Slashdot Mirror


Approaching Solar Storm Forces ISS to Take Cover

vichyschwa writes "A Coronal Mass Ejection resulting from an X3 Solar Flare earlier today is forcing the ISS and Shuttle astronauts to take cover and may result in communication disruptions. Last week, the same sunspot generated what astronomers described as a rarely imaged solar tsunami. The activity began with an X9 flare Dec. 5. According to Spaceweather.com, "satellites may experience some glitches and reboots, but astronauts are in no danger." However, the astronauts were ordered to a protective area of the space station as a precaution."

118 comments

  1. Why would they take cover? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    When they can get cool powers like the Fantastic Four?

    1. Re:Why would they take cover? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      I for one welcome our new cosmically powered overlords!

    2. Re:Why would they take cover? by empaler · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Finally a use of that meme that was semi-funny.

    3. Re:Why would they take cover? by Samah · · Score: 4, Funny

      Hell, anything that gives me a tightly-fitted-lycra-suit-clad Jessica Alba is alright in my books :)

      --
      Homonyms are fun!
      You're driving your car, but they're riding their bikes there.
    4. Re:Why would they take cover? by LurkerXXX · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, making Jessica Alba invisible is just soooooo wrong.

    5. Re:Why would they take cover? by Barryke · · Score: 0

      Cosmonauts?

      --
      Hivemind harvest in progress..
    6. Re:Why would they take cover? by dch24 · · Score: 1

      If you are as confused as I was when you read the linked article, notice that this article is linked from the first one. The first talks about the solar system "weather forecast." The second talks about the crew of the shuttle and ISS taking cover.

    7. Re:Why would they take cover? by kicken18 · · Score: 0

      Unless your gay, then your in danger of turning straight!!!

      --
      Visit My Blog at http://spaces.msn.com/members/chrisharries
  2. WOOHOO!! by gllitznz · · Score: 1

    "...described as a rarely imaged solar tsunami.." SURF'S UP!!!!.......oh, wait......

  3. X2 vs X9 by andphi · · Score: 5, Informative

    I was confused by this, so I looked it up.

    From the Wikipedia article on Solar Flares: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_Flare

    Solar flares are classified as A, B, C, M or X according to the peak flux (in watts per square meter, W/m2) of 100 to 800 picometer X-rays near Earth, as measured on the GOES spacecraft. Each class has a peak flux ten times greater than the preceding one, with X class flares having a peak flux of order 10-4 W/m2. Within a class there is a linear scale from 1 to 9, so an X2 flare is twice as powerful as an X1 flare, and is four times more powerful than an M5 flare. The more powerful M and X class flares are often associated with a variety of effects on the near-Earth space environment. Although the GOES classification is commonly used to indicate the size of a flare, it is only one measure.

    1. Re:X2 vs X9 by cluckshot · · Score: 0, Troll

      Here is another reality regards these CME's and flares. The matter in them leaves the sun and accelerates rapidly upon exiting the sun. This isn't like the acceleration of a gun. In a gun once the bullet leaves the gun, it begins slowing down. In a CME the matter gets faster and faster on the way out like it was riding a railgun track all the way out. The matter in these X-Class flares left the sun and in about 16 hours are reaching the earth. They left the sun at a velocity that was a few thousand miles per hour. By the time they get to the earth they are going many times that. In the case of these flares the matter is traveling about 10% of the speed of light when it passes earth. We have had flares like this which have passed earth going nearly 30% of the speed of light in 2004 and 2005. These were measured at Saturn by space craft to be going nearly 50% of the speed of light.

      The reality is that had the solar system been ruled by gravity as certain people who always find their "troll" moderation say, this could not have happened. If the sun were the nuclear furnace proposed in the popular solar models of today it is also impossible to have had this happen. The cosmology of today is busted. It is wrong.

      The solar system is operating as I write a massive particle accelerator that is operating at scales and forces beyond imagination. Millions of tons of matter are going out from the sun right now at speeds which will very shortly approach the speed of light. This means in the words of "Doc" from the movie back to the future---"This sucker is electrical." The electrical universe is real and it is very much happening around us. The Gravity hypothesis for solar system operation provides no model to allow any such activity. Acceleration of matter in this fashion cannot occur in a gravity driven universe.

      --
      Never Politically Correct ~ I prefer the facts If you don't like what I say, get a life, or comment yourself.
    2. Re:X2 vs X9 by Schemat1c · · Score: 1

      I found a very interesting video talking about exactly what you describe.

      Thunderbolts of the Gods

      --

      "Nobody knows the age of the human race, but everybody agrees that it is old enough to know better." - Unknown
  4. Re:Fantastic four by KrayzieKyd · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Lets hope the results from this storm end up more entertaining THAN the Fantastic Four movie.

  5. Take Cover? by Kenshin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "A Coronal Mass Ejection resulting from an X3 Solar Flare earlier today [CC] is forcing the ISS and Shuttle astronauts to take cover..."

    I may be reading something wrong, or just may not know the exact details, but how exactly would the ISS "take cover"? Aside from the orbital path around the earth, there's little to hide under up there.

    --

    Does it make you happy you're so strange?

    1. Re:Take Cover? by richdun · · Score: 1

      It says ISS and Shuttle astronauts, as in both groups of astronauts, becuase, yes, it would hard to hide a battlestation...er...space station.

    2. Re:Take Cover? by Cyno01 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Presumibly an extra shielded compartment of the station?

      --
      "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
    3. Re:Take Cover? by Unholy_Kingfish · · Score: 5, Informative
      One of the modules of the ISS is hardened against just this type of event. All of the modules have radiation protection, but this class of flare exceeds the safety limits of the those modules.

      Think of it as a storm cellar in space.

      --
      Fear Is the Only God
    4. Re:Take Cover? by Jarjarthejedi · · Score: 1
      --
      There are two kinds of fool One says 'This is old therefore good' Another says 'This is new therefore better'- Dean Ing
    5. Re:Take Cover? by repvik · · Score: 1

      So the ISS is going to hide inside itself? OP said ISS *and* astronauts. He was wondering where the ISS was going to "hide".

    6. Re:Take Cover? by Markus+Landgren · · Score: 2, Informative

      Guess what? "The ISS and shuttle astronauts" means "the ISS astronauts and the shuttle astronauts".

    7. Re:Take Cover? by edxwelch · · Score: 1

      You're right. It's unlikely that any part of the space station offers sufficent protection against gamma rays. Probably on of the modules is a bit more protected than the others

  6. Re:Fantastic four by ThePopeLayton · · Score: 1

    then or than, thats a pretty small grammar error, especially on slashdot

  7. Re:Fantastic four by srn_test · · Score: 0

    _Let's_ hope the results from this storm end up more entertaining THAN the Fantastic Four movie.

    If you're going to be picky.

  8. BOFH - Solar Flares by ServerIrv · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's friday, so I get into work early, before lunch even. The phone rings. Shit!
    I turn the page on the excuse sheet. "SOLAR FLARES" stares out at me. I'd better read up on that. Two minutes later I'm ready to answer the phone.
    "Hello?" I say.
    "WHERE HAVE YOU BEEN, I'VE BEEN TRYING TO GET YOU ALL MORNING?!"
    I hate it when they shout at me early in the morning. It always puts me in a bad mood. You know what I mean.
    "Ah, yes. Well, there's been some solar activity this morning, it always disrupts electronics..." I say, sweet as a sugar pie.
    "Huh? But I could get through to my friends?!"
    "Yes, that's entirely possible, solar activity is very unpredictable in it's effects. Why last week, we had some files just dissappear from a guys account while he was working on it!"
    "Really?"
    "Straight Up! Hey, do you want me to check your account?"
    "Yes please, I've got some important stuff in there!"
    "Ok, what's your username..."
    He tells me. Honestly, it's like shooting a fish in a barrel. Twice. With an Elephant Gun. At point blank range. In the head.

    1. Re:BOFH - Solar Flares by djupedal · · Score: 5, Funny

      Have you EVER shot at a fish in a barrel? Two times? With an elephant gun? At point blank range? In their shiny little slimy head?

      Word to the wise. I'm here to tell you that you only need to do this once to appreciate the benefit of a good barrel when fish shooting. I mean, unless you have some pretty large fish (especially in the head area), and a pretty small caliber weapon, you are at risk of not only offing the fish, but you are also liable to put an NRA certified water-draining hole in your barrel. Now me, I use fish-shooting barrels from the Ukraine, and I've never had an issue with water stained carpets.

      Try explaining it to your significant other when they get home. "Have you been discharging weapons inside the apartment, again...?" - "Don't we recall what happened when you put the dartboard up on the wall at the end of the hall and shot at it with your new Glock? That little-bitty bullet went thru the dart board and the wall and all four of your alpaca sweaters hanging up on that end of the closet...right?"

    2. Re:BOFH - Solar Flares by captain+random · · Score: 1

      Woops - sorry, bloody mac trackpad. Hopefully this reply will remove the accidental offtopic moderation.

    3. Re:BOFH - Solar Flares by Vskye · · Score: 1

      Mod the parent up. LMAO! ;)

      (I guess you have to appreciate the BOFH series) And yes, I'm a former systems admin.

      --
      Life was hell, then I discovered Linux...
    4. Re:BOFH - Solar Flares by ScentCone · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Word to the wise. I'm here to tell you that you only need to do this once to appreciate the benefit of a good barrel when fish shooting.

      Actually, shooting a high-powered rifle, while looking down at close range, into standing water is ... a really bad idea. Presuming that you really ARE talking about an "elephant gun," the amount of energy being released is really quite astounding. Depending on the round you're using, you could be delivering over 8,900 foot pounds of muzzle energy. With that projectile doing 2,000 feet per second into a barrel of water right in front of you, some interesting things are going to happen. Supersonic hunks of metal of that size tend to create some interesting cavitation effects in enclosed bodies of liquid (especially when enclosed by wooden slats!).

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    5. Re:BOFH - Solar Flares by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      ...so the fish is dead, right? :)

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    6. Re:BOFH - Solar Flares by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      ...so the fish is dead, right? :)

      Well, I don't think you'd actually be able to FIND the fish, but for most people that would qualify as dead, even though it's really more like MIA.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    7. Re:BOFH - Solar Flares by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Who are you, Shroedinger?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    8. Re:BOFH - Solar Flares by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      Who are you, Shroedinger?

      See, a lot of people wouldn't get the whole Shrodinger's Fish In A Barrel reference. At least, I don't think so. You never know. Maybe it's a Heisenberg thing.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    9. Re:BOFH - Solar Flares by Hotawa+Hawk-eye · · Score: 1
      Have you EVER shot at a fish in a barrel?

      No, but these guys have done the next best thing.
    10. Re:BOFH - Solar Flares by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      ...so your saying, it only works with catfish? :)

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    11. Re:BOFH - Solar Flares by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      ...so your saying, it only works with catfish? :)

      Quantum catfish. They're bottom-quark feeders.

      *smacks self in head to stop this, now!*

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
  9. Re:Fantastic four by sporkme · · Score: 2, Informative

    1989 was pretty entertaining.

  10. I'm outa here! by djupedal · · Score: 0

    "...and may result in communication disruptions."

    A disruption in communications can mean only one thing...invasion!

    1. Re:I'm outa here! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I swear to god, if we of Earth ends up indebted to jar-jar, I'm taking my lightsaber and committing seppuku.

    2. Re:I'm outa here! by empaler · · Score: 1

      Since we don't have a crappy, third rate space fleet parked around our planet, I guess you're doubly wrong.

    3. Re:I'm outa here! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      You sure about that?

    4. Re:I'm outa here! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Weeze a are warriors I'mmma not afraid weeza gooonnnna fite.

    5. Re:I'm outa here! by chrish · · Score: 1

      And even if we did, there'd be nothing to fear... pop off a nuke above the robotic assault forces (ground forces? who uses ground forces?!) and watch the EMP take them out.

      Where's your army of slapstick robots now, fish men?

      --
      - chrish
  11. Oh dear by Whiteout · · Score: 4, Funny

    A Coronal Mass Ejection resulting from an X3 Solar Flare earlier today

    Too much Mexican beer after a day on the beach, perhaps.

  12. Re:Fantastic four by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh, snap!

  13. Re:First base64-encoded post; can you dig it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    According to the xoft decoder hosted on Sourceforge, decoding that results in gibberish. So no, I cannot dig it.

  14. According to by chanrobi · · Score: 4, Funny

    CNN, the shuttle should be able to escape it! http://shogun.shafted.com.au/temp/cnnsucks.jpg

    1. Re:According to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but at those speeds the shuttle would be travelling through time and have a bit more to worry about than just radiation! For some reason, I now have the picture in my mind of the Turtles fighting aliens in the future . . . if only I had Turtles in Time on an emulator.

      I'm not sure whether to consider that image a sign of the incompetence at CNN, or that of our nations school system.

    2. Re:According to by teebob21 · · Score: 1

      I remember watching that CNN coverage, and I noticed the same tagline when it came up. It was quickly corrected to "speed of sound" but still...I'm glad someone got it on film, and now that's on my hard drive for all eternity. Thanks :)

      --
      khasim (12/9/06): In a blind taste test, more people preferred Coke over the Pepsi that I had previously pissed in.
  15. Fore! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hope this doesn't mean that they have to postpone some of the important work that they're .... oh, yeah, never mind. Sorry.

  16. glitches for satellites, no danger for astronauts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    So why don't they make satellites out of the stuff astronauts are made of?

  17. Solar surfs up! by DavidV · · Score: 1

    When we have recreational vehicles using solar sails that is.

    (No, you don't need to point out how that is only maybe possible for the moments before destruction when reasonaby close to a supernova.)

    --
    !sig
  18. Global warming... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I tell you, it's happening because we pollute too much planet earth !

  19. tsunami by KillerCow · · Score: 5, Interesting
    1. Re:tsunami by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cooler pictures will be coming soon...

      http://stereo.gsfc.nasa.gov/

    2. Re:tsunami by Animaether · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I hope so, because unfortunately SOHO has been doings its CCD maintenance run while that tsunami occurred.

    3. Re:tsunami by pintpusher · · Score: 1

      I love it. the link to "tsunami wave" in the caption of that photo is a nice clip of a a guy surfing a serious wave on google video. Who says rocket scientists aren't cool! Way to go NASA!!

      --
      man, I feel like mold.
    4. Re:tsunami by Lu · · Score: 1

      Best understanding of what is happening is here:

      http://sohowww.nascom.nasa.gov/data/LATEST/current _c3.gif

      WARNING! 30 mb file, but one of the best proton storms I have seen and I check this site every day. And it probably needs to be mirrored.

      -Luen

  20. Re:glitches for satellites, no danger for astronau by glitch23 · · Score: 0

    Although some people think nonliving objects can all of a sudden evolve into living objects it wouldn't work out too well to go the other way and make a satellite out of muscles and bones. Just think of the gooey mess when you change the batteries. By the way, astronauts are still vulnerable. Ever hear of radiation poisoning? Why else would the astronauts have been told to go into the safest part of the ISS during the storm?

    --
    this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom. -- Lincoln, Gettysburg Address
  21. Re:glitches for satellites, no danger for astronau by DoubleRing · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Because, um, we can't? I doubt organic computing has advanced far enough. Last I heard, a mouse brain could auto-pilot a plane, but I don't think that is what scientists are really worried about. A few brief glitches doesn't justify making the enormous investment to create not only wholly organic computers, but completely organic sensors (like gyroscopes. How are we going to make an organic version of that?) We don't have the knowledge or the means to do it. Besides, I have a feeling that an organic satellite would have more problems in space than a mechanical one. A mechanical one would have to worry about a few solar storms and collisions, both of which are only intermittent concerns. Organic satellites would have to worry about a lot of things, like solar wind which would be constantly ablating the surface (think sunburn). An organic satellite would need to feed itself. The only organic means of converting sunlight into energy that I can think of requires a steady supply of water and carbon dioxide. Out of curiosity, how would we communicate with it? Moving on, I guess you could say that an organic satellite could heal itself. A big plus, until you realize that means that it can also develop cancer. I know, it sounds retarded, but there's a lot of radiation in space. Even with shielding, that's a lot of exposure. Instead of having to go on missions to replace a faulty sensor or transmitter, we'll need to send missions to perform surgeries in zero gravity. Sounds fun.

    Anyways, all of these concerns are a little academic, especially considering the fact that they don't exist!

    --
    Before you die, you see DoubleRing...
  22. sweet! by TheWart · · Score: 3, Funny

    I would hate to be the guy that has to look like The Thing after this passes.

  23. Re:glitches for satellites, no danger for astronau by QuantumG · · Score: 1

    especially considering the fact that they don't exist! As far as you know! The military have been experimenting with dolphins in space for decades!

    --
    How we know is more important than what we know.
  24. I've Seen This one... by MBC1977 · · Score: 0

    Gee can we say Fantastic Four anyone... (hope they got a hot chick to play Sue Richards)...

    --
    Regards,

    MBC1977,
    1. Re:I've Seen This one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  25. Re:Fantastic four by QuickFox · · Score: 1

    then or than, that's a pretty small grammar error, especially on slashdot

    --
    Terrorists can't threaten a country's freedom and democracy. Only lawmakers and voters can do that.
  26. Overheard in the Space Station by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Uuhhhh, guys, who's got the key?

  27. Look north tonight by pedestrian+crossing · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The last time one of these things happened, we had incredible views of the northern lights even in southern Europe.

    So I would suggest keeping an eye on the northern sky tonight, we might be in for a truly entertaining light show!

    --
    A house divided against itself cannot stand.
    1. Re:Look north tonight by rs79 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Ok so I'm lookin north. I live where it's dark and far enough north the aurora is pretty good here.

      But it's cloudy. And it'd gonna be cloudy all week.

      Wadda rip.

      --
      Need Mercedes parts ?
    2. Re:Look north tonight by arrrrg · · Score: 2, Informative

      Saw this earlier today: MIDDLE LATITUDE AURORAL ACTIVITY WARNING. Sadly, it's way too foggy here to see anything ... I was really looking forward to seeing my first aurora.

    3. Re:Look north tonight by yellowbkpk · · Score: 2, Informative

      Check out this page for the "energetic particles" count in the atmosphere. Basically, you have a decent chance of seeing Northern Lights if you are being covered by a yellow or red pixel.

    4. Re:Look north tonight by stormhair · · Score: 1

      Yes! I can see it! A big, yellow square in the sky! :-)

  28. Err.. by malkir · · Score: 4, Funny

    The only thing I'd want to 'take cover' of is a very particular part of my body which does not react well long-term to radiation. Think of the children!

    1. Re:Err.. by aussie_a · · Score: 1

      We are. That's why we would be saving any from having you as a parent.

    2. Re:Err.. by Korin43 · · Score: 1

      Come on, we saw what happened when space radiation effected only 4 people. Imagine how awesome it would be to have a million "fantastic" sperm!

  29. Re:Fantastic four by Columcille · · Score: 3, Funny

    Then or than, that's a pretty small grammatical error, especially on Slashdot.

    --
    I love my sig.
  30. More proof for... by finity · · Score: 1

    global warming.

  31. For a moment there by h2g2bob · · Score: 3, Funny

    I thought it said "Approaching Solar Storm Forces IIS to Take Cover"

    Oh well.

    1. Re:For a moment there by clark0r · · Score: 1

      we could only hope that IIS would be blown out of existance by the power of god. unfortunately we let 12 year old kids with perl scripts do it instead, slower but more entertaining.

  32. Solar Storm as Anti Virus? by LupeSpywalper · · Score: 1

    The space shuttle/station currently has a problem with Word virus. They haven't found a solution to it yet so they have banned attachment in email to and from the computers on board the shuttle. Maybe they could rely on the solar storm to wipe all Word documents from their computer?
    It was funny to listen to the space shuttle commander asking mission control: "Do you have any solution to.... I don't know if i should say this.... virus problem we have with Word documents?". Maybe they try to keep a lid on it since the next space tourist to the ISS is an old Microsoft employee?

    1. Re:Solar Storm as Anti Virus? by LupeSpywalper · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Just an update on the space shuttle virus situation. It seems NASA have cleaned their computers of the viruses that prevented the astronauts from receiving email attachments. At the end of this mornings wake up call, the Capcom gave this comment: "And most importantly: You are go for Outlook!". So this shows that if you just put all the best scientists in your country on the task, it is actually possible to use Outlook safely.

  33. Re:tsunami in STEREO! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just wait until the SECCHI/STEREO mission images start showing up.
    STEREO launched in October and things are looking good!
    Part of its primary mission is to image CMEs, which are very difficult to see when they are pointed straight at you.
    It uses two satellites (A=Ahead and B=Behind) to image the sun from different angles.

  34. Topic drift: gyroscopes by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 2, Informative

    >like gyroscopes. How are we going to make an organic version of that?

    You've been carrying around examples your entire life. Fluid-filled loops, one for each axis, little hairs along the inside to detect fluid rotation.

    Try this. Sit up straight in a swivel chair, kick it into a spin, maintain the spin until you get used to it. Then quickly lean forward. You will then know exactly how a gyroscope feels when you try to tilt it. Have a bucket handy or do it on an empty stomach.

    Besides, look how well organic technology worked for the Vorlons and the Shadows. Unless you're going to argue that it's a bad idea because they were both fictional and they both lost.

    1. Re:Topic drift: gyroscopes by ComaVN · · Score: 2

      That doesn't work in a zero-G environment. Gyroscopes do.

      --
      Be wary of any facts that confirm your opinion.
  35. How?? Easy. by Khyber · · Score: 1

    (like gyroscopes. How are we going to make an organic version of that?)

    It's called the inner ear. We know it's exact shape, we know it's filled with fluid and we know that's how we can tell with our eyes closed if we're upside-down, sideways, etc. The iner ear is our balance mechanism and we don't need three axises when we can have a spiral canal filled with fluid do the same thing with proper sensors attached.

    The other stuff, though, I can't think of an answer to, mins the "organic" part. Organic (generally) means anything containing carbon, until you get into the area of food.

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    1. Re:How?? Easy. by DoubleRing · · Score: 4, Informative
      It's called the inner ear. We know it's exact shape, we know it's filled with fluid and we know that's how we can tell with our eyes closed if we're upside-down, sideways, etc. The iner ear is our balance mechanism and we don't need three axises when we can have a spiral canal filled with fluid do the same thing with proper sensors attached.
      Wrong. As someone else pointed out, the inner ear depends on gravity a great deal. Why do they call the zero-grav training plane the "vomit rocket?" There's also a flight training exercise where an instructor and a student go together into a plane with an obscured canopy so they can't see outside. The instructor flips the plane upside down at a speed so that the centripetal force of the plane remains at 1 G. When they change the controls to the student, a lot of them end up never realizing they are upside down until the instructor tells them. The point is to trust your instruments. If you're flying in bad weather, you can't trust your inner ear, but you can trust the gyroscope.
      --
      Before you die, you see DoubleRing...
    2. Re:How?? Easy. by Khyber · · Score: 1

      I guess you've enver seen the video of the cat in Zero G. Tehy fliped that plane around so many times, yet the cat could tell exactly which way it was oriented. We can do the same thing, (take Aikido and you'll start understanding what I'm talking about, when your body flips three times before hitting the ground. Good martial artists can instinctively accomodate for unexpected physical positions. While the fluid needs gravity, in a zero-g environment, your flippign around still creates a "micro-gravity" (not an accurate term) that causes the fluid to slosh around in your ears. You can still orient yourself depending on what you feel, not the tug of gravity. I did the "You can fly" program at Huntsville's Space Camp program for older teens/adults. Perhaps you should give it a spin (if they still do the plane-flying from Huntsvilel to Macon, NC, that is) and they'll teach you ALL about it.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    3. Re:How?? Easy. by stormhair · · Score: 1
      Why do they call the zero-grav training plane the "vomit rocket?"

      I think it's called the "vomit comet" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vomit_comet - although I quite like "vomit rocket" :-)

  36. Re:glitches for satellites, no danger for astronau by dr_d_19 · · Score: 1

    ...but completely organic sensors (like gyroscopes. How are we going to make an organic version of that?) We don't have the knowledge or the means to do it

    Ehm... *cough*

  37. Insert obligatory quote.. by cheros · · Score: 1

    "They'd be better off if they'd used OpenOffice/Linux/BSD" - and I don't think that comment is inappropriate at all. With the defined file format of ODF scanning for problems is easier, and you can choose to zap any macros because they're a separate file in the ODF zip file..

    And I would personally not want to load up the Shuttle comms circuits with the volume of patches required to keep Windows safe - stupid..

    --
    Insert .sig here. Send no money now. Owner may sue, contents will settle. Batteries not included.
  38. X-ray flux raw data by dtmos · · Score: 4, Informative

    Real-time X-ray flux data is available here. A good site (for BOFHs or just curious laypeople) on this subject is SpaceWeather.

    1. Re:X-ray flux raw data by andphi · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the information. This has been an interesting week for the space sciences, I think, between the flares, the shuttle launch (I wonder if they could have missed some of this storm if they had launched sooner), and the publication of the Mars and Titan topography stuff.

    2. Re:X-ray flux raw data by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "BOFH"? What does a "Bastard Operator From Hell" have to with it?

  39. (OT) by evilandi · · Score: 1

    recall what happened when you put the dartboard up on the wall at the end of the hall and shot at it

    I actually did this whilst at university, only against a door instead of a wall. The door in question was the front door, as this was the only corridor long enough to act as a range.

    Although in the UK we only had air/CO2 powered pellet guns (albeit with 150m/s+ muzzle velocity, proper target pistols not BB guns), the stupidity of the situation did eventually dawn on us when the pizza guy rang the doorbell.

    --
    Andrew Oakley - www.aoakley.com
    1. Re:(OT) by h4rm0ny · · Score: 4, Funny


      Had a friend at university who used to throw knives and had a target drawn on his door. He was chucking a knife at it when his room mate walked in a fraction of a second after he'd thrown it. So we're all sitting there in stunned silence as this door swings shut behind him with a knife positioned right behind his head and he looks at us all and says "What's the matter with you lot?"

      The difference between funny and death is very fine sometimes.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    2. Re:(OT) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We'll call you Annie Oakley from now on.

  40. Re:First base64-encoded post; can you dig it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So it wasn't my decoder that messed up...

  41. It can still be cool! by CptnHarlock · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I lived in the north of Sweden (Luleå) for a year and one night there was going to be some major northern lights. The sky was clouded BUT the clouds looked as if they were backlit with a powerfull greenish-pinkish light! The night was quite bright and this was during the winter when even the days are dark and at best gloomy. So don't hesitate to take a look.. :)

    Cheers!..

    --
    $HOME is where the .*shrc is
    -- silver_p
  42. How this article should have gone.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Approaching Solar Storm Forces! ISS to Take Cover!

    Growing numbers of Solar Storm Troopers stationed
    on Moon Base Alpha are said to be behind the recent
    NASA announcement that the ISS shall relocate to the
    dark side of the moon until further notice. The Solar
    Empire has issued a statement to the effect that Moon
    Base Alpha inhabitants are experiencing an increase
    in crime thus necessitating the extra troops and denying
    any suggestion of a planned station to station invasion.
    The UN has called on the Solar Empire to withdraw
    Storm Troopers from the region as quickly as possible
    to avoid an incident.

  43. Re:First base64-encoded post; can you dig it? by Lostence · · Score: 1

    The gibberish is a zip file, with a lame bmp in it saying "LOL YOU WASTE YOUR LIFE"
    huhu

  44. Killshot by Locarius · · Score: 1

    Sure, it sounds crazy, but professional remote viewers have been predicting this for some time. Conveniently, they sell a DVDs on how to save your own ass. I'll save you $400 and say that your best advice is to get WAY underground when you hear of a space shuttle being hit by some sort of small projectile in space (like a pebble). This is the nearest preceeding event to the big solar flare that will nuke us. /crazy rant.

  45. Old joke, but ... by ferar · · Score: 0

    They should have traveled at night.

  46. WikiSlashdot by ThinkingInBinary · · Score: 2, Funny

    Slashdot comments should be editable, like Wiki pages! Instead of posting irritating comments, Grammar Nazi(TM)'s could just edit the offending posts directly.

    1. Re:WikiSlashdot by glwtta · · Score: 2, Funny

      Instead of posting irritating comments, Grammar Nazis(TM) could just edit the offending posts directly.

      --
      sic transit gloria mundi
    2. Re:WikiSlashdot by Tsen+Wrath · · Score: 0

      Instead of posting irritating comments, Grammar Nazi(TM)s' could just edit the offending posts directly.

  47. Super Powers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wasn't this what happened to the guys in the Fantastic Four movie?

  48. You are on to something! by clashdot · · Score: 3, Interesting

    According to a recent article in Scientific American, protection from radiation in space is a depressingly hard problem. Basically, the only protection known to work is to put a great many atomic nuclei in the way of the radiation. The irony is that a thin shield, such as a space station wall, may be worse than no shield at all: It stops low-energy particles, but when hit by the really nasty high-energy particles (that are out there in great numbers) secondary radiation is produced, that is in many cases more harmful than the original particles.

    Leave the lead shield at home: light elements such as hydrogen work the best for shielding, both because you get more atomic nuclei per mass unit, but also because less secondary radiation is produced. Therefore, water is a good choice for a shield. You need about one meter.

    Now, surrounding the ISS with a one-meter deep water shield is unfeasible. However, if you want to protect just one, or two, little things from radiation that is coming from a specific direction, you can. You carry one meter of water shielding with you at all times. Just use you body as a shield!

    You will find that astronauts fall into one of two categories: Those who choose to shield their heads and those who choose to shield something else. They are easily told apart during a solar storm by their bodies pointing in opposite directions.

    1. Re:You are on to something! by malkir · · Score: 1

      Whoa! I didn't know that, good read :]

    2. Re:You are on to something! by antispam_ben · · Score: 1

      You will find that astronauts fall into one of two categories: Those who choose to shield their heads and those who choose to shield something else. They are easily told apart during a solar storm by their bodies pointing in opposite directions.

      You'd think those who want to shield "something else" would leave a sample "in the bank" just as Lance Armstrong did.

      --
      Tag lost or not installed.
  49. Re:glitches for satellites, no danger for astronau by paving-slab · · Score: 2, Funny

    So that's what happened to the White Dolphins from Yangtze River...

  50. Another reason not to trust Wikipedia by crimbil · · Score: 1
    Each class has a peak flux ten times greater than the preceding one, with X class flares having a peak flux of order 10-4 W/m2. Within a class there is a linear scale from 1 to 9, so an X2 flare is twice as powerful as an X1 flare, and is four times more powerful than an M5 flare.
    Bad math at work. By the scale listed, an M9 would be four times more powerful than an M5, so there is no way an X2 is four times more powerful than an M5. An X2 should be 7 times more powerful than an M5. (M6-M7-M8-M9-X-X1-X2)
  51. Sci-fi foot soldiers by empaler · · Score: 1

    I've always wondered about sci-fi with grunt deployments - why the fuck risk the lives of countless of your own citizens when you can just nuke the other planet? Even better, send a few meteors their way. If you're really good, you can make it hard to trace, even.

  52. Time's running out by warmgun · · Score: 1

    How does this (and other) troubles affect their schedule? I recall this story about how the shuttle can't be in operation during a year change. When are they scheduled to land? How close will it be?

  53. Despicable, Mel! by Gorimek · · Score: 1

    It's just sad how the irresponsible portrayal of the Sun God in Mel Gibson's irresponsible and exploitative movie has endangered these astronauts, the planet's finest.

  54. X3 is nothing.. by slashkitty · · Score: 2, Informative
    I don't even know why this is news. Sun activity is very low right now, we're at the bottom of the cycle right now: http://www.sec.noaa.gov/SolarCycle/

    A few years ago we had that X28 flare!

    --
    -- these are only opinions and they might not be mine.
    1. Re:X3 is nothing.. by pla · · Score: 1

      I don't even know why this is news. Sun activity is very low right now, we're at the bottom of the cycle right now: http://www.sec.noaa.gov/SolarCycle/
      A few years ago we had that X28 flare!


      It counts as news because CMEs occur with equal probability in all directions.

      The Earth, from the Sun, counts as a very very VERY small target - Given a straight-line probability of hitting us, the Earth only occupues 0.00005% of vectors heading outward from the Sun. Granted, a CME takes the form of a rather large cloud, so boost that by a factor of a thousand (give or take an order of magnitude), but we still have an exceptionally small chance of getting hit by any given CME.

      Well, this one hit us, and as I write this, we have a Kp of >8, with a G4 intensity geomagnetic storm going on (the scale only goes to 5, much like hurricanes). To get an idea of what that means, I live a mile south of a international airport, my neighbor (to the North) has a brazillian watts worth of christmas lights out, and the sky still looks bright frickin' green (unfortunately we have some serious cloud cover here, or I'd have a hell of a show and certainly wouldn't waste it writing on Slashdot).


      Or to put it another way - if an X28 CME actually hit the Earth straight on, we wouldn't have any functional satellites left to tell us about it, nor would most of us hear about it on the news for a week or so due to massivly widespread blackouts.

  55. Invisible Jessica? by lpq · · Score: 1

    But would you be able to see her?