Slashdot Mirror


US Leads the World In Malware Creation

PetManimal writes "Symantec says that China, Russia, and the other developing countries usually blamed for the increasing amount of malware are not the biggest culprits. The security software company released a report (PDF) claiming that the US leads the world in a number of malware categories, ranging from the 'amount of malicious activity originating from their networks' to 'underground economy servers.' Preston Gralla says the US lead should come as no surprise, considering the capitalist way of life and the high level of technical knowledge. He also suggests that the some of the 'criminals' may actually be Internet entrepreneurs who crossed over to the dark side: 'It's an inevitable result of a thriving free market and tech expertise. An underground economy often mirrors the legal, above-ground one. Scratch a criminal, and sometimes you find a misguided entrepreneur, looking to get rich a little too quick.'"

126 comments

  1. Old Scratch by Dr.+Eggman · · Score: 1

    Idle hands are the devil's plaything. I would think the America's constant need to be entertained also factors into the amount of malware.

    --
    Demented But Determined.
    1. Re:Old Scratch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      America leads in malicicous activity originating from its networks. It is not malware creation.

  2. Offshoring & downturn perhaps by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Insightful

    During the depths of the IT recession, there were rumbles of out-of-work programmers talking about joining the "dark side" out of frustration. Perhaps many did.

  3. We are by davebarnes · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    #1

    --
    Dave Barnes 9 breweries within walking distance of my house
    1. Re:We are by Nazlfrag · · Score: 1

      #1
      Or put another way, the #192nd best.
  4. Not just the US by blackicye · · Score: 4, Informative

    There are a number of fairly organized malware purveyors from Canada as well, I think what separates the malware originating from North America, and the malware coming from the East is the purpose of the malware.

    In NA, its mainly spyware or extortionware.
    From the East a majority of them are keyloggers, dialers.

    1. Re:Not just the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Blame Canada!

      Those malware creating bastards...

    2. Re:Not just the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I think what separates the malware originating from North America, and the malware coming from the East is the purpose of the malware.

      You're talking out of your ass.

    3. Re:Not just the US by blackicye · · Score: 1

      "You're talking out of your ass."

      Sure I'll bite, since AC trolls now get modded insightful.

      Why don't you post your experiences to the contrary while logged in instead of AC?
      Oh, you've got nothing to say?

      I repair PCs for a living, and this is from my firsthand experiences of spyware ridden boxes, if you believe or have observed otherwise, do share.

  5. really by mastershake_phd · · Score: 0, Troll

    How can you be sure who makes the most malware. People arent exactly admitting to it.

    1. Re:really by Technician · · Score: 1

      "Symantec says that China, Russia, and the other developing countries usually blamed for the increasing amount of malware are not the biggest culprits.

      I think the lack of paid up subscriptions for AV software in Russia may also show a lot being proxied there in bots. This alone may cause the assumption much of your SPAM is from some .ru domain. In the US, there are lots of bots on broadband, but there is more patched systems running AV software. An added incentive for US operators to use Russian bots is making tracing for prosecution much more difficult.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
  6. Look who's calling the kettle black. by d2_m_viant · · Score: 4, Funny

    Takes one to know one. Symantec's software has all the qualities you'd ever want in a well crafted piece of malware.

    1. Re:Look who's calling the kettle black. by Broken+scope · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Does that make the pot wrong?

      --
      You mad
    2. Re:Look who's calling the kettle black. by pookemon · · Score: 2, Funny

      It makes the pot an expert... ;)

      --
      dnuof eruc rof aixelsid
    3. Re:Look who's calling the kettle black. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Malware yes. Well crafted? Don't know if I would give them that much credit.

    4. Re:Look who's calling the kettle black. by craagz · · Score: 1

      Maybe Symantec employs people to create malware for which it releases anti-dotes.

      These same employees were transferred and employed to creating and upgrading Symantec products. Thus leading to all products appearing like malware.

    5. Re:Look who's calling the kettle black. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was going to agree with this comment until I got to the "well crafted" part ...

  7. misguided? by jaymzru · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Scratch a criminal, and sometimes you find a misguided entrepreneur, looking to get rich a little too quick.
    Is malware even illegal? How is malware different from say, an automatic update or some other less than desirable software? Just because something is annoying doesn't necessarily mean it's illegal and that the author is a criminal.

    1. Re:misguided? by Seumas · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Uh. I believe the difference would be the mal part. Update - as annoying as it is - is not malicious.

    2. Re:misguided? by caller9 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It becomes criminal when it phones home with all of your pertinent keystrokes name, email, credit card + secret number, account #s, social, DOB, passwords, etc which are then sold on the black market. Where have you been?

      I assume you're thinking adware which is in rare cases only annoying, most cases privacy invading, and many cases illegal anyway.

    3. Re:misguided? by dbIII · · Score: 1

      In the cases of things I've had to remove it really can be classed as sabotage. Over a hundred machines with various breeds of *nix and it's the XP machine of the guy that like to download things to rip DVDs and mp3s that needs more attention.

    4. Re:misguided? by jaymzru · · Score: 1

      Ah, I was thinking of adware. Not meaning to be a fanboy, but I've run linux and os x since windows 95 and I don't think I've ever had malware on one of my machines - although I suppose I wouldn't know, since I don't really look for it either.

    5. Re:misguided? by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      Well, here in the UK it almost certainly falls foul of the Computer Misuse Act, which explicitly outlaws using computer resources without permission. You can hardly compare malware to automatic updates either (even if you were thinking of adware), as for the vast majority of computer users auto-updates are a very, very good thing, as it's the only hope they have of keeping their machine patched. In my experience, a lot of people still see computers as an appliance; you don't patch your washing machine, or your TV, or your toaster, they simply wouldn't think to patch their PC.

    6. Re:misguided? by Mipoti+Gusundar · · Score: 0, Funny

      it phones home with all of your pertinent keystrokes name, email, credit card + secret number, account #s, social, DOB, passwords
      This is why India is not top of malwares leauges - we are already having all these infos in our call senters!
      --
      Will code for new sig.
    7. Re:misguided? by jaymzru · · Score: 1

      You wouldn't happen to know which law it falls under in the United States would you? My point about automatic updates was that there must be a definition somewhere saying "this is illegal, however software like this is not illegal." He's calling people criminals, so wouldn't that imply that there is a law criminalizing these people? I just want to know what it is.

  8. Engineers vs Programms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Agreed , not all 'malware' is out to get you, there is a fine line though between
    adware and 'malware' at times.

    a good software engineer, that is a 'real engineer' would refuse to create such a product, as they are sworn to protect the public interest at all costs.

    A programmer mind you, unless they are ethical, goes where the money is.

    Lets call the industry what it is, and the workers what they are. Engineers != programmers.

    Engineers can be held accountable, in many ways. Programmers on the other hand, can always hide behind the shield of the corporation.

    1. Re:Engineers vs Programms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Ah yes, the 'Engineers are always moral' argument. Please remind me, what programmers were assigned to the Manhatten Project, the Cruise Missile project, and who designed Napalm?

      Oh yeah... that's right, they were mostly Engineers. Spare us the high-and-mighty talk. Just becuase there's an old Freemason-like order with fancy rings involved doesn't mean engineers are some kind of uber-moral fraternity.

      No offense to the good-hearted engineers out there reading this.. I just don't like the uppity attitude of some 'engineers' who think that computing science, along with every other realm of human endeavour other than those blessed by the local Engineering faculty, are something akin to making cute little blocks with playdough.

      Parent: get off your high horse. Lots of people, no matter their vocation, have to pay the bills, and some are just attracted to the darker side, no matter their training.

    2. Re:Engineers vs Programms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      a good software engineer, that is a 'real engineer' would refuse to create such a product, as they are sworn to protect the public interest at all costs.

      You truly are out of your fucking skull. The idea that an engineer has to take any such oath is suppurating bullshit of the highest water.

      Like some engineer's going to take a bullet for me (your words, "at all costs", not mine).

      Resume playing with yourself.

    3. Re:Engineers vs Programms by erbmjw · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It is not your title ie engineer or programmer that makes you ethical - it is your beliefs and integrity!

      Good engineer != ethical engineer unless you specifically define good to equal ethical in which case you have committed your statement to a state of circular definitions, and then your argument is effectively useless

      The same would hold true for your 'real engineer' argument.

      As for the line

      Engineers can be held accountable, in many ways. Programmers on the other hand, can always hide behind the shield of the corporation.

      Since you were initially discussing ethics - ethics do not let you always hide behind anything. If you are trying to switch the venue to law - then a programmer and a software engineer are going to be to a similar legal standard of responsibility based upon their respective position, education level and experience. The title "engineer" or "programmer" would have no bearing legally.

    4. Re:Engineers vs Programms by Bastard+of+Subhumani · · Score: 1

      a 'real engineer' would refuse to create such a product
      The idea that an engineer has to take any such oath is suppurating bullshit of the highest water.
      It could be different in other countries. Maybe the GP is a true Scotsman, or something similar.
      --
      Only three things are certain; death, taxes, and apocryphal quotations - Ben Franklin.
    5. Re:Engineers vs Programms by nomadic · · Score: 1

      The title "engineer" or "programmer" would have no bearing legally.

      Actually licensed engineers have additional standards they must meet, things that non-licensed engineers or programmers don't have to.

    6. Re:Engineers vs Programms by erbmjw · · Score: 1

      Yes but as you have admitted it's the "licensed engineer" not the "engineer" that requires an additional standard.

      So my original statement stands the title "engineer" or "programmer" would have no legal bearing.

      If you wish to contend that there is special circumstances for licensed engineers then you are modifying your original claim significantly from all good software engineers to only licensed engineers.

      And currently there are not very many states or countries that require {or even have} software engineer licenses

    7. Re:Engineers vs Programms by Ash+Vince · · Score: 1

      ...and some are just attracted to the darker side,

      More like some are attracted to money.

      Any one else remember a similar story a while ago regarding most spam kings coming from the US too? (http://www.spamhaus.org/rokso/)

      I think I see a pattern, I wonder if it has anything to do with the US being the birthplace of unrestrained capitalism?

      --
      I dont read /. to RTFA, I read /. to offend people in ignorance.
    8. Re:Engineers vs Programms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The title "engineer" or "programmer" would have no bearing legally"

      umm, there is a HUGE bearing. Programmers can be essentially sued by their employer, or possibly in a civil suit.

      Engineers on the other hand, can be sued by just about everyone, jointly and severally. Aditionally, they can face sanction and discipline by the professional organization. Essentially double the consequences, (losing their licence to practice).

      Other Engineers also have a duty to report wrongdoing by their colleauges. If they don't, and it's known that they knew about it, guess what, they are sued an disciplined too.

      Nothing against programmers, but engineers do have that extra layer of checks and balances. It's just like dilbert really, weasels keeping other weasels honest.

      Programmers on the other hand, don't have that second link, or professional organization to turn to. Try ratting out a colleauge for unethical/ilegal behaviour, and you are essentially an unprotected whistle blower.

    9. Re:Engineers vs Programms by erbmjw · · Score: 1

      Please note - this started as a discussion about software engineers not engineers in general. If you wish to expand this discussion from it's original scope ie software engineers then please make that intent clear. Taking a single sentence out of context and altering it's scope to encompass all engineers does not make for a clear intent.

      *********

      Many states require engineers in certain fields to have a license. Now while many of your post's statements do/may hold true for licensed engineers, they do not hold true for those states or countries that do not require a license for practicing software engineers.

      Accreditation by a professional association does not stipulate further legal responsibilities only ethical responsibilities. A license by a state or country stipulates further legal responsibilities but there are not many states or countries that require a license for practicing software engineers.

      ie If the state or country they work in does not require a software engineer to be licensed then they have the same legal standing as a programmer; nothing more nothing less.

  9. Actually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    I figured it was because of a certain Redmond company, personally... :)
    The only question then being whether or not Windows was counted *as* malware...

    1. Re:Actually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I recall thinking it was the height of cleverness as a teen to write a "virus" that upgraded Windows 95 by installing FreeBSD :)

      Never released it, though.

  10. Re:No surprise here. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are free to leave, anytime. Malware targets the US largely because we happen to have the most 'disposable' income-- Suck it commie!

  11. Yeah, software! by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 2, Funny

    But don't forget high speed pizza delivery too!

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
    1. Re:Yeah, software! by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      But don't forget high speed pizza delivery too!
      Sooo... you're saying it's safer to order pizza from Russia ?

      (confused)
      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    2. Re:Yeah, software! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just avoid the Sushi ;)

  12. Well, duh! by cyberbob2351 · · Score: 0, Troll

    We, like, own the internet don't we? Al Gore invented it after all, and all of the important servers and tubes is on our half of the planet!

    Because of all of this, we should have every right to exclusively fuck it up.

    --
    for sale
    I'm a self-modifying sig virus
    1. Re:Well, duh! by Paulrothrock · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I was watching a lecture by Neil DeGrasse Tyson wherein he made the point that the country that discovered something gets to name it. The Muslim world named most of the stars in the sky. The Greeks named most of the constellations. The US named most of the heaviest elements on the table, so we get names like Californium and Berkelium.

      And since we made the Internet, we get to name it. That's why there's .co.uk and not .co.us. And it's also why .gov is the US government and not .gov.us. Just like every postage stamp outside of the UK has to have the country of origin on it because the Brits invented the postage stamp, we get the TLDs because we invented the Internet.

      --
      I'm in the hole of the broadband donut.
  13. Oh, yeah! Teh U-S Rulz! W00T! We Rock! by mmell · · Score: 5, Funny
    Uh, what do you mean, this isn't a good thing? We're finally number one at something in IT again (other than outsourcing, that is) and it's a bad thing? That sucks . . .

    That said . . . in your face, China, Russia and the other developing countries - in your face!

    Oh, and a slight aside to the /. eds - I suspect that both the Chinese and the Russian people would be *ahem* amused at having their respective countries referred to as "developing countries". Just sayin'

  14. Numbers Game..... by Rank_Tyro · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I would guess that those numbers correspond to the number of users combined with the number of users who have no idea what computer security means.

    How many people buy a computer without knowing how to use one safely? How many of those people buy a computer and run around on the internet as administrator?

    Anytime you have a large number of users who do not understand or care to secure their computers, you will have higher numbers of those users who have been owned.

    --
    Today's show is brought to you by the number 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0: 25
  15. Windows? by Bob54321 · · Score: 3, Funny

    We all know that Microsoft makes the most common malware known to computing. There was never really any competition to stop the USA getting the title.

    --
    :(){ :|:& };:
    1. Re:Windows? by Clueless+Nick · · Score: 1

      WHY, why, why did you have to go and say it first?!?!?

      --
      Chat with other atheists http://secularchat.org
    2. Re:Windows? by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      I was amazed it took so long for that to pop up. I thought I was on the wrong site for a moment there.

      For the sake of completeness :
      - If we all ran Multics there wouldn't be any malware
      - Don't run punched cards you get in the mail
      - Remember to reinstall from a clean set of tapes every week

      Did I forget anything ?

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
  16. Re:No surprise here. by lahvak · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So shut up or leave are the only options? One isn't alowed to criticise what one sees as a problem in a country one loves, perhaps in hope it will get rectified once enough people point it out? I find your attitude rather similar to that of many hard-line communists. Besides, we are talking about malware created in the US, not targeted to the US.

    --
    AccountKiller
  17. Re:No surprise here. by lahvak · · Score: 1

    Since when is criticism equal to hate?

    --
    AccountKiller
  18. Remove all financial incentives for malware... by iamcf13 · · Score: 1

    And malware will go away for good!

    Fat chance of that happening at all, huh? :(

    1. Re:Remove all financial incentives for malware... by Torvaun · · Score: 1

      So you're saying that if there is no monetary value in doing something, it will not be done? This is wrong no matter what hat you wear. On the white hat side of programming, we've got all of Open Source. On the black hat side, we've got people who release viruses for fun, rather than profit. Money is only one motivation for people, and it's generally not the strongest one for most people.

      --
      I see your informative link, and raise you a pithy comment.
  19. Everything you want to know about Windows malware by Kadin2048 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Sometime when you're looking for an evening's entertainment (and not in the company of others, unless they also find this sort of thing terribly interesting), fire up a VMWare VM and load it up with Windows XP SP1, then fire up Internet Explorer and browse around. For fastest results, be sure to hit up some of the seedier side of the internet -- a quick Google for "serial numbers" will get you malware-ridden sites within the first few results. Then, just hit yourself on the head or otherwise simulate a stupid/ignorant user, and click "OK" to anything the computer prompts at you for a few minutes.

    In short order, you will probably have so much adware, malware, Trojans, and keyloggers on the VM, it's nearly impossible to ever clean it out (AFAIK you really can't with any reliability say that a machine once rooted is 'clean' until you zero the drive and reinstall from media). Monitoring the network connections and traffic that the VM makes is also pretty interesting. (Its easiest if you set up the VM's virtual interface with a different IP than the host machine's physical interface.)

    If you want to go for a second round, Google "adware removal" and download or run the first half-dozen or so tools that you see; chances are at least some of them will make the problem worse.

    The benefit of doing this in a VM is you can trivially roll the system back to an uncorrupted state, and just banish the thing altogether when you're done entertaining yourself. It really caused me to appreciate two things: one, reminding me why I don't use that OS at home, and two, the absolutely ridiculous amount of effort that must be spent (patching, updating, firewalling, antivirusing, user training) to keep the billions of Windows machines that people depend on from succumbing to the same fate in a matter of minutes.

    Anyone who doesn't use Windows on a regular basis should do that every year or so, if only for the "there, but for the grace of God..." value.

    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
  20. Re:Oh, yeah! Teh U-S Rulz! W00T! We Rock! by Jarjarthejedi · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Heh. While I find your comment amusing I must point out it's not the /.er's fault that China and Russia are considered developing countries. Blame human geographers for that. Russia and China are considered Developing by those groups. Personally I think it's just silly, who are we (people in general, not the US) to determine what style of life is better than another, but hey, that's how it is.

    --
    There are two kinds of fool One says 'This is old therefore good' Another says 'This is new therefore better'- Dean Ing
  21. Old News by slashdottinitup · · Score: 0

    Looks like Symantec just found out about MySpace.

  22. Re:Oh, yeah! Teh U-S Rulz! W00T! We Rock! by toddhunter · · Score: 1

    They might say better to be developing than going backwards...

  23. America, F*CK YEA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Writin' the malware to save the muther f*ckin day yea!
    Malware!
    Spyware!
    Adware!
    F*CK YEA!

  24. Excellent! by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 4, Funny

    At least we still lead the world in something! Take that, Indian outsourcing companies.

  25. FACT: these are OWNED servers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FACT: These are OWNED servers, and are used as delivery vehicles for malware created outside the US. This is was it not being considered, but it is there and not too hard to discern. Also, you must consider that any Tom, Dick, or Harry can rent a colo server in .com land. You think the Chinese are not? You kid yourself then. rackspace will take anyone. serverbeach, anyone. And when I mean anyone, I mean anyone.

    1. Re:FACT: these are OWNED servers by jackv · · Score: 1

      we're dealing with an international economy. The capitalist ethos crosses borders, and there is a lot of collusion between people from different countries . It's not the Americans or the Chinese or the Russians. It's pervasive

    2. Re:FACT: these are OWNED servers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's pervasive

      So when do we bomb Pervasia?

  26. US Leads the World In Malware Creation... by Webb21 · · Score: 0
    US Leads the World In Malware Creation

    Well yeah, that's because Redmond is located within the US.

    *ducks*

    --
    "A good compromise leaves everyone mad." -Calvin
  27. wonder by it074771 · · Score: 1

    symantec has always come with the qualities that serves the one-piece well implemented malware...are we talkin that malware is such a illegal? i wonder how it works for that purpose?

    1. Re:wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      symantec has always come with the qualities that serves the one-piece well implemented malware...are we talkin that malware is such a illegal? i wonder how it works for that purpose?

      Parse this shit and re-post it after you've turned it into something intelligible.

  28. Critical Problem? by it074771 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Where does it become a critical problem. Well, if you get a system that is infected, you may start having problems with not only your system, but with your enterprise network. In many cases, as you might expect. The end result is that the software tries to spread itself to other and begins to use all of the bandwidth you have on your enterprise for that purpose. If you have unprotected 'everyone' shares, the software can even propagate itself to others on your network, much like a virus or Trojan and then they start transmitting too. In the worse case scenario, you may receive communication from your ISP indicating that an address within your enterprise has a problem and unless you solve it, they will discontinue services. AT&T, Qwest, the RBOC (Regional Bell Operating Companies) and others follow this practice now.

  29. US Leads the World In Malware Creation!?! by Max+Littlemore · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    USA! USA! USA!

    --
    I don't therefore I'm not.
    1. Re:US Leads the World In Malware Creation!?! by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

      For a day to day assessment for the USA's position with regard to DoS attacks, botnets, phishing, and scanning, check out this page and look at the bottom chart. You can see the number one ranked country, ASN, and host for each category.

  30. WTF? by Lord+Kano · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "Scratch a criminal, and sometimes you find a misguided entrepreneur, looking to get rich a little too quick.'"

    You could say the same thing about crack dealers or contract killers, am I supposed to be sympathetic to them too?

    I'm not bothered by the legal aspects as much as the ethical ones. If someone is hurting someone else, they're doing something wrong. End of story.

    LK

    --
    "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    1. Re:WTF? by apathy+maybe · · Score: 1

      So ..., just to make clear. You are a pacifist yes? Because the army and the police each hurt other people all the time.

      Not saying I disagree with you, but unless you are a pacifist, you can't really make a statement like that.

      Also, what about in self defence?

      I'm sure you could make an argument about the lesser wrongness, but I won't buy it.

      --
      I wank in the shower.
    2. Re:WTF? by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      So ..., just to make clear. You are a pacifist yes? Because the army and the police each hurt other people all the time.

      I'm more of an isolationist.

      Also, what about in self defence?

      I'm sure you could make an argument about the lesser wrongness, but I won't buy it.


      You don't have to buy it. I'm not trying to convince you.
      If inaction will cause more misery and death than action, the only right thing to do is to take action.

      If someone were trying to rape your wife or mother, she or you would be perfectly justified in using deadly force to stop it.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
  31. We're #1! by Talgrath · · Score: 1

    We're #1! We're #1! The US is #1! WOOOO!

  32. And I'm Proud To Be an American... by FranklinDelanoBluth · · Score: 1

    ...because at least I know we can produce malicious computer programs!

    And there ain't no doubt I love this land. God bless the USAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!</lee-greenwood>

  33. US leads world in baby-food manufacturing software by patio11 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    ... and operating systems, and encryption, and VoIP, and browsers, and tax preparation, and CRM, and video games, and instant message clients, and illustration/graphic design, and pretty much any other string which you can append "software" to. That we lead in malware is not a heck of a lot of suprise. We also probably are neck and neck with Japan for producing cars used by bank robbers in getaways.

  34. Re:Everything you want to know about Windows malwa by Gazzonyx · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I worked with a guy, when we were working on malware removal techniques, who did exactly this. Our google search was either 'warez' or 'crackz', I can't recall. He even played the stupid user - "Yeah, I'm sure I can install this activeX stuff, whatever that means...The site told me to hit OK" - and the box was LEVELED beyond repair in under 5 minutes and 10 sites. We had to pull the virtual ethernet card on it. It got to the point that the box almost got beligerent as we tried to pull the malware out... This stuff isn't your typical virus from 10 years ago! I forget how many hits we picked up from adaware and spybot, but it was in the several hundreds. Oh, and it was a SP2 box, as well.

    --

    If I mod you up, it doesn't necessarily mean I agree with what you've said, sorry.

  35. Re:No surprise here. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
    Since when is criticism equal to hate?

    Criticism is equal to hate when your IQ is below 60. Or if you're a member of the Bush administration.

    Sorry for the repetition.

  36. And the difference is what, again? by sethstorm · · Score: 3, Insightful

    He also suggests that the some of the 'criminals' may actually be Internet entrepreneurs who crossed over to the dark side
    And they're different from the kind that run companies to the ground, create loopholes to avoid domestic workers, and fake their deaths to void convictions? Somehow the differences aren't stacking up.

    It's an inevitable result of a thriving free market and tech expertise.
    Apparently the Midwest hasn't gotten the memo on that one, since the 2001 recession is still going, continued by 2003's wave of job theft. There are some things that Ivy League economists will never understand. Thriving and "free market" somehow just aren't mixing in places that get the idea of not treating businesses like $DEITY.

    An underground economy often mirrors the legal, above-ground one. Scratch a criminal, and sometimes you find a misguided entrepreneur, looking to get rich a little too quick.'
    Wasnt that covered in Enron, Worldcom, HP (Hurd and Fiorina), and about any organization that uses loopholes to offshore work? That seems to point to a "misguided entrepreneur" as being one that has some morals left in them, not someone who's gone criminal.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  37. Re:Oh, yeah! Teh U-S Rulz! W00T! We Rock! by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

    I suspect that both the Chinese and the Russian people would be *ahem* amused at having their respective countries referred to as "developing countries"
    Why should we be amused at truth? Economically-wise, both are developing countries. I know some of my fellow countrymen think that Russia inherited the "superpower" title from the Soviet Union and managed to keep it, but it is obviously a delusion.
  38. This is my apprentice... by VGPowerlord · · Score: 1

    He also suggests that the some of the 'criminals' may actually be Internet entrepreneurs who crossed over to the dark side...

    This is my apprentice, Darth Malware. He will find your lost revenue.
    --
    GLaDOS for President 2016! "Well here we are again. It's always such a pleasure." -- GLaDOS, 2011
  39. Re:Oh, yeah! Teh U-S Rulz! W00T! We Rock! by hyfe · · Score: 1

    I suspect that both the Chinese and the Russian people would be *ahem* amused at having their respective countries referred to as "developing countries".
    That doesn't change the fact that they are though. Both countries are changing quite fast, both economically and culturally trying to find their new place in the world. What they morph into remain to be seen though.
    --
    "" How about taking the safety labels off everything, and let the stupidity-problem solve itself? """
  40. It's the other way round. by Ihlosi · · Score: 1
    Scratch a criminal, and sometimes you find a misguided entrepreneur, looking to get rich a little too quick.



    Scratch an entrepreneur who is willing to ignore good business practices and ethics to get rich quickly, and you'll most likely find a criminal.

  41. Flawed argument by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The argument is that the US' high degree of malware creation comes down to the US capitalist/free market life of way, that people create these to seek riches that are denied them.

    The implicit claim is that if computer literacy and absorption and internet access was equally prevalent in any other ('less capitalist') part of the world, i.e. you control for that, then they would still be behind the US in terms of malware creation.

    This is a Marxist argument, that the desire for significant material comfort is a byproduct of a capitalist upbringing, and if people have a correct/naturalised upbringing this desire will cease. It is also in my view wrong.

  42. Microsoft by Nerdfest · · Score: 1

    Windows should probably have been excluded, although doing so might drop the US far down the list.

  43. way too go! by Kerstyun · · Score: 0, Funny

    The ol red white and blue aint dead yet! Suck on that, Indier!

    U-S-A! Num-ber-1!
    U-S-A! Num-ber-1!
    U-S-A! Num-ber-1!

    --
    Keep the whitehouse white, vote Trump & Palin 2020.
  44. Spot on by jandersen · · Score: 2, Insightful



    I would say quite often in fact, but that's just my opinion. I think there is something in what serves as the basic moral code in American-style business, that makes it difficult to know where the line goes. Now don't take this as an attack on Americans or even America in general, but the kind of business ethics that is tought to American MBAs etc, is scarily devoid of what normal people would consider good moral.

    I once read about a class situation at one university - I don't recall the exact circumstances, but perhaps somebody else recognises it. The professor asked the class 'You are in charge of marketing a new medicine, and you receive reports that this medicine may be dangerous. What is the right thing to do?' Most would say things like 'We have to hold back and find out whether this product is actually dangerous and perhaps stop selling it' - but the 'right' answer, according to the professor was 'You keep on selling as much as possible until the company is forced to stop. Your only concern should be the shareholders' profit'

    This story, I think, tells just how twisted things can be. When young people are told that they have to commit moral and ethical suicide like this, how should they be able to see the fine line between being a creative entrpreneur and an outright criminal? If the size of the profit is what determines how 'right' or 'good' your actions are, then surely crime is perfectly justfied law abiding citizens are simply idiots, little better than cattle?

    1. Re:Spot on by SwashbucklingCowboy · · Score: 1

      I think there is something in what serves as the basic moral code in American-style business, that makes it difficult to know where the line goes.
      Aw, now don't let scandals at Enron, WorldCom, Adelphia, HealthSouth, Qwest, Apple, Broadcom, UnitedHealth, Comverse Tech., etc. get you down on American business ethics! lol!
    2. Re:Spot on by Spacezilla · · Score: 1

      Thanks a lot, now my eyes are going to hurt the rest of the day. :(

    3. Re:Spot on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      anonymous didn't even read your post because of the bold, but took time to reply to it. hm.

  45. Hold on there, Comrade... by Jasin+Natael · · Score: 1

    the US lead should come as no surprise, considering the capitalist way of life and the high level of technical knowledge

    Um, what? Perhaps he means that since we have food to eat and our basic needs are taken care of, that we naturally spend our time writing malware. Apparently people should never have liberty and prosperity, since they obviously lead to (or are intrinsically) vice!

    How about reporting what percentage of a country's total software output is malware? Or at the very least, acknowledging that instead of some "capitalist way of life", the problem is a doublethink one for social do-gooders: that our citizens, poor and criminal included, have access to technology and electricity. Don't think for a second that if rural China had electricity, not to mention uncensored Internet access, they wouldn't shoot straight past us on whatever yardstick this bozo is using.

    As Wendell Phillips said, "Eternal vigilance is the price of liberty." This is true for all values of liberty, and includes the liberty of running software of your own choice on your own hardware of choice. The market will produce, and already has produced, better systems that aren't (as) suceptible to malware. That's the capitalist way of life. All this guy is doing is hand-wringing and finger-pointing.

    --
    True science means that when you re-evaluate the evidence, you re-evaluate your faith.
    1. Re:Hold on there, Comrade... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with your statement in principle--it was essentially what I wanted to post. However, I don't think the bias is coming from TFA this time. Mr. Gralla uses the words "thriving free market," without any obviously negative overtone, and several of his recent articles are pro-privacy and seem to have instances of political lambasting of both sides.

      For instance:
      http://www.computerworld.com/blogs/node/4056
      http://www.computerworld.com/blogs/node/5182
      http://www.computerworld.com/blogs/node/5017

      Seems like the bias is coming from elsewhere here.

  46. Collaboration is actually distributed by now by edis · · Score: 1

    I was employed for a while by U.S. company/enterpreneur, who seemed to be walking along thin line of ethics in engineering, as we'd understand it. Those were attempts to make graspable profit from online presence. Lucky I was not to be exposed to the parts, that would make me uncomfortable in my jobs. But there were more people hired, and at least half of them should have been not residents of U.S. (just as I am not) - some of them should have been doing parts, that were crossing into the darker side, I suspect.

    As those were rather short - term profitability efforts (better name it speculation), I doubt any success is still with that business. Wish better luck and models to net enterpreneurs! Garbage of the net is destined to rot.

    --
    Servant of karma
  47. Re:Everything you want to know about Windows malwa by giorgiofr · · Score: 1

    Your simulation is quite unrealistic, because it assumes that a dumb user browses crackz & warez sites: this is IMHO quite unlikely. Gamers, power users etc would do it but not your typical dumb user. The problem anyway is not that if you click OK your box gets rooted - the situation is much worse, there are many exploits lying around on warez and pr0n sites and they will root your box silently and without user interaction. This happens because MSIE is a suboptimal browsing platform when it comes to security (and functionality too but that's beside the point).
    Usage of different browsers is an easy and good remedy to this situation. In fact, I recommend Opera or FF to anybody who is dissatisfacted with IE.

    --
    Global warming is a cube.
  48. Microsoft is based here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We are #1 because Microsoft is based here and all know that their software is malware.

  49. Re:Oh, yeah! Teh U-S Rulz! W00T! We Rock! by CmdrGravy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Advert for the Economist at the moment reads:

    "Invest in the 4th largest world economy. Before it's number 1. China"

  50. Re:Everything you want to know about Windows malwa by canUbeleiveIT · · Score: 1

    I think that you have hit upon it. A computer behind a NAT firewall can stay uninfected (even without AV software) if a user restricts her/his browsing to the more mainstream segments of the web. From my experience, computers with spyware/malware/trojans/viruses mostly have contracted the problem from at least one of the following ways:

    • Downloading software or songs with Limewire, Kazaa or other P2P
    • Visitng pr0n or warez sites
    • opening unsolicited emails (especially attachments)
    • Downloading and installing "free" software

    While I'm aware that there are other ways to get your computer infected, they just don't happen that often. My wife has been using an XP Pro box w/o AV for a couple of years without incident or malware. Her web habits are scrupulous--all she does online is shop and check her yahoo mail account.

    In my opinion, the worst thing for a computer is to have a teenager operate it. I reinstall Windows all of the time for people with teenagers and within six months, it's back to be wiped again. Apparently AV & firewall software does no good if you always click "allow."

  51. Re:Oh, yeah! Teh U-S Rulz! W00T! We Rock! by WML+MUNSON · · Score: 1

    Visit anywhere in China that isn't Beijing, Shanghai, or Hong Kong and tell me it's not a "developing" country. I have no experience with Russia, on the other hand.

  52. Re:No surprise here. by camperdave · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Since when is criticism equal to hate?

    Since September 11, 2001. ...or so it seems.

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  53. Re:Everything you want to know about Windows malwa by swillden · · Score: 1

    Your simulation is quite unrealistic, because it assumes that a dumb user browses crackz & warez sites: this is IMHO quite unlikely. Gamers, power users etc would do it but not your typical dumb user.

    The use of crackz and warez sites is just to accelerate the process. Unless you confine your browsing to only the most trustworthy sites on the net, you'll eventually get infected.

    --
    Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
  54. Re:Oh, yeah! Teh U-S Rulz! W00T! We Rock! by Bastard+of+Subhumani · · Score: 1

    Fair enough, since Russia has no experience of YOU!

    --
    Only three things are certain; death, taxes, and apocryphal quotations - Ben Franklin.
  55. Re:Everything you want to know about Windows malwa by sqlrob · · Score: 1
  56. Re:Everything you want to know about Windows malwa by msormune · · Score: 1

    ...leveled beyond repair... now that's funny.

  57. Re:Everything you want to know about Windows malwa by Paulrothrock · · Score: 1

    Anyone who doesn't use Windows on a regular basis should do that every year or so, if only for the "there, but for the grace of God..." value.

    I just listen to the Security Now podcast. Did you know about the virus-like behavior that simply arose because of a bug in Windows? It's called "Free Public WiFi"

    --
    I'm in the hole of the broadband donut.
  58. Say what?! by smooth+wombat · · Score: 3, Interesting
    and the high level of technical knowledge.


    If Americans did have a high level of technical knowledge, the amount of spyware infections (and related matters) would be significantly lower. Considering we lead the world in malware creation, that argues for a lower level of technical knowledge.

    Punch the monkey to win money! Give us your email address and we'll send you free offers! Install this program to prevent infections!

    Let's put it this way: I went to the dentist recently and the girl who was going to scrape my teeth asked what I did and where I worked. When I told her I work in IT and for a specific government agency, she said that she wished she knew more about computers but she didn't have the time to figure them out.

    So, we have someone who admits they don't know enough about a subject yet aren't willing to take the time to learn more about it. Yup, this America. If it isn't easy, we're not interested.

    --
    We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    1. Re:Say what?! by supermank17 · · Score: 1

      Two things:
      1.) The US does have a fairly high level of technical knowledge. Perhaps the average person off the street couldn't write malware, but there are tons of self-taught and university educated people in the US that could. The knowledge required is widely available and not too difficult to procure.

      2.) Just because someone would like to know more about something but doesn't take the time to learn about it hardly means they're lazy or stupid. It simply means their priorities are different. I'd love to know more about astronomy, photography, economics, history, and a dozen different computer fields ranging from IT and networking to graphics engine design. I don't have time to become an expert in everything I find interesting, however, so I pick the things that have the highest priority to me and put the others off for another day. Your backhand condemnation of your dental hygienist because she doesn't have the time to learn more about computers is rather narrow minded.

  59. Re:Oh, yeah! Teh U-S Rulz! W00T! We Rock! by hyfe · · Score: 1

    Yes, it certainly is developing!

    --
    "" How about taking the safety labels off everything, and let the stupidity-problem solve itself? """
  60. wooo! by nomadic · · Score: 1

    USA! USA!

  61. Re:Oh, yeah! Teh U-S Rulz! W00T! We Rock! by elrous0 · · Score: 1

    Personally I think it's just silly, who are we (people in general, not the US) to determine what style of life is better than another

    While I realize that there are philosophical differences over cultural values and all that, I think it's foolish to say we can't make judgments on what constitutes a "better" life.

    I think, for example, that it's pretty fair to say that a life of hard labor in a concentration camp would suck ass compared to the life of just about anyone outside of said concentration camp. I think it would also be fair to say that it would be much better to live in a country with relative freedom and financial prosperity than to live in one with biting poverty and brutal, senseless violence.

    -Eric

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  62. Malicious Activity, not Malware! by rhets · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Did the author of this post even read the paper? The U.S. leads the world in Malicious Activity, this is very different from malware. Malicious Activity = phishing sites, attacks, command and control servers, bots, spam zombies and malicious code infections. The United States is the top country for the combination of all of these things. The paper does not state anywhere that the United States is the source of the most malware!

    1. Re:Malicious Activity, not Malware! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did the author of this post even read the paper?


      What's the old joke? Oh yeah, "you must be new here..."
  63. We're Number One! by J.R.+Random · · Score: 1

    At last, America is a technical leader again!

  64. Re:Oh, yeah! Teh U-S Rulz! W00T! We Rock! by foniksonik · · Score: 1

    Depends on how you look at it I suppose... The US is obviously still developing too. It's like a 50 yr old calling a 20 yr old a kid, then being told by an 80 yr old that he's still just wet behind the ears himself.

    --
    A fool throws a stone into a well and a thousand sages can not remove it.
  65. Re:No surprise here. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think you are confusing patriotic with moronic. Typical lefty mistake.

  66. USA! USA! USA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We're number one!
    We're number one!

    Yeah!

  67. Re:Everything you want to know about Windows malwa by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

    I think you could replace "warez" with any number of NSFW porn terms and turn up the same things, and idiot users do troll for porn. And I'd argue that a lot of idiots who don't know what they're doing, end up at cracks/warez sites too ("hey, my friend said I can get expensive games for free..."); you're assuming a lot of intelligence on the part of people who are Googling for and clicking on the top results for obvious terms like "serial number crack" and the like.

    But anyway, I really only included that step to guarantee a quick powning of the box; you could probably -- as you point out -- achieve the same result without clicking "OK," or even going to that many really obviously shady sites, just by browsing for long enough.

    And although I've never tried it, I suspect you could also get easily hacked if you just put the VM's IP address in your firewall's DMZ, so that it's exposed to the public network, and then just walk away for a few hours. That's probably a more interesting experiment, but if you just want to see how messed-up you can get a Windows machine in 15 or 20 (or 3) minutes, the hack'n'crack sites are a guaranteed reservoir of nastiness.

    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
  68. Good thing I wasn't using VMWare-NAT by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

    Very interesting. I wasn't aware of that, and I'm now glad that I wasn't using VMWare in the NATed configuration (although, IIRC, that is the default!).

    I prefer to let the VM's virtual network interface talk to the LAN and get its own DHCP lease and IP address, just to make it easier to determine what traffic is coming from the host and what's from the guest, if I want to analyze traffic at the router or somewhere else downstream. I'm not sure what VMWare's lingo is for this type of setup, but it's pretty trivial to change during the installation/setup process. For some reason they recommend the NATed setup, I suppose because some networks are configured to disallow more than one IP lease per physical Ethernet port, but as long as you control the LAN as well and have internal IPs to spare in your addressing scheme, you might as well not introduce the extra layer of NAT (or, it would seem, the security vulnerability).

    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    1. Re:Good thing I wasn't using VMWare-NAT by sqlrob · · Score: 1

      If you're really wanting to play with malware, you can't trust virtualization. You don't know that that is the only problem. For example, what if there's a buffer overflow in the clipboard that propagates out to the host? Not a problem on a local machine, but in a virtual going to the host, it can be a big problem.

      Also, moot for this, but some malware behaves differently under VMWare. Not out of bugs, but to help prevent analysis.

  69. We're Number One! by Shoggonater · · Score: 1

    We're number one! We're number one! We're number one! Take that China!

  70. Well, it's kind of natural given the new economy. by SadGeekHermit · · Score: 1

    Let's be realistic.

    The past six years has been rather hard on the American programmer.

    We were pretty much always looked down on by the rest of society as a bunch of geeks, and no small number of us were picked on growing up just because we were studious and not particularly into sports. For a few years in the late nineties, we got a little bit of respect, and it was good. But we got deluged with carpetbaggers who claimed to be programmers after a weekend HTML course, until the word "programmer" barely meant ANYTHING. Finally, the bubble burst and the carpetbaggers were scattered to the wind, but in the process we got leveled right along with them. And the outsourcing boom has killed the market value of our skills, exactly as the bastard corporations intended.

    The worst people on Earth, the people who run these corporations, happily betray not only their own countrymen but their fellow geeks in some cases (Fuck YOU, Bill Gates) when they tell our idiot Congress that Americans aren't smart enough, talented enough, skilled enough, GOOD enough to fill the positions they've got on offer.

    They have the nerve to post job offers that insist on expertise in twenty different in-demand skills for a lousy 40K sub-entry-level job. Then they claim they made a good-faith effort to find someone to fill it and hire an Indian on an H1-B, paying him as little as possible.

    In the end, the market for the American programmer is being demolished. We have all been sold out, viciously, because we wanted to be paid a fair wage and some filthy rich asshole with more money than he could ever spend wasn't willing to pay what we were worth.

    Now it seems that a portion of these disenfranchised technologists have decided to become vandals. Well, CRY ME A RIVER.

    As you reap, so shall you sow. It's the way of things, really.

    Maybe you should have thought of that.

    --
    NO CARRIER
  71. Re:Well, it's kind of natural given the new econom by anubi · · Score: 1
    I certainly understand your grief, Hermit.

    It seems all the sciences/engineering/tech fields got hit. Anything where lots of effort went into training.

    I can understand the businessmen and their concerns about getting cheaper skilled labor. Its the same concern I have when I can get cheaper stuff.

    My main concern is with Congress, and how they've been passing all this one-sided law.

    Outsourcing labor, Fine! But what happens if I try to buy a CD which is cheaper in China than here? Can't do that! Its a Violation of some businesses' marketing model. Well whoop-de-do, we have a "marketing model" too! We paid in both time and dollars for our education, and we are paying a hefty income tax if we are making enough to keep a roof over our heads... and that "business model" needs protection too.

    Of course, business can get labor somewhere else cheaper. Those people do not have to pay US property or income tax, or have the cost of living overhead we have here. I can get my music cheaper too if I don't have to pay all the RIAA overhead, but somehow skitting around paying the RIAA is considered illegal, but outsourcing skills is simply business. RIAA cannot compete with damned near free. Neither can I. We protect RIAA with DMCA. Either provide me housing, food, and creature comforts at foreign rates and relieve me from taxation - or protect me too, or my kind will cease to exist.

    Personally, I am perplexed, as I have a lot of skills in refrigeration design, and its quite obvious to me how to design HVAC systems that take advantage of ice baths to store enthalpy so not only can I time-shift the energies required to transfer enthalpy (BTU's of heat energy) to times of abundant power in the middle of the night, I also take advantage of radiating the unwanted heat to deep-space much more efficiently than when I have a 6,000 degree kelvin heat source overhead during the day.

    Not only that, I have a whole bag of evaporative cooler and other tricks in my bag to make SEER soar. There are a whole mess of tricks like using gravitic pressure assist to keep refrigerant from flashing before it hits the thermal expansion valve, or using pipe-in-pipe methods to recycle heat flows. These have to be custom-designed for the application for maximal efficiency.

    There is a whole mess of new technology here to be explored. Brand new scroll and screw compressor designs coupled with SEMA motors and International Rectifier drivers, driven with custom programmed AVR micropower controllers. Yes, like Linux, it will take some time to set up, but once its running, and people understand how it works, it will work as long as you want it to. Efficiently. And if something better comes up - if you know how the thing works, its easy enough to integrate it in.

    But what happens? The powers that be want an off the shelf box, just like in your field, they want a windows box. Anything so they don't have to understand what they have. Just use it.

    We cannot thrive on ignorance!

    From what I see, we are rapidly approaching "peak oil" and energy prices will soar. Trying to tell the executives about this is just as hard as selling them on a Linux system. They will pay whatever it takes to have the mainstream unit, no matter how virus prone or inefficient it is. A big company offers them the comfort of being held blameless for going that way, no matter what goes wrong. Its the little guys who stand to profit/lose personally which seem far more likely to adopt innovation than the corporate leviathans.

    It seems a shame when I see so many technical people underemployed when I feel our country needs us more than ever. At least the kids can see us and avoid our mistake like the plague, and get their tra

    --
    "Prove all things; hold fast that which is good." [KJV: I Thessalonians 5:21]