Slashdot Mirror


Hacker Replaces iPod HDD With Flash Memory

Via a Wired Blog, an anonymous reader wrote with a link to a post on the Geek Technique website. There, post author Mark Hoekstra details how to replace an iPod's HDD with flash memory. It's not an inexpensive procedure, as 16 Gigs of flash memory is still a mite expensive, and the post is not a 'how-to'. Just the same, the project took painstaking work and is well worth recognizing. "I guess I can say I found ways of eliminating almost every hard drive out of almost every hard drive based iPod thereby eliminating all moving parts. The only one left is the iPod video which would only need a slightly different adapter. But next to that I've got a gut feeling that one's being upgraded to flash memory by Apple themselves any time soon."

90 of 125 comments (clear)

  1. Since Apple makes flash based iPods... by catbutt · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What is the point?

    I suppose its impressive from a technical point of view, but isn't the point of hacking generally to do something you couldn't already do by just selecting a different model?

    1. Re:Since Apple makes flash based iPods... by iamacat · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The point is that he is selling his adapter to people who want more battery life or skip protection out of their video iPods.

    2. Re:Since Apple makes flash based iPods... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      The highest capacity iPod made by Apple is the 8gb nano. This guy has twice that amount.

    3. Re:Since Apple makes flash based iPods... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The point of this in my opinion is that you can take your old iPod and flash base it, rather then buying a whole new iPod. Plus 16GB of flash memory is still more then the original HDD of some iPods, even 8GB of flash would be an upgrade, and cheaper then a new iPod with the same storage capacity.

    4. Re:Since Apple makes flash based iPods... by Short+Circuit · · Score: 3, Informative

      Not just battery life and skip protection, but reliability. No moving parts means less damage due to jarring motions.

    5. Re:Since Apple makes flash based iPods... by PipOC · · Score: 1

      It allows you to get more life out of an old ipod, with a dying hard drive.

    6. Re:Since Apple makes flash based iPods... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What is the point?
      Spoken like a true non geek! Why exactly are you on slashdot again?

    7. Re:Since Apple makes flash based iPods... by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If you must have an iPod, then yes, then the current flash based models will do music, but they won't play video, nor do they have a large enough screen for decent photos or videos. There are flash models that compete with the nano that can play video, I had a Sansa e2xx something, but it was clunky and the screen is tiny.

    8. Re:Since Apple makes flash based iPods... by MichaelSmith · · Score: 4, Interesting
    9. Re:Since Apple makes flash based iPods... by UnknowingFool · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Apple does make their three lines of iPods slightly different with different features. The iPod 30GB and 80GB can play video and have a 14 and 20 hr battery life respectively. The iPod nano is 2GB, 4GB, and 8GB models. These models have about 24 hr battery life. While they do have color screens, they cannot play videos. This guy seemingly has customized his iPod to be a hybrid. Twice as large than a nano but can play videos.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    10. Re:Since Apple makes flash based iPods... by UnknowingFool · · Score: 2, Informative

      I stand corrected. It doesn't play videos. WTF was the point? :P

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    11. Re:Since Apple makes flash based iPods... by dmsuperman · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Not to mention since he put a flash based drive in there, he could probably put one of those 32 or 64GB flash based drives in it. If I had to guess, the three biggest problems with iPods are the screens, hard drives, and batteries. Eliminate one by buying a batter pack, and replace the HDD with a solid state drive and you greatly reduce any risk of problems with your iPod.

      --
      :(){ :|:& };: Go!
    12. Re:Since Apple makes flash based iPods... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I have an ipod with a physically messed up hard drive. Now it can still get some use.

    13. Re:Since Apple makes flash based iPods... by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

      Does anybody have any figures for read times for flash memory vs. the disk drives? Not that I personally have any use for video, but I'm curious as to whether this is a limitation...

    14. Re:Since Apple makes flash based iPods... by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

      I hadn't realised until I saw that image that Apple apparently have some sort of partnership with Hewlett-Packard in production of these gadgets. Maybe I've just been living in a barrel. :-|

    15. Re:Since Apple makes flash based iPods... by Kremmy · · Score: 1

      Problem being that it is far more complex of a task to upgrade a flash-based iPod. In the hdd-based iPods, the hard drive is a distinct component which is attached by a connector of sorts to the rest of the device. In the flash-based iPods, the flash memory is an integral part of the motherboard.

    16. Re:Since Apple makes flash based iPods... by linuxci · · Score: 1

      For a while there were HP branded iPods, not any more though

    17. Re:Since Apple makes flash based iPods... by markdavis · · Score: 2, Informative

      >These models have about 24 hr battery life Strange- I have a nano too... I am lucky to get 5 hours out of it. 24 hours? Impossible.

    18. Re:Since Apple makes flash based iPods... by brotherash · · Score: 1

      Anonymous Coward, I get your point. We hack because we can. But there is another deeply geeky principle that might lead the grandparent to question the merits of this hack: DRY. Geeks are lazy and most of us pride ourselves on that.

    19. Re:Since Apple makes flash based iPods... by MtViewGuy · · Score: 1

      I agree, why bother.

      Besides, by this fall we'll have true video widescreen iPods (based on iPhone technology) that might include a model with all flash memory that could contain as much as 32 GB of storage.

    20. Re:Since Apple makes flash based iPods... by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      24 hours is the maximum battery life if you optimize the power usage. Turn off the backlighting (or set for 2 secs) and don't manually change the playlist while playing often.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    21. Re:Since Apple makes flash based iPods... by alisson · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The point is that he is selling his adapter to people who want more battery life or skip protection out of their video iPods. Stop using a jackhammer while listening to your iPod. No, seriously, it's not easy to make them skip. And if you simply must listen to your iPod while jack-hammering for more than 20 hours straight, and don't mind having a rather limited hard-drive, why not just get a freaking nano? They're cheaper, with a longer battery life, and already have a flash drive.
    22. Re:Since Apple makes flash based iPods... by maxume · · Score: 1

      You can't watch video while jackhammering with a Nano, sheesh.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    23. Re:Since Apple makes flash based iPods... by POTSandPANS · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure you can just buy a solid state flash based hard drive with an IDE interface. They come in 1.8", 2.5" and 3.5" sizes, just google "solid state hard drive".

    24. Re:Since Apple makes flash based iPods... by Piazzola · · Score: 2, Informative

      Good thing, too. I got one (as a gift; wouldn't have picked it out for myself) and while it was still an iPod and therefore totally decent, I couldn't get Apple support for it when it went wonky, and HP support was crap, like usual. I can't wait for this one to really die so I can justify going and getting myself a new one.

    25. Re:Since Apple makes flash based iPods... by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      I have an ipod with a physically messed up hard drive. Now it can still get some use.

      Why not just buy a replacement hard drive?

    26. Re:Since Apple makes flash based iPods... by mattatwork · · Score: 1

      Unless you install Linux on your nano, you can't watch video on your nano at all....

      --
      I've refrained from profanity, racial/ethnic epitaphs and am 5'11" - how can I be ranked as troll?
    27. Re:Since Apple makes flash based iPods... by markdavis · · Score: 1

      I had it set to 15 seconds on the backlight. The way I use it, I always listen to random, with an occasional skip to next song (sometimes never skipping, without triggering backlight). I have never seen greater than about 5.5 hours. I don't think 24 hours is a reasonable claim, ever. Skipping to the next song infrequenty should make all that much difference on a Nano, since it has no hard drive to spin up? Maybe mine is a bum unit or something.

    28. Re:Since Apple makes flash based iPods... by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      I don't think 24 hours is a reasonable claim, ever. Skipping to the next song infrequenty should make all that much difference on a Nano, since it has no hard drive to spin up?

      It makes a difference only in that the backlight turns on. I don't have a nano but the 5G Video and the lifetime is about 14 hours when I don't skip frequently and turn off the backlight. A friend of mine has the Shuffle and he says it's about 24 hours. You might want to talk to your local Apple store about it. This is the 2G nano or the 1G nano?

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    29. Re:Since Apple makes flash based iPods... by markdavis · · Score: 1

      This is a 4GB nano. I play 160Kbit MP3s, only.

      You can't compare any other ipod model's battery life to the Nano... hard drive models have HUGE batteries in comparison, and the shuffle has hardly any brain and no display (I owned a shuffle too, and the battery life seemed like FOREVER on it).

      Yes, skipping a song would turn on the backlight- but just a few seconds. Skipping a song every 15 minutes should be, overall, negligible on total battery life. So either Apple's claims are completely bogus, or my unit is defective (from purchase, a year ago).

      I generally believe in the half-battery theory. Whatever the manufacturer claims for electronics' battery life... cut it in half, and that will be much more accurate. Seems to work with my cell phone, laptop, ipods, recorders, wireless phones... just about everything.

    30. Re:Since Apple makes flash based iPods... by ssintercept · · Score: 1

      well, the first thing i thought of was the implications. no moving parts. no wear. less stress on the parts and the device as a whole. with flash i believe it is instant on. cool. and if this guy is doing this in his spare time i have to believe that the big boys have something really innovative coming around the corner. 16 gigs, throw linux on it and think about having a full desktop the size of an ipod. usb wifi or maybe a micro mouse...i am just rambling but you get the picture. the WOW starts at doing it differently.

      --
      "You can kill the revolutionary, but you can't kill the revolution."-- Fred Hampton
  2. How about for my laptop? by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 1

    I'd love to do this for my laptop. Anyone know of a ComactFlash laptop-HDD adapter?

    1. Re:How about for my laptop? by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yes, I got one from NewEgg. The pinouts on a CF card are pretty close to IDE already. There are adapters that will connect your CF card to either a desktop IDE interface or to a laptop one, they have pins for both on the same card.

    2. Re:How about for my laptop? by WindBourne · · Score: 2, Informative
      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    3. Re:How about for my laptop? by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 1

      Yes, I got one from NewEgg.

      If this is your boot drive, do you have any sense of how is affected boot time?

    4. Re:How about for my laptop? by flyingfsck · · Score: 1

      Samsung makes solid state notebook drives: http://laptoplogic.com/news/detail.php?id=921

      --
      Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
  3. how to not write a 'how to' by Virtual_Raider · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm confused by the summary. It talks about how the article gives details on how to do it, but it's not a 'how to'. Er... huh? But back to topic, I think this is cool as a technical hack but a bit pointless unless for some strange reason you absolutely need the battery life that I suspect is the only gain. Then again, getting to know how to (but not 'how to') swap your HDD might come in handy when those flash-based HDDs come to the market at reasonable prices.

    --
    +Raider of the lost BBS
    1. Re:how to not write a 'how to' by tftp · · Score: 1

      One unexpected side effect of this mod would be a reduction in mass of the iPod, and that is generally useful if you keep it in a pocket, for example. HDDs are heavy. Also, Flash does not require spinning up, so the modded device should be somewhat faster. But I can't be sure because I don't have any iPod, either modded or original.

    2. Re:how to not write a 'how to' by Virtual_Raider · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I agree on the weight thing. Less weight and better battery life, but speed I'm not so sure. I don't own an iPod but I've used a couple and I didn't think anything about the speed at all which I would propose means it's fast enough as it is, not intrusive or noticeable. After all you play the music in real time, not to chipmunk-time-warp mode. And you seek the songs scrolling with the wheelie thingie (tm), so it's not like you would gain a lot in terms of seek-time.

      --
      +Raider of the lost BBS
    3. Re:how to not write a 'how to' by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      I don't think it's about speed. There is a durability issue, the hard drive is the weakest link on an HDD-based portable media player. As it is, there is no 16GB PMP that I've heard about.

    4. Re:how to not write a 'how to' by Virtual_Raider · · Score: 1

      True, but how big was the original HDD? That's why I was wondering what benefits one might possibly gain that would counterbalance the loss of storage space.

      --
      +Raider of the lost BBS
  4. Reverse iPhone by Mr.+Flibble · · Score: 1

    How long until someone does the reverse with the iPhone when it comes out? Of course, my prediction is that future models of the iPhone will do that on their own. Still. not a bad hack at all, hopefully it won't be long until flash ram fully outpaces hard drive capacity/cost.

    --
    Try to hack my 31337 firewall!
    1. Re:Reverse iPhone by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      When the litle flash based ipods came out there was an article on how to attach it to a HDD.

      With a rubber band, as I recall. It wasn't a pretty sight.

  5. Inverse by corychristison · · Score: 5, Funny

    I, personally, prefer the inverse of this hack.
    Go 6 second battery life!

    1. Re:Inverse by flyingfsck · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hmmm, puts the use of Fast Forward in a whole new light...

      --
      Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
    2. Re:Inverse by edwardpickman · · Score: 1, Insightful

      That particular hack seems ironic. If you bought the music legally it would be worth $50,000 through iTunes. 50 grand in music on a $200 device. Also it'd take you 500 days of continous listening to play it all or two years of every waking hour. If you have to have that many illegal downloads crammed onto an iPod to prove your street creds you might want to actually check out some of those spam enlargement ads. The won't help but it'll be cheaper than the fine for all that music if you get busted.

    3. Re:Inverse by Doppler00 · · Score: 1, Informative

      I hope everyone realizes that's UNcylopedia, and everything is photoshopped ;) Although this kind of hack would definately be technically possible, but a little more effort would be needed than what's shown.

    4. Re:Inverse by frostband · · Score: 2, Informative
      6 minute battery life

      the standard bat. life was measured at 8:00+ (more than 8 hours) and the modified nano's life was 0:06 (6 minutes)

    5. Re:Inverse by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

      Why, no... until you mentioned it, I had no idea that the post was a spoof. I thank you for bringing it to my attention. You're a real American hero.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  6. Waste of time by Wiarumas · · Score: 2

    As impressive as it might be, its a waste of time. Lets just wait a year or two before Apple makes this standard.

    --
    I will bend like a reed in the wind.
    1. Re:Waste of time by Breakfast+Pants · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Sounds like you are the one who wants to waste time--one or two years to be exact.

      --

      --

      WHO ATE MY BREAKFAST PANTS?
    2. Re:Waste of time by cbreaker · · Score: 1

      As long as they can make 80GB Flash players without costing $800, I'm all for it. Otherwise, the hard disk based players are fine. The iPod videos with the big storage are still pretty darned small, still last a long time on battery, and hold a shit load of stuff.

      Of course, I don't even own an iPod, so what the fuck do I know.

      --
      - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
  7. Finally... by teebob21 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Sure, I'm relatively new here, but it sure is nice to see a /. headline that I truly love. Did you notice the word 'hacker'? It was used correctly!

    Hacking has always been about using technology to do something you normally couldn't do. The original hackers built the foundations on which the Web lives. The media and other public opinion sources have vilified all the good hackers by lumping them in with the crackers, script kiddies, and other generally nasty online personas.

    Hackers continue to advance the state of technology, whether its writing new bits of the Linux kernel or by upgrading a typically non-user-servicable iPod. The article says it itself: Apple will eventually offer a Flash-based model. Granted, they might have done this themselves eventually, but if the populace starts modding their iPods to run Flash, it only pressures Apple to move forward. Think about the early case modders: Windows, lights, case paint other than beige....Now about 70% of cases I see on Newegg have windows and LEDs.

    Whether Fox News wants to admit it or not, hackers will continue to drive innovation. Not MS, not Apple...

    --
    khasim (12/9/06): In a blind taste test, more people preferred Coke over the Pepsi that I had previously pissed in.
    1. Re:Finally... by Chris+Pimlott · · Score: 3, Insightful

      They do offer a flash version. It's called a nano. It's also smaller.

    2. Re:Finally... by nacturation · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hacking has always been about using technology to do something you normally couldn't do. The original hackers built the foundations on which the Web lives. The media and other public opinion sources have vilified all the good hackers by lumping them in with the crackers, script kiddies, and other generally nasty online personas. Whenever I hear "cracking" I think of removing annoying copy protection from video games. I've always seen hacking as being morally neutral. As you say, it's using technology to do something you normally couldn't do, such as gaining root access on a system or making free long distance phone calls. The word cracker seems to be an after-the-fact invention to subdivide hackers based on morality.
      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    3. Re:Finally... by babyrat · · Score: 1

      making free long distance phone calls.

      That is Phreaking...

  8. Not exactly hard by Spazmania · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'd be impressed except that compact flash is electrically and programatically compatible with the ATA spec *by design* so replacing an ata hard drive with compact flash requires only mating the two physical plugs.

    --
    Moderating "-1, Disagree" is simple censorship. Have the guts to post your opinion.
    1. Re:Not exactly hard by Technician · · Score: 4, Informative

      From the article, the 1.8 inch drive is not pin for pin compatible with ATA/CF. Pinouts for both are listed in the forum.

      This makes not exactly hard into not exactly easy.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    2. Re:Not exactly hard by slashdot.org · · Score: 1

      From the article, the 1.8 inch drive is not pin for pin compatible with ATA/CF. Pinouts for both are listed in the forum.

      This makes not exactly hard into not exactly easy.


      Hehe, or you could just buy a 1.8" flash drive...

      I know, I know, not nearly as l33t. And of course CF is still a lot cheaper, so if the guy's intent is to actually produce this adapter it may be worth the proof-of-concept stage. Of course there's a good chance that one of the companies that make these sort of adapters will pick it up and start building them for $0.99 each.

    3. Re:Not exactly hard by Technician · · Score: 1

      I know, I know, not nearly as l33t.

      Also not as much capacity. The linked page lists 2, 4 & 8 Gig model flash drives. The hack is a 16 Gig model.

      CF is definately cheaper. A quick search turned up 16 Gig CF cards for $234
      http://www.flash-memory-store.com/16gb-compact-fla sh.html

      The 8 Gig flash drive on the other hand is $382. It is over $100 more for half the capacity.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
  9. Apple don't already have a 16GB Flash model. by Mr+EdgEy · · Score: 1

    They have the 8gb Nano but no higher.

  10. Cheap iPod mini by canadiangoose · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I had an iPod mini that was stolen a couple of years ago, and I've wanted a new one ever since. With this hack I can buy a broken one used (and cheap) and put in a couple of gigs of flash myself. Cool. I'm not looking for something that hold too much, no videos or anything. As a plus, I can upgrade it as flash prices drop. Sweet!

    --
    Never eat more than you can lift -- Miss Piggy
  11. Re:Useless by Sitnalta · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's only a matter of time before larger capacity cards come out. And it's only a matter of time before they become dirt cheap. Just because it isn't very practical now doesn't mean it won't be in the near future.

  12. Re:Useless by jfuredy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Less storage then a regular size iPod. More than twice the cost of two 8GB iPod nanos. Other than for the sheer sake of proving it can be done, why is this hack impressive again? Well, for one thing, he got you and many thousands of other people talking about it and thinking about it. That's how new things are learned and discovered. Trying new things and learning from them. At least he actually DID something, rather than just questioning why other people do things on /. .
  13. iPod Mini by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

    I haven't checked out dimensions or costs yet, but this would be a nice way to increase the usefulness of my 6GB iPod mini. Yes, I know I could just buy a higher capacity model, but I can't really afford it.

    On second thoughts, on that last criterion, I should probably leave it alone in case I fuck it up... :-|

  14. Re:Umm... So? by sarahbau · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Do you think everyone runs out and buys the newest iPod as soon as it's released? There are tons of people out there with 4GB Minis, and 10-20GB 2G and 3G iPods that this would actually be a storage upgrade for, not to mention reliability improvement and increased battery life. All of the models I mentioned have hard drive based storage, which is by far the most likely component to go bad due to it having moving parts. It also means you can't really jog with these models due to skipping. I suppose you also can't skip with one of them due to jogging. 8GB Compact Flash cards are under $75, and $16GB cards are just over $200 and dropping fast. I'd consider replacing my 10GB iPod's drive with an 8GB flash drive if I used it for jogging or wanted longer battery life (I only use it in my car).

  15. Re:Useless by Anarchitect_in_oz · · Score: 1

    The sort of thing that will bring the price down is wide scale adoption, which your really only going to get if someone like Apple or another big company starts to use them in a shipping product.
    They'll always be buying at greater scale which will get them better terms than a single buyer.
    So by the time it is practical Apple likely to have the puppies in iPods anyway, and it'll still be more expensive to hack one together.

    It's interesting that it has been done, but not sure it's really a great suprise.

    --
    "Call us when the New age is old enough to drink" Beck
  16. meme strikes again! by SeaFox · · Score: 1

    Less storage then a regular size iPod. More than twice the cost of two 8GB iPod nanos. Other than for the sheer sake of proving it can be done, why is this hack impressive again?

    So, I guess what you're trying to say is that... for use in a Video iPod, this flash memory HD replacement is not adequate... in space?

  17. More iPod Hacks by wehe · · Score: 3, Informative

    Hacking the iPod and modding other portable media players seems to be an interesting hobby for computer nomads. The Repair4Player project lists all kinds of repair, upgrade and hacking guides for portable players.

  18. Is there such a thing as an MP3 player ... by aeschenkarnos · · Score: 1

    ... into which can be plugged a standard USB flash disk, to serve as the MP3 player's drive?

    1. Re:Is there such a thing as an MP3 player ... by east+coast · · Score: 1

      Do you mean like this?

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
  19. The correct put-down by BeerCat · · Score: 1
    "Less storage then a regular size iPod. More than twice the cost of two 8GB iPod nanos. Other than for the sheer sake of proving it can be done, why is this hack impressive again?"

    No, no, no. It goes like this:

    No wireless. Less space than a nomad. Lame.
    --
    "She's furniture with a pulse"
  20. He wants to make these adapters? by FuryG3 · · Score: 2, Informative

    They already exist! $25 for one that supports one flash card, and $30 for one that supports 2. :)

    1. Re:He wants to make these adapters? by lhaeh · · Score: 1
      Those won't work as they are for laptops, for ipods it would need a smaller, female connector. I do recall seeing a laptop-ipod connector around though, maybe that combined with a gender changer would work.

    2. Re:He wants to make these adapters? by dave420 · · Score: 1

      Those are for 2.5" hard disks. The iPod uses a 1.8" HDD.

    3. Re:He wants to make these adapters? by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Wow too bad it wont work. An Ipod does NOT have a laptop hard drive in it.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  21. The point is by bradavon · · Score: 1

    Ipods have much bigger screens to Ipod Nanos and those stop at 8Gb. Not that it would interest me Ipods are the fisher price of MP3 Players anyway, they look nice and are easy to use (you can't fault them there) but technically there are superior MP3 Players out there. I fail to see how modifying hardware you own is hacking though. He's not breaking the law by doing this, just his own warranty.

    1. Re:The point is by east+coast · · Score: 1

      Not to make fun but it's easy to tell that you're new to the "scene".

      Cracking, for the most part, is the illegal aspects of hacking.

      Hacking, among the geeks, is normally a term for tinkering or modding, regardless if it's software or hardware. It doesn't imply a state of legality since crackers are hackers in their own right.

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
    2. Re:The point is by freedomlinux · · Score: 1

      I fail to see how modifying hardware you own is hacking though.

      Way to go! Thank you for applying the stereotype that hacking is always the malicious modification of someone else's hardware or software.
      There is also a legitimate reason for hacking on your own system, which is used to add functionality to an existing product for experimentation or functional use.

    3. Re:The point is by dave420 · · Score: 1

      Hacking means to make something do something it wasn't necessarily intended to do - "pushing the envelope" in wanker-management-speak. Are you confusing the term with "cracker", meaning one who illegally gains access to computers they aren't allowed on? The media certainly makes that mistake on a frighteningly regular basis.

    4. Re:The point is by theralfinator · · Score: 1

      Yeah, as other people have stated, hacking does not imply any state of legality. The term 'hacking' means messing around with something (whether it's source code or hardware) to make it do something different (usually with the intent of making it better). The illegal aspect of 'hacking' comes from the media's error of calling crackers (people who attempt to break into other people's systems or products) hackers. Now what I'm wondering, is if the media doesn't like saying 'cracker' because of fear of sounding vaguely racist.......:p

  22. Toast? by chicago_scott · · Score: 1

    Is that piece of toast a subtle warning?

    Or is it just breakfast?

    http://geektechnique.org/images/1387.jpg

    1. Re:Toast? by Quantenmechaniker · · Score: 1

      That thing on the lower right? That's a solder sponge...

      --
      /(bb|[^b]{2})/ , that is the question;
  23. RTFS by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

    The point is that he is selling his adapter to people who want more battery life or skip protection out of their video iPods.

    Didn't the article say that the one iPod model the guy hadn't yet managed to hack the hard drive out of was the video iPod?

    Heck, didn't the Slashdot story submission say that?

  24. Re:Umm... So? by post.scriptum · · Score: 1

    Actually, the only time I can hear the HD spinning is when the iPod fills its own cache for at least another 20 minutes approximately, maximal power saving. So you can kinda forget about skipping, unless you're running while the HD spins but I've never had any problems with that actually. I have a 30gb video iPod by the way.

  25. Re:Useless by Sitnalta · · Score: 1

    The wide-scale adoption is already there. These cards are primarily used for digital cameras, and ever increasingly, digital video cameras. So demand isn't the problem.

  26. Re:Cease using the term "HACKER"... by abb3w · · Score: 1

    We all need to cease using the term "hacker" despite what it originally meant once upon a time long ago. The term has been successfully hijacked by the media and now is associated with evil by virtually the entire non-techie public.

    Judges 12:4-6.

    --
    //Information does not want to be free; it wants to breed.
  27. Mark.. by StarfishOne · · Score: 1

    Just wanted to say, based on personal experience, that Mark is a very cool guy. :) A true hacker in the positive sense of the word!

  28. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion