Slashdot Mirror


Unisys Targets Just 20 Execs With Ad Campaign

Carl Bialik from WSJ writes, "Security company Unisys is taking niche marketing to a new level, aiming ads at about 20 top executives, delivering custom-covered issues of their Fortune magazine subscriptions, and even placing billboards where these individuals will be likely to see them, the Wall Street Journal reports." From the article: "If an executive flips over the mock Fortune cover, he or she will discover a letter — also individually tailored — from a senior Unisys manager describing challenges in the target's specific industry. The Fortune 'cover wraps' also offer personalized Web addresses, where the executives can find mock news videos that mention their names and tell how they achieved business success. To reinforce the message, Unisys is placing billboards and outdoor signs — albeit without information-chief portraits — close to the executives' offices. Some ads will even appear on video screens in the elevators of their office buildings."

159 comments

  1. Cool... or Creepy? by gbulmash · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm torn as to whether this is cool or creepy. On the one hand, it sounds pretty cool because it's so individualized and personalized. On the other hand, if I was the target of this kind of marketing ploy, I might feel like I had a well-connected, well-financed stalker.

    People talk about how advertising is becoming more invasive. It's everywhere. But what about when it knows who you are and maybe knows a little too much about you? Imagine a urinal that got your ID from your phone via bluetooth, analyzed your urine, and then said: "Hi, Bob. Noticed a high level of sodium in your urine. Ask your doctor about Gronkaflix XP. Better yet, I see that Doctor Finkelberg is your doctor of record. Say 'yes' if you'd like me to e-mail him the results of my analysis of your urine, Bob."

    I don't know. While this Unisys campaign will impress some people as cool, it just makes me feel we're one step closer to nosy urinals.

    - Greg

    1. Re:Cool... or Creepy? by giorgiofr · · Score: 0

      No YOU are creepy for coming up with such ideas ;) ! Just how? How did you manage to...? Ah fsck that I give up. I must not be inventive enough.

      --
      Global warming is a cube.
    2. Re:Cool... or Creepy? by DeQuincey · · Score: 1

      Not to mention that I'd be concerned about a company who's executive were moved by such flattery.

      Business as usual, eh?

    3. Re:Cool... or Creepy? by Nanoda · · Score: 1

      I totally agree. At first it seems nifty that you can get your product info to the high rollers, but you know that as soon as it gets more developed you'll be walking through the mall and every available surface will be nattering that John Anderton needs to buy Guinness and a Lexus.

    4. Re:Cool... or Creepy? by lowrydr310 · · Score: 1

      Whenever I see an ad that's annoying, I make it a point NOT to buy the product being advertised.

    5. Re:Cool... or Creepy? by gbulmash · · Score: 1
      No YOU are creepy for coming up with such ideas ;) ! Just how? How did you manage to...?


      During a recent bout of insomnia, I watched a movie where a urinal in a guy's apartment did that for him every morning and reported the results to a central computer. With the current existence of ad kiosks targeting bluetooth phones as you walk by, it wasn't too hard to combine the two into something that gave off a good creepy sense of invaded privacy.

      -Greg
    6. Re:Cool... or Creepy? by Arwing · · Score: 1

      It's creepy, it reminds me the scene from Minority Report where they can your eye and pull out all your personal purchasing information. Asking you "How did you like that Windows XP you purchased?" (it sucked). But somehow I can see this becoming a trend as the printing technology grow, I mean, this is what google is basically doing, right?

    7. Re:Cool... or Creepy? by kfg · · Score: 2, Insightful

      On the other hand, if I was the target of this kind of marketing ploy, I might feel like I had a well-connected, well-financed stalker.

      They're called "salesmen."

      KFG

    8. Re:Cool... or Creepy? by uncoveror · · Score: 1

      Unisys has been a real brain trust from day one. Not! Instead of keeping one of their well established and respected names after merging Sperry and Burroughs, they cooked up a new one, and became a leviathan of a company that no one had ever heard of. They are lucky they survived.

      --
      The Uncoveror: It's the real news.
    9. Re:Cool... or Creepy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IT'S CREEPY!

    10. Re:Cool... or Creepy? by Vaakku · · Score: 1

      I will put it shortly. Desperate.

    11. Re:Cool... or Creepy? by autophile · · Score: 1
      On the other hand, if I was the target of this kind of marketing ploy, I might feel like I had a well-connected, well-financed stalker.

      Believe me, the C*O's that these ads target will love the attention.

      Anyhoo, if I could be guaranteed that my records were secured, I wouldn't have much trouble with a urinal asking me if I want my doctor to know I have high sodium. More strongly, I wouldn't care what a system knew about me, or what correlates it infers, as long as (a) those records are secure, and (b) those inferences are not mandatory actions to me.

      --Rob

      --
      Towards the Singularity.
    12. Re:Cool... or Creepy? by smittyoneeach · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but "salesmen" are less prone to horrifying technical glitches.
      McNealy accidentally opens the copy intended for Steve Jobs, featuring a concert shot of Soundgarden doing "Black Hole Sun".
      And, should a salesman do something of that magnitude, you can retaliate much better.
      The inatimate object abuse in "Office Space", over the long haul, just isn't satisfying.

      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    13. Re:Cool... or Creepy? by joshetc · · Score: 1

      I'm just trying to figure out why they are spending all this money to try to sell crappy cordless phones to top business execs?

    14. Re:Cool... or Creepy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd say creepy. Creepy was what was on my mind before I saw the first post that said Creepy in it, it's like your predicting my opinion and posting targeted posts. creepy times two.
       
      This really throws me off. I don't much like unexpected contact with strangers, not a real fan of it, i'm a nice guy, but i am definitely anti-social. The guy in that Twilight episode who loves to read and ends up loses his glasses after getting the world to himself, well before he loses his glasses he is my personal hero. I don't even clothes shop in places with excitable sales staff cause I don't mind telling just one person that "i'm browsing, go away", but when you have to repeat it to several people cause they staff 10 salespeople in a small store than I don't shop there (I'm looking at you "The Gap"), it irritates me.
       
      Now (not that I'm ever going to be worth targeting this much) I would be really uncomfortable with feeling like people had tracked my day and placed things in my path constantly, I would seriously second guess anything I felt I had naturally stumbled upon as a planted ad. It sounds like relaxing and forgetting about work for even 5 minutes is going to be more difficult for these guys, I feel sorry for them if they have even 1% of my love of personal space.

    15. Re:Cool... or Creepy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      if I could be guaranteed that my records were secured

      Damn straight those records are secured! You won't want our competitors to have access to those data, would you? By the way, I'm afraid we are going to have to cancel your life insurance policy, and your health insurance premiums are going up. How about some low-salt chips to cheer you up?

      Why in the world do you think the records would be secured in anyway that you'd want them to be secured?

    16. Re:Cool... or Creepy? by kfg · · Score: 1

      And, should a salesman do something of that magnitude, you can retaliate much better.

      Say "No!"

      KFG

    17. Re:Cool... or Creepy? by archen · · Score: 1

      Yeah, exactly what I was thinking. If I were one of these execs and concious of the level of targeted marketing I'd be a little nervous. I mean what kind of company is such a nitch player that they want to get on the money train through 20 people? I'd be leary of any company that has a product that doesn't stand out on it's own enough to the point where they have to point it directly at ME.

    18. Re:Cool... or Creepy? by Richard+Steiner · · Score: 1

      Much to the chagrine of their new management (if you can call the folks that've been running the company since 1986 "new"), it's the traditional mainframe customers (airline and transportation sectors) that have helped a lot to keep the company afloat over the years.

      I've never heard Unisys called a "security" company before, though... :-)

      --
      Mainframe/UNIX Bit Twiddler and long time Windows/Linux Hobbyist.
      The Theorem Theorem: If If, Then Then.
    19. Re:Cool... or Creepy? by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 3, Interesting

      While this "invasion of privacy" is a little unsettling, we're talking about 20 very high-profile people here, not John Q. public.

      Also, everybody seems to be missing the other half of the story, namely how they targeted specifically this small group of people instead of wasting more money on a broader campaign. How much money did they save? How much more were they free to spend since they were targeting such a small group? How does the creativity angle work when you're targeting one guy instead of a large, poorly-defined wad?

      The privacy angle here is a red herring. We should be talking about Advertising and marketing getting out of the 19th century.

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    20. Re:Cool... or Creepy? by Jawbox · · Score: 1

      Think about it, it microtargets the biggest weakspot of the Corporate Exec... vanity. If you work for one of these companies expect to see Unisys gear soon.

    21. Re:Cool... or Creepy? by Mainframes+ROCK! · · Score: 1

      I see Univac.com is for some outfit called "Universal Vacations and Realty" -- pathetic.

    22. Re:Cool... or Creepy? by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      Me, too. In fact, if more people did this, ads would become less annoying.

      Oh, who am I kidding, they'd just pay Congress to pass a law making ads mandatory.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    23. Re:Cool... or Creepy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Imagine a urinal that got your ID from your phone via bluetooth, analyzed your urine, ....

      I'm not going near any urinal with teeth, blue or not.

    24. Re:Cool... or Creepy? by tomknight · · Score: 1

      You'd *really* care if you found that some system then decided you were high risk and increased your life/health insurance premiums...

      --
      Oh arse
    25. Re:Cool... or Creepy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The privacy angle here is a red herring. We should be talking about Advertising and marketing getting out of the 19th century.

      Yes, bring on the nosy urinal!

  2. PNG by internetstruck · · Score: 0

    I'd laugh harder if they had a file name in the lower corner that said advertisement.png

  3. whats next? by racebit · · Score: 1

    Oh wow...whats next? Toilet paper with ads for microsoft vista ?(that would be cool)

    or possibly a toilet that tells you, when flushed, that crest (tm) toothpaste whitens your teeth?

    1. Re:whats next? by rbf2000 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So, whatever happened to good old fashioned house calls? I mean, if they are spending this much to influence 20 people, couldn't they just hire a lobbyist or somebody that can sweet talk them into whatever it is that they are selling?

      With such a small group of people being targeted, this just seems like a terribly inefficient way to sell your service.

    2. Re:whats next? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      Oh wow...whats next? Toilet paper with ads for microsoft vista ?(that would be cool)

      How about SCO Toilet Paper?
    3. Re:whats next? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But that isn't as fun

    4. Re:whats next? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh wow...whats next? Toilet paper with ads for microsoft vista ?(that would be cool)

      or possibly a toilet that tells you, when flushed, that crest (tm) toothpaste whitens your teeth?


      It was bad enough the first time I saw LCD TV ads in the men's room.

      I was in a bar, comfortably drunk, and distracted, when I saw the picture on the wall in front of me start moving, and a voice from out of nowhere started talking to me. That freaked me out until I realized what it was.

      If a toilet started talking to me, I'd probably swear off alcohol forever...

    5. Re:whats next? by ReidMaynard · · Score: 3, Funny

      or a real hottie. Hotties can sell anything.

      --
      -- www.globaltics.net

      Political discussion for a new world

    6. Re:whats next? by hal2814 · · Score: 1

      The first time I saw the LCD ad system in a bar restroom, the LCD was broken and I didn't spot it right away. I did think the toilet was talking to me. I was horrified that we now lived in a world where businesses try to sell products via talking toilets. Fortunately, I saw the broken LCD setup and realized we don't have that sort of world... yet.

    7. Re:whats next? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is so last year. When I was reading DDJ on the crapper and realized there was no toilet paper, the first thing I grabbed was a Microsoft ad...

    8. Re:whats next? by Irish_Samurai · · Score: 1

      With such a small group of people being targeted, this just seems like a terribly inefficient way to sell your service.

      Actually, its highly efficient.

      These are CIO's at 20 Fortune 500 companies. If they decide to move forward on a company wide security initiative you're talking about a project that could take 2-3 years and millions of dollars to implement. If Unisys grabs just one sale from this, they have more than paid for the marketing. I don't think this initiative cost them any more than $700,000.

      Plus, lobbyists sell government, not business. Two different motivators and methodologies.

    9. Re:whats next? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hotties can almost sell anything, the exception is if they're trying to sell something to an ugly, or fat, woman. Then they tend to get shot down, and usually not based on the merits of their product - but because of jealously.

      Selling to another hottie tends to result in a cancellation of the hottie effect. Unless the two hotties are into each other, then a sale may result - and the two may go out on a date later.

    10. Re:whats next? by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      Toilet paper with ads for microsoft vista ?(that would be cool)

            Not so cool because it would phone home and tell Microsoft what you had for lunch yesterday, and of course it would be exploited to spam you about Preparation H and "My you have a small penis, ENLARGE IT TODAY!"...

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    11. Re:whats next? by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      the exception is if they're trying to sell something to an ugly, or fat, woman.

            There are male hotties too.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    12. Re:whats next? by Jim_Maryland · · Score: 1

      So, whatever happened to good old fashioned house calls?

      In some cases, you have to watch the "types" of money that you use to influence a person. Say that Company A and Company B are both large government contractors competing on a large multi-year contract. Which ever company loses this contract will likely have to downsize or shift a lot of employees to other work. The companies also lose the ability to keep their employees fresh on the latest developments and training in whatever the contract relates to (for example, IT). Often these large contracts will have strict auditing to ensure that both companies are not "buying" future work (i.e. they don't spend research and development, trade show, etc... money that often has tax advantages). One way to influence a decision maker is to target ads at a specific individual or those around that individual hoping to sway them toward your company. Given that the ad has been seen by the public, it "can't" be seen as "buying" the decision maker.

  4. Is this supposed to be something new? The small/meduim sized company where I work sent out iPods with out logo etched on the back and a podcast on them to a few dozen execs in the industry. This was a year or two ago. This sort of targeted, small scale advertising was all the rage not that long ago.

    1. Re:And? by ve3id · · Score: 1

      UniSYS used to have a magazine add that said "If you are late to the party you had better bring something good" or words of a similar nature, as a cartoon man came down a winding staircase at a mansion, carrying their PC. So they were late coming out with a PC, and they are using stale marketing ideas now. Seems consistent to me!

  5. Creepy. by SuperStretch · · Score: 0

    Talk about targetted advertising! Next there will be chocolate chip session cookies. Maybe cross-item-of-clothing scripting?

    --
    Help me get a new laptop - http://nocreditcard.yourgiftsfree.com/?id=3012
  6. Just for the execs? by solevita · · Score: 5, Interesting

    If this was just for top buisness executives, why'd it get viewed by millions in this slash-vertisment? Obviously Unisys is advertising to all of us, albiet through a new and novel means.

    1. Re:Just for the execs? by aftk2 · · Score: 1

      Thank you - I wanted to say the same thing, but you beat me to it.

      --
      concrete5: a cms made for marketing, but strong enough for geeks.
    2. Re:Just for the execs? by SJasperson · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Not quite. This isn't a slashvertisement for Unisys. It's a slashvertisement for their new hip ultra-cool marketing firm (mentioned by name in TFA, but I'm not going to give them more notice here) who hope other corporate sales and marketing drones will say "hey, what a cool idea, I've gotta get me some of that hypermarketing stuff too!"

      --
      Sigs? Sigs? We don't need no steenkin' sigs.
    3. Re:Just for the execs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, I think they just wanted to insinuate the phrase 'security company unisys'.. WHAT? I thought they make windows based mainframes!

    4. Re:Just for the execs? by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      And I thought they were the evil GIF patent trolls?

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
  7. The next thing you know... by ScentCone · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... sales execs who've actually done some homework on the dozen or so people in the entire universe likely to meaningfully purchase what they have to sell will be taking these guys on golf outings. I mean, how creepy is that? They'll probably even shake hands!

    --
    Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    1. Re:The next thing you know... by spun · · Score: 1

      What's creepy is the level of concentration of wealth, power and influence. It's starting to feel like the vast majority of humanity just doesn't matter. That may give some people a stiffy, but it creeps me out. If it gets to the point where we really don't matter, and they have all the power, what do you think the outcome will be?

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    2. Re:The next thing you know... by MasterC · · Score: 1
      If it gets to the point where we really don't matter, and they have all the power, what do you think the outcome will be?
      I think Karl Marx would chime in on that one...if he had a /. account...and were, you know, alive...

      --
      :wq
    3. Re:The next thing you know... by ScentCone · · Score: 3, Interesting

      What's creepy is the level of concentration of wealth, power and influence

      What are you talking about? The guy with something to sell is representing products or services that are worth millions of dollars. He's not selling one single large diamond he inherited from his grandfather, The Duke. What he's selling is produced by hundreds or thousands of employees, all of whom in turn use products and services supplied by other people in the course of doing what they do. They all take home their paychecks and spend it on all sorts of other things.

      Then you've got the guy he's selling to. Did you think we're talking about yachts, here, or gold-plated horse trailers? It's big-ticket IT stuff that is used to power entire business operations - upon which (at the scale we're talking about), hundreds or thousands of people will do their jobs and serve, in turn, their customers.

      Just because the sales guy has a vested interest in persuading a higher-end decision maker to go one way versus another doesn't mean the decision is made in a vacuum. At that level, the decision maker is answerable to a board of directors, investors, and so on.

      Like or not, large employers that do a lot of things for a lot of customers and staff use big-ticket things, like airplanes and server farms. Someone sells them, and someone decides which ones to buy. And it's rarely about just one technical dividing point or another - there's finances, support, legal issues, security reputations, and much more that figure into it. If you don't have the face time and easy relationship with someone who has to weigh all of that, you don't have a chance to convey everything you have to say.

      The point of my comment is that this is the oldest story in the book, and just because some newer methods of getting a little attention and face time have evolved, the need for suppliers to woo purchasers hasn't changed one bit.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    4. Re:The next thing you know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you considered that perhaps the rest of humanity are irrelevant because the rest of humanity haven't done anything to deserve relevance? Do you think market forces care that everyone is a beautiful and unique snowflake? When lazy suckers are a dime a dozen, even someone in the worst situation possible can come out on top. You're not a victim. You drank the kool-aid, you were not a critical enough thinker, you listened to the wrong people, you made the wrong choices, you lost. No it's not too late, you could still be relevant if you really wanted to be. No, it's not going to happen. You don't actually want relevance bad enough. You're comfortable. You're secure. You don't really want the pony. The juice isn't worth the squeeze. Quit whining.

    5. Re:The next thing you know... by vertinox · · Score: 1

      That said... If I happened to be in a state of power and any of my underlings bought a product because they saw a nifty billboard or were taking out on a nice golf trip, I'd be rather irrate on misuse of company resources.

      Not because it shows a misuse of company resources towards something that was chosen because of perks, but rather showing what kind of character that person is when making important decisions.

      Of course usually its the person on top who is the one blinded by human desires which often destroys the company which defeats his goal of appeasing the stock holders.

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    6. Re:The next thing you know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it gets to the point where we really don't matter, and they have all the power, what do you think the outcome will be?

      Solyent Green. Yummy!

    7. Re:The next thing you know... by spun · · Score: 1

      DO you think the rest of humanity cares if you or some big shot thinks they are irrelevant? They are not just going to lie down and die? Who made those fuck heads relevant? The rest of humanity, you elitist prick. The problem comes from the fact that now that they have all the power, they don't need us. Me, I'm comfortable, and relevant. But unlike some elitist assholes, I still give a damn, and I know that it wasn't just me that got me where I am. No man is an island. The sad thing is, there are far more talented, driven people who haven't had the luck or social connections to make it big than there are lazy suckers. But you keep holding on to your fantasy that you are special and that you got where you are only through hard work and skill. Must be a nice fantasy.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    8. Re:The next thing you know... by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      will be taking these guys on golf outings. I mean, how creepy is that?

            Inviting someone to a game of golf, or to a party, or a seminar, or whatever is a lot less creepy than this indirect approach.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    9. Re:The next thing you know... by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

      What's creepy is that Unisys DID NOT take these guys golfing! If I were a CEO of a F500 company, I would be a long more inclined to spend a million bucks with some guy shaking my hand than with a faceless company sending me fake magazines.

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    10. Re:The next thing you know... by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      will be taking these guys on golf outings. I mean, how creepy is that?
      >>Inviting someone to a game of golf, or to a party, or a seminar, or whatever is a lot less creepy than this indirect approach


      *checks sarcasm meter* ... *tap tap tap*

      Is this thing on?

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    11. Re:The next thing you know... by charlesnw · · Score: 1

      A million bucks? A fortun 500 company? Most of these companys spend that much a day. A million dollars is nothing. I know that in the last year I have signed over a million dollars worth of Purchase Orders for server gear. At that is at a company with a $70 million market cap. The companies being targeted and the level they are targeting takes a lot of money and time to figure out. To invest that time/money you are going to expect at least $100 million in return.

      --
      Charles Wyble System Engineer
    12. Re:The next thing you know... by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      Go actually learn about upward social mobility in the United States and then talk to me about that.

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    13. Re:The next thing you know... by TeraCo · · Score: 1
      That said... If I happened to be in a state of power and any of my underlings bought a product because they saw a nifty billboard or were taking out on a nice golf trip, I'd be rather irrate on misuse of company resources.

      What if you were in the market for the product? ie: Company Y sells Product Q. Customer A uses Q a lot, but is unhappy with the quality of Q they're getting from Company X (This is where 'Commercial Intelligence' comes to the party.) Company Y thinks "Aha, I will personalise my pitch of Q to the X management." and then everyone wins.

      Except for Company X.

      At the product/cost we're talking about, most companies (at least in Australia) need to do presentations by the bucketload to get the funds made available, so it wouldn't just be a case of buying an ivory backscratcher on the spur of the moment.

      --
      Not Meta-modding due to apathy.
    14. Re:The next thing you know... by TeraCo · · Score: 1

      Damn it, I meant 'personalise my pitch to A management'. Worst sanitisation ever. :/

      --
      Not Meta-modding due to apathy.
    15. Re:The next thing you know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1m on a prob recent 70m cap - welcome to the honeymoon zone - it will end soon

    16. Re:The next thing you know... by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

      Most of these companys spend that much a day.

      So? A quick calculation shows that I spend at least twenty dollars each day, but that does not mean a twenty dollar bill means nothing to me.

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
  8. Salesmen? by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If your target market is 20 individuals whom you all know by name, isn't it standard to do something like have your salesmen get in touch with them for a face-to-face discussion?

    Admittedly, the personal letters are a step in this direction, but the main effect of advertising--on anyone--is simply to remind them the product exists. Convincing them to buy it falls more heavily on other forms of sales and marketing. Then again, sometimes experimental marketing produces unexpected results.

    --
    In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
    1. Re:Salesmen? by DeQuincey · · Score: 1

      I think the point of this approach is to flatter the execs by asking them to imagine how good their mugs will look on the cover of Fortune magazine proclaiming the success they brought their organizations by using Unisys.

      In that sense, this approach is as old as advertising itself.

    2. Re:Salesmen? by Azarael · · Score: 1

      It sounds like the ultimate act of pretension to me. Unisys: 'We'll just toss a bunch of ads where those guys will see them and they'll just come running!'.

    3. Re:Salesmen? by gstoddart · · Score: 4, Insightful
      If your target market is 20 individuals whom you all know by name, isn't it standard to do something like have your salesmen get in touch with them for a face-to-face discussion?

      If your salesmen can get their foot in the door to get an appointment to see one of such a rarified group of executives. I don't imagine they are people whose schedule is easy to get onto.

      They're doing a pitch which says "see, we know exactly what your business needs are, and we have some offerings for you. Why not call us, and we'll tell you more."

      I should think a personalized edition of Fortune magazine is going to catch your attention, and probably appeal to your vanity. It might have them calling you asking what you can really do for them, which probably makes the whole sales cycle a lot easier to do.

      I suspect if they could close two deals (and probably a single one) from this, they would be sufficiently large to cover the costs of such a specialized marketing campaign. And, if nothing else, the other 18 or 19 have you fresh in their minds.

      Cheers
      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    4. Re:Salesmen? by micromuncher · · Score: 1

      People in those positions have admin staff that isolate them from the phone call. Strangely, those same staff usually screen mailings. So - I doubt that these magazines will reach their targets unscathed... that and the fact that most execs I know don't read fortune! They read the rags in their vertical, or their favorite hobby rag. When fluff comes it, it gets put on the waiting room table.

          When time is a precious commodity, you get other people to waste it...

      --
      /\/\icro/\/\uncher
    5. Re:Salesmen? by jamboarder · · Score: 1

      If your target market is 20 individuals whom you all know by name, isn't it standard to do something like have your salesmen get in touch with them for a face-to-face discussion?

      Come on, these are executives we're talking about. There is no such thing as over-stroking their over-inflated ego and this kind of advertising strokes it in public, where they like it.

    6. Re:Salesmen? by Ibag · · Score: 1

      If I had to guess, I would say that this kind of marketing is akin to the way companies will hire people to talk to their "friends" on the street about how awesome a new album is or to go to a bar and talk about how great their drink is, or something along those lines. When people aren't directly targeted with what they view as advertising, they are more susceptible to the pitch. Similarly, when an executive doesn't realize that the adds are tailored especially for him, he is less on his guard. I think that this method of advertising is somewhat clever because it will keep the product on the executive's mind without his analytical side going "but they are only telling me what they think I want to hear." I don't know if this will actually be successful, but from a psychology experiment point of view, it is fascinating.

    7. Re:Salesmen? by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      People in those positions have admin staff that isolate them from the phone call.

            There is a reason these people exist. Attempts to bypass will NOT improve their chances of making a "sale".

            As a personal example, I am a physician, and I do NOT answer my telephone. If I speak on the phone the conversation inevitably heads towards the patient trying to get me to commit to a diagnosis or prescribe something over the telephone. First, this is not the way medicine is done, and second: I charge for consultation, this is how I earn my living. The patient, more often than not, is trying to get a "freebie".

            So needless to say I rarely speak on the telephone. Patients who insist or take out their frustrations on my poor secretary are certain NOT to get a return phone call.

            As a business exec I would certainly question the desperation of a company who resorted to such tactics, and refuse to do business with them.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    8. Re:Salesmen? by drooling-dog · · Score: 1

      I should think a personalized edition of Fortune magazine is going to catch your attention, and probably appeal to your vanity.

      The problem is that even if you succeed at catching the attention of these key executives, there's not going to be any basis for discussion within their organizations because nobody else has seen the materials. Few, if any, CEOs make unilateral decisions based on advertising they've seen; they want their subordinates to field the ball and present the case to them if it has merit. This campaign doesn't seem to recognize how decisions are made in real organizations.

    9. Re:Salesmen? by gstoddart · · Score: 1
      The problem is that even if you succeed at catching the attention of these key executives, there's not going to be any basis for discussion within their organizations because nobody else has seen the materials. Few, if any, CEOs make unilateral decisions based on advertising they've seen; they want their subordinates to field the ball and present the case to them if it has merit.

      Very true, and a good point.

      But, if the CFO (I believe that was mostly the target group) or the CEO comes to the subordinates and says "OK, this had come across my desk, now I want you to review it and see if it meets our needs", then the process is essentially fast-tracked within the organization. The salesman doesn't need to convince you to look at something, you've been told.

      Certainly, no responsible C*O is gonna say "they gave me a custom edition of Fortune magazine, buy their stuff". But they might say "hmmm, this could be interesting, I'll have someone look into it and tell me if the vendor is being truthful and if they can meet our needs".

      They make not make the decision based solely on that campaign, but when the C*O says "look at this", it's an order from on-high that isn't going to be ignored by anyone since there aren't many higher ranked people in the organization. (Me, I try not to be in the same room as anyone with a C*O designation if I can avoid it.)

      And, again, one or two closed deals for Unisys in this context will probably lead to mega-money since they would undoubtedly be targeting some very large organizations for whom any spending is non-trivial. They're probably firmly in the Fortune 100 list or something like that.

      Cheers
      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    10. Re:Salesmen? by Mr+Z · · Score: 1

      Actually, I think these are intended to make it easier for Unisys to get on the calendars of the VPs and CIOs below the CEO. Chances are, Unisys probably isn't interested in meeting with the CEO. But, when they call the CIO or one of the lower levels of management that might need to get approval from above, it becomes easier if the folks above have heard of Unisys and what it's offering and how it's relevant.

      --Joe
    11. Re:Salesmen? by dangitman · · Score: 1
      Me, I try not to be in the same room as anyone with a C*O designation if I can avoid it.

      I know what you mean. C3PO has to be the most irritating twat of a bot ever built.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    12. Re:Salesmen? by deltx · · Score: 1

      If you look at Unisys stock and earnings over the past two years, desparation would be an uplifting thought for them. Their mantra is "At least the Titanic had music"

    13. Re:Salesmen? by micromuncher · · Score: 1

      Too funny.

      --
      /\/\icro/\/\uncher
    14. Re:Salesmen? by micromuncher · · Score: 1

      I totally agree. However... my recent calls to my doctor about my latest lab tests are really about "should I lay off the sauce or is my liver patte?"; translated "Should I come in for a consult?"

      Cheers ;-)

      --
      /\/\icro/\/\uncher
  9. Ohhhhhh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know what this is. This is one of those ARGs I've been hearing about.

  10. Here's a copy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
    Dear Friend,
     
    I am the manager of UNISYS at the foreign remittance department.
     
    In my department we discovered an abandoned sum of U.S$25M US dollars
    (Twenty five Million US dollars) in an account that belongs to one of
    our foreign customer who died along with his entire family in November 2002
    in a plane crash.
     
    Since we got information about his death, we have been expecting his next if
    kin to come over and claim his money because we cannot release it unless
    somebody applies for it as next of kin or relation to the deceased as
    indicated in our banking guidlines and laws but unfortunately we learnt that
    all his supposed next of kin or relation died alongside with him at the
    plane crash leaving nobody behind for the claim.
     
    It is therefore upon this discovery that I now decided to make this business
    proposal to you so that the money will be released to you as the next
    of kin or relation to the deceased for safety and subsequent disbursement
    since nobody is coming for it and we don't want this money to go into the
    bank treasury as unclaimed bill.
     
    The banking law and guidline here stipulates that if such money
    remained unclaimed after four years, the money will be transfered into the bank
    treasury as unclaimed bill. The request of foreigner as next of kin in
    this business is occassioned by the fact that the customer was a foreigner
    and a Burkinabe cannot stand as next of kin to a foreigner.
     
    I propose that 30% of this money will be for you as my foreign
    partner, in respect to the provision of a foreign account, 10% will be set aside
    for expenses incured during the business and 60% would be for me.
    Thereafter I will visit your country for disbursement according to the percentages
    indicated.
     
    Therefore, to enable the immediate transfer of this fund to you as
    arranged, you must apply first to the bank as relation or next of kin of the
    deceased indicating your bank name, your bank account number, your private
    telephone and fax number for easy and effective communication and location
    wherein the money will be remitted.
     
    Upon receipt of your reply, I will send to you by e-mail a text of the
    application which you'll fill in and send to the bank's email address..
    I will not fail to bring to your notice that this transaction is
    hitch-free and that you should not entertain any atom of fear as all required
    arrangements have been made for the transfer.
     
    You should contact me immediately as soon as you receive this letter
    for further clearifications.
     
    Yours faithfully,
    . DR HASHEEM HASEEMAPOOTOOLAH
    1. Re:Here's a copy by buswolley · · Score: 1

      SO how many of us have gotten this one in their email box?

      --

      A Good Troll is better than a Bad Human.

    2. Re:Here's a copy by rk · · Score: 1

      "O how many of us have gotten this one in their email box?"

      Never. In any 419 I've received, the typography is never that good.

  11. Shades of... ? by Penguinisto · · Score: 1
    Oh, great. Just fscking Great. This means we're only 20 years or less from the advertising crap seen in Minority Report

    ...anyone got a pair of laser-proof eyeglasses I can borrow?

    /P

    --
    Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    1. Re:Shades of... ? by eMbry00s · · Score: 1
      ...anyone got a pair of laser-proof eyeglasses I can borrow?
      Just like with the DMCA, if the industry puts big bucks into a new technology they will also put equally big bucks into lobbyism to enforce it. Expect your anti-RFID lead wallet and laser-proof eyeglasses to become illegal should these services grow.

      You've got nothing to hide, do you?
  12. billboards by 56ker · · Score: 1

    Seems the ideas in the Minority Report (eg billboards targeted just to the person the advert is aimed at) are starting to have a basis in reality instead of just science fiction.

  13. Unisys a security company by ve3id · · Score: 1

    Since when is Unisys a security company? I know them as a computer manufacturer. Did I miss something, or are they trying to re-market themselves?

    1. Re:Unisys a security company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gee, I'm an employee and I didn't get the memo!

      Posting cowardly to not besmirch my nickname.

    2. Re:Unisys a security company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ha Ha! Me too. GOIS is teh r0x!
      Seriously, I like the idea. If this is what it takes to get a foot in the door, although it seems to me to come close to those 'you're pre-approved' regular mail spams, only with a forbes... o.O

    3. Re:Unisys a security company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Their big thing now is consulting and IT outsourcing. As far as security goes, they're the company that has the IT support contract with TSA for airport security systems. Translation: they're Big Brother's Geek Squad.

      As a company they've got their head planted way, way up their collective ass. I'm not just saying that because I had the misfortune of having my job (and by extension, me) outsourced to them.

      Actually, on second thought that's exactly why I'm saying it.

  14. Two thoughts... by Otter · · Score: 1
    1) Since when is Unisys a "security company"?

    2) Going to their website to look into #1, I not only see that is that their current persona, but also that the top headline in their News section is "FBI contracts with Unisys for combined DNA index system." So the guy worrying about being individually marketed to by his urinal may not be so far off.

    1. Re:Two thoughts... by arose · · Score: 1
      Since when is Unisys a "security company"?
      Nice GIF writting software, it would be a shame if anything happened to it...
      --
      Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
  15. Unisys? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are they still around? I thought the only thing they had left was the LZW patent that screwed up all of the JPEG implementations and pissed off the developers that were using GD.pm.

  16. May be good for execs by otacon · · Score: 2, Funny

    I think this would annoy or creep out the average person, whereas top level execs would probably love to hear how great they are from billboards or the mock videos.

    --
    In a world of acronyms, the words are the real victims.
    1. Re:May be good for execs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I think this would annoy or creep out the average person, whereas top level execs would probably love to hear how great they are from billboards or the mock videos.

      And you can tell how susceptible they are to this foolishness by looking at their walls. If you see a framed newspaper from the local western theme park with a picture of the exec and a caption saying, "Mr. Runnynose Carruthers guns down three outlaws in running gun battle", you've got your man

  17. Insecticide Unisys style by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 4, Funny
    What happened to the old fashioned way of sending sales reps with blond bombshell "assistants" to get these 20 bozos and ply them with wine and fine food and golf outings and "business" trips to Cayman islands? Reminds me of a spoof ad for an insecticide:

    User Guide to Unisys Mosquito Killer

    1. Catch the mosquito and pluck its wings so it does not fly away.

    2. Lay the mosquito on its back and tickle its feet.

    3. When the moquito opens its mouth to laugh, dump the Unisys Mosquito Killer into its mouth.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:Insecticide Unisys style by Coryoth · · Score: 3, Interesting
      What happened to the old fashioned way of sending sales reps with blond bombshell "assistants" to get these 20 bozos and ply them with wine and fine food and golf outings and "business" trips to Cayman islands?

      I think, as someone else pointe out, that the issue is that, with so many companies competing for the attention of these execs and all offering blonde bombshells and trips to the Caymans, managing to get picked to be one of the companies supplying such things and hence getting contact with the execs, is rather hard. To get to that stage you first have to compete for their attention at all - and that's most likely what this campaign is about.
  18. Gronkaflix XP works! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been on Gronkaflix XP for three weeks, and my urine's sodium levels have never been better!

  19. Ads in the building by SydShamino · · Score: 0

    >> Some ads will even appear on video screens in the elevators of their office buildings.

    I wonder how much the IT guys at their companies pocketed to do that. ;p

    (My company owns its own building, so the screens are internal. Having third party ads show up on them would mean somebody was on the take.)

    --
    It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    1. Re:Ads in the building by thalassinos · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't have been cheaper to just bribe the execs to buy Unisys stuff? ;-) On second though, doesn't Unisys bribe them already by inflating their ego?

  20. Cool AND creepy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The June 2004 issue of Reason mag had a feature Database Nation. 40,000 subscribers received a personalized issue that had their name, and a satellite photo of their mailing address on the cover.

  21. If it sounds like something only a PHB would do... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    ... that's because Unisys is full of them.

    I left Unisys recently and it was the wisest thing I ever did. Crazy shit like this and massive amounts of management yes men compared to technically skilled staff (hell, they even outsourced INTERNAL support to Bangalore..), it's not a company I would trust to secure my shoelaces, let alone my systems.

    I'll dig ditches before I work for them again.

  22. Nerds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I get home from a hard day's geeking, I just can't *wait* to read the latest from Forbes, Fortune or The Economist.

  23. Unisys partners with HP on spying by Knytefall · · Score: 1

    When HP was spying on journalists, it was just a trial run for their new partnership with Unisys for spying on victims^H^H^H^H^H^H^H prospective customers.

    Indeed, Unisys IS spying on these executives through a company named PHD (which suspiciously contains HP in its name)

    "To guarantee the executives in question would see the billboards erected near their offices, field teams from PHD tried to figure out how they might commute to work. In some cases, such as around Citigroup's building on Lexington Avenue in New York, PHD staffers even scoped out local coffee shops and eateries to see where an executive might grab a sandwich, Mr. Von Kennel says."

    1. Re:Unisys partners with HP on spying by dan828 · · Score: 1

      So PHD was spying on the PHBs?

    2. Re:Unisys partners with HP on spying by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      I would definitly call that stalking.

  24. Problem with targeting CEOs by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 2, Funny

    I hope they didn't spend a lot of money stalking/targeting the CEO of HP. Might be a short campaign.

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  25. Not new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I believe that this technique (custom billboards) is already done when marketing movies to the Oscar judges (or to stroke the egos of the producers/directors).

  26. That'll teach them by Joebert · · Score: 1

    Good.

    Hopefully theese are the same executives that blindly give the ok to their marketing departments to harass me in every way possible trying to get me to buy crap I don't need or want.

    --
    Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
  27. Try listening to DC-area drive-time radio sometime by ScentCone · · Score: 5, Interesting

    If you're in radio earshot of the capital beltway, you can always tell when some congressional committee or federal procurement process is closing in on a big contract decision. The local AM radio stations (and NPR sponsorship slots) will fill up with advertisements that can only be meant to influence about half a dozen people.

    --
    Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
  28. 2nd by argStyopa · · Score: 1
    --
    -Styopa
  29. Wasteful, disrespectful of staff being laid off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    it seems there's three sorts of people left at Unisys.
    1 - People hoping that the company will turn around, and hoping to avoid redundancy
    2 - People who are being made redundant
    3 - People handing in their notice.

    I left band 1 and joined band 3 last Friday. Four colleagues in my team of 9 have been made redundant. The whole team are all chargeable until at least next July on client projects, and are on site. It's not like Bangalore can suddenly go on-site... Another colleague will be handing in his notice as soon as clearance comes through. That leaves 3 people to do the work that clients have paid 9 people to do. Offshoring won't work.

    To be pissing away money on this sort of advertising when the company is collapsing is disgusting. The phrase "swansong" comes into mind, as does "desperation".

    What's left of the company is going to be struggling to meet existing contractual commitments, and sales are going ballistic to bring in business for Q4. I don't believe they can deliver what they're trying to win.

  30. Drawing the line by Dunbal · · Score: 1

    Where does advertising cross the line between informing someone of a product, and criminal harrassment?

          The measures outlined in the header seem a little extreme. Are they so sure that some of these execs simply won't cancel their magazine subscription - I mean after all if a magazine that is prepared to do this for a buck, how unbiased can the content be? Why can't this corporation contact the execs by the normal methods of telephone, sales reps, letters, etc. Why do they feel they have to bombard or "brainwash" their "targets". Are they thatinsecure about their information or product? Or are these executives so lacking of any critical thought that they will mindlessly concede before this abuse?

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  31. If it were Forbes .... by LMacG · · Score: 1

    If it were Forbes Magazine, these execs would also be getting personalized :CueCats.

    --
    Slightly disreputable, albeit gregarious
    1. Re:If it were Forbes .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know about you, but I still have my cuecat next to me at all times. That 20' cord and striking design really comes in handy.

  32. Re:Try listening to DC-area drive-time radio somet by Leebert · · Score: 3, Funny
    If you're in radio earshot of the capital beltway...The local AM radio stations (and NPR sponsorship slots) will fill up with advertisements that can only be meant to influence about half a dozen people.


    It worked with me, I love my new littoral combat ship. ;)
  33. Data Mining Nightmare by shaneh0 · · Score: 1

    imagine getting back to your seat and having ads in your inbox for Purell Hand Sanitizer (Bob, you didn't wash your hands), Dockers Stain Resistant pants due to the occasional splatter-back, and, of course, Whizzinators.

  34. Re:Try listening to DC-area drive-time radio somet by ScentCone · · Score: 2

    It worked with me, I love my new littoral combat ship. ;)

    Hey, I almost got that! But since I like faster stuff, I opted for a Joint Strike Fighter. But stupid me (early adopter!), I got the one from Boeing instead of the final one from Lockheed. It's like owning a flying Betamax. Oh well, it still has Firewire, and it runs Linux if you don't care about the display drivers or compatibility with cheaper imported air-to-air missle hardware.

    --
    Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
  35. gif patents by HiThere · · Score: 1

    When I think of UniSys I think of the submarine patent on gifs, and the "burn all gifs" campaign.

    I suppose that there are worse companies to do business with...I could even hazard a guess at the names of a few. Still, UniSys isn't a company that *I* would choose to do business with unless there were not a decent alternative.

    --

    I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  36. Re:If it sounds like something only a PHB would do by Chapter80 · · Score: 1
    I remember when Unisys was formed, and used the slogan "The power of two". In 1990, when their stock plunged (from nearly 50 in 1988 to less than 3), Scott McNeally (of Sun) supposedly commented that the slogan had to do with their stock price.

    Haven't heard much from Scotty lately....

  37. Unisys isn't a security company by VENONA · · Score: 1

    They're a vanilla IT corporation. Is having the first word of the submission be inaccurate a first?

    --
    What you do with a computer does not constitute the whole of computing.
  38. The Game by MrSteveSD · · Score: 1

    It sounds like something out of that film with Michael Douglas, "The Game".

  39. Let me run Unisys for day... by Brandybuck · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Whoever did this ad campaign should be fired, dumped in the gutter, and blackballed from the industry. Why? Because a simple sales call would have accomplished the same thing for a tenth of a percent the cost.

    --
    Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    1. Re:Let me run Unisys for day... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...so you're an expert on marketing now?

      Next time marketing tries to influence the design of a product that you're working on in a really dumb way, remember it's just the same as what you're trying to do here.

    2. Re:Let me run Unisys for day... by tinkertim · · Score: 1

      Consider that the attention span of the person accepting the telemarketing call (if they accept it) is about 5 minutes at best.

      Now formulate a sales pitch that highlights what Unisys has to offer within that time frame in a way sure to grab the attention of the call taker, and convince the call taker to relay information and interest up stream to the person who signs the checks. CIO/CEO's often don't take marketing calls :)

      Furthermore, within that 5 minutes, convince the call taker to give you information about their existing infrastructure so you had the info you need to show the value of the product you want to sell as it relates to them.

      While this approach is rather unorthodox, I don't see many other ways they could go about it considering the price tag of their systems and amount of data someone has to ingest to understand their use and cost effectiveness.

      Unisys has been rather active in the Xen community testing the latest builds and features on their machines and relaying the output on the lists, which I think is designed to entice people into the vaule of a Virtualized Unisys platform (32 processors / 64 GB is rather enticing virtualized via Xen).

      I guess that didn't work out so well, because I haven't seen a peep from them on the lists .. and now this.

      So its not like they didn't explore alternative advertising schemes prior to this one.

      How would *you* market their stuff? I'm not saying this is the best way, but some major out of the box thinking and technique would have go to into it.

    3. Re:Let me run Unisys for day... by hugzz · · Score: 1
      Whoever did this ad campaign should

      be fired, dumped in the gutter, and blackballed from the industry. Why? Because a simple sales call would have accomplished the same thing for a tenth of a percent the cost.

      But it wouldn't get on slashdot, would it? Marketing

  40. Custom magazine from Reason in 2004 by rune-bare-rune · · Score: 1

    In 2004 Reason Magazine put the name and a satellite photo of the house of 40.000 of their subscribers.
    http://www.reason.com/putting/

    It's a nice way of saying "We know where You live, and where Your kids go to school"

  41. Wouldn't Want to Be Them by organgtool · · Score: 1

    Wow. It sounds like these executives are really being assaulted by this advertising campaign. And I thought popup windows were annoying. Thank God I'm not the executive of a billion dollar corporation!

  42. and in other news by mgabrys_sf · · Score: 1

    Slashdot posts story that is only interesting to 20 people.

    Moving right along...

  43. that's not targeted by Archfeld · · Score: 1

    Ads, thats the ONLY 5 people LEFT on the planet that DO NOT HATE UNISYS, and have not had a crappy experience using their HARDWARE and heinously restrictive software and support.

    --
    errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
  44. I hate to admit it but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I am taking lessons from 419 emails to write my cover letters. Seriously, those guys try very hard to catch your attention... and it works! Next time you have to write a cover letter for a job, use these tips:
    • Start with Dear Mr XXXX <<< "target your customer"
    • I am god fearing man and understand that so are you. <<< Never misses to attract attention
    • I have a proposition which will be mutually beneficial
    • etc etc etc...
    Now check-out how many interviews you get!

    Only (half) joking...

  45. Oblig. Homer quote by hotdiggitydawg · · Score: 1
    Yeah, but "salesmen" are less prone to horrifying technical glitches.

          Homer: Good evening, Madam. You have been selected by the good people of
                        Slash-Co to reap the benefits of their new Nev-R-Dull knife edge.
                        Here, shake hands with the Slash-Co! [hands her the knife]
          Woman: [grabs the wrong end] Aaaaaagh!
          Homer: [to himself] Handle first, handle first...
  46. Unisys is still around? by trudyscousin · · Score: 1

    I thought they would have lost their raison d'etre by now after their GIF patent-thingy expired.

    --
    Those who can, do. Those who can't, write technology blogs.
  47. Security Company? by bracher · · Score: 1

    So they're a security company? Are they, perchance, offering information security? Something along the lines of: "If you worked with us, your personally-identifying information wouldn't be out there for every Tom, Dick and Adman to find and exploit"???

  48. Sperry Unisys used to be mighty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    The world was theirs to lose.

    It would appear that they did.

    What's this cost? What's the rate of success?

  49. Memos, anyone? by PhotoGuy · · Score: 1

    It's obvious to them, and anyone, that it's targeted to them, so the fact it's on a magazine, should carry no more weight than a simple office memo, but far more expensive and time consuming to produce. Are their executives really that stupid and impressionable from a print ad??

    Stupidist idea I've seen in awhile. Hard to believe Unisys is still dominating the computing industry, despite these brilliant ideas. Oh, wait...

    --
    Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
    1. Re:Memos, anyone? by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      what i guess unisys is hoping is that the mailroom guys/secratery will pass the execs fortune subscription to the exec directly since he presumablly asked for it and therefore they will slip thier message past the normal protection schemes.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  50. They haven't been strictly hardware for a while by BitterAndDrunk · · Score: 1
    There's still revenue generated from their printers and servers, of course, but they've been working hard for the past decade to really pump up their professional consulting services.

    They're not horrible; same thing every consulting firm deals with which is attracting and retaining talent. Some divisions are better than others.

    --
    You better watch out, there may be dogs about . . .
  51. Surprised? by Ctrl-Z · · Score: 1

    Around 20 high-ranking executives at corporations such as Subaru of America, DHL, Citigroup and Northwest Airlines will get a surprise when Fortune magazine arrives on their desks this week. Each will find his or her own face gracing the cover.

    Actually, I doubt they will be surprised since it has already been reported in the Wall Street Journal.

    --
    www.timcoleman.com is a total waste of your time. Never go there.
    1. Re:Surprised? by ggvaidya · · Score: 1

      Wonder how mad they'd get if it turns out they're *not* the "high-ranking executives" being targetted =).

  52. Unisis targeted execs 30 years ago by bgspence · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Back in the early 70s I worked for Burroughs supporting their largest mainframes. Burroughs later merged with Sperry to form Unisys. We had an account manager who needed to get the attention of the executives in charge of all the regional IBM systems. In those days the safe choice was IBM, but the other smaller vendors each had much better products. They simply couldn't exist in that environment If they weren't superior to IBM. it was well known that "no one got fired for choosing IBM." So, one day he sent each of these executives a baby pacifier to remind them of the security blanket they were hiding behind.

    1. Re:Unisis targeted execs 30 years ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He should have kicked him in the nuts, then told him that no one ever got kicked in the nuts for choosing Unisys.

  53. Well, I for one think this puts an end... by Garabito · · Score: 1

    to the market share myth.

  54. ***NOT*** a submarine patent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    UniSys filed for the LZW compression patent June 20, 1983, and it was granted December 10, 1985 (source). LZW compression is used during GIF write-creation, hence UniSys had some merit in its royality claims, though it may be argued waiting until December 1994 to seek such royalties from a 1987/1989 image format to have been somewhat disingenious.

    Submarine patents, on the other hand, are patents which request a 'blackout' for the entire time they are in the patent office's filing and approval queue; they are held in-secret regardless for the first 18-months (unless granted sooner), even without filing for such a 'blackout' request. The submarine reference, then, stems from the analogy of going under, running undetected, and only later surfacing at conclusion, though some also draw additional meaning with regards to a submarine's ability to sink a vessel (completing, but later-filing, patent or subsequent successful technology).

    1. Re:***NOT*** a submarine patent by mabinogi · · Score: 1

      Unisys (no camel case) didn't exist in 83.
      Unisys was created via the merger (or rather, hostile takeover) of Sperry and Burroughs in 1986.
      Sperry originally had the patent - and Unisys discovered it and its potential implications later, which is why they appeared to wait so long.
      I'd imagine someone knew about the patent when they merged, but it was probably considered unimportant at the time, with both Sperry and Burroughs being mainframe companies. Since CompuServe didn't come up with GIF until the following year there probably wasn't any use of the algorithm outside of the now absorbed Sperry at that time.

      --
      Advanced users are users too!
    2. Re:***NOT*** a submarine patent by HiThere · · Score: 1

      Technically you may be (probably are) correct.

      HOWEVER, expecting programmers to follow patents is totally disingenuous. Perhaps some more abusive word that submarine should be substituted, as your argument that submarine is the incorrect term is probably valid.

      P.S.: For programmers to follow patents would be a very bad idea. If you claim to understand what a patent means you automatically become liable to triple damages. (I think I have that right. It may be worse.) Only an attorney approved of by the patent court is supposed to be allowed to express an opinion as to what a patent means. (Yet another reason why the patent system and all laws authorizing or implementing it should be revoked and reconstructed ab initio with a blank slate, and no ability to patent anything that was known before the present date.)

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  55. old news by pangu · · Score: 1

    sneaker companies were taking out rival billboards in Akron Ohio where I used to live when Lebron James was still in high school. The target audience was one, Lebron James. The message was basically please sign with us.

  56. It's targeting more than 20 people by therblig · · Score: 3, Insightful

    They are targeting more than twenty people. They are targeting twenty people and all the people who are going to pester them because SOME of the targeted advertising will be seen by their superiors. The fact that a company has one of the twenty targets should be enough to generate a buzz that requires attention to be paid to the ads.

    It's a clever way of forcing you to pay attention to the sales pitch. I've had salesmen decide the best way to get through to me was to go over my head to my boss. It's too heavy handed and has never worked. This may be a better way of going over someone's head.

    --

    I struggled for days and days and all I got was this lousy sig.

  57. Re:Try listening to DC-area drive-time radio somet by vox_soli · · Score: 1

    Do you really expect anyone on Slashdot to know what 'littoral' means?

  58. "Security" company Unisys? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Idea: Why don't we Slashdot readers write personalized mail to those 20 CEOs telling them how much Unisys sucks.

    And "Security" company? Unisys? Of GIF Patent Fame. Failed Mainframe Maker. PC Non-starter.

    Suddenly they're a "Security" Company?

    No self respecting IT person would authorize their equipment. They're a rung above SCO and cockroaches. On second thoughts, no cockroach has ever eaten out of greed.

    Send them to the scrapheaps of history, boys!

  59. Good press indeed by brownsteve · · Score: 1

    Perhaps by reducing the number of people who see its name in print, Unisys will lower the chances of someone being reminded of "LZW" and "patent troll." This is a good thing for their corporate image. Plus, how many of today's CIOs would remember the GIF fiasco from a decade ago?

  60. Re:Try listening to DC-area drive-time radio somet by Leebert · · Score: 1
    Do you really expect anyone on Slashdot to know what 'littoral' means?


    Nope. I expect people who listen to WTOP to have heard the commercials for Lockheed's littoral combat ship and thus cackle madly at my witty joke. Or maybe not. :)

    Or the Secure Border Initiative. etc. etc.
  61. Worked with Telstra by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The company that sold Telstra their new 3G network stuck a massive billboard outside the CEOs office. Seems like it worked pretty well for them!

  62. Definitely Creepy! by KlaymenDK · · Score: 1

    Whoa, I read that thing, and your post, and shuddered.

    If I could ask my newspaper to skip the sports section and plop in a tech section instead, that'd be great; but if tomorrow's paper said 'Hi Klay!', or even worse if there were me-targeted ads outside my front window, I'd be "creeped out" (?) for sure!

    Anyway it probably would not work; whenever I detect I'm being subjected to an ad I do my best to stay the hell away from that product, or do my own market research.

  63. Typo! by KlaymenDK · · Score: 1

    "Congress to pass a law making ANNOYING ads mandatory." There, I fixed it for you.

    But yeah, I do the same. It doesn't seem to be working. In my country, ads actually aiming to be "loathsome"! :( If they are then at least you'll have an opinion, or whatever the thought is. It stinks.

    I just wish my HD recorder could skip ads automatically, but apparently that's not allowed, or supported, here.

  64. is there invasion of privacy, here? by artifex2004 · · Score: 1

    Are Fortune's subscriber lists open to any buyer?
    How did Unisys know these people even had Fortune subscriptions?

    Sure, it starts small. But I don't like where it might be going...