Slashdot Mirror


Apple and LG plan Flash Laptops

Lucas123 writes "An article in Computerworld states that Apple and LG each plan to launch new laptops — one that's supposed to ship this month — with hybrid disk drives. The new drives are like hybrid cars in that the NAND flash memory works in conjunction with the spinning disk, kicking in data that can be cached like portions of the operating system, which can make for much faster boot up and resume times."

197 comments

  1. Warranty? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder if the hybrid drive warranty in Apple's laptop will conveniently last about as long as the iPod's? Just enough time for the product to break so you have get a new one.

    1. Re:Warranty? by coren2000 · · Score: 1

      How long do ipod nanos last?

    2. Re:Warranty? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      4GB or 8GB?

    3. Re:Warranty? by soft_guy · · Score: 1, Troll

      I wonder if the hybrid drive warranty in Apple's laptop will conveniently last about as long as the iPod's? I'm willing to bet that the warranty will be Apple's standard 1 year warranty. If your iPod is breaking after a year, you are abusing it.
      --
      Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
    4. Re:Warranty? by empaler · · Score: 1

      That's why I'm happy to live in a country with consumer protection.

      Apart from the basic 2-year warranty, I usually by a 4 year insurance anyway - the risk of spilling coffee in a lappy is big enough, along with all the other crap it covers.

    5. Re:Warranty? by norminator · · Score: 1

      I wonder if the hybrid drive warranty in Apple's laptop will conveniently last about as long as the iPod's? Just enough time for the product to break so you have get a new one.

      Hopefully it's designed so that if the flash fails, it can go gracefully, leaving the spinning disk still useable. Although the flash is probably more reliable than the spinning disk, so maybe that wouldn't matter.
    6. Re:Warranty? by coren2000 · · Score: 1

      Both... and 2GB, if you know the answer.

    7. Re:Warranty? by alisson · · Score: 1

      My 3G is still running fine :D As is the HD in my g4 iBook.

      No, really. If you just don't sit on they, they last just fine!

    8. Re:Warranty? by dlim · · Score: 1

      The iPod is, for the most part, a hard drive. Hard drives fail. Even when they're not running while they're being carried around, used in warm or humid environments, or run continuously for hours on end. I wouldn't call this type of use of an mp3 player "abuse".

      "Abuse" could break an iPod in much less than a year. And "abuse" isn't covered by the warranty anyway. So why not offer a longer warranty if the product normally won't break in two years? I think it's safe to assume Apple did some kind of research into the failure rate of iPods before they decided to ask their customers for an additional $50 to warrant the device for 2 years.

    9. Re:Warranty? by jusdisgi · · Score: 5, Funny

      The new drives are like hybrid cars in that the NAND flash memory works in conjunction with the spinning disk...

      Oh...so that's how hybrid cars work...

      --
      Given a choice between free speech and free beer, most people will take the beer.
    10. Re:Warranty? by soft_guy · · Score: 1

      The iPod is, for the most part, a hard drive. Since the subject of this article is flash memory, I assume that the GPP was meaning the iPod nano/suffle which are flash based. Not hard drive based.
      --
      Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
    11. Re:Warranty? by general+scruff · · Score: 1

      No, this technology actually looks useful. Have you ever seen the real world MPG of a hybrid? Its a huge waste of resources and a concept born out of "environmental" incentives. The average MPG of a Prius is about 40. Guess what the average MPG is of a non-hybrid VW TDI (turbo diesel)? 50. Yep, 50 MPG. That, and you can convert a diesel to run on vegetable oil!

      I'm curious. Has anyone ever checked to see what type of number comparison would show if you tested a Prius against, say, a TDI Golf? It would be nice to know, how much more or less crude oil was needed to keep a Pruis going. Actually, let me know if you know of any comparison.

      Sorry to be so off topic, but I think this should be something /. should discuss.

      Why really, is it illegal to buy a new TDI in California, and the other states that choose to follow California (Maine being one of them....)

      --
      As a rule, I never trust dark brown ketchup.
    12. Re:Warranty? by jusdisgi · · Score: 1

      Hey, as it happens, I recently saw just such a comparison!

      http://teslamotors.com/learn_more/energy_efficienc y.php

      This is a well-to-wheels comparison...I'm not sure which way changing it to pump-to-wheels would skew things, although my guess would be in favor of the diesel. But I think well-to-wheels is what we should really be interested in anyhow. In any case, the comparison naturally shows the company's own Tesla Roadster as far and away more efficient than the others in the list...and their argument is fairly convincing. But it also does show the Toyota Prius and Honda Civic VX (the two hybrids in the list) as slightly more efficient than the diesel Jetta. It is worth noting that the fuel-cell and natural-gas cars performed terribly.

      If you haven't checked out Tesla's site, you should...it's really cool. Here's hoping that batteries get cheaper and their production ramps up as fast as they expect, so these can get into reasonable price ranges. Oh, and here's hoping the lithium doesn't run out ;-)

      --
      Given a choice between free speech and free beer, most people will take the beer.
  2. Sweet by danpsmith · · Score: 4, Funny

    Let me be the first to say:

    <borat>Nice</borat>

    --
    Judges and senates have been bought for gold; Esteem and love were never to be sold.
    1. Re:Sweet by jacquesm · · Score: 1

      closer but not quite there yet.

      I mean to that totally static solid state 10 ns 100G storage device...

      It's a pity that we have to go through all the intermediary stages before getting
      to the 'real thing', but for now we'll just have to settle for the next step.

      Anybody remember bubble memory ?

  3. OK Sure by tak+amalak · · Score: 2, Informative

    There has been so much speculation, but where's the proof? It'll have to run a slim OS like the iPhone to work well on flash due to the high rate of paging MacOS does.

    http://www.macworld.co.uk/news/index.cfm?newsid=17 434

    --
    Don't lead me into temptation... I can find it myself.
    1. Re:OK Sure by tak+amalak · · Score: 5, Funny

      Oh, and can I be the first to coin the term "Flashtops"?

      --
      Don't lead me into temptation... I can find it myself.
    2. Re:OK Sure by maxume · · Score: 3, Funny

      It's really too bad. If they had access to the source, they could totally change the way that OSX was paging, in order to work better with swell new hardware.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    3. Re:OK Sure by TheNetAvenger · · Score: 5, Insightful

      There has been so much speculation, but where's the proof? It'll have to run a slim OS like the iPhone to work well on flash due to the high rate of paging MacOS does.


      I won't comment on OSX's paging, other than it needs a bit of refining as it tends to be over agressive.

      However, I think Apple's initial plans are to use the Flash on these drives as more of a Read area for portions of OSX that are accessed at startup or frequently.

      As for the lifespan of Flash, if the device or OS is smart enough to not use the same bits over and over and distributes the writes intelligently(Since areas of Flash are fairly equal in speed), then the lower end bits won't get any more use than the top end of the cache, and in theory the flash should last as long as the HD platters. There are also techniques to extend Flash usage by what bits are used and when, so the limited writes are extended beyond just linear write lifespans of the Flash.

      Remember the HD Mfrs are not stupid about caching or Flash limits, so this is stuff that people a lot smarter than the average SlashDot reader has already considered and worked around.

    4. Re:OK Sure by FSWKU · · Score: 4, Funny

      Oh, and can I be the first to coin the term "Flashtops"?

      I think that term is reserved for the ones already using Sony batteries.
      --
      "So after all this, you make my case for me. To end this stalemate, you must die..."
    5. Re:OK Sure by zigziggityzoo · · Score: 1

      Computers Gone Wild! This gives a whole new meaning to geek porn.

      --
      Zing!
    6. Re:OK Sure by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 5, Funny

      ....people a lot smarter than the average SlashDot reader....

      I hear they're also taller than the average midget...

    7. Re:OK Sure by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      >due to the high rate of paging MacOS does.

      How well do you know the workings of OSX VM? What are you comparing it to?
      Are you considering the 32-bit table scheme or the 64-bit?

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    8. Re:OK Sure by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Informative

      Oh, and can I be the first to coin the term "Flashtops"?

      No.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    9. Re:OK Sure by jeffeb3 · · Score: 1

      "Remember the HD Mfrs are not stupid about caching or Flash limits, so this is stuff that people a lot smarter than the average SlashDot reader has already considered and worked around."

      That's right! I challenge anyone to find something as cheap, and small with as much technology as a modern hard drive. There is a lot more that goes into one of those than storage, to read off of a disk that's spinning at 10,000rpm and a reading arm that's hovering mere molecules above the surface of the disk, you need to have incredibly intelligent algorithms to compensate for errors in the reading arms position, as well as dealing with the disk movement such as the taco effect. It wouldn't surprise me at all if the flash drive doesn't only improve the speed of the data, but will greatly reduce the failure rate of hard disks.

    10. Re:OK Sure by Salmar · · Score: 1

      Oo! Oo! That reminds me! A friend and I came up with this idea last month:

      Instead of caching pieces of the OS for boot-time, why don't we use flash to persist the entire RAM? You could close your laptop to hibernate and restore almost instantly hours later, with no battery use in between. You'd never need to shut it down! Wouldn't that be considerably more useful? It's also simple than relying on the OS to handle paging and whatnot; it could be implemented entirely in hardware.

      --
      This is not the signature you're looking for.
    11. Re:OK Sure by blake3737 · · Score: 1

      The explosions are not a bug, they're a feature. They just kick so much ass they explode sometimes. We recommend the wearing of lead lined denim and tungsten jeans for use with our high energy batteries.

    12. Re:OK Sure by The+Great+Pretender · · Score: 1

      You will now be sued by Apple for infringement of their flashtops trade mark. This will then be followed by Steve Jobs making a public statement that having to not use trade marks would be adopted whole heartedly by Apple.

      --
      A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort.
    13. Re:OK Sure by ady1 · · Score: 1

      Oh I didn't realize that there are people with batteries. I myself still use the biological powering method in some part of the world known as food.

    14. Re:OK Sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My shuffle 1.0 just died. I'll never buy a Mac flash product again. It's like having to buy razors but more expensive.

  4. drives are like hybrid cars by 1u3hr · · Score: 5, Insightful
    NO, they're NOT "like hybrid cars". Stop it with the inane car analogies.

    The word "hybrid" has a meaning outside automobiles. Originally it was a biological term.

    1. Re:drives are like hybrid cars by baldass_newbie · · Score: 1

      The 'hybrid' term had me scratching my head, too.
      I am wondering if it's meant to imply that it is somehow 'environmentally friendly'. I don't know.

      Using some form of flash/caching along with memory and disk drives is not, shall we say, new so I'm wondering what it's a 'hybrid' of exactly.

      --
      The opposite of progress is congress
    2. Re:drives are like hybrid cars by Crazy+Man+on+Fire · · Score: 4, Informative

      The disk dive is a hybrid. It combines a standard platter-based drive with flash memory to hold the stuff used to boot up. This is supposed to improve boot speed.

    3. Re:drives are like hybrid cars by Demoknight · · Score: 1

      Finally feel like I can go "hybrid" without feeling like a smelly hippie.

    4. Re:drives are like hybrid cars by terraformer · · Score: 1

      The word "hybrid" has a meaning outside automobiles. Originally it was a biological term.

      Yes, we have a few of those posting around these parts...

      --
      Who are you? The new #2 Who is #1? You are #617565. I am not a number, I am a free man! Muhahaha.
    5. Re:drives are like hybrid cars by Poruchik · · Score: 1

      Which is no way like cars. Cars already boot instantaneously.

      --
      $signature =~ s/$signature//;
    6. Re:drives are like hybrid cars by Rakshasa+Taisab · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Just like a hybrid car, with one engine that runs on gasoline, another on electricity. And then it switches to whatever is most efficient for the particular purpose.

      Or did someone already use the car analogy?

      --
      - These characters were randomly selected.
    7. Re:drives are like hybrid cars by rizole · · Score: 1

      Tag this story "broken car analogy"

    8. Re:drives are like hybrid cars by MightyYar · · Score: 4, Informative

      I agree that car analogies often are incomplete, but this is hardly a bad one. You take an electric car and a gasoline-powered car and do an engineering mash-up and you get a car with many of the advantages of a gasoline car (capacity, cost) and many of the advantages of an electric (power consumption, throttle response). You take a platter-based hard drive and a flash-based drive and do an engineering mash-up and you get a drive with many of the advantages of a platter-based hard drive (capacity, cost) and many of the advantages of a flash-based drive (power consumption, latency).

      It's actually not a bad analogy.

      The only thing stranger than all of the car analogies is the impassioned resistance that they invoke.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    9. Re:drives are like hybrid cars by Scootesti · · Score: 1

      Yours boots automatically? I've literally had to get out and take the 'boots' to mine to get it to start :D

      --
      "So, Lone Starr, now you see that evil will always triumph, because good is dumb." - Dark Helmet
    10. Re:drives are like hybrid cars by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      The word "hybrid" has a meaning outside automobiles. Originally it was a biological term.
      Really? I thought it was from X-Files.

    11. Re:drives are like hybrid cars by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The only thing stranger than all of the car analogies is the impassioned resistance that they invoke.

      Would you like it if car people make idiotic computer analogies all the time?

      "Well, I increased the CFMs of my carburetor, which is like doubling your ram. And then I added a second fuel tank, which is like adding another hard disk."

      But seriously the reason that people like me resist it so strongly is that most of them are just fucking stupid. This one is less stupid than most but it's still not a very good fit. In fact, it's not all that analogous which is why I resist the analogy. But I didn't rail against it for the reason that you state; this is probably one of the best car analogies that's been used on slashdot recently :)

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    12. Re:drives are like hybrid cars by Moofie · · Score: 1

      For people more familiar with computers than cars, those analogies might be useful, IFF they are written well.

      Badly written analogies are bad.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    13. Re:drives are like hybrid cars by lostatredrock · · Score: 1

      No it is still a bad analogy because your entire justification was just describes what the term hybrid means.

      'anything derived from heterogeneous sources, or composed of elements of different or incongruous kinds'

      That is one definition of a hybrid which is essentially what you just described the addition of a car only makes a muddled analogy as the car part of a hybrid car has no relationship to a hybrid hard drive only the hybrid part does.

    14. Re:drives are like hybrid cars by dr.badass · · Score: 1

      The word "hybrid" has a meaning outside automobiles. Originally it was a biological term.

      A hybrid drive is more like a hybrid car than a genetic hybrid. The components are distinct, like a Prius or an Insight, not integrated, like a Liger or a Zeedonk. While I sympathize with disdain for car analogies, this one is actually pretty accurate.

      --
      Don't become a regular here -- you will become retarded.
    15. Re:drives are like hybrid cars by operagost · · Score: 4, Funny

      Ooh! Let me try...

      I upgraded to Vista, which is like kicking myself in the balls.
      I started playing World of Warcraft, which is like smoking crack (but less socially acceptable).
      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    16. Re:drives are like hybrid cars by operagost · · Score: 1

      Excuse me... is that a cloud of smug over your head?

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    17. Re:drives are like hybrid cars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My car takes like 10 seconds to finish its flashing of lights and dinging of noises. I hardly call that instantaneous. In that time i could be doing over 70!

    18. Re:drives are like hybrid cars by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      You must live in a warm climate.

    19. Re:drives are like hybrid cars by MightyYar · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Actually, that was not my argument at all. I was saying that the things improved by a "hybridizing" a car are very closely analogous to the things improved by "hybridizing" a hard drive, no matter what the definition of hybrid is:
      • fuel capacity <-> hard disk capacity
      • cost <-> cost
      • power consumption <-> fuel efficiency
      • throttle response <-> latency

      I agree that car analogies can be forced and bad, but this one is actually pretty good.
      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    20. Re:drives are like hybrid cars by snark23 · · Score: 1

      ha, that's exactly what I came here to post =)

      It's the worst analogy of the day!

    21. Re:drives are like hybrid cars by TerranFury · · Score: 1

      >It's the worst analogy of the day!

      No... surely it's no worse than a leaky screwdriver?

    22. Re:drives are like hybrid cars by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      A hybrid drive is more like a hybrid car than a genetic hybrid.

      But it's more like a hybrid drive. I think most people here understand how drives work better than they do cars -- I certainly do -- so an "explanation" comparing it to car mechanics is less than illuminating. The word "hybrid" itself tells you the general idea. I also note that in TFA they didn't feel the need to bring in cars to explain the concept.

    23. Re:drives are like hybrid cars by Eccles · · Score: 2, Funny

      Cars already boot instantaneously.

      You've never owned a British car then, I take it.

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
    24. Re:drives are like hybrid cars by lostatredrock · · Score: 3, Interesting

      As much as it pains me to say this and trust me it's painful, I think you have actually made a good point there.

      Damn you!

    25. Re:drives are like hybrid cars by MightyYar · · Score: 2, Insightful

      LOL, a gentleman on Slashdot... you should have turned it into a flame war.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    26. Re:drives are like hybrid cars by mdielmann · · Score: 1

      Yep, that's certainly the Ford Pinto of analogies...

      Sorry, couldn't resist. :D

      --
      Sure I'm paranoid, but am I paranoid enough?
    27. Re:drives are like hybrid cars by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      the things improved by a "hybridizing" a car are very closely analogous to the things improved by "hybridizing" a hard drive

      Not "closely", but even so, what's the point of drawing such an analogy? The basic ideas of how a hard disc works are actually simpler than the workings of a modern car. An analogy is supposed to help understand a complex or new concept by comparing it with a known, simpler one. This actually does the reverse.

    28. Re:drives are like hybrid cars by lowid+(24)+_________ · · Score: 1

      World of Warcraft. Less socially acceptable than smoking crack.

      nice.

    29. Re:drives are like hybrid cars by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure how much more closely an analogy need be - all it is supposed to do is convey a point.

      But I think that you are right - what is the point? The analogy is not from TFA, it is from the summary. Presumably, everyone on Slashdot knows what a hard drive is and basically how it works... why use a car analogy? If it were a "mainstream" site, a car analogy would make more sense. While cars are more mechanically complicated, many more everyday people can describe that a car "burns" gasoline or uses electricity than can explain even what the difference between RAM and storage is, let alone how a hard drive works. Usually I find a record player or CD player to be a better analog than a car when describing a hard drive, but they don't really make a "hybrid" :)

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    30. Re:drives are like hybrid cars by snark23 · · Score: 1

      I missed that one. You're right. Amended:

      It's the second worst analogy of the day!

  5. What "resume" time? by thinbits · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Either it's a Windows thing I don't understand, or "resume" means something that is not obvious. When I open my MacBook (and any PowerBook I've ever owned), it's usable almost instantaneously (within a second or two).

    Do Windows laptops not work this way (I've never used one)?

    1. Re:What "resume" time? by TheNetAvenger · · Score: 1

      Do Windows laptops not work this way (I've never used one)?

      Windows or Linux is not limited in any way or inferior to OSX in this regard.

      I think people are wanting instant on/off from hibernate with large amounts of RAM.

      Even my old Toshiba from 2002 running XP will return from a hibernate (no power) in less than 2 secs, and will resume from standby (still powered) instantly. It has 768MB of RAM.

      However my new laptop with 4GB takes almost 4 seconds to resume from a powered off hibernate state as it takes just a bit more time to read the RAM from the HD.

      Hope this makes sense.

    2. Re:What "resume" time? by supertbone · · Score: 0

      I noticed that when I upgraded from XP to Vista, my laptop resumes almost instantaneously, whereas previously it would take a lot longer.

    3. Re:What "resume" time? by GiovanniZero · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Actually, OS X is superior when it comes to sleep. Because Mac's have a set amount of hardware so they can develop for their own platform and make sure everything is fine tuned and working well.


      http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=225106&cid=182 31650 ->This discussion talks about hardware differences and shows one of the reasons that Apple has superior stability.


      Windows and even linux machines can have such a wide variety of hardware and all it takes is one bad driver to make sleep or suspend not work. Furthermore suspend2 for x86-64 doesn't come compiled in most distros of linux and you have to recompile the kernel to get it to work.


      While your notebook may not have any problems with sleep it is probably the exception. Lots of windows boxes will sleep but when you bring them back up sound won't work or usb ports won't work. It's a pain.

      --
      Mod me up, mod me down, do your worst you modding clown.
    4. Re:What "resume" time? by thegameiam · · Score: 1

      All of my mac laptops (G1MBP, G4iBook) wake from sleep nearly instantly. My mac desktop (a cube) wakes well, but takes a few seconds - basically, it wakes up before spinning up the drive, and only spins the drive when it needs to.

      My pc laptop (Dell D600, Win 2k) blows chunks - getting it to go to sleep can take a 30 seconds, wakeup takes about the same, and startup takes more than a minute. Bleah!

      -David

      --
      Need Geek Rock? Try The Franchise!
    5. Re:What "resume" time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My pc laptop (Dell D600, Win 2k) blows chunks *emphasis by me

      Gee.. I wonder why it "blows chunks" at sleep/stanby. How well does your Mac OS 9 PC/notebook sleep?
    6. Re:What "resume" time? by FSWKU · · Score: 1

      Lots of windows boxes will sleep but when you bring them back up sound won't work or usb ports won't work. It's a pain.

      No hardware issues with mine in that regard, but it does have it's own nasty quirk. Sometimes, when I bring it out of sleep mode and try to find a wireless network, the scanner will load into memory, but no interface, and it basically just sits there. GG Lenovo =\

      That said, I can put the system to sleep within a second or two, and to wake it up takes 5 at most. Hibernate, on the other hand, takes a good 20 seconds either way...
      --
      "So after all this, you make my case for me. To end this stalemate, you must die..."
    7. Re:What "resume" time? by empaler · · Score: 1

      Resume from Hibernate, probably, is what they're thinking of (where the RAM contents are hosed onto the HDD and the power completely cut off)

    8. Re:What "resume" time? by Moofie · · Score: 1

      "Windows or Linux is not limited in any way or inferior to OSX in this regard."

      You're joking, right?

      Every Windows laptop I've ever worked on regularly fails to wake up when you open it. There is no clear indication of what state it's in, and pressing the power button for varying amounts of time sometimes wakes the machine up, and sometimes powers the machine off.

      So, yeah, that's inferior.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    9. Re:What "resume" time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps you shouldn't download midget porn full of spyware and viruses. I've NEVER had a windows laptop that failed to resume from standby.

    10. Re:What "resume" time? by DrXym · · Score: 1
      While your notebook may not have any problems with sleep it is probably the exception. Lots of windows boxes will sleep but when you bring them back up sound won't work or usb ports won't work. It's a pain.

      Usually true for desktop PCs, but most laptops appear to sleep / hibernate just fine. I have an IBM laptop which I hibernate every night. It literally goes months between reboots.

      My experience of XP and Vista hibernate on the desktop is not so good. Under XP desktop machine hibernate used to throw an error. Under Vista it does appear to work, but sometimes the Sleep function hibernates and then wakes up instantly which is extremely annoying when I discover my machine still turned on after I told it to turn off.

    11. Re:What "resume" time? by dave420 · · Score: 1

      I guess I've been lucky with every single notebook I've owned that ran XP, then. great!

    12. Re:What "resume" time? by MojoStan · · Score: 2, Informative
      "My pc laptop (Dell D600, Win 2k) blows chunks - getting it to go to sleep can take a 30 seconds, wakeup takes about the same, and startup takes more than a minute. Bleah!"

      Sounds to me like your Dell is set to "hibernate" (which actually powers off your computer after saving its "state") and not "standby" (Windows 2000's term for "sleep").

      Hibernate saves the computer's state (including open programs) and memory contents to the hard drive, then powers off the computer. Coming out of hibernation powers on the computer, loads back the saved memory contents from the hard drive, and returns the computer to its previous state. The notebook's battery is not being drained at all while in hibernation because the notebook is actually turned off, not "sleeping."

      "Stand by" in Windows 2000 is like "sleep" in Mac OS. It should take a few seconds, at most, to go into and out of "stand by." I have a Toshiba notebook (Pentium 3) that's much older than your Dell D600 (Centrino era), and it "sleeps" (goes into stand by) and "wakes up" in seconds. Since your Dell uses an Intel Centrino chipset and Pentium M, it should have no problem going into and out of stand by.

      I read about this from Mac users all the time in Slashdot, but I'm certain that almost all of them are confusing "hibernate" and "sleep".

      --
      TO START
      PRESS ANY KEY

      Where's the 'ANY' key? I see Esk, Kitarl, and Pig-Up...

    13. Re:What "resume" time? by nostriluu · · Score: 1

      It's true that the Mac wakes up much faster than any other notebook I've seen, near instantly (though I think they cheat a bit, because the screen comes up right away, then it sometimes disappears, and the system isn't responsive for a few seconds).

      But current Macs have a known problem suspending, related to Bluetooth, USB or network activity. It may just be user confusion, but it's pervasive enough to be an issue. I've seen this problem on some systems, hunting around in preferences didn't help. I've seen other references to this problem, but here's one: http://www.macosxhints.com/article.php?story=20070 210010538919&query=sleep

      Basically, when you're in that situation, using a Mac doesn't mean much compared to Windows or even Linux, cause knowledge and hacking are involved for a solution.

      On the other hand, I don't have any software problems, but my Macbook Pro's jewelry box like latch doesn't work well, so I have to use masking tape to make sure it doesn't wake up mid journey. Talk about favouring "elegance" over robustness.

    14. Re:What "resume" time? by Professor_UNIX · · Score: 2, Informative

      Windows or Linux is not limited in any way or inferior to OSX in this regard.
      That hasn't been my experience though. My Powerbook (1.67GHz/1GB RAM) wakes up from sleep in a second, I login (locked screensaver) and I can start browsing the web via my Airport connection in under 3 seconds. On the other hand, my Windows desktop (AMD Athlon XP 2400+ on some MSI motherboard with 2GB of RAM) wakes up from S3 sleep in about 4 seconds to the lock screen, I login, and then I have to wait another 20-30 seconds for the networking to come online, even if I statically assign the IP address to rule out a DHCP issue! My Mac uses DHCP and it works fine waking from sleep though. Don't even get me started on Linux... Linux absolutely sucks for desktop power management uses. The newest Ubuntu on the exact same desktop I use for Windows won't ever go to full S3 standby, it just looks like it blanks the screen and doesn't power down any of the hard drives or fans like Windows does. Yea, I know, go to some web site and grab this or that package and compile this or that to load some custom kernel module that may or may not fix the issue. NO! It should just work! ACPI S3 sleep mode has been out for a long time and the fact that, at least this distribution of, Linux doesn't support it as a standard feature without screwing around is absolutely lame.
    15. Re:What "resume" time? by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      I think you're right. I have the big brother of the D600 - a Precision M70. It sleeps/wakes in less than 2 seconds typically. It takes 20-30 seconds to resume from hibernation, though part of that is the fact that I've got 2GB of memory.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    16. Re:What "resume" time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must have a Dell.

    17. Re:What "resume" time? by fangorious · · Score: 1

      You're confusing Standby and Suspend on Windows. Standby is pretty lame. It turns off components like the disk and the monitor, but it doesn't do anything special for saving system state to power down to nearly zero power consumption (I don't think it even slows down the CPU). Suspend is the mode that saves system state to memory and powers down, using only enough power to maintain the contents of RAM. Hibernate takes it the one step further to save to state to disk and fully power down. I've never understood why Macs don't have a hibernation mode. It's the only way to preserve system state while changing batteries.

    18. Re:What "resume" time? by godawful · · Score: 1

      You're partially correct with Mac laptops. When they go to "sleep" they aren't completely powering off, and it's not the same as Hibernate. However; should a Mac stay in sleep until the battery dies, before the battery dies the OS will go into hibernation, writing the contents of RAM to the HDD, next time it powers up with electricity there will be a small progress bar at the bottom.

      Kind of a nice way to use hibernate only when necessary, however, I'm sure some people wouldn't mind having hibernate as an option rather than the OS doing so only when it determines as such.

      --
      Live EVERY week... Like it's Shark Week
    19. Re:What "resume" time? by Altus · · Score: 1


      I find my mac takes a bit longer than that to get its wireless connection back... its kind of frustrating. Certainly not as long as what you describe for you windows machine (I dont have a windows laptop to compare it too). But I always feel like I am sitting around waiting for it to get its wireless connections back.

      Any suggestions?

      --

      "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

    20. Re:What "resume" time? by andreyw · · Score: 1

      ...they did on PowerBooks since 2005. Look up "Safe Sleep". That's the hibernation mode.

    21. Re:What "resume" time? by gordyf · · Score: 1

      Check your "preferred network list" (System Preferences, Network, Airport, "By default, join:", change to Preferred). It is populated with every network you've ever connected to and can become quite long. Remove any networks you no longer need, and move the ones you use frequently to the top of the list. That should speed up your wireless re-connects.

    22. Re:What "resume" time? by poopdeville · · Score: 1

      However; should a Mac stay in sleep until the battery dies, before the battery dies the OS will go into hibernation, writing the contents of RAM to the HDD, next time it powers up with electricity there will be a small progress bar at the bottom.

      Not in my experience. When I've put my G4 PowerBook to sleep and drained the battery, it just cold booted when I turned it on. No resume from hibernation.

      Then again, all this stuff is hardware dependent. I wouldn't mind or know of improvements.

      --
      After all, I am strangely colored.
    23. Re:What "resume" time? by Kjella · · Score: 1

      It should just work! ACPI S3 sleep mode has been out for a long time and the fact that, at least this distribution of, Linux doesn't support it as a standard feature without screwing around is absolutely lame.

      Unfortunately, there's no standard ABI to just say "sleep" and "wake up". If you try even a casual search you see issues about fans not coming back on, network ports not working, screen not getting back on. The generic sleep function is there, but they have to reinvent the wheel for every new mobo out there. The current etch installer doesn't recognize any of my six primary SATA ports (etch does though), luckily I got a few others which work and it's not even out yet. Is it because Linux doesn't support SATA? No, but there's no standard way to communicate with chipsets. Without hardware manufacturers playing ball and offering drivers or at least specs to the linux community, you'll always wonder what dark incantation was missing to resurrect the machine. If you want something guaranteed to work, you have to research first and buy afterwards. Every so often I see a review which says "and then we slapped a Linux CD in some random hardware. didn't work. had to download this, recompile that, tweak x, lame." Well, that might be true but I wish they'd also try it on *recommended* hardware before they shot it to hell.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    24. Re:What "resume" time? by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Actually, it works well for most desktops too, for OEM ones made in the past few years. The only problematic machines I have had in terms of sleep/hibernate in past few years are PCs built from components. Just too many variables to deal with, especially once you start cramming it full of expansion cards (though some do work with no problems).

    25. Re:What "resume" time? by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      When he said "Mac laptops," what he really meant was "newer Mac laptops." Both your G4 PowerBook and my G4 iBook predate that, unfortunately.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    26. Re:What "resume" time? by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      My old G4 iBook and iMac Core Duo both wake from sleep in 1-2 seconds. My Thinkpad x60 wakes from sleep (note: not hibernate) in 3-5 seconds. I think OS X is still a bit better than Windows in this regard, although not by all that much.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    27. Re:What "resume" time? by TheNetAvenger · · Score: 0, Troll

      Windows and even linux machines can have such a wide variety of hardware and all it takes is one bad driver to make sleep or suspend not work.

      Ok, you realize that maybe .05% of Windows users have issues like this? You could have a bad device driver on OSX and find the same issue arise. PS Vista, doesn't allow drivers to do this, so the .05% of the people with a bad driver no longer have issues.

      Actually, OS X is superior when it comes to sleep
      Why do people believe stuff like this? I know it is Mac lore, but it is not reality.

      If you want to get technical, OSX has a lot of catching up to do with regard to modern sleep/suspend/hibernate features in other OSes.

      OSX didn't even offer a full power off hibernate state until 2005, something the rest of the PC world has been using since the early 90s as a common feature.

      http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=302 477

      And in comparison, the 'glorious' sleep state of OSX is like the old standard 'standby' feature PC users have been using the early 1990s. Even APM supported Standby.

      OSX also lacks features that other OS users just take for granted. In 1999, my computer (using ACPI) would turn itself ON based on a scheduled task, check my email, etc, and then shut itself off. And this is with old Win2k back then. (And remember this from a FULLY POWERED OFF STATE, NOT JUST SLEEP/STANDBY.)

      OSX has some really good stuff, but power management is truly not a strong point to argue. Especially when you also take into account device power saving features, CPU/GPU throttling, etc.

      So to continue my previous comparison, my 2002 Toshiba Laptop has a legacy free BIOS, (meaning no BIOS delay), and it can turn itself back on from a NO POWER state in less than 2 seconds. Which is as fast as most OSX powerbooks can wake up from their 'powered' sleep state.

      OSX is not superior in any regard, and still has catching up to do when it comes to no power sleep states, responding to tasks with all power off and any non-standby/sleep power saving modes.

    28. Re:What "resume" time? by TheNetAvenger · · Score: 1

      I login, and then I have to wait another 20-30 seconds for the networking to come online, even if I statically assign the IP address to rule out a DHCP issue!

      Your problem could be in the NIC itself or its driver. Some NIC drivers even set themselves to delay a few seconds from a resumed state when it is not needed.

      I do know what you are talking about, as I have also have experienced computers that take a few extra seconds to get the NIC alive again, but this is more the exception than the rule. I agree that is annoying when you run into one.

      Another thing to check is some virus or firewall software which create a delay. Norton screams to mind as a really bad/good example of preventing the network from being instantly responsive as well. Try your system with the low level virus/firewall/spyware software disabled, you might be surprised to find it is creating the delay.

      (PS this is one reason I support MS's push to keep Synamtec and McAfee from putting driver level software into Vista, as their drivers that are supposed to help users are usually compatibility and performance sucking nightmares.)

      As for Linux power management, ya, there are some issues, but it is maturing. Also, at least you could do a powerless hibernate state in Linux before it was even an option with OSX.

      As a almost full time notebook user for a long time now, the OSX sleep/standby mode just didn't cut it when I wanted to resume what I was doing two days later without a power source. Thank God Apple finally added Safe Sleep(Hibernate/Software Suspend) in 2005. Which is more than 10 years after I was accustomed to using it on PCs.

    29. Re:What "resume" time? by TheNetAvenger · · Score: 1

      When he said "Mac laptops," what he really meant was "newer Mac laptops." Both your G4 PowerBook and my G4 iBook predate that, unfortunately.

      Yep, Apple's 'Safe Sleep' was added as an 'extension' to OSX and Powerbooks at the end of 2005. Prior to that, when the battery died, you lost all running data.

      For non Apple PC users out there, this is probably pretty surprising, since Software Suspend and Hibernate has been a part of OSes and even APM BIOS features since the early 1990s, and something most non-Mac users have taken for granted for a long time.

      For the Grandparent post, there is a hack that might let your older powerbook use 'Safe Sleep', check out this link:

      http://andrewescobar.com/archive/2005/11/11/how-to -safe-sleep-your-mac/

      However, even if it works, some hardware might not wake up properly leaving devices off, but it is worth a shot if you are willing to play around with it.

    30. Re:What "resume" time? by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      For non Apple PC users out there, this is probably pretty surprising, since Software Suspend and Hibernate has been a part of OSes and even APM BIOS features since the early 1990s, and something most non-Mac users have taken for granted for a long time.

      Yes, it's existed, but it hasn't necessarily worked properly. I know when I got that (non-safe-sleeping) iBook in 2003 I was actually extremely impressed with the fact that regular sleep actually worked (and did so quickly!).

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    31. Re:What "resume" time? by poopdeville · · Score: 1

      Yup, thanks for your and the GP's answer. Honestly, I've learned to not push my battery. This "safe sleep" thing would be nice -- it's certainly a feature I would like -- but it won't make me sleep any better. :-)

      --
      After all, I am strangely colored.
    32. Re:What "resume" time? by Ant+P. · · Score: 1

      Your hardware maker can't hear you complaining on slashdot, will not fix their drivers because they can't hear you, so why do you bother?

    33. Re:What "resume" time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So to continue my previous comparison, my 2002 Toshiba Laptop has a legacy free BIOS, (meaning no BIOS delay), and it can turn itself back on from a NO POWER state in less than 2 seconds. Which is as fast as most OSX powerbooks can wake up from their 'powered' sleep state.

      That is simply not possible. The fastest laptop drive I have takes about a second to spin up and can transfer data at roughly 50 MB/s. Windows copies every last byte from its hibernate file into RAM before resuming execution. That means either you are only using about 50 MB of RAM, your OS "resumes" before everything is back in RAM, or you somehow have a laptop from the future that can copy over 350 MB per second from a parked drive to its RAM.

      Or maybe you're just exaggerating.

    34. Re:What "resume" time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Macs haven't needed it for years. My 15" PowerBook has a tiny built-in battery that lasts for several minutes of sleep. Basically, I just put the system to sleep, pop the battery out, put a new one in, and wake it up. So long as I don't leave the battery out for more than about 15 minutes, it keeps everything.

      So ... no. It's not the only way. ;-)

  6. fucking analogy by stratjakt · · Score: 2, Insightful

    like a hybrid car? It's nothing like a hybrid car. And I would think the average slashdot reader is technically inclined enough to understand what it really is, without the retarded analogy.

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    1. Re:fucking analogy by Zaatxe · · Score: 1

      And I would think the average slashdot reader is technically inclined enough to understand what it really is, without the retarded analogy.

      You must be new here...

      --
      So say we all
    2. Re:fucking analogy by bigredradio · · Score: 1

      I'm not so sure about that. I drive a hybrid car. Basically the car is powered mostly by the electic motor/batteries (hard drive), but uses gas engine assist (flash drive) when accelerating or taking off. There is a mechanism within the hybrid drives to switch between hard drive and flash drive based on usage. This is similar with a hybrid car. I understand that analogies often are used incorrectly, but in this case it is not completely off target.

    3. Re:fucking analogy by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      The only thing they have in common is the word hybrid, which comes from biology. Why don't you say that this hard drive is like a Liger, bred for its skills in magick.

      Or just say its a magnetic hard drive with a flash based cache.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  7. Add more ram and make smarter bootup sequences by tomstdenis · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Adding more ram for a disk cache is a simpler (and often lower power) solution to speed up disk activity. Writing to flash takes power, leaving the flash on [so you can access it] takes power. But you can't use flash as random access memory.

    Putting the laptop in suspend mode throughout the day (instead of hibernate or off) can also lighten the load on the disk/battery. Bonus points would be for flushing the read cache, compressing the in use memory and turning off as many memory banks as possible during suspend. (I know that's not trivial hence the bonus points).

    Tom

    --
    Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    1. Re:Add more ram and make smarter bootup sequences by Maddog+Batty · · Score: 5, Informative

      Adding more ram for a disk cache is a simpler (and often lower power) solution to speed up disk activity.
      Not if your hard drive is switched off (remember this is laptops we are talking about). It takes quite a while and a lot of power for a hard drive to spin up. You can get data from a flash chip within micro secs of switching it on.

      Writing to flash takes power, leaving the flash on [so you can access it] takes power.
      The whole point with flash is that you do not need to leave it on. Once the data is written to it, you can switch it off until the data is needed. RAM needs to have some power (though not much when in standby) to keep the data in it active.

      --
      wot no sig
    2. Re:Add more ram and make smarter bootup sequences by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      Perhaps people would benefit from just not putting applications on a HD? Use the flash as a /usr/bin mount point. Use the HD for /home and /tmp.

      I just don't see the whole "it's a cache" thing working too well.

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    3. Re:Add more ram and make smarter bootup sequences by sholden · · Score: 1

      You can read boot files from the flash before the hard drive has finished spinning up - more memory cache doesn't help there.

      You can leave the drive spun down with writes going to flash until you run out of flash or need to read something not in the flash. You can't do that with memory cache since you'll lose data if power is lost (battery goes flat, whatever)

    4. Re:Add more ram and make smarter bootup sequences by operagost · · Score: 1

      Being that most flash drives are under 4 GB, people would probably be hitting the wall constantly just like in the bad old days of small DOS partitions.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    5. Re:Add more ram and make smarter bootup sequences by dr.badass · · Score: 1

      Writing to flash takes power, leaving the flash on [so you can access it] takes power.

      Flash only consumes about as much as RAM (i.e. less than a watt in large quantities).

      But you can't use flash as random access memory.

      This is irrelevant when the point is to use it as non-volatile cache for disk writes.

      --
      Don't become a regular here -- you will become retarded.
    6. Re:Add more ram and make smarter bootup sequences by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

      Not if your hard drive is switched off (remember this is laptops we are talking about). It takes quite a while and a lot of power for a hard drive to spin up. You can get data from a flash chip within micro secs of switching it on.

      Point here is that if you're replacing the flash with RAM, instead of with disk, then it's already on anyway. If anything, it's faster than the Flash drive -- Flash has better seek time and startup time, but worse throughput.

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    7. Re:Add more ram and make smarter bootup sequences by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's see. 1Gbit of DDR2 SDRAM = 108mW in standby, up to ~600mW. 1Gbit of Flash = 1.8mW, up to 36mW. So can you help me with the lower power portion of this equation being DDR2 SDRAM.

    8. Re:Add more ram and make smarter bootup sequences by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      A complete Gentoo workstation [dev tools + office + tetex + gaim + gimp + ...] is usually around 2.1GB even when optimized for speed.

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    9. Re:Add more ram and make smarter bootup sequences by jcgf · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and it only took 3 weeks of compiling to get to that point.

    10. Re:Add more ram and make smarter bootup sequences by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      First off, no it doesn't. On a decent box it takes about a day at most.

      Second, you can do full image installs once you have your configuration you like. So say you admin 30 computers in a lab. You do the build once, test it, then tarball it up. Now unpack it on all the other boxes. Takes no time.

      Third, shut up. Even a Fedora or Ubuntu install can take hours to get from NUL to fully updated.

      Fourth, Windows takes even longer.

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    11. Re:Add more ram and make smarter bootup sequences by jcgf · · Score: 1
      thanks for the reply, first of it was just a joke and second:

      1. a day is still a while
      2. only works if all the machines are the same which isn't always the case
      3. don't use either so I can't say, personally I prefer FreeBSD (what Gentoo tries to be ;))
      4. I agree, plus you have the additional time after the initial setup to deal with virii and shit

  8. hybrid by mastershake_phd · · Score: 5, Funny

    The new drives are like hybrid cars

    So they get 50mpg?

    1. Re:hybrid by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      "So they get 50mpg?"

      Or they don't provide anywhere near the improvement the specs claim.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    2. Re:hybrid by Vanye1 · · Score: 1

      Its only 36 after the revised standards...

    3. Re:hybrid by bobdotorg · · Score: 1

      The new drives are like hybrid cars

      So they get 50mpg?


      And drive slow in the car pool / HOV lane?

      --
      __ Someday, but not this morning, I'll finally learn to use the preview button.
  9. We've already got one! by scriptedfate · · Score: 0, Redundant

    It's-a vehrry naice

    1. Re:We've already got one! by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 0

      French? Borat is Kazakhstani (Even though the phrases he uses are generally Polish). What the hell does France have to do with it?

    2. Re:We've already got one! by the+darn · · Score: 5, Funny

      You have just missed a Monty Python reference. Please turn in your Slashdot card, as well as any and all other nerd paraphernalia.

      --
      Ceci n'est pas un post.
    3. Re:We've already got one! by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1
      Okay, I get the 'smelly french type' as Monty Python, but given context of Borat quotes, I'm not sure how you extrapolate mixing Borat quotes with that to be a Monty Python reference.

      *returns to pining for the fjords*

    4. Re:We've already got one! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "*returns to pining for the fjords*"

      Careful. It's dangerous to admit you're "pining for the fjords". People might mistake you for being dead.

    5. Re:We've already got one! by Poltras · · Score: 1

      As long as he doesn't eat quiche, he's man enough.

    6. Re:We've already got one! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The original quote was straight from the movie, make sure you read the subject line, and if you still don't get it you clearly haven't watched the movie more than say 10 times.

    7. Re:We've already got one! by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      He's not dead, hes just.. resting.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    8. Re:We've already got one! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lemon curry?

    9. Re:We've already got one! by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "Careful. It's dangerous to admit you're "pining for the fjords". People might mistake you for being dead."

      Beautiful plummage though.....

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  10. Question by stratjakt · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Does the flash inside these things die after however-many thousands of writes?

    It sounds to me like the life expentancy of one of these would be greatly diminished over a conventional HDD.

    Has flash technology advanced to the point that the limited write cycle thing isn't an issue, or do they just expect you to replace it every few months to a year (depending on how much you use it)?

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    1. Re:Question by blackmonday · · Score: 1

      I got the impression that the information on the flash won't be written to often. It will be used at boot time, therefore won't change much, unless you change the startup sequence.

    2. Re:Question by LOTHAR,+of+the+Hill · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No, flash tech hasn't changed much in a long time. It's just gotten faster, larger, and cheaper. NOR flash is much more reliable than NAND, but it's much slower. That is why computers use NOR for boot flash.

      The iPOD Nano uses a NOR boot flash, but NAND for data.

      Hybrid drives are a great idea if done correctly, a nightmare otherwise. Personally, I'm a bit leery of the concept. I wouldn't want to be an early adopter on this one.

    3. Re:Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Does the flash inside these things die after however-many thousands of writes? It sounds to me like the life expentancy of one of these would be greatly diminished over a conventional HDD.

      Apple are well known for the reliability, longevity and serviceability of their devices so I'm sure this won't be a problem.

    4. Re:Question by Lord+Ender · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It isn't a problem. For Linux. With minor modifications.

      If you put /tmp, /var, and swap on a different disk or RAM disk, then you mount it with the "noatime" attribute (to stop disk writes on every file read), you can have a Linux machine boot from flash just fine. I imagine Apple can make similar modifications to their OS.

      I've been running several servers off of flash drives for about six months, and they are all working beautifully.

      Windows, on the other hand, would blow a flash drive quickly due to all the registry bullshit, and due to its inflexible design.

      Solid-state computers are going to be Unix-based for at least the next 10 years. Microsoft is always late to the game where new technology is concerned.

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    5. Re:Question by networkBoy · · Score: 2, Informative

      NOR Flash:
      More reliable
      Faster reads
      easy to integrate (looks like an sram)
      able to execute code directly from NOR Flash (looks like an sram)
      more expensive

      NAND Flash:
      Faster writes
      PITA to integrate (requires separate controller chip)
      Slower reads
      Inability to directly execute code, must DL to real ram to execute.
      less reliable
      higher density
      cheap

      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    6. Re:Question by forkazoo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Does the flash inside these things die after however-many thousands of writes?

      It sounds to me like the life expentancy of one of these would be greatly diminished over a conventional HDD.


      Yes, they do eventually die. No, they won't die dramatically younger than a hard drive. Modern flash uses wear-levelling algorithms, so that no particular bad block will kill the whole flash drive. It'll just make a small block inaccessible when it finally dies, which won't happen very often. OTOH, when a head decides to dig into your constantly spinning mechanical platter and make a noise that makes you feel sick... Well, there just isn't any algorithm fix for that.
    7. Re:Question by rreay · · Score: 1

      When the flash eventually dies (which should be quite a while you still have a perfectly functional hard-drive.

    8. Re:Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Robin Harris over at storagemojo.com has been blogging about flash and flash life expectancy for some time. Check it out. http://storagemojo.com/?p=281 Oh, and I'm not Robin.

  11. Miniature version of MacOS X? by soft_guy · · Score: 1

    The article speculates that there would be a miniature version of Mac OS X in these units. I'm not sure what the reasoning for that is.

    If these disks make a MacBook use less battery power, great. But I don't see why the world needs a miniature version of MacOS X.

    --
    Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
    1. Re:Miniature version of MacOS X? by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 3, Interesting

      If these disks make a MacBook use less battery power, great. But I don't see why the world needs a miniature version of MacOS X.

      Back in the day, Apple used to ship Macs with a copy of pre-OS X, Mac OS on a ROM. It was basically unused, but it did have the advantage that if your hard drive went down or an extension to the OS was making your system unbootable, you could always boot from the ROM and at least do a hardware check to see if your problem was hardware or software related. Apple could re-introduce this feature using Flash memory, although I'm not convinced it is really worth their time.

    2. Re:Miniature version of MacOS X? by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Informative

      Back in the day, Apple used to ship Macs with a copy of pre-OS X, Mac OS on a ROM.

      Which macs are these?

      I've never seen one.

      The only Apple systems I've ever known to include an operating system (such as it was) in ROM were the Apple ][ series. Macintoshes include functions in ROM, but it's not a complete OS. Amiga used the same approach, only moreso - to the point where an OS upgrade mandated a ROM upgrade.

      I'm willing to be proven wrong, but I've never even heard of such a thing and every Mac I've ever powered up without a valid boot volume just showed me a disk with a question mark on it - and that includes Macintoshes of literally every generation but G5, including the XL (Lisa), doorstop, Macintosh II, Quadra, G3 and G4.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:Miniature version of MacOS X? by gozar · · Score: 1

      Back in the day, Apple used to ship Macs with a copy of pre-OS X, Mac OS on a ROM.

      Which macs are these?

      I've never seen one.

      The Mac Classic could boot up from ROM using System 6.0.3 and Finder 6.1.

      --
      What, me worry?
    4. Re:Miniature version of MacOS X? by Jerry+Smith · · Score: 1

      http://lowendmac.com/compact/classic.shtml, there you are. The fact that you never saw one, doesn't mean they didn't exist :c)

      --
      All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain. Time to die.
    5. Re:Miniature version of MacOS X? by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

      Which macs are these? I've never seen one.

      You probably did, but never knew about it. I'm not sure which models had such a feature. I know the mac classics my friend used for a distributed computation, tic-tac-toe project did and that the very early PPC machines, like my old 66Mhz slab did as well. I know the old g3 tower a co-worker bought at a garage sale did not have the feature. I imagine you should look at early PPC machines and the early gen processor machines.

      Macintoshes include functions in ROM, but it's not a complete OS.

      It was a full, bootable OS, but not good for much aside from testing the hardware.

      I've never even heard of such a thing and every Mac I've ever powered up without a valid boot volume just showed me a disk with a question mark on it...

      If I recall correctly it never failed to the ROM, but you have to know about it and boot with a specific key combination in order to use it. Most people never knew it was there.

    6. Re:Miniature version of MacOS X? by thinbits · · Score: 1

      Cmd-Option-X-O I think was the key combination. I think XO was the internal code name for that project at Apple.

      It was good if your filesystem was hosed and you needed something clean to boot from and run a repair utility (presumably you would put the repair utility on a floppy and pop it in).

    7. Re:Miniature version of MacOS X? by Firehed · · Score: 1

      They pretty much have, substituting the install disc for the Flash memory. Not really full OS X, but you have access to Disk Utility and if you hold down some key (d?), you can go into a hardware diagnostics mode.

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
    8. Re:Miniature version of MacOS X? by soft_guy · · Score: 1

      Back in the day, Apple used to ship Macs with a copy of pre-OS X, Mac OS on a ROM. It was basically unused, but it did have the advantage that if your hard drive went down or an extension to the OS was making your system unbootable, you could always boot from the ROM and at least do a hardware check to see if your problem was hardware or software related. Apple could re-introduce this feature using Flash memory, although I'm not convinced it is really worth their time. I am quite convinced it wouldn't be worth their time. Almost fo one used or cared about this feature and as someone already pointed out, you can do the same thing by booting off a DVD or even a flash drive.
      --
      Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
    9. Re:Miniature version of MacOS X? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Key words is "[a] feature unique to the Classic is the ability to boot from ROM"; some sources refer to this one instead as an easter egg. The grandparent post seems to imply this was a regular feature across many Macintosh models.

    10. Re:Miniature version of MacOS X? by Jerry+Smith · · Score: 1

      *shrug* It was documented when released, maybe not openly advertised, but still. It wasn't some sneeky funny thing embedded between two lines of code, it was a pretty major hardware thing.

      --
      All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain. Time to die.
  12. Read Cache is not the point! by samael · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The point is that it can turn off the hard drive while you're working away, until the flash cache is full, and then turn it on long enough to dump the contents. This should save a lot of battery power.

    1. Re:Read Cache is not the point! by GungaDan · · Score: 1

      I was under the impression that most of the energy costs of magnetic disk storage related to spinning the discs from a halt, not maintaining the rotation after the platters have reached the proper speed.

      --
      Eloi are stupid, throw morlocks at them!
    2. Re:Read Cache is not the point! by roseblood · · Score: 2, Informative

      According to the powers that be at GRC/SpinRite (the HDD software recovery people) the majority of power consumed in a HDD is very rapid accelerations required to move the read/write head from point to point across the HDD platters. We have a good grasp on how to make great bearings, so keeping a HDD rolling is trivial. Bypassing that whole Force=Mass*Acceleration is going to take a lot more than good bearings.

      --
      There are lies, damned lies, and statistics.
    3. Re:Read Cache is not the point! by imsabbel · · Score: 2, Informative

      For a 2.5" drive, 1 minute of idle operation costs more energy than a spinup-and down.

      --
      HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
    4. Re:Read Cache is not the point! by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      Hm. Source? Sounds very interesting, but I've never, ever heard that before.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    5. Re:Read Cache is not the point! by jZnat · · Score: 1

      Or, more importantly, that torque = r x F

      --
      'Yes, firefox is indeed greater than women. Can women block pops up for you? No. Can Firefox show you naked women? Yes.'
  13. Sub-notebook by necro81 · · Score: 1

    Related story from last month: Apple May Be Re-entering the Sub-Notebook Market.

    Makes good sense, sub-notebooks have a premium on low power consumption / long battery life (more so than ordinary laptops).

  14. I don't think that this IS the time... by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    FTFA:

    Wu, who was among the first analysts to forecast the unveiling of Apple's iPhone music player/phone earlier this year, cited unnamed industry sources as the basis for his report.

    "The time is right for the flash makers to make a move" as flash memory prices decline, Wu said by telephone. "Apple, from what we understand, is pretty much ready. The ball is in the flash vendors' court."

    What do you mean Apple is pretty much ready? To replace a rotating disk with a SSD? I have news for you, that doesn't take much.

    But seriously, I think that this is precisely the WRONG time to do this. Intel's PRAM is on its way. MRAM has finally seen some commercial use (in smaller quantities) and may be more available soon. Flash RAM is crap by comparison to either technology except for its availability and the wait for one or the other to actually become available should not be very long.

    Such a device will be markedly expensive, so adopters will be few. It's an expensive way to get practice working in a particular market segment.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    1. Re:I don't think that this IS the time... by Kjella · · Score: 1

      I must say, I don't understand why flash HDDs are so slow. Your plain memory stick like Corsair Flash Voyager GT 8GB can do 27/34MB w/r. Put four of these in an internal "RAID0" and you should have 32GB @ 108/136MB externally. That's enough to spank any conventional HDD with zero access time as a bonus. Is there any reason not to? They're supposed to be very reliable over their lifetime.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    2. Re:I don't think that this IS the time... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      There are already DRAM drives. Flash HDDs are slow compared to DRAM because they have vastly higher latency even on reads, and absurdly higher write times (well, it's not absurd, it's quite logical.) But no, the only reasons not to use DRAM in drives are cost (high-capacity DIMMs tend to be very spendy per megabyte) and the fact that they don't retain their contents if you lose power, so you need a battery backup, or to never use it for critical data.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  15. Real purpose by reydelamirienda · · Score: 2, Funny

    So now the OS will go in a big flash drive as if it was some kind of firmware (you don't change the os very often, so flash life is not a problem) and leave the spinning disk to what really matters: pr0n!

  16. Petrol fueled drives! cool! like Pear Trees! by fantomas · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    "The new drives are like hybrid cars"

    w00t! Petrol fueled hard drives! but ecologically sound!

    oh. you didn't mean that. You just meant that you wanted people who didn't know what "hybrid" meant to have point of reference.

    Actually you meant "They are a bit like Pear Trees". As in, a hybrid...

    hmmm...

  17. A bit misleading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    The drives in question have only 256MB Flash or so, far too little for any reasonable boot-/resume caching effect with todays OS sizes. Also, reading large amounts of data from flash tends to be slower than sequential reads from the disk anyway.
    It's much more likely that the main use will be as a write-cache to allow to permanently and safely store smaller amounts of data on the drive without having to spin the drive up and thus saving power and reducing noise. A boost in performance in writing randomly distributed small blocks and/or mixed read-/write workloads might be possible as well, as the flash-cache will allow writes to the platter to be reordered for less head-movements/and to interfere less with reading from the disk.

    1. Re:A bit misleading by stokessd · · Score: 1

      "The drives in question have only 256MB Flash or so"

      If that size is correct, it's a whole lot less interesting than I was imagining. You can't push your RAM image into that for sleep, you can't keep much of the OS in there. IT would be useful for saving files you are working on. Imagine, the program lives in main memory and you keep saving your files to flash and leave the platters spun down until needed (needed may be quite often with only 256Meg).

      So the Hybrid Car analogy is closer to correct than you guys thought: "An overly complex system that doesn't really solve the problem, but may postpone the need for the real solution."

      Sheldon

  18. Try again by empaler · · Score: 1

    You are right about the speculation part, however, you misinterpret the disk type - not flash, but flash/platter hybrid .

  19. Is it just me... by keytohwy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    They keep talking about quick boot times. Is this an issue for anyone? I boot my Mac about twice a month anyway, so boot times are a non-issue. And wake from sleep times in OSX have been consistently quick for years. I understand the other benefits, but these points seem moot.

    1. Re:Is it just me... by gnasher719 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      '' They keep talking about quick boot times. Is this an issue for anyone? I boot my Mac about twice a month anyway, so boot times are a non-issue. And wake from sleep times in OSX have been consistently quick for years. I understand the other benefits, but these points seem moot. ''

      You may have noticed that hybrid flash/harddisk combinations are always mentioned in one breath with the "improvements" that Vista is promising, like faster boot times by using some Microsoft-only technology. And of course it is nonsense. If you use your Mac 40 hours a week, and boot twice a month, even if it took two minutes to boot (and it doesn't), that would be just 0.04% of your time. The only reason why anyone would care about boot time is because it is something that the blathering marketing idiots can measure easily. Same for this meme that you would store applications in flash memory to make them start faster. It is absolute nonsense.

      The sensible thing to do is to have some good caching algorithms that take into account the special characteristics of flash and hard drive, and let them do their thing.

  20. I've been wondering... by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    If I could replace my OS drive with one of these really large flash drives to cut down on heat/noise, but I know there's a limited # of writes you can do with these drives...

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:I've been wondering... by trouser · · Score: 1

      Regular hard drives last forever?

      --
      Now wash your hands.
  21. Rumors, Analysts, and Apple by maggard · · Score: 3, Interesting

    First, rumor has it is all this is. An analyst put it in a report and everyone is passing it on a valid. Especially with Apple folks should know that rumors & speculation are just that.

    Next it was widely reported a few years ago when Apple made a huuuge futures purchase on flash memory getting an excellent price and assuring their supply. Someone more motivated then I can crunch the numbers but even with however many million iPods sold I'm guessing Apple still has flash memory to play with and a decent price.

    Then there's the non-US market. Yes, Americans want 21" screens, 6 speakers, 200 GB hard drives, and accept 30 minute battery life from their portables (oftentimes too big even for American laps). The rest of the world typically wants really small, really light, just enough computing enough power for on-the-road use, and 12 hour battery life. Thus an ultraportable will fill a huge hole in the Apple product line, one many posters to /. may not even be fully aware of.

    With all of that in mind do I expect Apple will come out with some sort of clever new device that is small, robust, and runs for longer then others on the market? I wouldn't be surprised. Apple has innovated time & time again, particularly on laptops, and part of their market is remarkably price-insensitive (I've rarely heard "Get me the best Dell, whatever the price!", I've heard that regularly about Macs.) What starts at the top often soon moves down.

    Finally, Apple still does largely design their own motherboards, owns their own OS, can implement a new technology without needing to coordinate it among many parties. But do I think J. Random Analyst is going to be all that insightful about Apple's hardware future? Not particularly, he's just an excuse to post another story about everyone's favorite conundrum.

    --
    I don't read ACs: If a post isn't worth so much as a nom de plume to its author then I wont bother either.
    1. Re:Rumors, Analysts, and Apple by plasmacutter · · Score: 1

      got a macbook recently (core duo, just before core 2 was announced).. have the ram fully maxed on it, and can run video feeds or even games on the machine nonstop for 4.5 hours on the battery (considerably longer if i dont tax it like that).

      im just saying.. the macbook line delivers decent battery performance for the kind of power it packs (despite the fact that i despise how terrible their glossy view angles are)

      --
      VLC FOR MAC IS DYING! IF YOU DEVELOP, PLEASE SAVE IT!!
    2. Re:Rumors, Analysts, and Apple by PsychoSid · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Pretty good point. I would hazard a guess and say those flash memory supply mountains could be in reserve for the iPhone though rather than a flash based laptop.

    3. Re:Rumors, Analysts, and Apple by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      (I've rarely heard "Get me the best Dell, whatever the price!", I've heard that regularly about Macs.)
      they must be pretty rich then ;)

      for fun i decided to go to http://store.apple.com/Apple/WebObjects/ukstore.wo a/6924042/wo/H84TLj1rESUy25S5bl21WopohZG/2.?p=0 and see just how much a top spec mac pro would cost

      Price: £11,717.47
      VAT: £2,050.56
      Subtotal: £13,768.03

      ouch!

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    4. Re:Rumors, Analysts, and Apple by mrchaotica · · Score: 2, Informative

      Then there's the non-US market. Yes, Americans want 21" screens, 6 speakers, 200 GB hard drives, and accept 30 minute battery life from their portables (oftentimes too big even for American laps). The rest of the world typically wants really small, really light, just enough computing enough power for on-the-road use, and 12 hour battery life. Thus an ultraportable will fill a huge hole in the Apple product line, one many posters to /. may not even be fully aware of.

      Hey asshole, the US-bashing was completely uncalled for! There's plenty of us Americans who want ultraportables too, you know. In fact, I've chosen to forgo a Mac in favor of a Thinkpad X60, specifically because Apple didn't have anything small enough (or that was a tablet, but that's beside the point).

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  22. Don't have a cow, man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually it kind of is like a hybrid car. A hybrid car is a mix of a heavy gas engine and a lighter electric engine that allows the gas engine to run less often.

    The combination of a disk drive with a flash backup does exactly the same thing.

    I'm kind of surprised you didn't notice that yourself--it's pretty obvious.

  23. This is a good idea for laptops. by plasmacutter · · Score: 2, Interesting

    the battery power issue has been mentioned, but also keep in mind laptop hard drives tend to either be A. - lower RPM than desktop drives or B. - switched off for power conservation.

    this means much higher response lag whenever laptops have to page in/out (and the reason i opted to upgrade the ram on the laptop to as much as the desktop).

    apply this to the entire apple line and you suddenly have a considerable performance edge over competitors (using the same software configurations).

    apply it to desktops as well for extra power conservation and performance per watt as well (and with desktops you have a larger case to include more flash into the drive).

    --
    VLC FOR MAC IS DYING! IF YOU DEVELOP, PLEASE SAVE IT!!
    1. Re:This is a good idea for laptops. by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      apply this to the entire apple line and you suddenly have a considerable performance edge over competitors (using the same software configurations).

      No, apply this to the entire Apple line and it will keep up with the "designed for Vista" laptops that will also have hybrid hard drives.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  24. There is already a flash laptop by DrXym · · Score: 1

    OLPC. I would buy a consumer version of one of those in an instant.

    1. Re:There is already a flash laptop by Brunellus · · Score: 1

      cheap at double or triple the price, yes. OLPC + vim == ideal note-taking for student me.

  25. Mac ROM returneth? by rdarden · · Score: 3, Insightful

    However, I think Apple's initial plans are to use the Flash on these drives as more of a Read area for portions of OSX that are accessed at startup or frequently. Not unlike the old days when some of the core OS functionality was stored in a custom Mac ROM. Funny how things are cyclical.
    1. Re:Mac ROM returneth? by andreyw · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Except ROM is slow, "Read-Only", and needs a special interface (if any at all.... but if you wish to use block device abstractions, say hello MTD) while what Apple is doing will just be a logical extension of their already present boot cache mechanisms.

      So - 'no'.

    2. Re:Mac ROM returneth? by TheNetAvenger · · Score: 1

      Not unlike the old days when some of the core OS functionality was stored in a custom Mac ROM. Funny how things are cyclical.


      Like probably everyone here, this was my first response when I read the Apple tech information on how they plan on using Hybrid drives.

      If they can lock key OSX code in this area (which is possible), they will also stop OSX emulation projects like PearPC/etc.

      I remember the days of Atari ST users having to go out and buy Mac ROMs to run Mac software, we may see this shift again, and emulation users will have to go find an Apple OSX HD just to get all the components of OSX.

    3. Re:Mac ROM returneth? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Talk about missing the point. You know Comic Book Guy? That's you, that is.

      Oh, I love how you pointed out out Read Only Memory is Read Only BTW, that was classic.

  26. Flashtops by ProfessionalCookie · · Score: 1

    No- Flasthtops are on their way out Pramtops are the N.B.T. Ok Actually flashtops are a pretty good idea (are you listening Apple). It would be sweet to have a 12 or 13 inch laptop with a midgrade processor, a real graphics chip and a solid state drive. Oh and one more thing- get rid of the stupid waste of space optical drive. Give me a bigger battery or something.

    1. Re:Flashtops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This can be achieved with an after-sales service from MCE.

      Disclaimer: I am only aware of this service from a search engine result in the past, I have not ordered it, I can't vouch for MCE as reputable dealers, I do not endorse this, and I'm not in an economic area that can avail of this service.

  27. Intel's PRAM? by MS-06FZ · · Score: 1

    Intel's PRAM is on its way. I admit I've been out of touch for a while, but this is a total shock! I had no idea...

    Do they know who the father is?
    --
    ---GEC
    I'm but the humble pupil, seeking to snatch the scratchbuilt pebble from the master's fully articulated hand
  28. Macromedia? by noc007 · · Score: 1

    Am I the only one that initially read that as laptops powered by an all Macromedia Flash UI? Must be me dreaming about a carputer with a Flash UI running on BSD again.

    Back on topic: I wonder if Apple plans on bringing any other changes for the new laptops besides hybrid HDDs and OS X.V. I'm still holding out for them to do a docking station and maybe a proper Delete key (no I don't think I should hit two keys to get the Delete function).

  29. RANDOM write benchmarks slower than hard drives! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    flash is slower than hard drives for writing data, even the worlds fastest product on sale now.

    Though preposterous to imagine, a hard drive MOVING its head between thousands of 512 byte block accesses in a random write benchmarks is faster than a solid state high end flash drive.

    read sandisks own benchmark white paper if you do not believe me

    basically 512 byte writes to random locations are KILLERS for flash

    amusingly a LAPTOP hard drive using the same range of motion covering the same storage amount (32 gigabytes or less) is faster

    Hilarious but true

    flash parts also degrade and truthfully cannot be fully written to more than 100,000 times generally.

  30. cantbuyityet by istartedi · · Score: 1

    I see cantbuyityet in the tags list, but this article isn't tagged. It should be.

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  31. Eureka! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Putting swap on a RAM disk, eh...? That totally isn't totally redundant!

    1. Re:Eureka! by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      that depends: on a traditional software ramdrive it is as you say pointless.

      however some machines have ram that is not really usable as normal ram, for example some chipsets could support more ram than they could cache (you don't want uncachable ram as part of the main pool but as swap space its fine) and graphics card ram.

      and you can buy (though they are pricey) hardware ramdrives that you can load up with more ram than most motherboards can take directly.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  32. it is a hybrid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    try looking up word in a dictionary some time.

    hybrid:
    3 a: something heterogeneous in origin or composition

    in this case, it's composition consists of two different methods of storage.

    try to get it into your head that words can have various methods of use.

  33. page multilevel by uid8472 · · Score: 1

    It's also a lot like old-fashioned drum memory.

  34. Bashing by maggard · · Score: 1

    Wow - get over-sensitive much?

    Bashing is having four guys come after you as you walk out a door. Bashing is having a board used as a baseball bat on your skull. Bashing is waking up in a hospital covered in cuts & bruises with broken ribs, arm, and a skull fracture. Bashing is an eye that will never again focus properly, becoming deaf in one ear, and most importantly, permanently losing short-term memory.

    That's "Bashing"

    Pointing out that the US portable market is skewed towards desktop replacements and "the rest of the world typically wants..." smaller/lighter machines is just market analysis and easily confirmed when you look at portable offerings broken down by manufacturer & region sold in. Asia & Europe love ultraportables, the US market is largely indifferent.

    You however, wow, "asshole", "bashing", - get help. Out of proportion, needlessly aggressive, confusing your purchasing desires with the aggregate buying habits of a nation, that's real 'alarm bell' stuff.

    Oh, and the bashing? I've several friends who've been bashed & twice been in situations where I coulda been. The description I used was specifically of my buddy Doug. What I didn't note that when he came to he was also informed that as he'd been gay-bashed while unconscious his evangelical christian family had disowned him and the US Military, of which he was on active duty with, had begun the process of issuing him dishonorable discharge.

    That you confuse something like that with my post can only be described as ill.

    --
    I don't read ACs: If a post isn't worth so much as a nom de plume to its author then I wont bother either.
    1. Re:Bashing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The English language typically allows for what we call "figurative speech". This "figurative" use of words is actually not overly limited in its use. The word "bashing", for example, can be used in ways not defined by a dictionary, via this "figurative" used of language.

      In short: calling Americans fat for no purpose, completely irrelevant to the discussion at hand, is bashing. Period. I hope something happens to you worse than what happened to Doug. Eat flaming death. I had humiliating sexual relations with your diseased mother in recent memory.

  35. Other changes to new laptops by argent · · Score: 1

    I wonder if Apple plans on bringing any other changes for the new laptops besides hybrid HDDs and OS X.V. I'm still holding out for them to do a docking station and maybe a proper Delete key (no I don't think I should hit two keys to get the Delete function).

    A decent keyboard[1] and two mouse/trackpad buttons[2] are at the top of my list.

    But a docking station would be nice.

    [1] I'm sure IBM Japan or Lenovo Japan or whoever it is this week would be more than happy to get together with them and put a Thinkpad-quality keyboard in a sexy-looking box.

    [2] No, double-tap and other passive-aggressive tricks to keep from backing down on the one-button-mouse farce don't count.

  36. The Neverending Question by Siker · · Score: 1

    Doesn't this question about flash die after however-many thousands of asks?

    It sounds to me like the relevancy of this question would be greatly diminished over a conventional question.

    Has Slashdot commenting advanced to the point where the redundancy thing isn't an issue, or do they just expect you to answer the question every few minutes to an hour (depending on how much you read Slashdot)?