Slashdot Mirror


Wikipedia Goes Mobile

eldavojohn writes, "Webaroo has added Wikipedia to their services on mobile devices. There have also been open source efforts to deliver it to the iPod (also check out the wiki) or a PDA. I guess if I were still a bartender, this would be a necessity in solving bar disputes before they escalate to fisticuffs." Wikipedia requires 6 GB of free space, 10 GB recommended. And remember: Don't Panic.

118 comments

  1. Finally ! by ATAMAH · · Score: 1, Funny

    Finally i'll be able to download the intraweb to my harddrive!

    1. Re:Finally ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...but will I still be able to edit the content so it says what I want it to say? I mean, everyone believes wikipedia, so it'd be nice if I could have this to mislead and misinform anyone I'd like, all in the palm of my hand.

    2. Re:Finally ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a Wikipedia editor I am not aware of any incorrect data in the Wikipedia database. If there were, someone would have corrected the aberrant data by now.

    3. Re:Finally ! by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      Considering that it's a file on your hard drive and still under the GFDL, yes.

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    4. Re:Finally ! by notthe9 · · Score: 1

      Finally? Not finally.

      You've been able to take wikipedia with you for years. Lots of people do it with Tomeraider, but I get the impression there's a number of options. I first did it 2003ish and I got the impression it had been around a while then.

  2. No, sorry, by Alias777 · · Score: 1

    Just the entirety of the world's knowledge, idiot.

    1. Re:No, sorry, by Arterion · · Score: 0

      The entirety of the world's useful knowledge... and most of its useless.

      --
      "That which does not kill us makes us stranger." -Trevor Goodchild
    2. Re:No, sorry, by ATAMAH · · Score: 1, Funny

      "Just the entirety of the world's knowledge, idiot" -- Well, that will obviously exclude any of your input :)

    3. Re:No, sorry, by 1337Garda · · Score: 4, Funny

      What are you saying? A complete breakdown of the world of warcraft episode of south park (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_of_Warcraft_co mes_to_South_Park) or the complete, 8 pages if you print it out, biography of Bender from futurama (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bender_Bending_Rodr% C3%ADguez) are useless?

    4. Re:No, sorry, by Arterion · · Score: 0

      And all the facts about Chuck Norris.

      --
      "That which does not kill us makes us stranger." -Trevor Goodchild
    5. Re:No, sorry, by skoaldipper · · Score: 0

      Does wiki mention the 'ole Chuckster and Brinkley sweating over a Total Gym machine? It's $49.95 btw, so act now. Supplies are limited. I'd paypal someone baller type scrillah to put that up there. Future genetically engineered children with superior adaminitium exoskeleton hydraulic limbs will want to know where that fitness trend all started from. So, until wiki stops dissin Hollywood and gets their facts straight, it's no more entertaining than an unfinished crossword puzzle at a public toilet.

      --
      I hope, when they die, cartoon characters have to answer for their sins.
    6. Re:No, sorry, by zerocool^ · · Score: 1


      And yet, we couldn't convince the community that they needed to keep a short, 1 page blurb on the official counterstrike maps - de_dust, cs_office etc. Despite that 1 in 15 people in america owns counterstrike, and at any point, even years after its release, there are 100,000 people playing it, or that it's by far the most popular first person shooter ever.

      Gotta make space for those individual pages on pokemon characters.

      ~Will

      --
      sig?
    7. Re:No, sorry, by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      I hope you set some pages aside for Viva Pinata... I hear that's the next Pokemon craze coming down the pipe. And I'm sure there are hundreds of different pinatas.

    8. Re:No, sorry, by dascandy · · Score: 1

      You just cost me my whole evening. (I'm in Europe)

  3. Don't Panic! Don't Panic! Don't Panic! by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Wikipedia requires 6 GB of free space, 10 GB recommended.

    Damn, I got to get myself a bigger PDA. Having 32MB isn't what it used to be!

    1. Re:Don't Panic! Don't Panic! Don't Panic! by arth1 · · Score: 1

      It appears to be WinCE (PocketPC) only. No PalmOS or other PDAs. So the memory requirements are vastly different.

      --
      *Art

    2. Re:Don't Panic! Don't Panic! Don't Panic! by dangitman · · Score: 3, Funny

      My PDA is a Cray.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    3. Re:Don't Panic! Don't Panic! Don't Panic! by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 3, Funny

      My last PDA was a Univac!

    4. Re:Don't Panic! Don't Panic! Don't Panic! by znode · · Score: 3, Funny

      "LAP-TOP: smaller and lighter than the average secretary
      PORTABLE: smaller and lighter than the average refrigerator
      TRANSPORTABLE: neither chained to a wall nor attached to an alarm system"
          -- THE PERSONAL COMPUTER AWARENESS DICTIONARY

    5. Re:Don't Panic! Don't Panic! Don't Panic! by WWWWolf · · Score: 1
      Damn, I got to get myself a bigger PDA. Having 32MB isn't what it used to be!

      Yeah, I thought having Wikipedia in Plucker format would be really cool, but I had to face the reality that crunching Wikipedia to my 2 megabyte Palm m100 is a bit difficult...

      ...hmm, well, I suppose I could crunch Wikipedia's Pokémon articles, or something, in this space - or some guides from StrategyWiki...

    6. Re:Don't Panic! Don't Panic! Don't Panic! by dangitman · · Score: 3, Funny

      Actually, I was talking about shellfish.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    7. Re:Don't Panic! Don't Panic! Don't Panic! by torpor · · Score: 1
      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    8. Re:Don't Panic! Don't Panic! Don't Panic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      LAP-TOP: smaller and lighter than the average secretary
      PORTABLE: smaller and lighter than the average refrigerator
      I'm confused. Which are they saying is more massive?
    9. Re:Don't Panic! Don't Panic! Don't Panic! by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

      I wonder how well Wikipedia would compress, given that it's mostly text. And how about when multimedia files were excluded? Or is that 6GB already compressed?

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    10. Re:Don't Panic! Don't Panic! Don't Panic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't need a bigger PDA. Use http://en.wapedia.mobi/wapedia:Start on your Mobilephone or Wireless-enabled pda...

    11. Re:Don't Panic! Don't Panic! Don't Panic! by wcleveland · · Score: 0

      640K ought to be enough for anybody

    12. Re:Don't Panic! Don't Panic! Don't Panic! by sharkey · · Score: 1

      LAP-TOP: smaller and lighter than the average secretary

      But not as satisfying for use on the lap.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  4. 6 GB? by blang · · Score: 1

    I would imagine it would be compressed, and since much of the wiki is text it would shrink a lot.
    I'm thinking at 2 GB would do it, which would easily fit on today's flash memory. And for multimedia content such a pics, they cold convert to smaller and lower quality jpeg's saving at least that much.

    --
    -- Another senseless waste of fine bytes.
    1. Re:6 GB? by DittoBox · · Score: 1

      However decompression would likely drain your battery much faster. If you've got an 80gb iPod, 10gb is fine, especially if it increases your battery life by a substantial amount.

      --
      Good. Cheap. Fast. Pick Two.
    2. Re:6 GB? by EPAstor · · Score: 5, Informative

      Sorry, but I actually know something about this... My job this summer revolved around this issue, and seeing how much of Wikipedia we could cram into about 10 MB. (Hint: OLPC is using a subset of Wikipedia as its primary out-of-the-box reference material.)

      The images on Wikipedia as of this January are about 76 GB in size. Now, assume we can switch to low-quality JPEGs and cut the size down to 5% of its current - about the size you'd get from switching all the images to black-and-white, in fact. Making that jump is a big assumption, but even that only gets you down to about 4 GB.

      Text-wise, the Wikipedia database containing all current article info (no discussion pages, no history, etc.) is 1.7 GB - compressed. It's significantly larger when uncompressed.

      There - 6 GB total. And that's an achievement...

    3. Re:6 GB? by RealGrouchy · · Score: 1

      Okay, so I asked around on the Wikimedia IRC channel.

              Ashley`: Is that how big it is? I would've thought it would be humongous.
              RealGrouchy: someone is saying "I'd expect it to be compressed since it is text, so you coudl probably get it down to 2gb"
              RealGrouchy: ...I would suspect, though, that it is already fairly compact
              TimStarling: it depends on how they are distributing it
              Ashley`: And I would suspect that a mobile device would have issues with that much compressed dayta.
              TimStarling: they're not storing it in the same format as us, because we don't make our database dumps public
              RealGrouchy: +1 informative, TimStarling

      - RG>

      --
      Hey pal, this isn't a pleasantforest, so don't waste my time with pleasantries!
    4. Re:6 GB? by indraneil · · Score: 3, Interesting

      But then we would need swap space to unzip it on the fly and extract the page we are looking for!
      I shudder to think of how to go about doing that in real time with minimal memory
      All your base are belong to us!

    5. Re:6 GB? by griffjon · · Score: 1

      I think for most PDA apps, you could drop the images entirely. Not necessarily what you want to do for OLPC (I'm presuming y'all are still considering a community server to host it?).

      Are you filtering for only images which the pages you have include, or is that 76G all the images total in wikipedia?

      --
      Returned Peace Corps IT Volunteer
    6. Re:6 GB? by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 1
      Text-wise, the Wikipedia database containing all current article info (no discussion pages, no history, etc.) is 1.7 GB - compressed.
      Aw, nuts. I was hoping for some mobile edit-wars action. It'd be more fun than any Game Boy game, I tellyawhat.
    7. Re:6 GB? by EPAstor · · Score: 1

      The figures I gave are for the entirety of the English Wikipedia.

      Community server - I'm not sure what you mean, but since we can't always count on the laptops' having network connectivity, we're packaging a small (10-50 MB), static subset of Wikipedia directly on the laptops' storage, updateable on connection to the network (meaning Internet and/or local school server).

    8. Re:6 GB? by griffjon · · Score: 1

      There's been off and on talk about a "server" / central node in some places that would provide a more reliable gateway to the Internet, storage space, and so on, see http://wiki.laptop.org/go/System_Software#Distribu ted_Filesystem.3F , for example. I'm out of the loop, so this may've been a pipe dream that wandered off.

      --
      Returned Peace Corps IT Volunteer
    9. Re:6 GB? by EPAstor · · Score: 1

      No pipe dream - unless I'm mistaken, the current OLPC ideal is to have a server in every school. However, the server won't act as a Wikipedia repository any more than each laptop will - except in that it may store additional Wikipedia "bundles" (groups of articles packaged as e-books) locally.

    10. Re:6 GB? by griffjon · · Score: 1

      We should take this offline, well, online, but off of /. ; I'm interested (being in IT and Dev myself) at how exactly OLPC is intended to get distributed, how training/diffusion of the new tech is expected/planned/hoped to happen? A million laptops is a lot to deal with for a recipient country, especially as they'll be largely new (open hardware and software, yay, but this specific combo hasn't been seen before). my email is (oh god I'm about to post my email on /.!!) my_slashdot_username @ my_slashdot_username punto com

      --
      Returned Peace Corps IT Volunteer
    11. Re:6 GB? by AxelBoldt · · Score: 1
      There - 6 GB total. And that's an achievement...
      You didn't compress well enough. The Wikipedia-on-TomeRaider project gets the English Wikipedia (January 2006) down to 2GB with "many images" and to 4GB with "all images". See here. Maybe you should look into producing an open source TomeRaider viewer that would work on your Linux OLPC; TomeRaider is by far the best e-book format around, so this would benefit the OLPC project in many ways.
    12. Re:6 GB? by xtenkfarpl · · Score: 1

      Why is nobody noticing the elephant in the room? Webaroo is an ASTONISHINGLY bad idea. Clutter up your drives with gigabytes of "stuff" on the off chance that you might do the occasional search offline which, as actual results, uses a vanishingly small percentage of that "stuff". And aren't we all connected wirelessly nowadays anyway? As for the even worse "feature" of automatic resynchronization: the mind shudders at the storm of pointless bandwidth to update the "stuff". I can't wait for them to go public so I can short the stock...

    13. Re:6 GB? by EPAstor · · Score: 1

      *ahem* You'll note the figures I gave aren't for the OLPC implementation, but the raw Wikipedia database dumps... I promise you, we're doing a bit better than that.

    14. Re:6 GB? by AxelBoldt · · Score: 1

      You find me confused. First you say 6GB compression of all articles and pictures is "an achievement"; when pointed that it isn't that good, you claim that you can of course do better than that. So give us the numbers: how small do you get the full Wikipedia with all pictures?

  5. The whole database already available on the zaurus by A+Wise+Guy · · Score: 3, Informative

    I own the zaurus S-3200 running application Zbedic. Files are compressed to no more than 400mb total and fits in my 6gb internal hardisk of my pda just fine. the project location for the zaurus http://sourceforge.net/projects/bedic Look under english wikipedia and you can use it on a zaurus. http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group _id=51673

  6. 6 GB? I'm panicking already by arun_s · · Score: 2, Informative

    While one of the basic strengths of Wikipedia is its updatability, I would question the point of storing all the articles offline. Admittedly, TFA does say it'll sync up the data the next time you go online, but it'll practically eat up all your disk space eventually.
    I think I'll stick to just checking it online quickly on my humble Motorola A780.

    --
    I can explain it for you, but I can't understand it for you.
    1. Re:6 GB? I'm panicking already by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      "While one of the basic strengths of Wikipedia is its updatability, I would question the point of storing all the articles offline."

      To be fair, there's a plethora of historical data on Wikipedia that probably won't be touched much over the next year or so. Personally, one of the reasons I want a Treo is so I can hit Wikipedia from time to time. But if I could download a version of it today and update it once a year or so, I'm confident it'd be worthwhile even though it's not up to date.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    2. Re:6 GB? I'm panicking already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. Although I don't remember it was 6 GB its certainly an old project, the Zaurus one. Then again, iPod is c00l, gets you page v13wz! Ahem. I'd like to use this on my iRiver H340 btw. My Zaurus C1000 doesn't have the space minus an SD card (hint!), whereas my iRiver can easily contain this data.

    3. Re:6 GB? I'm panicking already by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      The point of storing the articles offline is to be able to access them offline seeing as how you can't access them online when you're offline by definition.

      Rich

    4. Re:6 GB? I'm panicking already by ChibiLZ · · Score: 1

      I would think you could set up a filter of some sort, or require more human intervention while syncing...

      But would it really matter if it was constantly updated? If you have a good starting base of information, I think it would suffice. If anything came into question, you'd be able to check it later when you reach an internet connection.

      --
      Don't buy WoW Gold! Make it yourself!
    5. Re:6 GB? I'm panicking already by jbarr · · Score: 2, Insightful

      We all don't have online access, so an offline solution is VERY useful. Obviously, it's just a dated snapshot, but it's certainly more useful than having nothing. I have an LG phone by Verizon (provided by work, so I have no choice as to model) and Web browsing is a MAJOR headache--it's simply not worth the hassle. Having an offline Wikipedia resource could be most invaluable. And besides, do we REALLY need to have the absolutely current, most recently updated version? No! It IS possible to live with Wikipedia data that's several weeks/months old and still have a reliable resource....

      --
      My mom always said, "Jim, you're 1 in a million." Given the current population, there are 7000 of me. God help us all!
  7. Not really new news by CUatTHEFINISH · · Score: 3, Informative

    The Wiki addition to iPod Linux (WikiPodLinux I believe it was called) has been around for awhile. At least since I had installed iPod Linux back in March.

    1. Re:Not really new news by CUatTHEFINISH · · Score: 1

      I apologize, that's the wiki name of the iPod Linux website. Boy do I feel stupid =X. But I know the module to put wiki entries on the pod has been around for awhile.

    2. Re:Not really new news by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
      The Wiki addition to iPod Linux (WikiPodLinux I believe it was called) has been around for awhile.

      Likewise I saw a compressed version for smartphones about 18 months ago. Yesterdays news for nerds apparently.

  8. What ever happened to ... by iknowcss · · Score: 1

    that competition to compress Wikipedia down as much as possible for AI research? Have we made any progress on that or do I really have to upgrade my iPod?

    --
    Life is rarely fair. Cherish the moments when there is a right answer.
    1. Re:What ever happened to ... by solafide · · Score: 1

      You mean http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/08/13/200 254&from=rss ? Nope, no progress. Sorry, but I have tried and failed already :-).

    2. Re:What ever happened to ... by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      I gave up trying to get a copy of that Universal AI book.. Asked Amazon for it, paid for the best possible shipping, they still wanted me to wait a month.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    3. Re:What ever happened to ... by The+Amazing+Fish+Boy · · Score: 1

      I don't think the iPod would be able to decompress whatever compression they wind up using, unless software is written for the iPod, which would be undesirable. I don't want to reboot my iPod just to read Wikipedia. Then there's battery life to consider. I don't know how much battery life it would use up to decompress parts of Wikipedia, but that might be an annoyance, too.

  9. Re:The whole database already available on the zau by A+Wise+Guy · · Score: 1

    This is so old of a news the project i just posted has been around for over 4 years now. www.zaurususergroup.org

  10. drinks by mikesd81 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I guess if I were still a bartender, this would be a necessity in solving bar disputes before they escalate to fisticuffs."
    It would sure help with some mixed drinks you may not be familiar with. We have one around here called the 3rd Reich and some of the bar tenders don't yet know how to make it.
    --
    That which does not kill me only postpones the inevitable.
    1. Re:drinks by rolfwind · · Score: 2, Funny

      As far as I can tell, neither does Wikipedia:)

    2. Re:drinks by east+coast · · Score: 1

      Verizon offers (or offered maybe) DrinkNation as a 'get it now' app. Perhaps not the best resource humanly possible but I'd like to think it's at least on par with wiki.

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
  11. Unfortunately ... by ggvaidya · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... initial excitement died down after a major publishing house announced the release of a competing device. With a cheaper price, and the words "Don't Panic" written in large, friendly letters on the cover, the new version, tentatively called "The Guide Mk 1", is expected to dramatically outsell Wikipedia's own offering.

    1. Re:Unfortunately ... by quokkapox · · Score: 1

      "Don't Panic" written in large, friendly letters on the cover

      Thank you, I really didn't get the "Don't Panic" reference until suddenly now. You geeks and your in-jokes and your fscking jargon...

      --
      it's a blue bright blue Saturday hey hey
    2. Re:Unfortunately ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    3. Re:Unfortunately ... by LouisZepher · · Score: 1

      I've compared Wikipedia to The Guide before ("...contains much that is apochryphal, or at least wildly inaccurate..."), so this is just eerie. I think I'll just stick with having H2G2 on my cell...

  12. Dump troubles? by quokkapox · · Score: 4, Informative

    Wikipedia regularly dumps the entire database, which is available to download. However, It looks like they're having trouble getting them out lately (link is to a September 25 English dump, which hasn't yet successfully completed).

    The compressed dump files are huge, and I wouldn't want to even attempt downloading them without wget or unless a torrent were provided directly by Wikipedia (why is this not being done yet?)

    In 2009 slinging 100 GB data files across the net or between devices should be trivial, but not yet.

    However, I have a truly marvelous demonstration of how to compress Wikipedia, which the margin of this comment is just barely large enough to contain:

    Call somebody with Internet access and ask them. P.S. Wow, this also works for compressing Google... Hey, this margin is not as narrow as I thought.

    --
    it's a blue bright blue Saturday hey hey
    1. Re:Dump troubles? by baadger · · Score: 1

      Well, I find the fact that some of those multi-gig files have "xml" in the filename rather nauseating...

    2. Re:Dump troubles? by kripkenstein · · Score: 2, Funny

      Call somebody with Internet access and ask them.

      But to do that I'd probably need to have friends first. Hmm, seems easier to download 6GB onto my mobile device.

  13. No need for all that space by Zouden · · Score: 5, Informative

    Just connect to Wapedia with your phone/PDA.
    Seriously, that's the only reason I ever use the internet on my phone.

    --
    "A week in the lab saves an hour in the library"
    1. Re:No need for all that space by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I second this; my only qualms with it is often articles I know for a fact exist, and searching for on WikiPedia reveals that they exist, don't exist and aren't found when searched for on Wapedia. Which is why I was so excited to read the headline, thinking that phone/pda version of the site was being offered officially. Unfortunately, it's a static downloadable pack, which might be good for those without internet connection on their phones/pda, though I feel this number is going to shrink in light of developments like increased EVDO development.

    2. Re:No need for all that space by blahdeblah2000 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Wapedia is just one of the 3 main sites to access wikipedia via wap - so if one service is down you can use others. see Wikipedia via Wap Access These sites have all been available for a while so this thread is old news I'm afraid.

    3. Re:No need for all that space by darkpurpleblob · · Score: 1

      Maxpedia.org offers a very similar service.

    4. Re:No need for all that space by wampad · · Score: 1

      I like the one at wikipedia.7val.com for phones. I run a mobile search portal at http://wampad.com/. I had the site set to use google to transcode wikipedia.org but this 7val.com version works well enough that I switched my site over to it.

  14. Try Opera Mini... by dimension6 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...I've been accessing Wikipedia often on my phone, using the Opera Mini browser. If it will work on your phone (Java), then you can just view the normal site. It looks great.

    1. Re:Try Opera Mini... by Poptarts · · Score: 1

      I have tried using my OpenWave browser and overall it has worked well. However, I did run into a few minor problems, mostly because Wikipedia does not output the format in WML/HDML when browsed by a mobile browser. I submitted this to the Wikipedia's feature request list, but it got turned down. If you do happen to have problems browing Wikipedia on your mobile device, don't expect it to get fixed any time soon. Let's keep our fingers crossed that wikipedia will soon realize the importance of supporting its web-based audience in todays world.

  15. Vastly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whether your PDA has 32MB or 128MB of memory doesn't make much difference when you're dealing with 6GB files.

  16. No Need To Download by Poptarts · · Score: 1

    There's not really that big of a need to have the entire Wikipedia downloaded onto your PDA. I hope that most of Webaroo's users know that, as some of the links indicate, you can already access Wikipedia (or nearly any website for that matter) via mobile web on your cell phone / PDA. I suppose if I were going to be somewhere that did not have internet access, then downloading it would come in quite handy, but I've always thought the thing that distinguished Wikipedia from more traditional resources is that it is always up to date because any user can edit/post material. It did not appear as if the Webaroo Wikipedia supports editing, which is a major loss in my opinion.

  17. A disadvantage by benzzene · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Say goodbye to Pub Trivia.

    1. Re:A disadvantage by indraneil · · Score: 1

      Not necessarily!
      Trivia is not trivialized by having access to authentic data!
      Infact, it can stimulate more such discussions!
      Gyan over beer may become the norm - if you can remember the entire argument the next day, that is!
      Interestingly, discussions in a pub lead to the most authentic source of trivia! Who knows, wikipedia may benefit in some way by this as well!

    2. Re:A disadvantage by BenjyD · · Score: 1

      My old local pub quiz in London was always full of teams using mobiles to cheat anyway, I doubt this will make it worse.

    3. Re:A disadvantage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrt the ones on TV that was already the case when Internet + search engine existed, or rather when encyclopedias existed, or rather when Google and Wikipedia were started. Trivia is BS anyway.

    4. Re:A disadvantage by maxume · · Score: 1

      Nah. Playing games with cheaters isn't any fun even when you know they aren't cheating.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
  18. KILLER! by wish+bot · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Cray is the new iPod KILLLER

    --
    lemonade was a popular drink and it still is
  19. Wikipedian Pocket-Encyclopedia by Pi_r_ed · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Why doesn't Wikipedia make their own mobile? It could be updated when connected to the computer, like an iPod, and I'm sure ads for it would replace any mentionings of donations...

    --
    My name would be Pi_r_[]ed, but this stupid thing wouldn't allow it. Well, at least now you know.
  20. I cannot wait by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 2, Funny

    for when they put Uncyclopedia on mobile devices as well. I need access to the funny stuff as well.

    --
    Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
  21. I'm still not happy. by bmo · · Score: 2, Funny

    When I can put Wikipedia on an HP48, then I will be happy.

    --
    BMO

  22. Rockipedia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    An effort is also being made to create a plugin on Rockbox that can access a converted Wikipedia dump http://rockipedia.techmight.com/index.php?title=Ma in_Page The project is floundering a bit though due to losing the main coder.. http://misticriver.net/showthread.php?t=36924&page =27

  23. Re:Second Post is Pork Sausage by jpardey · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That whole post was an explanation. I have a feeling he/she wasn't a troll, but a regular slashdot reader who was fed up with all the modding down. Too few good posts are let out of the trash pile, and too many are modded down to the seventh circle. It was sort of funny that he posted that he was wasting a mod point, because whoever modded him down could not have used it for something better.

    I think the discussion system could use improvement, and so did whoever posted that.

    --
    I have freaks! I did something right...
  24. Okay, panic then if you really want to by renuk007 · · Score: 1

    Actually, I was talking about shellfish.

    Don't be so shellfish. The world's not your oyster, you know.

    1. Re:Okay, panic then if you really want to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What an udderly silly comment. Stop milking it for all it's worth.

    2. Re:Okay, panic then if you really want to by dangitman · · Score: 1
      Macs are the Betamax of the 21st Century.

      Sure it is. My Cray has an FM tuna.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
  25. Today Plugin by doobie22 · · Score: 1

    This would've worked well for those of us with dataplans. Just an easy to access search interface.

  26. recipe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    equal parts beer, blood, cognac and dusted on the top with gunpowder. Shaken in a tooth-gold shaker, served in a flaming skull.

    The yale S&B secret party menu has been pwnd, too much loose talk at bohemian grove

  27. Opera Mini + Wikipedia by Wullis · · Score: 1

    I have Wikipedia and the rest of the Web on my mobile phone, using Opera Mini. It works great, running on almost any phone with Java. Here's a screenshot., and the Opera Mini simulator can be found here.

  28. Censorpedia mobile??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh wow, now I can read the fake information and enjoy the censorship and become brainwashed.

  29. Do I hear 700MB? (was Re:6 GB?) by WillAdams · · Score: 1

    _Very_ interesting. Is the sub-set available somewhere?

    In the past, I've copied ``Wikipedia-CD'' onto my pen slate (got tired of coping w/ Encarta 2003 constantly badgering me to up-date it) and enjoyed using it:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia-C D/Download

    William

    --
    Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow.
    1. Re:Do I hear 700MB? (was Re:6 GB?) by EPAstor · · Score: 1

      I presume it will be available once the selection/cleanup process is finished - after all, all software on the laptop is open-source.

      The other offline versions of Wikipedia have a lot going for them, too - if you're interested, take a look at Wikipedia 1.0, and lend a hand if you care to. They're a very worthwhile effort, fully backed by Wikimedia and Jimmy Wales, and they're more specifically targeting CD- and DVD-sized versions.

    2. Re:Do I hear 700MB? (was Re:6 GB?) by h2g2bob · · Score: 1

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:DUMP has all the info on downloading wikipedia. A .bz2 of the .xml for articles (no talk pages) is 1,5 GB; while all pages, talk and history is a snip at 45,9 GB.

  30. Opportunity for Mischief by bluebox_rob · · Score: 1

    If you can find out when they take their snapshots this sounds like a great way to get your chosen piece of misinformation or spam replicated to thousands of PDAs across the globe, some of whom will probably never bother to update.

  31. Why have a copy of the dump? by dcw · · Score: 1

    Unless you are going way-out where there is no conectivity of any sort, why not just connect and get only what you need. If you trully need total access to Wikipedia offline you probably want at least a laptop just for comfortable use, most people arn't like me and happy to try and do everything though a Tungsen T5.

    --
    "All those, moments will be lost, in time, like tears, in rain. Time to die." Roy Batty
  32. History repeats itself, just faster. by johneee · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "I guess if I were still a bartender, this would be a necessity in solving bar disputes before they escalate to fisticuffs."

    Which is exactly why Guinness, the brewery, started publishing an anual book of world records: To resolve bar disputes about the longest, fastest, first, etc... Perhaps you've heard of it?

    --
    - ------- There are ten kinds of people in the world. Those who understand binary, and those who... Huh?
  33. The three sea shells... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't be so shellfish. The world's not your oyster, you know.

    Just make sure you learn how to use the three sea shells however.

  34. wikipedia on my PSP?!? by mu22le · · Score: 1

    Ehi, if you can squeeze wikipedia in ~2Gb You could fit it in a PSP!
    A memory stick can hold 4Gb and imagine telling your mum that you are taking it to school 'cause it's a pocket encyclopedia!
    (not that it'd matter to me, I'm a little older, but still...)

    Now I'm really waiting for someone to port wikipedia to my PSP.

  35. Been there, done that... by east+coast · · Score: 1

    I guess if I were still a bartender, this would be a necessity in solving bar disputes before they escalate to fisticuffs

    I use my Samsung SCH A950 (Verizon) and Google already. The local bar that I frequent has a daily trivia question. If you're the first to get it right you get a free drink. I'm currently disqualified because I "cheat". I can't recall the last time I haven't found the correct answer in under 10 minutes.

    --
    Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
  36. 5G Support? by My+Iron+Lung · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Now I think this is a great idea, unfortunately it's not available for the latest model, iPod Video 5G. I'm not trying to be a troll here, but does anyone know why that is?

  37. TomeRaider by bookemdano63 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have been carrying around Wikipedia on my PDA for years. TomeRaider has a "complete" version of Wikipedia, with some pictures, for about 1GB.
    And it is very good for settling bar bets.

    1. Re:TomeRaider by AxelBoldt · · Score: 1

      And here's the link to Erik Zachte's Wikipedia-on-TomeRaider project. Works on Palm and Pocket PCs and requires the $38 TomeRaider shareware and a 2GB (if you want many images) or 4GB (if you want all images) memory card.

  38. What about TomeRaider? by RorschachUK · · Score: 1

    I've been using Wikipedia on a PocketPC for at least a couple of years, thanks to Erik Zachte's project at http://infodisiac.com/Wikipedia/index.html which turns Wikipedia dump files into TomeRaider (http://www.tomeraider.com/) .tr3 files. TomeRaider's also available for Palm, Windows and other formats. The Wikipedia file takes up 893Mb on my SD card and is probably the major reason I still bother with PocketPC. Looks like the download link's 404'd at the minute though, don't know if that's temporary.

  39. Added service? by VincenzoRomano · · Score: 1

    Maybe I'm a little bit out of all these new technologies, but I thought that once I got my PDA online with GPRS/UMTS/WiFi I should able to reach ... the whole Internet.
    Or not?

    --
    Maybe Computers will never be as intelligent as Humans.
    For sure they won't ever become so stupid. [VR-1988]
  40. I was excited by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 1

    Then I read the content, and realized I /still/ can't access a PDA-friendly online version of wikipedia. All I really want is to be able to browse it online from my mobile device (64MB) without it being ugly.

  41. Not only can you see all of Wikipedia's mistakes.. by DiamondGeezer · · Score: 1

    ...but you can see all of the plagiarism as well. A perfect gift for the misinformed and the ignorant to keep them that way!

    --
    Tubby or not tubby. Fat is the question