Democrats Take House, Senate Undecided
Every news publication on earth is saying mostly the same thing. The Democrats have taken the house picking up a sizable number of seats. But the Senate remains a tossup with a few undecided seats holding the balance. Concerns of voter fraud have been heard from around the nation as well.
That would be a great disturbance in the Farce.
Kindness is the language which the deaf can hear and the blind can see. - Mark Twain
Successful votes: 46%
Unsuccessful votes: 2%
George Bush: 52%
You fell right into Karl Rove's Dieboldian scheme of Haliburtonist warforoilism! You fools!
This
Rove let the Democrats win so fixing the 08' elections will be more plausible...
I still think Diebold arranged this one...
Hello United States of America!
Maybe You should consider inviting the UN for supervising the next election like any other Banana Republic out there?
Oh sorry - You couldn't take a joke ;-)
were in ur house, beetin ur repz!
that no Nancy Pelosi sex tape emerges for oh so many reasons.....
Monstar L
we'd be better off relying on strange women lying in ponds distributing swords as a basis for a system of government.
Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.
US border agents noted a surge in US citizens returning from extended stays in Canada...
We're all hypocrites. We all have hidden parts, it's the contrast between them that make us more a hypocrite than others
When I see a strange woman lying in a pond, with or without a sword, I tend to lose interest in governmental matters.
I don't trust atoms -- they make up stuff.
Come January, if Nancy Pelosi becomes speaker of the house, she will be two heartbeats away from the presidency. Should both Bush and Cheney die suddenly, she would be next in line to become president.
A macacaphonic chorus.
Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
How many times do I have to say this?
Ahem...
strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is NO basis for a system of government.
You cannot just call yourself Senator just because some watery tart tossed a sword at you.
I mean, if I went round, calling myself Congressman, just because some moistened bink lobbed a scimitar at me, they'd put me away.
OSGGFG - Open Source Gamers Guide to Free Games
No, but if you're looking for a hot tip, I just got one from a guy I don't know named "Antonio Quintela."
He tells me that:
The symbol is IFLT.PK and the price is at $0.01 right now, but he seems pretty optimistic about a 10,000% increase.
We'll see what happens...
They'll go along with a minimum wage increase, but the president will add a signing statement:
"Within the context of this statute, the term 'Dollar' shall defined to be equal to 68 cents."
Well, the Democrats got a favorable outcome, so I guess that means they don't think there was any voting fraud this time.
"Karl Rove somehow also controls how quickly the justices age or how healthy they are"
Where's my tinfoil hat?!?!?
Opinion:=TMyOpinion.Create(Me);
More likely the President tells the Congrssional leadership what he wants and they write the desired laws. Imagine how much editing would be required if Bush wrote the legislation himself!
Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
How many times do I have to say this?
Ahem...
strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is NO basis for a system of government.
You cannot just call yourself Senator just because some watery tart tossed a sword at you.
I mean, if I went round, calling myself Congressman, just because some moistened bink lobbed a scimitar at me, they'd put me away.
Be quiet!
How many times do I have to say this? Ahem... strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is NO basis for a system of government. You cannot just call yourself Senator just because some watery tart tossed a sword at you. I mean, if I went round, calling myself Congressman, just because some moistened bink lobbed a scimitar at me, they'd put me away.
You all saw it he's trying to repress me.
OSGGFG - Open Source Gamers Guide to Free Games
At least it would be pretty ... imagine how many different crayons he would use :)
burrocrisy
/. spelling error been more apropos.
Ahh.. and that would be what? Ruling by jackasses?
Methinks never has a
Maybe they'll just proclaim that the last six years never happened, and institute a Congressional Do-Over.
Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
I for one welcome our new Democratic overlords
----------------------------------- My Other Sig Is Hilarious -----------------------------------
Or as Fox News has put it, "Al Queda invades Washington, cattle raped, women stampeded!"
If he's the Walrus then can I be a penguin please?
Didn't you get that memo? The one they passed around 15 years ago?
There's still a 30-year moratorium on Monty Python sketch recital. It's been observed to cause virginity.
No, no, no, dig up stupid.
The days of the digital watch are numbered.
I think a key issue to watch is going to be Rumsfeld. It's clear his strategies
Rummy's got strategies? Oh yeah, put a stop to sectarian violence going back nearly 1500 years with a few years of grossly undermanned occupation.
Heckuva job, Rummy!
God, the bush admin crew is retarded (apologies to the mentally challenged). At least by voting in democrats, we can show the world the rest of the USA isn't filled with a bunch of pin-headed shrub-lovers. Now we've got democratic retards, instead of bush retards.
"We are all geniuses when we dream"
- E.M. Cioran
Don't let "I'm not an American" stop you! With all those Diebolds around, I'm sure you can figure out a way to vote as many times as you like. You won't get a sticker, though.
Don't blame me, I voted for Kotos!
This is not the greatest
Dag gunnit, why didn't we think of it before?
A Good Troll is better than a Bad Human.
Wow, way to convince me. Your arguments are well reasoned and informative, plus really easy to understand. You must have been on a debate team in high school.
Seriously, why do you have a problem with this? Isn't it the role of the judicial branch to act as a check on the legislative? Are you actually advocating the current system, where the wealthy decide which laws get reviewed?