Slashdot Mirror


High-Def Disc Interactivity Debuts on HD DVD

An anonymous reader writes "Next to picture quality, interactivity has been touted as one of the key selling points of the next-gen disc formats — unlike standard def DVD, both HD DVD and Blu-ray are capable of delivering truly interactive experiences. This past Tuesday, Universal Studios released 'Fast and the Furious: Toyko Drift' on HD DVD with an interactive feature they've dubbed 'U-Control,' delivering the first true on-the-fly, user-controlled supplements to a pre-recorded video format."

135 comments

  1. interactivity... by User+956 · · Score: 1, Funny

    Next to picture quality, interactivity has been touted as one of the key selling points of the next-gen disc formats -- unlike standard def DVD, both HD DVD and Blu-ray are both capable of delivering truly interactive experiences.

    By "interactivity", I'm assuming they mean throwing the player out of a third-story window when it refuses to play a DRM'ed movie that you've paid for?

    --
    The theory of relativity doesn't work right in Arkansas.
    1. Re:interactivity... by NevDull · · Score: 1

      Hell, dude, it's even worse. Interactivity means being able to turn features on which do prerecorded things, on demand. Wow.

      On-demand multiple streams of recorded content took only 35 years after videos first made it to optical discs?

    2. Re:interactivity... by ColaMan · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of those VCD arcade games of the 80's - wouldn't that be defined as "interactive video"?
      You know, those old 'western' type ones. Damned if I can remember the name of it now.

      --

      You are in a twisty maze of processor lines, all alike.
      There is a lot of hype here.
    3. Re:interactivity... by blugu64 · · Score: 2, Informative

      MadDog McGree(Cree??)

      --
      "Personal ownership is a hallmark of conservative capitalism. And I don't believe I am entitled to anything that I did n
    4. Re:interactivity... by Guitarhero1000 · · Score: 1

      I think their new "Interactive" incentive is bundling a Meguires car toweltte in with "The fast and the furious, tokyo drift". No joke, I actually seen this. And the funny part about it was that is cost more than the Movie without the towel. Whoever buys that has issues. 16$ = Movie. 22$ = Movie/ FREE CAR CLEANING TOWEL!!!

      --
      How the hell did I get such bad karma? I blame the meds...
    5. Re:interactivity... by inKubus · · Score: 1

      Or maybe throwing yourself out the window if you buy a stupid piece of crap movie like Tokyo "Drift"

      --
      Cool! Amazing Toys.
    6. Re:interactivity... by errxn · · Score: 1

      The day that video becomes interactive is the day when I can reach through my TV screen and slap the livin' shit out of Tony Kornheiser.

      --
      In Soviet Russia, Chuck Norris will still kick your ass.
  2. wth by RinkyDinks_RJ · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And I care about movie interactivity why? It's a friggin movie for crying out loud.

    1. Re:wth by Neil+Hodges · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I would think that people who want interactivity would play the video game based on the movie. Why would they want to have influence over the movie that they only want to watch, rather than have full control of a simulation in a video game?

    2. Re:wth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Again the dumbass mods fail it. Valid question for a stupid technology.

      Regular DVDs have enough storage, enough resolution, enough interactivity (minimal), and are freaking everywhere. No one with half a brain will want to buy their entire movie collection all over again on a format that offers so goddamn little.

      Give it up, corporate fat bastards. We don't want your shitty newer harder to crack technology. FOAD/DIAF.

      Yes, I'm angry. Thanks to greedy fucks that take advantage of people by dangling marginally better technology in front of them to get even richer than they already are. Fuck them.

    3. Re:wth by ergo98 · · Score: 1
      And I care about movie interactivity why? It's a friggin movie for crying out loud.

      Despite the score on your post (currently -1), it's a very valid point -- most extras on DVDs are never viewed (at most I've gone into the deleted scenes for some laughs). Making those interactive will hardly improve them (in fact the interactivity is usually the pain, as you wait for stupid transition scenes to play out between selections), and I marvel that studios still spend the money to produce them.

      Where I think interactivity would improve the genre are for things like DVD games, basically turning the DVD player into a 3do.
    4. Re:wth by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      "And I care about movie interactivity why? It's a friggin movie for crying out loud."

      Depends on what features are added. I've had DVDs that had some interesting commentaries, for example. The Muppets in Space movie had a neat little gag where it had MST3K'ish chars in the front making comments. The Star Trek DVDs had little blippy 'facts' about the art direction in the shows byh Michael Okuda. (Although why that was some flashy thing with graphics instead of simple text is beyond me...)

      Interactive doesn't just mean they can play Dragon's Lair. Conversely, it doesn't necessarily mean only good will come from it. Heh.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    5. Re:wth by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      Because everyone knows the videogame to a movie sucks but we aren't sure about this yet?

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    6. Re:wth by SeaFox · · Score: 1
      And I care about movie interactivity why? It's a friggin movie for crying out loud.

      It's funny how many people say something like this, then complain when a movie comes out on DVD and it's only one disc and doesn't come with anything more than the theatrical trailers for extras. Even more amusing is that the better the movie itself is the more they expect in the way of extras (LOTR, Blade Runner, ect).
    7. Re:wth by WhoBeDaPlaya · · Score: 1

      Not to mention for "cheap bastards" like me, software enhancement + upsampling (ala ffdshow + Zoom) comes close enough for moderate-sized screens (19 ~ 30).

  3. DVD didn't deliver by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Been suckered once. I bought DVD soon after it came out. There was promise of 8 sound tracks and 32 subtitles; watch the movie in language of your choice. Most newer US DVDs are English/French only and 2-3 subtitles max.

    1. Re:DVD didn't deliver by evolseven · · Score: 2, Interesting

      on top of that.. I have this button called angle on my dvd remote.. I believe it was supposed to allow you to watch a scene from different angles, every dvd player I have seen has it on it.. But amazingly.. i have never seen it used.. so its great that hd-dvd can do it.. but the question is.. will it get used?

    2. Re:DVD didn't deliver by Coopjust · · Score: 1

      DVD was capable of doing all of those things; however, most studios did not utilize them. Angles require more storage. Besides, most movies are made from one angle at a time, but a few music DVD's have multiple angles. Languages and Captions are also possible. Region 1 DVD's most often have English, Spanish, and French (primary languages for Canada & US). The lack of subtitles in more than one or two languages is extremely stupid. If you make the subtitles for whatever language so you can sell it there, why not put it on?

    3. Re:DVD didn't deliver by Tim+Browse · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yes, I have seen the angle feature used twice in all of the DVDs I have:

      • In a music concert - you get to choose between 4 streams (3 raw cameras and one directed stream). Quite cool.
      • On the Ghostbusters DVD 'extra bits' - they had some animatics of SFX sequences, and you could flick between the animatics and the final footage

      I've noticed some DVDs don't have the angle feature on the remote now (and, for example, Windows Media Center doesn't seem to support it).

    4. Re:DVD didn't deliver by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      Why would you need to? This is America and Canada, everyone speaks English (or Spanish, or French) here. W-wait a minute, you wouldn't want to play your region 1 DVD in a different region, would you? Sacriledge!

      I have the sinking feeling that's one of the reasons why DVDs come with so few language tracks. Another notion is that possibly the same movie in different regions might be a different cut of the film (some countries have different editing needs..) It might be possible that a different language track won't exactly match the cut of the movie on your R1 disc.

    5. Re:DVD didn't deliver by yakumo.unr · · Score: 1

      The Shaolin Wheel of Life DVD has a few scenes with different angles too.

    6. Re:DVD didn't deliver by WWWWolf · · Score: 1

      I've seen multi-angle used in exactly one feature movie: The Hunt for Red October has the texts at the beginning in different languages.

      It's also used pretty often in special features (usually in storyboard/animatic/special effect comparisons where you can switch between storyboard/etc view, final movie view and one that shows both).

    7. Re:DVD didn't deliver by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've heard a rumor that lots of porn dvds use this.

    8. Re:DVD didn't deliver by POKETNRJSH · · Score: 1

      A few specialty DVDs do...I believe DCI does, but that's why the DVD costs nearly 100 bucks.

    9. Re:DVD didn't deliver by Ucklak · · Score: 1

      The Matrix is the only movie I know of that used it and it was only when the white rabbit popped up in the corner of the screen and all the `feature` was was the special effects shot without all the effects.

      --
      if you steal from one source, that is plagiarism, if you steal from many, well, that's just research.
    10. Re:DVD didn't deliver by DrXym · · Score: 1

      Subtitles and language tracks are not features for users, they're features for the distributors to save production costs. All those extra tracks eat into the disk capacity at the expense of genuine features and movie quality. I don't know why any English speaker would care about alternative languages unless it's a foreign language and you want the choice of watching it dubbed or with subtitles.

  4. Nice... by DanielNS84 · · Score: 1

    I'm assuming this content is better than the movie itself. I had to turn the movie off halfway through because the quality level was almost as bad as the second TFATF.

    1. Re:Nice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm assuming this content is better than the movie itself. I had to turn the movie off halfway through because the quality level was almost as bad as the second TFATF.

      Apparently you didn't learn your lesson from the first two...

    2. Re:Nice... by Mattintosh · · Score: 1

      Tokyo Drift is worth watching if only to see Nathalie Kelley.

      I'd love drift on her curves.

    3. Re:Nice... by Isotopian · · Score: 1

      Dude, she looks like Michael Jackson. She's nasty man.

      --

      It's poetry with a beat behind it! And guns! They're like beatniks with automatic weapons.

  5. Why is this cool? by crazyjeremy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How do these features differ from the simplest video games? So there's some more space available on an HD DVD or Blueray... they just cram the space full with this?

    Unless I don't understand something... what does this add to the movie itself? If it doesn't, then it's just an added feature that has no inherent quality and doesn't aid in my decision to purchase a movie in the first place.

    1. Re:Why is this cool? by AdmiralWeirdbeard · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      ...so what you're saying is you hate freedom, right?

      --
      Come read my stupid blagablog. Rants and Giggles
    2. Re:Why is this cool? by gardyloo · · Score: 1

      what does this add to the movie itself?

          In the case of this movie? Doesn't matter. Anything helps.

    3. Re:Why is this cool? by HAKdragon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No, no, no. Don't you get it? This is HD-DVD! It's new and exciting! We're finally able to do things we've never had the space to do before? No, this is nothing like Dragonslayer or other laser disc games, nor is it like a FMV game. It's new! Buy it! Please?

      --
      "Our opponent is an alien starship packed with atomic bombs. We have a protractor."
    4. Re:Why is this cool? by crazyjeremy · · Score: 1
      what does this add to the movie itself?
      In the case of this movie? Doesn't matter. Anything helps
      Heh, that made me laugh out loud. I don't care who you are, that's funny.
  6. Interactivity! by bunbuntheminilop · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yes, that's whats going to sell it!

  7. Movie vs. Features by corychristison · · Score: 5, Insightful


    I don't know about anyone else, but when I watcha movie, I like to watch the movie. Not Flashy, buzz-wordy bull crap.

    Whenever I purchase a new DVD, before I even watch it, I rip it, strip everything but the main movie, and burn it.

    Whoever invented the retarted "feature" to stop you from going directly to the meny during previews is a fucktard. I've only seen it once or twice, but still a complete pain in the ass.

    Then we have the people who enjoy placing a tonne of DRM/copy proctection on the discs and just like to piss people like me off who actually buy movies, and want to just have the main movie start playing when the disc in inserted. Not sit through a bunch of warnings, movie previews, and then sit at the goddamn menu until you have to press the play button. I can see sometimes this can be of use, but in more cases than not, I just want to watch TFM[ovie]!

    In conclusion, I want better content, not features. Stop waisting your time and money on crap nobody cares about.
    </rant>
    Sorry. I just had to get that off my chest.

    1. Re:Movie vs. Features by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Some features are a huge draw to DVDs.

      But yeah, when I put it in, just start.

      Some childrens movies will start automatically if they sit at the main menu for a little while. Still ahve to go through the FBI warning, then the MPAA psuedo warning.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Movie vs. Features by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1
      Still ahve to go through the FBI warning, then the MPAA psuedo warning.

      I don't like the fact that you can't click past the copyright warnings but I think it is much worse that the same feature is used to force you to watch the studio splash.

    3. Re:Movie vs. Features by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      I actually want the menus, but I don't want a menu sequence. That is, when the menu comes up, I want to be able, at that very moment, to click on the options (usually sound and subtitle information). Forget the previews, forget the copyright notice. Just a responsive menu without some "oooh, sit back and look at what we whipped up" menu sequence.

    4. Re:Movie vs. Features by Firehed · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You must be my long-lost brother (or switched with the current one that I'm trying to lose). Almost my entire movie collection - at least, that which isn't ripped to Xvid on my hard drive - is a burned copy of the original with the movie and, that's it. Put it in, it plays. No "you can't skip this", no waiting for six minutes of pre-menu animation, no dozen FBI warnings in three languages, and no previews (the one REAL improvement the first DVDs had over VHS).

      Of course, not all players seem to like my DVD-R copies (what I hate about the + and - formats), but mine has no problems with them anyways, and in case it's a separate issue. I used to work at a video store, and almost without question, the second disk of two-disk movies went untouched (obvious from the lack of fingerprints - you think people might have figured out how to pick up optical media by now). People get movies to watch the movies - only the collectors and enthusiasts actually care about extra features. Give me cheaper stuff that Just Works and I promise I'll actually pay.

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
    5. Re:Movie vs. Features by MrSteveSD · · Score: 2, Informative

      I only recently discovered how annoyed my parents were with DVDs, compared to their old Video Recorder. They are very frustrated that they can't whizz through all the crap at the beginning.

      I've noticed that on some DVD's you can just skip to the root menu, but others make you watch every single company logo and FBI warning. Do we really care that the DVD can't be watched on Oil Rigs? Given the minuscule number of people living on Oil Rigs, is it at all fair to take up our time with that crap?

    6. Re:Movie vs. Features by evilviper · · Score: 1
      I don't know about anyone else, but when I watcha movie, I like to watch the movie. Not Flashy, buzz-wordy bull crap.

      And when you see a /. story, you want to jump right to the ranting and complaining, not take time to think about the subject for a few minutes...

      I'm sure people had the same complaint about video games when they were introduced. Not to mention FMVs...

      There are different kinds of movies being churned out by Hollywood these days. One type you want to sit back and watch... The other, they couldn't possibly make any worse by adding interactivity. Guess which category "Tokyo Drift" falls under...

      Whoever invented the retarted "feature" to stop you from going directly to the meny during previews is a fucktard.

      When was the last time you had that problem with your HD-DVDs?

      DVDs != HD-DVDs

      In conclusion, I want better content, not features.

      Funny. Why aren't you buying VHS tapes then?
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    7. Re:Movie vs. Features by corychristison · · Score: 1
      Just for kicks, I feel I must reply to your completely misinformed comment.

      And when you see a /. story, you want to jump right to the ranting and complaining, not take time to think about the subject for a few minutes...
      So I'm not perfect. You, on the other hand, look at other comments and nit-pick and complain about the ones you don't like.
      There, we are even on that one.

      I'm sure people had the same complaint about video games when they were introduced. Not to mention FMVs...

      There are different kinds of movies being churned out by Hollywood these days. One type you want to sit back and watch... The other, they couldn't possibly make any worse by adding interactivity. Guess which category "Tokyo Drift" falls under...
      At least we can agree on something. ;-)

      When was the last time you had that problem with your HD-DVDs?

      DVDs != HD-DVDs
      I think you are completely missing the point on my statement. I'm argueing the fact that people don't give a damn about the ads. After reading other comments on this news article, there are quite a few people who seem to have the same opinion. Options never hurt anyone.

      Funny. Why aren't you buying VHS tapes then?
      Because the cartridges don't fit in my disc player.
      But seriously, because a lot of movies are not available on VHS. Not to mention the lack of widescreen, not being able to easily watch them on my computer... and so on.

      I hope this helped clear a few things up.
      Thank you, come again!
  8. The interactive features of DVD mostly unused by openright · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Most of the interactive features of DVD's were never used seriously,
    to create a new viewing experience.

    How many DVD's really had useful multiple angles?
      - Like perhaps a Fixed camera, vs one that panned.
    How many DVD's had a useful alternate audio track.
      - Like a music only (matrix came close), or without drama music.
    How many DVD's had seamless alternate endings or alternate paths.
    (not just an all too common alternate ending presented like a deleted scence.)

    The features of DVD should be used before we think about a need to switch to the new disposable DRM formats.

    1. Re:The interactive features of DVD mostly unused by Rakarra · · Score: 1
      - Like a music only (matrix came close), or without drama music.

      Amadeus comes with an excellent music-only track. Mozart wrote some fantastic stuff, and it's nice to just pop in the dvd and listen. Or even watch the movie only with the music to see how each piece was chosen to convey mood and suppliment emotion.

    2. Re:The interactive features of DVD mostly unused by Ucklak · · Score: 1

      Like Legend with the Jerry Goldsmith track or the Tangerine Dream track. Instead you get 2 DVDs.

      --
      if you steal from one source, that is plagiarism, if you steal from many, well, that's just research.
    3. Re:The interactive features of DVD mostly unused by zrobotics · · Score: 1

      Actually, more than you'd realize. Out of the DVDs in my collection, about ten percent have alternate audio tracks (not counting alternate languages), several have multiple angles, and over half (including, oddly enough, a re-release of the Big Sleep) have alternate endings that can be viewed seamlessly. So many people complain about the under-utilization of DVD special features, while at the same time proclaiming they don't even use the special features. It all depends on the movie you're watching...The Matrix is more likely to have interesting, engaging special features than, say, Snakes on a Plane.

      Also, there's more to the format battle than just features (if you think about it, VHS is still perfectly adequate for most people, but DVD is far superior. same logic applies)

    4. Re:The interactive features of DVD mostly unused by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      How many DVD's had a useful alternate audio track. - Like a music only (matrix came close), or without drama music

      Or sitcoms where you can turn off the laugh track. Though in a lot of shows you'd then notice an an awkward-looking pause.

  9. Interactivity: perfect for porn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Once again, the porn industry drives technology forward. It will be very "interesting" to see what they come up with for this feature!

    1. Re:Interactivity: perfect for porn by PornMaster · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hahahaha... superimpose a bag over the chick's face.

    2. Re:Interactivity: perfect for porn by TychoCelchuuu · · Score: 1

      Judging by your user name, you've been planning this a while. :D

      --
      Against stupidity the Gods themselves contend in vain.
    3. Re:Interactivity: perfect for porn by Frightening · · Score: 1

      Once again, the porn industry drives technology forward

      ????
      Elaboration please.

    4. Re:Interactivity: perfect for porn by tgpo · · Score: 1

      1. Click Up 2. Click Down 3. Repeat Step 1-2

      --
      -tgpo
  10. Why bother editing a movie? by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 1

    Why not just shove a bunch of shots onto the disk and let the user play them in whatever order they like. Save money because you can fire the editors. And you can label it 'truly interactive' to sell it for more money. Guaranteed profit.

    --
    Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
    1. Re:Why bother editing a movie? by garcia · · Score: 1

      Why bother editing a movie?

      Because the first time around the movie sucked bad.

    2. Re:Why bother editing a movie? by NexFlamma · · Score: 1

      Shhhh! Don't give them any ideas!

  11. One area they'll never be interactive in by noidentity · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I can guarantee you DVDs and successors will never give interactivity where it's most wanted: being able to put the disc in the player and press ONE button ONCE and have it immediately start playing the ACTUAL MOVIE. No way. To get that feature, you have to break the law and copy the DVD.

    1. Re:One area they'll never be interactive in by SeaFox · · Score: 1
      I can guarantee you DVDs and successors will never give interactivity where it's most wanted: being able to put the disc in the player and press ONE button ONCE and have it immediately start playing the ACTUAL MOVIE.


      Both DVD players in my house do that. Open tray, put in disc, hit PLAY button on front of player, disc starts playing the movie just like I had brought up the main menu screen and chosen "Play Move" from there.
  12. Movies by bostonsoxfan · · Score: 1

    I don't know about others of the Slashdot crowd but most of the time I see absolutely no need for movie extras really. I want to watch a movie, sometimes its fun to see extra scenes but really some of them were cut for a reason. I mean how much of the price of a dvd or one of these HD dvds is going to be paying someone to program these interactive features.

    1. Re:Movies by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Some of them are cut for time.
      One of the best scenes in Galaxy Quest was cut for time, and I'd like to see it in context.

      Same thing with unbreakable. There are two VERY powerfull scenes that were cut at the last minute which I'd like to see in context as well.

      Yeah, most of them wouldn't look to good since they probably didn't get to the final stages of editing.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Movies by corychristison · · Score: 1
      sometimes its fun to see extra scenes but really some of them were cut for a reason
      I see you have made an input error. Let me correct it for you:
      sometimes its fun to see extra scenes but really most of them were cut for a reason

      Enjoy. :-)
    3. Re:Movies by Tim+Browse · · Score: 1

      Actually, they are often cut for stupid reasons. For example, ask a Hollywood director how easy it is to get a studio to accept a comedy movie that lasts longer than 90 minutes.

    4. Re:Movies by MikeBabcock · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is the case in the Bourne Identity which allows you to play the original theatrical version or the new beginning and ending tacked on as well. Several movies I've seen do this already (and the additional footage is of course lower quality).

      The one I'd love to see though is say the Lord of the Rings trilogy done so you can watch the theatrical version (for the shorter-movie-loving wife) or the DVD versions turning on or off the extra scenes live (and switching to the appropriate version of the soundtrack).

      That I see as a valuable way to be able to author a DVD ... not adding overlays.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
  13. More things change.. by geekoid · · Score: 1

    Isn't this what was promised with DVDs?
    Why yes, yes it was.

    I have yet to see a DVD player that contains all the features of Laser Disk.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:More things change.. by garcia · · Score: 1

      I have yet to see a DVD player that contains all the features of Laser Disk.

      And I haven't seen a Laser Disc player since I was in 7th grade and it's not like it's because they're had to see because of their size ;)

  14. Pr0n by not-admin · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I have a feeling this might actually end up being a main selling point for the disk format...

    After all, doesn't everyone want more intereactivity in their pornography?

    1. Re:Pr0n by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think we need to invest more in sex bots personally. I would be interested in a seeing what our society is like once we can get a robot that sounds, looks, and feels close enough to a real women/man....

    2. Re:Pr0n by failedlogic · · Score: 1

      Uh, isn't the point supposed to be that you can change the camera angle so that you can't see her teeth, pimple, needle mark, ruise and wrinkle esp since it will be in HD? ;) Suggestion: Maybe you should spend more than $5 on your porn so they can pay for a better "actress"!

    3. Re:Pr0n by dank+zappingly · · Score: 1

      Hey man easy with the stereotyping. There are plenty of brainy broads out there in pr0n. Like Thomas Pynchon's niece: http://www.nypost.com/seven/09282006/gossip/pagesi x/pagesix.htm (New York Post). Just because they're taking it in the dumper on film to make a living does not mean that they're all meth head junkies. Some are oversexed coeds from ultra liberal arts colleges who view the money as just an added bonus for what they would be doing in their spare time anyway. When I used to write for the Cornell Daily Sun I couldn't even bring it home to show my parents because the sex columnist would be writing about how she her bum was violated by a Naval Officer on shore leave. Seriously. Then again I don't know anyone who would pay to see her in a state of undress.

  15. Obligatory Futurama by Dachannien · · Score: 4, Funny

    Announcer: If you want Calculon to race to the laser gun battle in his hover-Ferarri, press 1! If you want Calculon to double-check his paperwork, press 2! Enter now!
    Fry presses 1.
    Chair: You have pressed 2!
    Fry: No, I didn't!
    Chair: I'm almost positive you did!
    Time passes.
    Calculon: Add in the carryover from form 16A, then deduct line 2B...

  16. Heck no! by Cybert4 · · Score: 1

    We can't have that. We need several minutes of ads. And it sure can't play the movie after that! Customer experience? Who cares!

    It SHOULD just play the damn movie the moment you stick the disc in. It doesn't.

  17. Doesn't matter how good the features are... by thedbp · · Score: 1

    If the studios keep pumping out crap like Fast and the Furious, they'll continue to see box office decline, slumping interest, skyrocketing piracy, and marginal adoption of new technology. Generally bad things for the forseeable future.

    1. Re:Doesn't matter how good the features are... by farble1670 · · Score: 0

      i get your point, but i really can't see how poor quality increases piracy, however much we'd like to be punishing movie studios for crap content. how does it work? this movie sucks, so i'll use up 4GB (or 1.2GB, or whatever) of my drive, and use my bandwidth to share it? i think poor quality probably deters piracy.

    2. Re:Doesn't matter how good the features are... by smidget2k4 · · Score: 1

      No no, you got it backwards. Poor movies = lower profits. Lower profits = something is wrong. That something is obviously piracy.

      I see nothing wrong with that logic.

    3. Re:Doesn't matter how good the features are... by in2mind · · Score: 1
      but i really can't see how poor quality increases piracy, however much we'd like to be punishing movie studios for crap content. how does it work?

      Its quite simple.The case with low quality movies is this - The consumer wants to watch the movie.However,he deems it not good enough for the hassle of driving to theatre,pay for family etc.Instead he thinks the movie is just worth a watch on computer & delete.

  18. Why is this cool?-FOR ME! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Unless I don't understand something... what does this add to the movie itself? If it doesn't, then it's just an added feature that has no inherent quality and doesn't aid in my decision to purchase a movie in the first place."

    Hey Mr Insightful! Why does everything have to be about YOU? What about the rest of us?

  19. Not again... by JohnnyBigodes · · Score: 1

    They have tried this over and over again about 10-odd years ago with "Interactive Movies", basically 'games' that you could pick cutscenes in, little more than that. They failed miserably and terribly, except for the odd corner case.

    Apparently, history does repeat itself (and they still haven't learned from the previous mistake).

    When people put a movie in, they want to be *passively entertained*. Having the brain in between two states (passive and active) doesn't really work.

    1. Re:Not again... by Ucklak · · Score: 1

      Bob Gale of Back to the Future fame experiemented with interactive movies after BTTF ran its course.

      The only interactive people want in media is video games, and not everyone is a gamer. Most people want to be entertained.

      --
      if you steal from one source, that is plagiarism, if you steal from many, well, that's just research.
    2. Re:Not again... by Mattintosh · · Score: 1

      If you RTFA, you'd see that these "interactive" additions are little different from VH-1's "Pop-up Video". The things metioned are picture-in-picture interviews during the movie, concept art overlays, "GPS" (a sort of bird's eye view of the race scenes, kinda like the track map in a game), and pop-up stats about the cars.

      You don't get to decide the outcome of the movie. The "good guy" still wins. And Nathalie Kelley is still hot.

  20. Pr0n by king-manic · · Score: 2, Funny

    It'll be huge for porn. They already do choose your own camera angle. They can now do it with higher definition. See that $5 whore and her meth teeth in 1080p with 5.1 surround to truly capture what it's like to be seedy and cheap all from the comforts of home. See every pimple, needle mark, ruise, and wrinkle.

    --
    "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
  21. I wonder what programmability the format has by Future+Man+3000 · · Score: 1

    There were some pretty interesting things that could be done with the programming language that DVDs use, but to my knowledge it wasn't to the point of being able to write meaningful games. I wonder if the "interactivity" means including things like a pseudorandom number generator so one could throw in, for example, a video poker game as an easter egg (or is there a way to do this on regular DVDs that didn't occur to me?)

    --

    I never vote for anyone. I always vote against.
    -- W.C. Fields

  22. Here we go again! by WWWWolf · · Score: 2, Insightful
    delivering the first true on-the-fly, user-controlled supplements to a pre-recorded video format.

    Great! The people who missed 1995 in videogames have finally a chance to relive the legendary golden era of Full Motion Video Multimedia CD-ROM Games! A little bit less compression artifacts, but the same two-penny production values, the same horrible acting, the same cheesy special effects and especially the same level of interactivity!

    ::runs in fear as the memories of the Philips CD-i commercials flood in mind...::

  23. Just buy a video game by iamacat · · Score: 1

    It should be easy (as far as movies and games go in general) to write, say, an XBOX 360 game that is just streaming VC1/MPEG4/H.264 video most of the time and occasionally drops into mini-action sequences so that you have to kill an enemy, win a car race or otherwise influence movie's branching storyline. Interactive features on players without a decent CPU/GPU are doomed to be amatuerish in comparison, so why even bother?

  24. Tokyo Drift? I was figuring on "Dragon's Lair"! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I mean, hasn't Don Bluth made that thing into everything but a musical?

  25. Tried pr0n? by tepples · · Score: 2, Informative
    I believe it was supposed to allow you to watch a scene from different angles, every dvd player I have seen has it on it.. But amazingly.. i have never seen it used

    I've read that most multi-angle DVDs are of erotic films.

  26. The simple question is, why? by Rockinsockindune · · Score: 1

    I would assume that I'm not too far off from others when I say that I don't particularly enjoy these features inserted into the movies. Also, how is the end result of this different from what DVD could do? The technology is better, and more interesting, but for which applications could they be used that truly make the users' experience better?

    The PIP is neat, but I for one have never sat all the way through a movie a second time to hear the commentary. This just adds a small box with video content to that. Is there really a demand for this? How does that spell interactive? All this mixing of different streams does is stop the disc from having to seek when you activate a feature, but the net effect is still pulling the person out of the movie, and putting them somewhere else. The other issue is the 'twitch factor' involved in activating these features. If you miss the activation button when it pops up onto the screen, you have to rewind it. You'd probably have to be sitting with the remote in your hand, and have to expect the button to catch it.

    Alternatly I don't see a problem with the special features menu present on DVDs. It has a description of the content, that I can choose to watch, not interrupting the movie. I'm sure that the PIP feature could be used nicely in that context, choose scene to watch, choose which part is in PIP box (Scene, or Behind the Scenes).

    --
    I abuse commas, I cannot help myself.
    1. Re:The simple question is, why? by ColaMan · · Score: 1

      The only time I've ever sat through an audio commentary was with 'Goldeneye' and the only reason was that the producers and directors that were doing the commentary, sounded like they had had about 6 beers beforehands, and were genuinely having a good time about it. Poked fun at some girl who won a 'bond girl' contest about 10 years before that movie that gave her a bit part, and was now looking a bit worse for wear now, etc.

      But saying all that, I'd accidentally hit the button for the audio commentary track in the first place, and a few ones I checked out after that were pretty dreary, so I've never really bothered that much again.

      --

      You are in a twisty maze of processor lines, all alike.
      There is a lot of hype here.
  27. shouldn't parent be modded funny, not insightful by MBuhrow · · Score: 1

    Yeah, yeah, I must be new here....

  28. Flag to Prevent Skipping Ads by joeflies · · Score: 2, Informative
    The DVD "feature" that prevents you from skipping the FBI warning and the trailers at the beginning of your DVD is called User Operationg Prohibition When you rip your dvd's and reburn them, the software removes the flag so your palyer will let you skip those sections.

    But back when I was looking for an all-region dvd player, i found that some players have hacks to remove recognition of UOP flags. I'm glad I did - I find UOP Flag more annoying than the region locking, since I have to deal with UOP with every DVD I watch.

    1. Re:Flag to Prevent Skipping Ads by Headcase88 · · Score: 1

      So for those keeping track at home, if you pirate the movie, you can skip the anti-piracy warnings.

      --
      "When the atomic bomb goes off there's devastation...but when the atomic bong goes off there's celebraaaaation!"
  29. BluRay by SQLz · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Ok, in the past I've bashed BlueRay,and HD DVD. Today I went to the Sony Global Marketing Conference on Sony Pictures lot. BlueRay is damn impressive. I was more impressed with BluRay and the new Bravia line of TVs than I was with the PS3. The picture quality is unbelievable compared to DVD, and on 52 inch 1080p bravias, it was awesome. PS3 wise, they had the offical hardware. There was 4 playable PS3 machines. You could just walk up and play. They were also using PS3s to play BluRay movies on a few TVs, incluing an 82 inch LCD that was playing PS3 trailers. There was a dirt bike game which had some sweet physics, GT HD, an anime looking golf game with litte girls in short skirts, and a WWII era FPS where the nazi's look like zombies. The graphics we decent (not PC quality for sure), the sound quality was amazing.

    1. Re:BluRay by plasmacutter · · Score: 1

      ok.. a few things i caught in that rant:

      -52in 1080p bravia
      -82in LCD

      can you say... rich people's toys.. and no i don't mean middle class and up i mean RICH people's toys!

      my family is arguably upper middle class and cannot afford that crap, as is about 80% of the american population, and at a projected 1800 bucks a BD player youre looking at the requirement for even more obscene amounts of cash..

      I don't think joe sixpack is willing to sell half his organs, his arms, his legs, and farm out his brain to a supercomputing firm for the chance to see blu-ray on an 82 inch lcd tv.

      --
      VLC FOR MAC IS DYING! IF YOU DEVELOP, PLEASE SAVE IT!!
    2. Re:BluRay by radl33t · · Score: 0

      Ironically, he won't think twice about spending 4x on an SUV he'll spend .16x the time with. In conclusion, Joe "The Median" Sixpack doesn't have to do anything other then rearrange his already hopeless priorities to acquire this TV.

    3. Re:BluRay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The 82inch was just a prototype. The 52 inch is actually affordable. If you were a Sony employee, 3100 for a 52 inch, I think 4500 retail. The difference between BluRay and DVD on an HD TV was like VHS vs DVD.

    4. Re:BluRay by DrEldarion · · Score: 1

      and at a projected 1800 bucks a BD player youre looking at the requirement for even more obscene amounts of cash..

      You do know that there's going to be a $499 Blu-Ray player coming out in November, right? Word on the street is that it also plays some pretty sweet games.

      1080P displays aren't TOO expensive. I got a 42" 1080P LCD for $1499. The 37" was $1199 at the time. Still a good amount of money, but definitely not only for the "RICH".

    5. Re:BluRay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ironically, he won't think twice about spending 4x on an SUV he'll spend .16x the time with. In conclusion, Joe "The Median" Sixpack doesn't have to do anything other then rearrange his already hopeless priorities to acquire this TV.

      Right ...

      Certainly, I don't disagree that it is a matter of priorities and that someone could afford one of these TVs I still think they're well out of the price range of most people.

      Now, I was reading an article earlier this month which talked about the typical household in Canada's financial situation; previously I have read that, if you eliminate the super rich and super poor from the US the finances of Canadian and American households are similar. It turns out that the median (mid point) household income in Canada was $50,000 and the mean (average) income was $65,000. This (basically) means that half of all households can not (easily) buy any new car, and even the 'average' family would find it difficult to own your 'SUV'.

      The thing that disturbs me about most people when they talk about how expensive PS3/Blu-Ray/HDTVs are is that there is always someone (who probably lives in a pretty nice suburb of a large city) who thinks of their neighbours as being average. If you start thinking "John could afford this new PS3 if he didn't buy his wife that Hummer last year, or if he didn't go to Hawaii" you probably don't understand how people who make $12 per hour and have a $800 per month rent feel.

    6. Re:BluRay by __aailob1448 · · Score: 1

      For those of you who care:

      Dirt bike game (also allows cars and other vehicles): Motorstorm

      Golf game: minna no golf (Everyone's Golf)

      WWII era FPS: Resistance: Fall of Man

  30. marketing by forwardhairbrush · · Score: 1

    Anyone else get offended by being marketed to this way on Slashdot?

  31. What button do I push to make it not suck? by plasmacutter · · Score: 1

    They might address their sagging sales to the fact that instead of releasing good movies, they release titles like "fast and the furious, tokyo drift".

    let's see.. direct the platform toward the 27-55 demographic.. market movies for the platform to the 12-22 demographic.. I think i'm seeing their problem here!

    --
    VLC FOR MAC IS DYING! IF YOU DEVELOP, PLEASE SAVE IT!!
  32. You just described Final Fantasy by Asmor · · Score: 1

    Long streams of video with brief moments of interactivity? Final Fantasy!

    1. Re:You just described Final Fantasy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We also would have accepted "Metal Gear Solid 2: Sons of Liberty".

  33. Perhaps... by NexFlamma · · Score: 1

    "Next to picture quality, interactivity has been touted as one of the key selling points of the next-gen disc formats ... This past Tuesday, Universal Studios released 'Fast and the Furious: Toyko Drift' on HD DVD..."

    Maybe, instead of adding fancy user controlled content, they should use that money hire more competent writers, directors and actors, so that we are being sold media based on the quality of the IP contained inside, not how many different angles you can look at Vin Diesel's Orc crushing arms.

  34. Um, Dragons Lair, Dragons Lair II, etc on DVD.... by THESuperShawn · · Score: 1

    I have had Dragons Lair http://www.amazon.com/Dragons-Lair-Don-Bluth/dp/B0 0000INHR and a few other of the "laserdisc games" on DVD for years now. You can play if on your PC or on your DVD player using your remote control (mine uses the up/down/left/right arrows). Wouldn't this be considered interactive? I mean, if I don't push any buttons, it just sits there.
    Plus, the latest Final Destination DVD http://www.amazon.com/Final-Destination-Widescreen -Two-Disc-Special/dp/B000FC2HS6/ref=imdbpov_dvd_2/ 102-6203978-4790560?ie=UTF8 has the ability to let the viewer select from multiple choices throught the movie that actually change the outcome. For example, if you choose for the characters not not get on the roller coaster in the first place, the movie is less than 20 minutes long. Thats probably a good thing as the movie sucks.

    --
    Repant. Thy end is sheer.
  35. DVD [movies] didn't deliver by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's another thing people in this forum are forgetting. DVDs isn't just about movies. I have educational material that uses all the features of DVD, as well as DVD magazines that use some.

  36. So, how does it work? by Duke+Blazingstix · · Score: 1

    Of course there are all the obligitory comments above about how commentaries are stupid, and special features are stupid, and interactivity is stupid, but must have missed the thread where people actually discussed how these new features are technically achieved, and I for one would like to know.

    I know I've seen some really neat things done in the past that took advantage of the unused capabilities of DVDs, or that used them in new and interesting ways.

    • Men in Black - my favourite commentary, they had something (I forget what they called it) where you could see the sillouette of Jones and Sonnenberg while they did their commentaries, as well as them drawing on the screen, ALA football postgames. The was far-and-above my favourite example of dvd commentary capabilities. After seeing that, I assumed that all movies would use that in the future, but I never saw another that did.
    • X-Men 1 - They had an option where you could watch the movie with the deleted scenes thrown in where they belonged. I could never actually get it working on my DVD player, but it seemed like an excellent idea. I assumed because I could never get it working that they did it the smart way and threw in an alternate "playlist" instead of having the movie on there twice.
    • Final Destination 3 - someone above mentioned that there was some kind of "Choose How They Die" alternate scene ability on that one. That's really cool... reminds me of the ending to Clue, or the "Wayland Smithers" ending to Who Shot Mr. Burns.
    • Back to the Future - they had this thing where if you hit a "suddenly appearing" on-screen button during certain parts of the movie, it would play a PIP of a Michael J. Fox interview. The only unfortunate thing is that it was most definately not a real-time-PIP, and I seem to remember something distinctly "off" about it, but I don't remember what... probably similar to my X-Men problems.
    • Momento - The only reason I mention this one is because they have the whole "Chronolgical Edit" version on the 2-disc set, but they really authored it poorly. I mean, it's neat how they start with the credits, played in reverse... but they left out the ability to fast forward or rewind, so you have to literally sit there for 10 minutes before you actually get to the movie... definately a "what-not-to-do" reference disc.

    So getting back to my actual point, are any of these new HD-DVD (and I'm assuming BluRay as well?) features truely new to HD-DVD, or is it just because there's now more room to put them on there?

    It sounds like now they can do real-time PIPs (see Back to the Future, above), so that's cool, but is it only one audio stream? Does it blend two audio streams, or is it a one or the other kinda deal?

    The Insurance/Damage Calculator (see TFA) sounds like it's the same as the Men in Black visual commentary (ahah! that's what it's called!) and the button overlays. But I admit, it does sound like a really neat application... kinda like watching Burnout. I could see an onscreen bodycount in some classic action films some time in the future.

    I'm also extremely curious on the technicalities behind the "There's a pretty neat (but again gimmicky) feature when you can change the paint job / tires of a car in a particular scene." quote from the article, too.

    So, anybody know how they do that? Or have any other note-worthy DVDs out there, with unique special features?

    1. Re:So, how does it work? by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

      From what I've observed:

      • Men in Black: Almost certainly a separate title. I don't believe DVDs currently do any compositing at all, except possibly the menus. I suppose it's possible they could've made the whole movie a "menu", but even if they did, it would've been incredibly clumsy.
      • X-Men 1: I wish I'd seen this kind of feature more often. In fact, I've never seen it at all, except by offering the director's cut as a separate DVD.
      • Final Destination 3: This is the extent of how I believe DVDs work. All this is inference by observation, but it really seems like the best you can do is a sort of choose-your-own-adventure with the menus. It's like static web pages -- no javascript and certainly no server-side tricks, but with real video.
      • Back to the Future: Possibly an alternate angle. The only DVD I've bothered to dissect this on was The Matrix, in which "Follow the White Rabbit" was a completely separate title, and it switched completely away from the action for the little behind-the-scenes shorts.
      • Momento: I use this kind of crap as an example of why we should boycott next-gen formats until they give up on DRM. Right now, I can fastforward through that all I want, because the best screen I have is hooked up to my computer, which runs Linux and has four or five media players all capable of cracking DVD encryption and completely ignoring "You can't use that button now" instructions.

      In general, almost every DVD I've played has some combination of deleted scenes, audio commentary, or a behind-the-scenes documentary. And of course, I always focus more on the movie itself -- Zatoichi is awesome, by the way. But regarding the features you mentioned, I suggest you try turning the features on and off, and see if the title changes. If a movie fits into less than half the disc, they might put it on there twice, as they did in The Matrix. Certainly, audio is pretty much always going to be one or the other -- especially considering that any time you're blending two audio streams, you need those two streams in the first place, so there's not much point to allowing realtime mixing -- at least, not for the features we've done so far.

      However, everything you mention is, as far as I know, entirely possible with current DVD tech, but in many cases it wastes disc space (bumping up against that 9 gig limit), even as they compress the shit out of the documentaries. Most DVDs, I'd rather they use something like Superbit, where they simply compress the actual movie less, and remove any special features that take a significant amount of space.

      What excites me is just how much I imagine Blu-ray is going to kick HD-DVD's ass in this area, if they have the imagination to. Blu-ray players make a small JVM available to the discs, which means you can do your special features in Java. As much as I hate Java, it is a real programming language, and we're likely to see some cool stuff come out of it. Regarding your bodycount: It would be entirely possible for you to attempt to count every kill by pushing the button, and have it tell you at the end how far you were off, or replay the deaths you missed.

      I still stand by the "boycott" comment, though. I will not buy music, movies, or books in any format that uses uncracked DRM. I make an exception for games, because there are almost no games I want to play that don't use DRM, but I'd hate to see the same thing happen to the movie or music industries.

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    2. Re:So, how does it work? by Duke+Blazingstix · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I shoulda said how does HD-DVD work. I'm well aware of the standard DVD format, and as for Men in Black, I'm 100% positive that the visual commentaries were a separate "subtitle layer", if you will.

      I kinda got off on a tangent in the middle there with those exemplary DVDs. Kinda muddied my question.

  37. Thank you! by Belial6 · · Score: 1

    Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. I thought I was the only person that realized just how crappy FF is.

    1. Re:Thank you! by Asmor · · Score: 1

      Nope. Thinking FF sucks is actually a well-documented psychological condition. It's called "sanity."

      Modern medicine is close to wiping it out, though, and soon this condition will live on only in the history books.

  38. How come... by CODiNE · · Score: 1

    Seriously this is a decent idea, I know many Slashdotters would call this censorship or something but bare with me.

    Release multi-rating DVD's. Mom and the kids can watch the movie at PG-13 if they want... Pastor Bob can get it PG rated and grandpa can opt for the R or unrated version. Hey parents can set the kids TV to block R rated stuff (V-Chip) and then get little Timmy a copy of Pitch Black (To go along with his standard PG-13 Chronicles of Riddick) which he can watch at PG-13 until he's older.

    Why not? Starship Troopers was PG-13 until they decided to raise the rating since people were calling it a kids flick. They'll sell twice as many DVD's to those who want to avoid certain language or graphic scenes. Sounds like great business sense to me.

    --
    Cwm, fjord-bank glyphs vext quiz
  39. So, how does it work?-Ask Dr DVD. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  40. Experimenting is good by Matt+McIntyre · · Score: 1

    I trully think its retarded to jump on the bandwagon of "new toy" fanatics. The best use the new high Def DVD's is to improve the picture and sound quality. And yet I say let the retards play with this new toy in stupid ways because something cool just might come out of that interaction. After all we wouldnt have computers the size of a credit card if sombody didnt play with there new toy.

  41. You're not the sole target for DVDs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess you have to actually *care* about the movies for the extras to be worth it sometimes. Perhaps you only rent movies, but for those of us who actually *buy* DVDs the extras are a nice addition.

    The deleted scenes are fun and all, but for me it's the director's cuts and director's commentaries that add a new dimension to my favorite movies. Try listening to Ridley Scott's commentary on "Alien" and see if that changes your opinion of extras being worthless.

  42. ReadySoft CEO breathes a sigh of relief... by ArghBlarg · · Score: 1

    Now they have an excuse to resell Dragon's Lair and Space Ace again! Oh boy.

    --
    ERROR 144 - REBOOT ?
  43. Jesus fuckdickle dude, what is wrong with you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Try some good porn, you might like the attractive women more than pimply, needle marked, wrinkled $5 meth whores.

    1. Re:Jesus fuckdickle dude, what is wrong with you? by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      Try some good porn, you might like the attractive women more than pimply, needle marked, wrinkled $5 meth whores.

      Getting paid to have sex, be it on the set of a "movie" or in the back room of a crack/meth den puts you in the same catagory.

      A 5$ whore and a $5,000 whore have one thing in common. They're both whores.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
  44. Yet another naysayer.. sorry.. by IlliniECE · · Score: 1

    Does anyone remember the promise of being able to view footage from many different angles on a DVD, back when DVD was a hot new thing? Well, that certainly never became widespread (Circuit City demos aside). I think people are simply too interested in no-frills-straight-to-the-movie entertainment. Just my two pessimistic cents.

    1. Re:Yet another naysayer.. sorry.. by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

      Multi-angles doesn't really seem to have ever been a particularly good thing, except for porn. MGS3 had a feature where the first-person-mode button could be pressed sometimes during cinematics. Aside from allowing the player to stare at Eva, I didn't really see the point. Most of the time, it was a question of looking at Snake's face as he stares through binoculars, or actually looking through the binoculars.

      I think this becomes even worse for movies. Why would we want to select angles, rather than just have the best angles already selected for us? This really only becomes a nice feature in games, and then only when you're allowed free movement of the camera, or even your character.

      But, I do think that if I'm buying a movie, especially if it's going to be at next-gen prices, I deserve a little replay value. Commentary helps here.

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
  45. old folks by dillee1 · · Score: 1

    People expect video to behave like video; that is, you stick in the media, press play button, and the damn video should just run. Tape, LD, VCD, all analog media behave like that. DVD on the other hand comes with non-standard interactivity, forcing one to use non-standard menu to navigate the media, having non-skippable advertisement that is counter intuitive to "skip" button etc.

    I have come across a few old folks and kids(sometimes young adults too) who got stuck when they first encounter dvd. Those people trends to memories the machine's operation procedure instead of the understanding the ration behind the actions. Non-standard way of interaction make dvd hard to use for them or anyone trying to teach them to use one.

    Looks like HD disc will be even more invasive than dvd. Hope that some manufacturer will put a DON'T-BUG-ME-JUST-PLAY-THE-VIDEO-SERIALLY button and gimme back my old time video experience.

  46. Tricky, but I like it. by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

    Tricky, because you'd have to implement it as a standard, and it's probably too late for either Blu-ray or HD-DVD. Also tricky, because it now means that you now can't refuse to sell, say, X-rated material, because most DVDs will include unrated or X-rated material for those who want it. And there's probably a whole other can of worms I haven't even touched on.

    But I like it. I like it becaues it means I'll just allow all content, but they'll be less afraid of putting "strong" content in films that really deserve it.

    I don't like the rating system, though. There will be people who like sex and not violence, and vice versa, and ours is not the only rating system. There's no reason not to have incredibly fine-grained control here -- down to the curse word, body part, and sexual or violent act. For instance, most consider Star Wars to be a family movie, even though they can get extremely violent -- but there's no blood. So, someone with a "no blood" setting could watch all of Star Wars, but someone with a "no kissing" setting could only watch most of it, and "no violence" could watch almost none of it.

    I suspect that consumers would love such a system, but writers, directors, filmmakers in general would hate it. For instance, Zatoichi is a movie with brutally realistic swordfights -- but the blood was added in digitally. (I'm not sure about Kill Bill and other, similar movies.) It could easily have a PG or PG-13 rating, because while there are geishas, there isn't so much as a nipple shown -- so, remove all the blood, maybe some of the worse sound effects (all of which can be done), and it's a family movie. And Takeshi Kitano would absolutely hate it -- it wouldn't be the same movie at all.

    --
    Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
  47. FBI Warning by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

    So for those keeping track at home, if you pirate the movie, you can skip the anti-piracy warnings.

    Yep -- or you can choose to keep them. I think that's the "Extra Irony" option.

    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
  48. Polishing a turd into a diamond... by bgeek · · Score: 0

    I don't think even HD could lure me into buying such a rubbish film.

  49. Fast And Furious HDDVD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Peopole i know didn't even bother to leech this "movie" from the internet.
    Why someone would buy an HD-DVD edition is beyond me...

  50. Re:shouldn't parent be modded funny, not insightfu by not-admin · · Score: 1

    I agree personally... But hey, I can't hep it if I have deep insight into the slashdot mentality...

  51. Flag to Eliminate Drama Queens. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "So for those keeping track at home, if you pirate the movie, you can skip the anti-piracy warnings."

    For those at home that aren't drama queens. The FBI warnings aren't a big deal.

  52. One Word by brunes69 · · Score: 1

    Porn

  53. Overlays nothing new by HalAtWork · · Score: 1

    This isn't anything new, we've been able to do overlays on DVDs already, whether it's MST3K-like shadows providing commentary, or something like a body count (just use a subtitle track) like what was mentioned in the article. We've also been able to have storyboards accompanying the main movie. Whether it's PIP embedded in the video and you have to flip over the disc (due to storage limitation on DVD), or a simultaneous stream of audio or a seperate sub-picture, we're able to do it on DVD already. This doesn't provide a "true interactive experience" as suggested. Unless "fully interactive" and "toggle something on/off" have suddenly become fully synonymous.

  54. 20% more plot by PhYrE2k2 · · Score: 1

    Actually Fast and the Furious # 3 has 20% more plot than the previous two movies combined.
    If it wasn't for that guy's (Lucas Black aka "Sean Boswell" in the movie) absolutely horrible accent, the movie would be pretty hard to top.

    Plus it'll lead way for Need For Speed: Carbon- bringing back the drift modes again.

    In any case, it wasn't that bad.

    -M

    --

    when you see the word 'Linux', drink!
    1. Re:20% more plot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hallelujah. Tokyo Drift needed, what, maybe four things to be watchable?

      1. Drift racing.
      2. Shots of Tokyo.
      3. Hot Japanese women for eye candy.
      4. No Paul Walker.

      Hell, at 4/4, that's better than the Doom movie did hitting up its bullet points.

      And you can't really complain about the first one *that* much, I mean all they did was do a search and replace ("surfers" -> "racers") on the Point Break script.

      (Note: Not a cinematic masterpiece by any measure, but at least watchable)

  55. They could do that right now. by SeaFox · · Score: 1
    Release multi-rating DVD's. Mom and the kids can watch the movie at PG-13 if they want... Pastor Bob can get it PG rated and grandpa can opt for the R or unrated version. Hey parents can set the kids TV to block R rated stuff (V-Chip) and then get little Timmy a copy of Pitch Black (To go along with his standard PG-13 Chronicles of Riddick) which he can watch at PG-13 until he's older.


    What's funny is we don't even need a new player to do something like that. Just add extra DVD scene cuts at the points where you have gore/sex and maybe scenes with alternate audio tracks added if language is that much of an issue. Then have multiple "playlists" for the movie. The lower rated version can simply skip those "naughty" tracks and play the ones with the alternate audio tracks clips for the movie.
  56. F*ck Interactive by pandrijeczko · · Score: 1
    "Interactive" is probably the most overused word ever when linked to modern technology - in reality, it just means "charging the consumer more for even crappier product".

    Look, if I want "interactive", I'll go stick on a PC game or write a shell script or two; if I *just* want to be "entertained", I'll go buy a beer, stick on a CD, go see a favourite band play live or, yes, play a DVD. I do *NOT* need DVD to be anything more than that - I just hand over some money to someone, get a DVD in return and all it has to do is keep me entertained for an hour or two.

    Interactive DVD??? Hell, I find it difficult enough sometimes getting my ass out of the chair to stick the disc in the DVD tray...

    --
    Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
  57. The name.. by The+Creator · · Score: 1

    Toyko drift? Does it play on a genuine Sorny player?

    --

    FRA: STFU GTFO
  58. I don't think so by Cybert4 · · Score: 1

    In most of the discs, you'll be treated to the usual IP lecture and several ads (Often for completely unrelated stuff like Pepsi).