Slashdot Mirror


An iPod For Every Kid In Michigan

mikesd81 writes "Over at C|Net there is an article about Michigan spending $38 million to distribute an iPod to every kid, for learning purposes. From the article: 'On Thursday, House Democrats delivered a spending bill that includes the idea of putting $38 million worth of public funds toward outfitting every student with a digital music player.' The plan included measures to tax soda and satellite TV services to pay for it, among other things, to raise funds. If you recall, Duke University tried something like this with mixed results. How financially strained will Michigan residents feel about paying higher taxes to buy someone else's kid an iPod?"

333 comments

  1. really? by sam.thorogood · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Please allow me to contribute the obligatory "yes, because blackboards and chalk have clearly failed us" response.

    1. Re:really? by MidnightBrewer · · Score: 0

      The problem is, nobody's yet figured out a way to make 30 copies and then take the blackboards home with them. It's not like audio lectures are a new thing here, plus there's that whole "saving paper" idea.

      --
      "Give a man fire, and he'll be warm for a day; set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life
    2. Re:really? by fishthegeek · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Observationally, as a teacher I would like to suggest that the kids could try these revolutionary ideas instead:

      Take notes.
      Read their textbooks.
      Email the teacher (my kids do this one a lot)
      Actually pay attention.

      I see this as giving the kids a device they won't use for the purpose intended (for the most part anyway), and as just another silly idea from the Ivory Tower folks. This won't save one ream of paper IMHO. Schools burn through paper like you wouldn't believe.

      --
      load "$",8,1
    3. Re:really? by Gigaflynn · · Score: 1

      this is the maddest idea ever to come out of capital hill
      honestly, do they seriously think kids will use these to study
      anyways, i think poor kids'll just sell them (no offense meant if you are poor)

      --
      "Neo, follow the white rabbit"
      "Can i eat the white rabbit?"
      "No, there is no spoon to eat it with"
    4. Re:really? by fishthegeek · · Score: 1

      This is a state thing not national. I agree with you... there is a 0% probability that this will work.

      --
      load "$",8,1
    5. Re:really? by MidnightBrewer · · Score: 4, Insightful

      As a teacher, I completely believe you. I also agree that I would sooner see this as a pay raise for me than spent on an iPod that will get lost, stolen, or broken within six months and never hold even one lecture related to class. The irony of this kind of idea is that they'll give these kids the iPods and completely fail to give the schools the resources to record and publish anything that could go on the iPods. Do the schools also get recording equipment? Does anybody at the school know how to make a website, or an RSS feed?

      The only thing the kids are going to learn is that the government really does waste their parents' tax money on cool stuff.

      --
      "Give a man fire, and he'll be warm for a day; set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life
    6. Re:really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i am SO sad to see this news. not only do i believe it is a total waste of money... not only is it lamely uninteractive... kids will have tinnitus by the time their done with high school and those who know how dangerous earbuds and headphones are in general to hearing will agree.

    7. Re:really? by EvanED · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, actually, they have. (Okay, it's a whiteboard, but you get the idea.)

      You couldn't outfit every classroom with this for that money yet though.

      But that's really a strawman anyway. It's not an either-or situation: distribute iPods or not have anything the kids can take home. One of my H.S. teachers tape recorded his lectures on cassette tape. You could record the lectures and put them online to download and let kids listen to it on their computers at home, or on their own iPods. If someone is really financially disadvantaged enough that this isn't an option, the school could have some players that you could check out from the library.

      There are plenty of ways to achieve about the same effect without being fiscally stupid.

    8. Re:really? by yada21 · · Score: 1

      kids will have tinnitus by the time their done with high school
      Picture hundreds of lawyers, all rubbing their hands together.
      --
      I will have a sig when the market demands it.
    9. Re:really? by fishthegeek · · Score: 1

      You are dead on target. These kids can't write well as it is... and giving them another excuse to actually put less effort than they already do is ill advised.

      --
      load "$",8,1
    10. Re:really? by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 3, Insightful
      > nobody's yet figured out a way to make 30 copies and then take the blackboards home with them

      Mmmm...I'm guessing you never went to school so you don't know how it works.

      --
      Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
    11. Re:really? by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      I don't think this is intended to educate kids as much as it is intended to make Michigan look like they are in the 21th century and capable of tech related work. It is much like NASA and the space race wasn't about going to space as much as it was an attempt to show the world we can solve complicated problems and had good sciences in the process.

      Michigan has suffered from a drought of jobs in the last couple decades. They have a high tax rate with a populace that is Union friendly. This means that to outside businesses, it doesn't look very friendly when considering a place to locate an expansion. The big auto industry bailed on Michigan for much of the same reasons. Now Michigan has some 2 billion in a fund designed to attract new industry and jobs to the area by tax cuts and other incentives. I think this is just something to play along with this and remove the idea that the welfare state is ignorant of the type of jobs they are trying to pull in.

      Now don't get me wrong, the only thing I don't like about Michigan personally is that football team kicks our ass a good portion of the time. Well that and the high taxes and some of the other problems they run themselves into. But I don't see their objective as a problem at all. I just question the legitimacy of it when compared to the intended goals. I believe this is being done for two reasons, shock value "look at what Michigan has done" and to loose the steriotype of them being a bunch of poor unionist factory workers.(look, we are high tech, all our kids use Ipods)

    12. Re:really? by chris_eineke · · Score: 1

      Read
      Ahead,
      Stay
      Ahead,
      Be
      In
      Class.

      Look up Howard Scott Warshall's book "Conquering College." It's all you need to survive college and high school.

      --
      "All you have to do is be fragile and grateful. So stay the underdog." Chuck Palahniuk, Choke
    13. Re:really? by FLEB · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I believe this is being done for two reasons, shock value "look at what Michigan has done"

      Yeah, but I think that shock and sentiment is working the wrong way. Given the general state of the State, as well as the schools, and the relative uselessness (especially given costs) of iPods in education, this just comes off as mind-blowingly idiotic more than anything forward-thinking, especially when the gov't has been putting forth cuts and finagling tax hikes claiming poverty.

      I could even see buying eBooks or something like that-- at least those have more educational use than a trumped-up portable drive.

      "Look what Michigan has done... dumped a whole bunch of money from a struggling economy into ooh-shiny electronics." Now I (a Michigan resident) get to be thought of either as part of the people who thought "iPods" and "education" were a natural combo, or the people who apparently can be cowed and placated by throwing shiny things at them.

      --
      Information wants to be free.
      Entertainment wants to be paid.
      You just want to be cheap.
    14. Re:really? by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      My understanding is that the costs are supposed to be offset by tax spikes on certain things. While I don't agree with it in principle, I think it would be somewhat effective in getting the attention of other companies looking to locate a new branch.

      It does seem to be a waist. But what is the alternative if the project wasn't' there and the tax wasn't collected for it. I really think you need a reason to tax the poor which is who these taxes to pay for the ipods will effect. I seriously think there are some political leadership problems up there and the resulting problems will take more then a few election terms to fix. Paying teachers more won't fix the problem, paying for more teachers will take 15 years or so before the full effect is realized, giving continued tax cuts to parts of the industries coming in only causes the existing industry to look elsewhere which is one thing some already have done.

      It is a tough call, But at least this has some immediate staying power with likely impressions of the area that might positively influence business in locating there. But it is just a guess to the actual degree in which this would be benificial. They definatly need something new, the old tricks stopped working long before they realized it.

    15. Re:really? by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      Umm, I hope I'm not misunderstanding and thinking you believe this is somehow a good thing. This is every bit as loony as the subsidies planned for Digital TV receivers. As a matter of fact, I believe that somebody didn't get the memo that April 1 was last Sunday. "learning purposes"? Waddaya gonna learn? How to work an iPod? Or that your politicians have finally gone over the edge? The spirit of William Proxmire is truly dead.

      --
      What?
    16. Re:really? by phlegmofdiscontent · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I realize you're being facetious, but the obligatory response is bullshit. I learned quite well with old-fashioned books and blackboards and managed to get a degree in Physics years before iPods were ever invented. Millions of people have done just as well. It's not lack of iPods that are preventing kids from learning, it's something else (parents, poor teachers, lack of funding, shitty educational standards, take your pick).

    17. Re:really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Payraise? Ah, wouldn't we all want one.

      Now go fuck yourself. You probably get better pension and healthcare benefits than 90% of us here.

      All teachers can do is bitch how much (or little, depending on POV) they make without taking into consider the 10's of thousands in benefits they recieve year in and year out.

      If it's so damn bad, get a job in the private sector or start you business you leech.

    18. Re:really? by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      Heh.. No I don't think this is a good thing.

      What I was trying to say is that Michigan is desperate here. The problem is that nothing else is being suggested that doesn't sound just as loony if not worse.

      What they need is real word fixes to several problem that while on the surface seem independent but are really causes or reaction to each other. I was also addressing the GPs suggestion of spending money as waisted when it isn't money they already have but plan on collecting from citizens taking in some common activity (drinking pop or satellite TV Which is another questionable thing). Michigan wants to be seen as progressive with modern ideas and students that can rise to the challenge. They want to shake this old impression of heavily unionized overtaxed business unfriendly environment that forced the American car makers into importing a lot of what they make. And thanks to some documentaries and the history of the area, that is the impression people have.

    19. Re:really? by Dan541 · · Score: 1

      The irony of this kind of idea is that they'll give these kids the iPods and completely fail to give the schools the resources to record and publish anything that could go on the iPods. Do the schools also get recording equipment? Does anybody at the school know how to make a website, or an RSS feed?
      Do the kids being given iPods also have a computer? I see a vicious cycle in the making.
      --
      An SQL query goes to a bar, walks up to a table and asks, "Mind if I join you?"
    20. Re:really? by TapeCutter · · Score: 2, Funny

      C'mon, even Newton used an apple. :)

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    21. Re:really? by Redlazer · · Score: 1
      But, are you really surprised that politicians have no goddamn clue what to do, and despite their apparant best efforts, have absolutely no clue what is best for the masses?

      Its times like these i wish people didnt think "Republican" meant "George Bush".

      According to real republican values, the government has no business taxing the people to give their kids an iPod.

      But, im tired and angsty.

      -Red

      --
      Guns don't kill people, "with glowing hearts" kills people.
    22. Re:really? by Bloke+down+the+pub · · Score: 1

      Well the kids could simply copy what's written on the board onto a piece of paper. Just don't let the RIAA find out!

      --
      It's true I tell you, feller at work's next door neighbour read it in the paper.
    23. Re:really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm, A teacher who would rather see himself get a pay raise than see his students get an ipod. . . I suddenly remembered exactly what I loved so much about my selfless high school teachers.

    24. Re:really? by leeann8148 · · Score: 1

      The advantage of giving students IPods is that they will be able to use them conveniently wherever they go. Many families are extremely busy these days and if your child can fit there textbook ie IPod in their pocket while their running errands with their parents they will be able to access information without having to carry around heavy books. By brining IPods into the classroom they will be able to add many new elements into the curricula by integrating audio and video content including speeches, interviews, artwork, music, and photos to bring lessons to life. Currently society is becoming more dependent on technology, it is only fair to prepare students for this by updating the way we teach them. There is nothing wrong with wanting to spend money in order to invest in our children's future and although Michigan's economy is weak, it would improve the our education sector.

    25. Re:really? by feltenan · · Score: 1

      Even though every kid within Michigan's educational system would love to participate in the classroom with iPod headphones in their ears all day, this idea is just not feasible. I understand that you can download audio books from iTunes and have someone read for you. But what good is this going to do for our educational system. These children should be learning to read for themselves not the other way around. I know if I had my own children I would not allow for them to utilize an iPod for educational purposes. I am able to make this statement because I have once before downloaded a high school novel to my iPod so that I could listen to it during and in between class. However, my $300 iPod was confiscated by administration and locked in a safe. (The cost of iPods comparatively to other capable mp3 players is also debatable. It would just be a boondoggle to tax Michigan citizens even more for iPods). They claimed someone would steal it and they didn't want to deal with it and I claimed I was enriching myself when really I would just fall asleep after hearing the monotone narrator rabble on and on. On the whole, I do not believe that iPods should be implemented as an educational tool. Additionally, how would we be able to ensure that students were in fact listening to scholarly audio instead of their favorite hip hop artist.

    26. Re:really? by DetWings · · Score: 1

      Paper is a renewable resource...we can plant trees and watch them grow and then kill them and turn them into the next biology project. Giving a little kid an ipod and wasteing 38 billion dollars on it is not just going to make the youth pay more attention in class. I feel like if we stick to pencil and paper we will save intellegence and thats way more important than saving some paper.

    27. Re:really? by MidnightBrewer · · Score: 1

      We were merely saying that, as teachers, we have seen too many years of great ideas poorly implemented, and that this has all the hallmarks of a big mistake. You need infrastructure in order to carry out the wonderful vision you've described, and that simply doesn't exist. To be fair, the linked articles are lacking in detail, but just putting the technology in the hands of the children isn't enough; you're going to need to train the children on how to use the technology, and you're going to have to train the teachers (and adults are not famous for rapidly adapting to new technology.) In most cases, the knee-jerk response to teachers asking for training and funds in such situations is, "Can't you just get by with what you've got?" as if the instruction manual that comes with your average MP3 player would open up the world of audio-visual recording.

      To give you a for instance: a former school I taught at bought two new laptops and a wireless network for teacher use, and then forbade the teachers from connecting to the Interweb "except when absolutely necessary," for fear that they might catch something from the tubes, or that some malicious hacker would download all the students' address information and go on a stalking spree. I even pointed out to them that if you want to get really paranoid, even "except when absolutely necessary" was too long (since nowadays it only takes a few minutes for an unprotected computer to get owned), that these computers were anything *but* unprotected, and that they had no business putting sensitive information on a networked computer, anyway. These protests and attempts at reason fell upon deaf ears, and the wireless network continues unused to this day.

      --
      "Give a man fire, and he'll be warm for a day; set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life
    28. Re:really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In my opinion, it is better to invest money on education facility instead of I pod.
      It can not make children study and it is useless near in the future.
      However, if they spend money to increas books in library or desk and chair in the classroom,
      it can make children to study efficiently.

    29. Re:really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In my opinion, it is better to spend the money on education facility instead of I pod.
      I pod can not make childrens study and it is useless because they will be lost or broken and some other reasons.
      That means it is going to waste money.
      If they spend money to increase books in library or buy desk and chair in the classroom.
      It can make children to study efficiently and keep using in the future for other childrens.

    30. Re:really? by mizzzy! · · Score: 1

      how about instead of handing out free ipods to kids who most likely will NOT use them for anything educational, they hand out free supplies to shelters for the poor or something of that nature? just an idea... seems like a pretty good idea to me...

      --
      ~mizzy
  2. Umm.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why not spend the money on text books or library books or classrooms or teachers? Or all four?

    1. Re:Umm.. by hey! · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well, the idea is that they'll be used kind of like text books, I guess.

      WRT to teachers, of course that's the best and surest way to improve education. Lower class size. If class size wasn't important than the elite in this country wouldn't be sending their kids to prep schools where classes are four or five students sitting around a table with a teacher.

      While increasing the number of qualified teaches is almost a surefire way of improving education, it's also the most expensive. Since it's the most expensive thing you deal with, often money is well spent just to improve the effectiveness of our use of teacher time. This means hiring aides to handle non-teaching chores, specialists in math and reading and so forth.

      My attitude toward something like this is like my attitude towards an Iraq troop surge: the idea itself is neither nor good nor bad, it depends on whether you have a credible plan to use them. I'm not saying that the iPod idea is a good one, but it is not necessarily bad. Just because iPods are a lot of fun doesn't mean they can't be used as serious educational tools. If money is tight, then creative ideas for marginal improvements are actually more worth looking at. If we were swimming in dough, the answer to the best use of our dough would be simple: reduce class sizes.

      I have a feeling that the idea will go down in flames, because the public instinct is exactly the opposite. When we're flush, we might consider something like this. When money is tight, we obsess about things we can't afford.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    2. Re:Umm.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I'm all against this OiPC (one iPod per child) program, as those poor starving kids should at least get more food and clean soda before being equipped with free Xboxes and iPods.

    3. Re:Umm.. by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      Teacher wages aren't that big of a problem here. Michigan has been in the top ten of states ranked based on wages for a long time, and almost the top based on benefits. I know several teachers in my private life too, and they aren't hurting by any stretch of the imagination. The biggest complaint is really bone-headed educational policies and bone-headed administration.

    4. Re:Umm.. by aussie_a · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Its called bread and circuses. The Democrats must be real desperate to get re-elected in Michigan.

    5. Re:Umm.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What are you basing your assertion that lower class size == better result? That's been shown time and time again not to be the case. You need look no further than class sizes in countries that consistently demonstrate a better academic result by focusing on academics rather than "social studies." Chicago Math, anyone?

      You might not even have to go outside the borders to do it. Private and parochial schools produce better educated students with large class sizes, *and* for less money than public schools.

      The problem is the mis-guided policies and curriculum of the government-controlled public schools - not the size of the classes.

      #permission to mod down for insufficiently leftist sentiment approved

    6. Re:Umm.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Japanese classrooms are signifigantly larger than American, yet they regularly beat the Americans in every subject. Class sizes are a myth.

    7. Re:Umm.. by linkedlinked · · Score: 3, Informative

      HAH! Why would they spend money on text books?
      At my (michigan) high school, we couldn't afford *PAPER* to stock the classrooms. If kids needed paper or a pencil at any time during the day, we were told with straight faces that we should go out in the hall and beg from friends.
      Meanwhile, across the road, we approved a multi-million dollar rennovation to our football stadium (yes, "stadium") which was already much nicer than most of the ones in the area; two of the best-liked teachers in the school (who were also the newest) got fired to help fund that. And we had a $300,000 camera surveillance system which, when four guys broke into my friends car and lit it on fire, did NO good identifying them (and most of the cameras were in the parking lot, for that matter). Between 6th grade and 12th grade, the district-wide price of a school lunch hiked from $1.75 to over $3.00, and I'm confident that the volume of the lunch went down over that period.

      I graduated last spring.

      I'm not at all surprised to hear that we're giving kids iPods instead of text books.

    8. Re:Umm.. by arpad1 · · Score: 1

      Japanese classrooms are significantly larger than American, yet they regularly beat the Americans in every subject. Class sizes are a myth. Not if you're a union rep or a unionized teacher. To them the words "smaller class size" is always followed by a "cha-ching".

      --
      Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum, minutus carborata descendum pantorum.
    9. Re:Umm.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think thats due to a culture difference. I've never been to either country, but from what I have seen in documentary's about American schools and what I have seen about Japanese culture is the Japanese culture is alot more education orientated.

      Also from living in the uk what I have found is people born in the country tend to not care so much about education as people who's family immigrated from other country's (normally third world) however this changes from culture to culture. England has alot of different cultures due to the common wealth.

      Chinese children tend to be pushed alot by there parents
      Nigerian same as above
      indian same as above

      so if you feel a classroom with Chinese or Indian kids (say about 60) they will tend to preform better then 60 English children.

    10. Re:Umm.. by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah? Well, a hundred and fifty years ago, class sizes in the US were a lot smaller, and large portions of the population couldn't even read.

      Don't compare two completely different things and pretend the difference is one variable. The main difference between Japanese and US schools, and this has been demonstrated over and over and over, is the level of involvement parents have in their education and the emphasis society place on it. In US schools the question is 'How do we get students to learn?' which is not a question in Japanese schools. (There, sadly, it's 'How do we keep students from cracking under the pressure and killing themselves?', which is a large problem that people who assert our schools should be more like Japanese ones might want to consider.)

      Meanwhile, in the US, average class size is almost directly proportional to the quality of the education, although that doesn't mean it causes it...high class size is almost always a sign of less money, and it's possible the lack of money is, in some other way, causing the failure to educate. Or it's possible that poor education and less money are both symptoms of some even more underlaying cause, like a fundamental neglect of the system or mismanagement of resources.

      However, there are many specific examples where class size was decreased with no other changes and student performance immediately improved. So there are certainly some oversized classes where lower class size would help. But there are also some classrooms that look oversized and are fairly poor performing where making them smaller would not help.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    11. Re:Umm.. by Paulrothrock · · Score: 1

      There's other advantages to those prep schools than class sizes. They don't have to accept all kids, meaning they can get rid of all but the best and brightest. They're also privately funded, so they can pay their teachers better and therefore get the better teachers.

      Imagine you were a teacher fresh out of school with a good GPA, and had the following choice: Work in a public school system where you have 35+ kids in a class, including kids with behavioral problems, and get paid $25,000 per year or work in a private school where you have 5-10 kids per class, which are all well behaved (or they'd be expelled) and intelligent, and you're making $35,000+/year. If you're not altruistic and want to "make a difference," you pick the private school.

      Now couple this with having the private school in a good neighborhood, or a better state, and the public school being in downtown Detroit, and you see the problem that Michigan public schools are having.

      --
      I'm in the hole of the broadband donut.
    12. Re:Umm.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's other advantages to those prep schools than class sizes. They don't have to accept all kids, meaning they can get rid of all but the best and brightest. They're also privately funded, so they can pay their teachers better and therefore get the better teachers.

      Taking your second point first, private dollars are no more valuable than public dollars, the only difference is how efficiently they are spent. BTW, I can guarantee you there are a hell of a lot of private schools that spend less per child on tuition than the local public schools, and with better results.

      As for the first claim, if you think that the "best and brightest" are cheaper to educate to their full potential than the "worst and dumbest," then I pray you never have a job in education. Public schools like smart kids because they are cheaper to educate to a certain level, and then they can spend the extra money trying to get the dumb kids to the same level. It doesn't do society any good to have all students equally mediocre, but that's what we are doing.

    13. Re:Umm.. by chaoticgeek · · Score: 1

      Chinese children tend to be pushed alot by there parents
      Nigerian same as above
      indian same as above

      so if you feel a classroom with Chinese or Indian kids (say about 60) they will tend to preform better then 60 English children. I kinda agree that children are pushed harder, except that it is used as a stereotype. I do quite well in school because my mother pushed me, and I'm a white guy. A lot of the problem is that the students are not motivated by their parents and view school as something they have to stick around till they can drop out. Many don't realize that without a high school and college education they will end up just like their parents working paycheck to paycheck. But they are not taught things like this and not pushed to do their best in school.
      --
      hello
    14. Re:Umm.. by hey! · · Score: 1

      You can't make the kind of inferences you are making with the examples you cite. You have to look at similar groups with different class sizes, not different groups with different class sizes. For example, as somebody else notes Japanese class sizes are larger than US class sizes. But Japanese kids also attend additional cram schools and often get private tutoring.

      In controlled research, class size reduction shows academic improvement. Period.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    15. Re:Umm.. by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1

      What are you basing your assertion that lower class size == better result? The "class size" theory in US public schools is entirely based on discipline, not any direct relationship between the number of students and how well they learn. My mother teaches algebra to 8th graders (or tries to, anyway). According to her, most teachers are poor disciplinarians. Combine that with children who have essentially been left to raise themselves by disinterested parents, and you have a recipe for chaos. Orderly, hyper-polite, conformist Japanese children can learn in a class of fifty kids? Holy shit, what a fucking surprise! Is it really any surprise that in this age of mandatory mainstreaming that the classrooms are madhouses? Imagine a class where three kids are mildly autistic, eight are chronic discipline problems (who can't be kicked out), and 5 are just not ready to learn algebra at age 13. How easy is it going to be to teach the remaining 15 who are ready to learn? When classes reach a certain size, the number of "troublemakers" reaches the point where most of the class time is spent reining them in.
      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    16. Re:Umm.. by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1

      As for the first claim, if you think that the "best and brightest" are cheaper to educate to their full potential than the "worst and dumbest," then I pray you never have a job in education. It's not that one is cheaper than the other, it's that the discipline problems inherent to public schools drag everyone down by wasting time and attention. Plenty of time to teach the good kids (be they smart or dumb) if you can simply tell the bad ones "you're outta' here". Can't do that in a public school.
      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    17. Re:Umm.. by FLEB · · Score: 1

      Also from living in the uk what I have found is people born in the country tend to not care so much about education as people who's family immigrated from other country's (normally third world) however this changes from culture to culture.

      One point I've heard to explain that is that a country's emigrants are the people with the drive and ability to move out, while a country's goobers and losers end up staying in the home country. It makes sense.

      --
      Information wants to be free.
      Entertainment wants to be paid.
      You just want to be cheap.
    18. Re:Umm.. by yada21 · · Score: 1

      Meanwhile, in the US, average class size is almost directly proportional to the quality of the education
      directly? You mean inversely.
      --
      I will have a sig when the market demands it.
    19. Re:Umm.. by Descalzo · · Score: 1

      In controlled research, class size reduction shows academic improvement. Period.
      It's not quite that simple (but maybe you're including that in your definition of 'controlled research.')

      Class size reduction works when you are able to hire good teachers. If you hire crappy teachers to fill the vacancies you create by reducing class size, then you see no net improvement. The instructional quality is less in the crap-teacher classrooms, and much better in the good teacher classrooms. Apparently this has been found to be most effective in grades 1-3, and the effects last through the 12th grade.

      --
      I cried real tears when Li Mu Bai died.
    20. Re:Umm.. by MisterBeowulf · · Score: 1

      That is America my friend!

      You have to get out or learn a little more about the world out of the US, to convince your self that the country that you live in is not as good as you think, as your leaders and your media makes you think.
      Wake up Americans, stop being zombies.

    21. Re:Umm.. by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 2, Funny
      Ever seen Mr Holland's Opus?

      Some choice quotes:

      • "I care about these kids just as much as you do. And if I'm forced to choose between Mozart and reading and writing and long division, I choose long division." "Well, I guess you can cut the arts as much as you want, Gene. Sooner or later, these kids aren't going to have anything to read or write about."
      • [on the football coach lamenting to the just-sacked music teacher that he'd be the next to go] "The day they cut the football budget in this state, that will be the end of Western Civilization as we know it!"
    22. Re:Umm.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, a hundred and fifty years ago, class sizes in the US were a lot smaller, and large portions of the population couldn't even read. Actually, even larger portions of the population can't read today. Just look at Washington D.C. where 1/3 of the population does not have functional literacy. http://www.cnn.com/2007/EDUCATION/03/19/adult.lite racy.ap/index.html

      Back in 1840, literacy rates were 90% and above in the US. And that was complex literacy. What would have been a 5th grade text in 1840 is now college material.

      Learning to read is not difficult for somebody who's self-motivated. And nearly everybody wants to, until someone (usually a teacher or some "expert specialist") comes along, administers a test, and says, "you're dyslexic, a slow learner, stupid, or x,y,z diagnosis." That's plenty to take the wind out of your sails for a while.

      Why do educators make a big fu$$ about reading? They're always arguing about phonics vs. whole-word, switching between versions of the two every couple years, depending on what's trendy in the education schools. But really, learning the alphabet and the sounds they make takes less than 30 hours. After that, there's nothing left to be taught. It's up to the student to make a private appointment with themself and practice using the alphabet key to unlock written language.

      I have found that John Taylor Gatto's books on the underground history of modern schooling are a good place to start in understanding how all of this has come about. His last book is available for free in HTML on his website: http://www.johntaylorgatto.com/

    23. Re:Umm.. by budgenator · · Score: 1

      The Democrats must be real desperate to get re-elected in Michigan.
      I don't seeing a Democratic administration being elected in Michigan, Granholm on her second term and that'll be it for her, and the state has been driven into the ground durring her watch.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    24. Re:Umm.. by Willuknight · · Score: 1

      In US schools the question is 'How do we get students to learn?' which is not a question in Japanese schools. (There, sadly, it's 'How do we keep students from cracking under the pressure and killing themselves?', which is a large problem that people who assert our schools should be more like Japanese ones might want to consider.)

      Um, i think your talking out of your hat there. The problem of kids not learning is equally relevant in Japan. I read several blogs by teachers, and have a close friend who teaches over there. Their biggest problem is that they have very little authority over the children. It's largely the case that the only requirement for passing high school, is being still alive at the end of it. Many kids skip entire years of school, showing up only to get their graduaction certificate. They don't expell kids nor to they have dentention.

      Note, im not talking about Japanese Universities, which are renoun for being difficult to gain admission to, and if one wants to attend, they need to bucke down and seriously study - unlike the american system which seems that you only need enough money to go.
      --
      Do not anger the Karma Whores, for they don't bathe often, and might decide to come visit you in person. -Ryan Amos
    25. Re:Umm.. by yada21 · · Score: 1

      private dollars are no more valuable than public dollars, the only difference is how efficiently they are spent.
      Wrong. Private dollars are indeed worth more - because there's more of them. Which proves in itself that free markets are good, and state monopoly's are bad.
      --
      I will have a sig when the market demands it.
    26. Re:Umm.. by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      Yeah, cause we all know dyslexia is completely made up with no basis in fact.

      Why do educators make a big fu$$ about reading? They're always arguing about phonics vs. whole-word, switching between versions of the two every couple years, depending on what's trendy in the education schools. But really, learning the alphabet and the sounds they make takes less than 30 hours. After that, there's nothing left to be taught. It's up to the student to make a private appointment with themself and practice using the alphabet key to unlock written language.

      What are you talking about? No educator makes a big fuss about reading. They make a big fuss if someone can't read by a certain point, as well they should, but the fact they disagree how to teach reading isn't why certain segments of the population can't read. Educators disagree about the 'best' ways to do a lot of things.

      Functional illiteracy is due to a failure much later in the education process than people actually learn to 'read'. It's due to middle and high schools that act as nothing more than babysitters, and children that are never really required to read anything past a verification they can sound out the word 'cat'. This sucks, obviously, but it doesn't have anything to do with 'How should they learn to read in elementary school?' debates. Functional illiterates can, in fact, 'read'. They can turn letters into words and know what what the words mean. They just have no practice at understanding sentences.

      Reading is like driving a car, you actually have to do it a few times before you can operate a car, no matter if you've memorized what all the signs mean. It's a very sad commentary on our schools that people manage to get through them without that practice, and just 'theory' in reading, but I'll point out that illiteracy is going down as you go down in age. And a large part of youth illiteracy is due to speaking English as a second language. Remove that, and I'd wager that no more than a tiny faction of a percent of people who get a high school diploma are functional illiterate. (Of course, now you have to ask yourself: What's the dropout rate in DC?) To get out of HS anywhere, you have to read several novels, and even if you cheat and read cliff notes, you still have to read the cliff notes.

      No, the failure of people to read doesn't have anything to do with 'How should we teach reading' and your idea that they diagnose dyslexia and learning disabilities to make excuses for kids is just silly. Identifying those kids is incredibly helpful in actually teaching them how to read, especially dyslexia. Once dyslexia is identified, they have specific tricks they teach them that make it fairly easy for them to read normally. And even for learning disabled and actual mentally handicapped kids, basic reading is one of the things they try very hard to teach. (That, and basic math so they can use money.) So the idea that overdiagnosing disabilities is somehow leading to functional illiteracy makes no sense.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    27. Re:Umm.. by union76 · · Score: 1

      I like your analogy: learning to read is like learning to drive a vehicle. It takes a whole lot of practice. So, in the US, why does the government hand out driver's licenses so easily, considering that a car can be used as a deadly weapon? Forget gun control when anyone can make a 20gal-gasoline bomb on 2-ton chassis with wheels. They give a piece-o-cake written exam, and eventually a short road test. And almost everyone eventually passes. Why is it so easy? The government needs people to commute, of course, for the economy to run. But also, in this case, the government trusts people to avoid killing themselves. And most people don't want to die, so they've got to take driving, at least a little bit, seriously.

      But, why do have all these expert specialists in schools telling kids they've got a problem and will need extensive hours of specialized training, etc.?

      Let's take the driving analogy again. What if you've got a parent or a driving instructor that continually butts in and says, "no, you're too clumsy, so you'd better jump rope for a couple hours and take an etiquette class before you learn to drive." Or, "gee, you've a little bit nearsighted, but instead of getting you a $50 pair of eye glasses to correct the problem, let's get you a telescope so you'll be able to see extra well!" With all these experts continually dispensing advice on a problem, is there any time or self-confidence left for the individual to address the problem themself? Many reading problems are easily self-fixed without "expert" interference.

      Let's take "dyslexia" again. What the heck is it really? It's definition has been so convoluted that it virtually has no significance. scholar-google it or check out this TV report from the UK:
      http://www.channel4.com/news/microsites/D/dyslexia _myth/dyslexia.html

      Yes, dyslexia can be neurologically-based, but it's a very small percentage of the population. And a proper diagnosis is extremely helpful. But what about the kids who've got something else going on (some kind of reading disorder) and get misdiagnosed as having dyslexia? Now, they're totally screwed. They're taught to trust an expert, and not themselves. Would you want to learn to drive this way: "I've been told my memory is not so good, and I'm not sure the accelerator is on the right side, so I'd better use my cellphone to ask my driving instructor before I do anything." Yes, some kids see right through the schooling crap, and figure it out for themselves. But, others get stuck in this I-need-help-from-an-expert mentality for perpetuity. Corporations and the health care industry are quite happy with this kind of thinking.

      Back to teaching technology in the classroom... Whom would you rather hire as a security consultant: the "perfect" student who obeyed all instructions, completed the required assignments, but had no ambition to learn anything beyond what was taught in class, or the student who completed only some of the assignments because s/he wass too busy figuring out how to bypass security settings, installing software (games or whatever), and poking around on "secured" servers? Frankly, having all kids have ipods for the intended purposes would be a joke and a waste of money. But, the unavoidable temptation for non-sanctioned tinkering would definitely help motivate "unmotivated" kids.

    28. Re:Umm.. by union76 · · Score: 1

      So, what do the elite private schools actually *do* that makes them so much better? Or is it the things they don't do? These elite private schools don't seem to spend a lot of money on technology and such. If you look at places like Groten and Sidwell Friends, their classrooms look pretty abysmal compared to some public schools: no LCDs, no computers, no TVs, no fancy gadgets.

      Why do private schools collect so much money, yet spend little of that directly on the students? The virtues that private schools stress don't cost much money, but the students generally come out well educated. Is there something to be learned by the public schools here?

    29. Re:Umm.. by irc.goatse.cx+troll · · Score: 1

      I don't see the point of using ipods though. Unless you equip every teacher with a mic hooked up to some central server to podcast everything, ipods really are not a good education device. At least give the students something with a mic in it so they can record classes on their own, and even their own notes seperately.

      Or give the kids cheap tablets or laptops (OLPC?), so they can actually use them for research and as a viable textbook alternative.

      --
      Pain lasts, kid. Its how you know you're alive. Sometimes I think this growing up thing is just pain management-TheMaxx
    30. Re:Umm.. by QMO · · Score: 1

      For a small dataset, consider my experiences looking for teaching jobs.

      In my experience, private schools pay teachers LESS on average than public schools, and (consequently) have LESS stringent requirements for their teachers.

      Parental involvement and priorities are so much more important than teacher quality* that students from poorly taught/equipped private classrooms often manage to get educated as well as their public school counterparts.

      *Parental involvement is also more important than: age of textbooks, violence in school, class size, technology available, funding, leaky roofs and most "behavior disorders".

      --
      Exam 4/C again. Maybe I'll do better this time.
    31. Re:Umm.. by N3WBI3 · · Score: 1
      Lower class size. If class size wasn't important than the elite in this country wouldn't be sending their kids to prep schools where classes are four or five students sitting around a table with a teacher.

      How do you explain Catholic schools which have classes about the same size, and significantly outperform public schools? How do you explain that some of these elite acadamies cost parent 6K per year (Half of what is spent per student in Minneapolis, and Nearly a thrid of what is spent in DC). The fact is the public schools are so busy making diversity, the environment, and political correctness part of their core that they are leaving out providing a quality education.

      --
    32. Re:Umm.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't believe the government spend that much of money for electronic stuff for kid. If the government spend money for school, they upgrade kid's lunch meal, class environment, level of teacher and library. I guess it is not a good idea of spending citizen's money for entertainment stuff to all kids.

      How do they make to pay tax from parents who don't have a kid?
      Then, parents who have 2 or 3 kids have to pay more than who have one kid?
      When and how long do parents have to pay tax? until their children get 21?

      It may help to make benefit from computer store, music and video industry and internet connection provider.

    33. Re:Umm.. by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      Yes, dyslexia can be neurologically-based, but it's a very small percentage of the population. And a proper diagnosis is extremely helpful. But what about the kids who've got something else going on (some kind of reading disorder) and get misdiagnosed as having dyslexia? Now, they're totally screwed.

      Oh my God! Kids who have some sort of reading disability will have...individual..instruction to help...them...read...no, wait, what was the issue here again?

      With all these experts continually dispensing advice on a problem, is there any time or self-confidence left for the individual to address the problem themself? Many reading problems are easily self-fixed without "expert" interference.

      Yeah, cause that's the problem. The kids just, um, were busy earlier when everyone else was learning to read. They may be a few years behind everyone else, but if we just stand around doing nothing I'm sure they'll fix the problem themselves!

      What are you talking about? Do you know anything about education? Did you even go to a school? You can't ignore children lagging behind their grade level in something and just hope they're magically going to catch up, especially in reading, which would cause them to lag everywhere.

      Yes, some kids see right through the schooling crap, and figure it out for themselves. But, others get stuck in this I-need-help-from-an-expert mentality for perpetuity. Corporations and the health care industry are quite happy with this kind of thinking.

      No, you think kids get stuck in something like that, but in reality, they don't. It doesn't matter what is called 'dyslexia' and what isn't. Kids who are behind in reading but without any other obvious learning disabilities need, duh, a specific kind of help.

      The only other options are to stand by and do nothing, waiting as they get further and further behind, or to treat them as having a generic learning disability, and putting them in special education, both of which behaviors are clearly stupid.

      You want to talk about setting expectations for them, how would they feel when they constantly lag behind due to their reading difficulties? Or how would they feel in 4th grade being put in classes with people who have trouble adding 18+5? (Especially if such people can read better than them!)

      What exactly is the solution you're proposing here besides a teacher saying 'You appear to have dyslexia (Or whatever word you want to use), we're going to give you a special tutor for a bit and you'll be fine.'?

      Maybe where you come from there's some sort of special stigmata on 'dyslexia' or something, but the rest of us have no idea what you're talking about. You can argue medically or scientifically that it's not a 'real disorder' or whatever, and for all I know you're right. But if it is, as various people claim, just code for 'children who appear to have normal intelligence but have trouble reading', that doesn't have a damn thing to do with whether or not we should identify such children and give them some extra help.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    34. Re:Umm.. by union76 · · Score: 1

      The kids just, um, were busy earlier when everyone else was learning to read. They may be a few years behind everyone else, but if we just stand around doing nothing I'm sure they'll fix the problem themselves! No, you think kids get stuck in something like that, but in reality, they don't. It doesn't matter what is called 'dyslexia' and what isn't. Kids who are behind in reading but without any other obvious learning disabilities need, duh, a specific kind of help.

      So, how did the following folks survive in life: Ben Franklin, Michael Faraday, Frank Lloyd Wright, Albert Einstein, Craig Venter, Bill Gates, Michael Dell, Steve Jobs, etc etc etc? I don't think they got any special help from their schools teachers.

      In fact, half of them flunked out of elementary school, and the other half never made it through college (at least the first time around). Have you noticed that the most successful people in the world tend to have little time or respect for institutional schooling and the experts within?

      So, back your question. What DO we do for these struggling kids? Well, you alluded to peer pressure, which is a very powerful motivator indeed. It sure does not feel good to be a 12-year-old kid in school that can't do the nominal things a 9-year-old can do, and so on. But, is age-segregated schooling really necessary in the first place? In real life, does this kind of segregation exist to this degree? Imagine walking into a restaurant, and being asked what decade you belong to, so you can be seated accordingly. Also, is there a truly a perfect time to learn to read, for example? Consider a kid who learns to read at age 4. That's kinda early, but she's still "normal" intellectually, medically, etc. And then there's a kid who learns to read at age 9. He's naturally slow, but perfectly in the bounds of being normal too. But in school, they get labeled and diagnosed differently. The 4-year-old is "gifted and talented." The 9-year-old is bound for mediocrity in "special ed."

      I don't know what the solution is, but it's not throwing more money toward specialists and technology. I think you underestimate the power of the individual will. If a kid is ready and motivated to learn to read, she'll do it on her own time, or ask for help from a parent. If a student in the LA ghetto wants to learn calculus, he can do it if he studies hard (check out Jaime Escalante). Maybe he'll be motivated by his peers, maybe he'll be inspired by a special teacher, or maybe he'll be motivated by his own curiosity. But, stuffing prescribed shit down his throat just because the school says so is counter-productive. The solution is getting kids out of our modern government schools, and into true learning environments. What better place than the home and community!? Are all parents effective educators? No, some are really crummy and horrific parents. But, what makes a government teacher more qualified, and why should we automatically trust them? Yes, some have advanced degrees in science, mathematics, and so forth. But, what guarantee of success is that? Is that the only benchmark? There is surprising little what the government actually knows about its teachers. And what makes parents so unfit that they can't give their children a basic education, or at least point them in the direction of somebody who's a true expert in a field they are interested in? Instead, we've got parents who have no confidence in themselves, and this is largely due to the fact that they've been through the government schools and were taught to "trust the school expert."

      There's no overnight solution, no silver bullet to the problem. Throwing more money at government schools ain't gonna work--it's been done before. The schools have gone through countless reforms, but nothing really changes once the fad wears off. My parents were school teachers for over 30 years, teaching in both ghettos and affluent schools. They can attest to the fact that the power to get any real change done is spread too thinl

    35. Re:Umm.. by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      Ben Franklin, Michael Faraday, Frank Lloyd Wright, Albert Einstein, Craig Venter, Bill Gates, Michael Dell, Steve Jobs, etc etc I don't think they got any special help from their schools teachers.

      In fact, half of them flunked out of elementary school, and the other half never made it through college (at least the first time around).

      Every single one of those people except Ben Franklin and Michael Faraday graduated high school, and those two didn't do it because, duh, education was vastly different 200+ years ago, and there was no 'high school'.

      Albert Einstein and Craig Venter both earned their college degree, although Venter had a war in the middle and Einstein has unsupported and probably untrue rumors he wasn't good at math in school. The last threes are people who dropped out of college to start tech companies that was very influential, but that's almost entirely an accident of historical timing within the computer industry boom. And, yes, if you have Frank Lloyd Wright's skill, you do not need to graduate college. Good luck with that plan.

      I don't know what a random list of people you've asserted you 'don't think got any help from their school teacher' have anything to do with dyslexia. Those people are not dyslexia, as far as anyone knows. And you have no idea how their schooling went.

      And I really like the fact you don't like how impersonal and mechanized schools are and use that to...argue against personal instruction and help for people who are behind. Yeah, that make a lot of sense, thanks for that argument.

      Ironically, I agree with you 90% about how schools are failures, but, frankly, you're a fucking moron when it comes to learning and reading disabilities. People who can't seem to learn to read when everyone else can need help learning to read, and that is done through the classification of them as 'dyslexic' and assigning special resources to them to help them catch up. Somehow you've gone from 'The classification of dyslexia is stupid. It's a spectrum and some of it's not related at all.', which is a valid, yet slightly silly, claim, to 'We shouldn't bother identifying students who are behind in reading, despite the lack of reading hindering their entire education'.

      And I don't know in what universe when you're taught to read determines how 'slow' or 'gifted' you are. I think I pretty clearly explained that dyslexia is not a standard learning disability, and thus it doesn't put you in special ed. And reading 'gifted' to mean 'smarter' is idiotic. 'gifted' students are ahead of other students, and learn quicker, so are put in classes that teach them faster. They are the opposite of learning disabled. (Which is why the gifted program is also 'special education'.) It doesn't have anything to do with reading or what skills you show up to kindergarten with, in fact, gifted programs don't normally exist until third or fourth grade, and entrance to those is based on testing.

      As for being 'special education', some kids have actual problems learning, aka, learning disabilities, and some are just behind, either because they develop slowly, or because of something else. Special ed teach put a lot of work put into to catching up the second category, at least to one year behind and then holding them back, and getting them out of special ed, or at least having them in a normal classroom 95% of the time. If you're a 6th grader with a 5th grade education, you don't need to be in a slow 6th grader class, you need to be in a normal 5th grader one. This is called 'holding them back', and I like how you think you've invented that idea.

      It's really ironic how you're against schools doing things correctly: Teaching students at the level they are at, instead of their grade level and/or age, and giving those who are behind in one thing but nothing else special help in that one thing. You've somehow managed to come to the complete opposite conclusion, that this a

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
  3. Who will monitor the usage? by ShadowFalls · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It is hard to see how they could keep these iPods from being used for purposes other than educational. Who pays for stolen ones or broken ones? Some parents can't afford one to give to their kids on their own, to replace one would be atrocious. In the end, this is just more politicians wasting time on things that do not really matter instead of focusing on the things that do.

    1. Re:Who will monitor the usage? by BakaHoushi · · Score: 1

      You mean politicians would waste millions of dollars on pointless, useless, expensive "solutions" that would only worsen the problem, all in the name of being re-elected?

      Honestly, that's too crazy and unheard of.

    2. Re:Who will monitor the usage? by CFrankBernard · · Score: 1

      > Who pays for stolen ones or broken ones?

      Exactly. And if it is slightly damaged or obviously scuffed? If it is allegedly stolen? We will hear: "So what if Johnny's devices have been 'stolen' 4 times. We have to provide him another device like everyone else because he's now at a disadvantage in learning and socializing with his peers; his psychological and mental health are at stake!"

      And then what happens when that model of device is no longer available? "What? Michelle has a better device than the rest of us?"

  4. obligatory by holywarrior21c · · Score: 0

    I for one welcome our 640k michigan kids on a ipod wheel lords... taxsuckers. -- samsung yp-u1 2gb, snap!

  5. This is a horrible idea. by forkazoo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Or, at least, it is a horrible idea unless I can manage to be declared eligible.

    Seriously, how about spending the millions of dollars on teachers? I just can't see any real requirement for a DAP for educational purposes. Want the students to be able to listen to lectures as home? Put MP3's on the school website and let students listen to them at the computer or put them on their own DAP. Need students to be able to listen to audio on their own while in class? 30 million dollars buys a lot of blank CD-R's, and CD players are a hell of a lot less expensive than iPods.

    30 million dollars also buys a hell of a lot of teacher bonuses. IMNSHO, Investing in teachers will have more of a benefit than whatever hair brained scheme they have cooked up for the iPods.

    1. Re:This is a horrible idea. by PhoenixAtlantios · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's sad that I managed to decipher IMNSHO without pausing to process it, even though I've never seen it before. The Internet has corrupted me =(

      I have to agree with the idea of investing money in teachers instead of the students though. Plans to give students free iPods and PSPs just seem to be extremely short sighted, as when given the choice between working and playing games/music I'm fairly sure I know which one most teenagers would choose. Giving the teachers laptops, maybe giving them Broadband for free at home, etc. would likely have a more beneficial effect on learning.

    2. Re:This is a horrible idea. by rucs_hack · · Score: 1

      Its an interesting idea.

      If some of the free content producers (podcasters etc) got their act together and offered content as well as the paid content producers, it might take off.

      I'm in favour of audio teaching material. My son is accustomed to listening to audio lectures and books whilst playing his games now. It's not perfect, but as an extra to his normal studies it seems to work.

      Unfortunately its likely that this will turn out to be yet another idealised liberal concept that fails in the face of cold hard reality, perpetuated for several years in spite of obvious failure in order to delay collapse so the people who organised it can save face.

      too pessimistic?

    3. Re:This is a horrible idea. by Punch-Drunk+Slob · · Score: 0

      What's so horrible about this?

      --
      By the pricking of my thumbs, Something wicked this way comes: Open, locks, whoever knocks!
    4. Re:This is a horrible idea. by cheater512 · · Score: 1

      Even if it fails its not that big of a deal. Its actually pretty cool.
      Lets face it, 30 odd million is pocket change for the government.

    5. Re:This is a horrible idea. by suv4x4 · · Score: 5, Funny

      This is a horrible idea. Seriously, how about spending the millions of dollars on teachers?

      You could spend the money on teachers, but will this give your kids THE BEST MUSIC PLAYER in the world? I don't think so.
      Everyone could come up with the idea of giving the teachers money. But we have to DARE to be DIFFERENT. This is what distinguishes a follower from a leader. Are you a follower or a leader?

      So, I think it's an INCREDIBLE IDEA. It's the BEST. IDEA. IN THE WORLD. EVER.

      And that's nothing, EVERY KID IN AMERICA should have an iPod. Hell, every kid in the world should have one. Why spend all this money on inventing and producing OLPC, when iPod is here. Does OLPC even have headphones? Does it have a clickwheel? NO, it has a keyboard. Keyboards ARE BORING.

      I know it, you know it, and the children know it: THIS is what really iPod is: raising the IQ of the children!

      - Steve J.

    6. Re:This is a horrible idea. by gafisher · · Score: 1

      http://www.recallgranholm.com/ is one reaction for about 75% of Michigan. The state's schools have fallen behind almost as badly as its economy under "Generous Genny" Granholm's governance, but now that her Party has control of the State House her solution to every problem has been to tax what's left of Michigan's worst-in-the-nation economy to pay for a spending spree Louis XIV never dreamed of.

      It might be possible to defend supplying MP3 players, even iPods, to some students if those players were used to store lectures, language practice, famous speeches, even music lessons for those in related classes, but now that it's come to light that these are/were to be iPod Shuffle players, which present content in random order, even the most liberal interpretation of this proposal falls apart.

      However, even if this was a really good idea, it's just not defensible to throw an untried ed-tech experiment into a public school system that trails the nation despite above average per-pupil spending in a state that's expelling businesses and seeing taxpayers drop out as badly -- and as quickly -- as is happening in Michigan.

    7. Re:This is a horrible idea. by Yvanhoe · · Score: 1

      This is not a federal budget. It is a state budget.

      --
      The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
    8. Re:This is a horrible idea. by canUbeleiveIT · · Score: 5, Informative

      I have to agree with the idea of investing money in teachers instead of the students though.

      I am so tired of hearing about how underpaid teachers are. It's like a mantra that people just repeat and repeat without giving a whole lot of thought to. While it holds true for private schools, public school teachers have it pretty good.

      Teachers' salaries in Michigan are among the highest in the nation at an average $54,474/year. And that's with an average education just slightly higher than a B.A.. In my area the state university's Teacher's College has the lowest average SAT & GPA of all of the programs in the school.

      In addition, they only work 9 months out of the year and have every weekend, holiday and summer off. If a teacher chooses to work the entire year (teaching summer school), like most of us, he/she would make $72K. Add the excellent bennies that most public school employees have and I have a hard time shedding too many tears for them.

    9. Re:This is a horrible idea. by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 1

      30 million dollars also buys a hell of a lot of teacher bonuses.

      I think the problem is that the PO's already been signed, so the teachers would have to take their bonuses in iPods.

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
    10. Re:This is a horrible idea. by Nasarius · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's sad that I managed to decipher IMNSHO without pausing to process it, even though I've never seen it before. The Internet has corrupted me =(
      You think that's bad? In the past couple weeks, I instantly deciphered GMAFB and GAS (in the context of guitar/bass players). I think I need a break.
      --
      LOAD "SIG",8,1
    11. Re:This is a horrible idea. by rbannon · · Score: 3, Informative

      I work in a state funded school where 65% (contact hours) of the teaching is done by very low paid part-timers. To give you an idea of how low paid, a typical course is $1,500 (maximum $2,250) for a four month semester. These teachers are not given any benefits and can be fired at any time. Salaries at my school are only reported for full-timers, so wages may seem high. Yes, I know teachers who are making more than $100,000! Yikes, that hurts, especially when my take home pay after 20 years is less than $400/week (I'm tenured and full time). I am also highly qualified, with an MS (engineering) from an Ivy League school.

      So please stop looking at what your government wants to tell you about teacher wages --- they're only reporting full-timers!

      -rB

    12. Re:This is a horrible idea. by canUbeleiveIT · · Score: 1

      Actually I got my info from the American Federation of Teachers. Sorry, it's a pdf.

    13. Re:This is a horrible idea. by Doctor+Memory · · Score: 1

      Investing in teachers will have more of a benefit I agree, but it's harder to do something like raise salaries or benefits, since that requires perpetual funding. While I understand you said "bonuses", which wouldn't require additional funding, with that scheme you need someone to establish bonus performance criteria, then someone to collect and monitor the performance, and someone to issue the bonuses (after providing reports to all concerned parties), and someone to provide oversight — that's probably enough work for a small-to-medium sized administrative consulting company, which will either cost more money (nowhere near $38M, granted), or decrease the bonus pool substantially.

      I did not RTFA, but I hope that it uses "iPod" as a euphemism for DAP. I see no compelling reason to pay the premium for an iPod when a variety of equivalent (for this purpose) players are available for less money. Unless, of course, Apple is offering some kind of educational discount, but it would have to be pretty hefty to make the iPod a compelling choice.
      --
      Just junk food for thought...
    14. Re:This is a horrible idea. by bbernard · · Score: 1

      Has anybody checked the local economy in Michigan lately? Let's look at the pillars of their industry.

      1. Paper industry. This one has been on the way out for about a decade at least. Fortunately, they've laid off about everyone they can already.
      2. Chrysler/Ford/General Motors. Survey anybody who works for one of these companies, or for any of the thousands of companies that were built to do business with them, and I doubt you'll see too many of them who think they'll have jobs within the next 5 years.
      3. Pharmasuticals. Well yes, these companies are, in general, doing ok. However, they've been pulling out of Michigan for some time now.

      All this leads to the question: When there's not enough jobs for people in the state, and you can't sell your home because nobody is moving into Michigan (unless it's a cabin in the woods) so you can't afford to leave, are you really going to believe that the best use of your tax dollars is buying every kid a music player?

      For crying out loud Michigan! Figure out how to create some jobs, not how to isolate kids by ensuring they don't ever talk or interact with others because they've got ear-buds in all day.

      I'll get off my soap box now.

      --
      ----- Connection reset by beer
    15. Re:This is a horrible idea. by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      I live in Michigan, I have a child in the school system and I can tell you, its horrible. So bad that last year I pulled her and put her into a private school even though we cant afford it. I live in one of the best rated school districts in Michigan and the schools suck. The kids run rampant, the level of education is horrible. They spend money on silly crap instead of competent teachers and are more interested in consumerism than education.

      Biggest problem is the schools that pay the most don't have the best teachers, they get the oldest teachers. The ones that are more interested in retirement than teaching. MY daughter had in 7th grade 3 teachers that basically did nothing their entire last year so the kids learned nothing. And let metell you the ratio of teachers that actually care abou the kids education drops drastically as you get closer to that retirement age.

      Unfortunately the real teachers that care about kids and their education are in the inner city schools and low paying schools. The ones that took a job that paid slightly better than Burger-King and has to deal with school violence are there for the kids and their education. Because private schools typically dont have the Tenure crap and do not tolerate union garbage the teachers have to do their job and educate. Because they also have far smaller classes they can accelerate the smarter ones and do things that the public schools cant. This year the kids in the physics class will be going to Great America, before riding any ride they have to calculate the G forces and rates of acceleration as well as angular forces of each ride, bonus points for calculating the KW energy needed for each to run as well.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    16. Re:This is a horrible idea. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      You could spend the money on teachers, but will this give your kids THE BEST MUSIC PLAYER in the world? I don't think so.
      Everyone could come up with the idea of giving the teachers money. But we have to DARE to be DIFFERENT. This is what distinguishes a follower from a leader. Are you a follower or a leader?

      So, I think it's an INCREDIBLE IDEA. It's the BEST. IDEA. IN THE WORLD. EVER.

      And that's nothing, EVERY KID IN AMERICA should have an iPod. Hell, every kid in the world should have one. Why spend all this money on inventing and producing OLPC, when iPod is here. Does OLPC even have headphones? Does it have a clickwheel? NO, it has a keyboard. Keyboards ARE BORING.

      I know it, you know it, and the children know it: THIS is what really iPod is: raising the IQ of the children!

      - Steve J.


      How much do you want to bet that this guy is a kid from Michigan?

    17. Re:This is a horrible idea. by Lumpy · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hi Im senator lumpy and I am looking for support for the "give america grilles bill S158774-2". Children all over are forced to go out in public without a grille in their mouth causing ridicule and low self esteem. Giving every child in america a grille will help their education.

      Wont you think of the children? Call your Senators and Represenatives and say you support S158774-2.

      BTW: ignore the minor text at the back that says the bill also invokes martial law in the USA.

      Thank you and God bless america!

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    18. Re:This is a horrible idea. by aussie_a · · Score: 0

      before riding any ride they have to calculate the G forces and rates of acceleration as well as angular forces of each ride, bonus points for calculating the KW energy needed for each to run as well. Oh that's so cute! You actually believe they're going to do it.
    19. Re:This is a horrible idea. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quote:

      "I am also highly qualified, with an MS (engineering) from an Ivy League school."

      All that education for take-home pay of $400 a week? Why not put it to use somewhere else that will pay you better?

      Oh yeah, I almost forgot: Those who can, do. Those who can't teach.

      I suppose you "can't".

    20. Re:This is a horrible idea. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You seriously, seriously, need to work somewhere else. If you're good at teaching, you're being ripped off.

    21. Re:This is a horrible idea. by arpad1 · · Score: 1

      It'll be a lot more interesting an idea when some state that isn't in the toilet economically boosts their test scores via iPod. Until then it's just another half-assed idea put forth by people who aren't held responsible for results.

      --
      Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum, minutus carborata descendum pantorum.
    22. Re:This is a horrible idea. by eunos94 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Having several public school teachers in my family and having taught myself for awhile, I can tell you first hand, your analysis of their economic situation is WAY off base. While teachers receive a decent salary, for many it is just that, a salary. They don't get paid for the countless hours they spend outside of school getting their work done.

      You can't plan and organize a class during the time your teaching, you have to do it at home. And holidays? Please. Most of those days are spent fulfilling silly requirements for the state for continuing education seminars. Or grading 150 essays. Or going to the store to buy the materials your school district is too poor to pay for. Or buy supplies for kids whose parents don't have jobs and there's no support network to buy the kids backpacks or pencils. Never mind the afterschool meetings, the evenings calls with parents, the weekends spent in the school preparing for the next week...the list goes on.

      Nevermind the fact that Michigan's public school teachers are probably some of the highest paid because of basically Oakland County. IIRC, Oakland county is in the top 5 richest counties in the country. There's a ton of money being tossed around there and honestly, it has some of the best schools in the state. Strangely, money seems to be buying a better education.

      No one's asking public school teachers to be remunerated like brain surgeons, but at least create some incentives to excel at what you do. Seems like the harder you work in public schools, the more likely you are to get the jobs that there's just no pay for.

    23. Re:This is a horrible idea. by eunos94 · · Score: 1

      After looking it up, it appears Oakland County has sagged a little lately. Still in the top 25 or 30, but not top 5 any more. Que sera sera.

    24. Re:This is a horrible idea. by maxume · · Score: 1

      There are about 6 million people here, so it is $5 a person. The state collected a lot more than that from me.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    25. Re:This is a horrible idea. by maxume · · Score: 1

      You guys should get together and start a website to go back in time and unbreak the auto industry. Blaming Granholm for Michigan's economic woes is just insane.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    26. Re:This is a horrible idea. by DavidTC · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I like how people, when talking about how much teachers work, love to mention the fact they're only working 9 months a year. And then add in 'and holidays'. Um, no, not 'and holidays'. Teachers have to work 190 days or so, which barely fits in 9 months without holidays. School years are actually 10 months, with a month of holidays spaced in there.

      So your calculations about summer school are entirely off. If the 10 month year paid 54 thousand, then summer school would be maybe another 11 thousand, so we're talking about 65 thousand there. And this completely ignores the fact that teachers can't just 'decide' to teach summer school. Maybe one out of ten teachers is wanted for summer school. And, no, they can't run out and get a job elsewhere, because that's exactly the wrong time of year to be looking for jobs. They're competing with high school students.

      And they completely ignores the fact they do without a lunch hour. It's more a lunch 20 minutes, and lower grade teachers eat with their class, so it's not a break at all.

      'Traditional' 9-5 day is 8 hours minus an hour for lunch is 7 hours times 20 days a month times 12 months, for 1680 hours a year.

      Teacher 7:30-3:30 day is 8 hours times 190 days. That's 1520 hour, or a single month extra. Of course, a lot of teachers come in around 7 instead, or leave about 4. My mother did both, for ten years, and barely had time to do all the work required of her. I saw plenty of other teachers that did that too. Even if they don't show up for themselves extra, teachers end up hanging around before and after school for quite a lot of school-required functions, from monitoring students before classes to parent/teacher conferences to PTA meetings to after-school clubs.

      Of course, people in other contract jobs work extra too, but usually not consistently. Maybe once a year they end up working a 12-hour a day week.

      Oh, and teachers don't get any sick days or personal leave days. Well, they do, but they have to pay their replacement, which no one in any other job has to do. Just like no other eight hour job doesn't have a lunch break.

      Teachers work weird times, compared to other jobs, but pretending they work less actual amounts of time is just ignorance. They may work 190 days a years instead of the 240 days that other contract workers do, but that doesn't have any bearing on the actual hours spent, which often is about the same amount other contract workers work.

      And the reason you hear about underpaid teachers is that, in many parts of the country, they still are. Michigan, however, is not one of those places.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    27. Re:This is a horrible idea. by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      So... would you say that this idea is Insanely Great?

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    28. Re:This is a horrible idea. by soft_guy · · Score: 1

      Big fucking deal. They leave at 3pm, too.

      I'm a software engineer and I'm on salary. No one pays me for pulling all nighters to meet deadlines, plus I get laid off every 2-3 years when my company goes out of business (because I work for start ups).

      So, you could say boo fucking hoo for me, but i choose to do what I do. So do teachers. They have it pretty easy and I don't feel sorry for them. if they don't like their jobs, then they can quit and work somewhere else.

      Their main problem isn't lack of pay - it is lack of autonomy and all the stupid rules that the districts put on them.

      --
      Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
    29. Re:This is a horrible idea. by General+Wesc · · Score: 1

      They have it pretty easy and I don't feel sorry for them. if they don't like their jobs, then they can quit and work somewhere else.

      That's exactly the point. Most competent people will and the only people left are people who really, really enjoy working with the kids and don't care much about money (not many people), and incompetent people.

      You seem to be looking at this as 'If you're underpaid, it's your own fault for choosing that career.' But the people you're arguing against aren't crying about the poor teachers. They're crying about the poor students stuck with incompetent teachers. Teaching is not a career path we want avoided by smart people.

    30. Re:This is a horrible idea. by canUbeleiveIT · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but I don't think that is a mitigating factor at all. Nearly everybody I know who is on salary has to put in extra time, go to meetings, work weekends or attend seminars. It's just the way that it is. It sucks, of course, but that's just the way that it goes when you're on salary.

      A close friend of mine is a pharmacist and earns $100K/year, working a 44-hour work week. Along with that, they have a mandatory 8-hour meeting every month, an average of 4 hours of uncompensated overtime per week, take home work and continuing education requirements.

      As for an education, this person had to get one of the 75 spots in pharmacy school out of 500+ applicants (in other words, a 3.7 or better GPA & excellent SAT scores), go to school for seven years + internships + externships.

      So how much should teachers make? If the average is $54K and starting pay is $35K, there are probably senior staff making in excess of $70K. In my estimation, they are paid enough.

    31. Re:This is a horrible idea. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's Saturday morning 10 am I just woke up and started making breakfast. I know I am dyslexic but WTF I tried to read this post 3 times after reading the whole article linked to the topic. I still can't understand what this guy typed. Did you learn to type from Mr. Miyagi "CAPS ON. caps off"

    32. Re:This is a horrible idea. by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1

      Teaching is not a career path we want avoided by smart people. Unfortunately, there's nothing you can do about that. Teaching in public schools is a government job. Government jobs are rife with bureaucracy and the pay is usually decent, but uninspiring. Creativity is definitely not rewarded. Heck, nothing is rewarded--- the worst teacher earns exactly the same as the best. Government is too prone to corruption to even consider any sort of "merit pay" system. It's just not the kind of job smart people tend to go for.
      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    33. Re:This is a horrible idea. by suv4x4 · · Score: 1

      It's Saturday morning 10 am I just woke up and started making breakfast. I know I am dyslexic but WTF I tried to read this post 3 times after reading the whole article linked to the topic. I still can't understand what this guy typed. Did you learn to type from Mr. Miyagi "CAPS ON. caps off"

      It's hard to transmit the accents Steve Jobs puts in his speeches, in written form, you know :P Gimme a break.

      What should've I done? Attach a score above the text, with pitch and velocity?

    34. Re:This is a horrible idea. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You conveniently *made up* several things:
      1) "'Traditional' 9-5 day is 8 hours minus an hour for lunch is 7 hours". I've never encountered a job like this. A 'traditional' day is 8 hours, plus whatever breaks you take. If you're taking a 1 hour lunch, that's 9-6, not 9-5 like the stupid song says. So rather than inventing this mythical 7 hour private-sector day, you should be subtracting 20 minutes off of your hypothetical teachers' day.
      2) There aren't 20 days in a month, there are 5 days in a week times 52 weeks a year. That's 260 days. Minus vacation which is typically around 10 days.
      3) A lot of people work over 8 hours a day every day consistently in the private sector, too (see: software development). This is not something unique to teachers. Seeing as I've not met a teacher that did this, I'd say it's not even common to teachers.

      A teacher's day is not necessarily any more difficult than a work day in a private sector job (obviously some jobs are harder, and some are easier). So, being generous and not accounting for the dozen or so 'teachers days' that occur at most schools each year, the ratio of teacher workday to private sector workday is 190/250, or 76%. Let's see, there are 12 months in the year, multiply by 3/4... hey! that's 9 months! Just like everyone already knows. A teacher works 9 months out of the year. Regardless of what extra hours some teachers put in (vs some private sector individuals), this is still a lot less than the rest of us.

      Then add to that the fact that $54K was an average. By that statistic, nearly half of all teachers make more than that. I have an uncle who teaches shop (i.e. babysits), and earns over $80K a year for working 9 months out of the year (yes, 9 not 10). That, and in less than 5 years he's going to retire with full benefits. What kind of private sector jobs pay that kind of money and offer that kind of job security and benefits? Especially only working 3/4 of a year?

      No sir, teacher salary and benefits are not the reason the school system is in its present state.

    35. Re:This is a horrible idea. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GMAFB == Give Me A F**** Bass?

    36. Re:This is a horrible idea. by budgenator · · Score: 1

      East China School District pushes the average quite a bit as well, just think of the property taxes on 5 power plants.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    37. Re:This is a horrible idea. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great idea, Max! How much of a tax increase do you suppose that would require?

    38. Re:This is a horrible idea. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > They have it pretty easy and I don't feel sorry for them. if they don't like their jobs, then they can quit and work somewhere else.

      I've got a sister-in-law that was a terrific highschool english teacher - after about ten years she moved over to librarian. She was too tired of all the extra hours of work she had to do correcting papers every single night and weekend. Not including directing the school play.

      Having worked my ass off as an engineer for twenty five years I can't say that I've worked any harder than she has, and I'm paid about twice as much.

      Of course, like you say - all these great, talented teachers could just quit and so something else. And maybe we can just have the next generation taught by computers from $8/hr indian teachers. That would be great for our future.

    39. Re:This is a horrible idea. by PygmySurfer · · Score: 1

      Agreed. The blame lies squarely with the Republican party, who chose to let an absolute loon represent them.

    40. Re:This is a horrible idea. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      perhaps they could hire more teachers to decrease class sizes?

    41. Re:This is a horrible idea. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My woman is a school counselor, and was a teacher for many years. She currently makes around $80k/year, but that's with almost 35 years at the same school, and with a Masters. She could have gotten her PhD and boosted the income a tiny bit, but it wasn't worth the effort for the miniscule raise. I would guess the average salary in this area for a public school teacher is probably around $50k/year or so.

      But, depending on where you work, this isn't exactly great pay. My woman works in a school in a low-income area, predominantly black, with lots of violence. People are shot, 10 year olds come to school abused by their parents or dealing drugs for them. While she technically does get off work every weekend, the workload is so immense that she works weekends anyway, at home, in order to keep her job. Because of lack of funds at her school, she often has to do not only her own job, but she has to serve as a substitute teacher often as well. The workload, and the stress, are so high that she's retiring after next year, even though we can't really afford the cut in household income that retirement will entail...and yet, proverty is still better than her dying 10 years early because of a hostile and stressful work environment where she has reason to fear for her life every time she shows up to work. We'll be fine, albeit more frugal, but that's mainly because we live in an area with relatively low cost of living. I can't see that it'd be pleasant to retire as a teacher in any area with even a medium cost of living; they just don't make enough money for that to be fiscally prudent.

      And while she technically is off every summer, the school's definition of summer doesn't match what most people would believe to be the case: her summer begins weeks after school has let out for the kids, and the next school year begins, for her, a couple of weeks before the kids show up. So it's a lot closer to two months than it is three, if it IS even two months.

      As for perks, they've gotten worse and worse over the years. Health care in particular has eaten up an increasingly large amount of my woman's income. The school pays some, but less and less each year for the same coverage, just as it's becoming more and more important. And after retirement, that'll be a *very* significant part of her retirement money gone each month. The situation is such that we're seeing what we can do to cut other expenses, such as food, by growing more of our own. Instead of a new car, we're considering one of those gas heating units that also generate electricity, so in the winter we can reduce our electricity consumption (and bills), but those things cost as much as a new car, so it's an either/or thing, as we can't do both.

      For teachers in medium or high cost of living areas, I don't see how they make it at all. I guess they just rent instead of owning a home, and just basically live kinda poor. $50k/year here in the Midwest isn't too awfully bad, but $50k/year in San Diego or New York? That's pretty close to poverty.

    42. Re:This is a horrible idea. by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      So, being generous and not accounting for the dozen or so 'teachers days' that occur at most schools each year, the ratio of teacher workday to private sector workday is 190/250, or 76%.

      And, yet again, you're adding things twice.

      Schools are required to be in session 180-175 days. Teacher had a week at both end.

      They also have days they show up that kids are not there. Those are not counted in the 190 days.

      I love how, when counting teacher workdays, everyone rounds down, and subtracts things twice, and when counting everyone else's workdays, they round up, and ignore holidays.

      In the real world, a lot of people get Christmas holidays off. And they get Thanksgiving off. I somehow don't see that in your 250 days. They get at least three or four three day weekends, I'm not seeing that either.

      Teacher actually work ten months. They show up, just as much as everyone else, for ten months. Now, you can claim that they're actually doing nine months of work, and that is actually true. But by that logic, everyone else is doing eleven.

      The actual numbers of real days at work are good deal closer to 200 for teachers and 240 for other people. When add to that the fact that $54K was an average. By that statistic, nearly half of all teachers make more than that. I have an uncle who teaches shop (i.e. babysits), and earns over $80K a year for working 9 months out of the year (yes, 9 not 10). That, and in less than 5 years he's going to retire with full benefits. What kind of private sector jobs pay that kind of money and offer that kind of job security and benefits? Especially only working 3/4 of a year?

      No sir, teacher salary and benefits are not the reason the school system is in its present state.

      I think I was pretty goddamn clear when I said that teacher in Michigan were not unpaid, you lunatic. Sadly for your point, teacher pay in Michigan is the second highest in the nation, so I don't know what claiming that Michigan pay is normal is supposed to prove. Michigan schools are broken because they are run by idiots, not because of anything to do with teacher pay.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    43. Re:This is a horrible idea. by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      So how much should teachers make? If the average is $54K and starting pay is $35K, there are probably senior staff making in excess of $70K. In my estimation, they are paid enough.

      *sigh* I quote myself:

      And the reason you hear about underpaid teachers is that, in many parts of the country, they still are. Michigan, however, is not one of those places.

      Of course teachers being paid $52,000 are not underpaid. $52,000 is fucking great average pay for a teacher. It's $20,000 dollars higher than in some places. It's $10,000 dollars higher than here in Georgia.

      Of course, 'average' pay is pretty misleading by itself. The problem is high turnover of teachers, and the real way to fix that is higher starting pay. But, anyway, Michigan apparently pays their teachers more than enough.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    44. Re:This is a horrible idea. by soft_guy · · Score: 1

      Where I live, the schools have way too much money and do almost nothing with it. Seriously, we moved here and the schools spend about 3X per student what our old school district spend and the schools are so lousy we had to take our kid out of the public school and put her into a private school. It turns out that the district has scandal after scandal of missing money, overpaid contractors, overpaid administrators, etc.

      I used to support the idea of public education, but after seeing this, I will never vote for any money for schools ever again and my two daughters will go to private schools.

      --
      Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
  6. Finally! by Yoozer · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Oh well, this proves that Microsoft is not the only one that can buy politicians. :)

    Ye gods, I've rarely heard an idea that's more stupid. Now, if these were OLPCs... but that'd mean Michigan would be a developing part of the country.

    1. Re:Finally! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you've never been to Detroit?

    2. Re:Finally! by sharperguy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think OLPC's would be a great idea. They are actually cheaper than iPods (and many other DAP's) and as long as you buy 1M+ of them then there's no reason why you can't. They would be much more usefull in education and since thats what they were designed for, as opposed to entertainment, it might seems much more worthwhile paying for them.

      --
      "sudo rm -rf your-face"
    3. Re:Finally! by smchris · · Score: 1

      Flamebait or educated inference? All the links say is that it is "the Dem's budget plan". Apparently, nobody is taking responsibility for it or offering a reasoned defense. Isn't this the way lobbyist graft works? And if you "follow the money" (a pretty useful maxim in my experience) the beneficiary is?

      I wonder what Nicholas Negroponte thinks about this and whether distributing $100 laptops to poor U.S. kids is still a stupid idea.

  7. I'm sorry, what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If books and chalk boards produced the morons in the legislature that would consider giving iPods to kids for learning purposes, then I can't wait to see what this generation does? Idiocracy?

    Can you please send $38 million dollars to our libraries and schools for books and pencils? Also, can you please give a raise to teachers who are the architects for the upcoming generation?

    1. Re:I'm sorry, what? by Lawrence_Bird · · Score: 3, Insightful
      soapbox mode is on

      Er.. no. How many billions more dollars must be wasted on the 'education system' before people realize throwing money at it does no good - including pay for teachers.

      The AFT teacher salary survey for the 2004-05 school year found that the average teacher salary was $47,602
      Note that in 2005 the median household income was $46,300. [we'll assume teacher salaries are not so widely dispersed that the mean is a fair estimate of the median] Teachers get a tremendous benefits package and do not work a full year. The students educated before electronic blackboards, computers in every class, class size under 20, (insert stupid education metric here) managed to graducate high school and go on to such things as developing quantum mechanics, various field theories, nuclear weapons, man on moon, space probes,.... And until you actually pay for the little rugrats education by owning a property you will never fully understand just how much it costs. My latest assessment results in local school taxes in excess of the full year tuition at the state college. And before you claim the college is subsidized, so is the local school system. The system is horribly broke and it is time turn back the clock and revert to what once worked very well (note to parents: this might also include getting the balls to disciplining your child).
    2. Re:I'm sorry, what? by ZorbaTHut · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually, if anything, I think teachers aren't being paid enough. Ever heard the phrase "those who can, do, those who can't, teach"? It's true - if you can do something, you get a job doing it. If you can't make a living doing it, instead you teach people how to do it. Guess how well this works.

      There's three big problems with the American educational system at the moment.

      * Money going to the wrong places - computers bought with no plans in mind, new buildings without staff for them, extraordinary administrator salaries for administrators who don't do anything.
      * Incompetent teachers, paid badly enough to keep all the possibly-skilled teachers far, far away.
      * America's teacher's union, which essentially requires teachers to be kept or fired based solely on seniority, not competence.

      The latter keeps the former two going. If you want to fix the educational system, the first thing you do is get rid of the damn union, the second thing you do is fire crappy teachers, and the third thing you do is raise teacher salaries enough to hire good teachers.

      Supply and demand. There's just not enough demand to create a good supply.

      --
      Breaking Into the Industry - A development log about starting a game studio.
    3. Re:I'm sorry, what? by PixelScuba · · Score: 1

      Could I please stop hearing this "Teacher's don't work all year" rhetoric. Technically Nobody works all year. Teacher's work roughly 180 days a year depending on the state, and other full time positions work maybe 260 (5 days a week x 52 weeks) also subtract your paid vacation time and holidays, say another 20 days so a full 240 days a year. That's 40 more days of work.

      Next time you go to work (if you work a standard 9-5 job) think about your 15 minute breaks and hour lunch, Teachers don't get that. One half hour lunch and an hour of "prep Time" when students aren't in your room... but this time is used for getting more work done, it's not a break. That's a Full hour a day of "time off" regular full time employees get that teacher's don't, so every 8 days is almost another full day of "work". Over the course of a year is almost 30 days of "work time".

      This doesn't even account for the 4+ hours of unpaid work done when we get home. Go home after a long day of work and grade 25 biographies, 25 math assignments and 25science journals. It's a lot of work in addition to spending a couple more hours getting all the materials ready for the next day, lesson plans, worksheets, schedule... these things take time to prepare... time we're not technically paid for. My math is pretty weak, but I think it illustrates that, in a 180 day work schedule, teachers work a full year's worth of work time for your average 9-5 job. That $47,000 you cited (which I WISH I made that much), pays for a full year's worth of work. Do teacher's "work" 240 days a year like most jobs? No, but they obviously put in the same amount of hours working as a full 240 day job.

      That's just the minimum ammount of extra time required to make a classroom run effectively. The real teachers that are going above and beyond to make every day of class exciting, are putting in extra hours to design props, models, miniatures, decorations for the room, costumes... you name it. Those take countless more hours to prepare. Of course not EVERY teacher goes to those lengths, but some do and they get paid the exact same as a teacher who does less.

      I'm not saying "boo hoo teachers work a lot" I don't want sympathy, but people just like you regurgitate this myth that teachers do less work for the same pay, when I'm trying to illustrate that it's probably even. I understand some jobs people feel compelled to work at home, extending their 240 day work schedule longer, or they put in more hours at the office... but teaching requires that every day. If you take nothing else from this post, I'm not trying to advocate teachers work harder than anyone else at their job, but that... they work just as hard. It just happens to be crammed into a shorter time frame. So please, stop regurgitating this common stereotype.

    4. Re:I'm sorry, what? by ffejie · · Score: 1

      Next time you go to work (if you work a standard 9-5 job) think about your 15 minute breaks and hour lunch, Teachers don't get that. One half hour lunch and an hour of "prep Time" when students aren't in your room... but this time is used for getting more work done, it's not a break. That's a Full hour a day of "time off" regular full time employees get that teacher's don't, so every 8 days is almost another full day of "work". Over the course of a year is almost 30 days of "work time".

      I think you're pretty far off-base. Teachers do get little breaks throughout the day. Kids switch classes, sometimes teachers have a "free" period just like their students. For elementary schools, this is less pronounced, but what teachers do you know that don't give students "in-class" work that requires no intervention from the teacher? No? Did you ever take a test? Quiz? Reading assignment? Group project? What are teachers doing during that time? Sitting at their desks grading, or possibly taking a mental break.

      I used to have a math teacher that would teach for 10-20 minutes until everyone understood the concept and then she let us work on our homework. She assigned a lot of homework, but if you were fast/good, you could get somewhere between 50% and 100% of it done in class. I used to think it was great. Now, thinking back on it, what was she doing during the other 25-35 minutes in class? Grading our homework! Brilliant! This way, she could probably blow through 10-15 of the assignments in that time.

      The point is, teachers work from 7ish to 3ish, roughly an 8 hour day. However, a lot more work as coaches, after school mentors, good role models for students, prepare great plans, head departments, develop teaching plans that can be applied to other teachers classes etc. Why don't we reward the teachers that do go above and beyond? Companies give raises to their top performers every year. If you're a employee, who works hard and pleases management, you should get promoted to a higher level, even if it means doing the same job, you get more money and more responsibility. Why can't we do this with teachers? We have teachers that are making 75K+ who do a crappy job just because they've been around forever. We have young, enthusiastic teachers who are making 30K, because they haven't put their time in. Promote the good teachers! Give them pay raises that aren't scheduled by a calendar.

      What's that? Oh, there's a union involved? Forget everything I just said. Until you break the union, you're screwed from both ends. The union protects itself as an entity and no one else.

      --
      Disagreeing with me does not mean you get to mod me troll.
    5. Re:I'm sorry, what? by Lawrence_Bird · · Score: 1

      someone else followed up but I would add to it:

      local school district: 205 days, less 23 days vactaion with possible 2
                             more if snow days not used = 182.  Standard day
                             8-3

      average joe: 52 weeks, less 3 vacation and up to 2 for federal holidays
                   = 235 days.  Standard day 9-5

      last checked: 235 > 182 by 29%

      Teach gets lunch; many 'average' workers eat at desk or take short (less than one hour) lunch break. Many office workers, in particular, work longer than 9-5 and take work home. So lets give teach an extra 4 hours a day. 9-5ers work at least an extra hour leaving at most 3 hours more and I'm willing to wager at least half of that is made up by 9-5ers as well, nobody works 9-5 if they want to keep their job or get a raise.  As noted by the other poster, many teachers have at least one free period a day and other time to do grading/planning/admin work.   As to class planning - what about the paid summer time off? Is it unreasonable to expect a teacher to do their class planning then?  And how much does the class plan for geometry or freshman english change each year?

      Teachers also get two full months of the summer off during which they can work, take classes or generally slack off.  Thus one can view any 'shortage' of salary (of which I believe there is little, if any) as partly a lifestyle choice.

      But my whole point was not to just single out teachers.  The whole system is a waste of resources.  We keep spending money because it makes parents some how feel good - not because of a real need.  The problems begin at home and end with the school administrators. Instead of continuing to throw money down the pit we have dug maybe we should try going back to a point when things seemed to work reasonably well?

    6. Re:I'm sorry, what? by PixelScuba · · Score: 1

      Um, I'm not "off Base" because I do know something about this... I am a teacher (IAAT?) I have never worked in a district where teachers get breaks, nor have I ever worked in a district where teachers get more than a half hour for lunch. That's it, one half hour lunch. There IS a specialist period, I referred to it above, it's called prep period. During that time it's hardly a break, I always have a ton of work to do or our team has meetings we go to.

      I know you were attempting to discredit my post by citing sterotypes and anecdotal stories of teachers not working, but I don't think you would have gathered from my original post that I AM a teacher (for good reason, I left my post as career neutral as I could). My lord, yes I DO assign a LOT of in class work... what am I doing during that time? Working! When children are working on assignments you think you can just take a break? You must be constantly on the move to help answer questions, offer assistance present information differently with other tools to help some students make sense of information. I've never had a minute to sit still even when students are given in class work or large group projects, there is always work to be done and students to help.

      I'm sorry you had 1 or 2 teachers who were not proficient at their jobs, but citing a couple bad people who taught you hardly discredits anything I've said. OBVIOUSLY there are bad teachers, dozens of books have been written about it. I agree to some extent that tenure and unions have helped create an environment that keeps some unqualified professionals in their job. You asked why we can't pay better teachers more. A noble proposal and a few are out there (MN is trying QComp), but all ideas I have heard are ultimately flawed. How do you guage how "good" a teacher is? Test scores? They don't reflect how good a teacher is. Putting in extra hours? better... but suppose someone choses to do their work at home rather than stay in the building, how do you pay them for that? pay for teachers who go above and beyond is a noble idea... but nobody has a clue how to fairly implement it. There is no tangible quality like "making money" liek the private sector you can use to show how good someone is at teaching.

      Neither you nor the other reply to this post have actually addressed anything I argued. Teachers work the same amount of time during their year of work as other professions. You might not see it since you don't teach but I've worked both Teaching and Private work and I worked the same... but for different lengths of time during a year. Again, I'm not bragging or asking for sympathy, but I'm tired of this "Teachers got it easy, they don't work". Please, please enough.

      I shouldn't expect anything else though, it is too easy to see the Bias this community has against teachers. Every post I've ever made about teaching hardly garners a single upvote and I actually fear for a -troll rating when I talk about working as an educator. If nothing else, I believe my posts are an interesting insight into this topic that apparently people here don't want to read about.

    7. Re:I'm sorry, what? by SirSlud · · Score: 1

      Why don't we reward the teachers that do go above and beyond? Companies give raises to their top performers every year.

      If you can say that without squirting milk though your nose, I envy your naiveté. Grow up. Especially with the 'unions are inherently evil' comment at the end. The world is not a meritocracy, nor is it an anti-meritocracy. How are you going to fix this? Magically convince all the 'best' teachers that 'unions are evil'? Your post is like a 3 page math proof where all the axioms are anything but. Your proof revolves around a math teacher you used to have. If that isn't a LOL, I don't know what is.

      --
      "Old man yells at systemd"
  8. Piracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Right, they give thousands of Ipods out to people who can't use them. Now, if you give someone an ipod who can't afford one, do you think they'll have enough money to buy music to put on it? NO!

    They're all gonna swap CDs amongst themselves and piracy is going to sky rocket.

    This idea is absolutely atrocious, they're making their children criminals! (I'm saying nothing about whether swapping music is morally right or wrong)

  9. Some points by Lurker+McLurker · · Score: 4, Informative
    • First of all, the taxes aren't just to pay for the music players, they are for a number of measures.
    • Secondly, the story doesn't specifiy it'll be ipods, just a digital audio player. Given the more reasonably-priced audio players around, they'd be idiots to pick Apple's trendy but pricey players.
    • I think digital audio players could be very useful in an educational context, but current copyright law will probably render them useless. You need to be able to put useful content on these devices. This could end up being very expensive.
    • The person who wrote the cnet story is called Erica Ogg.
    --
    Mod parent up!
    1. Re:Some points by wizzahd · · Score: 2, Insightful

      they'd be idiots to pick Apple's trendy but pricey players.

      On Thursday, House Democrats delivered a spending bill
      Hm..
    2. Re:Some points by tidewaterblues · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Lucky for me I happen to be a Michigan resident living in a strained economic area. I can attest fully that this idea is beyond moronic in our current economic climate.

      I work in higher education IT, and I have a fair idea about what does and does not work in the classroom. This is yet another example of people believing that throwing technology at students will make them learn better. We have done this on a grand national scale to the tune of billion of dollars in various programs, and so far it has not had a measurable impact. Where I work we just had one of the major DOE education program spends thousands of dollars on an enormous wide-format printer for underprivileged students. So that they can print posters. Posters. In college. This is their idea of a sound technological investment in education. Not to mention that we already had one just like it.

      The fact of the matter is that no one "gets it" when it comes to technology in the classroom. An until they do, crap like this will keep creeping into legislation. The only silver lining about this is that there is no way in hell the governor will sign this measure into law.

      --


      ...En að Besta Sem Guð Hefur Skapað Er Nýr Dagur
    3. Re:Some points by suv4x4 · · Score: 1

      First of all, the taxes aren't just to pay for the music players, they are for a number of measures.

      To successfully fund all these measures via taxing sat TV and soda, a new TV spot was created with a tagline "Be a patriot: drink soda and watch sat TV".

      The budget for this TV spot will be funded from the income from sat TV and soda taxes as well. This way it makes sense.

    4. Re:Some points by JonASterg · · Score: 1

      Parent brings up an excellent point: throwing technology at students will not necessarily enable greater learning. At my university, a few professors started using tablet PCs during lectures to assess the effectiveness of the technology (as opposed to using PowerPoint, blackboards, overhead projectors) in a teaching environment. I participated in the study in 3 of my courses. The overwhelming consensus is that the technology was effective IF AND ONLY IF the professor is well versed in how to use it. Mind you, these were all upper level and graduate courses in engineering; the professors were not unfamiliar with high technology. I believe this sort of funding would be better spent on increased science/math/engineering courses in public schools. Teach the children theory and ideas which further future technological development and stimulate their minds. Get them interested in learning - fund hands-on science courses, interesting niche computer/robotics courses (my high school did this), and/or pay teachers more competitive wages to attract a higher caliber of educator (Michigan may already have excellent teachers, I am not saying that they don't). Please don't spend the money on a piece of equipment that a large portion of the student body will end up using as a toy instead of as a tool.

      --
      If you steal from one source, that's plagiarism. If you steal from many, well, that's just research.
    5. Re:Some points by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah I've lived in Berrien County Michigan for 27 years in a few months. As I'm sure most of you aren't aware it happens to house one of the most dangerous ghettos in the USA and for most of my life held the highest murder rate per capita. The school system here is a joke, no two ways about it, and during her recent 4 year reign our dingbat Governor didn't make a single f'in' thing better.

      You assume she won't sign this into law? If she doesn't it's because the bill isn't stupid enough, she's probably also going to want to tack on more relief for single mothers or maybe free spinners for city buses.

      It's not so amusing when 1/4th of your paycheck goes to all the whores, 1/3rd of your check goes to the feds, cigarettes are $6 a pack, gas is $2 a gallon and we have the highest unemployment rate of any state in the union. Most jobs are 15+ miles away so a bike is out of the question and I dare you to not go insane here without taking in a drug 20-30 times a day.

      My county has several thousand unemployed - try finding a decent job here.

      Hell, just be glad on any given day it's just the state that's robbing you at gunpoint and not your neighbor.

      Just pointless bitching? Private schools are $2000 a semester. Public schools are $7000 a semester. One breeds intelligent people, the other breeds sub-literate, barely functioning adults. The problem isn't funding, the problem is bureaucracy and inefficiency. Neither the reds nor the blues have any f'in' idea on how to fix this, just retarded ideas like music players and after this makes zero effect, they'll just throw more money at the schools.

      You have some faith in our Governor. So do I; I think she's too inept to qualify as the anti-Christ despite her best efforts.

    6. Re:Some points by aussie_a · · Score: 0

      Lucky for me I happen to be a Michigan resident living in a strained economic area. That's lucky? Woah! Will you be appearing on those World Vision ads before you call yourself mildly unlucky?
    7. Re:Some points by Z0mb1eman · · Score: 1

      >they'd be idiots to pick Apple's trendy but pricey players.

      Heh heh heh.

      Oh man, thanks for the chuckle this morning.

      From what I know of government (not even talking about the U.S. specifically here), if a bad idea is worth doing, it's worth doing as inefficiently as possible...

      --
      ClutterMe.com - easiest site creation on the Net. Just click and type.
    8. Re:Some points by porcupine8 · · Score: 1
      The overwhelming consensus is that the technology was effective IF AND ONLY IF the professor is well versed in how to use it.

      Study after study has shown exactly this. Technology doesn't make a difference - teachers who are well trained in using that technology in their classroom do. And not just a one-day workshop on "ideas for iPods in your classroom!" - often it takes sustained training over the school year, networking among the teachers to share ideas, etc. Then technology can do some great things, even if it's just freeing up the teacher's time on mundane tasks so they can prepare better lesson plans. But you just hand teachers something - an iPod, a computer, a "clicker" response system, whatever - and it doesn't do much of anything.

      --
      Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
    9. Re:Some points by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      Educational media doesn't have to be expensive. I came from a school where some teachers made their own educational media on school time. Once it's recorded, it can be used several times before needing to be updated.

    10. Re:Some points by It'sYerMam · · Score: 1

      The mathematics department at the college I attend has just bought the so-called "interactive whiteboards" for most maths classrooms. This is another example of what appears to be people who don't really think things through being duped by shiny technology promising to improve teaching or learning. Goodness knows who decided that providing us with computers designed to do the exact same things as whiteboards, but apparently not providing more than the most basic of training with the included whiteboard simulator, would improve anything. The upshot, predictably, is a load of pissed of maths teachers who now find that they are forced to do the same task on an inferior piece of equipment.
      Unless someone gives them some training, and some more software, then all this can ever be as an expensive way of doing the same thing as before, but worse, since they have a lower resolution, are less intuitive, and are slower - the sensitivity seems to mean that drawing quickly is impossible, and writing is uniformly illegible. (Examples, for example, once turned out looking more like Exomiles) In one classroom at least, a traditional whiteboard is going to be installed by the side of the new one (with a hole cut out of the middle, because it will now be covering the light switch) and the word from our teacher is that this will be used in preference to the new "monstrosity."
      There is a vague possibility that, at some point, someone will decide to put graphing software up, but it's difficult to see how this will be more helpful than what we have at the moment.

      --
      im in ur .sig, writin ur memes.
    11. Re:Some points by Chabo · · Score: 1

      Secondly, the story doesn't specifiy it'll be ipods, just a digital audio player. Given the more reasonably-priced audio players around, they'd be idiots to pick Apple's trendy but pricey players.

      So I guess gov employees better catch the next Woot-off, huh? :)

      --
      Convert FLACs to a portable format with FlacSquisher
    12. Re:Some points by jshackney · · Score: 1

      First of all, the taxes aren't just to pay for the music players, they are for a number of measures.

      gg:define:pork barrel

      Secondly, the story doesn't specifiy it'll be ipods, just a digital audio player. Given the more reasonably-priced audio players around, they'd be idiots to pick Apple's trendy but pricey players.

      Apple = Education

      I haven't yet attended or worked in a school that hasn't been cut a deal by Apple so Apple could get their products in the system.

      I think digital audio players could be very useful in an educational context, but current copyright law will probably render them useless. You need to be able to put useful content on these devices. This could end up being very expensive.

      And I think the minority will use them for the educators' intended purpose. Call my cynical. Everyone else will get a free toy.

      As a former resident of Michigan, I left because I saw this place being flushed down the toilet. At the time I was involved in flight training and very few places were left operating when I left. Pay was, and still is dreadful. I couldn't afford perks like $2.50 a gallon gasoline on an annual income of $11,000. I had to live over 40 miles away from work just to find affordable housing in a safe neighborhood. And I drove a reasonably fuel-efficient car at 40+ MPG. I had to sell my car and find a new job somewhere else. I came a few states south and found that business was exploding. I only go back to see family now.

      Regarding one of the earlier posts, the gasoline tax was 33.33 cents per gallon when I left, it sounds like that will be increased to over $0.40 / gallon over the next few years.

    13. Re:Some points by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Yeah I've lived in Berrien County Michigan for 27 years in a few months. As I'm sure most of you aren't aware it happens to house one of the most dangerous
      > ghettos in the USA and for most of my life held the highest murder rate per capita. The school system here is a joke, no two ways about it, and during her
      > recent 4 year reign our dingbat Governor didn't make a single f'in' thing better.

      Why don't you stop bitching about everyone else needing to solve your problems and either move or start working to fix the problems yourself. Hell, you're 27 - by that point many people have traveled around the world.

      And btw, they aren't planning to distribute music players - these are for listening to podcasted classes. Probably exactly the kind of thing that gets done at those expensive private schools you'd love to go to - but then complain when they do it at the public schools.

  10. Tag story with "Democrats" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tag story with "Democrats"

    1. Re:Tag story with "Democrats" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would agree at some point, but after watching some Democrats, especially Democratic initiatives, here in Michigan, they behave nothing like Democrats that I have seen elsewhere.

      Sheer craziness sometimes.

      And I am not sure even those claming D as the affiliation truly buy the whole party line, especially the Governor.

  11. Whispered in their ear by friend.ac · · Score: 2, Funny

    Do you think the RIAA lobbied Michigan for the free ipods? I believe they need some more cash..

    "Here you go young child, here's a free ipod, can't pay for music on it? Don't worry - HA HA HA"

    Rubbing their hands in glee at the thought of suing all those kids..

  12. Great by adona1 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Now if only someone can write an adding & subtracting game for the PS3, I can start lobbying politicians here to subsidise those...for educational purposes =)

    In fact, the Wii promotes physical fitness as well, so they'd better give us one of them too. [It might seem weird to give us a game of a sport rather than encouraging us to actually do said sport, but it's not. It's progress =)]

    --
    Between the falling angel and the rising ape
    1. Re:Great by MidnightBrewer · · Score: 1

      Actually, my main reason for buying a Nintendo DS is so that I can study my Japanese kanji. Admittedly, this doesn't really impact the American market, but it's a definite educational tool, and very significant for at least one nation of people.

      --
      "Give a man fire, and he'll be warm for a day; set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life
    2. Re:Great by Paulrothrock · · Score: 1

      It might seem weird to give us a game of a sport rather than encouraging us to actually do said sport, but it's not.

      The benefit of the Wii is that its convenient, adaptive, and inside.

      It's more convenient than, say, actual tennis because you don't have to find someone to play against, buy a racket and some balls, and find a tennis court that's not in use. By the time you're done with that you're probably going to be too tired to actually play tennis, especially if you're out of shape.

      It's adaptive in that it's easy to pick up and play. Most people can't serve a tennis ball over the net reliably, let alone sustain a volley. And most people don't even know the rules of tennis. The Wii takes all those things out of the picture and lets you just play. And as you get better, the person you're playing against gets better. And maybe you'll grow to love tennis enough to actually want to start playing it.

      Finally, it's inside. You can't play tennis every day, and fees for indoor tennis courts are cost prohibitive for many people, especially after getting a racket and balls and shoes and clothes. As long as you've got electricity, you can play Wii tennis. Hell, you don't even have to get dressed to do it.

      So there are real benefits to playing Wii sports versus playing actual sports.

      --
      I'm in the hole of the broadband donut.
  13. Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One word:

    Why?

  14. digital music player =/= iPod by justinlee37 · · Score: 1

    An iPod For Every Kid In Michigan

    FTFA: "On Thursday, House Democrats delivered a spending bill that includes the idea of putting $38 million worth of public funds toward outfitting every student with a digital music player."

    I don't know how you get "iPod" out of "digital music player." Anyone else think the OP is a troll for Apple?

    Just so we're all clear, digital music player =/= iPod, paper tissue =/= Kleenex and self-adhesive bandage =/= Band-aid.

    1. Re:digital music player =/= iPod by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 1

      Just so we're all clear, digital music player =/= iPod, paper tissue =/= Kleenex and self-adhesive bandage =/= Band-aid.

      Although trademark dilution might seem to be a problem for their owners, Apple, Kimberly-Clark and Johnson & Johnson are crying all the way to the bank. I'll let them fight that battle, and I'll try to stop people from calling me 'Bob'.

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
    2. Re:digital music player =/= iPod by nwbvt · · Score: 1

      Well, the CNet article does mention iPods by name, as does the Detroit Free Press article. So while they do also use the more generic terms "digital music player" and "MP3 player", it does seem that at least someone over that has begun leaning towards the Apple device.

      BTW, correct me if I am wrong (I don't own an iPod, I went for the cheaper and more technologically advanced iAudio x5), but iPods can't record audio, can they? Since one of the supposed benefits I keep on hearing about is that they can record lectures, wouldn't the iPod be a very bad choice? Wouldn't they be better off purchasing cheaper (though outdated) $20 cassette recorders?

      --
      Mathematics is made of 50 percent formulas, 50 percent proofs, and 50 percent imagination.
    3. Re:digital music player =/= iPod by SCHecklerX · · Score: 1

      I couldn't figure out your notation at first. It's spelled '!=' :-P

    4. Re:digital music player =/= iPod by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and your rant changes the fact that tax money is being wasted how?

    5. Re:digital music player =/= iPod by justinlee37 · · Score: 1

      Honestly, I think that iPod is just a huge buzzword right now, and the journalists just use it because it grabs people's attention.

    6. Re:digital music player =/= iPod by justinlee37 · · Score: 1

      It'd be interesting to hear what they're planning on doing with these music players.

  15. won't happen by raind · · Score: 1

    For one Michigan has a deficit officially at 940 million, probably north of 1 billion. Also the Republicans control the senate, this will never pass.

    --
    Get up!
    1. Re:won't happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Republicans control the senate, this will never pass.

      Oh, so that's why they're doing it -- so that after it fails, the Democrats can use that issue as a way to get the young people's vote in the next election.

    2. Re:won't happen by raind · · Score: 1

      Wasn't thinking of it like that, just stating a fact. But now that you mention it the Dems will probably do just that.

      --
      Get up!
  16. ... higher taxes to buy someone else's kid ... by pedantic+bore · · Score: 4, Insightful
    They'll probably feel the same way that they do about paying higher taxes to give someone else's kid a better education, or some else's parents a better senior center, or the people on a different street a better sidewalk...

    Part of being a community is pooling resources in to help others. Even if you don't have any children of your own, for example, someone paid for your schooling, and when you're an adult you pay it back.

    Of course, then there are the endless arguments about exactly how this money should be spent...

    --
    Am I part of the core demographic for Swedish Fish?
    1. Re:... higher taxes to buy someone else's kid ... by ystar · · Score: 1

      Considering this is a democratic society, what if they feel that this simply is a fruitless approach to bettering education? I certainly would feel that way, but I wouldn't mind if taxes went up 3-5% for (what I deem as) *valid* educational efforts.

    2. Re:... higher taxes to buy someone else's kid ... by Albanach · · Score: 1

      Considering this is a democratic society...
      You got it in one. If the people don't like it, in a democratic society they get to elect someone the think can do a better job. I think if I were in an economically depressed state, I'd be looking for the state government to pour tons into eduction. Into teachers, school buildings and technology. If they economy is depressed they need a highly motivated, well educated workforce in an area with otherwise low costs.

      I don't really think I can comment on whether this individual idea is good or not, because I don;t know what other proposals their state government has to improve education. If they think iPods alone with fix things then the state is in deep trouble. If, on the other hand, they're proposing a series of measures to raise overall attainment then I wish them the very best of luck and would encourage state residents to do everything they can to support the plan and make it work.
    3. Re:... higher taxes to buy someone else's kid ... by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      How very communist of you. Why cant I give money to MY schools directly instead of being taxed? Honestly the schools in detriot would do better by making only detriot residents money go to detriot schools and so on. Yes that means that rural areas will have to pool schools instead of having a nice huge high school, middle school and grade school for their 300 students.

      I am tired of paying money to the "community good" and watching it go to someplace else instead of my neighborhood, my schools, my community.

      I sit here with a pothole the size of a car in front of my house for the past year, why dont my taxes fix that damn thing? No they went to Saginaw or Yipsilanti or the tiny town of freesoil that really should not exist as it can not sustain it's self without everyone else paying for it.

      I am tired of financing other people towns. I am tired of paying for other People problems that they should take care of. While I watch my neighborhood deteriorate and my good money is being wasted elsewhere.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    4. Re:... higher taxes to buy someone else's kid ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It was wrong that my parents' childless neighbors were once forced to pay for my schooling. It is also wrong that I should now pay for others kids' schooling.

      Of course, then there are the endless arguments about exactly how this money should be spent...
      Stolen money shouldn't be spent. It should be returned to those who earned and own it.
    5. Re:... higher taxes to buy someone else's kid ... by goldspider · · Score: 1

      Right, because people can't make rational value judgments about how their taxes are being spent.

      If living in your community requires me to buy toys for all the little kiddies, then I don't want to live in your community. Thanks anyway.

      --
      "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
    6. Re:... higher taxes to buy someone else's kid ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's exactly why I'm glad I don't make much money: less of it for people like you, who believe in employing coercion rather than voluntary association as your means, to squander from me. I try hard to invest my life in personal interest rather than making money, to the greatest extent possible, and I believe that my freedom is maximized in this fashion. 40 years from now, I'll look back and smile, satisfied that I spent the greater part of my time in this world bringing happiness to myself, my family and friends, rather than slaving away for the state. I won't be rich, but I'll be happy.

      Go ahead and laugh, I don't care. I'll just sit back and smile.

    7. Re:... higher taxes to buy someone else's kid ... by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      It was wrong that my parents' childless neighbors were once forced to pay for my schooling. It is also wrong that I should now pay for others kids' schooling.

      You're not, and they didn't, you fucktard.

      You're paying for your own schooling. As are they.

      No one who went to public schools for free can whine about how they're having to pay for other people to go to public schools for free.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    8. Re:... higher taxes to buy someone else's kid ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with you and maybe should be the efforts we all work for in Michigan government; continue to focus and earmark funds. It makes me sick when the gov. blares that lottery money goes to schools, but then diverts the orginal genral funding source to pay for other things.

      Many (all that I know) people here in Michigan are very distinct in the idea that "I don't have kids in schools, why should I pay". They find every way to avoid paying taxes, at every step. They complain about minimal police, but are ignorant how those police are funded. In fact, unless the person is completely broke, they are the most selfish, un-altruistic people I have ever met; and they are *my* clan. Maybe the government feels it needs to be deceptive.

      Even if they fixed the roads in front of your house, today and tomorrow, if the next generation of kids are not taken care of, for whatever reason, they won't be able to take care of things when you are unable, and that time will come.

    9. Re:... higher taxes to buy someone else's kid ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No- they did, and I do. You faggot.

      By virtue of insult and bold lettering, I have really made an insightful observation and told you off good in the process.

      Fag.

    10. Re:... higher taxes to buy someone else's kid ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Why cant I give money to MY schools directly instead of being taxed? "

      If you can also promise to also forgo any of the benefits to the economy brought about by better education of the masses, then fair enough.

  17. $920 million deficit means more spending, right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Consider this:

    - the state of Michigan currently has a fiscal year 2007 budget of $920 million
    - the state government has been instructed to prepare for a shutdown this may due to lack of funds
    - next year's budget deficit is estimated to be more than $1 billion due to the single-business tax repeal that hasn't been replaced
    - Gov. Granholm has proposed higher taxes (a 2% tax on services) to cover part of the current deficit

    Combined with the problems of the Big 3 automakers (GM, Ford, Chrysler) that's been causing most of the economic slump in this area, the state legislatures have got to be daft to propose more spending on such silly projects. Now is the time for spending cuts, not increased spending!

    The state has been trying to convince students to stay in the state following graduation; I for one will run out of this state as fast as I can once I graduate in a few months (PhD in Aerospace Engineering). There is no way I want to stick around and see the state legislature and governor make the state economy even worse than it is.

  18. Some problems by PhotoGuy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I like the concept, but I have a few problems with it.

    First of all, why Apple? I love Apple, and I love the iPod, but in many ways, it's a prestige brand, not something that is warranted for a utilitarian purpose such as this. You can easily find as capable and reliable MP3 players for less than half the price of an equivalent iPod. The "wow" factor and ease of integration with iTunes, are both major features of the iPod, and both totally irrelevant to the educational purposes talked about here.

    Also, learning is a very visual medium. Unless we're talking about the super expensive video iPods, then the use will be limited to audio and minimal simplistic document reading. (There are other, cheaper devices that do video and documents better/cheaper than a non-video iPod.) Are most textbooks available/suitable/useful for viewing on a 1 inch screen? Wouldn't that involve buying digital copies of all the relevant texts, and additional and unnecessary cost?

    Plus, it will disguise music use; "what are you doing, Jimmy?" "Listening to a lecture, ma'am." Meanwhile he's listening to tunes. Like it or not, school kids do need some structure and supervision; this makes it too easy to goof off.

    It sounds like someone's trying to seem progressive, and is very misguided.

    --
    Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
    1. Re:Some problems by walkie · · Score: 1

      First of all, why Apple?

      It was a crappy headline, but if you're not going to read the article, at least read the summary. If you're not going to read the summary, at least scan the comments.

      Also, learning is a very visual medium.

      True, but I still prefer charcoal or watercolor myself.

  19. More Details... by suv4x4 · · Score: 4, Funny

    "The iPods that will be given away are iPod Shuffle, a light music player that shuffles the songs and plays them randomly", explained a spokesman for the House of Representatives.

    "We'll intermix the lectures with the latest pop and hip-hop singles, and the kids will have to put up with listening to lectures randomly so they can play they favorite music. We think it'll be a smashing success.".

    1. Re:More Details... by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      gross. What about kids who don't like hip-hop and pop? Having grown up in rural Michigan I know that country music is massively popular, and people who like country tend to dislike hip-hop with a passion.

      What stops a kid from hitting the next button the iPod shuffle? Why try to pad the lecture with entertainment? I never believed edutainment actually works.

      We're given the choice between tax and spend democrats, and borrow and spend republicans. if you come up with some new plan and show a way to pay for it, at least you're being honest. But why must we pay for everyone's pet project, pay now with taxes or pay later with debt and cuts to important programs.

      I'd rather see the money go towards a radio program geared towards education, but with edgy DJs and interesting and relevant topics. Of course you'd have to hire some good marketing consultants to prevent it from being an insulting failure. Or maybe the money could go towards something practical, like books for students, better libraries, improved health care for students, or college financial aid.

      It sounds like this was a laptop-per-child idea, but they realized that they could only afford an ipod shuffle per child. would be cooler if iPods could support sharing wirelessly (bluetooth maybe?). then you could play games where you gave students a lecture and one random answer. and they could network with their friends and collect all the answers by sharing them. or whatever.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    2. Re:More Details... by suv4x4 · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry that was meant as a joke, I really doubt they plan to do what I said.

    3. Re:More Details... by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      There wasn't much content to the article. so I just assumed the worse.

      I still stand by that the money might be better spent on real programs instead of pet projects. (or maybe just kept in citizen's pockets)

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  20. Well okay then... by Viceroy+Potatohead · · Score: 2, Funny

    House Democrats delivered a spending bill that includes the idea of putting $38 million worth of public funds toward outfitting every student with a digital music player.

    So let me get this straight: Apple's next big product is called the iPorkBarrel?

  21. Sensationalist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your first hint is that the article is on C|Net. Your second hint is that its primary source is an anonymous editorial. Your third hint is that its secondary source has a single sentence about the proposal.

    1. Re:Sensationalist by blagooly · · Score: 2, Funny

      http://www.freep.com/apps/pbcs.dll/
      The bill includes the cost savings by releasing 2400 prisoners. They will Not be given iPods. Instead, each will get a confiscated weapon if they promise to move to Ohio.
      Not yet made public is a clause that makes Detroit part of Canada. "We are hoping that the change does Detroit good, moving to a new place can have that effect, you know, and Canada is really very nice,really."

    2. Re:Sensationalist by arpad1 · · Score: 1

      The state budget's already running a big, fat deficit. Do you think Michigan can afford to pay what Canada would demand to take Detroit?

      --
      Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum, minutus carborata descendum pantorum.
    3. Re:Sensationalist by biobogonics · · Score: 1

      http://www.freep.com/apps/pbcs.dll/
      The bill includes the cost savings by releasing 2400 prisoners. They will Not be given iPods. Instead, each will get a confiscated weapon if they promise to move to Ohio.
      Not yet made public is a clause that makes Detroit part of Canada. "We are hoping that the change does Detroit good, moving to a new place can have that effect, you know, and Canada is really very nice,really."


      Or maybe we get Toledo, Canada gets Detroit, Wisconsin gets the U.P. and we fight the war of 1812 all over again?

    4. Re:Sensationalist by Kabuthunk · · Score: 1

      Being from Canada... if others think like I do, the USA couldn't pay Canada enough to TAKE Detroit. We like our ozone layer, thanks :P

      --
      Planet Zebeth - Metroid with a twist
  22. Re:$920 million deficit means more spending, right by theuedimaster · · Score: 1

    Don't you understand man? You wanting to get out of Michigan as fast as you can, which has been the trend for highly educated students coming out of Michigan Universities, is a big reason for why Michigan is going down the tubes. If you really care about our state, you would stay and do your part in trying to bring back economic prosperity to the region. I for one am sick and tired of all my fellow college students ranting about how they want to escape Michigan as fast as they can... don't they feel some sort of responsibility or compassion for the state in which they were brought up?

  23. I Thought it happened only in India by srujan1.1beta · · Score: 1

    Here they have given television sets and all in election campaigns. US does one better by givin iPods. That too taxing the people for that. Wow Indian politicians have to learn this soon.

  24. Re:$920 million deficit means more spending, right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You wanting to get out of Michigan as fast as you can, which has been the trend for highly educated students coming out of Michigan Universities, is a big reason for why Michigan is going down the tubes.

    Umm, no. Try the downturn in manufacturing (auto industry anyone?).

    If you really care about our state, you would stay and do your part in trying to bring back economic prosperity to the region. I for one am sick and tired of all my fellow college students ranting about how they want to escape Michigan as fast as they can... don't they feel some sort of responsibility or compassion for the state in which they were brought up?

    I don't care for Michigan more than any other state; in fact, I probably detest it. I wasn't raised here, and this is the first time I've lived here. The experience has been...less than desirable. I have no intentions of staying in a state in such disarray. I came here for an advanced degree from a good university (with tuition through the roof, by the way), but once I'm done, I'm gone.

  25. Why can't they try something sane for once? by Atriqus · · Score: 1

    I went to school in Michigan from grades k-12. They could barely get millages passed for semi-odd proposals; there's no way this one's going to pass, especially if it's state wide. I can assume that the North (Let's say anything north of Bay City) will be against it. I can't make any assumption about the South. Either way, I'm just imagining all the requests for new ipods because the kid dropped it in the Au Sable river while canoeing. Man does that suck when a canoe trip turns into an underwater scavenging hunt for car keys.

    --
    Hey, look! It's Bono's brother.
    1. Re:Why can't they try something sane for once? by maxume · · Score: 1

      Is this a subtle commentary on the quality of k-12 education provided in Michigan?

      (I'm kidding, I put my keys where I can't find them all to often)

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
  26. You have got to be kidding.. by ari+wins · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Living in Michigan, I can tell you I was shocked to read this. We're currently facing a multi-hundred million budget deficeit (400+ iirc), and this actually stayed in? They're closing schools all over the state, our single-business tax has expired, so they're trying to get another gas tax added on (costing 3cents/gal. for 3 years for a total of an additional 9/gal), and Granholm has been trying to get an "entertainment" tax in place, meaning taxes on movies, video games, etc. etc. Our "sin" tax seemingly goes up yearly, meaning when I moved back up here from TN. I went from paying under $3/pack of smokes to over $5. Granted, that's not as high as some metropolitan areas, but the cost of living is no where NEAR those places, therefore neither are the wages.

    Frankly, I'm saddened by it. We used to have some of the best roads in the nation, and now I can't drive to work without wondering when my suspension is going to fail. It's not even a matter of avoiding the potholes, you actually have to avoid entire roads. Now you're telling me every little bastard in school is going to get an ipod? What about my nephew, who attends a private charter school? We pay property taxes, even though he doesn't attend public schools, and now you're going to tell me I have to foot the bill for this?

    I only wish Granholm hadn't been the lesser of two evils this prior election. On the bright side, however, she's done a great job turning the strengths of our states into our weaknesses, while also driving businesses (Lifesavers, Johnson Controls, numerous others) out of the area. What's next?

    --
    Don't worry if you're a kleptomaniac, you can always take something for it.
    1. Re:You have got to be kidding.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same here! I plan on writing my state representative about this! It's insane. We're in a deep budget crisis and they want to buy kids iPods? What genius came up with that idea? I can think of a million other more useful things schools need. How exactly will these iPods be used for educational purposes? Books on tape? lol Seriously.. If they want the kids to be able to transport files to and from school, why not USB flash drives? Why do they need a freakin' iPod?

      If the state does this, they'd better buy some of us tax paying adults an iPod too! I work for a living, pay taxes, and I don't even have the extra cash laying around for one.

      This is pure stupidity!

    2. Re:You have got to be kidding.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's no such thing as a private charter school in Michigan.

    3. Re:You have got to be kidding.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Or anywhere, AFAIK. Charter school are, by definition, public. Otherwise, they'd just be called private schools and would be no different from other private schools.

    4. Re:You have got to be kidding.. by Antony-Kyre · · Score: 1

      Let me see if I understand Michigan.

      Local-only property taxes.
      State-only sales taxes.
      Local and state income taxes.

      I don't live in Michigan, so I don't know if this would work, but here is my idea.

      Implementing local sales taxes might create problems since the system is not set up to deal with that. However, what they can do is, if not already, create additional state sales tax rates.

      Certain businesses would have a higher sales tax rate depending on the type of business.

      Perhaps superstores (like Wal-Mart) be subject to an addition 1 cent/dollar sales tax. Prices are low enough already, so this wouldn't be a big deal.

      Restaurants would be subject to an addition 0.5 cent/dollar sales tax.

      Restaurant deliveries would be subject to an addition 0.7 cent/dollar sales tax (on top of the above).

      Etc.

    5. Re:You have got to be kidding.. by HardWoodWorker · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Your comment is quite obnoxious.

      What about my nephew, who attends a private charter school? We pay property taxes, even though he doesn't attend public schools, and now you're going to tell me I have to foot the bill for this? Sorry, buddy, but I don't have kids and I happily pay my property taxes. Even if I never plan on burdening the public school system, the products of these schools will be my caretakers when I'm elderly and my coworkers in my near future. It's to everyone's interest to ensure the success of all children in the United States. If you think otherwise, I kindly ask you to leave my country. Your self-centered outlook is killing America. As much as you'd like to think, you are not the master of your own destiny. When I hear comments like that, it's usually from those who regard themselves as "self-made" and think their success in life is entirely the result of their actions and that if everyone was as smart/hard-working/${pick your adjective} as they are, everyone would have the same fate and not be on-welfare/in-poverty/on drugs/${pick your social ill here}. Your success is based on the success of all America, especially the middle class. Do I think iPods are a worthwhile investment?...no, but I'll happily pay my taxes to support the school system. Frankly, I don't think iPods are the greatest waste of money you'll find in the Michigan budget this year.
    6. Re:You have got to be kidding.. by Dun+Malg · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I don't live in Michigan, so I don't know if this would work, but here is my idea.

      Implementing local sales taxes might create problems since the system is not set up to deal with that. However, what they can do is, if not already, create additional state sales tax rates.

      Certain businesses would have a higher sales tax rate depending on the type of business.

      Why? What possible justification is there for implementing a byzantine variable sales tax based on the type of business?

      Perhaps superstores (like Wal-Mart) be subject to an addition 1 cent/dollar sales tax. Prices are low enough already, so this wouldn't be a big deal. Ah, they old misguided "they can afford it" reasoning. People don't always shop at Wal-Mart because they're cheapskates. Many people shop there because they have very little money. So essentially what you're proposing is a 1% tax on being poor. Way to go.

      Restaurants would be subject to an addition 0.5 cent/dollar sales tax. Because only rich folks eat at restaurants. Especially fast food joints.

      Restaurant deliveries would be subject to an addition 0.7 cent/dollar sales tax (on top of the above). Because only rich folks have pizzas delivered. Seriously, are you trying to drive every little chinese food and pizza shop out of business, leaving only Dominoes?

      Etc. "Etc.", in other words "keep adding random taxes onto random businesses until we've either made up the deficit, or driven every last small business out of the state." You should run for state legislature. You'd fit right in.
      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    7. Re:You have got to be kidding.. by Hemogoblin · · Score: 1
      Somewhat offtopic, but I found this interesting.

      I went from paying under $3/pack of smokes to over $5 In Canada, small packs of smokes cost something like CAD $15 because of taxes. I don't smoke, so I don't know the exact price. Hell, I couldn't afford it even if I wanted to.
    8. Re:You have got to be kidding.. by feepness · · Score: 2, Informative

      (costing 3cents/gal. for 3 years for a total of an additional 9/gal)

      If 3 cents/gal for three years is 9 cents/gal, yes, Michigan is in trouble.

    9. Re:You have got to be kidding.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      He said: What about my nephew, who attends a private charter school? We pay property taxes, even though he doesn't attend public schools, and now you're going to tell me I have to foot the bill for this?

      You said: Sorry, buddy, but I don't have kids and I happily pay my property taxes. Even if I never plan on burdening the public school system, the products of these schools will be my caretakers when I'm elderly and my coworkers in my near future. It's to everyone's interest to ensure the success of all children in the United States. If you think otherwise, I kindly ask you to leave my country. Your self-centered outlook is killing America.

      Perhaps you'd care to explain how a child in a private school is not part of "all children." I won't even ask you to explain how an iPod giveaway (of rather dubious utility) to just certain kids is fair.

    10. Re:You have got to be kidding.. by Phoobarnvaz · · Score: 1

      Now you're telling me every little bastard in school is going to get an ipod?

      What about giving me an Ipod as well. Being 45 & living in Arizona...I deserve...NO...DEMAND...for the State of Michigan buy me an Ipod too...so that I can be cool...hip & stupid as well.

      I know how stupid that previous sentence sounds...but Michigan seem to be brimming over with taxpayer money to make sure their school kids have toys to be annoying with. What about giving them a "decent" education with the same money as they are going to waste with this boondoggle.

      --
      Don't worry about the world coming to an end today. It's already tomorrow in Australia. - Charles M. Schulz
    11. Re:You have got to be kidding.. by crackerjack911 · · Score: 1

      Sounds like you are from the Holland area as well. Everything you said is true. Too bad we had to shit up our state via our elected leaders ....

      --
      You tried your best and you failed miserably. The lesson: never try.
    12. Re:You have got to be kidding.. by FLEB · · Score: 1

      The option for public schooling is always open.

      --
      Information wants to be free.
      Entertainment wants to be paid.
      You just want to be cheap.
    13. Re:You have got to be kidding.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I live in Michigan and can tell you that there is no way this will pass. Also, I can tell you that there is no way in hell that you can blame Granholm for the economic climate in Michigan. EVERYTHING in Michigan has revolved around the auto industry, and since detroit has fucked up and made cars that are both not reliable and inefficient, the whole state is suffering, My best friend lost his job at a delphi plant, my dad lost his at a ford plant. There is no way to hold Granholm responsible for "driving businesses" away, both republicans and democrats have enacted measures to get more employment, it just won't work.

      And that tax is ridiculous, but the original plan to re-adjust the property tax would never pass (nor will this "entertainment" tax)

    14. Re:You have got to be kidding.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $10 for cheap cigarettes, ~$12 for brand-name. Cancer is expensive!

    15. Re:You have got to be kidding.. by Acer500 · · Score: 2, Informative

      (costing 3cents/gal. for 3 years for a total of an additional 9/gal)

      If 3 cents/gal for three years is 9 cents/gal, yes, Michigan is in trouble. I suspect he didn't phrase it correctly. Lemme Google for it... the Times Herald says that

      Bipartisan legislation, introduced Tuesday by Rep. Hoon-Yung Hopgood, D-Taylor, and House Minority Leader Craig DeRoche, R-Novi, would raise the gas tax 9 cents in three years - topping out at 28 cents per gallon by 2010. So it seems he was correct. I guess they will be increasing it by 3 cents every year.
      --
      There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics.
    16. Re:You have got to be kidding.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...so they're trying to get another gas tax added on (costing 3cents/gal. for 3 years for a total of an additional 9/gal)... You went to public school in Michigan, didn't you? It's a good thing this gas tax has an expiration date, otherwise it would cost you infinity cents/gallon!
    17. Re:You have got to be kidding.. by SScorpio · · Score: 1

      The main issue with Granholm is her stance of, oh poor me. The evil republicans in power before me killed the budget, etc. This did happen; however, she could have stopped the whining and been more proactive in making changes to help the economy. Sadly the republicans decided to put someone like Devos up for election during a election year were democrats dominated due towards the hatred of the current presidential administration.

      Michigan does need a new leader who can run the state more like a business; however, the person responsible for Amway wasn't it. Granholm was also let the single business tax expire which thankfully was in the original bill. I can only dream that all taxes had a required expiration date on them. This really killed small business across the state. As an employee at a small tech company the single business tax was close to the amount of all the other taxes we paid combined.

      To sum up the current state of Michigan for everyone, the economy is still shit after 6 years and we're losing people people like mad. The roads are still in disrepair, taxes are going higher, many companies are packing up and heading to greener pastures, and you can't travel a block without seeing an empty house or three that's been foreclosed or the people moved away and just can't sell. There are also more hair brained ideas like "let's send every laid off person to college to get a degree". That will really help which people with 4 year+ degrees can't find employment within the state. The only really good thing is working for a company that's being run by smart managers which is actually being able to expand and grow. This provides a nice paycheck, which is making the really bad state of the housing market look really good since I can be really picky and kill some people on a great deal.

    18. Re:You have got to be kidding.. by Antony-Kyre · · Score: 1

      I think you misunderstand.

      Where I live, we have a variable sales tax on the type of business in some localities, if I understand my state's tax system.

      The prices at superstores are low enough that a 1 cent/dollar sales tax increase is still going to be significantly cheaper than the non-superstores.

      Fast food needs to be looked upon as a luxury. If someone cannot afford it, just cook at home or buy premade food at grocery stores.

    19. Re:You have got to be kidding.. by yada21 · · Score: 1

      Where I live, we have a variable sales tax on the type of business in some localities, if I understand my state's tax system.
      Where is that? I've travelled all over the world starting businesses or helping people to improve them and I've never come across such a thing.
      --
      I will have a sig when the market demands it.
    20. Re:You have got to be kidding.. by Antony-Kyre · · Score: 1

      Maybe this would be a better idea with which to start.

      Break up the budget into sections. Assign each section a taxation method. Let voters decide on the rates. The below is the best I can find on the Internet, currently, for a general idea of the sections.

      K-12 Education: Sales tax.

      Higher Education and General Budget: Income tax.

      Social and Health Services: Payroll tax.

      Department of Justice: Corporate business tax.

      Transportation, Parks, and the like: Property tax.

    21. Re:You have got to be kidding.. by Antony-Kyre · · Score: 1

      Some of the localities in Washington state I believe charge a small extra sales tax at restaurants if I understand the tax code.

    22. Re:You have got to be kidding.. by Antony-Kyre · · Score: 1

      Found this information.

      http://dor.wa.gov/docs/pubs/industSpecific/Restaur ant.pdf

      Scroll down to page nine. (It's page 11 out of 36 in my PDF viewer.)

      Also, on a different note, factor in that Washington state lacks a personal income tax. We have a B&O tax, which is a rate on gross revenue of certain types of revenue.

    23. Re:You have got to be kidding.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cleveland and Pittsburg have recovered from the Steele industry leaving.

    24. Re:You have got to be kidding.. by mattatwork · · Score: 1

      They're probably just trying to mimic larger Universities that incorporate iPods into their curriculum.... It's a trendy idea and possibly attached to this proposed legislation so that they (democrats) can look hip/cool and try to put a positive spin (if that's even remotely possible) on a $1 billion deficit.... I agree with the need for the USB flash drives...there are so few good reasons that are out-weighed by how impractical and expensive this idea is.... Growing up in the Lansing area and having to use school computers, have a USB Flash drive then would have been far more helpful than any mp3 player.... Did anyone think of what happens in the classroom when students go from using their iPod for classroom use to listening to their favorite music or watching a TV show,podcast or movie? The teacher would have to wander around the classroom making sure everyone is doing what their supposed to....

      --
      I've refrained from profanity, racial/ethnic epitaphs and am 5'11" - how can I be ranked as troll?
  27. wtf mang by kaizokuace · · Score: 2, Insightful

    seriously wtf. This is the dumbest idea these policrats are spittin out since i dunno, ever. This money could be used to how about this: pay teachers more. I'm not saying get more teachers. Pay them higher salary. If i was a teacher and i suddenly got more money i would think i would enjoy teaching more. Happy teacher = learned student IMHO. I seriously think the country as a whole should be pumping money into the school system because now its not just the problem of too many people living too long or something and not enuff people putting into social security for each person that is receiving but that there will be too many idiots that cant make enuff money to put money into the system a guess what happens after that! The current generation will have dumb kids that cant support us when we are living way too long! or something like that i dunno maybe i am dumb and dont know how the system works but ranting at 5am is better than sleeping right now i think.

    --
    Balderdash!
  28. Sniff...Sniff.... by Gazzonyx · · Score: 1
    Is that....sarcasm that I smell?

    Fortunately, in this case, I think that treating this idea with anything other than sarcasm lends it too much credit. All politics aside. I'm not bashing it - it really is a stupid idea.

    How about the Pennsylvania Fund for Broke College Students who are holding their source code server together with duct tape and prayer? Namely, me. If they get music players, I demand that I be upgraded to an opteron at tax payers expense.

    --

    If I mod you up, it doesn't necessarily mean I agree with what you've said, sorry.

    1. Re:Sniff...Sniff.... by suv4x4 · · Score: 1

      Namely, me. If they get music players, I demand that I be upgraded to an opteron at tax payers expense.

      You clearly aren't after the BEST. Why have run-of-the-mill Opteron? They have just couple of cores. Nowadays, couple of cores is like a pocket calculator. Especially to Ruby on Rails.

      You don't have money for THE BEST? Then you have even less money for THE WORST, so THIS EIGHT CORE MAC PRO is the PERFECT machine for this, or any, purpose. It's created ESPECIALLY FOR HOLDING SOURCE CODE, by our top engineers.

      You don't just want it, you NEED IT. Treat yourself eight cores, and do it NOW, as next year we're releasing the 16 core Mac Pro and this one will be like a pocket calculator to it.

      - Steve J.

  29. Is it really Apple iPods? by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
    Oh well, this proves that Microsoft is not the only one that can buy politicians. :)

    TFA is very light on verifiable facts. It links to an editorial, not a news article. I dug arounbd for a while but couldn't find what the proposers of this idea actually said, only those attacking them.

    But one thing, it does say "MP3 player or iPod". This could very likely mean that "iPod" is being used as a generic term; like "walkman", "hoover", kleeenx", as just meaning a kind of hardware despite their being trademarks. Apple may get a look in, but if it goes through it could easily be some generic MP3 player with low-end specs.

    1. Re:Is it really Apple iPods? by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1

      The PO has been signed, for iPod Shuffles. Worse than useless, you can only listen to your studies in random order. What a joke.

  30. In soviet russia... by Lord+Duran · · Score: 1

    The iPod buys YOU!

  31. Incomplete support by halalay · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I expect that teachers will be given one day of training on incorporating the use of iPods into their teaching, provided no other resources or time to do successful incorporation, be blamed when the program flops, and be that much more reluctant to invest themselves in other new and promising tech initiatives in education.

    I am a high school info tech teacher in Michigan. Some of my classes are currently working to produce podcasts to help improve their understanding of available resources to support their current and future learning and to increase the range of media that they can communicate through. I have only just heard of the iPod initiative. The research I share with my students shows that good podcasts take planning and use intelligent editing. Class lectures done in podcasts will be of no more value than current hard copy if the students don't listen to or view them.

    iPods for learning have potential, but despite the good intentions, it currently is just another top down, half-baked solution to a serious problem. Past experience leads me to be very cynical of tech initiatives for education, not because they can't work, but because they are incompletely supported.

  32. 'ey mang! by Gazzonyx · · Score: 1

    I'm in the same boat - the not sleeping thing, not the rest of the post. Actually, people with low income put all of their money back into the economy. It's not like they're saving it when they're living paycheck to paycheck. And, as it goes, we need people in this country to do manual labor. That's the reality of this world, for better or worse, you fill a place in society whether you want to or not. If the current generation has dumb kids, well, we'll find something for them to do and their paychecks will go back into the economy. If they're all smart kids, we'll use them for research and sell the technology, knowing that not all of their paychecks will go back into the economy as fully. Albiet, a smaller part of a much larger whole in the latter case.

    --

    If I mod you up, it doesn't necessarily mean I agree with what you've said, sorry.

    1. Re:'ey mang! by kaizokuace · · Score: 1

      eh, i guess so. But you have to admit that you can argue for both sides of that coin. I think its time for a sangwich.

      --
      Balderdash!
    2. Re:'ey mang! by kaizokuace · · Score: 2, Insightful

      oh and one more thing, Why mp3 players! i understand that the goal is to get education to the student but these peeps just got the wrong idea. I say the development of serious games is more promising. Put money into developing games that can be given out to students (cross platform of course) that can help them learn subjects. I am not saying stuff like all the learning crap thats out now which seems to me like they think kids are dumb and need everything in a dumb kiddy theme (i hope you know what i mean by this). Educational games can be so much more than dora the explorer and reader rabbit! Overt education in software doesnt seem to work. You gotta throw some meat in with those veggies! and maybe kick it up a notch with some essence of emeril. BAM!

      --
      Balderdash!
  33. Every student? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So in kindergarten and below they can be renamed iPoddy? "Look teacher, no hands."

    Seriously though, the first song that should be loaded onto all of them should be The Wall

  34. Good point! by Gazzonyx · · Score: 1

    I was trying to be economical... That, and a mile down the road at work I have a dual processor, dual core, dual logical core Xeon 5000 1U. So, I have 8 logical cores...but, alas, you are correct; that isn't 8 physical cores. And I need a machine that reviews couldn't peg in benchmarking! Why, how else, could I keep my code safe? I'm going to write my representative immediately! Thank you, kind sir! I salute your sarcasm! :)

    --

    If I mod you up, it doesn't necessarily mean I agree with what you've said, sorry.

  35. It's the content by rwa2 · · Score: 1

    Ostensibly they're trying to save money on things like textbooks or language labs with tape decks. If that's the case, they should just stop refreshing textbooks for a while until they save enough money to buy an iPod and load it with educational content.

    Oh wait, schools hardly refresh textbooks as it is, that wouldn't raise enough money very fast :P

    Even then, they often forget that putting an iPod / PDA / laptop in a kids' hands is useless without any specialized content to throw on it, and the support structure to load and maintain that content.

    I'd question their decision to use an iPod rather than a more general-purpose PDA, which are cheaper, can run more programs, and still play back music and movies like an iPod, except for the larger screen that PDAs have. ;P

  36. Cool, a second iPod, courtesy of the taxpayers! by LaughingCoder · · Score: 3, Insightful

    As of 2003, there were 52 million school age children in the US (http://usgovinfo.about.com/cs/censusstatistic/a/l atestpopcounts.htm).

    As of the end of 2006, there were 42 million iPods sold (http://reviews.cnet.com/4531-10921_7-6416165.html )

    It strikes me that a large percentage of the Michigan school kids probably already have iPods.

    --
    The more you regulate a company, the worse its products become.
  37. I wrote to my representative about this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Despite being an independent that supported Democrats in the last election, I wrote my Republican State Representative and asked him to publicly chastise whoever inserted this into the bill. I also wrote the following to the Democratic House Speaker, Andy Dillon:

    "Either you believe MP3 players are more important than plugging the budget hole or you were asleep at the switch when one of your fellow congressman slipped it in. The former makes you look elitist and out of touch with the middle- and lower-class of Michigan, the latter paints you as an impotent speaker.?

    The Detroit News also pleasantly surprised me by writing the editorial: "An iPod for every kid? Are they !#$!ing idiots?" at http://www.detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=2 007704060333&imw=Y/

  38. Misguided by mattr · · Score: 3, Informative
    Yes this is moronic. They should spend the money on teachers and texts.


    On the other hand, even supposing they have plenty of money they still made a bad choice.


    Based on my experience with a new video iPod I received as a present:

    • Very hard to use for text. Bad navigational control, no paging, tiny font, must split in tiny chunks with max of IIRC 8MB total, can't display HTML. Even if they hacked Mac OSX into them, hardware wise it is a very bad choice for education.
    • Not robust. Synching while using as hd, often get persistent errors that suggest need to reformat.
    • For target age group, forcing kids to listen to lectures in class probably more effective than expecting them to synch and listen themselves. Though perhaps a library of video interviews by professionals/experts could be very cool! Aim at adults and get them to buy the hardware themselves! Spend the money on content/software (esp. free software programming) and not on hardware, doh!
    • There is a very effective way to use tech in language, and I've been there. Middlebury's summer intensive language program had fabulous IIRC Tandenberg tape recorders you use in a tiny room of your own, with headset/mic and volume controls so you can superimpose your voice on that of the language drill prof on tape. By pressing revers very often you can (I did successfully) build a very good accent. Also Cornell University's Dept. of Modern Languages had similar tape recorders. So you want something with robust hardware buttons like that. maybe a linear slide is okay but the circular one on the video ipod is extremely difficult to use to back up to a place you want to be a few seconds ago, due to both physical configuration and gooiness. Having it digital instead of tape makes no difference with this screen size, though with larger screen you could show frames ever 1 sec into the past and click on one for example. Also power drainage a problem. Also there are cheaper, very tiny mp3 players that work fine with no moving parts or scratch-sensitive coating either.
    • If they went for a cheap ipod shuffle that is just totally dumb. just shuffle again if you hit a lecture.
    1. Re:Misguided by thrillseeker · · Score: 1

      Yes this is moronic. They should spend the money on teachers and texts.

      How about this? They don't take the money from the taxpayers in the first place and allow the taxpayers to decide how best to spend their own money?

    2. Re:Misguided by arpad1 · · Score: 1

      Now that's funny.

      --
      Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum, minutus carborata descendum pantorum.
    3. Re:Misguided by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > How about this? They don't take the money from the taxpayers in the first place and allow the taxpayers to decide how best to spend their own money?

      Oh nice, so we end up with 50% illiteracy because some bozos would rather put their money into SUVs, swimming pools, etc than into their kid's education. Then of course, these morons quickly thereafter become every else's problem to deal with.

      Or say, we go with vouchers? Another nice one - it sure helps fund exclusive religious schools, but it isn't very good for those who can't afford to drive their kids to school every day, and who exactly will have to deal with those with borderline social or educational issues? Go ahead and force schools to comply with No Child Left Behind, tons of bureacracy and educate those with issues - and the precious charter and private schools show zero advantage over most public schools.

    4. Re:Misguided by mattr · · Score: 1

      Sure, but it might be intelligent to spend more money on teachers and texts, or even on language learning equipment, even if the state has a financial problem. Your suggestion is one possibility but it assumes they already have enough of an education budget. Unfortunately TFA does prove that they don't know how to spend an increase so maybe your choice is the safest.

  39. Ha ha only serious by argent · · Score: 1

    You can easily find as capable and reliable MP3 players for less than half the price of an equivalent iPod.

    You exaggerate, I think... the Apple Tax is more like 40% than 100%.

  40. Excuse me, Michigan by Duffie · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Exactly why has this become our top priority. I've watched from forty miles away as they've closed down Detroit schools and shut that community out more than they already are. Places like Detroit and inner Flint are struggling to even fit the definition of a city in the first world, and now our economic priority is... digital audio players! Oh, yeah. Because we all know that they're going to go home and put on their device scientific podcasts and discussions debating the importance of the Han Dynasty in China. We all know how academically sound students are anyway. THIRTY EIGHT MILLION DOLLARS? We just had an election centered on our business tax and how we can appropriate funds once we remove it. WELL THERE YOU GO. Better yet, let's spend that 38 million reviving the education system to include some kind of motivation and benefit to graduate well. But now. Now teachers and future teachers, like me, will get to hear "Sorry Mrs. Teacher, I didn't do my homework podcast thing because I had to rip cd's onto the ipod." Great job on the priorities, little Jimmy. Your government hath done thineself proud.

    1. Re:Excuse me, Michigan by biobogonics · · Score: 1

      Exactly why has this become our top priority. I've watched from forty miles away as they've closed down Detroit schools and shut that community out more than they already are. Places like Detroit and inner Flint are struggling to even fit the definition of a city in the first world, and now our economic priority is... digital audio players! Oh, yeah. Because we all know that they're going to go home and put on their device scientific podcasts and discussions debating the importance of the Han Dynasty in China. We all know how academically sound students are anyway. THIRTY EIGHT MILLION DOLLARS? We just had an election centered on our business tax and how we can appropriate funds once we remove it. WELL THERE YOU GO. Better yet, let's spend that 38 million reviving the education system to include some kind of motivation and benefit to graduate well. But now. Now teachers and future teachers, like me, will get to hear "Sorry Mrs. Teacher, I didn't do my homework podcast thing because I had to rip cd's onto the ipod." Great job on the priorities, little Jimmy. Your government hath done thineself proud.

      I live about 30 minutes from Saginaw. What started in Detroit is now commonplace in Pontiac, Flint, Lansing and Saginaw. Crime is rampant. Drive by shootings and arson are commnplace in the large cities. The governor is trying to bail the state out of an enormous budget deficit. Part of her plan is to put at 2% tax on services (with some exceptions). This is supposed to replace the already onerous "Single Business Tax" which will not actually have expired when her new taxes come into force. In addition, lawmakers propose raising the cost of license plates by 50%. Not only are we being taxed to death, we are being "feed" to death as well.

      The big 3 auto makers are in danger of bankruptcy. 50% of their workforce has been laid off. In addition parts suppliers are going under left and right. Michigan is an economic basket case and all our governor can do is raise taxes. Michigan is circling the bottom of the toilet - and the governor and the legislature just keep flushing.

      This proposal is beyond idiotic. If things get worse here, I will do something no native Michigander ever wants to do - I'm moving to Ohio.

    2. Re:Excuse me, Michigan by Duffie · · Score: 1

      Exactly. Maybe my Spanish degree from Grand Valley will not only help me be a Spanish teacher, but may be a fallback for if I have to move to Mexico.

    3. Re:Excuse me, Michigan by biobogonics · · Score: 1

      Exactly. Maybe my Spanish degree from Grand Valley will not only help me be a Spanish teacher, but may be a fallback for if I have to move to Mexico.

      You could move to Saginaw instead, though you probably would hate being in the neighborhood of your rival SVSU.

    4. Re:Excuse me, Michigan by Frozen+Void · · Score: 1

      Apple might have a hand in that.

    5. Re:Excuse me, Michigan by Alex+Singleton · · Score: 1

      Giving out iPods is a nice thing but policymakers have totally forgotten the opportunity cost of doing so.

  41. Devil's advocacy thread by hey! · · Score: 1

    Arts education, particularly music education is something every student should have, and most students need more of.

    You can try to stuff more math and language arts training into children, but in most cases the marginal effort would be better spent on music education. Yes, of course we need basic skills in math and writing. But actual fluency in using those skills has a lot in common with music, and we have no better way of training those aspects of functional literacy than music.

    My state has rigorous exams in every academic area by which schools are judged (we had this even before No Child Left Behind). My daughter single handed raised her school's math ranking by acing the math exam. She's also an opera nut (bit of a snob actually). The facts are not unrelated. We were not a "Baby Mozart" kind of family, we've just always enjoyed music and we watch opera and musical theater DVDs regularly, just for pleasure.

    Some people seem to believe that making schools more effective is equivalent to making them grim, joyless places.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    1. Re:Devil's advocacy thread by night_flyer · · Score: 1

      are these iPods overwrite protected?

      --


      Thanks to file sharing, I purchase more CDs
      Thanks to the RIAA, I buy them used...
  42. someone elses kid? by bl8n8r · · Score: 1

    sfw.. dont forget someone else will be buying *your* kids ipod then. The cost of the ipod will most likely be covered 10 times over by the amount of tax increases the state will gain:

          "..tax soda and satellite TV services, among other things, to raise funds."

    --
    boycott slashdot February 10th - 17th check out: altSlashdot.org
  43. They are asking for a 504 discrimination lawsuit! by beetle496 · · Score: 1

    By design, but not for technical reasons, the iPod is not accessible to the blind nor the Deaf. Both RockBox and VoiceOver demonstrate, independently, paths to solving the first challenge. Captioning for video is an even easier fix that effects even more people. Apple only last month made iTunes accessible.

    --
    I paid the going retail price for a Windows screen reader and got a free Unix computer!
  44. mnb Re:$920 million deficit means more spending, r by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    True happiness come from what is within, not what surrounds.

  45. I wonder if there would be the same type... by lord_mike · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...of outrage if the suggestion was to buy MacBooks for every classroom.

    Probably not... although, I imagine that 30 years ago, there was probably some resistance to buying kids Apple II's in their schools, with the same old curmudgeon responses, "But the roads stink. We don't need more stuff in schools... bah!!!"

    Yes, Michigan roads stink... I always know I've hit the Michigan border when I hear the "kerchunk, kerchunk" every few seconds... you can set a timer to it. Perhaps it's the fact that you guys drive like 90 MPH.

    Michigan is in the same dire straights that Ohio is now, but it's not because of Jennifer Granholm or anything the state government did or did not do. The U.S. automobile industry is in the tanker, and the economy of Michigan feeds off of the Big 3. No amount of state intervention (or non-intervention) would have helped the situation. If you can blame anyone, blame our federal government, who has shown little interest in protecting American industries. Michigan is just feeling it's disastrous effects. Of course, political opponents are using this to their advantage. But, does anyone really believe that DeVos would have been able to improve anything?

    This single line item in the budget that has everybody so in an uproar won't pass. It can't pass, since the state can't run a deficit like the feds... It sure struck a nerve, but unfairly so, I believe.

    Thanks,

    Mike

    1. Re:I wonder if there would be the same type... by Scudsucker · · Score: 1

      If you can blame anyone, blame our federal government, who has shown little interest in protecting American industries.

      I blame the American car companies for not making vehicles that people want to buy, and the corporate practice of rewarding executive failure with multi-million dollar bonuses.

    2. Re:I wonder if there would be the same type... by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      blame the American car companies for not making vehicles that people want to buy, and the corporate practice of rewarding executive failure with multi-million dollar bonuses.

      If they would stop the second, the first would stop by itself.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    3. Re:I wonder if there would be the same type... by maxume · · Score: 1

      I blame the corporations for writing pension IOUs and the unions for accepting them. The automakers can't service their obligations because shareholders put the money they should have been using to do that in their own pockets for 40 years.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    4. Re:I wonder if there would be the same type... by Darth_brooks · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes, Michigan roads stink... I always know I've hit the Michigan border when I hear the "kerchunk, kerchunk" every few seconds... you can set a timer to it. Perhaps it's the fact that you guys drive like 90 MPH.

      Ahh michigan, where you can go by a state trooper doing 80, because he's looking for the guys doing 110...

      Road conditions in Michigan suck for four reasons:

      1. Climate. The temp swings 120 degrees every year, and usually can swing 60 degrees in a week. Yeah, I know this happens in other states, but Michigan usually gets hit harder.
      2. Budget vs. Infrastructure. Michigan has a MASSIVE amount of highway space. More than it needs now. But they still have to pay to maintain it.
      3. Salt. Michigan salts roads and gets the plow trucks out at the first hint of snow. Here in Sunny South Bend, Plow trucks come out oh, you know, when they get around to it. I've seen double the snow during the winter here in SoBend than I saw in SE Mich, and I've seen half the plows. Don't know if that means we underplow, or they overplow, either way, those trucks are out in force come winter in Mich.
      4. Weight limits. Michigan has the 2nd highest weight limit for Semi's in the union. We allow trucks of 164,000 pounds on the roads. For reference, a GE Genesis locomotive (think amtrak) is 254,000 pounds. The official line is that we require more axles to distribute the load. Which in and of itself is a load. You're still driving tanks over abused roads.

      Individually, none of these problems are huge. Every other state deals with the same issues. But the cumulative effect makes things pretty rough. The funny thing about it is, driving into and out of Detroit is actually pretty nice now that they've redone I-94. That was a true shithole of a highway until the superbowl motivated them into doing some real work.

      --
      There are some people that if they don't know, you can't tell 'em.
  46. education.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah right. Education. In 3 hours these iPods will be filled with that jungle junk hip hop music and there will ghetto dance parties everywhere.

  47. Good grief by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    While the merits of distributing a solid-state audio player to every child are certainly debatable, the idea of supplying iPods is not. Why should Apple receive a state subsidy when there are many less expensive and more capable MP3 players out there? Just so the kids will feel good about themselves? Half of the things will probably be stolen the first week after they're handed out. In any event, this is a complete waste of taxpayer dollars, if the idea is to allow children to receive audio lessons. And no, I didn't RTFA, I just felt the need to spew a random comment.

    --
    The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    1. Re:Good grief by Scudsucker · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Yawn. Apple does offer significant discounts for bulk and education purposes. Especially when good, cheap publicity is involved. As for "more capable", they don't need radio tuners in school, and students also don't need to be walking around with voice recorders that will be used to record embarrassing conversations to post them on Myspace.

    2. Re:Good grief by DMoylan · · Score: 1

      yeah!

      make the buggers suffer! give them a zune! ;-)

  48. Why You're Wrong by Luscious868 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Don't you understand man? You wanting to get out of Michigan as fast as you can, which has been the trend for highly educated students coming out of Michigan Universities, is a big reason for why Michigan is going down the tubes. If you really care about our state, you would stay and do your part in trying to bring back economic prosperity to the region.

    You're wrong. Michigan is experiencing a single state recession and the Governor's solution is to raise taxes on an already overburdened population. Michigan should be cutting spending and lowering taxes in a bid to retain those of us who are contributing to the tax base instead of reaching into our wallets and trying to take more. Michigan has to compete with 49 other states in addition to countries the world over. When will the Governor realize this and take steps to make Michigan a more attractive place to do business instead of raising taxes and making an already bad economic situation worse? Nobody has an obligation to stay in Michigan, especially when it's being mismanaged in such a horrendous fashion.

    The Michigan Congressional Delegation is also to blame. For every dollar Michigan residents send to the federal government the State of Michigan receives about $0.85 cents back in return. It's a crime that Michigan is a donor state given our current economic situation. Especially when there is every indication that it's going to get worse before it gets better. Our Congressmen and Senators should be on the floor of their respective Houses of Congress every day that Congress is in session making an issue of this situation! Why would anybody expect residents with the means to stay in this state when their elected representatives continue to show such a failure of leadership?

  49. Something better to steal then your lunch money by davef139 · · Score: 1

    If this goes through it will be a bullys wish, no more crappy robbing kids of thier lunch money, steal thier iPod! I could just see a bunch of the eBaying it anyways.

  50. maybe there's another side to this story? by kpharmer · · Score: 0

    You do realize that the paper that really blew this is The Detroit News - a highly conservative paper. A paper that seems to criticize every single expenditure on education excepting only vouchers for religious schools.

    So, it's not unlikely that there's another side to this story.

    teachers podcasting lectures:
    - http://www.apple.com/education/solutions/itunes_u/ profiles/umich.html

    learn chinese in michigan schools - while the schools save money on teachers:
    - http://education.zdnet.com/?p=934

    info about ipods for educational institutions:
    - http://campustechnology.com/articles/40744/
    - https://segue.middlebury.edu/index.php?action=site &site=achapin-ipod

    And $38m is a lot, but the benefits of the plan were conveniently left out of the editorials - and it's just possible that some of that cost will be offset by savings.

  51. yeah right by DaSH+Alpha · · Score: 1

    Hmm, thought maybe the origin of the article might have been April Fools day but didn't see that (only backtracked the article a few levels though). FTA: "to transport or store digital documents and projects" How about a cheap USB flash drive instead? It would likely be much easier to use than an iPod for transferring documents. Not sure what kids need to transfer so much stuff for though... When I was in college, I did my CS work remotely and just transfered the work via FTP or something between their system and mine. FTA: ", or to listen to lectures" Yeah, maybe for college w/ large auditoriums or if you miss lectures. For grade/high school, how about just going to class and actually listening for a change? you know, what you're supposed to be at school for Oh yeah, plus if they used iPods, what about all of the kids that don't even have computers at home? They'd probably just sell their iPod for money anyway...

  52. Re:$920 million deficit means more spending, right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Agreed. I am currently working on my undergraduate in mechanical engineering, and I don't think there's any way you could keep me in Michigan after I finish up with school. Also, it seems like every engineering student I talk to is planning on leaving the state once they graduate. Granholm's plan to keep students in the state is failing and with the current state of the big 3, it's going to be pretty hard (if not impossible) to bring the state's economy back to where it used to be.

  53. educational iPod ? by billcopc · · Score: 2, Interesting

    How is an iPod educational ? I remember way back in the 90's when I was a student :P We didn't have MP3 course materials, we had audio cassettes. A portable cassette player in the 90's cost about $20. Then when CD burners got cheap, people were distributing discs. A portable CD player in the 2000's costs $20. iPod players cost $200 right now, and I doubt they'll ever be $20, not even the chinese knockoffs. I say stick to CD players. They're cheap, they're reliable, they're ubiquitous, they're well understood by even the dumbest members of society; all facts that do not apply to digital players at this point in time.

    Of all the things going on in Michigan right now, this is not a priority. Just walk up to any state citizen and ask them what they think their government should be doing. The ones who answer "iPod!", just smack them over the head with a shovel! What most honest, self-supporting people in North America want from their government is less bullshit like this, and lower taxes. The more stuff the government buys with tax money, the closer we get to being full-on communists.

    --
    -Billco, Fnarg.com
  54. Laptops for kids opposed too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.eschoolnews.com/news/showstory.cfm?Arti cleID=5812
    August 2, 2005--One of the nation's most ambitious programs to equip teachers and students with laptop computers "is no longer an option," declared Kathie Johnstone, chair of the Cobb County, Ga., school board. A county judge ruled against the laptop program on July 29, and Johnstone's announcement came after the school board met with its attorney for two hours and 15 minutes on Aug. 1.

    Granted, this was partly ue to the illegal use of the taxes, but there was plenty of opposition to the concept too,

    http://www.ajc.com/metro/content/custom/blogs/educ ation/entries/2005/02/10/cobbs_laptop_extravaganza .html

    1. Re:Laptops for kids opposed too by cashman73 · · Score: 1

      Cobb County, Georgia?!?! Really?! If they gave students iPods, it would probably be with the primary intent to distract them away from actually reading their anti-religious, anti-Christian science textbooks that discuss the "Theory of Evolution."

  55. Alternative Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wait, what about giving the money to the 100,000+ workers that have been laid off since 2000? It would only be fair to the people who used to be the backbone of our economy. I'm just waiting for this story to come on the news:

    -Kid brings home new iPod
    -Kid tells family how he got the iPod
    -Father, who hasn't had a job since 2003, goes crazy and kills family

    Growing up near Detroit it really wouldn't surprise me that much.

  56. Win-Win! by BigFoot48 · · Score: 1

    I suggest the free iPod giveaway be combined with a tax on iPods sold on eBay by Michigan residents! A win-win situation!

  57. what? by LSanchez · · Score: 1

    What will this accomplish? How could any digital music player be educational if you gave it to teenagers?

    according to TFA, it says it could be used to to transport or store digital documents and projects, or to listen to lectures.

    couldn't you buy a cheap small flash drive instead? Floppy disks? Could kids instead take notes at the lecture instead of listening to it later?

    The money used to buy this could be spent on much more important things. Teachers, books, actual supplies, etc; This will only make students perform worse.

    However, I doubt that even politicians would be dumb enough to pass this.

  58. Wait a minute... by supaneko · · Score: 1

    Well, this is just a little bit grotesque. Last week The Oakland Press had on a story on the front page titled, "Government Shutdown." The entire article, as well as many of the front page articles of the past three weeks, talked about how the governor of Michigan and the Michigan legislator are in a battle about how to balance Michigan's budget and lose the debt that was obtained MANY years ago. The articles always mention how the politicians are looking to cut certain government programs and reduce the funds given to cities and other areas of Michigan's government. And of course, what better way to "cut" spending than to buy an MP3 player for every student in Michigan. COME ON NOW. They already cut funding for schools by $30+ per student. Now they want to increase it by $200+ on something that hasn't even been proven to aid students in learning? If I could place a huge thumbs down icon here, I would.

  59. Apple by loconet · · Score: 1

    Seems to me they've been at this for a while. Any Apple shareholders in the committee that decided this?

    --
    [alk]
  60. One word: podcasts! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone who has gotten used to using itunes to subscribe to podcasts with automatic syncing to their ipod so they can listen in the car while commuting or on the treadmill, or those other disjointed timeslices people have these days will understand why this is the best idea anyone has ever had for education. But what will all the teachers do once their knowledge has been recorded in a way that can be re-used?

  61. I listen to molecular bio in my car by TheSync · · Score: 1

    Recently I've been listening to the Introduction to Molecular and Cellular Biology podcast during my commute. It is pretty cool!

    1. Re:I listen to molecular bio in my car by mizzzy! · · Score: 1

      you are an exception. haha i'm sure SOME kids would use it for intellectual purposes. i mean, i downloaded the audio book "a tale of two cities" and listened to it while i walked i totally aced the test, which was pretty sweet. :-) that also meant i didn't read the book... but o well haha. but i don't think that the cost of an ipod would, in the long run, be worth the effort. and plus, that's putting a lot of expensive murchandise on the streets. i just think it's a waste of money when there are countless other options.

      --
      ~mizzy
  62. Always too late by krugg234 · · Score: 1

    Damnit! I went to Duke and live in Michigan. I'm always just a few years too old to get my free iPod.

  63. Re:$920 million deficit means more spending, right by grim4593 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There are many reasons Michigan is going down the tubes. All the auto industries are leaving, the government is fubar, and taxes are going up. Who in their right might would want to stay here? Every other week there is something on the news about such and such company laying off 1000-10000 workers. Those that are not being laid off are being forced to take pay cuts.

    I like Michigan, I have lived here my whole life. Most of my family lives here too. However, if I can't get a good paying job after graduating college, I am going to leave Michigan because I have to make a living.

  64. Love the lack of fuss over no bid contracts by jmorris42 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    > Why not spend the money on text books or library books or classrooms or teachers? Or all four?

    Well if ya are committed to pissing away $30 mil when you already have a deficit I guess what you say makes sense.

    And I want to know how Apple manages to get their product specced in legilation, avoiding bidding them out. Of course Apple, being by far the most expensive vendor, would never win the contract and some no name digital player wouldn't have the buzz for the bill's backers. This stinks of corruption, we need an investigation. At least an investigation would cost less and scuttle the project at least until it finished.

    [sarcasm]
    You Apple fans should be opposed as well. If every kid is walking around with YOUR beloved fashion accessory just how the hell does your self esteem get boosted by being better than everyone else?
    [/sarcasm]

    --
    Democrat delenda est
  65. This is a good thing by stickyc · · Score: 1

    Now there will be more folks seeding the music torrents.

  66. I, for one. . . by MagusSlurpy · · Score: 1

    I, for one, welcome our future digitally-outfitted Michander overlords!

    --
    My sister opened a computer store in Hawaii. She sells C shells by the seashore.
  67. Investing in the future... of party dominance by poity · · Score: 1

    What better way to ensure your political future than to give trinkets of luxury to the most easily influenced of people?

    Those in high school will be eligible to vote in less than 2 electoral cycles years; those in middle school, less than 4 cycles; and those in elementary, less than 8. So within the next few elections, you'll have gained the favor of an entire generation of new Democratic voters.

    How crafty.

    --
    your thin skin doesn't make me a troll
  68. A saying in Michigan by xyz321 · · Score: 1

    There's a saying in Michigan: When the auto industry has a hiccup the state has a heart attack.

    At this point the auto industry is having a heart attack, the state is in the ICU, and the state treasury is in the coffin... and politicians want to do this?

  69. How about ONE LAPTOP PER CHILD? by Doug+Dante · · Score: 1
    How about one laptop per child instead? They're going to go on sale to consumers developed countries for $200.00 each, right? How about we get them for all Michigan children at 10% off? That would be $180.

    What's an Ipod Nano today? The cheapest on amazon is $142.00. Getting those at 10% off is still $127.80.

    So we can give the kids laptops for only $52.20 more each? Isn't that more worth it?

    --
    The world will not get better through technology. We must seek to be better people.
  70. I'm usually hesitant to agree with teachers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but I really feel I have to here, at least on one major points: these iPods will NOT be used for school purposes. I still remember, before computers were in every household, when families would buy one for their children "for school purposes" and yes, nobody expects the iPods to be solely used for school, but has anyone considered that the cost of these things, when compared to their actual use for the intended purposes, may not be worth it?

    Maybe this is a stupid question but: Has anyone thought about what exactly the iPods are actually going to be used for? I'm not seeing it in the CNet article, nor in the editorial, but it doesn't exactly make sense to bring out any positive elements of a pla you're criticizing.

    That aside, let's guess what the uses are... making the classes available for kids who want to review them? Nonsense, time is limited even for a kid, so they're not going to run home and re-listen to hours of lectures just to make sure they didn't miss anything. They're also not likely to jot down "remember to backtrack to minute 17 to hear the last three parts of that formula." It's easier, and quicker, to just look at the neighbor's notes. (although now someone is going to say "what if the kid is too shy to look at his neighbor's notes and this information is too critical that without it he'll fail!" or some similarly elaborate construction of facts to which I would respond "Michigan should spend 38 million dollars so that ultra super-shy minority won't potentially be faced with the need to someday ask someone else for three lines of text. How much do you want the state to pay so that kid will be able to talk to 911 without breaking his vow of shyness."

    Yes, sometimes kids are absent, but do you really think they're going to spend 6 hours listening to audio-copies of the day they missed, on top of a couple hours reading the stuff they had to read for those classes and doing the homework too?

    How often are the new recordings going to be made available? Do they get uploaded at the end of every class, or just at the end of the week? Because that means by the time you listen to the class you missed on Monday, your class has already moved into Friday's lesson.

    Is every class recorded? Even in a small school, you're looking at a couple dozen teachers recording, transferring and uploading hours of class each day.

    Is it just classes that a particular student's going to miss, because I don't remember every single member of my grade showing up every single day back in school, so the teacher is still essentially digitizing 6 hours of class a day almost every day, only now they're doing it for the benefit of a single person rather than for the global benefit (if you only have to record classes for absent students, then you can't say you're doing it on a global scale for the benefit of all students, because that indicates that when all the kids are in class, there is no global benefit to be had from making the recordings.)

    I'm currently in Law School, where we've had video and audio taping for a while (provided you're going to miss the class for a reason, you give advance notice to set up the recording and all that). It's much easier and much more convenient to just borrow someone's notes, but the rest is an option and some kids actually take the school up on it. Recently, podcasts have been explored. I listened to one taken for a make-up class (which is when the teacher plays hookie and has to reschedule the class at a time that's not likely to be conducive to the entire class) and although it started out kind of rough, the sound quality wasn't that bad. It's hard to skim through an audio lecture (my opinion) because you can't jump without wondering if he's saying something important. You can try to jump through boring anecdotes, but you might miss the point, if any, and you might spend more time backtracking to get to the end of the story/start of information than you would just listening to the whole thing straight through.

    And of course that leads to

  71. An ipod for ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    every kid in Michigan.

    Sounds like a bargain, but I've got nowhere to keep them.
    I think I'll keep the ipod.

  72. And what will they learn? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The students won't learn a thing, but taxpayers will learn that they shouldn't have done this.

    Check the administrators for conflict of interest (e.g., holdings of Apple stock).

  73. Why not use mp3 player made in Michigan? by rewinn · · Score: 1

    Making it here would mean that the money spent would cycle back into the economy, providing a double benefit.

    Of course, we would have to conceal the manufacturing facility as a professional sports stadiums.

  74. Feel sorry for the teachers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is a little off topic but...

    Why do so many people feel sorry for teachers? Most teachers are incompetent. Even if we could magically raise their salaries to attract more qualified people, none of the current teachers will ever be fired, and the people hiring them are too incompetent to tell a good teacher from a bad one.

  75. iPods can be educational by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I taught myself spanish by listening to Pimsleur's Speak and Read Essential Spanish series on an iPod while traveling through Mexico. I didn't even bring a dictionary.

    As a child, I really enjoyed listening to audio books on audio cassette. Children have active imaginations. They absorb information like sponges from day one. Parents that aren't fueling that fire are missing the one chance the child has to get ahead. The iPod could be a great addition to the learning process if used for audio books. Culturally, it couldn't hurt if children listened to music. I would be concerned about their ears... the iPod needs safeguards to protect children's (and adult's) ears.

  76. Re:$920 million deficit means more spending, right by RyoShin · · Score: 1

    Agreed. I'm also a student (from Iowa) in Michigan, and plan to graduate at the end of this year or beginning of next year. When I do, I'm getting the hell out of here and not looking back. Even if my college offered me a free Masters run, I would be hesitant to pick it up.

    Perhaps it comes from living in Flint, but the combination of the idiot government, the attitude of a lot of the people around here, and the roads (yes, they are that bad to be a large reason to leave) that I've seen all around tells me that I'll be much better off in some other state.

  77. RIAA by n1hilist · · Score: 1

    In related news, The RIAA have been seen setting up camp.

  78. I think you mis-interpreted it the headline. by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1
    I believe they mean ONE iPod for every kid in Michigan. Though, I can't imagine how useful that would be for such a large population base. Though it does sound like one of the more expensive models. Maybe it has lots of headphone jacks.


    -FL

  79. Kids less able. . . by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1
    My SO's father is a teacher. He's one of the good ones; praised by everybody in town, kids and adults alike. He tells me that in his estimation on average, children today as compared to kids from when he started teaching, are far less able to handle the intellectual/emotional demands of school and life in general.

    My guess is that we can blame video games, TV, and electronic brain-mushing devices of all sorts.

    Kids are designed to interact directly with the world in order that their growing brains can absorb as much useful data as possible. Childhood grants a lot of time to assimilate all of this experiential information, and the drive to collect this experience is built into children as the desire to play.

    Now, if you replace the real world with a candy-coated sensory alternative, (aka, a virtual reality 'pod'), then all those thousands of hours the child would normally spend interacting with the world are not just wasted, but actually serve to create bad programming which limits them for the rest of their lives.

    The fact that Apple knew enough to so aptly name their creepy little device suggests that they also should know better.


    -FL

  80. mass hysteria by chocolateicecream · · Score: 1

    So, you believe everything you read -- or don't read? Here's the source of all this disinformation -- an unsigned editorial in the Detroit News -- http://www.detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=2 007704060333. The author does not cite his source for this idea, but cleverly talks about it alongside of other issues and proposals and mentions the name of the Democratic leader of the House to imply he's responsible without actually saying so. You don't really know from this whether anyone actually proposed any such thing, or what support it got. And this is the only reference for the CNET commentary. If this were really news, why isn't it reported as news by anyone anywhere? But the Detroit News got you all riled up against the Democrats in Congress, so they achieved their objective. They were counting on you to not dig any deeper, and you kindly obliged. These are the very same tricks that got us where we are in Iraq. You would think we'd be more inquisitive by now about facts and sources. Is it any wonder this "news" paper, more aptly named The Detroit Rumor Monger, could not survive without merging with the only other paper in town?

  81. Re:Cool, a second iPod, courtesy of the taxpayers! by toQDuj · · Score: 1

    Well, I'd say quite a chunk of the 42 million ipods would've been sold in Extra-American [sic] countries, so don't count on most schoolkids having iPods. Never mind the fact that people beyond the 10-18 age group might have bought them as well.

    B.

    --
    Every experiment which ends in a big bang is a good experiment.
  82. Blame microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If this was microsoft, everyone would be up in arms about this. But Apple-loving slashdot sucks Apple's dick yet again.

    They're NOT a nice company!!!

  83. Now I know... by jlindy · · Score: 1

    Now I know why the budget for public libraries here has been cut from next to nothing, to even less. I'm left to wonder what program(s) gets cut to pay for the iTunes subscriptions to go with the iPods.

  84. Re:They are asking for a 504 discrimination lawsui by soft_guy · · Score: 1

    The shuffle is as accessible to the blind as anything else (the shuffle is what the schools were buying). And why the hell would deaf people need a shuffle anyway?

    --
    Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
  85. Hmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a high schooler in Michigan (Otsego High School) I am very surprised to hear this. At my school at least, they stopped buying tissues and make you use toilet paper instead (last year they ran out of toilet paper 2 months before school got out), they have a single T1 line shared over 4 schools resulting in sub-dialup speeds and "This page failed to load." messages around 90% of the time, we have to bring our own paper and pencils and they still have desks from the 1960's, which often break and hurt kids. Maybe it's just me, but I don't think this is the first priority we need to work on.

  86. Your Tax Dollars at work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    AND THEY COULD GET A OLPC computer for every child for 1/3rd the price.

    If this passes, they should arrest the people who vote for it!

  87. Current Indoctrination not working; need more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Aparently the current indoctrination from the teachers isn't working. There are too many
    students learning to think for themselves. They have to do something to reverse this.

  88. Breaking News! by cashman73 · · Score: 1

    This just in! RIAA lawyers have sent letters threatening to sue to every child in the state of Michigan. Each letter asks the child for $3,000 to prevent a lawsuit due to the intent that they might break the law by downloading music illegally to their free, government-issued iPod. They don't have the iPod yet, and they haven't downloaded any music yet, but the RIAA calculates a 90% probability that they will do so, and they are trying to institute some preventative measures in place before they actually do download illegal files. Any child that fails to pay will be sued in Michigan Court.

  89. Reply and comment by Antony-Kyre · · Score: 1

    With Michigan having an income tax, I'm kind of curious about something. Are you a resident of Michigan or another state? If I'm not mistaken, someone who is attending college in one state but has residence in another state (legally speaking) can avoid paying the income tax in that state they're going to college in (but they'd owe tax in the former state if their former state has income tax to begin with, I think). Don't ask me to cite sources, I cannot remember (provided I have this correct).

    In reply to something else (not the parent poster), I have this to say...

    The federal government is a problem for tax revenue in a lot of states. The federal government heavily taxes and wastes a lot of that money on "defense" related things. This leaves less money for the states and the things they need to accomplish.

    Here is what they should consider doing in Michigan. Break up the budget into specific categories, such as education, health care, etc. Then assign specific taxation methods to each one. Let the voters decide on the rates, therefore allowing the voters decide on balancing the budget.

  90. Solve social problems through technology... Uh-huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Once again, a colossal waste of money due to the ignorance behind the half-witted idea (on the part of those who don't understand technology) that human/social problems can be solved by technology.

    Give a kid an iPod, that'll solve the fact that he/she isn't learning. It's a great solution to the idea that he/she may be dicking around in class, sleeping or some other nonsense. Yes! Give a kid an iPod. That'll take care of the idea that teachers have been emasculated to the point that they have no chance of fixing the problems in their classrooms that lead to slowed learning for fear that they'll be sued, lose their jobs etc. etc. by telling/forcing a kid to straighten his/her ass up in class and get it together.

    Wasn't the whole "give a kid a laptop" lesson enough for lawmakers? While we're at it, why not give every kid a cell phone so they can "take notes" on that, too? They'll definitely not abuse THAT.

    Pathetic.

  91. Is it just Shuffles? by beetle496 · · Score: 1

    I agree that the Shuffle is less discriminatory, but I do not find the specific product named in TFA and the school objectives quote a more ambitious agenda that shuttling documents and recorded lectures. (And if the latter is really all there is to this, why not just USB thumb drives at half the cost? iTunes remains a stumbling block in that third party products are still necessary for accessibility. The Shuffle has the battery/charging indicator which is visual only, but I agree that is less an obstacle that the one-line display in other MP3 players at that price point. Can you provide a citation as to why you believe this is what the schools were buying, or that just hearsay? At the Bionic Ear Blog you can find an example of a Deaf individual making good use of an iPod. You have probably Steve is hard of hearing himself.

    --
    I paid the going retail price for a Windows screen reader and got a free Unix computer!
  92. Perhaps just need to tweak the idea by Kabuthunk · · Score: 1

    The idea in ITSELF has potential... however the proposed method of execution is horrible at best.

    Give kids digital music players. And then what happens? Kids go home, fill it's drive with their band of choice, and listen to music while in class. Or failing that, just listen to music in general. Or go on EBay and sell it. Or just throw it out. They didn't pay for it, what do they care?

    NOW... if you actually want this plan to WORK, it'll require a little bit more planning and effort. They'd have to find someone to manufacture an entirely new audio player (or just get new software on some random cheap one), in which it can ONLY play a certain file format. Something like .LEC for lecture or something. Then... however they plan to have the teachers record these, have them record it in this .lec format.

    BAM, most problems solved. Won't sell worth a damn on EBay due to it only playing .lec files, can't cram other music on there, and if the schools require it to be turned in at the end of the year, or on graduation, otherwise they don't pass/graduate... that should stop them from being thrown out. And odds are the kids will keep a close eye on them to hinder them from being stolen by kids being jackasses.

    Until of course someone writes a program to convert mp3s into .lec files, but it'd just be way too much effort when the kid can just get a regular cheap mp3 player for like... 40 bucks.

    --
    Planet Zebeth - Metroid with a twist
    1. Re:Perhaps just need to tweak the idea by mizzzy! · · Score: 1

      that's a good idea, but i know that eventually people will figure out how to put music on it. and why is michigan so special?!?! how come they get special stuff?... it's michigan, people. i mean, come on hahaha (no offense, michigan)

      --
      ~mizzy
  93. um... sources? by feed_me_cereal · · Score: 1

    Before we go too far with this story... are there any other sources about this other than a link to the free republic, a rabidly conservative site and an unsigned editorial? I'd really like to know what the details of this case are from reputable sources.

    --
    "Question with boldness even the existence of a god." - Thomas Jefferson
    1. Re:um... sources? by mattatwork · · Score: 1

      There's an editorial in the Detroit News, Wired news, and CNET news about this....
      http://www.detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=2 007704060333
      http://blog.wired.com/gadgets/2007/04/michigan_to_ buy.html
      http://news.com.com/2061-10801_3-6174170.html

      What's really sad is what little money the state of Michigan has to spend now.... In the past 5 years, the state has lost over 300,000 jobs which has drastically effected the amount of money for the state to operate. My father works in a state government position in Lansing where they can't afford to send state employees to check on out of state contractors and have talked about employees taking stints of unpaid leave due to the cash shortage. Anyone in the state government there should recognize the crisis the state of Michigan is in and put the approx $38 million to a good use!!!

      --
      I've refrained from profanity, racial/ethnic epitaphs and am 5'11" - how can I be ranked as troll?
    2. Re:um... sources? by feed_me_cereal · · Score: 1

      Two of these are the same articles I mentioned, and the wired blurb has no additional sources.

      Each of these articles either is or cites the same anonymous editorial from the detroit paper or a post on the free reupblic as their sole source... a rabidly conservatice website and editorial whose subtitle is "Are they !#$!ing idiots?" ...hardly a non-biased source. I would like to hear something from a bill, a lawmaker, ...perhaps a reputable news source? Hell, even a non-anonymous editorial would be better. Seriously, it seems like I could publish an anonymous editorial and say pretty much anything I'd like. I'm not saying this isn't actually happening, but so far I've seen no reason to believe it is.

      --
      "Question with boldness even the existence of a god." - Thomas Jefferson
    3. Re:um... sources? by mattatwork · · Score: 1

      Check out this article form the Detroit Free Press. The article cites the Michigan speaker of the house and lists the iPod idea amongst others to help the state.... With the condition that the state of MI is in, I'm not suprised that people are popping up (albeit anonymously) blasting the proposal.... I also can see that with a demacratic Governer (Granholm) and a predominately demacratic state house and senate there is a partisan agenda as well....

      --
      I've refrained from profanity, racial/ethnic epitaphs and am 5'11" - how can I be ranked as troll?
    4. Re:um... sources? by feed_me_cereal · · Score: 1

      The link was broken for me, but I found a different one that might have the same quotes:

      http://www.mlive.com/news/grpress/index.ssf?/base/ news-35/117620854957570.xml&coll=6

      pretty messed up...

      --
      "Question with boldness even the existence of a god." - Thomas Jefferson
  94. Student Perception by foesssco · · Score: 1

    As a college student it disgusts me to see money "blown" on something like ipods for students. Tuition costs are rising, the budget is a struggle, and our governor would love to get rid of the tax cuts, so the obvious next step must be ipods for students. I think this would run right up there with her idea of giving all kindergarten children laptop computers. The city of Detroit has to close 13 education buildings soon, but technology in the classroom has priority. Now I don't want to sound as if I don't understand what the ultimate goal is, but I think the priorities have gotten severely messed up. I am not concerned with my own well being at this point, but that of everyone to come. Yes, ipods are great, but students need to learn how to communicate and be successful through hard work and studying. Not every want is a need and right now our state needs someone who knows how to help.

  95. I agree... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think that it is better to spend money on library and school facility.
    I pod can not help to children's studying and it will be lost and broken near in the future.
    Also, they can not study well because of listening music.
    It is better to invest in facility of education than I pod.

  96. For real? by Pokerstars+com · · Score: 1

    Now talk about a late April fools joke. That is the most retarded thing I've ever heard. How does an iPod have anything to do with "learning"

  97. iPod socialism vs. Slashdot socialism by Zhe+Mappel · · Score: 1
    Socialism for poor kids in Michigan = free iPods



    Slashdot response: @#$%^! They'll just use them to listen to vulgar rap music or break them while conducting drug deals! Idiotic government!



    Socialism for Slashdotters = Home mortgage interest deduction



    Slashdot response: Yay! With the tax savings from my house deduction, I can buy more Sailor Moon episodes! While enjoying this wealth transfer from other taxpayers I'll be plopped in front of my flatscreen TV, which was paid for with an interest-deductible home equity loan! You know, I like to piss and moan when somebody down the food chain gets something, but make no mistake: wise is the government that subsidizes my fantasies about Japanese school girls with supersized eyes!

  98. As a parent... by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 1

    As a parent, whose kids would directly benefit from this measure if I lived in Michigan, which I don't and never would, please let me assure you that I feel this is the stupidist idea I've seen all day.

    Kids don't need iPods, cellphones, or any other little gadgets that they can lose or have stolen.

    They need engaging and compelling teachers in front of reasonably-sized classrooms.

    They need textbooks and notebooks.

    They need vocational training options in addition to college prep options at school.

    But they do not need iPods.

    If I lived in Michigan, I would be extremely upset about this waste of money. I get what you're saying about how society pays for things that we don't directly use and in turn have things paid for us that we don't bear the entire cost of. But that doesn't mean the government should blindly waste millions of dollars.

    --
    They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
  99. Okay ... by tbone1 · · Score: 1
    Let me get this straight. Michigan is a state with serious, serious problems. Their big city, Detroit, has surpassed Newark, DC, and New Orleans as the worst city in America that is big enough to have big-time pro sports. The politics is so corrupt that it surprises Chicago natives. Crime is rampant, companies are leaving or shutting down and none are stepping up to replace them, the state's economy is tied to a domestic industry that has been ruined by unions, and their politicians seem more interested in blaming everyone outside of the state than actually doing something. (Not that they are really that different from other politicians.) The result is a huge brain drain and those left behind aren't as serious about education. So, they solve this by giving iPods to students. I'll bet you three of them get chucked at Ron Artest the next time he plays the Pistons.

    --

    The Independent: Reverend Spooner Arrested in Friar Tuck Incident - ISIHAC, Historical Headlines
  100. Pension by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 1

    Teachers are very well compensated for the work that they do. Once you retire, you still get paid every month until you die.

    Those of us in private industry certainly don't get anything like that anymore. In private industry, it's considered a great benefit if your employer matches a little of your 401(k) contribution.

    Teachers like to complain, "Boo hoo, I make nothing," but the fact of the matter is, you make more than the median household income, and you have ridiculous benefits.

    --
    They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
    1. Re:Pension by PixelScuba · · Score: 1

      Pensions are nice... once you work for 30 years. A 401k you can take with you, it doesn't disappear if you fail to finish 30 years at the same job. Considering the vast majority of New Teachers quit after 5 years, that's a lot of work time eaten you could have been saving money.

      The replies to my comment and the bulk of comments in this thread illustrate why it doesn't pay to be a teacher. It's the only licensed and educated professional career I know of that every Joe-Sixpack and their brother thinks they can do better. Why bother requiring an education or licensure to teach, apparently they have it easy and their work isn't difficult. Honestly, I never hear people complain that "Programmers are so lazy, they hardly work... I could do their job." or "Pharmacist just give out drugs in bottles, I could do that... they don't know how easy they have it."

      But seriously, the bulk of all teachers are well educated in content, management, psychology and know their respective curriculum well, and they work hard at their careers. What's with Slashdot's vitriolic and absurd hatred of teachers?

    2. Re:Pension by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 1

      Pensions are nice... once you work for 30 years. A 401k you can take with you, it doesn't disappear if you fail to finish 30 years at the same job. Considering the vast majority of New Teachers quit after 5 years, that's a lot of work time eaten you could have been saving money.
      First of all, you don't have to work the same job for 30 years to get your pension. You just have to work in public schools in the same state for 30 years. As a teacher, as an administrator, in another city, county, etc. In other words, I call BS on your, "Boo hoo, I have to work the same job for 30 years in order to qualify."

      Secondly, you do realize that teachers have 403(b)s, which are basically a 401(k) for public servants and other nonprofit employees, right? So what, exactly, are you complaining about? If you envy my 401(k), quit'cher bitchin' and open a 403(b). Well, actually, I'd advise you to open a traditional IRA or Roth IRA since your money will perform better there (typical 403(b)s offer awful investment options). So I call BS on your, "Boo hoo, I can't have a 401(k)". You can have your cake and eat it too, smarty.

      The replies to my comment and the bulk of comments in this thread illustrate why it doesn't pay to be a teacher. It's the only licensed and educated professional career I know of that every Joe-Sixpack and their brother thinks they can do better. Why bother requiring an education or licensure to teach, apparently they have it easy and their work isn't difficult. Honestly, I never hear people complain that "Programmers are so lazy, they hardly work... I could do their job." or "Pharmacist just give out drugs in bottles, I could do that... they don't know how easy they have it."
      Well, I don't even know where to begin here. Ahh yes, I'll begin by saying you are putting words into my mouth. I never said I could be a better teacher than you, and neither did I say that it wasn't difficult. It sounds to me like you are just venting here.

      Be that as it may, how does "every Joe-Sixpack and their brother thinks they can do better" relate to "why it doesn't pay to be a teacher"?

      And here's another licensed professional career that people think they can do better: real estate agent. Guess you can't make that claim anymore.

      Programmers are lazy. Look at all of the comments they make on slashdot instead of working.

      "Pharmacist" is one of the cushiest, best-paid jobs in America. Sure, it requires a lot of education and attention to detail, but at the end of the day, they dispense medication and log it. For that, they make double what you make and work reasonable hours. And yes, they know how easy they have it.

      What's with Slashdot's vitriolic and absurd hatred of teachers?
      I'm not sure I can answer this one, and I assume that the comment was not directed at me. I do not hate teachers, but I am going to call BS when you claim to not be well-compensated. The fact is you are.

      I put thousands of dollars away each year for my own retirement, whereas you will just keep getting paid every month until you die. Make sure you subtract out those thousands of dollars from my salary when comparing mine to yours. Make sure you also subtract out my health insurance costs, life insurance, disability, summer vacations, etc. Don't forget to add in your income from private tutoring, coaching, exam proctoring, etc. Be sure to factor in your job security.

      I think you'll find that teachers are paid just fine. Not too much, and not too little. But rather, just right.

      --
      They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
    3. Re:Pension by PixelScuba · · Score: 1

      Ahh yes, I'll begin by saying you are putting words into my mouth.

      Well then, I'm glad we understand one another, because you're doing the same thing. I don't recall complaining or asking for your sympathy when talking about retirements, merely stating differences. I only talked about the differences, never once stating an opinion on the matter... only providing the other perspective. I don't see where I asked for your pitty.

      Paid just fine? Depends, this is what the argument has been about from the beginning of this discussion. From what I see there is an inherent and ingrained bitterness of government employees by people in the private sector. Who knows why, but there is a definitely animosity towards civil servants as though they don't deserve what they've worked for and they have it easy. Maybe you should look at it from another vantage, maybe it's just different. Public sectors jobs have their OWN share of problems, many are similar to Civil Service positions. There is tremendous ineptitude at the top of the corporate ladder and rampant cronyism and egregious pay inequality. Government Jobs have tenure issues and incompetence issues... to me it seems like the problems are the same, just different fields. 401ks, retirement benefits... private jobs pay more so you can put money away... it's just a different approach to retirement and pay.

      One need only look at my initial argument... and YOURS as well... Teachers are paid fine, which you agree... but it just happens their 9 months = 1 year of work. (However, I make less than 30,000$ a year... there are plenty of fields I could have gone into that would have paid me a hell of a lot more.) But whatever, this is just pointless rambling :P

  101. Pension by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 1
    You forgot pensions that teachers get. Most people in private industry don't even know what a pension is. Most teachers don't even realize that they are unique in having one.

    (note to parents: this might also include getting the balls to disciplining your child)
    Blah blah blah.

    You know, it's funny. One of the things that you'll realize if you become a parent someday is just how little control over who your children become.

    Case in point: Three of my cousins. One is an insanely successful investment banker. The other is a doctor. The third had, shall we say, "discipline problems" in school (understatement of the year), can't hold down a job for more than 10 seconds, and is just generally a complete screwup. Same parents, same house, same schools, same parenting style. Before you ask, no divorces, deaths, abuse (well, except for the abuse that "screwup" dished out to everybody), or any other "mitigating factors" to point to. The kid (adult now) is just that way.

    Everyone is so quick to judge the parents. But they'll learn eventually.
    --
    They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
  102. messy Michi by ChristTrekker · · Score: 1

    Michigan is a mess in general. This particular problem is just a good illustration of the problem of government education as a whole, as you point out.

  103. Silly by lexerama · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure why every kid in Michigan needs an iPod. I think iPods are cool, useful for carrying loads of music, files and podcasts, but I don't see the benefit in making sure every kid has one (for learning purposes). Most people don't use iPods to learn - they use them for watching music videos on the bus to kill time or to have a simple way to play music while exercising. They aren't necessary for the classroom, and I certainly can't see kids using them for an educational end. Kids lose things, break things and get things stolen very easily, so even if there is a small educational benefit lingering in the notion, it's much too economically weak to withstand the possible cons of such an endeavor. If someone wants to give me an iPod and tell me to use it to learn, that's fine, but I probably won't use it to learn. I'll probably spend entirely too much time on party shuffle.

  104. Ipod to every kid in michigan? by DetWings · · Score: 1

    That seems like a waste of money to me. I feel like there is a lot better ways to learn than just sitting in class listening to an ipod. Some ways that worked for me were taking notes, reading, listening to the teachers lecture things of that nature. What would be the point to fit every kid in Michigan with an ipod. 33 million dollars down the drain. That money could be used to better the state of our States economy. Throwin it away to apple and there ipods doesnt seem to be a great idea

  105. Terrible Idea by nealecha · · Score: 1

    Personally, I believe it is a terrible idea to give each kid in Michigan an Ipod using public funds. The bill the Democrats have proposed would put $38 million of public funds towards buying every student in Michigan an Ipod to be used for educational purposes. To raise this money, Democrats have proposed a 4% tax on soda among other things. First of all, there is no guarantee that every student will actually use their Ipod for educational purposes, which would render giving them a free Ipod pointless. When Duke University gave all their Freshmen an Ipod, they obtained mixed results on the educational use of these devices. Secondly, for a state that is suffering from a budget crisis of around 1 billion dollars, it is ridiculous to make taxpayers pay more taxes to fund giving an electronic music device to every kid in Michigan. Parents who are struggling to make ends meet as it is are not going to see paying for another kid to receive an Ipod as something that is worthwhile. With the economy as bad as it is, many people are struggling to make due , and the government forcing them to pay additional taxes for this project is just mind boggling and incredibly idiotic. Furthermore, if the government is set on putting these funds to use, why don't they focus on fixing up schools, especially in Detroit, and making them better equipped to provide a positive learning environment. Also, the funds could be used towards hiring better quality teachers and educators and giving current great teachers a deserved raise. The funds could be used for much better purposes than strapping an already failing economy with a proposal that isn't guaranteed to improve the quality of learning for students.

  106. unbelievable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about instead of wasting the millions of dollars on Ipods they hire more teachers to reduce class size? Or they could use the money to figure out a way to reduce the several hundred million dollar budget deficit. Or there are a host of other worthwhile things to use the money on instead of just wasting it.

  107. Re: An iPod For Every Kid in Michigan by amarie11 · · Score: 1

    The idea that the State of Michigan is even considering such an endeavor is a bit maddening. As a resident of Michigan, I am constantly hearing about the financial ruin our state is in. Budget cuts for seemingly everything make the front page of news papers on a regular basis. Spending $38 million dollars on iPods for "educational purposes" is simply unthinkable. As a recent high school graduate, I would be interested to know how these entertainment devices would be used for learning. It is also important to consider how many Michigan students already have iPods or some other MP3 player. I imagine that it is a large percentage. Will students who already own iPods receive another one from the State, and how will the distribution of the iPods be regulated?? How will the State regulate how schools and teachers use the iPods in the classroom. It seems that it will too easily just become a nice present from the State of Michigan, used by youth for only entertainment purposes. There are so many more important ways for the State of Michigan to use that $38 million dollars. Our economy desperately needs a boost. The priority of the state should be to attract Michigan jobs and businesses- not entertain its youth. I truly hope that this just a funny joke made by some Michigan Democratic. iPods today, and tickets to rock concerts tomorrow!!!

  108. Should be tested by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think this should be experimented on a group of students first to see how effective it is. I don't think it would be good for learning purposes because most people use ipods for fun. People need to be taught how to use ipods for learning purposes first. The idea doesn't sound right. Why don't they buy a Wii to every kid for fitness purposes? That money should be spent on more important things. I think this is just to get more people to use iTunes.

  109. MICHIGAN DEMOCRATS by mizzzy! · · Score: 1

    they are fools. i guarentee that just about every kid is thinkin, "those suckers", and yeah, of course all the kids are going to put on the "but it's for EDUCATION!" act... they just want the ipod. i would too. how come my state can't be that stupid? i want a free ipod.

    --
    ~mizzy
  110. Oil company profit only ~9 cents per gln by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Data from the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) indicates that when the average price of unleaded regular peaked at about $3 a gallon in the middle of 2006, major companies were making a profit of about 10 cents a gallon on their U.S. refining and marketing operations.

    So when those politicians and Democrat supporters scream that the cost of gas is due to the Evil Oil Companies (TM) and the Jew Puppet Bu$Hitler Chimpy McHaliburten, just remember that in this MI tax increase alone (not counting their other previous gas taxes) MI is making MORE than the Evil Oil Companies (TM).

    The federal tax is 18.4 cents per gallon, while state and local taxes vary from 8 cents in Alaska to nearly 50 cents per gallon in New York.

    If the politicians really want to control gas prices, they will lower the taxes. Or allow more plants to be built in order to open up the bottlenecks in production.

    Plus why do the Dems complain so loudly against high oil prices isn't that what they have wanted for years in order to get cars off the road?

    Not that I am for Evil Oil Companies (TM), I am just against hypocrites.