Slashdot Mirror


China Readies Royalty-Free DVD Format

An anonymous reader writes with an InfoWorld article on China's new attempt to introduce a royalty-free format to rival the DVD. The article is not sanguine on China's chances of getting the EVD format used outside of its own borders (they tried once before in 2003). The submitter is more optimistic, asking: "Is this the future and the effective end of DRM — to be taken and co-opted by nation-states?" From the article: "The DVD player makers plan to switch to EVD (enhanced versatile disk) in an attempt to avoid paying patent royalties on the DVD format, according to published reports. The world's largest producers of DVD players, Chinese electronics companies would use the format instead of standards such as MPEG-4. Last week, 20 top manufacturers including Haier announced their plans to switch from DVD to EVD entirely by 2008, according to a report in China Economic News."

183 comments

  1. Make it backward compaitble, and I'm there! by From+A+Far+Away+Land · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Could the Chinese government wind up providing the solution to DRM, through the production of a DRM machine? Now that they control the manufacturing process, it's not hard to imagine them controlling the design process as well, and implementing whatever they darn well please. No doubt the USA would make importation of EVD illegal, but hopefully Canadians would be able to get their hands on them, and create a non-black market for technology people really want.

    1. Re:Make it backward compaitble, and I'm there! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      Make it backward compaitble (sic), and I'm there!

      Erm, the whole point is that they don't want to pay the royalties of the DVD format. In order to be backwards compatible, they would have to do pay them.

    2. Re:Make it backward compaitble, and I'm there! by From+A+Far+Away+Land · · Score: 1

      "Erm (sic), the whole point..."

      Then they should make it their point to play both formats because I don't want to buy the EVD for each of my DVDs to replace it. Neither would anyone else, so they'll just have to make a machine that does both and isn't legal on the "free market".

    3. Re:Make it backward compaitble, and I'm there! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know you're all excited about it because it could lead to you getting free shit (which is all 99.9% of slashdotters care about), but that isn't why China is doing it.

    4. Re:Make it backward compaitble, and I'm there! by pipatron · · Score: 1

      They would still have to pay the royalty, if they include a DVD-player there.

      --
      c++; /* this makes c bigger but returns the old value */
    5. Re:Make it backward compaitble, and I'm there! by NitsujTPU · · Score: 1

      No doubt the USA would make importation of EVD illegal.

      Why?

    6. Re:Make it backward compaitble, and I'm there! by bigdavex · · Score: 1

      If they make the player backward compatible with DVD media, they would have the same liabilities regarding royalties as making a normal DVD player. So I don't think there would be any point.

      --
      -Dave
    7. Re:Make it backward compaitble, and I'm there! by name*censored* · · Score: 1
      Hopefully if the EVD overtakes the DVD, then someone will pay the DVD royalties (which will have plummeted in cost) and make a marginally more expensive but widely more popular backwards-compatible player. Of course by that point, DVD will be the equivalent of VHS - old hat.

      The only problem will be with the early adapters (who, ironically(1), are necessary to make the EVD popular in the first place), who will buy a seperate EVD player and run it in conjunction with their current DVD players, who will lose when they make said backwards-compatible player...

      *1; Yes I know it's not true irony, but as far as I know there isnt another word for "unfortunate coincidence that is self-referring/self-generating"
      --
      Commodore64_love: I don't comprehend people who're so frightened of death that they'll bankrupt themselves to stay alive
    8. Re:Make it backward compaitble, and I'm there! by Anonymous+McCartneyf · · Score: 1

      The DVD format was created and supported by some of America's favorite content providers; they are getting the royalties. The HD-DVD and Blu-ray formats are also supported by content providers. (Blu-ray very much so.) It is already known that the MPAA has more influence over politicians than one might expect. This might be another area for them to influence.
      On the bright side, maybe some companies will move manufacturing jobs back into this country to make DVD and hi-def players. Or at least the makers of DVD players might outsource to countries that are known to pay their workers.

      --
      There is a fine line between recklessness and courage... -- Paul McCartney
    9. Re:Make it backward compaitble, and I'm there! by Yez70 · · Score: 1

      What loss?

      I'm fairly certain we are the kings of the disposable economy here. Who cares if we have to toss a $99 EVD player after a few years. Actually, it would still hold some value on eBay.

      Early adopters aren't concerned with costs, and a new format that is specifically meant to be cheaper is going to have a lot more people trying it out.

    10. Re:Make it backward compaitble, and I'm there! by From+A+Far+Away+Land · · Score: 1

      The point would be they could sell a royalty free player, and smart people at home could add on the DVD hacked firmware.

    11. Re:Make it backward compaitble, and I'm there! by NitsujTPU · · Score: 1

      The DVD format was created and supported by some of America's favorite content providers; they are getting the royalties. The HD-DVD and Blu-ray formats are also supported by content providers. (Blu-ray very much so.) It is already known that the MPAA has more influence over politicians than one might expect. This might be another area for them to influence.
      On the bright side, maybe some companies will move manufacturing jobs back into this country to make DVD and hi-def players. Or at least the makers of DVD players might outsource to countries that are known to pay their workers. Right... but when was the last time that the US made a bunch of home electronics illegal? What I'm saying is is that this is putting the cart before the horse. They might very well make piracy illegal. The movie studios will probably refuse to make releases on these formats. I doubt that the US will make the players illegal.
    12. Re:Make it backward compaitble, and I'm there! by Anonymous+McCartneyf · · Score: 1

      Well, I know that some states ban radar detectors.
      But you've got me here. I suspect that, strictly speaking, some of the entertainment hardware out there is illegal. But it's all still available in a catalog near you. I recently saw a catalog offer satellite radios that could record broadcasts, and I know the RIAA at least wishes that illegal.
      In short, touche. But if the content industry doesn't license content for EVD players, they'll only take off in Chinatowns.

      --
      There is a fine line between recklessness and courage... -- Paul McCartney
  2. Re:correction - "DRM-free machine" by From+A+Far+Away+Land · · Score: 1

    ..."through the production of a DRM-FREE DVD style machine"

  3. It's all about the money. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    ""Is this the future and the effective end of DRM -- to be taken and co-opted by nation-states?""

    No. This is an economic end-run around the DVD forum.

  4. People's *VDs by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Even China's "avant garde" attack on formats which don't fill China's mafia government Treasury is behind the vanguard of the Internet. The way to do half of what China is trying is to just release the DRM-free EVD format on the Web. Codec plugins, players, and encoded content (all open source so we can tell the Chinese haven't included any trojans). Even dual DVD/EVD-R HW, so we can backup our DVDs to EVDs, with PC connections so we can move our content across the Net. EVD would quickly dilute DVD, especially if cheap Chinese HW preferred EVD for features like sharing.

    The other half, which that strategy wouldn't do, is lock us into some Chinese format instead of DVD. We might not pay Chinese crony corps royalties this generation, but there's no way to stop them from using some lockin on the next gen, like when they increase density for HD-EVD, or some other creepy strategy they learned from the current Euramerican masters of the game. Releasing the format as a data format in open source rather than a HW format (ie. discs only) means that their attempt to upsell would be just another fork, which the rest of the world could ignore in favor of anyone's alternative upgrades.

    I think DVD Jon should start giving code to some real "maverick" Chinese manufacturers right away.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  5. Lets do it ! by johnjones · · Score: 0, Redundant

    ok lets do it

    I'll buy a EVD player

    no DRM great back to VHS.. I'll even pay a bit extra for the option it can play my old DVD collection

    Frankly blueray etc can just plain go away...

    regards

    John Jones

    1. Re:Lets do it ! by Bob+of+Dole · · Score: 1

      Back to VHS? Did you ever try to copy a VHS tape?

      VHS had (well, has) very effective DRM. (Although technically it was ARM)

    2. Re:Lets do it ! by Vegeta99 · · Score: 1

      Not if your old crap VCR didn't have the automatic gain adjustment! =)

      I did have a few wally-world type VCRs that were pretty good at ignoring Macrovision

    3. Re:Lets do it ! by Aqualung812 · · Score: 1
      It couldn't have DRM (Digital Rights Management), IT WAS ANALOG!

      If you're talking about Macrovision, anyone could walk into Radio Shack (back when the salesmen actually knew about radios) and get a device for less than $20 that would ignore the gain control from that. Macrovision stripped, and you had a pretty good copy.

      However, with VHS and all analog devices, your copy of a copy had flaws. If you did it right, maybe very small flaws.

      --
      Grammer Nazis - I mod you "troll" unless you actually add something on-topic. Yes, I know I have mispellings in my sig.
    4. Re:Lets do it ! by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      no DRM great back to VHS.. I'll even pay a bit extra for the option it can play my old DVD collection

      It's funny that I scanned the first group of posts and didn't see anybody else mention the 'D' word. The studios want DRM. The studios control which format the movies will be released on (i.e: no VHS of Ep III). Therefore, I would assume that all other issues are big fat moot points. The studios aren't going to release movies in a format that they can't control.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
  6. Sounds good but China is worrying by WiiVault · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This EVD concept sounds cool at I like the fact that it is royalty free. At the same time I'm weary of anything proposed by such a huge human rights abuser. I also wonder if the loss of chinease DVD market will affect our cheap 20$ Wal-Mart DVD players?

    1. Re:Sounds good but China is worrying by j35ter · · Score: 1
      At the same time I'm weary of anything proposed by such a huge human rights abuser.

      But at the same time you buy Chinese goods at Wal-Mart & Co.?
      --
      Delta-Mike November Bravo Tango
  7. It's a matter of cost. by Gordonjcp · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If the EVD players are sitting on the shelves in ASDA for £24.95, the public will buy EVD players and demand EVD discs. It's just that simple.

    Not convinced? Then look at where the el-cheapo DVD players come from now...

    1. Re:It's a matter of cost. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you Sir. Your logic is flawless.

    2. Re:It's a matter of cost. by westlake · · Score: 1
      If the EVD players are sitting on the shelves in ASDA for £24.95, the public will buy EVD players and demand EVD discs

      and if the only legit import EVD pressings available are out of Hong Kong and Bollywood? with soundtracks in Mandarin and Hindi? no James Bond, no Harry Potter?

      the format has no market in the West unless Western content can be licensed. on a massive scale.

    3. Re:It's a matter of cost. by Gordonjcp · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Right. So if you cannot get cheap Chinese DVD players any more - because they're making EVD now instead, and in fact EVD is cheaper because they're not paying a licence fee - the cost of players goes up. So, there are less people buying DVD players, less of a market for DVDs, and people buy the cheap EVD players and buy pirated EVDs that are straightforward dubs of DVDs for a couple of quid a time from a guy down the flea market.

      Either way, the DVD Consortium needs to stop pissing consumers off with region coding and other shit. That, and the movie industry needs to realise that falling sales aren't (entirely) due to "piracy" - they are because people don't really want to see American Pie 27 XTreme and watch all the same boring crap again.

    4. Re:It's a matter of cost. by EveLibertine · · Score: 1

      Nah, it won't be considered successful until Dell , HP, and the other OEM's are prepackaging them as the default in their machines. That's a ways away, and requires the consumer adoption that you've just mentioned. The only problem is that most consumers already have a computer with a DVD player, or burner, so there is no real reason for them to move to a format that doesn't offer any benefits other than the fact that it is royalty free. Maybe being an Open format would make a difference, but probably unlikely and not enough to turn that many heads. Then you have to worry about strong arming that the DVD consorts would surely apply to these OEM's in such a case.

      It's a long ways off and a relative long shot, from where I'm sitting.

    5. Re:It's a matter of cost. by tigga · · Score: 1
      So if you cannot get cheap Chinese DVD players any more - because they're making EVD now instead, and in fact EVD is cheaper because they're not paying a licence fee - the cost of players goes up. So, there are less people buying DVD players, less of a market for DVDs, and people buy the cheap EVD players and buy pirated EVDs that are straightforward dubs of DVDs for a couple of quid a time from a guy down the flea market.

      Then people will buy cheap DVD players made in Taiwan, Malaysia,Indonesia, Mexico - whatever place has cheap work force. And the same people already buying pirated DVDs. Why should somebody have at home two different players?

    6. Re:It's a matter of cost. by LordVader717 · · Score: 1

      Nobody will buy EVD-only players in the West, and it won't make any differnce to them anyway. It might be different for the chines market, but it's just not worth a new technology for western customers. I heard that DVD-licenses were quite high, about $8 per player. Of course this is going to piss off the chinese manufacturer, who makes about $2 on a player, but unless Players are going to drop in price to about $10 (which won't happen, transportation alone will liekly cost more), western customers won't give a shit, because they can already get DVD players for an incredibly cheap price of $30.

    7. Re:It's a matter of cost. by westlake · · Score: 1
      So if you cannot get cheap Chinese DVD players any more - because they're making EVD now instead, and in fact EVD is cheaper because they're not paying a licence fee - the cost of players goes up. So, there are less people buying DVD players, less of a market for DVDs, and people buy the cheap EVD players

      You need only cheap labor and the capacity for precision manufacturing to build a competitive DVD player. The Chinese OEM isn't going surrender his prime export markets by shipping EVD to the West.

      the DVD Consortium needs to stop pissing consumers off with region coding and other shit

      In the states, the collector of import video bids for the region-free player on eBay. The fan who simply wants his anime or Bollywood fix buys the cheapest DVD player off the shelves at Walmart. No one else gives a damn.

    8. Re:It's a matter of cost. by Reaperducer · · Score: 1

      and if the only legit import EVD pressings available are out of Hong Kong and Bollywood? with soundtracks in Mandarin and Hindi? no James Bond, no Harry Potter?

      You've obviously never been to Hong Kong where legitimate VCDs can be purchased right next to their legitimate DVD releases in the original English. Why would this be any different for EVDs? These are VCDs put out by the American movie studios for the Hong Kong market, and yes, they're in English, because that's what the market demands.

      Virtually any DVD that comes out in your local suburban American Best Buy is available as a legal VCD in Hong Kong within a week, including Harry Potter, the Incredibles, the Bond series, heck even Friends, Seinfeld, Frasier, and other American and British TV shows.

      So why don't the movie studios sell VCDs in the United States? I think you know the answer.

      --
      -- I'm old enough to have lived through six different meanings of the word "hacker."
  8. It's the content, stupid! by Tyler+Eaves · · Score: 3, Informative

    People, by and large, do not care about the DRM or region coding on DVDs. It doesn't effect them. The DRM on DVD's is quite mild compared to much of what is floating around. Unless the major studios and distributors supported this (not likely) this will never gain anything even resembling market success.

    --
    TODO: Something witty here...
    1. Re:It's the content, stupid! by kanweg · · Score: 1

      Perhaps people don't care, perhaps they do. I don't know. I do know I DO. I want all my stuff legal. But my Mac allows me to run my own region only (yeah, I can change a couple of times, but then he ends up with the one that refuses to play my other DVDs). I want to have a movie (Tucker, the man and his dream). I have ordered it at a store, but can't buy it here in Europe. In the US it is available, but then I have the DVD region problem. The only solution, which I don't want to consider, is to pirate. I welcome anything that leads to competition, and hopefully the end of DRM, because it only bothers honest people.

      Bert

    2. Re:It's the content, stupid! by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 3, Informative

      In Europe, a significant number of DVD players are hacked to allow playing US DVDs. US DVDs are imported because the EU versions are too often inferior quality or delayed from the US release.

      I wanted to get an EVD (or was it HVD?) player back when they tried it, but there were less than ten discs in Chinese that I could find online, and I could not find any information on subtitling. At any rate, the JVC D-VHS format was more successful than EVD/HVD.

    3. Re:It's the content, stupid! by bky1701 · · Score: 1

      Save an iso image and mount it. Or reburn it... I think you can change the region in the ISO. There may also be a way to hack the hardware into being all regions (ie DVD-rom BIOS flash).

    4. Re:It's the content, stupid! by serialdogma · · Score: 1

      You could try VLC or another software player that uses libdvdcss, but I think mac DVD drives implement the RPC2 region lock-out so it might not work.

    5. Re:It's the content, stupid! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The content? Bwahahahaha! Dude, you seriously think your average Chinese consumer cares whether the content is properly licensed from Hollywood or not? As long as EVD can get content from the same channels as most Chinese DVDs do, that's not going to be a problem.

      That kinda points out the real flaw in EVD vs. DVD. EVD just isn't that much more compelling over DVD. Even with the licensing fees, that's a one time cost. The actual DVDs still sell for like a dollar a pop. DVD is already cheap in China.

    6. Re:It's the content, stupid! by jZnat · · Score: 1

      In RPC2 drives, I think the drive outright refuses to read an out of region disc.

      --
      'Yes, firefox is indeed greater than women. Can women block pops up for you? No. Can Firefox show you naked women? Yes.'
    7. Re:It's the content, stupid! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People, by and large, do not care about the DRM or region coding on DVDs.

      People who travel, or are learning foreign languages, or who live in regions where the studios don't bother releasing much, do care.

      I have legit DVDs I have bought while travelling in Singapore, Hong Kong, US and others I have bought while living in New Zealand, UK and Japan. A few years ago, this wasn't a problem, I owned a region-free DVD player, and was technically compentent enough to track down and install a firmware hack for my PC's DVD drive. Now that I've built up a fairly substantial DVD library, I buy a new PC and find it has an RPC-2 drive with encrypted firmware. Well fuck you MPAA, I'm now a bittorrent convert.

    8. Re:It's the content, stupid! by metamatic · · Score: 1

      I'm not so sure about that.

      I'm not buying HD-DVD or Blu-ray until I can get a region free player.

      My family have region-free DVD players, because we like to be able to send each other disks as gifts.

      There may be a lot of Americans who never watch any non-US TV or movies and don't know anyone outside the US, but people in the rest of the world travel more.

      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    9. Re:It's the content, stupid! by jamar0303 · · Score: 1

      The joy of pirated DVDs- 0-region so it reads on anything (well, sometimes it gets stuck in the drive because of a couple of imperfections, but a paper-clip hook will pull it out of the slot just fine).

      --
      OSx86 FTW
    10. Re:It's the content, stupid! by jamar0303 · · Score: 1

      In HK would have it been so much trouble to cross the border and get some region-free DVDs?

      --
      OSx86 FTW
    11. Re:It's the content, stupid! by ben+there... · · Score: 1

      Check out the Mac forum of rpc1.org. There are a few apps and the possibility to flash your firmware to make it region free. I'd try the apps first.

    12. Re:It's the content, stupid! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i think that's a major impediment to adoption of EVD players in the world-outside-china - the reason for all the DVD encryption etc. is because of the MPAA etc., right? in which case there's no reason for the MPAA to allow the content producers to release stuff in EVD format, in which case in places where you can't quite get DVDs for a dollar, you also won't be able to get any EVD discs (unless there starts to be massive demand for chinese-produced movies and such by north american consumers?). looks like EVD is solely intended for the internal market - and that's interesting, in that the chinese manufacturers expect the internal chinese market to be large enough to support a new format all on it's own. it could well be the case that china will evolve it's own technological ecosystem that everyone else outside will be a bystander to...

    13. Re:It's the content, stupid! by joeljkp · · Score: 1

      Yes, but what if China went one step further, and created its own SACD or DVD-A standard, sans DRM? Or its own HD-DVD/BluRay? That's when things will become interesting.

      --
      WeRelate.org - wiki-based genealogy
    14. Re:It's the content, stupid! by khchung · · Score: 1

      In Europe, a significant number of DVD players are hacked to allow playing US DVDs. In Asia, well SE Asia at least, all DVD players are either already hacked (i.e. all-codes enabled) or comes with instructions on how to do that, even the ones from big name retailers. One of the reason is there so many DVD imports from Europe, US and Japan that it simply doesn't make sense to buy a region coded DVD player here.
      --
      Oliver.
  9. Black Market by Mark_MF-WN · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That's one of the nice things about Canada -- we can freely buy a lot of the things that Americans can't due to retarded embargoes. We have cuban cigars at the store where I work. They're expensive, since they have to be flown in, but we have them.

    You know, for a country that spends so much time braying about its love of capitalism, Americans sure do their best to prevent any capitalism from happening. Cubans want to buy and sell their products in American markts? Sorry, no can do. Foreigners want to buy computer chips? Obviously they all just want to make nukes (forget for a moment that the computations are the easiest part of the entire processs, with or without computers...). China makes quality video players that aren't deliberately crippled? That's GOT to be banned -- using a product that you paid money for is supposed to unpleasant. Now China wants to make a quality video player that has even stronger DRM than domestic video players, and isn't encumbered by patent royalties; that's somehow evil as well. Seriously, who are the REAL communists here?

    It's sad that "socialist", "liberal" Canada embraces capitalism and free trade so much more fully than Americans, who've been duped into thinking that a "free market" means that you get to choose which state-mandated church you attend while the government works overtime to inhibit competition and international trade.

    1. Re:Black Market by philwx · · Score: 1

      Erm, Cuban cigars is your one and only example I bet. And you guys sure beat the dead horse on it. Embargoes are embargoes, capitalism lives on with or without them imo. While I agree that any problems we have with Cuba are petty and should not be an issue anymore, this post strikes me as lame "we are teh better" nationalism.. If we desperately needed cuban cigars, we could, I dunno, go to Mexico and buy them.

      The USA is about regulated capitalism anyway. Unbridled "pure" capitalism would lead to huge monopolies, stifled/complete lack of competition, and extreme corruption. Which would ironically be contrary to the spirit of capitalism.

    2. Re:Black Market by Stormwatch · · Score: 1
      The USA is about regulated capitalism anyway. Unbridled "pure" capitalism would lead to huge monopolies, stifled/complete lack of competition, and extreme corruption. Which would ironically be contrary to the spirit of capitalism.
      You got it backwards. It is government interference that leads to monopolies, stifled competition, and corruption.
    3. Re:Black Market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is often claimed. I tend to believe that monopolies tend to occur in spite of government interference, but I am willing to consider your point of view.

      Please explain your assertion, as it relates to non-IP cases. (I think IP is kind of a special case scenario, so I'd prefer to limit our discussion to tangible goods and services, if only for simplicity's sake.)

    4. Re:Black Market by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 4, Interesting
      It's sad that "socialist", "liberal" Canada embraces capitalism and free trade so much more fully than Americans.

      [sarcasm]That's right... that's why I can't buy satellite signals from Direct TV complete with HBO[/sarcasm] (both of which outshine any Canadian offering). The Canadian government won't let Canadians buy American TV services directly and there is an outright ban on HBO (they don't want to put pressure on Canadian companies and TV stations to force them to finally offer a good products for a good price).

      You see we're all about a competitive market up here. Same reason we're only now starting to see cell phone number portability being implemented at phone companies, and why I have to wait up to 8 months for an MRI even though the one at the local hospital isn't being used more than 8 or 10 hours a day because they can't afford to pay the staff to run it... while not allowing private companies to use the machines who are willing to PAY to for the privilege of giving their customers faster access. BTW, the government frowns and disallows companies from buying their own machines and offering these services. One of the reasons the only health care system in the G8 that we are above is the U.S. health care system... which is on the bottom. Don't brag about shit if it is not all as true as you make it out to be.

      That said, I agree that Canada is WAY more capitalistic than almost every American thinks. Just because we have a failing single insurer health care system and believe in paying for safe injection houses instead of water filtration plants (Vancouver's 2 weeks of boil water advisory because a rainstorm screwed up the water system for 2 MILLION people) doesn't mean we don't like capitalism. It just means we don't want to sell American products to Canadians because that would make us uncomfortable when we were America bashing. Meanwhile, we would rather have a 60 billion dollar trade deficit with China who will sell us anything and won't buy a damn thing from us except lumber and oil (if we would sell it... which the liberals here would be OK with because they have no problem with the trade deficit or China's human rights abuses since they are trying so/too hard to be understanding of their values while forgetting our own). Yeah yeah and a few other token things they buy... 60 Billion dollar trade deficit. People here don't want to get on China's bad side because we don't want to lose out on that big potential market. But so far all it has us is 60 billion dollars deeper in debt every year... and that is just from Canada. Time for some equalization. Starting to rant against idiotic notions that trade with China is all good... must stop now.

      --
      -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
    5. Re:Black Market by nine-times · · Score: 1

      The USA is about regulated capitalism anyway. Unbridled "pure" capitalism would lead to huge monopolies, stifled/complete lack of competition, and extreme corruption. Which would ironically be contrary to the spirit of capitalism.

      And yet we still have huge monopolies, stifled competition, and extreme corruption in our "regulated" capitalism.

    6. Re:Black Market by philwx · · Score: 1

      Which underscores the need for regulation..

    7. Re:Black Market by jZnat · · Score: 1

      Standard Oil.

      That is all I have to say.

      --
      'Yes, firefox is indeed greater than women. Can women block pops up for you? No. Can Firefox show you naked women? Yes.'
    8. Re:Black Market by redcane · · Score: 1

      Of course upon your return you could be fined or thrown in jail. w00t for the free market.

    9. Re:Black Market by L0rdJedi · · Score: 1

      They have Cuban cigars around here too (LA and San Diego area). It is the importation of Cuban cigars that is illegal, but the seeds can be imported all we want. So the stores import the seeds and grow the tobacco here. Problem solved.

      So much for your example.

    10. Re:Black Market by msobkow · · Score: 1

      I agree it's nice to have a government that remembers their place in society, especially the legal contracts that took all those decades to work through the system. :)

      If the Chinese manufacturers didn't participate in the DVD and follow-on format specification meetings, then they obviously have to pay royalties or license fees to use the format.

      But there is nothing illegal about them creating a competing format. There are already two competing DVD follow-on formats -- who is to know in advance which will "own" the market, or how a shared market will end up divided by the globe?

      On the bright side, I'm sure it pisses off the *AA to no end that they can't force every country to follow US law. Awww. Guess you'll have to compete on a level playing field with competitors in the target markets, or wrangle enough agreements with foreign partners or divisions to try and force your views.

      It blows me away how little some foreign investors know about the law in the markets they put their money into, relying on their local government's connections and leverage instead of doing research.

      --
      I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
    11. Re:Black Market by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      I have to wait up to 8 months for an MRI even though the one at the local hospital isn't being used more than 8 or 10 hours a day because they can't afford to pay the staff to run it... while not allowing private companies to use the machines who are willing to PAY to for the privilege of giving their customers faster access. BTW, the government frowns and disallows companies from buying their own machines and offering these services.

      Okay, I'll never get an MRI anyway, but I don't get this: why is Canada so fucked in the head on this? I like socialized medicine, where everybody gets a base level of care, but I want the option to get additional coverage. The big win for this scheme is that there's no real question of whether the hospital will get paid for most things (and more people will see doctors, reducing the emergency burden further). Anyway, why is it that Canada won't let someone open up Joe's MRI and sandwich shop?

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    12. Re:Black Market by lokiomega · · Score: 1

      So if I grow French grape seeds in Montana I have a French wine??

    13. Re:Black Market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > That's one of the nice things about Canada -- we can freely buy a lot of the things that Americans
      > can't due to retarded embargoes. We have cuban cigars at the store where I work. They're expensive,
      > since they have to be flown in, but we have them.

      As opposed to cigars from the Dominican Republic, which are brought in by semi?

    14. Re:Black Market by alshithead · · Score: 1

      "Americans" don't "do their best to prevent any capitalism from happening". I think that many "US" companies do their best to make sure that the rules fall in their favor. "Americans" that I know mostly want a good product for a fair price...no matter where it comes from. Unfortunately, in the US many, if not most, politicians are beholden to special interests. Businesses have the deepest pockets and therefore the politicians legislate in their favor. Let's not bash all of the folks of a country when they really don't have a say in the matter. Most US citizens would probably have things be different if they could. Our opinions are lost in the background. Sad, but true.

      --
      I reserve the right to think for myself. Others' opinions are optional. Puppy on lap = typos...not illiteracy.
    15. Re:Black Market by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1

      I don't get this: why is Canada so fucked in the head on this? I like socialized medicine, where everybody gets a base level of care, but I want the option to get additional coverage. If "the rich" are allowed to buy their own additional medical care at private clinics and hospitals, then you'd see an exodus of the best and brightest doctors to the higher-paying private system. This leaves the "public" system full of the leftovers, the Dr Nick Rivieras. You basically end up with an even worse version of our county hospitals here in the US. A few dedicated idealist doctors toiling in a great vat of underfunded mediocrity. That's the theory, anyway.
      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    16. Re:Black Market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyway, why is it that Canada won't let someone open up Joe's MRI and sandwich shop?

      Err... You can, and people have. http://www.canadadiagnostics.ca/ That's just one of many. Do the google thing.

    17. Re:Black Market by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1
      Simple solution there: increase the supply and cull the Nick Riviera's of the world. Of course, we've got a system where everything is private - if some level of insurance was provided to anyone who could fog a mirror (and many who can't - this is a hospital), would all the hospitals run away? In your real life example, would allowing people to pay for use of the big magnetic donut drive the best away from the public sector? Would it allow the hospital to buy another big magnetic donut, or would they not, since 'they' only use it half the time anyway (never mind the people renting it).

      I get that you probably don't buy this argument, but it's really irritating. Perhaps we should be looking at sweden or denmark for our model healthcare.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    18. Re:Black Market by Mark_MF-WN · · Score: 1

      The American people have all the say they need. They CAN have things differently -- all they have to do is:
      a) Not vote Democrat. If possible, have your local Democratic candidate stuffed into a small box labelled "AIDS Queer" and shipped to Texas for a ceremonial shit-kicking.

      b) Not vote Republican. If possible, have your local Republican candidate locked in a cage and forced to Go-Go dance for the homeless insane at a drug-rave to an all Marilyn Manson club mix.

      c) Not vote for any politician that breaks their election promises. If possible, sue them for false advertising. Multiply this by the number of voters in the constituency, do it in small claims court, and then laugh as he/she spends the next twenty years in court, paying out $1000/lawsuit for defrauding the voters.

      d) Not vote for any politician who violates the constitution in any way whatsoever. If possible, have such politicians hung as traitors. It's only fair.

      e) Not vote for any politician that is illiterate or can't speak basic English properly. Flubbing a time honoured adage and replacing half of it with a line from a song by The Who qualifies as not being capable of speaking English properly.

      g) Not vote for anyone that uses religion, blind patriotism, troop-support, family values, or any other form of imaginary bullshit to win votes. Everyone wants families to thrive, for the troops to not die, and for churches to not be burnt down. Anyone using those things to win votes us just trying to distract you from the fact that they're a complete fuckup, and could very well be sufficiently incompetent to cause families to starve, the troops to die in pointless wars, and for churches to be burnt down by the ATF.

      h) If you were too goddam fucking stupid to follow any of the aforementioned rules, then you have CHOSEN the current state of affairs. This makes you a fuckup of the highest calibre. Fortunately, firearms are still legal in most of the US; purchase one and use it to permanently remove yourself from the electorate / genepool.

      See? It's easy. Americans totally have it within themselves to improve things. It's just that most Americans are collosal retards, and don't feel obliged to vote with their brain rather than ... whatever organ is responsible for being that goddam fucking stupid. Possibly the anus, but I hesitate to ascribe such odious qualities to such a useful bodypart.

      Politicians only listen to businesses because voters LET them. If you just didn't vote for politicians that took bribes (AKA: campaign contributions and lobbying), there would be no problem. Almost every other democratic nation on Earth has had the sense to engage in serious campaign reform for precisely this reason. You have to wonder about a people that are so goddam fucking stupid that they see absolutely nothing wrong with their politicians setting up an entire network of systematic bribery, working against the people, and being complete sleazebags out to rob the public coffers for every last penny.

    19. Re:Black Market by Yez70 · · Score: 1

      If that's the issue - require the 'good doctors' to match their time hour for hour in the public and private systems. Tax their services on top of that and use the money to improve the public system. It's win win.

      The rich get what they want and end up paying even more to help the poor - classic canadian socialistic policy.

    20. Re:Black Market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why have central planning at all. We know it doesn't work (except politicians in England, France, Germany etc.; but these countries are going dooooown healthwise, I know cuz I live there).

      What you really want is BOTH (a) competition in a free market, with lots of incentives to improve the health situation, and (b) social security, with someone paying for the poor.

      It's quite easy to get (b) in an (a) system: For those who are below a certain income, subsidize their health insurance (i.e. give them the option to insurance, in which case the state will pay them a fair portion of that insurance). (all this is backed by tax money, which is MUCH better than having government-controlled insurance)

      But trust me, you don't WANT the socialist healthcare system from Germany, even though most Americans seem to regard it as almost magical. It sucks.

    21. Re:Black Market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Right. The big evil company that was exploiting everyone, because they were totally evil by definition.

      Wait. Wasn't that the company who didn't have an eternal monopoly, but only held huge market share because they kept innovating, because they constantly managed to produce oil for everybody for an ever cheaper price, so that people who previously had to buy expensive candles could buy cheap oil for lamps? And their market share wasn't even 99%. It wasn't a monopoly, because there was competition, and people being free to buy from that competition, just like MS, Apple, Sun, and Linux (I happen to run a Mac, it's my choice).

      Yeah, eeeeeevvvvvvilllll.

      Only government can create real (i.e. harmful) monopolies, for instance most government agencies (stifling actual competition out there by regulating everything to death; how could you create innovation in flight security, with the government sitting there doing actual crap?), or the AT&T monopoly back in the day (before government started licensing monopolies, there was widespread competition in gas, phone, water, electricity markets).

    22. Re:Black Market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a difference between the best (in terms of absolute outcomes) and the most cost-effective (outcomes per spend)

      The US system is gold-plated, but then it costs 12% of the USA's considerable GDP. In terms of outcome-per-amount spent the French system (9% of GDP) is currently the best. The UK's NHS used to have the best outcomes-per-spend but various semi-privatisations have saddled it with additional costs and the outcome improvement has increased less than the costs. The spending is about 7% of GDP, which is about the same in terms of GDP as the cost of Medicare and Medicaid in the USA, although on about a 30% smaller GDP per capita, and it covers more people so the spend per patient is much less, but then some costs in the US system are higher (e.g. drug costs) due to prevailing market conditions. How the outcomes of the NHS compare to Medicare and Medicaid I don't know, so I can't say if, on that basis, the NHS is more efficient than Medicare and Medicaid.

      If you intend to pay for private healthcare costs via an insurance scheme with subsidies for the poor then there is an imperative for it to be cost effective. The private sector, though, has the imperative to make it profitable as a first priority, and cost effective only as a by product. This is where the tension comes. I have read that something like 80% of medical costs in the NHS are generated by patients over the age of 60. Often those over the age of 60 are less well off, which implies quite a considerable strain on the insurance top ups unless it is covered by taxation during the working years. Even if it is switching to such a system would take some time as the cost would have to be covered piecemeal.

    23. Re:Black Market by drsquare · · Score: 1
      It's sad that "socialist", "liberal" Canada embraces capitalism and free trade so much more fully than Americans

      CD tax anyone?
    24. Re:Black Market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The private sector, though, has the imperative to make it profitable as a first priority, and cost effective only as a by product.

      No, the private sector has no incentive to make it cost-effective for you. Competition will take care of that, unless you regulate them to death (such as have the *current* docs in the AMA decide who may become doctor and who may not; that way they make sure nobody will compete against them, lowering their nice margins).

      By the way, in Germany we pay 12% of our wages (in addition to taxes) for health "insurance", and still there are lines at the doctor, and you don't get nearly all treatment you'd need. Just looking at what doctors actually get from that huge amounts of money, the *average* earner would only pay HALF as much in a private system, and even a low earner (i.e. 15000 Euro/year) wouldn't need to pay more in that private system. BUT that system would have incentives to become better and cheaper, which the current system totally lacks (it's basically state-controlled, financed by that 12% tax).

      And those who fall through the private system, because they couldn't afford it (unemployeds, handicaped people...) could easily be covered by government, for only a fraction of what we need to pay now for that shitty socialist system.

      I don't really know why the USA has a system that's both expensive as hell per person, and isn't too great either (well, certainly good, but not that much better than what we have). Maybe it's the AMA monopoly, maybe something else. But whatever it is, Europe shows that it can be different, cost-wise, but it also shows that Socialism isn't the answer.

    25. Re:Black Market by tigga · · Score: 1
      Read on about Standard Oil. It was not such nice company as you are trying to paint it.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_Oil

    26. Re:Black Market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice article. Well, clearly Std Oil were quite tough-handed in competing, and lots of other people (competitors) bitched about it, but IMHO they were in the clear.

      If you can't stand the heat, you shouldn't BE competing. Nobody has a *right* to be in a market, and the consumers, the whole *point* of a business, were happy with low prices, as TFA says.

      By 1911 their market share had fallen to 64%. How's that a monopoly you need to go after?? The article says that only in 1909 did the USDOJ actually do anything against StdOil, and at that point is seems to be like they only did it because they hate big corps, because there was no monopoly (and even before that: they customers were happy).

      And all that bitching and moaning about Std Oil getting discounts through "secret railroad rates" or "discriminations on rates", OMG, that's just your basic rebate for big customers...

      So in the end, I don't see much wrong at all. Nobody was actually *hurt*, many competitors were bought (i.e. received money for selling their assets), and the business did what it was supposed to. Most monopoly intervention is claimed to be based on "protecting the consumer". Clearly that's just a shitty bogus claim.

    27. Re:Black Market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While it's not perfect, remember that it was basically done as an alternative to the **AA

    28. Re:Black Market by alshithead · · Score: 1

      I have to treat most of your post as a humorous rant. As such, I can agree with most of your points to a certain extent. You are spot on for a lot of your "things not to do". However, you don't tell us how to accomplish what you think voters should do. Most times it is a matter of voting for the lesser of two evils. You don't really want to vote for either/any candidate because they both/all suck. What is the solution to that? Campaign reform would do wonders but the people who can implement campaign reform (politicians) won't because it doesn't serve their best interests. Vote them out of office? The next person elected won't do it either no matter what they say while campaigning. Sue for false advertising? Hah! Riiiight... Voters haven't chosen the current state of affairs, it was foisted upon us and now we don't have the power to effectively change things. Next you'll be advocating armed revolution to overthrow the government and start fresh. Not a bad idea in the context of a work of fiction but in no way possible with the majority of the US being sheeple.

      Grammar Nazi point: "have such politicians hung as traitors". I think it's "have such politicians hanged as traitors".

      --
      I reserve the right to think for myself. Others' opinions are optional. Puppy on lap = typos...not illiteracy.
    29. Re:Black Market by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1

      If that's the issue - require the 'good doctors' to match their time hour for hour in the public and private systems. No good. The problem with the public system is that they don't have enough money to pay the doctors they have. If you force them in such a system to match hours, their private "big money" hours are limited by what the government can afford to pay for in public hours. Additionally, such systems inevitably breed a "timeclock" mentality, where time spent on the public side is artfully accounted for in the least painful way, which is generally also the least productive.

      Tax their services on top of that and use the money to improve the public system. Do you have any idea how heavily they'd have to tax the "private side" to even have the slightest effect on the public costs? You'd end up with an artificially overpriced private system used by only the ultra-rich. There's no point at which you could set the tax rate that would still allow enough participation to matter. Taxes are a deterrent to the activity they're applied to. Too many socialist types don't understand this. I once had someone tell me they should tax all income over $50,000 at 100%. He actually claimed it would be a fantastic boon to social services and social justice alike, with nobody being "overpaid" and tons of money coming in as taxes. Great idea, except for one thing: how many people are going to keep working after they've made their $50K for the year if they know that every dime after that was going to the government? This is the extreme example, but it works at all taxation levels. The higher an activity is taxed, the less of it there is.
      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    30. Re:Black Market by FLEB · · Score: 1

      With proper marketing and a sufficiently undiscriminating customer base, sure. Just watch out for regional designation trademarks (or whatever they're called).

      --
      Information wants to be free.
      Entertainment wants to be paid.
      You just want to be cheap.
    31. Re:Black Market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I'll just give my perspective on this. I've been fortunate in my business and have made a lot of money. I very much like having the option of walking into a clinic and not only being able to afford whatever I want but actually having the ability to legally get it done right then and there.

      In summation, I couldn't imagine living in some country where I walk into a doctor's office with a blank check and am told basically, your money's no good, sign your name at the bottom of this long long list. My next stop would be the airport, passport in hand.

      I understand that for poor people, this is not an option. But, then again, I used to be poor. I made a conscious choice to correct that problem. Not everybody can do that but many can, they just choose not too. For those that can't, I'm all about the subsidies. If your mentally retarded, physically disabled, too old, too young, whatever. But if you are an able bodied, reasonably intelligent adult, opportunity is out there. That is all.

    32. Re:Black Market by Mark_MF-WN · · Score: 1
      It's funny that one of the few examples of a monopoly that wasn't a clear-cut disaster for the people is also one that the US split up. The US is odd that way -- Canada, by contrast, tends to tolerate monopolies unless they are causing problems.

      I'd guess that Canada may just be lucky in that any money that a corporation might spend to manipulate a government will invariably be spent on the American government, rather than Canada's. As a result, the US tends to get stuck with the very worst in government toadying towards business special interests (at least the worst as far as Democracies go -- see "Fascism" for further information on just how ridiculous business manipulation of politics can get). The governments in America's immediate shadow are left in a position to be much more sane about whether they bust up a monopoly or just keep a watchful eye on it to keep it honest. That, of course, is always the peril of being the biggest show in town; you attract all of the negative attention.

      American is Internet Explorer -- a big moderately functional package that attracts all of the attention of those with a mind to find exploits in the system. Canada and Mexico get to slink by as Mozilla and Opera (decide for yourself which is which) -- the holes might be there, but no one is looking for them because all eyes are on the big dog. So they come off looking relatively good, if a tad obscure and unpopular.

    33. Re:Black Market by b.burl · · Score: 1

      You are 100% wrong. Read up on anti-trust laws and the case study of Standard Oil's business practises.

    34. Re:Black Market by b.burl · · Score: 1

      There is none sadder than the willfully blind. Which am talkshow do you host btw?

    35. Re:Black Market by b.burl · · Score: 1

      Tv is an issue about culture. There is a reason foreign owned media is verbotten and canadian content encouraged. You might not agree with it, but the issue is a lot deeper then you think. MRI's, sure you have to wait if you want it for free, but you can still pay for one if you really want it now, it just requires a plane ticket. And the 'rain storm' was a once in hundred year dealio, and water filtration IS subject to environmental upheavals. Using that as somekind of reason to slam our country is just stupid. How would a private water company have prevented the 'rain storm' or its effects. (water tx requires sediment tanks and they can be overwhelmed, its just they way the technology works).

    36. Re:Black Market by b.burl · · Score: 1

      How about if you bumb the maximum wage up to a million? How many workers will be quitting two months into the new year then?

    37. Re:Black Market by orasio · · Score: 1

      "IP" exists _only_ due to government intervention.
      For example, Copyright is an exclusive distribution contract with the government. If the government didn't offer that deal, copyright, and distribution monopolies based on it, would not exist.

    38. Re:Black Market by orasio · · Score: 1

      Which would ironically be contrary to the spirit of capitalism.
       
        Pure capitalism has no spirit. It's exactly that, the lack of regulation, thus, the lack of an intentional direction. The thing that would happen if governments didn't do anything. They are something like a natural state of affairs. There is no intention behind capitalism.
    39. Re:Black Market by zacronos · · Score: 1

      Or, taking the other responder's idea a little further, set it at some higher amount than $50k (maybe $100k) but instead of taxing 100% past that, you tax at 80% and prohibit tax credits or deductions from reducing your tax liability below 80% of your post $100k income? In other words, you add a new, fairly simple tax rule that tells you to calculate your income + social security + whatever taxes as you do now, and also calculate 80% of your income minus $100k. Your tax liability is the larger number.

      Think $100k is too low? Fine, make it $500k. Both the percent and the starting point could be tweaked so that there is still some incentive to work more if you want to earn more, but overall yes we discourage people from making tons of money. You will be hard-pressed to convince me anyone "needs" to make more than $500k a year, and I do think that sort of thing should be deterred. Taxing it at 80% would have the twin advantages of deterring ridiculous incomes to a large extent and increasing government income where it's not deterred.

      Just in case you are wondering, I think that such high incomes should be deterred for multiple reasons, but one of which is the opportunity benefit -- anyone or any company deterred from giving $2M of income to someone since they would only make $380k off it (using the $100k/80% rule) is still going to have that money to spend. Maybe they only give $1M to the person, and then $100k to 10 other people. Voila, we're not just cutting down the largest incomes, we're also encouraging many lower incomes to increase.

  10. Re:correction - "DRM-free machine" by camperdave · · Score: 1

    Is that DRM Free, as in sans DRM, or DRM-Free as in DRM that you don't have to pay for?

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  11. irony by oohshiny · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's kind of ironic that China should restore free enterprise and free market competition by providing an alternative to the artificial DVD oligopoly.

  12. The Chinese have a chance by elucidnation · · Score: 1

    We may see the Chinese embrace open source, in part because it is more in tune with the communitarian nature of their society, but primarily because it will give their mass maunfacturers a competitive edge. There is a built in tension between hardware manufactures and content providers---the easier it is for a platform to share content, the more consumer appeal that platform has. Embracing royalty free formats is in keeping with the open source philosophy----even if their motives are entirely opportunistic.

    1. Re:The Chinese have a chance by shmlco · · Score: 1

      "We may see the Chinese embrace open source..."

      Why the heck do people always have to "embrace" open source? Why can't they just use it? What kind of sick love-fest are you guys running here? ;)

      --
      Any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.
    2. Re:The Chinese have a chance by tigga · · Score: 1
      Why the heck do people always have to "embrace" open source? Why can't they just use it? What kind of sick love-fest are you guys running here? ;)

      It's just a religion, nothing new...

  13. G'luck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The consumer wont buy any DVD player if there is no content. And since Sony owns a bunch of movie studios, g'luck

    1. Re:G'luck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The consumer wont buy any DVD player if there is no content. And since Sony owns a bunch of movie studios, g'luck

      We're talking about China. I'm sure there will be plenty of content, even of Sony "owned" movies. It'll just be pirated.

  14. Good Idea But... by Swimport · · Score: 1

    Even if 25% of the installed dvd players supported this it wouldnt be enough for many companies to release products using the format. I would however love to see a royalty free format. Every time I buy a dvd player, dvd software, or even a movie im paying a royalty. Enough is enough. They should focus on a next generation format. With their large percentage of the manufacturing base, they could have a lot influence. I cant believe im on China's side for once.

  15. Nation-states?? by posterlogo · · Score: 1

    What is this, the pre-20th century or something? Nowadays, we call them "COUNTRIES".

    1. Re:Nation-states?? by hey! · · Score: 1

      Nope. Countries -- states -- nations. All different things. One is geographic, the other political, the other cultural.

      Sorry, we were being pedantic here, weren't we?

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    2. Re:Nation-states?? by dark-nl · · Score: 1

      But China is not a nation-state :) It encompasses several distinct nations.

  16. Are disks readable on Data DVD readers? by billstewart · · Score: 1
    There are different kinds of backward compatible out there
    • Can you play existing DVDs on an EVD player? (No, they're not paying the royalties for the codec, and maybe other components.)
    • Can an EVD player read the data format for existing DVDs so you can send the data to a computer that has codecs? (Probably not, but maybe?)
    • Can you install new firmware, either by downloading or plugging in a chip, to add new data or codec functions in the future and stay forward-compatible? (If they're smart, yes, because somebody will leak the codecs and formats to make it DVD-backward-compatible :-)
    • Can you play EVD disks on a DVD player? (Presumably the player won't have the codecs, though some may have royalty-free codecs.)
    • Can you read EVD disks as data on a DVD player, so your computer can play EVDs using software codecs? (That's the second interesting question - it makes it possible to sell EVDs to a market where people don't have EVD players.)
    • If most of the EVDs are in Chinese, does it matter that the only players are in China or sold mailorder to overseas Chinese speakers? (Probably not.)
    • If the point of royalty-free formats is to make the players cheaper, will $20 external EVD players be cheap enough that anybody who wants to play EVDs will buy a player along with their first EVD disks?
    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
    1. Re:Are disks readable on Data DVD readers? by hummassa · · Score: 1

      There are different kinds of backward compatible out there
      • Can you play existing DVDs on an EVD player? (No, they're not paying the royalties for the codec, and maybe other components.)
      As you said, no, the EVD players don't have the codecs.

      Can an EVD player read the data format for existing DVDs so you can send the data to a computer that has codecs? (Probably not, but maybe?)

      Yes, no reason why not... an EVD is physically a DVD, with the same UDF filesystem on it, but with the movie in a different format (DVD = video/audio in MPEG-2 encoding; EVD = video in VP6 encoding, audio in EAC encoding).

      Can you install new firmware, either by downloading or plugging in a chip, to add new data or codec functions in the future and stay forward-compatible? (If they're smart, yes, because somebody will leak the codecs and formats to make it DVD-backward-compatible :-)

      This is a manufacturing thing. This is possible, even with DVDs players today (I know my Philips does that).

      Can you play EVD disks on a DVD player? (Presumably the player won't have the codecs, though some may have royalty-free codecs.)

      Yes, my Philips DVD player that has a lot of codecs in it possibly can play EVDs right now.

      Can you read EVD disks as data on a DVD player, so your computer can play EVDs using software codecs? (That's the second interesting question - it makes it possible to sell EVDs to a market where people don't have EVD players.)

      Yes, no problem.

      If most of the EVDs are in Chinese, does it matter that the only players are in China or sold mailorder to overseas Chinese speakers? (Probably not.)

      I don't get the point of this question.

      If the point of royalty-free formats is to make the players cheaper, will $20 external EVD players be cheap enough that anybody who wants to play EVDs will buy a player along with their first EVD disks?

      Yes, I suspect so.

      --
      It's better to be the foot on the boot than the face on the pavement. ~~ tkx Kadin2048
    2. Re:Are disks readable on Data DVD readers? by Anonymous+McCartneyf · · Score: 1

      "...will $20 external EVD players be cheap enough that anybody who wants to play EVDs will buy a player along with their first EVD discs?" (emphasis mine)
      If not, I'm sure those people can still get an EVD player at Rent-A-Center for $1 a month. Or they'll wait for the clearance sale--"75% off!"

      --
      There is a fine line between recklessness and courage... -- Paul McCartney
    3. Re:Are disks readable on Data DVD readers? by billstewart · · Score: 1
      The reason there's a question about whether the EVD readers can read the data formats for DVD disks is that the codecs aren't the only part of the system with either patents or copyrights or other intellectual property attached - if you remember the whole DVDCCA mess and DVD Jon et al. getting harassed for doing Linux DVD readers in the open, there's licensing there too. (I don't know if that part has royalties or just terms&conditions, or if it's available separately from licensing the codecs, or if the licensing part only applies to the audio section, or for that matter if you could do the mechanical and electrical parts without having to license the data formats; the whole thing was ugly enough I didn't keep track.)


      But if the mechanicals and raw data formats can be done without too much licensing baggage, so EVDs can be sort of compatible, then I'd be surprised if the things aren't either chippable or downloadable, just as most Europeans I've talked to about DVD players say that stores selling DVD players over there pretty much always give you a nudge-nudge-wink-wink about asking them for the chip to defeat region coding. On the other hand, if they can't make compatible mechanicals and raw data formats, it may not end up being practical to have backward-compatibility-hacking in EVD players, and similarly, EVDs might not end up being readable on computer DVD players.


      The point of the EVDs-in-Chinese question was mostly that even if they're not forward compatible so you can't read EVD disks on DVD players, there's enough Chinese market that they may get their economies of scale anyway.

      --

      Bill Stewart
      New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  17. It's the region-free players, stupid! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The only solution, which I don't want to consider, is to pirate. "

    I guess you must think slashdot is full of idiots (you may be right), but here are some region-free players

  18. Academic by Kev_Stewart · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Haier is a fairly arrogant company to start with. I once found a critical safety defect in one of their refrigerators, yet they wouldn't accept it until I'd sent them a video demonstrating the obvious defect. That was a few years ago when I was inexperienced at dealing with Chinese companies.

    What I didn't know back then was that Chinese businessmen will often make bold statements knowing full well that it's bullshit. He knows that YOU know it's bullshit too - yet it's considered rude to call him on it.

    I think there's an element of that in the statement about using their own DVD format. It's just a spot of chest beating IMO. Many Chinese business people that I've spoken to seem to think that pretty much all disc formats will be dead in a few years anyway.

    In my case, the dear old DVD is merely a way of transporting the movie from the store to my hard drive. Once it's on there I never open the DVD case again. As hard drives get bigger and cheaper it's easy to imagine more people storing/viewing their movies this way.

    1. Re:Academic by Charcharodon · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Stop imagining, it's already happening now. I've set up over 20 media computers this year for friends. Just did one today, and have three more that are waiting for me to come over and show them how it's done.

      Even outside of the PC things are happening in the now. The next gen Tivo's are on the way, that are not only set up to record scheduled shows, but download and store on demand content as well.

      The new format war was already being won while HD-DVD and Blue-ray were still in the crib. I can see media centers going mainstream once 1TB drives hit the $200 mark sometime next year.

    2. Re:Academic by jamar0303 · · Score: 1

      They're too used to dealing with things the Chinese way- you have to yell and swear at them until they cave (or bring the media down on them- that works quite well here in their native market). For that matter, here it's possible (and almost customary) to haggle on prices for things like that (if you can't get a discount on that fridge, get some free stuff thrown in) so if you got it at full price you were probably taken for a ride.

      --
      OSx86 FTW
    3. Re:Academic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "What I didn't know back then was that Chinese businessmen will often make bold statements knowing full well that it's bullshit."

      Because white people never do that.

    4. Re:Academic by evilviper · · Score: 1
      The new format war was already being won while HD-DVD and Blue-ray were still in the crib. I can see media centers going mainstream once 1TB drives hit the $200 mark sometime next year.

      Let me know when hard drives + bandwidth are as cheap as a little round piece of plastic with a metallic coating.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    5. Re:Academic by Charcharodon · · Score: 1

      Let me know when hard drives + bandwidth are as cheap as a little round piece of plastic with a metallic coating. HD's are already alot cheaper than a DVD's in space, money, and transfer time. The only advantage a DVD has is once it's scratched up it makes a nice coaster or frisbee.

      Oh yeah HD are already available, are continuously being upgraded and are not made by any companies that end in -ONY, which will always make them cheaper overall.

      The only way DVD's are currently cheaper than HD is in price, but there are many things more valuable than money, such as time and convience. Try crunching the numbers on how many DVD's would be needed to replace 1TB of harddrive space and what that would take up in physical space, not to mention the shear amount of time needed to burn them.

      Sorry DVD's don't even come close and things such as Blue Ray aren't even available in any real quantities. When they are they are even more expensive than HD's for the media, much less cost of the player.

      So exactly how are little pieces of plastic cheaper than HD again?

    6. Re:Academic by Anonymous+McCartneyf · · Score: 1

      I can understand why you don't want to burn 1 terabyte worth of DVDs. But why can't you buy DVDs that have the films already on them? I know, they aren't as useful as large HDs of films, what with all the FBI/Interpol warnings. But if you live anywhere near a store that sells DVDs, they should be cheaper and faster to get than downloading through bandwidth.
      Or are you using "mpaaradar"?

      --
      There is a fine line between recklessness and courage... -- Paul McCartney
    7. Re:Academic by Charcharodon · · Score: 1
      Yes buying them is faster, heck mail order is usually faster than downloading, they did a study for fun not long ago comparing the bandwidth of the postal service to the internet based on AOL and Netflix discs being mailed. It was quite the eye opener on the potential bandwidth of physical media. I don't remember the exact results, but what it ammounted to was more data was moving through the postal service in a month than what was moving around the internet in a year, and that was just DVD's and CD's. Imagine what it would be with larger media.

      I think discs still are a great way to move it around, but I don't think anyone is actually going to be using them to play anything back in a year or two. So the whole concept of "the next great thing" in media format is kind of pointless. We could have HD 1080p movies on DVD's now if they really wanted it, sure a movie would be on 3-5 discs(yes I realize HD needs more bandwidth to play than DVD is capable of delivering), but it's not the format that's important just how portable and usefull it is. Due to the advancements in playback and storage, disc aren't good for much of anything beyond being the transfer mechanism to get it to your media center. Keeping DVD's around as your playback media is a waste of space.

      Now as far as downloading movies I think that is going to displace the disc even faster than the crappy hardware being peddled by HD-DVD and Blue-ray. It will start with TV. As it is now it doesn't take that long to download a fairly good quality copy of a tv, something that could be easily accomplished on a modest connection while you are at work or school. As far as the costs go for bandwidth, the only reason they are high is because of the foot dragging by communication companies. It's much easier and more profitable if they can keep it priced as if it were a scarce. I live in England at the moment and the prices here are cheaper for faster connections than in the States simply because have litterally dozens of choices for ISP's in all the major markets. Even out here in farm country I have a good 4-5 to pick from. Where in the states you'd be lucky to have more than 1-3 or two choices even in major cities. I'm paying less for a 4mb connection than I was for a 1.5mb connection back in California. For a measely 10 pounds more, about $19 US, I could jump up to a 10mb connection something that you just won't find in the States. A 10mb connection would easily make short work of anything but the Lord of the Rings super duper secret director's extra extended cut trillogy in HD 1080p.

      There is no reason not to offer IP delivered content on demand. It's already happening through the cable companies, it's only a matter of time before it is everywhere.

    8. Re:Academic by evilviper · · Score: 1
      HD's are already alot cheaper than a DVD's in space, money, and transfer time.

      A little physical space isn't much of a premium.

      "money"? How is that different than "price" which you mention below?

      Transfer time is a non-issue, as I can't watch my movies much faster than realtime anyhow.

      Oh yeah HD are already available, are continuously being upgraded and are not made by any companies that end in -ONY, which will always make them cheaper overall.

      In no way are hard drives cheaper than even the latest disc formats.

      And that's JUST the drives. You've got to get the movie ONTO the drive somehow, so you're either buying the disc anyhow, or you're paying ridiculous ammounts of money for a high-speed connection, which (you can't use for just about anything else, since it'll be constantly busy downloading movies). I can buy 100s of discs for what you'd pay to download 10, and I'll have mine in about 5 minutes.

      The only way DVD's are currently cheaper than HD is in price, but there are many things more valuable than money, such as time and convience.

      You're right. Discs are faster AND more convenient than hard drives. That they're so much cheaper is just a big plus.

      So exactly how are little pieces of plastic cheaper than HD again?

      In every single possible way?
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  19. Re:correction - "DRM-free machine" by From+A+Far+Away+Land · · Score: 2, Funny

    sans DRM, and not DRM made by a company named Sans.

  20. Open source EVD codec? by jelle · · Score: 3, Interesting

    My main question is, is there an open source EVD codec available anywhere? A 'Royalty free codec' with the goal of fast widespread adaptation should be accompanied by such a thing, shouldn't it?

    --
    --- Hindsight is 20/20, but walking backwards is not the answer.
    1. Re:Open source EVD codec? by ettlz · · Score: 2, Informative
    2. Re:Open source EVD codec? by Aladrin · · Score: 1

      After a little research, it appears Theora is probably able to play on EVD players, but Theora is a superset of VP3 and will eventually contain information that will make it not play on EVD players.

      --
      "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
    3. Re:Open source EVD codec? by Wesley+Felter · · Score: 1

      Theora != VP6.

    4. Re:Open source EVD codec? by evilviper · · Score: 3, Informative
      My main question is, is there an open source EVD codec available anywhere? A 'Royalty free codec' with the goal of fast widespread adaptation

      The AVS codec has been available in ffmpeg/libavcodec (and so, any program that uses libavcodec) for quite a while now.

      It is NOT, however, royalty free. They intend to keep the fees lower than other codecs, but that's all.

      For royalty-free video, you have a few to choose from:

      Dirac/Snow: Very impressive codecs at the range of bitrates (slightly better than even h.264), but even more CPU-intensive, and both (sadly) perpetually unfinished.

      MPEG-1: actually does quite well with modern encoders like libavcodec... At lower bits/pixel rates (eg. 720x480 @600k) , it often looks better than MPEG-4/Divx. At higher bitrates, MPEG-4 slowly starts looking a little bit better than MPEG-1, but it's still rather competitive. It's only near DVD bitrates that better MPEG-4 encoders look obviously better (sharper details) than MPEG-1 (where MPEG-2 will likely outperform MPEG-4, anyhow).

      VP3/Theora: Blocky, distorted mess, in most expert opinions (IMHO, that's slightly harsh). Does okay at very low resolution (320x240) and tiny bitrates (~300k), but not impressively well even then.

      MJPEG/NUV: High-speed, but needs extremely high bitrates to be watchable at all. Competitive, perhaps, with MPEG-2 at DVD bitrates.

      Royalty-free audio codecs:

      MPC/MP+/Musepack: Very good quality, and very fast. Lowest selectable bitrate ~60kbps. Not yet designed to fit in a A/V container with video (not packetized) but can be done in non-standard, non-compatible ways.

      Vorbis: CPU-intensive. Mostly good quality, but completely blows-up on certain sounds. Uncommonly supported. Fits in very few containers (Ogg and MKV).

      MP2: Supported everywhere. Anything that can play MP3 can play MP2 as well. Pretty good at 128kbps and above. Surpasses MP3 quality when approaching 192kbps.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    5. Re:Open source EVD codec? by Comsn · · Score: 1
      say what? mpeg4 asp is not royalty free. the mpeg-la group owns it.

      MPC, also known as Musepack (formerly MP+), a derivative of MP2;

      and

      Thomson Consumer Electronics controls licensing of the MPEG-1/2 Layer 3 patents in many countries, including the United States, Japan, Canada and EU countries. Thomson has been actively enforcing these patents.
    6. Re:Open source EVD codec? by evilviper · · Score: 1
      mpeg4 asp is not royalty free.

      I only mentioned MPEG-4/Divx in comparing it to MPEG-1 (which _is_ patent-free). What were you reading?

      MPC, also known as Musepack (formerly MP+), a derivative of MP2;

      "MP2"... MP3 != MP2

      Thomson Consumer Electronics controls licensing of the MPEG-1/2 Layer 3 patents in many countries

      MPC is NOT a derivitive of MP3.

      If you would have done the most basic search, you'd have found detailed reports of MPC's former and current patent-status.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  21. Pastel-states?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Only for those who think all three are distinctly seperate entities.

    1. Re:Pastel-states?? by Cheapy · · Score: 1

      It should be noted, that they all are distinctly separate entities.

      --
      Would you kindly mod me +1 insightful?
  22. Please explain how it this oping to succeed? by I_LV_MSFT · · Score: 0

    To avoid paying royalties (the major goal behind the format), the players should not inclue support for MPEG2 etc. So you will need to buy the new EVD media, because old DVDs will not work.

    If there is no Encription (often called DRM here), there will be no support from any holywood studio. What am I supposet to play on this glorious device?

    Overall the format possibly has a chance in countries with large Indie movie production like India and China, but I dont see it working in US/Canada/Europe (no offence whoever I missed).

    1. Re:Please explain how it this oping to succeed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was possibly the faggiest comment in the whole thread.

  23. Extremely good argument against closed media.. by binary_ftw · · Score: 1

    If the shift away from the DVD format happen as soon as 2008 (No chance, since the demand would still be strong for years) it would illustrate in an excellent way how closed media formats are really risky to 'invest' in. The last shift were hardly noticeable, since VHS were.. well.. nobody in their right mind had 300+ movies lying around. And the VHS as a media, well.. it had room for improvement. Right now there's no immediate reason that people would accept that their shelf-loads of DVDs should not play on a next-generation player.

    If this went through, it'd really open some up some eyes.

    --
    analog < infinite binary (Heisenberg is with me on this one)
  24. EVD vs HD/Blu-ray DVD? by NekoYasha · · Score: 4, Informative

    The EVD "hype" has been here (in China, that is) for like, ages.

    It is interesting that though the Chinese media has a lot of news about EVD's being better than DVD and being a national pride (as present international standards are mostly made by western countries and companies, China desperately needs its own standards to be more powerful in the intl market), there are seldom any mention about how exactly is EVD better than other formats, i.e. the technical specs. Moreover since EVD is less known outside China (and maybe inside China too - the computer magazines here talks about Vista and Blu-ray and HD but seldom EVD) compared to western Hi-Def formats, I am made curious: how is EVD, and can it do 1080p?

    A quick search dug out a quite official-looking site for EVD: (Chinese only... apparently they have an English version, but the database is down. Note I'm not making any assurance that this is indeed the official site).

    From several articles on the site we can see that the EVD standard uses DVD discs (format D5 and D9) as media - wow, I didn't know that, no wonder never have I heard the data capacity of EVD -, supports 720p and 1080i (not as much as the western Hi-Def formats), and utilizes MPEG2 and ExAC (custom audio coding standard) as compression algorithms. And there is, indeed, a copy protection scheme.

    The site also metioned about a even lesser-known NVD and a Taiwan standard, FVD .

    When I first heard that they've made a format called EVD, I thought that "it's just 'DVD++'". Today I know that E officially stands for Enhanced. But to me, it's just DVD++.

    1. Re:EVD vs HD/Blu-ray DVD? by mikrorechner · · Score: 1

      ...and utilizes MPEG2 and ExAC (custom audio coding standard) as compression algorithms.

      I ask myself, what exactly is the advantage for China then? If they use MPEG2 vor video compression, they still have to pay royalties if they want to sell those players anywhere outside China.

      According to this, an MPEG2 decoder has a one-time licensing fee of $2.50. I couldn't find anything about the DVD standard itself - does anybody know how much the total license fee for a DVD player is?
      --
      "Oh, a lesson in not changing history from Mr I'm-my-own-Grandpa." - Dr Hubert Farnsworth
    2. Re:EVD vs HD/Blu-ray DVD? by evilviper · · Score: 1
      I am made curious: how is EVD, and can it do 1080p?

      China's hype exceeds it's grasp. Their claims of AVS (their video codec--NOT MPEG-2) being better than h.264 while being computationally simpler, are the exact opposite of reality. The quality/bitrate is (AT BEST) slightly lower quality than MPEG-2, and all while being as CPU-intensive as h.264. That's not exactly a winning combination.

      Also, the AVS videos samples they've provided contain suspicously little noise, which is very atypical, and either indicates they did strong denoising before encoding (to make the codec look better) or the samples were hand-picked for their low noise, as being the best possible examples to make AVS look better.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  25. Re:Cheap hardware? by ShaneThePain · · Score: 0

    lets hear it for china. The only place where real progress for humanity is being made is in: a NON-democratic country. Democracy is inherently progress-stunting. There ARE alternatives. China is on a greater path.

    --
    Fascism is the greatest political ideology ever conceived. Sorry.
  26. Oops... feel free to mod me down. by NekoYasha · · Score: 1

    Didn't know Slashdotters have already been introduced to FVD (which, by the way, looks like FUD - not that matters...).

  27. EVD vs DMCA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At any rate, if we're making our backups from EVD (i.e., you purchased the DVD but you make a copy of the EVD for your backup) then we aren't in violation of the DMCA, right?

  28. Re:Cheap hardware? by jaymzru · · Score: 3, Informative

    I hope this is a joke. China is one of he worst offenders against humanity on earth.

  29. As a current resident of China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I can't believe that the EVD is going anywhere. In Beijing, at least, there are DVD hawkers on every corner, and 2 or more DVD stores in most neighborhoods. It could be that my own precious Chinese made DVD player (which plays everything- any region DVD, VCD, CD, DivX, MPEG-2 and 4...) also plays EVD. But considering that the main source of DVDs on the market are foreign films, pirated as bit-to-bit copies off the original DVDs, I doubt that many new films will appear in the new format. (Actually, you can also get original DVDs meant for the Korean, American or Japanese Market that have failed their quality control, and get routed to the Chinese stores. But they usually start skipping at some point...)

    There are factions within the Chinese government who want to force industry to follow international copyright law. But there are also nationalist factions that consider it a loss of face, or a waste of perfectly good source material. I would guess that it was the nationalists who were touting EVD over DVD, as a way of neutralizing the issue, and possibly as a way of reducing foreign cultural and economic influence.

    The long and short of it is, if the government (the guys that matter) actually decides to do this, it will happen, overnight. If only some faction within the government is pushing it, it will only amount to propaganda.

    1. Re:As a current resident of China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I live here too, and thats pretty much total shite.

      As a not unrelated aside, hdtv encodes are all coming from China, look at the 1080i torrent sites.
      Its China thats driving the market on that right now.

  30. watch next week by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The high level economic talks with the US and china which are going on right now are down the shitter, bad. I know this news from the past couple days barely registers with the "gaming" crowd here, but the adults who watch things can verify what I am alleging, at least the signs are there. There is NO happy news coming out of those talks now, none, because china has everyone by the short and curlies now-something they didn't 20 years ago but DO now. china is sitting on over a trillion bucks which *they don't freekin want anymore* because they don't trust it anymore. Everyday they sit on it it drops in value, a huge amount, and no one outside a few fed governors knows how much realistically. And to top it off the dimocraps are making huge noises in public about slapping huge tariffs on everything from china in the new year (20 years too damn late to make any sort of difference at all now because they already shipped the factories and machine tools out. Do people understand that yet? Gone, out the door, buh bye!Idiots.) The buck is gonna tank next week, start a much bigger fall, as china divests into precious metals and tangibles like energy supplies, weapons, food, raw materials-anything they can get their hands on to get rid of that stuff. The wall street pirate shills and the Fed will go secret double overtime printing up more IOUs and propping up the phony stock market with worthless paper purchases, like they have been doing, post all sorts of feel good soothing sounding articles. Morons. Did you catch the latest all the really big guys are bailing out of the market? Only putting back one dollar for every 63 they are pulling out? CLUE TIME.

    Me, dumping more Fed notes (mostly the rest of my stash) into PMs as soon as I can monday when my broker opens. Probably gonna restock the pantry and score some more ammo too, just because. I have seen humans in emergency OH SHIT THIS SUCKS situations, the veneer of civilization is quite thin. Quite. I may try to lock in a price tomorrow, watching the news tonight late for some more clues. I bet the canuckistanian dinar tanks along with the fednote, just a smidgen slower because you guys asre sitting on a lot of nice raw materials. Play it smart, canada will be a powerhouse into the next century. go for the fast profit now and you'll go broke and be serfs for your new overlords, the ones who speak english as a second language, and no I don't mean the quebeccers.

    Bottom line-Worrying about stupid hollywood movie players is such a *minor* concern right now. It's right up there with wondering who the next "TV Champ" is in big time wrestling. People are going to really need to get their priorities straight as this crash unfolds. If people need to get shipments of electronics or other manufactured items in to keep their businesses running they better do it real soon now.

    1. Re:watch next week by cunina · · Score: 1

      My advice to you: take a deep breath, have a nap, and don't get your geopolitical and economic outlook from [i]Soldier of Fortune.[/i]

    2. Re:watch next week by Prune · · Score: 0, Troll

      your new overlords, the ones who speak english as a second language, and no I don't mean the quebeccers.

      I'll take Chinese overlords over the Frogs anytime.

      --
      "Politicians and diapers must be changed often, and for the same reason."
  31. There already IS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The format is NOT VP6 like the old EVD, this one uses a format called "avs". There is currently a codec in beta called "CoreAVS" that can already play these streams!

    1. Re:There already IS! by jelle · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the tip. Found it, but it's actually OpenAVS not CoreAVS at sf.net

      http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group _id=168676

      --
      --- Hindsight is 20/20, but walking backwards is not the answer.
  32. Free Market by Mark_MF-WN · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I think you're confusing free markets with capitalism. Capitalism is all about monopolies, corruption, and destroying the competition. The entire idea is to take everything you can at any cost. Free markets are a different beast, and are a bit closer to what western nations (and even supposedly "communist" nations, these days) strive for. Capitalism is what we used to do back in the days of wondrous events like potato famines and great depressions.

    Going to mexico to buy things that are banned in America? Isn't that evidence that things are fucked? And it's not just cigars; we also import resources (nickel and cobalt, apparently) from Cuba, we can travel there on vacation (which a remarkable number of people I know have done), etc. We actually TRADE with Cuba, in a serious sense. America, meanwhile, posts security guards in the American zones of airports to make sure that Americans aren't trying to board flights to Cuba from other countries. Nice control-freak government you've got there. You should be proud that your ancestors died so that your government can decide where you go on vacation. I'm sure they would think that taking a British cannon round to the face was totally worthwhile to guarantee that their descendants would someday be sent to jail for duplicating a DVD (despite it being explicitly permitted in the constitution) or sharing (which the bible explicitly encourages, if you happen to think that the bible warrants anything other than scornful curiosity) artistic works.

    There's a list as long as your arm of tariffs imposed by the US to protect American workers from having to actually compete with the rest of the world. A remarkable number of products can't be exported at all, or only to a handful of friendly nations. Many types of software are completely banned in the US (it's interesting how most Linux distros have a "non-US" repository for software that Americans believe will destroy their economy and completely unhinge people's morality).

    Canada has some serious issues regarding free markets; but we're nowhere near as schizoid about it as Americans. At the very least we don't run around screaming about the evils of communism, trumpeting ourselves as the saviours of capitalism, and then prohibit people from engaging in basic reasonable forms of trade. The fact that America violates the free trade agreements that the US itself agitated for ... pretty much says it all.

    1. Re:Free Market by Vinegar+Joe · · Score: 0

      "Going to mexico to buy things that are banned in America? Isn't that evidence that things are fucked? Canada has some serious issues regarding free markets; but we're nowhere near as schizoid about it as Americans." Be sure and remember that the next time you want to buy a gun in Canaduh.

      --
      "The average reporter we talk to is 27 years old......They literally know nothing." - Ben Rhodes
    2. Re:Free Market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In Australia, a majority of us a) don't see the need to be able to buy a gun, b) are worried about the amount of deadly force that a gun places in the hands of say, a kid that gets picked on at school, and c) uhh, no those two reasons are good enough.

      We can still buy a gun if we REALLY want to, but since not that many criminals/anti-social people run around with guns here, we generally don't need or want one. While a Cuban cigar may knock you off your feet, it's nowhere near as deadly/destructive as a gun. Why would you want a gun?

    3. Re:Free Market by Mark+Maughan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Canadians have more guns per capita than Americans. You think they need better access or something?

    4. Re:Free Market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ever shot one?

    5. Re:Free Market by shadwstalkr · · Score: 1

      sent to jail for duplicating a DVD (despite it being explicitly permitted in the constitution)

      Being an American, I'm not too familiar with my nation's fundamental documents. Can you direct me to the DVD duplication clause in the US Constitution?

    6. Re:Free Market by Anonymous+McCartneyf · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Amendments 1, 9, and 10?
      (I recommend that, if you must copy DVDs, you save the secret css-smasher for movies over 28 years old. Pretend you're working under a semi-reasonable copyright law--14+14 or 28+28. There aren't as many originals of the 28-year-old films, and the MPAA gets angriest at people copying hot hits.)

      --
      There is a fine line between recklessness and courage... -- Paul McCartney
    7. Re:Free Market by Anonymous+McCartneyf · · Score: 1

      And no, I do not possess a secret css-smasher!

      --
      There is a fine line between recklessness and courage... -- Paul McCartney
    8. Re:Free Market by slysithesuperspy · · Score: 1
      I think you're confusing free markets with capitalism. Capitalism is all about monopolies, corruption, and destroying the competition. The entire idea is to take everything you can at any cost.
      I think you're confusing capitalism with state-controlled non-free market "capitalism". Capitalism is mainly about private property. It is where the people engage in trade because it is mutually beneficial, they would not trade if it was not! For example, I pay for some apples because the apples are more useful to me than the money I have. The shop owner has lots of apples so the money is more useful to them. People who are successful do not get money at the expensive of other people. Any thing that is not free-market is not capitalism. Corporatism is probably a better word. This is when people use the government to achieve their own means at the expense of others. For example, protectionism, tariffs and subsidies. These measures are not capitalistic, they are part of coercive "capitalism".
    9. Re:Free Market by cloricus · · Score: 1

      Yes. I'm Australian and one of my favourite sports is rifle shooting.

      I don't feel any need to own my own rifle (if I got more serious I'd get my own and stop using club rifles) as it is rather expensive to buy a good one and the odd Sunday of shooting doesn't warrent it when I have uni costs. Australians simply don't need guns or rifles in every day life. The criminals don't have them, insane people don't have them, and the police have to do so much paper work every time they fire a round that they would rather run 5km through muddy fields to crash tackle you than take a shot. I do how ever know where my cricket bat is at all times in my house.

      --
      I ate your fish.
  33. Re:Cheap hardware? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Word.

    Locking people up in prison without due process...
    Attacking countries under faulty intelligence...
    Killing hundreds of thousands of people by stoking an insurgency...
    Let's not mention throwing foreign nations into civil war.

    China is without a doubt on of the worst offenders
    against humanity on earth. ...It's just not THE worst.

  34. Where is the EVD Specification? No mention of DRM. by GodWasAnAlien · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I will believe it is a Royalty-Free, Open standard when I see it.
    I have seen some mention of China releasing the spec, but is that to vendors only?
    And is there really no DRM?
    I will buy an EVD player and some discs if they are HD, and the specs are open, and no effective DRM is used. After all, I want to play the discs in Linux or whatever future device I want.
    Otherwise, I'll stick with the last effectively-open standard, DVD.
    DRM or private specification is the path of the Laser Disc.

  35. Re:Cheap hardware? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and america is one of the worst culprits of war mongering on earth

    now let's try to link both statements to how that relates to new media formats.

  36. Royalty-Free DVD Format != Cheaper for Consumers by nighty5 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Just remember that this is all about the manufacturers and not the consumers.

    Whatever savings are made in the use of EVD or some such will be digested into a larger profit for the manufacturers.

    Not saying its a bad thing, at the moment the market is so competitive that manufacturers make an abysmal profit margin.

    Considering a large majority of the players are made in China, its no surprise.

    The biggest challenge for China isn't the technology for the politics behind it, with the very powerful corporations who own the rights to DVD will lobby to the governments to stop EVD from becoming anything important. Its all about the content, and the holders of it.

  37. It doesn't matter what it's about by HangingChad · · Score: 1

    No. This is an economic end-run around the DVD forum.

    Economics probably play a big part in the decision, but really it doesn't matter why they did. It's more significant they CAN do it. They make all our DVD players, who's going to tell them they can't? A country that owes them 100's of billions of dollars? Hahahaha! Right.

    I predicted this would happen years ago when we outsourced almost all our electronics manufacturing to the Asian rim, though I didn't see this coming. I'll bet the MPAA is reaching for the antacids tonight. Makes sense when you think about it. Also makes me wonder how many electronic components in our military hardware are manufactured in China or Korea.

    Hey, Microsoft, you're next! HAHAHAHAHA!

    --
    That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
  38. What, and blaspheme the Free Trade God? by Travoltus · · Score: 1

    Ban EVD from America? Won't someone think of the investors!

    Now here's an interesting math question.

    If the RIAA/MPAA bullet train shot out of Wall Street down the global Commerce Railway in 1997 and the Chinese EVD bullet train shot out of Beijing to careen down the Silk Road... ... how long will it be before these two trains collide?

    God, it's nice to see the Devil and Satan going mano y mano...

    --
    --- Grow a pair, liberals... stop letting the Republicans bully you!
  39. sell the lumber by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All the shiny white snow reflects heat back into space, trees in the north cause global warming.

  40. Re:Cheap hardware? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    According to Western studies on human rights offenses, yes. Fortunately for those nations that colonized the Western continents, these studies didn't begin until after wiping out the native populations.

  41. Vocabulary note? by Anonymous+McCartneyf · · Score: 1

    ...as far as I know there isnt another word for "unfortunate coincidence that is self-referring/self-generating"
    Maybe if we could extend the meaning of "catch-22," that'll help.
    (A catch-22 is an unfortunate effect, which may or may not be intended, that is self-referring and self-generating, usually in a paradoxical fashion.)

    --
    There is a fine line between recklessness and courage... -- Paul McCartney
  42. Accounting for progress... by hackwrench · · Score: 1

    Let me ask you this: would you rather have a $1000 debt, $100 other expenditures a month and $110 in income or $500 debt, $100 other expenditures and $95 a month?

  43. Re:Cheap hardware? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm assuming "China" is actually the "United States of America" given your four-line description.

  44. You could at least have visited Wikipedia... by hummassa · · Score: 1

    EVD and DVD are physically the same, and logically they share the same UDF file system. The only difference between them is the codec used to encode the movie... MPEG2 in the case of DVD and VP6+EAC in the case of the EVD.

    --
    It's better to be the foot on the boot than the face on the pavement. ~~ tkx Kadin2048
  45. YADF (Yet Another Disc Format) by Circlotron · · Score: 1

    And I suppose it's going to be a Purpl-Ray disc ;-)

  46. Re:Cheap hardware? by aurispector · · Score: 0

    And if the people of China don't like their government they can simply go to the polls and vote.

    --
    I have mod points. The reign of terror begins now.
  47. Re:Cheap hardware? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i've been voting against fucking bush every fucking time, but all the goddamn retards who think the universe was created in seven days, are breeding like rabbits, probably because they think that making sure every little sperm of theirs grows into another goddamn bush voter is more important than thousands of iraqis being bombed to bits, are outvoting me.

    the ability to vote does not guarantee good government.

  48. Re:Cheap hardware? by tigga · · Score: 1
    And if the people of China don't like their government they can simply go to the polls and vote.

    Ouch! That hurts!

  49. nation-states by perlchild · · Score: 1

    The submitter is more optimistic, asking: "Is this the future and the effective end of DRM -- to be taken and co-opted by nation-states?" Since the nation-states enforce many of the provisions of the DRM, at least those related to copyright provisions, and since also, they make laws to prohibit private parties from doing so(that would be vigilante), the nation-states are already on board, if not technically, co-opted for DRM. Now one of the nation-states, thinks the deal the others decided it would get is not good. Not sure it really qualifies as a new type of co-opt. It's basically a contract renegotiation, nothing to see here, except "Economic powerhouse wants a better deal, news at eleven!"
  50. libavcodec by DrYak · · Score: 1

    For decoding :

    according to the wikipedia article, libavcodec has decoding ability for VP6.

    For encoding :

    other /. have pointed out that Theora is VP3 based, can be asked to use a VP3-compatible mode and apparently can be played on a EVD player.

    Thus far, I counldn't find anything about a open source EAC implementation.

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
    1. Re:libavcodec by jelle · · Score: 1

      Ah, wikipedia, thanks for the tip... found it http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenAVS

      --
      --- Hindsight is 20/20, but walking backwards is not the answer.
  51. Black Market-Veterans Administration. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Perhaps we should be looking at sweden or denmark for our model healthcare."

    We don't need to do any such thing. We already have a good model right here. It's called the VA.*

    *And no it's not like the VA of old. It's not perfect, but then what health system is?

  52. CD Tax by Mark_MF-WN · · Score: 1

    Hey, the CD Tax is basically just a national subscription to a music download service called "The Internet". We pay a small fee on our media and get to download as much music as we like to fill that media up.

    Well, not really. But for all intents and purposes, that's how the levy plays out. It's just a shame that the levy monies don't actually go to artists, but rather to the CRIA or whatever the hell they're calling themselves these days.

  53. Why even bother by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why even bother with a whole new format of EVD over DVD? DVD has been around for a long time and all the movies are in that format, what advantage does the consumer get from EVD that would require them to buy a whole new player? Also lets not forget that DVD is at the ends of its use as we are now slowly being introduced to HD-DVD and Blueray.

  54. What's the point? by abertoll · · Score: 1

    Everything seems to play my video file formats these days anyway. Why come up with a new format for a physical disc? DVD's are going to go away anyhow.

    --
    "he drew his sword Ringil that glittered like ice... and he wounded Morgoth with seven wounds..."
  55. Distraction? by MikeFM · · Score: 1

    I'm reminded of the book Distraction where the Chinese, and others, effectively crush the economic power of the US by totally ignoring all estern copyrights, patents, etc and making the content available for free over the Internet. I think if China followed that example they could destroy DRM and make a killing in hardware and software. Start with the software version of the players first and release all the content and then when they've kicked the feet out from under the US they could set their own market standards - and consumers would love them.

    --
    At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
  56. Jon Lech Johansen et al: by hummassa · · Score: 1

    Their problem was with CSS -- the half-assed attempt at DRM existing in any commercial DVD these days. To make a DVD player that plays in linux, you'd have to pay royalties for (and be sworn to secrecy of) the codecs _and_ CSS. As Jon and others figured out how to decrypt the discs, they were perseuted by the DVDCCA.

    But the EVD contains _no_ attempt at DRM. Just the movie, unencrypted, in VP6 + EAC. So, any _current_ linux system with the codecs could just read the disc and play it. Now, IIRC VP6 is just a cousin of Theora. The spec is out in the open, but maybe _someone_ would have to pay royalties over it. And EAC was developed by the Chinese gov'mnt. So, it's possible that it is on public domain, but I can't guarantee it.

    --
    It's better to be the foot on the boot than the face on the pavement. ~~ tkx Kadin2048
  57. Let's be realistic here by Zontar_Thing_From_Ve · · Score: 1

    I know I'm asking a lot in asking Slashdot readers to be realistic, but I'll try. I find it amusing that a few people say "The US will just make it illegal to own such players." Really? What evidence do you have for this? It's not currently illegal to import foreign DVD players, even ones that have been modified to overlook region codes. You're giving Hollywood an awful lot of power here.

    Secondly, let's just say for sake of argument that there are no problems to import EVD players. I buy DVDs of Chinese movies from time to time because I like Asian cinema. Unfortunately, I don't speak any dialect of Chinese, which means I need subtitles. I hate to break it to you, but domestic Chinese DVDs typically don't have English subtitles, ever. Even if we are able to get the players, a good question is - Is there going to be anything we can play on it with English subtitles? Probably not. I have to get my DVDs from Hong Kong because most DVDs in Hong Kong have English subtitles. There might be some gee whiz factor to being the first guy you know to have an EVD player, but unless you speak Mandarin or Cantonese, it's not going to be of any practical use for you unless China starts releasing cheap versions of Hollywood movies in the format and to the best of my knowledge they have not done so.

    1. Re:Let's be realistic here by Mark_MF-WN · · Score: 1

      If the player does anything whatsoever to evade any kind of copy protection (including techniques as feeble as region coding), then it is illegal in the US courtesy of Bill Clinton's masterpiece -- the DMCA. So the US doesn't HAVE to ban Chinese players that work around region coding: they are already covered by existing legislation.

      But if you're not sure, look at what happens to US stores that try to sell DVD players and gaming systems with non-US region codes. They get DMCA complaints filed against them -- they are circumventing a copy protection scheme, and the DMCA forbids that.

      I hate to burst your bubble, but that really is how US is going. Too many Americans are too stupid to vote sanely, and so they end up with jackasses like that don't even read the legislation that they vote for. The PATRIOT act? The DMCA? Copyright term extension after copyright term extension? Pretending that Cuba is an enemy while still operating a military base there? Pulling out of Afghanistan and letting Bin Laden go free, just so that there would be troops available to be killed in Iraq for no reason? What kind of president pardons 140 people in one day? -- with that many, it's completely impossible that he put any thought into them. "Read my lips -- no new taxes", just two years before raising taxes. Lieing under oath before the supreme court? Selecting Dan Quayle as a running mate should be an automatic disqualification for holding office. Voting for a senile actor with an economic policy that whose plausibility is equated with magic? And let's not forget the man that oversaw the almost complete destabilization of the middle east and used taxpayer money to train fundamentalist terrorists in ... guess where -- Afghanistan (and Pakistan).

      American politics are easily the world's stupidest. I suppose that's a good thing in some ways, since it frees up all the sane, competent Americans to do real work like designing buildings, inventing new caffeinated treats, and finding news parts of the pizza in which to hide cheese. Still, you'd think that the American public would have at least marginally higher expections of their leaders.

  58. Re:EVD vs HD/Blu-ray DVD - What's the advantage? by NekoYasha · · Score: 1

    Simple. 1080p. On DVD media.
    Though they didn't realize that and keep trying to make EVD next-gen ^_-;

    Since I never heard anyone making standards concerning that, I'll assume EVD nicely fills the blank. We have SVCD for 480p on CD, but we don't have a similar standard for HD Video on legacy media (not counting HD-DVD, that's partly next-gen).

    And though you'll still have to pay fees for MPEG2, EVD is still a Chinese standard, and it's more "national dignity" than royalities. Plus China would also gets its share if EVD gets made into a int'l standard ^_^

  59. Whoops, It's 1080i, not 1080p by NekoYasha · · Score: 1

    Typo...