Slashdot Mirror


What Not To Do With Your Data

Tiny Tim writes "Stupidity strikes! A data recovery company has revealed the dumbest data disasters it's confronted this year — including rotting bananas, smelly socks and a university professor's foolhardy application of WD-40."

79 of 319 comments (clear)

  1. nonsense! by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 4, Funny

    Nonsense! I once turned a 5400RPM drive into a 7200RPM drive merely by giving it a good squirt of WD-40. I swear!

    --
    This guy's the limit!
    1. Re:nonsense! by zhouray · · Score: 5, Funny

      Damn! Now I think of Steve Ballmer every time I see the word "squirt". =(

    2. Re:nonsense! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Tranny Ballmer is not more attractive than regular Ballmer.

    3. Re:nonsense! by thepotoo · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Ladies and gentlemen, we present to you this season's lame Slashdot joke! (Don't worry if you find it funny. It'll lose its charm in about ten or twenty repetitions.)

      A guy with a sig like yours has no right to talk ;)

      --
      Obligatory Soundbite Catchphrase
    4. Re:nonsense! by Jesus_666 · · Score: 2, Funny

      A guy with a sig like yours has no right to talk ;)

      You see, I'm an expert.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
  2. Privacy aspect by tomalpha · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What's interesting about this story is how easy it might be for *others* to recover your data after you think you've wiped it.

    1. Re:Privacy aspect by LordSnooty · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yeah - a chainsaw, a garbage compacter and a wood chipper. And a rocket to launch the fragments into space.

    2. Re:Privacy aspect by networkBoy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      When a drive is to be re-used within the company I work for we do a "secure erase" using a utility IT has blessed. If a drive is to leave the company it is wiped with the assistance of a 1/4" drill bit through the platters in at least three places.

      A hard drive is cheap. Company data (or potentially incriminating data for those of us at home) is not.
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    3. Re:Privacy aspect by PRC+Banker · · Score: 2, Funny

      I don't know how effective this is, but it's how I discard an old HDD, and it's fun! 1. Dismantle (sometimes hard to do) 2. Scrape platters with wire-gauze 3. Put drive plates in a fire for a few minutes, enough to warp a little 4. Randomly punish - skate on concrete, etc 5. Place in water, for a few months (toilet tank) 6. Discard

      --
      Oh.
    4. Re:Privacy aspect by OmnipotentEntity · · Score: 2, Informative

      Problem is, if the drive has any bad sectors, that fails and leaves the rest of the drive unerased.

      I use badblocks read-write test. It's designed to do stuff like that.

      --
      "Build a man a fire warm him for a day, set a man on fire and warm him for the rest of his life."
    5. Re:Privacy aspect by tdemark · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I don't think it's the company you have to worry about. It's the person they send your drive to after they refurbish it you should be concerned about.

    6. Re:Privacy aspect by archen · · Score: 2, Informative

      dban should be find then. If time is a constraint then you just need 4 random passes over the drive. Personally I like the Gutman wipe with the 27 voodoo passes. Of course it doesn't work on any spare sectors, but assuming there isn't anything that fits on a sector that is critical that should be fine.

    7. Re:Privacy aspect by antifoidulus · · Score: 3, Funny

      You put your hd in the toilet? Are you hoping to make next years list?

    8. Re:Privacy aspect by drinkypoo · · Score: 5, Funny
      Anybody know of any usefull tools to completely wipe the contents of a drive?

      Yes. I call it "thermite".

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    9. Re:Privacy aspect by atta1 · · Score: 3, Informative

      No, it doesn't. All a full format does is relabel all the sectors and erase the FAT or MFT.

      --
      "The avalanche has already started. It is too late for the pebbles to vote" -- Kosh
    10. Re:Privacy aspect by Mawbid · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Heh, yeah. I remember when my company bought a hard drive (sold as new, not refurbished) with an ntfs partition on it and a whole lot of personal data. There were pictures of a father and his baby taking a bath. Awww, isn't that sweet?.

      I'm pretty sure the person who turned the disk in, if they thought about it at all, assumed that surely the shop would wipe the disk before reselling it. Well, clearly that's not something you can count on.

      --
      Fuck the system? Nah, you might catch something.
    11. Re:Privacy aspect by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 4, Funny

      With very, very long drill bits.

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    12. Re:Privacy aspect by ultranova · · Score: 4, Funny

      How do they do the drilling on the drives of laptops that get stolen?

      They don't. Instead they just use Sony's batteries. Takes care of both data and thief in one blow.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    13. Re:Privacy aspect by db32 · · Score: 2, Funny

      We frequently use a heavy duty degausser for real wiping, but it also destroys the drive. But sometimes we get creative.

      We had 40 gateways that just as the warranty expired started failing like clockwork. 6 out of 40 in the first month or two after it expired so we fought with them and got a free warranty extension on them. One of the hard drives that failed on us had to be sent back for replacement...so our boss told us to make sure that the data was gone and do it "however you want". So after running a data wiping tool writing a pattern to the drive X times, we took it out and proceded to use a jackhammer on it. We tried to pick up as many pieces as we could...some were quite small since it was a laptop drive...and we packed it up nice and neat in its little antistatic bag and sent it back to the company in bits.

      --
      The only change I can believe in is what I find in my couch cushions.
    14. Re:Privacy aspect by eggstasy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sorry, that just means you eliminated the data on those three specific places. The rest of the platters can still be read, and whole files retrieved. The way data densities are today, even if you shatter a disk into a thousand pieces, a single, 1/1,000th piece of a 300 GB hard drive is still 300 MB... and breaking shit does not demagnetize it.

    15. Re:Privacy aspect by badfish99 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The "overwrite eighty times" stuff comes from some studies done in the days of 1GB drives. Basically, consumer-grade hardware in those days was not making full use of the storage capacity of the disks, and more sophisticated equipment could read information from between the tracks where the data was supposed to be stored.

      Drive technology has evolved, and now your disk can store 80 times as much data as in those days, or even more, and there is no longer any wasted space. So the advice about wiping is really out-of-date and useless. But it has passed into folklore, so it still gets done.

      Have a google for "Peter Gutmann" if you want to discover the theory behind all this.

    16. Re:Privacy aspect by networkBoy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's all about being harder to use the data.
      By the time someone has read and re-constituted the data from a drive that damaged the data is likely already public, out of rev, or obsolete.

      It's not like they don't wipe the drive first, it's just that they take the added step of mechanically destroying the drive. It's then off to the recyclers where (I believe) it is, in fact, smelted.
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    17. Re:Privacy aspect by Sangui5 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, that you can recover data doesn't mean you can reliably recover it, or do it fast. Hence no 40TB drives.

      As for how, the short version is that if you write a one and then a zero, you end up with .1; the old value leaks in a bit. When combined with the error correction codes built in to the drive, you stand a decent chance of recovering the overwritten data (slowly, with special read heads/drive electronics, and somewhat error prone). If you overwrite with the same fixed pattern repeatedly, you really don't improve the situation much (diminishing returns on removing the residual bit), so an 80x "wipe" of all zeros may be recoverable (although 80x is a bit much, even for all zeros). But overwriting to DoD spec is probably sufficient in this case, though. So is beating up the physical platters.

      For the really determined attacker, then can use high resolution magnetic force microscopy (MFM). See, when you overwrite, the write head doesn't exactly line up with the old stuff--so you'll have little bits of the old data sticking out from above or below the track. MFM can resolve very localized magnetic fields, far smaller than your disk read head, and can see the misalignment. These misaligned pieces allow peaking back a few generations of overwrite, which allows you to subtract out the newer things (and hence clarify the older). Plus, it doesn't use rapidly spinning the disk, so it can work on beat up platters. Even without misalignment in the generations of overwrite, good MFM can resolve better analog detail as well, so the whole 1 then 0 = .1 thing works better. But it is far too expensive to bother with in most cases.

      A detailed technical paper about the theory of data destruction/recovery on magnetic media can be found here: http://www.usenix.org/publications/library/proceed ings/sec96/full_papers/gutmann/

    18. Re:Privacy aspect by ajs318 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Changing from FAT16 to FAT32 doesn't overwrite most of the disk. FAT16 and FAT32 are very similar internally, so a drive already formatted as FAT16 just needs to have a FAT32 FAT written to it to make it FAT32.

      Windows also has different FAT entries for "freshly formatted" and "deleted files", preferring not to overwrite a deleted file if it can avoid it. When you convert a disk from FAT16 to FAT32, the reformatter actually respects previously deleted files. If there was enough room on the drive to fit all of Windows 98 on there away from the existing Windows 95 installation, then that's what it would have done.

      You can't recover genuinely-overwritten data with software. A disk drive is designed so that, as far as anything talking to the drive through the proper interface is concerned, a one which used to be a zero is indistinguible from a one which has always been a one, and a zero which has always been a zero is indistinguible from a zero which used to be a one. But very often, data isn't actually overwritten, because of the way Windows tries not to overwrite old data. Other OSes aren't so recovery-friendly. There was talk a few years ago about being able to recover imperfectly-overwritten data if the head wandered slightly, but today's data densities mean less head wander. And there's more data on a disk nowadays, most of which isn't relevant. If you tried to use magnetic force microscopy, it would take you a very long time -- several years -- to recover the missed data; you probably wouldn't get all of it; and you would not have any clue which bits were the bits you wanted.

      I stand by my assertion that one overwrite pass will put any data well out of OnTrack's reach. I haven't got the money to waste proving it, though.

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    19. Re:Privacy aspect by Apocalypse111 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's all about being harder to use the data.
      Absolutly correct. Even without demagnetizing the disk, if you smash it into a zillion pieces then anyone who wants to read from it will be stuck using an electron microscope to read the polarities off the platter fragments - not a fast or inexpensive process.

      The best "oh, shit!" solution for immediate, total data destruction is still thermite IMHO. Not only physically destroys the drive, but the heat demagnetizes it as well. Behond that, a couple shotgun slugs will also, in general, render a drive unreadable by *most* means. You can still hypothetically recover data from such a drive, but the expense and effort involved is more than most are willing to put forth.

      --
      There is no mod option "-1: Disagree" for a reason. "Overrated" is not an acceptable substitute. Post something instead.
    20. Re:Privacy aspect by _anomaly_ · · Score: 2, Funny
      C:\>cat /dev/zero > /dev/C:
      The system cannot find the path specified.
      *sigh*
      --
      "I have no special gift, I am only passionately curious." - Albert Einstein
    21. Re:Privacy aspect by HomelessInLaJolla · · Score: 3, Interesting

      > As for how, the short version is that if you write a one and then a zero, you end up with .1; the old value leaks in a bit

      I've always wondered, if this were really true, why we don't see random errors cropping up constantly especially on heavily used portions of hard drives.

      > See, when you overwrite, the write head doesn't exactly line up with the old stuff--so you'll have little bits of the old data sticking out from above or below the track

      Is there a similiar random misalignment with the read head and, if so, why again do we not observe daily errors on heavily used portions of hard drives? If not then how does the read head compensate for the misalignment of the write head?

      The questions are simple but the premise is sound. While I agree, in theory, with the technical papers that contend that this sort of data recovery can be done I don't see how, in practice, it can work for data recovery but not be a problem in everyday use. The magnetic field on the drive is what it is--it has no way of knowing if it is being read for recovery purposes or for standard reading.

      Maybe there's a quantum mechanical "FBI/NSA/Investigator" bit which gets set at the beginning of the drive which instructs the rest of the magnetic fields to cooperate with investigative purposes in a recovery lab which is left unset inside of a standard computer. Personally I think that most of the technical papers discussing the theory behind such low level hard drive forensics rely on anecdotal empirical evidence from years past (mostly recovered from drives where people didn't bother to properly wipe the data at all--such as using quick formats) and add just enough extremely technical theory to make it sound plausible and keep the populance in starry-eyed awe (under the sway of FUD) of the near magical capabilities of the high priests in the Cathedral.

      --
      the NPG electrode was replaced with carbon blac
  3. Unbelievable but True Tales of Data Disaster... by vivekg · · Score: 4, Informative

    Original ontrack article - Top 10 List of Data Loss Disasters of 2006

    --
    The important thing is not to stop questioning --Albert Einstein.
  4. advert alert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    waste of time

  5. The real list by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    The article is a summary of an advert. The original can be found here: http://ontrack.co.uk/special/data-disasters-2006.a spx?hp=Top10_2006

  6. favorite data loss tale by krell · · Score: 4, Funny

    Someone I know had an important data disc that he used with no problems. Everything was going fine until he decided to get a little more educated about computer commands. He read a statement somewhere that said you need to "format discs before you use them." After reading this, he made sure to format the data disc before the next time he tried to access it.

    --
    Where were you when the voynix came?
  7. The perfect secret weapon! by Bananatree3 · · Score: 4, Funny
    One customer left a banana on top of his hard drive, which then rotted and seeped through into the device. The circuits were ruined and the drive failed to work.

    AHhahahahahaha! the perfect corporate sabotage! Disguised as a janitor in a data center, place the banana inside one of the server cases over the holiday weekend, and voila! Muahahahahahahaha......

    1. Re:The perfect secret weapon! by OakDragon · · Score: 2, Funny

      In a another, similar article, I read of people noticing a mysterious foul odor that seemed to be coming from one of the office computers. A tech investigated, and found that one of the plastic panels for an (empty) drive bay was a little loose. He opened it and found what looked to be a month-old taco. Seems somebody confused the computer for a fridge.

    2. Re:The perfect secret weapon! by GammaKitsune · · Score: 5, Funny

      Is that a banana in your server or are you just happy to see me?

      --
      Gamertag: WyleType
    3. Re:The perfect secret weapon! by pilgrim23 · · Score: 3, Funny

      It is known that any given drive will max out on data in time. It would be good to...pear it down...
      Thus the users could enjoy the fruits of their labor... I'll stop now...

      --
      - Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum, minutus carborata descendum pantorum.
    4. Re:The perfect secret weapon! by SpiritusGladius1517 · · Score: 2, Funny

      What if they have a pointed stick?

      --
      If the women don't find you handsome, they should at least find you handy.
    5. Re:The perfect secret weapon! by LunaticTippy · · Score: 4, Funny

      Oh sure, like none of us has ever used a computer to heat up some lunch.

      --
      Man, you really need that seminar!
  8. Great Advertising for OnTrack by waif69 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Although, from people I met over the years, they have a very good reputation for data recovery. At one of the PC Expos in NYC, I remember they had a booth with a computer that was in a fire. They claimed that they were able to retrieve the data.

    1. Re:Great Advertising for OnTrack by King_TJ · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah... OnTrack has been around for *years*, doing data-recovery. I believe "DriveSavers" is another worthy competitor offering the same services.

      I used to work for a small business that partnered up with them to get a discount on drive recovery work we sent in to them (and then we'd get to keep the difference as a commission).

      The problem with these places is that the cost of recovering data is so high, it's unfathomable for most home or small business customers. For example, one of my previous customers had their home office PC's drive fail after it was only a year old or so. They had all of their tax records stored on it, and shortly after it crashed, they discovered they were being audited by the IRS! They wanted us to attempt to recover it, but the drive refused to even spin up - so there was nothing else I was able to do. The quotes I received for recovery started at the $3000 range and up. (They go by the size of the hard drive, primarily.) When I told them the estimated cost, they cringed and saying "That's 3 times what the whole computer cost us new, last year!", decided to manually reassemble all their tax records, rather than retrieve the data from the drive.

    2. Re:Great Advertising for OnTrack by Himring · · Score: 2, Funny

      And then, this other time, there was this other computer, and, like, something really bad had happened to it, and, like, they said they retrieved that data too ... it was awesome....

      --
      "All great things are simple & expressed in a single word: freedom, justice, honor, duty, mercy, hope." --Churchill
  9. Ok... by aliendisaster · · Score: 3, Insightful
    according to a data recovery company that has released a list of the most remarkable cases of data loss witnessed this year.
    British comedian Dom Joly, presenter of Trigger Happy TV, thought the joke was on him when he dropped his laptop, damaging a hard drive containing 5,000 photos, 6,000 songs, a book he was writing and all of his newspaper columns.
    Is dropping a laptop really that remarkable? I think they are just trying to name drop on this part.
    --
    Freedom is a state of mind. A mind is a state of being. Stay the fuck out of my mind and my being. - Corporate Avenger
    1. Re:Ok... by iainl · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, it's just that they're trumpeting how wonderful dropping a laptop could be toward saving us from being submitted to any more of Joly's dire attempts at humour ever, ever again.

      --
      "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
  10. TDWTF has some good stories. by The+MAZZTer · · Score: 2, Informative
  11. keyboard by joerdie · · Score: 4, Funny

    This is sort of OT but when i worked at radioshack, this guy was complaining about his keyboard on his laptop not working properly. After looking at the unit I realized that the customer had been hiding a thin layer of pot under the keys... I didn't "inform the authorities," but I did have a long conversation with the guy about where he should hide the pot.

    1. Re:keyboard by multipartmixed · · Score: 2, Funny

      > If you really never want to see your data again, just record it on a DVD-minus-R.

      Scene at the Zeller's department store near my house:

      Noob: What the difference between a DVD plus R and a DVD minus R?
      Droid: The plus R, you can read to it and write to it. The minus R, you can burn but you can't read from it.
      Me: So, what's the point of writing to a DVD if you can't read the data back?
      Droid: *drool*
      Noob: So what should I buy?
      Me: How old is your computer?
      Noob: Six months
      Me: Anything'll do. But shop at a computer store, it's cheaper.

      --

      Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
    2. Re:keyboard by gt_mattex · · Score: 3, Funny

      I had something similar to this. I was doing computer repair some years ago when a customer walked in claiming his new scanner would not work. I looked it over and tested it. It seemed to work fine.

      I called the guy back over and asked him to replicate the error for me. He then proceeded to activate the scanner by placing his document up to the monitor and pressing the power button on the scanner.

      I laughed so hard I almost passed out.

      --
      "No doubt one may quote history to support any cause, as the devil quotes scripture." - Learned Hand
  12. slashvertisement? by minus_273 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This thing is full of really bad puns and reads like an ad for a certian data recovery company. how the hell did this get posted on the front page?

    --
    The war with islam is a war on the beast
    The war on terror is a war for peace
  13. Just an advertisment by z_gringo · · Score: 4, Informative

    That "article" is nothing more than a commercial for using their data recovery service.

    --
    -- -- Warning. Do not stare directly at the sun.
    1. Re:Just an advertisment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And what's worse, it's not even funny!

  14. STOP POSTING ADS by rbanzai · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "OnTrack claims it rescued the data in all cases. Jim Reinert, senior director of software and services for the company, said it pays to have your damaged hard drive or storage device evaluated because the chances of recovery are good."

    This "slashvertisement" crap has gone too far.

  15. Commonly by Himring · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The most common issue I've dealt with is jr techs deleting user profiles off xp boxes to "fix" something without first determining if there is any sensitive data in "my documents." Yes, generally -- although we tell users to put important stuff on network drives -- there are docs there that carry weight....

    I had a HD going bad once, with stuff on it I HAD to get off. I hooked it up and as it clicked and thumped and stopped spinning, I'd whack it with a flash light. This would make it spin and the copy would continue. After 30 minutes of beating it into submission, all data copied off successfully....

    I will tell this: one time we had a fire at a site. After all the damage cleaned up, machines replaced, etc., we were working with the maintenance guy who had been involved in the smoke cleanup, etc. The server was pretty messy. We were going to replace it, but he said, "no problem. Got it working." We asked what he did.

    He took the thing apart, apparently, and ran all pieces through the industrial dish washer -- all the but the harddrive. He let dry thoroughly, put all back together, and it worked. We were dumb-founded....

    --
    "All great things are simple & expressed in a single word: freedom, justice, honor, duty, mercy, hope." --Churchill
    1. Re:Commonly by Lumpy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I got a free laptop and a free $900.00 Universal MX-3000 remote that way. Both were damaged by smoke in a fire. they were being tossed at a clients home I snagged them and soaked both in distilled water for days, finally ended spraying down the boards, drying and then reassembling.

      Both work great, in fact the laptop has been running fine for 6 months now with my daughter using it. (It's a super slow Dell latitude C640 good for a kid only wanting to run simple games like UT2004 or DOOM3)

      Washing electronics is not surprising. everything you own has been washed once in it's life, typically during the assembly.. they wash off all the flux from the soldering process, typically with water if the place uses modern water soluble flux.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  16. Advert for a company NOT to go to.. by mdobossy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I like my data to be private, and if I was ever in need of a data recovery company, I would expect them to be professional, and respect my privacy/data.

    Here you have a company airing their clients misfortunes all over the net.. and in one case even specifying the name of the individual. Doesn't exactly give me a warm and fuzzy feeling about how well they respect a client's privacy.

    1. Re:Advert for a company NOT to go to.. by Poltron+Inconnu · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'd highly suspect that they got permission to do so in all cases. The named individual probably even got the service in exchange for the publicity as it mentions they contacted him after reading about his problem in the paper. If there was not a prior agreement then I'm sure there will soon be an article on Slashdot about the lawsuit. Your comment isn't insightful, it's silly. Many companies give away their services or products in exchange for the right to publicize. And considering that your average Joe on the street assumes that a dead drive means all information is lost forever, as the aforementioned comedian did, then I can see why this company would want to shout from the rooftops that their service even exists. People don't look for what they don't know exists. If the company followed your advice their client list would be limited to only technologically adept people and that would rule out the vast majority of people using computers.

    2. Re:Advert for a company NOT to go to.. by stereoroid · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you're talking about Dom Joly, did you even read TFA? He wrote about his mishap in a column in a UK national newspaper (The Independent on Sunday), after which OnTrack contacted him. So, what are you referring to?

      --
      (this is not a .sig)
  17. N00bkes by SuperStretchy · · Score: 5, Funny

    Thats why I use the Microwaved-Hard-Drive method. It works! Mostly because you can't find the HD amidst the smoldering ruins of the house.

  18. What is "False" about it? by krell · · Score: 3, Informative

    "Can we at least *try* to avoid posting false news items that are really nothing more than thinly-disguised press releases?"

    Can you please cite the false parts of this news item? If you can't, why call it false?

    --
    Where were you when the voynix came?
    1. Re:What is "False" about it? by idontgno · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think the fundamentally false premise is that this story is actually news.

      However, at least it's interesting. Everyone loves someone else's disaster story.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
  19. Backup? by PhoenixK7 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Yet more reasons to buy a cheap external hard-disk and at LEAST back up to that :-)

    Or, you can be like me and back up to an external hard disk at home, and a filesystem on a RAID array with a hot spare, and another backup system for that array in a different location!

    Backup solutions are way cheaper than paying some person to extract data from a dead drive... even for the bare minimum external USB/FireWire drive that you backup to daily, would save probably like 90% of all accidental damage losses of data, or losses due to random drive failure. Go out and set up your backup solution NOW, not tomorrow :-)

  20. Freeze your bad hard drives by jgercken · · Score: 3, Informative

    I concur that this is a lousy promotional post. Therefore I'd like to make sure everyone knows the trick of putting failed/failing hard drives in the freezer for a few minutes. For reasons unknown to me, it normally gets them running long enough to pull the important data off them. If you're tempted to send a failed drive to a recovery company, try this first.

    --
    Never ascribe to malice what can be adequately attributed to ignorance. -Napoleon
  21. Photography losses by khendron · · Score: 4, Funny

    I used to work in a camera store. Although not directly related to losing computer data, the ways customers would destroy their cameras and their film were often quite amusing.

    One guy dropped his camera into a lake at the cottage. He had read somewhere that once a camera has been immersed it should not be removed from the water. So he brought us his camera in a bucket full of lake water. I think there was even sand.

    Another guy had his film (remember that stuff?) with vacation pictures break in the camera, so he couldn't rewind the roll. He did a very intelligent thing. He went into a pitch dark room, and by feel opened up the camera, took out the film and put it into a film container. Would have worked, except that didn't use one of those black Kodak film containers. Instead he used one of those clear film containers from Fuji. When he proudly brought his "saved" film in for processing, we regretfully had to inform him that despite his best efforts, the film was ruined.

    Then there was the lady who didn't understand why her night photos of Niagara Falls (taken with a Kodax Disc camera) didn't turn out, because she distinctly remembered that the flash went off. We had to explain to her that if her flash could illuminate all of the Falls from that distance, it would probably kill everybody within 10 feet of her.

    --
    Life is like a web application. Sometime you need cookies just to get by.
  22. Re:Interns by curecollector · · Score: 2, Funny

    Ah, the old read mail, real fast routine. Love it...

  23. "priceless" data until they hear what the price is by dmccarty · · Score: 2, Informative

    Having worked in IT for a while, I've found that everyone's data is "invaluable" until they find out what the cost of recovery is.

    I remember one person's drive that failed badly. Naturally, he hadn't saved his files to the server. All his data was "priceless," of course, until we got a quote from the recovery service that was about $1,000. On second thought, he said, maybe we could just keep the old hard drive around in case we need something off of it, and then we could send it in.

    As it turned out, there was never anything important enough to warrant sending it in.

    --
    Have fun: Join D.N.A. (National Dyslexics Association)
  24. Re:The freezer method? by binner1 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I have actually done this. My previous employer has some Building Automation software running on a machine that was not backed up what-so-ever. We were in the process of building a replacement box and getting it all setup, etc. Only days before being able to move the data across (the new system was being backed up), the drive crapped out. A morning in the freezer and we were able to get the data off.

    I wouldn't have thought to try this, but a few of the maintenance guys suggested it. I was both surprised and happy that morning!

    -Ben

  25. Fixing "Dead" HDs by G4from128k · · Score: 3, Informative

    A friend gave me an old iMac G4 because the HD (Quantum Fireball 13 GB) was fried. The HD's motor driver chip had a nice burn mark where the chip had spewed it's magic smoke. I yanked the circuit board of a similar HD (Quantum Fireball 10 GB) -- the circuit boards "look" identical -- and the Frankenstein HD worked. My friend got her data back and I got to keep the iMac.

    The point is that electronics problems with HDs (but not mechanical problems) can be fixed by swapping circuit boards.

    --
    Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do.
  26. DoD spec.? Seven times... stop repeating the myth! by Ayanami+Rei · · Score: 3, Informative

    The NSA (and by extension the DoD) does not allow, under any circumstances, the use of wiping software to declassify hard disks. No matter how many passes. They might have at one point but nowadays there are no guarantees with the way storage technology changes so quickly so that they decided it would no longer be a good policy.

    Disks can be wiped using a single 0-pass to be re-used for a different project at the same or higher classification level (but different need-to-know).

    But disks can never go lower. Than can only be destroyed by melting or shredding. You remove the platters from the drive, send them to Ft. Meade, and they run it through the shedder, and send you a receipt of destruction.

    This also applies to flash media (compact flash, USB memory sticks). Same rules.

    --
    THIS THING CAN TURN ON A DIME, MACROSSZERO STYLE ALSO FUCK BETA, ~NYORON
  27. Re:10 by ajs318 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Yes! As long as the drive's already been formatted once, all you need to do is write out an empty sector map (or FAT, or inode table, or whatever name your OS calls it) showing that every sector on the disk is "free space" and not part of a file. You don't need to change the data. The awkward bit is finding out which sector on the disk belongs to which file.

    Data that has actually been overwritten, even just once, can never, no matter what anyone tells you, be recovered by any kind of analysis of the drive. But data isn't often overwritten. When you "delete" a file, it just gets marked as free space -- what's worse, it actually gets marked as "free space, after a fashion, but only use as a last resort" so as to give you a longer window of opportunity to recover it. New stuff will only get saved over the top of old stuff if there's really nowhere else to stick it. You can make sure data gets overwritten by first filling up the drive with junk files till there's no room to save anything else, then deleting the stuff you want rid of (which just marks it as free space), then creating more junk files -- knowing that the only place they can possibly be saved now, is over the top of the stuff you just deleted. Delete all the junk files and the drive is ready for re-use.

    --
    Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
  28. Remote Kaboom ? by cyberchondriac · · Score: 2, Funny
    How do they do the drilling on the drives of laptops that get stolen?
    They don't. Instead they just use Sony's batteries. Takes care of both data and thief in one blow.

    LOL ! That gives me an idea - would it be possible to write a Lojack type app, which when triggered remotely and covertly, would stress the power supply and make the batteries explode ?
    That would teach a thief to steal laptops. (Or teach a scumbag to buy stolen laptops for that matter)
    --

    Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
    1. Re:Remote Kaboom ? by Itsacon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      would it be possible to write a Lojack type app, which when triggered remotely and covertly, would stress the power supply and make the batteries explode ?

      You wouldn't even need to stress the power supply. Just tell the charger-circuit the battery voltage is 2 volts lower than it really is. Any LiIon drive will explode or at least seriously burn out at the next full charge cycle...

      You'd need some plastic explosives for NiCad and NiMH batteries though, they're much tougher.

      --
      I take life with a grain of salt...a slice of lemon and a dash of tequila
  29. Write-only disk drive? by wsanders · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Easy DIY project - the write-only disk drive!

    Reminds me of the colleague who asked "What is the best program to convert files?"

    Answer: "Well, rm converts files into free disk space very efficiently!"

    --
    Give a man a fish and you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish, and he'll say "WHERE'S MY FISH, YOU IDIOT?"
    1. Re:Write-only disk drive? by BrynM · · Score: 2, Informative

      I have a physical version of this somewhere, but it was easy enough to google a PDF. I give you Write Only Memory (WOM). It's a joke so old, it has a Wikipedia page.

      --
      US Democracy:The best person for the job (among These pre-selected choices...)
  30. No. DoD grade is not 7 overwrites. by Ayanami+Rei · · Score: 2, Informative

    DoD grade is complete destruction by an NSA-approved procedure. They remove and shred the platters.

    Please don't perpetuate that myth. DoD would rather not deal with issues like unpredictable sector reallocation, varying densities of magnetic domains... it's much simpler (and much faster) to destroy the drive.

    Also, many vendors who supply hard drives with equipment on GSA schedule have policies that allow users to keep harddrives from leased machines for destruction, or for sending empty drive shells back for RMA replacement of failed drives.

    --
    THIS THING CAN TURN ON A DIME, MACROSSZERO STYLE ALSO FUCK BETA, ~NYORON
    1. Re:No. DoD grade is not 7 overwrites. by LurkerXXX · · Score: 4, Informative

      DoD grade is complete destruction by an NSA-approved procedure. They remove and shred the platters.

      Please don't perpetuate that myth.


      Actually there are several different levels of DOD grade in handling of hard drives depending on the grade of the information on them (unclassified, secret, top secret, etc).

      I refer you to the Clearing and Sanitization Matrix.

      Approved ways to 'Sanatize' (as opposed to 'Clear') hard drives include:

      "d. Overwrite all addressable locations with a character, its complement, then a random character and verify. THIS METHOD IS NOT APPROVED FOR SANITIZING MEDIA THAT CONTAINS TOP SECRET INFORMATION."

      So overwriting is indeed DOD approved, just not for "top Secret" information.

      Top Secret data may be 'Sanatized' by:

      "a. Degauss with a Type I degausser"
      "b. Degauss with a Type II degausser."

      As well as

      "m. Destroy - Disintegrate, incinerate, pulverize, shred, or melt."

      -- which seems to be the only one you are familiar with.

      Please do your research before accusing someone of perpetuating myths.

  31. Back in the days of ST506... by CustomDesigned · · Score: 2, Informative

    I repaired many a hard drive (10, 20, 30 Megabytes with an M) by squirting WD-40 on the bearing. In those days, the bearings were exposed, and did not require opening the case.

  32. Re:10 by fuzz6y · · Score: 2, Informative
    Data that has actually been overwritten, even just once, can never, no matter what anyone tells you, be recovered by any kind of analysis of the drive.

    That's just not true. It certainly isn't going to be recoverable without taking the drive apart, but there's a reason FIPS standards require multiple overwrites with 1s, 0s, and random bit patterns.


    When you "delete" a file, it just gets marked as free space -- what's worse, it actually gets marked as "free space, after a fashion, but only use as a last resort" so as to give you a longer window of opportunity to recover it.

    There are filesystems that do this, but not FAT, or NTFS, or EXT2. A file may not get overwritten because it's not the right size (a deleted 1MB file won't make room for a 2MB new file, so the OS might choose a bigger free chunk to drop it in, rather than having to fragment it), but there's no preference given to "clean" bits.



    You can make sure data gets overwritten by first filling up the drive with junk files till there's no room to save anything else, then deleting the stuff you want rid of (which just marks it as free space), then creating more junk files -- knowing that the only place they can possibly be saved now, is over the top of the stuff you just deleted. Delete all the junk files and the drive is ready for re-use.

    Neither necessary nor sufficient. US Government offices use a secure deletion program like shred(1) (or rather, a variant that they've certified) for sensitive data, and a belt sander for top secret data.

    --
    If you're going to be elitist, it would help to be elite.
  33. Waterproof by waterford0069 · · Score: 2, Informative
    As any scuba diver knows, waterproof is rarely truly waterPROOF. Notice it says Water "Resistant".

    Typically your waterproof watch is good to 50ft - which means, you can probably shower with it on. It can handle NO dynamic forces.

    Your waterproof watch that's good to 100ft - you can have a bath.

    Your waterproof watch that's good to 100m (changing scale) - you can go swimming with. I've even used one for recreational diving (so long as you don't press any buttons you are probably OK).

    Your waterproof watch that is good to 300m - that's pretty close to waterproof for all practical means.

    If the camera really was billed as a waterproof/resistant camera (suitable for scuba diving and snorkelling), and it was appropriately cared for (it was sealed properly, and the o-rings were greased to the manufacturer's directions) - I'd be tearing the manufacturer a new one.

  34. Re:Worse... by Dr.+Zowie · · Score: 2, Informative

    No, the problem is the ".*" -- it matches "..", which is the containing directory, so it blows away every user's files just like "rm -r *" would in /usr/users.

  35. Re:DoD spec.? Seven times... stop repeating the my by dbIII · · Score: 2, Interesting
    But disks can never go lower. Than can only be destroyed by melting or shredding

    You don't have to melt it - get it above the curie temperature and it isn't ferromagnetic anymore so any magnetic information is lost. It doesn't even have to be for long - an intense enough shock wave gives you enough local heating to do it - so a bullet through the drive may well wipe the entire drive.

    To be sure you would have to use a large bullet or put the thing in the oven for long enough for the heat to even out. By doing this you cook the board, explode the capacitors and melt the solder - so a mechanical shredder is probably less hassle and gives you enough microstructural damage that putting the pieces back together again would still give you incomplete maganetic information - shredding would get the parts hot too.