Slashdot Mirror


Ubuntu Feisty Fawn Released

Lots of readers told us about the official release of Ubuntu 7.04 Feisty Fawn (screenshots here for Ubuntu and Kubuntu). Some readers report that the distribution servers are being hammered. Here is a review of Feisty Fawn. Reader LinuxScribe sends us to LinuxPlanet for the story on a pleasant Java surprise in the release.

95 of 590 comments (clear)

  1. Fast mirror at Indiana University by cow+ninja · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here is a quick mirror: (ftp also works) http://ftp.ussg.indiana.edu/linux/ubuntu-releases/ 7.04/ maintained by http://www.ussg.iu.edu

    Go ahead, take our bandwidth :)

    1. Re:Fast mirror at Indiana University by didde · · Score: 5, Informative


      Let's not forget The Pirate Bay, people. They've had this up since 03:00 UTC.

      The .torrent is available here.

    2. Re:Fast mirror at Indiana University by Dogtanian · · Score: 5, Funny

      Let's not forget The Pirate Bay, people. They've had this up since 03:00 UTC. I told The Pirate Bay that there was no piracy involved, it was perfectly legal to copy Ubuntu discs and pass them around.

      They got all stroppy and took it down immediately.
      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    3. Re:Fast mirror at Indiana University by ender- · · Score: 2, Informative

      Get those torrents going folks :)

      They haven't finished downloading yet but I've got bittorrent going on a 10Mbit connection for the following two disks [torrent links from the mirror posted above]:

      Ubuntu Desktop i386
      Ubuntu Desktop amd64

      I'll leave them running for a day or two once they're finished downloading.

    4. Re:Fast mirror at Indiana University by mattnuzum · · Score: 5, Informative

      Try the homepage now. We've simplified things and will update the mirror list frequently until the excitement dies down.

      Please note that if you use Ubuntu now, you can update very easily, but don't use dist-upgrade. Instead:

      Before you start

              * You can only directly upgrade to Ubuntu 7.04 ("Feisty Fawn") from Ubuntu 6.10 ("Edgy Eft") (see UpgradeNotes)
              * Be sure that you have all updates applied to Ubuntu 6.10 before you upgrade
              * The latest version of Update Manager (0.45.2) must be installed before you upgrade. Otherwise, you will receive an Authentication failed error. See [WWW] here for instructions how to check if you have the required version.

      Note: If you have a version of Ubuntu which was released before Ubuntu 6.10, please see http://wiki.ubuntu.com/Installation/UpgradeFromOld Version for information on how to upgrade.

      Network upgrade for Ubuntu desktops (recommended)

      You can easily upgrade over the network with the following procedure.

            1. Open System -> Administration -> Update Manager
            2. A button on the top of the window will appear, informing you of the availability of the new release
            3. Click Upgrade
            4. Follow the on-screen instructions

    5. Re:Fast mirror at Indiana University by teh+loon · · Score: 4, Informative

      Torrents are the way to go. A few hours ago I couldn't find the ISOs on most mirrors except for the ones that I downloaded slowly from, so I opted for the torrent option. Managed to download the ISO in an hour through DHT - the ubuntu tracker wasn't accepting the torrent then.

      Now I'm installing it as I speak, and it's nearly done.

    6. Re:Fast mirror at Indiana University by therevan · · Score: 2, Informative
      Thanks for posting those mirror links. For the KDE and educational users out there, here are the links to Indiana University's mirrors for the Feisty versions of: Xubuntu (the Xfce variant for low-end machines) is up on Ubuntu's official image servers:
    7. Re:Fast mirror at Indiana University by dfay · · Score: 4, Funny

      Ah, but is it a PROPER-FINAL release? Or is it just another tired beta leak from a group trying to get a reputation?

    8. Re:Fast mirror at Indiana University by Lunar_Lamp · · Score: 3, Insightful

      How exactly do you 'leak' a public beta?

    9. Re:Fast mirror at Indiana University by Spudds · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You can easily upgrade over the network with the following procedure.

                  1. Open System -> Administration -> Update Manager

      There's a gui to upgrade the distro version???

      It seems that ubuntu is the first distro to really "just get it" when it comes to the desktop!
      All hail the New Hope for Linux on the Desktop!
    10. Re:Fast mirror at Indiana University by niteice · · Score: 5, Informative

      Technically speaking, it's just the package updater (like Windows Update but less evil), which also is capable of updating the entire distro.

      --
      ROMANES EUNT DOMUS
    11. Re:Fast mirror at Indiana University by bill_kress · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yes, very close.

      I've dipped into Linux many times (Since before CDs) but this is the first time I've installed it on all my computers.

      Yesterday, in fact, I got windows XP running within Ubuntu (My current project requires it) and it was easy, free and very slick. This means I can convert my last remaining dual-boot computers (because of games, mostly) over to Linux.

      I still run into things here and there that SHOULD just take 5 minutes but end up taking 2 hours of research, but much less often than with any other distro--and I haven't figured out how to get dual monitors working yet. Oh, and suspend/resume still doesn't work on any of the 3 laptops (I got my wife a MAC and the fact that suspend/resume always works, and does so quickly and smoothly makes me so jealous!)

      Every install worked flawlessly in each laptop. CD's, floppies and USB drives are automatically mounted, all resolutions are available on the screens (even wide-screens), and even my wireless internal lan adapter just worked out of the box.

      With the addition of Click And Go (I hope it's in this release) it'll be MUCH easier to acquire and install new software than it is in Windows.

      If you are considering installing Linux for the first time, I advise you scan this page first--I use it all the time now. It gives you a great summary of what can be done and how to do it. Most "Tasks" are simply a few entries on the CLI now--and most installs can be done from a decent GUI as well (the guide uses CLI because it's easier to describe) http://ubuntuguide.org/wiki/Ubuntu_Edgy

      Oh, and hey--one complaint (more of an observation actually), for those of you who complain about how often you must enter the root password on a PC, take a look at that page and see how often "SUDO" (the Linux equivalent) is required. Holy cow, it's like every single time you want to call apt-get (in other words, any time you want to install ANYTHING), you have to give up the root password. I believe this means that all install scripts are running as root--I don't know if this is a security hole, but it sure sounds like one. This is the exact equivalent to every windows program install requiring administrator access--something they have at least recognized as a flaw and begun to combat.

      But at any rate--seriously, it's now mainstream. Stick it on your grandma's computer. This from a Very Picky user.

    12. Re:Fast mirror at Indiana University by SuperQ · · Score: 3, Informative

      Some do! The mirror at umn.edu has iso downloads disabled, and a torrent is up and seeding at 75mbit. :)

    13. Re:Fast mirror at Indiana University by daveewart · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Oh, and hey--one complaint (more of an observation actually), for those of you who complain about how often you must enter the root password on a PC, take a look at that page and see how often "SUDO" (the Linux equivalent) is required. Holy cow, it's like every single time you want to call apt-get (in other words, any time you want to install ANYTHING), you have to give up the root password. I believe this means that all install scripts are running as root--I don't know if this is a security hole, but it sure sounds like one.

      First, a correction: sudo requires you to enter your own password, not the root password.

      Requiring administrative/root privileges to install software is the whole point. You are installing programs that are to be used system-wide. You need root privileges (granted to you via sudo) to do that. It's not a security hole when implemented properly. The point is that, unlike many Windows desktop, you're not running with 'root' privileges all the time. This is exactly what most Windows XP desktops are doing. You never need to be prompted for a 'root'/admin password when doing that, because you're always admin! That's insecure.

      --
      "If you think the problem is bad now, just wait until we've solved it." --- Arthur Kasspe
    14. Re:Fast mirror at Indiana University by emarkd · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Not the original poster here, but fwiw vmware player runs my xp partition very well from ubuntu on my laptop. I boot xp in vmware player and maximize it on one face of my beryl desktop cube and watch people do double-takes as I switch from one to the other. Fun. :)

      --
      Mark
    15. Re:Fast mirror at Indiana University by Eivind · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Yes there is. And it's very very grandmother-friendly too. My procedure:
      • Log in, as usual.
      • There's a message for me, indicated by a slowly pulsing alert-icon. It reads: "There are updates available for Ubuntu, click here if you want to install them. So I do.
      • I'm met with the familiar update-manager, only this time it has a new button: "There is a new version of Ubuntu available, 7.1 Feisty Fawn, click here to upgrade."
      • I click, and am informed that this required administrative priviledge, and would I please enter my password to proceed.
      • I do as told, wait half an hour, and that's it.

      I've never seen anything even close to this smooth. It's not just a Linux-best. It's quite simply the best I've ever seen.

      Oh, and did I mention I lied above ? You see, all the messages mentioned was nicely localized into my native written Language, nynorsk, the least used variant of Norwegian, which perhaps half a million people in the world write. I'm impressed.

    16. Re:Fast mirror at Indiana University by Jestrzcap · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Oh, and hey--one complaint (more of an observation actually), for those of you who complain about how often you must enter the root password on a PC, take a look at that page and see how often "SUDO" (the Linux equivalent) is required. Holy cow, it's like every single time you want to call apt-get (in other words, any time you want to install ANYTHING), you have to give up the root password. I believe this means that all install scripts are running as root--I don't know if this is a security hole, but it sure sounds like one. This is the exact equivalent to every windows program install requiring administrator access--something they have at least recognized as a flaw and begun to combat. This not entirely true. (in an otherwise positive post). It's true, when you need to install something you will likely need to provide *your* password (there is no root password, just accounts with sudo privilege). However, sudo will only ask for your password once every 5 minutes (and that can be changed) so you can accomplish a variety of tasks with only one password entry. Having to be root to write to certain directories is essential for the security of linux.

      In the future if you think something is a hassle or annoying, do a little research on it, Linux is very flexible and odds are you can modify or change it.
      --
      "I have great faith in fools: Self confidence my friends call it." ~Edgar Allan Poe
    17. Re:Fast mirror at Indiana University by cow+ninja · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, it's the final. Check the Ubuntu site again.

    18. Re:Fast mirror at Indiana University by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 5, Funny

      Very carefully

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    19. Re:Fast mirror at Indiana University by disasm · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's an issue of space. The live cd doesn't contain the actual packages, it actually installs the system thats on the live cd. To include package files, you would need the equivalent of everything on the alternate cd, which is why the alternate cd is required. This is also the reason I prefer to install from the alternate cd. Sam

    20. Re:Fast mirror at Indiana University by kestasjk · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Requiring administrative/root privileges to install software is the whole point. You are installing programs that are to be used system-wide. You need root privileges (granted to you via sudo) to do that. It's not a security hole when implemented properly. The point is that, unlike many Windows desktop, you're not running with 'root' privileges all the time. This is exactly what most Windows XP desktops are doing. You never need to be prompted for a 'root'/admin password when doing that, because you're always admin! That's insecure.

      I think Linux distros would benefit a lot from making it possible to install apps under a user account. I always do this with custom compiled software, it seems logical to do it for possibly dubious (i.e universe repository) software that doesn't need to install things as admin. It would be reassuring to know that non-dependency/library, single user, non-system software never has admin permissions.
      --
      // MD_Update(&m,buf,j);
    21. Re:Fast mirror at Indiana University by mhall119 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I understand what you are saying, I wasn't talking about XP style permissions. What I was talking about was Vista's attempt to restrict admin access to only be asserted when required. Suddenly you are getting popups all the time asking for admin access.

      This makes sense, however, as does the way you explained sudo. But the problem is that many people who complained about Vista's continual prompting, aren't realizing that typing sudo all the time is the same exact thing.
      It's different in the fact that you are only prompted by sudo when the changes you are trying to make will effect the system or other users on the system. Things like installing system-wide software and services should require proof that you have permission to do this. From what I have heard about Vista's prompts (I don't use it), they are used for user-only preferences changes too, or running (not installing, running) user-space applications. The one time I played with someone else's Vista install, I tried to run a pre-installed game and was prompted with the "Cancel or Allow?". That is what makes no sense.

      As for the security hole issue. I don't know the way apt-get works, but it seems to me that when it installs something it is executing some kind of a script. That script is most likely running as root. If I'm wrong, or if the scripting language is weak enough that it can't cause a problem, please let me know.
      Even if apt is running system shell scripts (an example, I really don't know), how is this insecure? You don't give install permission to people who might install bad software, and let apt check their permissions before installing. Yes, someone with root access can possibly cause security issues, but they don't need apt for that. Bottom line hasn't changed in decades, don't give root access to people you don't trust to have root access.

      Also, if this is the case and apt-get is completely safe to run as admin, why not just set it's SUID/SGID flag and be done with it?
      Because SUID would let anyone run apt as root, potentially giving anyone on your system root access. Again, don't give root access to people you don't trust.

      Not that apt-get is not the ONLY time I type SUDO either, it seems to be that I have to give up admin access a few times a day for some reason or another.
      I'm not sure what you're doing to require so much root access, but I'd bet that every time you're asked for your password, you're doing something you wouldn't want your web server (an example, could be any non-root user) doing without your permission. Next time you're prompted for your password, ask yourself if you want to let someone else do that same thing on your box without having to ask you.

      If you get in the habit of doing something like this all the time, you might as well be running as admin all the time (At least that was the complaint many people had with Vista)
      From my Ubuntu experience, you only run as root when you need to run as root. If you're doing more than system administration and still being prompted by sudo all the time, chances are you need to re-think what you're doing. There is probably a better (read: more secure) way.
      --
      http://www.mhall119.com
    22. Re:Fast mirror at Indiana University by Chandon+Seldon · · Score: 2, Informative

      The general concept of installing a package on a multi-user system involves running arbitrary third party code as root. This is true on Windows, Mac OS X, every GNU/Linux distro, and every Unix. You're right that this is dangerous from a security perspective - if you can get a user to install something, you've got root on their system. Some packages shouldn't need this, but many actually do - I think that Mac OS X is the only system that provides a built in mechanism to install packages that don't need root access without granting it.

      Both Microsoft and Debian/Ubuntu have settled on the same "solution" to this problem: Cryptographically sign install packages. This means that the user has to trust everyone who can sign packages. For Windows, signing packages requires getting a developer signing key that costs a couple thousand dollars. For Debian/Ubuntu, the packages are signed when they are put in the official repositories - so there's a little bit more control since packages are stored centrally.

      Either way, you can still install unsigned packages. but that's obviously a risk - you have to figure out if you trust the source enough to run arbitrary code as root on your own.

      --
      -- The act of censorship is always worse than whatever is being censored. Always.
    23. Re:Fast mirror at Indiana University by Chandon+Seldon · · Score: 2, Informative

      By default, there is no root password on Ubuntu. If you run the "passwd" command as root, you are setting a password, but there is no old password to replace.

      Sorry to nitpick, but I don't want anyone thinking that Ubuntu has a default root password. That would be an ugly security issue.

      --
      -- The act of censorship is always worse than whatever is being censored. Always.
    24. Re:Fast mirror at Indiana University by ottothecow · · Score: 3, Interesting
      This is sort of what blizzard does with WoW patches. The patch downloader is a simple torrent client so all users are able to use the torrent without dealing with people who dont know what torrents are.

      Blizzard then has an http seed running. If the program determines that you are incapable of recieving a torrent (firewall or driver issues), then your entire download comes straight from blizzard's http seed. If the program is able to connect to the swarm, you then start recieving data down from the other people downloading the patch AS WELL as the blizzard seed. Likewise, if you connect a long time after the patch comes out and there is nobody left downloading the patch, you still get the data straight from blizzard without having to find the file in a different manner.

      In this model you have basically a standard server/client relationship when only one person is downloading and it scales out to a p2p model as additional people connect.

      --
      Bottles.
    25. Re:Fast mirror at Indiana University by Knuckles · · Score: 2, Informative

      There is a root password but it isn't really documented anywhere.

      Nononono, how often do we have to dispel this myth! If people like you would do their homework before talking, it would probably already have died. From /etc/passwd:

      root:!:13456:0:99999:7:::

      From "man shadow":
      "If the password field contains some string that is not valid result of crypt(3), for instance ! or *, the user will not be able to use a unix password to log in, subject to pam(7)."

      So, effectively, the root account is disabled and no password exists that would let you in. Before writing about sudo and root in Ubuntu again, please read this :)

      --
      "When I first heard Daydream Nation it quite frankly scared the living shit out of me." -- Matthew Stearns
    26. Re:Fast mirror at Indiana University by eric_brissette · · Score: 2, Informative

      I just finished downloading from that pirate bay torrent. The MD5 sum checks out. (ubuntu feisty fawn desktop i386)

  2. Plesant Java Surprise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Does that mean they removed it?

    1. Re:Plesant Java Surprise? by Kirth · · Score: 5, Informative

      They bundled it. Except on 64bit machines, where it still does not work correctly and still does not have a browser plugin; because the bug-report for this is only two years old.

      --
      "The more prohibitions there are, The poorer the people will be" -- Lao Tse
    2. Re:Plesant Java Surprise? by geschild · · Score: 2, Informative

      Lets get the facts right, here. It's not a bug-report, it's an RFE, a Request for Enhancement.

      AND IT'S BLOODY FOUR YEARS OLD!!!

      See for your self: http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id =4802695

      To add insult to injury, when the status of this 'RFE' only very recently changed (January 16th 2007), IT WAS TARGETED FOR THE NEXT RELEASE. In other words it'll be another 18 months.

      And the first person who tells me I should use a 32-bit browser anyway, I'm going to strangle with Java-code.

      Excuse me for losing my cool there, I've been waiting for it to magically apear in every point release of V5 and then in Java 6. Even if this is 'non-trivial', Sun should get their collective heads out of their assess and just do it. There's no telling how many people and projects are being held up by this.

      If you have a few minutes, please get an account at SDN and vote for this particular RFE. I'd like the vote to go up to about a thousand at least. Perhaps that'll get them out of snooze-mode. :/

      --
      Karma? What's that again?
  3. torrents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Don't bother with the official sites - I think they must be running Ubuntu Sluggish Slug Server Edition! Kidding aside, there are a myriad of torrent options.

  4. Re:Sarkozy is teh devil ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Our good friend Don Imus has some suggestions for future Ubuntu releases.

    Angy Akata
    Busty Beaner
    Crackhead Coon
    Ditzy Darkie
    Eerie Earfucker
    Fisting Feminazi
    Grubby Goombah
    Horny Ho
    Irate Inky
    Jumping Jigabo
    Kinky Kike
    Lame Limey
    Morose Moolie
    Nappy Nigger
    Obscene Oreo
    Puny Popolo
    Quiet Queer
    Reeking Rafter
    Sleazy Spic
    Tipsy Tranny
    Ugly UncleTom
    Venomous Velcrohead
    Wretched Whigger
    Xenophobic Xena
    Yellow Yenta
    Zany Zebra

    This is just some random text to avoid the lameness filter. This is just some random text to avoid the lameness filter. This is just some random text to avoid the lameness filter. This is just some random text to avoid the lameness filter. This is just some random text to avoid the lameness filter.

  5. Why Can't Linux Developers Match OS X by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Yes Linux has come a long way in desktop features and the other things that make up a desktop environment, but I just don't understand how Linux desktop UIs still can't manage to get spacing, font/text placement and alignment, shading, and all the other details that make OS X so instantly appealing to so many people, regardless if they want to are able to pay for Macs of their own to use.

    Just compare:

    http://shots.linuxquestions.org/scaled/Ubuntu%207. 04/11.gif

    vs

    http://images.apple.com/macosx/leopard/images/inde xdesktop20060807.jpg

    I just don't understand how there can remain such a huge gap in the attention to detail and refinement with Linux desktops and apps. Have Linux developers never used Interface builder and it's alignment spacing tools or ever really sat down with a Mac and gone over the various OS X UI parts to understand how and why the feel and work so well?

    1. Re:Why Can't Linux Developers Match OS X by Mattintosh · · Score: 3, Insightful

      First off, I don't think your post is flamebait. Screw the mods.

      Second of all, I like the look of Ubuntu's default Gnome environment almost as much as the Mac OS X 10.4 UI. But here are the differences I notice:

      First of all, the bad:
      - Look at the buttons on the window title bars in Ubuntu. Especially that annoying catch-all menu on the left side. Notice how the space around the button is wider on the top and left than it is on the bottom. That just looks sloppy. Mac OS has never had this sort of problem in a final release.
      - Where is my quick-access-but-not-a-desktop-icon method of launching an app? Mac OS has had one for over a decade. There were pop-up folders (tabs), tabbed launch apps, and now there's the Dock (though I prefer the old categorized tabs, myself). Even Windows, that paragon of UI anti-design, has Quick Launch bars. I guess you could call the hierarchic menu a "fast launch" menu, since it's still faster than manually navigating to the folder and running the app or typing the path/app into a CLI. But I never considered that a quick-access method on Mac OS even when you could stick stuff into the Apple menu. Hierarchic menus are just too finicky... OH WAIT. There it is. Sorry, but there's a reason that the Mac mouse was one-button for all those years, even in the face of heavy criticism. Relying on a right-click for what should be basic system functions is just poor practice. I've been running Ubuntu for a while now, and this screenshot was the first I'd seen of the aforementioned feature.
      - A system-wide menubar is really a nice thing. You can't click another app's menus without switching to that app anyway, so why even give the option? Plus, it frees up screen real-estate for other things. You'd be amazed how much space is wasted by all those menubars, especially the ones that consist of just File, Edit, View. Move all that crap to one place. And yes, I do understand that it takes some getting-used-to and that people are resistant to change. Especially Linux geeks. Try it for a month and I'll guarantee you won't go back. It's the same challenge we all issue to Windows users, and what's good for the goose...
      - And one final note: thank goodness the Apple folks have finally realized that brushed metal looks like ass. Now if we could just get back to a standardized look and feel...

      And the good:
      - As I mentioned before, a standard look and feel. Ubuntu has that. Given, it's baby-turd brown, but at least it's consistent. And I'm sure there are themes to change the colors (and given my first criticism above, hopefully the layout). Note that the "themes" issue is another failing of the Mac OS in its current incarnation. It's also quite a sore issue with Apple, I fear, so any official resolution is unlikely.
      - The shut-down button is awesome. On a Mac, you can just bonk the power button and invoke the "sleep, restart, shut down, or cancel?" dialog, but on generic PC hardware, you can't always do that. Often, the case's faceplate is gone, exposing little sharp plastic nubs instead of a nice power button. Sometimes the damn thing is under your desk and just out of reach. Sometimes it's in a server locker 1000 miles away. Being able to shut down the OS using an always-accessible power button icon is just really damned nice.
      - Multiple desktops. Windows doesn't have it. Mac OS doesn't have it. (Third-party add-ons don't count.) Nothing more needs to be said. And the UI to switch between them is pure gold.

      And the Ugly? Just about everything Windows does. I would like to take this opportunity to beg the Linux/GNU/Gnome/KDE/whatever devs and contributors not to copy Windows. It's an ethical thing, really. Mistreatment of eyes is a horrible crime. Won't someone please think of MY EYES?!

    2. Re:Why Can't Linux Developers Match OS X by Paulrothrock · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Leopard (OS X 10.5) is going to have multiple desktops in October. And the real reasons I use OS X aren't so much the interface as it's Textmate and Quicksilver. There is no text editor on any platform that can compare to TextMate, and Quicksilver is one of the greatest interface innovations since the GUI.

      Of course, they make me use Windows at work.

      --
      I'm in the hole of the broadband donut.
  6. Upgrade from 6.10 by raffe · · Score: 3, Informative

    I have just update my 6.10 vmware image running on my win xp to 7.04. Runs great. If you want to try to upgrade from 6.10 to 7.04 open a terminal and enter
    gksu "update-manager -c -d" and follow instructions. As always, back up your computer fist. :-D

    1. Re:Upgrade from 6.10 by Clover_Kicker · · Score: 3, Insightful

      probability of ruining /home : very low
      consequence of ruining /home : very high

      You do whatever you like, my /home lives on a server that's backed up every night, TYVM.

    2. Re:Upgrade from 6.10 by bytor4232 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      gksu "update-manager -c -d" and follow instructions. As always, back up your computer fist. :-D

      I don't know if thats a good idea. I could be wrong, but what your asking for is to upgrade to the last beta. You may want to wait a few days before running update-manager.

      Check it out:

      arthur@persephone:~$ update-manager --help
      usage: update-manager [options]

      options:
          -h, --help show this help message and exit
          -c, --check-dist-upgrades
                                                      Check if a new distribution release is available
          -d, --devel-release Check if upgrading to the latest devel release is
                                                      possible
          --dist-upgrade, --dist-ugprade
                                                      Try to run a dist-upgrade
      arthur@persephone:~$

      --
      -- 4 8 15 16 23 42
    3. Re:Upgrade from 6.10 by bytor4232 · · Score: 4, Informative

      To properly upgrade 6.10 to 7.04 simply go to System - Administration - Update Manager. The button just appeared on my update-manager informing me of a new release.

      --
      -- 4 8 15 16 23 42
    4. Re:Upgrade from 6.10 by WheresMyDingo · · Score: 5, Funny
      As always, back up your computer fist.

      Agreed about the fist. When upgrading, I too curl my fingers into that well-known "computer fist" as I anticipate what I am about to do. But backing the fist up (usually up and to the right, near my ear) is important, so that it will have maximal effect when I pound it down on the desk in frustration, when something inevitably breaks. Or even if something doesn't, to celebrate. A good way to relieve tension, but it does interfere with typing.

    5. Re:Upgrade from 6.10 by Knuckles · · Score: 3, Informative

      -c is only needed if you upgrade from 6.06 LTS (Dapper) to 6.10 (Edgy), since by default, LTS releases will only upgrade to the next LTS release.
      -d is wrong since it is there to force an upgrade to a development version, which 7.04 (Feisty) isn't anymore.

      To do an upgrade correctly, follow the instructions here: http://www.ubuntu.com/getubuntu/upgrading

      --
      "When I first heard Daydream Nation it quite frankly scared the living shit out of me." -- Matthew Stearns
    6. Re:Upgrade from 6.10 by BruceCage · · Score: 4, Funny

      The pure adrenaline pumping through my veins is the sole reason I don't do backups during system upgrades.

      --
      Perfect is the enemy of done.
  7. Use the torrents, people by moranar · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Help alleviate the load: use the torrents.

    --
    "I think it would be a good idea!"
    Gandhi, about Internet Security
  8. Old news! by Otter · · Score: 4, Funny

    I already heard this from Michael Dell.

  9. Finally! by tygerstripes · · Score: 2, Funny
    At last, Ubuntu are all set to work on the release they really wanted to push: Generic Gnu!

    (Of course, it'll be a Gazelle, but hey.)

    --
    Meta will eat itself
    1. Re:Finally! by StonedRat · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's already been announced as Gutsy Gibbon.

      --
      "Religion is the most malevolent of all mind viruses." - Arthur C. Clarke.
  10. Thanks Mark by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Whatever we think about this man, we should thank him to have launched the Ubuntu Project. This is the first Linux distro that have the potential to succeed on the Desktop and to get some decent market share beside Windows and MacOS.

  11. System Requirements? by 2008 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Based on the review this is worth upgrading to - but what are the system requirements like? 6.06 is just usable on my 196 meg RAM laptop, will this push it over the edge?

    Incidentally, how come SAMBA isn't included by default? This bit me recently when trying to move files between 2 networked (but not on the internet) computers.

    --
    I quit!
    1. Re:System Requirements? by SomeGuyTyping · · Score: 3, Informative

      on SAMBA, just begin to set up a share and synaptic will download and install the SAMBA components.

      --
      My posts are definitive. Reality is frequently inaccurate.
    2. Re:System Requirements? by mbrod · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Have you tried to run Xubuntu? It runs xfce as the window manager and is suppose to have lighter hardware requirements. I would wait a bit on trying to get that distro or even access their site as the entire Ubuntu world is getting slammed right now.

    3. Re:System Requirements? by bhsx · · Score: 3, Informative

      I've not tried 7.04 yet, but I have Xubuntu (the XFCE version) running just dandy on a 200MHz, 96MB RAM Toshiba Satellite 4010CDS. It does take a bit(39-60 seconds) to launch some apps, OO.o and Firefox specifically; but once launched they work just fine. Installation could have been smoother, but again, this is some pretty old hardware. I use it as a second web terminal on the coffee table when someone (wife, step-daughter) is on the main PC. If I were you I'd wait for the Feisty version of Xubuntu.

      --
      put the what in the where?
  12. slashdotted... this time IRC, not HTTP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    On freenode,

    #ubuntu = 1600 users
    #ubuntu-release-party = 850 users

    In the last hour, these have both gone up by around 100-200 each. 24hrs ago, #ubuntu-release-party had 20 people.

    Apparently this is a new record for the freenode IRC network!

    Forget whether or not ubuntulinux.org can remain online, everyone start praying for the poor folk at freenode :)

  13. Official mailing list announcement by balster+neb · · Score: 2, Informative

    The release was officially announced on the mailing list moments ago. Here is the link:

    https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-announce/ 2007-April/000102.html

  14. UbuntuStudio by SomeGuyTyping · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm excited about this release mainly because UbuntuStudio was supposed to come out with Feisty. I'm looking forward to having a maintained and stable realtime kernel for audio work

    --
    My posts are definitive. Reality is frequently inaccurate.
  15. Re:Gentoo has failed me too many times by Anivair · · Score: 2, Informative

    I think it is. Linux geeks have a powerful love for Ubuntu (I know, being one myself). Personally, i think ubuntu is the best shot Linux has at the desktop market in any way. It's easier to set up and run that any windows and doesn't lack any features. As long as you're willing to actually USE the internet and look for answers to your questions, you're in luck. And to be fair, technical support in ubuntu (at the publuc forums) is vastly superior to windows tech support (I admin both OS's and linux is easier to get help with by far). So there's a reason for the ubuntu love, certainly. But with Vista just out, any new linux dostro story is bound to spark flames.

  16. Might skip this version by Rik+Sweeney · · Score: 5, Funny

    and the next one...

    Bring on Version 9: Hungry Hungry Hippo!

  17. Re:Java is not YET Free software by at_slashdot · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Ah, please can you take your self-righteousness and shove it up your ass?

    --
    "It is our choices, Harry, that show what we truly are, far more than our abilities." -- Prof. Dumbledore
  18. Re:Java is not YET Free software by jetxee · · Score: 4, Funny

    Well said and sad. The cheat of Linux distros. Way too easy to get it working...

  19. Re:Java is not YET Free software by drinkypoo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Ubuntu seems consistently (whether it be proprietary, closed, non-Free wireless or video card drivers or this) just to be attempting consistently to squeeze a few extra percent of the market share at the expense of the long-term robustness of Free software. Maybe the next release should be Sneaky Snake or Conniving Chimp ?

    Whether you agree with what the Ubuntu project is doing or not, there is nothing sneaky about it. They have never tried to hide what they are doing.

    Many of us, including me, have been asking for a long time for a distribution that fucking works. One that does things, out of the box, that every other operating system does. And we frankly don't care if that means that we have to run closed software today. Because as we have seen, the existence of closed software on Linux does not prevent people from working on open alternatives to it. The existence of free-as-in-beer Java hasn't stopped people from working on free-as-in-speech implementations (and as you point out, Java is on its way to Freedom.) The existence of the free-as-in-beer nVidia drivers isn't stopping work on an alternative.

    Ubuntu is doing what a sizable slice of the community has asked them to do, and your complaining about it is ridiculous. Complain about the users if you like.

    And stop complaining about the lack of Ubuntu-distributed new features. Even if no one "at" Ubuntu ever fixed a bug, which frankly is not required by the Open Source model, they do a shitload to coordinate it, and they have done more to package Linux for the end user than anyone else.

    Finally, Ubuntu is going to be bringing out an entirely-Free distribution. So I'm not really sure what you're bitching about. If Free software can't compete on its own merits, then it deserves to lose.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  20. Re:Java is not YET Free software by Vexorian · · Score: 4, Funny

    Yeah everybody knows linux should stay pushing philosophies instead of actually work. Who needs users anyways?

    --

    Copyright infringement is "piracy" in the same way DRM is "consumer rape"
  21. Java by Vexorian · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I don't like Java too much but I really think that although ubuntu may be rushing it (since Java has not been GPLed yet) linux and Java may make a great alliance, let's face it, linux has the issue that windows programs don't work on it, even with WINE there are issues sometimes, and Java's main selling point (cross platform-ness ) doesn't quite work with the current operating system monopoly situation. The only thing we needed to start improving the situation was a distribution that comes with sun's Java installed by default, these are great news.

    --

    Copyright infringement is "piracy" in the same way DRM is "consumer rape"
  22. Re:Dual-boot by staticsage · · Score: 3, Informative

    If you download the Alternate Install CD, you can choose where to install grub. Install it to a floppy or usb drive and you can use that file with the windows boot loader. This way if you want to remove the Ubuntu partitions in the future you won't have to worry about fixing the boot loader. It's been a while since I've done this, but this looks about right: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=56723

  23. Re:Java is not YET Free software by nine-times · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I don't want to sound harsh because I believe you're genuinely concerned, but I think you're wrong. Ubuntu is providing non-free packages for some things because it's what people want. People want the ability to get easy 3D accelleration for their video cards, and the open source drivers don't do it, so Ubuntu provides the ability to install the non-free drivers easily.

    And yes, "what people want" matters. Making it easy for people to get good performance from their computers will win converts to Linux. As Linux's share of the market grows, there's an increasing chance that various companies will support linux in various ways. The more people are using Linux on their desktop and the more people want 3D accelleration for their desktop, the more likely it is that someone (maybe even Nvidia and AMD) will actually produce Free drivers.

  24. Re:Java is not YET Free software by crush · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I don't want to sound harsh because I believe you're genuinely concerned, but I think you're wrong.

    Fair enough. Thanks for the rational post. I think you're completely wrong though. By providing what some people want Ubuntu is cannibalizing the market and making it easier for hardware vendors (and arguably in this case Sun) to continue to provide hardware that works inadequately with Linux. Just because a large number of people might be able to get a short-term gain (my nVidia card will now do 3D with this particular version of the driver that will break when the next kernel update is released and may be unsupported in the future because there's no source code). I don't see this as morality, I see it as a practically self-defeating strategy by one Linux distro which is undermining the whole basis on which Linux manages to exist: Free/Open source code.

    I realise that what I'm going to say sounds harsh and isn't an option for people with a work requirement for CAD or whatever, but it's possible to buy hardware for wireless, video etc that is completely supported by Free/Open drivers. Other hardware should be sold to Windows users or else junked, it's not that expensive to buy replacements and the actual cost of maintaining it by undermining the pressure to release specs is ultimately going to see us in the same position years down the road

  25. What's new? by digitalderbs · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I always find it difficult to get a summary on the new features to help me decide if I should upgrade. These are the results from my searches :

    1. 18 month support term
    2. Better installation, includes migration tools for mail and such from Windows and linux partitions.
    3. Improved wireless support with Avahi
    4. Easier third party codec/firmware/driver installation, including Nvidia and ATi proprietary drivers and mp3 codecs.
    5. Two new games : glches and soduko
    6. Compiz/Beryl support for desktop 3D effects (not default)
    7. Beagle (search indexed), Tomboy (note tacking program, sticky notes) and F-Spot (photo management.. alternatively called G-spot, depending on the type of photos).
    8. java

    sources : blog 1, blog 2
    I already have all of these setup on Edgy, so I won't upgrade.
    1. Re:What's new? by ror · · Score: 3, Informative

      You can just "upgrade" by changing a word in a config file somewhere, there's no reinstallation involved; You'll just be bumped with a few programs to download and you're done, there's little reason *not* to.

    2. Re:What's new? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      The improved wireless support comes from network-manager not avahi, avahi is a service for automatically discovering network services on your local network.

      Tomboy and f-spot at least, were included in Ubuntu 6.10.

      There are *lots* of small incremental improvements in Ubuntu, that's the benefit of 6 month release plan. Some of them are detailed here: http://philbull.livejournal.com/34930.html There are also a list of improvements from Gnome 2.18 here: http://www.gnome.org/start/2.18/notes/en/

      I imagine the new kernel release adds support for new hardware and things too.

  26. Re:Java is not YET Free software by Ginger+Unicorn · · Score: 3, Insightful
    If there are more people aware of free software, then perhaps there would be more pressure to produce free alternatives to proprietary drives and codecs.

    ubuntu is making vast progress in the arena of raising awareness and usage of free software in the general public. In what way is it parasitic? Ubuntu runs at a loss, held up by shuttleworth's own money. For the first time ever, because of the work ubuntu have put in, I now feel the slightest twinges of comfort in recommending the use of linux to a non technical person.

    Fair enough if the FSF want to be purist about their approach, but no one else is obliged to, and no one who is obeying the licensing terms of the software they distribute can ever be accused of being underhanded or parasitic.

    --
    (1.21 gigawatts) / (88 miles per hour) = 30 757 874 newtons
  27. Re:Java is not YET Free software by Ginger+Unicorn · · Score: 2, Insightful

    name a package that is included on the CD that is not free software. all the non free stuff has to be downloaded through apt-get.

    --
    (1.21 gigawatts) / (88 miles per hour) = 30 757 874 newtons
  28. You must really like pain. by Kadin2048 · · Score: 2, Informative

    The only problem I can forsee is setting up MythTV to work with my Radeon AIW. Either way it should make for a fun weekend project!

    If by "fun weekend project," you mean "experience that will make you curse computers, question your own sanity, and shake your fist at God for not having struck you down with a well-placed lightning bolt before you set forth on this foolhardy endeavor," then yeah, sure, it might be a fun weekend project.

    But seriously, if you want MythTV to work, and work well, get hardware that's well supported. Hauppauge PVR-x50 MPEG-2 encoder cards and Bt848 framebuffer cards [1] are your friends; all others your enemy. Low-end NVidia cards with S-Video out are also probably the best way to avoid wanting to kick the computer.

    Unless you put a very, very low value on your time, the cost of the hardware will be insignificant compared to the effort involved in getting poorly-supported gear working with MythTV. I've been down that road. Six weeks worth of work later, I just tossed it all into the parts bin and went out and bought a PVR-150, a Streamzap, and a cheap eVGA NVidia card with S-Video out that was listed as being on the "A" list for Knoppmyth compatibility. With that, it was a weekend project.

    [1] The HDHomeRun is pretty slick, too, if you want HD. It's the most painless way to get dual HD tuners.

    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
  29. Re:Java is not YET Free software by crush · · Score: 2, Informative

    So far all the ATI cards upto and including the r300 chipsets, the nvidia cards now supported by the nouveau project (which is very recent) include up to the geforce 8800 (IIRC). You can see the details at free3d.org

    The latest Intel G965 chipsets also include an integrated video chip GMA X3000 which is apparently beefy enough to do stuff like Compiz/Bery, Tuxracer just fine.

    anything that forces hardware vendors to support Linux on more desktops is more likely to lead to more adequate drivers. That's verifiably an unsupported idea. The Linux-only market is a tiny fraction of the Windows market and its a waste of ATI/Nvidia's time to put enough engineers on it. That's why their proprietary drivers suck and why the nouveau guys were irritated enough to start trying to write one themselves. Ubuntu is relieving any pressure there might be on these manufacturers and thus actually penalising manufacturers like Intel who have taken the risk of opening up their specs completely.

  30. Re:Java is not YET Free software by Bandman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You're so far off your rocker that you don't even know where your porch is.

    Every time I hear someone go off on how free-as-in-beer software is evil and corrupts the precious open-source movement, I just want to smack my forehead in disgust.

    It's the usability, stupid.

    It's about turning your computer into something productive, so it's not a paperweight with blinking lights. Ubuntu has made more headway in organizing a usable system than RedHat, Mandrake, and Debian combined. It is really the first distro that nearly everyone can use.

    Now, about your comments that it is "parasitic", I think you're confused even further. If nothing else, Ubuntu is a way to increase the user base of the software which you say it doesn't contribute to. It gets Linux, Open Office, Xorg, and thousands of other softwares into the hands of people who would never have known there was another alternative to Microsoft otherwise. And you decry it because it encourages people to have choice. You insult the very software that could very well be the cause of manufacturers opening drivers, or if not providing open drivers, perhaps providing working binary drivers, ala NVidia. But then, you're against that, too. To fanatical egotistic closed minded people like yourself, having a binary driver in your kernel would sully it somehow, rendering it unfit to use, so instead you install semi-working drivers provided by people who have reverse engineered the hardware and bitch about how for-profit companies refuse to give away their trade secrets.

    Get over yourself. It's not a paragon of virtue and selflessness. It's a fucking kernel. That's it.

  31. MAGNET URI Torrent address by Danathar · · Score: 4, Informative

    Don't people understand that when you put the .torrent file on the same server as the iso's if one is being hammered the other get's killed too.

    So....your mirrors are breaking. Yea! Bittorrent saves the day! Lets put the torrent file on the SAME SERVER that's currently melting down. That will fix it. :(

    So your torrent servers don't get killed post the Magnet URI so that people can join the torrent independent of the accessibility of the .torrent file.

    Here is the Ubuntu 7.04 i386 desktop

    magnet:?xt=urn:btih:DMDDBZV4X4NWSEHVEBBZHSMFY4GHDK XV

    Note Slashdot has a problem with Magnet URI's there is NO space between the last K and XV

    1. Re:MAGNET URI Torrent address by The_Wilschon · · Score: 3, Informative

      Note Slashdot has a problem with Magnet URI's there is NO space between the last K and XV
      That's part of the lameness filter. In an effort to prevent screen-widening hacks, long strings of characters with no whitespace get some whitespace inserted in them. You can get around this by enclosing the URI in a URL tag. The URI as displayed will still include the whitespace, but the HREF for the generated link will not. Observe:

      <URL:magnet:?xt=urn:btih:DMDDBZV4X4NWSEHVEBBZHSMFY 4GHDKXV>
      (without the extra space of course) becomes
      magnet:xturnbtihDMDDBZV4X4NWSEHVEBBZHSMFY4GHDKXV
      --
      SIGSEGV caught, terminating

      wait... not that kind of sig.
    2. Re:MAGNET URI Torrent address by Cl1mh4224rd · · Score: 2, Informative

      <URL:magnet:?xt=urn:btih:DMDDBZV4X4NWSEHVEBBZHSM FY 4GHDKXV>
      (without the extra space of course) becomes
      magnet:xturnbtihDMDDBZV4X4NWSEHVEBBZHSMFY4GHDKXV

      Umm... Check your results.
      --
      People will pass up steak once a week, for crap every day.
  32. Re:Java is not YET Free software by Gompers · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There will likely never be good drivers for the best video cards for Linux until there is a large installed base of users in the market for those video cards on Linux.

    There will likely never be a large installed base of Linux users until a distribution hits the market that is a viable alternative to windows for most tasks.

    It's really a chicken-egg problem.

    If you want to wage jihad with the closed-software community, you have the option of going with a variety of different distributions that are much more focused on that.

    If, instead, you want to build the very best Linux desktop you can, you do what Ubuntu is doing. Politics be damned. The people who view free software as religion or political platform tend to block it into a corner that will always relegate it to a niche market in the view of the general public. At the end of the day, the vast VAST majority of users could care less about whether the driver is close-sourced, or open sourced or anything in between. They care mostly that it works, and secondly that it costs them nothing in terms of time and money to make it work. Ubuntu is aimed at those users. Those users are the ones who will have to use Linux to get it out of the niche. And once it becomes a sizable portion of the market, we will see better drivers.

  33. Re:GUI upgrade? by spun · · Score: 2

    Try Beryl/Compiz. Makes the GUI as flashy and pretty as you like and your machine can handle. MUCH nicer and FAR more configurable than OS X. Currently only works with Nvidia and Intel graphics adapters, AFAIK.

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
  34. Re:Automatix? by Knuckles · · Score: 2, Informative

    Especially, note that 6.06 cannot be directly upgraded to 7.04, you need to go to 6.10 first*. You might be quicker doing a backup and reinstalling.

    * At least with the (recommended) automatic tool. If you know what you are doing, you can likely upgrade directly with the manual tools. You will need some knowledge though. (aptitude dist-upgrade, dpkg --force-things, and apt-get -f install are your friends. It won't be pretty)

    --
    "When I first heard Daydream Nation it quite frankly scared the living shit out of me." -- Matthew Stearns
  35. Re:Java is not YET Free software by drinkypoo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Ubuntu as a distribution fits into the software ecosystem as a parasite. It gives back very litte in terms of original new code or projects and weakens the push for Free software.

    Ubuntu widens the market for Linux by providing a distribution that people can actually use.

    As a result, it strengthens the push for Free software, because most Linux software is Free.

    Ubuntu is the first Linux distribution to include an automated crash reporting tool, which feeds more useful bug reports into the system, which is a benefit to all. And the entire system, including aggregation of these crash reports, was built and is maintained and run by Ubuntu.

    Finally, Ubuntu is using software in accordance with its licensing, so really no one has room to bitch. If you want to force people to contribute back changes, then put something about that in the license of the software you develop, and quit bitching. Let peace begin with me, and all that.

    What software have you written and released under an OSI-approved license? What patches have you written and released (and had accepted) for Free software?

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  36. Re:Java is not YET Free software by zenslug · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I like using Linux but it is too much work too often. The easier it is for me to get a desktop running, the more likely I'll use it. Ideals are great, but without enough marketshare Linux won't demand the attention of hardware makers. With a larger marketshare and the continued persistence of people like you, Linux will get more free hardware support.

  37. Re:General Linux Java Question by LDoggg_ · · Score: 2, Informative

    On windows you're likely running the Sun Java Virtual Machine.
    On Linux you may unknowingly be using the free Gnu implemenation of Java (gcj). Install the Sun JVM and try running from that one instead.
    In my experience the Sun JVM on Linux is better than the Sun JVM on windows, but the Sun JVM on windows is faster than gcj on Linux.

    That said, I applaud the efforts by the gcj guys big time.

    --

    "If they have both, tell them we use Linux. And if they have that, tell them the computers are down." -Dave Chapelle
  38. Pure FUD! by HalAtWork · · Score: 2, Informative

    Um, in Ubuntu you're NOT always admin. There is no way to log in as root in Ubuntu. The first user you create gets sudo priveledges automatically, and the "root" account inherits the password of the first user account you create. From then on, any user you create does not have any escelated priveledges whatsoever. The idea behind this is that you use the first account you created to administer, therefore enforcing the idea that you should never log in as root or run anything unnecessary as root, and then you use your other accounts for normal work/play. The reason behind this is that novices are used to the idea of logging in under a seperate account to admin stuff, and so that other users do not have a method of doing any of this stuff, even accidentally.

    1. Re:Pure FUD! by lahvak · · Score: 2, Informative

      Um, in Ubuntu you're NOT always admin. There is no way to log in as root in Ubuntu. The first user you create gets sudo priveledges automatically, and the "root" account inherits the password of the first user account you create. From then on, any user you create does not have any escelated priveledges whatsoever.

      Ehm, actually, the root account does not inherit any password. You are correct that by default, there is no way to log in as root in ubuntu. The reason for that is that the root account does not have a password, and does not allow password-less login. The first user you create is automatically added to the "sudoers" file, which gives him/her the privilege of using sudo. Sudo grants the user temporary root privileges, so that he/she can perform administrative tasks. Later, you can add more users to the sudoers file by granting them administration privileges (There is a GUI for it somewhere in Ubuntu). They can then perform admin tasks using sudo, with their own password, just like the first user.

      With this setup, there really is no reason to use the first account only to administer. The only thing that is special about the first account is that it can temporarily gain administrative privileges using sudo, but for normal operation, it has no special access to the system.

      You can also use sudo to set up a password for your root account, and thus make it possible to log in as root, but it is generally a bad idea. If you really need to perform some heavy administration task that requires running a number of commands from a terminal with root privileges, and you don't want to keep typing "sudo" in front of each of them, you can always use sudo to get a root shell. See sudo man page to learn how to do it.

      --
      AccountKiller
  39. Re:Version number to name table? by Ambidisastrous · · Score: 2, Informative

    Off the top of my head, it was something like:
    Warty Warthog (4.10)
    Hoary Hedgehog 5.04
    Breezy Badger 5.10
    Dapper Drake 6.06
    Edgy Eft 6.10
    Feisty Fawn 7.04
    [Next: Gutsy Gibbon 7.10, though Glossy Gnu was considered]

    Release dates are every 6 months, except in the case of Dapper Drake. Version numbers are Y.MM, so you can calculate back from today.

  40. Livecd goodness by elmartinos · · Score: 3, Informative

    I am posting this from the same computer on which currently Ubuntu is installing. Beat that, windows!

  41. Re:Automatix? by david@ecsd.com · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you go to http://ubuntuguide.org/ you can find a replacement for '/etc/apt/sources.list' which contains sources for all the non-free stuffs you'd want.

    Great resource, I have it bookmarked.

    David

  42. Re:Playstation Installer by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 2, Informative

    The PS3 needs an OpenGL library that either runs on the Cell SPE(s), or calls functions on the RSX. So far, Sony has locked out the RSX, and I doubt they'll let (unlicensed) Linux apps compete with their licensed products by tapping the RSX (which is unique to PS3, and 9x as fast as the Cell). So really what's needed is OpenGL running on SPEs.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  43. Re:Java is not YET Free software by Knuckles · · Score: 2, Informative

    At present Ubuntu is encouraging people to ignore the problem of video-driver support, to purchase broken crap from nvidia and to penalise Intel by not selecting their boards and integrated cards.

    That's so not true

    --
    "When I first heard Daydream Nation it quite frankly scared the living shit out of me." -- Matthew Stearns
  44. Re:Version number to name table? by Knuckles · · Score: 2
    --
    "When I first heard Daydream Nation it quite frankly scared the living shit out of me." -- Matthew Stearns
  45. Re:iPods, iTunes and Digital Cameras? by Knuckles · · Score: 2, Informative

    iPod: works out of the box
    DigiCam: the very vast majority works out of the box (and simpler than Windows, plugging it in opens a management app)
    iTunes: complain to Apple and/or help her a bit: https://help.ubuntu.com/community/RestrictedFormat s/iTunesMusicStore
    Multimedia: 7.04 will prompt you and offer to install support for proprietary codecs. DVD needs a tiny bit of help: http://medibuntu.sos-sts.com/

    --
    "When I first heard Daydream Nation it quite frankly scared the living shit out of me." -- Matthew Stearns