Slashdot Mirror


Apple Orders 12 Million iPhones

Waqas writes "Apple has placed an order for 12 million iPhones to be built by a Taiwanese contract manufacturer, according to an analyst citing reports from Asia. The Chinese-language Commercial Times on Wednesday cited Taiwan-based sources within Apple's iPod component supply chain as saying the phone is due to arrive during the first half of next year."

68 of 334 comments (clear)

  1. It's all about the interface by jmp_nyc · · Score: 5, Interesting

    While I don't care about a phone that plays music or video, I want a phone that has a quick, intuitive interface for placing calls and text messages to people in my address book. I find that each time I've had to replace my phone, I'm progressively less satisfied with the interface. It seems like Motorola et al are so worried about form factor that they ignore interface design.

    For example, about 7 years ago I got a Motorola StarTac. It was the coolest form factor phone at the time, and had a reasonable interface. Each name in my phone directory could have multiple numbers associated with it, with each number having an icon for office, home, cell, etc. When I wanted to call someone, I first selected the name, then the appropriate icon from that person's list. It wasn't a perfect solution, but it worked reasonably well. Now I've got a Motorola RAZR, and they've somehow lost the ability to recognize that a single person can have multiple numbers. If I have office, home, and cell numbers stored for the same person, I get three entries for them, making the full list of names much longer. Not only are phone makers not making steps forward, they're moving backwards.

    Given Apple's track record, I'd say they're the most likely candidates to figure out an elegant cell phone interface, and I'm looking forward to the iPhone for that reason alone. If the interface is half decent, I'll be buying one to replace my RAZR.
    -JMP

    1. Re:It's all about the interface by Andy_R · · Score: 2, Insightful

      My Sony(spit!)Ericsson phone does that too - but in such an obscure way that I didn't discover that feature until I had the phone for about a year, long after the irritating micro-joystick used to choose which of a contacts's numbers to dial had clogged up. The software is at best clunky, the bare minimum that the makes could get away with, unless they the developers thought of something that would add a bullet point to the feature list. So I have a built in multi-track music sequencer, but not the ability to take a photo without a 5 second wait.

      There really is a huge gap in the market for a phone that's well designed and has a well written software, rather than the botchware that my past SE and Nokia phones shipped with. How did my phone ship with the ability to play a 45 minute video clip, but no way to pause, rewind or fast-forward it?

      Apple's problem is not that the other makers are subsidised, because their phones will undoubtedly be subsidised too (why on earth does the analyst think this would be an issue?) but that one size doesn't fit all. I want at least a 2 megapixel camera and 4Gb of ram, or if wish fulfillment is an option, OSX on a transmeta cpu... but the 'bare bones' market wants just a phone/ipod nano combo in a small form factor. If we don't see iPhone, iPhone Nano, and iPhonePro then a big share of the potential audience will be disappointed.

      --
      A pizza of radius z and thickness a has a volume of pi z z a
    2. Re:It's all about the interface by laurens · · Score: 5, Informative

      Actually, you can still do that. On my (unbranded) RAZR I can select a name by pressing number keys or up/down, then choose from different numbers for that person by pressing left/right. It's a setting:

      In your phone book, choose [menu] -> Setup -> View: Primary Contacts.

      Now, every number with a certain associated name will be grouped under that name.

    3. Re:It's all about the interface by Salmar · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This is exactly the situation the iPod faced. I haven't yet found a better way to call someone than through Nokia's contact list, but that could be because of some fundamental design flaw in today's phones, which Apple has perhaps found. If Apple can actually improve on that design, they may launch the next generation of cell phone interfaces. I would be disappointed if they did any less than start a revolution.

      --
      This is not the signature you're looking for.
    4. Re:It's all about the interface by jrumney · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Apple continue to show other makers how to not overload a music player.

      Maybe I'm misunderstanding you here, but my iPod has a photo viewer, PIM functionality and games. It's basically like my mobile phone, but without the phone. I don't know of any other MP3 player that is as overloaded with useless features.

    5. Re:It's all about the interface by rjstanford · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Where they make it work is that if you only want to use the iPod to play music, you never even need to know that it can do all that other stuff. This is a skill that a surprisingly large number of "feature-rich" products lack.

      --
      You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
    6. Re:It's all about the interface by zigziggityzoo · · Score: 2, Informative

      RAZR: Go to Address Book, Then hit menu. Then go down to Setup, and Change view to "Primary Contacts". Instantly, all your qualms are resolved. (Didn't read all your replies, I hope I'm not the fifth to say this).

      --
      Zing!
    7. Re:It's all about the interface by cweber · · Score: 3, Informative

      You're correct, the iPod has these features, but they are minor items and never get in the way of accessing and playing the music, photos and video.
      What I meant is that Apple demonstrates that you can resist the urge to overload and clutter the interface, onscreen as well as button count and placement.

    8. Re:It's all about the interface by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2, Informative

      laurens,
      I wish I had some mod points, I'd reward your excellent post. I really love it when somebody actually offers a solution - without making anyone feel stupid, without jargon - just a simple, straightforward recipe to a fix. Something you almost never find in an online game forum, for example.

      I'd been really pissed at my RAZR for not being able to list multiple numbers (and addresses) under one name. You obviously dug a little deeper into the manual than I was willing to go, and you shared the nugget you found there.

      Thanks, pal.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    9. Re:It's all about the interface by joshsisk · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't know of any other MP3 player that is as overloaded with useless features.

      This is amusing, because most iPod-critics on slashdot decry how the iPod is lacking in features... yet I guess there are still some who think it has too many.

      Anyway, as others have pointed out, those features are very incidental to the iPod and you can even simply not show them on your menu if you like... as I have done.

    10. Re:It's all about the interface by stunt_penguin · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Hang on a minute, who said that an iPhone *has* to be a music player- the assumption just seems to be out there that apple are going to take an iPod and bolt on 9 keys and an internal arial.

      Apple know how to build great devices that just work, and if they're working on releasing a phone, well then you can be damned sure they're not going to compromise on making it a good phone just to squeeze iTunes in.

      Also, why would they miss an opportunity to sell you a $300 phone that plays music , when they can sell you a $250 phone and a $250 music player :)

      --
      When the posters fear their moderators, there is tyranny; when the moderators fears the posters, there is liberty.
    11. Re:It's all about the interface by SaDan · · Score: 2, Funny

      Sounds like you need to look at something like a Treo or a Motorola Q. I love my Treo 700p.

      In fact, I'm using it to send this reply while waiting in line at Autozone. :-)

    12. Re:It's all about the interface by MrAnnoyanceToYou · · Score: 2, Informative

      The coolest thing (despite my dislike for other portions of the tech, I do like some of it....) about my RAZR is that when I hit the button on the side and say, "Call Dad Cell Home" (yeah, it's not quite perfect) it asks me whether it's got the right result and then dials the goober. Same with any number of others. It even gets my friend Octavius' name right about half the time. Speaking of impressive.

      Yes, I will buy an iPhone, but that's just because I want to be cool. And the Motorola isn't as reliable as I'd like. (go ahead, agree with people that think glassblowing with it in my back pocket is unkind treatment... Plus, the whole "Verizon doesn't want you to add music you pull out of your MP3 library as a ringtone, so we disabled that" thing makes me grumpy)

    13. Re:It's all about the interface by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      The click wheel was such a nice addition to the iPod, they MUST incorporate that into the phone. I've got it! You could like spin the wheel around to select each number instead of typing them in. It will be so innovative...oh wait...

    14. Re:It's all about the interface by DDLKermit007 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I know the phone doesn't fit in with the small phone crowd that screams for more features & better interface, but Treo's (outside of the 700w) are hands down the best interface you'll get your hands on. You don't even need to be so worried about losing your phone if you sync enough to keep data on the phone and your PC. New revision out? Get the new one and the data will come off your PC. No stupid assed copying contacts from the SIM card that only allows one phone # per record. It's a hell of allot better option than anyone else's current offerings.

      Only way the iPhone will be taking the place of my Treo is if they have it able to sync with iCal and Addressbook at the very least with my Mac. I'd love to see it happen, but I really don't see it working out.

    15. Re:It's all about the interface by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 2, Informative
      I knew you were American before I even read 'cellphone'.

      Clue: SMS text messaging is THE SINGLE BIGGEST thing about cellphones these day, for users and networks.

      In 2006 100 million text messages a /day/ in the UK. 25 million a day in Australia, a country of 20 million. Similar in each European country. The worldwide estimate is over 120 BILLION a year.

    16. Re:It's all about the interface by oldosadmin · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Being a guy with a heavy southern accent, phone dial doesn't like me much :(.

      I wish they'd make it work better for those of us from the south :)

      --
      Jay | http://oldos.org
  2. My phone by Kell+Bengal · · Score: 2, Insightful

    My phone calls people, it takes calls. It sends SMS and it receives them. That's all - I love my phone. When I went to buy it, the service chick couldn't understand why I didn't want a camera/video/gps/somethingsomething. I'm obviously a geek festooned with gadgets, afterall. The obvious answer is that I already have all those things, and much better ones than can be put in a phone, too. The original ipod was just a music player, but it has become more things - Apple is on a slippery slope - I hope they don't fall to the dark side with creeping featuritis and 'convergence'. I, for one, will always pass on a player/phone that is not just a player or phone.

    --
    Scientists point out problems, engineers fix them
    altslashdot.org: The future of slashdot.
    1. Re:My phone by m0nstr42 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This logic actually backfired for me on my last new phone cycle. Since it was on sale, I could have gotten the camera/whatever/phone for the same price that I got my plain old phone with absolutely no bells or whistles. I thought "hey, it's simpler, maybe they put more effort into making it a solid phone." My wife got the fancier phone that looked cool but was also on sale. Turns out my phone sucks (really slow boot time, occaisionally shuts off, mediocre battery performance) and hers is way better. I still generally agree that the phone/mp3/toaster phone is unnecessary, but at least in this case it didn't work out quite as I expected.

  3. and now we seee... by User+956 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And now see the real reason Apple crippled the features to be included in the Motorola ROKR phone (especially the storage). they wanted that market for themselves, but didn't have a product ready yet.

    --
    The theory of relativity doesn't work right in Arkansas.
    1. Re:and now we seee... by Cid+Highwind · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And now see the real reason Apple crippled the features to be included in the Motorola ROKR phone (especially the storage).

      Because the phone companies that are making $3 or $4 per song didn't want meaningful competition from $0.99 iTunes tracks?

      (This is why I think iPhone, if it really exists, is doomed. No mobile carriers will allow it on their network because they don't want to jeopardize their own services that charge 3x more than iTMS.)

      --
      0 1 - just my two bits
    2. Re:and now we seee... by Dalroth · · Score: 2, Insightful

      GSM baby. I don't have to buy the iPhone from the phone company. I can just take my card out, pop it in the iPhone and I'm ready to go.

      The only reason to get a phone from your phone company is they subsidize it so that they can sucker you into those multi-year contracts. Do you save money? Sure, but if Apple REALLY wanted to they could find a way to subsidize their phones as well.

      The probably won't. And they won't do it because of people like me. I can honestly say I'd like to have my iPod and phone roled into one. I'm just concerned about battery life. I don't really care what T-Mobile thinks about it.

      Bryan

  4. Better them than Microsoft by Lev13than · · Score: 4, Funny

    Apple has placed an order for 12 million iPhones to be built by a Taiwanese contract manufacturer, according to an analyst citing reports from Asia.

    Let's just be thankful that they aren't being designed by Microsoft. If they were, you could only talk to other Microsoft phone owners, and every number you called would get blocked after three calls or three days unless you paid extra to get it unlocked...

    --
    When you have nothing left to burn you must set yourself on fire
  5. Re:I remember by Tackhead · · Score: 5, Funny
    > I remember when Apple was a computer company.

    I remember when phones were used to talk to people.

    (Git off my lawn!)

  6. Re:I remember by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Apple learned faster than Microsoft that the desktop-centric computing world is dying and be replaced by various computing devices, especially portable and useful ones. The Zune and the xBox are all about trying not to become irrelevant.

    Apple is and always has been a company to make useful consumer computing devices, whether that computing decives is a really nifty audio player or a really nifty phone

  7. My LG has that multi-number icon deal by mekkab · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ANd the best feature of all, a timer. And not just an alarm clock (which it does have) but a "ring 10/30/60/ minutes from now" timer, and it's only 4 keystrokes TOTAL (my old nokia had me set the time and date and it took 12+ keystrokes).

    --
    In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
  8. Re:I remember by the_humeister · · Score: 5, Funny

    I remember when apple was a fruit

  9. Re:It's all about the interface-My RAZR by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I also had a StarTac, now have a RAZR, and had a V60i in-between. I have no trouble with my Verizon RAZR associating multiple numbers with a single name entry. Perhaps you just aren't entering them correctly.

    My beef with the RAZR is its Voice Recognition. While it works, it doesn't understand my preferred terminology. With the V60i, I recorded my own voice tag for selected numbers. That let me refer to a telephone as Name Cell. RAZR only accepts NAME MOBILE. Also for business numbers I used Name Office. The RAZR only understands Name Work.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  10. Re:I remember by Queer+Boy · · Score: 2, Informative
    Apple has always created Mac-oriented devices to fill the hole in the market until other manufacturers finally realise that Mac users are brand loyal and will continue to buy your line of products and update/upgrade them regularly if you support the platform. As it stands, there are to my knowledge no phone manufacturers that actually have software for Macs (Palm excluded because it's a PDA first).

    Apple has manufactured still and web cameras, printers, scanners, modems, NICs, displays, etc.

    --
    Not since Marie-Antoinette played milkmaid has looking simple and honest been so fake and complicated.
  11. Re:I remember by jrobinson5 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Apple may not be a fruit, but its customers are.

    (ducks)

  12. 12 million phones? by frinkster · · Score: 3, Insightful

    That's a strange number to order. Is that for a full year? If so, why order them all at once?

    Just for a reference, Motorola sells around 10 million RAZRs a quarter. I don't think Apple is crazy enough to believe the iPhone is going to be that popular.

    1. Re:12 million phones? by KillerCow · · Score: 4, Insightful
      That's a strange number to order. Is that for a full year? If so, why order them all at once?

      Just for a reference, Motorola sells around 10 million RAZRs a quarter. I don't think Apple is crazy enough to believe the iPhone is going to be that popular.


      Are you kidding? With the i**** brand on it? RAZRs were trendy because they were thin. B.F.D. Being thin doesn't measure up to being an i-something from Apple.

      I would be absolutely shocked if it didn't instantly become more trendy and more popular than the RAZR.
    2. Re:12 million phones? by Kuciwalker · · Score: 2, Funny
      Are you kidding? With the i**** brand on it?

      I wouldn't be so harsh about the brand.

    3. Re:12 million phones? by zigziggityzoo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't imagine they'll be able to supply all 12 million right away. If you order in large enough quantities, you get a significant discount. Plus, By the time they've produced a good 8 million, Apple will know how well they sell, and will subsequently order accordingly.

      --
      Zing!
    4. Re:12 million phones? by vistic · · Score: 2, Insightful

      From the phones I've used, you sure wouldn't *guess* that the current cellphone manufacturers have had years and years to perfect their design and interface.

      I actually would bet Apple does this better on their first try than any of the current manufacturers have been apple to do after over a decade of design.

  13. How will the iPhone fare? by nevesis · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So, I'm rather curious as to Slashdot's opinion on the iPhone.

    Most industry/financial analysts have been harshly attacking Apple for the iPhone. (Many of these same analysts were gushing over Motorola's "genius" idea to design a "cool" cell phone, ala razr)

    So I ask you, Slashdot analysts, how will the iPhone fare?

    1. Re:How will the iPhone fare? by Tibor+the+Hun · · Score: 4, Funny

      I take it upon myself to answer on behalf of the slashdot collective:
      It depends if it has more space than Nomad or not.

      --
      If you don't know what AltaVista is (was), get off my lawn.
    2. Re:How will the iPhone fare? by jabberwock · · Score: 2, Insightful
      If they design an interface that appeals to the zillions of people who can't live without their IPods, they're going to own the cell phone industry.

      And I say this as someone who doesn't own an IPod and who only uses a cell phone as a modem.

      I don't claim to understand the market for their little gizmos. But it doesn't take understanding it to see that it's there.

  14. Re:I remember by Abreu · · Score: 2, Funny

    or a Music Label...

    --
    No sig for the moment.
  15. Apple Product Lifecycle by The+Hobo · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The headline reminded me of the (in?)famous lifecycle

    --
    There is another kind of evil which we must fear most, and that is the indifference of good men. -- Boondock Saints
  16. Re:Apple is the same way! by falcon5768 · · Score: 4, Informative
    Um you can play songs purchased from iTunes on

    1) a CD

    2) a computer (up to 5 with no limits to how many times you play them on there)

    3) your iPod which you now can have linked to up to 2 librarys on 2 different computers

    Yes you need to strip the DRM to play it on a device that is not supported by fairplay, but if your buying from iTunes then you know this already and its not a issue, as everyone knows iTunes exists to sell the iPod, and your personally ripped tracks stay DRM free (unlike Microsofts which get the 3or3 scheme thrown into them too)

    --

    "Slashdot, where telling the truth is overrated but lying is insightful."

  17. and it would be BROWN. by arcite · · Score: 4, Funny

    Thats right. Brown.

  18. Ouch by Francisco_G · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Steve must be pissed that this got out. Remember, loose lips sink ships.

    1. Re:Ouch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I thought it was loose lips, pink slips.

    2. Re:Ouch by Basehart · · Score: 2, Funny

      I thought it was pink lips.....oh nevermind.

  19. Re:I remember by Basehart · · Score: 4, Funny

    You were lucky!

    When I were a lad I'd have to walk two hundred miles to the nearest village with my legs tied together with barbed wire, find a rotten apple on the floor near Farmer Bob's apple cart, then take it one thousand miles over broken glass and rusty nails to grandma for her dinner.

  20. Re:I hope they're not too much like the iPod.. by RalphBNumbers · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Ok, this is something that I don't really expect the majority of gadget freak slashdotters to ever really grok, but I'll say it anyway:

    The iPod's integrated battery is a *good* thing.

    The battery in most iPods will never be replaced, and I actually suspect it wouldn't be even if it were a simple 5-second task. Batteries have gotten good enough that their expected service lifetime can come close to matching the expected usage lifetime of devices they power (yes, some will fail early, but that doesn't mean all or even many will, there are always outliers).

    Making a battery user-accessible requires adding latches, contacts, extra layers of plastic casing, and other design compromises that just aren't worth it to facilitate a task that *might* be performed once in a device's lifetime. Those compromises cost the device in terms of money, weight, and ruggedness, all of which could be better allocated enhancing something the user does every day, like listening to music on the go.

    If you really want to keep your iPod a couple of years down the road, rather than upgrade to the latest greatest gadget like most people, you *can* still replace the battery, or even have a professional do it for you for a reasonable fee. You just won't have spent the last 700+ days carrying around the means to swap out the battery in your pocket, waiting for the one day when it's ready to be changed.

    --
    "The worst tyrannies were the ones where a governance required its own logic on every embedded node." - Vernor Vinge
  21. GSM or CDMA? Which carriers? by Nick+Driver · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Will these phones be GSM or CDMA? And are there any carriers lined up for them? I'd predict they'll likely be GSM since most USA CDMA carriers like to cripple the snot out of their phones and remove all the cool features unless they can nickel and dime their customers out of pay-per-use of those features. Heaven forbid you wish to make your own mp3 ringtones without buying them from the carrier or anything like that, or dare to use BT for anything other than connecting an earpiece.

    1. Re:GSM or CDMA? Which carriers? by Michael+Wardle · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Or UMTS, the "3G" standard used in most of Europe and Asia.

      Most 2.1 GHz UMTS phones also speak GSM, but UMTS would be a great feature as it allows much faster download speeds, which could be handy if you're downloading 128 kb/s AAC song files! It would allow you to download a three minute song in one minute.

  22. It's not just the interface... by DerekTomes · · Score: 2, Interesting
    ...but I'm sure Apple will do a good job of it. Phone technology at the moment is a pain in the butt. Most of us have a home phone, a mobile and a work phone not to mention skype/voip. Why can't these all be the same thing? I'd like a phone that figures out the best way to contact someone and calls the correct number. I'd like a phone that:
    • when I'm at home rings if someone dials in on my home number
    • when I'm at work rings if someone dials in on my work number
    • if I have voip and the person I'm after it does too, call using that
    I really don't cary about being to take photos. I own a camera that is vastly better than my phone camera. I'm hoping Apple will shake the tree a bit with a new phone concept. I'm unimpressed with most of the phones at the moment because they really only offer new ways for TelCos to take money off me.
    --
    have courage
  23. Yes, but... by vought · · Score: 2, Funny

    I've also heard that...

    Microsoft is working on a Zune phone that will allow you to record something and send it to someone else with a Zune phone. But they'll only be able to listen to this "message" for three days unless you pay Cingular and Universal Music Group each a dollar.

    This new product will be called the "Zone". Microsoft's marketing message will be "Welcome to the Zone".

    This "record and recall" feature should be added to the Zune within a year, but look for C|Net News.com to buck the trend and to annoint the "Zone" an "iPhone killer" for the next six months, followed by swooning reviews of the Zone, claiming it's "great for phone beginners".

    Also, the Zone is slated to be compatible with Windows XP SR2 and Windows Vista only.

  24. The winner for longest-lived Apple rumor... by Infonaut · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm thinking the iPhone has to take the cake. What other continuously-running (not off and on, like the buyout/merger rumors) Apple rumor has had legs for this long? The iPhone rumor has been in full force for at least two and a half years.

    --
    Read the EFF's Fair Use FAQ
  25. How about SD? by StikyPad · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I just want a phone with an SD slot, quality playback, and decent folder navigation. The only time I listen to music on a portable player is at the gym, so I just want to be able to pop the card out of my PC and into my phone/MP3 player. I don't want to carry around seperate devices, I don't want to have to remember to charge a player I only use a few days a week, and I don't need a goddamned computer-in-a-phone. For the love of God, SD cards are up to 8GB now. It's the simplest and fastest way to transfer music, but almost nobody's supporting it because they all want you to use their proprietary crap, or pay-to-download, etc. I finally found a decent car stereo with SD support, but as far as I've seen, the phones that do have SD slots are all full-blown SmartPhones (sic) with some craptastic keyboard and/or a huge display that's just begging to get broken/scratched if I were to put it in my pocket.

    Maybe I should just start my own company, use someone else's VC to fund it, and if it fails, at least I'll have exactly what I wanted.

    1. Re:How about SD? by StikyPad · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yeah, this is what turned me off:

      You can download songs only through the included USB cable. There's no way to transfer iTunes music wirelessly, you can't listen to music through a Bluetooth headset, and you can't use iTunes tracks as ring tones. The strict 100-song storage limit hasn't changed either, and all songs must be saved on the TransFlash card, assuming you haven't filled it up with a lot of other data. And forget the idea of storing more music on the phone's skimpy 5MB of integrated memory--it just isn't possible. So in other words, don't get too excited about circumventing the inadequate 100-song cap. Like the Rokr, the Slvr L7 also connects with only one computer at a time. When we tried connecting to a second computer, the Slvr L7, like the Rokr E1, erased all our previously loaded songs. http://reviews.cnet.com/Motorola_Slvr_L7/4505-6454 _7-31313329.html

      So it would seem you couldn't just pop in a (micro) SD card with mp3s on it and go. Even worse, it's only USB 1.1.

  26. How good.. by Piroca · · Score: 2, Funny


    Besides getting scratched easily, your nice white apple cell phone will be dirty with all that oil your face produces. How good is that going to be?

  27. So what's the catch? by realmolo · · Score: 5, Funny

    Everyone knows that Apple always does one stupid thing with every piece of hardware they sell. Something that isn't a deal breaker, but is annoying, and makes no real sense. With the Macs, it's their refusal to ship the things with 2-button mice. Withe the iPod, it's their refusal to include an FM tuner.

    My guess is the iPhone will have no "7" button.

    Steve hates the number 7.

    1. Re:So what's the catch? by oberondarksoul · · Score: 3, Informative

      There's quite a great deal of sense in both those examples you provided. One-button mice are considerably easier for new users; the number of times I've had to explain the difference between left- and right-clicking makes me really very pleased that they do.

      As for the lack of an FM tuner: that would add bulk to the iPods, and probably wouldn't be used by many users anyway. The iPod plays prerecorded songs and videos; I'm a huge fan of BBC radio but have never missed it whilst listening to my own tracks. In any case, if you really want an FM tuner in your iPod, Apple will gladly sell you one.

      --
      And tomorrow the stock exchange will be the human race
    2. Re:So what's the catch? by starving4clarity · · Score: 3, Informative

      AFAIK, all new Macs (minus portables) ship with the Mighty Mouse. It has two button clickability (one shell, pressure sensitive between right and left), a 360 degree scrollbutton, and pressure sensitive sides that can be linked to OS X's expose feature (squeeze your mouse and see all windows open at once on your desktop). Plus there is always CTRL-Click (which I concede was/is a pain in the ass).

  28. Re:Will this one implode too? by Moofie · · Score: 2, Informative

    um, Taiwanese contract manufacturers probably manufacture just about everything that's within five feet of your person, right this minute.

    --
    Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
  29. A special kinda stoopid by maggard · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Whoah - not the way to do business with Apple.

    Steve Jobs does ... not ... like ... his surprises to leak in advance.

    Apple used to leak like a sieve. Everyone knew their product plans before their own salesfolk did. It got so bad sales took a huge hit every time the next big thing was due as everyone put off their orders. Now after Job's return Apple does a few big new introductions at their own MacWorld or at a few specialty shows, the famous "one more thing ..." products. Those are always hugely, obsessively, secret so Apple gets the maximum PR. Heck, everyone in the industry, caring about Apple or not, tracks these just to see what Apple will do next.

    The last time someone leaked in a big way it was ATI. The result was 24 hours before the new Mac introductions, with ATI cards, they had their products stripped from the new Macs, all Apple presentations were rescripted to omit references to ATI, Apple marketing materials were quickly remade sans ATI, etc. Apparently ATI were persona non grata at Apple HQ for several months until his Steveness was sufficiently mollified this would never happen again.

    Since then other Apple manufacturers have gotten in lower levels of trouble for simply acknowledging large orders had been made by Apple. These are picked up by the local press, which is of course read by everyone in the industry around the world.

    But to confirm the long awaited iPhone, a rumor that has been a staple for years from the dingiest Mac rumor site to the NYT, that takes a special kind of stoopid.

    My assumption is that as soon as this story started to break a damage control team from the manufacturer to Cupertino. Now the question is if Jobs will go ahead with the rollout or delay it at the last minute. As this is the same man who once had a factory closed down for all of the robots to be repainted, 9 times, 'til he was happy, who has a history of cancelling large projects, I dunno.

    It'll be interesting to see how this plays out. Also, if true, what the iPhone will entail, especially after Disney's recent phone flop.

    --
    I don't read ACs: If a post isn't worth so much as a nom de plume to its author then I wont bother either.
    1. Re:A special kinda stoopid by Nicolay77 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well, a leak of a new product makes that you stop buying all current competitors of said product.

      A leak of a new MacBook would slow down MacBook sales.

      A leak of an iPhone would slow sales of competing MP3 cell phones, but not slow much any Apple product. This leak could potentially slow down sales of Sony Ericsson phones.

      In fact, Sony Ericsson would benefit from the feature list of the phone, but we don't know anything yet about it. Except that scrollable border patent.

      We don't know if we will buy the iPhone... but we WANT information about it so bad that it creates a strong iPhone brand.

      -Hey, there, take a look of this new SE/Nokia MP3 cell-phone!
      -Buzz off! I want to know about the iPhone first!

      --
      We are Turing O-Machines. The Oracle is out there.
  30. Re:I remember by Yaztromo · · Score: 2, Informative
    As it stands, there are to my knowledge no phone manufacturers that actually have software for Macs

    I have a native OS X application from Sony Ericsson for developing themes for many of their cell phones (my trusty T610 included). With Bluetooth for data transfer, and Apple'OS X's built-in iSync, SMS through the Address Book, Bluetooth File Transfer software, and GPRS dialler support, what more could one need or use?

    Yaz.

  31. Re:My LG has that multi-number icon deal by byolinux · · Score: 3, Funny

    I believed you up until you said wife.

  32. Re:I remember by obeythefist · · Score: 2, Funny

    Please, this is a much better business model. Now, mobile phones are much more appealing to the most lucrative market. By loading phones with dozens of complicated games and applications, they are objects of desire for rich nerds who love twiddling with little gadgets but would never want to own a regular telephone because they don't have any friends to call.

    That's progress!

    --
    I am government man, come from the government. The government has sent me. -- G.I.R.
  33. Re:I remember by ricosalomar · · Score: 2, Funny

    Tell the kids o' today that, an they won't believe yer.

  34. Wish people would get over phone subsidies by Timbotronic · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Interesting to see that TFA is already predicting that the iPhone will bomb because it can't compete with subsidised handsets in the US. I really wish this meme would die.

    For one thing, of course there's no such thing as a free phone. You just pay the cost over time through higher call plans. Admittedly, you may get some benefit of scale when the network buys handsets in bulk but there's no reason Apple couldn't do that too. More likely some company will just start offering much cheaper pre-paid SIM plans like everywhere else in the world.

    Another thing, the US carrier market is only a minor fraction of the world market. There are 1.5 *billion* handsets in the world. There are around 300M US citizens. Do the math. The European and Asian markets are enormously larger and people there are used to buying unlocked handsets so that they can connect to any network they like. Here in Australia we've had number portability for years.

    Lastly, independence from carriers is a *good* thing. We need to stop carriers dictating phone features. I'd like to see a phone that can switch to WiFi when it gets a signal, or peer to peer when I'm close to the person I'm calling. Think the carriers want that? There's no technical reason that phones can't do this today, but the longer the carriers control the phones people buy, the longer it'll take to happen.

    --

    One of these days I'm moving to Theory - everything works there

    1. Re:Wish people would get over phone subsidies by John+Whitley · · Score: 2, Informative
      I really wish this meme would die.


      Agreed. IIRC, bundling cell phones with service contracts is actually outlawed in Denmark. The carriers don't get to interfere with phone features and performance, and are forced to compete on an even price footing not muddied by the "deal" you're getting for that fancy phone.

      This all reminds me of the bad old days of Ma Bell. For the young 'uns (or just plain forgetful...) the phone company used to own not just the phone line, but the phone, the phone jacks, and the wires in the walls of your house. The end of that stupidity brought vast improvements in price, selection of features, quality and design -- such as would never have happened under a lethargic monopoly.

      I would love to see a similar revolution in today's US cell phone market. Let phone makers compete amongst themselves for consumers' good will, and the same for the carriers.
    2. Re:Wish people would get over phone subsidies by Overzeetop · · Score: 2, Insightful

      For anyone sufing this low in the thread, even as recently as 25 years ago it was pretty standard that all long distance calls were 25c/minute - in 1980ish dollars. You can see today what "everybody playing on a level field" has brought in terms of services costs. That's what dereg in the LD market did - one standard, many players. I pay the "outrageous" rate of 4c/minute, but I have no minimums and no service fees, so my LD runs me about $2/mo. I'd prefer to see some real standardization in the cell coverage market - then we might get some better rural coverage, as we wouldn't need three vendors on every metropolitan tower just to cover the handsets used.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?