Slashdot Mirror


Hell.com Domain Name Up For Sale

Carl Bialik from WSJ writes "Internet domain name Hell.com is going up for sale, with bids of over $1 million expected, the Wall Street Journal reports. From the article: 'Sex.com sold for about $12 million earlier this year and Diamond.com changed hands for $7.5 million. The big-money domain-name sales echo an earlier boom, when Business.com fetched $7.5 million in 1999. Today's live auction of 300 names, by Seevast Corp.'s Moniker unit, includes more than a handful it predicts will generate bids of more than $1 million, including Iran.com, Auction.com and Elections.com. Now someone who buys Hell.com "has the opportunity to redefine what hell means, at least on the Internet," says Monte Cahn, Moniker chief executive.'"

188 comments

  1. i remember when.... by zxnos · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...hell.com used to be the weirdest site. strange stuff there and fun to search around. now it is a bit dull. ....what is going to happen to all of those who purchased lifetime @hell.com emails?

    --
    always mosh clockwise
    1. Re:i remember when.... by Marc2k · · Score: 5, Funny

      Purchasing a lifetime @hell.com address seems like a poor life choice to me..

      --
      --- What
    2. Re:i remember when.... by bucktug · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Outside of the browser full screen stuff that I haven't seen in forever. Very cool stuff. Hell.com circra 1999 has some of the best shockwave stuff and the navigation made zero sence to me... But the three or four hours I spent on it were the most confusing of my life.

      --
      I had a flame... but she had a fire.
    3. Re:i remember when.... by jeschust · · Score: 4, Funny

      A lifetime at hell? Psh, I could score that for free.

    4. Re:i remember when.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    5. Re:i remember when.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is the one I remember There weren't many sites like that 10 years ago and I spent 2-3 hours in the belief it was all some puzzle to be cracked. Much more creative than the tacky commercial marketing bullshit that followed (matrix etc).

    6. Re:i remember when.... by rainman_bc · · Score: 2, Funny

      Purchasing a lifetime @hell.com address seems like a poor life choice to me..

      Considering that where all the slutty women go - might not be THAT bad of a life choice ;)

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    7. Re:i remember when.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The dude(s) who had that weird site with the cool html tricks sold hell.com (for a lot) and moved to nosuch.org, though right now I get some blog with a white background so I guess they quit. The new owner of hell.com used a style like the original to sell emails. No idea how succesfull iot was.

    8. Re:i remember when.... by 8ball629 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yeah, just get married ;).

    9. Re:i remember when.... by British · · Score: 1

      IIRC hell.com had that introduction that came off to me as the snottiest website I have ever visited. It mentioned about being invited to some exclusive content from the website, or links ot other websites.

      Does anyone remember what I'm talking about? You had to click through it sentence by sentence while it berates you for bothering to visit it.

      Yeah, gimme the domain name to a website with THAT reputation. {david spade voice} Ooh look we hopped on a cool domain name! {/david spade voice}

    10. Re:i remember when.... by jahudabudy · · Score: 5, Funny

      Hell - where the pints all have holes in the bottom, and the women don't!

      --
      ...sometimes, in order to hurt someone very badly, you have to tell that person terrible lies. - PA
    11. Re:i remember when.... by shaneh0 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That's not free!

    12. Re:i remember when.... by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      Heheh. I was going to suggest that this should be an online dating site. It would give new meaning to the following:

      • Dating is Hell
      • Date from Hell
      • Girlfriend from Hell
      • Marriage made in Hell
      • Mother-in-law from Hell
      • Telling your date "Go back to Hell"

      Just a thought.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    13. Re:i remember when.... by fastgood · · Score: 1
      a lifetime @hell.com address seems like a poor life choice

      And the big boss there would be rush@limbaugh.com whose in-progress auction
      nearly doubled (a whopping $1500) since kicking Michael J. Fox earlier this week.

      Ends in 3 days, for those who haven't decided on the scariest person they can be for Halloween.

    14. Re:i remember when.... by Kingrames · · Score: 1

      Unless you regularly nail your women in the foot I don't see this as a problem.

      But then I'm sober.

      --
      If you can read this, I forgot to post anonymously.
    15. Re:i remember when.... by Reverend+Raven · · Score: 1

      This is what is concerning me. As someone who's had their primary email address through hell.com for years, this concerns me greatly. Especially since they were still selling lifetime accounts until earlier this month.

      --

      --Reverend Raven
      Desperate days demand dire deeds.
    16. Re:i remember when.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      Just a thought.
      Let it go.
    17. Re:i remember when.... by mapkinase · · Score: 1

      Eventually, they will all die and will be taken into account for freevolous attitude towards their own afterlife.

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    18. Re:i remember when.... by Yvanhoe · · Score: 1

      And I remember the humorous website at jesus.com. The guy stated in his FAQ that he would never sell this domain name, unless you propose him 10 million dollars. This was told as a joke but now he changed his address. I am curious...

      --
      The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
    19. Re:i remember when.... by nickheart · · Score: 1

      I continually compare the lifetime channel to Hell.

    20. Re:i remember when.... by buswolley · · Score: 1

      Another Idea: A computer Science School should buy hell.com

      --

      A Good Troll is better than a Bad Human.

    21. Re:i remember when.... by anode_blue · · Score: 1

      All I can say is good riddance.

      Hell.com was just the first in a whole slew of sites where the "cool" net art kids gathered for basically no other purpose than to act out their fondest collective high school fantasy of being the arbiters of cool and uncool in their little domain.

      "Now who doesn't get invited to the party?"

    22. Re:i remember when.... by BunnyClaws · · Score: 1
      IIRC hell.com had that introduction that came off to me as the snottiest website I have ever visited. It mentioned about being invited to some exclusive content from the website, or links ot other websites. Does anyone remember what I'm talking about? You had to click through it sentence by sentence while it berates you for bothering to visit it. Yeah, gimme the domain name to a website with THAT reputation. {david spade voice} Ooh look we hopped on a cool domain name! {/david spade voice}
      I remember what you are talking about. I only went there once back in 1997. I got the same feeling you did and never went back.
      --
      "Anything tastes good if you deep fry it."
    23. Re:i remember when.... by billeger · · Score: 1

      Never before thought about it like this but if somebody gets tired of hell.com they can dicker with me for http://hawaii-island.com/ and get a good chunk of online paradise. What am I bid?

      --
      Those who trade freedom for security will soon have neither.
  2. My bet is by antifoidulus · · Score: 0, Redundant

    it will just end up as a redirect to myspace.com

  3. Perfect timing... by shadwwulf · · Score: 0, Troll

    ...for the Windows Vista launch.

    MTW

  4. Diamond.com could have easily gone for more by Tweekster · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They should have put up a page about the horrors of diamonds and how they are obtained.

    DeBeers would have quickly wrote a MUCH larger check.

    --
    The phrase "more better" is acceptable English. suck it grammar Nazis
    1. Re:Diamond.com could have easily gone for more by Moby+Cock · · Score: 4, Funny

      They should have put up a page about the horrors of diamonds and how they are obtained

      That store in the mall isn't so bad. Why so angry?

    2. Re:Diamond.com could have easily gone for more by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 5, Funny

      So...the people that buy hell.com should buy diamond.com and point it to themselves.

      Then DeBeers would have hell to pay!

      *drum fill*

      Thanks, I'm here all week!

    3. Re:Diamond.com could have easily gone for more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everybody knows... nobody cares.

    4. Re:Diamond.com could have easily gone for more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps.

      But that strategy could have easily backfired. DeBeers has a history of acting without regard for morality or human decency, and they also have no presence in the US and many of the first-world countries where they could face retribution for their actions. So would you want to take the chance that they would rather right a large check to you instead of spending a lot less money by simply hiring some goons to torture you until you revealed the information they'd need to transfer the domain before finally killing you?

      I wouldn't.

    5. Re:Diamond.com could have easily gone for more by pNutz · · Score: 1

      Where's that big goddamn hook?

      --
      Death and danger are my various breads and various butters.
    6. Re:Diamond.com could have easily gone for more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would, they are not as tough as everyone pretends they are.
      They only control the weak. They wouldnt know what to do if someone stood up to them, because that doesnt happen very often

    7. Re:Diamond.com could have easily gone for more by freeweed · · Score: 1

      DeBeers would have quickly wrote a MUCH larger check.

      Or just had the site owners killed.

      --
      Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
  5. so what's thier ip address? by plopez · · Score: 1, Funny

    666.666.666.666 ?

    (and yes I know it's not possible under base 16. but we are talking about the supernatural aren't we?)

    --
    putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    1. Re:so what's thier ip address? by Odin_Tiger · · Score: 1

      10.100.110.10, perhaps...

      --
      Unpleasantries.
    2. Re:so what's thier ip address? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      666.666.666.666 ?

      (and yes I know it's not possible under base 16. but we are talking about the supernatural aren't we?)


      And in that case you probably also know that it's not base 16.

    3. Re:so what's thier ip address? by bigattichouse · · Score: 5, Funny

      Silly.. hell is a class C with 255 layers:

      6.6.6.0 is the gateway to hell.

      --
      meh
    4. Re:so what's thier ip address? by Ford+Prefect · · Score: 4, Interesting

      216.216.216.216 would be a more sensible hellish IP address - 6*6*6 and all that.

      More appropriately, it actually appears to exist - it's owned by a 'New Edge Networks' based in Vancouver, WA, USA. The machine of the beast has an ISP!

      --
      Tedious Bloggy Stuff - hooray?
    5. Re:so what's thier ip address? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IP addresses usually use base 10, not 16.
      What makes 666 impossible is because ipv4 addresses are four bytes, so the max decimal value for each of them is 255. /AC because I'm just being the random annoying nitpicking geek

    6. Re:so what's thier ip address? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      666.666.666.666 ?

      (and yes I know it's not possible under base 16. but we are talking about the supernatural aren't we?)


      Well actually with that IP address I thought you were talking about SuperNETtroll!!!

      Fortunately I'm not here all week..... I'll get my coat ;-)

    7. Re:so what's thier ip address? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      It appears the US Army is one step ahead of you:

      # whois -h whois.arin.net 6.6.6.0

      OrgName: DoD Network Information Center
      OrgID: DNIC
      Address: 3990 E. Broad Street
      City: Columbus
      StateProv: OH
      PostalCode: 43218
      Country: US

      NetRange: 6.0.0.0 - 6.255.255.255
      CIDR: 6.0.0.0/8
      NetName: YUMA-NET
      NetHandle: NET-6-0-0-0-1
      Parent:
      NetType: Direct Allocation
      NameServer: NS01.ARMY.MIL
      NameServer: NS02.ARMY.MIL
      NameServer: NS03.ARMY.MIL
      Comment: Army Information Systems Center
      Comment: U.S. Army Yuma Proving Ground
      Comment: Building 2105
      Comment: Yuma, AZ 85365-9110 US
      RegDate:
      Updated: 2002-10-07

      OrgTechHandle: MIL-HSTMST-ARIN
      OrgTechName: Network DoD
      OrgTechPhone: +1-800-365-3642
      OrgTechEmail: HOSTMASTER@nic.mil

      # ARIN WHOIS database, last updated 2006-10-26 19:10
      # Enter ? for additional hints on searching ARIN's WHOIS database.

    8. Re:so what's thier ip address? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hell is a class C with 255 layers

      I misread that as "255 lawyers". Surely there are more than 255 lawyers in hell.

    9. Re:so what's thier ip address? by Iron+Condor · · Score: 1
      6.6.6.0 is the gateway to hell.

      Given that the 6.x.x.x class-A address space is reserved for the Army Information Systems Center, you may be closer than you think...

      --
      We're all born with nothing.
      If you die in debt, you're ahead.
    10. Re:so what's thier ip address? by MrNougat · · Score: 1

      And 6.6.6.255 is the loudspeaker on the pole in the middle of hell.

      --
      Web 2.0 == Giant Blogspam Circle Jerk
    11. Re:so what's thier ip address? by mpaulsen · · Score: 1

      Spammers used to obfuscate IPs by making use of the fact that Windows will accept out of range values in a dotted quad and just discard the extra bits.
      1010011010 bin = 29A hex = 666 dec
          10011010 bin = 9A hex = 154 dec

      C:\WINDOWS>ping 666.666.666.666

      Pinging 666.666.666.666 [154.154.154.154] with 32 bytes of data:

      Nothing interesting to report:

      >whois -h whois.arin.net 154.154.154.154 ...
      No match found for 154.154.154.154

      route-views.oregon-ix.net>sh ip bgp 154.154.154.154
      BGP routing table entry for 0.0.0.0/, version 13497381
      Paths: (1 available, best #1, table Default-IP-Routing-Table)
          Not advertised to any peer
          286
              134.222.85.45 from 134.222.85.45 (134.222.85.45)
                  Origin IGP, localpref 100, valid, external, best
                  Community: 286:286 286:3031 286:3809
      route-views.oregon-ix.net>

    12. Re:so what's thier ip address? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The phone number of the bar I frequent is 312-666-6666

      Illinois Bar in Chicago.

    13. Re:so what's thier ip address? by kdemetter · · Score: 1

      no that's the network adress of hell .

      the broadcast would be 6.6.6.255 :-)

    14. Re:so what's thier ip address? by denebola · · Score: 1

      6.6.6.0 is the gateway to hell.

      don't you mean 6.6.6.1?

      .0 is the network

      :)

    15. Re:so what's thier ip address? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure it works, just use 36.36.36.36 =)

      For more info checkout: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/666_(number)

      Least it works with satanic nerd =)

  6. Ob SP... by GillBates0 · · Score: 1

    Welcome to Hell on Earth 2006.

    --
    An Indian-American Hindu committed to non-violent thought/speech/action alarmed by the global explosion of radical Islam
    1. Re:Ob SP... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I can't go to hell at work.. Now what kind of an irony is that?

    2. Re:Ob SP... by jZnat · · Score: 1

      I knew Hell would butcher HTML standards!

      --
      'Yes, firefox is indeed greater than women. Can women block pops up for you? No. Can Firefox show you naked women? Yes.'
    3. Re:Ob SP... by nschubach · · Score: 1
      I knew Hell would butcher HTML standards!
      ...but it's compatible with IE!
      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    4. Re:Ob SP... by RobertLTux · · Score: 1

      its called recursion
      You can't go to a place you already are!!

      --
      Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
    5. Re:Ob SP... by rtb61 · · Score: 1
      Of course the real hell will be when the continuing abuse of the so called international domains forces the balkanisation and mirroring of those domains independantly within each country.

      Could you imagine the fun of those who paid millions for the name, only to have to rebid for it in each country that maintains it's own .com .net etc. domains, mirroring or redirecting calls as they deem appropriate ;-).

      There is nothing stopping the large ISP's from doing the same thing and redirecting all generic domain name calls to the highest bidder.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
  7. Redefinition? by tbone1 · · Score: 1
    Now someone who buys Hell.com "has the opportunity to redefine what hell means, at least on the Internet," says Monte Cahn, Moniker chief executive.

    So, we can just think of the new owvers as AOL twelve years later ...

    --

    The Independent: Reverend Spooner Arrested in Friar Tuck Incident - ISIHAC, Historical Headlines
    1. Re:Redefinition? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, we can just think of the new owvers as AOL twelve years later ..

      Queue the A.O.Hell jokes...

  8. my prediction.. by tont0r · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Some political party will buy it and put their opponents all over it.

    1. Re:my prediction.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I predict that if liberals do it, it will be applauded by Slashdotters and all their leftie friends at Digg. If conservatives do it, it will be trashed as "gutter politics" by Slashdotters and all their leftie friends at Digg. It is the nature of liberalism to be totally hypocritical in every way possible. That's why they went berserk over Foley while applauding Studds, who actually did have sex with a minor. Welcome to the Neo-Democratic part.

  9. Business opportunity! by Jeian · · Score: 1

    Anyone want to chip in and buy this? Just think of all the money we could make selling hell.com subdomains!

    1. Re:Business opportunity! by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 1

      Yeah. Count me in for a dollar.

  10. I guess someone will buy it by Garabito · · Score: 1

    just to have the e-mail address satan@hell.com

    (this is creepy, 'Sympathy for the devil' by the Rolling Stones happens to be playing on my winamp right now)

    1. Re:I guess someone will buy it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was one of my favorite anonymous ftp logins :)

    2. Re:I guess someone will buy it by Doctor+Faustus · · Score: 1

      just to have the e-mail address satan@hell.com
      A guy I know online used to use Satan@Hell.org, and had to change it because a bunch of spammers were using it as their supposed from address. I expect much the same would happen with Hell.com.

    3. Re:I guess someone will buy it by smk · · Score: 1

      Nope, he didn't. These addresses were never used. You lied or he did.
      But it doesn't matter anyway, since hell.com closed the webmail system one year ago and expired the last addresses (except for the patronage ones) in early oktober.
      You could sign up at http://hell.com/PAY/X.html, but this is also "dead" now.

      --
      * Smile. People will wonder what you think. *
    4. Re:I guess someone will buy it by Doctor+Faustus · · Score: 1

      What addresses were never used? You did catch that I said .Org and not .Com, right?

    5. Re:I guess someone will buy it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats dotorg, wiseass.

    6. Re:I guess someone will buy it by Iron+Condor · · Score: 1

      just to have the e-mail address satan@hell.com

      ... but everybody knows that the real hell is a .mil domain...

      --
      We're all born with nothing.
      If you die in debt, you're ahead.
  11. redefine hell on the internet? by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1
    how someone who buys Hell.com "has the opportunity to redefine what hell means, at least on the Internet..."
    I think that goatse and tubgirl have locked up the definition of hell on the internet.

    Then again, from what I've heard, myspace is becoming a strong competitor.
    --
    "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    1. Re:redefine hell on the internet? by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 1

      At least goatse and tubgirl are less hellish after you've already seen them once or twice. Myspace, on the other hand, has millions of users without a single remedial HTML class between them, and more join up every day to push the boundaries of sparkly "Thanks for the Add" gifs, bright-pink-on-bright-yellow stylesheets, and embedded Fall out Boy songs just that much further.

    2. Re:redefine hell on the internet? by Bassman59 · · Score: 1
      and embedded Fall out Boy songs just that much further.
      That's the definition of hell right there.
  12. yeah well, its allready defined. by scenestar · · Score: 1

    The internet is filled with Murder, Sex and violence and Myspace to begin with.

      Kinda hard to redefine isn't

    --
    perpetually dwelling in the -1 pits
  13. Of course... by Stanistani · · Score: 4, Funny

    Hell as defined on the Internet:
    An all-Flash site.

    1. Re:Of course... by dptalia · · Score: 1

      I hate to confess it, but I actually visit an all flash site daily! And yes it sucks. But I have a polar heart rate monitor that uploads to the web, and the only way to access the data is through their all flash site.

      --
      Genius is one percent inspiration and 99 percent perspiration, which is why engineers sometimes smell really bad.
    2. Re:Of course... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No it's not.

    3. Re:Of course... by micromoog · · Score: 2, Funny
      I hate to confess it, but I actually visit an all flash site daily! And yes it sucks. But I have a polar heart rate monitor that uploads to the web, and the only way to access the data is through their all flash site.

      You support an all-flash site merely for some heart-monitor something or other? Do Web standards mean nothing to you?!

    4. Re:Of course... by focitrixilous+P · · Score: 1

      yeah, I modded you down in the process you modding you funny. My bad. First time that's happened to me. yes, this is OT.

      --
      SAILING MISHAP
    5. Re:Of course... by Roddd · · Score: 1

      I thought it was called MySpace...

    6. Re:Of course... by dptalia · · Score: 1

      Like every consumer the world over - I'm willing to drop all my hard earned principles if it benefits me!

      --
      Genius is one percent inspiration and 99 percent perspiration, which is why engineers sometimes smell really bad.
  14. Hell on Earth 2006 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Will we be able to buy a ferrari cake on this site?

    1. Re:Hell on Earth 2006 by StarvingSE · · Score: 1

      great south park reference... i wish I had mod points

      --
      I got nothin'
    2. Re:Hell on Earth 2006 by neildiamond · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'd settle for an Accord cake.

  15. Any takers? by 192939495969798999 · · Score: 1

    We could all chip in and buy it, just to have it redirect to microsoft.com, but they'd probably just sell even more software from the publicity.

    --
    stuff |
    1. Re:Any takers? by Mr.+Hankey · · Score: 1

      I'd rather give it to Matt Groening, all he ever really wanted to do was draw rabbits.

      --
      GPL: Free as in will
  16. Anyone want to buy my domain name? by spun · · Score: 1

    It's aitcheedoublehockeysticks.com. Starting bid is.... one BILLION dollars! Mwahahaha ah *cough* *cough* *wheeze*, gotta lay off them smokes...

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
  17. Betting on the winner by DemonWeeping · · Score: 2, Funny

    Ten bucks says it's Golden Palace. They'll do anything for publicity.

    1. Re:Betting on the winner by Speare · · Score: 1

      Funny you put a wager on the concept that Golden Palace Casinos would ante up for the domain publicity. Speaking of which, are we going to see less Golden Palace marketing crud now that the USA is reigning in all online gambling activities?

      --
      [ .sig file not found ]
    2. Re:Betting on the winner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ten bucks says it's Golden Palace. They'll do anything for publicity.

      What is Golden Palace?

  18. obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All your hells are belong to us!

    1. Re:obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Korea, only old people go to hell.com

  19. Top Level Domain Names Don't Matter by twifosp · · Score: 3, Interesting
    In the age of search engines like google, what good do top level domain names really do? If you want to know about hell, you don't type in hell.com you go to google and type in hell. If you want to buy diamonds, you don't go to diamond.com, you search for local dealers, prices,and quality buying guides.


    Why pay 1 million dollars for hell.com when you could spend a fraction of that researching proper google indexing or hiring someone to do it for you.


    Sure there is a share of goth kids who sit around and rue their surroundings who get on the internet and type hell.com and killme.com and ihatemybrother.com but whatever... who cares about emo?

    1. Re:Top Level Domain Names Don't Matter by Lord_Slepnir · · Score: 1

      Anyone that owns stock in Hot Topic

    2. Re:Top Level Domain Names Don't Matter by Barondude · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Owning the domain name that matches your search keyword ranks you higher in search engines. That is why domain names still matter

      --
      "That's the sort of blinkered, philistine pig ignorance I've come to expect from you non-creative garbage."-Monty Python
    3. Re:Top Level Domain Names Don't Matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It does matter and good domain names are hard to find (squatting scum). In the UK there's an insurance company called "elephant.com". Every time I hear the name on TV I cringe, no way I'd ever buy insurance of a company that can't even manage to think up a decent name. Amazon.com might have been daft but at least it rolls of the tongue. Then we get to http://hompages.someisp.com/~unrelatedmammalinsura nce/ and you're not telling me that presents a professional image.

    4. Re:Top Level Domain Names Don't Matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's easy to remember, brandable, and a lot harder to fuck up when typing it or telling someone about it, as opposed to something like h-e-l-l-666.com

    5. Re:Top Level Domain Names Don't Matter by patrixmyth · · Score: 1

      That's true, since many browsers automatically post on the .com if you skip putting the tld, you can just tell them to go to hell!

      --
      "Don't you know you're going to shock the monkey?"- Peter Gabriel
    6. Re:Top Level Domain Names Don't Matter by robdavy · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you're marketing offline, you do (and always will) need a good domain name.

      People do still market websites offine you know..

    7. Re:Top Level Domain Names Don't Matter by Spinalcold · · Score: 1

      Hey! I don't appreciate being lumped into the same sub-culture as Emo. I'm goth, I am too desensitized to be entertained by hell.com.

      Now emobeatdown.com is another story.

    8. Re:Top Level Domain Names Don't Matter by loconet · · Score: 1

      Not to mention it is a lot "cooler" to have your website name on advertising (tv, radio, posters, etc) as hell.com instead of someplace.com/below/earth/~hell. Additionally, an organization (if that is what they'll use it for), will automatically have its website's domain associated in the minds of people as orgname.com.

      --
      [alk]
    9. Re:Top Level Domain Names Don't Matter by fithmo · · Score: 1

      Well, right, but when you search on Google for "diamonds" or "hell", the first results are diamonds.com and hell.com respectively.

      So it does matter.

    10. Re:Top Level Domain Names Don't Matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Top level domains definitely matter. Think about, pulling something out of thin air, http://www.halloween.com/. How many people will be typing in Halloween.com this season. Tons. Type in traffic matters quite a lot. Obviously search engine traffic matters too, but type in traffic is still a huge draw. :-)

  20. To the winner by Azathfeld · · Score: 5, Funny

    Good luck with the domain squatting suit against Lucifer himself.

    I mean, who do you think has all the lawyers?

    1. Re:To the winner by denttford · · Score: 1

      Register the domain while in New Hampshire - I hear the Devil doesn't go there anymore.

      Part of a legal settlement or something.

      --

      Leben Sie jetzt die Fragen.
    2. Re:To the winner by ivan+kk · · Score: 1
      I mean, who do you think has all the lawyers?
      Al pacino of course.
  21. What was hell.com? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What the hell was hell.com it says a private parallel web? i've tried looking for a definition but couldn't find one.

  22. Richard Dawkin's has the money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... and that's where he'll probably end up anyway, so why not get an early start?

  23. hell.com? Bah... hell.NET is better. by mfarah · · Score: 1

    Either if you see it as hell.net or as hell.NET, it's just so much spookier than hell dot com.

    --
    "Trust me - I know what I'm doing."
    - Sledge Hammer
    1. Re:hell.com? Bah... hell.NET is better. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but the spookiest is hell.gov

  24. means.... by Himring · · Score: 2, Insightful

    has the opportunity to redefine what hell means, at least on the Internet

    women?

    --
    "All great things are simple & expressed in a single word: freedom, justice, honor, duty, mercy, hope." --Churchill
    1. Re:means.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      has the opportunity to redefine what hell means, at least on the Internet

      women?


      Dude, the man said redefine
  25. I, for one,... by alexandreracine · · Score: 1

    ...welcome our new Hell overlords!

    --
    No sig for now.
  26. Poor life choice? by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 4, Funny

    At least they only bought the lifetime version. The eternity subscription is a bitch.

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
  27. The true horrors of diamond making.. by Channard · · Score: 3, Funny
    Because the truth is that diamonds are produced by the most horrible of means. Rows and rows of superheroes who have been forgotten by the public are chained up in squalid conditions and forced to eat coal, which is pooped out as diamonds and then sold on the open market. Some of them occasionally escape, but even those who do can never look at an open-hearth fire again. Didn't you ever wonder what happened to Power Girl until her recent DC revival?

    As for Hell.com, there's at least one little town that could make use of the domain.

    1. Re:The true horrors of diamond making.. by shaneh0 · · Score: 1

      There's a Hell, Michigan as well

    2. Re:The true horrors of diamond making.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Not to be a grammar Nazi, but you said:

      There's a Hell, Michigan as well

      You can really drop the "as well", and what's more you should replace the comma with a colon.
    3. Re:The true horrors of diamond making.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is Hell, Cayman Islands, too

    4. Re:The true horrors of diamond making.. by Channard · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yeah, but at least the ones in Michigan and Norway have a chance of freezing over.

    5. Re:The true horrors of diamond making.. by shaneh0 · · Score: 1

      What?

      You mean: There's a Hell: Michigan as well

      you're wrong.

      and for your "as well" crit, you're wrong there as well.

    6. Re:The true horrors of diamond making.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      whoooosh!!!

    7. Re:The true horrors of diamond making.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    8. Re:The true horrors of diamond making.. by 0bject · · Score: 1

      It was supposed to be funny. If you make his corrections the sentance would read: There's a Hell: Michigan.

    9. Re:The true horrors of diamond making.. by NRAdude · · Score: 0
      It was supposed to be funny. If you make his corrections the sentance would read: There's a Hell: Michigan.


      Wait. There's still some dust on this sentance. It should be corrected to read as:

      • It was supposed to be funny. If you make his corrections the sentance would read; There's a Hell: Michigan.


      Remember the rule, children: A semicolon always precedes a colon. You can't have two colons, unless you're some sort of mutant/irradiated Slashdot Troll that somehow grew-up in that harsh environment consuming mouthfulls of vile slime called "News for Nerds."
      --
      without prejudice
    10. Re:The true horrors of diamond making.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  28. Cease and Desist by Speare · · Score: 2, Funny

    As the owner of the world-famous leading branded HELLO.COM site, which is a world leader in friendly touchy-feely family photograph sharing, I must inform you that we find your site, "HELL.COM" is illegally infringing on our established trademark. Your site bears a confusingly-similar mark which could tarnish our reputation and dilute our market standing in the public mindshare.

    You are hereby ordered to relinquish your domain registration and terminate all marketing which bears the infringing HELL.COM mark, or any other mark which closely or confusingly encroaches on our intellectual property.

    As a token of good faith, we will reimburse you $15/year to cover your registration fee, and give you a coupon redeemable for FIVE JOYBUX at our HELLO.COM social site.

    --
    [ .sig file not found ]
    1. Re:Cease and Desist by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      As the owner of the world-famous leading branded JELLO.COM site, which is a world leader in gelatinous desserts, I must inform you that we find your site, "HELLO.COM" is illegally infringing on our established trademark. Your site bears a confusingly-similar mark which could tarnish our reputation and dilute our market standing in the public mindshare.

      You are hereby ordered to relinquish your domain registration and terminate all marketing which bears the infringing HELLO.COM mark, or any other mark which closely or confusingly encroaches on our intellectual property.

      As a token of good faith, we will reimburse you $15/year to cover your registration fee, and give you a coupon redeemable for five dollars on JELLO products.

    2. Re:Cease and Desist by Joebert · · Score: 1

      As a member of The Shell Group, we'd like to ask you a question.
      Do you like being able to drive your SUV ?
      We know you'll do the right thing.

      --
      Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
  29. Of course... by CoolCat23 · · Score: 0

    Of course, I would expect this site to advertise "Optimized for Internet Explorer"...

  30. Who wants that? by istartedi · · Score: 1

    Imagine what kind of cooling system you would need. You think a Slashdotting melts servers? Just wait. Then again, I never thought I'd see a useful 4-letter domain name again, so maybe it's actually cold there now. OK. didn't have time to read all the replies. Hope I'm not being redundant.

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  31. won't fetch that much by Electric+Eye · · Score: 1

    Seriously. hell.com isn't NEARLY as valuable as a business.com or sex.com. What's the real appeal? My guess is it'll fetch maybe $75k

    1. Re:won't fetch that much by oahazmatt · · Score: 1

      It's because it's a neat, short, common word for a TLD. Those are hard to come by.

      And at this rate, I think in 2076 people will be bidding on wouldyoulikeasandwich.org.

      --
      Those who believe the Internet is private,
      find their privates are on the Internet.
    2. Re:won't fetch that much by Joebert · · Score: 1

      After I added the sex.com curve to the equation, I projected
      mygreatgreatgreatgrandmothergotbuttfuckedbyelvis.w ithoutarubber
      by 2069

      --
      Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
  32. best domain ever! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    boobies.com ;)

  33. If I bought hell.com... by Bryansix · · Score: 2, Funny

    I would put up a website mocking AOL.

    1. Re:If I bought hell.com... by StarfishOne · · Score: 1

      But then you're running the risk that all hell will break loose! ;)

  34. never been to by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

    business.com, sales.com, hell.com, ...etc

    These are novelties. In the age of google domain names are pointless.

    Tom

    --
    Someday, I'll have a real sig.
  35. Gee, I wonder... by Gadzinka · · Score: 1

    Gee, I wonder, how much I could get for my domain... Maybe all those legions with their lives destroyed by write-only Perl code could bid some high $$ for it...

    Robert

    --
    Bastard Operator From 193.219.28.162
  36. The asking price is... by sethstorm · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...one's soul?

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
    1. Re:The asking price is... by Guncrazy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      One's soul? Sure, it sounds like a high price to pay. But the moment you become willing to sell it, it loses all its value.

    2. Re:The asking price is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope. The devil needs cold hard cash to cover what he paid for Dick Cheney's soul. Those Halliburton contracts weren't cheap you know.

  37. Seems like a waste of money to me. by Peregr1n · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I have to say, I have no idea who owns Business.com, Diamond.com and Sex.com or what they do with them (although with the latter example I have a fairly good idea). But if I was looking for diamonds, diamond.com wouldn't be my first port of call - I'd be more likely to search, or go to a known brand name retailer online.

    So unless somebody wants to brand their own business hell.com and spend mega-bucks promoting it, it all seems a bit pointless. After all, eBay does fine without being called auction.com; Google does fine without being called search.com. In fact, it could be argued, they do BETTER - decent, unique brand names stick in consumer's minds far better than relying on a recycled word.

    I'm sure hell.com will sell for a fair bit - but it will only be effective as a one-off marketing ploy (hey! Look! So-and-so casino has bought hell.com), no long term value in it.

    1. Re:Seems like a waste of money to me. by Khomar · · Score: 1
      I'm sure hell.com will sell for a fair bit - but it will only be effective as a one-off marketing ploy (hey! Look! So-and-so casino has bought hell.com), no long term value in it.

      Although I doubt they could afford it, Hell, Michigan might just be interested in this one. :-)

      --

      I believe in de-evolution. God made the world perfect, man fell, and its been going downhill ever since!

    2. Re:Seems like a waste of money to me. by evilviper · · Score: 1
      But if I was looking for diamonds, diamond.com wouldn't be my first port of call - I'd be more likely to search, or go to a known brand name retailer online.

      When you search for "diamonds" on Google, what do you think is going to be one of the first results? More importantly, if you see the first couple are http://www.geocities.com/diamonds , and the third is http://www.diamonds.com/ , which result do you think you'd follow?

      In fact, it could be argued, they do BETTER - decent, unique brand names stick in consumer's minds far better than relying on a recycled word.

      That only works if you're going to spend significant ammounts of money BUILDING brand recognition to begin with... Most don't.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  38. Worth anything? by robdavy · · Score: 1

    Is it really worth anything (or much)?

    All the other domain names that have sold for millions have generally had some sort of business/commerce potential.

    Diamonds.com - sell diamonds
    Business.com - loads of things you can do with this
    Auction.com - obvious...

    Elections.com and Iran.com - can't really see much potential to make money from those (certainly not millions anyway).

    1. Re:Worth anything? by robogun · · Score: 1

      The Tribune Company tried this in the late 1990s. Auctions.com, apartments.com, cars.com etc

      After a huge expenditure apartments and cars.com do OK but the rest were a huge waste of money. I think in the current business environment asking someone for seven figures on top of launch expenses is inviable.

    2. Re:Worth anything? by Iron+Condor · · Score: 1

      Is it really worth anything (or much)?

      Within the framework of a capitalist system, "value" is measured by putting a product onto a market and letting the various forces have a go at it. However many bucks you can make in the end is the "value" of the entity in question.

      Would you be willing to buy "hell.com" if you knew for sure that something like it can be sold for a million dollars? Would you consider it valuable?

      --
      We're all born with nothing.
      If you die in debt, you're ahead.
  39. Redefinition by illegalcortex · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hell is other domains.

  40. The Price....... by stunt_penguin · · Score: 1

    Funny , seeing the headline I thought the price might be YOUR IMMORTAL SOUL, cheques addressed to Beelzebub, but having read the article, $1m seems quite reasonable :)

    --
    When the posters fear their moderators, there is tyranny; when the moderators fears the posters, there is liberty.
    1. Re:The Price....... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But a rubber check is priceless. ;)

  41. Orgy of evil by lordvalrole · · Score: 1

    Whoever buys hell.com should put a bunch of pictures of Bush, Cheney, Rove, Rice, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, Foley and Congress all having a sex orgy on the senate floor with banners saying mission accomplished!

    1. Re:Orgy of evil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you mean "eMission" ... on more than one level. ;)

    2. Re:Orgy of evil by Joebert · · Score: 1

      I think the day the world discovered thoose photos exist, would be the day hell.coms server froze.

      --
      Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
  42. Behind The Times by somethinghollow · · Score: 1

    WSJ is behind the times. The Register scooped them by over 1/2 a decade. Anyway, I guess my point is that Hell.com has been for sale for a long time and no one is biting. The domains WSJ cites obviously have earning power. Hell.com is a black sheep. It has no obvious lucrative ties, unlike sex.com or business.com. Granted, Hell.com might make a nice porn domain, I can't think of much else it could do. I'd hate to see Hell.com turn into some crappy site after all the time I spent looking at the various "art-sites" they coordinated with (notably "having a hand in" the marriage of the Entropy8 chick and the guy who did Zuper to form Entropy8Zuper). Hell.com was a major reason I got into web design. So, I hope whoever buys it, if anyone, doesn't fuck it up.

    There used to be no-such.com (or something like that) that had ties to Hell.com. I think the same guy owned them. I don't know what happened to that site, either.

  43. Not if... by deesine · · Score: 1
    Fred Phelps can raise enough $$$ to buy it.

    You know, the litigious Christian cult leader who owns godhatesfags.com, smellthebrimstone.com, etc.

    --
    damaged by dogma
    1. Re:Not if... by not-real-sure · · Score: 1

      I have to say that smellthebrimstone.net sounds alot better. no real comment here just thinking aloud.

      --
      My Doom. The gift that keeps on giving
  44. Sheesh by The+Real+Nem · · Score: 1

    View the source, it's Java, not flash....

  45. Can't Afford It by ehaggis · · Score: 4, Funny

    I may have to settle for heck.com.

    --
    One ring to bind them - should probably have more fiber and less rings in their diet.
  46. Shocked! Alarmed! I will write an angry letter! by BeeBeard · · Score: 5, Funny

    I innocently went to the sex.com web site mentioned in the article and I was SHOCKED at what I found. I am almost embarrassed to tell you this, but I will because I know that you too will share my outrage: There were...scantily clad women prominently featured EVERYWHERE on the web site! Every time I clicked a link, more images of barely clothed females, cavorting around could be seen on my computer screen!

    You read correctly. Apparently, the Inter Net is being appropriated by these rascals and is being used to transmit filthy images of unclothed women!

    After making this alarming discovery, I spent the next 4 1/2 hours double-checking my findings by clicking the "Black", "Fetish", "Anal", and "Black Anal Fetish" links on the left portion of the computer screen. I found it necessary to do this repeatedly and vigorously until I finally grew tired, and I anticipate needing to continue on with the double-checking tomorrow.

    I estimate that this double-checking process could take upwards of the next 7 months, after which I intend to write an angry letter to the Web Masters of Slash.dot.com and the Wall Street Journal. However, most of my angry missives will be directed to the people behind this horrible, deviant web site, and I will demand that they direct me to other, similar web sites so that I may carry on my investigation.

    Yours in Christ,

    Beebeard

  47. Private Parallel Domains by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Back in the day I remember perusing the various art sites affiliated with hell.com and I always found them intriguing and actually quite cutting edge design / webtech wise... yes one can joke as to whats going to happen with hell.com now, but honestly I wish that more sites would focus on private parallel domains of odd strange art sites that are glimpses into odd strange realities. I always found the fact it was usually by invite only to see these things quite cool... just because its a cool thing on the web doesn't mean everyone gets a chance to see it. That and originally it wasn't based around money like everything else seems to be online these days.

  48. Already? by quizzicus · · Score: 1

    What? MySpace is up for sale again?

  49. Sounds Like the New Vista Site to me! by Prototerm · · Score: 1

    Either that, or the main site for Windows Genuine Disadvantage.

    --
    "My country, right or wrong; if right, to be kept right; and if wrong, to be set right." --Senator Carl Schurz (1872)
  50. Ideas for the site by Atryn · · Score: 1

    Sounds like a great domain to forward to whitehouse.gov. I mean "hell" because of who lives there and ".com" because its clearly a commercial enterprise today...

    --
    Come play Moral Decay!
  51. Hell.com is ... by miletus · · Score: 1

    ... otherpeople.com

  52. More WSJ shilling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey look! Another article in the WSJ about Technology!

    So how much does WSJ pay for this incessant shilling of Wall Street Journal articles submitted by the same submitter?

    That's 13 articles in the last two months.

  53. Iran.com? Really? by PunkXRock · · Score: 1

    Maybe I can see hell.com having some value (a million bucks is absurd, but whatever). But Iran.com? What possible use could that have?

    Of course, when the country's bombed out of existence, I guess the domain will be all that's left. Sigh...

    1. Re:Iran.com? Really? by GeneralTao · · Score: 1

      You got it all wrong. It's IRan.com. It's a site for people to brag about having finished the Boston marathon.

      --
      --- Tao
    2. Re:Iran.com? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Either that or a Flock of Seagulls fan site.

  54. so this means by llbbl · · Score: 0

    That we could buy the domain name and redirect to myspace.com because I think we all agree that is "what hell means, at least on the Internet".

  55. What's that smell? by Espinas217 · · Score: 1
    --
    La vida no es una pastafrola. :wq
  56. Hell.com is nice but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... what about hell.no ?

  57. Obligatory comment on IE... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shouldn't that be a MUST for such a domain?

  58. I thought Hell was for... by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1
    I'm confused, I thought Pat Benatar said that Hell is for Children?

    [Sigh, I am so old...]

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  59. Quick answer by RetepMc · · Score: 1

    Jack Thompson?

    --
    PtPete
  60. one MEEEELION dollars! by Jamie+Zawinski · · Score: 1

    Someone asked me if jwz.org was for sale the other day, and I said "sure!" but they seemed to think that ten million was too high. They didn't even make a counter-offer, though; I probably would have gone as low as a million. What, don't people haggle any more?

    1. Re:one MEEEELION dollars! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One million dollars is too low, obviously. They just felt pity. Like, you know, that look on the venture capitalist's face when you say you only need a few hundred thousand.

  61. No branding by robertjw · · Score: 1

    What is the point of buying one of these high dollar domain names? Sure, sex.com is probably lucrative, but diamond.com? If I want to buy a diamond I'm going to go to a jewlery story website (or walmart) not diamond.com. There's no branding associated with it. It's not any better than any other name unless someone promotes it. Any jewler that wants to sell jewelry would be better off to spend the millions on a marketing campaign and get their domain associated with high quality gems.

  62. I don't want it... by ChadL · · Score: 1

    Spam would be out of control on that domain... Any mail server would most likely just melt as soon as it was powered on for that domain.

    Every time a site wants my e-mail, and I don't want them to have it... I use goto@hell.com or a similar address.
    Further reducing the value is the fact that I have never been to that web site, nor had any desire to.

    1. Re:I don't want it... by neminem · · Score: 1

      I tend to use nobody@nothing.com - I have a feeling that one would get even more spam than this one. You do, however, have a point.

      And yeah. I can't imagine anything at hell.com other than a joke - and who would pay several million dollars for a joke?

  63. Gates Will Buy It by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

    Microsoft knows what Internet Hell really is - and they intend to sell it to you.

    --
    Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  64. My problem by QuantumFTL · · Score: 1

    I really wanted to buy the domain, but didn't know how the hell I'd afford it :(

  65. I have one. by myndzi · · Score: 1

    Hell.com sold their e-mail list to spammers. My only registered address with them, besides the @hell one, was a forwarding address of the form hell.com@ADomainIOwn.com -- and a couple years ago I started receiving all sorts of nasty spam to it (mostly questionably legal forms of porn). I contacted them and suggested maybe they had been compromised, but was greeted with denials and the response that they "don't even keep the e-mail list on a server". After this, I never had any dealings with them again. It's too bad they are likely to make out so much on this deal, what a bunch of crap that is.

  66. No, HE11.com is cheaper by cheekyboy · · Score: 1

    That will be $11 dollars sir.

    try perhaps http://www.corpse.org/issue_10/gallery/krej/index. htm

    --
    Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
  67. Hell is Pizza! by ultracool · · Score: 1

    http://www.hell.co.nz/ is a chain of Pizza places in New Zealand :-) And yes, it's all in Flash...

  68. useless. by Treates2 · · Score: 0

    thats like trying to sell 666.com, or jesus.com or some stupid shit. get a life.

  69. Missing Link by The+Cisco+Kid · · Score: 1

    It would be nice if they'd have made a nice link to Moniker's website, instead of making me google for it.

    Oh, blatant plug - microwave.com could be yours, at the right time, for the right money.

  70. Firefox/Iceweasel? by RealGrouchy · · Score: 1

    Maybe Firefox should relocate to Hell.com

    They wouldn't be able to accommodate Iceweasel, though. That would cause it to freeze over. /ducks

    - RG>

    --
    Hey pal, this isn't a pleasantforest, so don't waste my time with pleasantries!
  71. Hell won't sell by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

    At least not for the minimum of $2.3 million.

    --

    Lars T.

    To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

  72. Pizza! by Rupert · · Score: 1

    hell.co.nz

    I don't know if they have international expansion plans.

    --

    --
    E_NOSIG