Slashdot Mirror


Revisiting the Physics of Buckaroo Banzai

serutan writes "Shortly before the release of 'The Adventures of Buckaroo Banzai: Across the 8th Dimension' in 1984, physicist Carl Sneider of U.C. Berkeley wrote a surprisingly interesting essay on the physics behind the movie. Since the essay is not widely available on the web and I could only find it in plain text, I posted a more readable HTML version on my site. Among the more interesting points Sneider makes are that the oscillation overthruster is the result of decades of research instead of the usual laboratory accident, and its development corresponds surprisingly well with the evolution of particle physics from the 1930s to the 80s."

163 comments

  1. Call It A Night, Cockboy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Slashdot only allows a user with your karma to bukkake Amanda Congdon 2 times per day (more or less, depending on moderation). You've already shared your bukkake with us that many times. Take a breather, and come back and see us in 24 hours or so.

    If you think this is unfair, please email posting@slashdot.org with your username. Let us know how many times you think you've bukkaked Amanda Congdon in the last 24 hours.

    1. Re:Call It A Night, Cockboy! by thc69 · · Score: 1

      Troll or not, that one was funny.

      (This post will be -1, Offtopic in no time.)

      --
      Procrastination -- because good things come to those who wait.
  2. Weird science by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Consider this, if you were to disrupt the particle behavior of an object so that its molecular bonds were permeable (since they are mostly made of space in the first place), you'd end up with the particle either collapsing on itself or blown to bits due to repulsive charges of neigbor particles. So Banzai wouldn't be able to fly through a mountain because the mountain would have collapsed upon itself. If he used the oscillator on himself and his ship, he wouldn't be able to recover from the damage.

    There's no doubt a lot of fun speculation to be made here, but if you're going to get your science from the web, it's best to stay away from Slashdot.

    1. Re:Weird science by IdahoEv · · Score: 5, Insightful

      On the other hand, not knowing much about particle physics, I had always assumed that the "science" in Buckaroo Banzai was just so much vapid technobabble.

      The fact that phrases like "intermediate vector bosons" tossed around in the movie actually have a connection of any sort at all to the issues being discussed puts BB already a few parsecs ahead of the typical S.F. junk that hollywood puts out.

      I'd always thought of BB as a camp fantasy classic. It's refreshing to know that the writers actually knew a little science and applied it, even if the final product was entirely improbable.

      --
      I stole this sig from someone cleverer than me.
    2. Re:Weird science by serutan · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Bear in mind that the article was written in the spirit of making the movie more enjoyable for people who are geeky enough to understand something about particle physics. The point was not to prove the feasibility of the oscillation overthruster, but to show that the science thread that runs through Buckaroo Banzai is a cut above standard movie technobabble. Sneider sort of addressed the mountain-collapsing issue by mentioning that the area of effect was small and short-lived, which is why the jet car had to travel 700 mph to keep up with it. It's all in fun.

    3. Re:Weird science by h4rm0ny · · Score: 4, Funny


      All the I know, is that The Adventures of Buckaroo Banzai (Across the Seventh Dimension), was the worst thing that I ever ever got in charades once. My sister got Jaws!

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    4. Re:Weird science by redblue · · Score: 1
      ...but if you're going to get your science from the web, it's best to stay away from Slashdot.
      Whereever you go, just not there.
    5. Re:Weird science by JabberWokky · · Score: 4, Interesting
      For what it's worth, if you like it, it's pretty much a direct lift from the classic Doc Savage, "Man of Bronze" pulps of the 30s and 40s. They weren't camp at the time, just from a different era, both in terms of literature and science. This was before physics was considered a major branch of science, so much of the wizz-bang new inventions are through the modern miracle of cutting edge chemistry. The characters were painted in bright, broad strokes, just like Buckaroo's sidekicks. One even carries around a long eared pig. Ethnic stereotypes and slurs weren't considered politically incorrect, and women had only had the ability to vote for ten years, so you have to take some things with an understanding of the era (i.e., if you're offended by such things, don't read 'em).


      Fun stuff, and highly recommended if you really like Science Fiction, as you can see where much of it came from. The Philip José Farmer take on the characters later in the century is a different beast (enjoyable, but not what we're talking about). Things like ice bullets and enzymes are the high tech weapons, plus a little dabbling in the (even at the time) classics of SF like hollow world theory. (There was an official Doc Savage movie that was done to be camp and sucked monkey balls).

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    6. Re:Weird science by hal2814 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "The point was not to prove the feasibility of the oscillation overthruster, but to show that the science thread that runs through Buckaroo Banzai is a cut above standard movie technobabble."

      Right. It's basically an inside joke. Most people think Buckaroo might as well be reversing the polarity of the neutron flow but a few people out there are really going to appreciate the effort put forth in creating the technobabblish scenes. And this sort of inside joke is a lot harder to pull off than throwing Gil Garrard's name into a Family guy episode.

    7. Re:Weird science by phoenixwade · · Score: 1

      "Right. It's basically an inside joke. Most people think Buckaroo might as well be reversing the polarity of the neutron flow but a few people out there are really going to appreciate the effort put forth in creating the technobabblish scenes. And this sort of inside joke is a lot harder to pull off than throwing Gil Garrard's name into a Family guy episode."

      Owch... First it's the pseudo-science technobabble, then it's "Family Guy".

      Next up "You're a 30 year old virgin living with Mom"

      I'm thinking I'll scrap my article on the science of "The Rocky Horror Picture Show" the audience is too brutal for me.

      --
      A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort.
    8. Re:Weird science by Ucklak · · Score: 1

      I loved that movie (Doc Savage) as a kid. I've only seen it on the spanish channels recently. As horrible as it is, I'd still like to see it again uncut and in english.

      --
      if you steal from one source, that is plagiarism, if you steal from many, well, that's just research.
    9. Re:Weird science by dpilot · · Score: 1

      I was glancing through the shelves of the video store the other day, and saw the "Doc Savage" movie there. One of these days when I have some lifespan to waste, I'd like to watch it. Any comments, to move it up or down on my priority list?

      --
      The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
    10. Re:Weird science by mbourgon · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Agreed on the Doc Savage reference. Buckaroo is an updated version of the old pulps - and the novelization of the movie (written by the script writer) is written like a pulp, complete with references to other adventures. FWIW, Evan, someone took the old movie and replaced the "songs" with the original (instrumental) John Philips Sousa tunes, and it makes the movie MUCH more watchable. Still not great, but it holds up a whole lot better this way than I would've imagined.

      Here's hoping that Raimi does wind up doing Doc (he recently got the rights to do movies based off of Street & Smith characters).

      --
      "Sometimes a woman is a kind of religion, she can save your soul & set you free from all your sins" - Bad Examples
    11. Re:Weird science by azuravian · · Score: 2, Funny

      Seems like that would have been hard in charades. Especially since you're trying to get people to guess a movie that doesn't even exist.

    12. Re:Weird science by paiute · · Score: 2, Informative

      Consider this, if you were to disrupt the particle behavior of an object so that its molecular bonds were permeable (since they are mostly made of space in the first place), you'd end up with the particle either collapsing on itself or blown to bits due to repulsive charges of neigbor particles. So Banzai wouldn't be able to fly through a mountain because the mountain would have collapsed upon itself. If he used the oscillator on himself and his ship, he wouldn't be able to recover from the damage.

      Going through matter like that is not a question of altering material behaviour in our three or four dimensions but taking advantage of other dimensions, up to the eighth. Buckaroo just used the next fifth through eighth dimension to make him and his car orthoganol to the first three or four dimensions.

      --
      If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
    13. Re:Weird science by slothman32 · · Score: 1

      doesn't even exist That's like on the Seinfeld episode "Bubble Boy".
      "I'm sorry it's the 'Moops'."
      --
      Why don't you guys have friends or journals?
    14. Re:Weird science by mengel · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Actually, as long as you did it for a really short period of time, the main effects would be:
      • particles would fall due to gravity (unless this effect also weakened gravity, but current theory wouldn't support that). But it would take a signifigant portion of a second for the particles to move much due to gravity.
      • particles vibrating due to brownean motion would possibly continue past each other possibly rearranging crystaline structures
      Once you turned the field back off, the forces between the atoms would reappear, and most of the molecules would snap back into place.

      If you left the field on a long time, yes you would possibly get a tunnel, as the particles would fall to the bottom of the region at which point their fields would turn back on, and there would possibly be... fusion? an explosion?

      Disclaimer: I am not a particle physicist, but I do talk with them in the cafeteria...

      --
      - "History shows again and again how nature points out the folly of men" -- Blue Oyster Cult, 'Godzilla'
    15. Re:Weird science by smellsofbikes · · Score: 1

      As an ex-laser-freak, I note that the physics and math in the background of "Real Genius" -- the stuff written on chalkboards and equipment on the benches -- was all good science. It was just the stuff in the foreground that sucked. I think that's often the case with movies intended for the camp/dork crowd, that they get people with some experience in the subject to at least try and prop it up.

      One of the things I found most charming about BB (which might be my favorite movie) was precisely the sense of time: how the Professor and Emilio Lizardo were using an electric trolley controlled by knife switches to get to the required velocity, BB was using a Ford F-series pickup with a jet, and the Black Lectroids had a full-on starship, all to do the same thing. I also loved the set design in the Black Lectroid starship, with cryrogenic fluids flowing through channels grown in the walls. That would've been a fun movie to work on.

      The script for the sequel (BB against the world crime league) exists, but it's really hard to get your hands on, and is kind of disappointing. I still hope it'll happen.

      --
      Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
    16. Re:Weird science by Piquan · · Score: 1

      reversing the polarity of the neutron flow

      He only said that ONCE, for crying out loud! Why does everybody make such a fuss?

    17. Re:Weird science by steveha · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you enjoy pulp adventures, I highly recommend Aaron Allston's "Doc Sidhe" books. Sadly there are only two so far, but I'm eager for more. The first one is available completely free from the Baen Free Library:

      http://www.baen.com/library/aallston.htm

      Enjoy!

      steveha

      --
      lf(1): it's like ls(1) but sorts filenames by extension, tersely
    18. Re:Weird science by hal2814 · · Score: 1

      The only one making a fuss here is you. Pertwee did say it and it is technobabble at its finest (or worst depending on your point of view). That's why I used it as an example. Reversing the polarity of a neutron? That's fantastic.

    19. Re:Weird science by The_Wilschon · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      This was before physics was considered a major branch of science
      Right, that old Isaac Newton chap, he was really just a minor player. Oh, and Mr. Faraday too. And Thomas Edison didn't make the incandescent lightbulb as a practical application of physics. Also, I'm very glad that Archimedes now knows that his screw for lifting water was a result from only a minor branch of science. And I almost forgot! Gallileo! He died for a minor branch of science. All this time, I've been thinking all these people were actually important! Silly me. </sarcasm>
      --
      SIGSEGV caught, terminating

      wait... not that kind of sig.
    20. Re:Weird science by TobyRush · · Score: 1

      To learn the physics behind the oscillation overthruster, it's easy... take the physics behind the flux capacitor, and turn them upside-down.

      --
      Sam! If you will let me be,
      I will try them.
      You will see.
    21. Re:Weird science by JoeRandomHacker · · Score: 1

      All the I know, is that The Adventures of Buckaroo Banzai (Across the Seventh Dimension), was the worst thing that I ever ever got in charades once. My sister got Jaws!
      Picking nits, it was the eighth dimension.
    22. Re:Weird science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Currently nitting picks and will be after you shortly.

    23. Re:Weird science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you are right, if you could concentrate a lot of these particles together and then turned the beam off you would get some nice fusion effects.

    24. Re:Weird science by mOdQuArK! · · Score: 1
      As an ex-laser-freak, I note that the physics and math in the background of "Real Genius" -- the stuff written on chalkboards and equipment on the benches -- was all good science.

      Given that it was filmed at Caltech, they probably just used whatever homework and equipment the students there were working on at the time (as long as it looked "sciency" enough).

    25. Re:Weird science by smellsofbikes · · Score: 1

      That's likely -- but the stuff in the background, even in the lecture room, was all not just physics, but laser physics: stuff you see in second-semester physical chemistry, three and four state metastability diagrams, stuff like that. Even at CalTech, that's probably on less than 5% of the blackboards at any given time.

      Then there's the awful plot. Sigh. I had such hopes...

      --
      Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
    26. Re:Weird science by aiabx · · Score: 2, Funny

      No wonder it was hard. You were confusing everyone with the wrong number of dimensions.

      --
      Just this guy, you know?
    27. Re:Weird science by The_Wilschon · · Score: 1

      Well, since I got modded as "flamebait" for my previous post, I'll try again with a little bit less sarcasm. Physics was most certainly considered a major branch of science by the 30s and 40s. It was considered a major branch of science long before chemistry and biology, in fact. Physics dates back all the way to Archimedes, Aristotle, Lucretius, and friends. Chemistry and biology did not so much as exist in the classical period. During that time, what we call science pretty much included physics and nothing else. For a slightly more contemporary example, in the 1800s, thermodynamics was king, and gave us things like the steam engine. The steam engine, of course, made possible the industrial revolution, which changed the world.

      I know this is a peripheral point to the entirety of your post, but as a physicist, I heartily object to this disregard for my field's history. Otherwise, a good and interesting post.

      --
      SIGSEGV caught, terminating

      wait... not that kind of sig.
    28. Re:Weird science by sgt_doom · · Score: 1
      When...Oh when..will they ever come out with a sequel to the Buckeroo????

      We can only hope..until we meet again, Third Dimension beings.

      This is brought to you from the Eight Dimension (said with the appropriate Jamaican Rasta accent....)

    29. Re:Weird science by RoloDMonkey · · Score: 1

      Doc Savage was a huge influence on modern fiction. I own a few of the original paperbacks, and one of my favorite bits of trivia is the fact that Doc had a "Fortress of Solitude" in the arctic years before the first Superman comic was printed.

      --
      Long live the Speaker Bracelet
      Rolo D. Monkey
    30. Re:Weird science by JabberWokky · · Score: 1
      Physics as a *distinct* branch of science. Einstein had done his tango in the field, but the mainstream world didn't really know about physics as a its own field or think it had any relevance to the world. That comes pretty much from Feynman's stories about the work on the Manhattan project and how they were treated. Of course physics the field existed through antiquity: ever since people noticed things fall down. Up through Newton and possibly Maxwell, it was all just lumped in under the general term "Science". As a distinct field it rose in mainstream awareness in the late 40s. At least according to Feyman's account.

      As always, I could be wrong, especially using a single source, but my statement is purely regarding the terminology used, not the body of knowledge. From what I understand from his account, what is now taught under the rubric of "physics" was just called "science" until recently, and it was not a common term in mainstream use (newspapers, dinner conversation, etc) until the late 40s. Of course physics itself pre-dates mankind.

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    31. Re:Weird science by jordi67 · · Score: 1

      "The script for the sequel (BB against the world crime league) exists, but it's really hard to get your hands on, and is kind of disappointing. I still hope it'll happen." I don't know about a sequel. It wouldn't be the same without the original cast and I don't see Peter Weller and Jeff Goldblum signing on for that....

    32. Re:Weird science by smellsofbikes · · Score: 1

      Besides that, the person who owns the movie rights is apparently strongly opposed to making the sequel, on aesthetic and vengeful grounds.

      They could probably get Peter, but Jeff has gotten very expensive. Yes, both characters were in the sequel.

      --
      Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
    33. Re:Weird science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      That's why I used it as an example. Reversing the polarity of a neutron? That's fantastic.

      Taking Double ROT-13 to Quantum Encryption!

  3. Cool car mod by Timberwolf0122 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I for one would love an oscilating overthruster on my car, it would enable me to drive through traffic jams. My only consern is that if I can pass through solid matter what is to stop me passing throught the crust of the earth? I drive a MR2 Roadster and I don't think the canvas soft top is rated to magma.

    --
    In the not too distant future, next Sunday A.D.
    1. Re:Cool car mod by MaGogue · · Score: 3, Interesting

      If you project your intermediate vector bosons accurately, you'll obtain a tunnel through the mountain with solid floor just below the wheels, and a collapsing yet transparent core in front.
      Move fast enough, and banzai!, you tunnel through.
      It is interesting to note that 'electron tunneling' is an actual term used in quantum physics.

      Only make sure you don't use up your batteries too soon.

    2. Re:Cool car mod by Spiked_Three · · Score: 1

      traffic jams, 700 miles an hour? Don't think it will work.

      --
      slashdot troll = you make a compelling argument I do not like the implications of.
    3. Re:Cool car mod by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Yeah, because you're out of phase."

      "So why don't I fall through the floor?"

  4. Laugh-a while you can, Monkey Boy! by Tumbleweed · · Score: 1, Funny

    WHERE ARE WE GOING?!

    1. Re:Laugh-a while you can, Monkey Boy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Home, Home is where you wear your hat.

    2. Re:Laugh-a while you can, Monkey Boy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Planet Ten!

    3. Re:Laugh-a while you can, Monkey Boy! by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 1

      That's BigbooTAY!

      --
      No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
    4. Re:Laugh-a while you can, Monkey Boy! by jejones · · Score: 1

      When?

    5. Re:Laugh-a while you can, Monkey Boy! by Megane · · Score: 1

      Real soon!

      (I knew I wasn't the only one with this idea)

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    6. Re:Laugh-a while you can, Monkey Boy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Tay! Tay! Tay!

      BLAM!

    7. Re:Laugh-a while you can, Monkey Boy! by rezac · · Score: 1, Funny

      It's not my god-damned planet! Understand Monkeyboy?

      --
      -- my sig got /.'d
    8. Re:Laugh-a while you can, Monkey Boy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      History is made at night! Character is what you are in the dark!

  5. I dunno by deft · · Score: 2, Funny

    On slashdot sure I see some morons, but there's usually some people on here so smart I don't understand a thing they said to smack down the moron, and somehow I say that's expertise.

    --

    There's nothing Intelligent about Intelligent Design.
    1. Re:I dunno by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      Kaluza Klein ... Intermediate Vector Boson ... Brane Theory .... Reverse the polarity of the neutron flow ..... SMACK! MORON!

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    2. Re:I dunno by Minwee · · Score: 3, Funny

      I believe that that's one of Clarke's Laws. Any sufficiently advanced technobabble is indistinguishable from smack.

    3. Re:I dunno by somersault · · Score: 3, Funny

      Mod parent diagonal.

      Now excuse me while I go phlib my enjuntificator.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    4. Re:I dunno by It'sYerMam · · Score: 1
      Now excuse me while I go phlib my enjuntificator.

      That's disgusting.

      --
      im in ur .sig, writin ur memes.
    5. Re:I dunno by somersault · · Score: 1

      Only when I run it on untreated sewage

      --
      which is totally what she said
    6. Re:I dunno by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Laugh while you can, monkey boy!

      If neutrons were flowing, they could reverse the polarity by making them flow in the opposite direction somehow. Polarity is not nescesarily elecrical polarity.

    7. Re:I dunno by Minwee · · Score: 1

      Or if you reverse the polarity.

      Oh, many Shubs and Zuuls would know what it was to be roasted in the depths of the Sloar if that happened I can tell you.

  6. Posted Link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The web server's the shits! It'll never survive the slashdotting! One more word out of you Big Booty and ... It's Boo Tay Tay Tay!

  7. Just remember by stox · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "No matter where you go, there you are!"

    --
    "To those who are overly cautious, everything is impossible. "
    1. Re:Just remember by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My favorite quote ever. And a perfect description of the personalities that you meet on the internet:

      "Character is what you are in the dark."

      "History is made at night. Character is what you are in the dark."

    2. Re:Just remember by Duggeek · · Score: 1

      That's the power-on greeting for my mobile.

      Don't you see it?! Right there! Evil, pure and simple from the Eighth Dimension!

      Loved the Jet Car... it was the real deal. (except for the whole dimension-crossing bit) Even had working turn signals!

      What's that watermelon doing there?
      I'll tell you later

      Alas, nobody told New Jersey about the watermelon in the movie.

      --
      This post © Copyrite Duggeek, all rights reversed.
  8. This was already discussed by Londo Molari by rogerborn · · Score: 3, Informative


    He discussed it a long time ago in the far off, but rather close future.

    Here is the link -

    http://www.rogerborn.com/commentary/a-walk-among-t he-atoms.html

    ""These are my principles. If you don't like them, I have others."

  9. Best Quote by Umbral+Blot · · Score: 1

    Mandatory link to the best quote of the movie.

    1. Re:Best Quote by Gramie2 · · Score: 1

      "Laugh while you can, monkey boy!"

      Indeed a timeless line. I sometimes use this on my 9-year-old son (who watched the movie with me), and as often as not, my nickname for him is "monkey boy".

    2. Re:Best Quote by sesshomaru · · Score: 1
      I also like:
      Sealed with a curse as sharp as a knife. Doomed is your soul and damned is your life. - Lord John Whorfin
      --
      "MIT betrayed all of its basic principles."
    3. Re:Best Quote by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Assuming your son is not adopted, does he say "Yes _dad_" to that?

      He have any uncles? ;)

      --
  10. The Usual Accident by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

    > the result of decades of research instead of the usual laboratory accident

    Decades of research is the usual method. Favourable laboratory accidents (which are recognized thanks to decades of research) simply make for memorable anecdotes. Which does seem to be about all the general populous's education and curiosity can retain, so yeah I suppose a half-wit might think lab accidents are the usual way forward. It's just a shame to see it on /..

    1. Re:The Usual Accident by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      That's the point of the article! It's saying that the movie more reasonably potrays advances as the result of protracted endeavour rather than the usual for movies laboratory accident. Next time read more carefully.

    2. Re:The Usual Accident by shadowcabbit · · Score: 1

      Then again, a long stretch of time- and resource-consuming research usually begins with some guy in the lab saying, "Huh, that's weird..."

      --
      "Why Subscribe?" Good question...
    3. Re:The Usual Accident by residieu · · Score: 1

      Or falling off the toilet and hitting their head on the sink.

  11. Bet Now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  12. Buckaroo Banzai was easy to identify with by it0 · · Score: 1

    ISTFM (I Saw the Fucking Movie)

    Since BB was a Adventurer/surgeon/rock musician like most of us, he was easy to identify with.

    1. Re:Buckaroo Banzai was easy to identify with by Inexile2002 · · Score: 1

      For completion's sake, Buckaroo was a Half Japanese/Rockstar/Neuro-Surgeon/Particle Physicist/Adventurer and part time crime fighter. Like me.

    2. Re:Buckaroo Banzai was easy to identify with by KORfan · · Score: 2, Funny

      He had it easy. Back when I was a musician/physicist/adventurer/crime-fighter, we built our own instruments and our cars were crank starters. We didn't have any of this automatic transmission nonsense, and we reloaded our own bullets, too! This guy would have to struggle to make his own vacuum tubes.

    3. Re:Buckaroo Banzai was easy to identify with by jafac · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The movie was certainly about 10 years ahead of its time.

      (I can't stand watching it now, because of the nasty 1980's rock-video hairstyles and costumes. But the dialog was some of the funniest stuff in cinema history - - big boo TAY!)

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
  13. Buck-A-Roo! by beezly · · Score: 3, Funny

    Curse that headline. I thought this was going to be an article about the inner workings of some extreme version of Buckaroo!.

    I was so disappointed when I found out it was about a sci-fi film.

    Buck-A-Rooooo!

  14. Just another jab at intelligent deisgn... by kaytea2k · · Score: 1, Funny

    This is yet another jab at intelligent design that scientists attempt so gingerly. Really why do the miracles of Buckaroo B have to be broken down w/ the unimaginative Scientific Method?

    1. Re:Just another jab at intelligent deisgn... by pla · · Score: 1

      This is yet another jab at intelligent design that scientists attempt so gingerly. Really why do the miracles of Buckaroo B have to be broken down

      Sometimes, even normally staid scientists can derive some pleasure in terminating the trajectory of anaerobic-decompositionally accelerated projectiles into cylindrically confined ichthyoids.

      Or in this case, taunting the laughably ignorant fundies.

    2. Re:Just another jab at intelligent deisgn... by Hucko · · Score: 1
      Really why do the miracles of Buckaroo B have to be broken down w/ the unimaginative Scientific Method?
      The same reason all miracles must be 'broken down'. Unimaginative is not a well thought out adjective.

      Yes, I am pro creationist, as I have not yet been able to follow the logic concluding at evolution. I therefore have stuck with the simplest solution.

      Ahh, originally I thought to curb a fellow psuedo-creationist's paranoia. Kudos to your sarcasm.

      --
      Semi-automatic amateur armchair Australian philosopher; conjecture ready at any moment...
  15. The real method. by chro57 · · Score: 0

    is the use of quadratic neutrinos accelerated through a complex (as real + imaginary) gravity field. One must be carefull to not go faster than the Linden barrier, or the cosmological theta constant, or the bosons vector collapse into photons. It's common sens. It's written in every physic books. __ O.A.C.

  16. BZflag has benefitted by flyneye · · Score: 1

    Three cheers for B.Bonzai or there would be no oscillation overthruster flag in BZflag.
    Kinda' makes ya think,donut?

    --
    *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    1. Re:BZflag has benefitted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tim needs to add an option to show the 8th dim creatures when you're oscillated.

  17. He got to see the director's cut! by SoundGuyNoise · · Score: 2, Informative
    "The machine which finally enables Buckaroo Banzai to move through matter is based on decades of research that are shown to the audience through home movies and flashbacks."

    Dr. Sneider must have seen an early edit of the film in 1984. The home movie segment wasn't widely available until the recent DVD release.

    --
    You never expect irony, do you?
    Want to be a professional wrestler? Visit www.iyfwrestling.com
    @iyfwrestling
    1. Re:He got to see the director's cut! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hi:

      Actually, the home movies were posted to the BB web site several years ago.

    2. Re:He got to see the director's cut! by Purity+Of+Essence · · Score: 1

      The article was written before the release of the film and the author refers to the script directly.

      --
      +0 Meh
    3. Re:He got to see the director's cut! by The+Dobber · · Score: 1


      True, but since the scenes were filmed they may have been present in earlier edits of the film.

  18. Don't touch that! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You never know what it might be connected to.

  19. Lesson to be learned by Lord+Grey · · Score: 5, Funny

    Not only did Buckaroo's car go wicked fast -- so fast that the on-board camera shook alarmingly -- and was able to drive through a mountain, it had turn signals . And Buckaroo used them . This Half Japanese/Rockstar/Neuro-Surgeon/Particle Physicist/Adventurer sets a good example for all of us!

    --
    // Beyond Here Lie Dragons
    1. Re:Lesson to be learned by smellsofbikes · · Score: 2, Funny

      >Not only did Buckaroo's car go wicked fast

      Yeah, but one heat-seeking missile and he's *history*.

      --
      Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
    2. Re:Lesson to be learned by JoeRandomHacker · · Score: 1

      >Not only did Buckaroo's car go wicked fast

      Yeah, but one heat-seeking missile and he's *history*. No problem, as long as there is a mountain nearby.
    3. Re:Lesson to be learned by smellsofbikes · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but then they advise you to cancel Phase 2, and you *don't* cancel Phase 2, and all hell breaks loose and next thing you know, crazed physicists are clamping electrodes to their tongues and the world's about to get nuked.

      You wanna roll those dice?

      --
      Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
  20. Thanks, guy. by dschuetz · · Score: 1

    Now I'm gonna have that closing music stuck in my head all day long.

    1. Re:Thanks, guy. by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 1

      Could be worse.. as is widely known among fans, the music wasn't finished yet when they were filming that scene. On set, the cast had to walk in time to Billy Joel's "Uptown Girl," which happened to have the same tempo.

      And now, you've got that stuck in your head instead. Bahahahaha!!!

    2. Re:Thanks, guy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I just watched it recently, too. I like that end credits music. I'd like to have that as my ring-tone.

      This is one of my all time favorite movies. Stylist wardrobe, excellent cast, fun characters, campy but a true classic.

  21. Copyright? by MMC+Monster · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Doesn't the original writer have copyright over this essay? Is it legal for it to be posted to the web without his authority? I know we don't care so much about copyright on /., but this is a bit rediculous.

    --
    Help! I'm a slashdot refugee.
    1. Re:Copyright? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So is his spelling! (Now I'm rediculing it!)

    2. Re:Copyright? by serutan · · Score: 1

      Actually I thought about that. The text copies that are on the web have been there for years, and were not marked "reprinted with permission..." so I figured it was probably a non-issue. The article was part of the press kit for the movie, so presumably the studio holds the copyright. If anybody's lawyers ever complain I will sadly but promptly take the page down.

  22. Only on Slashdot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Can you post this story between two stories about copyright infringement, and see no irony whatsoever.

    Dare I ask whether this person has Dr. Sneider's permission...?

  23. Timelinesss of Post by littlewink · · Score: 1

    I wish to thank the OP for the timely nature of his post. I had finally begun to forget the nonsense of "Buckaroo Bonzai" when this article caught my eye.

  24. Atoms are mostly empty? by lawpoop · · Score: 1, Interesting

    The metaphor that Buckaroo uses is something like tiny marbles in an orbit configuration. So an atom is a tiny cluster of marbles, neutrons and protons in the nucleus, and tiny electron marbles orbiting some distance from the nucleus, and mostly empty space. Even the author uses the metaphor of a bee in a cathedral when describing the nucleus.

    But aren't these tiny marbles actually just a sort of bundle of waves? That what we think of as tiny parts of matter that give the hardness to matter not really hard at all, but just a collection repellent forces? That an atom really isn't mostly empty space, but that 'space' is full of the wave functions of the electrons in 'orbit' of the nucleus?

    --
    Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
    -- Pablo Picasso
    1. Re:Atoms are mostly empty? by SirGarlon · · Score: 2, Informative
      That an atom really isn't mostly empty space, but that 'space' is full of the wave functions of the electrons in 'orbit' of the nucleus?
      Yes and no. I am too lazy to go look it up in my quantum textbook (it's been more than a decade since I graduated) but I remember being surprised to find that, when you actually integrate the wave function, you still come out with a high probability of a particle being localized to a fairly small area in space. That is, in principle the wave function extends through the entire universe but most of its moment is within an angstrom or two (waving my hands here, too lazy to re-read-up on the math) of where a classical "orbiting marble" model of the atom says it would be.
      --
      [Sir Garlon] is the marvellest knight that is now living, for he destroyeth many good knights, for he goeth invisible.
  25. Important questions by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 1

    Why is there a watermelon there?

    --
    This guy's the limit!
    1. Re:Important questions by MrPlastic · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Though the movie answers with, "Er...I'll tell you later," ISTR that Earl Mac Rauch has said that the watermelon in the vise was part of a program under development at the Banzai Institute to create food that could be air-dropped into a famine area without parachutes or other special equipment: any bush pilot could fly over and drop a load of watermelons, and the starving masses would rejoice, needing only a sharp knife to get through the tough, drop-rated skin. (This idea is somewhat reminiscent of the water spheres in the classic short story "Arena," by Frederic Brown, which are unbreakably held together with increased surface tension until something sharp releases the water.)

    2. Re:Important questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Buckaroo was developing a bouncing watermelon to drop from airplanes
      to feed the starving kids in third world countries.

      Somehow I find this amazingly entertaining.

    3. Re:Important questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I'll tell you later."

    4. Re:Important questions by Carpe+PM · · Score: 1

      Um - I'll tell you later.

  26. I don't think it would work inside an atmosphere by SirGarlon · · Score: 2, Informative
    From the article:
    The basic premise of the Overthruster seems perfectly reasonable if we could just find a way to do this. How could we shorten the distance that virtual photons travel within the atom? Since virtual photons have no mass, they are able to travel the full distance between electrons and protons. What would happen if the virtual photons were given mass? If virtual photons had mass, they would be restricted to a very small region around the elementary particles that make up the atoms.

    Fair enough, but what would be the implications for the object that gets its virtual photons recombobulated this way?

    First thing that comes to mind is that all matter, not just Banzai's rocket car, could move through the target (the mountain in this case). So, the surrounding air would rush into the newly created "empty space" that coincides with the mountain. This would cause a tremendous thunderclap and lots of turbulence. Since the molecules inside the mountain are no longer really solid, they'd get displaced by the inrushing air and spewed all over the place.

    Inside an atmosphere, the Oscillation Overthruster would basically be a disintegrator ray.

    --
    [Sir Garlon] is the marvellest knight that is now living, for he destroyeth many good knights, for he goeth invisible.
  27. The Usual Latex Accident by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Then again, a long stretch of time- and resource-consuming research usually begins with some guy in the lab saying, "Huh, that's weird..."

    Guess that explains how the condom got it's start.

  28. before physics was ... by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

    ...pulps of the 30s and 40s. ...This was before physics was considered a major branch of science, So Einstein was just working on minor science? (1905 was his big year)
    --
    The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    1. Re:before physics was ... by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1
      So Einstein was just working on minor science? (1905 was his big year)

      In popular thought, Einstein was a mathematician, really smart but not doing anything relevant to real life. Physics and physicists didn't much enter the public consciousness as The Big Science until WWII - radar, nukes, et cetera.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    2. Re:before physics was ... by LWATCDR · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It really was science with no practical applications then. The sad thing is just as WWI was the fought with chemistry war WWII was the war fought with physics.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    3. Re:before physics was ... by Ana10g · · Score: 1

      So, if WWI was fought as a Chemistry war, and WWII was the war fought with Physics, what's WWIII going to be? The war fought with Quantum Physics? String Theory? This could get pretty messy!

      --
      just an analog boy living in a digital age.
    4. Re:before physics was ... by LordPhantom · · Score: 1

      Well, at least we know about WW IV....
      "I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones." -- Albert Einstein

    5. Re:before physics was ... by LWATCDR · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually WWII was fought with Quantum Physics.

      WWIII is being fought with the media.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    6. Re:before physics was ... by Gr8Apes · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Argh, the limits of textual communication. Einstein made a huge splash in the scientific community in 1905. My point was that the GGP was incorrect, physics was a major branch of science, as scientists were working studiously to discover the workings of the world/universe at that time. Whether the public had the slightest concept of this is irrelevant.

      I'd say physics still isn't in the public consciousness as big science, although "nukulear" physics sure still seems to be, barely. After all, if it's not slapping Joe Sixpack in the face, it doesn't exist.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    7. Re:before physics was ... by The_Wilschon · · Score: 1
      It really was science with no practical applications then.
      Oh right, I forgot. That silly old thing we called a "steam engine" wasn't a practical application. After all, no practical result from physics could have so thoroughly changed the world...

      Thermodynamics is very much a part of physics, and it very definitely had practical applications long before then 1930s.
      --
      SIGSEGV caught, terminating

      wait... not that kind of sig.
    8. Re:before physics was ... by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1
      My point was that the GGP was incorrect, physics was a major branch of science...Whether the public had the slightest concept of this is irrelevant.

      I belive the poster's point was exactly that the public, the readers of pulp SF fiction, did not have the concept that physics was a major branch of science, therefore "so much of the wizz-bang new inventions are through the modern miracle of cutting edge chemistry."

      When discussing science in fiction, it is very relevant what concepts of science the readers may hold.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    9. Re:before physics was ... by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      I was speaking about public perception. Heck the cannon and the long bow where practical applications of physics.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    10. Re:before physics was ... by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      note that the readers of pulp SF are only an insignificantly small subset of the general public.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
  29. Big Trouble in Little China by Jonah+Hex · · Score: 2, Interesting
    http://imdb.com/title/tt0086856/trivia

    # The end of the movie invites the viewer to watch for the upcoming film "Buckaroo Banzai vs. The World Crime League". This was the real title for a sequel that Sherwood Studios planned to make if this film had been successful. Unfortunately, it was a box-office bomb, and Sherwood Studios went bankrupt. After its release on video and cable, however, BB became a cult favorite, much in the same way as Mad Max (1979) (which crawled from obscurity to spawn two sequels). Legal wranglings due to the bankruptcy prevented any other studios from picking up the sequel rights, and even years later MGM had to fight through a pile of red tape simply to get the OK to release it on DVD.
    # The script for the proposed sequel Buckaroo Banzai vs. The World Crime League ended up becoming the script for John Carpenter's Big Trouble in Little China (1986).
    Since I read this I can't watch BTiLC without thinking of Buckaroo and crew going deep under Chinatown.
    Jonah HEX
    1. Re:Big Trouble in Little China by silentounce · · Score: 2, Informative

      "The script for the proposed sequel Buckaroo Banzai vs. The World Crime League ended up becoming the script for John Carpenter's Big Trouble in Little China (1986)."

      That's false. I recently had the pleasure to view the recent DVD release of BTiLC. One of the special features discusses how the film was developed. There is no mention of BB in there. In fact, the original script was set in the Old West. My memory is vague. But I'm fairly sure that the trivia from IMDB is BS.

      --
      There are many tongues to talk, and but few heads to think. -Victor Hugo
    2. Re:Big Trouble in Little China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think that's right. But, that's another of my top three favorite (cult comedy) movies:

      Buckaroo Banzai
      Big Trouble in Little China
      Monty Python and the Holy Grail

      I don't know how many times I've watched them, but I never get tired of them.

      Now,
      This really pisses me off. Go away before I taunt you again, you damned Monkey-boy.

      John Ya-Ya Whorfin Big Boote Smallberries
      Yoyodyne Propulsion Systems

    3. Re:Big Trouble in Little China by DerekLyons · · Score: 1
      My memory is vague. But I'm fairly sure that the trivia from IMDB is BS.

      A good portion of the 'trivia' on the IMDB is bogus.
       
      Though I see they have finally deleted the claim that USS Blueback was used for Red October. (Though the Wikipedia, even when provided with evidence, merely replaces the claim with weasel words.)
    4. Re:Big Trouble in Little China by silentounce · · Score: 2, Informative

      I should have looked in the wiki before I posted that.
       
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Trouble_in_Litt le_China#Production_History
      http://en.wikipedia.o rg/wiki/The_Adventures_of_Buckaroo_Banzai_Across_t he_8th_Dimension#Sequels
       
      Both of those explain what I tried to say much more clearly.

      --
      There are many tongues to talk, and but few heads to think. -Victor Hugo
  30. Big Bootay, Tay Tay! by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

    I was forced to watch this movie by my GF's housemate about 2 times a week for months until another housemate and myself hid the tape on him. I think it caused me permanent trauma. I started calling him John Smallberries.

    Home is where you hang your hat.

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  31. Why is there a watermelon there? by snowwrestler · · Score: 1

    I'll tell you later.

    --
    Build a man a fire, he's warm for one night. Set him on fire, and he's warm for the rest of his life.
  32. this movie was groundbreaking! by QAChaos · · Score: 1, Funny

    Not only does this film challenge our imagination as moviegoers, it challenges other filmmakers to throw away their sorcery, and base their fantasies on a reasonable portrayal of the way that scientists actually work. Hence after BB all movies about computers also followed these strict guidlines......

  33. worst pickup line ever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I once asked a gal in a bar if I could show her my oscillating overthruster and she slapped me.

    1. Re:worst pickup line ever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Especially if your name is "John Smallberries."

  34. Wait... by TALlama · · Score: 1

    What's that watermelon doing there?

    --

    - The Amazina Llama

  35. Typo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Ernest 0. Lawrence"

    That zero should be the letter "O".

  36. Well... by biglig2 · · Score: 1

    It doesn't suck as much as the movie of The Shadow.

    That doesn't really tell you much, though, does it.

    --
    ~~~~~ BigLig2? You mean there's another one of me?
    1. Re:Well... by paganizer · · Score: 1

      The Shadow has my very favorite-of-all-time dialogue in it. Margo: Oh, God I dreamed. Lamont: So did I. What did you dream? Margo: I was lying naked on a beach in the South Seas. The tide was coming up to my toes. The sun was beating down. My skin hot and cool at the same time. It was wonderful. What was yours? Lamont: I dreamed I tore all the skin off my face and was somebody else underneath. Margo: You have problems. Lamont: I'm aware of that.

      --
      Why, yes, I AM a Pagan Libertarian.
  37. Alignment solves everything by mattr · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm quite worried a lot of people will get the wrong idea about this movie, that it's all impossible. Of course the overthruster isn't disintegrating the matter on which it is focused, it is simply enabling a bidirectionally permeable interface to form naturally between two space harmonics.

    It has been long known that spacetime has a granular quality, in fact when you get small enough everything is spin networks (you can learn more about it on Wikipedia) which can basically be thought of as a quantum of space. in other words we are all just living on particles strung on lattices (see lattice theory). But since the granularity of spacetime is at a resolution of Planck units, there is obviously an infinity of other universes that can exist between the lines as it were, made of particles strung along a lattice just out of step with our own. If you can gauge the distances correctly along this string-net and apply a constant field to shift the center of gravity of space quanta a little to one side and perfectly coincide with the spin networks on a different lattice, then voila! you can continue motion over that other dimension, which is only confusing because we use the word dimension when clearly it is simply a spacetime superimposed on our own but with a topology ordered along a geometry that is slightly out of step with ours.

    This duality over the lattice may seem difficult to stomach but it will be invariably clear to anyone who has gotten used to the television version's compression of the entire x-axis into the tube's smaller aspect ratio (the ultra-cool credits scene). That, and if you can believe a key researcher is named Joan Baez.

    This is what the movie is trying to illustrate when the Buckaroo's nemesis gets himself stuck halfway through a wall. That probably happened partly because they were using an inefficient energy carrier (as TFA suggests), bosons not being known in the 30s, but mostly in fact due to insufficient speed, since if you lose momentum while in the interface you would have to push against quite a lot of knots in the spin network to extricate yourself. It is a kind of rigged Hilbert space, with the knots rigged along the lattices like a ship's rigging, and it is all so intertwined you really have to push with a lot of oomph.

    Hence the 700 miles per hour rocket. Obviously the characters are pushing through onto another lattice and not disintegrating the matter in front of them, because if they were destroying matter not only would things probably get quite hot, but also gravity would drag down the nose of Buckaroo's craft toward the center of the Earth! And that doesn't happen at all in fact.

    We shall soon see how well the movie predicts reality with the next generation of particle accelerators. TFA only makes one terrible mistake, in that they suggest the movie is wrong about magnitudes because Buckaroo is superhumanly able to miniaturize accelerators. In fact just recently research scientist Anatoly Maksimchuk and Donald Umstadter, and another team in Europe, have been able to focus high energies with table-top devices. Certainly as higher energies are reached there will be a manifold of possibilities to study. Just remember, wherever you go, there you are.

    1. Re:Alignment solves everything by faqmaster · · Score: 1

      Show off!

      --
      Are you...Are you some kind of genius?
      No, ma'am, I'm just a regular Slashdot reader.
    2. Re:Alignment solves everything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think this poster is in serious danger of creating a resonance cascade.

    3. Re:Alignment solves everything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod parent down! Score -1, Brain Explosion

  38. Blatant pitch by deblau · · Score: 2, Informative

    The oscillation overthruster was incorporated into BZFlag, a tank-based FPS. It lets your tank 'walk through walls' and lay in wait inside buildings where you can't be shot by normal bullets. For the record, I'm an admin on a few servers, and I play regularly. Oh yeah, the game runs on Linux, BSD, Irix (where I first encountered it), and Windows of course.

    --
    This post expresses my opinion, not that of my employer. And yes, IAAL.
  39. Re:HTML more readable than plain text? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    HTML more readable than plain text?
    (Score:-1, Offtopic)
    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday December 19, @04:18AM (#17297936)
    That's news to me.


    -1 Offtopic huh?

    FTS:
    I posted a more readable HTML version on my site.


    Yup, really offtopic. Its the title of the link to the god damned article (GDA). And just about the most absurd thing I've ever heard.

    Slashdot reader: If my post is -1 Offtopic, then the summary is offtopic, but the summary defines the topic, so how can it be offtopic?

    Slashdot moderator: I modded the post offtopic, yet the post addresses the summary which defines the topic... does not compute, does not compute... You are not of the body, I am Landrew. You are Offtopic, You are Offtoopic, Youuu aarreee nooottt offf theee boooodddyyy, Yooouuu aarreeee ooffff ttooppiiiccccc..... BOOM!
  40. Sneider would show the film by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I actually went to one of his presentations at Berkeley. He would give a talk about the science behind the movie, show the movie, and then have a discussion after. It really made the movie for me. Otherwise BB would have just landed on the pile of cheesy '80s B - scifi like Hell Comes to Frog Town.

  41. Gets it wrong by DerekLyons · · Score: 1
    From TFA [summary]
     
    Since the essay is not widely available on the web and I could only find it in plain text

     
    'Widely available' is a term without meaning on the web, either it's available - or its not. One copy is all it takes.
    1. Re:Gets it wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What if it's on the web, but password-protected? That would be "not widely available".

    2. Re:Gets it wrong by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      No, it isn't. Especially if the page isn't cached by Google.

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
  42. Declaration of WAR the short form by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At least someone has the BALLS to FACE FACTS!

  43. It's on my iPod! by Cybrex · · Score: 1

    I have a "Happy Music" playlist on my iPod that I listen to once or twice a week. That song is on it, which means that I probably haven't gone more than 4 days without hearing it in about 2 years. All of Michael Boddicker's music is fantastic and well ahead of its time, but the opening and closing themes are really something special.

    --
    Boundless Expansion, Self-Transformation, Dynamic Optimism, Intelligent Technology, Spontaneous Order- BEST DO IT SO!
  44. Right you are! by Cybrex · · Score: 1

    Additionally, the watermelons are engineered to be nutritionally complete.

    Now, if you want the other reason why it was there, watch the DVD with the commentary track. There was a lot of conflict going on over the movie, and they threw it in to see if the studio was even bothering to watch the dailies anymore. It turned out that they weren't. :-)

    --
    Boundless Expansion, Self-Transformation, Dynamic Optimism, Intelligent Technology, Spontaneous Order- BEST DO IT SO!
  45. The Ernie Cline script rocks by Cybrex · · Score: 1

    BTiLC is a fantastic movie and shares much of the same charm that makes BB special, but as others have mentioned the claim that Big Trouble was intended to be the sequel is incorrect.

    Incidentally, if you can still find the Ernie Cline script for the sequel anywhere it's definitely worth a read. I was lucky enough to download a copy many years ago before it got pulled from his site, and it would make for a damn fine movie.

    --
    Boundless Expansion, Self-Transformation, Dynamic Optimism, Intelligent Technology, Spontaneous Order- BEST DO IT SO!
  46. What a great day to be on Slashdot! by Cybrex · · Score: 1

    It thrills me more than it probably should just to see that question posted, 22 or so years after the movie came out, and see so many people quickly respond. BB has been in my top 10 all-time favorite movies since I saw it in the theater as a kid, and I'm delighted to see that it still has a strong following.

    --
    Boundless Expansion, Self-Transformation, Dynamic Optimism, Intelligent Technology, Spontaneous Order- BEST DO IT SO!
    1. Re:What a great day to be on Slashdot! by Tumbleweed · · Score: 1

      That movie and Big Trouble in Little China are two of my favourite movies of all-time.

      Indeed!

  47. Re:I don't think it would work inside an atmospher by kaytea2k · · Score: 1

    Fair enough, but what would be the implications for the object that gets its virtual photons recombobulated this way? I don't think recombobulated is a word you should just be throwing aronud.
  48. The ultimate mod? by scalpod · · Score: 0

    Installing an oscillation overthruster and a flux capacitor in the same jet car... Now I can drive though a mountain and get back BEFORE I'VE EVEN LEFT!

    --
    If "beauty is in the eye of the beholder" and "it was beauty that killed the beast" then "please stop staring at me".
  49. Just... just hold on... that's good. by VikingBerserker · · Score: 2, Funny

    This article reads like a truck.

    1. Re:Just... just hold on... that's good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Good... What is truck?

    2. Re:Just... just hold on... that's good. by serutan · · Score: 1

      What is a truck?

  50. truck authenticity by obtuse · · Score: 1

    I also love that the truck dieseled (ran on) when he shut it off. Thanks to the incredibly cool MSG for pointing that out to me.
    Perhaps I didn't notice it at the time because it was a common bug in US made gasoline engines of the era.

    --
    Assembly is the reverse of disassembly.
  51. Buckaroo Banzai Frequently Asked Questions.... by figmentfly · · Score: 1

    Why was the watermelon there? Where is the sequel? Was Jamie Lee Curtis in the film? Was Big Trouble In Little China originally written as sequel for Buckaroo Banzai? All these questions and more are covered in the Buckaroo Banzai FAQ located at http://www.figmentfly.com/bb/bbindex.shtml. Sean

  52. Wow by d_54321 · · Score: 1

    An interesting read. Thanks for the link.