Slashdot Mirror


Bill Gates On the Past, Future, and Google

editingwhiz writes "eWEEK reports that Bill Gates told PBS talk show host Charlie Rose and a Stanford University audience at TechNet Wednesday that 'We're at the beginning of something important again' in the development of technology — just as in the 1980s with the advent of the PC. He also discussed the growing Microsoft-Google competition, world health issues, how to give lots of money away to the benefit of mankind, and whether he'll return to Harvard to finish his studies." From the article: "On whether there's another idea today that is as powerful as the idea of the personal computer in the 1970s: 'If I knew medicine like I do computers, I would like to be able to control the [human] immune system, to fight against the onset of disease on a world level ... but I think the idea of the PC still would have topped that.'"

154 comments

  1. "If I Knew Medicine..." by TheWanderingHermit · · Score: 5, Funny

    If he knew medicine and could control the immune system in the human body as well as he and his company can control computers, just imagine the biological viruses we'd have faced by now. Every day your heart would stop beating for no reason and they'd have to restart it with CPR, but nobody would think that was odd.

    1. Re:"If I Knew Medicine..." by OwnedByTwoCats · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Networking PCs was as important, maybe more important, than the notion of the PC itself.

      And we all know how Microsoft led in that area. Their BlackBird networkins service totally dominates... errr..., wait. They were caught totally off guard by the rise of the internet, and the importance of TCP/IP. They did wake up to the threat posed to their business by the web browser, but so late that they had to break the law to fight it off, and then have an election go there way to get away with it.

    2. Re:"If I Knew Medicine..." by rubberbando · · Score: 3, Informative

      Every day your heart would stop beating for no reason and they'd have to restart it with CPR, but nobody would think that was odd.

      Actually, CPR doesn't restart your heart. It keeps the blood circulating through the body until a paramedic can use a defibulator to actually restart it.

      --
      DEAD DEAD DEAD DELETE ME
    3. Re:"If I Knew Medicine..." by heroofhyr · · Score: 2, Funny

      Welcome to the Microsoft Emergency Room. No doctors are currently available, but please wait in the patient service lobby for an additional $1.75 per minute. If you need anything, feel free to ask the giant, talking paperclip at reception. Thank you for choosing Microsoft Emergency Room. Our motto is: Where Do You Want to Die Today?

      --
      brandelf: invalid ELF type 'KEEBLER'
    4. Re:"If I Knew Medicine..." by aychamo · · Score: 5, Informative

      rubberbando, you are completely wrong. CPR is cardiopulmonary resuscitation. The technique is used if the patient goes into cardiac or pulmonary arrest. It literally starts their heart beating again, or makes them start breathing again. Using a defibrillator on someone in cardiac arrest wont do anything. A defibrillator (as its name implies) is used to revive a person who's heart is in atrial or ventricular fibrillation, which is an erratic pattern of contraction, instead of the normal pattern as observed by ECG. The defibs cause a complete depolarization of hopefully the entire myocardium in an attempt to get it to contract all together again. If the heart isn't beating at all, the defibs won't do anything.

    5. Re:"If I Knew Medicine..." by s20451 · · Score: 3, Informative

      It keeps the blood circulating through the body until a paramedic can use a defibulator to actually restart it.

      That is not correct. A defibrillator is useless on a person whose heart has stopped. It is used when the heart goes into "fibrillation", which is an uncoordinated sequence of heart muscle contractions that result in no net blood flow. Since fibrillation almost never resolves itself, left untreated it will cause death within minutes.

      In fact the defibrillator works by applying an electrical shock which stops the heart -- thus ending the fibrillation. The hope is that the heart's normal rhythm will start again immediately thereafter.

      In CPR, the idea is to maintain blood flow and oxygen in the lungs until (hopefully) the heart starts again on its own. This is why CPR has such a low success rate (5-10%), although still much better than the zero per cent success rate of doing nothing.

      Disclaimer: I am not a doctor. (Although I have a PhD, so technically ...)

      --
      Toronto-area transit rider? Rate your ride.
    6. Re:"If I Knew Medicine..." by tuzo · · Score: 1
      Actually, a defibrillator typically doesn't restart your heart, it stops it from fibrillating. :)

      i.e. The electrical current stops the heart so that the normal electrical activity can (hopefully) resume.

    7. Re:"If I Knew Medicine..." by dirvine · · Score: 1

      I think CPR *is* designed to restart your heart if possible. A defibrillator - actually stops your heart and then restarts it in an attempt to bring it into line with a normal beating heart - i.e one thats not beating irregularly. Basic CPR if theres a pulse don't start compressions you could kill the person, if the pulse is erratic you need a defibrillator. A lot of the new ones now talk to you and tell you what to do and will not attempt to shock a no pulse person.

    8. Re:"If I Knew Medicine..." by sgt_doom · · Score: 1

      But at least one would turn that comforting M$ shade of blue....

    9. Re:"If I Knew Medicine..." by EspressoFreak · · Score: 1

      So you got a 45 on your MCAT too huh.

    10. Re:"If I Knew Medicine..." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Every day your heart would stop beating for no reason and they'd have to restart
      > it with CPR, but nobody would think that was odd.

      Windows95 called --it wants its funny analogy back.

  2. If he knew medicine like he knows computers... by Opportunist · · Score: 1, Funny

    ...and manipulated our immune system to be as tough and secure as his systems, the human race would've died out by now.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  3. Wise choice by Constantine+XVI · · Score: 1

    From the article: "On whether there's another idea today that is as powerful as the idea of the personal computer in the 1970s: 'If I knew medicine like I do computers, I would like to be able to control the [human] immune system, to fight against the onset of disease on a world level"

    Think of what would have happened if he did. Norton sucks enough on a $500 piece of (comparatively) disposable hardware, just think on a one-of-a-kind human body.

    --
    "I think an etch-a-sketch with an ethernet port would beat IE7 in web standards compliance."
  4. Healthcare?! by ScislaC · · Score: 1

    With the track record his company has had in protecting his OS from viruses, I'm *GLAD* he's not in healthcare. ;)

    1. Re:Healthcare?! by sputnikid · · Score: 1

      Stupid comparison.

      That would be like me saying that tomatoes are more resiliant than humans because anthrax can kill people and not tomatoes.

      Viruses are written for the O/S that it is targeting. There are countless hacks and vulnerabilities in the Linux world but people seem to be happy waiting for the 16 y/o open source programmer to finish his dinner so that his parents will let him use the computer to write a patch.

  5. if only he cared about computer diseases... by chroot_james · · Score: 0, Redundant

    then maybe windows wouldn't be the best way to transport disease from one machine to another!

    --
    Reality is nothing but a collective hunch.
  6. Present by spellraiser · · Score: 4, Funny

    Bill Gates on the Past, Future, and Google

    So he's saying Google is the Present?

    Damn straight ...

    --
    I hear there's rumors on the Slashdots
    1. Re:Present by Constantine+XVI · · Score: 1

      No, Google transcends time. They have always existed. :-)

      --
      "I think an etch-a-sketch with an ethernet port would beat IE7 in web standards compliance."
  7. Re:FP by celardore · · Score: 0, Redundant

    A cunt you say? Whatever you say about him, he's donated more to charity than you and your children will ever earn combined! I think you're the cunt here.

  8. Hot Air by quokkapox · · Score: 4, Interesting
    'We're at the beginning of something important again'

    His job is to say things like this. He's been saying this for over a decade. It's a lot of hot air.

    The microsoft windows monopoly is becoming less relevant with each new free web-based software application/service that comes out, be it Google, YouTube, Flickr, Writely, etc. And all of those run fine on Linux.

    --
    it's a blue bright blue Saturday hey hey
    1. Re:Hot Air by WeAreAllDoomed · · Score: 5, Insightful
      His job is to say things like this. He's been saying this for over a decade. It's a lot of hot air.

      his job is to continue to leverage his single stroke of phenomenal luck - being at the right place at the right time a few decades ago - to sustain the ongoing illusion to the unwashed masses that he is some kind of unparalleled genius, and by extension, that microsoft is the beginning and end of computing.

      --
      free software, open standards, open file formats, no software patents.
    2. Re:Hot Air by Dystopian+Rebel · · Score: 2, Funny
      his job is to continue to leverage his single stroke of phenomenal luck - being at the right place at the right time a few decades ago - to sustain the ongoing illusion to the unwashed masses that he is some kind of unparalleled genius, and by extension, that microsoft is the beginning and end of computing.
      ... while wearing a sweater.
      http://www.alibris.com/images/subjects/features/bo oks/roadahead.jpg
      --
      Rich And Stupid is not so bad as Working For Rich And Stupid.
    3. Re:Hot Air by umeshunni · · Score: 1

      Right... look at all the mission critical software that runs on Writely, Youtube and Flickr!

    4. Re:Hot Air by maxume · · Score: 1

      How them grapes taste?

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    5. Re:Hot Air by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      Name me one major business not named Microsoft that uses Windows in any "mission-critical" status.

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    6. Re:Hot Air by flacco · · Score: 1
      How them grapes taste?


      as amazing as it may be to you, it's possible to make a negative observation about someone who is wealthy unmotivated by jealousy.

      --
      pr0n - keeping monitor glass spotless since 1981.
    7. Re:Hot Air by Wovel · · Score: 1

      Name one that doesn't. I could paste the Forbes fortune 1000 list here. Every single one of them runs an application they consider critical on Windows. (This is where some poser comes in claiming to work for one of them and saying they do not, that person is a liar)

    8. Re:Hot Air by Lando · · Score: 1

      Just a brief note. Flash does not work in a 64 bit elf environment last time I checked. Youtube requires flash to view videos or at least it complains that I don't have a modern version of flash and refuses to run video. So I'd have to say that youtube does not run fine on linux.

      --
      /* TODO: Spawn child process, interest child in technology, have child write a new sig */
    9. Re:Hot Air by Pastis · · Score: 3, Insightful

      To win the Lotto is a "single stroke of phenomenal luck".
      To build the company as he did, by outsmarting other competitors like IBM, is not luck. Far from it. He provoked the situation and get the most out of it.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MS-DOS

      As yourself: would you have done the same in the same position?

    10. Re:Hot Air by GrahamCox · · Score: 1

      ... that microsoft is the beginning and end of computing...

      Well, that's certainly HALF right.

    11. Re:Hot Air by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      Google. Every piece of mission-critical software in the Googleplex is on Linux. Yes, there are a few end-user applications on Windows, but those could be entirely cut out of Google and Google would still be running fine.
      Amazon. Same deal.
      Yahoo. It uses almost entirely FreeBSD.

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    12. Re:Hot Air by tehcyder · · Score: 1
      his single stroke of phenomenal luck
      You're not bitter at all are you?
      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    13. Re:Hot Air by Pastis · · Score: 1

      Typo: I meant ask yourself...

    14. Re:Hot Air by Danious · · Score: 1

      Erm, there are 32 bit versions of Linux you know, and there is a simple way to run 32 bit browser plugins in a 64 bit browser, and Flash 9 for Linux is now in public beta, so your point is?

      John.

    15. Re:Hot Air by Lando · · Score: 1

      Nothing really just making a comment. YouTube relies on proprietary code which means that it won't be supported over all versions of Linux.

      As to your points. I run 64 bit linux and though I suppose I could drop back to 32 bit browser in order to use false, the fact is that 64 bit browsers have been around since 2003. Flash is proprietary once flash is available I suppose I would have to stick to 32 bit until all plugins were updated to 64 bit. Extending that concept, I might as well be running windows since there are more plugins on Microsoft windows than on linux. Furthermore, what happens if I am not using intel/amd hardware that still leaves a problem.

      None-the-less. I am unfamiliar with any method to run 32 bit browser plugins within a 64 bit browser, if you can point me to where I can find that information I would appreciate it. I haven't seen Flash 9 available for 64bit linux but I'll drop by and check it out. Thanks.

      --
      /* TODO: Spawn child process, interest child in technology, have child write a new sig */
  9. This is the original by digitalderbs · · Score: 3, Informative
    Bill Gates on the Past, Future...

    This is the original article for the dupe posted earlier today.
    1. Re:This is the original by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Informative? You know it's bad when the moderators don't even check the link to make sure it really is informative.

  10. Was anyone else reminded of by antifoidulus · · Score: 4, Funny

    the movie "Back to School" after reading, "and whether he'll return to Harvard to finish his studies". Replacing Dangerfield with Gates would make for a weird, weird movie.

    1. Re:Was anyone else reminded of by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Bring us a pitcher of beer every 5 minutes until somebody bluescreens, then bring one every 8 minutes".

      Yeah, just not the same

      --
      No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
  11. Ahh, so that explains it by also-rr · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The reason I have been feeling as sick as a dog all day today is because my immune system is stressed out about what it might have to face in the future.

    Anyway, I believe that the next big thing will be an expansion of high speed communication to cover most of the human race. Sure, it's pretty obvious... but as I recall so was the idea that the internet would be a world changing phenomenon in 1994 and I have a file that was originally written on a BBC master in 1987 explaining how the computer would be widespread in business and the home.

    Over the next 20 years? Same as the last 20. Continual progress towards more devices that communicate more freely.

    1. Re:Ahh, so that explains it by tehcyder · · Score: 1
      Over the next 20 years? Same as the last 20. Continual progress towards more devices that communicate more freely.
      Wow, you're really going out on a limb there. Calm down a minute.
      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  12. Come again? by Aqua_boy17 · · Score: 5, Funny
    'If I knew medicine like I do computers, I would like to be able to control the [human] immune system, to fight against the onset of disease on a world level ...
    Except for the fact that you wouldn't be able to download your immunizations until Microsoft verified that your genetic code was authentic via Windows Genome Advantage.
    --
    What if the Hokey Pokey really is what it's all about?
    1. Re:Come again? by mattwarden · · Score: 1

      And any organ transplants would require a new license.

  13. scared by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These assholes are scared and they form the Google-Yahoo-MS-Novell-Mozilla alliance. Good! We'll know who to put out of business next!

  14. Windowa Vista Alive! by forrestf · · Score: 1

    Ya i can see it now, Windows Vista Alive! Runs on your unused brain! May Suffer From random crashes, and virii

  15. Oh teh Noes! by Aqua_boy17 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hey, quick, someone check on Charlie. Looks like he has the 'Blue Face of Death' again.

    --
    What if the Hokey Pokey really is what it's all about?
  16. It's arrogance and delusion... by Arker · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Bill doesn't know personal computers any better than the average hospital administrator knows the human immune system. And I'd bet you that when someone does make the next breakthrough in understanding and controlling the human immune system, that someone will not be a hospital administrator. I'd also bet that at least one hospital administrator will believe he did it though.

    --
    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
    Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
    1. Re:It's arrogance and delusion... by bogjobber · · Score: 1
      Bill doesn't know personal computers any better than the average hospital administrator knows the human immune system.

      Wanna share your thoughts on how you came to this conclusion? It seems pretty ridiculous to me. There are many things you can say about Bill Gates, but claiming that he is simply a management type that doesn't know anything about how computers work is definitely not one of them.

    2. Re:It's arrogance and delusion... by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      I don't think it's any less ridiculous than claiming he's some kind of technical genius. If he actually did know something about technology, then maybe at least one of his huge claims about technology in the past decade might have been correct.

      I have no doubts that billg is a shrewd and ruthless businessman, but I have plenty of doubts that he's done anything technical since Microsoft Basic 1.0.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    3. Re:It's arrogance and delusion... by bogjobber · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I never said he was a technical genius. What the original poster was saying is that Bill Gates doesn't understand computers. Maybe he hasn't done any real hacking in a while, but claiming that he is just an administrator who makes grand claims about computers but doesn't know very much about the actual concepts is ridiculous.

    4. Re:It's arrogance and delusion... by a.d.trick · · Score: 1

      I think geeks tend to (incorrectly) make the assumption that if someone speakes and acts like a businessman, they aren't be technically apt. Often it's true, however, not nessicarily. People like Gates are almost always speaking to a less knowledge able audience that us. They are smart enough to know that and craft their words and half-truths to take advantage of the audience's ignorace. (This is not unique to the computer field by any means). I don't know how smart the guy actually is (I wouldn't say a genius), but it's probably more than we give him credit for.

    5. Re:It's arrogance and delusion... by dangitman · · Score: 1

      No, you totally missed the point. He was likened to a hospital administrator. That doesn't mean that a hospital administrator doesn't know anything about medicine - in fact, they most likely do. But Bill has a similar level of insightful knowledge as a hospital administrator does compared to a brilliant medical researcher.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    6. Re:It's arrogance and delusion... by DragonWriter · · Score: 1
      Wanna share your thoughts on how you came to this conclusion? It seems pretty ridiculous to me. There are many things you can say about Bill Gates, but claiming that he is simply a management type that doesn't know anything about how computers work is definitely not one of them.



      Er, "Bill doesn't know personal computers any better than the average hospital administrator knows the human immune system" does not imply "that he is simply a management type that doesn't know anything about how computers work". Hospital administrators are not infrequently themselves physicians, after all. They just aren't, as a class (individuals may be exceptional) particularly the most accomplished among physicians at innovating in the non-administrative aspects of healthcare.

      Likewise, Gates clearly has some technical background, but hardly, from a technical perspective, one of the great innovators, personally, in the computing field.
    7. Re:It's arrogance and delusion... by Arker · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm sure he's a very smart guy - but his smarts have been focused on marketing and management, all along. He's never made any notable technical contribution to anything - this doesn't mean he's a technical know-nothing, by any means, I'm sure in comparison to Uncle Bob and Aunt Judy he could be called a computer genius. But I think the analogy to a hospital administrator is apt. Hospital administrators are usually doctors, and they do know more about medicine than the average patient for certain - but they're doctors whose true talents lay in other areas, in management and marketing, and they aren't the people you want to turn to when you need serious medical knowledge.

      --
      =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
      Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
    8. Re:It's arrogance and delusion... by sgt_doom · · Score: 1
      Well done, Citizen Arker! Perhaps Mr. Bill will return to Harvard and finally study Computer Science 101 - and decide he needs to redo everything - for legacy sake, of course!

      Or perhaps he will study Economics 101 and suddenly realize how honest economic systems are supposed to work! Now that's a thought....

    9. Re:It's arrogance and delusion... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I see you are the billionaire with your great understanding of the industry and where the mainframe big iron world went wrong.

  17. Monopoly by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 1
    If I knew medicine like I do computers, I would like to be able to control the [human] immune system
    • Everone who didn't pay MS on a periodic basis would be die.
    • The Bush administration would step into any medical malpractice suit and claim executive privilege to nullify the suit.
    • Sharing tips about how to stay healthy would be legislated as "piracy", and would be punishable by prison time and/or heavy fines.
    • We'd require special permission to learn about how our bodies worked. Medical schools would all require students to sign NDAs.
    1. Re:Monopoly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you got it wrong: Everyone who used MS would die and be rebooted on a periodic basis. There'd be free healthcare, but people would be too afraid to use it because its "just too different" from their usual crappy service. No matter how much training you took to build up your muscles, you'd run slower and slower every year, while requiring more and more food and health-care upgrades.

    2. Re:Monopoly by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      No matter how much training you took to build up your muscles, you'd run slower and slower every year, while requiring more and more food and health-care upgrades.

      So, no different than it is now, huh?

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    3. Re:Monopoly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't believe more don't hail this comment! Bravo! Mod parent up!

  18. gates as prophet by entropy42 · · Score: 4, Funny

    When you are evaluating bill gates's prognostication ability, do not forget to consider this prediction: in January, Mr Gates predicted that technology would make spam "a thing of the past" within two years.

    Yes, that was January 2004.

    --
    -- Stop the violins!
    1. Re:gates as prophet by shawngarringer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Funny, because both my hotmail (Microsoft) and my gmail (Google) accounts get LOTS of spam, but because of technology 99% of it gets filtered out.

      So, in truth technology has made spam a thing of the past.

    2. Re:gates as prophet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny, my gmail never gets spam. Gmail = family and friends. Hotmail = companies/spammers.

    3. Re:gates as prophet by dangitman · · Score: 1
      So, in truth technology has made spam a thing of the past.

      How can spam be a thing of the past, when there is more of it being sent today than at any time in the past?

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    4. Re:gates as prophet by Nightspirit · · Score: 1

      Oddly enough, spam is a thing of the past for me. I use outlook and everything I don't want is shoved into the junk mail folder. Out of 100 emails a day I may get 1 spam message through, and I almost never have a false negative in the junk mail folder.

    5. Re:gates as prophet by shawngarringer · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Gates was talking about spam from a users point of view not a technical one. Spam, for users, is not a big deal anymore because of how good spam filtering takes care of it. I get MUCH less spam delivered to my inbox (1 or 2) than I did 2 years ago (100+). My spam filter gets over 200 a day still, but it really doesn't impact me at all.

    6. Re:gates as prophet by dangitman · · Score: 1

      If that's what he meant, then why didn't he say that? Even if the end user doesn't see it, spam still exists, and still causes problems. Somebody must be seeing it, if spam still exists. I think it's much more important to get rid of the cause of spam than cover up the symptoms.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
  19. In memory of... by Ariastis · · Score: 0, Redundant

    "640K ought to be enough for anybody." - Bill Gates, 1981 would become "One kidney should be enough for anybody." - Bill Gates, 2006 And of course, we'd all welcome ou monthly HealthCare Patch Tuesday :P

  20. Zombies. by khasim · · Score: 2, Funny

    Don't forget whole cities converted to zombie'ism. Crawling around, slower every day.

    "Brains! Brains!"

    "Refinance your home. Low rates. Buy herbal viagra!"

    "Brains!"

    "Teenage sluts want to gamble with you! Brains! Brains!"

    "Brains! Protect yourself from zombie attack! Drink Zombie-B-Gone soda today! Guaranteed not to turn you into a zombie! Brains! \/14gra!"

  21. 640 kb by CSLarsen · · Score: 0, Redundant
    'We're at the beginning of something important again' in the development of technology -- just as in the 1980s with the advent of the PC'
    ... around the time he professed that 640 kb should be enough for everyone. :-)
    --
    Claiming to be pedantic on Slashdot is asking for trouble
  22. I'd be happier if by harrythefish · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'd be happier to let an open source group develop medical software with clinic and hospital distributed databases where clinicians could be sure any data submitted to government would be entirely anonymised. I shudder to think of how the NPfIT in the UK will end up. Still, there are other countries to go and work in. IAAD in the UK

    --
    I like Apple. They make nice stuff which works most of the time.
  23. Oh no, not the defibulator! by Dystopian+Rebel · · Score: 5, Funny

    When a guy's flat-lining, the most hilarious thing you can do to him is to use the defibulator and the detibulator to remove his leg from the knee down, then attach his feet directly to his femurs. When he revives, he starts walking around like a duck and looking confused. We crazy paramedics just about split a gut laughing every time!

    --
    Rich And Stupid is not so bad as Working For Rich And Stupid.
    1. Re:Oh no, not the defibulator! by bdonalds · · Score: 1

      Best, most hilarious Spelling Nazi EVER!!!!!!!

      --
      The most important thing to do in your life is to not interfere with somebody else's life. -FZ
    2. Re:Oh no, not the defibulator! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hahaha. This is the rare Slashdot post that actually made me laugh out loud. Cheers!

    3. Re:Oh no, not the defibulator! by D+H+NG · · Score: 1

      Like this?

  24. This guy is going to have problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nobody is going to give this guy's resume a second look, when they see he didn't even finish his degree.

    Kids, don't end up like Bill: stay in school!

  25. *shudder* by gt_mattex · · Score: 1

    Am I the only one who got a chill down his spine when he referenced being as knowledgeable about the immune system as he was with computers?

    Now I'm not a Microsoft hater and unlike most my first thought wasn't about possible viruses but about DRM.

    Can you imagine a world where MS has copyrights to a healthy immune system? Now you can add in the jokes about viruses... oh and now there are new opportunities for monopoly joke as well.

    --
    "No doubt one may quote history to support any cause, as the devil quotes scripture." - Learned Hand
    1. Re:*shudder* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except companies are already patenting living things. And MS may be big, but Cyngenta for example is the largest privately owned company in the world.

  26. Philanthropy for Dummies by kfg · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Whatever you say about him, he's donated more to charity than you and your children will ever earn combined!

    Steal from 100 widows, support 1, collect humanitarian award.

    Refuse to steal from widows, get arrested for indigence.

    Such it has always been, so it shall always be.

    KFG

    1. Re:Philanthropy for Dummies by kz45 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "Steal from 100 widows, support 1, collect humanitarian award."

      and microsoft steals from widows.....how?

  27. If this were against Microsoft... by mmport80 · · Score: 1

    Microsoft would take threaten to take their toys home - as they did with the EU and Korea... That's the great thing about open source, "it" doesn't (can't) throw chairs about, and generally react stupidly to dumb people.

  28. However harsh it may sound... by scsirob · · Score: 3, Insightful

    His wish to be able to cure people and eradicate diseases is noble, but saving every sick person will not save the Earth. In fact, it will make the Earth's population grow way out of control.

    So instead of dying from cancer, HIV or bird flu, we'll starve for lack of food and water.

    In other words, dying is a necessary evil fact of life. If we can make it happen without pain and suffering, so much the better. But trying to prolongue it forever is foolish.

    --
    To Terminate, or not to Terminate, that's the question - SCSIROB
    1. Re:However harsh it may sound... by UnrefinedLayman · · Score: 1

      Longevity research shouldn't be blocked because it can increase the population, but the benefits of that research should be restricted to people willing to make sacrifices in other parts of life. If there were a treatment that could slow the aging process and allow people to live an extra fifty years, anyone choosing to undergo the treatment should be required to forfeit the right to reproduce and should not be permitted the same retirement, social security and other welfare benefits as the naturals would receive.

      There are all kinds of arguments about how it may be unfair to have restrictions like this, but there can never be fairness with life and death, only balance. The reality is there are people like me who don't want children and don't mind working an extra twenty years to live another fifty. Everyone has the right to reproduce, everyone has the right to collect social security and their pension, but not everyone has the right to live beyond their natural means. Sometimes you have to give something up (like part of your paycheck now, or the right to reproduce) in order to get something else later on (social security checks, or an unnaturally long life).

    2. Re:However harsh it may sound... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not true.
      The countries with the best health care have the lowest birth rates.

    3. Re:However harsh it may sound... by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      That used to apply to the United States.

      Not anymore.

      In any event, longevity research is less about how to make us live longer as it is to make us live better, longer. I'm in my mid-forties now, and if the medical system could keep me as I am now 'til I'm 90 or so, that would be great. What scares me most about old age is not death, per se, but the long, debilitating, unproductive process most of us suffer before we finally die.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    4. Re:However harsh it may sound... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The human experience is not a zero-sum game. Even if it were, prosperity has always led to lowered birthrates, until there is an equilibrium.

      However, if humanity is to reach for the stars, we'll need an awfully large number of people to have a sustainable breeding population, and we really shouldn't empty the Earth at the same time.

    5. Re:However harsh it may sound... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no kids - 10% high education
      1 kid - 20% upper middle class
      2~3 kids - 40% family oriented
      3~5 kids - 20% lower class uneducated
      6+ kids - 10% psycho religious freaks

      At this rate we will definitely kill the planet and extinct ourselves (in a nuclear religious war perhaps?)

      We could live quite comfortably without damaging the planet with about 10% the worlds current population. We need to get away from families and focus on casts - Alphas, Betas, Epsilons.. reproduction should be strictly controlled to maintain the total population and fill demand in the appropriate casts.

    6. Re:However harsh it may sound... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      That's a myth. The Earth has enough resources to sustain many times its current population. There's also no correlation between population density and standard of living.

    7. Re:However harsh it may sound... by Wovel · · Score: 1

      Why does this garbage always spew forth from an AC.

  29. What if... by c0ldfusi0n · · Score: 1
    'If I knew medicine like I do computers, I would like to be able to control the [human] immune system, to fight against the onset of disease on a world level ... but I think the idea of the PC still would have topped that.'
    Yeah right. If Bill Gates would be in medicine instead of softwares, a bunch of people would just turn blue and then fall dead randomly, Tourette syndrome would be way more common and the children would look exactly like their parents, except random parts of their body would start glowing.
    --
    A computer makes it possible to do, in half an hour, tasks which were completely unnecessary to do before.
  30. BSOD... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Blue Skin of Death...

  31. Re:FP by orasio · · Score: 3, Interesting

    As he said, personal computers are very important for the world as a whole.
    The policies of MS, and their way of doing bussiness has an effect everywhere.
    Although MS is not the cause of all the bad stuff that is happiening around, they have some responsibilities, here and there, including developing countries.
    They use some techniques I don't approve to convince my government to give them money, and I think that money has better places to be spent. The same thing is happening in Africa, for example.

    The guy gives back some money, that is right, and he even gives in a sensible way. But the net gain for everybody, because of the existence of MS is not that clear.

    Plus, charity is not that great, and it just doesn't work very well.
    Charity alone is not something to praise a guy for. Good ethics, and an overall good effect on the community, that would earn my respect. Giving something back is sometimes not enough.

  32. Re:FP by smittyoneeach · · Score: 1

    Who says Bill Gates is offtopic with this first post claim?
    He nose slashdot like he nose computers!

    --
    Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
  33. Pirate Genes by Aqua_boy17 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Anyone with Pirate genes will be left out in the cold, and will be comdemned to eventual privation and death. Won't someone please think of the Pirates? We'll never be able to defeat global warming without them.

    --
    What if the Hokey Pokey really is what it's all about?
  34. Re:FP by spectecjr · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Plus, charity is not that great, and it just doesn't work very well.
    Charity alone is not something to praise a guy for.


    That's why he has a foundation, and there are strict rules governing the way that the money is given to 3rd parties. It's run like a business - your charity has to produce results for you to get the money, and to keep getting more, you need to keep producing results. Otherwise, he gives his money to another charity which will do a better job.

    Pretty smart way of handling it actually - which is why Warren Buffet jumped on board too.

    --
    Coming soon - pyrogyra
  35. Choice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    MS stole the decision of which OS/applications widows get with their PC's? How can you be a philantropist with someone elses money? He did the right thing is all.

    1. Re:Choice by diersing · · Score: 1

      And if every PC sold from a retail outlet to a widow came with an option of Microsoft Windows XP or any of the dozen or so Linux distros that are more popular then the others - what percentage do you think MS would garner? Seriously, do you think the average home user would pick anything other then the platform they've grown accustomed to? Right, wrong or indifferent, people aren't comfortable making a home OS switch without the dedicated retail outlet and onsite expertise that Apple offers. Your average Best Buy/Circuit City/Walmart buyer is going to pick MS and we both know it. You and I may strip it off and load , but the masses aren't concerned with the same things you and I are.

  36. Other observations and predictions by Bill Gates by truthsearch · · Score: 1

    "There's nobody getting rich (by) writing software"

    "We will never make a 32-bit operating system, but I'll always love IBM."

    "There are no significant bugs in our released software that any significant number of users want fixed."

    "There are people who don't like capitalism, and people who don't like PCs. But there's no one who likes the PC who doesn't like Microsoft."

    "We've done some good work, but all of these products become obsolete so fast....It will be some finite number of years, and I don't know the number -- before our doom comes."

  37. Bill thinks he invented the PC? by xoyoyo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Obviously I'm only going from secondary sources here, but the quote - "If I knew medicine like I do computers, I would like to be able to control the [human] immune system, to fight against the onset of disease on a world level ... but I think the idea of the PC still would have topped that." - makes it sound awfully like Bill is claiming the PC. Either that's poor editing or severely delusional. Hell, Microsoft was the *second choice* OS vendor for IBM.

    Which makes me wonder, what has Bill invented?

    1. Re:Bill thinks he invented the PC? by MrCopilot · · Score: 1
      Which makes me wonder, what has Bill invented?

      The worlds largest bank account.

      --
      OSGGFG - Open Source Gamers Guide to Free Games
    2. Re:Bill thinks he invented the PC? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      He has been trying to make it sound like the PC wouldn't exist without him for 3 years. This is no different.

      Visual Basic.
      A lot of the intial Apple application software.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:Bill thinks he invented the PC? by xoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Visual...yes, Basic, no - that belongs to Grace Hopper

      As far as Apple Software goes...

      Excel was a line by line rip of 1-2-3 "Do everything 1-2-3 does and do it better" was the goal
      Word? Too many word processors to list, and the code came from Xerox Parc along with Charles Simonyi
      PowerPoint maybe? Ah, no, that came from a company called Foresight.

      Even DOS itself was a rewrite.

      My point is that Bill isn't an inventor in the Edison mould (not even Edison was, but one sacred cow is enough for one day). He's a smart implementor and a genius marketer/monopolist. And it's disingenuous of him to suggest otherwise. Innovation simply does not run very deep within Microsoft's culture: they excel (pun intended) at taking ideas from elsewhere and packaging them: or rather they used to excel - that momentum has been lost.

      The PC would have been a success without Microsoft: if Gary Kildall hadn't been out flying when IBM came to call you'd all be hating on Digital Research now. There was plenty of good software about in the early 80s that did all the things MS later tied up.

    4. Re:Bill thinks he invented the PC? by ccp · · Score: 1

      Which makes me wonder, what has Bill invented?

      His past. Have you noticed that he's sounding more and more delusional and megalomaniacal every year?
      I guess being always surronded by yes men and lackeys does that to you, but for us spectators is kind of weird to see it happening in real time.

      I'm expectig the persian cat and the monocle anytime soon.

      Cheers,
      CC

  38. Darth Gates? by darthservo · · Score: 2, Funny
    "If I knew medicine like I do computers, I would like to be able to control the [human] immune system, to fight against the onset of disease on a world level" - Bill Gates, Stanford University TechNet Event

    "One day I will be. I'll be the most powerful Jedi ever! I'll even be able to stop people from dying!" - Anakin Skywalker, Attack of the Clones.

    Am I the only one who thought that these two quotes are pretty scarily similar?

    --

    Prove it.

    1. Re:Darth Gates? by tehcyder · · Score: 1
      "If I knew medicine like I do computers, I would like to be able to control the [human] immune system, to fight against the onset of disease on a world level" - Bill Gates, Stanford University TechNet Event

      "One day I will be. I'll be the most powerful Jedi ever! I'll even be able to stop people from dying!" - Anakin Skywalker, Attack of the Clones.

      Am I the only one who thought that these two quotes are pretty scarily similar?

      Yes.
      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  39. Irrelevant by fa_king · · Score: 1

    Anything that comes from Microsoft is now Irrelevant.
    They are now behind the times, and are relying on their soon to be obsolete dominance to push things that are already out there: look at Zune and Windows Leopard, I mean Vista...lol.
    They should change their names to Copy$oft.

    I will give credit to the Xbox, but that wasn't new either it is a copy of unmentioned consoles.

  40. Re:Metaphors for Dummies by eggsurplus · · Score: 1

    Call me a dummy too then. The metaphor doesn't fit right. Close but no cigar. Close is only good in horseshoes and grenades.

  41. Offtopic observation by Chocolate+Teapot · · Score: 1

    William Henry Gates is an anagram of 'Lying weasel. Tar him!"

    --
    Modest doubt is called the beacon of the wise. - William Shakespeare
  42. Re:Metaphors for Dummies by JazzLad · · Score: 1

    ... and depth charges, nukes, really bad farts ...

    --
    "If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear." - Every fascist, ever
  43. What he didn't say... by Duggeek · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The tricky part is reading between the lines...

    From TFA:

    [Gates on "powerful ideas"]

    If I knew medicine like I do computers, I would like to be able to control the [human] immune system, to fight against the onset of disease on a world level ... but I think the idea of the PC still would have topped that.

    Translation: "Y'all better be glad I'm just screwing up your PC."

    [Gates on how Live.com competes with Google]

    Competition between our two companies will be good for the whole industry.

    ...until we leverage all the content out of Google with IP lawsuits.

    [Gates on recent struggles with the EU]

    We have worked out our differences. If they wanted us to leave out some of our components for some reason, we could have delivered a European version of Vista for them. But it turned out that wasn't necessary.

    Interesting that there's no specific mention of what was modified to make the European Edition "unnecessary". It's obvious that Vista is still packing Windows Media Player (component in question) Is this IE/Netscape all over again)?

    [Gates on the next 10 years]

    We're on to another wave of innovation; we just need to make sure the United States continues to stay right up there in relation to the rest of the world.

    This is after quoting all the "amazing stuff" that's coming with the Xbox360, Zune and voice recognition. Yes, World, be like the good ol' U.S. of A-holes! Cave-in to an oppression of content not seen since the book burnings of 1938 Germany!

    [Gates on the delays of Vista]

    Yes, it's later than we planned. But we want it to be right. It reminds me of when we released Windows 95 late that year, taking much longer than we planned.

    ...and we all know how "right" Windoze95 turned out to be. (...but it's got a killer version of MS-DOS!)

    [Gates on the exposure of medical research furthered by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation]

    I get a little upset with the media, which will cover a plane crash in India that killed 100 people, but it won't cover the fact that 1,000 times that many died in Africa today from malnutrition or disease.

    Of course! That's why Billy has a problem with the media. ...or is it another reason?

    If Gates did turn out to be a doctor, I'm sure he'd be a plastic surgeon. If he can't make you well, he can at least make you look good.

    --
    This post © Copyrite Duggeek, all rights reversed.
    1. Re:What he didn't say... by dastardly_villain · · Score: 1

      The newscast about the Voice Recognition software is hilarious. I love how the two reporters take open shots at Microsoft who obviously tried to stop them from airing the clip.

  44. in a parallel universe... by paniq · · Score: 1

    ...Dr. Gates tells his patient "your body is at risk" and recommends his OneCare miracle medicine.

    --
    Do not trust this signature.
  45. Re:FP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't he just giving the money he has taken illegally (due to the illegal monopolistic practices his company was convicted of) to charity? Ya, great guy!

  46. Bill isn't a functioning part of MS anymore by gelfling · · Score: 1

    So what do we actually care about what he has to say about it? Bill doesn't work for or at MS any more and hasn't really had his head in the company for years. I know because I am a shareholder who is greatly disappointed at their miserable performance.

    1. Re:Bill isn't a functioning part of MS anymore by MoreBonez · · Score: 1
      So what do we actually care about what he has to say about it? Bill doesn't work for or at MS any more and hasn't really had his head in the company for years. I know because I am a shareholder who is greatly disappointed at their miserable performance.
      What? He's not giving up his day-to-day work until 2008, and even after that he'll still be the Chairman. And as for their miserable performance, as of right now:

      Share Price: 29.47
      52 Week High: 29.46

      Greatly disappointing for you shareholders, I'm sure.
    2. Re:Bill isn't a functioning part of MS anymore by gelfling · · Score: 1

      Chairman doesn't mean squat for operational performance. And for that stock price - 11/18/2003 price was 25.84 that's what, three and a half bucks in 3 years - what's the cube root of +13%? 2.5% cgr

  47. ObCottonHill by sharkey · · Score: 1

    When I woke up, they had sewed my feet to my knees!

    --

    --
    "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  48. Re:Metaphors for Dummies by kfg · · Score: 1

    Call me a dummy too then.

    Now you're just being silly. You're a hockey puck.

    KFG

  49. Re:FP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'b be willing to bet you that if this article were titled "Linus Torvalds on the Past, Future, and Google" you all would be kissing his ass up one side and down the other. I don't even know why slashdot posts articles on anything related to Microsoft in any way, shape, or form because all everyone does is talk about how shitty Microsoft is and how super great Linux is.

    I guess slashdot's website slogan should be changed to "news(with a slant) for nerds. stuff(slanted towards our views not yours) that matters."

  50. Re:FP by 14CharUsername · · Score: 1

    And how do you define "results"? and no matter how you define it, you're going to end up with a bunch of organisations that spend a significant amount of money gathering statistics, writing progress reports, auditing, etc, which ends up taking resources away from actually helping people. And of course it will still be very easy to pad the numbers to make it look like you're doing a lot.

    It really isn't just as easy as "lets run it like a business and demand results!". You honestly think that in the history of charitable organisations, that idea has never occurred to anyone?

    Now don't take this the wrong way I'm not saying that the Gates Foundation is doing anything wrong. But if they are doing things right, its not as simple as "they expect results". Every funding agency in the world demands some kind of positive result for every project they fund. Do you really think anyone just throws money out there and hopes for the best? Everyone expects some kind of measurable progress, just some funding agencies are more efficient (and less corrupt) than others.

  51. Ummm. by Skiron · · Score: 2, Informative

    The only reason he likes [compares] PC's and the human immune system is due to the control to make lots of $$$. His money donated goes to drug manufacturing companies to 'aid' the world health. Unfortunately drug companies are cartels anyway (like big Microsofts), and seeing as he and his family have an interest in/and investment in major drug manufacturing companies, where else is there to give away money to get it back straight in the front door.

    Gates & co do not care less about human welfare or health. Money and control is the only thing on the agenda.

    Lets do some sums.

    Suppose the UK Health service has 100,000 PC's (I expect a lot, lot more). Suppose half of those run MSOffice. At £200.00 a licence (a conservative estimate on price), that is £10,000,000 straight away - before any patients even get an aspirin. Now use the same calculation on ALL the worlds health services that run MS products. I bet the bill (pun intended) is BILLIONS of £ to MS before anyone patient gets treated.

    He really cares doesn't he?

    1. Re:Ummm. by geekoid · · Score: 1

      You might want to look at where his money is going.

      I suspect this is the result of having a child. The first thing any father wants to do is change the world to protect his children.

      If I had a billion dollars, I'd donate money to getting medicine to kids.

      I would not wish I wasn't the worlds richest man, though.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Ummm. by Zonnald · · Score: 1

      I do not for a second believe that £200 is conservative. That about $495 AUD. Given that Independent schools (and probably state schools) pay around $180 AUD or about £72 for Office and a new licence for Vista Business edition. Coming to about £3,600,000.
      Which is still a Shiite load.
      But the Money the Gates Foundation is channeling into health is going to countries that do not have a well established Health Service, almost like - you going to hate this....., like Robin Hood.

  52. MS and Google Alike by lys1123 · · Score: 1
    "I've been told that Google is the company most like ours. That may be true. Well, we overlap in a lot of areas. We're both software companies, so we're competing on a lot of levels. They hire a lot of smart people, we hire a lot of smart people. Google Earth is fantastic; what they do is free and a huge benefit to all."


    Yes, Google is the company most like Microsoft. Just like Superman is the person most like Bizarro Superman.
  53. Re:Metaphors for Dummies by kfg · · Score: 1

    I eat a lot of beans. He should be grateful that I didn't just fart in his general direction.

    KFG

  54. let me guess, Zune is going to change the world by Locutus · · Score: 1

    Sure Bill, got it and thanks for the tip. Now go back to sleep and let reality set in.

    LoB

    --
    "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
  55. You've got to be kidding by rewt66 · · Score: 1

    PCs are a bigger deal than health for 6 billion people?

    Everyone else is saying, "Good thing he's not in health, because we'd have all these viruses." I'm wondering how his perspective got so twisted. Which changes people's lives more? Having a PC, or not dying?

    1. Re:You've got to be kidding by geekoid · · Score: 1

      He was talking about personal interest.

      Besides, how many people have PCs saved?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  56. Re:Metaphors for Dummies by JazzLad · · Score: 1

    Oh, and Slashdot car analogies.

    Heck, they don't even have to be close.

    --
    "If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear." - Every fascist, ever
  57. We could all wake up to error messages like... by jasmak · · Score: 1

    We are sorry to alert you that your ears are not compatible with the current brain you have installed... please call tech support at: 800-555-5555 to get the correct driver.

    --
    It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it.
  58. Oblig. Clippy by dangitman · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hi, it looks like you're having a near-death experience. Would you like me to help you with that?

    --
    ... and then they built the supercollider.
  59. Arrogant and self-delusional by Nicolay77 · · Score: 1

    He could know a lot about computers, but computers are amazingly simple compared to living systems.

    No matter how great genius he could be, the human immune system is more complex than what any single person could study in his/her lifetime.

    Would had he dedicated his life to medicine, he would know far less about the human body than he knows about technology, by several orders of magnitude.

    --
    We are Turing O-Machines. The Oracle is out there.
  60. Napoleon Dyanmite + Back to School! by antdude · · Score: 1

    More like Napoleon Dyanmite and Back to School movies combined. ;)

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  61. It's his wife... by doodlebumm · · Score: 1

    His wife is responsible for his philanthropy. I don't think he was even someone you could consider a philanthropist until he got married. His fortune was his scorecard in the game of life. It was the only way he could show he was better than everyone else.

    1. Re:It's his wife... by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      His wife is also responsible for Microsoft Bob.

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    2. Re:It's his wife... by kfg · · Score: 1

      She's a witch! Burn 'er! Burn 'er!

      KFG

    3. Re:It's his wife... by doodlebumm · · Score: 1

      Giving away billions to the needy is her way of making up for Bob.

  62. I don't like spam! by Meph_the_Balrog · · Score: 1

    Don't forget we'd also all be force fed about 200 square meals of spam a day

  63. if there is a worse person to ask about google.... by timmarhy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    .... then i don't know who it could be. gates is scared shitless of google, they threaten his office based control of the OS market. do not be fooled, just because gates is a billionare don't think losing his ill gotten monopoly won't bother him, to guys like this it's all about control and power, money is an after thought. besides, gates has as much insight into the future of computing as my grandmother. he is the guy who considered the internet unimportant, and thinks hardware will be free in 10 years time and you'll only pay for the OS. his ipinion means fucking NOTHING

    --
    If you mod me down, I will become more powerful than you can imagine....
  64. Re:Arrogant and self-delusional (and flakey) by Eggz+Factor · · Score: 1

    Also, I shudder at the idea of Gates / Microsoft being responsible for the crashing of the human immune system!

    --
    blah, blah, blah...
  65. Re:FP by smittyoneeach · · Score: 1
    I don't even know why slashdot posts articles on anything related to Microsoft in any way, shape, or form
    Uhh...cold, hard frogskins?
    --
    Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
  66. Re:FP by Zonnald · · Score: 1

    Robin Hood

  67. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 0

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  68. If Gates knew computers like he knows math... by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 1

    ...he'd still be trying to find a way to factor prime numbers.

    --

    ___
    It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
  69. Return to missed classes by gungh0 · · Score: 1

    Obviously he left Harvard before taking the "Removing bugs - 101" class.

    --
    No, really !
  70. Re:FP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > Isn't he just giving the money he has taken illegally (due to the illegal
    > monopolistic practices his company was convicted of) to charity? Ya, great guy!

    Illegal? Sorry, M$ is a US company and over here we follow the Golden Rule: he who has the gold makes the rules.

    BTW: I'll tell Bill you'd like him to take all his money back. Even if it looks like an act of charity, this is Microsoft we're talking about so we MUST do the opposite, right? Sheesh. I hate him too, but at least I can recognize the rare instance where he does something right.

  71. Re:FP by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

    No, but if it were about RMS I'd be supporting him because he's been consistently right. Case in point: BitKeeper.

    --
    Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.