Slashdot Mirror


New Phone Uses GPS To Locate Your Contacts

Salvance writes "Palo Alto-based Loopt Inc. has announced an agreement with Sprint Nextel to immediately begin offering their cell phone mapping service to all 3.8 Million Sprint Boost subscribers (Sprint Boost is a service specifically targeting the under-25 market). This service will notify users when another subscriber in their contact list is within 25 miles, providing a real-time map displaying their contacts' locations. According to the article, the only apparent privacy safeguard is to provide users the option to 'temporarily cut out from being spotted by their friends.' Given a retailer's propensity to package together extra services, and the average user's lack of knowledge regarding their phone's capabilities, this new service seems ripe for abuse."

147 comments

  1. Wow! GPS enabled contacts?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'd think that'd be the bigger news. They're so tiny! And now I will never lose them.

    1. Re:Wow! GPS enabled contacts?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'll still lose them when they fall off as you try to put them in over the bathroom sink and forget to put the drain plug in the sink first, like I did last week. :P

    2. Re:Wow! GPS enabled contacts?! by DaveM753 · · Score: 1

      But they're GPS enabled, so your plumber can find and retrieve them from the sewer. Vision restored! Woohoo!

    3. Re:Wow! GPS enabled contacts?! by JymmyZ · · Score: 1

      Eww. There's something about GPS-enabled contacts having to be fetched by a plumber that makes me think they wouldn't be fit for anything, except maybe as homing devices for all my friends so I knew when they were less than 25 miles away and I'd have a chance to run and hide

      --
      The unexamined life is not worth living
  2. Closer by forrestf · · Score: 1

    They should set it to be able to track within, like a mile or even less.

    1. Re:Closer by adamstew · · Score: 1

      FTA: "Using the phones' built-in GPS satellite technology, the Boost Loopt service could alert users whenever their friends are within a half-mile to 25 miles."

      It looks like you can set it anywhere from 1/2 mile to 25 mile radius.

  3. I hope that's configurable by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'd rather know when my contacts are within .1 mile than within 25 miles. At least 10% of my contacts spend most of their lives within 25 miles.

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    1. Re:I hope that's configurable by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 1

      "the Boost Loopt service could alert users whenever their friends are within a half-mile to 25 miles."

    2. Re:I hope that's configurable by Salvance · · Score: 2, Informative

      25 miles is the max distance, it looked like you could set the sensitivity down to 1/4 mile.

      --
      Crack - Free with every butt and set of boobs
  4. Uses: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Could be good for search&rescue, kidnap victims, people lost in unfamiliar areas, and the like.

    1. Re:Uses: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here honey I got you a new phone (cheating bitch)

      2 days later...

      Caught you bitch!

    2. Re:Uses: by joekampf · · Score: 1

      The technology for Cell Phone Tower triangulation already exists. More than likely that is what this technology is using. (Unless they are actually using a GPS, which I doubt.) I definatly see it for something to use with those kiddy cell phones.

      --
      When a man lies he murders a part of the world.
    3. Re:Uses: by james_orr · · Score: 2, Insightful

      A lot of cell phones can already show yourself and 911 where you are. The difference here is you are seeing where other people are. I don't think that's necessarily a bad thing, in fact it could be a good thing, but I would want a lot of control over it. An easy way to turn it on/off (1 or 2 button pushes max) and being able to specify who on my contact list I would want to see where I am.

    4. Re:Uses: by ohearn · · Score: 1

      There are a lot of devices that are still semi-active even when "off". If you want to be sure that they can't track you, take the battery out of it completly.

    5. Re:Uses: by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      They don't use triangulation, they use TDOA (Timed difference of arrival.) It's like GPS in reverse.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    6. Re:Uses: by Kenyon · · Score: 1

      But it could have an additional internal battery!

    7. Re:Uses: by Catbeller · · Score: 1

      And they don't track you to the foot, they don't keep a running database of your movements using TDOA, and they don't sell that information to anyone who pays up, which is what they do with the GPS-tracking phones.

  5. Ripe for abuse? by diersing · · Score: 1

    Its more likely, the still hormone strengthed under-25 crowd will spend their time catching their significant others in otherwise undetected social situations that had previously gone undetected. Or, was that what you meant?

    1. Re:Ripe for abuse? by flyingsquid · · Score: 1
      Every breath you take
      Every move you make
      Every bond you break
      Every step you take
      I'll be watching you

      Every single day
      Every word you say
      Every game you play
      Every night you stay
      I'll be watching you

      Oh, cant you see
      You belong to me
      How my poor heart aches
      With every step you take

      Every move you make
      Every vow you break
      Every smile you fake
      Every claim you stake
      I'll be watching you

      Unfortunately, the Police's political commentary seems only to have become more timely over the past twenty years... the NSA already has data on something like 1.9 trillion phone conversations according to Wikipedia, and conducts wiretaps without a warrant, all in the name of protecting us from terror. Somehow it does't make me sleep all that much easier at night. It is hardly a stretch to imagine the NSA coming up with a database that tracks the movements of individuals using their cell phones.

      I do think we have to ask tough questions about how much privacy we're willing to compromise for how much security, but the current trend is just to grant the government the authority to do anything it wants, even when there's little evidence that the wholesale surrender of our civil liberties has really foiled any terrorist plots. I suspect that we haven't even begun to see the half of it, the full extent of these programs and the abuses won't be known for years to come. Oh well. When the world is running down, you make the best of what's still around.

    2. Re:Ripe for abuse? by The_Wilschon · · Score: 1
      even when there's little evidence that the wholesale surrender of our civil liberties has really foiled any terrorist plots.
      What is far more important is evidence that the wholesale surrender of our civil liberties will foil any terrorist plots. If it has foiled some plot, then it is just that much more likely that the next plot will avoid that particular weakness. Also, "foiled" plots are easy to manufacture, whereas sound, well-reasoned arguments for why a given action will foil future plots are much much harder to come by.
      --
      SIGSEGV caught, terminating

      wait... not that kind of sig.
    3. Re:Ripe for abuse? by Skater · · Score: 1

      Uh, "Every Breath You Take" wasn't a political commentary about the government watching its citizens, it was a (lost-)love song.

            Since you've gone I been lost without a trace
            I dream at night, I can only see your face
            I look around but it's you I can't replace
            I feel so cold and I long for your embrace
            I keep cryin', baby, baby, please ...unless you think he loves the government watching him and cuddling him...

    4. Re:Ripe for abuse? by Skater · · Score: 1

      Obviously, the part starting with the ellipses was supposed to be on a separate line. It's not a lyric. I'm not sure what happened there - I previewed!

  6. wow, that's every stalkers wet dream by jimstapleton · · Score: 2, Insightful

    how much do you think sprint is gonna get owned in lawsuits?

    --
    34486853790
    Connection too slow for X forwarding? Try "ssh -CX user@host"
    1. Re:wow, that's every stalkers wet dream by frakir · · Score: 4, Interesting

      A different approach might really work.

      Imagine opt-in GPS tracking instead of opt-out. Eg: Bob requests tracking of Alice within $distance for $duration, Alice might agree or not, but default is OFF.

      Some phone pairs, like mom-child might have tracking ON and not possible to switch off (it might go into cell service plan).

      Definitely something I would love to have....

    2. Re:wow, that's every stalkers wet dream by OhHellWithIt · · Score: 1
      I think opt-in is already a default in some cases. My new phone (low-end LG model sold by Verizon) has a GPS feature that, if I read the documentation right, can provide GPS-based location information to the network. It has two settings: 1) always provide this information or 2) only provide this information when calling an "emergency number". Emergency numbers are specified in a small set of registers and include 911 and a couple of numbers for accessing the phone company's support services. The factory setting for the GPS location option in my phone was to provide the data to the network only when calling emergency numbers. IMHO, this is a responsible choice.

      It would of course be an easy thing for Sprint to require phone manufacturers to always enable GPS location information; however, even if the phones didn't have GPS facilities at all, it would be possible for a phone company to provide other subscribers a way of knowing if you're within 25 miles of someone else. I am pretty sure that for cell phones to work, the phone has to be *much* closer to a cell tower, and the phone co. could simply use the cell tower that detects your phone to provide location information.

      I guess if one is being stalked, the solution is for the stalkee to subscribe to the service and buy a hypothetical phone that alerts her/him whenever the stalker's cell phone is too close, but overall I think this whole thing is just a bad idea where the potential for harm is a lot greater than the potential for good.

      --
      "Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past." -- George Orwell
  7. I wonder how long it will take.... by 8127972 · · Score: 1

    ..... for the first lawsuit regarding the misuse of this technology to be filed? Methinks seconds. Maybe minutes at the most.

    The upshot is that lawyers now have a new income source.

    --
    This is my opinion. To make sure you don't steal it, it's covered by the DMCA.
    1. Re:I wonder how long it will take.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The upshot is that lawyers now have a new income source.

      Oh, yippie....

  8. Honestly now... by Captain+Sarcastic · · Score: 2

    ...can anyone here tell me what makes this even remotely (pardon the expression) a GOOD idea?

    We have been using technology to bring people closer, but there are some advantages to keeping one's distance.

    --
    Strike while the irony is hot! -- The Freethinker
    1. Re:Honestly now... by Otter+Escaping+North · · Score: 1

      ...can anyone here tell me what makes this even remotely (pardon the expression) a GOOD idea?

      *with parent hat on* Knowing where my kids are.

      Besides that - can't think of a thing.

      Oh and don't get me wrong - a GPS-enabled phone is not the best foundation for a trusting parent-child relationship; but when pressed to find something of worth in it - that's what I come up with.

      --
      Running Windows^H^H^H^H^H^H^H OSX and Linux in the home. (I don't have time for Solitaire any more.)
    2. Re:Honestly now... by Captain+Sarcastic · · Score: 1

      *putting parent hat on as well*

      OK, I can see that.

      --
      Strike while the irony is hot! -- The Freethinker
    3. Re:Honestly now... by ultrasonik · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I like the idea. It's not like anyone can track you. If you can't trust your friends then you've got bigger issues. I would use it. I travel around a lot and have friends in many different cities and states. It would be great if I was traveling and some old friend called me up because they saw I was in town.

    4. Re:Honestly now... by shawn(at)fsu · · Score: 1

      I realized something when I was approaching the end of teenage years. I figured that emotions like trust and respect where for lack of a better word mature emotions. Fear on the otherhand seems to be very primal, until kids are old enough to understand and exhib trust and respect, a limited amount of fear will work just as well.

      It worked for me I never knew how much my parents knew about me, I was always afraid the knew the answer before they asked. I think this would be a good thing for parents. It's easy to trust your child when they call and say where they are, it takes effort to make sure they are lying to you.

      As Regan said
      "Trsuat but verify"

      --
      500 dollar reward for tip(s) leading to the arrest of the person(s) who stole my sig.
    5. Re:Honestly now... by JazzLad · · Score: 1

      I'm not familiar with 'Trsuat', but Regan was sick for a long time ... ;)

      --
      "If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear." - Every fascist, ever
    6. Re:Honestly now... by StikyPad · · Score: 2, Insightful

      We have been using technology to bring people closer

      Er.. I think most luddites would argue that technology has kept us seperated, as the telephone, the TV, and the internet have directly contributed to the decline in face-to-face contact and communication.

      The only reason this is a good idea is that it's a new idea. I can see a group of girls wanting this (at first), or some college buddies so they know what bar their friends are in when they finally finish that paper, but overall it will probably be of limited success. And once people start getting blocked, assuming they add the capability, it will damage relationships when people spot their "best friend" in the food court, but they're not showing up on Boost.

    7. Re:Honestly now... by DragonWriter · · Score: 1
      ...can anyone here tell me what makes this even remotely (pardon the expression) a GOOD idea?
      Having had my wife become ill when commuting home and having had her call on her cell phone only able to tell me that she was parked, and near some trees, and unable to stay awake, I can certainly see a good use for this.
      We have been using technology to bring people closer, but there are some advantages to keeping one's distance.
      Apparently, you can deactivate the feature that provides your information. Admittedly, I'd prefer a more fine-grained control than the article suggests, but then I'm not going to rush to be an early adopter. The general technology and concept is good and useful, and to allow you to keep your distance, if you want.
    8. Re:Honestly now... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      We have been using technology to bring people closer
      Er.. I think most luddites would argue that technology has kept us seperated, as the telephone, the TV, and the internet have directly contributed to the decline in face-to-face contact and communication.

      They could make that argument; my counterargument is that you're as close to people as you feel. Relocation and suburbism, as well as rampant inflation and a minimum wage that hasn't kept up with it in twenty years, THESE are the things that keep us separated. We spend less time together because we have less time to spend.

      Granted, if some of us spent a little less money on gadgets (he said, stroking his brand new Motorola V3i) we'd have more time and money to spend with other people... But we could as easily be spending our money on booze or something so I don't consider that a cause, more of a symptom.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    9. Re:Honestly now... by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      you're as close to people as you feel.

      Nonsense. There's perception, and there's misperception. Ever had a great friend in a MMORPG? Quit playing and see how well they keep in touch. That's just an example, and there are certainly counterexamples of people who find out they didn't know their spouse, but your basically asserting that "if you think you're close to someone, then you are," which is something most people learn isn't true in their youth.

      Relocation and suburbism, as well as rampant inflation and a minimum wage that hasn't kept up with it in twenty years, THESE are the things that keep us separated. We spend less time together because we have less time to spend.

      Actually we have more free time than in the past. Minimum wage doesn't matter as long as the average wage of an industry keeps pace, and wages have definately kept up with inflation because -- here's the kicker -- wages drive inflation. Inflation is the devaluation of money, and money only devalues when there's more of it in circulation. You could argue that there's an increasing economic divide, and increasing minimum wage might help to close that, but it will almost definately increase inflation as well. If you think the middle class is unhappy now, just wait until minimum wage goes up, especially if it goes up significantly.

    10. Re:Honestly now... by spasm · · Score: 1

      You and yr idiot friend are meeting to get drunk. Your friend isn't real familiar with your town:

      You: "Where are you?"

      Friend: "I don't know - I'm beside a blue building near some traffic lights"

      You: "Never mind, my phone says you're a block away. Stay there and I'll come meet you".

      At least if one earlier press release is true (service gives direction and distance, not just distance).

      But yeah, opt in on a case by case basis seems like it'd be a much much better default.

    11. Re:Honestly now... by absorbr · · Score: 1

      If it could be modified to inform you of contacts within 1 or 2 miles, I think that'd be better. I have friends all over Austin but unfortunately 10 miles away means a 30-45 minute drive usually; which usually means I don't get to see them. I'd love to be able to spontaneously visit a friend like that!

    12. Re:Honestly now... by VirusEqualsVeryYes · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sometimes I would just like to do things and go places without broadcasting the news to everyone I know, and the measly temporary opt-out certainly doesn't cut it for me. Whether I trust my friends or not is irrelevant. If you like it, by all means, do it, but count me out.

      I just hope that the ability to (easily) track others will stay limited to subscribers of this and similar services.

    13. Re:Honestly now... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      There's nothing to worry about here. This is a feature of Sprint's "Boost" service, which according to TFA is a service targeted at the under-25 crowd. They don't care about their privacy. Haven't you looked at myspace.com before?

      The rest of can stay happy with our non-GPS-tracking phone service.

  9. YRO??!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It seems that no online rights of mine would be affected by this phone. In fact, I think it barely has anything to do with my online rights as well.

  10. Within 25 miles? by lawpoop · · Score: 1

    This is marketed to the under 25 crowd? So if you are sitting in a lecture hall, you are constantly getting an update of where everybody in your 50+ buddy list is on campus at that moment?

    This can't operate the way they describe.

    --
    Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
    -- Pablo Picasso
    1. Re:Within 25 miles? by kevin_conaway · · Score: 1
      This is marketed to the under 25 crowd? So if you are sitting in a lecture hall, you are constantly getting an update of where everybody in your 50+ buddy list is on campus at that moment?

      You're confusing the "under 25 crowd" with the "under 22 crowd", i.e. students.

      It sounds like a target is the so called "young professionals" out and about on the town

    2. Re:Within 25 miles? by lawpoop · · Score: 1

      Not everyone starts college immediately after high school, and not everyone finishes in exactly four years.

      Even if it were for young professionals, 25 miles pretty much covers a town/city radius. You would only be getting a notification if someone was coming in from out of town, or totally crossing town. If someone were traveling 25+ miles into your area and they wanted to see you, or even had the time to see you, don't you think this meeting would already be planned?

      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
      -- Pablo Picasso
    3. Re:Within 25 miles? by DragonWriter · · Score: 1
      Not everyone starts college immediately after high school, and not everyone finishes in exactly four years.


      And not everyone takes until 18 to graduate from high school, and not everyone goes to college at all. A sizable percentage of under 25s are not students, and a sizable percentage of those that are have a life that extends beyond campus.

      Further, it seems that what this offers is not simply a "notification" as the contact crosses into or out of the range, as I read it, it gives you a realtime update of position, whenever they are within the range you specify (from, per TFA, a minimum of 0.5 mile to a maximum of 25 miles).

  11. *chime* by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hmm? Oh, pardom me guys, it's a mesasge on my phone...

    ted from acctg is shaggin ur gf lol

    Thanks, Sprint!

  12. Not really a privacy invasion: by adamstew · · Score: 4, Informative

    FTFA: "The real-time tracking would only occur for those who have agreed to be located and had given the user their mobile phone numbers." So you have to agree to be tracked in the first place.

    1. Re:Not really a privacy invasion: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please, think of the FUD.

    2. Re:Not really a privacy invasion: by TubeSteak · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I buy two phones & stick one + lots of extra batteries in/on your car.

      Privacy invasion or stalker heaven?
      You decide.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    3. Re:Not really a privacy invasion: by d474 · · Score: 1

      Excellent point. That's the loop hole. Of course, you better retrieve your "tracking" phone before the battery dies, or else your target might find it!

      --
      Authority questions you. Return the favor.
    4. Re:Not really a privacy invasion: by lav-chan · · Score: 1

      Anybody can do that with already-existing GPS technology. The police sometimes use it to track suspects' vehicles.

    5. Re:Not really a privacy invasion: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And if the company accidentally marks you as agreeing, how do you know?

    6. Re:Not really a privacy invasion: by ambivalentduck · · Score: 1

      Yes it is.  I may want Jill to be able to track me, but not Suzy.  But if Johny is looking through Jill's phone and gives my number to Suzy...

    7. Re:Not really a privacy invasion: by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Some companies actually sell products meant for this purpose. I found out about these GoPass guys because I bought one of their bluetooth GPS units. It's about the size of a pager (remember those?) and smaller than the average flip phone. It tracks 20 satellites, supports WAAS and EGNOS, and gets 10 hours of battery life (included Li-Ion.) These guys make a module with a GPS and a GPRS unit that will report back tracking info via the 'net, and which uses an external antenna. Actually, they make like five different ones...

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  13. What about stalkers? by chaboud · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Does one agree to be located in general, or on a per-person basis? If it's in general, how can I know who's tracking me once my number is available to them?

    I'm not worried about stalkers, personally, but this is the sort of thing that you might see being handed out to girls on college campuses or boys on grade-school ones.

    Married couples could see this causing trouble.

    Tony: "You shut tracking off for a few hours there. Where were you?"
    Toni: "You're a freak. I'm leaving you."
    Tony: "For the guy/girl/goat that you were off with when you went off the radar?!" ...

    Honestly, though, it's kind of a cool feature.

  14. I can't fib on my whereabouts :( by us7892 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So when I tell one friend I'm staying in because I'm tired, and go out with another friend for some beers, and tell yet another I was working late, I'm gonna get screwed when they all locate me nearby.

    How about they work on dropped calls and poor coverage first.

  15. I felt him by jeepee · · Score: 5, Funny

    Welcome, young Skywalker. [Looking at cell phone] I have been expecting you.

  16. no worries about this by Lumpy · · Score: 1

    The GPS in most cellphones is such a piece of garbage there is no problem with this. the Boost mobile phones have even crappier GPS than normal. I would say that the service will not work far more than it will be abused. A cellphone in your pocket get's ZERO Gps signal. Hell the GPS in my blackberry never shows a good location and it's sitting 1.5 inches away from my body, a friends boost phone with built in GPS app couldnt get a lock on 3 sattelites within a 25 minute period sitting still in a clear sky condition.

    Sorry, but every phone I have ever seen with GPS has not worked worth a damn unless you hold it still for 5-10 minutes away from your body when clear skies. Until they put a 1/2 way decent gps in these phones it will not work. Tracking you based on tower works far better.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:no worries about this by Dj+Stingray · · Score: 1

      I have to agree with this. The last time my Nextel 733 locked a GPS signal was April 12th 2006.

    2. Re:no worries about this by planetmn · · Score: 1

      I recently tried out VZNavigator on my new Verizon phone and was pleasantly surprised. Not as accurate as Hertz Neverlost is, but sitting in the center console of my car, it kept my position pretty well. It's all implementation. A quality antenna, and decent processing are required to do it right.

      -dave

      --
      /., where "Apple and Google provide Iran with nukes" will be refuted with "But Microsoft is a convicted monopolist"
    3. Re:no worries about this by mikerich · · Score: 1
      The GPS in most cellphones is such a piece of garbage there is no problem with this. the Boost mobile phones have even crappier GPS than normal. I would say that the service will not work far more than it will be abused. A cellphone in your pocket get's ZERO Gps signal. Hell the GPS in my blackberry never shows a good location and it's sitting 1.5 inches away from my body, a friends boost phone with built in GPS app couldnt get a lock on 3 sattelites within a 25 minute period sitting still in a clear sky condition.

      Good point, fortunately there is plenty of work being done on getting location information using mobile phone basestations. Install the client software on your phone and it regularly measures the signal strength of a range of nearby basestations (not just the one currently handling the phone itself). It's straightforward math to determine the distance to each of those basestations based on the attenuation of the signal. The phone knows where the masts are (getting this info from a database), therefore it can triangulate where your phone is.

      It's possible to get to 10m resolution in built-up areas where there are plenty of masts and it even works in urban canyons where GPS is a bit hit and miss at the best of times.

      The really nice feature is that it doesn't need extra hardware which gobbles up your battery and it works on many phones already on the market.

    4. Re:no worries about this by DrYak · · Score: 1
      within a 25 minute period sitting still in a clear sky condition.


      Which are condition that are easily met in a openair music festival, and could be the best application for such a technology.
      The concert you were lisetening to with your girlfriend just finished, and you want to go back spend some time with the rest of your friends. At which concert are they ?

      The previous options were :
      - Try phoning them, and yell in the phone in hopes that you'll understand each other over the background noise.
      - Try writing SMS and hope that the friends will manage to cram in max. 130 caracters good information how to find them in the crowd.

      Now :
      - Provided that you have coupled your phone before, you can just walk to where the friends are using GPS. And as openair festivals are, per definition, open air, poor GPS performance is less a problem compared to driving inside a city.

      Note :
      - 25 miles is a little bit too much. 1 mile is fair enough in such situations.
      - GPS coordinates of friends could be transmitted over bluetooth on such a short distance in the open.
      --
      "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  17. average user's lack of knowledge? nonsense by JonTurner · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Given a retailer's propensity to package together extra services, and the average user's lack of knowledge regarding their phone's capabilities, this new service seems ripe for abuse.


    Lack of knowledge about a phone? Get real. This is the under-25 crowd we're talking about. Do you think the 40+ year-old moms & dads are going to be the ones lining up for these products? And to a GenY'er, a phone is almost an extention of themselves. Ringtones, downloads, games, IM's, push-to-talk, voicemail, etc. are all an essential part of staying online.

    That being said, I do think that there is potential for abuse. Stalkers, for instance. Or college profs following up on students too "sick" to attend class. (but plenty well enough to catch a movie or go to the beach, instead!) Also, how long before this information is subpoenaed by attorneys. (For instance, in auto collision cases -- if client was at a bar for three hours prior to a fiery crash, that doesn't look good.)

    However, it could be a cool feature -- see who's nearby for a quick lunch meet-up. Finding your family/friends at an amusement park/mall/beach/etc.

    Like nearly all technologies, it's benign. It's up to the user to make it good or bad.
    1. Re:average user's lack of knowledge? nonsense by DragonWriter · · Score: 1
      Lack of knowledge about a phone? Get real. This is the under-25 crowd we're talking about.
      You mean like the one that was, less than an hour ago, complaining to me about how much they hate getting a new phone, and trying to figure out all it can do and how to do it?
    2. Re:average user's lack of knowledge? nonsense by Squirmy+McPhee · · Score: 1

      Like nearly all technologies, it's benign. It's up to the user to make it good or bad.

      While I agree the technology itself is benign, it seems to me the user doesn't really have much control over good or bad. The user can choose be tracked or not, and that's about it. Whether it's good or bad for the user depends on who makes use of the tracking information and why, and that is totally beyond the user's control. Your own comment gave examples of that: Stalkers, followups from the professor, and subpoena-happy attorneys are all beyond the user's control.

      Certainly the user has a choice about whether to expose him- or herself to all of that, but he or she is at the mercy of the other users (and the occasional non-user, like an attorney) to make it a good or bad experience.

    3. Re:average user's lack of knowledge? nonsense by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Or college profs following up on students too "sick" to attend class. (but plenty well enough to catch a movie or go to the beach, instead!)

      Who puts their college professors on their phone's contact list? Students must have developed much closer relations with faculty since I've graduated.

    4. Re:average user's lack of knowledge? nonsense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not too mention that college profs couldn't (and shouldn't) give two shakes whether you attend class or not. You're an adult, you've paid your tuition, and if you fail because you can't be bothered to show up for class, then who cares?

    5. Re:average user's lack of knowledge? nonsense by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Maybe he was thinking of one of those freaky religious colleges like Baylor or Bob Jones. They probably take attendance in all the classes at those schools.

  18. Perfect by Matt+Apple · · Score: 1

    Perfect for stalkers and suspicious spouses, now all they need is 30 seconds with your cell phone to enable this option and they own you.

  19. Your contacts or my contacts? by Nikker · · Score: 1

    How about if I have your number programmed into my phone and you don't have mine? Can I harvest cell#'s and 'war drive'?

    Even better do they realize we can triangulate someone closer then their resolution if I have 3 of these phones locating the same #? If all mappings are relative to 'Jack' (person on contact list) then if there are 3 other locator's that are given mappings relative to Jack then each mapping on the 3 phones will have different information to Jack's location.

    With this information combined can we get a closer look at where Jack is?

    --
    A loop, by its nature, continues. If that didn't make sense, start reading this sentence again.
    1. Re:Your contacts or my contacts? by Smuffe · · Score: 1

      Yes, probably.

      Or you get a closer look at Jack Shit.

    2. Re:Your contacts or my contacts? by dwayneabailey · · Score: 0

      I've warned 'Jack'. He's a little concerned by your obsession with him and his location. And with the team of stalkers you have apparently lined up.

  20. Well... by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 3, Funny

    When I call someone on a land line, I know exactly where they are.

    --
    No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
    1. Re:Well... by hyperion454 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Maybe you've never heard of call forwarding.

    2. Re:Well... by mfender9 · · Score: 1

      Not if they forward it to their mobile/skype in/office etc... I'm rarely at home when I pick up someone who's called my land line.

    3. Re:Well... by loconet · · Score: 1

      or voip softphones

      --
      [alk]
    4. Re:Well... by maxume · · Score: 1

      Unless they happen to forward the line.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    5. Re:Well... by Pheersome · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but who (besides you) calls anybody on a landline anymore?

      Seriously, though, everybody I know under the age of 30 uses a cell as their primary phone.

      --
      Better to light a candle than to curse the darkness.
    6. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...India?

  21. I hope I'm not the only one... by foxtrot · · Score: 1

    ...who was imagining someone looking at the ground and squinting wondering how GPS was gonna help that guy locate his contact...

  22. somebody shagg'n the wife by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    An interesting concept might be to know who is within a certain distance from your house. Say, the only authorized individuals are, me and somebody else and then if anybody else is around with a phone it would notify you. Criminals have cell phones and they aren't smart.

    1. Re:somebody shagg'n the wife by Roduku · · Score: 1

      But they have to be in your contact list to make it work.

      "Excuse me...are you a criminal planning to rob my house?"

      "Why, yes...yes, I am."

      "Can I have your cell phone number?"

  23. Contacts? by husker_man · · Score: 1

    Why would I want to have my cell phone be able to find my contact lenses? That's going a little too far!!!

  24. You're being tracked anyway by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 1

    The phone company has to know where you are so they can route the call to the correct tower. Phone companies log everything.

    This service simply exposes the information to other cellphone users.

    The only way to avoid having location information recorded is to keep the phone turned off and have incoming calls go to a pager.

  25. A phone that tells you when you don't need it? by gelfling · · Score: 1

    Seems odd - check up on the locations of people you can walk over to talk to in person. Or don't young people do that any more? Oh well there's no end to the stupid crap you can sell to the younger generation.

  26. Surprise ! by Joebert · · Score: 3, Funny

    Alright, when Jim walks in the door, everyone turn on their phones !

    --
    Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
    1. Re:Surprise ! by jasmak · · Score: 1

      Or it could work for the evil enterprise as well... Theives or Vandalists... "Hurry get out theyre coming home"

      --
      It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it.
  27. Isn't most of the under 25 market still in school? by Broken+scope · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure i have ever seen a campus that couldn't fit within a 50 mile diameter circle.

    --
    You mad
  28. Marauders' Map by Bull+SR · · Score: 1

    Why stop at contacts; let's see all subscribers on a map!

    "I solemnly swear that I am up to no good."

  29. 25 miles sounds nice... by DJ+Jones · · Score: 2, Funny
    What we really need is a cell phone that alerts you when your boss is within 15 feet from your cubicle.

    -- M.B.W.A. - Management By Walking Around

    1. Re:25 miles sounds nice... by dodobh · · Score: 1

      You just need to replace his phone with one that has a proximity switch. Just ask the BOFH for help.

      --
      I can throw myself at the ground, and miss.
  30. Won't work all that well by James+Lewis · · Score: 1

    The GPS isn't going to work unless the person is outside and their phone has an unobstructed view of enough satalites long enough to get a fix. I don't see that happening all that often. Not to mention, I imagine most users will be turning off their GPS to save battery life.

    1. Re:Won't work all that well by planetmn · · Score: 1

      Well, define work? So lets say I walk into a bar, and lose sat coverage. The phone will still know it's last location where it had coverage, so it keeps my position as that. My friend is at another bar down the street and sees that I'm a block away, walks to the position and is in front of a bar. Chances are he's gonna know that I'm insid the bar.

      Is it 100% accurate 100% of the time. No, but that's not the point. If you're out on a friday night bar hopping, you might run into a friend.

      -dave

      --
      /., where "Apple and Google provide Iran with nukes" will be refuted with "But Microsoft is a convicted monopolist"
    2. Re:Won't work all that well by JazzLad · · Score: 1

      I did not RTFA (why would I, this is /.), but does it give direction + actual distance or just is within radius?

      Your point is great if it does the former, but I suspect (again, didn't bother to RTFA) it is the latter.

      --
      "If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear." - Every fascist, ever
    3. Re:Won't work all that well by JazzLad · · Score: 1

      Nevermind, apparently I didn't even RTFS :)

      Feel free to mod me into oblivion.

      --
      "If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear." - Every fascist, ever
  31. Open Air by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    When the GSM and CDMA networks are opened as wholesale carriage with competition, like the long distance carriage and local origination/termination industries have been, then the playing field will finally be level. The beginning revolution in component telephone services integrated with familiar phones and contacts will finally include the mobile terminals ("phone") and all their advanced features, including the personal ones like presence. That will mean we'll have more choice over the features of our terminals, like we do with our PCs. And more control over our data.

    The existing mobile network operators have consolidated, rather than competed. And kept locks on end-to-end control of their networks, services, data, terminals, subscribers. But multimode roaming 3G, like WiFi/CDMA, and mixes of Bluetooth and WiMAX, will finally open the mobile networks to too many competitors. Especially as the legislative climate long favoring media ownership monopolization tends to wane.

    In the meantime we'll be stuck with the services, phones, prices and privacy the Sprint/Verizon/AT&T oligopoly wants us to have.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:Open Air by planetmn · · Score: 1

      Well, considering that spectrum and capital costs are expensive, it's unlikely for the networks to be opened anytime soon. It's not like landline phones where a company was granted a monopoly and required right-of-way to lay down copper/coax/fiber/etc. The cellular companies are required to go out, locate and lease property for towers and antennae. Why should they be forced to open this up? They aren't being granted this land by the gov't for the "common good" they are investing in infrastructure to grow thier business.

      -dave

      --
      /., where "Apple and Google provide Iran with nukes" will be refuted with "But Microsoft is a convicted monopolist"
    2. Re:Open Air by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Because the "spectrum" is a lease the government offers to franchised operators from the public airwaves. That's the right of way. And spectrum licenses have an even more highly specified requirement for serving the public good than do landline rights of way.

      However, to date the spectrum operators have operated as cartels to maximize profits without the risk of competition, arbitrarily restrict consumer choice, and subvert the public interest. Sure, their costs are high, but their profits are so high that they're carrying the telcos, despite the rest of the wireline business that's so cheap.

      So not only are the usual monopoly protections important, but the government has extra leverage in the public good of the public airwaves and franchises. For the past 6-12 years, that's meant the mobile carriers were safer, under a monopoly-hungry FCC and Congress. Now that control has changed, back to the party that legislated the AT&T breakup and Internet development, the public's hand is probably strong enough to push changes. Considering the growth of a diversified economy in a unified voice/data network market, I'd say it's inevitable.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

  32. Time To Change The Ads by jo42 · · Score: 2, Funny

    :%s/Can you hear me now?/We know where you are now./gc

  33. Stalker central! by smellsofbikes · · Score: 0, Redundant

    And all over the world, parents, pedophiles, and policemen are cackling and rubbing their hands with glee.

    --
    Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
  34. That's not much of a feat. by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

    You could do that right now with a small two-way radio and a GPS. It's not hard, and if you are planning on doing something like that, you're probably not going to be bothered by the fact that you're supposed to have an amateur radio license first.

    They seem to be out of production right now, but there was a company that was making little integrated units consisting of a GPS receiver and Amateur radio transceiver, that fed into the APRS system. I think it was a combination of this transmitter and an equally small GPS. They were pretty slick, and have a lot of cool (legitimate) uses.

    Bugging someone's car and following them around isn't very hard, and hasn't been for a while. Probably the hardest part of the whole procedure would be finding someplace on the car to put your GPS antenna where it wouldn't be noticeable, but would still receive the satellite signals.

    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    1. Re:That's not much of a feat. by topham · · Score: 1

      Amazingly enough, I've heard that UNDER the car is excellent. (Radio waves bouncing off the pavement).

      I doubt it is as accurate as sitting on the roof, but you do not need 100% coverage, you need 'decent' coverage, intermittent, once every block or so is enough to track, and once parked GPS is very good, even in bad conditions. (Assuming you have a unit which can be forced to keep trying.).

      Me, i just wish I could figure out how I can take advantage of the GPS in my cell phone, far as I can tell it's useless for me. (I don't even think it is supported by 911 service where I am).

  35. opt in for specific people by MooseTick · · Score: 1

    Many her complain about phone GPS, but I recently had a verizon that had excellent service. It could even give door to door driving directions. It was expensive, but nonetheless it worked well.

    This could be handy but I would want to be able to turn it on for individuals, not the world. Also, 25 miles is worthless. 90% of my family and friends are always within 25 miles. It would be more useful if it said they were using the same tower or within 1-2 miles.

    My biggest fear is that they will charge for people to be able to track other people. Then once that is popular they will charge for the ability to turn tracking off the service so other's can't track you. It reminds me having to pay extra to have an unlisted phone #.

  36. Come On, Stop Being Negative by blaster151 · · Score: 1

    Screw this negative spin! I think this idea is simply cool. I'm getting tired of naysaying "privacy advocates" painting progress in such dire colors. I'm personally excited to read this story. Our lives could be so much cooler if not for all the worriers and heeldraggers . . .

    1. Re:Come On, Stop Being Negative by Meostro · · Score: 1

      Seconded!

      If any of you actually took the time to go and see what Loopt is about or looked for more information, you would realize several things.

      For starters, this is OPT-IN ONLY. You can't just see everyone's info, and you get to pick who you share your info with. You can choose who can and cannot see your info.

      Second, the point of this is to see when you're in the same three blocks as your friends. You may not be in the same restaurant or same building as your friends, but you would be surprised at how often you are within a few blocks of them.

      Third, this service updates your position about every 15 minutes. This is based on GPS, but phone GPS doesn't work like regular GPS. The location your phone gets probably isn't created from satellites, it probably comes from the cell tower. If you have enough signal to get/send a call/SMS, you have enough signal to locate your phone within a few hundred feet. This is the same thing that E911 uses to find you when you call for police/ambulance - it's by no means perfect, but it'll do.

      Finally, this is no different than the Family Locator or similar services that the cell companies have available. Most people would probably love to know when their child (or at least their child's cellphone) goes outside of that same 1/4 mile of the schoolyard during the day, or deviates from the path between school and sitter/home. Yes, the data is a potential problem if it gets into the wrong hands, but there are safeguards in place, and in general this will help more than hurt.

  37. almost got it right by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

    as a 25-and-under, what i really want is the ability to find my friends inside a club or bar. it is impossible to yell 'the upstairs dance floor!' loud enough to be heard over music. what they need is an ad-hoc triangulation system since GPS doesn't work indoors.

    --
    A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    1. Re:almost got it right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try text messaging next time

  38. For cellular companies..... by 8127972 · · Score: 1

    .... The reason for this technology to exist comes down to three words:

    NEW REVENUE SOURCE

    --
    This is my opinion. To make sure you don't steal it, it's covered by the DMCA.
  39. This needs to work like the 360's friends list.. by Channard · · Score: 1

    .. so that you can only accept someone as a contact/friend if they agree. And either party can remove the other party at any time. Just being able to plonk someone on the list doesn't bode well for anyone with a boyfriend/girlfriend-turned-stalker

  40. Already exists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is already a web-based service which does that sort of thing. I expect this is just an extension of that technology onto a mobile device.

    http://geomobiles.net/

    1. Re:Already exists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wow, that's pretty amazing. I wonder how they're allowed to do that??

    2. Re:Already exists by CorSci81 · · Score: 1

      Hmmm.... so in order to actually track someone do you have to agree to sign up for their "sexy webcams" service?

  41. For what practical purpose? by businessnerd · · Score: 1

    Well that's nice, but why do I need this? It certainly has a nice wow factor to it. The only practical uses I see are for nefarious purposes. You know, stalkers, spying, making sure the bitch isn't messing around on you. But is this really an important feature, or a feature we want? While it might be nice to know that the wife/girlfriend is or is not cheating or lying about her whereabouts, do you really want the wife/girlfriend to know if YOU are cheating or lying about your whereabouts?

    Anyone have any ideas for some good uses that don't require certain levels of paranoia?

    Nice new tech, but I don't see it becoming a standard, let alone popular, feature in most phones.

    --
    "It's not whether you win or lose, it's how drunk you get." -- H. J. Simpson
    1. Re:For what practical purpose? by planetmn · · Score: 1

      It's friday night, you're downtown, and low and behold your friend is in the bar down the street from you. I wouldn't pay extra for it, but it might be nice to have.

      -dave

      --
      /., where "Apple and Google provide Iran with nukes" will be refuted with "But Microsoft is a convicted monopolist"
    2. Re:For what practical purpose? by businessnerd · · Score: 1

      Touche Salesman

      --
      "It's not whether you win or lose, it's how drunk you get." -- H. J. Simpson
    3. Re:For what practical purpose? by CorSci81 · · Score: 1

      If it's Friday night and you don't otherwise know your friend is at the bar down the street, how do you know he wants you to drop by?

  42. Speeding tickets? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder if they will relay the information to the cops when we are going too fast, then automatically send us speeding tickets.

  43. Re:I can't fib on my whereabouts :( by Bassman59 · · Score: 1
    How about they work on dropped calls and poor coverage first.

    Word!

  44. Thief's dream by hocrap · · Score: 1

    It's a thief's dream to get a hold of someone phone number, with some social engineering figure out his address and add them to his contact list.

    Now wait for the person to leave his home. Take the time you need, you know he's not in range.

    Reminds me of a movie called Louis 19. (EDtv was the American adaptation of the same screenplay for the US market) Where the guy is followed 24/7 by a TV crew. One night he comes back and his apartment was broken into and everything was stolen.

    1. Re:Thief's dream by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a thief's dream to get a hold of someone phone number, with some social engineering figure out his address and add them to his contact list.

      You, like most of the other slashtards, are a fucking idiot ranting about your own made-up bullshit that isn't even in the article.

      And you guys call yourselves "smart"? WTF?

  45. once step from that Trek:NG episode "Legacy" by ethanms · · Score: 1

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legacy_(TNG_episode)/

    They all had implants that would light-up when rival gang members were near-by...

    Maybe Boost will roll that feature out next year...

  46. PacMan Fun by ottc777 · · Score: 1

    I'm going to play a hightech pacman with this new feature. It will consist of someone watching on their phone in horror as I make all their dots (friends) disappear.

    --
    this amount of stupidity usually requires a group of people
  47. Wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have GOT to get one of these phones for EVERY ONE of the women I am currently stalking!

  48. tin foil hat by mitcheli · · Score: 0

    Now, I'll need one for my cell phone too... Wonder if it'll effect signal quality?

    --
    Select from tblFriends where interesting >= 4;
  49. I will buy a set for my in-laws by Lukasz+(Qr) · · Score: 1

    ... too see them coming:)

  50. Upshot? by gitargr8 · · Score: 0
    The upshot is that lawyers now have a new income source.
    I hardly find this to be an upshot...
    1. Re:Upshot? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      The upshot is that lawyers now have a new income source.
      I hardly find this to be an upshot...

      That's only because you don't know what upshot means.

      The dictionary is your friend. Learn to use it, or be ignorant forever.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  51. Just 25 miles? by NokX · · Score: 0

    I wanna know where my friends eat and sleep...

  52. RTFA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dude. Your answer is a click away. Why spend all that time typing when you could have just clicked the link and found out?

  53. Marketing Challenge by dthree · · Score: 1

    I guess marketing will have to come out with a new slogan. "Where u at?!" will now be meaningless since, well, I can see "where you at."

    --
    "I forgot my mantra."
  54. Helio has taken a different approach by haunebu · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Helio is a joint venture between South Korea's SK Telecom and EarthLink. They launched a slick new device (don't call it a phone =)) last week called the Drift that includes a hybrid GPS receiver (real GPS and A-GPS). It launched with a couple of GPS-enabled services: GPS-enabled Google maps and Buddy Beacon. The latter sounds pretty similar to Boost's solution, but takes a different approach to privacy.

    With Buddy Beacon, users must intentionally broadcast their location to their friends list. It does not constantly track your whereabouts and auto-broadcast your new locale. It's more like "find me here" than "i'm searching for so-and-so..."

    --

    Blue skies, Barthy Burgers, girls...

  55. Re:I can't fib on my whereabouts :( by element-o.p. · · Score: 1

    On the plus side, if Sprint can't complete a phone call reliably, your friends will never receive the GPS update of your location, either.

    --
    MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
  56. In the loopt by Kesh · · Score: 1
    Just to cut off some of the "OMG ST4LK3RZ" hype: this is an opt-in service. Customers have to actually sign up for it and (starting next year) pay for it. They can then invite people to join their buddy list and share their data. Other people can request to join, and you can always turn off the feature for everyone or just for specific people on your list.

    Also, this is for Sprint/Nextel's Boost Mobile pay-as-you-go division, not Sprint/Nextel contract phones.

    (Disclaimer: I work for Boost's tech support division. My comments are not intended to reflect the opinions of my employers, and all that jazz.)

  57. Unless you have something to hide... by gillbates · · Score: 3, Insightful

    you have nothing to worry about.

    But I think the government is very happy about this service. I'm sure the phone company would be more than happy to provide this information to the government, if requested, regardless of whether or not you agree to be tracked. Remember, if you irritate the government, you could lose your license to the radio spectrum on which your revenue depends.

    After all, if you have nothing to hide why would you object to the government knowing where you are at all times? Don't you realize that this is for the safety of the children? Are you really going to object to technology that could help solve a kidnapping?

    It is optional today. But not for long. As soon as the government figures out that this can be used to track everyone, in real time, it will become mandatory. They'll pass the law in the name of "protecting the children", or "fighting terrorism", etc...

    --
    The society for a thought-free internet welcomes you.
    1. Re:Unless you have something to hide... by RoloDMonkey · · Score: 1

      Actually, you have it backwards. About a decade ago, the government mandated that all cell phone providers provide real-time GPS for emergency calls (911) by 2004. So, these companies are just figuring out ways to make a profit on functionality they have already been forced to implement.

      --
      Long live the Speaker Bracelet
      Rolo D. Monkey
  58. From loopt... by samaltman · · Score: 1

    When we founded loopt a year ago, we were excited about the possibilities of being able to find your friends on the go. We also knew we needed to spend a lot of time thinking about how to build a service that addressed all of the important safety, security and privacy associated with location services. As such, we've built the service as a completely opt-in, private network. Loopt is a bunch of private networks of friends. In order to invite a user to be your friend, you have to know their phone number. You can't even browse their profile or message them without establishing friendship. Even when you've mutually agreed to be friends, you can turn off location sharing for everyone or individual friends. There also seems to be a bit of confusion as to how our service actually works. loopt doesn't integrate directly with your phone's contact list to automatically share your location as this post suggests. loopt is a downloadable app that lets you see where your friends are on a map on your phone (and some other cool stuff). Also, if we can't get GPS, we can always get a network-based location. Thanks for sharing all your comments. Please keep in touch with us and drop us a note if you have any questions or comments (feedback@loopt.com)

  59. That was Bush... by Kozar_The_Malignant · · Score: 1

    >"Trsuat but verify"

    Regan was senile, but he could pronounce English words properly. "Trsuat" sounds much more like something Bush would say.

    --
    Some mornings it's hardly worth chewing through the restraints to get out of bed.
  60. While slightly off-topic... by hugecabbage · · Score: 1

    ...I've been paying a bit of attention to Loopt, as well as several other tech startups, not because of their products per se, but rather how they've been helped in getting started.

    Y Combinator http://ycombinator.com/lib.html is an interesting little VC group that helped fund the likes of Loopt and several other tiny operations with big ideas. While obviously expecting a return on their modest investments, Y Combinator seem to be as much about philanthropy and helping out the little guy, as their extremely interesting and informative articles seem to attest.

    From their articles, I've learned a lot about stuff that I didn't think I was even interested in. Folks might want to rummage around their site for some refreshing ideas on when to run (or not) with new ideas, how to get your little operation off the ground, and why the hell no one can seem to make a halfway decent online dating site.

    And no, I have absolutely no affiliation with these guys. Just thought they were a refreshing voice in a sea of noise. And they're a big reason why we're reading about Loopt today on /.

    --
    oO0Oo
  61. Response from loopt by Mark+Jacobstein · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Hi everyone, I run corporate development over at loopt and am in charge of all things safety, security and privacy related and I just wanted to clear up some major misconceptions reflected in the original posting and in some of the threads, and to reinforce some of the messages presented by Sam Altman, our CEO, in an earlier thread. 1)loopt is entirely opt-in. You must choose to get loopt, choose to become someone's friend, choose to share location with that person and then, and only then, would that person have access to your location. 2)I can promise you that there are numerous privacy safeguards and that there is no way that Sprint Nextel (or us) would ever green-light a service that didn't do everything possible to protect everyone's privacy and safety. 3)Briefly, some of those safeguards include: a.Everything is opt-in b.You can turn-off location sharing, with individuals or with everyone, at any time from your phone or the web or via SMS c.loopt is a private network, not an open social network. You can't even invite someone to be your friend unless you already know their phone number, and there is no open browsing d.We don't ever keep your location history, just your current location, unless you explicitly and actively choose to store a location for your journal, a feature that comes out next week e.We verify loopt members as the holder of the handset account they are attempting to register, to remove any anonymity, the source of much of the misbehavior on the web f.We send frequent reminders to our members regarding their location sharing, and we have constant and conspicuous reminders throughout the application as well g.We've consulted with literally a dozen online and mobile safety groups, including ICAC, WebWiseKids, the Ponemon Organization, and NCMEC to make sure we've incorporated every best practice in the industry into the service We're very happy that so many people are already using the loopt service, and I hope this helps clear up some of the misconceptions. We're always happy get any questions or comments (feedback@loopt.com)

  62. Hmmm... by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

    What they don't say is that anyone stupid enough to leave this tracking enabled isn't going to have any friends.

    Not for long, anyway...

  63. My first thought by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jeezus, who the hell would put a GPS transmitter in their eye?

  64. Looks like they finally caught on to mologogo.com by yellowbkpk · · Score: 1

    Check out mologogo.com. They wrote a simple little java app that does this exact same thing. Plus, it's free.

  65. GPS tagging pics by MatthewHays · · Score: 1

    Can it GPS tag the pics I take on the thing? Assuming it has a camera..

  66. Well, it may be too late.... by chaboud · · Score: 1

    I did read the article, and it doesn't state whether the opt-in/opt-out is personal or global. That makes a big difference in how one uses the service. As it's described in the article, one could "opt in" to being seen by "friends" but be visible to anyone that knows the appropriate number.

    That can be a deal-killer for people who don't want to be seen by everyone.

    Before you jump on people, make sure that you CTFA (Comprehend...).

    But, of course, that may be why you posted AC.