Slashdot Mirror


Neural "Extension Cord" Developed

moon_monkey writes "Researchers at the University of Pennsylvania have developed a 'neural extension cord' by growing neurons attached to a microchip. The cord is made by gradually moving two batches of neurons apart, as they naturally grow towards one another. This biological 'data cable' could then interface with the brain once implanted, the researchers say." From the article: "...in the long run, it may not be necessary to interface directly with nerves at all. 'In Europe most researchers in this field are using non-invasive EEG,' [an outside researcher] explains... 'The signals are weaker so more complex processing is needed, but not having to perform surgery on the nervous system has many advantages,' [he] says."

141 comments

  1. Interesting but... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Is it compatible with Windows Vista's DRM requirements?

    1. Re:Interesting but... by Quasicorps · · Score: 1

      No. It won't be.

      But they've already found a workaround.

    2. Re:Interesting but... by kalleguld · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Not if it runs Linux.

      --
      Sigs are bad for your health
    3. Re:Interesting but... by mastershake_phd · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Is it compatible with Windows Vista's DRM requirements?

      And is keeping a copy of portions of copyrighted material in your brain legal? I know mine is full of Simpsons material.

    4. Re:Interesting but... by kfg · · Score: 2, Funny

      Is it compatible with Windows Vista's DRM requirements?

      The roadmap has it slated for SP4; but I advise reading the EULA very carefully before installing.

      And beware the blue haze of death all in your brain.

      KFG

    5. Re:Interesting but... by charlieman · · Score: 1

      All your brains are belong to us!!

    6. Re:Interesting but... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      I'm sure a zombie patch will be out soon. :P

  2. Understatement of the year by Spazmania · · Score: 4, Funny

    not having to perform surgery on the nervous system has many advantages

    I nominate this guy for the Understatement of the Year award.

    --
    Moderating "-1, Disagree" is simple censorship. Have the guts to post your opinion.
    1. Re:Understatement of the year by Divide+By+Zero · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Frag that, chummer. I want my datajack, and I don't care how.

      --
      Dare to Hope. Prepare to be Disappointed.
    2. Re:Understatement of the year by Lazerf4rt · · Score: 5, Funny

      OK, all you need are 8 of these neural data links, interfaced to a twisted pair cable. Plug that into a 10-BASE-T hub, and think really really fast to implement the 802.3 protocol in your brain. As long as you can remember your MAC address, you're golden.

    3. Re:Understatement of the year by 42nnn · · Score: 1

      if only i had Mod points +1 for shadowrun!

    4. Re:Understatement of the year by iago-vL · · Score: 1

      Just watch out for the Black IC!

    5. Re:Understatement of the year by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know this is a joke, but only 4 wires out of a ethernet cable are used for 10 and 100Mbit. Of those two one is a return path...so really you just need two nerve paths, one in, one out.

    6. Re:Understatement of the year by MrAnnoyanceToYou · · Score: 1

      Bah. Who wants to interface at only 100Mbit?

      My question is whether this will affect spinal column injuries.

    7. Re:Understatement of the year by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      QFT.

      Sign me the fuck up.

    8. Re:Understatement of the year by ross.w · · Score: 1

      Don't forget to download your licence key from the server.

      --
      If my call is important, why am I talking to a recording?
    9. Re:Understatement of the year by davidsyes · · Score: 1

      But, can you talk to GOD at 99 million BAUD, or will you need a Cisco Bridge to bridge that GAP (God-Adjustable-Pacing)? (GODBaud... pretty gaudy...)

      Oh, will God require a Crossing Over (sic) Cable, or a Straight-Through?

      Will that be powered wiring? Will it zap your ass into 7th Heaven? Or, will you just "fly away"....?

      hehhe ... Captcha: "imperil"

      --
      Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
    10. Re:Understatement of the year by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      10 baseT only have 1 pair (2 wires) for transmit and 1 pair for receive. Each pair uses balance signals, so realistically you only need a single transmit and receive. Getting your brainwave to go anywhere more than tens of Hz is going to be fun.

    11. Re:Understatement of the year by Ceriel+Nosforit · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I've been wondering myself if neural plasticity would be enough to decode the protocols and codecs used on the net... A rat brain evidently managed to operate a flight simulator, so why couldn't a human brain learn TCP/IP?

      Plus, there was an article some time ago about electrodes on the tounge letting the blind see thanks to neural plasticity, so maybe it'd be enough for me to suck on a CAT-5? XD

      At any rate, it seems to me the difficult part will be getting data OUT from the brain rather than INTO the brain. Once we learn that trick properly things might get really interesting.

      --
      All rites reversed 2010
    12. Re:Understatement of the year by FusionDragon2099 · · Score: 1

      Only on Slashdot would a reference to Shadowrun to be modded Insightful.

      BTW, I too want a datajack.

    13. Re:Understatement of the year by Doug+Neal · · Score: 1

      Maybe if it was learnt from birth like a spoken language, yeah.. but there's a lot of evidence to suggest that brains just aren't made to handle regular patterns (such as you might find on an ethernet cable...) and cope much better with making sense out of chaotic input. That's what we've evolved to cope with after all. Of course there are exceptions like expecting a certain day and year length, but again that's what we've evolved to live with. Epileptic fits are often triggered by patterns like flashing lights or sounds, kind of sends the brain into a spasm because it doesn't know how to deal with it. And even if you're not epileptic, nobody really likes looking at bright flashing lights for any length of time or hearing loud repetitive sounds (unless you're a raver of course!)

    14. Re:Understatement of the year by Ceriel+Nosforit · · Score: 1

      If we need chaos, we run NetBIOS. Problem solved. ;)

      On a more serious note, I guess what you said should lead us to ask what a good protocol for the brain would be like. IIRC the brain operated like a "pulse computer" or somesuch, so Ethernet-to-the-Brain wouldn't be a viable solution to begin with...

      Interesting post. I wish I had mod points for you. =)

      --
      All rites reversed 2010
  3. Oblig. by knightmad · · Score: 1

    I, for one, welcome our energy sucking brain slaving Matrix overlords

    1. Re:Oblig. by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      One sec, I just got a cellphone fedex'd to me from some Morpheus guy.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    2. Re:Oblig. by WafflesMcDuff · · Score: 1

      If you're going to use a parody of the Mentat Mantra from dune, at least do it right:

      It is by caffeine alone that I set my mind in motion
      It is by the beans of Java that my thoughts acquire speed
      The hands acquire shakes
      The shakes become a warning.
      It is by caffeine alone that I set my mind in motion.

  4. Power Strip by eviloverlordx · · Score: 3, Funny

    Extension cords are well and good, but what we really need is a neural power strip. You can never have too many of those.

    --
    'Loose' is when your pants are three sizes too big. 'Lose' is when you misuse 'loose'.
    1. Re:Power Strip by DBCubix · · Score: 2, Funny

      USB gadgets are cool and everything, but I am waiting for the neural gadgets to warm my coffee, light silly lights, and the neural-powered George Foreman grill would be cool too.

      --
      I called it a mighty Sperm Whale, she called it Finding Nemo.
    2. Re:Power Strip by CRCulver · · Score: 1

      Me, I'm waiting for a droud a la Larry Niven's The Ringworld Engineers . Aren't we all waiting to become drooling, grinning wireheads, spending 23 and a half hours a day with current going straight to the pleasure center of our brains.

      Well, with the time one spends on Slashdot, maybe there wouldn't be much of a change...

    3. Re:Power Strip by xeromist · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yes, but for the typical slashdotter a neural powered grill might be a bad idea. Imagine the fire hazzard if they were hooked up when they read the latest DRM or MS article!!!

      --
      This sig is exactly seventy characters long and a real waste of space!
    4. Re:Power Strip by downwithpeople · · Score: 0

      Or, more practically, a neural Surge Protector with battery backup (and a HUGE warranty!).

      --
      [error processing directive.]
    5. Re:Power Strip by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      Aren't we all waiting to become drooling, grinning wireheads, spending 23 and a half hours a day with current going straight to the pleasure center of our brains.

      Speak for yourself. I just want a way to aim my car-mounted LMG while I drive.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    6. Re:Power Strip by noidentity · · Score: 1

      Don't you just hate it when you're sitting in the basement and need to poke your head into the kitchen to see what kind of food is available? The snag has always been that oh-so-short neck, but not anymore! Just plug this extension cord in and be free of that limitation. Wireless version to be announced.

    7. Re:Power Strip by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am waiting for the neural gadgets to warm my coffee, light silly lights, and the neural-powered George Foreman grill would be cool too.

      The nice thing about neural gadgets is they only need to make you think your coffee is warm, you see silly lights, and that George Foreman is selling something worth buying. There doesn't even need to be coffee in the cup!

    8. Re:Power Strip by Xenographic · · Score: 1

      > Imagine the fire hazard if they were hooked up when they read the latest DRM or MS article!!!

      Flame on!

      (Sorry :-)

    9. Re:Power Strip by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hazzah!

  5. oh yeah... by macadamia_harold · · Score: 4, Funny

    The cord is made by gradually moving two batches of neurons apart, as they naturally grow towards one another. This biological 'data cable' could then interface with the brain once implanted, the researchers say.

    That way, in the future, people can have an almost lifelike experience watching Ow! My Balls!

    1. Re:oh yeah... by vtolturbo · · Score: 1

      yeah, and men can finally experience menstrual cramping and childbirth. great... i'm much more interested in the experience of a female orgasm, personally.

    2. Re:oh yeah... by lord_ashe · · Score: 1

      Ah yes, +1 for the Idiocracy reference...

    3. Re:oh yeah... by Gat0r30y · · Score: 2, Funny

      i'm much more interested in the experience of a female orgasm, personally. I'll bet your into unicorns and other mythical type things too man. Seriously, its a neural extension cord, it cant make imaginary things become real.

      --
      Prediction: The real iPhone killer is going to be sex robots from Japan. Think about it.
  6. Finally... by End+Program · · Score: 4, Interesting

    "Real" virtual p0rn!

    Come to Papa, Jenna.

    1. Re:Finally... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Talk about turning on the evil bits! Turn 'em ALL on!

  7. sweet by mastershake_phd · · Score: 1

    Forget eyesight, I want sonar. Brain to brain networking would be cool to, maybe.

    1. Re:sweet by steveo777 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Brain to brain networking would be cool to, maybe. Not if someone hacks into your brain and fills it with porn, penis enlargement, and second mortgage ads. Nothing worse than having to 'click-through' just to brush your teeth...
      --
      This sig isn't original enough, it's time to come up with something witty...
    2. Re:sweet by vtolturbo · · Score: 1

      with a little wifi and brain-to-wired network, i'm sure we could work out some rudimentary telepathy. who knows, maybe we could even manage to get 1200baud thought-sharing, though i doubt samba supports that.

    3. Re:sweet by Virtual_Raider · · Score: 1
      You just reminded me of Neal Stepehnson's Diamond Age, where they mention that one character committed suicide after his brain was hacked to show adverts in some Arabic language in the lower side of his sight 24/7.

      Also in one other novel I think it was by William Gibson —but I'm fuzzy on the details, maybe I'm mixing it up with Strange Days— they talk about how in the early days of brain interfaces they tried to watch the others recorded dreams but the experience was so bizarre that some of the relationship were broken as a result.

      Not everything may be as cool as it sounds...

      --
      +Raider of the lost BBS
    4. Re:sweet by louisadkins · · Score: 1

      I believe that is called Telepathy. Now, if we could just toss some empathy in with that...

  8. Sound like the beginning of tuning by hasmael · · Score: 1
    "researchers in this field are using non-invasive EEG"

    I for one welcome our Emergents of the Emergency Overlords

    1. Re:Sound like the beginning of tuning by umdstu · · Score: 2, Informative

      I never realized how many idiot comments people made on /. until today.

    2. Re:Sound like the beginning of tuning by pluther · · Score: 4, Funny
      I never realized how many idiot comments people made on /. until today.

      You must be new here.

      --
      If the masses can keep you down, you're not the Ubermensch.
    3. Re:Sound like the beginning of tuning by Cygnostik · · Score: 0

      Well yeah, lets just expect everyone to shut up unless they have something impressive to say! oops.

    4. Re:Sound like the beginning of tuning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shut up, bitch.

    5. Re:Sound like the beginning of tuning by Greg.Rodden · · Score: 1

      Shhh....

      --
      I have ridden the mighty moon worm!
  9. How about repairing spinal injuries? by nizo · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I know several people with severe spinal injuries that could potentially benefit from something like this. Heck using this to restore the use of amputated and reattached limbs/appendages springs to mind as well.

    1. Re:How about repairing spinal injuries? by Greyfox · · Score: 2, Funny

      How about attaching a THIRD arm somewhere? I often find I need more than two. Hell I want SIX arms like that Indian goddess Whazzername! Finally I'd be able to carry the groceries, scratch my nose, find my keys and smack the kids all at the same time! Awesome!

      --

      I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    2. Re:How about repairing spinal injuries? by NMerriam · · Score: 1
      How about attaching a THIRD arm somewhere?


      While on the one hand it sounds useful to have the extra manipulative ability, on the other hand you'd have to redesign clothes and cars and many things we interact with to take advantage of it. On the gripping hand, you would FINALLY HAVE A GRIPPING HAND!
      --
      Recursive: Adj. See Recursive.
    3. Re:How about repairing spinal injuries? by wolfneuralnet · · Score: 1

      This technology was originally developed (2001) to do just that. The intention was to make a "bridge" between the white matter of the anterior portion of the spinal cord the grey matter below. Any communication between the two would eventually reroute the connections that were still available coming down from the brain to cells (motor neurons that go out to the limbs for example) that were still responsive below. The animal implants are in progress now, and they do show nice integration with the host spinal cord.

    4. Re:How about repairing spinal injuries? by zCyl · · Score: 1
      How about attaching a THIRD arm somewhere?

      While on the one hand ...

      I think we can come up with some better locations to attach a third arm.
  10. Yay Degree by unchiujar · · Score: 4, Funny

    Instant learning for classes. No I can finally finish college.
    I knew procrastinating worked...

    --
    Shakespeare poems - infinite monkeys with infinite time.Computer tech support - a few trained ones working from 9 to 5.
  11. Hey -- wait a minute... by wtansill · · Score: 3, Funny
    "...in the long run, it may not be necessary to interface directly with nerves at all. 'In Europe most researchers in this field are using non-invasive EEG,' [an outside researcher] explains... 'The signals are weaker so more complex processing is needed, but not having to perform surgery on the nervous system has many advantages,' [he] says."
    We at "Lobotomies 'R' Us" would beg to differ...
    --
    The contest for ages has been to rescue liberty from the grasp of executive power. -- Daniel Webster
    1. Re:Hey -- wait a minute... by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, you can all get jobs in mainstream television.

  12. Implications by RyanFenton · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Sure - being able to read the impulses sent to muscles, immune systems, etc. will be great. Being able to interact with a truly naturally developed informational system can lead to a lot of obvious and non-obvious insights.

    What would be fascinating is if we were to discover interfaces that allow contents of memory or other brain contents to be read in this way. Of course, this is the start of a lot of sci-fi stories, few of which have a good ending - but if we were able to use such 'clean' techniques to read and store at least some of the contents of minds, I still think it would be a very good net change. Even if very few things are able to be read, and even then very slowly, it would open up many important insights - how massively multi-nerve systems communicate, how memories change in terms of pure data.

    On a personal level, it would be a really nice change to be able to leave behind a little undiluted, untranslated part of my memories and self in the world beyond genetics and teaching others, rather than just let it all rot or hope for a supernatural rescue. It's not the loss of the self that annoys me about our current idea of death, it's the total loss of information that we currently accept as part of the process. Even if it was just a database for others to query, I'd love for my raw memories to live beyond myself.

    Ryan Fenton

    1. Re:Implications by Lazerf4rt · · Score: 1
      our current idea of death

      Whose current idea of death? I assure you my current idea of death is quite different from yours.

      Even if it was just a database for others to query, I'd love for my raw memories to live beyond myself.

      You mean like Slashdot?

    2. Re:Implications by MindStalker · · Score: 1

      In most anyones current ideas of death, your memory's are no longer accessible to the living.
      There.. fixed it for you! :)

    3. Re:Implications by gad_zuki! · · Score: 1

      >I'd love for my raw memories to live beyond myself.

      I dont think that's possible. The patterns in the meat of your brain do not have some kind of universal or raw format. They would be a meaningless mess to another person in a best case scenario. Most likely they would be a painful epileptic seizure. Sorry but when the meat goes so does the memories. I'd start on my memoirs now if I was you.

    4. Re:Implications by ClassMyAss · · Score: 3, Insightful
      What would be fascinating is if we were to discover interfaces that allow contents of memory or other brain contents to be read in this way.
      This would be incredibly tricky, as there is no data format to speak of that the brain uses - program and data are all bound together in one messy lump. The parallel is actually very close to that of neural networks in CS: suppose you trained a network to implement some complicated function that had some parameters hard coded into it, like (for instance) to generate a sine wave at a few particular frequencies within some range of input. How would you go about reading those parameters from the weight structure? Your only option is really to look at and interpret the output, since the network has not necessarily encapsulated away the sine function and stored the parameters separately (though it might have). Such is the problem with the brain, at least barring some incredible discovery in neuroscience that shows us that the brain does have a central data repository. Alas, to my understanding, the data storage literally happens along the very connections that perform the data processing, so I doubt that this is feasible.

      However, this is still a very interesting development, as neurons have proven to be quite adaptable, so one could (in theory) learn to recieve or transmit a data feed to an off-site storage location. What I see as more plausible is that one could in theory wean his/herself off of brain-based permanent memory and attempt to rely more and more on the external data feed. This is not as clean as a hard copy of the brain, but provided that the data path was sufficiently wide and the person was trained exceptionally well, could be a decent approximation, especially if you got skilled enough to subconsciously feed records of your thoughts and perceptions into your "backup." But I don't think it will be easy!

      Gotta wonder who's going to weasel the patent system into blocking further inquiry on this one, though!
    5. Re:Implications by David_Shultz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You're reading into this technology much more than you should be -there's nothing there to even suggest that we can interface meaningfully with these new chips at all, let alone consciously using them as storage devices.

      If you're looking for something that will maintain information about yourself after your death, it's called a book and it's been around for awhile. Write a diary or a biography if you feel so inclined.

    6. Re:Implications by FireFury03 · · Score: 1

      What would be fascinating is if we were to discover interfaces that allow contents of memory or other brain contents to be read in this way.

      As an anti-terrorism measure, all citizens are required to have their brain contents submitted to a government database in real-time.

      If you have nothing to hide then you have nothing to fear and anyone who does not agree to this measure must be a terrorist.

    7. Re:Implications by FireFury03 · · Score: 2, Funny

      The patterns in the meat of your brain do not have some kind of universal or raw format.

      You mean my brain doesn't use OOXML? But Microsoft told me.... :)

    8. Re:Implications by not-enough-info · · Score: 1

      The patterns in the meat of your brain do not have some kind of universal or raw format. They would be a meaningless mess to another person in a best case scenario. Most likely they would be a painful epileptic seizure. Sorry but when the meat goes so does the memories. I'd start on my memoirs now if I was you. Just because the format isn't documented or understood, doesn't mean it doesn't exist. Besides, the GP was asking for a way to get the information out and read, not to be used as-is. Even if it's only partial, I can see the value in that.
      --
      ---k--
      </stupid>
    9. Re:Implications by RyanFenton · · Score: 1

      Well, in any case, any access to the raw data of the brain would be an improvement to me. Even if all minds are incomprehensible mazes of virtual languages never spoken before in any other brain, I'd love the data itself to be collectible onto some medium. Given enough data sources, the steps each brain goes through to communicate with the outside world may be able to be decoded, and perhaps some day we may be able to at least have a simulation of previously recorded memory.

      Much akin to the development of written word, or audio/video recording devices, I'm eager for any development which removes the fog of time from what others will be able to draw from history. The most efficient step along that path I can imagine now is being able to grab the raw contents of brains before they rot, and hope that some day, someone will be able to appreciate the smell of springtime, or the real feel of our time.

      Of course though, the idea of being able to index brain contents through a spinal feed is unlikely - but I'd love to see what we can find by testing all the communication paths we have available into this neural world. Your idea of a actively mind-adapted memory chip is another path to the same idea.

      Ryan Fenton

    10. Re:Implications by andphi · · Score: 1

      It is an interesting idea. One question, meant seriously: when dealing with external memories that belong to someone else, how do we sort out data from meta-data, or alternately, data that has rarely been accessed and must be got at through layers of meta-data?

      I can imagine that there are portions of every person's memory that are rarely accessed but not so isolated as to die out entirely. Would that one spark still be raw, or would it have become re-contextualized by the act of accessing it?

    11. Re:Implications by RyanFenton · · Score: 1

      Well, the idea would be to just gather the data in a static state (even if reading is somewhat enforcing what is read at the time) in whatever imperfect state is possible, then have it in a format that can be queried as many times as needed without degrading or changing that data. Of course, there's many potential problems at every point - but hopefully the data combined with a structural image of the brain will give clues on what to look for next. I highly doubt that if we were able to get consistent data from enough brains that all of them would remain complete gibberish against any analysis. Brains have to work well enough to deal with a body, and also an outside world - learning how data and meta-data relate in the brain would be a fascinating stopping point, if nothing else.

      Ryan Fenton

    12. Re:Implications by NMerriam · · Score: 3, Funny
      This would be incredibly tricky, as there is no data format to speak of that the brain uses - program and data are all bound together in one messy lump.


      That's the clearest evidence against Intelligent Design I've heard all week. Everybody knows that a real God would have used a Model-View-Controller architecture.
      --
      Recursive: Adj. See Recursive.
    13. Re:Implications by virgil_disgr4ce · · Score: 1

      The point was that there is NO format. NO format whatsoever. The only person/machine that could understand the brain patterns in the subject's brain is the subject's brain.

    14. Re:Implications by permawired · · Score: 0

      You know... I was thinking that sounds like a good idea, but then I thought of what someone would see if they looked through my memories:

      1) Go to work
      2) Strive to not kill users and/or co-workers
      3) Go home and drink beer
      4) Pr0n
      5) Sleep


      Then again... it might make a nice self help video with a title to the effect of, "You have so much to live for" /cheers

    15. Re:Implications by ClassMyAss · · Score: 1
      That's the clearest evidence against Intelligent Design I've heard all week. Everybody knows that a real God would have used a Model-View-Controller architecture.
      First, I have to give the obligatory chuckle to this, but it actually brings up a serious question for CS: is it possible that our current inclination to separate function from state is seriously damaging the prospects for pushing the field further? Evolution tends to be a discriminating bitch when it comes to finding effective ways to solve nasty problems (the simpler ones it just solves any old way - the problem is that the harder ones are so tough to solve that if it gets done at all, the solution must be one of the simplest), so it doesn't seem that unlikely to me that the only feasible way to carry out many of the toughest feats that the brain handles is to throw encapsulation to the wind and let everything slosh around in one big program/data object, then just figure out how to tweak and constrain that object to get it to behave nicely.

      Think about it this way: a large part of the "data" that we carry around in our heads - the very stuff that most people on /. make their livings off of - is actually the details of how to use our brains to solve certain problems. Now imagine setting up a Java program whose purpose was to store different methods of solving problems in Java. Yeah, you could do it, but it would be a nasty piece of work, more or less equivalent to writing your own version of a Java compiler. And that's just to figure out how to run the instructions, let alone generate them! I really think there needs to be a fundamental shift in the way we view programming to tackle "bigger" problems. I'm certainly aware that Lisp can handle this type of stuff, but honestly, until these features make it into a mainstream language (by which I mean one that you cannot possibly graduate with a major in CS without having seen), they will not be widely understood or effectively exploited (no slight to the Lisp programmers out there, of course, I just mean that a million minds using a great tool will leverage it much more effectively than a thousand). A huge step in that direction would be to create a variant of Lisp that bore more resemblance syntactically to C, which unfortunately is about the only language that everyone working with computers is guaranteed to be exposed to. This might be tricky, especially considering that the strange syntax is in some ways indispensable to Lisp, but if you think about it less as a port of Lisp and more as an extra feature tacked on to C (or Java, or whatever - please not VB, though!), it doesn't seem all that ridiculous. To some extent the simple insertion of an eval() function to one of the mainstream languages would allow people to start thinking more along these lines, slow execution of those calls be damned!
    16. Re:Implications by ClassMyAss · · Score: 1
      Well, in any case, any access to the raw data of the brain would be an improvement to me. Even if all minds are incomprehensible mazes of virtual languages never spoken before in any other brain, I'd love the data itself to be collectible onto some medium. Given enough data sources, the steps each brain goes through to communicate with the outside world may be able to be decoded, and perhaps some day we may be able to at least have a simulation of previously recorded memory.
      Yes, I'll wholeheartedly agree that it would be a huge improvement over the current means of recording brain data (pen and paper). Any trimming of the intermediate steps between brain and storage, assuming the data is possible to interpret, is a great thing. I would also not overlook the huge potential of sharing this information with anyone else that is "plugged in." When billions of stupid cells get together, each one communicating with only its neighbors, you get a reasonably intelligent human. What do you get when a billion reasonably intelligent humans connect up and start processing data on a global scale? [errr...other than a technophobe crusade, allegations of "playing God," a strange new version of democracy and maybe even a religious war or two, I mean]
    17. Re:Implications by Lorkki · · Score: 1
      However, this is still a very interesting development, as neurons have proven to be quite adaptable, so one could (in theory) learn to recieve or transmit a data feed to an off-site storage location.

      Certainly an interesting and tempting concept. However, I shudder to think what would happen to such an individual were (s)he then suddenly cut off from that external mass memory even temporarily. I seem to find myself feeling a little stranded just losing my less direct access to the Internet at times, but it doesn't really compare at all to suffering an effective lobotomy.

      Still - what wouldn't any self-respecting philomath give to have a memory that doesn't forget, and perhaps even the sum of human knowledge at a thought's length?

    18. Re:Implications by not-enough-info · · Score: 1

      No format that we understand or are able to decipher.
      We are, today, able to somewhat predictably measure and manipulate brain activity with respect to function and memory. Just because we lack the computational power and knowledge required to decipher the format doesn't mean it doesn't exist. And, even if the raw data collected from one brain isn't directly compatible with that of another, doesn't mean it is impossible to translate it from one to the next given enough measurement data and computational power and intelligence.

      --
      ---k--
      </stupid>
  13. Problems with this technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you have one of the older model brains without the polarized plugs, this setup may be troublesome. Also if you plug in more than a couple of brains, the cord gets real hot. And for the kayakers out there or those considering deployment of super-intellegent Christmas lights, the current versions are for indoor use only.

  14. Hybrids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now we can make hybrids to control the operation of our base stars!

    We're almost there....

  15. Long way to go yet... by ZwJGR · · Score: 1

    While being able to detect neural impulses and induce them in live connected nerve cells is an impressive feat, it does not really make deciphering or producing complex nerve signals, such as those associated with sight, hearing or thought, particularly easier.
    The ability to apply a voltage to a few dozen nerve cells does not make it possible to interface with the human nervous system in a seamless way as is suggested as future advancement. I can only assume that this refers to a long time in the future, after a significantly increased pace of advancement. However this hopefully does not preclude the interception of basic muscle motor neurone impulses for prosthetic limbs, and the feedback into the nervous system of touch sensors on the end, perhaps, which is a more realistic and highly useful, for those affected, form of technology/research.

    --
    There is no psychiatrist in the world like a puppy licking your face - Ben Williams
    1. Re:Long way to go yet... by Supermuttonpie · · Score: 1

      This is a good example of how primitive neurone-interface technology, for want of a better descriptor, is. We have all seen infomercials for the external version of this device, and I feel the study you have linked to is more reflective of safety/efficacy concerns while it's also a testament to how good we're getting at water-proofing electronic devices.

    2. Re:Long way to go yet... by Penguinshit · · Score: 1

      I'll let you know after I have the procedure done.

    3. Re:Long way to go yet... by Supermuttonpie · · Score: 1

      It could be worse......Fancy = buggy.

  16. New Icon by Lord_Slepnir · · Score: 1

    If any story deserves to have the "Bill Gates Borg" icon, it's this one.

  17. Laziness by Normal+Dan · · Score: 1

    I love hearing about this research. I'll be one of the first in line to get a brain-computer interface installed/implanted. It's been a long time dream of mine to be able to lay back and do some programming without having to lift a finger. I've already started working on my own EEG, but I'm a bit too lazy to finish it. I have more to say, but I'm too lazy to continue typing.

    --
    A unique way to learn a language: http://languageloom.com
  18. Non-invasive EEG? by Moridineas · · Score: 1

    Can anyone explain non-invasive EEG versus (I guess) invasive EEG?

    1. Re:Non-invasive EEG? by MyNymWasTaken · · Score: 1

      'Non-invasive' is probably being redundantly used to quickly describe an EEG - given that most people don't know what one is.

      Medical Encyclopedia - EEG
      Electroencephalogram (EEG)

      An electroencephalogram (EEG) is a test that measures and records the electrical activity of your brain by using sensors attached to your head and connected by wires to a computer.

    2. Re:Non-invasive EEG? by Mprx · · Score: 1

      If you put the electrodes under the skull you get much better signal quality.

    3. Re:Non-invasive EEG? by David_Shultz · · Score: 3, Informative

      Can anyone explain non-invasive EEG versus (I guess) invasive EEG?

      They don't mean "non-invasive EEG", they mean "non-invasive", which means no surgery is requried. This happens to be an EEG helmet. The alternative, "invasive", involves of course the surgical implantation of some interfacing device.

      Briefly, non-invasive currently sucks. It's nice in that it can work by just wearing a helmet, but you can only (currently) reliably get one bit of information out of it (I vaguely remember hearing about someone getting two, not sure). non-invasive systems are also bulky and require a lot of preparation to use. Also, they require training to use the system and some people are incapable of using it.

      Invasive kind of sucks because you have to have your head opened up, but the results are quite impressive. They have trained a rat to mentally control a water dispensing robot, and they have gotten a monkey to control a robotic arm, for example. Read "the Body Electric" by James Geary. Obviously it's harder to get testing on humans for invasive technologies off the ground.

    4. Re:Non-invasive EEG? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
  19. I am Neo by loggiew · · Score: 1

    I know kung foo.

    1. Re:I am Neo by blake3737 · · Score: 1

      but obviously not the different between foo and fu ;)

    2. Re:I am Neo by tygerstripes · · Score: 1

      Kind of the point, surely. Foo. You know, foo. That old computing term that means "just about any file, folder or anything else" (probably acronym for "File Or Object"). It's one of the oldest metasyntactic varables. If you don't get it, you should probably be quiet. Either that, or say "I don't get it".

      Alternatively, it could just be that the poster "misspelled" it, but then it is a perfectly reasonable romanised spelling of an oriental language. While not conventional, as a phonetically accurate translation it is by no means wrong.

      I think Jesus put it best when he said "Don't be a dick".

      --
      Meta will eat itself
    3. Re:I am Neo by blake3737 · · Score: 1

      You had me at metasyntactic... I mean hello... PS. I do know the difference. And I believe someone in some bar said it best when they said "Go F*ck yourself"

  20. I saw a subtitle for the matrix once... by Jaqenn · · Score: 3, Funny

    I saw a subtitle for the matrix once for when Neo wakes up: "I'm lying naked in a vat of nutrients, with my bodily functions handled by tubes, connected to the internet by a fiber-optic cable wired directly into my brain...THIS IS LIKE A DREAM COME TRUE!!!"

    --
    You are awash in a sea of fiercely stated opinions. Obvious exits are: 'File->Quit', 'Reply', and 'Page Down'.
    1. Re:I saw a subtitle for the matrix once... by Killall+-9+Bash · · Score: 1

      http://www.duk0r.net/matrix/matrix1.php
      originally done by Cr0bar from detonate.net.... back when that site had a pulse.

      --
      "Prediction: within 10 years, Windows will be a Linux distribution." Me, 7-6-2016
  21. USB 2.0 by instagib · · Score: 1

    The days of the memory stick industry are counted ...

    1. Re:USB 2.0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considering how much I forget things, wouldn't this be a good thing for Memory Sticks? Although I doubt anyone would really want to have something Sony proprietary attached to their brain.

  22. Nice, but by hypermanng · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It's all well and good to "biopatch" if you will, but machine-biological interfaces are really the holy grail. Machine engineering is far easier than biological engineering, more replaceable, more durable, and eventually more versatile. If your arm is amputated, we can either restore some basic functionality with a neural extension cord, or we can put a big fat processor connected to precise abiological sensors on it to provide all the proprioceptive and tactile data the original arm would have supplied. The only problem is presentation of that data to our biological brains. For that we'd still need some sort of electrode grid or something. Not an easy problem, but at least if it's solved once it's more or less solved for all time. Trying to regrow biological parts involves a gajillion types of tissue and membranes and so on in bewildering variety. Nature did not design us for easy reverse engineering.

    In any case, biopatching is great and tractible for reconnecting pieces that already fundamentally work, but for wholesale replacement at a high grade of function we still need that bridge.

    --
    I am the one true god. However, as an atheist, I don't believe in myself. I guess I have a self-esteem problem.
    1. Re:Nice, but by FireFury03 · · Score: 1

      Machine engineering is far easier than biological engineering, more replaceable, more durable, and eventually more versatile.

      More durable? When was the last time you saw a significantly complex machine that could run non-stop for 80 years or more?

      Sure, it might be easier to replace broken parts on a machine, but those parts generally wear out a _lot_ faster than biological parts (which are usually inherently being replaced cell by cell throughout their life).

    2. Re:Nice, but by KlaymenDK · · Score: 1

      The only problem is presentation of that data to our biological brains. For that we'd still need some sort of electrode grid or something. Not an easy problem, but at least if it's solved once it's more or less solved for all time. I very much agree with your view about manufacturability, but I do want to say that the presentation, or interface, is not necessarily as big a problem as you think -- it's just untested.

      When a baby is born, it's not fully aware of its body and all the sensory inputs that it provides; the brain has to learn to interpret all those signals. And is amazingly good at it -- take for instance the balance nerve and the very rich information it provides -- with a reasonable amount of training it becomes "second nature", so to speak.

      There are several scientific experiments now (and for the past, oh, ten years) where humans have had simple electrodes implanted and connected to simple computer software. These people report that at first, an electrode signal 'feels' like for instance a tingle in a particular spot of the body; but given time they grow used to the sensation and can tell it apart from an actual touch.

      So if a simple signal (say, the eqivalent of an "you have email" LED) can be learned by the brain, it is quite consceivable that more complex signals (say, positioning data from a 3D mouse or virtual object) can be learned if given ample time and training. Users (if that is the term) have been able to move a screen cursor in two dimensions with nerve signals alone.

      To me, this suggests there is some measure of excess capacity in the human nervous system. Or, if likened to a serial communication line, unutilized bandwidth. Nobody knows how much more 'traffic' you could potentially train your brain and body to process.

      Mind you, I'm not saying we can hook a DSL into our necks, but I see the eventual possibility of a much richer human/computer interface. To think, to be able to move about in a metaverse without two-and-a-half-D controls!
  23. I can see these extension cords might be useful by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 1

    I bet Barzan Ibrahim wished he had one.

    --
    Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
  24. oh man... by icepick101 · · Score: 1

    i've wanted a neural jack ever since i first watched Johnny Mnemonic

    1. Re:oh man... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone actually sat through that entire piece of turd? Where are you, in prison?

  25. From the Planetary Datalinks: by Brunellus · · Score: 1

    I think, and my thoughts cross the barrier into the synapses of the machine, just as the good doctor intended. But what I cannot shake, and what hints at things to come, is that thoughts cross back. In my dreams, the sensibility of the machine invades the periphery of my consciousness: dark, rigid, cold, alien. Evolution is at work here, but just what is evolving remains to be seen.
    Commissioner Pravin Lal, "Man and Machine"
  26. Better than telecommuting! by Zeek40 · · Score: 2, Funny

    So does this mean I can finally just send my brain to work while I stay home without dieing? hmmm.... I'll need to grow hands from my brain too, so it can shut off the alarm clock on its way out.

    1. Re:Better than telecommuting! by corbettw · · Score: 2, Funny

      That would be the exact opposite of what a number of my coworkers do currently.

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
  27. I am Monkeo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I know flung poo.

  28. Bring out the Squid. by dw604 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I want a neural power squid.

  29. Other possibilities? by anethema · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Would it be possible to use this or a similar technique to join breaks in the spinal cord? Maybe even for limited functionality if the 'bandwidth' of one of these cords isn't enough?

    --


    It's easier to fight for one's principles than to live up to them.
    1. Re:Other possibilities? by wolfneuralnet · · Score: 1

      This technology was originally developed (2001) to do just that. The intention was to make a "bridge" between the white matter of the anterior portion of the spinal cord the grey matter below. Any communication between the two would eventually reroute the connections that were still available coming down from the brain to cells (motor neurons that go out to the limbs for example) that were still responsive below. The animal implants are in progress now, and they do show nice integration with the host spinal cord.

  30. Ok, you can attach that to my head... by bruno.fatia · · Score: 1

    as long as the chip is not a Pentium 4.

  31. I worry about the Ghost in the Shell. by WarlockD · · Score: 4, Insightful

    One of the things I like about the TV series is the depth and the questions they pose about the issues with this technology.

    Better question is if it can be stopped. The thing is that when you watch that series, you wonder about the safety rating of this technology. The first Window 95 computers were open to the world, internet wise, so will it be the same for the first 'cyber brain' installs? Will there be a point where you MUST have a retina mechanical replacement or atleast an optic nerve pass though just to read a book? Better yet, what about education? If all your books are DRM encrypted that is mandated to be bought from a school virtual book shop, used books, hell, books could just disappear. We talk about a lack of critical thinking NOW....

    Heck, it even creates the ultimate lower class. Those who not only can't afford to eat, but due to the lack of implants, even achieve a decent job. I mean, it becomes a decision to have your entire body mechanically replaced for a 5 year mining contract or living at the lowest end of the spectrum.

    Maybe I am over thinking this, but its psodo-mandatory that you have a state ID, why would some kind of implant.

    1. Re:I worry about the Ghost in the Shell. by Chandon+Seldon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There's a tradeoff between "planning ahead" and "planning ahead so far that your plans have no chance of applying to the reality". You're risking the latter. An increase in understanding how our body works and how to interface with it / repair it is a good thing. Let's wait until we actually have prototype cybernetic implants working before we worry about the government making them mandatory.

      People are too infatuated with the Frankenstein myth, the absurd belief that research is innately dangerous. Research is *essential*, and not something that we should be stopping just because someone can come up with some unlikely scenario in which new technology could cause problems.

      --
      -- The act of censorship is always worse than whatever is being censored. Always.
    2. Re:I worry about the Ghost in the Shell. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the government making them mandatory.

      Woo man, THAT would be REALLY horrible. Good thing he was just talking about it becoming mandatory just to convince someone to hire you, since companies wouldn't want to hire some meatbag who might get sick or injured or something. That would be merely terrible.

    3. Re:I worry about the Ghost in the Shell. by Chandon+Seldon · · Score: 1

      Whatever. It's still so far in the future that trying to make predictions like that is absurd. It's like if someone had tried to prevent the development of Velcro on the basis that it could be used to tie people into restraints easier.

      --
      -- The act of censorship is always worse than whatever is being censored. Always.
    4. Re:I worry about the Ghost in the Shell. by WarlockD · · Score: 1

      Whatever. It's still so far in the future that trying to make predictions like that is absurd. It's like if someone had tried to prevent the development of Velcro on the basis that it could be used to tie people into restraints easier.

      I will fully admit that what I said is FAR in the future. However, its just that its like computer technology. No one had a clue that in under 20 years, we would be this far along. The only thing really holding us back from any kind of cybernetics is the neural interface technology. Second someone is able to map just a single nerve ending will make this technology soar. I mean lets face it; man is a sucker for gadgets.

      I have no problem with developing this technology, its just I wish people just brainstorm a bit. This technology will zoom quickly and when I am old and have dementia, with these chips the only think keeping me sane, I don't want to worry about a Sony battery recall.

    5. Re:I worry about the Ghost in the Shell. by jackbird · · Score: 1

      The process of human-use approval is so slow, though (and rightly!), that anything in its infancy now will be hitting shelves in 10-15 years, not 1-2 years from now like electronics innovations.

    6. Re:I worry about the Ghost in the Shell. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is actually the basis of the game Deus Ex, just for what it is worth.

    7. Re:I worry about the Ghost in the Shell. by Magada · · Score: 1

      Doesn't matter... You only have to do it once and it is just an interface. You can run arbitrarily complex warez off it... what matters is that there is a workable way to interact with them directly.

      --
      Something bad is coming when people are suddenly anxious to tell the truth.
  32. Why the constant anti-evil slant? by inviolet · · Score: 1
    but not having to perform surgery on the nervous system has many advantages,' [he] says."

    Unless, of course, one happens to be an evil genius and/or mad scientist bent on evil world domination. I for one have had it with the constant anti-evil spin you brief mortals are constantly putting on scientific breakthroughs like this.

    "What are we doing tonight, Brain?"
    "The same thing we do every night, Pinky... no-longer-necessary surgery on the nervous system!"

    --
    FATMOUSE + YOU = FATMOUSE
    1. Re:Why the constant anti-evil slant? by BytePusher · · Score: 1

      This might have a slightly better ring to it: "What are we doing tonight, Brain?" "The same thing we do every night, Pinky... no-longer-necessary surgery on your central nervous system!" Just a thought.

  33. I love when science fiction becomes reality... by Grinin · · Score: 1

    ...at least when it is in a good and positive way.

    I don't so much like it when its a "Big Brother" is watching your every key-stroke kind of way. (Hi BB!)

    -2cents

  34. I'm One step closer... by ErrataMatrix · · Score: 1

    ...to having my wet wire so I can download my engram to a black box. This will allow my program to run before hardware failure causes early termination and permanent data loss. Dreams anyone? I have dreams for sale.

  35. Ghost In The Shell by veredox · · Score: 1

    Not to mention that non-invasive EEG would be one way. I don't want anyone hacking my brain.

    1. Re:Ghost In The Shell by Virtual_Raider · · Score: 1

      Anyone can hack into your brain right this day. It can take the form of social engineering, indoctrination, culture, advertisement. People are constantly trying to break into your mind and place ideas there with the explicit intent of "programming you" to do something they want you to do, and I'd wager that's a more real concern that some physical tampering. Heck, I am doing it now by introducing this idea that wasn't there before. Are you aware of the the things you "know"? Do you have any idea of how much of that "knowledge" is belief rather than fact? (you don't need to answer me, these are rhetorical questions).

      On the other hand, since we are speculating about something not even remotely feasible for the foreseeable next 10 to 20 years (this is one of my beliefs, not a fact) I'd bet that any wetware interfaces would have to be regulated under the same category that critical systems are. One would not, and legally can't use plain vanilla Linux, Windows or OSX for certain applications where the failure to operate properly may result in injuries or loss of human life, such as in some medical and military settings. One needs specially certified systems, so in all likelihood any computational devices that they placed in your brain should operate under those standards and not under shrink-wrap commercial software with guarantees that disclaim suitability for any particular purpose.

      You can go and get elective surgery like lasik at discount prices (I did!) but even then they have to perform very thorough studies lest you walk out blind. And you should strive to get informed when undergoing any such process, which are fundamentally different from purchasing consumer electronics (which you should also ideally research at least a little, but if you blow it buying a cheap Chinese knock-off gadget, the most you usually stand to lose is money [and even Brand companies sell exploding batteries sometimes, don't they?]).

      Remeber kids, [meme]You don't get what you deserve, you get what you negotiate for[/meme]. So it stands to reason that anyone considering stuffing electronics and software inside their skulls should research the risks it entails, and to protect the Darwin Award would-be-candidates from themselves there would be medical regulations in place at least similar to those that exist for other elective surgery procedures. And that's assuming it would ever attain the status of elective. I think that the world is drifting towards 1984 rather than Neuromancer, so extrapolating from where we stand now it seems unlikely that anyone could purchase brain implants in back alley shops that wouldn't be regulated leaving them exposed to unauthorized tampering.

      --
      +Raider of the lost BBS
    2. Re:Ghost In The Shell by Magada · · Score: 1

      Yoou haven't read Neuromancer very attentively, have you? Most of the characters are either riff-raff or super-rich so you don't really notice it, but... there is security everywhere (private, police, corporate, you name it), the Turing police has global authority just like the Yakuza, being a sarariman (like most of the middle class is) is just like being an indentured servant in 18th century England and so on and so forth. On the whole, not as left-wing-command-economy as 1984, true, but just as oppressive. Do you feel that the world is moving towards planned economy? I think not.

      --
      Something bad is coming when people are suddenly anxious to tell the truth.
  36. You still need a strain relief bushing by mbstone · · Score: 1

    but not having to perform surgery on the nervous system has many advantages

    You would still need to drill a hole in your skull and insert a little rubber grommet into the hole. Then, you tie a knot in the cord that is slightly larger than the grommet. This will keep people from accidentally tugging or jerking on the cord and pulling out part of your brain.

  37. Exactly by hypermanng · · Score: 1

    With machines, you can just replace damaged parts. Biological parts usually wear out even faster than machines, but as you point out there's mechanisms in place to repair the bioparts along the way. Think of modern manufacturing as being the repair process writ large and simplified. In that view, a number of 16th century windmills have far outlasted any of the biological machines that built them. Perhaps those are insufficiently complex to qualify in your mind, or maybe they are insufficiently non-stop in their operation. I would say they are nonetheless excellent candidates for comparison to, say a knee, which is a very complex device designed to accomplish a fairly simple task. Also, a knee in constant use without rest will break down in an awful hurry.

    It would seem fairly easy to, when one's cybernetic arm is mechanically damaged, to take the spare out of your closet or whatever, flash the firmware with the virtual neural state of the damaged arm, and blammo, it feels exactly the same. Then you ship the damaged arm back to the manufacturer.

    There are limits, of course. As long as the brain remains biological (and it seems likely to remain so for a long time) then one must have functioning metabolism feeding the brain, so full body replacements don't appear to be immediately in the offing. It might even be easier to "migrate" the mind from wetware to hardware than to work out ways to accommodate the incredibly convolute requirements of the various metabolic systems. "Easy" in the sense of being plausibly tractable by the end of the century.

    --
    I am the one true god. However, as an atheist, I don't believe in myself. I guess I have a self-esteem problem.
  38. Neural Rape! by Dareth · · Score: 1

    If this technology ever came to be, I would like to visit all of my old professors, most especially the math professors. And NO, I am not interested in getting their knowledge of math directly from their brain. I really, REALLY want to give them back everything I got from their classes. I can't think of a worse thing I could ever do.

    --

    I only look human.
    My mother is a halfling and my dad is an ogre, so that makes me an Ogreling
    1. Re:Neural Rape! by powerpants · · Score: 2, Funny

      If you couldn't handle their classes, what makes you think you could overpower them mentally? You might just be setting yourself up for... whatever-the-fook-we're-talking-about.

  39. Partial data by hypermanng · · Score: 1

    Having partial data from peoples' brains seems likely to be about as useful as 48 bits of a 128bit key - it might help in some way for those crunching the ciphertext, but on its own it's not going to make anything intelligible.

    --
    I am the one true god. However, as an atheist, I don't believe in myself. I guess I have a self-esteem problem.
  40. non-invasive EEG are useless. by John+Sokol · · Score: 1

    To communicate with the brain properly you need to interface with many individual neurons.

        I keep seeing people talk about decypering these communications. That's not how it really works.
        It may be possible to see some patterns, but to do it right, the computer side and the brain side need to adapt and learn together how to interract and communicate. Litterally the Brain grows new connection in the process of learning. Having Neurons grown on a chip in a dish and then have the whole thing implanted near the center of the brain you need to interface to would be the ideal way to do this, because the extermal grown neurons will have grown and learn how to interface to the chip and now those neurons will then adapt and grown with the brain's.

      The chip that interfaces will also have to have a simulated neuron network that will also learn and adapt to eventually negotiate how to communicate with the brain.

      Neuron's aren't like digital logic, no group of brain cells learn and grow the same way and any others, they are all unique and have to in some sense negotiate how to communicate messages with each other, using a reward and punishment system.

    John

    --
    I am always doing that which I can not do, in order that I may learn how to do it. - Pablo Picasso
  41. What about this one? by cookie_token · · Score: 1

    TFA reminded me of something I stumbled across last year: http://www.gfai.de/~heinz/. It's mostly german, but this guy's publications contain many new concepts and ideas and are definitely worth some time and consideration.
    http://www.gfai.de/~heinz/historic/index.htm has more material on the topic.

  42. I thought this was going to be about.... by Molochi · · Score: 1

    I thought this article was going to talk about floating wires up into your brain through the bloodstream. http://www.pbs.org/22ndcentury/story_brain.html

    I caught the show the other night but PBS has it online, as well.

    It would be great; a harkonen heartplug and a datajack all-in-one.

    --
    "The Adobe Updater must update itself before it can check for updates. Would you like to update the Adobe Updater now?"
  43. Ninja skills by Xamusk · · Score: 0

    Now I can finally learn kung-fu in a few hours

  44. Interesting, but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hope it won't lag.