early investors in Amazon, America Online, Compaq, Electronic Arts, Google, Macromedia, Netscape, Quantum, Segway, Sun Microsystems (just to name a few). Looks like it is more serious than virgin snake oil.

    1. Re:VC backer by Quixotic137 · · Score: 1

      Not that their support is a bad indication, but I bet they funded a few companies that didn't pan out so well too.

    2. Re:VC backer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't see any reference to "Eestor" or "Eestore" in KPCB's website's search function, or in their list of public or private companies.

      If they are funding them, they're keeping it off their website.

  68. Now, I'm not one to complain .... by smoker2 · · Score: 1

    ... but this dupe is showing in the RSS feed as well. The worst part is, that it can't be unintentional, because the headline is different !
    Have a gander.

  69. Official Memo - superdupe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Official Memo

    Attn: Slashdot Users
    Date: Now
    Re: Official policy - tags

    Please be aware that the tag "superdupe(r)" is reserved for the third posting (second re-post) of an article.

    Please use the common tag "dupe" or "dup" for the first re-post.

    This will help ensure consistency in our statistical analysis and reporting.

    You may use the tag "!superdupe(r)" to help remove incorrectly tagged stories.

    Thanks,
    Anonymous Coward
    CEO, Slashdot Holdings

  70. Wait a minute! Can I... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...tell you a story about the ultra-capacitor that could charge in 5 min~!#%$%&$%*@#$!DNF

  71. OK, but... by caudron · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...now that you've explained how many gallons of electricity it is, could also please give us the equivalent Libraries of Congress of electricity? It seems useful somehow. ;-)

    Tom Caudron
    http://tom.digitalelite.com/

    --
    -Tom
  72. Uhhh by KillerMoblin · · Score: 1

    The same info 2 days in a row? Uhhh. . . .ok.

  73. Re:Noo noo noo noo by Intron · · Score: 1

    It's Groundhog Day!!!!

    --
    Intron: the portion of DNA which expresses nothing useful.
  74. Noise Pollution by Sparxter · · Score: 1

    Living next to a major highway I would have to say that the best part of an electric vehicle becoming mainstream would be how much quieter the world would become without all those combustion engines rumbling along. Naysay the technology all you want; I hope it's true.

    1. Re:Noise Pollution by An+Onerous+Coward · · Score: 1

      That's actually one of the things that worries me about e-cars. If they're all that quiet, how are people going to hear them coming and know not to walk into the road?

      My solution is to have every electric car have a bagpipe player walking alongside it, playing 'Scotland the Brave.' This will ensure that electric cars are just as safe as the quality cars that are currently on the road.

      Just a thought,

      General Motors

      --

      You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!

    2. Re:Noise Pollution by djcondor · · Score: 1

      More noise is generated from the tire tread slamming into the pavement several thousand times each second times several thousand cars, rather than the comparatively quiet puttering of their motors. That tire tread impact isn't going to go away because the engine is no longer running gas fired pistons. Sorry.

      --
      Now with more sodium!!
    3. Re:Noise Pollution by Sparxter · · Score: 1

      A good point, but one I'm already aware of. That's why I said "quieter" not "quiet". I'm all for anything that drops the noise of today's vehicles. This will also have the added benefit of being good for people's hearing: less engine noise means you don't have to turn the radio up as high for pleasurable listening.

  75. Re:DUP nothing to see here..Move along by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Almost every post is marked "-1 Redundant" - It seems people have some mod-points to burn, and that they haven't considered:

    - This whole article was posted previously, so was going to attract statements and discussion pointing this out.
    - The actual topic is the lameness of the contributors for not reading their own fucking articles.
    - Pointing out the article is a dupe and a repeat is not off-topic.
    - The moderators aren't following the mod guidelines in promoting the positive.
    - The moderators are feeding the karma whores who are cut-n-pasting the 'informative' posts from the previous article.

  76. Misleading numbers by pudro · · Score: 1

    For the price per gallon (~.45 a gallon), they assume 25 mpg. The cost for the trip at that price would be $50, not "$60 or more". If you are going to compare things, don't do it misleadingly. My brother gets 10 mpg in his truck, so I could say that "At today's gas prices, covering that distance can cost $125." Then I can compare it to my Mom's old Metro which got 50 mpg and say "the EEStor device would power a car for the equivalent of about 18 cents a gallon."

    Use a different system, or at least be consistent with what you do use.

    --
    Freedom is assumed. Then they try to take it away. The degree to which you resist is the degree to which you are free.
  77. But to be fair... by Jerf · · Score: 2, Insightful

    But to be fair, is it just me or have they been doing a lot better lately? Certainly I've noticed fewer, and I've appreciated it.

    I know it's more fun to bitch about people, but you ought to hand out some kudos every once in a while too. We could do with a bit more of that on the Intarweb.

    1. Re:But to be fair... by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      But to be fair, is it just me or have they been doing a lot better lately? Certainly I've noticed fewer, and I've appreciated it. I know it's more fun to bitch about people, but you ought to hand out some kudos every once in a while too. We could do with a bit more of that on the Intarweb.
      Doing the bare minimum at your job is not a praiseable accomplishment. The reward for not being lousy at your job should be continued employment.
      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    2. Re:But to be fair... by Jerf · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Doing the bare minimum at your job is not a praiseable accomplishment.
      Improvement is.

      If you emit nothing but negative feedback, if even improvement is met with negative feedback because the improvement doesn't make it to "perfection" or some other standard, the psychological result is as predictable as the sun rising tomorrow: Lack of interest in continuing to try and ever diminishing performance. It's a bit odd that anybody thinks relentless negativity can have any other effect. (But there are entire major ideologies currently built around this very idea, that a tarnished but pretty good product is so, so very bad that letting blackest evil win is preferable; identifying which is left as an exercise for the reader.)

      Extra double bonus points for continually raising the putative bar every time someone comes close, and continuing to emit nothing but negative feedback. Triple bonus points for being even more critical as improvements are made and the remaining imperfections stand out that much more clearly.
    3. Re:But to be fair... by FireFury03 · · Score: 1

      Triple bonus points for being even more critical as improvements are made and the remaining imperfections stand out that much more clearly.

      Wow... sounds like my ex-boss... :)
      (the key two letters being "ex")

  78. He Should Resign. by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 1
    On a sidenote, what seems odd to me is that not only is this a dupe that is currently visible on the index of slashdot, but that the article summary is almost identical to the earlier submission, and is even from the same submitter.
    Personally, I would consider this a sackable offense. The occasional dupe will slip through, paticularly when a lot of time has passed since the original story. The odd one may slip in if two different submitters submit substantially different summaries. But this isn't the case.

    ScuttleMonkey has just posted a dupe, of the exact same story that was posted only four hours earlier, and which is still on the main page. The summary is near identical, the submitter is the same, and what's worse the different titles are immediately noticeable and recognisable. It's a total farce with no excuses. To make some would be to further make a farce of the situation.

    ScuttleMonkey should resign. No one could honestly consider themselves fit for an editorial position after such a slip up. I cannot for the life of me see how he can go on working for Slashdot after this. He should resign, or be sacked.
    --
    May the Maths Be with you!
    1. Re:He Should Resign. by Rogerborg · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Meh, they serve as many ads to people ranting about the dupe as they do to people reading the original. It's all good.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  79. after tripe you get quap by cool_arrow · · Score: 1

    after tripe you also may get a hankering for menudo.

  80. Free charging by BytePusher · · Score: 1

    Since we'll never see this product anyway, let's pretend it's real. Supposing you connected one end of your capacitor to ground and connected a metal rake to the other end way up in the air... what's the possibility of charging the thing from ions in the atmosphere? P.S. I'd prefer to not hear responses from the "just wouldn't work" crowd, but rather "it wouldn't work because of 'this' and I know because I have a Ph.D. in 'that'" crowd.

    1. Re:Free charging by cool_arrow · · Score: 1

      While I don't have a Ph.D, I'd like to pose this question. To what degree do charged molecules in the air charge grounded appliances in your home? Maybe I don't understand the question?

    2. Re:Free charging by narcc · · Score: 1

      Sounds like the plot to one of the "Back to the Future Movies"...

  81. Won't help that much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It won't help as much as you think. A lot of the noise coming from a highway is from the tires on the road. Sure you get the odd hot rod, motorcycle, or truck downshifting. But from living near rural I-476, when traffic is moving, it's mostly tire noise.

  82. TANSTAFL by Guysmiley777 · · Score: 1

    If it works as it's supposed to, it will charge up in five minutes and provide enough energy to drive 500 miles on about $9 worth of electricity. At today's gas prices, covering that distance can cost $60 or more; the EEStor device would power a car for the equivalent of about 45 cents a gallon.

    My father is fond of the acronym "TANSTAFL" to describe situations like this. There Ain't No Such Thing As A Free Lunch. I don't care how hard you squeeze your eyes shut and wish for this, there is no way in hell you get a two orders of magnitude increase in efficiency.

    The key to that entire quote is " If it works as it's supposed to ". Talk about leaving yourself an out. This would be wonderful, but it just isn't going to happen, at least not the way described here.

    --
    Coding with assembly is like playing with Legos. Coding an application in assembly is like building a car with Legos.
  83. It's a capacitor by Moraelin · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck... I don't know about you, but my guess would be that maybe it's not a fish. In this case, if it "acts like a capacitor", then it _is_ a capacitor.

    In fact, if you RTFP (Read The F***ing Patent), it _is_ a fancy capacitor, plus circuitry to get a constant voltage out of it. In fact, it's downright the most classical kind of a capacitor, with two surfaces separated by a thin dielectric material. Only they use a fine powder to achieve lots of surface.

    So, yes, it _is_ a capacitor.

    At any rate, if it "acts like a capacitor" then it's fair to compare it to the best ultra-capacitors available. And if what they're proposing ends up having to be 80 times better than the best existing ultra-capacitors, then I'm getting a tad suspicious. Sure, it could be that they're geniuses, but I'll hold the celebrations until I hear something about a working prototype.

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    1. Re:It's a capacitor by andymadigan · · Score: 1

      I'm waiting for a prototype as well, but an 80-fold increase above current ultra-capacitors wouldn't blow me away.

      --
      The right to protest the State is more sacred than the State.
    2. Re:It's a capacitor by Valdrax · · Score: 2, Funny

      It might if you licked the terminals.

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
  84. Oh, really? by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 1
    EEStor is tight-lipped about its device and how it manages to pack such a punch.
    Perhaps it involves a 100 mpg carburetor and some magic beans.
    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
  85. Definition: by Excen · · Score: 1

    A gallon of electricity, converted to metric, is roughly 2.34567 shitloads of electrons

    --
    "No beer until you finish your tequila!" -Leela's Dad
  86. Metric system by MS-06FZ · · Score: 2, Funny

    Ah, yes, the metric shitload. Much easier to work with than our antiquated American shitloads, based upon (but not matching) the old British shitloads...

    --
    ---GEC
    I'm but the humble pupil, seeking to snatch the scratchbuilt pebble from the master's fully articulated hand
  87. Groan of anticipation by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 1

    This thread, any minute now, is likely to lead to the dreaded car analogy.

  88. Theoretically possible, but... by m.dillon · · Score: 1
    In the last 20 years high capacity capacitors, called 'dime caps' have become widely available. These capacitors typically range from 2V to 30V and have capacities of up to several Farads. I started using them years ago instead of lithium batteries for static ram backup. The capacitors use a thin-film technology. One capacitor the size of five dimes stacked on top of each other could be 'unfolded' into an area the size of a tennis court.

    So it is certainly possible to envision a capacitor-driven car, but it would be *VERY* expensive and probably very heavy using current technology. Apart from the construction issue, most of these capacitors also have limited current capabilities... the internal resistance goes up as the current goes up. Historically they have only been usable in low-current applications.

    -Matt

    1. Re:Theoretically possible, but... by MohammedDeVries · · Score: 1

      I think you are talking about carbon double layer capacitors, these have a high series resistance, because carbon has a high resistance. ceramic capacitors are different, don't have high series resistance.

  89. DON'T MOD PARENT UP!!! by Dread_ed · · Score: 2, Funny

    No offence Insipid, but the irony is just too damn sweet.

    In an discussion under a duped article we have a post that refers to Deja Vu that was modded Redundant! It doesn't get better than this folks!

    --
    When the only tool you have is a claw hammer every problem starts to look like the back of someone's skull.
  90. Editor? You keep using that word... by blueZ3 · · Score: 1

    I do not think it means what you think it means (at least here at Slashdot, anyway) :-)

    More like "automated poster of random articles, without the application of any thought whatsoever." Seriously, a well-trained rat could hit the "Publish" button and accomplish pretty much 99% of what /. apparently pays "editors" for. At the least they should change the job title to "button clicker" or something more accurate.

    I swear you could write a script to spellcheck article submissions and post some random subset and the result would be better than Zonk + ScuttleMonkey

    --
    Interested in a Flash-based MAME front end? Visit mame.danzbb.com
  91. Re:DUPE!!!!! by advocate_one · · Score: 1

    unbelievable... they wasted two mod points on me that could have been used to mod two other more deserving posts up... idiots... when I made my OP, there were NO posts in the topic... none at all...

    --
    Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
  92. Odd math.... by brundlefly · · Score: 1

    The claim being that you charge the ultra-capacitor in 5 minutes, with approximately 9$ (~$.45 a gallon) of electricity

    $0.45 / gallon of electricity?? Huh? Could I get that in kilo-watts of gasoline, just so I have a better frame of reference?

  93. Re:Echo hot licks and rhetoric by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Blow away the combustion engine"
    I heard Sony was in a licensing negotiations to build them. It's not a saftey issue, when they blow up they burn through the cars frame instantaniously and continue burning through concrete, asphalt and dirt till they extiguish themselves. They work faster than a plasma cutter. James Caan in a remake of the movie "Thief" is going to strap one to a bank vault and set it off. It burns through thirty floors and lands on the first floor security personal desk. As everyone charges upstairs to see what's up, Caan and associates repel down the hole using teflon rope, with fire extiguishers blasting to make their escape.
    Bubba said, "I should a knowed to slowww down after I smelt dirt aburning. I hit that hole going 70 and blew both left tires and bent them rims." Joe Tech said "I never saw a leaking capacitor like this before. One that ruined a surrounding 2.5 ton horizontal transportation device. I know we throw away a lot of power supplies for this very reason and they eventually leach their way into the water table, however I've never seen one go straight into the aquifer without going to the county dump first."

  94. ...capacitor? by Ant+P. · · Score: 1

    Okay, so you're using a huge capacitor to store enough energy to push a one-ton car approximately five hundred miles.

    So how wide is the blast radius when it short circuits?

  95. One more, just one more... by bumptehjambox · · Score: 1
    Good god, how many times will you guys caps lock a new 'dupe' warning.

    Every single 'dupe' post is a dupe in itself, ya nerds.

    I've got one thing to say: May the force be with you.

  96. No RiverWorld references? by pecosdave · · Score: 1

    If you've ever read the RiverWorld series by Philip Jose Farmer you would see a lot of simmularities between this and the batacitor that powered the Not For Hire. I'm surprised this wasn't a topic, on another note where are they going to find grail stones to charge them?

    --
    The preceding post was not a Slashvertisement.
  97. Re:But still! Think of how much current it would d by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...and that's why electric cars are a dead end. It's too hard to charge them fast enough to make it usable.

    What we really need to be looking into is a 'gasoline replacement'. An artificial liquid fuel similar enough to gasoline, that we can use the current fueling stations (tanks, pumps, hases, etc), the current transpartation (gas tankers, etc), the current gasoline infrastructure.

    Why a liquid fuel? Several reasons:

    1) We already have a transportation and distribution infrastructure in place for liquid fuels (gas stations, etc)
    2) Liquids are relatively easy to handle. (tanks, hoses, etc)
    3) The public is already familiar with liquid fuel (gasoline) and it's handling. (Don't smoke at the pumps, etc)

    The biggest problem people seem to have withhtis is the expense. "It costs tooo much," people whine. Well, guess what- ALL FUEL PRODUCTION COSTS! It's just that, with gasoline (which comes from oil), the 'production' phase happened a few million years ago, and so we don't factor that into our calculations- we just see the energy we get out of oil, and not the energy that went into making it. Well, guess what? From now on, any fuel we produce, will have to include the 'production' cost, too!!!

  98. You're absolutely right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Commercial capacitors are made by folding or rolling the plates. There are limits, of course, imposed by the laws of physics. There are many different capacitor types and each type is suited for a different application. For a high power capacitor used in a radio transmitter, I might use something with just two plates separated by a sheet of mica. For automotive use, I might use a supercapacitor: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supercapacitor Choosing the correct capacitor is often not straightforward. All the specs can look correct and the circuit won't work because there was one spec that you'd never heard of before.

  99. It might get toasty.... by dskoll · · Score: 1

    So, you're going to dump 52 kWh into the battery in 5 minutes? That
    means 624kW to charge the thing for 5 minutes. Let's assume that the charging
    circuitry is 99% efficient, so only 1% of the charge is lost as heat.

    That's a nice 6,000W heater you've got there. Even at 99.9% efficiency,
    it's still a rather powerful hair-dryer. At 99.99%, then we're talking coolness.
    Just the equivalent of the heat from a 60W bulb.

    1. Re:It might get toasty.... by matt21811 · · Score: 1

      At 99% efficiency then 0.52Kw hours is dumped in to the cap, which weighs 200 pounds. If the cap has a specific heat that is close to water then it will heat up by about 40 degrees Celcius. If the cap can distribute its heat to the car body then the whole car will only heat up by less than 4 degrees.

      Your point is certainly worthy of consideration but I dont think it is a deal breaker for this technology.

  100. Re:But still! Think of how much current it would d by DonVictor · · Score: 1

    There are a number of techniques - you could use a liquid (alchohol), charge batteries that are kept in the car, use small batteries that are transferred to the car at the fuel station (i.e. the way propane canisters are rented), or burn solid/gaseous fuels.

    In the end it probably comes down to cost. Saying "we need a new liquid" is kind of pointless. We need to know what options are available scientifically, and then choose based on various tradeoffs between the technologies.

    Best way to do this is probably market forces.

  101. Needs. More. Flair. by missing000 · · Score: 1
    "Doing the bare minimum at your job is not a praiseable accomplishment"

    STAN
    What do you think of a person who only does the bare minimum?
    JOANNA
    Huh. What do I think? Let me tell you what I think, Stan. If you want me to wear thirty-seven pieces of flair like your pretty boy Brian over there, then why don't you just make the minimum thirty-seven pieces of flair?
    STAN
    Well, I thought I remember you saying you wanted to express yourself.

    JOANNA
    Yeah. Yeah. Y'know what? I do. I do want to express myself. Ok? And I don't need thirty-seven pieces of flair to do it. All right? There's my flair! And this is me expressing myself.
  102. -1 Dupe. by Harik · · Score: 0, Redundant



    +1 month before I think about subscribing. Seriously, what the fuck DO you do with subscription money? Use it to light cigars? Because you sure as hell don't use it to ACTUALLY LOOK AT THE SITE.

    P.S. 5 minute recharge at some ungodly number of amps at an insane voltage. Um, yeah, that'll almost work, really.

  103. Fast Electric Vehicles on Horizon by Hewman1 · · Score: 1

    The $80,000 battery electric Tesla Roadster is selling well (although deliveries don't begin until next year.) Zero to sixty in four seconds, with a range of 250 miles per charge. Charging takes four or five hours, but who cares, if you plug it in and go to bed? Tesla plans to build more-affordable electric vehicles (EVs) once early adopters get the economy-of-scale ball rolling. I'm saving my pennies for a $30,000 third-generation EV that will outrun everything at a stoplight (just like the late, lamented GM EV1.)

    --
    Breathe free,
  104. Erm....Alternative? by Sj0 · · Score: 1

    Why are hybrid cars considered an "alternative"? They're just replacing a mechanical transmission with a more efficient electrical method, where the torque is turned into electricity, the electricity is stored, then used instead of the direct torque to rotate the wheels. The energy savings come mostly from the fact that you don't need a massive engine to get moving, so you can have a smaller motor running more efficiently for less time.

    Calling it an "alternative" is like calling Fuel Injection an "Alternative".

    "Oh, you poor dear, you're still reliant on fossil fuels? I use fuel injection. I'm green as a leaf!"

    --
    It's been a long time.
  105. Fast-charging, safe lithium batteries now by Hewman1 · · Score: 1

    Altair Nanotechnologies (partnered with Boshart Engineering, an auto proving firm) is now testing an electric vehicle powered by its safe and fast-charging lithium batteries. From a corporate release this summer: "Altairnano NanoSafe battery cells have now achieved over 9,000 charge and discharge cycles at charge and discharge rates up to 40 times greater than are typical of common batteries, and they still retain up to 85% charge capacity. As an example of the application significance of this feature if a conventional lithium battery is charged and discharged every day then it would typically last for about 2 years. Under the same scenario, an Altairnano battery would be projected to last 25 years. This durability is critical in a high value application like electric vehicles." These batteries are expensive now. After the first ten thousand electric vehicles (EVs) powered with them are sold (the $100,000 Tesla Roadster sold its first hundred in three weeks in August,) volume production will begin reducing battery costs. Sometime in the next few years, the EV equivalent of the Model T will go on the market; then we can stop funding terror and begin to breathe free.

    --
    Breathe free,
  106. Sanity check on the numbers... by tcgroat · · Score: 1

    %9.00 power at $0.11 per kWhr, 81.8 kWhr

    81.8 kWhr x 60 min/hr / 5 min = 982 kW

    Estimate storage system voltage = 600 Vdc (optimistic, 400 Vdc is more likely)

    Charging current: 982kW / 600 V = 1.64 kA (that's one serious cord and connector!)

    Assume 480V three phase power

    Assume an ideal charger: 100% efficiency and 1.00 power factor

    982 kW / 480 Vac / sqrt(3) = 1.18 kA per phase input current

    If you add a "two pump" recharge island at each filling station in town, that's a huge impact on the power grid. We aren't talking about off-peak usage here, this is day time demand that strains generation capacity. It's an interesting technology, but has the same shortcomings as any extreme-rate recharge scheme. Adding large, variable loading to the power grid at peak hours won't help establish a viable EV market. As high density energy storage for a hybrid car--there it has potential. As storage for an overnight-recharge EV--there too it holds promise, if it performs as well as they claim. But with 500 mile range, there's little benefit compared to the high costs of extreme rate charging.

  107. GM would sell you a car powered by anything. by tjstork · · Score: 1

    Dude, the whole Detroit is against electric cars concept is a MYTH. There is absolutely no reason why GM or Ford's owners would want to do any favors for Exxon and vice versa. The facts of the matter are thus:

    a) People do not want to buy electric cars at the price / performance point they can be offered at. Sure, some people moaned about their EV1 leases being terminated and the cars being crushed, but the vast majority of Californians turned their backs on the technology.

    b) Mass production does not reduce commodities costs. If you have a battery with an ounce of platinum in it, it is going to be 3k, minimum, because, platinum right now is around 3k an ounce. Even good old gold is expensive.

    The bottom line is, if people -really- wanted to buy electric cars, GM and Ford would most certainly make them, because they want to sell cars and honestly, features in cars at this point are just items that appear on a bill material and are associated with a marketing cluster analysis. But, as it is, most environmentalists are impoverished cheapskates, as well, and so, cannot afford or will not pay premiums on exotic vehicles at a high level of production.

    --
    This is my sig.
  108. Re:But still! Think of how much current it would d by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    charge batteries that are kept in the car,

    Useful for commuting, sure. Where a car can charge overnight or all day long.

    But, try using one of those card to drive from, say, New York City to visit friends in Boston. It's a 4 hour, 200+ mile trip. Are you willing to to take 3 days to do it, so your batteries can charge every 70 miles or so??

    use small batteries that are transferred to the car at the fuel station (i.e. the way propane canisters are rented),

    Even 'small' batteries are HEAVY. You'd need heavy machinery to lift them into place. Not to mentionthe fact that EVERY car would have to have a standard 'battery pack'. And it would certainly take longer to swap batteries than to pump a tank of gas.

    or burn solid/gaseous fuels.

    Solid fuels? What, fill the back of a pickup truck with wood, or coal?? You are funny.

    As for gas, it is not too bad.... Unless you think about the lack of density (compared to liquids) and the high-pressure tanks, hoses, and fittings required.

  109. So many Techno-phobes on Slashdot by Deeper+Thought · · Score: 1
    I am amazed at how many technophobes there are on slashdot... whining about how scary new technologies are.

    To them I ask: Are you going to spend your life attacking everything new that comes along? You sound like a bunch of grumpy old men.

    When you get old, you can look back think about all the opportunites you missed to innovate and change the world... To engineer new solutions... To be a part of the future, vs. fearing it.

    You know -- some of us engineers think that new technology is COOL!

  110. why would it discharge if you don't use it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why would it discharge if you don't use it?
    Don't leave the radio on for 2 years and expect
    the car to start when you come back.

    1. Re:why would it discharge if you don't use it? by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      Capacitors leak charge across the dielectric. To increase the charge capacity of a capacitor, you increase the surface area of the charged plates, move the plates closer together, or most likely, both. Moving the plates closer together means a thinner dielectric, which, obviously, will have a lower resistance than a thicker dielectric of the same type, and thus a higher leakage current. Large capacity capacitors don't typically maintain their charge for very long.

      You can read more about capacitors in many places on the web. Try clicking on that link and searching for the word 'leak'.

  111. The numbers dont add up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A back of the envelope calculation shows that to consume $9 of electricity in 5 minutes, you need between 3000 and 4000 AMPS at 240 volts. Just drive to your nearest electric company substation and drive on to the busbars to charge?