Slashdot Mirror


MPAA and FBI Help To Train Swedish Police

Several readers let us know about a program in which a US FBI agent and employees of the MPAA led a seminar for Swedish police officers in methods of finding and stopping illegal downloading from the Internet. The writer at zeropaid.com says, "I bet the Swedish people are going to love to find out that the US government and a US lobbying group now have a hand in training their police personnel. So much for the notion of national sovereignty." Reader Oxygen provided a bit of translation from an article in Swedish on IDG.se: "According to Bertil Ramsell, responsible for the course, the purpose of the visit was to give the invited speakers a chance to explain to the students what their organization's purpose was. But in a report from the IIPA, the purpose was to educate students in anti-piracy."

165 comments

  1. Revolution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Get out your guns and start shooting at heads of state and their cronies, and also the corporate CEO's and their cronies.

    It's time the governments of the world feared the people.

    1. Re:Revolution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think it is time the people realise that the government is an instrument of the PEOPLE, they work for and represent the PEOPLE. I think alot of people have forgotten this.

      The only people that took away your rights was yourselves.

      Wake up.

    2. Re:Revolution by Morosoph · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's time the governments of the world feared the people. Bad idea. Fear doesn't get people to do what you want.
    3. Re:Revolution by EddyPearson · · Score: 1

      That's insightful? Thats just good old fashioned misguided anarchy.

      --
      You feel sleepy. Close your eyes. The opinions stated above are yours. You cannot imagine why you ever felt otherwise.
    4. Re:Revolution by jackharrer · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually it does, but only for a very short time.

      --

      "an experienced, industrious, ambitious, and often, quite often, picturesque liar" - Mark Twain
    5. Re:Revolution by tenco · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Destroy Power
      Not People.

    6. Re:Revolution by svanstrom · · Score: 1

      It's time the governments of the world feared the people. Bad idea. Fear doesn't get people to do what you want. Of course it does, just see how well it's working with all the nukes etc that the US has... asif they'd ever actually have to use their weapons to get things done, and if they'd ever invade a country everyone in that country will stop fighting and do as the US says... or... hmmm...
      --
      perl -e'print$_{$_} for sort%_=`lynx -dump svanstrom.com/t`'
    7. Re:Revolution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
    8. Re:Revolution by takeya · · Score: 1

      Revoultion is not anarchy.

      It is revolution. Out with the old, in with the new.

    9. Re:Revolution by Beyond_GoodandEvil · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Revoultion is not anarchy.

      It is revolution. Out with the old, in with the new.


      "Meet the new boss, same as the old boss."
      -The Who Won't Get Fooled Again.

      --
      I laughed at the weak who considered themselves good because they lacked claws.
    10. Re:Revolution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get out your guns

      And get killed. Pull your head out of your ass, idiot: your silly guns are worth shit if you ever think of pulling a stunt like that. The police outguns you, they are better trained, you stand absolutely NO CHANCE at all.

      The corporate CEOs? My, have you tried going through their security? Their bodyguards will kill you faster than the police - and they won't even warn you.

      Keep spouting your shit, kid, and doing absolutely nothing. You are nothing. You can do nothing. You can't win. You can't even fight. The days "the people" could actually instill fear into their governments is long gone and won't come back.

      Deal with it. Deal with it or suicide.

    11. Re:Revolution by goldspider · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's a good thing that guns are all but completely banned in Sweden (a few registered long guns for hunting are permitted), otherwise the government might have to face an armed revolt. One can only hope that my own government in the USA will someday have nothing to fear from the People as well.

      --
      "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
    12. Re:Revolution by westlake · · Score: 1
      Get out your guns and start shooting at heads of state and their cronies, and also the corporate CEO's and their cronies. It's time the governments of the world feared the people.

      It is this kind of talk, modded up "Insightful," that makes the world fear the Geek.

      The bearded bomb-throwing anarchist who would be instantly recognizable in the editorial cartoons of 1906.

      The old-time anarchist had at least some sense of proportion. His cause somewhat larger than having to pay for a print of a movie that cost $100 million dollars to produce.

    13. Re:Revolution by Markspark · · Score: 0

      funny.. i suggested the same thing yesterday, but using bombs, and i got modded -1 flamebait.. nice consistency.. anyway.. kill the *AA!

      --
      i find your lack of faith in science disturbing!
    14. Re:Revolution by westlake · · Score: 1
      I think it is time the people realise that the government is an instrument of the PEOPLE, they work for and represent the PEOPLE. I think alot of people have forgotten this.

      The people also include the voters of New York, Los Angeles, Orlando, Nashville, etc. Quite a number of whom have a direct stake in the entertainment industry.

      Now and again, they become Governor of California or President of the United States.

    15. Re:Revolution by mOdQuArK! · · Score: 0

      Wasn't Sweden the country that required every able man to go through the military for a few years, then gave them a military weapon when they were done & required them to keep it handy just in case they had to join a militia on short notice? Or am I thinking of some other Scandinavian country?

    16. Re:Revolution by FusionDragon2099 · · Score: 1

      You're thinking of Switzerland.

    17. Re:Revolution by redcaboodle · · Score: 1

      Nope, that is Switzerland.

      --
      -- Put crudely, the world is an extremely large problem instance. (Russel/Norvig Artificial Intelligence)
    18. Re:Revolution by IcyNeko · · Score: 1

      It's like special forces training to be douchebags. ... Amazing! I can't wait for our troops to be RIAA certified. Coming to the military near youuu

    19. Re:Revolution by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1

      Indeed... there is a reason the French sent the Americans the Statue of Liberty.

    20. Re:Revolution by deviceb · · Score: 1

      amen sister! and of course.. it is our country once again getting up in other peoples shit for greedy US companies.

      --
      Kill your TV
    21. Re:Revolution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Suicide by shooting cops and ceos and government officials with a hunting rifle!

      I mean, hell, if you're going to die, you may as well take some bigger assholes with you.

    22. Re:Revolution by Skye16 · · Score: 1

      Actually, our anger is not so much placed towards having to pay for a movie, it's for having to watch some pretty greedy assholes, on an epic scale, demanding more and more money from us while giving less and less. That's the nature of capitalism, I suppose, but that doesn't hide the fact that truly ridiculous greed is a horrible human sickness. Self-interest is one thing, or even eating the last slice of pizza without asking anybody else, but getting 400 million dollars as a severance package is beyond ridiculous.

      It just so happens that an organization known for the overwhelming greed of its members is also telling us we are "bad people" because we downloaded a 99 cent mp3 (going by iTunes prices). The gall of some people is truly astonishing.

      That is what pisses me off. It is but a symptom of the flaws in the system. I agree that if someone is pissed off solely because they were prohibited from stealing (or copying) and decided to kill some people, then they are completely out of touch with reality. I think a simmering anger and resentment for greedy fuckers in general is completely understandable, and while I'm not saying anyone should firebomb starbucks, I also wouldn't be surprised or think they were the worst persons in the universe for doing such. I don't condone it, but I do (somewhat) understand it.

    23. Re:Revolution by Monsuco · · Score: 1

      One can only hope that my own government in the USA will someday have nothing to fear from the People as well.
      Well, the founding fathers certainly knew something when they wrote the second amendment. It is probably the most important right of all of them. Most dictatorships have banned guns. If I remember right, Hitler, Musolini, the USSR, North Korea, Iran, Saddam Hussein, and Darfur had rather strict gun control for the general public. Not sure if that is true, but I think those were the most notable ones. I also think if I remember right, the whole reason Switzerland was not invaded by Germany during WWII was because Switzerland had very lax gun control and provided all citizens with rifles when they thought they would be invaded. This detered Germany.
    24. Re:Revolution by Crizp · · Score: 1

      ...Or Norway, with its "Home Defense" Heimevernet (HV) which is basically official "military militia" assigned to protect their local place of living, having drills each year. Not every soldier receives this [honor|punishment|annoyance] but those that do (at least up until recent years) had all necessary equipment at home (AG-3 with 100 shots, uniform etc) and could be called at a moment's notice.

      I bet Sweden has the exact same thing but I'm not sure.

      OT just because it's such a cool fact: Our local HV guys defending our radar installation is undefeated, even when the "enemy" was visiting British SAS soldiers :) Shows how significant it is to know your surroundins. Sun Tzu can tell you more about that...

    25. Re:Revolution by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 1

      I don't understand this. Theft is theft. If they went to charge $100.00 per track, that is within their right. It's called supply and demand -- the more people are willing to pay, the more they are willing to supply. If enough people are not willing to pay it, the price will come down. "Enough people being willing to steal it" does not factor into that equation. Your choices as a consumer are: a) buy it or b) don't buy it. Choosing option "c) download it" isn't some political statement, it's just theft.

      Another way to look at it. Artist cut when a CD is purchased: $0.12. Probably less, but that's not the point - this is: Artist cut when the tracks are downloaded for free from someone's rip: $0.00 In the name of some petty cause, you justify stealing from the artists. (Not you specifically, but those who argue that they have the "right" to download music for free.)

    26. Re:Revolution by jZnat · · Score: 1

      But the problem with your argument is that the supply is infinite. Therefore, the price should be nothing due to how economics work.

      --
      'Yes, firefox is indeed greater than women. Can women block pops up for you? No. Can Firefox show you naked women? Yes.'
    27. Re:Revolution by Wildclaw · · Score: 1

      Please don't cite supply and demand when discussing intellectual "property".

      The theory of supply and demand was created explicity to deal with situations where the supply is limited. Todays market where coorporations tries to artifically limit supply using different means is nothing more than an abomination that spits right in the face of the words "free market".

      Also note that while the free market is the most efficent way to deal with supply and demand issues, it may not always be the best way. I personally am against pure free market on labor, not because it isn't efficent, but because it also has a huge impact on the happiness of society due to the large salary gaps between different people. Treating humans as things without feelings is a fault and downfall of many economic theories.

    28. Re:Revolution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the fuck are you talking about?

      "In Sweden, with a population of 9 million, there are (2006) 656 000 persons who legally own about 2 million weapons: 959 000 rifles, 726 000 shotguns, 122 000 combination hunting weapons, 88 000 pistols, 55 000 revolvers, 3 000 full auto weapons and 78 000 extra barrels and other parts you need a permit for." -http://pang.larp.se/licens.html

      That's 2 million guns owned by half a millino people. Revolution in Sweden is nothing to fuck around with.

    29. Re:Revolution by takeya · · Score: 1

      You know despite the government always seeking loopholes, our constitutional rights are still enumerated and guaranteed and more often than not they are respected. When they don't, it makes the news. That's why we hear so much about civil liberties violations, because they happen pretty rarely, and are usually rectified.

    30. Re:Revolution by aliquis · · Score: 1

      Yeah, we have "hemvärnet" aswell, althought I have no idea how large any of our military stuff is nowadays. I think we are down to little over 200 airplanes to begin with.
      The swedish defence whatever informs me that Hemvärnet got around 40.000 people of which 1.500 is musicans ;)
      Well, atleast our subs kicks american ass ;/

    31. Re:Revolution by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 1

      Please don't cite supply and demand when discussing intellectual "property".

      The theory of supply and demand was created explicity to deal with situations where the supply is limited. Todays market where coorporations tries to artifically limit supply using different means is nothing more than an abomination that spits right in the face of the words "free market".
      Artificial limitations are still limitations -- it is still a scarce resource if it's not being produced. Whether it's not being produced because the supplier doesn't wish too or the supplier cannot do so is irrelevant.

      Also note that while the free market is the most efficent way to deal with supply and demand issues, it may not always be the best way. I personally am against pure free market on labor, not because it isn't efficent, but because it also has a huge impact on the happiness of society due to the large salary gaps between different people. Treating humans as things without feelings is a fault and downfall of many economic theories. That's a completely separate discussion. I'll say only that I believe that the underlying assumption that all humans have equal potential is flawed -- and that a free market seems to be the only one that recognizes this.
    32. Re:Revolution by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 1

      The supply is only infinite if the suppliers wish to make it so. They do not. Stating that "well it should be nothing" not justify stealing it. The fact remains that it is not free, and that is the choice of those who own the rights to it -- not the consumers.

    33. Re:Revolution by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 1
      You actually marked me as 'foe' because you don't like that I call "stealing" ... "stealing"?

      That's hilarious, thanks for the chuckle.

  2. Bloc-ization by kahei · · Score: 4, Funny


    As time goes on and power is consolidated in the world, smaller powers will find themselves increasingly strongly attached to the main power bloc with which they are affiliated. Thus European nations find themselves increasingly Americanized, Asia finds itself increasingly Sinicized, and the Islamic world finds itself increasingly dominated by relatively uniform fundamentalist thinking, as opposed to the diverse, relatively secular regional ideologies that prevailed in the last century.

    Eventually, the three nations of Eurasia, Eastasia and Oceania will settle down into their near-endless cold war.

    P.S. Eastasia will win.

    --
    Whence? Hence. Whither? Thither.
    1. Re:Bloc-ization by psicic · · Score: 4, Funny

      Eventually?!?

      What are you talking about?

      We've always been at war with the pirat...terroris...er...EastAsia

      --
      Concrete analysis...
    2. Re:Bloc-ization by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pretty lesbians? OK, I willingly surrender.

    3. Re:Bloc-ization by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok you say near endless, but then Eastasia will win. What you mean is 'we will win' since your from asia right? In short, you are posting cheers for your home team about a future 'near endless war' against the U.S. in a thread about music piracy in Sweden??? I shall now gouge my eyes out with a spork.

    4. Re:Bloc-ization by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Before gouging your eyes out with a spork, look into George Orwell's 1984. Seems like people only get Simpsons or Futurama references around here.

  3. Good article, trolling comment- by Aeron65432 · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I thought the article was fairly interesting but this was just one troll of a comment. "I bet the Swedish people are going to love to find out that the US government and a US lobbying group now have a hand in training their police personnel. So much for the notion of national sovereignty."

    There are United States military troops in Germany, Italy, South Korea, Japan, Colombia, the Phillipines, Indonesia, Kosovo, Egypt, Singapore, Thailand, the UK, Spain, Turkey, Portugal, Qatar, Bahrain, Cuba, etc. etc. etc. We run the Iraqi and Afghanistan governments. Training Swedish police is not a threat to national sovereignty, and if you dispute this, it still barely scrapes the iceberg. It's hysteria to complain that training foreign governments is intruding on their sovereignty if they request it.

    We train police around the world, in almost all situations, our assistance is requested and welcomed. (by the governments, at least) If the wholly independent Swedish government and the people were opposed, there might be a case.

    Complain about training them in bad DMCA-style law enforcement, or in RIAA-scare-tactics. Don't complain about a foreign country asking and receiving assistance.

    1. Re:Good article, trolling comment- by Balp · · Score: 2, Insightful

      All the bad press has been on it being MPA and IPFI, not on the FBI. FBI have been working with the swedish goverment for a long time. In both directions. The differece in the storied about MPA did at the scool from the MPA and the swedish police makes this an intersting story.

      That the other speaker at the conference was the swedish version of RIAA that have tried to use scare tactice already, doesn't make it better. The only problem with FBI is that they are talking together with MPA at this occation.

    2. Re:Good article, trolling comment- by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It isn't so much that it's the US government, as it is a private company training a foreign national police force to enforce their private agenda. The government is one thing, they could know something about enforcing law and protecting the peace.
      The MPAA aren't soldiers, they aren't police, and they aren't a neutral public institution. Their concerns isn't for the citizens. They're there solely to make sure their profits are safeguarded and that things will go exactly the way they want them to. They've essentially bought their way into law enforcement and there's something profoundly unsettling about that.

    3. Re:Good article, trolling comment- by bjourne · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Do you think American FBI agents are the only people in the world who knows how to catch file sharers? Or that there is so little technical know-how in Swedish organizations that we really need Americans to help us? It is not, Swedish cops are just as good at using computers as American cops are (if not better). Maybe they could use some help in improving their interrogation techniques, but they sure as hell do not bring Russian FSB agents over. The real reason why they invite the FBI has nothing to do with training.

      What the big fuss is about, is that the Swedish police is tacitly agreeing that it will follow FBI:s and MPAA:s anti-piracy policies and do their dirty work for them. Which means do everything they can to shut down thepiratebay.

    4. Re:Good article, trolling comment- by pimpimpim · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Who is this 'we' you're talking about? Are you as an American citizen also a part of the industrial structures as the MPAA? Would you fight for the rights of the MPAA if they called you to do so? Are you not a patriot if you don't agree with what the MPAA tells you to do? It sounds like you should rethink your stance on who is running your beloved country.

      Sidenote: The US militairy troops in e.g. Germany have no authority outside the borders of their camps, also not over the German military. Also, in many cases the assistence of the US government is not very much welcomed, ask all the happy Iraquese whose country is now a big load of junk, with no outsight at all on a stable government. Actually, that is where the US calls in the help of the rest in the world, because creating stability doesn't seem to be on the list of competences of the US.

      --
      molmod.com - computing tips from a molecular modeling
    5. Re:Good article, trolling comment- by Intrinsic · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Complain about training them in bad DMCA-style law enforcement, or in RIAA-scare-tactics. Don't complain about a foreign country asking and receiving assistance.


      I doubt very highly, that the people of Sweden are in any way interested in copyright infringement law enforcement. Its lunacy to even be talking about it, copyright infringement is our countries way of trying to hold back the tide of an every increasing momentum of free expression. This isn't book and print. You put something out on the net or make it digital it no longer has any substance. It exists in the minds of the people that create it and experience it. Sharing ideas whether they originated with you are not is a natural part of how we express our selfs. Get over it, and move the fuck on.

    6. Re:Good article, trolling comment- by russ1337 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      >>> Which means do everything they can to shut down thepiratebay

      Firstly, I expect the FBI and MPAA will be tainted to train to American laws. Obviously the Unless copyright laws are aligned between the two countries we're likely to see the Swedish Police overstepping the mark, like they did when they confiscated TPB servers previously - didn't that turn out to be against local law (TPB was working within the law?).

    7. Re:Good article, trolling comment- by russ1337 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      ah. sry for the sh!te grammer, sp etc.. forgot to delete rest of sentence. no coffee yet.

    8. Re:Good article, trolling comment- by Yaa+101 · · Score: 0

      "We train police around the world, in almost all situations, our assistance is requested and welcomed."

      I bet the Iraqis disagree.

    9. Re:Good article, trolling comment- by Rakshasa+Taisab · · Score: 1

      No, the Swedish police surely don't have any problems getting the expertise from other sources. My guess is that this is more to please the US corporate interests than actually training someone to go after pirates. Once the training is complete, all they need to do is some token efforts against piracy, then go back to catching kind of people the public really wants taken down.

      --
      - These characters were randomly selected.
    10. Re:Good article, trolling comment- by PodBayDoor · · Score: 1

      Mod parent down; certainly not "Insightful".

      The reasons why are almost entirely covered in the other replies, but I would add the following:

      America's interference in matters of copyright and DRM is *never* welcomed , it is simply tolerated because:
      1. the US is a significant market for all kinds of good and the world's leading producer of media, and therefore it's trade agreements are a serious bargaining chip
      2. the US is also the world's leading military power, which gives it power in other domains (e.g. invading Iraq to control oil resources)

      But things change - patents lapse or are denied force, military assets become obsolete, other economies and markets and producers develop. And when governments consistently fail the people they represent, they are replaced or toppled, by vote or revolution. The ecology of power in a state and between states enforces limits, and there will always be enough little people to pull down greedy Gulliver.

    11. Re:Good article, trolling comment- by init100 · · Score: 1

      didn't that turn out to be against local law (TPB was working within the law?).

      That hasn't been determined yet. The police have imaged their servers, but refuse to give them back. They probably intend to keep them forever, maybe sell them to some criminals to make a tidy profit, as has been recently reported in local newspapers.

      The case main prosecutor actually wrote in a PM six months before the raid that TPB was probably not doing anything illegal, or at least not doing something that they could prosecute. You can't prosecute someone for contributory copyright infringement without also prosecuting someone for the primary infringement. Finding the primary infringers would be a problem, and that's why TPB was off the hook, at least until the MPAA called the administration and demanded that something had to be done, legal or not. :)

    12. Re:Good article, trolling comment- by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Yes, everyone was so thankful for the the training of the contras.

    13. Re:Good article, trolling comment- by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      You put something out on the net or make it digital it no longer has any substance.

      In this respect, how is the Internet different than analog broadcast? I can't touch or hold any broadcast any more than I can touch or hold a digital stream.

      The reasoning you have on sharing ideas seems pretty odd on a site whose constituents routinely say that the recording and movie industries and their products don't have any ideas.

      I think your argument is specious in another way, because it is continually getting easier and cheaper for anyone to make their own images, music and videos to share their own artistic views, why advocate the sharing the works of those that are least interested in it? The quicker we leave them out of it, the quicker they'll go away.

    14. Re:Good article, trolling comment- by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      I think it's a great idea. We should also get other parties known for their neutrality to educate the police - for example PETA, Microsoft or Scientology.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    15. Re:Good article, trolling comment- by westlake · · Score: 1
      it is a private company training a foreign national police force to enforce their private agenda.

      Cultural nationalism can put piracy on the public agenda.

      The domestic product withers in the face of the big-budget foreign film or video. You have no hope of building an export market if your rare commercial success abroad is casually pirated.

    16. Re:Good article, trolling comment- by pilotfactory · · Score: 1

      "It's hysteria to complain that training foreign governments is intruding on their sovereignty if they request it." now take a guess, did the swedish request it?

    17. Re:Good article, trolling comment- by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? They'll be going after politicians and corrupt executives?

    18. Re:Good article, trolling comment- by Das+Modell · · Score: 1

      I didn't realize that a high budget video game produced by tens or hundreds of people using expensive software and hardware is now just an insubstantial "idea" that anyone can and should spread freely on the Internet.

    19. Re:Good article, trolling comment- by Das+Modell · · Score: 1

      I find it interesting that almost any comment on Slashdot, whether on topic or not (in this case the latter), gets modded positive if it's anti-American or critical of the US government or its policies. Meanwhile, I once got modded flamebait or troll for saying something in favor of Israel (I actually just stated the fact that Israel left Gaza, but even that was too much).

      For a seemingly non-political site, Slashdot's extreme leftist slant is readily obvious, and fully supported by the moderating system which favors leftists by allowing them to anonymously mod someone troll or flamebait without any explanation or accountability. On traditional forums they're at least forced to say something, like "you fucking Nazi."

    20. Re:Good article, trolling comment- by Das+Modell · · Score: 1

      There's nothing unusual about police or military forces training together, or training each other. It does not violate national sovereigenty.

    21. Re:Good article, trolling comment- by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      In the US there are military personal from Germany, Italy, South Korea, Japan, Colombia, the Philippines, Egypt, Singapore, Thailand, Spain, Turkey, Portugal, Qatar, Bahrain, Canada, and many other counties. The US often trains with other nations and trains personal from other nations here in the US.
      It is called international cooperation. There are also students from many nations in US universities and researchers from many nations at US labs as well. These are good things.

      Now the MPAA in Sweden... What are they thinking! Kick them to the curb. Nations co-operating is usually a good thing. The MPAA and RIAA have nothing to do with cooperation between nations.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    22. Re:Good article, trolling comment- by Intrinsic · · Score: 1

      People should be compensated, but I just don't think we have any control over that any more. if someone wants to take your idea and run with it, its because you gave him the means to use it. If you don't want it used in ways you didn't instead, then don't release it to the public..

      Personally I believe in peoples good will to compensate you when you did something worthy, there will always be people that take freely, and give freely. Maybe people are taking because they are in need, and maybe the people that don't need to take are giving because they have what the need.

    23. Re:Good article, trolling comment- by Intrinsic · · Score: 1

      In this respect, how is the Internet different than analog broadcast? I can't touch or hold any broadcast any more than I can touch or hold a digital stream.


      There isnt any differnce, thats the point. when you make somthing like music, video or computer code and make a copy of it, you are transfering that experince to the world. Your expectations or hopes of making a return off of it are dictated by how much the world feels it is worth to them. This is going to vary from person to person depending on their life situation. Some may want to steal your copies and use it for their own purposes, while others will buy a copy from you because it gives them value. Personal I have faith in peoples inheriant desire to do good. but that desire has limits, espcially when people feel that you are tring to control their experince by making them wrong for doing somthing they they feel is right. Like giving a copy to someone wheahter its over the internet or not. When you create somthing and it to the world without expectation, that good jesture will be returned to you, but not always in the way that you expect. The world gives to you exactley what you need at each moment, even if its to teach you a lesson that may at first appear to be negative.

      The reasoning you have on sharing ideas seems pretty odd on a site whose constituents routinely say that the recording and movie industries and their products don't have any ideas.

      Very odd, and very counter-intuitive. But experince has taught me that most things that are benifical to us are counter-intuitive. The people on slashdot might say that there isnt any good ideas comming out of the industry, and Id have to say there is some truth to that, but there is also truth in the fact that the movie industry is making good things and doing good to the world as well. But people tend to focus on the negative when they feel wronged. When people feel wronged it accumulates and multiplies, until it becomes clouded by half truths and mis-understandings driven by anger and a feling of being wronged..

      I think your argument is specious in another way, because it is continually getting easier and cheaper for anyone to make their own images, music and videos to share their own artistic views, why advocate the sharing the works of those that are least interested in it? The quicker we leave them out of it, the quicker they'll go away.


      I don't think I can answer that accept to say their must be a reason for it,maybe its to get back at them, maybe its because there is a connection between the work and two or more people, who knows... but I don't think its going to help to try any deny that it shouldn't be happening just the way it is. We should work with it they way it is until it changes.
    24. Re:Good article, trolling comment- by Das+Modell · · Score: 1

      People should be compensated, but I just don't think we have any control over that any more. if someone wants to take your idea and run with it, its because you gave him the means to use it. If you don't want it used in ways you didn't instead, then don't release it to the public..

      Or if you don't want to get robbed, don't keep valuables in your home. If you don't want to get mugged, beaten, murdered or raped, don't go outside. How simple it all is.

      Personally I believe in peoples good will to compensate you when you did something worthy, there will always be people that take freely, and give freely.

      You can't make games like Mass Effect and Gears of War with a couple of small donations from a few people, and if those games aren't made then there's nothing for people to take freely.

      Maybe people are taking because they are in need, and maybe the people that don't need to take are giving because they have what the need.

      I get illegal stuff from the Internet like anyone else, but I'm not going to pretend like I'm in some sort of dire need of the latest episode of 24, or some music album.
    25. Re:Good article, trolling comment- by Intrinsic · · Score: 1

      Or if you don't want to get robbed, don't keep valuables in your home. If you don't want to get mugged, beaten, murdered or raped, don't go outside. How simple it all is.


      This sounds like an apples and oranges comparison to me. data, music, video does not have physical substance accept on the media it comes on. when you tell someone an idea or show him how to play a song, its no longer yours to control anymore, and thats they way it should be IMHO. making a copy of something does not rid anyone of anything. Profits are gained by people making good will efforts to compensate people, that will always be that way regardless if some people decide to make copies available for free or not.

      You can't make games like Mass Effect and Gears of War with a couple of small donations from a few people, and if those games aren't made then there's nothing for people to take freely.


      I definitely agree with you on that, as I said I still believe in peoples ability to compensate artists or companies that make something worth value. But trying to control distribution on the internet or in digital form is insanity. take a look at this from outside of the current brick and mortar business model and you will see that this is true.

    26. Re:Good article, trolling comment- by Das+Modell · · Score: 1

      This sounds like an apples and oranges comparison to me.

      No, you're clearly shifting responsibility from the perpetrator to the victim. No reason why it shouldn't also apply to murder or robbery.
    27. Re:Good article, trolling comment- by Intrinsic · · Score: 1

      Sorry I dont think you understand the entire issue enough to say make that kind of judgement, but thanks for the feedback.

    28. Re:Good article, trolling comment- by Das+Modell · · Score: 1

      What is it that I don't understand? You're saying that the victim is responsible, not the offender. What more is there to understand?

  4. Uh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    From TFA:

    FBI agent Andrew Myers and the MPAA have given a group of six Swedish police officers extensive training on how to effectively combat piracy and catch people who engage in illegal downloading from the internet.

    How exactly is the MPAA able to teach Swedish police how to "effectively combat piracy", when the MPAA themselves fail to achieve that?

    1. Re:Uh by jackharrer · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The same they did in Poland. There are three guys coming to your home: judge, cop and IT guy. If you don't allow them in they sign a warrant on spot and enter your premises. They even have certain pricelist, like 1 PLN for a mp3, 5 PLN for a film. Plus retail price for all illegal software. If you don't pay or cooperate - they just take your computer. And they have no problems with Win software and security (as if anybody have).

      Is it a law? Or it's an abuse?

      --

      "an experienced, industrious, ambitious, and often, quite often, picturesque liar" - Mark Twain
    2. Re:Uh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As soon as qualified Swedish police officers will come in and "bust" (as in "walk-in-the-server-room-and-talk-to-some-dude-for -4-hours") some poor ISP's servers, they will find nothing that would be against their law. Then, during the 2 day period of the site's servers being confiscated, the site gets itself temporary hosting in a gray-server haven called Amsterdam, and functions as usual, then they get their servers back and the police now owe them an apology for raiding every server there was, hurting the company's business. The next day, MPAA will come up in its news section with a "LOL! LOOK! WE JUST BUSTID A SWEDISH PIRATE CONSPIRACY SECRET RING WHO ARE RUTHLESS PIRATES DESPITE THE FACT THAT IT WAS REALLY A SEARCH WITHOUT RESULTS!"

    3. Re:Uh by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      They teach them the MPAA way: Sue first, ask questions later.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    4. Re:Uh by paulmer2003 · · Score: 1

      What if you don't run Windows eh? What if you run a operating system they don't know how to use? Alright, sure, feel free to go on my computer, but good luck finding my warez when its owned by root (chmod 600 :))

    5. Re:Uh by pilot1 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Unless your drives are encrypted, that's not going to stop them when they boot from a livecd.

    6. Re:Uh by aliquis · · Score: 1

      I guess it's because the police got some power to do something while the MPAA doesn't (or well, shouldn't have) ;)

      To my fellow Swedes: Maybe it's time to try qnext? I like it, it must mean something (I don't use it for filesharing thought, yet...)

    7. Re:Uh by aliquis · · Score: 1

      As someone said that wont help a bit.

      More importantly you shouldn't do it on your webpage ;)

  5. In next election.... by DrYak · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And suddenly the popularity of the "Piratpartiet" bumps up to 56%, and steals 2/3 of the sweedish parliament on next election...

    Thank you, RIAA, this was the most intelligent thing to do.

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
    1. Re:In next election.... by westlake · · Score: 1
      And suddenly the popularity of the "Piratpartiet" bumps up to 56%, and steals 2/3 of the sweedish parliament on next election...

      and if this Geek fantasy doesn't materialize, what then?

      Sweden has 800 movie theaters for a population of nine million, tickets cost about $10 US. Film in Sweden That suggests something less than a blanket popular endorsement of piracy.

    2. Re:In next election.... by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1

      That suggests something less than a blanket popular endorsement of piracy.
      You seem to have a very fixed opinion of who a pirate is... my guess is that many people treat the theatre as a social outing, and have no qualms downloading the movie they see either before, so they can pre-screen what they want to see, or after, if they found they really enjoyed it.

      Movie piracy doesn't hurt theatre sales, it hurts DVD sales. Of course, I have a feeling you'll find plenty of DVD rental and sales outlets in Sweden too -- and that many people own both legitimate copies and pirated copies.

    3. Re:In next election.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And suddenly the new government of 'Piratpartiet' realizes there is a real world out there and that it needs to survive on the economy; "uh oh" not welcome to participate in the world economy because of some self serving laws and using their influence as the Robin Hoods of the internet to pander to the weak and poor.

  6. Now there is a thought. by Don_dumb · · Score: 4, Funny

    "I bet the Swedish people are going to love to find out that the US government and a US lobbying group now have a hand in training their police personnel. So much for the notion of national sovereignty."
    I hope the Swedish will love it just as much as the Iraqi people do.
    --
    If this were really happening, what would you think?
    1. Re:Now there is a thought. by Clandestine_Blaze · · Score: 1

      Bravo - insightful AND funny, yet, it did not require the use of an "In Soviet Russia, Police train you!" joke.

  7. UK children by pubjames · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Well, in the UK children who study computer science study a module that basically tells them how to comply with software licences, and that it is illegal to "copy software".

    1. Re:UK children by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      So what, in communist countries you had to study Marxism/Leninism, no matter what you studied. At least so far the copycrap hasn't been forced down every other science branch.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:UK children by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Er, children don't study computer science in the UK. They might have a GCSE in IT, but that's totally different to computer science. Generally, people don't study computer science until they are adults at university. I did exactly that, and have never heard of this so-called software license module.

    3. Re:UK children by pubjames · · Score: 1

      Er, children don't study computer science in the UK.

      Well, they call it ICT.

      I did exactly that, and have never heard of this so-called software license module.

      http://www.bbc.co.uk/schools/gcsebitesize/ict/lega l/

    4. Re:UK children by init100 · · Score: 1

      In my university we used so much free software that it would be strange to have a course teaching students that "it's illegal to copy software". :)

    5. Re:UK children by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, they call it ICT.

      From the link you've provided, it seems I was right. That's not even remotely computer science - it's IT. Just because it involves computers, it doesn't make it computer science.

    6. Re:UK children by Technician · · Score: 1

      Well, in the UK children who study computer science study a module that basically tells them how to comply with software licences

      I hope they cover all the basic types from closed source commercial to BSD and GNU. When they understand the licences, they can make good choices in software selection.

      I used to buy software just on features alone. Now I select software based on TCO, liability, usefulleness within the license, and features. In short, I use the best value. Low value restricted use software at high prices are of no use and are a liability. BSA member software is a liability with high risk in the license agreement.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    7. Re:UK children by Phillip2 · · Score: 1


      http://www.bbc.co.uk/schools/gcsebitesize/ict/lega l/

      A scary questionaire. Aside from the didactics, which are poor, there were a surprising number of factual errors.

      "If you buy a legal copy of a CD, it's okay to copy it"

      was marked as wrong when it could be true or false. It was riddled with this sort of error.

      If you are going to talk about the law, then you should get
      it correct.

    8. Re:UK children by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True, but it's a bunk. And an instant pass.

      Your tax dollars (well, pounds) at work here, people.

    9. Re:UK children by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1

      Actually, in the UK, it is ALWAYS illegal to copy a CD... new legislation is currently under review to fix this issue. Of course, the line said OK, not Legal. The questionnaire appears to be trying to moralize legislation.

  8. I know, it's premature and immature, but... by SlovakWakko · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...so long, piratebay, and thanks for all the torrents...

  9. Comment from the Pirat Party by tcdk · · Score: 4, Insightful

    From http://www2.piratpartiet.se/ in my translation:

    "The judicial system is make a mistake a see these lobby organisations as some sort of private police corp. Their only interest is to keep their old profitable monopoly. There organisations have nothing to do in our judicial system, says The Pirate Partys partyleader Rickard Falkvinge."

    That pretty much sums it up if you ask me.

    --
    TC - My Photos..
    1. Re:Comment from the Pirat Party by jackharrer · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Problem is that 'old profitable monopoly' finances politicians, which in turn do whatever those monopolies want.
      It's called politics.
      No way to do anything to it, as long as they have at least a little of their reputation left. Which is not much, anyway.

      --

      "an experienced, industrious, ambitious, and often, quite often, picturesque liar" - Mark Twain
    2. Re:Comment from the Pirat Party by Slyswede · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Swedish politicians are actually not funded directly by private interests, since we don't have personal elections in the true sense of the word. Although you are allowed to check your personal favourite on the ballot, your vote still counts mainly against the party of that candidate. While this reduces the need for candidates to fund their own election campaigns, it creates an interesting problem in my opinion since the political parties instead get their funding from the taxpayers. This means there's no way for me to avoid supporting people with ideas I really don't care for. :( On the other hand, with a larger share of the popular vote, the pirate party would also get money from the taxpayers... I bet the MPA and RIAA would love that. :)

  10. The most wonderful irony... by Sj0 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The most wonderful irony is that when i quote Orwell to illustrate my opinion of what this means, *I'm* the criminal.

    --
    It's been a long time.
    1. Re:The most wonderful irony... by Shatrat · · Score: 1

      The most wonderful irony is that when i quote Orwell to illustrate my opinion of what this means, *I'm* the criminal.
      Did you not pay for your copy of 1984?
      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    2. Re:The most wonderful irony... by Sj0 · · Score: 1

      I don't have public performance rights for the novel.

      --
      It's been a long time.
  11. Fight them abroad... by Hangtime · · Score: 1

    so we don't have to fight them here?

  12. Swedish Taxpayers Subsidize Foreign Publishers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm guessing that if one were to do careful accounting on this, one would find that taxpayer funds that could be spent more productively elsewhere in Sweden are instead being diverted to enhancing the revenues of foreign publishers. How this is in the Swedish national interest is probably something that no amount of accounting can explain.

    1. Re:Swedish Taxpayers Subsidize Foreign Publishers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      It might stop them being bitchslapped with a big fine by some WIPO type body if they look like they are making an effort to stop copyright infringement.

  13. well... by cosmocain · · Score: 1

    ...the FBI trains the swedish police - that's not as exciting as one might think. i guess (even though i got no facts on that) that the FBI (or some other "secret service") train almost all of the police forces somewhere...

    but why the heck is a lobbyist group involved? yeah, sure. they could give a speech on the matters of piracy and on how we all are doomed if we don't stop the uberevil pirates of the world from ruining markets, margins and stuff. they could even hand out some flyers. a nice powerpoint showing, err, well... facts and figures. but - as a lobbyist group - they should NOT be allowed to tangle with trainings. that's the moment when all parties involved should stand up and state: "nice for coming, folks, thanks for the freebies and now get the f* outta here"

    1. Re:well... by Alchemar · · Score: 1

      I want to know if the FBI and MPAA represenatives were given extensive training in the difference in laws between the two countries concerning copyright and civil rights before teaching the police force how to properly enforce the laws as they apply.

  14. Wrong perception in the USA by blind+biker · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Folks, Swedes are not angels. They are people just like you and me. Yes, there is no RIAA or MPAA in Sweden (yet), but that doesn't mean that there aren't wealthy and powerful people who are pushing their profit-driven agenda, there. The same is true for my country, Finland. Yeah, it's where Linus was born and raised, but it doesn't make it heaven on earth. For example, we have our share of corrupt CxOs, don't worry.

    --
    "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    1. Re:Wrong perception in the USA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is APB www.antipiratbyran.com

    2. Re:Wrong perception in the USA by Ontology42 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      IT's called having sane copyright laws, the U.S. should look into this "New form" of thought.

    3. Re:Wrong perception in the USA by kastberg · · Score: 1

      there is, IFPI and antipiratbyrån.

    4. Re:Wrong perception in the USA by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      True, but your countries are full of Nordic women, which pretty much makes up for any deficiencies.

  15. we'd never do that by oneplus999 · · Score: 2, Informative

    yeah cause its not like americans ever got training from the french during the american revolution

    1. Re:we'd never do that by hansamurai · · Score: 1

      We received Freedom training, not French training.

  16. Why Am I Suddenly Thinking by ReidMaynard · · Score: 1

    Why am I suddenly thinking of puppet-police all talking like Swedish Chef from The Muppets..

    --
    -- www.globaltics.net

    Political discussion for a new world

  17. So ? You swedish are going to let this slide ? by unity100 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The swedish i know would raise hell because of that issue, its crooked perpetrators, anyone who participated and related government agencies.

    There are no news around to that extent yet. We are waiting to see some swedish democracy in action.

    1. Re:So ? You swedish are going to let this slide ? by larske · · Score: 1

      My experience (as a swede) is that the general public in Sweden (the middle-swenson or medelsvensson i.e. joe sixpack) are mostly ignorant of important issues as long as they get their weekly dose of celebrity news and glorification of national sport heroes. Intellectual property issues are mostly unknown, the problems with patents are rarely discussed and people do not understand how big business (and the media monopolists in particular) lobby away our freedom and integrity.

  18. stupid thinking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    since when did I have any input into government policy? I get to vote once every three years and that is it.

    NO, its the corporates that control things...like the mass media, party funding, and so on.

    1. Re:stupid thinking by Kierthos · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Ah, yes... the old Zionist conspiracy.

      Something happens that makes the Muslims look bad. It's the Zionist conspiracy.
      Something happens that makes the Muslims look good. It's the Zionist conspiracy.
      A company does something you don't like. Zionist conspiracy.
      Your Eggos were burnt this morning. Zionist conspiracy.

      We need a new moderation descriptor. -1 - Complete nutter

      --
      Mr. Hu is not a ninja.
    2. Re:stupid thinking by Ash+Vince · · Score: 1, Informative

      It is interesting though that we are kicking all this fuss up about Iran and Korea having any sort of nuclear program even though they insist it is for power generation only. Yet Isreal have a well known nuclear weapons program which we have been ignoring for years.

      http://www.fas.org/nuke/guide/israel/nuke/
      http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/corresponden t/2841377.stm

      --
      I dont read /. to RTFA, I read /. to offend people in ignorance.
    3. Re:stupid thinking by endianx · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It isn't having nukes that is the problem. It is how they would be used. Israel would never just randomly nuke Iran. Even if they found a way to do it so that it did not lead back to them, the Muslim world would blame them regardless, and it would be open war on Israel.

      Iran, on the other hand, would be happy to nuke them some Jews. They probably wouldn't be so bold as to launch a missile at Israel, but if a suitcase nuke should happen to find it's way in there, well then so be it.

      Every country has a right to try and acquire nuclear weapons (and even more so nuclear power). But countries who would be threatened by that also have a right to try and provide incentives (both positive and negative) to try and stop them.

    4. Re:stupid thinking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      since when did I have any input into government policy? I get to vote once every three years and that is it.

      Your choice. You could also choose to get involved. Pick a party that's close to what you belive in and start making a difference.

    5. Re:stupid thinking by Ash+Vince · · Score: 1

      Every country has a right to try and acquire nuclear weapons (and even more so nuclear power)

      Errmmm, no actually.

      There is something called the nuclear non-proliferation treaty which the US has signed and is the legal justification for the forthcoming attack on Iran.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_Non-Prolifera tion_Treaty

      Israel would never just randomly nuke Iran.

      Says who? If you go and ask people in Lebannon they might not be so keen to believe it at the moment being that their entire country has just been punished for the actions of a few nutcase terrorists. The US used to fund the IRA but we (UK) never tried to punish all US citizens by a bombing campaign for the actions of a few citizens with too much money.

      http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/1563119. stm

      --
      I dont read /. to RTFA, I read /. to offend people in ignorance.
    6. Re:stupid thinking by endianx · · Score: 1

      There is something called the nuclear non-proliferation treaty which the US has signed and is the legal justification for the forthcoming attack on Iran. I was referring more to a natural right for a country to acquire the necessary arms to defend itself, as oppose to a legal right.

      If you go and ask people in Lebannon they might not be so keen to believe it at the moment being that their entire country has just been punished for the actions of a few nutcase terrorists. I'm not saying that Israel would never attack anybody, just that they wouldn't do it with nukes unless they were facing imminent destruction, or perhaps if they had been nuked themselves.

      And sorry about the off topic :(
    7. Re:stupid thinking by Ash+Vince · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I'm not saying that Israel would never attack anybody, just that they wouldn't do it with nukes unless they were facing imminent destruction, or perhaps if they had been nuked themselves

      I understood that, I disagree though. I think the Zionists in the Israeli security forces would always want to retaliate one step beyond whatever was done to them. So it is not hard to invisage a situation where they open up with nuclear weapons just because they were attacked with conventional weapons. I don't think that attack would have to threaten the entire state of Israel either.

      Every action they have taken since the inception of the country has involved trying to inflict revenge on anyone who wrongs them rather than making peace. This is interesting because it is the same attitude we (I am British) took at the end of the first world war.

      We tried to punish the entire of Germany for starting that war with Treaty of Versailles (http://www.historyonthenet.com/WW1/versailles.htm ). This caused severe economic hardship and generally set up Hitlers rise to power as he could blame alot of the problems of industrialisation (some of which all countries were facing, not just Germany) on foriegn governments. This set up the German people to support invading other countries to take back what they had lost in the treaty.

      This is why when WW2 ended there was no attempt to punish Germany further. We had by that point levelled a great many of their cities by firebombing, the people has suffered enough. Instead the allies forgave and started to try and rebuild the country. There was a huge amount of US investment in this process (in Japan as well after they caught a couple of Nukes).

      This rebuilding was the best course of action to make sure another war on that same scale didn't happen, either against Germany or Japan. The people of all the countries had to forgive or the cycle would continue.

      This has to happen in the middle east now, or there will be no peace. But the only time the people of Israel elected a leader who might have allowed this to happen, the Zionists killed him. The reason this is important for America now is that without US support the Israeli state could not survive (http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/US-Is rael/U.S._Assistance_to_Israel1.html). So without US assistance they certainly could not spend money on developing nuclear weapons.

      If Isreal ever attacks another country with them, the retaliation may also be directed at the US people, probably in the form of the terrorist attack you describe. The only way to avoid this is for both sides to forgive. I am certainly not suggesting that the terrorists are any better. They also need to forgive, and concentrate on more productives. The rest of the Arab world needs to recognise Israels right to exist (Some countries like Egypt already have atrted down this path - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israel-Egypt_Peace_Tr eaty)

      Sorry for this being a long offtopic rant, but hopefully nobody is reading such an old article apart from us :)
      And sorry for any typos or grammar errors, but I have to do some work.

      --
      I dont read /. to RTFA, I read /. to offend people in ignorance.
    8. Re:stupid thinking by endianx · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Well, I agree with most of what you said. A massive conventional attack by a sovereign country (Iran, or whoever) could provoke a nuclear response from Israel. That would probably kick off WW3 as I suspect the USA would back Israel in such a situation. That is a whole other discussion though.

      I am not certain that Israel's history of an overly aggressive response is unjustified though. They are surrounded by hundreds of millions of people who hate them, most of whom do not understand the difference between forgiveness and weakness; and weakness is NOT something Israel can afford to portray.

      And I agree that both sides need to "forgive", but that is never going to happen. It isn't like the problems between Great Briton and Germany in the past. These people have been raised since birth to hate each other, and there is an inordinate amount of misinformation, on both sides I suspect.

      Peace in the middle east isn't going to occur in my lifetime. The only way I can see it happening is if, first, people are educated (and not by religious leaders) to clear up all the misinformation and such. And second, the people there need to become wealthy enough that they become too lazy to fight (like most people in the USA). If this works, I expect a noble peace prize!

    9. Re:stupid thinking by Ash+Vince · · Score: 1

      and not by religious leaders

      I thoroughly agree. Maybe we should take all the religous leaders of the world and just let them slog it out to the death pitfighting style. That is something I would pay to watch.

      PS - Who on earth is wasting mod points on a discussion in a three day old thread, go use them on new stuff instead where you might actually make difference rather than just hammering peoples karma.

      PPS - If anyone wants to mod this down please be my guest as:

      1) Anyone that daft doesnt deserve to moderate.
      2) I have karma to burn.

      --
      I dont read /. to RTFA, I read /. to offend people in ignorance.
  19. theft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    It is still theft.

  20. Re:I still thing the Nazi threat was worse... by kaysan · · Score: 1

    and we're running out of milk!

  21. The Reason as I see it by salle_from_sweden · · Score: 1

    It's not a threat to our sovereignity to seek advice and skill from other countries police forces, or from interest groups who knows about piracy and how it is done (and are willing to help).
    Why are we doing this?
    Well because the US has put some pressure on the last government, so slowly changes are being made. Why do we care what the US says?
    We don't want to be the next Cuba (or Iraq before the invasion), our biggest export market is the US (ok it's only 10% but still).

    So to please our economic overlords we train 6 police officers to deal with an illegal activity that 1 million swedes do, ie piracy. Is this going to put an end to piracy in sweden? Probably not.
    Will it lessen the extent to which there is movie, music and software piracy?
    Again probably not. Because the swidish police is still very inefficiant they have to do an godawfull amount of paperwork for every case, and as the laws are right now it's hard to collect evidence against users who are found sharing or downloading copyrighted files on p2p sites or programs, as the police can't get warrants to search computers, and it's illegal for them to hack our computers (regardless of how unprotected it is).
    So they will probably try to close down torrent-sites and DC-hubs and find the "key players" in "piracing groups". That provide rips and cracks and what not to the masses.
    I guess it's because the sueing tactic RIAA uses in the US is impossible in Sweden.

  22. Re: there's a difference between international law by purpleraison · · Score: 0

    There's a difference between international law, and American law. Sending the FBI, an organization whose operating objectives are solely to combat INTERNAL national crime (ie. American crimes that cross state borders) NOT international criminal activities. Additionally, there is no justification for the RIAA, an American organization representing American business interests to join hands with the FBI in an international endeavor to fight music downloads. Perhaps something more important, like human trafficking, or arms smuggling -- but even that goes to international police agencies like Interpol. Weird....

    --
    I am open source, and Linux baby!
  23. MPAA and FBI Help To Train Swedish Police by iminplaya · · Score: 3, Funny

    You know, this is how the Vietnam war started. First we send in "advisors". Then we make up a story about being attacked off the coast of Gotland, and the rest is history.

    --
    What?
    1. Re: MPAA and FBI Help To Train Swedish Police by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahh, damn you outed our sinister plan.

      First we send in the "advisors". Then we make up a story about HMS Gotland being attacked off the coast of San Diego, and the rest is meatballs with lingonberries.

  24. Isnt it also curious that FBI spares resources by unity100 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    for that, whereas, as they say, a 'worldwide battle against terrorism' is going on at the same time ?

    Very curious that, one important government agency can spare resources to spend for a PRIVATE organisation's whims, whereas there are army units deployed in iraq, afghanistan, pakistan is battling a lot of internation terrorist organisations trying to get roots in there, and terrorists are constantly trying to sneak into major western countries ?

    Either they are screwing us over terrorist threat level, or they are screwing us over our taxes.

    1. Re:Isnt it also curious that FBI spares resources by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1
      My knowledge of USA intelligence agencies comes only from TV/cinema but...

      CIA: Edward Wilson
      FBI: Fox Mulder

      2 different agencies which have different responsibilities. I'd suggest, again only from watching popular culture, that the CIA is more focussed on your 'worldwide battle against terrorism' than the FBI.

    2. Re:Isnt it also curious that FBI spares resources by Ogive17 · · Score: 1

      At first I thought you weren't American, and I was going to let it slide... then I read the last line where you used "us" and "our".

      Do you understand what the FBI actually does? It's a little bit of everything. But being the son of a retired police officer, I know they do a lot of training. If someone requests help, they provide it... it's pretty simple.

      --
      "Action without philosophy is a lethal weapon; philosophy without action is worthless."
    3. Re:Isnt it also curious that FBI spares resources by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      Not that I don't agree that it's probably an inappropriate use of resources, but it's not a zero sum game. It's possible for multiple people to tackle multiple problems and still get results in both areas. In fact, beyond a certain point, having more people working on one particular thing is counterproductive. This is commonly known as the law of diminishing returns.

  25. Threats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a problem that only one view was represented at the seminar but not so much a threat to sovereignty.
    The trade sanctions threat posed earlier is more worrying in this regard.

  26. I'm Swedish and I think like this: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm Swedish and I think like this:

    A) Copying IS NOT stealing.
    B) As long as the people that made the data that is being copied has a roof over their head and food to eat they can't complain too much. If they have more they should just STFU.
    C) A pirate is not bad if he does not use copied content to make money. Pirates that profit is however an issue to talk about.
    D) We live and die. If somebody copies a file in order to increase their life's value I say go ahead and let him. It's all about making people's life better, right...?
    E) Piracy does absolutely not mean that nobody will go to the movies anymore or buy them. If it somehow does a new legal distribution system needs to be arranged.
    F) If you can afford it and want to support the people behind it, and if you are not lazy at the time, go ahead and purchase the item in question.

    That is just my brain however. Maybe it can be yours too?

  27. Sweden: Grow a Set by organgtool · · Score: 2, Informative

    Up until now, I was always apprehensive of visiting Sweden for fear of being assaulted from all angles by pirates trying to get me to buy a bootleg of Justin Timerlake's latest CD, but now I will be able walk the streets of Sweden with confidence.

    All jokes aside, this is very disturbing. Even more disturbing is the fact that I have read several comments that don't seem too troubled by this behavior. People have forgotten that the police are a resource used to protect the physical well-being of their fellow citizens. They are not there to protect copyright holders from other countries. And time spent investigating copyright infringement by the police is less time spent investigating real CRIMES. Sweden needs to grow some balls and tell the MPAA to stay out of the police department.

    1. Re:Sweden: Grow a Set by yoder · · Score: 2, Informative

      Exactly. Our law enforcement is quickly becoming little more than hired guns for corporate interests. They have become a twisted fun house mirror view of law and order.

      If other countries give into our corporate attack animals then that is their problem and they deserve everything they get. If other countries see their own sovereignty as something to be given away to US industries then they deserve everything they get.

      --
      "In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act!" -- George Orwell (Eric Arthur Blair)
  28. Time to move my Swede bank account by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To a more friendly country; like South Africa!

  29. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  30. what is wrong with knowledge sharing? by azery · · Score: 0, Troll

    I think it is a good idea that police forces share their ideas. Why shouldn't we know how speeding, murder, traffic jams, illegal music, etc are handled in other countries? It doesn't mean that you have to copy the discussed techniques and apply them without thinking or checking them against your own law system... Typically slashdot: information should be free unless it can be used to check about pirated software or music.

  31. slippery slope by pizpot · · Score: 1

    Dear Sweden:

    Don't use the American's help. They will have you using shock gernades on people with keyboards and mice. Also any agreements that you sign are actually legal tricks. You might think it is just a disclaimer or something, but that is only because a US federal lawyer made it look innocent. Before you know it, you will be sorry. Take it from Canada and Mexico. Do engage the US! I know they are persistsant. That is how they spread. Just keep ignoring them until they move on.

  32. This is a good thing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    The police in Sweden need to first destroy all
    copies of songs by the wannabe artists. Then they need
    to go after Roxette. When they are done with that, they
    can go after the motherload: ABBA


    Elimination of all traces of ABBA will help the world.

    1. Re:This is a good thing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We have already wiped out the existence of ABBA here in Sweden. It's only you foreign folks left clinging to them.

  33. Finland not heaven on Earth? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The hell you say!

  34. The first lesson is... by Provocateur · · Score: 1

    (Actual quote)

    Bork, you're a federal agent! You represent the United States Government! Never end a sentence with a preposition.

    from the film
     

    --
    WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
  35. Justice? by World.Pop(MPAA) · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I love how the RIAA and MPAA can buy access to the FBI, yet the millions of Americans (heck non-Americans as well) are second-class citizens in the eyes of the Dept of Justice. You mean to tell me the abating intellectual property theft in Europe is more pertinent of an issue than fighting "white collar" crime? Ask the victims of Corporate Criminals (Enron) or dirty politicians (Randy Cunningham) whether they want a 16 year old boy downloading music jailed, or someone who violates the American people's faith in their government? I bet if we looked deep enough, we would find Jack Abramoff's dirty little paw prints all over this!

  36. Corporate Politicians by h2gofast · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Republican or Democrat, this is what you get when you vote for deal makers and not leaders. You get politicians who work for corporate lobbyists. Americans are suckers for the line of bullshit from their Democrat or Republican darlings who say that they are the only ethical ones, while the "other party" are the ones to blame for corruption. Voting for the least corrupt candidate is still voting for a crook.

  37. National Sovereignty, blah blah blah by Gothmolly · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Nice troll by the writer - as if the US and the RIAA just INVADED Sweden, and trained their cops, w/o any interaction with the Swedish government. So much for national sovereignty - the Swedes are giving it away.

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
  38. Thank God for priorities... by Eric+Damron · · Score: 1

    I'm glad to see that the FBI has its priorities straight so that it can use its limited resources in a way that will protect the people. We wouldn't want them to squander their budget on less important things like tracking down murderers, child molesters and terrorists.

    --
    The race isn't always to the swift... but that's the way to bet!
  39. Because you have a narrow, naive world view by MS-06FZ · · Score: 1

    I was thinking of the Swedish scene from "Top Secret", myself. Good stuff. Now excuse me, I have to go put some books away on some very high shelves...

    --
    ---GEC
    I'm but the humble pupil, seeking to snatch the scratchbuilt pebble from the master's fully articulated hand
  40. Re:UK children -- how about US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In Stafford, Virginia (USA), all public school students must sign the school board's computer use policy (rule 10) which prohibits the removal of any computer data or programs, and prohibits the alteration, destruction, or erasure of computer data. Basically, Susie (in Kindergarten) is in VIOLATION for turning on the computer (alteration of data, logs), editing her picture and saving it to hard disk (alteration of data) and exporting it to a floppy (removal of computer data). A child downloading open source and compiling it is in violation of multiple clauses including downloading software, alteration of computer data, etc.

    The head of the school board told me that they were just copying what other school boards do and they had no issue with the rules (I wish I still had the letter). One attorney recommended I change the wording by adding "unauthorized" before signing the agreement. In the DARE program, kids are also being taught that ANY copying of software or music is wrong. These actions are one-sided, based in a "we know best" mentality, and based on the premise that ALL software and music is commercial and hence shall be protected to the fullest extent of the law.

    (I have several kids in the Stafford county schools.)

  41. End Run by Jerry+Rivers · · Score: 1

    Or maybe the Swedes just wanted to see what the RIAA and FBI are up to so they can help find ways to circumvent their methods.

    --
    The pursuit of absolute tolerance leads to the most rigorous and ludicrous intolerance. - REX MURPHY
  42. Which "People" ? by abreauj · · Score: 2, Informative

    I think it is time the people realise that the government is an instrument of the PEOPLE, they work for and represent the PEOPLE. I think alot of people have forgotten this.

    The American government represents the American "people". But the question is, who are the American "people"? Sadly, the Supreme Court ruled in 1886 that a corporation is a person, with the same constitiutional rights as a human person. And as "people', corporations are immortal, incredibly wealthy, and exhibit psychopathic behavior.

    So the American government, over the past 121 years, has increasingly represented primarily the corporate "people" who have all the bribe money, and relegated the human "people" to second-class status.

  43. americans at it again.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i believe earlier this week the MPAA, RIAA, and FBI were trying to educate the local south african tribal folk about internet privacy.

    thank god i'm american i hate to be educated about priracy.