Slashdot Mirror


Parking Attendant 2.0

theodp writes "Would you trust a robot to park your car? That's the question facing New Yorkers as the city's first robotic parking garage opens in Chinatown. With new software and enough laser and radar sensors to make Fort Knox jealous, it's believed that the new facility — which can squeeze 67 cars in space that would otherwise hold only 24 — will not suffer the kind of glitches that caused the nation's first robotic garage in nearby NJ to drop and trap cars."

189 comments

  1. The FIRST robotic garage in NJ... by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 5, Informative

    ... did not trap cars due to technical malfunctions, but rather due to a contractual dispute.

    1. Re:The FIRST robotic garage in NJ... by rvw · · Score: 4, Funny

      ... did not trap cars due to technical malfunctions, but rather due to a contractual dispute. That sounds more like a "mob"otic garage...
    2. Re:The FIRST robotic garage in NJ... by phayes · · Score: 1
      According to TFA:

      Dennis Clarke, the chief operating officer at Robotic Parking, called the 26-hour outage a freak incident, where two redundant sensors failed at the same time and a maintenance crew failed to follow company policy in not repairing them right away

      Sure looks like a technical problem to me...
      --
      Democracy is a sheep and two wolves deciding what to have for lunch. Freedom is a well armed sheep contesting the issue
    3. Re:The FIRST robotic garage in NJ... by massysett · · Score: 4, Informative

      In NJ, it was a battle over the software used to run the garage. It was proprietary software, which made it easy for the vendor to hold the city hostage. Remember this story?

      http://hardware.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/08/ 08/1512211

    4. Re:The FIRST robotic garage in NJ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd trust a German robot, but you couldn't pay me to leave my car in an American robo parking garage.

    5. Re:The FIRST robotic garage in NJ... by MindStalker · · Score: 1

      Yea people seem to have their stories mixed up. There was a temporary outage at one point. But the interesting stuff happened when the city decided to kick the maintainers out of their office and break the contract. The maintainers simply shut down the system (trapping cars) and said the city is no longer registered to operate the software :)

    6. Re:The FIRST robotic garage in NJ... by Idbar · · Score: 5, Funny
      If runs linux, I wouldn't go if that runs on MS OSs. However, about the question:

      Would you trust a robot to park your car?
      I think it's clear that robots won't take your car for a spin, won't move your seats and mirrors or smoke in your car. Unless of course Bender is already out there working for them.
    7. Re:The FIRST robotic garage in NJ... by ozbird · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think it's clear that robots won't take your car for a spin, won't move your seats and mirrors or smoke in your car.

      ... yet.

    8. Re:The FIRST robotic garage in NJ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wouldn't go if that runs linux, linux depends on knowledgable users to even list files, let alone control car throwing robots!

  2. Get me one! by lemmen · · Score: 4, Funny

    Get me one so my wife can finally park her car normally!

    1. Re:Get me one! by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      Get me one so my wife can finally park her car normally!

      I call BS. This is slashdot; you don't have a wife. Admit it, your blow-up doll can't park at all! :P

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    2. Re:Get me one! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The 6 digit UIDs are, as a general rule, at least 20 years old by now since they started surfing slashdot about 8 years ago. The rest of you, I can't speak for.

  3. I, Robot by SinVulture · · Score: 2, Funny

    Reminds me of the scences from I, Robot that showed the immense automated car storage system. I'm looking forward to Parting Attendant 3.0.

    1. Re:I, Robot by Hanners1979 · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm looking forward to Parting Attendant 3.0.

      A hairdressing robot?

    2. Re:I, Robot by hey! · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Reminds me of the scences from I, Robot that showed the immense automated car storage system.
      It's kind of like when you see a Edwardian engraving depicting life a hundred years in the future. They'll show advances that haven't happened yet (e.g. everybody flying around in their own personal dirigibles), but miss other ones. I think in a world with robotics so advanced, it is unlikely that anybody will drive -- or be allowed to drive -- a personal automobile, except at the track. It's like the dawn of radio: people missed the possibility of broadcast or person to person communication. They thought you or your servant would go to the telegraph office to send and receive your messages.
      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    3. Re:I, Robot by Elrac · · Score: 1

      A divorce-lawyering robot?

      --
      When one person suffers from a delusion, it is called insanity. When many people suffer from a delusion it is called Rel
    4. Re:I, Robot by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I'm looking forward to Parting Attendant 3.0.

      I haven't even seen 2.0, and the only experience I had with parting attendant 1.0 was when my Camaro got stolen and the cops found just the unibody. I don't think I want to see what 3.0 does. Probably won't even have to steal my car, it'll just be a truck that like slides the back over on top of it looking like a shipping container, and they just come back and pick up the parts 'round 3AM.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    5. Re:I, Robot by esampson · · Score: 1

      I can't wait either because I think the writers really nailed how one of those things would work. I mean the way all the loose change and dirt tumbled around to pile up on the driver's side window was a stroke of genius. It's really too bad they had to cut the scene where he had to make a quick stop after going to the grocery. :)

  4. Better now than later.. by Yetihehe · · Score: 1

    But does it run linux?
    Imagine big parking lot (beowulf cluster) of these.
    I, for one, welcome our car throwing, parking overlords.

    --
    Extreme Programming - Redundant Array of Inexpensive Developers
    1. Re:Better now than later.. by owlnation · · Score: 3, Funny

      You forgot...

      In Soviet Russia, car parks you.

    2. Re:Better now than later.. by Yetihehe · · Score: 1

      And in Soviet America mafiaa takes your car for listening pirated music on your in-car stereo.

      --
      Extreme Programming - Redundant Array of Inexpensive Developers
    3. Re:Better now than later.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its robotic. It doesn't need drivers except to bring the cars to the location and then take them away again.

    4. Re:Better now than later.. by Crunchie+Frog · · Score: 1

      But does it run linux?

      Funny you should ask that. This morning I was waking up at my desk. Slurping coffee and deleting spam when a co-worker wandered past with a discharged mobile phone. He borrowed a USB cable to charge it from his PC but came back because windows tried and failed to find drivers for that type of phone and refused to supply electrons to charge it.

      He solved the problem by plugging it into a linux box, which doesn't expect to have drivers for mobile phones, but it raises an issue about the "drivers for everything, even standard things" approach of windows. Will you be told that a windows controlled car park can't accept your car because it doesn't have the drivers to interrogate your sound system to verify the validity of your CD collection?

      Thus is complete crap. USB sockets are powered or not powered but there's no driver deciding to turn power on or off for a particular device. I recharge plenty of devices via usb under windows without bothering to install drivers. Try again troll.
      --
      --- Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity
    5. Re:Better now than later.. by ambrosen · · Score: 1

      Funny you should say that. The USB spec's quite clear that electrons should only be supplied to devices that are exchanging data with the host.

    6. Re:Better now than later.. by jimstapleton · · Score: 0

      Ok, I can see this now

      [stew]
      Parking > spot 3 ...
      Dependancy Error: Parking Spot 3 depends on sedan-model cars in spot 2 and 4. Spot 4

      "DAMNIT! Spot 3 is the spot that my car is supposed to go into, I'll get ticketed if it is elswhere."

      [stan comes along and tries to access the attendant next to stew]
      Parking > spot 5 ...
      Dependancy Error: Parking spot 5 depends on minivan-model cars in spot 4 and 6
      "Huh? WTF?"

      Stew: "Whats up?"
      Stan: "It won't let me put the car in my spot unless there's a minivan in spot 4 and 6."
      Stew: "That's annoying... WAIT... I can't park unless there is a sedan in spot 4!"
      Stan: "So... we can't park at the same time?"
      Stew: "Apparantly not. Unless we want to go to the wrong spot and get tickets. Who set this crap up?"

      [a few minutes later, steve, a sedan driver pulls up to the next attendant..."
      Parking > Spot 4
      Dependancy Error: Spot 4 requires vehicles in spots 3 and 5. Spot 4 cannot hold minivan or sedan.
      "What the hell!? I can't park in my own spot with my own car?"

      Stan: "Not only that, but spots 3 and 5 cant be filled at the same time due to these stupid dependancies."
      Stew: "Who said we should use Linux on these things again?"

      --
      34486853790
      Connection too slow for X forwarding? Try "ssh -CX user@host"
    7. Re:Better now than later.. by autocracy · · Score: 1

      "A USB devise is currently drawing too much power and the port will be deactivated." Yeah, totally. Trolling down the river.

      --
      SIG: HUP
    8. Re:Better now than later.. by kimvette · · Score: 1

      Well, think of the poor proprietary manufacturers! If they promote and adhere to standards, and document the external interface to their devices, they are somehow giving away competitive advantages to their competitors. No, instead, they will provide you only with proprietary, Windows-only drivers, and you will thank them for the privilege of having a half-working device to begin with.

      (this also applies to video, cards, and WiFi cards)

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    9. Re:Better now than later.. by Crunchie+Frog · · Score: 1

      Funny you should say that. The USB spec's quite clear that electrons should only be supplied to devices that are exchanging data with the host. Well that would be somewhat of an issue with a USB powered harddrive... which comes first, the data to initiate power, or the power to allow data exchange?
      --
      --- Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity
    10. Re:Better now than later.. by giorgiofr · · Score: 1

      He's not a troll. Windows will not charge my RAZR unless the correct drivers are loaded. I know it's ridiculous but that's just the way it is.

      --
      Global warming is a cube.
    11. Re:Better now than later.. by jamar0303 · · Score: 1

      He's right. My phone's the same way. Couldn't charge it on one of those USB-to-AC wall chargers, and it wouldn't charge on my PC until drivers were found. The phone refused to recognize that it was connected to anything until the drivers were installed. Maybe it's a Japanese thing (my phone's a Toshiba), or maybe you're incredibly lucky. But there are devices out there that won't charge until data of some form is transmitted that tells the socket to start delivering power.

      --
      OSx86 FTW
    12. Re:Better now than later.. by tha_mink · · Score: 1

      Thus is complete crap. USB sockets are powered or not powered but there's no driver deciding to turn power on or off for a particular device. I recharge plenty of devices via usb under windows without bothering to install drivers. Try again troll. Actually, you're the crap holder. Windows won't charge the blackberry line of phones without drivers. I know a *ton* of USB phones that won't charge under windows without drivers. So like...you're totally wrong.
      --
      You'll have that sometimes...
    13. Re:Better now than later.. by SnowZero · · Score: 1

      Ooh that's funny. This was only solved nine years ago. Your comment is about as relevant as making fun of Win98 after the release of Vista. Welcome to the 21st century.

    14. Re:Better now than later.. by electronerdz · · Score: 1

      You must not use USB much. The original Windows XP CD's had a bug in the USB drivers during setup. If you had a USB keyboard, the driver would crap out. The USB ports would turn off. I know this because the optical mouse light turned off once setup loaded. So the driver turned off the ports. Or am I just a troll?

      --
      Kernel Krunch - Part of a Complete OS
    15. Re:Better now than later.. by jimstapleton · · Score: 1

      well, it's an imperfect solution, because APT did exactly that kind of thing to me two years ago. I couldn't grab the dependancies at times, or it could grab them but couldn't handle some conflict.

      It's been alleviated I'll grant you, but solved, it is not.

      --
      34486853790
      Connection too slow for X forwarding? Try "ssh -CX user@host"
    16. Re:Better now than later.. by ambrosen · · Score: 2, Informative
      Well, I oversimplified, and I'm no expert, but according to Wikipedia

      the USB specification requires that devices connect in a low-power mode (100 mA maximum) and state how much current they need, before switching, with the host's permission, into high-power mode.
      That sounds reasonable.
    17. Re:Better now than later.. by operagost · · Score: 1

      I can back you up based simply on the fact that I have a $1 LED light that plugs into my laptop's USB port. Windows doesn't see it, because it has absolutely no brains in it. It just sucks power off the port.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    18. Re:Better now than later.. by ewanm89 · · Score: 1

      Some of the new motorola phones seem to have to do some negotiation to charge them. They seem to charge them enough to power up the computer and then negotiate whether to charge or not. Drivers can be downloaded from motorola to charge on windows, but my computer runs linux. My problem is getting the motorola java api to install with eclipse/linux.

  5. Not Really New by Garrett+Fox · · Score: 5, Informative

    This isn't entirely a new idea. Tokyo already has space-efficient parking garages that stack cars using turntables and elevators. I think the images atop this link are fake, but the video appears real and this appears similar to what I saw from outside.

    --
    Revive the Constitution.
    1. Re:Not Really New by notAyank · · Score: 1

      I remember seeing these type of garages in Osaka in 2001 or 2002, if I'm not mistaken

    2. Re:Not Really New by jrumney · · Score: 3, Informative

      I remember using one in Nagoya in 1989. They are not new technology at all.

    3. Re:Not Really New by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 5, Informative

      The picture you think is fake is an actual "garage" at VW. It's not something where you park your car, but it's where new cars are stored awaiting the customers. (You had a hint in the text, plus all cars in the picture are clearly VWs) It's in "Autostad" near Wolfsburg.

      It saves a bit space and is a nice to show off ;-)

    4. Re:Not Really New by QuickFox · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I remember using one in Nagoya in 1989. They are not new technology at all. Come on, we're dealing with Americans here, people who believe war is a solution to everything, even to terrorism. No need to embarrass them further by rubbing their nose in how backward they are.
      --
      Terrorists can't threaten a country's freedom and democracy. Only lawmakers and voters can do that.
    5. Re:Not Really New by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      Tokyo already has space-efficient parking garages that stack cars using turntables[...]

      Yeah, but after the Giant Discjockey Incident people are getting weary of all the scratching.

      *ba-dum pshh*

      Thank you, I'll be here all week. Tip your waitress.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    6. Re:Not Really New by Skater · · Score: 1

      As an American, let me just say...

      I'll kill you for that!

      Just kidding. :) I'm no expert on parking systems, but from what I've read these systems are new in the manner in which they work - each car is on a tray that can go in all sorts of directions independently of all the other cars, while the older ones mentionedabove just have fixed trays and the whole mechanism rotates (or elevates) into the proper position to find the car.

    7. Re:Not Really New by kisielk · · Score: 1

      Yep. I live in Japan right now, and these parking garages are everywhere. I pass about 3 on the walk to work each day, and I don't even live in a major metropolitan area.

    8. Re:Not Really New by jrumney · · Score: 1

      Its not a case of being backward, more a tradeoff between the cost of installing and maintaining a complex system vs property prices for the land required for a simpler conventional carpark. With skyrocketing property prices around the world in the last few years, its not surprising that we're starting to see solutions that Japan adopted at the peak of its property bubble in the 1980's.

    9. Re:Not Really New by beset · · Score: 1

      Am I the only one who really wants to leave a video camera running a car to catch all the inner workings of the garage? Watching your car whirl around above masses of others would be like porn to me.

      Come to think of it, why hasn't anyone done this (or linked to this) already?!

      --
      1) Clever Sig 2) ????? 3) Profit!
    10. Re:Not Really New by drsquare · · Score: 1

      That's nothing, I saw one on Thunderbirds in the 60s.

    11. Re:Not Really New by johnw · · Score: 1

      There was one in Leeds in the early 70s. Slightly different in that it went up rather than down, but otherwise pretty much the same.

    12. Re:Not Really New by QuickFox · · Score: 1

      the land required for a simpler conventional carpark. Carpark? It's the penchant for war that is embarrassing, not the parking arrangements. And my comment wasn't meant to be taken seriously, even though there's truth in it. It's a bitter joke.
      --
      Terrorists can't threaten a country's freedom and democracy. Only lawmakers and voters can do that.
    13. Re:Not Really New by butlerdi · · Score: 1

      I have been using one of these in London (Pimlico) since around 1995/6. No problems. Large number of cars, and as it in the heart of the city many expensive autos delivered daily to their rightful owners with no damage.

      --
      "If the King's English was good enough for Jesus, it's good enough for me!" -- "Ma" Ferguson, Governor of Texas (circa
    14. Re:Not Really New by jrumney · · Score: 1

      Was it like the one in Birmingham from the same era, mothballed after a week because it didn't work?

    15. Re:Not Really New by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Am I the only one who really wants to leave a video camera running a car to catch all the inner workings of the garage? Watching your car whirl around above masses of others would be like porn to me.

      Here is a link: AutoMotion Parking Systems Video

      --
      Jumpstart the tartan drive.
    16. Re:Not Really New by QuickFox · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      (Moderators who feel that this is off-topic, it's not, wait and see.)

      I think most of us Europeans see it more or less as you described. Except we get the impression that not only your politicians but also your media lie, persistently and to a disastrous extent. This is extremely worrying, since you democracy can't exist without calm debate based on truth.

      We certainly don't hate or despise Americans, on the contrary, we tend to see you as respected friends and allies. I get the impression that some of your media make it look like we hate you, by holding forth fringe Europeans who do, but the mainstream people certainly don't. Your shocking re- election of Bush did make quite a dent in our confidence, but that dent is very, very far from hatred or despise. (Most assume that he was re-elected by the American people and not by Diebold.)

      However, I must mention -- and I mention this only to ward off the dreaded off-topic mod -- I must mention that we feel that your extreme use of private cars wouldn't be this extreme were it not for the above-mentioned media lies, in this case lies about climate change; and that because of this extreme usage, any parking problems that you may have are self-inflicted and well-deserved. With this masterly twist at the very end, this entire rant becomes nicely on-topic.

      --
      Terrorists can't threaten a country's freedom and democracy. Only lawmakers and voters can do that.
    17. Re:Not Really New by beset · · Score: 1

      Am I the only one who really wants to leave a video camera running a car to catch all the inner workings of the garage? Watching your car whirl around above masses of others would be like porn to me.

      Here is a link: AutoMotion Parking Systems Video Thanks for that. Not nearly as cool as my mind had made it out to be but still really neat.

      I'd hate to be the person responsible for maintaining all the mechanical runners, plus I know my trackcar would ground itself once you'd driven it into the ramps. Even a standard supercar would have clearance issues.
      --
      1) Clever Sig 2) ????? 3) Profit!
    18. Re:Not Really New by operagost · · Score: 0

      Only months after suffering a horrible terrorist attack, the Spaniards elected a leftist terrorist appeaser who immediately pulled all Spanish troops out of Afghanistan AND Iraq. Europeans are cowards, trolls, and will have to pull the huge planks out of their eyes before pointing at the speck in a Yankee's.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    19. Re:Not Really New by Lars+T. · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Only months after suffering a horrible terrorist attack, the Spaniards elected a leftist terrorist appeaser who immediately pulled all Spanish troops out of Afghanistan AND Iraq. Europeans are cowards, trolls, and will have to pull the huge planks out of their eyes before pointing at the speck in a Yankee's. Only months after suffering a horrible terrorist attack, the Spaniards kicked out the government who had lied to them about who the terrorists were. Gee, looks like they are smarter than you after all.
      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    20. Re:Not Really New by johnw · · Score: 1

      I don't know whether it was physically like the one in Birmingham, but it certainly wasn't mothballed after a week. It was a regular part of any visit to Leeds for me as a young teenager to go and watch it.

    21. Re:Not Really New by costas · · Score: 1

      My hometown (Thessaloniki, Greece) has had robo-parking for at about 2-3 years now: PDF; I think it can hold 100-200 cars and works pretty well: takes a minute or two to "park" the car on the receptor and generally 5 minutes or so to retrieve it. Faster than actually walking up a parking deck, finding the car and driving out (never mind safer and with less potential damage to the vehicle).

    22. Re:Not Really New by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 1

      I know my trackcar would ground itself once you'd driven it into the ramps

      I just watched the "Original Stolzer Parkhaus video - 3:25" video on that site. What ramps? The only "ramp" I have seen is the slight depression the tires of the red BMW are in. That's 3cm or so.... If you don't have 3cm clearance under your car you'll have other problems than parking your car. Just driving around would damage it.

      I don't claim that my Audi TT is a supercar (it clearly isn't), but that "ramp" is not a problem at all. I've seen a Lamborghini take a speedbump once (+/-20cm high, I guess) and it had to slow to a crawl, but it didn't seem to be a problem getting over it.

    23. Re:Not Really New by QuickFox · · Score: 1

      Only months after suffering a horrible terrorist attack, the Spaniards elected a leftist terrorist appeaser For several months before the Iraq war, Europe was horrified by the catastrophic chaos in Iraq that would inevitably follow, the vastly increased terrorist recruitment opportunity, the risk of civil war, and the total lack of discernible exit strategy and other specific plans. Only the US remained unaware of all this, its media in a blind frenzy of "rallying around the flag", its government giving childish replies of "Either you're with us or you're against us".

      The descriptions in our debates turned out to be horrifyingly, nightmarishly accurate. The nightmare still plays out, just as horribly and just as devoid of solution.

      Europeans are cowards, trolls, No, we're simply less blind and stupid.

      The reason may be that we never can work up a rally-round-the-flag frenzy. There is no such nationalism in Europe.
      --
      Terrorists can't threaten a country's freedom and democracy. Only lawmakers and voters can do that.
    24. Re:Not Really New by beset · · Score: 1

      I just watched the "Original Stolzer Parkhaus video - 3:25" video on that site. What ramps? The only "ramp" I have seen is the slight depression the tires of the red BMW are in. That's 3cm or so.... If you don't have 3cm clearance under your car you'll have other problems than parking your car. Just driving around would damage it.

      I don't claim that my Audi TT is a supercar (it clearly isn't), but that "ramp" is not a problem at all. I've seen a Lamborghini take a speedbump once (+/-20cm high, I guess) and it had to slow to a crawl, but it didn't seem to be a problem getting over it.

      I watched the SWF "Automotion Promotional Movie" and the tyre depression looked to be around 3" in the final shot. As always YMMV.
      --
      1) Clever Sig 2) ????? 3) Profit!
    25. Re:Not Really New by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're an idiot. Please shut the fuck up, and stop shaming my country further.

    26. Re:Not Really New by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, everyone, listen to this guy. He's a religious nut who majored in music. Obviously an expert in European politics, terrorism, Afghanistan and Iraq.

      Little bald man, shut the fuck up.

    27. Re:Not Really New by pete6677 · · Score: 1

      Yes, its very smart to let terrorists dictate foreign policy.

    28. Re:Not Really New by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Typical conservative rant:

        Use any combination of: terrorist, leftist, coward, Iraq, liberal, traitor
        Stir thoroughly
        Bake on high for 160 minutes
        Et voila!

      Man, it must suck to be a conservative and seeing the wind blowing left again!! Now... go check your mail.

    29. Re:Not Really New by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

      Yes, its very smart to let terrorists dictate foreign policy. Go attack your own President for that then.
      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

  6. Great idea! by CaptainZapp · · Score: 4, Interesting
    They tried such a scheme (alas not quite as sofisticated) in the city of Zurich, Switzerland a few years ago. You parked your car in a lift thingie, left it, acknowledged a sort of EULA in which you certified that you didn't leave life animals in your car and presto! Your car was parked fully automagically.

    The parking worked like a charm too. What didn't quite work was the retrieval of your car (which should happen within 120 seconds according to the specs). The city, as the owner of the garage, had to shell out a few nights in a nice hotel until the less lucky owners cars could be retrieved by manual intervention.

    --
    ich bin der musikant

    mit taschenrechner in der hand

    kraftwerk

    1. Re:Great idea! by MichaelSmith · · Score: 2, Funny

      acknowledged a sort of EULA in which you certified that you didn't leave life animals in your car

      Gee those Swiss are civilised. If the car park was outside an Australian casino the EULA would have to make you certify that you didn't leave your children in the car.

    2. Re:Great idea! by Kijori · · Score: 1, Funny

      Gee those Swiss are civilised. If the car park was outside an Australian casino the EULA would have to make you certify that you didn't leave your children in the car.

      I'm not sure I'd call it that civilized to keep your children alive while on car journeys...

    3. Re:Great idea! by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1
      ...make you certify that you didn't leave your children in the car.

      Given the behavior of most children I've seen in public lately, I'd say they fit firmly in the "animals" category.

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
  7. Not very detailed by archeopterix · · Score: 1
    Ok, the previous garage had serious problems, the current is (supposedly) OK.

    It would be interesting to know a bit more, specifically what were the main difficulties in building the system? It seems very simple - make sure that the car fits into a (virtual) box ( you can do that by first trying to fit it into a real box :-) ), then put the box into a free space.

    1. Re:Not very detailed by Fist!+Of!+Death! · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Probably a Towers of Hanoi type problem. i.e. economically shifting other parked cars to liberate the one right at the back. Could probably overcome it by intelligent stacking using previous park times for the same number plate etc.
      So in short probably no problem from a codiing point of view - reliability of the 'robots' (read moving shelf thingies) is probably the real issue

      --
      Nothing witty
    2. Re:Not very detailed by ctr2sprt · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The fastest way to make this system really complicated is go with dynamic parking spot sizes. Then you'd need to figure out the dimensions of every car being parked and remember them, as well as periodically reorder vehicles to reclaim "dead" space. ("The parking garage is getting slow, we'd better run defrag!") This would be a really, really neat system, but it'd have to be perfect or the robot would slam cars into each other if it guessed their sizes wrong. And quite aside from the cost to repair the damaged vehicles (and probably the damaged robot as well), I'd be worried about some drunk kids riding in their cars as they're being parked (hell, I'm sober and I think it'd be pretty cool) and getting decapitated or something. Imagine the lawsuits coming from that one.

      You could also make the robots somewhat smart, like we do with elevators, and have them reposition cars intelligently based on when they are statistically more likely to be reclaimed. (At work, the parking garage elevators "park" at the 3rd floor at 7am, then gradually move up toward the 10th floor as the garage fills up.) So statistics may show that most people fall into one of two groups: people who park for about an hour, and people who park for about four hours. The robots could then, during idle time, find the cars which are likely to be recalled soon and move them closer to the entrance. This isn't just a convenience thing: if the robot is fetching a car, it can't put one in the garage, so the faster you can get cars in and out, the more cars (over the course of a day) you can store (and the more money you can make). This would be especially crucial for local events like sports games, where 20k people are all going to be getting their cars at the same time.

    3. Re:Not very detailed by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 4, Funny

      Probably a Towers of Hanoi type problem. i.e. economically shifting other parked cars to liberate the one right at the back.

      Oh, great. And when you park the 64th car the Universe ends.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    4. Re:Not very detailed by Fist!+Of!+Death! · · Score: 1

      Well it probably reboots to Pong at the very least. Which would be bad news for your car/paddle

      --
      Nothing witty
    5. Re:Not very detailed by maxume · · Score: 1

      The added complexity wouldn't just be in the slot management, the handling equipment would have to be able to resize itself(at least in order to put a car in a slot) -- the system in the article has the cars on uniform pallets that are handled. Moving around a standard size sled is way easier than moving around randomly sized cars.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    6. Re:Not very detailed by Radon360 · · Score: 1

      So not only do we have to defrag our hard drives, we have to defrag the parking structures too??

    7. Re:Not very detailed by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 1

      The system stacks cars in way that it needs to move one out to get to one that is behind it.

    8. Re:Not very detailed by sloth+jr · · Score: 1

      I'd be worried about some drunk kids riding in their cars as they're being parked (hell, I'm sober and I think it'd be pretty cool) and getting decapitated or something. Imagine the lawsuits coming from that one.
      Oh, no need for something quite as dramatic as decapitation. The real problem is anyone riding in the vehicle - because how, then, would they get themselves OUT of the garage, especially if retrieval is through magnetic card system (so calling a friend to come retrieve your car wouldn't work). I'm assuming that a robotic car garage would be a fairly unfriendly place for someone to play obstacle course in....
    9. Re:Not very detailed by GWBasic · · Score: 1

      This isn't just a convenience thing: if the robot is fetching a car, it can't put one in the garage, so the faster you can get cars in and out, the more cars (over the course of a day) you can store (and the more money you can make). This would be especially crucial for local events like sports games, where 20k people are all going to be getting their cars at the same time.

      You really don't need robotic parking for events where everyone shows up and leaves at the same time. In Boston, near Fenway park, during Red Sox games, the cheap parking lots just block everyone in. When the game ends, everything sorts itself out! I've seen the same approach work at a church; everyone who plans on leaving right after the mass blocks each other in.

  8. Plagiarized Summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow, theodp really plagiarized the heck with the summary. Why write your own summary when you can just cut and paste? Heck, I can not get 100 Slashdot submissions per hour! It is sad that it is so bloody obvious.

    1. Re:Plagiarized Summary by snoggeramus · · Score: 0

      From now on all summaries must be submitted in hex.

  9. someone set us up the car by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    The one in NJ dropped cars? I remember it was shut down with cars inside by a contract dispute.

    I don't see the big novelty since there's been a variety of systems in Japan for a dog's age, but this is an American design, at least according to sharply-named Robotic Parking Systems's website. (Which I won't link to, since it has pretty much no actual content and is only missing the Monorail Song.)

    Do love this quote from the vendor in TFA: "What seems to have happened is that the developers have been wanting this for a long time, but the architects have been lagging behind. Architects use the same plans over and over, particularly when it comes to parking in a garage."

    Riiiiight. Gosh those architects just walk all over developers. More likely it's been uneconomical till now. I guess that was the vendor's way of deflecting attention from what will be hefty sticker shock.

  10. Self-Parking cars by advocate_one · · Score: 4, Informative

    too late... self-parking cars are already available... in Japan...

    --
    Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
    1. Re:Self-Parking cars by Mike89 · · Score: 1

      too late... self-parking cars are already available... in Japan...
      Not quite the same. Defintely not anymore space efficient. Vast amounts of space can be saved because:
      1) People dont need to exit via the doors
      2) Cars can be literally bumper to bumper - no 'human error' factor.
    2. Re:Self-Parking cars by advocate_one · · Score: 1

      you've lost the plot haven't you, the OP I replied to had cracked an "In Soviet Russia, cars park you" and I replied that he was behind the times, they already could...

      --
      Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
    3. Re:Self-Parking cars by Mike89 · · Score: 1

      Oh, my bad. As soon as I saw Soviet Russia I immediately stopped reading the comment. I thought yours was a new thread because you changed the Subject field :/

    4. Re:Self-Parking cars by jamar0303 · · Score: 1

      The Prius, right? (I'm in China- can't read the link). It had that "intelligent parking" thing. Does the US version have the same thing, or was it removed? (If it was, wonder why... maybe the sue-happy nature of SOME Americans has something to do with it)

      --
      OSx86 FTW
    5. Re:Self-Parking cars by ggKimmieGal · · Score: 1

      There are also self driving robots. I actually think cars that could drive themselves (but still have a manual mode built in for those just in case situations) would be a really good idea and probably reduce the number of traffic deaths every year. I would totally invest in a self driving car... after they've been on the market for like 5 years.

    6. Re:Self-Parking cars by operagost · · Score: 1

      Er... there's a self-parking Lexus available in the USA as well.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    7. Re:Self-Parking cars by SnapShot · · Score: 3, Funny

      There's a story by Calvin Trillin in the NYT about that... ( http://select.nytimes.com/search/restricted/articl e?res=F70810FE3C5B0C758EDDA80894DF404482 ).

      The sad part is this quote: "The Advanced Parking Guidance System works only if the spot is six and a half feet longer than the car -- the sort of spot, in other words, that the average Manhattan parker comes upon about once every 14 or 15 years."

      --
      Waltz, nymph, for quick jigs vex Bud.
    8. Re:Self-Parking cars by advocate_one · · Score: 1

      you only see gaps like that in movies...

      --
      Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
    9. Re:Self-Parking cars by angrytuna · · Score: 1

      The Lexus (in the US) has that feature. The BMW does too, although I'm not sure if that version is available in the US. You can see a video of it in action here.

      --

      It is a solemn thought: dead, the noblest man's meat is inferior to pork.

    10. Re:Self-Parking cars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      in japan, self-parking cars are for old people.

    11. Re:Self-Parking cars by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      (Mostly) self parking Lexuses are available in the US as well. (Lexus is the luxury brand of Toyota, the same company described in the article linked above).

  11. big deal! by keeboo · · Score: 5, Funny

    which can squeeze 67 cars in space that would otherwise hold only 24

    The junk yards have been doing that for years.

    1. Re:big deal! by shadowbearer · · Score: 1

      Fits right in with the new leasing business models, doesn't it?

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
  12. Working links by arielCo · · Score: 1
    (that is, yet-to-be-/.ed)

    just for the pics

    company's site

    --
    This post contains no rudeness or derision of any kind. All arguments are friendly. Terms and exclusions may apply.
  13. That makes me feel so much better... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "It is a complete virtual impossibility that damage can occur," he said.
      - TFA

    1. Re:That makes me feel so much better... by pahles · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I read that too...

      Is the virtual impossibility complete (whatever that may be)?
      Or is the impossibility completely virtual?

      Stumped!

      --
      Sig?
    2. Re:That makes me feel so much better... by Constantine+XVI · · Score: 3, Funny

      But if it's a virtual impossibility, it must have a finite improbability. Let's work out exactly how improbable, feed that into the drive and give it a cup of really hot tea.

      --
      "I think an etch-a-sketch with an ethernet port would beat IE7 in web standards compliance."
    3. Re:That makes me feel so much better... by sBox · · Score: 1

      It worked on his holodeck simulations. What else can go wrong?

    4. Re:That makes me feel so much better... by 5pp000 · · Score: 1

      Yes, I am definitely going to have to remember this phrase! It's an instant classic!

      "Is your code stable?" "Yes, it's a complete virtual impossibility that any bugs remain."

      --
      Your god may be dead, but mine aren't!
  14. Very common in Japan by TorKlingberg · · Score: 3, Informative

    These automatic parking systems are everywhere in Japan. Especially in the craped city centers, but even many normal apartment buildings have them to cram in a parking spot for each apartment.

    1. Re:Very common in Japan by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      These automatic parking systems are everywhere in Japan. Especially in the craped city centers

      For a minute there I thought you were talking about Kuala Lumpur. There is a machine like that near the Hotel Malaya in KL. It is a horrible big steel thing. Four stories high. You wouldn't want to stick your hand in. It was working when I was there in 2000 and (surprisingly) still working a couple of months ago. I don't think its very automatic though.

    2. Re:Very common in Japan by TorKlingberg · · Score: 1

      These automatic parking systems are everywhere in Japan. Especially in the craped city centers, but even many normal apartment buildings have them to cram in a parking spot for each apartment. Here is the info page from a company that sells these systens, large and small.
      http://www.seiden-kousan.co.jp/html/parking.html
    3. Re:Very common in Japan by KaOsx42 · · Score: 1

      Why is anyone still driving their own cars in a cramped city? We should be building better mass transit systems.

    4. Re:Very common in Japan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck off. Cars are better than trains, all they need is proper roads and garages. Trains are NOT the future.

    5. Re:Very common in Japan by Shadow99_1 · · Score: 1

      Reason number 1: On call people. Waiting for a train/subway or worse a bus to take you into work is unacceptable to most companies.

      Reason number 2: Some people like to drive.

      I can't think of anymore off the top of my head, however those are at least a couple reasons some people in the city have cars...

      --
      we are all invisible unless we choose otherwise
    6. Re:Very common in Japan by Koutarou · · Score: 0

      Mass transit stops from about half past midnight to 5am or so. Anyone that needs to get anywhere during this time needs to either:

      1. Wait
      2. Pay a very expensive (US$100-150 for me to get home if I work after midnight) taxi fare
      3. Have a car

    7. Re:Very common in Japan by Nasarius · · Score: 1

      Reason number 2: Some people like to drive.
      Have you ever driven in, say, Manhattan? It's not exactly an enjoyable experience.
      --
      LOAD "SIG",8,1
    8. Re:Very common in Japan by ElleyKitten · · Score: 1

      Why is anyone still driving their own cars in a cramped city? We should be building better mass transit systems.
      Even if people take the subway most of the time, they often have cars for emergencies, vacations, off-hour jobs, etc. If they're sitting in a cramped parking lot, then they're not polluting or making the roads cramped, so I wouldn't get all judgemental about finding cars in a parking lot.
      --
      "What is Internet Explorer 7? Are you saying we can't access the normal internet?" - I love tech support. Really.
    9. Re:Very common in Japan by nasch · · Score: 1

      Reason number 1: On call people. Waiting for a train/subway or worse a bus to take you into work is unacceptable to most companies.
      I'm not saying you're wrong, but that sure rubs me the wrong way. Have you really seen policies that say "you must not take public transportation to work if you're on call and get called in"? Don't they just say that you must be able to get to work within a certain amount of time? What if you live somewhere that could take 10 minutes by train or 15 by car? Would they really require you to drive? I know when my wife has been on call as a nurse, the rule was she had to be ready to go 20 minutes from getting the call. She could stay in the on-call room at the hospital, or if she had somewhere else to sleep that would still let her get there in time, fine.
    10. Re:Very common in Japan by Shadow99_1 · · Score: 1

      I (as I'm on call) am required to be to my office (or other required location) within 30 minutes of getting a call. Seeing as how buses run locally every 30 minutes (and last time I visited one of the few cities that have them, the subway cycled every 10 minutes). Obviously the bus rider would be screwed and even the subway rider would have to be a fairly short walk from either endpoint (and realistically it can take 10 minutes to walk 4 blocks here where I live downtown).

      If you look at the numbers I tossed up driving could be the better solution. In fact for me it is as the whole trip is 20 minutes by car (and then foot, driveway to office door).

      --
      we are all invisible unless we choose otherwise
    11. Re:Very common in Japan by TiredOfCrap · · Score: 1

      "Crapped" has two P's!

    12. Re:Very common in Japan by nasch · · Score: 1

      If you look at the numbers I tossed up driving could be the better solution.
      No argument there, I'm just questioning the assertion that public transportation is unacceptable to companies with on-call employees. It seems to me that arriving late is what's unacceptable, regardless of how you choose to get there. Your argument ends up at the same place: some people have cars in part because they're on call and public transportation doesn't get them there fast enough. But the cause is that public transportation is inadequate, not that the employer forbids the employee to use it.
    13. Re:Very common in Japan by MunkieLife · · Score: 1

      Plus, public transportation is too public. It's so much nicer to have your own little space, temperature the way you like it, music the way you like it, clean comfortable seats, clean air, privacy. Seeing that I spend about 40 minutes driving each day, to and from work, that's a minimum of 170 hours a year of my life I spend just sitting in a car. As far as I'm concerned, taking public transportation would increase that time and lower my standard of living. That's why you won't find me using it.

    14. Re:Very common in Japan by KaOsx42 · · Score: 1

      I am very well gonna get judgemental, though not so much about the people stuck with cars as with cities that don't make public transportation a priority. Or, cities that don't provide enough affordable housing so you don't have to commute your life away. If you have an emergency, call an ambulance. If you want to go on vacation, rent a car. In the US we suffer from caritis. It's so much more comfortable to have your own personal bubble to shield you from the outside universe. Yes, driving is fun! But we have to take responsibility for our actions. I recently moved to a city (Honolulu) that has decent public transit, and gave my old car to a charity. I also work at home, so I really don't have to travel a lot. If I want groceries, I walk to the store to get them. I don't find that not having a car is an inconvenience - in fact, not having to pay for car insurance, gas, or maintenance is quite a financial relief. This is a choice that I made because I wasn't comfortable with my environmental impact - and it is a choice that everyone should at least consider - and their aren't that many excuses. At the very least, no one in a city should own an SUV. As for your comment about cars not polluting because they are just sitting around - it still took a lot of resources to make that car. Smelting the steal, refining oil to make the plastic parts, the transportation costs of the workers, the cost of transporting the vehicle to market, and on and on. And what happens to the car when it finally goes to the dump? Sure, some the parts will be salvaged for scrap, but it will still have a long slow death as it decomposes over millenia, leaching all sorts of bad chemicals into the environment.

    15. Re:Very common in Japan by ElleyKitten · · Score: 1

      I think that people should focus on reducing how much they use their cars, but most people can't give up their cars altogether. Even when I lived at college and walked to all my classes, I still had a car I used every few weeks. Being under 25 I couldn't rent a car, so I had to have a car to visit home once in a while and randomly visit friends at other colleges. Right now I live in a city where public transportation does not go anywhere I'd like to go (to my job, to church, to my friends' houses) and there's very few things within walking distance (the grocery store a block away has closed, and it looks like the rest of the stores are leaving as well) so even reducing my car use is difficult, and getting rid of my car would be completely impossible. I don't think most people could give up their cars, though we could probably reduce how much we drive.

      --
      "What is Internet Explorer 7? Are you saying we can't access the normal internet?" - I love tech support. Really.
    16. Re:Very common in Japan by KaOsx42 · · Score: 1

      What percentage of population is on-call? It can't be very much. So if you rule out those people, you are still left with a huge chunk of the population that could use mass transit, or bicycle, or walk. It's really the structure of cities and urban areas that's the problem. Everything is adapted for the car. Cities that grew up before the advent of the car have the best public transportation systems (in North America and Europe anyway). If we continue adapting for the car, it will only get worse.

  15. Bigger lots by ap0 · · Score: 1

    Unless they have some sort of multiple entrance system, the planned 900 and 1200 stall lots in the Middle East could sure form some long lines. I wonder if they've perfected their collision detection algorithms...

  16. In my previous job we had one by MK_CSGuy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    In my previous job (3 years ago) there was a robotic parking lot - you parked your car inside a garage-sized room and a robotic arm/elevator combo. using electro magnets parked it in the "lot" (if I remember correctly it was a shaft both underground and in the building itself). In the end of the day you put your parking-card thru the card reader and the robotic combo. brought it to the garage-sized room. It saved much space and is really cool. The disadvantages I saw where:
    a) 17:00 most of the people in the building finished their work. BAM, long line of workers infront of the garage-sized room. Sure, it can be solved with more "terminals" (aka the garage-sized rooms) but this takes more space. Also, altough in regular parking lots there is also a bottle-neck in the exit, I suspect they will usually be faster.
    b) in the first few weeks of the system's operation there were two accidents - the robotic arm with the elcetromagnets ripped of their roofs. This was solved with further tuning but needless to say that some people were afraid to put their car into this system :)

    Overall I think such a system is good if there is a space problem, but in terms of costs I really don't know how it compares.

    1. Re:In my previous job we had one by MichaelSmith · · Score: 2, Insightful

      in the first few weeks of the system's operation there were two accidents - the robotic arm with the elcetromagnets ripped of their roofs.

      I hear that happens in Iraq from time to time as well :(

      I have to say I don't like the idea of picking the cars up by the roof with a magnet. Roofs are only designed to be structural in compression (if you roll over), not routinely as a way of moving the car around. What happens if the roof distorts slightly and stuffs up the seal around the doors?

    2. Re:In my previous job we had one by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1

      I have to say I don't like the idea of picking the cars up by the roof with a magnet. Roofs are only designed to be structural in compression (if you roll over), not routinely as a way of moving the car around. What happens if the roof distorts slightly and stuffs up the seal around the doors? And, more importantly, what happens if you have a cabrio?
    3. Re:In my previous job we had one by Software · · Score: 2, Informative

      The robotic arm was not supposed to touch the roof. It was moving to pick up some other car and happened to hit the roof of the unfortunate vehicle.

    4. Re:In my previous job we had one by sidb · · Score: 1

      I'd be pretty upset if I'd left a laptop in my car and someone tried to use a giant magnet on it. Or if I had tools lying around that damaged the interior when they went flying to the roof. Any number of things could go wrong. What a bad idea.

    5. Re:In my previous job we had one by syncrotic · · Score: 1

      I call bullshit. Either you're misunderstanding how the system worked or you're just lying: there's no way you could pick a car up by clamping a giant electromagnet to the roof without causing severe damage to the vehicle. The roof is not designed to support the weight of the car, especially not in tension.

  17. Hardly new by Edis+Krad · · Score: 1

    This is hardly news. In Japan, since there's a lack of terrain (making waste of space a pricey luxury) these "robotic" parkings are almost more common that open wide parking lots.

  18. Beta version? by Vexler · · Score: 1

    I guess I am already using the next -release, while my wife is only using -unstable.

    BA DA BING!

  19. Leaking fluids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, what happens when the car above you takes a leak of some essential fluid on your car? Can't imaging that oil/radiator/transmission fluids can be good for the finish.

    1. Re:Leaking fluids by Radon360 · · Score: 1

      Looking at the car pallets, they appear solid and bowled, so it would appear that they would collect whatever oil, water, snow that might fall off a vehicle. The trick is to get that cleaned out to prevent accidents (slips, falls) when the next user has the pallet.

    2. Re:Leaking fluids by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1
      Can't imaging [sic] that oil/radiator/transmission fluids can be good for the finish.

      Speaking from personal experience, brake fluid will take paint off down to the bare metal in short order.

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
  20. Insurance... by ilovegeorgebush · · Score: 1

    I can imagine the insurance companies going ape-sh*t.
    "How was your car damaged sir?"
    "The robot parking it managed to reverse into a bollard"
    "Sorry, you're not covered"

    Seriously, I can't be far off. Are there insurance cover implications here?

    1. Re:Insurance... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can imagine the insurance companies going ape-sh*t.
      "How was your car damaged sir?"
      "The robot parking it managed to reverse into a bollard"
      "Sorry, you're not covered"

      Seriously, I can't be far off. Are there insurance cover implications here?
      Gee, I wonder if the company who owns and operates the robot that damaged your car might be responsible for your damages. Hmmmmm. Such a tricky legal question.

      P.S. You are brain dead.
  21. I love this comment by jimicus · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "It is a complete virtual impossibility that damage can occur," he said.
    Make up your mind. It's either impossible or it's not. If it's not, do those "we do not accept any responsibility blah blah blah" signs have any legal bearing? Because I really don't want to lose my no claims discount because of your car park.
    1. Re:I love this comment by The_Mr_Flibble · · Score: 1

      It's virtually impossible.
      ie in a virtual world it's impossible.
      However in the reall world ...

    2. Re:I love this comment by smudge · · Score: 1

      [...] do those "we do not accept any responsibility blah blah blah" signs have any legal bearing? [...]
      FYI: Those often don't holdup in court. A company can't make you sign away your right to sue.
    3. Re:I love this comment by jimicus · · Score: 1

      Didn't think so - same's true in the UK. But when the USA is the topic of conversation, anything's possible.

  22. Not fake by imsabbel · · Score: 1

    Those pictures are very real, just the description is wrong:
    its in germany, not japan
    And its no garage, its a car "storage tower" near a vw plant, where people can "dial" their car, and it gets fetched to them.

    --
    HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
    1. Re:Not fake by Bastard+of+Subhumani · · Score: 1

      I hope it's not like those machines they have at the dry cleaners', or all the contents will end up in the footwell (or the back seat, depending which way up they hang them).

      --
      Only three things are certain; death, taxes, and apocryphal quotations - Ben Franklin.
  23. and Not Really Robotics by paxmaniac · · Score: 1

    At least, not unless you think an elevator is a robot.

  24. The real question by name*censored* · · Score: 3, Funny
    The real question is, do we still tip robots the standard 12%, or do they get 15% for doing such a good job?

    (disclaimer: I don't actually come from a "tipping" country, so I dont know if the 12% is correct)
    --
    Commodore64_love: I don't comprehend people who're so frightened of death that they'll bankrupt themselves to stay alive
    1. Re:The real question by Monkeys!!! · · Score: 3, Funny

      In my experiences with tipping, this simple equation has become quite handy:

      Tip = the change you can't be arsed finding space for in your wallet

      *doesn't come from a tipping country as well, but has "tipped" overseas*

    2. Re:The real question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The real question is, do we still tip robots the standard 12%, or do they get 15% for doing such a good job?
      The good news is that the robots will calculate the tip for you.

      The better news is that the variable used is of a signed type, such that: 15% of $860 = -$127!
    3. Re:The real question by tulrich · · Score: 1

      In my experiences with tipping, this simple equation has become quite handy:

      Tip = the change you can't be arsed finding space for in your wallet

      *doesn't come from a tipping country as well, but has "tipped" overseas* Translation: *doesn't come from a tipping country, but has had food spit in overseas*
  25. And If There's A Brownout? by mynameismonkey · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Am I the only one who likes being able to get my car out if the grid is down? In the last major blackout I had to drive home to NYC, the next day I figured if I had no electricity I may as well go camping so I drove to NJ. One fuse blown and my car could be stuck for no good reason.

    I, for one, do *not* welcome our new robotic parking overlords.

    --
    -- Religion is not an exact science
    1. Re:And If There's A Brownout? by Chmcginn · · Score: 1
      There's nothing stopping them (unless there's new municipal codes of which I'm unaware) from having an emergency generator onsite.

      The 'one blown fuse' is something of another issue, though - what level of testing have all the components gone through?

      --
      Have you been touched by his noodly appendage?
    2. Re:And If There's A Brownout? by cmorgan47 · · Score: 1

      you went camping in NJ? really? my wife told me they did when she was a kid, but i thought it was one of those childhood memories that's not quite accurate.

      --
      no i have not shot my gun in the air and gone 'Ahh!'
    3. Re:And If There's A Brownout? by mynameismonkey · · Score: 1

      Surprisingly, south NJ is full of great campsites for quick, kid-friendly weekenders. I usually camp somewhere around Barnegat, but that whole area inland from LBI is awash with various styles of camp grounds.

      --
      -- Religion is not an exact science
  26. Automated Storage and Retrieval by sjbe · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is just a new application of automated storage and retrieval systems (AS/RS). They've been around for quite some time in warehousing applications, particularly for manufacturing and libraries. They're particularly useful when dense storage of a wide variety of items is needed. They can be quite secure since you only have to control access to the user terminal to control what goes in or out. They also are generally very reliable and easy to use.

    The downsides? All that automation is pretty expensive. Unless one has fairly specific needs there usually are cheaper and simpler alternatives. There also is the risk of breakdowns and regular maintenance is of course required. Power outages obviously will shut the system down and prevent access. The biggest problem though is that if one isn't careful about data entry regarding where things are stored, doing physical inventory and finding lost items can be a BIG problem. If you say the item is in bin 6A and it's really in bin 7C, there is generally no easy way to find it other than searching bin by bin. Not fun even on a small AS/RS system. RFID and barcoding can help in some cases but it's still a serious challenge.

    1. Re:Automated Storage and Retrieval by Oscaro · · Score: 1

      Actually this is not even a new application. Here in Torino (Italy) there are at least three such parkins, and all of them are at least 10 years old...

    2. Re:Automated Storage and Retrieval by akf2000 · · Score: 1

      This is not even new. Here on Moon Base #C1321 we stack transporter craft in an underground quantum tunnel made entirely of gold.

    3. Re:Automated Storage and Retrieval by Man+Eating+Duck · · Score: 1
      If you say the item is in bin 6A and it's really in bin 7C, there is generally no easy way to find it other than searching bin by bin.

      This is actually an easy way to do inventory. You don't go through all the bins looking for product XYZ, you count them all at once periodically.

      When I was a student I used to drive a forklift at a warehouse of pharmaceutical drugs. We had various storage systems, including an immense automated one designed for pallets.
      It was 13 pallet-heights (you know what I mean :) and pretty expansive, only accessible from a loading area. From here you could retrieve pallets with a forklift or pick up things from them manually, from several loading stations. Not all pallets were fully loaded.

      Of course things got misplaced, but inventory once in a while was a breeze as you could just put a bunch of people in the loading area and have all the pallets come to them.

      Regarding security: As the general site security was tight, explicit internal access control were only enforced at the class A and B drug areas.
      Now, counting all those woo-woo homeopathical sugar pills in their tiny bottles in another storage area, that's another story :)
      --
      Are you a grammar Nazi? I'm trying to improve my English; please correct my errors! :)
  27. Re: Just an EULA? by Cinnamon+Whirl · · Score: 0

    So, what happens if you left someone in the car? and what happens if you left the car there - do you pay upfront, or when you retrieve it?

    Not that I'm in the Mafia, or anything.....

  28. The NJ Garage by NormAtHome · · Score: 1

    I have a friend who works for a contractor that's been doing a lot of renovations in Hoboken where the first garage is and to this day he say's that the police are there at least once a day because the robot tries to give somebody the wrong car. Parking your $75,000 BMW or Lexus and then having the robot try and give you back a mini cooper can really ruin your day.

    1. Re:The NJ Garage by squallbsr · · Score: 1

      I would have to say that parking my Mini Cooper and getting a $75k Lexus in return would make me a happy camper - now does it come with keys?

      --
      Sleep: A completely inadequate substitution for Caffeine.
    2. Re:The NJ Garage by emilyridesabmx · · Score: 1

      I've actually had the (dis)pleasure of using the Hoboken garage with a friend of mine, and the time I was there, the whole system worked glitch free, and thought it was a pretty interesting concept because of the amount of space it saves. If you've ever tried to park in Hoboken, you can appreciate this, because it's even harder to park in Hoboken than anywhere in Manhattan. However, my friend was one of those people who had his car stuck in there for over 24 hours. That's ridiculous. Imagine your Bank all of a sudden saying, 'Sorry Pal, you can't get any cash or do any transactions with your money for the entire weekend'. Luckily for my friend, Hoboken is on the PATH (which is the NJ Transit public transport that goes to NYC), so he was able to go where he needed to go, but a total system failure is unacceptable. No matter how well designed and redundant a system is, there is always a chance for a total system failure,so unless you're prepared to deal with the fact that your car may become inaccessible at any point due to a power failure or computer glitch, you should stick with parking in a standard garage. Or use the subway like the rest of us.

      --
      Et In Arcadia Ego
    3. Re:The NJ Garage by Scyber · · Score: 1
      Luckily for my friend, Hoboken is on the PATH (which is the NJ Transit public transport that goes to NYC)

      Technically PATH is run by the Port Authority, not NJ Transit. Hence the name; Port Authority Trans-Hudson.

    4. Re:The NJ Garage by NormAtHome · · Score: 1

      If the keys came with the car it would be great, however I can just picture it now: "But honestly officer, this is the car that the robot gave me so it must be mine!"

    5. Re:The NJ Garage by RollingThunder · · Score: 1

      Arguably, I would think that part of the problem that leads to the long outages is the rarity of the systems.

      As the systems become more common, you are more likely to have a sufficient supply of trained technicians, because their cost gets spread over more units. I would think that with only one garage, they keep the number of techies to an absolute minimum.

  29. Re: Just an EULA? by CaptainZapp · · Score: 1
    Well, that would be happened, since the garage is no more operational for quite some time. Don't know if they ever found skeletons in the closet, so to speak.

    do you pay upfront, or when you retrieve it?

    Upon retrieval at a cash machine (as in all parking garages here).

    --
    ich bin der musikant

    mit taschenrechner in der hand

    kraftwerk

  30. If a minivan falls in an... by qcs-rf.com · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... automated parking garage and nobody is there to hear it, does it make a sound?

    --
    There are only 10 types of people in the world: Those who understand binary, and those who don't.
    1. Re:If a minivan falls in an... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It'd sure wake a dozy attendant, electric sheep you say?

    2. Re:If a minivan falls in an... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, the children were sleeping

  31. Moo by Chacham · · Score: 2, Funny

    to make Fort Knox jealous

    You mean Fort Knox and jealous aren't the same person?

    Repeat after me: There is no spoon.

  32. More parking spots = Longer lines by lake2112 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I lived a block away from the Hoboken, NJ garage. Getting your car in the morning or the evening for rush hour usually required at least a 20-30 minute wait. Police were required in the evening to direct traffic around a bunch of cars waiting for a robot to load cars.

  33. I for one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I for one, could care less about our new robotic underlings...

  34. All over Taiwan by GomezAdams · · Score: 1

    These parking garages that stack and rotate cars are all over Taiwan. I've seen small devices on streets that hold a dozen or so cars to very large arrays that hold an estimated hundred cars in the metro areas and for large condo/apartment complexes. Never seen a scrape yet. Of course in Taiwan traffic scratches and scrapes are a fact of life so how can you be sure.

    --
    Too lazy to create a sig...
  35. Get the bugs out, add more features... by Radon360 · · Score: 1

    It would seem plausible to me that at some point, they could integrate a car wash into a larger version of these garages. That way, not only do you have the option of parking your car, but you could have the option of getting it washed while not in use. While this could be a totally automated process, I would imagine that there would be a market for subcontracting a manual portering bay in lieu of an automatic system so that other cleaning services (such as an interior vacuum, paste waxing) could be offered. Likewise, another subcontracted bay could offer oil/filter/lube service as well.

    It seems to me that if you can integrate other services into something like this, whether automatic or performed by humans, would add to the ROI on something like this.

  36. Servants to No Servants and Back Again by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    . I think in a world with robotics so advanced, it is unlikely that anybody will drive -- or be allowed to drive -- a personal automobile, except at the track.

    I can't wait. It's a dangerous unproductive waste of time.

    They thought you or your servant would go to the telegraph office to send and receive your messages.

    This time around we ride in our servants.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  37. Actually.... by encoderer · · Score: 1

    The self-parking cars DO save space. You can get out of the car and use your remote to press "park." Thus, you don't need any door space. When you need to get back into the car, you just press the park button again and it backs out of the space. The new BMW 7 has this. The Lexus has auto-park, too, but i'm not sure if it's remote-controlled like the 7-series is.

  38. Germany by easter1916 · · Score: 1

    These park-bots are everywhere in Germany. Many moons ago (1994) my building in Ruesselsheim (Opelstadt!), Germany, had one in the basement.

  39. Berkley did it by Skadet · · Score: 1

    Dude, my buddy's *apartment complex* in Berkeley had one like 3 years ago. What's this news about?

  40. Not even the first in New York. by Animats · · Score: 1

    The first mechanized garage was built in 1932 and ran until 1979. This isn't even the first automated parking garage in New York City. There was one working around 1970.

    The layout was well worked out. It looked like a little parking garage with two stalls, with no sign of any machinery. You parked your car and got out. Then, solid barriers rose out of the floor around the car, a big freight elevator door opened behind the car, the pallet on which the car was parked moved into the elevator, the elevator doors closed, and shortly thereafter, an empty pallet was delivered. Then the barriers went back down, leaving an empty parking stall.

    Light beams and photocells were used for safety interlocks. The light beams were modulated, so extraneous light wouldn't bother them, and the modulation was at about 5Hz, so you could see this.

    Technically, the biggest problem was with limit switches. The system depended on hundreds of mechanical limit switches for position feedback, and they were not reliable enough, so the system could stall. This became worse with wear.

  41. Has to be said. by Overkill+Nbuta · · Score: 1

    And I for one welcome our new parking overlords.

  42. job security by xPsi · · Score: 1
    From TFA: There is no human supervision, but an attendant will be on hand to accept cash and explain the system to baffled humans.

    In a place like that, if that's all he's doing, I might be worrying about job security if I were that guy.

    --
    i\hbar\dot{\psi}=\hat{H}\psi
  43. My car! by WeeBit · · Score: 1

    will not suffer the kind of glitches that caused the nation's first robotic garage in nearby NJ to drop and trap cars.

    irobot gone on strike! News at 11.

  44. Future capacity by noidentity · · Score: 1

    640 cars per garage should be enough for anyone.

  45. WTF from TFA by jdog-usa · · Score: 1

    What the hell is this supposed to mean? From TFA:

    "It is a complete virtual impossibility that damage can occur," he said.

    Yeah, I want THAT guy in charge of the robotic parking system. Ugh...

  46. Charging for vehicular volume by sidb · · Score: 1

    If I were designing this system, I'd consider charging more to park larger vehicles. There could be different sizes of storage berths, and the laser-wielding robot would measure your car and charge you for the smallest berth your car would fit into. People who think they need to drive an SUV to work would pay for more cubic meter hours.

    1. Re:Charging for vehicular volume by The_mad_linguist · · Score: 1

      And if you underreport the size of your car, the laser-wielding robot will correct it.

  47. Get one that has an automated car wash, too! by Behrooz · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If the system is combined with an (optional) automated car wash, they could make even more money! :D Park your car, and it's CLEAN when you get back!

    --
    "We have to go forth and crush every world view that doesn't believe in tolerance and free speech." - David Brin
  48. Your wife ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  49. there are a nubmer of simpler system by ctj · · Score: 1

    http://www.u-parkit.com/U-parkit makes customised elevtor type systems which you drive on to and a number of cars can then be stacked up its a nice idea for cheap extra storage. No complex robotic systems. They have just started to expand after a number of smaller projects.

  50. Robots rule by danimrich · · Score: 1

    If there were a reasonably well working robotic garage next to a traditional garage, I'd probably use the robotic garage if the price was similar.
    Why? Because it would spare me the trouble of finding a parking space, finding the pedestrians' exit of the garage and then searching for the car when I return. And I wouldn't need to worry about scratches or burglaries.

    --
    where's all that Karma?
  51. Virtual bool impossibility by CrazyJim1 · · Score: 1

    class BaseClass{ virtual bool impossibility_of_damage(){return true;) } class ActualClass::BaseClass{ virtual bool impossibility_of_damage(){if((rand()%2)==1) return false; else return true; }