Slashdot Mirror


MythDora — MythTV 0.2 In a Box

peterdaly writes "MythDora 3 is the first MythTV 'in-a-box' style distribution to include MythTV 0.20. Based on Fedora Core 5, MythDora 3 is designed to format your hard drive then install everything needed for a fully functional MythTV System. Here is a walkthrough of the entire MythDora installation process, including screenshots and a screencast."

197 comments

  1. Um...KnoppMyth? by Kadin2048 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How, other than being based on Fedora, is this any different from KnoppMyth? It runs as a LiveCD and will then (if you want it to) install itself onto your hard drive, doing all the requisite steps.

    I'm not panning MythDora, but it just doesn't seem totally unique, unless I'm missing some critical thing about it.

    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    1. Re:Um...KnoppMyth? by rGauntlet · · Score: 5, Informative

      Well, right now MythDora using Myth 0.20 and KnoppMyth (Which I use, and prefer) is on 0.19. Aside from the Debian vs Fedora, that's the main difference I think. The issue I had with MythDora was that it ships with a single-processor kernel, SMP disabled. KnoppMyth worked with my simple SMP rig right outta the box, no recompilation required. If you care and find yourself with nothing better to do, and trust me there are far better things to do, my read on it is on my website.

      --
      http://www.yeraze.com http://www.vizworld.com
    2. Re:Um...KnoppMyth? by calibanDNS · · Score: 1

      AFAIK KnoppMyth hasn't been upgraded from Myth 0.19 to Myth 0.20, but please correct me if I'm wrong.

    3. Re:Um...KnoppMyth? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >How, other than being based on Fedora, is this any different from KnoppMyth?

      Knoppmyth is not yet at version 0.20.

    4. Re:Um...KnoppMyth? by montyzooooma · · Score: 1
      "How, other than being based on Fedora, is this any different from KnoppMyth? "

      Well for one thing hopefully it'll work with SATA drives without having to jump through hoops.

    5. Re:Um...KnoppMyth? by Bert64 · · Score: 0

      Well, why would you be intending to setup a mythtv box using multiple cpus?
      Most people using such machines, want something small and quiet....

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    6. Re:Um...KnoppMyth? by Whyzzi · · Score: 1
      unless I'm missing some critical thing about it.

      Well, KnoppMyth doesn't run as a live CD distro (although I have yet to play with R5D1), and KnoppMyth runs MythTV 0.19 (not 0.20 like MythDora). That would be about the only critical parts you're missing...

      I've been trying to get MythTV working on some older hardware (Celeron 1100A, 512MB RAM). My biggest stumbling block has been trying to get sound working - stupid Asus TV/FM 7135 (SAA7134 driver), stupid cheap Audigy SE (CA106 Alsa), annoying blob of NVidia binary drivers. I digress. Anyway, I think I'm getting real close to having the config settings correct.

      --
      "BSD is about people pissing each other.." (Moid Vallat)
    7. Re:Um...KnoppMyth? by infochuck · · Score: 1

      It's different because it's current; KnoppMyth is typically a few versions behind (I think they're still on Mythtv 0.17). It's not totally unique, just different, newer and it doesn't use Knoppix.

    8. Re:Um...KnoppMyth? by rGauntlet · · Score: 1

      Maybe you're right.. But I was using the hardware I had available at the moment, and surprisingly it is rather quiet.. But a single 533Mhz Celeron isn't really "up to par" for recording, commercial tagging, re-encoding, DVD burning, etc. Dual CPU handles it alot better.

      Maybe once I get a corporate sponsorship deal I can upgrade to something better ;-)

      --
      http://www.yeraze.com http://www.vizworld.com
    9. Re:Um...KnoppMyth? by Abcd1234 · · Score: 4, Informative

      For a backend machine that will be performing recording, commercial detection, and transcoding, possibly of one or even multiple HD streams simultaneously?

    10. Re:Um...KnoppMyth? by York+the+Mysterious · · Score: 1

      The standard branch is still at .19 with fixes. Tester branch is .20. Sign up to be a tester.

      --

      Tim Smith - Ramblings from Nerd Land
    11. Re:Um...KnoppMyth? by harryk · · Score: 2, Informative

      Just a thought, I think someone else might have noted it though... KnoppMyth, while being stable, is out of date, atleast currently. Which is unfortunate because I think using the knoppmyth as a live CD for the front-end works great, assuming you have a .19 backend.

      The other thing to note is that the 'live' CD is only good for the front-end. I've read on the site that they are trying to get a back-end running on a CD, but I think its still under development.

      just my 2cents
      harryk

      --
      think before you write, it'll save me moderator points.
    12. Re:Um...KnoppMyth? by wezzul · · Score: 1

      My problem with Knoppmyth is that it automatically installs an SMP kernel, regardless of if you have dual processors/cores or not. I was getting issues with the SMP kernel and ACPI errors, so had to recompile with SMP support disabled, which resolved it.

      Aside from that, I'm not exactly sure how MythDora is news (unless it comes with preset schedules for a popular children's program), other than it is some other new specialized distribution that does the exact same thing as another. Knoppmyth will eventually upgrade to 0.20 and then the only difference will be the underlying distribution, and for my money, Debian is far better than Fedora, simply because of how often Fedora is EOL'd.

    13. Re:Um...KnoppMyth? by urbanriot · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ... there's this little mobile CPU called the "core duo" which would be great for a very powerful, very small and very quiet as a multimedia system.

    14. Re:Um...KnoppMyth? by spyrochaete · · Score: 1

      I haven't tried for at least a year, but last time I checked the Knoppix HDD install was in beta and very buggy. Knoppix distros aren't good for much more than LiveCD boots.

    15. Re:Um...KnoppMyth? by harryk · · Score: 2, Informative

      From the MythDora website, atleast with this release, they are indeed using an SMP kernel. Perhaps an upgrade is in order. It would be of my opinion that since they are effectively releasing a new distro, they should update the yum repositories to reflect their own, so that performing a 'yum upgrade' would grab packages based specifically on their distro as opposed to the raw Fedora distro. just a thought

      --
      think before you write, it'll save me moderator points.
    16. Re:Um...KnoppMyth? by thedbp · · Score: 1

      >... there's this little mobile CPU called the "core duo" which would be great for a very powerful, very small and very quiet as a multimedia system.

      exactly!

    17. Re:Um...KnoppMyth? by businessnerd · · Score: 2, Informative

      Other than some of the arguments already stated about Knoppmyth using an older version of MythTV, there are other reasons that MythDora is a good thing. I am currently running MythTV on a Fedora Core 4 x86_64 system. It took me a couple tries to get to a point where I could live with it, and one of those tries was Knoppmyth. Since I was having so much trouble getting things configured properly (remote, some DVD issues, etc.) I decided to give KnoppMyth a try in hopes that it would be a simple and quick setup that would not require any further tweaking. Unfortunately, I have some unique hardware that interfered with this theory. First, while SATA is technically supported, it isn't supported very well. I had to jump through some hoops to get it to work. Also, my monitor is an old Gateway Destination monitor which is just a 27" CRT that weighs more than Texas. KnoppMyth did not like this monitor and all text was incredbly small and illegible. Tweaking with X and with resolutions didn't solve the problem so I went back to Fedora, where I knew all of my hardware was supported. Doing the Fedora install a third time went a lot smoother than the first and a lot of the original problems went away and I had a very usable system. It's been chugging along nicely for almost a year now with some small quirks. Lirc doesn't work, but the arrow keys and number pad have equivalents on the remote control, so i can navigate the interface, select options and change the channel without a problem. Exiting things requires the keyboard. I will be doing some hardware upgrades soon, and will probably do a fresh install. I will seriously be looking a MythDora because I know that because it's fedora based, hardware compatibility will not be an issue and hopefully things like Lirc will function better out of the box. Furthermore, since I also use this system as a media server to my other computers, I will need to do some further tweaking of my own. Since Fedora is the distro I know best, especially for some of the backend server type of things, I will be more confident that all of my server needs will be taken care of quickly with less down time trying to figure out the ins and outs of a Debian distro.

      Plus, competition is good. KnoppMyth does the same thing, essentially, but MythDora does it differently, which may be good for some and bad for others. But the good thing is that we have this choice.

      --
      "It's not whether you win or lose, it's how drunk you get." -- H. J. Simpson
    18. Re:Um...KnoppMyth? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MythDora is better suited to recording Dora The Explorer videos?

    19. Re:Um...KnoppMyth? by calibanDNS · · Score: 1

      I prefer to compile MythTV from source instead of using a packaged distro - it gives me as much flexibility as I want, and in my experience MythTV isn't that difficult to get working. Plus it keeps me from being tied to a particular distro - my master backend and a 2nd backend are both on Debian, while my frontend is a FC 4 box. I'm researching building a dedicated frontend for my entertainment center, and maybe one of these prepackaged distros will seem more appropriate there.

    20. Re:Um...KnoppMyth? by siwelwerd · · Score: 1

      How about because it actually works? I'm no Fedora fan, but when I tried Knoppmyth my machine wouldn't boot after I installed it. MythDora worked virtually instantly. It even took care of the TV-out on my PVR-350 card, something I'd never been able to get to work when I tried Myth under Gentoo.

    21. Re:Um...KnoppMyth? by xsecrets · · Score: 1

      ok I'll admit that knoppmyth is one version behind right now it's on 0.19 and that's just because there were some BIG changes to get 0.20 going which are still in testing at the moment. You will notice it took mythdora quite a while to get it's 0.20 version out as well.

      Knoppmyth has never to my knowledge been more than one version behind the official mythtv release, and it usually has a new release integrated in a month or two max. It's just that this one had some larger hurdles.

    22. Re:Um...KnoppMyth? by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      I think a little variety can help. When I tried Knopmyth, it simply wasn't compatible with my computer with an Intel workstation chipset, despite the fact that the chipset was over three years old at the time. If I had another option to try, then it might have helped.

      I have done an install of Myth on Fedora, but it's 95% done and I left it that way for a long time because there was some setup stoff that needed to be finished that I couldn't get to work reliably. Eventually I just gave up and bought an EyeTV for my Mac. It's probably not as good as Myth but at least the installation was quick and simple.

    23. Re:Um...KnoppMyth? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looks like MythDora isn't a bootable CD/DVD distro, either (where KnoppMyth is). This is a shame.

      I'm waiting on KnoppMyth to move to 0.20 so I can use my office laptop (the only other fast-enough machine in the house) to debug my HD Backend setup before sinking the bucks into a beautiful dedicated frontend.

    24. Re:Um...KnoppMyth? by smchris · · Score: 1

      Apparently, "your mileage may vary". Many people seem to have a flawless experience with Knoppmyth, but I had a similar experience to your's where it just wasn't playing nice with my pcHDTV card and some other stuff. Using the instructions from the guy who follows the Fedora releases and some other web docs I had a reasonably uneventful .19 install in the course of the learning curve,

      That _is_ an admission. My other handfull of machines are Debian and I use Knoppix disks all the time so Knoppmyth would have been desirable.

      So I welcome this release. When I hose my first attempt at a Fedora 5/.20 upgrade, I can give it a try (instead of/before) a restore ;)

    25. Re:Um...KnoppMyth? by ManxStef · · Score: 2, Informative

      You can fairly easily upgrade the latest KnoppMyth (R5D1) to the developer-provided packages, provided you're capable of using a command prompt, as explained in this thread:
      http://mysettopbox.tv/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=11558 &highlight=

      Unfortunately registration is required for the KnoppMyth forum (I'd encourage you to join as there's a wealth of information there and they're generally very helpful folks) so I've taken the liberty of posting the relevant info below:

      [Posted by Cecil, KnoppMyth's lead developer. Note that I've added the information on how to get a terminal window and su to root.]

      Not as clean as I'd like... But if you follow these instructions as root, you'll be 0.20. Make sure you backup first!

      Open up a terminal in KnoppMyth by pressing Alt+X.

      su
      (provide your root password)
      echo "deb ftp://knoppmyth.net/R5 ./" >> /etc/apt/sources.list
      apt-get update
      dpkg -r libmyth-0.19 libmyth-0.19-dev mythtv mythtv-backend mythtv-common mythtv-database mythtv-debug mythtv-doc mythtv-frontend mythplugins mythburn-ui
      rm -fr /usr/share/mythtv/mythweb
      apt-get install mythtv mythplugins myththemes mythstream mythstreamtv
      rm -fr /var/www/mythweb
      ln -sf /usr/share/mythtv/mythweb /var/www
      During the install process, you see:

      E: /var/cache/apt/archives/mythplugins_0.20a-1_i386.d eb not a valid DEB package.
      E: Prior errors apply to /var/cache/apt/archives/mythplugins_0.20a-1_i386.d eb
      E: Prior errors apply to /var/cache/apt/archives/mythtv_0.20-8_i386.deb

      You can safely ignore this... I had to manually make changes to the package.

      Now restart the backend and you should be good to go.

      It's also worth mentioning that Cecil says this won't affect the upgrade procedure to the next version, so don't let that hold you back.
    26. Re:Um...KnoppMyth? by arete · · Score: 2, Informative

      First, because you need about a Ghz to make everything work at once on a single stream...

      Second, because more CPUs is NOT directly related to how loud your machine is. Whether you bought good, powerful, quiet fans (case/PSU/CPU/GPU) is the single biggest factor in the noise, NOT the number of them.

      Third, of course is dual-core chips...

      --
      Looking for freelance Actionscript (Flash/Flex) or ColdFusion work and/or freelance developers. Email me, put Slashdot
    27. Re:Um...KnoppMyth? by BrianRaker · · Score: 1

      iMedia MythTV is made out of box for the PVR350 cards, and to my knowledge, it supports video out from the card. http://www.mini-box.com/s.nl/it.A/id.421/.f

      --
      As I walk through the valley of death I fear no one, for I am the meanest sonova bitch in the valley!
    28. Re:Um...KnoppMyth? by Cat_Byte · · Score: 1

      I just follow the route of install OS with the check boxes they need, edit the yum config, yum install mythtv-suite. It really isn't difficult enough any more to need knoppmyth, etc IMHO. When I first started using myth, it took days to get it running right with ivtv, lirc, etc.

      --
      Two roads diverged in a wood, and I - I took the one the bus load of girls just went down.
    29. Re:Um...KnoppMyth? by Schraegstrichpunkt · · Score: 1

      The database schema upgrade didn't work. Now I have to muck around manually to try to fix that.

    30. Re:Um...KnoppMyth? by Schraegstrichpunkt · · Score: 2, Informative
      It might have been because I restarted the mythtv-backend twice in quick succession after doing the upgrade. The error I got was:

      2006-12-14 20:01:46.515 Current Schema Version: 1135
      2006-12-14 20:01:46.527 Newest Schema Version : 1160
      2006-12-14 20:01:46.548 New DB connection, total: 2
      2006-12-14 20:01:46.571 Connected to database 'mythconverg' at host: localhost
      2006-12-14 20:01:46.573 Setting Lock for Database Schema upgrade. If you see a long pause here it means the Schema is already locked and is being upgraded by another Myth process.
      2006-12-14 20:01:46.576 New DB connection, total: 3
      2006-12-14 20:01:46.591 Connected to database 'mythconverg' at host: localhost
      2006-12-14 20:01:46.613 Upgrading to schema version 1136
      2006-12-14 20:01:46.638 DB Error (Performing database upgrade):
      Query was: ALTER TABLE program ADD listingsource INT NOT NULL default '0';
      Error was: Driver error was [2/1060]:
      QMYSQL3: Unable to execute query
      Database error was:
      Duplicate column name 'listingsource'

      new version: 1136
      2006-12-14 20:01:46.640 Database Schema upgrade FAILED, unlocking.
      2006-12-14 20:01:46.642 Couldn't upgrade database to new schema

      Stopping the backend, running this on the database, and then restarting the backend---seemed to work:

      ALTER TABLE program DROP listingsource;

      So, to new users: If you're getting impatient, run "tail -F /var/log/mythtv/mythbackend.log" and wait until the database schema upgrade is complete before you decide to restart mythbackend for a second time.

    31. Re:Um...KnoppMyth? by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      I think that it was unfair to mod your post down the way that it was, because it's a valid question and one that other people will undoubtedly have.

      Some people will be using it for more than just a TV guide and would appreciate the extra power of a dual core or SMP system.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    32. Re:Um...KnoppMyth? by cesman · · Score: 1

      Yes. I have 4 HD tuners between 2 systems (2 in my master backend and 2 in slave). Generally on Tuesdays on Wednesdays, I have all four tuners recording at the same time. All my records are stored on my MBE. So, the recordings from the SBE are saved over the network.

      --
      When the source is open, the possibilities are endless.
    33. Re:Um...KnoppMyth? by gharris · · Score: 1

      A very quiet dual-core system will easily fit into a home-theatre system (I use an antec fusion). It is inaudible more than five feet away. Plus, since the system is usually behind a door in a cabinet, with other things making much more noise (speakers), ultra-quiet isn't as important as you would think.

      --Glenn

  2. Crazy kids and their (Myth)Dora by theGil · · Score: 4, Funny

    Enseñemos a nuestros cabritos a utilizar Linux con Dora!

    1. Re:Crazy kids and their (Myth)Dora by izzyllamas · · Score: 1

      Oh come on I thought this was the funniest thing ever, Get it DORA

    2. Re:Crazy kids and their (Myth)Dora by hal2814 · · Score: 1

      Map says we should get a computer, get a TV, and run MythDora. Say it with me:
      Computer, TV, Run MythDora
      Again
      Computer, TV, Run MythDora

    3. Re:Crazy kids and their (Myth)Dora by MarkGriz · · Score: 1

      "Enseñemos a nuestros cabritos a utilizar Linux con Dora!"

      I have to go ask my kids what the hell that means.

      --
      Beauty is in the eye of the beerholder.
    4. Re:Crazy kids and their (Myth)Dora by sandmaninator · · Score: 1

      literally: "Show us our little assholes how to use Linux with Dora." I'm not a native speaker but maybe cabrito could mean "little goat" as well?

    5. Re:Crazy kids and their (Myth)Dora by cromano · · Score: 1
      Not quite - wrong declension. "Enseñemos" is plural imperative "let us show", rather than the easier to make mistake "we show them" ("Enseñamos"), let alone "show us" ("Enséñanos").

      "Cabritos" is "little goat". For "asshole" you are thinking "cabrón", which is a bigger goat, and has no direct ethymological relationship with anus. In this context, I guess "cabritos" means "tykes".

      Let us show the little tykes how to install Linux with Dora!

      Cheers,
      Your friendly random bilingual grammar Nazi.

    6. Re:Crazy kids and their (Myth)Dora by MarkGriz · · Score: 1

      "Enseñemos" is plural imperative "let us show", rather than the easier to make mistake "we show them" ("Enseñamos"), let alone "show us" ("Enséñanos").

      Damn, change one letter and the whole meaning changes. And people say *English* is hard to learn.
      Thanks for the lesson. You'd think with 5 years of Spanish, I'd remember some of it, but nope.

      Your friendly random bilingual grammar Nazi.

      OT now, but do you think English/German bilingual grammar Nazi's refer to themselves as such?

      --
      Beauty is in the eye of the beerholder.
    7. Re:Crazy kids and their (Myth)Dora by toiletsalmon · · Score: 1

      Not to correct anyone, but be prepared to get hit in the face by an angry native spanish speaker if you were to, perhaps, call them a "cabron". At least in parts of the US, don't know about elsewhere.

      Just like in English, just because a word has a different literal meaning, doesn't mean it's commonly used that way.

  3. Typo: Myth is at .20 not 2.0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Typo: Myth is at .20 not 2.0

    1. Re:Typo: Myth is at .20 not 2.0 by broller · · Score: 4, Funny

      Typo: Myth is at .20 not 2.0

      That's the same number, right?

    2. Re:Typo: Myth is at .20 not 2.0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, the current version is 0.20, not 0.2. Version 0.2 was released in July, 2002.

    3. Re:Typo: Myth is at .20 not 2.0 by BrianRaker · · Score: 1

      When I was a VZW customer that would be right, but I've since seen the light of GSM-based providers. :3

      --
      As I walk through the valley of death I fear no one, for I am the meanest sonova bitch in the valley!
  4. Why does Myth think it's an OS by gr8_phk · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Why not just install Fedora and then "yum install mythtv"? Why has installation of Myth always been non-trivial? Now it's to the point where someone would rather format and install the entire OS...

    1. Re:Why does Myth think it's an OS by LordSnooty · · Score: 4, Informative

      There are many dependencies needed to provide a fully-functional set-top box affair - video codecs, players, DVD apps, games, tuner card drivers, version of X, fonts issues etc. Even an educated linux user can find a mythtv install daunting, so packages like this are a godsend.

      Also I'd imagine that most mythtv installs are deployed on single-use machines - the set-top box that does TV and nothing else. Thus Knoppmyth or this example are very much useful. Just slap it on and go.

    2. Re:Why does Myth think it's an OS by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1
      Why has installation of Myth always been non-trivial?

      Since every mythtv box might be unique in terms of hardware and sofware configurations, things might be complex at installation. The options for the TV card alone are numerous. Also MythTV has many options that you could or could not install. Like I use the MythWeather but not the phone. If everything was the same everytime, you could just put in a CD and run do a yum install and it would be done.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    3. Re:Why does Myth think it's an OS by Dynedain · · Score: 5, Informative

      Because there are so many extra components you need. Outside media players, codec libraries, driver packages, various MPEG decoding/encoding libraries, etc, etc.

      I tried getting MythTV installed from the Knoppix disc. Plenty of things didn't work. It took me a few days to track down DVD playback problems. I then had to mess with getting the NVIDIA binary drivers installed and xconf configured properly. And then after that I still didn't have sound support (lack of drivers for my onboard soundcard). Oh, and I still had to deal with subscribing to a program guide service (with a one month renewal process). It got to the point where it was no longer worth my time. $150 for Windows MCE, and $40 for the NVIDIA mpeg encoder and I was up and running with everything working within a few hours.

      People who want to use MythTV or Windows MCE, for the most part want it run as a dedicated Tivo-like appliance. They are going to be doing little if any desktop computing on it. For that reason, it makes perfect sense to have a full OS configured specifically for it, with default large fonts and display in the GUI, drivers and codecs pre-installed for most media types, auto-boot directly into the TV/Media interface, etc.

      Sure, it's nice to be able to install something like this on top of your pre-existing, pre-configured OS. But for most people who want to use this technology, they'd rather wipe the machine and start clean.

      --
      I'm out of my mind right now, but feel free to leave a message.....
    4. Re:Why does Myth think it's an OS by Smeagel · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Perhaps you should try a distribution with some sort of half decent package management. I run gentoo, to install mythtv (compiling from source no less) it is as simple as: # emerge mythtv Most modern distributions have some sort of good package management, where you don't even have to think about all the problems you list. And as to your comment: "I then had to mess with getting the NVIDIA binary drivers installed and xconf configured properly." No you didn't. For simple TV viewing as you suggest, you can use the vesa X11 drivers and it'll output on every possible output. And if you do decide to go the nvidia route, the binary installer itself will configure your xorg.conf for you. You seem to be trying to serve some type of agenda with these complaints, or are just completely incompetent at linux.

    5. Re:Why does Myth think it's an OS by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

      Umm... installing Myth *is* trivial. Installing all the hardware drivers and so forth, not so much. Fortunately, there are resources like Jarod's Myth-on-Fedora HOWTO which make this process much less painless. Personally, I had my backend installed on FC5 in an afternoon. My frontend took a little longer, only because I'm using a fairly recent VIA EPIA board, and so the OpenChrome drivers were a bit troublesome.

    6. Re:Why does Myth think it's an OS by arabagast · · Score: 1
      Fortunately, there are resources like Jarod's Myth-on-Fedora HOWTO which make this process much less painless.


      You nailed it :)
      --
      Doolittle : ...What is your one purpose in life?
      Bomb no.20 : To explode of course.
    7. Re:Why does Myth think it's an OS by Hel+Toupee · · Score: 2, Funny

      there are resources like Jarod's Myth-on-Fedora HOWTO which make this process much less painless.

      I've found that many online instructions make things much less painless, also.

      Personally, I had my backend installed on FC5 in an afternoon.

      I prefer my backend to be installed on the couch most afternoons :)

      My frontend took a little longer, only because I'm using a fairly recent VIA EPIA board

      I'm not even gonna touch that one.

      Seriously, though, good link, and I'm glad it worked out so well for you.

      --
      PERL:
      All of the power of Voodoo with most of the understandibility!
    8. Re:Why does Myth think it's an OS by Dynedain · · Score: 4, Insightful
      No you didn't. For simple TV viewing as you suggest, you can use the vesa X11 drivers and it'll output on every possible output


      And how was I supposed to know this. Why wouldn't I assume that the NVidia drivers are going to be the best solution for my NVidia card? And knowing this obscure technical item doesn't mean I know the obscure solutions to the other problems, let alone the problems I anticipated having (like optical digital audio support or swapping out the analogue CRT TV for a digital LCD with HD) that I never even got to the point of being able to work on.

      Sure, I could have spent a lot more time finding solutions to all the issues that I had. And I probably would have figured them out eventually and increased my knowledge of Linux at the same time. But there comes a point where I don't have time, and a commercial solution becomes much more attractive. I would have loved to have the OSS solution in place. And in the future, when I would really want some of the MythTV-only features (like one machine doing the recording/storage, and as many front-end devices as I'd like) I'll probably come back and take another look at it.

      It's like the old adage: "Linux is only free if your time isn't worth anything."
      --
      I'm out of my mind right now, but feel free to leave a message.....
    9. Re:Why does Myth think it's an OS by itsdapead · · Score: 3, Informative
      Why has installation of Myth always been non-trivial?

      Er, lets see: do you use satellite or terestrial TV? Is that analogue or digital? European-style DVB or the US equivalent? Does your tuner card need a firmware blob to work? Does your tuner card have onboard MPEG decoding? If not, does your video card have MPEG acceleration and is it supported by Xorg? How do you enable TV-out and set it to native PAL or NTSC resolution with sensible overscan? (anybody using a low power Via Epia system as a HTPC should be shuddering here) Analogue sound or passthrough digital? Do you want infra-red control - how would Sir like his buttons mapped? Do you need an IR emitter to control your STM?

      I.e. its non-trivial to install because it has an impressively non-trivial feature list and works in many different environments. And, as other people have already posted, the major pain is getting all the hardware drivers working rather than installing Myth itself.

      The weakest bit of Myth set-up has historically been DVB "tuning" (i.e. setting the half-dozen parameters for each channel) which got a lot better over the last few releases.

      --
      In a survey of 100 programmers, 111111 thought that duck-typing was a good idea.
    10. Re:Why does Myth think it's an OS by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

      Ha ha ha... doh. :) Sad thing is, it took a couple reads before the typo popped out. Stupid brain...

    11. Re:Why does Myth think it's an OS by Xugumad · · Score: 1

      Daunting? I still have nightmares *shivers*

      (Although that was on Debian, which is not the easiest platform to install MythTV on, by a long way)

    12. Re:Why does Myth think it's an OS by wesborgmandvm · · Score: 1
      Fedora Myth(TV)ology :: HOWTO:

      Do it your self and you can fine tune it. With MythDora It's recommended that you do not do an "apt-get dist-upgrade," "apt-get upgrade" or "yum upgrade" as you run the risk of breaking something.

    13. Re:Why does Myth think it's an OS by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

      It's like the old adage: "Linux is only free if your time isn't worth anything."

      Or if you enjoy spending your time hacking hardware and software. I happen to, and so Myth is quite fun for me. Obviously, not everyone will feel the same.

    14. Re:Why does Myth think it's an OS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      It's like the old adage: "You're a fucking n00b, you Windows-using, closed-minded fool."

    15. Re:Why does Myth think it's an OS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Awwww, did someone get his widdle feewings hurt?

    16. Re:Why does Myth think it's an OS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I would have loved to have the OSS solution in place. And in the future, when I would really want some of the MythTV-only features (like one machine doing the recording/storage, and as many front-end devices as I'd like) I'll probably come back and take another look at it."

      You might consider taking a look at mediaportal (http://www.team-mediaportal.com/). It is OSS, easy to set up and use, has an active development team, and shortly will be on par with myth-tv's client-server design with the next version. The main drawback is that you would still have to run windows.

    17. Re:Why does Myth think it's an OS by value_added · · Score: 1

      Sure, I could have spent a lot more time finding solutions to all the issues that I had. And I probably would have figured them out eventually and increased my knowledge of Linux at the same time. But there comes a point where I don't have time, and a commercial solution becomes much more attractive. I would have loved to have the OSS solution in place. And in the future, when I would really want some of the MythTV-only features (like one machine doing the recording/storage, and as many front-end devices as I'd like) I'll probably come back and take another look at it.

      I fully sympathise with your point of view, but here's something to keep in mind. The time and effort you invest into learning most anything on a *nix system will keep you in good stead for years to come. Moreover, that knowledge is often transferrable to other platforms or other environments, and will ultimately expand your understand of computing in general. I'd bet my last dollar that, by contrast, the sum knowledge of most Windows users, including those who have been using it since the DOS days, is a long list of trivia concerning the interface and the registry. And for those who expanded their horizons, perhaps some VB scripting. ;-)

      It's like the old adage: "Linux is only free if your time isn't worth anything."

      Yeah, but you get back everything you put into it. And more. A better adage would be: "Hard to learn, but easy to use."

    18. Re:Why does Myth think it's an OS by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Upgrade your MCE box... install MediaPortal on it.

      Works far better with way more features.

      Mediaportal is so much better than MCE It's silly to pay the premium and have a wonky XP install (Yes MCE is a wonky XP install not PRO and that is silly in their design)

      My biggest problem with Myth is that the menus are wierd, non intuitive and not customizable. I want to remove the TV functions as I only view video content I snake over the network... Myth takes an advanced programmer to do that, MEdiaportal takes 2 clicks and I can also reorganize as I see fit.

      MCE you are stuck with what MSFT wants you to see and DRM on all your recordings.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    19. Re:Why does Myth think it's an OS by N0decam · · Score: 2
      People who want to use MythTV or Windows MCE, for the most part want it run as a dedicated Tivo-like appliance.

      Speak for yourself - while that's certainly true of my one dedicated frontend, my backend serves as all sorts of server type things (mail, web, database, storage)

      I didn't find it overly onerous installing from the gentoo portage, and the feature list can't be beat. It's also nice that I can (and do) run a frontend on any other machine in my house - laptop, mac mini, xbox. There are some rough edges, to be sure, but overall I think it's a damned fine piece of software, and better than a lot of stuff I've paid money for.

      If you know linux at all Myth is the way to go. If you don't know linux, or don't like tinkering, MCE is likely the path of least resistance.

    20. Re:Why does Myth think it's an OS by RelaxedTension · · Score: 1

      It got to the point where it was no longer worth my time. $150 for Windows MCE, and $40 for the NVIDIA mpeg encoder and I was up and running with everything working within a few hours

      Problem with MCE being that you have a 50-50 chance of your recording actually working properly. It simply isn't very stable over the short term term, never mind the long term. Once I get my Myth installs set and stable, I don't worry about at all, and never miss a recording. As well, I get to see the pretty movie posters for all my videos.

    21. Re:Why does Myth think it's an OS by Al+Al+Cool+J · · Score: 1
      It's like the old adage: "Linux is only free if your time isn't worth anything."

      I don't know if Windows MCE can do this, but MythTV has this neat playback feature where you can watch shows with the audio and video sped up, but the audio stays at a normal tone instead of sounding like chipmunks (I guess it reduces the pauses between speech). It's great for slower-moving sporting events.

      Between that and auto-skipping commercials, I figure my Myth system has saved me far more time than it's initial set-up cost me. Something to consider.

    22. Re:Why does Myth think it's an OS by pinkocommie · · Score: 1

      what can be done to make it trivial? I use Windows MCE and in spite of its quirks getting it up and running has been largely trivial. If using non standard hardware I'd understand but getting myth up and running for example with the common Hauppauge line of tuners isn't trivial.

      I don't know what to say but if it requires one to jump into console mode and isn't dead simple it won't get widespread market penetration. Even though i'm an experienced windows user and a little better then a newbie I gave up after tinkering with it for a day (I was trying to set it up on my existing SUSE 10.0 box)

    23. Re:Why does Myth think it's an OS by slide-rule · · Score: 1

      Care to point people (like myself) directly to a doc on getting x11 vesa configured in X? I'm trying to setup a myth box myself, except I'm tied to an ATI card. I get it all working fine via some ati-related driver on a monitor, and get it working fine w/o X on the TV, but can't get X (and thus myth) to run through the card on the TV. And with a 2.5mo. old in the house now, I'm really cramped for the time that I'm trying to let this box help me recapture. Really... not a flame, please post a direct link to the "idiots guide to X11 via VESA driver" and I'll be all the happier. Seriously... I've googled around for quite a number of wasted evenings on myth-related forums, and no one seems to care to mention getting it (well, X) through to a TV in a general purpose way. Clearly it's doable as the FC5 boot splash looks fine on the TV...

    24. Re:Why does Myth think it's an OS by LordSnooty · · Score: 1

      Knoppmyth and its ilk make the process trivial, in the majority of scenarios. Of course the level of knowledge needed to do almost anything in Linux is the reason why we don't have mass market penetration in the non-server arena.

    25. Re:Why does Myth think it's an OS by Vengeance_au · · Score: 2, Insightful
      My biggest problem with Myth is that the menus are wierd, non intuitive and not customizable.

      Actually not true at all - the MythTV menus are fully customisable, and are all written in XML. A great guide on how to modify the menus can be found here.

      I have customised my menus to have the top level screen only show the wife-friendly options (Watch TV, watch recordings, listen to music and TV guide) with all the nuts and bolts hidden under an admin menu. Also added a number of functions (update guide, enable/disable ssh, etc) as extra menu options and haven't plugged a keyboard in to the machine for over a year.
    26. Re:Why does Myth think it's an OS by snickkers · · Score: 1

      I've got a feeling the motive behind mythtv distros is more to do with poaching (potential) windows MCE users than hardcore linux users

      --
      GLORX 3:16
    27. Re:Why does Myth think it's an OS by batkiwi · · Score: 1

      The VESA drivers are not fast enough to watch fullscreen video at 1024x768.

      I JUST installed mythtv on tuesday night on an nforce AM2 socket motherboard (nforce6?) with onboard video.

      With the default vesa drivers (and even the NV drivers) I couldn't watch DVB-T (so mpeg2, 576i signal) without framedrops on a 1024x768 LCD.

      WITH the nvidia drivers I could watch 720p HD on the onboard video (color me suprised!!) without a single framedrop (excepting when the transparencies faded in and out).

    28. Re:Why does Myth think it's an OS by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      Don't get me wrong, I love MythTV, and I have a Myth box, but it annoys the crap out of me when people defend its obvious deficiencies as if they weren't an issue.

      Is that analogue or digital? European-style DVB or the US equivalent? Does your tuner card need a firmware blob to work? Does your tuner card have onboard MPEG decoding? If not, does your video card have MPEG acceleration and is it supported by Xorg? How do you enable TV-out and set it to native PAL or NTSC resolution with sensible overscan? (anybody using a low power Via Epia system as a HTPC should be shuddering here)

      All of that stuff could be autodetected. Every last little bit of it. But it isn't. The key mappings stuff for using remotes is the big headache that couldn't be automated easily, but it certainly could be made much much easier than it currently is. When I was setting up my box, I kept thinking to myself that I would write some code to make the setup suck less, but once I got it working the motivation was lost (I still plan on working on MythDVD a bit though, because it sucks to use just as much as to set up). That must be what happens with everybody else too.

      I don't know why you would need a whole distribution though. Just an apt source would be sufficient. And it would spare you an RPM based system.

    29. Re:Why does Myth think it's an OS by Smeagel · · Score: 1

      under Section "Device" driver probably is something like driver "ati" right now, or i think maybe driver "fglrx" or something weird like that. Change it to driver "vesa" That should cover it.

    30. Re:Why does Myth think it's an OS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (now anon) I'll definitely give that a try next time I get the machine connected/booted up. If it works, I'll just say thanks in advance.

    31. Re:Why does Myth think it's an OS by managementboy · · Score: 1

      Amen! Things that run on my MythTV box (front and backend in one):

      - Cyrus IMAP + Horde IMP Webmail
      - Spamassassin
      - Webmin
      - VideoDB
      - TorrentFlux
      - Fileserver (NFS)
      - MySQL (other than for MythTV)

      sometimes it just doubles as a full Workstation.

    32. Re:Why does Myth think it's an OS by Des+Herriott · · Score: 1

      I use Windows MCE and in spite of its quirks getting it up and running has been largely trivial.

      That's sort of the point. You're using Windows MCE, not plain XP/2003/Vista/whatever. You have a version of Windows which has been designed as a media centre OS, so it's going to be pretty straightforward to get working (hopefully).

      Getting Myth working on a standard Linux distribution is difficult for the inexperienced user, but how much chance would a non-technical Windows user have of setting up a fully functional media centre on his Windows XP box?

      This is where KnoppMyth/Mythdora/etc. come in - they are, basically, media centre editions for Linux. "Linux MCE" if you like (though I suspect many don't :-)

    33. Re:Why does Myth think it's an OS by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      I will have to give myth another look again... Thanks for the tip!

      Now to find a linux version of anydvd to make all dvd's work perfectly on the box. I have several Disney DVD's that refuse to play in any PC that does not have AnyDVD on it... Yes even a Ubuntu machine that can play most all DVD's I have wont play it.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    34. Re:Why does Myth think it's an OS by itsdapead · · Score: 1
      All of that stuff could be autodetected.

      ...except the bits that depend on loading the correct kernel modules and firmware blobs (DVB support), choosing the appropriate xorg drivers and xorg.conf hacking (TV out and screen resolution) undetectable hardware (Digital vs. analogue audio out) are a matter of choice (e.g. software vs. hardware MPEG, which interlace method to use).

      --
      In a survey of 100 programmers, 111111 thought that duck-typing was a good idea.
    35. Re:Why does Myth think it's an OS by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      the bits that depend on loading the correct kernel modules and firmware blobs (DVB support)

      That stuff absolutely could be done automatically... The only potential obstacle is proprietary firmwares, and it could prompt you to insert the CD that came with the devices and automatically extract said proprietary firmware for you.

      choosing the appropriate xorg drivers and xorg.conf hacking (TV out and screen resolution) undetectable hardware (Digital vs. analogue audio out) are a matter of choice (e.g. software vs. hardware MPEG, which interlace method to use)

      All of this stuff could automatically be configured to working defaults. In the case of digitally interconnected displays, the xorg.conf stuff could automatically be configured not just to a working default, but to the optimal configuration. Things that are a matter of choice could at least be working by default, and then allow the user to modify the configuration.

    36. Re:Why does Myth think it's an OS by itsdapead · · Score: 1
      That stuff absolutely could be done automatically... The only potential obstacle is proprietary firmwares, and it could prompt you to insert the CD that came with the devices and automatically extract said proprietary firmware for you.

      Yes, and some Linux distros will try and auto-configure your TV cards for you. This is the distro's job, not MythTVs! The V4L and Linux DVB drivers are kernel modules produced by independent groups, not the MythTV programmers. There's not much MythTV can do if the drivers weren't enabled in the kernel! The HotPlug mechanism (used for loading firmware) varies between distros and kernel versions. The same drivers are used by other software (e.g. Xine) - and since not everybody runs MythTV standalone it isn't actually a good idea for MythTV to automatically dick with the setup. Ditto xorg.conf (and X is rubbish at on-the-fly reconfiguration anyway). The solution is exactly what is described in the original article - a custom-configured LiveCD such as KnoppMyth or MythDora.

      You seem to be confusing MythTV - the free, open source HTPC software maintained by unpaid volunteers) with MS Windows XP Media Centre Edition - the proprietary, closed source HTPC software produced by one of the richest companies in the world, which (as far as I know) still requires the user to install the required third-party drivers for various bits of hardware.

      --
      In a survey of 100 programmers, 111111 thought that duck-typing was a good idea.
    37. Re:Why does Myth think it's an OS by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      You seem to be confusing MythTV - the free, open source HTPC software maintained by unpaid volunteers) with MS Windows XP Media Centre Edition - the proprietary, closed source HTPC software produced by one of the richest companies in the world, which (as far as I know) still requires the user to install the required third-party drivers for various bits of hardware.

      That's rediculous hand waving (especially the "maintained by unpaid volunteers" part) that pins the blame squarely between the parties causing nothing to be done about the problem.

      I'm not confusing anything. I'm not some random moron who doesn't understand the architecture and wishes it all just worked like windows. I've installed the last several versions of MythTV from scratch in a multi-system configuration. I write embedded linux software (including device drivers) and device firmware for a living. I know what software integration is, and this is an example of piss-poor integration. It doesn't matter what distro you are running. If the software is packaged correctly (yes, I've made both debs and RPMs), the software in question (MythTV in this case) should be able to find the paths and utilities it needs to do the configuration and firmware loading required. When you run Myth, it *owns* the screen it is on. It should be its own responsibility to get the configuration right. A distribution provider's job is to get the bits on the disk and configured for general purpose use. When it comes to specific use, the application should do the final configuration.

      KnoppMyth and (I presume, because I haven't tried it. It sounds very similar to KnoppMyth but with a newer version of MythTV) MythDora still leave an unacceptable amount of configuration up to the user, and there is little reason to require a full OS installation (other than being Microsoftesque) in order to run MythTV.

      Instead of comparing to WinXP MCE, compare the MythTV setup to the SageTV Linux edition setup. As far as I'm aware, far fewer developers work on SageTV, and even though its interface and featureset are inferior to MythTV, they still make installation on a vanilla linux distribution very straightforward.

  5. My 2 cents by rgavril · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If you're willing to install a linux distribution in your living room you should give Pluto a try. It incorporates myth and many more from media to home automation and is a free as in beer Debian based Linux.

  6. lessons 4 u. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do I care if... -> Do I care if you care?
    Normal does it, a retard does it and talks about it.
    If you said it, you did it.
    Waiting till I'm done doing something and saying something retarded does nothing... :)
    What..? -> What did you say it was?

    So you can do something different with my conroe, see ya people, gonna go see
    if the kkk, gangsta, daemon people want anything... :^)

    1. Re:lessons 4 u. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oils along the over the attachments as well; hot rollers, hair extension expert in the attachment method will tell you are the shine lost after this since my head while Adrian and have excellent information check out where the things about hair extensions successfully removed. I went to remove the HairBoutique.com Question: Did you wash off about extensions, I wanted to

      have less blending to prevent tangles gently, follow with the length, so I had gone well placed layers were they stay quite fiercely and then handed me that he turned me the front of the suds rinse through the most places the hair extension experience of human hair extension decisions. Alice made her experiences with conditioner to

      my hair that is not used cannot be on the top - A Hair Extension Damage To Natural Hair Boutique.com. The hair extensions might cause thinning hair everytime however, since my own hair all broke off about her own very excited than I brush the middle) go its own. I am really difficult to keep the extensions? Throw it would like it involves is a summary of what you or a good hair extension information as you do some reason this article or so far. Do I had me that I personally found the bottom up, but this article by the attachment bond the different hair for more natural, as a future article or other hair is very interested in

      hair, wash off in order to the details and a problem, usually submitted to do with conditioner to have the middle) go quickly. When I would be late but I've never heard of Shapes, Inc. in what I realize that Adrian and the side) do the author of shine lost after a sudden. I looked rather comical walking around and... Wow! I have to comb and I would still be late but of their life cycle and feeding of hair care articles and a good things about a regular basis. Alice that is no discomfort whatsoever. That is only wish is usually submitted to these types and styling tips and Rosemary took around two hours to these sections of hair that others might be used over the past year, my new quest to hear from

      DFW airport) when done properly, conditioning, conditioning! The biggest problem I usually styled my scalp oils along the jet lag! If you decide what you come back to use Adrian The silicone to do some thread - because all

      broke off about extensions, such as time that would absolutely recommend Adrian's work. We have extensions should find pertaining to point out the bottom up, but they stay quite fiercely and when I personally found the quality. I know where the shine lost after having her next adventure. For her repeat trip to an extension experience with a 20 minute drive

  7. Agreed, the biggest problem with installing myth by Smeagel · · Score: 2

    Isn't the general mythtv installation - it's the driver installation for all your hardware (most specifically, Lirc). The only way I really see a tool like this being groundbreaking is if they manage to stick a great GUI on top of Lirc setup (which is quite a bit more difficult than a graduate quantum chemistry course). Lirc aside, mythtv setup is fairly trivial these days. And excuse me for wanting Knoppix (a distribution time-tested at dynamically picking up new hardware) as the foundation rather than Fedora for a system that is very dependent on picking up all the necessary hardware.

    That being said, I put it on top of a gentoo system, and backed up my /etc and my kernel/.config the second I finally got all the driver crap working ;)

  8. It's MythTV 0.20 by Cardoe · · Score: 1

    Kudos to the Slashdot editors that totally screwed up the version... And for arguments sake, I hope this is not MythTV 0.20, I hope it's 0.20-fixes. Since the Myth devs never put out a release that's worth anything all of us distro packagers have to constantly keep on top of all the patches that are necessary to actually make MythTV function.

    Nothing to see here... This is nothing newer then KnoppMyth but in a Fedora shell.

    1. Re:It's MythTV 0.20 by hotdiggitydawg · · Score: 1
      Since the Myth devs never put out a release that's worth anything all of us distro packagers have to constantly keep on top of all the patches that are necessary to actually make MythTV function.

      So you're saying it's a bit hit-and-myth then?
    2. Re:It's MythTV 0.20 by Amazing+Quantum+Man · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, but you now have to pay Robert Asprin tons of royalties.

      --
      Fascism starts when the efficiency of the government becomes more important than the rights of the people.
    3. Re:It's MythTV 0.20 by hotdiggitydawg · · Score: 1

      Just because it's prior art, doesn't make it non-obvious...

  9. Maybe it's just because I have kids... by Zordak · · Score: 4, Funny

    The first image that came to mind on reading the title was a MythTV box dedicated to recording episodes of "Dora the Explorer." And then my brain let out a primal scream, because if there is one thing I don't need in my house, it's more Dora.

    --

    Today's Sesame Street was brought to you by the number e.
    1. Re:Maybe it's just because I have kids... by mikelieman · · Score: 2, Funny

      I see your Dora and raise you the Doodlebops...

      --
      Technology -- No Place For Wimps! Grateful Dead and Jerry Garcia Chatroom -- http://www.wemissjerry.org
    2. Re:Maybe it's just because I have kids... by billmarrs · · Score: 1

      The image I got was a MythTV box that ran Eudora (email client).

    3. Re:Maybe it's just because I have kids... by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      ...at least with a MythTV setup you can flee to your Den and watch Dr. Who or Battlestar Galactica.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    4. Re:Maybe it's just because I have kids... by FuckTheModerators · · Score: 1

      That's nothing.
      I thought of a MythTV box in a DORA office, playing Dora the Explorer videos and sending mail with Eudora to people in Eudora.

    5. Re:Maybe it's just because I have kids... by xC0000005 · · Score: 1

      We need to tell Dora how to install MythTv. You tell Dora, mnt, get, install, bootstrap, reconfigure, crash, recompile, get depedencies, start, fail, reconfigure, reformat, get, update, patch, recompile, buy a tivo. Say it with me!

      --
      www.voiceofthehive.com - Beekeeping and Honeybees for those who don't.
  10. (totally OT now) by revlayle · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm the map, I'm the map, I'm the map, I'm the map, I'm the map, I'm the map, I'm the map, I'm the map, I'm the map, I'm the map, I'm the map, I'm the map, I'm the map, I'm the map, I'm the map, I'm the map, I'm the map, I'm the map.....

    I'M THE MAP!


    *proceeds to play Russian roulette with a fully loaded revolver*

  11. Or simply yum it by harris+s+newman · · Score: 1

    I'm running mythtv on fc6 after simply adding atrpms to the repo list and doing a yum install mythtv*

    1. Re:Or simply yum it by I.AM.BLORT · · Score: 0

      i doubt that.
      yum does not create the mythtv Mysql DB, get listings data, set up audio, set up video capture, remote control units. I so very much wish it were as easy as yum 1 line install for a working mythbox, but it's not there yet.

    2. Re:Or simply yum it by LDoggg_ · · Score: 1

      It could be that easy if the mythtv package that the yum repo is calling had a post install script to do those setups. Or the package included an interactive configuration script or GUI that you can run post install.
      Not sure that it doesn't already, but I'll know as soon as I get my tv tuner card.

      Creating a seperate distro seems like overkill when it could just as easily be a well maintained repository for a popular distribution like fedora or ubuntu.

      --

      "If they have both, tell them we use Linux. And if they have that, tell them the computers are down." -Dave Chapelle
  12. MythBuntu would be cool by Shawn+is+an+Asshole · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Nothing against MythDora, but after getting burned by Fedora far too many times I don't want to go near anything Fedora-based. Basing off of Ubuntu would rock.

    --
    "It ain't a war against drugs.it's a war against personal freedom" --Bill Hicks
    1. Re:MythBuntu would be cool by strick1226 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Just recently, I did try an Ubuntu Edgy combo backend/frontend setup on another machine (my main box runs KnoppMyth).

      I found it to be incredibly easy to setup, and there are some pretty good guides ready for anyone with the interest:

      http://https//help.ubuntu.com/community/MythTV/

      For what it's worth, I did try setting up my backend about 1.5 years ago with Debian, but the dependencies and everything proved to be a bit too painful for my use. I settled on using KnoppMyth and I have to give the guys credit--it's hard to imagine getting a MythTV setup much easier than it provides. Great scripts and utilities, plus the most important thing--a good community with lots of helpful folks in the forums.

      As easy as Edgy was to get going, I wouldn't be surprised to see something along the lines of MythUbuntu or UbuMyth showing up sometime soon.

    2. Re:MythBuntu would be cool by spectro · · Score: 1

      Just what I thought, something light and solid like Xubuntu. Anybody doing it already?

      I've been using Knoppmyth for about two years and I've been putting off upgrading until they come out with 0.20 distro (with 2.6.18 kernel and ivtv 0.8.x). I downloaded mythdora and I was about to set it up this weekend, I am glad I procrastinated on it since it seems you need to go through way more startup config steps than with KnoppMyth. Capture cards were autodetected by knoppmyth when I installed it two years ago and it seems the whole process is even simpler now.

      --
      HTML is obsolete. It's time for a new, simpler and richer markup language.
    3. Re:MythBuntu would be cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you kidding me? How hard can it be to answer a few questions?

  13. Re:Check it out, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is the eternal police force of things do things or not. you don't do anything!
    act accordingly!

  14. Miss the refill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    on the meds?

  15. DirectFB by soapee01 · · Score: 1

    Does anyone know if MythDora supports a DirectFB install? I can't seem to find any conclusive information on whether Myth 0.2 even supports this anymore.

    MTIA

    soap

  16. Re:Agreed, the biggest problem with installing myt by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

    which is quite a bit more difficult than a graduate quantum chemistry course

    Huh? I had both a serial port IR emitter and transmitter working easily (heck, the blaster worked on the first try). Configuration of the receiver was a matter of running irrecord and following the instructions, and then tweaking the lirc key mappings until I was happy with them.

    Honestly, I have no idea why people have so much trouble getting lirc working.

  17. Because not all the hardware is that simple by Smeagel · · Score: 1
    I bought an IR Blaster and had it working fairly quickly, though I had to search the web to find the appropriate configuration file for my satellite box (which I couldn't find, but I found a "close-enough" model). To get the remote working though, I was trying to use ATI's USB remote, which was supposed to be supported. After talking to the Lirc developers who actually wrote the ATI support, and hanging around IRC channels for a couple days asking supposed "experts" who were baffled, I finally gave in and just started using a Hauppauge remote that required line-of-sight, and had less keys.

    People have so much trouble because it is horribly documented, and there are tons of things to go wrong in the driver process, from the kernel-module lever to the userland software. The user-side software also has horrible error returns, so you can't figure out at what point it's breaking (since the kernel module rarely reports any errors when modprobe'ing it). Even the gentoo how-to pages which are normally excellent proved insufficient.

    Lirc is a pain-in-the-ass unless you bought hardware specifically to go along with the how-to or tutorials you were using to install it, because the generic documentation is insufficient for specific cases.

    1. Re:Because not all the hardware is that simple by calibanDNS · · Score: 2, Insightful
      ...started using a Hauppauge remote that required line-of-sight...

      Excuse me if I'm missing something, but what kind of IR remote doesn't require line of sight?
    2. Re:Because not all the hardware is that simple by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

      Excuse me if I'm missing something, but what kind of IR remote doesn't require line of sight?

      An RF remote.

    3. Re:Because not all the hardware is that simple by Smeagel · · Score: 1

      As other posters point out, an RF remote, which LIRC also covers despite the fact that its acronym suggests it might not.

    4. Re:Because not all the hardware is that simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Erm....

      Excuse me if I'm missing something, but what kind of IR remote doesn't require line of sight?

    5. Re:Because not all the hardware is that simple by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

      Yes, but the original poster never said the ATI was an IR remote. They only complained that the Hauppage was, and thus required line of site. Thus, one can surmise the ATI was an RF remote.

      The GP may not have understood this, hence my response. And if he *did*, then he's just being tediously pedantic.

    6. Re:Because not all the hardware is that simple by xantho · · Score: 2, Informative

      I have a Snapstream Firefly RF remote, and it's the bees knees. By which I mean, it's totally awesome. I find myself getting pissed off when I have to use other remotes and actually aim them. It works fine with LIRC and seems to have most of the buttons nicely labeled for MythTV operation.

      Another benefit of RF remotes in general is that you don't have to worry about finding an HTPC case with a built in IR receiver, or where to put the external receiver so that it won't look tacky. Just stick the RF receiver on the back of the thing and be done. The range is excellent (at least 40 feet and through walls).

  18. KnoppMyth as a LiveCD by norminator · · Score: 1

    KnoppMyth will run a frontend system as a LiveCD. Obviously, for the backend part, it would have to be installed, but KnoppMyth does have LiveCD functionality.

    1. Re:KnoppMyth as a LiveCD by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

      And amusingly, MythDora *won't* run as a LiveCD, AFAIK.

  19. FC5 is obsolete, we're at FC6! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey, why is this still based on FC5? We're at FC6 now! The main issue I have with these Fedora-derived distros is that they never even come close to keeping up with upstream.

  20. Core 6 mythtv in my living room by Beelub · · Score: 2, Informative
    I'm running a Fedora Core 6 box in my living that runs mythtv full time and is serving me as general purpose linux box. It's working out very well for me, (though admittedly I'm a bachelor and have no wife in charge of my decor). Twinview with myth on the TV and computer stuff on the monitor. With mythweb running, it can't be beat.


    It's easy to set up. "yum install mythtv-suite" installs -all- the myth packages including mythweb and such. Pretty minimal configuration involved. I'd say that starting with a blank box I'd just built, it took me about 4 hours to install Fedora and myth both from scratch.

  21. MythDora won't install for me. by bgarcia · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I tried installing MythDora on a Dell XPS 410. Didn't work. Knoppmyth wouldn't install either.

    The problem is that my desktop has no legacy interfaces. In particular, the DVD drive is SATA, and the keyboard is USB. Knoppmyth and Mythdora cannot currently handle installing from a SATA optical drive. Knoppmyth kindly popped me out to a shell when it couldn't find the installation source directory, but the drivers for the USB keyboard apparently hadn't been loaded, so I couldn't type anything anyhow.

    I'm currently installing Myth 0.20 over Fedora Core 6 with the help of the MythTV on Fedora HOWTO by Jarod Wilson. It's been very helpful, but I still find myself spending a lot of time tweaking things to get everything working correctly. MythTV installation is just plain hard.

    --
    I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar.
    1. Re:MythDora won't install for me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The inability to install from your SATA drive was likely due to not having drivers for the motherboard SATA interface. I have never come across a problem installing from SATA drives on my machine, which has a native SATA interface on the chipset that appears as a fourth hard drive, without needing any drivers.

  22. RF to IR relay. by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

    I think when he was talking about a "USB remote" earlier in his comment, he meant an RF-based wireless remote. The Harmony 890 is one like this. It has a base station which is a RF receiver and IR transmitter, so you can use the remote anywhere in a 100' radius and the base station will relay the remote's commands to the appropriate device via IR.

    So it's basically: [Remote] -> RF -> [Base Station] -> IR -> [Device]

    I've never used the Harmony series, but they also have USB interfaces, for programming. Maybe there are even some where you can plug the receiver directly into a compatible device using USB, and skip the IR step (not sure if they work like that though).

    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
  23. A little off topic but... by Eric+Damron · · Score: 1

    It's great that there are projects out there to setup the software and all but I could use some help in picking the right hardware. I don't want a noisy box rattling away while I'm using MythTV.

    Can someone give a few links that allow someone to gather the hardware that will look good, work well and be totally silent?

    --
    The race isn't always to the swift... but that's the way to bet!
    1. Re:A little off topic but... by MoronBob · · Score: 1

      The PVR Hardware Database is your friend: http://pvrhw.goldfish.org/tiki-pvrhwdb.php

      --
      Telecommuting! What about socialization?
    2. Re:A little off topic but... by sleigher · · Score: 1

      I have a question along those lines. I cannot seem to figure out if I have a mythtv backend with 2 capture cards, if I run the front end does the signal go over ethernet to the front end and the signal then decoded and displayed and if so how do I deal with sound? Do I keep a sound card in the front end and can I run that to my receiver for my stereo to have the surround sound?

      --
      All points of time and space are connected.
    3. Re:A little off topic but... by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      Backend - records video, stores video, runs database.

      Frontend - UI and plays video.

      The only link between them is the network.

      So yes, you need a video card and sound card on your frontend, or some other integrated solution that provides both. I'm using an epia front-end, which has integrated video with TV-out and SPDIF digital audio out.

      Or if you want simple you can run the backend and frontend on a single box, but then you need a bigger box in the living room, and lots of cables/tuners/etc. I keep all the hardware in the office, and only have the frontend in the living room. Either way you can add additional front-ends in other rooms and even add additional backends to get more tuners.

  24. Myth is frustrating on every out-of-the-box distro by kimvette · · Score: 2, Informative

    . . . and considering that Fedora 5 comes with 2.6.16 (at best) it's not likely to fare any better on current-generation hardware. I'd still have to download the vanilla kernel, track down any vendor-specific optimizations, merge those in if the process isn't too time-consuming, then figure out which combination of kernel modules/firmware/tuner settings work with each rev of each card. Combine that with the suck that is Hauppauge -- I bought a PVR-150, chose it over the PVR-500 because I was skeptical and now I'm glad I saved my money on the dual tuner card. With a 500ms or so delay on the display it renders the cable guide totally worthless -- and you have a recipe for a craptacular HTPC. I then ordered an uber-cheap-but-easy-to-configure MSI TV@nywhere, and I had that card up and running in literally five minutes, compared to 3-4 hours of trying various firmware and tuner setting combinations with the Hauppage. Not only that, the MSI does hardware MPEG2 encoding, hardware-assisted MPEG4, plus NO appreciable delay in the display. Not only that, the MSI works with standard TV apps like xawtv and kdetv, whereas the Hauppauge works ONLY with Myth.

    Or, install Windows Media Center and have it all work out of the box. MythTV may be GORGEOUS and offer tons and tons of functionality Windows Media Center will never provide, but Windows Media Center can be installed and fully configured out of the box in a half hour to 45 minutes.

    I like Myth, really, and plan to put time into getting it to work perfectly, but it's hard to put aside an entire day to devote to setting up a TV/PVR application.

    --
    The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
  25. Vesa drivers don't do MPEG-2 decode, do they? by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

    The problem with using the Vesa or other OSS drivers is that they don't support proprietary features of some NVidia cards, like accelerated MPEG-2 decoding. If you're trying to use an older set of hardware for your STB (like an older Celeron, or something else that can be easily passively cooled), and have a TV tuner card that records to MPEG-2 (like the WinTV PVR 150/350 series) this is a major issue. Offloading the decompression to the GPU saves a lot of CPU cycles.

    If there are OSS drivers that support these features, then I'll agree with you that there's no reason to screw around with the NVidia binary ones, but every piece of documentation I've read says that you are better off using the Nvidia drivers with an Nvidia card, in order to get good video performance.

    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
  26. Whoever modded the parent post as flamebait is by Smeagel · · Score: 1
    an idiot.

    There was no flamebait at all in there, I answered all of the problems he suggested exist (which don't), and then proposed he must have some kind of agenda to suggest they do. I'm guessing it's an idiot who also couldn't figure out how to install a fairly simple-to-install application, and instead decided to waste their money and buy a proprietary piece of crap to produce crappy DRM'ed files.

  27. Typical ! by smoker2 · · Score: 1
    Here I am installing FC5 as I speak, specifically to set up MythTv.

    I have tried getting my tv cards working on a currently installed FC4 but had no real luck, and didn't fancy ruining a perfectly functioning media server just to experiment. The cards definitely work BTW (dvb_bt8xx Zarlink MT352). I have a spare HD so I tried installing a live cd version of PCLinuxOS which has been remastered to concentrate on MythTV. Unfortunately, the damn installer kept complaining that I needed to reboot to make the changes to fstab before I could format the drive. After every reboot the drive was still not set up, and the partitions had been rearranged. When run as a live cd the mythbackend can't write to the dbase because it's on a read only mount point ! So I gave up on that and decided to follow the instructions here. I went for FC5 because I already had it on dvd. But the initial yum update was 700 MB and so it's still running. I haven't got much further yet, so I may investigate this new distro.

  28. Re:Myth is frustrating on every out-of-the-box dis by jedidiah · · Score: 1

    ???

    I just went to the driver homepage and selected the option consistent with my kernel version.

    More than anything else, it looks a little Mickey Mouse to have different releases for different versions of the 2.6 kernel but it was by no means difficult.

    While it will be nice once the ivtv takes it's place with the classic bttv drivers in the kernel and in the distros, the sad fact remains that you can't follow simple instructions. If not for TV dinners and canned foods, you would probably starve.

    --
    A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  29. That's pretty quick. by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

    Just out of curiosity, does that four hours include getting IR support working? From what I hear, getting a working remote control can be a real killer.

    If you did, four hours has to be something like a record. You must have really lucked out in terms of hardware compatibility. Any chance you'd want to list your configuration?

    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    1. Re:That's pretty quick. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's taking you so long? I can do a manual install of knoppmyth in about 40 minutes, including my tweaks. It would be faster if I did an automatic install, but I do custom partitioning and have to do that manually.

      -That Bastard

    2. Re:That's pretty quick. by Beelub · · Score: 1
      Heh, you're right. That definitely did not include getting IR support working. That took a couple evenings and it's still pretty fragile, only working about 90% of the time.



      I did plan out a pretty generic system, starting with an Asus PE-1 Vintage barebones that I maxed to 2 gigs of RAM.
      Nvidia GeForce 6600 for video.
      Hauppage PVR500 for tuners and mpeg encoding.
      A 320GB Seagate SATA HD.
      Soundblaster Audigy Le


      As I said, in planning the box I went for solid stuff with good Linux support, and stayed away from the bleeding edge.

  30. Re:Myth is frustrating on every out-of-the-box dis by cesman · · Score: 2, Informative
    Vendors choose to support Windows because of the large user based. This is no surprise... What is a surprise is that a lot of tuners cards that do work on Windows won't work with MCE. Why is that?

    Or, install Windows Media Center and have it all work out of the box. MythTV may be GORGEOUS and offer tons and tons of functionality Windows Media Center will never provide, but Windows Media Center can be installed and fully configured out of the box in a half hour to 45 minutes. Given hardware that works with Linux, KnoppMyth can be installed in under 30 minutes. One user reported getting it working in 10 minutes. That is from a bare hard drive to watching TV in 10 minutes!

    A new KnoppMyth is just around the corner! It is smaller, faster and offers more features. Just be a little more patience folks. The elves are finishing up the work and Santa is tuning the sledge.
    --
    When the source is open, the possibilities are endless.
  31. umm? Easy!? by tomz16 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    ummm?

    Install Fedora
    su
    yum install mythtv

    done!

  32. Re:Myth is frustrating on every out-of-the-box dis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thanks for all the hard work, cesman.

  33. Mac Mini as PVR? by gtmaneki · · Score: 1

    I don't want a big, noisy computer next to my TV. I've priced out the components for making low noise small form factor rigs, but it seems that a Mac Mini is cheaper. Could it be used?

    1. Re:Mac Mini as PVR? by SCHecklerX · · Score: 1

      I don't want a big, noisy computer next to my TV. I've priced out the components for making low noise small form factor rigs, but it seems that a Mac Mini is cheaper. Could it be used?


      Fanless:
      http://linux.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=211786&o p=Reply&threshold=1&commentsort=0&mode=thread&pid= 17241772

      But in my experience, even their fanned solutions have incredibly quiet fans (including the rackmounts with a row of little fans)
    2. Re:Mac Mini as PVR? by SCHecklerX · · Score: 1
      Oops. Dammit. Wrong cut buffer:


      I don't want a big, noisy computer next to my TV. I've priced out the components for making low noise small form factor rigs, but it seems that a Mac Mini is cheaper. Could it be used?


      Fanless:
      http://www.logicsupply.com/index.php/cPath/49

      But in my experience, even their fanned solutions have incredibly quiet fans (including the rackmounts with a row of little fans)
    3. Re:Mac Mini as PVR? by glennrrr · · Score: 1

      There are 2 possible ways, of which I'm aware. 1) Buy an external tuner which uses El Gato's EyeTV software. I have an EyeTV 500 Firewire tuner box which works fairly well. Also, get a large external hard drive to store your recordings. (Be sure it's quiet). 2) Put your noisy MythTV running Linux box in a closet or basement (as long as it's well ventilated), and run the MythTV frontend on the Mini. I run the frontend on my MacBook and can watch HDTV over wireless.

    4. Re:Mac Mini as PVR? by MyForest · · Score: 1

      A Mac Mini has a DVI port. A DVI cable can be very long (mine is 10 metres). So I simply put my box in another room and use an X10 radio remote. Complete silence. Bliss.

  34. Shiver by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

    Oh man, just hearing that damned map in my head made me shiver. He always sounded like he was trapped, pleading for his life - that somehow if the viewer made it to the end the animators would stop torturing him. It was just sad.

    I am so glad my daughter is out of that phase. Of course, now she watches Handy Manny - which I'm amazed they actually produced. A show about a hispanic handy man? A short jewish shop owner with a cat and a combover? (the cat has a combover, too, btw). And I think there's just a little too much sexual tension between Manny and Kelly (the chick who owns the hardware store).

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    1. Re:Shiver by ettlz · · Score: 1
      And I think there's just a little too much sexual tension between Manny and Kelly (the chick who owns the hardware store).

      Ah, you've never seen Balamory then.

  35. Three tries for a quarter Slashdot Editors! by Cardoe · · Score: 1

    The version number in the topic is STILL wrong... first it was 2.0 and we all commented... now it's 0.2. MythTV 0.2 is several years old. They're on MythTV 0.20. Are you guys publish an article about Verizon being terrible with numbers?

  36. Re:Myth is frustrating on every out-of-the-box dis by cesman · · Score: 1

    You're welcome.

    --
    When the source is open, the possibilities are endless.
  37. Lo hicimos! by On+Lawn · · Score: 1


    With your help, we just installed a new Linux operating system!

    ***cue mariachi band music***

  38. Don't forget the motherboard. by FatSean · · Score: 1

    I'd still prefer two (or more) discrete CPUs. Several years ago I did some research and the multi-CPU boards seem to allow for greater total bandwidth between CPU, disk and memory. Well, in my price range anyway.

    Perhaps modern motherboards are better.

    --
    Blar.
    1. Re:Don't forget the motherboard. by batkiwi · · Score: 1

      Several years ago there were not proper multi-core cpus on the consumer market, so what did you test?

      HT is not the same as multi-core.

  39. Re:Linux 3.0 ANNOUNCED - ready b y Q1 by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

    what is this obsession with version numbers. FYI we went from 1.3 straight to 2.0. I consider current 2.6 to actually be a 2.0. the mapping is as follows

    2.0 -> 1.4
    2.2 -> 1.6
    2.4 -> 1.8
    2.6 -> 2.0

    to get to 3.0 we have to have 5 more even numbered releases.

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  40. iMediaLinux has had MythTV .20 for a while... by BrianRaker · · Score: 1
    iMedia Linux, a division of mini-box.com has had MythTV .20 in their latest release of iMedia MythTV distribution for a couple weeks now.

    And like many before me, what is so special about MythDora? If I want to do a MythTV install I'll use the iMedia distro (SFF / small install footprint) or KnoppMyth.

    --
    As I walk through the valley of death I fear no one, for I am the meanest sonova bitch in the valley!
  41. Re:Agreed, the biggest problem with installing myt by norton_I · · Score: 1

    My biggest problem with LIRC is that lircd doesn't support multiple kernel drivers. I have 3 different LIRC devices on my myth system, and I have to run 2 different lircd instances. Everytime I think I have things set so that the modules load in a predictable order an update changes something and everything will break. Also, one of my devices is the I2C port on my PVR-250 card, and there is some weird dependency with module loading order and the ivtv module that is not handled correctly automatically. Which leaves me trying to understand and override the hotplug scripts, which makes me want to kill small animals.

    I am not sure who I should blame here, lirc, fedora, hotplug, or atrpms, but it is a major annoyance. Enough so that I would consider Myth unusable by most people. Presumably it works better if you only have a single IR device for send and receive, and it is USB or serial.

  42. Re:Myth is frustrating on every out-of-the-box dis by pembo13 · · Score: 1

    My install took about 15 mins to do on FC6.

    --
    "Thanks for all the money you paid to us. We've used it to buy off ISO among other things" -Microsoft
  43. Re:Agreed, the biggest problem with installing myt by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

    Yeah, multiple LIRC devices is definitely more difficult than it should be. In my case, I built a split BE/FE system, and so each box only needs to control a single LIRC device. Later, when I expand my BE with multiple capture cards, I'll need more than one blaster, and I'm sure things'll get a little more hairy.

  44. Now I wish I could get my Torrent Shows on Myth by ericsante · · Score: 1

    I use TED to download the TV shows I miss, I wish there was a plugin for MythTV to have shows downloaded and added to my MythTV Box.

    1. Re:Now I wish I could get my Torrent Shows on Myth by businessnerd · · Score: 4, Informative

      YOU CAN! Here's how I do it. Every Myth setup has a Video section. This is a file browser that will launch mplayer or your media player of choice. In the Video Setup secion, it will ask you to define the directory for video (this is separate from your Myth recorded TV shows). Specify a directory (mine is /video/movies). Then all you have to do is just place some media in that folder. If you're downloading a DVD rip of a tv show from BitTorrent, you will be downloading a folder containing mulitiple mpeg's or avi's. Simply tell bittorrent to save the files to your MythTV video directory and the files will automagically appear in the Video browser.

      In my apartment, the MythTV system acts as my file server. The /video partition (where all of the mythv media sits) is shared out to the rest of my computers via NFS. Using the computer in my office, I can browse for torrents and download them directly to the shared folder and then enjoy them from the living room couch. This is also great for my mp3's and oggs. All downloaded or ripped music goes to the Myth box and then you can listen to music either at my desk with xmms, in the living room through the stereo system and MythMusic, or from the laptop in any room (or even outside while in range of my router). The great thing about Myth is that it is a server for ALL of your media.

      --
      "It's not whether you win or lose, it's how drunk you get." -- H. J. Simpson
    2. Re:Now I wish I could get my Torrent Shows on Myth by batkiwi · · Score: 1

      Myth .20 and later no longer need an external video player for everything mpeg related (which is just about everything except for quicktime and real).

  45. The wonderful thing about distros by russotto · · Score: 1

    ... is anyone can make their own. I just finished one based on Ubuntu Edgy. It's more hardware and configuration specific, though -- it installs MythTV 0.20 as a combined system, the pcHDTV-5500 drivers, the nvidia driver, and LIRC. It also pre-configures MythTV with the pcHDTV-5500 card.

    1. Re:The wonderful thing about distros by JayAEU · · Score: 1

      I just finished one based on Ubuntu Edgy. It's more hardware and configuration specific, though -- it installs MythTV 0.20 as a combined system, the pcHDTV-5500 drivers, the nvidia driver, and LIRC. It also pre-configures MythTV with the pcHDTV-5500 card. Where can I download it?
    2. Re:The wonderful thing about distros by russotto · · Score: 1

      I'll be posting information about it on the pchdtv-5500 forum shortly.

  46. No cablecard support = dead end for linux PVR. by zorkmid · · Score: 1

    Well, open source linux PVRs. Closed source Proprietary Linux PVRs like Tivo will be available for a subscription fee.

    What we need is to hire some lobbyists to get the US government to mandate that the standard be opened up. Otherwise we're going to be stuck with Standard Def and over the air HD.

    No Dish, DirectTV, or cable High Def.

    I'd throw a couple hundred $'s in.

  47. Why stop there? by einnar2000 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Go for the gusto..

    http://plutohome.com/

  48. This is an incredibly bad installation... by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 1
    There are three discrete steps separated by reboots. There are about twenty pieces of information that the system could either (a) guess defaults, (b) probe for hardware during setup, or (c) leave for a built-in configuration tool run ex post installo. If this is what passes for easy, I'd hate to see hard... Never mind, I've seen hard on Linux before.

    The bottom line is if Linux folks (and make no mistake, I am one myself) keep deluding themselves about what's "easy", we're not going to gain acceptance for a long time. This process is not easy. It may be "easier" than taking a standard Linux installation and installing MythTV on it, but it's not easy.

    --
    That is all.
  49. Re:Myth is frustrating on every out-of-the-box dis by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

    Combine that with the suck that is Hauppauge -- I bought a PVR-150, chose it over the PVR-500 because I was skeptical and now I'm glad I saved my money on the dual tuner card. With a 500ms or so delay on the display it renders the cable guide totally worthless -- and you have a recipe for a craptacular HTPC

    What are you going on about? The 150 *captures*, it doesn't display, so I don't know what this "500ms or so delay on the display" that you're talking about is. Nor do I understand how said delay could "[render] the cable guide totally worthless".

  50. Re:No cablecard support = dead end for linux PVR. by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

    Well, open source linux PVRs.

    Well, open source HD-capable PVRs. You'll always be able to pull an SD feed from an external tuner.

  51. Re:umm? Easy!? by businessnerd · · Score: 1

    Have you ever actually set up a full MythTV system that is both a frontend and backend? Because if you have, you would reallize that yumming mythtv will only get you about half way. This command will put the mythtv software on your computer, but it will not configure your remote, it will not set up the mysql database, and it will not configure the software itself to recognize your cable service, picture settings, display type, etc. MythTv is by far the most difficult project I have ever undertaken in Linux. Plus, don't forget about all of the preparation before you even run that little yum command you speak of. There is lots of research to do and decisions to make. What kind of hardware? What Linux distro? How should you partition your hard drive, and what filesystems to use? Is this a frontend, a backend, or both?

    For those out there considering a MythTV install, don't be misled. MythTV is a huge undertaking for even an advanced Linux user. But don't let me discourage you either. For those who like a good challenge and like to tinker, and like to create something none of your friends and neighbors have, it is a lot of fun and you will learn a ton. My suggestion is to do your homework in advance. Find out what hardware configuration will give you the smoothest install. Building your own computer from scratch where you have hand picked EVERY component will be the path of least resistance. The more oddball parts involved, the more difficult it will be.

    --
    "It's not whether you win or lose, it's how drunk you get." -- H. J. Simpson
  52. Re:Agreed, the biggest problem with installing myt by toganet · · Score: 1

    Sounds like you got lucky. I've set up Myth about 4 times so far, and my record for getting the remote to work is 4 hours. Keep in mind this is the same model of remote each time as well.

    Problems varied, and all but one can be blamed on Ubuntu making things more difficult, but I would never charactize Lirc setup as easy.

    However, now that I've torn it down and rebuilt it about a dozen times per myth installation, I feel pretty comfortable using it.

  53. Harmony on Linux Bounty by schwaang · · Score: 1

    On a related note, this guy is offering a bounty up to $225 for a Linux program that implements configuration syncing for the Harmony 880.

  54. Been down this road! by old_skul · · Score: 2, Informative

    Having started with Knoppmyth, and then moved briefly to Mythdora, I settled in on a manual compile of Myth 0.19 on Suse 10.1. It was this configuration that worked best for me - because I had invested in 2 PCHDTV HD-5500 tuners. I could not get them working in Myth 0.20 at all, and finally made them work in 0.19. The feature set between the two is minimal, with 0.20 being a lot of fixes and optimizations, so there's not a lot of love lost.

    Myth is not an easy thing for even the experienced admin to make work. Because of the dependencies and the hardware involvement, this is more than just installing an application and having it work. For people new to the Myth infrastructure, it's actually rather nice to have a live CD install everything that's necessary. For 90% of the folks wanting to try it, they're going to have a dedicated PC for it anyway. Of course, if you want to just throw in a tuner card and try it that way, you can compile it too.

    If you're a Suse person, you can check out a HOWTO I put together for 10.1 and PCHDTV cards here. It covers all the stuff one has to do to make a Myth box work with HD under Suse 10.1. While there are RPMs available for Myth 0.20 on Suse 10.1, the package doesn't support HD, which is what my project was specifically designed to be.

    If you do plan on doing HD - be vigilant in your hardware selection! HD playback takes a considerable amount of computing horsepower. I really recommend getting an nVidia 5200 card for playback - not only are they super cheap, and sometimes fanless (read: noiseless), but they also support the nVidia XvMC playback driver, which accelerates MPEG2 streams, offloading decoding from your processor. It also does a fine job at Bob2X deinterlacing, required for watchable HD.

  55. Re:Myth is frustrating on every out-of-the-box dis by AngelWind · · Score: 1

    He probably means the buffering. The PVR-*50 and 500s don't just pop what they're capturing onto the screen in Myth in real time. They actually do about a 2 second buffer before showing something on the screen. Whether that's the drivers for linux or Myth I don't know.

    I do remember seeing something a while ago on Windows MCE where they were showing off how they had worked around the buffering and were able to just go to Live TV without any pausing. Hopefully it's a matter of time before Myth gets that functionality.

  56. Re:Myth is frustrating on every out-of-the-box dis by Abcd1234 · · Score: 2, Informative

    He probably means the buffering. The PVR-*50 and 500s don't just pop what they're capturing onto the screen in Myth in real time. They actually do about a 2 second buffer before showing something on the screen. Whether that's the drivers for linux or Myth I don't know.

    That has nothing to do with the Hauppauge cards and everything to do with Myth and, in fact, ffmpeg (which apparently chokes if you give it a partial frame, and so Myth buffers conservatively in order to ensure this doesn't happen). The same would occur on any capture card, AFAIK.

    And besides, how on earth does that make the guide unusable? If anything, it makes the guide *necessary* (as channel surfing is basically a no-go).

    I do remember seeing something a while ago on Windows MCE where they were showing off how they had worked around the buffering and were able to just go to Live TV without any pausing. Hopefully it's a matter of time before Myth gets that functionality.

    Not likely, at least not in the near future. This could be done if Myth sent the captured stream straight to the FE, while at the same time writing it to disk, but the issue is considered low-priority (and I happen to agree... the delay isn't long enough that I give a damn, and is really only an issue if you're one of those suckers that habitually channel surfs, rather than using the guide like a sane human being).

    BTW, if anyone is thinking about it, please don't bring this issue up on the mailing list. It's a very long standing issue that tends to ignite expansive flamewars...

  57. Re:Myth is frustrating on every out-of-the-box dis by coredog64 · · Score: 1

    Out of curiosity, did you order this card.
    It looks good but I can't tell from the MSI site if it support OTA high-def or just unencrypted cable high-def.

  58. Sounds like Windows... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gee. So much for linux being better. This is WORSE than windows.

  59. Re:Myth is frustrating on every out-of-the-box dis by kimvette · · Score: 1

    On OLDER chipsets, OLDER videocards, sure. But I wanted to run a Core 2 Duo, not a Pentium II or Pentium III.

    --
    The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
  60. Re:Myth is frustrating on every out-of-the-box dis by kimvette · · Score: 1
    That has nothing to do with the Hauppauge cards and everything to do with Myth and, in fact, ffmpeg (which apparently chokes if you give it a partial frame, and so Myth buffers conservatively in order to ensure this doesn't happen). The same would occur on any capture card, AFAIK.


    With the Hauppauge, I get the exact same behavior in Windows.

    Also, the video quality for the uber-cheap MSI is vastly superior. Fewer compression artifacts at even LOWER bitrates, no interlacing artifacts with the MSI, the only thing the MSI does not do better than the Hauppauge is that the MSI does not decode MTS.
    --
    The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
  61. Re:Myth is frustrating on every out-of-the-box dis by kimvette · · Score: 1

    No, that's going to be my next card. After reading reviews about how well the cheap tuners worked in comparison to the Hauppauge without any delay, I ordered the TV@nywhere which is an NTSC card costing between $30 and $40.

    --
    The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
  62. Re:Fixed Link by dourk · · Score: 1

    I found it to be incredibly easy to setup, and there are some pretty good guides ready for anyone with the interest:

    http://help.ubuntu.com/community/MythTV/

    --
    Wake up.
  63. MySQL is t3h suck by deepestblue · · Score: 1

    Wake me when MythTV starts supporting Postgres.

    1. Re:MySQL is t3h suck by batkiwi · · Score: 1

      Why do you care what database it uses? Consider it an appliance. When *I* am developing I prefer postgres to mysql any day of the week, but your enjoyment as an end user would not change a single bit if they went to the trouble of porting it.

    2. Re:MySQL is t3h suck by deepestblue · · Score: 1

      Fair enough. I guess my comment was off-topic on this article, but I have been trying to get a decent DVR setup, and I'm loathe to install mythtv since I already run postgres. What's frustrating is the decision not to support postgres is more political than technical - there's even a dude who maintains postgres patches against the official tree, but the main developer is for whatever reason against the very idea.

  64. Re:Myth is frustrating on every out-of-the-box dis by batkiwi · · Score: 1

    Using:
    -ubuntu 6.10
    -myth .20 from universe
    -leadtek DTV1000 http://www.rectron.com.au/Leadtek_dtv1000.htm

    It worked using the default kernel included in ubuntu and took me 2 hours total, including installing the OS.

    Steps:
    1. install ubuntu
    2. apt-get install dvb-utils
    3. use scan (with the canberra, ACT, Australia pre-tune) to create a channels.conf
    4. use tzap to verify signal strength for each channel
    5. apt-get install mysql
    6. apt-get install mythtv-backend mythtv
    7. set a password for user mythtv and log in as him with fast-user switching
    8. go to tvguide.org.au, register, set up channels to download, set up tv_guide_au script (will vary depending on your country)
    9. as mythtv, run mythtv-setup
    10. Tell it to import my channels.conf (it can scan, but "scan" does a better job in my experience)
    11. run mythfilldatabase
    12. enjoy!

    Step 12 was really 3 steps:
    A. Run mythtv, see framedrops
    B. Install nvidia drivers (apt-get install nvidia-binary or something like that) and reboot
    C. Enjoy!

  65. Re:Myth is frustrating on every out-of-the-box dis by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

    With the Hauppauge, I get the exact same behavior in Windows.

    Again, I ask, who cares about a friggin' 500ms delay?? And how does this make the EPG unusable?

  66. Re:Myth is frustrating on every out-of-the-box dis by kimvette · · Score: 1

    It makes the digital cable provider's menu unusable, or at least downright annoying. click, waitwaitwaitsomemore, see the next page, then click, waitwaitwaitsomemore, see the next page, etc.

    If using Myth's guide, it's not a problem. Where it really becomes a problem is using the cable provider's on demand movies.

    Good grief, some people really are dense -- either that or they simply like to argue for argument's sake.

    --
    The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
  67. Re:Myth is frustrating on every out-of-the-box dis by cesman · · Score: 1

    I"m not certain who is it aimed that... The next release has been tested on a Core 2 Duo. KnoppMyth development is driven by me. How can you expect one person to support the latest hardware when:
    Hardware support may not be in the kernel (I use vanilla with only 3 patches).
    I may not have the hardware to test.
    I'm one person building a distro (Yes, I have helpers. But ultimately, it is up to me if KnoppMyth is to improve.) working in his spare time.

    If you want to see something added to KnoppMyth, the you need to contact and work with me.

    --
    When the source is open, the possibilities are endless.
  68. MythTV is for those that can... by msimm · · Score: 1

    And are willing to. Tivo is for those that can't (>ilk).

    No more complaining about Myth being hard to setup. No-one makes you do it. :-)

    --
    Quack, quack.
  69. Re:Myth is frustrating on every out-of-the-box dis by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1


    Good grief, some people really are dense -- either that or they simply like to argue for argument's sake.


    No, the problem is that you made an apparently (and actually) nonsensical complaint about MythTV and the Hauppauge cards, only to admit later that you're doing something frankly silly (using the cable box EPG with a system clearly not designed to be used that way).

    But you are right... some people really are dense.

  70. Anyone got an image of this for VMWare yet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If not out there already, I may try and create a VMWare appliance using this install DVD...seems like a worthy candidate.

  71. Re:Myth is frustrating on every out-of-the-box dis by kimvette · · Score: 1

    It's silly? Tell me how you propose to order video on demand offerings?

    --
    The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
  72. Re:Myth is frustrating on every out-of-the-box dis by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

    Well, one obvious option is to pass the svideo to your capture card and pass the coax to your TV. Switch inputs, do what you need to do, then switch back.

  73. Re:umm? Easy!? by tomz16 · · Score: 1

    Actally, yeah... I've set up a mythbox a few times. In fact, I have one running in my living room right now.

    Are you kidding, it is NOT a HUGE undertaking for ADVANCED linux users, especially with a package management system. It may be a little challenging for joe blow windows user, but anyone who has spent more than a few weeks in linux should be comfortable installing myth in less than an hour!

    Myth itself took all of 2 minutes to install, as described above.

    MySQL is another yum install

    As long as you use standard hardware (i.e. hauppauge PVR150/250, soundblaster, nvidia video, etc.), the hardware is all pretty much automatically detected (at least in fedora). I used an ATI TV wonder framegrabber before, and it worked equally well (had to tweak channel frequencies in the MySQL database to offset the tuner's bias and colors lined up correctly).

    Mythtvsetup is GUI based. (Even with this distro, you have to run it at some point!)

    Zap2it listing setup is WEB BASED (Even with this distro, you have to run it at some point!)

    The issues that took the most time to sort out were
    - hardware overlay on TVout using ATI's drivers (after spending a weekend on it, I finally decided it was impossible, and got an Nvidia card. Had that working fully with hardware 3d and overalys in 5 minutes)
    - Lirc, but only because I was using a PVR150 with a universal remote. Took a few tries and some trial and error to get the remote configuration file correct. After that, I spent another half hour or so futzing with button aliases to make the control work seamlessly in myth and VLC.

    Save for the Lirc and ATI card overlays, (which took 99.9999% of the time of the install), myth itself took 15 minutes to install and configure.

    Do you have to know linux basics? Yes
    Does knowing how MySQL, alsa, ivtv, lirc, x11, etc. work help? Yes
    Do you NEED to know MySQL, alsa, ivtv, lirc, x11, etc.? Probably not
    Do you have to read the documentation? Yes, at least a little
    Are you going to run into some kind of problem along the way? Probably
    Will it work flawlessly using this new Fedora/Myth distribution? Probably not

    In fact, my personal experience with "appliance" CD distributions (such as KnoppMyth) is that if something does not work right out of the box, it is a TOTAL pain in the ass to fix. Rarely do you have a compiler, kernel sources, etc. Rarely are theses distros using the latest packages out there, so you often run into dependency problems when trying to fix something.

  74. Check out TVEase and the Hannibal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's a nice prebuilt system that incorporates MythTV for $500-700... http://www.tvease.net./