I did some deep research, and found out the answer to your question. 4100 lumens.
(correct me if I'm wrong, but lumens is a measure of visible light? Wikipedia says "perceived" light)
You're totally right. We've all got so caught up in all the arguing and bickering that we've forgotten what's really important. What's really important is which god you believe in.
No no no. You see, when you hook a battery up to a LED - you may need some extra bits like resistors, etc, but basically you don't need much to make it work. Petrol doesn't quite work that easily... when you compare the footprint of a battery vs petrol, you have to include the engines too. Having said that, you can get remote control cars with combustion engines, so they don't need to be full car-sized engines. But I think if we're going down that road, lets leave petrol behind and go straight to nukular power. In this documentary I saw, you can get nukular reactors in back-pack size. And that was way back in 1984. By now they must come in sizes no larger than my left big toe.
DNF has been a long time in the making, and is indeed the biggest software development undertaken in the world to date. Some of the main features we've been looking forward to in DNF have been removed due to time constraints, but may be included in future releases. In fact, they've decided to change the name from Duke Nukem Forever to Duke Nukem Vista. "Forever", they say, is more of an ideal - a road map to the future - than a physical, tangible release.
Some of the notable upgrades since the previous Duke Nukem include:
- DNV will be very very pretty
- DNV will ask you for a password after every level. For security.
The most notable feature missing, however, is that Duke Nukem himself does not appear in his game.
Despite DNV not being released yet, there is already talk of Duke Nukem 7, which may herald the return of Duke Nukem. If not, then surely it will be in DN8. In any case, the development team decided it never actually promised Duke Nukem would be in Duke Nukem Vista (he was part of Duke Nukem Forever, which is just a fuzzy warm feeling and not a real game).
then I have to ask - what's the difference between a theory and a law? Try not to get sidetracked when i mention this guys... in the whole Creation vs Evolution thing, you often hear phrases like "Evolution is just a theory" and then the evolutionists arc up and talk about how "theory" means something different in a science classroom than it does in colloquial language - in science, a "theory" is something that's been tested time and time again, and always come up as true/supported. So, things start out as hypotheses, and eventually gradute into theories once their truth is well established.
But what you're telling me now is that theories aren't really tested that much... once they get tested over and over, and always comes up as true/supported, then they graduate into being laws.
I upgraded to Wife, but it just kept chewing up more an more resources. Total bloatware. Also, my particular version of Wife doesn't allow homebrew, so I might need to get a downgrade.
If you click on their website's link that says "available on iPhone now", you'll see they tell you that WiFi must be turned on for it to work. You don't need to connect to any network, it just needs to be on.
Obviously this is because it triangulates based on WiFi hotspot locations.
Now, navizon *can* triangulate your position based on cell towers, but that feature won't work on the iPhone because, as many have already said, the iPhone doesn't provide the functionality needed.
Looks like Navizon and GMM have the same possibilities - triangulate by WiFi, Cell Towers, or GPS. And they both have the same restriction on iPhones.
You've misunderstood. That sentence you've taken from TFA says that Apple are a bit slow on the uptake (not Google), and in fact Apple will likely be so slow that they won't make this feature possible on iPhones until after Google have already finished beta.
There's nothing Google can do to make this compatible with iPhone, they have to sit around and wait for Apple to provide the functionality required.
I love this kind thinking, so full of holes. It's like Jarred at subway - "Eat at subway and you'll lose all your weight (fine print: in addition to a good diet and plenty of exercise)."
In Australia we have a children's story called Rock Stew. Basic gist is that this character is trying to sell "Rock Stew" to a wealthy merchant. First you boil the water, then simmer with the rock in the pot. Then add some ingredients such as chicken, vegetables, etc, etc. Simmer for a bit longer, remove the rock, and serve. Mmm, that's good stew. Stupid wealthy merchant buys this incredible rock.
Of course you and I know the rock had nothing to do with it. It was all them other good ingredients. But some people get suckered in all the same.
Anyway my point is, firefox hasn't saved you - your own common sense of not downloading crap has saved you. My sister, who is known to cry "free emoticons?!? YES PLEASE!" and "Win $100 just for filling out a couple of surveys?!? Sign me up!" - she wouldn't be saved by firefox at all. She'd bypass any pop up blockers etc. that firefox throws her way.
Also, I loved your "I don't have any anti-malware scanners, and my PC has absolutely no malware on it". Classic. It's as good as "Our town fired all the policemen, and now we have no crime! (well, nobody's being caught doing crime)".
"The Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act states that Apple cannot void a warranty for a product with third-party enhancements or modifications to their product." -- it's incredible that a decades-old law was so specific as to only target Apple.
So they're going to skip the first step? The way I understand it is, first you send in the MALP, then if the terrain is too difficult to traverse, or if you want to do further reconnnaisance, you send in the UAV. Then, finally, you can send in SG-1 when it's confirmed that the coast is clear.
This still doesn't email things well enough. I've had similar questions on my mind - what does it/mean/ for MS to be bound by GPL3? Are you trying to tell me that as soon as someone redeems a SUSE voucher that they received from MS, then MS will need to make available all it's Windows and Office source code? That make no sense. Or do they just need to make the source code available for their vouchers?
If you believe in evolution, that God created evolution, and that it's been going on for eons - You're not a creationist. Creationist believe that the universe was created no more than 6000 years ago. That's only a tiny fraction of an eon. In fact, that's not even Intelligent Design (well, it might be a small offshoot). Intelligent Design says evolution has been going on for eons, like you said, but certain 'impossible' jumps in evolution were forced by God's hand. The reason we pick on 'creationism' and 'intelligent design' is because they're hilarious jokes that somehow got taken seriously.
Slashdot Mirror
Just want to make sure I have this right.
...?
Phase 1: make websites a PITA to load up
Phase 2:
Phase 3: bombs
I did some deep research, and found out the answer to your question. 4100 lumens. (correct me if I'm wrong, but lumens is a measure of visible light? Wikipedia says "perceived" light)
You're totally right. We've all got so caught up in all the arguing and bickering that we've forgotten what's really important. What's really important is which god you believe in.
So, taking the rib from a man and creating a woman from it is implausible, according to religion?
No no no. You see, when you hook a battery up to a LED - you may need some extra bits like resistors, etc, but basically you don't need much to make it work. Petrol doesn't quite work that easily... when you compare the footprint of a battery vs petrol, you have to include the engines too. Having said that, you can get remote control cars with combustion engines, so they don't need to be full car-sized engines. But I think if we're going down that road, lets leave petrol behind and go straight to nukular power. In this documentary I saw, you can get nukular reactors in back-pack size. And that was way back in 1984. By now they must come in sizes no larger than my left big toe.
DNF has been a long time in the making, and is indeed the biggest software development undertaken in the world to date. Some of the main features we've been looking forward to in DNF have been removed due to time constraints, but may be included in future releases. In fact, they've decided to change the name from Duke Nukem Forever to Duke Nukem Vista. "Forever", they say, is more of an ideal - a road map to the future - than a physical, tangible release.
Some of the notable upgrades since the previous Duke Nukem include:
- DNV will be very very pretty
- DNV will ask you for a password after every level. For security.
The most notable feature missing, however, is that Duke Nukem himself does not appear in his game.
Despite DNV not being released yet, there is already talk of Duke Nukem 7, which may herald the return of Duke Nukem. If not, then surely it will be in DN8. In any case, the development team decided it never actually promised Duke Nukem would be in Duke Nukem Vista (he was part of Duke Nukem Forever, which is just a fuzzy warm feeling and not a real game).
then I have to ask - what's the difference between a theory and a law? Try not to get sidetracked when i mention this guys... in the whole Creation vs Evolution thing, you often hear phrases like "Evolution is just a theory" and then the evolutionists arc up and talk about how "theory" means something different in a science classroom than it does in colloquial language - in science, a "theory" is something that's been tested time and time again, and always come up as true/supported. So, things start out as hypotheses, and eventually gradute into theories once their truth is well established.
But what you're telling me now is that theories aren't really tested that much... once they get tested over and over, and always comes up as true/supported, then they graduate into being laws.
Can you see my confusion?
I upgraded to Wife, but it just kept chewing up more an more resources. Total bloatware. Also, my particular version of Wife doesn't allow homebrew, so I might need to get a downgrade.
Sorry! GMM doesn't triangulate based on WiFi hotspots by the look of it. My main point is still valid though.
No, navizon doesn't do this on the iPhone now.
If you click on their website's link that says "available on iPhone now", you'll see they tell you that WiFi must be turned on for it to work. You don't need to connect to any network, it just needs to be on.
Obviously this is because it triangulates based on WiFi hotspot locations.
Now, navizon *can* triangulate your position based on cell towers, but that feature won't work on the iPhone because, as many have already said, the iPhone doesn't provide the functionality needed.
Looks like Navizon and GMM have the same possibilities - triangulate by WiFi, Cell Towers, or GPS. And they both have the same restriction on iPhones.
You've misunderstood. That sentence you've taken from TFA says that Apple are a bit slow on the uptake (not Google), and in fact Apple will likely be so slow that they won't make this feature possible on iPhones until after Google have already finished beta.
There's nothing Google can do to make this compatible with iPhone, they have to sit around and wait for Apple to provide the functionality required.
I thought it meant it won't happen until the iPhone comes out of beta. Which makes sense, and probably still means a need to wait until 2013.
sounds like toilet humour to me.
zomg they all invole space too! Clippy may have been annoying but at least he wasn't in space all the time!
Meanwhile hothardware has just "earnt" $2 billion because slashdot linked to them. Wait, did that say FREE emoticons?!? *click*
I love this kind thinking, so full of holes. It's like Jarred at subway - "Eat at subway and you'll lose all your weight (fine print: in addition to a good diet and plenty of exercise)."
In Australia we have a children's story called Rock Stew. Basic gist is that this character is trying to sell "Rock Stew" to a wealthy merchant. First you boil the water, then simmer with the rock in the pot. Then add some ingredients such as chicken, vegetables, etc, etc. Simmer for a bit longer, remove the rock, and serve. Mmm, that's good stew. Stupid wealthy merchant buys this incredible rock.
Of course you and I know the rock had nothing to do with it. It was all them other good ingredients. But some people get suckered in all the same.
Anyway my point is, firefox hasn't saved you - your own common sense of not downloading crap has saved you. My sister, who is known to cry "free emoticons?!? YES PLEASE!" and "Win $100 just for filling out a couple of surveys?!? Sign me up!" - she wouldn't be saved by firefox at all. She'd bypass any pop up blockers etc. that firefox throws her way.
Also, I loved your "I don't have any anti-malware scanners, and my PC has absolutely no malware on it". Classic. It's as good as "Our town fired all the policemen, and now we have no crime! (well, nobody's being caught doing crime)".
"The Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act states that Apple cannot void a warranty for a product with third-party enhancements or modifications to their product." -- it's incredible that a decades-old law was so specific as to only target Apple.
So they're going to skip the first step? The way I understand it is, first you send in the MALP, then if the terrain is too difficult to traverse, or if you want to do further reconnnaisance, you send in the UAV. Then, finally, you can send in SG-1 when it's confirmed that the coast is clear.
This still doesn't email things well enough. I've had similar questions on my mind - what does it /mean/ for MS to be bound by GPL3? Are you trying to tell me that as soon as someone redeems a SUSE voucher that they received from MS, then MS will need to make available all it's Windows and Office source code? That make no sense. Or do they just need to make the source code available for their vouchers?
I'm sorry, are you trying to say America is too dumb, don't bother?
The closest we'll get to proof that Shakespeare wasn't a monkey.
If you believe in evolution, that God created evolution, and that it's been going on for eons - You're not a creationist. Creationist believe that the universe was created no more than 6000 years ago. That's only a tiny fraction of an eon. In fact, that's not even Intelligent Design (well, it might be a small offshoot). Intelligent Design says evolution has been going on for eons, like you said, but certain 'impossible' jumps in evolution were forced by God's hand. The reason we pick on 'creationism' and 'intelligent design' is because they're hilarious jokes that somehow got taken seriously.
It looks like you're attempting to write a letter. Would you like to....
That's a kibometer, only new zealanders use that form of measurement though.