Slashdot Mirror


Web Surfing in Public Places Is A Way to Court Trouble

We had a story come in from the New York Times reminding people that web surfing in public places Is a way to court trouble. There's nothing in the story that is anything hugely new - but it does lead to an interesting question. What's the worst "on the road" security setups you've seen?

274 comments

  1. classic diligence, albeit in a modern world by yagu · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I remember sitting behind (I discovered later) an attorney on a business trip once. It was business class, and he had laid out all around him paperwork and documents busily reading and making notes. In addition to being behind him, I was beside myself with curiosity -- what kind of "stuff" would an attorney read on a plane?

    I succumbed and started reading. Interesting, I was reading the IPO strategies and schedules for a startup company in the bio-medical field. And coincidentally in minutes I realized these were notes for the IPO of a bio-med company I was consulting for in my personal time! Probably mostly no harm, no foul, but it was an eye-opener for me to realize what kind of information people expose unwittingly, technology or not.

    While wireless could make for more surreptitious spying, it seems to me once again (just like "security") the biggest risk and danger is from the lack of due diligence... striking up a conversation in the concourse bar and saying a little bit more than you probably should would be my bet on spilled beans.

    I could even think it might be safer with everyone traveling with laptops, I once did an informal (and anecdotal) caucus, and on one business trip observed about 95% of any laptop users playing solitaire or some game with their computers.

    1. Re:classic diligence, albeit in a modern world by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 4, Funny

      So how much money did you make on that particular IPO? :-D

      --
      This guy's the limit!
    2. Re:classic diligence, albeit in a modern world by ronanbear · · Score: 1
      Or how much money didn't you lose?

      Or how might it have helped negotiating your consulting fees? What would you have done if you heard that there had been trouble over a leak of information?

      --
      the more they over-think the plumbing the easier it is to stop up the pipe
    3. Re:classic diligence, albeit in a modern world by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "I once did an informal (and anecdotal) caucus, and on one business trip observed about 95% of any laptop users playing solitaire or some game with their computers."

      I needed a laptop for a biz trip to a software convention in SF CA. I was giving a talk and was reviewing my notes. But the thing the laptop was best for was killing the time during the flight. I was playing Nethack and even got a double take and knowing smile from a fellow techy who was walking down the aisle.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    4. Re:classic diligence, albeit in a modern world by Control+Group · · Score: 4, Funny

      This reminds me of an anecdote I read somewhere, the details of which I mostly forget. So I wouldn't believe it, if I were you, but it's still amusing.

      Dr. Smith is a medical researcher, helping run one end of a typical double-blind clinical trial of Unobtainasil, a new drug which is hoped to treat a severe condition. He's flying to Switzerland for a conference of some kind.

      While in the airport, he happens to sit down next to Dr. Jones, whom he met a while back at another conference. They get to talking shop, as is not surprising - and it eventually comes out that Dr. Jones is also working on the clinical trials of Unobtainasil.

      With great dismay, they realize they've just compromised the trial, and all the data will probably need to be thrown out.

      Whoops.

      Moral of the story: never talk about anything with anyone.

      --

      Reality has a conservative bias: it conserves mass, energy, momentum...
    5. Re:classic diligence, albeit in a modern world by PPH · · Score: 1
      As you point out, it doesn't take any wireless sniffers or key loggers to obtain information if your target is a moron.


      Back in the 'old days', before all this cool technology, I used to work for a certain aircraft manufacturer. On Friday, after work, some of us would get together at the local watering hole. After a few drinks, some of the engineers would start griping about work issues, like FAA certification problems and other screw-ups.


      For all they knew, the guy sitting quietly at the next table could have been an FAA inspector or a reporter from the local paper. The company always wondered how the press managed to get inside information on all the problems with our products.


      All technology has done is allow these sorts of people to screw up at the speed of light.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    6. Re:classic diligence, albeit in a modern world by Deadstick · · Score: 1

      I had substantially the same experience on a flight from Miami to San Juan. I sat next to a guy whose appearance...well, if he were an actor auditioning for the part of a sleazy lawyer, he'd have been turned down as too stereotypical. He did indeed turn out to be a lawyer, and spent much of the flight reading affidavits about a lawsuit.

      Seems a lady had taken a fall aboard a cruise ship in rough weather, and was suing the company. I cheerfully read page after page of information about weather forecasts, course changes, speed changes, what the captain could have done, and on and on...it was all laid right out on his tray table, even overhanging my turf. Some of that information would have been worth money to the right person.

      rj

    7. Re:classic diligence, albeit in a modern world by Iamthewalrus · · Score: 1

      Why would that necessitate throwing out the study? Did Smith say something stupid like "And we always put the placebo in the containers marked 'A'."

      It's not like science is so fragile that you can't realize the connection exists, stop talking about it, and each write a note in the results that mention the extent of the "contamination."

      --
      Help prevent the slashdot effect; stop reading the articles.
    8. Re:classic diligence, albeit in a modern world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I was playing Nethack and even got a double take and knowing smile from a fellow techy who was walking down the aisle.

      That smile had nothing to do with Nethack, it was probably another Mac user, he natually thought you were gay as well.

    9. Re:classic diligence, albeit in a modern world by networkBoy · · Score: 2, Funny

      I had someone ask "what's that" to which I replied "nethack". They instant assumed I was some evil hacker and informed the gate personel. Sucky day for me.

      I had to explain that it was a game "see it's in my games folder" and that it was also available as a GUI "see here it is with pictures". Wasen't till I showed them my badge and business cards from the multinational that I work for that they started beliving me.

      After that I only played in GUI mode while in public. (ASCII at work though, 'cause anyone who know's I'm not working also won't rat me out :-)
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    10. Re:classic diligence, albeit in a modern world by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      It wasn't a Mac, just like your comment wasn't a joke.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    11. Re:classic diligence, albeit in a modern world by PrinceOfStorms · · Score: 1

      Amusing, but unless the conversation included lines like: "And while I'm blinded to the groups in my half of the study, for some reason I know that the active treatment group in the other half of the study is labelled 'A' and the placebo group is labelled 'B'". "You're kidding, while I don't know the group assignments in my half of a study I'm working on, the other half of the study is labelled the other way around. In fact, I've just received some data from my half of the study with the groups labelled 'A' and 'B'. Hope that we're not talking about the same study, eh?" I suspect that the story is apocryphal.

    12. Re:classic diligence, albeit in a modern world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You may not have found it funny but that does not change the fact it was a joke. Obviously you can't handle a little joke directed in your direction. I bet you are fun to hang with at the office. Maybe there is a reason you often "enjoy" lunch alone more often then not.

    13. Re:classic diligence, albeit in a modern world by GrahamCox · · Score: 1

      They instant assumed I was some evil hacker and informed the gate personel.

      I didn't know they had games like that back in the old DDR! Pity old Honecker's dead, he'd make a great next prez of the USA, or at least, a no worse than this prez.

    14. Re:classic diligence, albeit in a modern world by VdG · · Score: 1
      Moral of the story: never talk about anything with anyone.


    15. Re:classic diligence, albeit in a modern world by jthayden · · Score: 1
      Moral of the story: never talk about anything with anyone.


    16. Re:classic diligence, albeit in a modern world by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      Sorry I hurt your feelings. It was hilarious. Really it was.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  2. Denver Airport by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    North Concourse - Baggage Claim WiFi. 100 percent open SSID. You can easily Guess the password. Took 1 try for me. Then you have access to the entire net, as well as (i can imagine) some other wonderful things that I did not choose to endevour into...

    1. Re:Denver Airport by ScottyH · · Score: 3, Funny

      "bags"?

    2. Re:Denver Airport by Crisavec · · Score: 5, Informative

      He wouldn't have seen/done much, as there is NO North Concourse at DIA. There's Terminal East and West(same building, different sides) and then Concourses A, B and C. Baggage is in the main Terminal.

    3. Re:Denver Airport by XMyth · · Score: 1

      No, it's 'terrorist' obviously.

    4. Re:Denver Airport by jamstar7 · · Score: 1

      Wasn't North Concourse at Stapleton? Haven't been through DIA at all, went through Stapleton the last time about 2 years before DIA went operational...

      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
    5. Re:Denver Airport by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 4, Funny

      "snakes" :P

    6. Re:Denver Airport by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The question asks the worst.

      How could any security setup be worse than something open like that this Denver example. The question is pointless. We all experience completely open WiFi all over. It's not shocking anymore.

      This leads me to wonder, why do people feel the need to put questions on the end of their slashdot stories all the time when the answer is what everyone is expecting anyway?

      Just to kiss a little editor ass in the hopes that it promotes discussion?

      I think so.

    7. Re:Denver Airport by Alkivar · · Score: 2, Informative

      it was "Denver" last time I went through that airport...

    8. Re:Denver Airport by SirTalon42 · · Score: 1

      So Hemos now kisses his own ass?

    9. Re:Denver Airport by Bonus_Eruptus · · Score: 1

      "bags"?

      No. What kind of password would an idiot put on his luggage? It's a baggage claim, remember?

    10. Re:Denver Airport by Kingrames · · Score: 1

      was it "12345"?

      --
      If you can read this, I forgot to post anonymously.
    11. Re:Denver Airport by RockyMountain · · Score: 1

      Wasn't North Concourse at Stapleton?

      Don't think the poster was referring to Stapleton. Wasn't Stapleton decomissioned several years before the birth of the wireless internet era?

      DIA had already replaced Stapleton by Dec 1995, I know. Think it happened a few years before.

    12. Re:Denver Airport by ElderKorean · · Score: 1

      No. What kind of password would an idiot put on his luggage? It's a baggage claim, remember?

      So it's '12345'?

      All credit to Spaceballs.
      12345? That's amazing! I've got the same combination on my luggage!

    13. Re:Denver Airport by Crisavec · · Score: 1

      I haven't the foggiest actually. And Stapleton was decommisioned in early 95, which I think was a few years before any sort of WiFi was available.

    14. Re:Denver Airport by Crisavec · · Score: 1

      I flew out of Stapleton in Nov 94, and flew back into DIA in April 95 and Stapleton was fully shut down as an airport by then. And unless I'm forgetting something, there was little internet access(or it was somewhat novel for the rocky mountain area and not widespread) and no wifi then at all.

    15. Re:Denver Airport by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I travelled to.From DIA once a week in 2005, They did have wireless in the terminals. I never logged in, just got a IP address (just like everyone else who left thier wireless on) I was then able to browse the "networks", and "workgroups". Able to login to the default shares using the default administrator passwords on many machines. Downloading quicken files, and such. Changing backgrounds and leaving a text file to warn the users. Fun times.......

  3. Re:Interesting question by Atheose · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I stopped at a cyber cafe while on vacation in St. Maartin last March to check my work email, and the computer I was at had a Key Logger installed and active in the system tray! I switched to another computer and, sure enough, same thing.

    The kicker--the manager of the place made the customers pay for the computer time by entering your credit card information into the computers themselves! Needless to say the only thing that kept me from leaving immediately was the 5 minutes I took to laugh in his face.

  4. Public computers by spineboy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I won't do anything on a computer that requires a password that I care about from a 'puter that isn't my home computer. It's too easy for someone else to install a key logger program, etc. I'm always amazed at the number who access their on-line banking from a terminal in the nurses lounge, etc.

    I still won't access it from work from my personal office computer, cause ; 1) it runs Windows, and 2) it's on a network and the security guys are always running "updates" -who knows what's in there.

    --
    ..........FULL STOP.
    1. Re:Public computers by denebian+devil · · Score: 4, Interesting
      My biggest issue has always been what am I willing to do or not do when I'm in various situations: on a friend's computer, a wired kiosk, a non-secured wireless connection using my own computer, etc., and the heartache that comes with those decisions.

      I find this comment in the article very interesting:

      "Where I'd draw the line is putting in your bank account information or credit card number," he said, adding that checking e-mail messages probably is not that risky, but if you want to be cautious, change your password once you are on a secure connection again.

      That said, if you gain access to your corporate network through a V.P.N., or virtual private network, you are safer using public hot spots, because your data is encrypted as it travels between Gate 17 and your office's server, where it is decoded before going to its destination.

      Technically, putting in your bank information or credit card information at most respectable websites should be more secure than checking email, because most major banking institutions or sites that accept credit card numbers do so using SSL, which should be safe even if being broadcast over any wireless connection. And they even accept the secure nature of VPN encryption, but don't bother mentioning the encryption available for most banking/CC transactions. On the other hand, most people don't check their email over a secure connection, because either secure email is unavailable to them, or secure email is not the default and they don't know better than to use the default, or only the password is broadcast securely while the emails themselves are still sent in plain text.

      That being said, I still avoid sending banking records, CC numbers, and even secure email over non-secure wireless connections, unless it is absolutely necessary, and tend to be very choosy about which of my friends' computers I will use to access my most valuable information. Guess I just can't take off that tin-foil hat!
    2. Re:Public computers by Angostura · · Score: 1

      I would hope that your bank has a Web site immune from threat by key-loggers. If not, change banks.

    3. Re:Public computers by jonwil · · Score: 4, Insightful

      SSL doesnt help when the machine you are using is running a software or hardware keylogger.

    4. Re:Public computers by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      How exactly do you propose to stop this? How do you make a web site that's immune to the threat of keyloggers, or in the more general sense, programs on client's machine that monitor what they do, either keypresses, or mouse clicks and screenshots?

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    5. Re:Public computers by NMerriam · · Score: 1
      I would hope that your bank has a Web site immune from threat by key-loggers. If not, change banks.


      I'm not even sure what that means. Most banks (here in the US) just use a user/password combination that it easily logged if your system is compromised. I know elsewhere many banks have smart cards with one-time use PINs and such, which we'd love to have, but it just isn't an option for most Americans.
      --
      Recursive: Adj. See Recursive.
    6. Re:Public computers by AdamKG · · Score: 1

      Neither does a VPN, but that's not what this article is about. This article is about compromises in between the antenna on your laptop/mobile phone and the internet.

      --
      groupthink: It's good for self-esteem.
    7. Re:Public computers by caluml · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I won't do anything on a computer that requires a password that I care about from a 'puter that isn't my home computer.



      Carry round Knoppix/Ubuntu/Gentoo Live CD. Boot off that, and you're safe. Apart from hardware nonsense, which you're probably OK with at a friends house. Depending on your kind of friends.

    8. Re:Public computers by bsane · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The login process an ING would stop keyloggers. Kind of hard to explain, but basically you have to enter a piece of your authentication info using an onscreen keypad. The numbers on the keypad are mapped to keys (the change every time), so you can use a keyboard to enther the info, but the keystrokes would be different everytime.

    9. Re:Public computers by Brickwall · · Score: 1
      I find this comment in the article very interesting: "Where I'd draw the line is putting in your bank account information or credit card number," he said, adding that checking e-mail messages probably is not that risky, but if you want to be cautious, change your password once you are on a secure connection again. That said, if you gain access to your corporate network through a V.P.N., or virtual private network, you are safer using public hot spots, because your data is encrypted as it travels between Gate 17 and your office's server, where it is decoded before going to its destination.

      I found this comment very confusing. Since when does VPN = Encryption?

      --
      What was once true, is no longer so
    10. Re:Public computers by squiggleslash · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm not going to go so far as to suggest boxed unencrypted VPN connection systems do not exist, but every VPN system I've ever come across has provided some kind of encryption between the remote machines and the networks they're connecting to.

      I guess you can bodge something together to run pppd over telnet, but generally off-the-shelf systems tend to be more secure than that.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    11. Re:Public computers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My bank (credit union actually) uses two factor authentication - acc num/password as the obvious first, and the second is done by choosing a sequence of images from a given set. Clicking random spots on a webpage with a mouse is much harder for a key logger to figure out.

    12. Re:Public computers by Hobbled+Grubs · · Score: 2, Interesting

      One solution is a box with numbers randomly distributed inside it. You click on the numbers to enter your password. Saving mouse clicks will not work because the box never has the same distribution of numbers. You would have to screen capture all the time which isn't feasible. Of course, you could combine a mouse click monitor with a screen capture of the region around the mouse.

    13. Re:Public computers by caseih · · Score: 2, Interesting

      While that does decrease the risk somewhat, the risk is still there. My friend once showed me a keylogger he designed that would fit right inside the old AT-style keyboard plug. No software required. Of course that was years ago, but it's still possible that something like this could happen on computers in public places. This is a bit paranoid, granted. Maybe you can use knoppix and then change your bank passwords shortly after.

    14. Re:Public computers by Compulsion · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You mean captchas? captchas won't fool a keylogger. The important stuff will already have been recorded.

      However if the captcha is "Which one of these is your mother?" or some other piece of info that is specific to you, then that would make the data thief's job a little harder.

      The using the randomly-ordered on-screen keypad to enter data is a pretty clever solution, though.

    15. Re:Public computers by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 2, Informative

      Since when does VPN = Encryption?

      Well, if it's a Virtual Private Network, I'd hardly see how it could be unencrypted.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    16. Re:Public computers by CastrTroy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This solution, and the one your sibling poster pointed out, do stop keyloggers, but don't stop the general case of software on the client machine that monitors what they are doing. You could just as easily write a program that records mouse clicks, and screen shots, to see what they are clicking on. Maybe just record a square 128x128 pixels centred around the cursor, and save it compressed in 16 colours so you wouldn't have to store so much information. Maybe they could just attach something to whatever module is being called to encrypt the information for sending it over ssl, so they record all the information that you are sending out over ssl. The point is, is that it's impossible for the person designing the website to protect against malicious software running on the users machine. If the machine is insecure enough to have a keylogger, it's hard to say what other kinds of software may be presesnt on the machine.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    17. Re:Public computers by Fred_A · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Since we're on the topic of comments, I particularly liked that one from some guy from the Federal Bureau of Made-up Statistics :
      Still, the most recent computer crime and security survey, conducted annually by the Computer Security Institute with the Federal Bureau of Investigation, found that the average loss from computer security incidents in 2005 was $167,713 per respondent (based on 313 companies and organizations that answered the question).


      Wow, you could buy that 911 document that got leaked a few years back twice over with just one hack ! </sarcasm>
      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    18. Re:Public computers by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      Ok, so you defeated, the keylogger, but what if there's a MINDREADER ? Or someone with a GUN ? Or TERRORISTS ? Or NORTH KOREANS with a NUCLEAR BOMB ?????

      Sheesh.

      Ok people, we got it, there's no absolute security. Everyone knows it here.

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    19. Re:Public computers by wwphx · · Score: 1

      12 or more years ago I wrote a program in VB 3 (or 4? I don't recall) that did this. Two versions, one was a 3x4 matrix for doing a telephone pad (with * & #), one was a full keyboard. My inspiration? An episode of Max Headroom where they decipher a key sequence by "looking at the thermal signatures of the keys"; also, the fact that often-used keys (if everyone was using the same code to enter a door) will show more wear, not quite the same issue on a keyboard.

      The keys shuffled after every click, it was kinda cool.

      The source code is here for the 3x4 pad and here for the 6x6 pad. Feel free to play with the code, primative as it is.

      --
      When you sympathize with stupidity, you start thinking like an idiot.
    20. Re:Public computers by pclminion · · Score: 1

      Well, if it's a Virtual Private Network, I'd hardly see how it could be unencrypted.

      My house is private, but it's not encrypted. My paycheck stubs are private but they're not encrypted either. It's true, I've never heard of an UNencrypted VPN, but I think the "private" is really referring more to the fact that it is a network set up for private use.

      Private doesn't mean secret, necessarily. When I'm in the bathroom, I'd really appreciate some privacy, but it's not like nobody knows what I'm doing in there!

    21. Re:Public computers by pclminion · · Score: 1

      The login process an ING would stop keyloggers. Kind of hard to explain, but basically you have to enter a piece of your authentication info using an onscreen keypad. The numbers on the keypad are mapped to keys (the change every time), so you can use a keyboard to enther the info, but the keystrokes would be different everytime.

      I have an ING account and I HATE the fact that you are allowed to type the numbers in. It should force you to use mouse clicks. Even better, the entire keypad should be rearranged after EVERY digit entered.

      Suppose your pin is 7717. No matter how the letters are chosen, the attacker will be able to tell that the first, second, and fourth digits are the same. That reduces the space of possibilities to a mere 100 instead of 10000. If you click to enter the PIN, the attacker is stuck (well, unless they have some pretty cool AI which can track your mouse movements AND comprehend what's on the screen, but at that point why not just spy on the box using VNC or something?)

    22. Re:Public computers by pclminion · · Score: 3, Funny

      If the machine is insecure enough to have a keylogger, it's hard to say what other kinds of software may be presesnt on the machine.

      We Have The Solution: Announcing the CryptoGoggle 9000. Supported by dozens of popular websites, our technology causes websites to be displayed as a random mash of blended colors. By donning the CryptoGoggle 9000, this incomprehensible mishmash can be magically unscrambled before your very eyes! Take the CryptoGoggle 9000 everywhere you go! Weight 26.4 pounds, shipped weight 34.1 pounds. And as a bonus, you get to look like a special forces secret operative while using it! Only $1,999.99, while supplies last! Order yours today!
    23. Re:Public computers by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 2, Funny

      When I'm in the bathroom, I'd really appreciate some privacy, but it's not like nobody knows what I'm doing in there!

      Posting to /., of course.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    24. Re:Public computers by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      PPTP doesn't encrypt by default unless the other end supports MPPPE. The problem is windows doesn't actually tell you whether it does or not, so you could easily be on an uncrypted VPN.

    25. Re:Public computers by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      Ok, so you defeated, the keylogger, but what if there's a MINDREADER ?

      Then I pity them. On the flip side, nobody who's read my mind has survived more than a couple of minutes, so the won't suffer much.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    26. Re:Public computers by fbjon · · Score: 1
      You don't even need smart cards, though they give extra geek points. I have a folded, laminated, credit card sized piece of paper that has 50 one-time PINs on it. To login, I type my randomized customer ID (8 numbers), then the next unused PIN. After doing my business, I confirm all transactions by typing in a different confirmation code, randomly chosen from the 20 or so also printed on the paper. No high-tech needed, and you need to do some serious work to perform nefarious deeds.


      Keyloggers will catch my ID, and one confirmation code out of 20, but not the next login PIN. Stealing the paper (or any bank statement found in the thrash) won't give away the customer ID. If I'm threatened, I could eat or burn the paper.

      Of course, a local trojan browser that inserts it's own transactions behind the scenes could work, if it's fast enough to do it between my clicks, but not otherwise, since page and session info is all on the server. It breaks the back button, but it breaks background trojans as well, as long as I keep clicking. And also: Holy Custom-Built Trojan, Batman!

      So far I haven't come up with a way to break this system, though I'm sure I've overlooked something. At least there's no easy way.

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
    27. Re:Public computers by BostonVaulter · · Score: 1

      If they're only using a hardware based key logger, than you can do simple things. For instance, if your password is "Password" You could type "word" then use the mouse to go to the beginning and type "pass" I am not aware of any way that they would then be able to correlate the mouse clicks and the screen together with the typing all using hardware, because you would be providing your own software (linux).

      --
      Happy Puppy User
    28. Re:Public computers by couchslug · · Score: 1

      If you can boot from a live CD (or USB key), do that, use a virtual keyboard, and bypass whatever nasties lurk on the hard disk.
      Live distros are so full-featured and convenient to work with that I carry at least one in my CD wallet whenever I travel. Aside from security issues, you can have your distro of choice everywhere, and if you prefer Windows there are some pretty nifty BartPE live CD options available.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    29. Re:Public computers by ewl1217 · · Score: 1

      You wouldn't even need to write a program to do all that. You could use a simple VNC server in combination with a keylogger and be able to keep track of EVERYTHING going on on the computer. I'm sure somebody might suggest using some kind of key-based verification to avoid this, but that doesn't stop somebody from lifting the key off you thumb drive, CD, floppy disk, external hard drive, or whatever other external storage device you use you have. simply put, don't do ANYTHING on a computer other than your own without expecting to be spied on.

    30. Re:Public computers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > However if the captcha is "Which one of these is your mother?" or
      > some other piece of info that is specific to you, then that would
      > make the data thief's job a little harder.

      Doesnt help you mate, I'd have no trouble identifying any part of your mother. *nudge nudge*

    31. Re:Public computers by NMerriam · · Score: 1

      Actually, it was the credit cards with scratch-off one-time numbers I was thinking of, not smart cards (I had one of those cool second-by-second smart cards for my DoD work though!). I wish we'd get wider distribution of that low-tech security, unfortunately I suspect we have to wait for some massive publicized widespread keylogging trojan before most American banks will spend the capital. Penny wise and pound foolish.

      --
      Recursive: Adj. See Recursive.
    32. Re:Public computers by Angostura · · Score: 1

      That whooshing noise was the goal-posts moving. My original point was, any bank that hasn't designed its systems to be immune from key-loggers is not one to be trusted. But you're right - a totally compromised machine is, indeed totally compromised.

  5. Best security ever by protocoldroid · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The worst security? Man, it might be easier to say the best security. At a cellphone store with my brother, he looks at a blackberry and says "...it's overkill, but, probably handy if you need to get online all the time, check email etc". So, I take my PSP out of my pocket, and in about 15 seconds, I show him gmail. Every idiot seems to have unsecured wireless.

    The best security ever, was with my same brother. I woke up early while staying at his place, and wanted to check my mail. I dipped outside to see what networks I could find. Everything was secured but one, and it seemed their ISP was down. So I said to my brother: "Only one jerk in this neighborhood didn't secure their wireless... and they have a flakey ISP, so I couldn't get online", he says: "Oh, that's me".

    Of course, from checking my mail on the road, there are now items in my sent folder with such subjects as "Do you have the north korea nuclear salesman's number?" and "Cheap anthrax mailing services" and "Increase your volume by 6000%"

    1. Re:Best security ever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Every idiot seems to have unsecured wireless.
      Of course, the fact that you were checking your email is completely safe...
    2. Re:Best security ever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure it is. See other comments re ssl.

  6. It's true by gh4nd1 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I've always wanted to marry trouble

  7. Cheap software by crazyjeremy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It's fun to connect with my ipaq... then use VMNet browser to search for other machines with shares and no security... I find all kinds of "shareware" in their public folders but I do not risk getting bitten by win32 viruses since I'm on a pocketpc machine.

    I have found sales documents, salary proposals, resumes and even documents discussing why or why not people should be fired from their company.

    1. Re:Cheap software by TheBitterRaven · · Score: 1

      Fired from their company for, say, leaving sensitive documents in a public folder?

  8. Sensationalist, at least about wireless by markov_chain · · Score: 4, Funny
    From TFA:
    These software programs are called packet sniffers and many can be downloaded free online. They are typically set up to capture passwords, credit card numbers and bank account information -- which is why Mr. Vamosi says shopping on the Web is not a great way to kill time during a flight delay.


    Michael Sellitto, a graduate student studying international security at Harvard, said that even though he encrypted any sensitive data on his laptop, he planned to sign up for a service like HotSpotVPN to add another level of security when he is traveling, especially when using poorly protected networks at cafes and hotels.


    Have these guys heard of SSL? SSH? Can you say overkill? And who is this Sellitto guy, sounds like a liberal arts major that can't cut it in a real security field. *breathes into paperbag*
    --
    Tsunami -- You can't bring a good wave down!
    1. Re:Sensationalist, at least about wireless by timeOday · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Exactly. I think this article is extremely ignorant:
      Mr. Vamosi says shopping on the Web is not a great way to kill time during a flight delay. "Where I'd draw the line is putting in your bank account information or credit card number," he said
      You will have a very hard time finding any online shopping site that transmits a credit card number without SSL. If you find one, you shouldn't be entering your credit card number there, either from home or at the airport it makes no difference. (All this is assuming you're using your own laptop; you can't trust a publicly accessible Internet terminal for anything). Anyways, people don't steal credit card numbers by going to the airport and sitting around waiting for somebody to send one unencrypted; they steal them by breaking into a website and grabbing its database so they can get thousands at a time. Or they buy them at a few cents per, from somebody who already did that.
    2. Re:Sensationalist, at least about wireless by freeweed · · Score: 3, Interesting

      These guys must be part of my upper level of management.

      I tried to install Ethereal to diagnose some issues on the LAN that normal host-based diagnostics would never catch. Had to do with EBCDIC-ASCII translations, so each host always disagreed with what was sent out on the wire. IT security freaked, calling it a "hacker's tool". I explained patiently that our LAN was segmented enough that they needn't worry, I wasn't about to be stealing the CEO's password. Still no go.

      I ended up installing the damn thing anyway, confirmed my suspicions, and saved myself and several hours many days of hunting around. Didn't tell them that, though :)

      Every news story that tries to use the fear of "packet sniffers" as a dangerous tool can pretty much be dismissed out of hand. Watching the data flow in and out of your own computer is never a security risk.

      --
      Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
    3. Re:Sensationalist, at least about wireless by Xugumad · · Score: 1

      In particular, now he's got his traffic encrypted all the way to the HotspotVPN people... who then send it out as cleartext on the Internet. Sure, it's less risky than broadcasting it over Wi-Fi in plaintext, but it's not a solution.

      Gyah. Reminds me of a website I used briefly. Their custom security solution turned out to be server side crypto (of some unproven variety), through to the back office server.

      Think about that a second.

      The traffic went as clear text through the Internet, arrived at their server, magic runes were waved over it to make it hard enough to read that the developer couldn't think how to break the crypto, then sent off to the back office server.

      Too many people know just enough computer security to be dangerous...

    4. Re:Sensationalist, at least about wireless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I ended up installing the damn thing anyway, confirmed my suspicions, and saved myself and several hours many days of hunting around. Didn't tell them that, though :)


      Your fired!

      -Your Boss
    5. Re:Sensationalist, at least about wireless by nine-times · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I tried to install Ethereal to diagnose some issues on the LAN that normal host-based diagnostics would never catch. Had to do with EBCDIC-ASCII translations, so each host always disagreed with what was sent out on the wire. IT security freaked, calling it a "hacker's tool". I explained patiently that our LAN was segmented enough that they needn't worry, I wasn't about to be stealing the CEO's password. Still no go.

      You know, having worked in IT, my inclination is to say that users shouldn't be doing that stuff. You're network is segmented enough? Unless you're in charge of IT security, it's not your job to decide that. I don't know what you're background in particular was, but I used to work for an engineering firm that made software (among other things). The programmers were constantly telling us that they needed to be able to install software, that they knew how to run their own machines, that they understood software better than we did, etc. And guess what? Those were the same guys whose computers were *constantly* broken. They did tons of stupid stuff because they didn't know what they were doing. Some of the best guys were tinkerers, who had been fixing computers for years, but didn't understand that working IT is different. In a business setting, mistakes and errors can have totally different ramifications.

      So I'm not saying you did the wrong thing, but that it should have been your IT staff to do it. If you have a bad IT staff, that's a separate problem, but they're right to try to discourage you from tinkering around on your own. Being your own IT person is like being your own doctor, or a lawyer representing himself in court. It's just a bad idea.

      Personally, I sometimes wish I had someone else who would lock me out of administering my own machine to keep me from fucking around and breaking things.

    6. Re:Sensationalist, at least about wireless by nine-times · · Score: 1

      Use SSH for what? A makeshift VPN? And SSL is good so long as the sites you're using use it, but I'm sure there are sites doing things in plain text that people would prefer to keep private. I've seen webmail that uses plain-text passwords, and you wouldn't believe the shit that some people have in their e-mail.

      I guess I'm suggesting that we should be telling the general public to be careful about their internet usage on public WiFi. If we're scaring them a little unnecessarily, it might still be better than not scaring them enough. After seeing enough people with some level of identity theft, my advice to everyone is, if you aren't sure about anything on the internet, be paranoid. Don't put anything on the internet you wouldn't want people to know about, don't ever click a link to your bank's page, but always enter it in the address bar yourself or use your own bookmark, and never enter a password or personal information unless the address starts with "https://".

    7. Re:Sensationalist, at least about wireless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I tried to install Ethereal to diagnose some issues on the LAN ...
      You know, having worked in IT, my inclination is to say that users shouldn't be doing that stuff....

      Personally, I sometimes wish I had someone else who would lock me out of administering my own machine to keep me from fucking around and breaking things.

      So... you're not in IT anymore?

      From the sound of it, that's probably a good thing.

    8. Re:Sensationalist, at least about wireless by nine-times · · Score: 1

      I usually don't respond to trolling ACs, but in case anyone misreads what I'm saying, that last line is mostly a joke. I am currently working in IT, and I don't break things generally. However, when it comes to my own system and my own data, the truth is that I am far sloppier than working on someone else's system/data. There are lots of reasons for this, but the truth is, my own work system would be far more stable if I treated it like I treat other people's work systems.

      However, I have different goals for my desktop system, and stability isn't really one of them (testing is), which is why I don't honestly wish that someone would lock me out. However, it's true that if you gave my desktop my standard Windows image (which is what's on pretty much everything else) and took away my admin rights, then yes, it would enjoy much better up-time.

    9. Re:Sensationalist, at least about wireless by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      You know, having worked in IT, my inclination is to say that users shouldn't be doing that stuff.

      He's not a user, he's a developer, and this is directly related to his work. Who're you to tell him no?

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    10. Re:Sensationalist, at least about wireless by TheBitterRaven · · Score: 1

      Well, I'm in IT security, and Ethereal doesn't scare me like it seems to have scared your guys. It's just a passive network tool that happens to be used by hackers. Whatever. When my shop was still all IBM SNA, our tech support people had packet sniffing boxes they'd carry around for diagnosing network issues. No one ever called that "hacking."

    11. Re:Sensationalist, at least about wireless by nine-times · · Score: 1

      Well, I'm no one. I'm just a guy on slashdot. But if I were his IT guy, I might be exactly the person to tell him "no".

      When I was working with programmers, the deal was that if the software guys wanted support from us on a system, then they didn't get admin rights on that system. So developers might have an IT-provided box for e-mail/web browsing and programming, and then they had their own development boxes on a separate network. They could do whatever they wanted on the dev boxes, and we might help them, but it was key that it wasn't our (the IT dept.'s) responsibility to fix what the software developers broke.

      This might sound silly... that is, until you've worked in helpdesk/network support for a company of any decent size. Before these rules were in place, the software guys would install all sorts of spyware and crap, erase system files they shouldn't, and generally screw up their own systems. Then IT would have to run around all over the place fixing these issues because the software guys couldn't even check their e-mail anymore. The IT dept was short-staffed as it was, and we didn't have the resources to deal with the stupid mistakes.

      Part of the problem was that these guys were over-confident of their abilities just because they had bachelors degrees in CS. Being a programmer doesn't mean you understand what goes into corporate desktop support. When you've worked in support long enough, you start to learn how important stability is, and how much you need to be careful even when "everything should be fine!" You start to figure out that you need broad policies that don't allow users more access/power than they absolutely need, and you can't play favorites. I don't care if you're a developer or a secretary, if I have to fix your computer, you're a "user" to me, and users shouldn't have admin rights on their computers. Users shouldn't be installing Ethereal.

      ... And I did say that I don't know the background of the guy I was responding to. Maybe he's entirely correct to handle things how he did. However, when I read his description, I had more sympathy for the IT guys.

    12. Re:Sensationalist, at least about wireless by freeweed · · Score: 1

      Let me say, fully tongue in cheek, thanks Mom :)

      I guess I figured it would be clear based on my knowledge and use of Ethereal that I am in IT. Well, that and discussing network troubleshooting and character set translation issues.

      The problem is not so much that I'm not allowed to much with my desktop - I am, mostly. It's part of my job to install and test random bits of software. The problem is an unwavering fear of anything new and unknown. I won't even start on the "we cannot ever trust any Open Source software" bit - they actually refer to it as "Shareware", just to give you an idea of where the mentality is coming from.

      The problem is that we have entirely separate units of the business responsible for things in IT, and sometimes there's no one up there who sees the whole picture. The security folks think I'll somehow hack their passwords (I guess) - my response to this is invariably "if a packet sniffer can compromise your network, you have far deeper problems". I stand by this response in any environment, let alone one I know intimately. The desktop folks (what you refer to as IT, I guess) think I'll break my system by installing anything they've never heard of. Well, the answer, clearly documented for a machine such as mine, is that the "fix" is a user-initiated re-image anyway.

      I suspect you've worked with some people in (I dunno) the shipping department who wanted to install all sorts of system-destroying goodies, maybe some movie playing software or a few games. I can entirely see where you're coming from. But when your JOB is IT, doing IT work for yourself is just fine and dandy. No, I won't be creating the next desktop image for the company. However, as it's my responsibility to make sure the desktop image (with all its peculiarities) works, damn right I'm going to be doing this work myself.

      It's a bit hard to explain the specific job situation in a website post, but "always go through the proper channels" in IT is silly, especially when you have people with no clue making decisions.

      I break, I buy. I'm fully aware and prepared to accept the consequences of my actions. I've signed an agreement stating such. Let me do my job as required, and bring Hell on Earth to me when I screw up.

      --
      Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
    13. Re:Sensationalist, at least about wireless by nine-times · · Score: 1

      Sorry, it was just that you talked about IT like they were an outside group, and it didn't occur to me that you would get any flack from wanting to use Ethereal if you were in any kind of support position. It wasn't clear to me that you were in IT, as lots of people have heard of Ethereal. I've just never worked in a situation where the security vs. desktop support vs. network support vs. whatever are so fragmented that the security guys would freak at even a desktop guy (who are, in my experience, considered low-man on the totem) installing Ethereal. We worked as a team, more or less. Sure, sometimes the corporate guys would come in and step on some toes, but they rarely knew what was going on at a given site unless it had an impact on the WAN. The security guys used Ethereal themselves, so it certainly wasn't off-limits to IT.

      But I have had plenty of tinkerers who would screw up their own systems and the network. Guys who thought they were being clever and "fixing" and "optimizing", but their equipment was always broken and misconfigured as a result. I'm not talking about people from the shipping department, but CS grads in various positions, decently high-level, often programmers. Mostly, it was a bunch of know-it-alls who ran their own home networks, and thought that entitled them to play "IT" and do things like install Ethereal and try to diagnose their own issues. By the time they were through "fixing" an issue, all they had accomplished was to create more work for IT. People like those should be have their computers locked down hard and fast.

    14. Re:Sensationalist, at least about wireless by syousef · · Score: 1

      Personally, I sometimes wish I had someone else who would lock me out of administering my own machine to keep me from fucking around and breaking things

      Try here:
      www.careforkids.com.au/search/quick.asp

      It must be that every sysadmin you ever had lock up your machine was both competent enough not to prevent you from getting your work done, and instantly available if something went wrong. Well either that or you have no idea what you're on about and have your head in the clouds.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    15. Re:Sensationalist, at least about wireless by nine-times · · Score: 1

      We actually measured trouble calling stats at one of the larger companies I worked for, and the number of calls dropped tremendously when admin rights were taken away. People had fewer problems and greater up-time. Most people were eventually happier that way (at least when I talked to people I was supporting at the time). Admittedly, there were a few malcontents who weren't happy no matter what. I've had users admit to me before that they just weren't comfortable not having admin rights, even though things did run better after I'd fixed their systems and locked them down.

      I've never locked down a machine without ensuring that all the user's apps would still work, and I generally didn't get complaints from users. Now maybe I was just some sort of miraculous desktop-support god, but I wasn't doing anything above and beyond common sense. You log in with a restricted account and test everything.

      Maybe you've just never had decent desktop support.

  9. It's not the security I'm worried about.... by HikingStick · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It's the level of user trust. I travel to Chicago frequently, and every time I've been there recently I've seen ad-hoc networks bearing the names of some of the common hotel access points in the Loop. How many uneducated digiots actually connect to those thinking they've found the hotel's hotspot (especailly in hotels that don't offer Wi-Fi!).

    --
    I use irony whenever I can, but my shirts are still wrinkled...
    1. Re:It's not the security I'm worried about.... by Geoffreyerffoeg · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yes, but are you sure those are necessarily evil networks?

      Your post reminded me of the ad-hoc "Free Public WiFi" that I've been seeing a lot of, and I've never gotten a connection through. A quick Google revealed that this seems to be a case of computers picking up that ad-hoc network from other computers and rebroadcasting that name for the next while. TechBlog: "Free Public WiFi"? Not!

      And yes, I don't have a problem connecting to sketchy networks. Other people can always associate with the legitimate network I'm on and try attacks, and my firewall's decent. And if I'm worried about sniffing I'll launch a VPN.

    2. Re:It's not the security I'm worried about.... by Intron · · Score: 1

      Like many people, I have a home computer attached to broadband, with a dynamic domain name and always on. It seems like I ought to be able to use it as a secure encrypted web proxy so that I can use my laptop on the road without worrying about eavesdropping. One method I can think of is to connect via a VPN and then configure my home address as the HTTP proxy in firefox, but I'm not sure how to guarantee that everything is going through the VPN and not through the insecure local net.

      --
      Intron: the portion of DNA which expresses nothing useful.
    3. Re:It's not the security I'm worried about.... by olorinpc · · Score: 1

      So does Chicago have open wireless? (Traveling through there for work tomorrow actually... been a while since I have been through there.)

      Judging from some I have seen though... put a lot of stock into the AP's name... sadly.

    4. Re:It's not the security I'm worried about.... by XSforMe · · Score: 1

      "I'm not sure how to guarantee that everything is going through the VPN and not through the insecure local net."

      Assuming you are using Windows 2K-XP, open the VPN connection's properties, select TCP/IP properties (networking properties), click on advanced options and click "use as default gateway..." checkbox.

      My system is in spanish, so some some of the labels might not match on a word-per-word basis, but I'm sure you can sort out the differences.

      --
      My other OS is the MCP!
    5. Re:It's not the security I'm worried about.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was able to get wireless in a parking garage in Chicago when I was up there a few months ago. If you are in the loop you are pretty much going to have some networks open everywhere.

    6. Re:It's not the security I'm worried about.... by SCHecklerX · · Score: 1

      That's a well-known problem. Simple Nomad did a talk about it at schmoocon this past winter in DC. I believe M$ fixed the problem, but if you are seeing it, have fun with the other holes that are likely also on those laptops.

      search "hacking the friendly skies" on google for the presentation.

    7. Re:It's not the security I'm worried about.... by Intron · · Score: 1

      So as long as setting that default guarantees that all software uses it, I'm OK.

      --
      Intron: the portion of DNA which expresses nothing useful.
    8. Re:It's not the security I'm worried about.... by XSforMe · · Score: 1

      Unless you are using other protocols (non-IP based), yes.

      --
      My other OS is the MCP!
    9. Re:It's not the security I'm worried about.... by wx327 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I installed OpenVPN on my home desktop machine, and whenever I am on the road I connect my laptop to whatever available internet connection and VPN back to my home network. Configuration is set so ALL of my traffic is automatically routed through the home network then back onto the internet. No proxy changes needed as the OpenVPN config can be set to make your computer use the VPN as the default gateway. If you want to try something like this, send me a note and I'll dig up the URL that was the most useful when I was setting this up.

    10. Re:It's not the security I'm worried about.... by m_vand · · Score: 1

      The Apple store on Michigan

    11. Re:It's not the security I'm worried about.... by RemovableBait · · Score: 1

      Could you pass on the URL so we can all take a look?

      I fought with OpenVPN a few months ago to try and get it to tunnel all internet traffic over the VPN, but failed to get it working reliably. Perhaps this is the time to revisit that little project...

    12. Re:It's not the security I'm worried about.... by wx327 · · Score: 1
      Could you pass on the URL so we can all take a look?

      Sure thing. The URL is bookmarked at home, so stay tuned for an update tonight. I struggled for a while trying to get the correct config settings to do this. An alternative I was using called iPiG (http://www.iopus.com/ipig/) - iOpus Private Internet Gateway - was useful for just redirecting traffic to a secured network, but it's not open source, so OpenVPN gets a few extra points for being that. I also used their free server software so I wouldn't be relying on a third-party connection point. The big extra of using OpenVPN aside from being open source is being able to connect to any of my home network shares.

      FYI, my OpenVPN setup is on an XP pro box sitting behind a WRT54G router running dd-wrt (although all you really need is correct port forwarding for your VPN port of choice).

    13. Re:It's not the security I'm worried about.... by wx327 · · Score: 1
      http://www.itsatechworld.com/2006/01/29/how-to-con figure-openvpn/

      Aside from making sure your router has the proper port forwarded and that it has the proper routing, make sure your server.ovpn file has the line:
      push "redirect-gateway def1"
      in order to force all your internet traffic to go through your VPN. This was needed on an XP server. Other OS might not require the def1 bit.

    14. Re:It's not the security I'm worried about.... by Intron · · Score: 1

      Thanks.

      --
      Intron: the portion of DNA which expresses nothing useful.
  10. Now all you need.. by Channard · · Score: 1

    Is a video camera built into your glasses, with a wire that goes down into your pocket to the battery and 30GB hard drive. Hey presto, inside information that can be reviewed at a later date.

    1. Re:Now all you need.. by meringuoid · · Score: 2, Funny
      a video camera built into your glasses, with a wire that goes down into your pocket to the battery and 30GB hard drive. Hey presto, inside information that can be reviewed at a later date.

      That, and a bowel disruptor, several drug habits, and two filthy assistants.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    2. Re:Now all you need.. by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      And a real gun, just to keep things interesting.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    3. Re:Now all you need.. by benplaut · · Score: 1

      And the music. You forgot the tense music.

  11. The virus of Troy wooden horse type by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Worst I have seen is a Hellokitty branded computer in Asia that was installed in a hotel room.
    If was free for guests to use and had windows XP (no service packs) with admin.
    It also came with 75 pieces of Asian spyware (not stuff I am familiar with) and a whole bunch of trojans.

    The trojans were in a delicate balance, and once removed the computer stopped booting.
    Assuming all the computers in the hotel were pwned to the same or a greater degree, that was about 1000 3ghz machines with insane bandwidth pumping out all sorts of garbage. Extremely irresponsible.

    ALWAYS carry a knoppix or damnsmall CD with you when travelling. If the system isn't locked down enough to stop you booting linux then it won't be locked down enough to stay clean.

    1. Re:The virus of Troy wooden horse type by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Only in Asia will you find hotel rooms with both a Hello Kitty branded computer and a bunch of Trojans.

    2. Re:The virus of Troy wooden horse type by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if there were hardware keylogger installed in those pc, it still unsafe to use linux liveCD right?

    3. Re:The virus of Troy wooden horse type by forkazoo · · Score: 1
      if there were hardware keylogger installed in those pc, it still unsafe to use linux liveCD right?


      Not necessarily -- you could set up your ssh connection to use keys, so that you don't have to type the password to get in. They could get the passphrase for the key, but that wouldn't help them without the key itself.

      You can have your browser set to remember your passwords before you make the boot image, so you don't have to type in web passwords, etc.

      You would be completely boned if you let somebody copy the CD, but you could work around hardware keyloggers.
  12. Re:Interesting question by justinbach · · Score: 5, Funny

    Wow, that's a sure sign I've had a rough weekend; my last post on Friday afternoon was a +5 Funny, and here I am Monday morning with a 0, Troll. I guess I need a hug... :-(

    --
    I left my wallet in El Sigundo!
  13. Public websurfing by SoVeryTired · · Score: 5, Informative
    Public websurfing is an inherently dangerous thing to do. If you don't believe me, check out the "security now" article on ARP cache poisoning.

    http://www.grc.com/nat/arp.htm

    It's the scariest thing I've seen since the last time I was tricked into clicking a link to Goatse.

    --
    Slashdot: news for Apple. Stuff that Apple.
    1. Re:Public websurfing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      If you think that's scary I have heard that public websurfing these days happens without wires and that practically anybody can listen to your conversations without having to spoof ARP! *Gasp*.

      [ObAdHominem] Oh, and GRC == Gibson. He's a gimp.

    2. Re:Public websurfing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ARP deals with mapping MAC addresses to IPs. How is that relevant to the current topic?

      We're not talking about malicious users jacking into public ethernet ports and using cache poisoning to steal IPs.

    3. Re:Public websurfing by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 1

      Glad Gibson is discussing this. He used to tell people that Ethernet switches, in contrast to hubs, were an absolute guarantee that nobody could sniff your packets.

      Irrelevant to WiFi, though.

    4. Re:Public websurfing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, and GRC == Gibson. He's a gimp.
      Gibson has a realistic attitude towards educating computer-illiterate users. But, yeah, he can be a fuckwit at times: http://grcsucks.com/
      He may know a bit of asm, but he's no +ORC. Am I right or am I right.

      Btw, we all know that +ORC dropped off the map because he got a job at MS.

    5. Re:Public websurfing by Chris+Pimlott · · Score: 1

      Because if I can make your PC think my PC is amazon.com, it doesn't matter if your credit card transaction is using SSL.

    6. Re:Public websurfing by markov_chain · · Score: 1

      Before someone complains that ARP only works for addresses on the same subnet as the original host (which amazon.com wouldn't be) let me point out the missing first step of making your PC think my PC is the default gateway, which means my PC gets to respond to DNS lookups, which means I get to tell your PC my PC is amazon.com.

      It seems that an access point could easily defend from this attack by validating the destination IP addresses, instead of just blindly switching by MAC address. I wonder if we will see this "feature" talked up by AP vendors.

      --
      Tsunami -- You can't bring a good wave down!
    7. Re:Public websurfing by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Mirroring Amazon on your laptop and impersonating a certificate authority seems like an awfully involved way to steal a credit card number or two.

    8. Re:Public websurfing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh yeah? So how exactly are you going to get a cert signed by a root CA for amazon.com? Or do you expect that they will blindly accept your self-signed cert?

    9. Re:Public websurfing by kabocox · · Score: 1

      It's the scariest thing I've seen since the last time I was tricked into clicking a link to Goatse.

      Um, if you really think about it that link is the least scary of the things that you can encounter on the internet now a days. With virii, spam bots, and spyware does visually distrubing links even other you?

    10. Re:Public websurfing by RESPAWN · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That's actually not a bad idea, but is that a feature that we will ever see make it down to the consumer level APs? I mean, how many people purchasing consumer level APs will be that interested in security that they will look for a router with that feature? I would imagine that subset of security concious people will also be the same people who turn off SSID broadcasting, enable WPA encryption, and utilize MAC Address filtering. IE, these are the same kinds of people who wouldn't have any untrusted computers running on their network to begin with.

      That said,I myself would be interested in seeing this. I rent a basement from a gentleman and leach my internet access from his wireless network (with his permission). I do use a NAT router to segment my network from his and protect my computers as best I can, but I actually have no way of protecting myself from an ARP poisoning attack performed on his segment of the network. His network is only secured via 64 Bit WEP with a pretty simple password -- the barest of securities and any education on the matter has fallen on deaf ears.

      Lastly, for the record I've acutally used ARP poisoning to monitor network traffic for select computers in an office before. It's really quite amazing how easy it is to do and how brilliantly it works. Especially when you use the tool (this was a couple of years ago so I don't remember what it was called) that would allow your browser to display all of their web browser requests, allowing you to see the same pages they were visiting.

      --

      If Murphy's Law can go wrong, it will.

    11. Re:Public websurfing by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1
      Public websurfing is an inherently dangerous thing to do. If you don't believe me, check out the "security now" article on ARP cache poisoning.
      http://www.grc.com/nat/arp.htm
      It's the scariest thing I've seen since the last time I was tricked into clicking a link to Goatse.
      Wait, the last time you were tricked? I was scarred enough by the first time I was tricked that I swore off internet use for a month, and only now am recovering the fortitude to click on links, even with checking the full URL first.

      And, given the reference to goatse in your post, there is no way in HELL I'm clicking on the link you provided... even if it may be the most insightful piece on security that's ever been written, it's just not worth the risk. /shudder
      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    12. Re:Public websurfing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because if I can make your PC think my PC is amazon.com, it doesn't matter if your credit card transaction is using SSL.

      Yes, it does matter. You might be able to fool my PC into thinking your PC is http://www.amazon.com/, and you can have a lot of fun with that, but you will never fool my PC into thinking your PC is https://www.amazon.com/ unless you have a signed SSL certificate for amazon, which is pretty hard to get.

      Now, many people won't know the difference, but that's a user problem.

    13. Re:Public websurfing by BAKup · · Score: 1

      That reminds me of a bash quote, URL broken to protect the stupid:

      *** Topic in #doghouse is 'Our hearts are extended to the 17 victims of the recent internet fraud'
      * Anubis has joined #doghouse
      <Anubis> what fraud?
      <Kadmium> You haven't heard about it?
      <Anubis> no?
      <Kadmium> You can read the full story at http://www-tubgirl-com
      <Anubis> omg wtf!
      *** Kadmium changes topic to 'Our hearts are extended to the 18 victims of the recent internet fraud'

    14. Re:Public websurfing by asuffield · · Score: 1

      It is a safe bet to assume that anything you read on grc.com is nonsense. Gibson is one of the single worst things to happen to people's understanding of network security, ever.

      All that you should take away from this page is: "anybody that is connected on this side of the nearest security barrier (typically your firewall; in large networks it may be the nearest router) is and must be completely trusted". This is something that anybody should understand before being allowed to handle a network: there is no security in a network except that which you deliberately and explicitly put in place.

    15. Re:Public websurfing by spun · · Score: 1

      If you see "grc.com" in the URL, you can be pretty sure it is NOT the most insightful piece on security that's ever been written...

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
  14. Sometimes OTT by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I've locked down people's home office PCs for their 3 man company systems (offices at home) with WPA and MAC address blocking, and they still want to know what else they can do in case someone wants to get their information.

    It's not like they were trading invention information pre-patent, more things like memos about (small) customers. It would have cost someone more to hire a detective to snoop on them than what the information was worth.

    1. Re:Sometimes OTT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's the perfect security. If passing the barriers is more expensive than the thing you're protecting, then you can be sure that nobody will ever try it.

  15. Worst by crossmr · · Score: 1

    Worst security?I was referrered to a sports medicine doctor. I was early as I'd never been to that part of town before. I opened up my laptop for fun and scanned and found two networks. 1 from the gym in the building and a "linksys". No wep, default passwords on the router, and net access. there were 7 machines connected, myself, a printer, 4 others that had no name listed, and one that had the full name of one of the other doctors in the office. I wasn't able to easily view any shares at least. I recommended he lock it down after I met with him.

    1. Re:Worst by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Give the guy a break, he is a sports medicine doctor, not a sys admin. If you knock him for not locking down his network then he can knock you for not being able to treat yourself.

    2. Re:Worst by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      Give the guy a break, he is a sports medicine doctor,

            Ahh, the motor neuron...

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    3. Re:Worst by DrSkwid · · Score: 1

      printing stuff out on the printer is always fun, I used to do it regularly before people got NATs & Firewalls behind their cable modems

      "They Know"

      or

      "We're on to you"

      are among my favourites

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    4. Re:Worst by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Give the guy a break, he is a sports medicine doctor, not a sys admin. If you knock him for not locking down his network then he can knock you for not being able to treat yourself.


      No.

      One person had the sense to go to an expert to get help.
      The other didn't care enough to go to an expert, or entrusted someone with that attitude.

      The real question is are you willing to trust his knowledge of sports medicine when he's shown that his innate understanding of _things_ is less than competent? I'm perfectly willing to say that he knows his sports medicine, but will he ever consider new information in the field to be worth his time to research? Will he give you answers that he can prove conclusively are correct, or will he just tell you what he thinks will work out ok?

      I'm not asking anyone to be perfect, and I'm not asking anyone to know how to set up a network. All I want is that people know (and admit) what they don't know and have moral and ethical motivation to handle the "I don't know" situation responsibly.
    5. Re:Worst by crossmr · · Score: 1

      I did treat myself. I saw my doctor who referred me to him. I knew when I needed help and sought it out. He didn't. He's also a professional who has private records of me, possibly on his computer, as well as the records of others. Its just that much easier to get access to his machines now.

      No one questioned why I was using a laptop in the waiting room, and no one obviously noticed that I had full access to the router in question.

      I mentioned to him that he should lock it down because its completely open. I see him again in 6 weeks and see if he's actually gone and done that.

      I forgave him though because he had a lovely young resident who could have been out of the pages of FHM perform the initial exam on me.

    6. Re:Worst by crossmr · · Score: 1

      I couldn't see the printer, so it would have been guess work on trying to convince XP what kind of printer it is.

      As I said in another post here, I see him again in 6 weeks. If he hasn't locked it down then, I'll offer to do it for him.

    7. Re:Worst by kharchenko · · Score: 1

      It's getting harder and harder to find open wifi spots that one can use while on the road. And I am not talking sinister stuff, I am talking plain'ol check my e-mail, check the news kind of access.

      Part of the reason are the computer-savvy advisors like you whose only recommendation is to lock down the network. The whole thing. Immediately.

      Perhaps you could've instead recommended him to secure his LAN while providing limited net access for others. This way there may be a chance that down the road all of us won't be forced to pay outrageous fees for basic network access like we already have to in the airports.

    8. Re:Worst by devilspgd · · Score: 1

      Can I treat myself? No. Do I go see a doctor?

      I don't fault him for not knowing how to set it up, I fault him for not hiring someone that does.

      --
      Give a man a fish, he'll eat for a day, but teach a man to phish...
    9. Re:Worst by devilspgd · · Score: 1

      Or you could just connect to the printer via XP, XP will identify it and likely even install the drivers for you.

      --
      Give a man a fish, he'll eat for a day, but teach a man to phish...
    10. Re:Worst by crossmr · · Score: 1

      I think its one thing if its a coffee shop or perhaps another business with non-sensitive data. Its an entirely different game when it comes to something like a doctor's office and the sensitive information that might be on their network.

      When it comes to medical records and other data, I'd prefer to keep someone off the network entirely, rather than tempt them. The only way I might feel safe is if they were physically kept off the network but that increases his cost to provide wireless for people he had no intention of providing wireless for.

    11. Re:Worst by crossmr · · Score: 1

      I've had mixed results with that. I have a network printer at home (HP photosmart 2575) and my college has a network printer in every room (all HPs, maybe its just them) they usually don't do well unless you tell em specifically which kind it is.

  16. It's ironic how by gh4nd1 · · Score: 0

    packet sniffers are also used in security. They can sniff out anyone on your network and allow you to decide whether or not that person should be on the network. It all goes back to the way something is being used.

  17. The worst place? That's easy by Rik+Sweeney · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The Apple Store on Regent Street in London. People use it as a glorified internet cafe. No one in there is actually trying out a Mac, they're checking their Hotmail, bidding on something on eBay, advertising a room in the classifieds... The staff don't care what people are doing just as long as they're fiddling with the Macs. The funny thing is that if they catch you looking at their screen, they give you a look along the lines of "excuse me, I'm doing something private"

    YOU'RE IN A F CKING SHOP!

    The only thing that went through my mind when I first saw people taking advantage of Apple's generosity was

    I wonder how many people here are actually just using these computers to do something sinister?

    1. Re:The worst place? That's easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      This is part of Apple's policy - you can turn up there either with your own machine, or use one of those on display - and use it for whatever you like (within reason - I guess booting off a installer DVD and resetting the root password would be beyond the pale). This is a good thing - it keeps the shop busy and, yes, people do use the machine to check their email. In the meantime, they are getting used to using a Mac. It makes a big, big change from PC World where you can't even normally USE the PCs without a password.

      As far as I know, all the machines are rebuilt from a boot image each night. Although, with OSX's decent security and lack of trojans/viruses/spyware, even that may not be necessary.

    2. Re:The worst place? That's easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention the fact that the Regent St Apple Store makes a quite astonishing amount of money.

    3. Re:The worst place? That's easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (within reason - I guess booting off a installer DVD and resetting the root password would be beyond the pale) Well... usually when that happened, we'd go get our firewire drive and reimage the machine. Sometimes we did this as a matter of course at the end of every day (to answer your later speculation). No harm, no foul. We've cleaned porn off iPods before as well. Really, the pranks involving the floor computers are mild compared to some of the things that people would expose to Geniuses at the bar. I always find it weird that people ask for help using iPhoto and then get freaked out whenever I would actually click to open iPhoto that I was going to see their "private" pictures. (Note: this latter didn't actually happen when I was a Genius. I just used it as illustrative of some things that I did do that I will not disclose because I don't think my former customers want anecdotes, even anonymous anecdotes, spread about them.)

  18. Amusing/Lesson in boredom by Mr+Krinkle · · Score: 5, Interesting

    So the usual sitting in the gate waiting for the plane to board.
    I happen to be happily on my laptop, doing those Oh so critical things like, well, /., The Register, various other random boards that all have the same PW etc. (Go ahead, login and post on /. as me. In fact, do that meta mod thing for me while you're at it)
    I hear the guy behind me start speaking VERY loudly on his phone.
    He then tells some guy repeatedly an IP to "just login to"
    I'm amused, since it sounds like it could be an external IP even, so I try it. Figure why not. It responds to ping. Hmmmm
    Wondering what type of login, I get it answered, when he says, "Ok choose Domain ________ and then use administrator and 12BlahBlah for the password"
    I'm like you HAVE to be joking.
    No one would just shout out their windows domain admin password. Nope, I was wrong, as it happily logged in.
    Oops.
    (I'm not saying which company's server it was, but it was a smaller company, but not so small that they should be dumb enough to do something like that.) I also quickly disconnected, and shutdown my laptop. :)

    Other amusing anecdotes are if you get carried away discussing work. Wife works for a DoD software contractor. They get to talking about bombs/blowing things up regularly, in fact, that's part of their job. Now, put them on a flight, and they start arguing over which type of charge would be more effective at dropping a building or how much of a yield would come from a certain explosive. For some reason, they get right back off the plane. :)

    --
    I am 31337 or something.
    1. Re:Amusing/Lesson in boredom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Wife works for a DoD software contractor."

      What does programming have to do with explosives? Blue Screen of Death bomb?

    2. Re:Amusing/Lesson in boredom by Mr+Krinkle · · Score: 1

      hehe
      Not that it really matters, but SOMEONE has to do the modeling to figure out how effective those bombs are going to be. And where to drop that MOAB on the wooden shack in the desert to ensure it is destroyed. :)
      Same thing as with CAD work kind of stuff. Eventually you have to build stuff, but there is a lot of design and testing before building now.

      --
      I am 31337 or something.
    3. Re:Amusing/Lesson in boredom by Kjella · · Score: 1

      No one would just shout out their windows domain admin password. Nope, I was wrong, as it happily logged in.

      I'm not saying it was very smart but I can understand... you're out on a trip, someone calls and needs to fix something. You're already annoyed you're being disturbed. Apparently the other guy isn't too bright or you have a bad line, since he talked loud and repeated it multiple times. Particularly if it's the kind you need to handhold, hanging up to send him via SMS and then dialing him up again is not exactly intuitive. You just want to get this case out of the world.

      Also, this doesn't sound that young but there's a new generation that's completely oblivious to the way they're broadcasting their life. Sitting on the bus I heard quite a few intimate details to the point I felt awkward sitting there, while they happily chatted on, mostly on the cell phone. Then again, I suppose people will regret that less than what they put on their blogs...

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    4. Re:Amusing/Lesson in boredom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If he needs that much handholding, wtf is he doing with the domain admin password?

  19. Utter garbage by gnomeza · · Score: 2
    [Packet sniffers] are typically set up to capture passwords, credit card numbers and bank account information ... "Where I'd draw the line is putting in your bank account information or credit card number."

    Robert Vamosi, Senior Editor at CNET, you are an idiot. (Or maybe Susan Stellin is a terrible journalist - I suspect both.)

    Saying entering your credit card number on a public computer is dangerous because someone's watching network packets is ridiculous. Just goes to show how little average users understand about online safety, despite efforts to educate them about SSL...

    And they even mentioned key-loggers later on...

    *gah*

    1. Re:Utter garbage by jimicus · · Score: 1

      If it's a public computer, it would be quite possible for an enterprising cybercafe owner to set up a proxy server which sets up the SSL connection itself, decrypts everything, then presents a self-signed certificate to the client PC. The upshot is that data is nicely encrypted to the proxy, whereupon it's decrypted, logged for later use, then re-encrypted to do the actual banking.

      If properly set up, you wouldn't see any error messages on the client PC as it would have the root CA for the self-signed cert installed.

    2. Re:Utter garbage by arth1 · · Score: 1
      Saying entering your credit card number on a public computer is dangerous because someone's watching network packets is ridiculous. Just goes to show how little average users understand about online safety, despite efforts to educate them about SSL...

      The above sentence shows how little average users like you understand about online safety, yes.

      SSL isn't safe on a public computer. A previous user might have installed (accepted) a Certificate Signing Authority cert, and set the browser to use a remote proxy server. All your SSL requests then go to the proxy server, which generates a site cert solely for the purpose of communicating with you, pretending to be a particular site. All your requests then goes to the proxy server, who decodes the traffic and logs it, and contacts the remote server on your behalf (to the REAL cert), so it can feed you the correct data back.

      No, SSL is ONLY safe when used on a machine you have total control over. That's not the case for a public computer.

      Making sure there's no proxy set or CAs accepted doesn't ensure you're safe -- how do you know that the browser hasn't been modified to lie to you?
    3. Re:Utter garbage by gnomeza · · Score: 1

      Aiee, I humbly retract some of what I implied in my comment. :)

      At least it's mitigated for the case where you already have cached certs from the sites to which you're connecting. (er. yeh. I don't)

      Though I would completely agree it's too much to expect the average user to pre-obtain certs or indeed understand how the MITM attack works...

      hmm...

    4. Re:Utter garbage by scharkalvin · · Score: 1

      Unless the access point is actually connected to a true "hub" (rather than a switch)
      I don't think you can see all the network traffic that isn't actually addressed
      to the connection that the packet sniffer is attached to.

      At least I've tried this while debugging software. I had to hunt around for
      an old style "hub" as opposed to a "switching hub" to connect together all the computers
      under test to or I couldn't see any network traffic not addressed to the computer
      running the sniffer. I'm not sure how this applies to wireless hubs however.

    5. Re:Utter garbage by gnomeza · · Score: 2, Informative

      Even wired switches are vulnerable to ARP cache poisoning.

    6. Re:Utter garbage by spencer99 · · Score: 1

      This reminds me of when I first saw Hackers back in High school. It would have been nice to have all those graphical interfaced hacking techniques back in the day... People read about these packet sniffers that can generate people's CC info, PWs, and other personal data. They don't realize how uneasy these are to use, it isn't like this thing just shoots out CC # within seconds of hitting a public hotspot. Not explaining or taking in to consideration how long and how much data is required to crack a WEP PW on a wireless router; usually you need at lease a gig of uploaded data. Do you know how long it takes for your 50 yr old next door neighbored to generate a gig of uploaded data?! Do a cost benefit analysis and take in to account the time, electricity, and mental sanity it would take in order to get that PW. All in all CNET is just scaring people to go out and buy a new more "hacker" stringent wireless router. Marketing, marketing, marketing... =P Now the key loggers setup on public terminals is just plain bit#h, its like a mouse trap waiting to spring. New racial profiling for street cops combating cyber crimes: (This can be applicable to airport terminals) "Male, dressed in jeans and a tee shirt. Usually surrounded by 3-6 empty latte cups using a portable computer in a public place for a long period of time without any social interaction. Common verbal phrases and or mumbles: - "I just Pwned your CC info" - "Ignorant newb"

    7. Re:Utter garbage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with you. Tried cracking some local wireless nets when i got my first wireless laptop. I was bored and curious. Two things i learned: A) Takes a hell of long time B) The end result isn't worth the effort. (great I get to use your ISP instead of mine. Oh wait... it's the same shitty one. DAMN IT!)

  20. See, now I'm scared to click on that link... by benhocking · · Score: 1

    It sounds safe, but you never know...

    --
    Ben Hocking
    Need a professional organizer?
  21. VPN by radarsat1 · · Score: 1

    I pretty much always connect to my university's VPN server whenever I connect to an unencrypted wireless access point.

    Mostly just so my email doesn't go over the airwaves unencrypted, otherwise I don't care much, since most sites I use that ask for passwords use SSL at least for transmitting the password.

    Why is it that more sites don't operate completely on SSL, by the way? I've noticed that a lot of sites use SSL just for the password and then drop to a regular HTTP connection after you log in. Why not just keep the encryption for the entire session?

    1. Re:VPN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      200% extra work for the connection.

    2. Re:VPN by Chris+Pimlott · · Score: 1

      Why is it that more sites don't operate completely on SSL, by the way? I've noticed that a lot of sites use SSL just for the password and then drop to a regular HTTP connection after you log in. Why not just keep the encryption for the entire session?

      Because it takes much more CPU to encrypt every connection. Keep in mind you also have to encrypt every image and included file that you use on an encrypted page. Trying to mix encrypted and unecrypted content will, at the least, give the user a warning dialog, and at the worst, it just won't work in some browsers; they'll get a bunch of broken image links.

    3. Re:VPN by LunaticTippy · · Score: 1

      SSL adds a lot of overhead. You can serve 10 plain pages or more for every 1 encrypted page. Plus, it's pretty stupid to encrypt myspace browsing or slashdot or whatever the kids do these days. You can't throw server hardware at it either. The performance degradation is on both client and server, and is pretty severe.

      --
      Man, you really need that seminar!
    4. Re:VPN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Emails are generally sent unencrypted between mail servers, stored unencrypted on mail servers, etc. Do you really expect encrypting it between you and your server would be such a boon to your security?

    5. Re:VPN by Rakishi · · Score: 1

      ...okay:
      1) Christ, you're an idiot.
      2) Because all those server-to-server connections are secure or close to it, as is your computer and those servers. An open/semi-open wireless link is pretty much by definition insecure without additional measures so guess which connection needs to be made secure?

    6. Re:VPN by radarsat1 · · Score: 1
      Plus, it's pretty stupid to encrypt myspace browsing or slashdot or whatever the kids do these days.


      Hm, looks like I should have been more specific in my post.. I really just intended to mean connections for sessions where you log in, presumably where it matters a little more. I didn't mean to suggest encrypting my browsing of myspace or the like. (Not that I ever do.)

      I meant primarily with email servers, bank stuff (which does it already I guess), and maybe certain forums or whatnot. Anywyas, it was just a thought.
    7. Re:VPN by LunaticTippy · · Score: 1

      I'd like to see any login or cc info be encrypted. For most types of websites, that's all that is necessary. One of my banks encrypts everything after you log in. That's OK I guess, but it doesn't display anything sensitive (last 4 digits of account number, etc.) and it is very slow. I wouldn't feel too much risk having my balance info and ATM activity compromised.

      Most webmail servers I use offer SSL login screens these days. None of them encrypt my whole session, which is fine with me.

      --
      Man, you really need that seminar!
  22. CC numbers? Bank details? by el_nino · · Score: 1

    I'd have a hard enough time finding an online store I would like to buy anything from that doesn't utilise encryption for the credit card process. Finding a bank that would allow me to give my credentials in cleartext would be even harder.

    The big issue is probably email which most people still access without encryption.

  23. Right Here in My Own Neighborhood by beadfulthings · · Score: 1

    One can count at least seven unsecured wireless routers, presumably sitting in peoples' houses since this is a fairly residential area. I'd have to say that for some folks, the least secure setting might be the one that literally offers all the comforts of homes. What can they be thinking? I guess the trouble is they're not thinking.

    --
    "Here's what's happening. You're starting to drive like your Dad..." - Red Green
  24. The Newspaper of Record by value_added · · Score: 1

    These software programs are called packet sniffers and many can be downloaded free online. They are typically set up to capture passwords, credit card numbers and bank account information...

    Sounds scary. Maybe there oughta be a law. On the other hand, since when did a tool like, say, tcpdump, typically used for networking troubleshooting, monitoring and analysis, become a tool that's "typically" used for something else?

    I have to wonder. The quality of writing in a publication like The New York Times is above and beyond what one would expect from a local rag. Everybody reads it. The worlds movers and shakers read it, and contribute to it. It's for the elite, by the elite, but this is lowest common denominator stuff.

    ... which is why Mr. Vamosi says shopping on the Web is not a great way to kill time during a flight delay.

    If not a non sequitur, at least on par with what passes for news coverage and/or editorials on Fox News. The only thing missing is a discussion of social networking and sexual predators.

    At this rate, I expect the Leo Laporte to win a Pulitzer.

    1. Re:The Newspaper of Record by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      Sounds scary. Maybe there oughta be a law.

            There already is a law. Several in fact. Just goes to show how unenforceable they are.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  25. It probably depends on the place. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you're sitting at a coffee shop and surfing the net, not too much trouble. However, places like the waiting room at an Ariport are more liable to such inrtusions. Perhaps, the MIT campus? Althought unlikely kids are probably poking for fun.

    In the worst case download something like Ethereal or some other software and monitor the traffic! Yipee!! What fun!

  26. TFA is uninformed by Facekhan · · Score: 4, Informative
    These software programs are called packet sniffers and many can be downloaded free online. They are typically set up to capture passwords, credit card numbers and bank account information -- which is why Mr. Vamosi says shopping on the Web is not a great way to kill time during a flight delay.

    "Where I'd draw the line is putting in your bank account information or credit card number," he said, adding that checking e-mail messages probably is not that risky, but if you want to be cautious, change your password once you are on a secure connection again.


    When you shop on the web, nearly all online stores will be encrypting your credit card and other information needed to checkout. There may be some debate as to whether they implemented it properly and one should use caution but in general SSL is gonna have you covered. Checking your email, at least with a pop3 client is among the worst things you can do on an unsecured hotspot because far too many email services still don't use encryption for the password exchange. In addition very few email services pop3 or webmail encrypt the messages so basically if you are reading your email, so is someone else. Email is one of the few services that you can still expect to see someones password come up in plaintext. Even AIM doesn't do that anymore although the messages are in plaintext unless SecureIM has been turned on for you and the person you are chatting with.
    1. Re:TFA is uninformed by DrSkwid · · Score: 1

      TFP is uninformed, using a random computer with random browser to enter your CC details, the SSL padlock cannot be trusted.

      Logging in to your bank account from random, out of your control computers is equally risky.

      Self signed SSL proxies are not that difficult to set up if you think the effort would be worth it.

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    2. Re:TFA is uninformed by permawired · · Score: 0

      This is also part of the problem with general user's being clueless or misinformed. Here you have a very large rather respected (at least by sheeple) information source give incomplete / skewed information. Ah well...

    3. Re:TFA is uninformed by Facekhan · · Score: 1

      I was referring to using a laptop over insecure wifi. Not sitting at a cyber cafe in Lagos and sending my bank account information to the former Minister of Finance for my finders fee.

    4. Re:TFA is uninformed by DrSkwid · · Score: 1

      Then what does TFA stand for ?

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
  27. Of course, the converse applies too... by gjuk · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Should I ever need to do anything a bit cheeky, I just pop out to the street, find an unsecured wifi, and do anything I like, safe in the knowledge that the cops will have someone else's IP address, and that they'll find it rather hard to find me. Should I say that?

    1. Re:Of course, the converse applies too... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Change your MAC address before connecting. Some people run arpwatch.

    2. Re:Of course, the converse applies too... by barryvoeten · · Score: 1

      In Belgium, someone has been brought to "justice" for using his neighbour's wlan. The neighbour was a doctor who did not really know anything and had everything wide open. So was his neighbour, using the other, stronger connection automagically, as windows does. This was posted by a user on this dutch website http://tweakers.net/nieuws/44510/Meeliften-op-open -WiFi-verbinding-is-illegaal.html

      Note: all computers have been taken by the police and conviction came.

  28. Or maybe... by killmenow · · Score: 1
    And who is this Sellitto guy...
    Maybe he's a shareholder of HotSpotVPN.
  29. Defcon - Wall of Sheep by xrayspx · · Score: 1

    How many people, knowing they were on a very hostile network, still logged into slashdot, livejournal, ftp sites, webmail, all in the clear...

  30. Re:CC numbers? Bank details? email? by woodsrunner · · Score: 3, Insightful

    No kidding! I just sold some property and the realtor wanted me to email the title company my social security number so they could process the paperwork. I had a hard time explaining to them that I would only telephone or mail the number since email was insecure. Finally they emailed me their telephone number. I just can't imagine what a treasure trove their email account would be for identity thieves.

  31. Internet cafes, gaming stores by argStyopa · · Score: 1

    I find it amusingly that people believe that they can login and play World of Warcraft anywhere - gaming cafes, etc. - and then are shocked that their accounts are hacked by keyloggers.

    Not sure if it's naivete, or simply an absence of logic. Yes, one would HOPE that such sites routinely sweep their systems for unauthorized software, but frankly, short of re-imaging the hard drive after every user, I'm not sure how they could entirely prevent it.

    --
    -Styopa
    1. Re:Internet cafes, gaming stores by Nasarius · · Score: 1
      short of re-imaging the hard drive after every user, I'm not sure how they could entirely prevent it.

      Use an operating system that doesn't allow a user to fuck with anything other than their own files? If you're running a public kiosk on *nix, this is as simple as zapping the home directory and replacing it with some default every time the guest user logs off. A fresh start with every login. Something similar is likely possible with Windows, though I wouldn't know where to start.

      --
      LOAD "SIG",8,1
    2. Re:Internet cafes, gaming stores by Asic+Eng · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Ok, I don't play WoW, but what kind of idiot would install a keylogger to get access to some other guy's game account? I can understand the motivation to steal someone's bank info - it's immoral, but there is the recognizable purpose of obtaining the money. However if you aren't playing according to the rules, what's be the point in playing a game? You could just as well print yourself a nice certifcate "You have won" and save your time. So maybe people don't pay much attention to these things because they overestimate the intelligence of their fellow citizens...

    3. Re:Internet cafes, gaming stores by JaxGator75 · · Score: 1
      Assume someone's identity, give away all of their stuff to accomplices, jump off of bridge, log out. Sounds too good to be true, especially if you can still sell the "Spear of 10,000 Bedsores" for real-life cash...

      --
      Come and see the violence inherent in the system!
  32. EVDO by TrappedByMyself · · Score: 2, Funny

    FTW

    --

    Help me take back Slashdot. When did 'News for Nerds' become 'FUD and Conspiracy Theories for Extremist Nutjobs'?
  33. Terminal rooms in schools by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Back in the 80's when terminals and mainframes still ruled universities (don't know if they still do) students in CS classes still had to use the public terminals to do school work. Many of the students (especially in the introductory courses) seemed to be incapable of remembering to log out. The terminals were VTs so they didn't time you out or lock the screen. I was regularly logging people out when I saw them grab their stuff and leave. I finally got sick of it and started encouraging them to log out by, say, changing their default process name on the VAX to "{sys admin's name} SUCKS" or adding a line to their "INTRO TO CS" program that printed out their intention to hurt the president of the US. Don't know if it improved security but it sure amused me.

    1. Re:Terminal rooms in schools by DrSkwid · · Score: 1

      The SunOS terminals in my Comp-Sci room were unsecure, even in user mode you could capture the keyboard/serial and log what you like.

      The solution? A memo : "No Redirecting the Keyboard"

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    2. Re:Terminal rooms in schools by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I usually threat my users with sending email from left open accounts announcing they are finally coming "out of the closet". First strike gets a copy to his own inbox, second get the copy gets sent to his whole department, strike number three everybody in his address book.

      Needless to say it works like a charm.

  34. Problems with the article by RT+Alec · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I had a few problems with the article:

    • I don't think the article made it clear enough the difference between using your own laptop versus using a kiosk. Obviously, never enter ANYTHING, even your name, into a kiosk. Period.
    • When you are using your laptop in a public hotspot, only enter personal information on web sites that use SSL. That excludes Slashdot, MySpace, and many web-mail sites... but still allows the use of many well designed and secure systems (Amazon, PayPal, eBay).
    • Using a VPN absolutely eliminates the danger of sniffing, even if the "VPN" is merely SSL webmail.
    However, the biggest omission is mentioning the danger of using a Windows laptop on a public network-- just turning it on! Remember blaster, et. al.? Try running ethereal at a busy hotspot-- not only can you see user names and passwords, but you can watch as infected Windows laptops attempt to wiggle in using Windows network stack bug <insert favorite zero day exploit here>. Imagine if the infection attempt was successful, and you brought that laptop back to the office, inside the corporate firewall.
    1. Re:Problems with the article by asuffield · · Score: 1
      Using a VPN absolutely eliminates the danger of sniffing, even if the "VPN" is merely SSL webmail.


      If AND ONLY IF you have verified the server certificate. If you did not verify the certificate at all, it accomplishes nothing. If you trusted the Verisign root certificates to do it for you (such as in the case of SSL webmail), it accomplishes nothing (because they have many times been caught handing out certificates to attackers).

      If you do not know what a server certificate is, using SSL or any kind of VPN accomplishes nothing for you.
    2. Re:Problems with the article by RT+Alec · · Score: 1

      Good point!

      For more traditional VPNs (PPtP, IPSec, etc), this is not as much of a concern, since the certificate and/or keys are usually part of the VPN software installation. For SSL web access, man-in-the-middle attacks can and have been used to intercept access. This would be extremely difficult to pull off by use of a laptop (by that I mean the criminal pretends to be a casual hotspot visitor), but much easier for the operator of the hotspot (who can control DNS, use NAT tricks, etc).

  35. Re:Interesting question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, that's right, it's all about YOU here.

  36. in related news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    stabbing yourself in the eye with a knife could lead to blindness

  37. Best security is your neighbors lack thereof by businessnerd · · Score: 1

    I have done some similar work, and yes they do ask if this is enough to protect themselves against an experienced hacker. Basically, I tell them this is only enough to protect you against the average wardriver. Being security savvy enough to know that if there is a will there is always a way, I am usually quite frank with my clients. However, there needs to be a will. Is there any reason in particular that someone wants YOUR network and the information on it. There might be, but for most of the clients I did this sort of work for, there really wasn't. The fact of the matter is, if you even have a week WEP key, the fact that you have something at all is enough for a wardriver to go elsewhere if there is an abundance of unsecured networks. Whenever I'm trying to pick up some internet access on the go, I don't bother trying to connect to the network with a uniquely named SSID and WPA enabled. I instictively go right towards "linksys" with no security (And if I'm feeling like an asshat, I'll change their router's password, MAC address filter everyone but myself and change the SSID to something that will piss off the owner). How many of you out there like to park your car next to a Mercedes or flashy sports car under the assumption that given the choice, the car-jacker will choose the nicer car?

    --
    "It's not whether you win or lose, it's how drunk you get." -- H. J. Simpson
  38. Re:Interesting question by ubergenius · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I never use internet kiosks where you have to pay to use the systems. Ever. I can not for the life of me fathom a circumstance where I couldn't just wait until I got home to check something online. Bank account balance? ATM. E-mail? Mobile phone, or just be patient and wait.

    --
    Student Manager - Take control of your education!
  39. Re:CC numbers? Bank details? email? by jimicus · · Score: 1

    Agreed. IME the places where you're most likely to be asked to email credit card numbers are smaller organisations and organisations which still do a lot of business face to face - places where the person you're dealing with can't say "Do it through our website".

    My g/f booked a small hotel recently and they asked her to email a credit card number across. Thankfully she refused, but apparently the hotel was rather surprised at this.

  40. Re:Interesting question by Gulthek · · Score: 1

    What if you're traveling, esp. in a foreign country?

    Always pay cash though.

  41. Virtual *Private* Network by NixLuver · · Score: 4, Informative

    It's not a VPN if it's not encrypted, it's just a tunnel. The Private is the important thing. A VPN is a system for creating secure private networks over 'unfriendly' or 'unsecured' networks.

  42. Re:Interesting question by MMC+Monster · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you are that essential to a business that you need your email while on vacation, you can afford a mobile phone and have a secretary read you the highlights. If you need network access for work while on a trip, you should have the work get you a laptop. They're cheap enough.

    --
    Help! I'm a slashdot refugee.
  43. No, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "lost".

  44. Re:Interesting question by libkarl2 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    This is the first time I have ever heard of a keylogger that actually broadcasts it's presence in the system tray, althought I can see how that would be useful for non-malicious purposes.

    The typical keyloggers I have dealt with operate as a standard process in the background. Most do not show up on the taskbar but can be stopped from the Process Manager (the Ctrl+Alt+Del applet).

    The nastier ones either replace, or patch the keyboard driver. Upon reboot, they run at all times and can only be found by AV scanner (knock on wood) and/or by the log file they create. The classic infection vector for these are rootkits, and software installation packages that have been tampered with.

    --
    You are where you are at the time you are there.
  45. Re:Utter garbage, Redux by NixLuver · · Score: 2, Informative

    Man-in-the-middle is not that trivial, my friend.

    From SANS WhitePaper:

    "The advent of Dug Song's 'webmitm' in late 2000 demonstrated the feasibility of mounting an MITM attack on the protocol, but a properly configured client SSL implementation would warn the user about problems with the server certificate."

    So a good SSL client will alarm, because you cannot own the correct CA certificate for the site in question, if the target site does already.

    But there is some truth to your assertion, if you are of the Windows Ilk:

    "One faulty SSL client implementation, Microsoft's Internet Explorer, allows for transparent SSL MITM attacks when the attacker has any CA-signed certificate."

    Sweet! ANOTHER reason I can't wait to run Boot Camp and install Windows.

  46. Consider the three basic VPN security methods by postbigbang · · Score: 4, Informative

    PPTP uses a hash. It's tough to crack, save very early editions, which were like wet paper.

    IPSec VPNs use a seed of some kind (they vary according to the implementation) or use a temporal key.

    SSL uses a nice scheme that's difficult to crunch.

    NONE OF THEM, however, protect against keyloggers and their variants. If you look at the wire or air with a sniffing device, however, you'll need to have cracked whatever encryption scheme has been implemented. IPSec with a TKIP/RADIUS-based authentication method is pretty tough to break.... unless you have a keylogger someplace or you can dictionary-attack weak stuff.

    --
    ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
    1. Re:Consider the three basic VPN security methods by splutty · · Score: 1

      And that's why you use RSA keys with single login settings. So that anyone else, even if they get your PIN + RSA key cannot use that to login. Plus after a minute, the whole code is invalidated anyway.

      --
      Coz eternity my friend, is a long *ing time.
  47. Re:Interesting question by Atheose · · Score: 0, Troll

    Yeah, I just assumed that whoever put it on there was an idiot Frenchman (St. Maartin has two sides, the French side and the Dutch side, and we were on the French half) who didn't know what he was doing.

  48. No one will notice! by dthomas731 · · Score: 1
    I like the last sentence.
    To be honest, it's [screen blocker] kind of a nice thing when you're sitting in one of those long drawn-out meetings," he said. "You can do what you need to do and no one will notice."
    Except maybe all the key tapping and mouse clicking.
    1. Re:No one will notice! by bennomatic · · Score: 1
      > Except maybe all the key tapping and mouse clicking.

      ...and the fact that they have to say your name three times to get your attention.

      ...and the fact that you are laughing out loud as they are announcing the worst quarterly results ever.

      ...and the fact that your boss might be on /., too, and those posts are time-stamped.

      ...and the fact that you are unwilling to stand up right after the meeting.

      Just a few possible problems with surfing during meetings.

      --
      The CB App. What's your 20?
    2. Re:No one will notice! by harpune · · Score: 1

      and pant fwapping...

      --
      Shriver

      And a thousand thousand slimy things
      Lived on; and so did I.
  49. ATT/SBC Freedom Link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I found with ATT or SBC Freedomlink hotspots, any
    hostname that resolves to www.mozilla.org, ftp.mozilla.org,
    or www.microsoft.com (and possibly www.apple.com) is
    publicly accessable without an account. It was nice
    when mozilla had several mirror sites I could use
    to download various programs I couldn't do on standard
    dialup. Unfortunately, now mozilla only resolves to one
    site.


    If any mozilla developers are reading this, could you *please* add in
    more mirror sites to ftp.mozilla.org. I need to download
    OpenOffice and update my linux laptop. :)

  50. This is why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is why I always carry a Live CD with me where ever I go. So once I enter this internet cafe where they had these windows 98 machines everywhere (jerks!!). And when I finally get ready for some secure surfing, 'X could not be loaded' !!! stupid xorg 7

  51. Re:Interesting question by LunaticTippy · · Score: 1

    Don't post if all you can do is a half-assed grammar complaint. You'll usually get modded down if you don't contribute something to the discussion. You'll get modded down less if you wait for something more compelling than an offtopic complaint.

    --
    Man, you really need that seminar!
  52. Airport Talk by Necroman · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The president of my division (about 1000 people) was flying from our main business office to our main engineering facility. When he was waiting in the airport for a flight, you overheard a conversation between 2 people sitting near him that were getting on the same flight as him. He later called someone in my office and reported back what he heard.

    The people he listened to were engineers for one of our suppliers talking about the problems with a product that they were flying down to present information to us about (I was sitting in on these meetings). They were having reliability problems that they never reported to us in the way they talked about it.

    You should always be careful what you talk about in public places, you never know who is around and listening.

    --
    Its not what it is, its something else.
  53. and people don't realize it by phorm · · Score: 3, Informative

    I got a call from my uncle recently asking if (during his upcoming trip to Thailand /w his wife) he should bring his laptop so that he could get online, or whether he might be able to connect from public terminals. After discussing what he wanted to do, he indicated that he would like to get online to do his internet banking so that they could handle any bills etc while away.

    My answer was of course: neither

    Doing your banking through a public terminal or even with a personal laptop on an untrusted internet connection in a foreign country is just not a good idea. With a public terminal, you're dealing with keyloggers, spyware, and who knows what else. With the untrusted connection, you're dealing with man-in-the-middle attacks, proxies, and various other issues (and a user who doesn't know that the little messages about unknown authentication are likely indicating an https hijacking attempt).

    The added danger of surfing on an insecure, untrusted wifi is even bigger. I would recommend that anyone using a connection not-their-own either refrain from doing anything financial or overly personal online. In my case, I have SSH and VPN tunnels I can setup to my home server for a semi-secure connection, but depending on the location I might not trust even these.

    1. Re:and people don't realize it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How does your uncle's internet bank work? When I was in guatemala, I did lots of bankin errands at dilapidated cyber-cafes, mostly moving money from an account with more money to the account to which my card was connected, which never had more than a couple of hundred bucks on it. To the point, I log in to my internet bank using a small device which I carry on me at all times. I get an 8-digit number from the web-bank, enter it on the (pin protected) device, and the device gives me another 8-digit number which I enter on the page. Whenever I perform some sensitive task, this process is repeated. No keyloggers or packet sniffers would be of any use. I suggest your uncle change banks.

    2. Re:and people don't realize it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless someone specifically targets you. It's really quite simple, you go to a page to do Task A but they instead alter the page to prompt for the info they need to do Task B. So you enter your number thinking that you will do Task A but instead Task B happens. Now if they make the connection "crappy" so every few pages it "times out" you may enter your info a few times before noticing anything is wrong (if you do at all given how confident you are in the security of the process). Heck they can even change the page and money amounts so you don't notice it's changed.

    3. Re:and people don't realize it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem with that is that to do something dangerous, for example transfering money, you need to add a new reciever, and to do that you need to run the receivers bank account number through your private little device. If you want to transfer an amount, you have to run that amount through your little box, and you cannot transfer money to a receiver that's not on your list. That means the info I enter to transfer money to myself is not the same info you need to transfer money to someone else. If they change the key numbers vividly and I don't notice, sure, I'm screwed. But I see your point, if they manage to make me "log in" (where a random key number is given) three or four times in a short time then they'd be able to transfer money. It's also the (from what I understand not entirely trivial) task to hijack a certified ssl connection. But if posts with secured information timed out several times, I'd definitely get suspicious, no matter how confident I am in the security system.

  54. Last login time feature by bigberk · · Score: 1

    I think an often overlooked "intrusion detection" system is the last login time feature that you'll find in a lot of online services like web email, and banks. Monitor that value and make sure you're the only person logging on. I've also asked my bank to show the IP addresses logging in (a history) but they haven't done that. I wish they would, so simple

  55. That's overly cruel by phorm · · Score: 1

    We had one guy in the lab who constantly harped on people who left themselves logged in. At the end of one class, we found that the great man himself had forgotten to log out, so we moved all his files to the end of a directory structure named something like:

    my\name\is\john\smith\and\I\will\not\leave\my\comp uter\logged\in\ever\again\etc\etc\

    Remember this was a terminal system (vax) so he did have to type in the full path (while checking to see what the next subdir was) in order to get to his files.

    Other tricks included putting the last command in somebody's login script as "logout" - but the teacher got annoyed with that as he was the one who got to change several login scripts a week. I believe other tricks included setting funny prompts and other such things, but nothing overly malicious that might warrant somebody getting a visit to the Dean's office. We did have one issue with a user that had left his IM on, and some dork decided to message a bunch of people rude IM's with *my* phone number (but it wasn't my IM logged in), which ended up with me getting some interesting phone calls and a rather long conversation between said dork and the admins for innapropriate behavior after he apparently also got caught making sexual comments on another person's IM (to a grandmother and a 15-yr girl, oooops).

    1. Re:That's overly cruel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do I show my age if I recall that the solution to logging in without running your login.com under VMS is to put /NOCOM after your username?

  56. Re:Interesting question by Jett · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I did a few times while in Ireland - it was something cheap like 2 euros an hour and all the coffee you could drink. If you need to check your favorite websites or read your email it's worth it. I used the internet for a total of about 3 hours the entire two weeks I was in Ireland - the least time I've spent on the internet since probably about 1995 or so. It was worth the euros.

    That said, I would never check my online banking or anything else more secure than my personal email from a machine I didn't personally own or someone I know and trust owns. People who check their online banking in an internet cafe or at a kiosk are totally insane - maybe if you could boot your own OS on the machine, I don't know if many places would let you do that though.

  57. Re:Interesting question by theskipper · · Score: 2, Funny

    5 minutes?

    Did you at least allow him a bathroom break during this time?

  58. Kill key logging? by Fysiks+Wurks · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't it be possible to kill key logging if keyboard-to-computer comunication was encrypted via hardward with some form of changing key? Or is this not a good route?

    --
    P226
    1. Re:Kill key logging? by pclminion · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't it be possible to kill key logging if keyboard-to-computer comunication was encrypted via hardward with some form of changing key? Or is this not a good route?

      If somebody has the physical access to install a keylogger, they also have enough access to open your keyboard and install a logger somewhere upstream of the encryption process. Barring that, they could place sensors directly on the keys themselves. I've even heard of software that can figure out what keys you're pressing by analyzing the keyboard clicking sounds. In general it's not possible to secure a keyboard without securing its physical surroundings as well.

    2. Re:Kill key logging? by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1
      I've even heard of software that can figure out what keys you're pressing by analyzing the keyboard clicking sounds.
      Really! That's k3wl! That reminds me ... I have heard of these horses with one horn pointing out of their head; I have been stalking the Burger King because it is rumoured that he feeds them, but so far all I got was pictures of him copping a feel from the Hamburgler :-(
      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    3. Re:Kill key logging? by Shadow+Of+The+Sun · · Score: 1

      Take a look at Acoustic Snooping. Yes, what the GP said is true.

    4. Re:Kill key logging? by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      Sure it's true ... it has to be. I've read it on the internets!!!! It poured right through a big series of tubes into my brain, and now I simply HAVE to believe it! Just like I know Unicorns are real, because I saw it on TV!

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
  59. Re:Interesting question by foamrotreturns · · Score: 1

    One word:
    Knoppix

  60. Wireless ATM by BlahMatt · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The tech school I went to had a wireless ATM in the pub.

    Needless to say several of us brought in our laptop(just to see what the traffic looked like) and there it was, clear as day, encryped pins bouncing happily back and forth. I mean, it's bad enough to even have a wireless ATM, but to put it in a technical institute where it will be surrounded by poor students learning how to manipulate computers. That's just asking for trouble :P. AND to top it all of, lets put it where they will be drinking.

    --
    To understand recursion, one must first understand recursion...
    1. Re:Wireless ATM by Peeteriz · · Score: 1

      Well, why not ?

      ATM PIN encryption is concerned with hiding the PIN's from employees of either the store or the bank with full physical access to the systems. Irregardless of wether it's wireless, phone-wired ATM, leased lines - it's pretty much expected that the network is not confidential.
          Wireless lines don't create a new risk - even a dozen years ago any technician from the telecommunication's company could've listened on the data and tried to extract $$$ from that. And if it would be feasible, then he could get a sizeable 'equipment investment' from the mob wanting to earn some free cash.

  61. Conference Call by onkelonkel · · Score: 4, Funny

    Similar situation - except it was a conference call between us and a supplier (10 people in our office on a speakerphone talking to 10 people in their office). At some point we needed to discuss something amongst ourselves so we told the suppliers we were going "off the air" for a minute and put the phone on mute. To our amazement, the suppliers thought that because they could no longer hear us that we could no longer hear them. Their mic was still open and we heard the talking as if we were no longer listening. They were quite candidly discussing flaws in their equipment that we hadn't found yet, and trying to decide which imaginary ship date they were going to tell us given that their product wasn't really going to be ready for 4 more months.

    Needless to say, we made the "off the air" discussion a part of every call we had with them.

    --
    None of them can see the clouds; The polished wings don't care.
  62. What's the worst ....setups? by bdwoolman · · Score: 1
    should read;

    What's the worst... setup?

    or

    What are the worst... setups?

    Heil Strunk

    (Do I get a medal?)

    --
    "No fear. No envy. No meanness." Liam Clancy
    1. Re:What's the worst ....setups? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree... too many people are replacing the word 'are' with 'is' all the time and it's beginning to annoy the heck out of me.

  63. My university by Jahz · · Score: 1
    My university has an undergrad population of at least 15,000 students. It is located in Boston proper. I won't say more than that... There are two wireless networks that represent examples of both the best and worst deployments.


    The University-wide Wireless: Completely insecure. Open to students, faculty, community members, and hackers. This network covers the better part of a square mile. It's huge.

    The College of Computer Science: This network has two levels of security. First, you need to log in to use the access points. You can choose to log in normally or via IPSec secured VPN. The former allows only port 80 traffic, SSH and other secure communication. The latter provides unrestricted traffic flow. You can't use it at all without being a currently enrolled student, and there is no connection further than a few feet outside of the building.

    Like I said: The best and the worst.

    --
    There are 10 types of people in the world. Those who understand binary and those who do not.
  64. Re:Interesting question by Atheose · · Score: 1

    Yeah, there's always that... unless they have the fancy keyloggers that physically connect between the keyboard and the computer. Then you're pretty much fucked.

  65. Nothing new, there is open access everywhere by wsanders · · Score: 1

    From my office high atop the wsanders tower in Downtown San Francisco, I can usually see 2 or 3 completely open APs.

    How else would I be able to do my firewall testing?

    --
    Give a man a fish and you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish, and he'll say "WHERE'S MY FISH, YOU IDIOT?"
  66. Maybe there is a reason they are unsecured by brokeninside · · Score: 1

    Have you ever heard the phrase ``plausible deniability.''

  67. Getting a cert as amazon.com by Sloppy · · Score: 1
    So how exactly are you going to get a cert signed by a root CA for amazon.com?

    There's always some way. This crap has happened before and it will happen again. Do you know all the CA's authentication policies? Unless you work there, I bet you sure as hell didn't actually check with them or audit them, and unless you're a criminal you probably haven't attacked to try to see if they will mis-sign something. Without looking, can you even name 10% of CA's that your web browser is configured to fully trust? Have you ever met any of them? Do you even have a rough intuitive sense of their "character" (as if a faceless corporation can have a character)?

    99.99999% of the population just dogmatically accepts the list of approved CAs that come with their web browser. Even I do, despite knowing how foolish it is. It's not like OpenPGP where the user has to make a decision who they trust and how much. People are just defaulting, and like Rush says: "If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice."

    --
    As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
  68. Re:Interesting question by foamrotreturns · · Score: 2, Funny

    No, you unplug the bastard and pocket it. Those things retail for about $90. Can you say eBay?

  69. OLD news story, besides somewhat obvious for Slash by Infoport · · Score: 1

    This story seemed familiar...because it is from Aug 22, 2006.
    It is also somewhat obvious for the technically minded Slashdot user.
    mainly though, it is a REPEAT.http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/08 /22/1526248?
    Infoport

  70. Oh, and nazi takes a capital "N" by bdwoolman · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    Like so: Nazi

    Man, you asked for it. But then you were taking the hour off.

    Heil Strunk!

    --
    "No fear. No envy. No meanness." Liam Clancy
  71. Re:Utter garbage, Redux by jimicus · · Score: 1

    Not sure I quite follow you - you don't need the correct CA cert for the site, as your clients would be configured to already know about the root CA you're using on the proxy server, and it's a cert signed with that which is presented to the client.

    In any case, as I understand from what you say, all the dodgy cybercafe owner needs to do to make that much less of a problem is ensure his PC's are running a vulnerable version of Internet Explorer. Not exactly difficult, as they're his PCs.

    Though thinking about it, I reckon if the cybercafe is that dodgy, it would be about 100 times easier just to install a keylogger on every PC.

  72. Stupidest security policy on the road by Roadkills-R-Us · · Score: 2, Funny

    A friend of a friend was recently in Asia (don't recall whether this incident occurred in Cambodia or Thailand). He went to an internet cafe, where he had to pay in advance for the amount of time he wanted. But regardless of how much time he bought (1/2 hour in his case) the email client was set up to require you to log back in every 5 monutes. So he started hitting "save" at the end of every line.

  73. HARDWARE keyloggers trump yer fancy Linuxes by HawkinsD · · Score: 1

    That's a good idea. But you can get teensy little hardware keyloggers for about $50 that you plug in between the keyboard and the box, which defeat even the boot-from-your-own-media defense.

    --
    Never attribute to malice that which can be explained by mere idiocy.
  74. ban attractive people by WheresMyDingo · · Score: 1

    since public areas are the only areas where i've encountered real living breathing attractive people my age, i would easily part with my passwords in order to touch or be touched by one. i consider that an inherent security threat, so something must be done about it.

  75. Re:Interesting question by Kingfox · · Score: 1

    I've used a cafe on the Dutch side, and while the machines were pretty infected with spyware, it looked more like neglect than actual malicious intent on the part of the operators. As usual, I changed passwords before leaving on the trip and after returning, and didn't log into anything important or sensitive while there.

  76. Re:Interesting question by raoul666 · · Score: 1

    The kicker--the manager of the place made the customers pay for the computer time by entering your credit card information into the computers themselves! Needless to say the only thing that kept me from leaving immediately was the 5 minutes I took to laugh in his face.

    You realize that any business that you use your credit card at will have your credit card info already, right? You know, since they need it to charge you and all...

    --
    When cryptography is outlawed, bayl bhgynjf jvyy unir cevinpl
  77. this is why I always make a VPN connection by atarione · · Score: 1

    back to my home network / RADIUS server. ... when using the interweb on public APs

    --
    actually I am happy to see you, however that is in fact a banana in my pocket.
  78. My vote by Pheersome · · Score: 1

    The world's most dangerous network: DefCON. Everybody who attends knows it. And yet *still*, people use plaintext authentication to all sorts of services. And then they appear on the Wall of Sheep.

    --
    Better to light a candle than to curse the darkness.
  79. "The city's computer told you!?" by mmell · · Score: 1
    "Artoo, you know better than to trust a strange computer"

    Hellfire, even George Lucas seems to get it, and he's a lo-o-ong way from being technically proficient.

  80. Re:Interesting question by MightyYar · · Score: 1

    If you've ever been in a foreign country where you can't get your hands on an English newspaper or English TV, you'll love Google News in a web cafe. It's also good for checking stocks, sports, weather - that sort of thing.

    --
    W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  81. Hotel and Airport hygiene by SallyShears · · Score: 2, Informative

    From hotel rooms: I do use the hotel LAN with my laptop. I immediately create a SSH tunnel to my own server and handle mail through the tunnel. I surf the web on my laptop. I will enter name, userid, password on familiar sites with SSL protecting the connection from my laptop to the known server.

    At public computers: I assume that the machine has a keystroke logger. Never enter anything remotely sensitive on such machines. Never login to anything from a public computer.

    Now, I often want to print a boarding pass or a document of mine. Here's my routine: Print to PDF on my laptop, upload the PDF from my laptop to my own web server with sftp. Name these a.pdf,, b.pdf, etc. The web server is set up so no one can get a file list for any directory. On the public machine, point the browser to www.mydomain.com/a.pdf and print. Later, from my laptop I'll login and delete the files.

    Most airlines let you get a boarding pass with conf number and name, no login required. The confirmation number is like a one-time password. Someone was thinking.

        -- Sally

  82. Re:Interesting question by Atheose · · Score: 1

    That's what made it so ridiculous!

  83. worst road setup by BigDaddySlim · · Score: 1

    The worst I saw was a linux wireless router with default username/password and default IP addresses. Also, there was no Administrator password set on several of the machines that were connected to it. Very, very, poor security. Ed

  84. wap + no password + old OS = owned by v1 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    A business in my town did several stupid things that led to disaster.

    1. run windows 98 as your server (in 2005)
    2. no passwords on anything
    3. lets install a wap
    4. passwords are inconvenient on a wap, turn them off

    2am Sunday morning, janitorial staff notice a kid in the parking lot sitting next to his bike, typing on a laptop.

    Next day, all gone. Except one rude note left on what was left of the fileserver. He basically deleted everything that he could, which was just about everything.

    Darwin at work I suppose.

    --
    I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
  85. who on earth? by theos07 · · Score: 1

    How many people out there have actually tried to crack someone's computer to steal information (including baking/credit card information)? Probably not many! Who of us really thinks that we're big enough and bad enough for somebody else to actually want to steal our information? By the way most banks use a SSL encryption which last time i checked was a 256 bit encryption. As far as I know online baking is VERY safe (excepting key loggers etc). Damn I live in New Zealand and even the four major banks in this country use those card thingy's that make sure the password is different everytime. No one wants to steal your information, no body cares. Get over it, get a life and get back to me if you've legitimately been the victim of identity or information theft!

    --
    Open Office- try it http://www.openofice.org
    1. Re:who on earth? by GrahamCox · · Score: 1

      ... including baking/credit card information...

      Yeah, I make sure I lock down my recipes with strong encryption - can't be too sure who might want to rip off my special carrot cake!

  86. People Who Should Know Better (TM) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This was a little while ago, but here I am playing with my new laptop with wireless. In addition to our network, there was a coffee shop with a killer signal and another unprotected node named "linksys" - clearly a rookie with a new WAP. Of course, I poke the "linksys" node and list every stinkin' desktop, server and printer shared from a major trade association across the street which happens to run the largest consumer electronics show in the world (can you guess the association?). Some moron obviously bought himself a Linksys base station and plugged it into the internal LAN so he could use his wireless laptop.

    Most of the servers were completely uncovered but I left all that alone. The only logical thing to do was print "SECURE YOUR WIRELESS NETWORK" in 24" multicolor characters on their HP DesignJet 5000 plotter in production plus several other LaserJets in important sounding offices. It was tempting to change the greeting on a few HP LaserJets' alpha displays from "READY" to "PAPER JAM". Wonder how long it would take them to find that. The wireless node was gone in two days. I could have completely blown up their network but did them a favor and dropped them a clue instead.

  87. Re:Interesting question by Gulthek · · Score: 1

    No no. Not for work. What if you want to check your email/blog/find hotels/etc. while traveling.

  88. When did people renounce to their privacy? by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    Just because it is a free service it gives nobody else the right to snoop in what other people are doing.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  89. Re:Interesting question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Blackberry