Slashdot Mirror


OLPC Project Rollout Begins In Uruguay

Acer500 writes "The One Laptop Per Child project became a reality Thursday in Uruguay, as the 160 children of school number 24 in the humble town of Cardal received their XO computers. The learning tools came directly from the hands of president Tabaré Vazquez. It has become a matter of national pride that Uruguay is the first country to realize the project's goal. The target is that by 2009, every school-age child in Uruguay will have one, and an initial 15 million dollars have already been allocated to the project. From the newspaper articles: 'The happiness of having a PC in their hands, some of them for the first time, had the kids in ecstasy, which didn't wait to turn on their computers, introduce their personal information (required the first time they're turned on), choose the screen colors, and start experimenting with them. What initially made them more enthusiastic was the possibility of taking photographs and filming each others with the included webcams.'" More information below. According to the unofficial blog of the Uruguayan project, named proyecto Ceibal, the infrastructure for wireless is not yet in place but will be provided in the next few days by the national telco ANTEL. No photos of the event have been posted online, but you can see an institutional video on Youtube. One interesting point is that it has not yet been decided that the XO will be the laptop of choice for the entire project. Two other companies want to be considered: Intel, with their Classmate PC, and Israeli-manufactured ITP-C. In a press conference, Intel manager for the southern cone Esteban Galluzzi went as far as to compare the XO to a Pentium II, and stressed that the Classmate is able to run Windows XP. As advisor and local guru Juan Grompone stated, 'who will ultimately benefit from this is education?' This will be an interesting test to see if the OLPC project meets its intended goals of 'learning learning'. Let's hope this project is the means that will foster among some of the children the desire to learn and to tinker."

248 comments

  1. english translation - courtesy of the fish by bl8n8r · · Score: 3, Funny


    The Web in the air of Cardal
    Near 40 niños of the Italy school they received its computers of the hand of several authorities of the government. In one week the niños podrà n to accede to Internet from all the points of the city

    In the middle of great expectation and much alegrÃa of the niños, president Tabaré Và zquez next to a great retinue of authorities left inaugurated the experience pilot of the Ceibal Plan in the Italy school n 24 of the city of Cardal (in Florida), the one that in the prÃximos dÃas quedarà connected to Internet by means of mbricas connections inalÃ, in order that the students can accede to the Web from their homes.

    In a brief speech during the act, Và single zquez refirià to "the importance" of the Ceibal project and asegurà that "cumplirà with the cronogram of arriving itself at 2009 to all the schools from paÃs". The agent chief executive prefirià to yield its time to one of the niños, that articulà words that moved to the presents.

    To I finish of the act, Và zquez was consulted by the present journalists on if to raÃz of cuts in the RendiciÃn de Cuentas it were going to be all the money for the plan. Và zquez asegurà that was not going to lack the money. "the USS 15 anticipated million està n in the budget", asegurà the conductor of the Uruguayan government.

    Under the glance of many parents, some from the windows or accommodated in algÃn rincÃn of the halls class, about 40 niños of 3 and 6 año received their computers X-O. DonaciÃn of Nicholas Negroponte is of 200 units. The rest of the students of that school of cardal recibirà its computers in these dÃas.

    AlgarabÃa to have a PC in its hands, some for the first time, dejà won the boys, who did not hope to ignite his mà quinas, to introduce their personal data (the first time that ignite it is necessary to put the one name and to choose the colors of the screen) and to put themselves to experiment with the X-O. What mà s entusiasmà was to be able to remove photos and to film themselves with webcam that come including.

    The niños by this week podrà n to sail in Internet from the Italy school, where instalà a servant to provide itself with conexiÃn in the classrooms, that in the prÃximos dÃas extenderà to the rest of the city so that the niños can be connected to the Web dese its homes. For mbrica it utilizarà tecnologÃa of conexiÃn inalà - it does not need cables that proveyà ANTEL with colaboraciÃn of UTE.

    One of that mà s divirtià giving the PC was the minister of EducaciÃn and Cultura, Jorge Brovetto. Ademà s of this jerarca, también was present the minister of Industry, Jorge Leprosy asà like the minister of GanaderÃa, José Mujica, next to their wife LucÃa Topolansky.

    También participated in the act the director of EducaciÃn of the MEC, Luis Garibaldi, the president of the ANEP, Luis bal YarzÃ, the president of the LATU, Miguel Brezhner, the Intendant of Florida, Juan Giaccetto asà like industralists of INTEL and Microsoft, that lanzarà n its own pilot in the department of PaysandÃ.

    ProducciÃn: Cecilia Pérez and Pablo Solari, envoys of the Observer to Cardal

    (It observes)
    http://babelfish.altavista.com/babelfish/tr

    --
    boycott slashdot February 10th - 17th check out: altSlashdot.org
    1. Re:english translation - courtesy of the fish by rts008 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Babelfish is the poor man's LSD, and it's even legal!

      *fires up Steppenwolf's Magic Carpet Ride and re-reads post*

      Wow, mannnn! It's like colors and stuff!

      --
      Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
    2. Re:english translation - courtesy of the fish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      From a fellow Uruguayan. Here are the article acronyms:

      ANTEL: Administracion Nacional de TELecomunicaciones (Government owned telephone company)
      UTE: Administracion Nacional de Usinas y Transmiciones Electricas (Government owned electricity company)
      ANEP: Administracion Nacional de Educacion Publica (Public schools administration)
      LATU: Laboratorio Tecnologico del Uruguay (Technological Laboratory of Uruguay [Equivalent of NIST in the USA])

  2. English? by EvilGrin5000 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Woah, didn't know I had to learn a different language just to read an article on Slashdot. Anyone have any English versions of the articles handy?

    --
    A black cat crossing your path signifies that the animal is going somewhere. -- Groucho Marx
    1. Re:English? by EvilGrin5000 · · Score: 1

      Heh, and just as I post, someone makes an English translation. I love you guys!!

      --
      A black cat crossing your path signifies that the animal is going somewhere. -- Groucho Marx
    2. Re:English? by bl8n8r · · Score: 1

      Can you not read? "..on the boys, who did not hope to ignite his mà quinas,.."
      Anyone can tell the article is obviously dealing with igniting your ma's quinas. It's simple english

      --
      boycott slashdot February 10th - 17th check out: altSlashdot.org
    3. Re:English? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, it's fucking weird how most of the world doesn't speak English. Talk about a failure of the education system!

    4. Re:English? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Woah, didn't know I had to learn a different language just to read an article on Slashdot. Anyone have any English versions of the articles handy?


      You must be new here--they've been running articles in foreign languages for a long time now, but nobody's noticed.
    5. Re:English? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      its "power up their machines" dumbass...

    6. Re:English? by EinZweiDrei · · Score: 1

      My mother did start a small kitchen fire cooking quinoa once. True story.

      --
      Perhaps life really is full of possibilities.
    7. Re:English? by Acer500 · · Score: 1

      The blog http://olpc-ceibal.blogspot.com/ has posted an article in English now in response to being Slashdotted.

      --
      There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics.
    8. Re:English? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, most of the educated world DOES speak English. Virtually all science, technology, and international commerce is carried out in English.

      Learning English is the key to success in the current age, just as French, German, and Latin were in the past (and as Chinese may be in the future).

      Generally, only poorly-educatated-but-smug American hippies are unaware of this fact.

  3. Re:Go by Abeydoun · · Score: 1

    Good in the sense that children in 3rd world countries finally have a chance to experience a part of modern technology which we truly take for granted. Bad in the sense that we're breeding a new wave of Uruguayan Uber Hackers that will wreck havoc on the pipes in a couple years. I still think it's worth it and it's nice to see this project which we've been hearing about for years finally start coming to life.

    --
    The only consistency in life is the lack thereof
  4. And the next day by Timesprout · · Score: 1

    50% of the kids were taking pics of the other 50% playing football and the day after that they were all back to doing whatever it was they were doing before they got their laptops.

    --
    Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
    What truth?
    There is no dupe
    1. Re:And the next day by caseydk · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Fast forward to 2012...

      "And in breaking news, it appears that Uruguay is now the #1 place to outsource technology jobs."

    2. Re:And the next day by MorpheousMarty · · Score: 1

      Except when they need to check /. Or Wikipedia.

    3. Re:And the next day by Acer500 · · Score: 1

      Fast forward to 2012...

      "And in breaking news, it appears that Uruguay is now the #1 place to outsource technology jobs." 2012?? It's the place to outsource to right now! You won't believe this, but the Indians are outsourcing to _us_ (that means our IT professionals are dirt cheap at the moment).

      According to renowned journalist Thomas Friedman, Uruguay is India's India:
      http://www.recordonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article? AID=/20060924/OPINION/609240312

      See also this Latin Trade article http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0BEK/is_1_1 2/ai_112408721
      --
      There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics.
  5. Which way to go, Intel or AMD? by innerweb · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Lets see. OLPC is a little less than $200 per laptop, or the Classmate PC at about $400 per laptop. Multiply it by 2 million children... more than a 400 million dollar savings! I wonder which way the more cash strapped countries are going to go?

    I would love to get my hands on some of these to see how well they work as a learning tool. The price point puts them in line with many other learning tools on the market for children. The open source platform makes them much more expandable. And, as they become more widely used, the software available for them will become much more diverse and powerful. I wonder if the Intel proposed alternative includes an Operating System in the price.

    InnerWeb
    --
    Freud might say that Intelligent Design is religion's ID.
    1. Re:Which way to go, Intel or AMD? by Zouden · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Not only is it more than twice the price, the Classmate PC is vastly inferior. Let me list the ways (stats taken from Wikipedia):

      -XO has a 1200x900 screen which can be flipped around (tablet style) and converted into ultra-high resolution grayscale for displaying text. The refresh rate can automatically adjust (down to 0hz) to save battery power. The Classmate PC has an ordinary 800x480 LCD.
      -XO has a camera. Classmate doesn't. This article shows that the kids obviously like the camera.
      -XO has a large trackpad that can be used as a graphics tablet. Classmate has a standard trackpad.
      -XO operating system interface was designed from the ground up for this purpose. Classmate uses Windows XP Embedded.
      -XO promotes the concept of Free software. Classmate has a freakin' Trusted Computing Module installed!

      --
      "A week in the lab saves an hour in the library"
    2. Re:Which way to go, Intel or AMD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your information has been outdated. Classmate PC will be priced very close to that of OLPC. OLPC is however already priced more than $200. From my observation, NN and his team are really just good at making marketing hypes around while rather weak in making their promises.

    3. Re:Which way to go, Intel or AMD? by catiger · · Score: 0, Troll
      I don't know if you are just a fan of OLPC or an employee working on OLPC. let me update you on following facts:

      about performance: OLPC uses AMD Geode CPU at 366 MHz while CMPC runs at Intel Celeron Mobile 900 MHz. so who's the really winner?

      about resolution: You must know, if you know a bit of tech, that LCD screen size matters much more than its resolution, while screen size largely determines the BOM price. What OLPC uses is either 7' or 9' LCD while Classmate PC offers both and support a variety of resolution from 800*480 to 1024*768...but all computer literate people would know a larger resolution on the 7' or 9' screen will make fonts look rather too smaller to be read or making eyeballs very painful eventually.

      about operating system: Classmate PC supports both worlds from ground up: Linux and Windows XP Pro

      about trusting platform module: I don't know why you are so freaked about TPM... like an ancient man were afraid of morden weapons. but you must be fair to understand its usage. To my knowledge TPM is not used for DRM sorts of thing but for anti-theft purpose since a kid carrying a mobile laptop is so vulnerable to thieves and robbers in the street.

      --
      IT's a way! IT's a wish!
    4. Re:Which way to go, Intel or AMD? by tomstdenis · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Faster processors aren't always "better." An entire generation of kids [e.g. me] grew up on nothing more than 4MHz single-issue, no cache, barely any memory systems and did just fine. When I was a teenager it was a really big deal to get my first processor running over 100MHz [cyrix].

      It's purely FUD that says you need a 1000MIPS processor for an EDUCATIONAL machine.

      Having not seen either LCD I can't really say which is better. I like the XO design mostly because it's supposed to be easier to read in grayscale mode. That and it uses a lot less power which is kinda important for these tasks.

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    5. Re:Which way to go, Intel or AMD? by Mr2001 · · Score: 1

      To my knowledge TPM is not used for DRM sorts of thing but for anti-theft purpose since a kid carrying a mobile laptop is so vulnerable to thieves and robbers in the street. Then I'm afraid you don't understand what TPM is or what it does. TPM does nothing at all to discourage or prevent laptop theft.

      Your remark about CPU speed also misses the point. OLPC is about cheap hardware with low power consumption and no moving parts to break. 366 MHz is enough for plenty of tasks if you don't have a bloated OS with a bunch of eye candy, virus scanners, etc.
      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
    6. Re:Which way to go, Intel or AMD? by rbanffy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      about performance: OLPC uses AMD Geode CPU at 366 MHz while CMPC runs at Intel Celeron Mobile 900 MHz. so who's the really winner?

      While I agree the CMPC has a faster processor and, most probably, can run Office much faster than the XO can run OpenOffice, it also draws far more power and batteries will be either heavier, more dangerous (the XO does not use Lithim on purpose) or last less. I suspect a 366 MHz Geode is quite enough for what they are aiming.

      about resolution: You must know, if you know a bit of tech, that LCD screen size matters much more than its resolution, while screen size largely determines the BOM price. What OLPC uses is either 7' or 9' LCD while Classmate PC offers both and support a variety of resolution from 800*480 to 1024*768...but all computer literate people would know a larger resolution on the 7' or 9' screen will make fonts look rather too smaller to be read or making eyeballs very painful eventually.

      Really, the XO's screen is not as easy to define - it's a very different kind of LCD and it is not directly comparable to the one in front of me. The extra pixels will not make fonts smaller, unless you are using a horridly primitive font management technology. What happens with mode DPI is that your fonts get better defined.


      about operating system: Classmate PC supports both worlds from ground up: Linux and Windows XP Pro

      Since the XO was designed for a very specific purpose, what OS it does run is not very important. But I think a Unix-like core is a better choice for a rugged device where running MS Office is not one of the requirements.

      about trusting platform module: I don't know why you are so freaked about TPM... like an ancient man were afraid of morden weapons. but you must be fair to understand its usage. To my knowledge TPM is not used for DRM sorts of thing but for anti-theft purpose since a kid carrying a mobile laptop is so vulnerable to thieves and robbers in the street.

      The fact there is a TPM indicates it can be used for just about anything TPMs are used for. While not alarming per se, not having a TPM means it cannot be used at all. As they say, "better safe than sorry". And since the notebooks are unable to pass for a common notebook - the form-factor is very characteristic - and thus its black-market value is very low, the risk of it being stolen should very small.

      I see the CMPC being used in other settings, but, dollar for dollar, the XO seems a much better value unless your requirements demand something it cannot do.

    7. Re:Which way to go, Intel or AMD? by Chandon+Seldon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      OLPC uses AMD Geode CPU at 366 MHz while CMPC runs at Intel Celeron Mobile 900 MHz. so who's the really winner?

      Actually, the OLPC is using a 500mhz Geode... but that doesn't really matter. The XO runs software that was specifically designed for its hardware - the software will run great on it. The Classmate will be running software designed for modern desktop PCs - for that, a 900 MHz processor and 256 megs of RAM will be dog slow.

      but all computer literate people would know a larger resolution on the 7' or 9' screen will make fonts look rather too smaller to be read or making eyeballs very painful eventually.

      This comment displays an utter misunderstanding of the concept of "resolution". When text resolution is increased, the text doesn't get smaller - instead, each letter is represented by more dots so that it's clearer and easier to read. It's true that Windows users occasionally have trouble getting their fonts to be larger because of poor software design, but the XO won't have this problem. As a closing thought, laser printers tend to print at 600dpi - about 36 times the resolution of a common computer screen - is the text 36 times smaller?

      --
      -- The act of censorship is always worse than whatever is being censored. Always.
    8. Re:Which way to go, Intel or AMD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have seen the screen of the XO at FOSDEM in Brussels and it is an extremely good screen. You can read it almost under any angle without that the colors get distorted and you can even read it under bright sunlight. Which I can't say about most normal laptop screens. On a sunny day, you must sit in the shadow if you want to use normal laptop screens outside. Just for the screen alone I would like to buy an XO.

    9. Re:Which way to go, Intel or AMD? by burnin1965 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      about performance: OLPC uses AMD Geode CPU at 366 MHz while CMPC runs at Intel Celeron Mobile 900 MHz. so who's the really winner?

      The Geode, obviously.

      What you thought higher frame rates while playing Halo2 makes the Celeron the clear winner? Think again. The Geode uses 40% less power than the Celeron, your CMPC will be a dead paper weight while the OLPC will still be doing its job.

      about resolution: You must know, if you know a bit of tech, that LCD screen size matters much more than its resolution

      And once again, how much power does the CMPC display consume? The OLPC is .1 to 1 watt. They don't even have the specs on the CMPC site or wiki.

      about operating system: Classmate PC supports both worlds from ground up: Linux and Windows XP Pro

      The OLPC runs linuxBIOS and linux which enables significant power savings features which are not available in an off the shelf BIOS + Windows/linux install.

      To my knowledge TPM is not used for DRM sorts of thing but for anti-theft purpose since a kid carrying a mobile laptop is so vulnerable to thieves and robbers in the street.

      WTF? I suggest you improve on your knowledge of TC, its claimed "that it will make computers safer, less prone to viruses and malware, and thus more reliable from an end-user perspective", it doesn't stop a thug from stealing it.

      Unfortunately one of the side effects of TC is that the hardware and software makers get to decide what is trusted and prevent end users from doing something with their hardware and software such as say running linux or open office because they deem them as not being trustworthy.

      Really I have no idea why anyone is even bothering to argue in defense of the anti-OLPC solutions, and yes they are anti-OLPC. If you look at the specs on the Classmate PC it is rated at 4 hours of use on its batteries, the OLPC is rated in DAYS. The OLPC XO is designed for a purpose, the supposed superior offerings from people who are used to marketing products in energy rich societies are not even close to what is needed in hardware and software for a project like OLPC. The only reason they are even trying is because their over inflated marketing egos have them believing they are the end all be all of technology solutions for the planet. They need to grow up.
    10. Re:Which way to go, Intel or AMD? by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      It only makes the fonts look smaller because operating systems are designed by people with crappy eyes. Low-resolution fonts were fine back in the day when video memory was at a premium and scan frequencies were low anyway. But fast forward to today, where I can have an 18" (viewable) CRT running at 1600x1200, and the font files are described by vectors that would look good at any resolution.

      I want to run my display at the highest resolution possible, with high-resolution fonts sized comfortably. I want the text to look crisp (because of the extra resolution), and I want the dialogue boxes to handle this well. Which means, Stop freaking hard-coding element positioning using pixels.

      (also, is it too much to ask for web browsers to use cubic interpolation when resizing images?)

      I consider it a failure of operating system and web page designers that using anything other than a 10pt font on Windows and Linux causes problems with menu text, dialogue boxes, web page text flow, and so many other things.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    11. Re:Which way to go, Intel or AMD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      to be fair, according to this writeup, at present (with the power management features still non-implemented) the OLPC only lasts 2-4 hours on a battery charge, (depending on screen use IIRC). Current power consumption is around 8 watts on 'BTest-2', with the target consumption being 2 watts. I don't doubt they'll sort out such things before the design is finalized though, and actually I was a little surprised to see this article after reading the writeup I linked above, there's still some real serious bugs on those machines.

    12. Re:Which way to go, Intel or AMD? by catiger · · Score: 0

      well. I do not think I am ignorant of TPM capabilities and can tell you TPM is not an application but a technology enabler! It provides you with secuirty means and root of trust for a computing platform! It is the application that determines its usage models. AFAIK, CMPC uses TPM for the anti-theft purposes but nothing else. so you do not have to jump to join the waggon of anti-CMPC because of it contains a TPM. OLPC also claims it can support this feature after knowing CMPC has delivered such a solution. However OLPC's solution is rather breakable via SW means because of lack a hardware hardned security solution!

      --
      IT's a way! IT's a wish!
    13. Re:Which way to go, Intel or AMD? by catiger · · Score: 0

      it is not about FUD...but the digital gap OLPC creats with its low spec while increasing its price at the other hand...purely marketing hypes. so you think kids will upgrade their laptops to the higher end ones each year when they get to the higher grade in the school? no way!

      --
      IT's a way! IT's a wish!
    14. Re:Which way to go, Intel or AMD? by Mr2001 · · Score: 1

      [TPM] provides you with secuirty means and root of trust for a computing platform! It is the application that determines its usage models Yeah, but the possible usage models are fairly limited. TPM could be changed to become more useful for the hardware owner, but currently it's easier to use the TPM against the hardware owner.

      FAIK, CMPC uses TPM for the anti-theft purposes but nothing else. Well, perhaps you could explain what these "anti-theft purposes" are. How exactly does a chip inside your laptop, storing a private key that you aren't even allowed to know, keep anyone from stealing your laptop?
      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
    15. Re:Which way to go, Intel or AMD? by evilviper · · Score: 1

      An entire generation of kids [e.g. me] grew up on nothing more than 4MHz single-issue, no cache, barely any memory systems and did just fine.

      You may have been "fine" but I sincerely doubt your 4MHz computer helped you achieve the goals that the OLPC is setting out to achieve.

      If your only source of information was PNG images, your 4MHz computer would have been a severe hinderance. If your only source of information was a compressed Vorbis audio stream, your 4MHz computer wouldn't have been able to make sense of any of it (without massive storage). If your only source of information was PDFs, you'd be sitting around for a very long time, just waiting for the next page to render. If you wanted to do VoIP, you'd simply have been completely out of luck.

      Usually, CPU power, and bandwidth have an inverse relationship. When CDs were the standard form of distribution, low-compression Cinepack videos that played on very slow system were just fine. Now that internet distribution is common, smaller MPEG-4 video are common, but unplayable on slower systems.

      So, while the OLPC has far more CPU power than it needs, the idea that 4MHz would work is a complete misunderstanding of the goals of the project.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    16. Re:Which way to go, Intel or AMD? by catiger · · Score: 0
      OLPC borrowed the anti-theft idea from CMPC estentially but implmented it in a somewhat different and weaker way. below gives a description of the common idea:

      In order to prevent OLPC laptops from being taken away from children to whom they will be given, OLPC will apparently "phone home" every day as part of a an anti-theft process: "It works by running, as a privileged process that cannot be disabled or terminated even by the root user, an anti-theft daemon which detects Internet access, and performs a call-home request -- no more than once a day -- to the country's anti-theft servers. In so doing, it is able to securely use NTP to set the machine RTC to the current time, and then obtain a cryptographic lease to keep running for some amount of time, e.g. 21 days. The lease duration is controlled by each country."
      since OLPC stores the priviliged process in a hard drive which can be totally erased thus cause the system lose the security protection. in contrast CMPC stores the security informaiton in TPM which can not be maniputated by SW. Destroying TPM & BIOS also means the MB will be greatly affected which results dysfuncitoning of certain parts, which is highly indesirable for normal hackers. - Richard
      --
      IT's a way! IT's a wish!
    17. Re:Which way to go, Intel or AMD? by Mr2001 · · Score: 1

      since OLPC stores the priviliged process in a hard drive which can be totally erased thus cause the system lose the security protection. in contrast CMPC stores the security informaiton in TPM which can not be maniputated by SW. TPM does not store "processes". It performs encryption.

      If Intel's laptop has code stored in hardware that performs the phone-home verification, that's nice, but it has nothing to do with TPM. That's just BIOS. Phoning home doesn't require the client to encrypt anything; the client only has to verify the server's signature.
      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
    18. Re:Which way to go, Intel or AMD? by catiger · · Score: 0

      [quote]but it has nothing to do with TPM. That's just BIOS.Phoning home doesn't require the client to encrypt anything; the client only has to verify the server's signature.[/quote] BIOS can not protect itself unless there is a one time programmable code that does the integrity check upon the very start of every system boot. TPM provides such a facility (OTP memory) as well as signature verification function that is critical for server authentication. I agree that TPM is not very necessary but very handy in offering OTP and signature functions.

      --
      IT's a way! IT's a wish!
    19. Re:Which way to go, Intel or AMD? by Mr2001 · · Score: 1

      BIOS can not protect itself unless there is a one time programmable code that does the integrity check upon the very start of every system boot. That's called a boot ROM.

      Again, TPM is totally unnecessary for this and provides no extra security. All it's good for is performing cryptography with a private key that isn't revealed to the person who owns the hardware. For this phone-home feature, the only key that needs to be kept secret is the lease server's private key, not anything on the client.
      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
    20. Re:Which way to go, Intel or AMD? by catiger · · Score: 0

      where do you then keep the clear text lease info on the client without being tampered by an unauthorized party?

      --
      IT's a way! IT's a wish!
    21. Re:Which way to go, Intel or AMD? by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      My point is we made do with what we had. And they'll do just the same. I should point out that most computers didn't have hard drives let alone CD drives when the Apple ][ was commonly around.

      This is a money pit sort of logic that destroys most "good" projects before they get off the ground. I mean if 1GHz is good, 1.5 is better, but if 1.5 is good, 2.0GHz is better, etc. Why stop at 128M of ram, when 1024M sounds so much nicer, etc...

      They have to make things economical and practical. It means cutting back and making the most of what you have. That said, I'm sure a 300MHz Geode can handle decoding an mp3 or a MPEG video clip. Heck we were doing that with 100MHz Cyrix processors back in 1998.

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    22. Re:Which way to go, Intel or AMD? by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      So are you saying that the kids are being held back because of the lack of state of the art laptops?

      That's so asinine I don't know where to begin. The XO is plenty capable of showing text books, encyclopedia, playing learning games [math, reading, whatever].

      It's only ignorance and "power obesity" that create the notion that you need a mini-cray on your lap to get "work" done.

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    23. Re:Which way to go, Intel or AMD? by Mr2001 · · Score: 1

      where do you then keep the clear text lease info on the client without being tampered by an unauthorized party? Anywhere you want. No one can tamper with it because it's signed by the lease server, and if it's modified, then the signature won't match. This is cryptography 101. The code that checks the signature can't be tampered with either if it's stored in ROM.
      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
    24. Re:Which way to go, Intel or AMD? by catiger · · Score: 0

      [blockquote]Anywhere you want. No one can tamper with it because it's signed by the lease server, and if it's modified, then the signature won't match. This is cryptography 101. The code that checks the signature can't be tampered with either if it's stored in ROM[/blockquote] I suppose in your way the code and public key are both put in the trusty ROM and the clear text lease info and its signature can be stored in hard drive. when someone tampers with the signature or clear text, the system will be just screwed...

      --
      IT's a way! IT's a wish!
    25. Re:Which way to go, Intel or AMD? by Mr2001 · · Score: 1

      Yup, which is exactly what would happen if someone tampered with the stored lease on a TPM system. The only difference is it might be stored in encrypted form on the hard drive, but that wouldn't make it any harder for an attacker to corrupt the stored lease.

      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
    26. Re:Which way to go, Intel or AMD? by catiger · · Score: 0

      Yup, which is exactly what would happen if someone tampered with the stored lease on a TPM system. The only difference is it might be stored in encrypted form on the hard drive, but that wouldn't make it any harder for an attacker to corrupt the stored lease.
      No. TPM provides read/write access control attributes on its NVM spaces such that SW apps runs in OS can NOT modify the data stored. However, in hard drive, there is no such control. But I agree TPM is not the only soloution and there can be other methods with the support of BIOS.
      --
      IT's a way! IT's a wish!
  6. Intel making a play.... by FraterNLST · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I find it interesting that Intel immediately jump in with "the ability to run win xp" as a major advantage. Leads me to ponder.

    A lot has been said about the OLPC project sticking to open platforms, which may partially be a cost issue and partially an idealistic one. The real question is what is really best for the project? Sticking to open platforms, and open source or completely custom solutions, or a system that allows the use of windows xp?

    I say windows and not os x, not because it's particularly better, thats an argument for a different time, but for the next question - is it better that the platform be completely open and/or custom, or that it corresponds to the most used operating system? The system that is used by a large quantity of consumers, the largest perhaps, and the platform that is the target of choice for people trying to make money of these consumers.

    The real question is what is better for the students in this country. Not what is better for Microsoft, Intel or indeed Linux and the Open Source movement. Is it enough to give these students a computer, or should we be giving them a computer that gives them the potential to learn the systems in use by a majority of the world?

    I guess the other side of the coin is this - if computing technology is about to find it's way into the hands of a lot of people who previously had no access to it, is that going to swell the marketplace such that what was previously a huge market share advantage could well be diluted by the choices made by this project? Every child in Uruguay is a lot of people - and its only a start. When other countries continue, the choice of operating system to learn might not seem quite as trivial as it may right now.

    --
    Doublethink is basically the power of holding two contradictory beliefs in one's mind simultaneously, and accepting both
    1. Re:Intel making a play.... by Watson+Ladd · · Score: 1

      Windows has the problem that it makes children learn the route muscle actions required to do things. They rarely understand what they are actually doing. Windows also does not make a nice LaTeX environment, and programing on Windows is a pain. The command line on windows is crippled and you need to install Cygwin to avoid it, but by then you should have just gone with Linux.

      --
      Inventions have long since reached their limit, and I see no hope for further development.-- Frontinus, 1st cent. AD
    2. Re:Intel making a play.... by infestedsenses · · Score: 5, Insightful

      From a practical standpoint: The OS was designed with ease of use in mind. From the demos I've seen, it does exactly what it's supposed to. Windows and all the other major operating systems are intended for general use, with loads of hardware and software to support, and as such have a huge array of things the OLPC devices will rarely need.

      From an idealistic standpoint: I think it's great to provide the kids with a neutral OSS system tailored to the laptop, where they can decide for themselves later on which OS they will use. The point of the project is to provide EVERY child with a laptop. Hooking every child to a certain, commercial OS from the youngest years onward is not something a government should be doing. The kids will learn Windows, OSX and whatnot soon enough, as you did too. Not necessary at this stage, which is about giving children access to technology, not preparing them for cubicles.

    3. Re:Intel making a play.... by maxume · · Score: 1

      We'll find out in a decade or more. They aren't giving these things to people that currently have mountains of disposable income(by which I mean $500).

      And if it takes you more than an hour to be able to use an operating system you are doing something wrong. A couple of weeks to get productive is fine, but moving files around, running programs, that should take an hour.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    4. Re:Intel making a play.... by bortizc · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You know what? I completely disagree with you. You are assuming that once you learn ONE os at an early age it is set in stone. As if you couldn't learn to use another. Or even two or three. You underestimate kids. People who grew up in the 80s know for a fact that this isn't true. My school's computer lab had 3 NEC with some kind of propietary os that we all learned to make BASIC programs. Then came the Apple IIe's and we had to learn DOS 3.2 and 3.3. My mother bought me my first computer, an Apple //c, and then I had to learn ProDOS. Next there was a Mac plus on which I ran MAC-OS 4 thru 6. Then a Mac quadra 605 (system 7-8). As soon as I started working it was MS-DOS, and all the windows. Three years ago I switched to linux. It wasn't so hard mainly because I was used to switching OS's. In fact the most difficult switch was from mac to windows 3.11. I now find myself costumizing gnome to match a lot of the original mac-os functionality (although not the windows decorations). But you know it isn't that difficult for me to figure out how to make gtk and metacity themes, had it not been for those BASIC programs I made in the NEC's and the apples. I hate that they teach children today to use powerpoint and word. The argument that it is what they will need when working is absurd. If that where true I would have been terribly hindered by my lack of knowledge of wordstar, lotus and dbase when I got my high-school degree. I learned to use computers. And I can adapt myself to computers. I think this project aims at that type of experience that will make children better computer users and not merely software consumers. By the way this I'm describing happened to me in Colombia. So the preconceived notion some of you have about the third world use some updating.

    5. Re:Intel making a play.... by WhiteWolf666 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      *shrug*

      Food for thought: If you give an OLPC to each child in the developing world (lets exclude 1st world for a moment), the majority of computer users world wide will be running Linux.

      Also, I think one of the project goals was to distribute laptops which would have easy to modify "guts". These things are supposed to be a breeze to do simple programming on, and I think that will be far more valuable to these children than learning how the Start menu works. Once you establish certain computing concepts it becomes far easier to transition to other environments.

      This also excludes the whole discussion of whether or not its valuable to put them on XP, especially given that XP is no longer the "current" MS OS. Soon, 1st world users will not be able to buy systems with XP; why would we sling it off onto 3rd world users?

      Not to mention the security debacle it would be; how would you deploy security updates?

      --
      WhiteWolf666 an exBush supporter. All you new-school,compassionate,save the children Republicans can rot in hell
    6. Re:Intel making a play.... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 4, Interesting
      It doesn't seem to get mentioned a lot, but one of the secondary aims of the project is that countries should not buy very many of the units. If they are a success, it is hoped that they will start manufacturing their own. The designs are available royalty-free, and so is all of the software. The only thing you need to reproduce it is a supply of the components, and many of these can be produced locally if there is a demand. The core ICs are about the only components that will need to be imported, and if there's enough of a need then setting up a chip fab might be in the country's best interests.

      The OLPC project hasn't just been sold as an educational tool to politicians, it's also been sold as an economic one.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    7. Re:Intel making a play.... by bit01 · · Score: 1

      should we be giving them a computer that gives them the potential to learn the systems in use by a majority of the world?

      The same could be said about Vista. Why doesn't the world stick with XP? Or MSDOS? Or even Multics?

      Any reasoning based on the premise that because it's been used yesterday and today it should be used tomorrow and so on forever is bogus. Every change starts somewhere and the OLPC is going to be distributed to sufficient people to create their own market.

      The OLPC has been designed specifically for them. M$Windows hasn't. Assuming the design is good no other reason is needed.

      ---

      Open source software is everything that closed source software is. Plus the source is available.

    8. Re:Intel making a play.... by suv4x4 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It doesn't seem to get mentioned a lot, but one of the secondary aims of the project is that countries should not buy very many of the units. If they are a success, it is hoped that they will start manufacturing their own.

      That's interesting as an insurance (you can always make your own in case something happens with the current manifacturer).

      But would you spend $300 making it on your own, or $150 buying it. Since those are targeted to poor countries, I somehow don't think they can make use of existing skills, equipment, staff, economy of scale and so on.

      Even the fact that the money "stay in the country", may not offset all the additional costs introduced in the process.

    9. Re:Intel making a play.... by zensonic · · Score: 1

      But its hard to beat the price of $100 if you can't scale. It really does make sense to produce these units at a centralized place, ie at quanta facilities, probably the worlds largest and most effecient laptop manufacturer.

      --
      Thomas S. Iversen
    10. Re:Intel making a play.... by gmuslera · · Score: 1

      The important (for the children) part of the OLPC is not the OS that it runs, but the user interface. Something centered in activities, something that was meant for collaboration between them from the start, something that dont add complexities but let them focus in doing what they must. Behind that interface, could have been Linux, Windows, Mac OS X, DOS, whatever.

      Of course, that be linux had some advantages for the big people behind. Was free (cost of the whole thing was important, and maybe more important, you dont depend of the mood of a private company to keep using it for the same price), was fully customizable, and had already most of the needed tools to develop this.

    11. Re:Intel making a play.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > ...and if there's enough of a need then setting up a chip fab might be in the country's best interests.

      Which must scare Intel shitless. Now who was it proposing a proprietary Intel based solution?

    12. Re:Intel making a play.... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      But would you spend $300 making it on your own, or $150 buying it. You are not thinking on the sale of a country. Paying $300 to make your own might be better if the home-built one only needed to import $100 of parts. The rest of the money remains in the economy, and is an investment in education of workers, since you then have a workforce that is experienced in building computers and can bid for international contracts or start manufacturing home-grown designs.
      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    13. Re:Intel making a play.... by Tom · · Score: 1

      I find it interesting that Intel immediately jump in with "the ability to run win xp" as a major advantage. Leads me to ponder. Here's what I ponder:

      "ability to run" != "comes with"

      Buying XP licenses for all those machines will about double their price, depending on how much of a volume discount MS is giving them. Maybe if MS is really, really generous, it'll only add 50% to the price. If the budget is fixed, that means somewhere between a third and half less machines are going to be distributed to children.
      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    14. Re:Intel making a play.... by Iloinen+Lohikrme · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You are forgetting a one very important question, namely: would the money spend at otherwise have a bigger return. It may be trendy to produce your own computers and keep as much money as you possible can circulating in your own country, it even may boost your national pride, but it will probably not be the smartest move to make. The smart move to make, in developing and under developed countries is to use the money to industrialize, namely: opening mines, building factories, building dams, building power plants, building roads and railroads, these all have very much higher returns for the whole economy.

      It should also be pointed out that people in developed countries enjoy higher quality of life, because A) infrastructure build in last 200 years, and B) specialising on certain task and performing them better than any other or most other places. So keeping as much money circulating your own economy is not the thing where to aim, but to be better at manufacturing or better yet designing things is a key to succeed in a global economy.

      On a different note, I also would like applaud Uruguayan efforts introducing OLPC to school children. OLPC can be a good step to educate their future workforce to be better suited on industrial and manufacturing industries: i.e. making a pulp or paper mill to work, or operating a nuclear plant requires having educated workforce.

    15. Re:Intel making a play.... by dave420 · · Score: 2, Informative

      The Classmate isn't running XP Professional, but XP Embedded, which gives you a stripped-down version of XP, including only the components you want (in great detail). It doesn't have to have anything it won't need. Though with Windows, you get to run Windows software *and* open-source software. The only reason to go with anything else would be licensing costs, not functionality-wise.

    16. Re:Intel making a play.... by Chandon+Seldon · · Score: 1

      Remember the $3 "starter" licenses that MS announced - with XP Starter Edition and a stripped down MS Office. It'd be nice if Microsoft priced themselves out of the computer market in most of the world, but unfortunately they've decided not to. Not that a *nix system isn't obviously better than an intentionally crippled version of windows, but...

      --
      -- The act of censorship is always worse than whatever is being censored. Always.
    17. Re:Intel making a play.... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      The smart move to make, in developing and under developed countries is to use the money to industrialize, namely: opening mines, building factories, building dams, building power plants, building roads and railroads, these all have very much higher returns for the whole economy Of the things on this list, building factories and power plants are directly required for building their own versions of the OLPC. Mine construction is driven by demand, and producing more things locally drives this demand, and transport infrastructure have the same impetus. The idea isn't that they will specifically create factories to manufacture OLPC machines, they will create factories (and the other infrastructure) that can build OLPC machines, but will also be used for building other artefacts of a technical society. Using this infrastructure to manufacture the OLPC units helps alleviate the trade deficit and provides some subsidy of offset the initial infrastructure construction cost.
      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    18. Re:Intel making a play.... by chthon · · Score: 1

      The thing with open systems is this : it is a matter of practicality, not a matter of idealism.

      There is a whole body of open software available. If you can run a C compiler on your platform, then you can run a whole lot of software (which might need tailoring).

      Choosing for something closed that runs now is short sighted. Yes, it has a short term advantage, but a long term disadvantage. My experience has taught me with several kinds of closed systems, that they might solve short term problems, but you have two long term problems : you WILL have to program the closed platform's deficiencies, and the supplier WILL put you under pressure, by means of licenses, to upgrade every couple of years.

    19. Re:Intel making a play.... by jimicus · · Score: 1

      or that it corresponds to the most used operating system?

      Seeing as these are mostly being sold in second and third world countries where there aren't millions of people leaving school in order to work 9-5 in an office where they sit in front of a Windows PC all day, I wouldn't think that's a particularly big deal.

    20. Re:Intel making a play.... by cthulhu11 · · Score: 0

      How then do you explain the massive number of people who, in 2007, are using a line editor (vi) on 1GHz+ computers?

    21. Re:Intel making a play.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are a computer nerd and that is why you know so much.

      Nobody as a kid learns how to program or any other inner workings of a computer; all they do is tell you to use this 'Mavis Beacon Typing program' and go to this website to search for information on your school project. Nobody remembers whether they used a Mac I,II or whatever one; they just remember they used to use Macintosh back in the early computer days and now 90+% use Windows OS.

      Hate to burst your small bubble but the best analogy use it "people just don't care".
      Maybe people would have cared when the PC was becoming so popular, but I honestly think the OSS community missed their point to take the desktop market and missed the boat by being so concerned on the server market.

      There was recently a study in America that said more than 50% of people have no interest in getting internet or have no use for it.

    22. Re:Intel making a play.... by Tom · · Score: 1

      The Sucker^H^H^Htarter Edition is so seriously crippled that it offers considerably less functionality than OLPC does. No local networking at all, 800x600 max resolution, max 3 processes at once. Which means once you have captured your 3rd spyware/trojan you can't even launch the removal tool anymore? ;-)

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    23. Re:Intel making a play.... by Kjella · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Look, I have pretty much the same experience as you but you must also remember that those who spent the 80s and early 90s on computers were those who chose to learn computers. It didn't take long after I got my C64 to write my first hello world program. I wanted to play around with it and loved the idea of a machine I could instruct on what to do, and playing games and seeing all the cool things you could do with it. I absorbed in everything from BASIC to Tiki PCs to DOS to Windows to OS/2 because it fascinated me.

      If you weren't interested in computers, you didn't use one. Your friends weren't all hanging out on MSN, in fact you didn't have an Internet connection at all. Schoolwork was handwritten, in fact I remember it being required so we'd learn to write "properly". My parents bought an encyclopedia as a reference, and then there was the library. You didn't have YouTube or whatever, it was only computer games and if you weren't interested in that it didn't do much. When we were so 16-17, first year of our high school there was a typing class. There were obviously people there who had barely been near a computer or typewriter before.

      Today, I'd almost say that your kids have to use a computer or at least otherwise they'll miss out on a lot, at least here in Norway. Not because of the machine itself, but just for normal social interaction with other kids. Getting the message "Hey, check out this youtube clip" on MSN is in fact important to take part in, not because it's important in itself but to establish the same peer relationships and social identity as we did in the brick-and-mortar days.

      And yet, even though everyone and their brother is forced to use a computer I don't think everyone is interested in a computer. Just ask all the people who didn't like it when their job started requiring a computer. Of course it's easier for kids who are taught that this is something they need to know, but I imagine quite a few are as unenthusiastic about that as school work. I read a study like that not that long ago that concluded it was a very wide spread among kids - about 25% were heavy computer users, probably like you and me. The rest of course knew a computer, but it didn't interest them much.

      Those that aren't interested, just want to learn to get by. Where to click, what buttons to push and how to do things. Certainly they're capable of learning more than one OS, but they're not interested in understanding concepts or patterns. They're not interesting in exploring the tools and figuring out how they work just for fun. There's a lot more of these people that need to learn Word and Powerpoint than there is of those like us. Those classes are the "No child left behind" classes of the digital society. And I mean, that's pretty much what basic education is all about.

      You set the standards too high. When we exited highschool, there were still people that barely knew how to type, couldn't do more than basic text formatting in Word and maybe simple arithmetic in Excel (yes, MS had arrived by then). You'd hope that today's students fare somewhat better, but it's still wildly unrealistic to compare their needs to our needs, and their results to ours.

      What's missing is a fast lane for those that are ahead of the curve, but that doesn't just apply to computers. I fought that system for many years in other subjects and eventually resigned to just finish "on track". All I got for a desire to learn was more tedious tasks of exactly the same difficulty, which served no purpose other than to slow me down. I would have loved it if school was more like university. Of course you have the required "No child left behind" classes but on top of that take the subject, pass the exam, move on to more advanced classes.

      Some people just won't accept that some kids are smarter than other kids. That some people are destined to solve complex challenges while others are never going to do more than garbage disposal. They think that simply by shaping us all in the same mold we'll all be equal, not to

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    24. Re:Intel making a play.... by asserted · · Score: 2, Informative

      > The only reason to go with anything else would be licensing costs, not functionality-wise.

      that's far from being true. i suggest that you read up (sorry, no links, as i got it from a presentation by OLPC security guy) about *purely technological* challenges the OLPC project had and, first of all, admire their work, and then appreciate the fact that there's *no way in HELL* they could pull that off with off-the-shelf OS, even embedded.
      in some places, such as power management, they literally had to pull the guts out of linux and put their stuff back in (of course, many patches are flowing upstream, but some work is simply too specific to the hardware).
      for example, this machine actually goes to deep sleep every several SECONDS, if there's no activity, and display refresh goes down to 0 hz. the wakeup time has to be on the order of a hundred milliseconds max, or the user experience will be degraded. now, if you ever had your traditional laptop go to sleep and wake up, you know that the time it takes to do so is measured in seconds at best, if not minutes. OLPC developers had to toss out the existing ACPI sleep system and write their own, complete, with kernel support. result? huge power savings and they almost made to under 100 ms of wakeup time. now, you go to microsoft and say "hey, we're this charity organization, developing laptops for children, and we have this problem with acpi. could you please rewrite your OS power management for us? kthx."
      then there's mesh computing - the mesh is running even when the cpu is asleep and uses unique protocols to self-organize. the lust goes on, and on, and on. having Linux to start with has been a huge win for these guys.

    25. Re:Intel making a play.... by dave420 · · Score: 1

      Well, as you're unwilling to read about XP Embedded, this discussion will be pretty pointless. XP Embedded is completely customisable. You can change anything you want on it. Want to change the power management? Do it. It's for non-standard hardware, just like the OLPC. The fact you're comparing it to XP running on a standard notebook is, quite frankly, hilarious. I could say that Linux is a bad choice as the FC6 install I downloaded and ran on my PC is slow in some respects and has shitty power management, if I used your logic. But then I know the OLPC isn't the same hardware as my PC, and FC6 isn't the OS on the OLPC.

    26. Re:Intel making a play.... by GrievousMistake · · Score: 1

      Speaking of which, are there any updated video demos of the interface? I remember seeing the demos about half a year ago and thinking it was awful. Completely crippled, nothing looked quite integrated (especially Squeek), etc. Their website has screenshots, and it looks better now, but it's hard to tell without seeing it in action.
      On their website they claim that "OLPC is about to revolutionize the existing concept of a computer interface." That's a risky experiment to be doing on the side of such a big project.
      Being an early deployer carries the risk of getting an unpolished product...

      --
      In a fair world, refrigerators would make electricity.
    27. Re:Intel making a play.... by FraterNLST · · Score: 1

      Actually, having programmed on both systems - and most recently, spending the last few years working on commercial .Net three-tier applications, Windows has become quite a pleasant system to program on. C# keeps the familiar syntax of C and C++ that I personally love (can't stand VB with its dim's and its _'s) and pairs it with the nicest language library i've ever come across.

      My personal hope is that one day Mono is able to implement all of .Net's CLR (though admittedly, I havn't looked in a long time so it may be closer than I remember) and we can write .Net apps that will run anywhere.

      My only beef with Microsoft with regards to .Net is that they made mono necessary. All they needed to do was produce a version of the runtime for os x and a version for linux, and they'd have achieved what Java wanted to (or, arguably achieved) with a much nicer language and library.

      I must admit, my biggest problem with Java was always the UI. They'd have been far better served writing their libraries like QT did - and using the display of each individual windowing system (so it looks different on each os) rather than one that looks crap on all os' ;)

      --
      Doublethink is basically the power of holding two contradictory beliefs in one's mind simultaneously, and accepting both
    28. Re:Intel making a play.... by robzon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't use vi, I use vim! Umm wait, forget that, I've got a 2GHz machine.

      Seriously tho, people use vim because it's very powerful, not because it was the first app they've used. Personally I went through quite a few IDEs (including MS Visual Studio on Windows) just to become a vim-addict (on Linux). Combined with the power of command line it's REALLY a great tool (not suitable for everything/everyone though).

    29. Re:Intel making a play.... by loquacious+d · · Score: 1

      Not to mention the fact that the aim of the OLPC project is to enhance "learning about learning", not "learning about Windows so Microsoft can outsource tech support to you for $0.30/hr in 20 years" (though I'm sure they wouldn't mind that). It's not learning about computers, it's learning with computers and the logical/critical thinking skills that operating and tinkering with a computer gives. The stylized, idealized open-source and (almost) infinitely modifiable OS of the OLPC is ideal for that. Windows is decidedly less so.

    30. Re:Intel making a play.... by evilviper · · Score: 1

      The Classmate isn't running XP Professional, but XP Embedded, which gives you a stripped-down version of XP, including only the components you want

      That sounds nice, in theory, but the reality is quite different.

      To get the performance, stability, security, kernel hooks, etc., etc. into XP Embedded that they get from OSS, you're going to be re-writing the operating system nearly from scratch.

      Basically, saying they could use XP Embedded if they went through and modified it drastically, is like saying they can start from bare metal, and code their way up to a fully functional operating system...

      It doesn't have to have anything it won't need. Though with Windows, you get to run Windows software *and* open-source software.

      One of the big things it won't need, and would be a liability, is the Win32 API/ABI, which means Windows software won't run.

      Also, saying open source software will run on Windows is like saying Windows software will run on Linux using WINE... In other words, performance is bad, stability is reduced, memory requirements increase, it can't be integrated with the rest of the system, etc., etc.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  7. </sarcasm> by MarkByers · · Score: 1

    Oops, sorry. I didn't mean that to be a troll, I just forgot the sarcasm tag.

    --
    I'll probably be modded down for this...
  8. Are they CONTRIBUTING yet? by Funkcikle · · Score: 5, Funny

    So how many of these new adventurers at the thin end of the open source wedge have contributed source code?

    Come on, children! THOSE LAPTOPS WERE FREE FOR A REASON! ~cracks whip~

    1. Re:Are they CONTRIBUTING yet? by harry666t · · Score: 2, Funny

      Of course they do contribute...

      One of these little hackers in training already contributed a rewrite of ed:

      #!/bin/sh
      while :;do read x;echo \?;done

    2. Re:Are they CONTRIBUTING yet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I sense a great disturbance in the force...

      As if thousands of children cried out in delight... and were suddenly given a Python interpreter.

    3. Re:Are they CONTRIBUTING yet? by iNetRunner · · Score: 1

      Oh yes! One has cracked BR. One has found three holes in Vista. *Don't know how he got in running.. Maybe he traced it remotely. Yes, thats must be it. .. Or he just removed a ton of crud.* .... The rest though.. Hmm.. A few of them are bickering if the software is free as in mothers milk or free as in telling 'bout your non-conformist friend. The rest just want to have the UI head in two different directions; but most aren't really doing anything about it. Just complaining on SandDot.



      :p

      --
      Store with salt
  9. I don't want to be pessimistic... by Nymz · · Score: 3, Insightful

    As a geek I luv computers, don't we all? But my gut tells me that tossing devices that, let's face it, require many branches of support like a species at the top of a complex food chain, will be about as successful as tossing paper money on them, them being poor children.

    Don't misundertand, this isn't the arguement that we shouldn't travel to space, or not do other things, because somewhere in the world is a child is starving. No, my concern is for accomplishing the goal of this project, which I assume is, to help them prosper. You know, teach a man to fish instead of just giving him one fish.

    Computers are excellent at doing many types of tasks, but lousy at others. People aren't poor because they don't have a laptop. In fact, I think most studies have shown that laptops actually have little or a negative impact on helping children learn. No, people are poor, in our current world and time, are poor because they don't have opportunity. Opportunity to exchange their own effort, work, or goods with other people.

    Why? Because either someone prevents them, by means of a gun and or a system that makes it impossible to be free to do such exchanges. Sometimes I think people toss that word around like it's some etheral ideal that everyone knows they are supposed to say they value, but then go right on and act in contray ways. No, freedom is a very very very important ideal, an ideal that cannot be replaced by a 100 dollar laptop.

    1. Re:I don't want to be pessimistic... by evilbessie · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I agree with you in part, regarding the studies showing laptop aided development in developed countries has little, or even negative impact. However in areas where there is no ready access to technology, and other teaching materials such as books are expensive, then the concept of having a cheap way of distributing content to children and of giving them access to technology may actually be very beneficial. Although this shouldn't be seen as the only thing we should be doing to close the digital divide.

    2. Re:I don't want to be pessimistic... by RealGrouchy · · Score: 1

      While it may be better to teach a man to fish than to give him a fish, is it equally worthwhile to teach him to build a fishing rod when he is hungry?

      - RG>

      --
      Hey pal, this isn't a pleasantforest, so don't waste my time with pleasantries!
    3. Re:I don't want to be pessimistic... by nursegirl · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You're right that giving someone a laptop might have little effect on helping them learn. But, that's because we're thinking of a laptop just as a laptop, as a way to surf the net and type an essay.

      All of these things will actually help kids learn:

      • Universal access to good quality, appropriate language, frequently updated textbooks
      • Access to experts in kids fields of interest (I remember one of my elementary school friends becoming pen pals with a zoo keeper from our local zoo)
      • Access to training tools for teachers
      • Unfiltered access to a variety of sources discussing history, geography, politics and economics (that's to help towards the path to freedom -- people must know that freedom can exist in order to fight for it)

      All of those things can be fulfilled by a series of networked laptops for kids, at a much lower cost than doing things the dead-tree way. People will have to make some serious investment on the software side of this project for it to work. But, it could work. And if it does, it will seriously turn the world upside-down. Not because they have a laptop, but instead because they have access to textbooks, communication, and unfiltered information.

    4. Re:I don't want to be pessimistic... by Nymz · · Score: 1

      While it may be better to teach a man to fish than to give him a fish, is it equally worthwhile to teach him to build a fishing rod when he is hungry?

      I see your point, but think we may be taking fish analogies too far. That or I missed the article describing the laptops as being edible. So, what is your favorite flavor of Linux?
    5. Re:I don't want to be pessimistic... by Nymz · · Score: 1

      Not because they have a laptop, but instead because they have access to textbooks, communication, and unfiltered information.

      I won't argue against a single point you made, because in reality those actions would only exasperate the current situation.

      With World Health Day passing last month, a number of interesting statistics were reveled. For example, in Ethiopia there are only 1,936 practising doctors, while North America alone has over 500,000. Oh, that isn't 500,000 doctors total, that 500,000 Ethipian doctors. A laptop may help a child achieve the education level of doctor, but it won't get them the opportunity to be one.

      Reversing the trend of brain drain the case of the Ethiopain Diaporas
      Why is Africa losing its best brains?
      April 7th is World Health Day: an Ethiopian doctor has 37,000 patients
    6. Re:I don't want to be pessimistic... by Chandon+Seldon · · Score: 1

      You're not going to fix brain drain by denying children education. You'll just have a couple more uneducated people.

      --
      -- The act of censorship is always worse than whatever is being censored. Always.
    7. Re:I don't want to be pessimistic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All of these things will actually help kids learn:
      • Universal access to good quality, appropriate language, frequently updated textbooks
      • Access to experts in kids fields of interest (I remember one of my elementary school friends becoming pen pals with a zoo keeper from our local zoo)
      • Access to training tools for teachers
      • Unfiltered access to a variety of sources discussing history, geography, politics and economics (that's to help towards the path to freedom -- people must know that freedom can exist in order to fight for it)

      That last one seems to be the use for Slashdot, let's just hope they don't discover mySpace.

    8. Re:I don't want to be pessimistic... by El_Isma · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I've heard that the plan was to put the textbooks in the laptops, which, if done, is economically viable. Each textbook is around 200 pesos (8USD), each year you require 4 of them (sometimes more) and there's 5 years of schooling. That sums up to 160USD. The laptops may be a bit more expensive now, but I think the plan is to "recycle" them (once kid gets out of school, give the pc to a new student). Also, you're getting other advantages that plain old textbooks don't give, like net access, PC education, games...

    9. Re:I don't want to be pessimistic... by chris_eineke · · Score: 1

      Universal access to good quality, appropriate language, frequently updated textbooks
      I like my textbooks to be least frequently updated, thank you.

      </bitter student rant>
      --
      "All you have to do is be fragile and grateful. So stay the underdog." Chuck Palahniuk, Choke
    10. Re:I don't want to be pessimistic... by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      This is the same arguement made for putting computers in schools here in the US - and it hasn't exactly worked out real well. Why do you expect it to be different in the Third World?

    11. Re:I don't want to be pessimistic... by nursegirl · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The safer and more economically viable a country is, the less the brain drain will occur. When most citizens in a country are educated and have an understanding of and belief in freedom, won't that country be able to negotiate well on the international market? Won't that lead to the country eventually being able to pay their professionals decent wages?

      The problem now is that only the richest educate their children well, and those children seek economic stability elsewhere. When the majority of the population has access to good education, there will be less of a brain drain, not more.

    12. Re:I don't want to be pessimistic... by nursegirl · · Score: 1

      I agree, but that's because I had to study from copyrighted, dead-tree textbooks. If my textbooks were updated for free like OSS software, I would have been thrilled to always have cutting-edge information.

    13. Re:I don't want to be pessimistic... by nursegirl · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I doubt that they have as much corporate "encouragement" to stay using copyrighted dead-tree textbooks. The movement towards English-language, open, software-based textbooks has been slow and decentralized.

      Hopefully, these countries have budgeted textbook creation as part of their operating costs for the OLPC project. If not, you're right, it will fail just like it has in the U.S.

    14. Re:I don't want to be pessimistic... by burnin1965 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think most studies have shown that laptops actually have little or a negative impact on helping children learn

      Fret not, as Nicholas Negroponte has stated "It's an education project, not a laptop project."

      This is not some new hair brained lets throw laptops at 3rd world countries plan as many try to make it out to be. If you do a little research into the project you'll find that it was started years ago with various test implementations using standard laptops running Windows software. The OLPC is an extension of original work performed by these people so they probably have a pretty good idea about what they are doing and what they need to make the project a success.

    15. Re:I don't want to be pessimistic... by lysdexia · · Score: 1

      Grep Gelato.

      I'm also partial to /bin and Jerry's Blueberry bison.yacc.

  10. Re:I'm disgusted by Rubinhood · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "They shouldn't spend *any* money on education until all poverty is solved"

    Not so fast, let's see how this works out first, OK?

    Education is the greatest basis for fighting poverty in a 3rd world country. Think better educated people -> more efficient entrepreneurs / companies -> more money in the local economy -> more taxes -> better healthcare and services etc. Uruguay could possibly have just made the first step to become the next India (IT-wise)!

    BUT the greatest thing is that with more literate & educated people, the less likely they will endure another dictator. And that should happen *everywhere* else, not just in Uruguay! Without education, you could wait forever for all poverty to be solved.

    Isn't the idea that instead of constantly giving them fish, we *teach* them to fish?

  11. Re:I'm disgusted by mgigirey · · Score: 3, Funny

    I think you have a wide education (educación) because of your words (palabras), I see how educated you are. You can do a more in deep research before you write (escribir). Uruguay has an excellent level of education, I studied in the Uruguay's public education system, it doesn't means that I'm more educated than people like you but a little bit more respectful. No se, pero al parecer a los yankees les falta un poquito de cultura y respeto por los demás. Sin ánimos de ofender a nadie. Saludos a los compatriotas Uruguayos. Arriba los sudacas!!!

  12. The main problem is porn. by MarkByers · · Score: 2, Funny

    > In fact, I think most studies have shown that laptops actually have little or a negative impact on helping children learn.

    Most of the failures reported so far are due to children using the computers to browse porn. If porn wasn't illegal and taboo for adults, then children wouldn't be so interested in it. I think porn reform is needed first before computers can be introduced to schools.

    --
    I'll probably be modded down for this...
    1. Re:The main problem is porn. by Chandon+Seldon · · Score: 1

      I think porn reform is needed first before computers can be introduced to schools.

      Fear of porn is definitely going to set back education by years, but waiting for things to change is just going delay education further. Just give the damn kids the computers, and (optionally) yell at them if you catch them with naked chicks on the screen.

      --
      -- The act of censorship is always worse than whatever is being censored. Always.
    2. Re:The main problem is porn. by N3wsByt3 · · Score: 1

      Do you think the 'funny' moderation you got is to the point? Or would you rather have 'insightful'?

      --
      --- "To pee or not to pee, that is the question." ---
  13. Re:Go by Mikachu · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Thank you captain obvious. Your post was either ridiculously insightful, or ridiculously useless.

  14. Respectful, eh? by MarkByers · · Score: 0

    > it doesn't means that I'm more educated than people like you but a little bit more respectful.

    If you want to be respectful, you should not use offensive words like 'yankees'. You shouldn saying that yankees have no culture. Have a nice day!

    --
    I'll probably be modded down for this...
    1. Re:Respectful, eh? by mgigirey · · Score: 1

      I used yankees as you bastards. It hurts, eh? Excuse me for that.

    2. Re:Respectful, eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Yeh don't call them yankees... They're not worth the 7 characters.

      Shorten it to "yanks" like the entire Australian continent, or use the full length "self obsessed corrupt evil genocidal yank fuckwits". Sure, that's a generalisation, but stereotypes exist for a reason.

      Am I trolling or am I right? It ain't both.

  15. Re:I'm disgusted by mgigirey · · Score: 1

    Where are you from Rubinhood?... I got the point people from the reach countries think have less problems with poverty, read this http://www.soundvision.com/Info/poor/statistics.as p

  16. Re:Go by pipingguy · · Score: 1

    It's worth it, definitely.

  17. When can the rest of the world buy them? by grumbel · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Any news on when the rest of the world can finally buy the XO Laptops? Since, well, a 200dpi display for less then $200 sounds like a damn cool device for ebook reading and I really want one.

  18. Re:Go by maxume · · Score: 1

    This post brought to you by the recursive inanity league.

    --
    Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
  19. That's nothing! by N3wsByt3 · · Score: 1

    Wait how enthusiastic they will be when they get India-made crappy pda-like devices for $10 with DNF included!

    --
    --- "To pee or not to pee, that is the question." ---
  20. Re:Go by pipingguy · · Score: 1

    I've spent time working in an engineering (not computer "engineering") environment working with Indians, Chinese, Brits, Americans, Canadians, Vietnamese, etc.. wait, am I replying to the wrong post?

  21. Edu soft needed too by mattr · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Now for just a little more the government can hire half the Uruguayan software industry to create fabulous educational software in collaboration with talented teachers and researchers, and since they are the first then they can release for free or even sell it (making money to invest back into educational software development while also being cheaper for another country to buy than make themselves).

    It would be fabulous to release that as open source, if only the programmers and others involved in making it can be somehow reimbursed or have their living expenses paid for which might not be a bad idea either. Also, it would be probably very cheap compared to first world rates. I'm thinking computers can be much more useful in education and maybe this will even result in a computer-based, self-paced learning curriculum in many languages.

    Maybe a lot of geeks here wish that sort of thing was available when they were in grade school. If it could be released as open source then talented kids could learn in more depth or follow their interests, or even learn in more than one language at once, so instead of the problems that come from skipping grades there could be perhaps ordinary lessons plus self-paced directed or inquiry-based learning. Not just browsing wikipedia but enough for a child to learn from.

    A similar thing written at adult level would also be fabulously useful. It appears some of this idea is in the encyclopedia of life that just won funding based on a "wish" speech at TED. The first thing needed is linux hacking for elementary school kids. Maybe before that an auto-restore, auto-backup extra partition?

  22. Two wrongs don't make a right. by MarkByers · · Score: 1

    I don't know, because I am not one. Ask one, and see what they say about it.

    --
    I'll probably be modded down for this...
    1. Re:Two wrongs don't make a right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      As a Yankee let me just say that we as a people take pride in not knowing where countries that have a smaller GDP than empoverished american cities are on a map, while having the calm assurance that our nuclear missles will little problem in either finding it or annihilating the mud huts and piles of stones that dot it. Be worried when your country rouses us enough to google it. :) - Best wishes, your American friend.

    2. Re:Two wrongs don't make a right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are just a little faggot with a big big penis-like atomic bomb, which you must recall constantly to assure the rest of the world how big and bad boy you are.

      But the other uruguayo is not much better than you. Another commie, happy with our stupid government spending millions of dollars in a political campaign for the next election. Many public schools here don't have working sewage, but hey!, they have laptops!. We really REALLY care about the public education: a public teacher earns around 6000 pesos (250 US$) per month. 3000 dollars a year. My monthly supermarket bill is more than that. My son's health insurance cost 1000 pesos per month. I spend half than that on electricity alone, in summer (in winter, around 5000 pesos).

      Those fancy laptops will surely improve our public education!

      Bah, please, invade us now, and send all of our commies to Guantanamo. We can't be worst than now.

    3. Re:Two wrongs don't make a right. by mgigirey · · Score: 1

      I believe that people like you can replay just as an Anonymous Coward.

  23. Webcams? by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 4, Funny

    What initially made them more enthusiastic was the possibility of taking photographs and filming each others with the included webcams.

    COOL! We're raising a new generation of myspacers!

    Go, Uruguay, go!!

    1. Re:Webcams? by coleopterana · · Score: 1

      Oh, come on now, they're kids--of course it's the first thing they think of. It's an obvious feature of the computer and they're not immune to the media at all. They'll get to the other features soon enough, and MORE IMPORTANTLY, I hope their teachers will too.

    2. Re:Webcams? by El_Isma · · Score: 1

      If you really want to know, Myspace is not popular here. What's popular are the "fotologs" or "flogs". I think those are less customizable than myspace (so, hopefully, less aberrant web sites).

  24. Where's that cheap one..? by suv4x4 · · Score: 1

    Two other companies want to be considered: Intel, with their Classmate PC, and Israeli-manufactured ITP-C.

    What?? Where is India's $10 laptop?!

  25. Scary by suv4x4 · · Score: 1

    I saw this institutional video someone posted here, with the kids playing with their new $150 laptops.

    And for some reason they kept poking the screens with their mischievous little fingers, as if trying to reach for something and pull it out. They just had the machines for one hour or so.

    At first I thought "yugh, fingerprints".

    Then "god damn it, the glass".

    Then "jesus christ they'll wreck the matrix..!".

    So, let the bets begin: how many days do you give em before they any of those:

    1. can it work under water?
    2. will it fly like a frisbee if I throw it properly?
    3. how does it look on the inside?

    1. Re:Scary by Chandon+Seldon · · Score: 1

      I saw this institutional video someone posted here, with the kids playing with their new $150 laptops.

      That video was disturbing. First, why did every shot consist of like 15 kids crowded around one tiny laptop? Isn't this supposed to be "one laptop per child"? Second, why did every shot focus on giant external mice? Aren't these things supposed to have awesome touchpads? Wouldn't that increase the price from $150 to like $160?

      --
      -- The act of censorship is always worse than whatever is being censored. Always.
    2. Re:Scary by skam240 · · Score: 1

      3. how does it look on the inside?

      This end may not always be a bad thing. I'm sure allot of slashdotters (I would certainly be included in this group) got their start into learning about computer hardware by asking just such a question as a child.

      --
      I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
    3. Re:Scary by suv4x4 · · Score: 1

      This end may not always be a bad thing. I'm sure allot of slashdotters (I would certainly be included in this group) got their start into learning about computer hardware by asking just such a question as a child.

      Maybe you didn't read their tagline: "ONE laptop per child". One. Not a couple of hundred.

      When I was a kid and took apart something, it could officially be called garbage. I gained knowledge all right (that I better not do that again).

    4. Re:Scary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. can it work under water?
      Will it work when dried out, if not, why not?

      2. will it fly like a frisbee if I throw it properly?
      How much abuse can it handle, if a lot, how? If not a lot, why not?

      3. how does it look on the inside?
      What does what? If I knock this off can I put it back? If it cannot, can I jury-rig it?

      Seems like if a few kids did this, then they may be sparking something in their mind. Something that might lead to a bigger and better tomorrow.
      1. Oceanographer?
      2. Engineer?
      3. Hacker?

    5. Re:Scary by thingsidontdo · · Score: 1

      Ha ha ... but really, they look very harmonic and gentle. Like angels compared to the imps I teach ;) (in Norway).By the looks of the design, and the testing, it looks like it can take a beating from an imp to. If this had been a XO with a touch screen, their exploring would have paid of.

    6. Re:Scary by suv4x4 · · Score: 1

      1. can it work under water?
      Will it work when dried out, if not, why not?

      2. will it fly like a frisbee if I throw it properly?
      How much abuse can it handle, if a lot, how? If not a lot, why not?

      3. how does it look on the inside?
      What does what? If I knock this off can I put it back? If it cannot, can I jury-rig it?

      Seems like if a few kids did this, then they may be sparking something in their mind. Something that might lead to a bigger and better tomorrow.
      1. Oceanographer?
      2. Engineer?
      3. Hacker?


      Spinning it as if damaging the laptop is somehow bringing a great future to the kid may sit well in a book or an artsy movie. Reality is harsher. How many oceanographers do you know who got their diploma after soaking laptops wet.

      You become a professional by studying and practicing a lot. You don't do it by random things "sparkling" in your mind.
      Have you tried telekinesis? Wishing real hard that the pencil moves. Right now. And if you can do it, you can quit this shitty job and no longer come home late and work during the weekends.

      How did it end: you moved the pencil or, no, you had to work during the weekends.

      In those poor countries, I bet lots of great ideas spark through a kids head, but they don't have the skills or access to information to do something about it.

      They should really explain those kids how to handle a sophisticated equipment like that. It's just as important as giving them the computer itself. The way these kids handled the laptops, obviously they were not thought well enough.

  26. Re: Better Translation - World Lingo by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 4, Informative

    Sorry, but I think the venerable fish is becoming exhausted. Here's World Lingo's version, with my own small tuneups.

    The Web is in the air of Cardal
    About 40 children of an Italian school received its computers by the good will of several authorities of the government. In one week the children should be able to connect to Internet from all the points of the city.

    In the middle of great expectation and much joy of the children, president Tabaré Vázquez stood next to a great retinue of authorities of School #24 of the city of Cardal, which inaugurated the pilot program of the Ceibal Plan in the Italian school (in Florida). In the next few days it should be connected to Internet by means of wireless connections, in order that the students can accede to the Web from their homes.

    In a brief speech during the act, Vázquez talked about "the importance" of the Ceibal project and assured that "she will fulfill herself the deadline of 2009 to cover all the schools of the country". The agent chief executive preferred to yield his time to one of the children.

    At the end of the act, Vázquez was consulted by the present journalists on the matter of cuts in the budget, and if she were going to be able to supply all the money for the plan. Vázquez assured that she was not going to lack the money. "the US$ 15 million are predicted in the budget", assured the conductor the Uruguayan government.

    Under the gaze of many parents, some from the accommodated windows or in some corner of the halls class, about 40 children of 3rd and 6th year received their computers X-O. The donation of Nicholas Negroponte is of 200 units. The rest of the students of that school of Cardal will receive its computers in the next few days.

    The chance to have a PC in its hands, some for the first time, excited the boys, who did not hope to ignite their machines, to introduce their initial preferences (the first time that boot the machine it is necessary to put the machine name and to choose the colors of the screen) and to prepare to experiment with the X-O. What further it excited them was to be able to take photos and to film themselves with on-board webcam.

    Later this week, the children should be able to connect to the Italian School, where an official arrived to provide the school with connection in the classrooms. In the next days this coverage is supposed to extend to the rest of the city so that the children can connect themselves to the Web from their homes. For this, wireless connection technology will be used, supplied by ANTEL with the collaboration provided with UTE.

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
  27. Indecent translation! Babelfish goes illegal! by N3wsByt3 · · Score: 1

    "AlgarabÃa to have a PC in its hands, some for the first time, dejà won the boys, who did not hope to ignite his mà quinas"

    That sounds fishy! ;-)

    --
    --- "To pee or not to pee, that is the question." ---
  28. And they will be criticize by ghostbar38 · · Score: 1

    because of the WLAN's and all the bad effect that produce in childrens, just wait, there's always someone that wants to be the hero and makes everything more difficult :/

    --
    ghostbar page.
  29. true, but... by N3wsByt3 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    While I agree with you on every point, they give it another spin. For instance:

    "-XO operating system interface was designed from the ground up for this purpose. Classmate uses Windows XP Embedded."

    They are effectively promoting their PC as a 'real' one (vs.a plaything of the XO) because it can run XP, while the XO doesn't.

    The XO is clearly a more interesting concept, though. I wish they would mass-market it in the west too. I wouldn't mind paying $200 for it, even if just to see how it ticks.

    --
    --- "To pee or not to pee, that is the question." ---
    1. Re:true, but... by burnin1965 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      They are effectively promoting their PC as a 'real' one (vs.a plaything of the XO) because it can run XP, while the XO doesn't.

      The XO is clearly a more interesting concept, though.


      And there in is the reason the XO is a superior solution. All the criticism of the OLPC XO and the benevolent offers of "superior" Windows based machines with $3 OS licensing fees is based off the need of a few greedy thugs to build their markets. The objective of OLPC is not to build a market for Microsoft and Intel to sell their products and introduce developing nations to the proprietary software licensing treadmill, its about instilling the ability to learn at an early age so these children will grow up with the ability to improve their living conditions. As Negroponte has already stated "An educated and creative population is, without a doubt, the best path to global health, wealth, and peace."

      While I'm sure a more expensive Windows based machine could be used for the same purpose, the initial experiments that led up to OLPC used Windows based laptops, the XO and its software were designed from the ground up to serve the specific purpose of "learning learning" while the so called superior solutions being pushed by multi-billionare corporate CEOs and the like are designed to help themselves break into new markets where their current products are simply too expensive.

      These wealthy individuals who lack the knowlege and experience of the people who developed and run the OLPC should simply STFU and let the professionals do their job.

    2. Re:true, but... by renoX · · Score: 1

      >I wouldn't mind paying $200 for the XO, even if just to see how it ticks.

      I doubt that you'd like this version as the keyboard is made for children (smaller keys)..

      But yes with a normal keyboard, the high black&white DPI, 1.5kg and nearly 0 power consumption for still display, rugged design, all this would make the OLPC a *very nice* book-reader.

      And one which can read pdf instead of being restricted to proprietary formats..

    3. Re:true, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cost is not just the cost of buying the hardware. The OLPC may be a great choice for 3rd world countries were one starts from scratch but makes not much - if any - sense for developed countries. Greece ordered a very large number of OLPCs. This move was initiated by the politicians without consulting any educators. Greece has developed a lot of educational content mostly developed in Java that will not work on the OLPC. It will be a huge project to port content and code to the OLPC and to reeducate teachers and students. Many schools have PC (mostly Windows) labs. By the time even just 10% of the ports are done and the teacher and student training is on its way there will be other offerings in the $100 range.

      Saving money at all cost, ignoring the total cost of introducing new technology, is a terrible idea.

  30. Re:I'm disgusted by The+Iso · · Score: 2, Informative

    Translation: "Not him, but it seems the foreign devils lack a little culture and respect for others. I don't mean to offend anyone. Shoutout to my Uruguayan homies. The South will rise again!"

    I may have lost some things in translation due to regional dialects.

    --
    "You don't need a weatherman to know which way the wind blows." - Bob Dylan
  31. Re:Go by Bastard+of+Subhumani · · Score: 4, Funny

    This is probably a good idea. Or a total disaster.
    It's both.

    Regards,
        E. Schrödinger
    --
    Only three things are certain; death, taxes, and apocryphal quotations - Ben Franklin.
  32. Re:I'm disgusted by mgigirey · · Score: 1

    No problem ;)

  33. Only a PII? O RLY? by tomstdenis · · Score: 3, Insightful

    My first computer in the classroom was an apple ][, followed by the various 68000 based macs. If I can play math, language, and geographical games on a low end 6502 or 68000 based machine, surely to god kids can learn today with "only a P2." And none of them ran Win XP either.

    I know why Intel spreads the myth that you need power to use a computer. They're in the business of pushing high end processors that most people don't need.

    Tom

    --
    Someday, I'll have a real sig.
  34. Laptops' true intent by icsEater · · Score: 1
    Don't you get it? The whole point of this project is to breed a new generation of super hackers. (Of course the laptops are rigged by the CIA to implant subliminal messages so that they will be useful to us in the future.)

    But on a serious note, technology (hopefully introduced via these laptops) is an enabler that opens opportunities. I'm not just taking about Nigerian scams and Brazilian hackers. You do read about how Africa nations are able to position themselves as a leader in mail processing center thanks to the ability to access scanned documents through the Internet. Maybe someday these laptops will help create the world's only remaining source for exploitable outsourced technology.

    1. Re:Laptops' true intent by rbanffy · · Score: 1

      Please, never again use the word "hacker" as a synonym to "criminal".

      Having hackers, Brazilian or not (I am Brazilian), is a good thing.

  35. Re:Go by bberens · · Score: 0, Troll

    What initially made them more enthusiastic was the possibility of taking photographs and filming each others with the included webcams. Ahh the hopes and dreams of every Uruguayan child can now finally be realized. To think that every child has the opportunity of opening their very own child pornography website brings a little crocodile tear to my eye. This is a moment we should all cherish.

    /seriously, how did no one else catch that?
    --
    Check out my lame java blog at www.javachopshop.com
  36. Re:Only a PII? O RLY? by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

    I know why Intel spreads the myth that you need power to use a computer.

    No, Intel would never promote a rival architecture!
    --
    The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  37. Re:Go by ClaraBow · · Score: 1

    This will be a total disaster without well trained teachers. I think this program will be successful if, and only if, the children have highly qualified teachers to guide them. I'm afraid some officials may be looking at the computer as a placebo for their education woes. The hard reality is that third-world country are in dire need of teachers.

  38. I Call Excrement of Male Bovines! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    You're missing out the battery life on the OLPC, but typically, lower MHz ~= higher battery life, which for a kids computer is probably actually the better idea.

    I have no idea where you get the weird idea that screen size is more important than resolution. That's just.... wrong. (you can fit more pixels = more letters on a higher res screen... even if you need a magnifying glass to still see them all ... and it's still more pleasant to read on a high res screen with larger character sizes. )

    Windows XP or Linux by themselves are both not-so-handy, they don't cater to kids.

    TPM does not help you secure your own computer, AFAIK.

  39. Internet access for these third world children... by cjjjer · · Score: 1

    According to the unofficial blog of the Uruguayan project, named proyecto Ceibal, the infrastructure for wireless is not yet in place but will be provided in the next few days by the national telco ANTEL
    In other news....

    Wiley publishing notes an increase in sales of its dummies series "learn to speak the language of third world countries" by creepy looking adult men.
  40. Why The Third World Focus? by aldheorte · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I find it disturbing that such focus is put on third world children when a significant number of children in the U.S. and other developed countries do not have access to a similiar device or good educational opportunities. It's a shared failure of Western governments and projects such as the OLPC to favor others over their own for the sake of political correctness and what I can only describe as some sort of institutional guilt over priviliege combined with well-intentioned, but nonetheless clueless, naivete.

    When it comes to technical leadership, it is sort of like the airline safety instructions you get - if the airmasks drop down, secure your own first so you can help others without losing your ability to do so. Think about it while you go to mod me down.

    1. Re:Why The Third World Focus? by Chandon+Seldon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The OLPC project is trying to make the world a better place, not make the United States more dominant.

      On the other hand, uneducated farmers working 60 hours a week to feed themselves in Cambodia don't help the US economy much - do they?

      --
      -- The act of censorship is always worse than whatever is being censored. Always.
    2. Re:Why The Third World Focus? by fiddlesticks · · Score: 1

      So? Set up your own programme to bring OLPC-style devices to the US.

      This isn't funded by Western governments, but by people who want to bring low cost, low power devices to non US kids. What's your problem?

    3. Re:Why The Third World Focus? by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      I find it disturbing that such focus is put on third world children when a significant number of children in the U.S. and other developed countries do not have access to a similiar device or good educational opportunities. It's a shared failure of Western governments and projects such as the OLPC to favor others over their own for the sake of political correctness and what I can only describe as some sort of institutional guilt over priviliege combined with well-intentioned, but nonetheless clueless, naivete.

      The term you are looking for is "White Man's Burden", it's one of the most subtle and damaging forms of racism there is - but it has the advantage of being culturally accepted, indeed almost encouraged. It's why Madonna is adopting a baby from (IIRC) Benin, rather than Compton. It's why white couples (in the US) adopt a Chinese or Korean baby. It's why churches send missionaries and doctors into poorer regions of the Third World - but not into Appalachia or the 'hood.
    4. Re:Why The Third World Focus? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So? Set up your own programme to bring OLPC-style devices to the US.

      This isn't funded by Western governments, but by people who want to bring low cost, low power devices to non US kids. What's your problem?


      Actually, I believe this program is to give a laptop computer to every child. It does not matter where they live. the reason so many non US locations are mentioned is that they are asking for them.

      A few of the States have inquired about them. Problem is either Microsoft, or Intel, or anyone other company not included in the project tend to spread FUD about it. That gets uninformed people to be against it. And when the school board/counties money is on the line, it is better to buy new football uniforms, or to fix up the gymnasium with a new A/C than it is to help educate the children about choice and freedom.

    5. Re:Why The Third World Focus? by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      The OLPC project is trying to make the world a better place, not make the United States more dominant.

      What a truly disturbing point of view - helping a child in Uruguay (in some unspecified way) 'makes the world a better place', but helping a child in Compton (in some unspecified way) 'makes the United States more dominant'. Even worse, you probably don't even realize how racist that sounds.
    6. Re:Why The Third World Focus? by Ant+P. · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is a cheap hardware project, not the world police force. OLPC is no more responsible for the US government not giving a shit about its citizens any more than it is responsible for the other corrupt third-world governments.

    7. Re:Why The Third World Focus? by fbjon · · Score: 1

      Korean?? I had no idea there were lots of adoptable children in Korea.

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
    8. Re:Why The Third World Focus? by Chandon+Seldon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What a truly disturbing point of view - helping a child in Uruguay (in some unspecified way) 'makes the world a better place', but helping a child in Compton (in some unspecified way) 'makes the United States more dominant'. Even worse, you probably don't even realize how racist that sounds.

      Helping children in Uruguay is cheaper.

      --
      -- The act of censorship is always worse than whatever is being censored. Always.
    9. Re:Why The Third World Focus? by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      I suppose being a thrifty racist is better than being a spendthrift racist - but it doesn't change the nature of the base metal.

    10. Re:Why The Third World Focus? by Chandon+Seldon · · Score: 1

      I suppose being a thrifty racist is better than being a spendthrift racist - but it doesn't change the nature of the base metal.

      What's racist about wanting to be able to have the largest beneficial impact on the lives of the most children for a constant amount of investment? I'm not sure if that's the most effective decision criteria or not, but it's definitely not racist - or even unreasonable.

      --
      -- The act of censorship is always worse than whatever is being censored. Always.
    11. Re:Why The Third World Focus? by mrogers · · Score: 1

      Helping poor people in a foreign country is "aid". Helping poor people in your own country is "socialism". One is acceptable to middle-class voters, the other is not.

    12. Re:Why The Third World Focus? by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      What's racist is your _original_ comment. Your subsequent comments are nothing more than handwaving attempts to divert attention from your racism.

    13. Re:Why The Third World Focus? by Chandon+Seldon · · Score: 1

      I'm going to assume for a moment that you're serious. The only way that could be true is if you misinterpreted my original comment to be "helping a child in Cambodia makes the world a better place then helping a child in Compton would". That's not what I said. A more clear statement of what I meant was: "If helping a child makes the world a better place, it where that child is isn't important."

      --
      -- The act of censorship is always worse than whatever is being censored. Always.
    14. Re:Why The Third World Focus? by Eccles · · Score: 1

      I find it disturbing that such focus is put on third world children when a significant number of children in the U.S. and other developed countries do not have access to a similiar device or good educational opportunities.

      The design is open, and the price is based on the manufacturing cost. Nothing stops Western governments from buying in, and even the poorest areas in the U.S. can afford $100/schoolchild. According to OLPC's Wiki, Massachusetts has shown some interest in the project.

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
    15. Re:Why The Third World Focus? by aldheorte · · Score: 1

      That's a lot of perspective in three sentences. Well said.

  41. You ARE being overly pessemistic and this is why by arcite · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Look at the impact CELLPHONES are having in developing countries. Its exploding everywhere, SE Asia, Africa. Cellphones are changing millions of lives in significant and simple ways,

    They allow people to communicate, simple but for most who earn a $1 a day or less this was previously impossible.

    They are spurring innovation in Banking, micro-finance, and enabling new kinds of transactions

    Text messaging, SMS, is still the cheapest way to get a message across - be it a pricing report for harvested crops, or a simple message to a family member in an isolated village.

    True that developing countries are plagued by tyrants, corrupted governments, and other nasty people, but when people are given the power to communicate they can mobilize and share information, get organized, and that is real power.

    Access to the internet is the obvious next step. "FREEDOM" just doesn't materialize, people have to fight for it, and in order to do that they need the tools. Even if there is one OLPC laptop in a village, that single laptop will open MANY doors to many people who previously had no opportunity or voice.

  42. Format support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One of the goals of this project was to get the kids onto the web (to interact, share ideas, learn, watch porn,+++). I hope that the computers will support some proprietary standards, such as Flash, MS Word, MP3, etc. If this is not the case, then the kids will not be able to participate in "web culture" on the same level as people with "normal" PCs.



    A lack of format support may cause them to lose interest in the web, thinking it is not for them. A good outcome would be that a new "web" would be created, by the kids using the laptops, tailored to the spces of the device. This is still a worse situation than having them on our existing web. The bad outcome would be if everyone started pirating MS Windows, to have the "real" computer OS.



    The creators of the OS may have envisioned the "good outcome" described above, and due to language/cultural barriers, the XO users would only want to talk to other XO users. I think this is a bogus argument, e.g. if word gets around about YouTube, then the kids will want it, no matter what. (One can argue whether having the kids visit YouTube is a good thing for society, but that is really irrelevant).



    Of course, some of this is an exaggeration, Slashdot and Wikipedia, for example, would work the same on any HTML browser. Many sites will not work that great, and if there is a link to a PDF or a WMV on Slashdot, it would be nice to see it.


    1. Re:Format support by tepples · · Score: 1

      Slashdot and Wikipedia, for example, would work the same on any HTML browser. Many sites will not work that great, and if there is a link to a PDF or a WMV on Slashdot, it would be nice to see it. PDF? Evince OK?
  43. IMO forget about the children by arcite · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Give one of these laptop to every TEACHER in a given country. People often forget that the teachers are just as poor as the children. If a teacher can have access to up to date curriculum that would be awesome in itself. The possiblities for teachers to swap ideas and support one another is also endless. The quality of teaching could increase immeasurably.

  44. Nature Magazine and linux bios by goombah99 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Nature Magazine has a cautious news story lauding the OLPC while pointing out what nay sayers observe. One concern is that the way they are achieving the price point is to push the marketing, distribution, and maintenence cost onto the buyers (the governements) and that they need to reach scale quickly, which while it probably will happen governments are demurring. If this roll out is a success it may be a big shot in arm convincing the hesitant governments. Perhaps the easiest places to get support will be one-man governments; Would-be "populist" quasi-dictators like Qudaffi is a prime candidate for a large purchase.

    There's also an interesting interview with Ron Minnich of LinuxBios, who points out that the OLPC will be a major roll out for OLPC in end user hands (rather than embeds). He says that LinuxBios enables such insanely better power management than traditional bios that it's going to knock everyone's socks off. It will wake instantaneously and conserve power.

    Even when operating this thing is miserly: 2 watts.

    One of the suggested alternatives in the Nature Article put forward by a prominent nay sayer in India (who will not be going forward with OLPC) are that set-top style web-based apps are a better idea. I Don't actually see how. All the set top boxes currently are more expensive, don't have a screen, the screen will be too far away for it's resolution, and they don't have Key boards. So the OLPC looks pretty good.

    The OLPC will automatically detect networks. I wonder if Ron Minnich managed to slide in his other project which is BPROC/Clustermatic which is used at Labs like Los Alamos to create high performance self configuring clusters with minimal cluster operating system overhead. Such a system could provide some incredible computing horsepower despite the low performance of the individual nodes.

    Another thing I wonder about is printers. In the developed world anyone who can afford a computer can afford or get access to a printer so paper has never really been factored out of computing. INdeed computers if anything, are an organized way to generate more not less paper docs. In the countries using OLPC, printers won't be available. We may see the rise of paperless computing finally.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    1. Re:Nature Magazine and linux bios by beyondkaoru · · Score: 3, Interesting

      i'm not sure how well a dictator would take to having an educated and/or freely speaking populace. the stereotypical dictator would _not_ want olpc's in the country, unless the internet was also controlled. i'm sure there's the possibility of a benevolent dictator, but i don't know how often that happens...

      --
      the privacy of one's mind is important.
      you do have something to hide.
    2. Re:Nature Magazine and linux bios by robzon · · Score: 1
  45. Re:Only a PII? O RLY? by Chandon+Seldon · · Score: 1

    I know why Intel spreads the myth that you need power to use a computer. They're in the business of pushing high end processors that most people don't need.

    A more powerful computer will be more useful. The "myth" that you're spreading is that no-one will ever want to do anything unexpected with their computer - computers are general purpose tools, and you rarely know everything that you might want to do with one when you get it.

    But... that doesn't change the fact that the XO is probably strictly better than the Classmate for its purpose. The increase in computing power a student would get in moving to the classmate doesn't really enable any interesting application categories; basically it just allows people to buy expensive (and largely useless) proprietary software. In comparison, the XO allows the user to do some really interesting stuff that the classmate does not - like surfing the web in direct sunlight over a mesh network when the nearest WAP is 5km away.

    --
    -- The act of censorship is always worse than whatever is being censored. Always.
  46. You're not very bright are you? by arcite · · Score: 1, Insightful
    Um gee lets see. Could it be that children in developed countries already have great access to the latest technology and therefore do not need a low cost version?

    I would accuse you of being selfish if it wasn't so clear that you are just horribly misinformed (and dare I say ignorant).

    Carry on.

    1. Re:You're not very bright are you? by aldheorte · · Score: 1

      I do not argue that many children in the developed countries have partents who provide a highly privileged lifestyle and will buy their children a computer or any technical item they want. However, a large number of children in developed countries do not have access to a similar computer as a consequence of urban or rural poverty or parental disinterest in or ignorance about the importance of technological educaiton. Furthermore, few schools in developed countries, even at the university level, have a curriculum centered around a common computing platform available to all students.

  47. Re:I'm disgusted by BobPaul · · Score: 1

    He's obviously referring to the argument that rich countries have a responsibility to save the rest of the world from poverty even while they have problems of their own to still deal with.

  48. On the other hand by arcite · · Score: 1

    I grew up using toasters and can use any brand today. Yet I have no clue on their inner workings. A toaster is a mysterious magical "black box" to me and thats ok. I don't know what has to do with the merits of power point however.

    1. Re:On the other hand by MeNeXT · · Score: 1

      What a stupid comment....So you know how to use a toaster, does it stop you from using a toaster oven? Or an oven? Or a microwave oven? Do you know you can make toast without a toaster? You can make toast without any appliance....

      By the time these kids grow up, Windows and Word and power point will look nothing like the do today. Most people are confused when Microsoft make changes with versions. Teach people to perform tasks not how to use menus and then they will never be lost.

      --
      DRM? No thanks, I'll just get it somewhere else...
  49. A new meme by Anomalyst · · Score: 2, Funny

    This is probably a good idea. Or a total disaster.
    It's both.
    It is a disastrously good idea!
    PS to parent, how's the cat? (Betcha never heard that before)
    --
    There is no right to feel safe thru security vaudeville at the expense of everyone's freedom, privacy and tax money.
  50. Typos by ThousandStars · · Score: 0
    The damn Slashdot editors *still* make routine and easily detected mistakes on the front page:

    The porn finders came directly from the hands of president Tabaré Vazquez.

    There, fixed that for you.

  51. Yay, Webcams by z_gringo · · Score: 5, Funny

    What initially made them more enthusiastic was the possibility of taking photographs and filming each others with the included webcams.'"

    What could possibly go wrong?

    --
    -- -- Warning. Do not stare directly at the sun.
  52. Re:Only a PII? O RLY? by Soul-Burn666 · · Score: 1

    Don't diss the P2. A friend of mine used a P2 350mhz as his MAIN computer until about 3 months ago.
    I was amazed to see it could reasonably run XP, IE7 and a java applet inside it.

    --
    ^_^
  53. Re:Go by dotoole · · Score: 1

    Oh good god no!!!!

    Quick - someone ban cameras!

  54. OS is growing by El_Isma · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There's a law (in progress, ie: not yet approved) that would require the public offices to use (as far as possible) OS software and force them to use open formats. So in that respect, the education that kids are getting is positive and useful. Up until now, Windows was taugth. Not to mention that not every school had PCs.

    Also, other South American countries which are on very friendly terms with Uruguay (such as Venezuela) are too pushing OS into the public offices. In Venezuela's case, the law is in place already, and it will force everyone to switch before a set date (Uruguay's law will be a progressive change). Brasil also has a widespread use of Linux in bussiness.

    A fun tale about this law: A few weeks before the law proyect was presented, Microsoft determined that ANEP (the public schools) owed them something like 500k USD in licenses based on the number of PCs and students that the schools had. After the proyect was presented, Microsoft gracefully donated those licenses.

  55. Re:Only a PII? O RLY? by tomstdenis · · Score: 2, Informative

    Hint: There is a reason why Intel and AMD are focusing strongly on improving their idle power usage. And it ain't because they have nothing better to do.

    Most of the time my E6600 sits here at 1.6Ghz even with firefox, audacious, etc going. For MOST of my tasks the box is just plain too fast. Of course, as a software developer I do put it through it's paces. Point is for most people who read webpages, listen to music, watch a movie, whatever, processors are VASTLY overpowered for what they do. Not every one is doing "make -j5", re-encoding live video, or whatever.

    I'd bet that for most if you simply told them "it's really fast" and then didn't load a bloatware OS and tools on it they wouldn't know the difference.

    Of course if Intel started just selling 1GHz cores and said "listen folks, you really aren't using the core anyways, so why waste the energy and wafer yield?" they wouldn't be able to sell $300 processors. Of course they would cost a lot less I guess anyways since the yield would be higher... hmmm...

    Point is, XO is just fine with a "P2 class" processor.

    Tom

    --
    Someday, I'll have a real sig.
  56. Check out the specs! Pretty cool... by dark-br · · Score: 1
  57. Re:I'm disgusted by El_Isma · · Score: 1

    Uruguay's software industry is already big and one of the top five income sources for the country. I wouldn't mind it becoming the number one source :)

  58. The "advantage" of windows xp by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 1

    There's one huge advantage for governments who go with the intel classmate and run XP - it's likely that the Gates Foundation will give grants to the governments to buy them as long as they don't run Linux. Watch and see.

  59. Re:Go by El_Isma · · Score: 1

    I learnt many thing using a PC. Things like programming, which helped me in my University courses. Things like Google that helped... well, it's Google, you know!

    I understand your concerns, I just hope this will go well in spite of teachers.

  60. PS3 vs Wii? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Honestly, I thought the industry learned this lesson recently.

    People made the same silly comparisons of processor and power in the PS3 and the Wii. In fact the price points aren't that different ($250 vs $500). Those systems are sold in the richest countries in the world to people who buy them with disposable income, and doubling the price still makes a huge difference. The idea that it won't be a big deal in Uruguay is absurd.

    What makes a greater difference is usability engineering. The choice to include a camera, and a large easy to use touchpad, and ears, were not accidents. They were the products of good research. The OLPC folk didn't just strip down a PC, they designed it from the ground up for this purpose. At all phases of this design, power was an important factor, what the Intel folk didn't "get" when building the CheapMate, was that a 4 hour battery life in a place where they only have power at the school will severely limit the use of this tool. They still have weekends in underprived countries. Doing your homework on Friday night and going the rest of the weekend with two hours of remaining battery life is just crap. With a normal use power consumption of 2W and an e-book consumption between .3 and .8 watts, and a 22.8 watt-hour battery pack. Well, do the math, the OLPC is going to be much more fun on weekends.

    As for the "screen is smaller and thus unreadable" argument, I'm afraid it's rubbish. Your hands probably aren't right at the base of your screen, and your arms are probably a foot longer than the target audience. They'll have no problem with a 7.5" screen at 1200x900, they will have the option of choosing a larger font and using the extra pixels for better hinting which vastly enhances readability. I have an Ipaq hx4700 with a 640x480 4" and have read many ebooks on it. Having read quite a few on it's 320x240 predecessors I can personally attest that the extra pixels, that allow extra hinting for the fonts vastly enhance readability and reduce eyestrain. Since the base model of the Classmate (whose price people seem to use for comparison) has only 35% as many pixels as the OLPC in it's hi-res mode (yup (800x480)/(1200x900) ) there will be no contest as to which is easier on the eyes.

    The nice folks at handhelds.org have been doing more, with less since the Ipaq 3650's which were in all ways horribly inferior to the XO. The OLPC folk have done a top notch job and will make a difference in the lives of millions more children for the same number of dollars.

  61. Re:I'm disgusted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I also enjoyed the uruguayan public education for like 12 years before emigrating to germany.
    The _only_ thing that works with this system is that there are more or less enough schools and children attend to them. Now the quality of the education is really bad, and the lack of economic resources doesn't help.
    A couple of months in the years, every year, classes are suspended because teachers are on strike, students are on strike, the public transport is on strike or it's a holiday.

    If that is "excellent" for you, than my friend, you need to travel more often.

    Btw. why to be so disrespectful with our fellow americans? stop attending to the comite de base and living in the '50s. (yes, you cannot even play good football anymore!)

  62. What should they get? by jbengt · · Score: 2, Insightful

    " . . . or should we be giving them a computer that gives them the potential to learn the systems in use by a majority of the world?"

    We're talking about young students here. What system will be in use by a majority of the world a few years from now? (hint: it won't be XP)
    In my opinion, it is almost always a mistake to teach skill in particular technologies over teaching the fundamental ideas that allow you to think on your own and adapt to changes.

  63. Re: Better Translation - World Lingo by Acer500 · · Score: 1

    Thanks for the translantion. I just wanted to point out that president Vazquez is a he :) and that the school's name is "Italy" not an italian school (many schools are named after a country here)

    --
    There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics.
  64. Re:Go by hjf · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Uruguay is not a third world country, mind you.

  65. Re:Only a PII? O RLY? by Chandon+Seldon · · Score: 1

    Point is for most people who read webpages, listen to music, watch a movie, whatever, processors are VASTLY overpowered for what they do.

    It's better for everyone if these people get fast processors anyway. First, it's impossible to be sure that they'll never want to do anything taxing with their computer. Second, more demand for powerful processors drives the technology - that makes good kit cheaper for everyone and continually allows for the development of new applications that make use of more powerful processors.

    Interestingly, one of your examples is inaccurate. A low end processor *cannot* playback high quality video. Without video acceleration, even a Core 2 Duo would struggle weakly trying to decode and display a well compressed high definition video file.

    Point is, XO is just fine with a "P2 class" processor.

    That's a different point, and I agree with it. But it's not that these kids wouldn't be better off if the XO had a more powerful processor, it's that these kids have constraints like money and electricity that make the Geode LX @ 500Mhz the right choice for the machine. The gain from moving to a more powerful processor would be more than offset by reduced battery life and less kids getting machines because they'd be more expensive.

    --
    -- The act of censorship is always worse than whatever is being censored. Always.
  66. OLPC does support XP by Charbax · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Just put a 10$ 1GB SD card in the SD card slot under the screen, and the OLPC can boot into a light, customized 3$ Windows XP OS. Microsoft has been working for the past year on adapting a Windows XP light version to run on such cheaper hardware, the OLPC hardware specs are totally sufficient for running a thinned down version of Windows XP. Microsoft certainly has the means and the will to provide such Windows XP on a 1GB SD card option, which each child could after some time and as SD card prices drop get one, and have a choice a boot-up for which OS to use.

  67. Re: Better Translation - World Lingo by aichpvee · · Score: 1

    Is America the best school? Or is it the worst, but they have a decent sports program?

    --
    The Farewell Tour II
  68. Re:Only a PII? O RLY? by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

    Your video argument is kinda my point though. A MPEG hardware decoder could decode the stream with much less power consumption. If your users are doing a lot of video work, sell them a hardware accelerator. Which in case you didn't notice, most recent GPUs sport.

    We already have "accelerators" in our machines. Ethernet controllers offload the line handling, disk controllers handle polling the drives, sound cards handle DMA tasks, hell the DMA controller itself as well.

    Making an MPEG decoder an optional addon for motherboards wouldn't be a smashingly bad idea.

    Tom

    --
    Someday, I'll have a real sig.
  69. Re:Go by bberens · · Score: 1

    Just to be on the safe side, I wanted to note that I hope it was obvious that I was being terribly sarcastic. Child pornography is disgusting and evil.

    --
    Check out my lame java blog at www.javachopshop.com
  70. Cygwin, or MSYS? by tepples · · Score: 1

    The command line on windows is crippled and you need to install Cygwin to avoid it Not necessarily. I use MSYS, which is based on the lighter-weight MinGW environment. It provides a lot of the same core stuff that people install Cygwin to get, such as Bash, GNU Coreutils, and GNU grep/sed. You can get it from the (confusing) official site mingw.org, but the best MSYS distribution I've seen is the one available at devkitpro.org. Add the Dev-C++ distribution of MinGW GCC, and there isn't as much need for Cygwin as some people claim.
  71. Re:Go by ggambett · · Score: 2, Informative

    Yep, we're 3rd world, but we don't exactly live in huts and eat each other. In fact, Uruguay already has a very strong software exports sector (in fact I run an indie game dev company) and Internet access is ubiquitous. I guess the über hackers are already wrecking havoc ;)

    No, really, ask Wikipedia ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uruguay ), most people are surprised to learn that Uruguay is very different to the typical first world stereotype of "third world", "south american" and "latin" people.

  72. Re:Only a PII? O RLY? by Ant+P. · · Score: 1

    I had a P2 running XP until a few months ago too, wasn't my main PC though. It died a horrible spyware-laden death at the hands of the rest of my family to the point where it took 3 minutes to boot, another minute until the desktop responded to right click and five more to stop thrashing.
    Instead of throwing it out, I stuck Knoppix in it.

  73. What will happen? by Mazin07 · · Score: 1

    What are the consequences on the environment of buying a crap-ton of laptops, and giving them out in poorer countries? They don't have infrastructure to deal with electronic waste. These things are probably going to end up in landfills, no? It's bad enough with all the electronics we have, but we have more money to throw at the problem. Honestly, when I first heard of this project, I thought of the sheer amount of materials that would be used.

    1. Re:What will happen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, people in 3rd world countries are not so eager to throw things away after using them once. When you lack the cash to buy a new laptop, you'll see how much re-use and recycling can be done if you weren't so apathetic.

  74. You may not want to. They're tiny. by Animats · · Score: 1

    Any news on when the rest of the world can finally buy the XO Laptops? Since, well, a 200dpi display for less then $200 sounds like a damn cool device for ebook reading and I really want one.

    If you haven't actually seen an XO machine, just pictures, you may not realize that it's much smaller than a standard laptop. The keyboard is sized for kid-sized hands.

    1. Re:You may not want to. They're tiny. by grumbel · · Score: 1

      For eBook reading the 19.1cm of the OLPC laptop should be perfect, most books aren't much larger either and with its 200dpi in monocrome mode it gets close enough to print resolution. Beside, I'm currently abusing a PSP for reading and that has a 11cm display and less dpi and its already doing the job quite nicely.

  75. Re:Go by Mazin07 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    /seriously, how did no one else catch that? That's excluding the tons of comments about that, right?
  76. Re:Only a PII? O RLY? by Chandon+Seldon · · Score: 1

    A MPEG hardware decoder could decode the stream with much less power consumption.

    That's great, as long as you're sure that decoding video in that specific format is the only compute-intensive task the user will ever do.

    Actually, I agree that GPUs should have MPEG4 decoders in them. It's a common enough format, and offloading the processing may well provide a significant performance gain for the cost. But... just because that specific task can be solved by dedicated hardware doesn't change the fact that general purpose computing power (i.e. more powerful CPUs and GPGPUs) is very useful, and much more valuable overall than a task-specific hardware accelerator.

    --
    -- The act of censorship is always worse than whatever is being censored. Always.
  77. From subsistence to surplus by tepples · · Score: 1

    On the other hand, uneducated farmers working 60 hours a week to feed themselves in Cambodia don't help the US economy much - do they? Farmer's kids get XO laptops. Farmer's kids find farming tips on Khmer Wikipedia. Family produces surplus food and sells it at the market for cash. Family's standard of living increases. Now what?
    1. Re:From subsistence to surplus by Chandon+Seldon · · Score: 1

      Family's standard of living increases. Now what?

      Now the country has a cheap, educated labor force available so they can compete with Taiwan and I can get RAM modules cheaper.

      I don't know, I'm not an economist. But, everything else being equal, I'd rather that family had the higher standard of living.

      --
      -- The act of censorship is always worse than whatever is being censored. Always.
  78. Re: Cultural Idioms by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 1

    Figures.

    The genders came up both ways, so I picked one. And I think I did see "Italy School", but that didn't make sense with this level of unreliability...

    But not so bad otherwise. It beats the weird characters.

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
  79. OLPC better than cheapie laptops. by MikeFM · · Score: 4, Informative

    As someone that has a XO (OLPC) I'll say that it is way better than any cheapie laptop I've seen. If it was available for retail purchase here in the US I'd buy several to pass out as gifts. The quality is great and it really has a lot to offer for such a low price tag. I mean it comes with the ability to participate in a mesh network and be connected to a normal wifi AP at the same time, has a decent built in camera, has a pad for pen input, is very durable, is very lightweight, stays cool, has a decent battery life, has features that make it usable as an ebook or handheld game, the software is custom written to take advantage of the laptop and work within its limited specs, and is just pretty damn cute. Every kid I've tested it on has loved it as have most adults. And remember that they actually plan to get production costs down to under $100 per laptop and then start distributing low-cost add-ons such as an OLPC printer. Your average cheapie laptop is not going to be the same.

    That said, I can't believe they are distributing the XO to kids already. The software is not done at all. IMO the software is barely usable thus far. Work on the software is progressing pretty fast, and in fact that is why I have an unit, but I would not yet be distributing them with the software in it's current state. I hope they have easy access to the units being distributed so they can be updated as needed.

    --
    At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
  80. Re:I'm disgusted by pjt33 · · Score: 1

    Sólo "un poquito"? Cierto que es más respetuoso que muchos ingleses!

  81. Re:I'm disgusted by pjt33 · · Score: 1

    Por alguna razón parece que Slashdot no permite ni ¿ ni ¡ .

  82. not 500 MHz, and size does matter by r00t · · Score: 1

    The "500" is part of the marketing name. In no way does the core run at 500 MHz. Actual performance is somewhere between a 200 MHz Pentium and a 200 MHz Pentium II.

    Text is often done as images intended for normal computers. Browse the web and observe. Either it ends up really small and hard to read, or you scale it by 2x each way and effectively cut the OLPC resolution down to 600x450.

    1. Re:not 500 MHz, and size does matter by cyba · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > The "500" is part of the marketing name. In no way does the core run at 500 MHz.

      According to the specifications is uses LX-700, which runs at 433MHz (more info here). Not far from 500MHz.

  83. Re:Only a PII? O RLY? by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

    i'm not saying no fast processors should exist. I'm saying we should stop trying to convince the laymen that they actually need it. The amount of power that is wasted on higher performance cpus idling is enormous compared to what our technology could allow for.

    It'd be like everyone driving hotrods since the extra HP is "nice to have."

    Tom

    --
    Someday, I'll have a real sig.
  84. 800x480 will look way better by r00t · · Score: 0

    That 1200x900 is single-color pixels, like in a camera sensor. It's not a real 1200x900, and it's nothing like the supposed 800x600 either. It shows weird moire-like effects too. The greyscale mode is really really dim, being unusable under bright indoor light -- it might just barely be tolerable under the mid-day sun of Libya. Tablet mode leaves you with no mouse or keyboard, so not too useful. The graphics tablet has hardware defects and, being overlaid on the touchpad with faulty automatic mode switching, is more hindrance than help.

    The ordinary 800x480 is pretty decent. The only downside would be reduced battery life.

  85. Re:I'm disgusted by AoT · · Score: 1

    Idi Amin was in Uganda, not Uraguay.

    That's in Africa, Uraguay is in South America.

  86. Re:Go by nietsch · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Seriously, are you nuts? Did you notice that Uruguay is not part of the United States, and has no tradition to sue everybody for anything? Parents in the rest of the world would not sue the webcam manufacturer because their kid used that brand while prostituting him/herself. They would be able to admit their own failure at parenting, which is exactly what it is. So yes bad things will happen, even with these devices around. Some bad things may even happen more often with them around. But in no way can you blame a simple device for the acts of other people. Kids and parents have their own responsibility, and no computer diminishes that.

    --
    This space is intentionally staring blankly at you
  87. Re:Only a PII? O RLY? by Chandon+Seldon · · Score: 1

    i'm not saying no fast processors should exist. I'm saying we should stop trying to convince the laymen that they actually need it. The amount of power that is wasted on higher performance cpus idling is enormous compared to what our technology could allow for.

    I value the innovative push higher than I value other people's money being spent on electricity. If at any point in the computer industry people had really, strongly decided to buy cheap processors instead of getting "top of the line" processors, progress would have slowed way down. People have been saying that "processors are way faster than what the average person needs" for 20 years now - and I think we can easily benefit from another 20 years at this rate of progress.

    It'd be like everyone driving hotrods since the extra HP is "nice to have."

    That's a horrible comparison. Other than racing, there is no task that can be done with a hotrod that can't be accomplished with a normal car. More relevently, I can't think of any task that's likely to become possible if a large chunk of the population owned hotrods that were twice as powerful as today's hotrods.

    With computers there are a number of applications that get really interesting when everyone has a 16 core Opteron and 1024-stream-processor GPGPU in their laptop.

    Not that I'm against low-power processors. If you can get a dual core processor in 2 watts, that means I can have a 64 core processor in less than 70 watts. =P

    --
    -- The act of censorship is always worse than whatever is being censored. Always.
  88. About the project in Uruguay by pflores2 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Hi! I am the mantainer of the blog referred in the article, http://olpc-ceibal.blogspot.com./ First of all, I'd like to invite you to see some pictures of the launching of the project in my last post (I decided to include some contents in english on the blog).

    I have seen many interesting comments here. Many of them are part of a discussion that exceeds uruguayan experience, as they are the technological apsects (using XO, Classmate, ITP-C...? using laptops or desktops...?), educational aspects (which contents to use, if all the children will be interested) and, obviously, economical aspects (is it worth spending so much money?... how much will the project really cost?). I just would like to make some comments:
    - Not only the educational aspects of the project have to be analyzed. The project also changes the "digital gap", taking into the information society many children and their families.
    - The technologies used are not as important as the agreements we have to do for using these technologies. License costs and their renewals, as well as intelectual properties of the contents generated must get up in the table.
    - The real effect of a project like this will not be seen in the next days, months, neither in a few years. Maybe in 10 years we will be able to start doing a comprehensive analysis of results. Now we are making "futurology", so it is normal having different views. What is important in this step is the conviction and honesty of stakeholders to try to make things as good as possible.

    Regards, Pablo Flores

    1. Re:About the project in Uruguay by cheros · · Score: 1

      Pablo, I wish your nation good luck with this project.

      I was saddened to see that even this charitable project got quickly buried in commercially driven politics - keep your eye on your goals and you should be fine.

      The cost of licensing and IP involved should feature very high in your project as that creates a time bomb under any economic benefit you may have, but NONE should feature so high as the "ability to tinker".

      You can't learn about car mechanics by just staring at the car and buying pre-manufactured 'black box' engines, ditto with IT. Open Systems are the only way to go here because you need to understand how things work first - breaking, fixing and changing things so they work for you is the best way for that.

      If you need to connect up with other nations going through the same process, I attended a conference at FLOSSPOLS once which had representatives there of the Spanish project in the Extremedura region of Spain. I strongly recommend you contact those Spanish people as they have created a whole infrastructure (i.e. also for business and government use). If you can't find details, contact the Ubuntu project (ubunto.com) instead. I know there have been talks so they should be able to point you in the right direction - and you can then also discuss their 'SchoolTools' project too!

      Good luck :-)

      --
      Insert .sig here. Send no money now. Owner may sue, contents will settle. Batteries not included.
  89. Re:Only a PII? O RLY? by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

    But sometimes we lose sight of the bigger picture. There was a push for faster computers before anyone had computers in the home. That wouldn't change as much if home users were buying the lower power cores. There is still enough business/academic push for fast computers.

    Part of the problem is the push for fast, or seemingly fast processors doesn't always go in one direction. Look at the P4. That was a leap backwards in technology. The AMD64 has been resting comfortably for far too long [though Barcelona seems to be changing that from what I hear].

    And really you should care about what others pay for electricity since it affects what you pay for it.

    Tom

    --
    Someday, I'll have a real sig.
  90. Re:I'm disgusted by AeiwiMaster · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm disgusted to see that you are wasting time on slashdot while there are still homeless people in places like Africa and America.
    You shouldn't spend *any* time on slashdot until all poverty is solved throughout the whole world.

    Fun aside.
    If the 14 people at OLPC uses there time on educating the childen of the world,
    then that is what they have chosen to do and not for you or everyone else to decide.

    If you would like to start the "one house per child" project then go ahead,
    don't wait for anyone to start it for you.

  91. specs ??? by goarilla · · Score: 1
    i was googling for specs and found out everyone was either wrong or the wiki is outdated

    Core electronics:
    * CPU: AMD Geode LX-700@0.8W
    * CPU clock speed: 433 MHz
    this comes from here http://wiki.laptop.org/wiki/Hardware_specification
    also amd seems to benchmark their systems with a plethora of common system utilities like SiSoft Sandra, Winbench, ...
    look here for more details http://www.amd.com/us-en/ConnectivitySolutions/Pro ductInformation/0,,50_2330_9863_13022%5E13072,00.h tml?redir=PCS10149ABC-04
    Although the benchmarks seem to be outlined relative to the geode line (previous models)
    it could be very well be that the LX-700's performance comes very close to a full-fledged athlon 700 ...
    anyway i want one the screen is really impressive
    1. Re:specs ??? by stardude82 · · Score: 1

      Minus fancy graphics and drives, that would put the performance of these guys at about original XBox levels.
      Which is interesting because neither Intel nor MS bitched about those being underpowered and useless. /I have a PII 450 laptop which runs XP and word just fine.

  92. Re:Only a PII? O RLY? by Chandon+Seldon · · Score: 1

    And really you should care about what others pay for electricity since it affects what you pay for it.

    Demand for electricity should only increase price in the short term, because it's reasonably easy to generate. The price is further constrained by the current "almost economical" status of photovoltaics. If anything, I want to see demand for electricity go up just so that electricity generation technology improves.

    --
    -- The act of censorship is always worse than whatever is being censored. Always.
  93. Some Updates by Acer500 · · Score: 1

    Some updates to the story:

    in response to being linked to by Slashdot the blog, the blogger has included some content in English

    and second, blogger Pablo Flores who was in the event, has published the pictures of the event in Picasa:

    http://picasaweb.google.es/pflores2/EntregaDeLapto psEnVillaCardal

    --
    There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics.
  94. Re:Only a PII? O RLY? by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

    You're an idiot. We're already demanding enough energy from our natural resources. We should be finding better ways to make due with less, not consume more. Solar cells are about 10-20% efficient and are not useful as a source of primary power only as a supplement.

    And the cost isn't temporary. I take it you don't pay rent or for your utilities. Electricity has been getting more expensive, not cheaper, over the years. Same with gasoline.

    Tom

    --
    Someday, I'll have a real sig.
  95. Re:I'm disgusted by ccp · · Score: 1

    Idi Amin was in Uganda, not Uraguay.

    That's in Africa, Uraguay is in South America.

    Uruguay, AoT, Ur u guay.

    Cheers,
    CC
  96. Re:Go by ccp · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Yep, we're 3rd world

    Not, you're not.

    Uruguay is a pretty decent small country, of rather modest means, but not Third World in any meaningful sense.

    Cheers from across the river,

    CC
  97. Re:Go by ggambett · · Score: 1

    I used to think so until I visited London for the first time last year :S

  98. Re:Go by ccp · · Score: 1

    I used to think so until I visited London for the first time last year :S

    And what does that mean? Being (a lot) poorer and kind of trapped in a time-warp doesn't make you Third World. Think Brigadoon, instead.

    And, just in case you're wondering, I went to London for the first time in 1978. ;>)

    Cheers,

    CC
  99. Re:I'm disgusted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Give it some time, and don't be surprised when your IT job gets offshored there in 10 years.

  100. Re:I'm disgusted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I lived in Uruguay for several years in the late 90's. The Uruguayans as a whole are very educated. The dictators there took over not because of ignorance, but because nobody was capable of resisting them. I spoke to many Uruguayans about that time period. The consensus was that those leading the military coup had guns. Those who wanted to resist did not. It's something I think about every time the 2nd amendment arguments come up. (no, I'm not a gun owner).

  101. Re: Better Translation - World Lingo by Al_Maverick · · Score: 1

    In that school they have a great education, but only the foreign kids really learn something. And the sports program is decent, but they play sports that no other schools play. j/k BTW, if it were named America, it wouldnt refer to the USA, since Uruguay is in America too, but you must already know that.

  102. Re:Only a PII? O RLY? by Chandon+Seldon · · Score: 1

    You're an idiot. We're already demanding enough energy from our natural resources.

    You're the idiot. We could easily be using ten times the electricity we're using today without seriously taxing the power generation techniques available to us right now. And our technology is only getting better. Sure, we're using our fossil fuels damn fast, but we have replacements - and technology only improves with time.

    We should be finding better ways to make due with less, not consume more.

    Conservation as a solution to our power problem is foolish and shortsighted. This is simple Economics 101 - there is a market price for electricity, and people will purchase it for their use if it is efficient for them to do so. Governments really shouldn't be subsidizing the use of fossil fuels - in fact they should probably be taxing to discourage usage because of environmental concerns - but there are other methods for generating power in the same price range that don't have those problems.

    Solar cells are about 10-20% efficient and are not useful as a source of primary power only as a supplement.

    Who cares how efficient they are at converting sunlight to energy? Having no solar cell is 0% efficient - 20% efficiency is a 100% improvement. As for "useful only as a supplement", that's bullshit. Power generated through photovoltaics has a price, and when that price is lower than the market price for grid power everyone will install photovoltaics. The difference is only like a factor of three - if the technology improves a bit, and the price of electricity increases a bit then we're there - and once that happens the price of electricity will only go down as the pv technology improves further.

    I take it you don't pay rent or for your utilities.

    Huh? Expenses are something you need to budget for - if you have a problem with that, get a job. Electricity, specifically, isn't expensive enough for me to worry about for any application but air conditioning. If it gets too expensive, I'll have to consider alternatives to electric air conditioning - that's ok.

    Electricity has been getting more expensive, not cheaper, over the years. Same with gasoline.

    If you adjust properly for inflation, this is mostly false. If the government screwed with the energy market less, they'd both probably cost half as much. But... instead they've outlawed safe nuclear, subsidized petroleum, outlawed small diesel cars (California did and 8 other states copied them), and allowed anticompeditive behavior around electric cars. Even so - if you have economic reason to, conserve. If you don't, conserving just keeps prices higher longer by allowing less capacity to be built.

    --
    -- The act of censorship is always worse than whatever is being censored. Always.
  103. Re:Go by Ngarrang · · Score: 1

    I can honestly say that not a one of my teachers in college taught me anything either new or useful about computers. I was self-taught on everything Windows, of which the University didn't teach ANYTHING on at that time (1989 to 1994). Sure, they taught me how to use an out-dated command line on a mainframe. Meh.

    No, I think the kids will do just fine. They will be teaching the teachers very shortly. The power of children is that their minds are not stuck with such ideas as "an expert required" to learn. And the kids will help each other learn. The adults would be well-advised to stay out of the way and not mess it up.

    --
    Bearded Dragon
  104. Re:Only a PII? O RLY? by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

    Where are you getting your "facts"? I seriously doubt any major city could use 10x the power and not run into any problems.

    As for why you can't use solar as your major source ... well first off, it's not reliable. You need to be able to produce a given level of energy consistently. Solar, wind, and other "eco" sources are only useful to supplement the grid.

    And there should be a market for eco friendly devices. We should encourage manufacturers for producing more efficient processes. In a way we do in the CPU world. Intel processors for instance, consume less energy than the previous generation. They're still inappropriate for most of the market. You're problem is you want everyone else to subsidize YOUR living conditions. Let others buy over-powered processors so you can get one cheap too, etc...

    But you keep thinking that we should consume more resources without end. And when electricity hits 50 cents per kWh, gasoline is 10$ a galon, etc, you can wonder what happened.

    Tom

    --
    Someday, I'll have a real sig.
  105. Re: Better Translation - World Lingo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course it'd actually be "The United States of America" but everyone there would just call it "America" because they'd *know* that they were the only ones who really mattered. Only 11% of them would be able to locate their school on an unmarked map and none of them would be able to find Uruguay.

  106. Re:Go by evilviper · · Score: 1

    Regards,
            E. Schrödinger

    Be quiet. After all, you're dead. I saw the box...
    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  107. The end of the beginning... by alex_vegas · · Score: 1

    OLPC is fantastic, and I am very, very happy to see the disenfranchised of the world finally getting a crack at using the most powerful labor saving device since the lever. However, it's important to note that this project is going to completely end both the dominance of software development by the US, and I would say possibly even proprietary software. Just think, bilions of children with little to do but kick cans around dirty, dangerous streets are now going to have extremely portable computers that they can write python programs on. Certainly, not every one of these kids is going to learn how to program, but having access will certainly mean that more will than would have otherwise. I'm college educated, and am currently pursuing a PhD. but I would argue that the real reason I've succeeded in academic affairs isn't due to any school system, but rather the fact that my father was educated, and I had access to his bookshelf and his Economist subscription when I was 7 years old. These kids are going to have complete access to one of the best-designed OS's the computer world has seen at the same age, and they're going to have equally little to do, and all the motivation for self-education that grinding poverty can provide. Not every one of these kids will turn into a kernel hacker, but enough are that this is going to be absolutely beautiful. Of course, if you're planning on making $100k a year writing crummy .NET apps for the next 3 decades, things might be looking a little dodgy in a year and a half, but if you lament the dumbing down of the average human's interactions with the bare metal brought on by GUIs, and want to see lots of good free code out there, this is fantastic. I saw someone griping that these decks don't have the CPU to run office. Who cares, if you want to produce professional looking documents, get LaTeX going and write a freaking book....Forget about web 2.0, when this project comes to fruition in 15 years we're going to be seeing an absolutely glorious technical renaissance. I just hope they don't all decide to DDoS Estonia...

    1. Re:The end of the beginning... by alex_vegas · · Score: 1

      meant to say decade and a half about the stuff really hitting the fan for the average code monkey, not year and a half

  108. Yes! by crhylove · · Score: 1

    I for one welcome our new Uruguayan child overlords.

    --
    I hold very few opinions. I hold information based on observation and fact. If you wish to disagree, please use facts.
  109. Re: Better Translation - World Lingo by jamarsa · · Score: 1

    Just one small correction: where it reads 'who did not hope...', should be: 'who did not wait'. This is a minor mistake in the double use of 'esperar' meaning 'to hope', 'anticipate', and the other of 'to wait for'. As for the rest, very good translation!

  110. Re:Only a PII? O RLY? by Chandon+Seldon · · Score: 1

    I seriously doubt any major city could use 10x the power and not run into any problems.

    Sure, we can't get there immediately. We'd need to build the extra generating capacity - hopefully using modern power generation techniques.

    As for why you can't use solar as your major source ... well first off, it's not reliable. You need to be able to produce a given level of energy consistently.

    That depends entirely on how good power storage is. With the cost & quality of batteries today and the current cost of electricity, you're right - it's most effective to use solar to supplement grid power. But, as I've said three times now, if electricity prices increase we will quickly get to the point where buying the solar panels and batteries is cheaper than buying grid power. And, both photovoltaic and battery technologies are rapidly improving.

    Solar, wind, and other "eco" sources are only useful to supplement the grid.

    That's a ridiculous overgeneralization. Lumping together the "eco sources" is silly. Solar and wind both have inconsistency issues at an "hours" time scale, but their inconsistencies aren't linked, and with enough energy storage for "days" it tends to average out. Hydropower and Tidal are excellent base load sources, but we're already using all our hydropower resources and haven't put much effort into tidal. Geothermal provides excellent base load, but it's probably not really a renewable resource.

    In any case, I'll come back to my central point about solar power. The solar panels and batteries commonly available on the open market can be used to build a reliable power generation system - the electricity cost of that system is a hard cap on future rising electricity prices.

    They're still inappropriate for most of the market.

    The neat thing about markets is that the *buyer* gets to decide what's most appropriate for them. Happily, in the CPU market, the buyers have decided to buy what's new and consistently push processor power for the past 20 years. Sacrificing that rate of progress for a little bit of power conservation would be a horrible economic decision for a central manager - luckily our economy mostly doesn't have one.

    But you keep thinking that we should consume more resources without end. And when electricity hits 50 cents per kWh, gasoline is 10$ a galon, etc, you can wonder what happened.

    The solar panel / battery hard cap is a bit less than 50 cents / kwh - so I'll never have to pay that price for longer than it takes to install the PV system. As for $10/gallon gas, I'm ready - I'll have to change my driving habits a bit, but my Prius is pretty good on gas.

    --
    -- The act of censorship is always worse than whatever is being censored. Always.