Slashdot Mirror


Linux Users Banned From World of Warcraft?

Turmoyl writes "Many Cedega (formerly WINEX) users claim to have been mistakenly caught up in a security sweep of the U.S. game servers performed by Blizzard's World of Warcraft Game Master (GM) staff. Affected users received the same strongly-worded 'Notice of Account Closure' email messages that true bot users did, in which they were accused of the 'Use of Third Party Automation Software.' While diagnosis of this event continues early speculation points to Blizzard's use of the Warden anti-cheating spyware application that is bundled with World of Warcraft, and the odd things that may have been produced by it when it was run via Cedega. Emails to World of Warcraft's Account Administration staff continue to go unanswered while the list of affected people continues to grow."

87 of 515 comments (clear)

  1. My Guesses & Opinions by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Well, I've talked with someone who does a lot of this sort of stuff and he explained to me that long ago when Blizzard first debuted WoW, it was an instant success. And there were many people that had developed scripts (duping, afk farming, etc) for games like Diablo that wanted to to do the same thing for WoW.

    The art of doing this successfully lies in knowing what addresses of memory that your client application is using to store data. You change these memory addresses & your client's state is altered. But there's some things you can't change because they're located on the server. Realistically, the client has to do some of the computation and storing itself (and with WoW being some huge multi-gigabyte client, there's a lot to investigate). Obvious, you want to reduce network traffic and give your servers a break so you design this to have minimal communication.

    The problem then becomes that users will write applications to modify the data & memory that their client applications are using. What results is signals sent back to the server which aren't true and give that user an advantage. Solution? Enter Warden to check these memory spaces and files for any potentially unauthorized changes (checksums, whatever method they want to use or seeing which threads are accessing that memory). And how do you protect Warden from it itself being hacked? You design it kind of like a root kit--that is the user shouldn't be able to alter or disable Warden & they lose the domain over that tiny bit of functionality of their hard drive.

    My guess is that before, they were checking if there were any known scripting or programs that were unauthorized and changing this data. And they were banning those and only those accounts. I fear that it now does a verification on the memory space, files & system registry to ensure that it is not being molested by another application or tweaked at all. I am guessing that they have changed the ban notice to ban whenever this verification stage fails and that Cedegra does not emulate Windows to the point of their verification satisfaction or to the point of Warden being able to query all other running applications. Worse yet, I fear they may look to integrate this with the WGA with Windows & some other means with Macs--though that is pure speculation on my part.

    The irony of it all? The fact that a talented programmer with burp or some other styled network tool and use linux on a routing box to intercept packets and change them to give him position hacks. Unfortunately, if you use this too much, I believe that random server side verification checks will eventually catch up with you but I can't say I've ever implemented this or been caught using it.

    Which brings me to one last point I'd like to make on this topic. I think that this cat n' mouse game of Blizzard versus the cheaters is good for AI. The last possible domain we have is people writing applications that extract data from video memory and use computer vision algorithms to write if-then-case bots. Yes, bots are bad but this is driving people to a corner where they essentially strive to pass the Turing Test ... after all, you don't want a GM messaging your bot as he sits idle doing his repetitive task, do you?

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:My Guesses & Opinions by keytoe · · Score: 4, Informative

      Your analysis falls down when you consider that there have been no reports of any Mac users being targeted by this. There is no Warden process or anything resembling a rootkit on my system when I start up the client. Just one process: World of Warcraft. I suppose they could just be excepting any client that reports as being run on a Mac, but if that were the case, all of the people working to hack the system would just switch to running on a Mac. I suspect there is a bit more to the method that they're using and have heard rumors of them using things like 'multiple logins to the same account from different IPs' and other indicators. Perhaps the linux emulators are doing something that trips one of these other detection mechanisms.

      I believe that for the most part Blizzard is handling the cheating by making the client as dumb as possible and not trusting it for anything other than 'requests'. The design philosophy is centered around the client 'asking' to do something and the server saying 'yes' or 'no'. There isn't a way for the client to say 'Put this character at position x,y', there is only a way for a client to request to move along a vector. The server then reports the current position back to the client. That doesn't mean that hacks haven't ever happened - but those have been cases of the server not strictly following this model and are subsequently patched.

      Of course, this doesn't stop anybody from writing their own client that allows them to automate the request process given they were good enough to spoof being a 'real' client to the server.

    2. Re:My Guesses & Opinions by crisco · · Score: 3, Interesting

      There is a wonderful set of slides from the BlackHat 2006 that outline the escalating war between the bot writers and Blizzard's Warden, culminating in the proposal to write a rootkit to hide the bot's activities from Warden: http://www.rootkit.com/newsread.php?newsid=543 If Blizzard is now looking for rootkit like behavior, or looking for specific signs of an existing rootkit, Cedega / Linux may very well raise all sort of red flags.

      --

      Bleh!

    3. Re:My Guesses & Opinions by jrockway · · Score: 3, Insightful

      > And how do you protect Warden from it itself being hacked? You design it kind of like a root kit--that is the user shouldn't be able to alter or disable Warden & they lose the domain over that tiny bit of functionality of their hard drive.

      That's trivial to get around. Run it under VMWare or qemu. Now the control of the user's machine is back in the hands of the user. When will people understand that you can't control software that's not entirely in your own hands?

      Anyway, the solution to this problem of being banned is trivial. Chargeback. As soon as they start losing money and their credit card processor starts asking questions, they'll start addressing their customer's complaints. If chargebacks don't work, take Blizzard to small claims court. Even if you lose, they'll still waste time and money sending their lawyers to defend themselves. Eventually they'll get the idea.

      Summary: You own your computer, not Blizzard. Money talks, letters don't.

      --
      My other car is first.
    4. Re:My Guesses & Opinions by Zondar · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You chargeback. Blizzard says it's a monthly service fee, and that you logged in during that month.

      You take them to small claims court. You win a default judgement.

      What do you do now? You will never... ever... collect the judgement.

    5. Re:My Guesses & Opinions by keytoe · · Score: 2, Informative

      We're talking about different classes of cheaters here. The casual cheater is for sure going to be using pre-written Windows based stuff and would never consider switching platforms. However, there is another segment of cheaters - the professional farmers. These people make a lot of money and would not hesitate to switch platforms if it meant it would further their aims.

      While I'm sure Blizzard wants ALL cheaters stopped, they primarily focus on the farmers with these retaliations as they are the ones that have the largest impact on gameplay for the rest of their users. Historically, they accompany these mass banning announcements with commentary proclaiming some number of farmers were caught in the net.

    6. Re:My Guesses & Opinions by sineltor · · Score: 2, Informative
      There isn't a way for the client to say 'Put this character at position x,y', there is only a way for a client to request to move along a vector. The server then reports the current position back to the client.


      Actually, your parent poster is right. There are some things which the client has direct control over. Movement is one of them - game hacks do allow you to access otherwise inaccessible content. There was a case a few weeks ago of an entire guild being banned because they used a client-side hack to fall through the floor of a dungeon and skip a large amount of content to just fight the boss at the end.
      --
      'No publisher will ever pay you enough to successfully sue them' - Dave Sim
    7. Re:My Guesses & Opinions by loraksus · · Score: 2, Funny

      You have to hire some guy to follow them videotaping the cops heading in so you can enjoy it ;)

      --
      1q2w3e4r5t6y7u8i9o0pqawsedrftgthyjukilo;p'azsxdcfv gbhnjmk,l.;/
  2. Poor Users by laffer1 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I do hope Blizzard will fix these users accounts. I don't currently play WoW on OSS platforms, but I plan on doing so in the future. It would be even better if they would make a Linux version of the game. Then again, I'd probably get caught "cheating" since I'd run it on BSD.

    I've seen this happen with PunkBuster checks in some games when you try to run then in another OS as well.

    1. Re:Poor Users by toadlife · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I used to get kicked by punkbuster while playing the linux version of America's Army on FreeBSD. This wasn't caused by me running it on FreeBSD, but by certain overzealous server admins throwing in mountains of custom checks that only worked with the Windows version of the game.

      --
      I don't always use unix-like operating systems; but when I do, I prefer FreeBSD.
    2. Re:Poor Users by ajs · · Score: 5, Interesting
      I play WoW under wine (wine itself, not one of the commercial spin-offs) on Linux. I've never been banned. I've never gotten a note calling me a "bot".

      There is a long history of folks blaming wine for bannings in WoW, and I would wait to see exactly what happened here, before assuming that Blizzard has gone off the deep-end and started attacking those users who have clearly gone to great lengths to be able to run the game.

      PS: If you want to run WoW under Wine, here's what I did on my Fedora Core 5 system using an NVidia card with the binary NVidia drivers:
      • Started with this HOWTO for gentoo
      • Installed the stock FC5 (extras?) wine.
      • Built the patched version in my homedir as described in the HOWTO, but did not install it.
      • Installed Mozilla and the ActiveX extensions as described in the HOWTO.
      • Installed WoW from CD under wine as described.
      • Copied patch files from a Windows system, just to save download time.
      • Ran WoW, and allowed it to patch.
      • Tweaked sound settings as described.

      It now works fine. The only problems that I have are:
      • Sound pops from time to time when CPU is under load, especially if some other app competes for CPU against WoW. The suggested fixes on the HOWTO page failed to address this.
      • Some graphics glitches, mostly involving flashes in water that extends to the edge of the clip plane. This is mentioned in the HOWTO, I think, but there's no known fix for it that I'm aware of. Not a biggie for me.
      • Some key-combinations are not relinquished by the window manager even in non-windowed mode, and thus any WM-specific keys or mouse actions are not sent to the game. This is fixable, but I don't bother. I just avoid those keys, and I re-mapped the ones that I needed in the game.

      On the other hand the benifits are huge:
      • It's faster under Linux than it was under Windows, but not by much.
      • Switching from WoW to a desktop app is amazingly fast and painless. Major difference from Windows.
      • Applications that contend for memory and/or CPU while I'm playing don't appear to harm application performance nearly as much as under Windows, which given that this is both my game system and work-from-home-at-night system, is a major win.

      Overall, I love WoW under Linux. It's a joy compared to some made-for-linux games I've tried to run, and wine really seems to have come along.
    3. Re:Poor Users by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 2, Informative

      I wrote a patch that mostly fix the sound popping issues, find it here. Let me know if it works for you.

    4. Re:Poor Users by king-manic · · Score: 2, Funny
      (on running WoW under Wine)

              Switching from WoW to a desktop app is amazingly fast and painless. Major difference from Windows.

      That does not surprise me at all. From what I understand, Windows both gives high priority to the current interactive process, and you don't get more interactive than a full-screen game, and it aggressively swaps out unused processes. So switching from your game session to your desktop means Windows has to hit the swap immediately.

      The Linux kernel's VM subsystem seems te be slightly more sane. Although I guess you have adequate physical RAM, because in low-RAM situations you might see some hiccups when switching too. I know my HP Omnibook laptop gets hit sometimes by slowdowns when switching desktops, but it's only 512M anyway, and it has a slow harddisk
      Mart


      on my core 2 duo 2 gig machine swapping to windows costs almost nothing time wise.
      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
  3. Of course letters to Blizzard go unanswered ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Blizzard is about as customer-friendly as Sony.

    These guys really deserve being knocked down a notch or two. Unfortunately, with WoW being as popular as it is, there's not much chance of that happening for a few years yet.

    1. Re:Of course letters to Blizzard go unanswered ... by MeanderingMind · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Nintendo ignores any mail complaining that someone couldn't get Halo or God of War working on their Gamecube. The same applies here.

      Blizzard does not support Linux. It was great that some enterprising people got WoW working, but that doesn't mean you can complain when Blizzard does something that unintentionally breaks it.

      My experience has been that Blizzard is extremely customer friendly. I've had a number of issues resolved cocerning game glitches, account errors and more in a timely and respectful manner. Many people complain that "blue" doesn't respond enough in the forums. Given the huge amount of traffic there, and the additional traffic and focus any blue response gives a thread, it would be both impossible (time constraints) and unfair (any thread with a blue response implodes, leaving other worthy threads unread) to increase their interaction.

      When Blizzard releases an expansion for WoW which does nothing but raise the level cap by X and doesn't even feature new content but the promise of new content claiming "You'll buy it because it's WoW", when they discontinue the in game ticket system and shut down the forums, when they "have built a line of equity and we intend on spending it", then they will be about as customer-friendly as Sony. As it stands, I don't think you can claim that Blizzard's service is anywhere near as hellish as what SW:G and EQ players have had to deal with.

      --
      Thunderclone: ONE MAN ENTERS! TWO MEN LEAVE! ONE MAN ENTERS! TWO MEN LEAVE!
    2. Re:Of course letters to Blizzard go unanswered ... by Volante3192 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Blizzard does not support Linux. It was great that some enterprising people got WoW working, but that doesn't mean you can complain when Blizzard does something that unintentionally breaks it.

      They don't support it, fine. That's their prerogative. But there's a difference between breaking and banning. This is denial of a paid service when the customer was likely adhering to their end of the contract.

    3. Re:Of course letters to Blizzard go unanswered ... by bigpat · · Score: 2, Insightful


      Blizzard does not support Linux. It was great that some enterprising people got WoW working, but that doesn't mean you can complain when Blizzard does something that unintentionally breaks it.


      Sure you can complain. Just means they don't legally have to do anything about it. But it is bad customer service not to listen to your customers whether they have to listen or not.

    4. Re:Of course letters to Blizzard go unanswered ... by technos · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Blizzard has been pretty decent to me.

      For a little while, Cedega and the WoW graphics options dialog weren't playing nice with each other. Every time you saved graphics options, WoW would crash, and your changes weren't saved.

      So I figure what the hell, I'll drop Blizzard support an email and ask them for a list of keys for Config.WTF. A couple days go by with no response. I figured I scared them by saying up front that I used Cedega to play WoW.

      Nope. Get a nice response four days later, 'Greetings! We don't have a documented list, you're not supposed to touch those. But here's my cheat sheet. Have fun!'

      --
      .sig: Now legally binding!
    5. Re:Of course letters to Blizzard go unanswered ... by sillybilly · · Score: 2, Informative

      Soon the "Internet" won't support linux. I already keep getting complaints from my bank that my browser is not up to date, which it isnt - mozilla-1.8b1, I don't like Firefox, not feature rich enough, and Seamonkey is a downgrade in features/stability, plus it's not even supported, unlike Firefox. Yahoo video complains that I need flash 9 or 8 to play its videos, and if you go to the macromedia/adobe site, the latest version for linux was guess what? version 7. Then they recently decided to release version 9 beta for linux, but this whole flash ordeal leaves me with a sour taste in my mouth because what's to stop them from pulling this same trick again, on flash version 19? Linux programmers can't keep up with the hidden/nonopen/patented/0wned/p4wned specs of Flash, they can't implement it, plus it's getting overly complicated to keep up with it anyway - what's to keep a company from jerking a spec all over the place and everybody try to keep up? - which means they just need the market share first, like jpeg, gif and mp3 did it, then come and sue everybody over the submarine patents/intellectual property. Yeah, the mp3 and jpeg fees are small, but what's to stop them from armwrestling you into a ludicrous "nonsmall" fee? Flash is a way of hijacking the web, this relatively free and open resource we call the Internet, everybody is vying to 0wn it and make everybody into pay-per-click-p4wns. Whoever can accomplish that, 0wning the internet by hijacking the underlying technology, will be able to blackmail anyone into anything. The Internet is a pretty tasty unowned territory that if you can stick a pole down and claim it under homesteading rules, it's all yours and everybody else is a tenant. I for one don't welcome our proprietary flashpushing overlords, and I'd like to point out that I try to live my life without flash, including nullflashplugin up until youtube came around, and even now I try to resist youtube temptations as much as I can, because youtube could just do fine with some more open mpeg1 type inline media format, or something better, like png replacing jpg that even the holy grail of all nonfree ip stuff, MS decided to use while the gif patents were still active, and they are still using png even today. I find it interesting that there wasn't an attempt to supplant png with something even more embrace-extend-msized image format that'd be pushed all over the web, like wmv is pushed against other media formats. Ms still only got the bitmap as their standard "own" microsoft bmp format, I just can't wait til the days of extended microsoft png, microsoft jpeg, and microsoft mp3 formats show up, of course not compatible with the standard specs because of extended functionality/feature upgrades. Why don't they do that? I mean when the beast does nasty behavior, and you expect it, you cry foul, but you're not suprised or scared, because you know what's going on and happenings fit well into your predictions and worldview, into how you understand things are, but when it acts unpredictably and uncharacteristically, you get very very scared that you can't keep up with what's going on, the pieces of the puzzle don't fit together in your head, and you don't understand thing and lose predicting power. Aha, it's all a mindgame! Throwing support behind linux? Oh my, now I'm really confused.. what the heck is going on?

    6. Re:Of course letters to Blizzard go unanswered ... by Godai · · Score: 2, Informative

      Seems I was wrong, at least on one point. The ToS & ToU do not prohibit the use of Caldega/WINE. That said, Blizzard has posted saying Warden doesn't flag users using Caldega for suspension. Supposedly they're following up on it now. Sounds like there's more to this than what's on the face of it.

      Read the Community Manager response here:

      http://forums.worldofwarcraft.com/thread.html?topi cId=47009071&pageNo=3&sid=1#40

      --
      Wood Shavings!
      - Godai
  4. Should be interesting by Reapman · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I run WoW in Linux, I only have one box for Windows and I don't want to be sitting at my windows laptop when I have a nice dual head display setup on my workstation with a better video card. If they ban me then so be it, there's money back per month for me. Usually the Blizzard guys are pretty good, so a bit disappointed if this is the path they are wanting to go.

  5. Re:Purely An Art Issue by Apocalypse111 · · Score: 3, Funny

    No, but you can get bearded GNOME freaks...

    --
    There is no mod option "-1: Disagree" for a reason. "Overrated" is not an acceptable substitute. Post something instead.
  6. If Blizzard Doen't Ban These Users.... by 8127972 · · Score: 4, Funny

    ..... Then the terrorists win.

    --
    This is my opinion. To make sure you don't steal it, it's covered by the DMCA.
  7. No Wai !! by EGSonikku · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You people have NOTHING to whine about. nada. zero. zip.

    You are using it on a non-supported platform. Deal with it.
    Blizzard has no responsibility to take how Cedega does things
    into account. You can whine all you want about it not being fair,
    or how you have some 'right' to play it on your Linux enabled
    toaster, but you don't.

    Blizzard makes the game for Windows. If you get it to work in
    Linux, power to you. But if it stops working, tough luck, it
    was never intended to work anyway. You may as well complain to
    Nintendo about the quality of Snes9x.

    --
    - "Scientia non habet inimicum nisp ignorantem"
    1. Re:No Wai !! by pslam · · Score: 2

      You obviously have no idea what you're talking about and should not have commented.
      They may be running WoW on an unsupported platform, but they are NOT cheating, they are NOT doing anything against the terms and conditions and they now have their accounts (and their huge playing hours) terminated.
      But you can ignore all that and snipe at the people affected if you want. You can make up all sorts of crap if you ignore what's actually happening.

    2. Re:No Wai !! by 91degrees · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No. People have every right to complain. Blizzard are behaving reprehensibly. They're banning a load of users and accusing them of cheating for no reason other than their decision not to use Windows.

      Their customers want to use Linux. If they are not going to take account of thios then they will be publicly criticised. The affected users have ewvery right to complain.

    3. Re:No Wai !! by Zondar · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If (DevCost[Linux]+[Linux]+ ... [Linux]) + (SupportCost[Linux]) >> NewIncome[Linux]
      Then (LinuxDev) != Live.Project

      If it costs you more to build and support than the new revenue it creates, it's not worth it.

    4. Re:No Wai !! by HermMunster · · Score: 5, Informative

      Blizzard has worked with the people at Cedega to make the product work properly. One known issue they helped the linux community with was when the mini map used to cause the screen to freak out. The Cedega team worked with the Blizzard developers to come up with the solution to the problem.

      Don't say that it isn't supported. No, officially it is not, but it is unofficially.

      As for him being modded as a troll--it would seem he is a troll. He is speaking out his arse without any knowledge nor history on the subject.

      --
      You can lead a man with reason but you can't make him think.
    5. Re:No Wai !! by Ephemeriis · · Score: 5, Insightful
      You people have NOTHING to whine about. nada. zero. zip.

      You are using it on a non-supported platform. Deal with it.
      Blizzard has no responsibility to take how Cedega does things
      into account. You can whine all you want about it not being fair,
      or how you have some 'right' to play it on your Linux enabled
      toaster, but you don't.

      Blizzard makes the game for Windows. If you get it to work in
      Linux, power to you. But if it stops working, tough luck, it
      was never intended to work anyway. You may as well complain to
      Nintendo about the quality of Snes9x.

      You're missing the point.

      This isn't a problem with support. It isn't a matter of whether WoW.exe will run or not - it does run under WINE/Cedega. The issue is that Blizzard is closing game accounts. You can still run the program, you just can't log in to your account. Doesn't matter if you reformat and reload your machine with Windows or MacOS to appease Blizzard, you can still run the program, you still can't log in to your account. Worse, the account is being closed because of cheating. That's what it'll say in your account details - hacking/cheating. Not "didn't pay his bill", but "caught running cheat/hack program". Much harder (impossible?) to get such an account re-activated.

      My bank doesn't support Firefox on Linux for viewing my balance on-line. They have a list of supported browsers and operating systems and Firefox/Linux just isn't on it. Because of that I will not be surprised if I cannot view my balance on their website...I will not be surprised if the page renders incorrectly or isn't functional - it isn't a supported platform. That's fine. I'll go view my balance on an IE6/Windows machine instead. But I most certainly will complain if they close my bank account because I tried to view my balance with Firefox/Linux.
      --
      "Work is the curse of the drinking classes." -Oscar Wilde
    6. Re:No Wai !! by HermMunster · · Score: 2, Informative

      Regarding comments on my post and the individual to whom I replied with my posts.

      The guy I commented on was highly uninformed and he made an negative comments about WoW gamers on Linux. In my opinion he's out of touch and he fails to exercise enough self-discipline regarding matters when he has no facts.

      I completely disagree that most people that comment on /. are uninformed posters. I read /. every day. Instead of him attacking WoW users on Linux some have attacked most people that post on /. His comments regarding WoW users on Linux are certainly less egregious than accusing most /. posters as being incompetent and uninformed.

      Let's lay it out:

      1) WoW was written on the Macintosh and ported to Windows (from all I have heard)--indicating that Blizzard recognized that there were other platforms that would be running this game (e.g., on OSX and potentially Linux).

      2) There was a Linux client available before the game went live--indicating that they had initially wanted to release it on Linux.

      3) Blizzard worked with Transgaming to correct bugs in the product when it was made clear that the way certain aspects of the game were written caused problems. Blizzard and Transgaming worked together to resolve the issues and those issues were resolved. From my understanding the cooperation between the two companies still exists.

      4) There's a switch to WoW that allows it to be run in a mode other than DirectX and the Macintosh doesn't support DirectX. Thus opengl is the alternative they provided. Even though PCs support Opengl this switch most likely was intended for other environments other than PCs running Windows.

      5) World of Warcraft has run under Linux since Beta and was in use by Linux users for the approximately 2+ years that World of Warcraft has been live, hence most users had a valid expectation that their continued use of the program under Linux would not result in them being banned.

      6) Cedega is a known entity and it is prominently known as a commercial program used to allow users to run DirectX games (and other Windows games) on Linux. Transgaming has been in business for years.

      The poster appears to have made no investigation into these facts, nor did he allude to having any hint of prior knowledge about these factors. These facts were not included in his post where he essentially dumped on every WoW user running it under Linux. Also, he did not have any direct information from Blizzard as to why their accounts were canceled or whether Blizzard planned to reinstate them.

      He blatantly acted as a Troll and hence he was modded as a troll. This clearly is in direct opposition most other posts on slashdot. Even so, he never came on and retracted nor did he admit going overboard with his conclusions.

      --
      You can lead a man with reason but you can't make him think.
  8. The Only Winning Move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    >doing his repetitive task

    I choose not to play games that hinge on this so much. Aside from the monthly fees, something like Oblivion's fast travel (or even console commands when the gates got boring) is the sign of a better game to me, instead of one which rewards behavior that can be currently emulated by a computer. It's not a job, it's a game!

    1. Re:The Only Winning Move by Mike+Micelli · · Score: 2, Informative

      You don't get experience in WoW for killing too far below your level. A mob's name is color coded.

      Red means the mob is a much higher level than you and you will probably die trying to kill it.

      Amber means that the mob is higher level than you, and you will have quite a fight on your hands that will probably end in your demise.

      Yellow means the mob is within a few levels of you.

      Green means the mob is lower level than you, and you will get reduced xp for killing it.

      Gray means the mob is way below you and you will reciev NO xp for killing it.

      The only reason for grinding gray mobs is for cloth, or other crafting supplies.

    2. Re:The Only Winning Move by TheRaven64 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      This article discusses how to design a game where a human has an intrinsic advantage over a computer player. (Forgot to press preview last time).

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    3. Re:The Only Winning Move by Typhon100 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Incorrect. First, the built-in scripting language for WoW cannot be used to bot, since it doesn't provide APIs to move, or even to make actions without some sort of user input. The closest you can come is to write a massive if tree so that you only have to push one button. But you still need to be there to click it.

      Also, Blizzard doesn't ban people for using the built-in scripting language, unless of course they find some exploit that lets them do crazy things.

      What they are banning for 3rd party apps.

    4. Re:The Only Winning Move by lewp · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Right now you could conceivably, with a piece of outside hardware/software to generate keyboard press events (WoW ties spell casting, movement, and most other combat-useful actions to keyboard events), do most or all of a bot's scripting in Lua. This is, however, not how current WoW bots work (I'm familiar with the code underlying a couple of them, and know the details of more). Moreover, this capability will be removed forever when WoW's 2.0 patch (in a few weeks) greatly restricts the ability for scripts to decide who to cast what spells on.

      --
      Game... blouses.
    5. Re:The Only Winning Move by Typhon100 · · Score: 5, Informative
      As I posted below, the LUA interface doesn't provide move commands. Here's what some of the most popular "mods" are:
      • Look/feel changes: These simply change the appearance of the GUI. Sometimes they add more information, like overlaying a % over the enemies health bar, or highlighting party members who are taking damage.
      • Bars: Many of the early addons were to add more buttons, until Blizzard implemented this themselves.
      • Raid: lots of addons help with raiding, like showing the health of everyone in the raid, showing the main tank's target, etc. Also, debuff cleansing with one button press (scans the raid and casts an appropriate cure spell), though this is being disabled by Blizzard in the coming expansion.
      • Additional GUI: some mods don't just modify the existing GUI they add more. A bar across the top listing money, regen rate, your (x,y) location on the map, your XP/hour, your fps and ping, the amount of ammo you have left, etc. For classes with reagent needs it can track those.

      As you can see most add-ons revolve around giving the user more information. The closest thing to botting there is the auto-curing, which is on its way out.
    6. Re:The Only Winning Move by xenocide2 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The ideas the article brings up is more a design of AI problem (and computer hardware) than a game design problem. Moving from local decision making to a coherent strategy isn't much of a win for humans. Pattern recognition, like believed to be helpful in Go, is making progress and I suspect something like Deep Blue's processor power applied there would probably make significant improvements over the best efforts made today.

      However, the place a computer is really at a disadvantage is predicting the behavior of other players. People are really good at this sort of thing, but nobody's quite sure how to even write a program that attempts this, let alone one that does so quickly. Predicting behavior requires a set of skills largely centered around common knowledge. This is what makes Counter-Strike stealth games so much fun in the absence of cheating; near the end of a round its a game of predicting your opponent's behavior and capitalizing on that while not being predictable yourself. It becomes a game of letting information (sound primarily) out intentionally to mislead your opponent and knife them in the head.

      This is slightly different than "strategy." Strategy can be something as simple as noticing that the key to winning Starcraft is the investment curve, and avoiding dents in the curve, or noticing that 1 battle of 10 vs 10 units will fare worse for you than one battle of 11 vs 10 or ten battles of 10 vs 1. (aka the concept of concentrated fire and superior numbers). Essentailly, what people are far better at than computers is the strategy of manipulating your opponent.

      Another example of a bad computer game is Pictionary. It's not so much about vocabulary as it is communicating based on common knowledge and perceptions. A pair of robots could perhaps use bar codes or other common knowledge communication schemes to circumvent the rules, but a robot and a human pair would have significant disadvantage.

      The author's heart is in the right place, but they need to keep thinking on that for a bit. I'm sure they can come up with several such games.

      --
      I Browse at +4 Flamebait

      Open Source Sysadmin

    7. Re:The Only Winning Move by Jekler · · Score: 3, Insightful

      One of the keys to avoiding cheats is that the game must be composed of mostly non-trivial, non-repetitive decisions.

      Almost every MMORPG is composed of completely trivial decisions. During a fight, at any given point in time there is a definite "right" decision to make, a definite order in which the character's abilities should be used, and a definite opponent that is optimal to attack. Buttering toast requires more difficult decisions than World of Warcraft has ever presented.

      Starsiege: Tribes never had a very successful bot created for it because the game requires the player to make decisions that a bot simply couldn't make quickly or predict accurately. In almost any scenario, there wasn't a dominant choice. You frequently had to choose among a range of equally attractive options, drawing only on past experience, intuitive knowledge of how physics works, and common sense about how people behave.

  9. WoW & Ubuntu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    There's a Wine package for Ubuntu that fixes a couple of bugs associated with WoW. The howto can be found on the excellent Ubuntu wiki at https://help.ubuntu.com/community/WorldofWarcraft and details the instructions. It's pretty much a download the package and double click it, then run 'wine WoW.exe -opengl'. This ban rumor pops up periodically but I have yet to encounter any problems.

  10. Not just the U.S. servers by Turmoyl · · Score: 3, Informative

    New information in the thread on the TransGaming forums linked in the original article shows that European Cedega users that play on European WoW servers are affected as well.

  11. Cheating is bad for their community by erroneus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If cheating were to go on unabated, the WoW community would shift away to something else. They are trying to tend to their interests and I can't blame them.

    What should have happened? Well, for one, someone from the Cedega project who also uses WoW (chances are pretty good) should get into communication with the Blizzard people in order to work out any issues. Allowing people to use Linux while playing WoW is certainly in Blizzard's interest and since Cedega is doing the bulk of the work, I can't imagine why Blizzard wouldn't at least come to the table to work it out. Cutting users off is likely the side-effect of an automated process not seeing what it expects to see and not some assault on Linux users.

    1. Re:Cheating is bad for their community by mysidia · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Have you considered the possibility that someone using Cedega was found cheating in the game? Warden could have been updated to detect something unique about some users of Cedega, maybe a characteristic others don't have.

      Or perhaps in fact warden just flags some Cedega users as "possible cheaters" and some other criteria (like extroardinarily long times of login or activity) was used to classify the player as a probable bot -- maybe there was a manual review involved, and the person reviewing the "information about the system or programs running" saw something they thought unusual.

      How is it known for a fact this was all automatic? Especially if it's not happening with all Cedega/Wine users.

    2. Re:Cheating is bad for their community by kfg · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Dealing with the issue could very well end up in a loss of money.

      Losing a customer could very well lose you more than their money.

      Sometimes you have to spend money to make money. Once upon a time IBM was the evil empire. How did they achieve Imperial status? Largely by making sure their customers were always satisfied, even if it cost them money.

      And hence nobody ever got fired for buying IBM. That was worth a lot of money.

      KFG

  12. Not at all surprised... by Svartalf · · Score: 4, Insightful

    For anyone that thinks Cedega's (or WINE, for that matter...) anything other than a good short-term solution to
    Linux gaming, all I need do is point them to this as a good example of why it's not so hot of an idea. And it's
    perfectly within Blizzard's rights to do this action- to the point of ignoring any contact with regards to this
    whole affair. Doesn't make it good for PR or customer relations, mind- but it's completely within their rights
    to do so. After all, they only support Windows on this title and don't have plans to provide support to other
    OS platforms. Again, which is their right.

    Native ports wouldn't have as many of these issues.

    As for the whole affair... It's Blizzard. They've apparently got a singular attitude about Linux users that
    started with the period around Starcraft forward. I wouldn't buy any title from them right now and for some
    while to come- you just don't treat customers or potential customers the way they seem wont to do.

    --
    I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
    1. Re:Not at all surprised... by Lacota · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Just a slight inaccuracy in your above statement. You see, they also support macs, officially. Mac's are the last thing in the patch notes and the client is on every "windows" CD. (Its also available in the Apple store). I agree with you though. Its well within their rights to select which platforms the game can be played off of.

      --
      It is not a god that would do evil biddings, but only a mortal and its limited knowledge would let such atrocities exist
    2. Re:Not at all surprised... by SilentChris · · Score: 4, Informative
      As for the whole affair... It's Blizzard. They've apparently got a singular attitude about Linux users that
      started with the period around Starcraft forward. I wouldn't buy any title from them right now and for some
      while to come- you just don't treat customers or potential customers the way they seem wont to do.


      What you just said would make sense if they weren't RUNNING WOW ON LINUX SERVERS. Their database environment has been Oracle on Linux since the game was released.

      http://www.blizzard.com/jobopp/senior-oracle-datab ase-administrator.shtml (Granted, they're looking at HP's *nix right now, but that's probably because HP gave them a deal on blade servers).

      Blizzard has nothing against Linux users. Their main beef is with cheaters, and I'm sure these accounts will be reenabled. But some Linux users (incorrectly) jump to conclusions that they're being targeted.

      Their previous beef was about bnetd allowing people to play online without buying games. They could care less if people played the game on Linux, they just wanted to make sure people went through official servers and paid to play the game. Again, some Linux users jump to conclusions that Blizzard was targeting the Linux userbase in general.

      Poor assumptions make poor arguments. Incorrect assumptions make faulty ones. If you're assuming Blizzard hates Linux or Linux users, you're incorrect. They wouldn't be using the OS themselves if that was the case.
  13. No. by keyne9 · · Score: 2, Informative

    I use linux, and I was not banned. Could we calm the knee-jerk reactions just a bit?

  14. Shouldn't there be a real Linux port by now? by NekoXP · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Once they get their heads around the next expansion why not start on a real Linux port? Linux is definitely growing in popularity. Blizzard could do well in mindshare alone by creating - even if it is just an authorized version to play through Cedega - a real Linux version, rather than having people run through a relatively unauthorized emulation system which can cause quirks with their weird anti-bot stuff.

    1. Re:Shouldn't there be a real Linux port by now? by Zondar · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Because "providing support" isn't just a matter of answering tech support calls. It goes all the way to the heart of the development cycle. If there's money involved, I'm sure Transgaming is going to require that Blizz verifies that each build of the client actually works on (insert list here) particular build(s) of Linux distributions. I mean, would you go into an agreement to support a product where the manufacturer could release a totally broken client? No way.

      So now Blizz has to do testing for each client against the list of 'official WOW Linux builds supported on WoW'.

      But now each expansion, the art in it, etc... all has to be tested against that same list. Blizzard's cost of the development cycle just went up, and it probably just got a lot slower. They already have to check playability on probably 30-50 different combinations of hardware builds and OS/driver versions each time a client is released. Think of adding Linux to that mix, kernel versions, driver versions, which distro, etc etc etc....

      It gets ugly. Fast.

  15. A bit more (still no) by keyne9 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Drysc (Blizzard poster) confirmed that "[a]n operating system would not produce a false positive[...]." So, no. This does not appear to be targetting linux/alternate OSes.

  16. Re:No Wait !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    You have NOTHING to whine about. nada. zero. zip. People modded him as a troll. Deal with it. We have no responsibility to take how you read things into account. You can whine all you want about it not being fair, or how you have some 'right' to have everyone else read, but you don't. Slashdot moderators make moderations for slashdot readers. If you get it to read it, power to you. But if it stops being read, tough luck, it was never intended to be read anyway. You may as well complain to Nintendo about the quality of Snes9x.

  17. Lets try some logic. by Kenja · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Windows users got banned. Linux users got banned. Not all Windows users got banned. Not all Linux users got banned. Could it be that the banned Linux users where doing somthing byond just using Linux?

    Naw, cant be.

    --

    "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    1. Re:Lets try some logic. by Rakarra · · Score: 4, Insightful
      My theory is that on Fri Oct 27 Blizzard made a change serverside to their warden program. At that point every user using cedega had the game crash.. over and over until Transgaming fixed the issue. I have a feeling that during those Warden-related crashes (Blizzard reps have said that game crashes like that are often a symptom of bots and software that tries to hack the game) a number of accounts were incorrectly flagged.

      Two of my coworkers were banned. Again, no pirated or hacked software, no dodgy addons. These were innocents.

      A disturbing trend during this whole thing has been the attitude from those who weren't banned that if you were accused of something.. well, obviously you must be guilty of the accusation.

  18. Re:No Wait !! by udderly · · Score: 2, Funny

    Why did this get modded "Troll"? He has a point. If I had mod points I would upmod this...

    If he wanted be modded +5 Informative, he would have written, "M$ teh suck."

  19. I used to run WoW in Cedega by Kadin2048 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I used to play WoW via Cedega, before I just decided I didn't have enough time for games entirely, and I think this is too bad. If they had stopped me from using Cedega, it would have been my subscription.

    Actually, using it via Cedega worked really well once you got it working. I can't say it was "better than Windows," because I've never run Windows on that hardware (at least, not as the bare-metal OS, only in VMs), but it was a lot better than I imagined it would be when I started messing around with it.

    I think there are quite a few people who only use Cedega because of WoW, so I expect that the Cedega people will fix stuff pretty quickly, if the Blizzard folks will even tell them what the problem is and what Cedega is doing that Warden doesn't like.

    I think it's going to get to the point where "anti-cheats" and "copy protection" are the major things tying games to the Windows platform, because they're fundamentally hard (if not impossible) to implement on a Free OS, because the user -- by design -- can basically modify whatever they want, run debuggers, memory editors, etc.

    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    1. Re:I used to run WoW in Cedega by QuantaStarFire · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I think it's going to get to the point where "anti-cheats" and "copy protection" are the major things tying games to the Windows platform

      DirectX already does a stellar job of tying games to the Windows platform, so anti-cheating and copy protection are the least of concerns with regards to Linux as a gaming platform.

      One of the things that makes DirectX great for developers is that all the necessary APIs are consolidated into one package and developed in unison, whereas the cross-platform equivalents are all independently worked on by various groups. Ergo, DirectX will have an advantage in reliability, since the APIs are designed to work together, and they all get updated at the same time.

      However, in the future, should some project be started (or a pre-existing project decides that it's time to advertise and make developers aware of their existence) that rivals DirectX and offers better performance on both Windows and Linux, and makes game developers aware of the alternative, then there just MIGHT be a chance there for Linux gaming, and then anti-cheating and copy protection can be developed from there. Until such time though, it's a non-issue.

    2. Re:I used to run WoW in Cedega by jZnat · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I guess it's too bad that DirectX isn't going to be doing sound anymore starting in Vista, so now Microsoft's API is just as fragmented as the OpenGL/OpenAL/SDL mix.

      --
      'Yes, firefox is indeed greater than women. Can women block pops up for you? No. Can Firefox show you naked women? Yes.'
  20. Re:No Wait !! by LanMan04 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Why did this get modded "Troll"? He has a point. If I had mod points I would upmod this...

    Would you rather it get modded Undead, Tauren, or Orc instead?

    --
    With the first link, the chain is forged.
  21. WoW by certel · · Score: 2, Insightful

    People spend too much time on this game...

  22. I'm a Linux user by SQLz · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I boot to Windows to play because my first account was banned for no reason when I was using Winex. Luckily, it was banned before I even reached level 10, although it pissed me off I just started another account. Noone ever responsed to my emails or anything.

  23. In other news... by copponex · · Score: 4, Funny

    The Linux community has pushed up the expected release date of kernel 2.8 by two full years.

  24. It's probably for the better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's probably for the better. Now they can go out in the sun and play (in real life).

  25. To Blizzard. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If you aren't going to let us legitimately run the game under a Windows compatibility layer, would at least release the Linux binaries already? We know that they exist. Your programmers have told us as much.

  26. Assuming you're right... by gillbates · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There are still better ways of catching cheaters.

    The old adage, "Never trust the client..." certainly applies here. The warden should run on the server, not the client. It should authenticate the client across the network.

    Granted, you don't want to saturate the network with every little move and detail of gameplay. But fortunately, you don't have to. There is only so much gameplay that a user can do in a given amount of time. The solution is to set a threshold for gameplay actions and client state - call it gameplay bandwidth - if it progresses too fast, it's scripted.

    The solution isn't to ban the cheater, but to throttle the gameplay bandwidth, as it were, to a reasonable level. This defeats the advantage of scripting without the attendant possibility of a false positive kicking out a legitimate player.

    With respect to altering packets mid stream - well, a good encryption scheme could take care of that. I suspect that most of the work has already been done with the operating system's SSL.

    --
    The society for a thought-free internet welcomes you.
  27. Re:And this is a bad thing because? by badenglishihave · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Amen. I am tempted to tell my good friend (or former good friend) to start using WoW on Linux. Maybe he'll get banned and hang out with friends again.

  28. no answers by alexhard · · Score: 2, Funny

    Emails to World of Warcraft's Account Administration staff continue to go unanswered

    How terribly surprising! After the amazing track record of Blizzards customer support, this is totaly unexpected!

    --
    Infinite time means everything that can happen, will. You being you is absolutely incidental. You do not exist.
    1. Re:no answers by Freymour · · Score: 2, Informative

      A quick phone call to Michael (Mike) Morhaime, President of Blizzard Entertainment at 949-955-1380 should start the wheels of progress.

  29. Re:And this is a bad thing because? by weinerofthemonth · · Score: 2, Funny

    Please stop bad mouthing Blizzard. WoW GMs are infallible and beyond reproach. They do not make mistakes, these people were clearly cheating and using hacks, they had to be or Blizzard would not have banned them.

  30. Re:No Wait !! by rpdillon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "Why did this get modded "Troll"?"

    Umm, because he's wrong?

    Yes, I'm a die hard Linux user and gamer. But I am going to be as completely objective about this as I can be. The accounts are being *banned*. Which is to say: sure, if I try to run EQ2 (what I play instead of WoW) under Linux, and it works for a while and then breaks, all his points are valid. The problem then becomes that I can't go back to my Windows box and play from there. Why?

    Because they banned the *account*! It's not like I tried to get F.E.A.R. working and it didn't so "waaaaah, I have to play under Windows!" Rather, I tried to play under Linux and now, even though I paid for the right to play, I cannot play under Linux or Windows at all.

    Now, their nazi-EULA probably says they can terminate your *paid* account for whatever reason they want, but if you want to talk about whether there is something to "whine" about, there absolutely is. People's accounts should not be banned because they attempted to get their software working under an unsupported OS. That really is unfair.

    I cannot address whether or not any of this is FUD, however, since I don't play WoW and I stopped paying for Cedega. It seems odd that only some of the Cedega users are affected, but not all.

  31. Old news by crossmr · · Score: 3, Funny

    I can remember this being talked about months ago, people were getting these letters and they were running WoW under wine.
    Slashdot at 11, we put a man on the moon.

  32. A few updates and corrections. by Rakarra · · Score: 3, Interesting
    First, Blue Poster Drysc says that Linux shouldn't be an issue, when asked if the people were banned for playing under Linux:

    An operating system would not produce a false positive, no.

    As a final word to those here concerning their account being closed I can only recommend that you contact our Account Administration team by e-mailing wowaccountadmin@blizzard.com which is also included in the e-mail you should have received.

    ...

    As I said we take enormous steps to ensure that those we remove from the game are specifically and properly confirmed as being in violation of our rules and agreements before doing so. I still urge those of you who feel you have been wrongfully banned to contact our Account Administration team.

    Now, I have two co-workers who were banned who I know don't run bot clients, cheat programs, or anything of the sort. They do run cedega though.

    Some people have mentioned that they weren't playing on Linux at the time of the ban but that they were actually on Windows. This doesn't really matter though as the GMs and CMs have said that they don't ban clients as they are individually discovered but rather they build up a large list and weild the ban hammer at once. So, if you were banned it may not have been for actions you were taking at the time of the banning, but instead could have been for something that happened a month ago. My instinct is to blame the period around October 29 when Blizzard made a change to their warden on the server side and it caused all cedega clients to crash upon login. Two days later Transgaming released a fix, but I wonder if a number of clients were incorrectly flagged for those warden-related crashes.

    Also, if you were not banned it doesn't mean that your account hasn't been flagged, correctly or incorrectly.

  33. there is always an exception to the rule by way2trivial · · Score: 4, Insightful

    My wife, it kills me, she'll grind through the same thing on D2:LOD 50 times an evening.

    I accuse her of being a bot- it's the most mechanical thing you've ever seen.

    she writes down many EXP points she got per baal run, then does it again,
    then does it again, then does it again, then does it again, then does it again, then does it again, then does it again, then does it again, then does it again, ad infinity..

    to a 'gamebandwidth' counter, that'll look VERY suspicious

    (BTW some of the repetions above I typed by hand, some I did by cut and paste- can you see where I switched to cut & paste above?---riiiight.....)

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
  34. Re:who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Number of people who play Wow >= 7 million
    http://www.joystiq.com/2006/09/07/world-of-warcraf t-hits-7-million-subscribers/

    Number of people who watched The Sapranos premier = 9.5 million
    http://publications.mediapost.com/index.cfm?fuseac tion=Articles.showArticle&art_aid=40982)

    So I wouldn't say that the game is unpopular.

    Of those that play using Linux, Cedega is a probably method-- the most popular so far as the anecdotal evidence I've come across. Let's say for the sake of argument assume half are using something else though.

    If 1% of World of Warcraft subscribers use Linux to play then there are about 35,000 people playing under Cedega.
    At $15 USD per month that's $7,000,000 per year in subscription fees.

    GG Troll, L2P.

  35. I'm always suspicious of cheaters crying foul by Rix · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I played WoW under Cedega with no problems, and I confirmed with a GM that it was kosher. I suspect that most, if not all, of these bannings are legitimate. Cheaters don't usually break down and admit it when caught.

  36. bait and switch. by ngworekara · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Just for the record, Blizzard in the early months of WoW, both pre and post beta, were "looking into" the possibility of linux development. I followed that on the forums for a while before I started using Cedega to play, thinking it might be a stop gap until the linux client finally emerged. After sinking nearly $200 dollars into that game with the monthly fees attached, they have crapped in my fruit-loops. To all of you out there saying I should have seen this coming, I'd like to know why it didn't happen oh say, two damned years ago. For what its worth, my $15 a month will be going into a little jar labeled Wii. You might even say a wee jar.

  37. Re:Strong AI and the WoW Turing Test by vertinox · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Which brings me to one last point I'd like to make on this topic. I think that this cat n' mouse game of Blizzard versus the cheaters is good for AI. The last possible domain we have is people writing applications that extract data from video memory and use computer vision algorithms to write if-then-case bots.

    Correct, in 10-20 or so odd years the technology maybe available that is undetectable nor traceable by any server to find if a person is an AI or human.

    Lets say in 15 years you have on computer with WoW2 installed on it.

    On a second one that isn't even hooked up to the network you simply take the VGA/DVI output to it and then OCR the text states and by able to recognize objects in the virtual world much like Stanley's robot car is able to recognize objects on the road.

    Then your AI could simply feed the other computer commands through a USB keyboard.

    If the WoW client had sufficient DRM and rootkit abilities then perhaps it could detect such a hardware setup.

    But even then perhaps if you had a robotic arm and a camera giving the input making it impossible for another program to detect an AI.

    Suffice to say... It will be something Blizzard or any other game company can defeat unless they require game players to physically come to game centers.

    Even then... How would you know if the player didn't have an AI chip implanted in his skull? ;)

    --
    "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
    -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
  38. More Blizzard follow-up by keyne9 · · Score: 4, Informative

    http://forums.worldofwarcraft.com/thread.html?topi cId=47009071&pageNo=3&sid=1#40 http://forums.worldofwarcraft.com/thread.html?topi cId=47009071&sid=1&pageNo=3#53 "We have been testing our security software with Cedega. Cedega was used and tested before the security procedures and during the security procedures. From this testing we have yielded no hits, meaning Cedega, by itself, does not incur an account suspension. We have accounts of several Cedega users who have been playing normally during the time that these processes are running. Again, these people are not being suspended simply because of using Cedega or Linux. We are in contact with the people at Cedega and following up with them regarding individual accounts. To answer the OP's question, no it is not against the ToS to use Linux or Cedega. We continue to monitor the situation to prevent cases of false positives and to rectify them if they do occur." - Tseric (Blizzard poster) Again, less knee-jerk reactions.

  39. Re:The eternal struggle by Zondar · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's not a much a difficulty question as it is a cost question. It simply costs more to develop something on multiple operating systems. It's easier if the program can just be recompiled or rebuilt in some development environment, but it's not that easy most of the time (hardly any of the time). And on top of that, it takes time (and money) to test the new client and to provide support when it doesn't work. Since Linux troubleshooting is much more complex under average conditions than troubleshooting a Windows program, your tech support people need to take more time per person, and have to be paid more because it's a more rare skill.

    Bottom line, it costs more than it's worth.

  40. OMG IT'S THE END OF THE WORLD!! by Danzigism · · Score: 2, Funny

    of warcraft...

    --
    *plays the Apogee theme song music*
  41. How in the heck... by ChibiLZ · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How would running WoW under Cedega look like Glider or any other botting software? Maybe it's just Warden working funky, but something just seems very off here. It doesn't surprise me, Blizzard acting first and thinking later. If it's any consolation to those banned, you'll probably get your accounts back in a couple weeks...

    Might help to make a big stink about it in the meantime though.

    --
    Don't buy WoW Gold! Make it yourself!
  42. The scammers are scamming slashdot by WallyGrump · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This is the site where all the scammers are crying about their bans.
    http://forums.wowglider.com/forum.asp?FORUM_ID=16/
    This is a program that automates warcraft. Blizzard can no doubt just cough up $25 and get themselves a copy. People on this slashdot aren't stupid. If blizzard had access to the program and warden has full access to the operating system then nothing can hide. If it tries to hide, blizzard can reverse engineer the thing and find how it hides. No false positives, no mixing up linux users - they can without doubt target such a program. No need for blizzard to seek out strange memory access or whatever - they can just go straight for the program.

    The thing is many people put years of work into their characters and have been caught cheating. Now they're trying to scam their way out of their problems - like theyve scammed their way through the game. Don't beleive these idiot posters.

  43. Possible reason for banning only some by Azureflare · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I remember back when I played WoW in Cedega on linux that if I played the game in fullscreen mode but put in managed mode and set the desktop to a value less than my desktop resolution, then World of Warcraft would essentially run in a windowed screen but think it was fullscreen. This was immensely useful if I wanted to read something while grinding for instance. However, I distinctly remember that if I held down the right click button while inside the game and didn't release it and moved my mouse really quickly to the side, the game would slow down immensely, and then send me back to the login screen. I believe something about how cedega sends signals to the client when it is in managed mode made the World of warcraft client freak out and think something weird was happening.

    Can anyone who got banned comment on this? Were you playing the game in managed mode rather than fullscreen in Cedega, or was it unmanaged and in fullscreen mode?

  44. Many people play under linux by Fizzlewhiff · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Many players run under Linux and have not been banned. Many people who have been banned for botting claim they have not been botting. Very few people who get caught cheating ever admit to it. I have a hard time believing this story.

    --

    'Same speed C but faster'
  45. Actually Blizzard answered, Cedega OK by AHumbleOpinion · · Score: 2, Informative

    "We have been testing our security software with Cedega. Cedega was used and tested before the security procedures and during the security procedures. From this testing we have yielded no hits, meaning Cedega, by itself, does not incur an account suspension. We have accounts of several Cedega users who have been playing normally during the time that these processes are running. Again, these people are not being suspended simply because of using Cedega or Linux. We are in contact with the people at Cedega and following up with them regarding individual accounts. To answer the OP's question, no it is not against the ToS to use Linux or Cedega. We continue to monitor the situation to prevent cases of false positives and to rectify them if they do occur." http://forums.worldofwarcraft.com/thread.html?topi cId=47009071&sid=1&pageNo=3

  46. Banned by agrovated · · Score: 2, Funny

    You were caught running a highly efficient, highly secure, highly robust operating system - namely Linux. In our (Blizzards) opinion this would provide an advantage over other players. In addition, use of this software can lead to exploitation and destabilization of the World of Warcraft server economy. As such, this account has been closed and will not be reopened under any circumstances. The recurring subscription on the account has been disabled to prevent further charges.

  47. Re:Even better, smack them where it hurts by ArcticCelt · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Another alternative is to make a complain at the "Better Business Bureau", this will damage their rating and smack them where it hurts. Even better " The BBB will try to mediate the dispute [against Blizzard] through their complaint process"

    Direct link to Blizzard BBB listing:

    (click: [file complaint] down right corner)

    --

    Yahh, hiii haaaaa! -Major Kong, from Dr. Strangelove
  48. Re:Strong AI and the WoW Turing Test by ultranova · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Games like WOW require a lot of silly repetive actions that *are* better for a machine to perform, so why would I want to perform them myself?

    It's not what you want to do, it's what the game company wants you to do: spend months paying them the subscription fee. And really, in what game does the actual content last months ? None. That's why they need to add repetition, and take a dim view on anyone who automates performing that.

    The standard model of handcrafted gameworld simply doesn't allow perpetual gameplay. As AI progresses, it's likely that we start seeing semi-dynamic worlds where new content is generated algorithmically; fully dynamic games would be possible even with today's technology, but would run the risk of upsetting the Horde or the Alliance if their side loses.

    --

    Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.