Slashdot Mirror


Battlestar Galactica To Continue After All

turboflux writes "According to executive producer David Eick, Battlestar Galactica is still an open-ended adventure and it will not be ending after the 4th season as previously reported. Evidently Edward James Olmos jumped the gun on confirming the show would be ending while attending the Saturn Awards this month. Eick goes on to say that the fourth season would actually be 22 episodes (2 more than prior seasons) rather than the reported 13 episode order."

223 comments

  1. Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I take back all I said yesterday

    1. Re:Hmm by Kagura · · Score: 1

      We'll never forgive you

    2. Re:Hmm by The+Great+Pretender · · Score: 1

      I still stand by everything I said yesterday. As much as I love the show, I really wish they had just closed it a good conclusive season and moved on to the next project.

      --
      A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort.
  2. Wooohooo!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's hope the 5th BSG season will become as great and necessary as the 5th season of Andromeda.

    Dammit... the 4th season is supposed to be aired in January 2008 and I already have almost given up on BSG because of this article..

  3. Battlestar Craptastica by astrotek · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If the extra episodes are just more of the filler crap they had last season then I wont be watching. Battlestar is a good show when they are actually trying to tell a story. Filler like Black Market sucked. At least Lost had the balls to say the show ends in 48 episodes. If Battlestar keeps the season format they had last season you only need to watch the first 3 and last 3 episodes because everything in the middle isnt related to the story at all.

    Yes I liked the show but the drama crap and all the story rewrites to try to find a new audience is pissing me off.

    1. Re:Battlestar Craptastica by Kjella · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It's not a "drama rewrite", it's that the basic premise is extremely limiting. It's about the Battlestar Galactica carrying the last survivors, and they're being chased by Cylons. There's is no BSG (the series) without the BSG (the ship) or the Cylons. You can't make a "BSG: The Next Generation" because it's not a stable universe, it's a tale of that one ship. You can't add new races, it's not an open universe like Stargete with a colorful selection of races. There's just this chase, these players and the ultimate outcomes are roughly:

      1) The Cylons destroys the BSG
      2) The BSG destroys the Cylons
      3) The Cylons leave the BSG and humanity alone
      4) They end up in a fairytale peace
      5) They find earth and earth kicks the Cylon's ass

      In any case, it's pretty much the end of the story which means they can't actually come to a showdown. They've tried every variation of tangling them together with both sides coming out alive but it gets old. I mean the Cylons must be very close to the prize for most indecisive killers in history. So what can you do if you can't have them actually clash in a meaningful way? Well, you get all the tedium of being on the run. Resource shortages, black markets, equipment failure, insurgents and sabotage, Adama's "keep us going at all cost" attitude, a few skirmishes and mourning a few fighter pilots here and there and some religious search for the way but there's no real dynamic in the show. The basic premise is exactly the same as it was in episode one. They're the BSG, and they're being chased by Cylons, looking for Earth.

      BSG is a show standing still. The only difference is that as of late it's been bad drama instead of good drama.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    2. Re:Battlestar Craptastica by Baron_Yam · · Score: 1

      I gave up on Galactica in the episode where Starbuck inexplicably started diving into a gas giant. Of course, I'd fast-forwarded through the Caprica scenes of season one, and entirely skipped a few of the recent filler episodes.

      I was just about to start watching again (despite a friend revealing to me the recent stupid season-ender) with the hope that season four being the final season would result in some direction to the lost show.

      An announcement that this actually WON'T be the last season is something I greet with disappointment.

    3. Re:Battlestar Craptastica by Aladrin · · Score: 1

      I take your point, but you've missed 1 thing: BSG kicks Cylon ass and THINKS they've won. You think a race made entirely of computers doesn't know to make backups? If BSG hits them hard enough, it'd take an entire generation of humans to get Cylon culture running again. But when they came back, they'd be more powerful than ever, and the human race would be weak from just trying to survive and the petty squabbling that humans do when they have no outside enemies.

      --
      "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
    4. Re:Battlestar Craptastica by deblau · · Score: 4, Funny
      You missed an outcome:

      6) They find earth, the Cylons kick earth's ass, but Adama and the BSG crew head through the Stargate to the Alpha Site to begin construction on another Battlestar. O'Neill, Thor, and Oma Desala get cameos.

      Hey, it could happen.

      --
      This post expresses my opinion, not that of my employer. And yes, IAAL.
    5. Re:Battlestar Craptastica by ferat · · Score: 1

      I take it you haven't heard that lost was renewed for 4 more years?

    6. Re:Battlestar Craptastica by solitas · · Score: 1

      Have you ever read TWOP's recaps of BG?
      http://www.televisionwithoutpity.com/articles/cate gory_1188.html

      I follow BG, Heroes, Lost, Dr.Who, and Gilmore Girls (for balance) on TWOP and the recaps are equal-to or better-than the episodes. (and fater to get-through)

      --
      "It's time to take life by the cans." ~ Bender ("Bendin' in the Wind", ep. 3-13)
    7. Re:Battlestar Craptastica by Okonomiyaki · · Score: 1

      Your #5 doesn't work. The timeline of the establishment of the 13th colony and our own understanding of our species' history on earth has the Galactica arriving on earth when humans are still quite primitive.

    8. Re:Battlestar Craptastica by Mathness · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If you look at some of the setting of the series, particular the pilot and first season, you will find that there are hint to where the humans are from and thier ancient history. Taken that with the sparse information we have about the cylons, I think this is the most likely ending;

      6) Earth is the home planet of the cylons (and it is the source of the human models.)

      Depending how it is on earth, you can have the series continue after BSG finds earth, since finding it only closes one major plot (and please do it in season 4, no more stupid fluff fillers).

      --
      Carbon based humanoid in training.
    9. Re:Battlestar Craptastica by dn15 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      "Funny" would be a much more appropriate rating for the parent than "interesting". Someone with mod points is a little confused. :)

    10. Re:Battlestar Craptastica by kimvette · · Score: 3, Funny

      There's is no BSG (the series) without the BSG (the ship) or the Cylons. You can't make a "BSG: The Next Generation" because it's not a stable universe, it's a tale of that one ship.


      My god, you have no imagination.

      Imagine this: Galactica 2010. Galactica reaches earth, and a small scouting party go to Earth to learn about the culture and try to find a place to live. They have cheesy flying motorcycles and the children have superhuman jumping ability. In the last shows of that series, Starbuck, who was presumed dead in the current series, will be found to not have died, but to have crashed on a Cylon-occupied world, and in his effort to survive, repairs and befriends a cylon (maybe they can become mates, who knows?). It'd be a great show! Really!

      What? That's been done before? Shit!
      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    11. Re:Battlestar Craptastica by PyroMosh · · Score: 1

      That's internet conjuncture. There's absolutly nothing in the new BSG that supports that claim.

      Seriously, the 12 colonies have existed for something like 4000 years. The Earth Colony left Kobol before the final 12 IIRC. But there's no way of knowing if the events that occur durring the BSG Exodus occur durring earth year 2000 BC, or earth year 3000 AD. At least until BSG gets there, or Starbuck reports back...

    12. Re:Battlestar Craptastica by kalidasa · · Score: 4, Funny

      Galactica 2010. Galactica reaches earth, and a small scouting party go to Earth to learn about the culture and try to find a place to live. They have cheesy flying motorcycles

      LA LA LA LA LA LA LA LA LA LA LA LA LA ...

      (And you younglings think George Lucas raped YOUR childhoods - at least he waited sixteen years; Glen Larson only waited nine months.)

    13. Re:Battlestar Craptastica by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      crapstastica is spot on. This is the worst excuse for sci-fi that I have ever seen, and it's so unforutnate it's going to contine. I did not get past season 1 it's so bad.

      As per the other thread, the jerky camera technique is a pain in the *ss! The actors are so hammy I think their going to 'oink' any second. Boomer is like Bambi as a serial murderer, and Starbuck cannot be a woman!

    14. Re:Battlestar Craptastica by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You people are forgetting the most obvious conclusion to the series. I came to this right after the pilot movies.

      You see, kobal wasn't the home of the human race. It was a planet colonized by seeder ships from Earth thousands of years ago. We'll call humans from Earth humans 1.0 and the seeded humans, humans 2.0. Well humans 2.0 build a civilization apart from human 1.0 on Earth. Mean while humans 1.0 are carefully watching over humans 2.0 from a distance. When human 2.0 are threatened by a natural disaster humans 1.0 guide human 2.0 to safety at the new colonies. This is where the names of the ancient gods came into play.

      During all this or before this the humans on Earth, humans 1.0, underwent a vorlon like transformation and became humans 3.0. Now the new humans 3.0 decided that after they had lead humans 2.0 to safety it was time for human 2.0 to live on their own. So humans 3.0 left humans 2.0 to fend for themselves.

      Now when human 2.0 reach Earth followed by the Cylons they will find a civilization so far in advanced that they can barely comprehend them. Humans 3.0 will simply tell them there is nothing for them at Earth and they cannot interfere in their affaires. They will send humans 2.0 to their fate.

      As for the thirteenth tribe, they didn't go discover Earth, they just went home.

      --

      Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

    15. Re:Battlestar Craptastica by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's exactly the problem. The story has a finite end, and the show's producers are doing their best to avoid it. At any cost. There is no such thing as "good irrelevant drama". What happened to all the good action scenes and real conflict that served to make the first season so compelling? The audience is beyond caring about Emostar Galactica. The audience wants to see *what happens*. That means choosing one of the resolutions you listed above and producing the necessary episode(s). Otherwise we are stuck with Star Trek Voyager 2. Remember how that series went? Years of going nowhere with the main plot, getting sidetracked continually by episodic side plots, and in the end, deus ex machina -- nothing that happened during the course of the series had any bearing to how the series ended. If I had bothered to follow that series, as I have been following BSG, I'd be mad. Fortunately Voyager was just background noise for me. Do you really think it would be good for BSG to get dragged out the same way? Then when the ratings are absolutely in the dumps and the network cancels the show, a time-traveling Adama goes back to prevent the Cylon war before it even happens?

    16. Re:Battlestar Craptastica by aftermath09 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      naww, I think the best BSG has always been about what makes us human and what seperates them from the cylons. it's not really about the end game. unfortunately, I think the last season has had too many "filler" episodes that just didn't have the hard edge of the first two seasons. Plot threads like the crazy admiral (Michelle Forbes) and Adama wanting to assassinate each other were incredible and entertaining. it also doesn't help that they keep putting in these 6-8 month breaks!

    17. Re:Battlestar Craptastica by Gravatron · · Score: 1

      7) They arrive on earth to find it at the very start of the great crusade. Forced into the Imperial Navy, they turn around and pursue the cylons back to their homeworld. Defining moments are when Adama orders the Exterminatus against the cylon homeworld and when a human cylon craps a brick at seeing a space marine with a chainsword. After all, you could always say that the cylons had been worshiping the void dragon or the Machine god in the end.

    18. Re:Battlestar Craptastica by jotok · · Score: 3, Funny

      Nah. I hear they're going to do a spinoff focusing on the zany adventures of one of the private freighters in the fleet and its wisecracking crew. They're going to run dubious cargos and take on odd jobs, all while staying just one step ahead of the Colonials and the Cylons. The tentative title is "Lightning Bug."

    19. Re:Battlestar Craptastica by FFFish · · Score: 1

      Ok, so it happens my wife and I have just started watching BSD for the first time, renting the DVDs (it's cheaper than the time wasted dicking about getting torrents). We've seen perhaps a half-dozen episodes so far, quite liking it.

      When should we stop watching the series?

      --

      --
      Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
    20. Re:Battlestar Craptastica by Eclipse-now · · Score: 1

      My god, you have no imagination. Imagine this: Galactica 2010. Galactica reaches earth, and a small scouting party go to Earth to learn about the culture and try to find a place to live. They have cheesy flying motorcycles and the children have superhuman jumping ability. In the last shows of that series, Starbuck, who was presumed dead in the current series, will be found to not have died, but to have crashed on a Cylon-occupied world, and in his effort to survive, repairs and befriends a cylon (maybe they can become mates, who knows?). It'd be a great show! Really!
      You mean -- after all that -- Starbuck was actually a MAN!!!???? So what was with that creepy Cylon "prophet" guy that kept seeing them together? What was with him kidnapping a "human youngling" just to get a kiss of Starbuck? And what was that brief thing between Gaius Baltar and Starbuck?????? (Baaaarrrrffff)
    21. Re:Battlestar Craptastica by Snaller · · Score: 1

      "You can't add new races,"

      Sure you could. They have just chosen not to. (The original series had other races)

      They have chosen to stay static, but they could have changed it infinitely more. It doesn't matter if the title ends up being irrelevant if there are millions of adoring fans.

      If the story takes place in our future, they could find a superior earth who had spread among the stars as well - with big fleets to fight the cylons. They could meet other races who take sides with the humans, and some who might side with the cylons.

      Millions of roads not taken, for the sake of falling asleep on this one.

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
    22. Re:Battlestar Craptastica by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I really like Battlestar Galactica and all of the actors in the series. Battlestar Galactica is different from all the other SCFI series now running. I hope it runs for at least 5 more seasons. If the people that wrote in that they don't like some of the shows in the series well just watch another show.

    23. Re:Battlestar Craptastica by MrNiceguy_KS · · Score: 1
      8) Human fleet arrives on present-day earth with the Cylons right behind them. The human race faces complete annihilation from a well-armed machine race when a cable company engineer and a fighter pilot go to Area 51, discover that the U.S. government has a Raider they've been keeping hidden for decades, fly it into a Base Ship, and use a MacBook Pro to upload a computer virus.

      9) Human fleet arrives on present-day earth with the Cylons right behind them. The human race faces complete annihilation from a well-armed machine race when one of the Centurions accidentally installs a Free Upgrade to Windows Vista. It quickly spreads throughout the Cylon network, slowing things to a crawl. The Cylons last thoughts are, "You are attempting to exterminate humanity. Confirm or Deny?" when they are obliterated by thermonuclear weapons launched by Microsoft's Genuine Advantage Enforcement Division.

      --
      Redundancy is good And also good.
    24. Re:Battlestar Craptastica by Belgand · · Score: 1

      How about the one where they arrive in 2007 and due to an amusing mix-up believe that Starbuck is a goddess on our planet: loved and praised by some with many, many temples devoted to her worship, yet loathed and hated by others who decry the vast growth of her temples into their neighborhoods.

    25. Re:Battlestar Craptastica by elrous0 · · Score: 1
      It amazes me that Ronald Moore was smart enough to create the brilliant miniseries and 1st season and yet so stupid as to think it can just continue indefinitely, or support 22-episode seasons without the quality suffering (it already is, and they're only in the 3rd season).

      Put it to rest next season, Ron. Put it to rest before it becomes the next Lost or Simpsons.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    26. Re:Battlestar Craptastica by jollyreaper · · Score: 1

      Agreed. With the premise BSG is founded on, it needs a solid beginning, middle, and end. It's more akin to an miniseries than traditional episodic television. And the worst crime of all is that the writers have no idea where they're going. This is not speculation, the show's creator said so. Compare this with Babylon 5. The story had some rough points, certain parts needed rewritten to take into account real world problems with actors, money, studio suits, etc, but overall that bastard holds up magnificently. Plot points laid out in the first season were paid off in the third and fourth and not due to sloppy retconning, it was scripted from the start. With BSG you end up with ridiculous facts introduced that should have been character-defining for the entire series. The worst offender here, Adama feeling guilt over having started the Cylon war. For those of you who didn't see it, they show Adama having commanded a battlestar before the Galactica and was in charge of sending a recon mission into Cylon space. They lost the pilot and couldn't be sure he was destroyed by Cylons but, seeing as there are only humans and cylons in space, he could draw a safe conclusion. Now this is supposed to be eating him up inside and we only ever heard of this now? That's called bad writing.

      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
  4. As if it wasn't overstreched already... by trenien · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Bad news.

    They're going to try to milk it way after its expiration date.

    And here I was with such great hopes after the last finale.

    1. Re:As if it wasn't overstreched already... by samkass · · Score: 1

      Agreed... this is the same problem that Babylon 5 suffered from. If they had either decided up-front that it would end early, or wouldn't, they could have properly paced the last two seasons. As it was, the last season was essentially useless.

      I say end it and start a new series/plotline if they're willing to keep funding it. It worked pretty well for ST:DSN.

      --
      E pluribus unum
    2. Re:As if it wasn't overstreched already... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not convinced. I remember Sega claiming up and down that the Dreamcast was not being discontinued... about a week before it was discontinued.

    3. Re:As if it wasn't overstreched already... by kennygraham · · Score: 1

      Even worse than Babylon 5 was the last season of Earth: Final Conflict. It should never have existed. You can't have E:FC without talons.

    4. Re:As if it wasn't overstreched already... by jollyreaper · · Score: 1

      That's actually a good idea, one that I haven't seen shows take. A good show should run the main storyline for a season or two, maybe three if it is exceptionally good. After that, there should be a major shakeup. For a show like Trek it would be a simple crew rotation, same ship but maybe 75% turnover of the characters. You keep the ones who are enjoying their work on the show, let go the ones who want to move on, but keep it on good terms so they can always come back as guest stars. For a show like BSG, you need to get to Earth or end the Cylon war or do something by season 3. From that point, the writers can start exploring different sets of characters. Want an example of this? Think Doonsbury. That strip has gone on for decades and never gets stale. Why? Because there's always time to let the characters rest! Nothing but Duke strips for five years would get stale. But if Trudeau can let the character sit until he has an idea worth bringing him back for, then it remains fresh.

      This is admittedly harder to do with live action since all the actors need to eat, it's hard to have them cool their heels, put all these elaborate sets in storage, etc, while taking a several episode jag off to cover another group of characters. Animation would fit the bill perfectly. If you look at the credits on any show, one actor usually plays multiple characters. You can keep your whole production staff together and happy while jumping around the story universe looking at where your favorite characters have gone, adding new ones, etc. And all of this can still be done under the name of the main show, no spin-offs or anything. It helps keep everything fresh, new ideas always coming in.

      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
  5. excellent by wwmedia · · Score: 1

    thank god! remember enterpise got canceled in 4th season and that was its best season yet galactica is an order magnitude better with so many loose ends to tie that itll take them years to wrap it ll up also remeber that unlike star trek they managed to have 3 seasons so far without any timetravelling episodes :)

    1. Re:excellent by mustard · · Score: 3, Funny

      Please. I got tired of Enterprise when they did more time traveling than Doctor Who!

    2. Re:excellent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Just you wait until Doctor Who really gets going.. i hear in future episodes hes going to explore far away worlds like London & Cardiff in the past and present.

    3. Re:excellent by CycoChuck · · Score: 1

      It was a good thing that Enterprise was canceled when it was. I only wish it was sooner. The inconsistency with established times lines from the other series and the fact that they explained it all with time travelers is a joke. That show should of died at episode 3 when I stopped watching.

      As for BSG, it is a story that has already been written out. Just look at the previous version. Unless the writers do something more creative than put skin on Cylons then the show is going to end next season or the season after that.

      --
      Windows is as solid as quicksand.
  6. Good, now just go back to blowin shit up, dammit! by LibertineR · · Score: 0, Redundant
    No more soap opera garbage.

    Time for Adama to bone the Pres, or END IT.

    No more Adama father-son drama.

    More catfights!

    How about a Cylon actually WINNING a dogfight?

    Except for Exodus part two, I could barely watch season 3. Amazing that the best-ever episode comes in the worst-ever season.

    FIX IT!

  7. I quit BSG when they cured the president's by caeili+draziw · · Score: 4, Interesting

    cancer with the magic cylon juice.

    1. Re:I quit BSG when they cured the president's by Zastai · · Score: 2, Funny

      Her cancer's back, so it's safe to watch again!

      --
      When all other methods of communication fail, try words.
    2. Re:I quit BSG when they cured the president's by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 5, Funny

      I don't have a problem with a Cylon based cure. It would have been more interesting to have the president need to eat Cylon fetus periodically to stay alive. Then there would always be an edgy back story about her looking for her next fix.

    3. Re:I quit BSG when they cured the president's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about the virus episode where they connect 2 computers together using a network cable and the cylons are still able to hack in? Or the thing where cylons are able to jack into computer systems by plugging fibre optic cables into their veins.

      The mini-series was good, the rest was just shark jumping.

    4. Re:I quit BSG when they cured the president's by chris_eineke · · Score: 1

      WARNING! SPOILER ahead!
      WARNING! SPOILER ahead!
      WARNING! SPOILER ahead!

      In the end, it didn't help.

      --
      "All you have to do is be fragile and grateful. So stay the underdog." Chuck Palahniuk, Choke
    5. Re:I quit BSG when they cured the president's by hidannik · · Score: 1

      But then you'd have to get rid of the president when the Hack-Man catches her. You'd have to eject her into space in a two-dimensional rectangular prison.

      Great. Just when everything's going smooth, she gets turned into more of a two-dimensional character than she already is, and a square to boot. What she really needs is to be taken in for re-grooving.

  8. Triumph of Commercialism over Content by theolein · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    In the true spirit of the RIAA, MPAA and other *AAs, where the notable inability of overpaid executives to tell between a good story and a one that simply makes lots of money (Hi Hollywood, you listening?) resulting in thousands of superficial shows with the same mindless plots and heavy application of special CGI effects, all based on a blockbuster two decades ago (actually three, but still).

    When audiences get tired of spending their dollars on this, the *AAs then get on their high horse and accuse almost everyone from consumers to vague thirld world nations of piracy and "stealing their profits".

    If Battlestar Galactica, which was, up until now, a fantastic show, but which was really starting to show warning signs of producer self overestimation and ego growth in the last series with the drop off over the edge into the supernatural, I sadly suspect that the next series will only get worse if the producers are not under pressure to produce a good finale to the show.

    In English there is a saying: "too much of a good thing."

    1. Re:Triumph of Commercialism over Content by BRUTICUS · · Score: 1

      Did anything actually happen last season after the first 2 episodes? Nothing that I remember. I was hoping hey would end it, tht way atleast i'd know something interesing was going to happen and not waste my time like last season.

    2. Re:Triumph of Commercialism over Content by Prune · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the last episode happened. It was the best of the series (I also enjoyed the Baltar trial a lot).

      --
      "Politicians and diapers must be changed often, and for the same reason."
    3. Re:Triumph of Commercialism over Content by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      then get on their high horse

      Well, the tone of your post certainly demonstrates deep experience with being on a high horse. Get over yourself.

      over the edge into the supernatural,

      What supernatural?

      Are there any genre fans left who can't just watch a show and get on with their lives afterwards? Does everything need a treatise? There's more important things going on.

    4. Re:Triumph of Commercialism over Content by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      where the notable inability of overpaid executives to tell between a good story and a one that simply makes lots of money

      If their only concern was to make money, then I'd say they accomplished their goal.

    5. Re:Triumph of Commercialism over Content by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      In English there is a saying: "too much of a good thing."

      I think you mean "point of diminishing returns."

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    6. Re:Triumph of Commercialism over Content by theolein · · Score: 1

      Fuck off chicken shit

  9. Re:I'm sure this will upset people but please end by syousef · · Score: 1

    Sorry all but the first 2 lines refer to the new Galactica. Old one just died because it got corny.

    --
    These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
  10. Re:I'm sure this will upset people but please end by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    God you're a fucking lame ass. Probably a fag, too.

  11. Hopefully things will continue to turn around by gmart · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The writers boxed themselves into a void in the last season. The cylons as evil killing machines with the capacity to be anyone as a sleeper agent, that was good television--even at times good social/political commentary. The best sci-fi works on all of these levels. So, bringing back the chase and eliminating the soap opera narratives will bring the show back. I don't think they've jumped the shark quite yet.

    1. Re:Hopefully things will continue to turn around by TheRaven64 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Right now, the Cylons seem not to have any motivation. They wanted to eliminate humanity because, after the last war, they saw it as an 'us or them' situation in the long run, and decided in favour of their own survival. A perfectly logical (if somewhat cold) decision for a civilisation to make.

      Now, they want to find Earth because...? They don't seem to consider destroying the Galactica a priority anymore, which is fine. It's not really a threat, and by the time it is even in the position to form a self-sustaining colony the Cylons could have spread out over hundreds of systems. Their growth rate is exponential, and they have a significant head-start on the humans now they've destroyed the twelve colonies. It doesn't seem likely that humanity could ever threaten more than a few percent of the Cylon race again.

      But, they want to find Earth. Because, uh, actually, I have no idea. I'm not sure that the writers do either. The Cylons just aren't a believable enemy unless they have some motivation for their actions, and right now they don't seem to. Maybe it will be revealed later, but I don't hold out much hope.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    2. Re:Hopefully things will continue to turn around by gnarled · · Score: 1

      The show's been on a decline, but I'd have to say it officially jumped the shark when four characters simultaneously started singing "All Along the Watch Tower." Good song, idiotic way for people to find out they're Cylons.

      --
      I'm a firm believer in the philosophy of a ruling class. Especially since I rule. -Randal, Clerks
    3. Re:Hopefully things will continue to turn around by chris_eineke · · Score: 1

      the Cylons could have spread out over hundreds of systems. Their growth rate is exponential, [...]
      Kekekekekekekekekeke ^_^
      --
      "All you have to do is be fragile and grateful. So stay the underdog." Chuck Palahniuk, Choke
    4. Re:Hopefully things will continue to turn around by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You might have forgotten, since it's been around for a while: The cylons are on a crusade, they want to bring God to all the heathen humans, thereby granting peace to all. (Ha!)

    5. Re:Hopefully things will continue to turn around by _xeno_ · · Score: 4, Informative

      But, they want to find Earth. Because, uh, actually, I have no idea. I'm not sure that the writers do either.

      During the first season commentary, the producers explain that the entire bit on Caprica was basically done because it was cool. The producer who came up with it (I can't remember which one) had no idea where it was going or why Sharon showed up again on Caprica, he just "thought it would be cool." As the story progressed, they eventually hit on the idea of Cylons trying to procreate, which has never really been well explained.

      So, yes, I expect you're completely correct - the writers are doing this by the seat of their pants and have no idea where it's going either. The Cylons may have a plan, I just wish they'd share it with the writers...

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little relative jumps, all alike.
    6. Re:Hopefully things will continue to turn around by GauteL · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "But, they want to find Earth. Because, uh, actually, I have no idea."

      Because they want to wipe out ALL of humanity and not just the other colonies? They are afraid that if they don't chase down earth and get rid of all humans, it will come back to haunt them?

      If this is the case, it makes perfect sense to just follow Galactica until they've found earth and then kill everyone.

    7. Re:Hopefully things will continue to turn around by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      slashdot needs a "you're a fucking moron for using the jump-the-shark phrase" mod

    8. Re:Hopefully things will continue to turn around by smallpaul · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The Cylons are religious and religion doesn't have to make sense.

    9. Re:Hopefully things will continue to turn around by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The cyclon plan - keep the series going so they make a self indulgent navel gazing episode 200 a la stargate sg1

    10. Re:Hopefully things will continue to turn around by Yusaku+Godai · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, in several of the commentaries and in some interviews, Ron Moore has said that they have the end-game for the series already mapped out. Now, I don't know to what detail they've mapped it out, or if they really have a way to tie together *every* plot point.

      But even if there are some things they make up as they go along to fill episodes (and I for one have nothing against that, as it's good material and does at least seem to be going somewhere) I don't think it's nearly as "seat of the pants" as something like Lost or The X-Files. I think that when they start any major plot thread they do sit down for a long while in the writer's room and try to figure out where they'll go with it.

    11. Re:Hopefully things will continue to turn around by Magada · · Score: 1

      You know, this is what has made the show enjoyable for me... Thinking of Adama and the president as walking around with this suspicion in their heads, but not daring tell anyone (including each other)... High drama indeed.

      --
      Something bad is coming when people are suddenly anxious to tell the truth.
  12. Re:Good, now just go back to blowin shit up, dammi by Opportunist · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You ARE aware that a Cylon winning a dogfight would lead to at least 10 episodes of mourning, griefing and goth-like navel contemplation, yes?

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  13. Totally offtopic I know... by arcite · · Score: 1
    But I just rented the first season of ROME...wow. I was missing out on something awesome.

    This show has it all, story arches, developed and complex characters, great sets and special effects for Rome & battle scenes.

    I really don't care how historically accurate the show is, it has a certain pulse and it works.

    Most importantly, like all HBO productions it has a kick ass PLOT.

    Granted, the requisite T&A per episode is always welcome, as is the (suitably) somewhat gratuitous violence on occasion (sword through the head anyone?). :)

    1. Re:Totally offtopic I know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I got Showtime free with my internet. Ended up being pretty dope. Weeds is just off the wall, unbelievably subversive. 12 yo kid gets taken to an asian massage parlor by cool uncle, cries for handjob. That's Aristocrats level humor there. Penn and Teller's Bullshit has fallen off, but you can't argue with their mission to include gratuitious nudity where possible. The Tudors in HD no less, is "plot plot plot gratuitious soft core porn plot." This American Life, Dexter, all decent. To say nothing of how I miss Dead Like Me.

  14. Terrorism in space by Opportunist · · Score: 3, Interesting

    That's when I hit the power button on my control, when I realized that this is where it's going. Cylons looking like humans, everyone could be one, general distrust and the felt backstab-threat... Sounds familiar?

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:Terrorism in space by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      It took something like five seasons for you to realise that? I had the original pilot movie out on DVD rental. Even then it should have been transparent to anyone with one eye and half a brain that it was a product (and reflection) of American society's post-9/11 neurosis about terrorism and religious fundamentalists.

      Anyway, I didn't enjoy watching this, and stopped before I got to the end. Aside from find it somewhat depressing, part of the problem is that it specifically reflected American society, and not being from there it didn't speak to me personally. I could see the psychology behind it, but it wasn't mine.

      It's a problem with sci-fi in general; when it reflects society, it's generally American society. The aliens are generally metaphors for other human cultures, but are nevertheless portrayed aliens, as seen from an Earth (i.e. U.S.) perspective. Fundamentally, Babylon 5 (which I was quite a fan of at the time) is the same.

      Of course, big-budget sci-fi generally costs a lot of money and has to please its largest market. That's understandable from a commercial point-of-view, and they're free to do this; it just doesn't resonate that much with me. Actually, I don't think it's the idea of American sci-fi I hate per se; rather it's that sci-fi is generally American by default. That, and the genre's predilection for cheesy dialogue, wooden acting and visual cliches. I could fill another post with that though :-6

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    2. Re:Terrorism in space by Alaria+Phrozen · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes, they've openly acknowledged that Battlestar Galactica is much more resonant post 9/11. "Science Fiction" isn't about good science ("The Singularity is about to explode! Weapons to maximum!"), and it really only uses fiction as an allegory for present day, very nonfiction concepts and events.

    3. Re:Terrorism in space by ClosedSource · · Score: 1

      I can see how you might not be able to relate to it if you don't live in the US or other country affected by terrorism. Nevertheless, BG doesn't take a pure pro-US position, but rather tweaks people in the US a lot. When the Cylons are occupying New Caprica, the humans are referred to as insurgents. Some of the humans are involved in suicide bombings. BG forces you to consider both sides of these issues.

      Of course, the war in Iraq is at least as important as 9/11 in shaping these analogies.

    4. Re:Terrorism in space by Kjella · · Score: 1

      That's when I hit the power button on my control, when I realized that this is where it's going. Cylons looking like humans, everyone could be one, general distrust and the felt backstab-threat... Sounds familiar?

      Yes, well more than a few have pointed to Star Trek having parallels to the Cold War. It's certainly possible to make some good commentary out of that, if done right. Or just a cheap trick since it's a current subject to many Americans, take your pick. I'm not so sure I've seen all that much insight, but disqualifing them before they had tried was certainly premature.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    5. Re:Terrorism in space by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      I can see how you might not be able to relate to it if you don't live in the US or other country affected by terrorism. I live in the UK, which most certainly *is* a country that has been affected by terrorism. Nothing remotely on the scale of 9/11, but I'm sure that you're aware of the July 7 London bombings and other significant failed attempts.

      I'm sure you're also aware of the many IRA bombings from the 1970s onwards. In one notable attempt, the IRA directly attempted to kill senior members of the British government (including the Prime Minister, Margaret Thatcher), and came very close to succeeding. It's interesting to speculate on what the US response would be to a similarly-close attack on senior government figures... and the effect on diplomacy if the UK government were as permissive towards that organisation as the US was towards the IRA, even after the Brighton bombing.

      In short, please spare me the lecture. I may not have been personally affected by terrorism, but neither have 99.9% of Americans.

      Nevertheless, BG doesn't take a pure pro-US position, but rather tweaks people in the US a lot. I didn't say it took a pure pro-US position, I said that it reflected US concerns. And I was specifically talking about the pilot movie, as I haven't seen the rest of it.

      Of course, the war in Iraq is at least as important as 9/11 in shaping these analogies. Perhaps, but the introductory movie I was discussing only went out in late-2003, before Iraq had got into the state it is now, and I suspect the original outline and story arcs were created earlier than that.
      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    6. Re:Terrorism in space by Bo'Bob'O · · Score: 1

      Yeah, whats with Sci-Fi dealing with issues? They clearly should stick to important stuff like holodeck malfunctions and aliens with crap glued to their foreheads.

    7. Re:Terrorism in space by be-fan · · Score: 2, Informative

      I actually quite like the "science" in BSG. It's very minimal, and it avoids driving the plot. ST: VOY drove me insane with all the shit science they just made up. Obviously, science fiction is supposed to be fictional science, but good in good Sci-Fi like BSG, it seems like the science has internally-consistent rules, while in a lot of bad Sci-Fi (unfortunately most modern Star Trek shows, save for DS9), the writers pay no attention to consistency, and just make up new pseudo-scientific things to work themselves out of complicated plots.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
  15. Re:Good, now just go back to blowin shit up, dammi by LibertineR · · Score: 1

    Excellent point, dammit.

  16. More than just Earth by PerfectMark · · Score: 0

    Well I guess there is room for a few more seasons. Once they actually find earth, they will still have the whole Cylon problem to sort out. Maybe the show could end with them re-taking the 12 colonies and wiping out the machine Cylons while having the humanoid ones mix with the real humans.

  17. Re:I'm sure this will upset people but please end by Moridineas · · Score: 1

    Wow, in one breath you're complaining about bad acting and bad scripting, and then you bring out Babylon 5 as an exemplar?!

    Please, I overall enjoyed B5, but--IMHO--seasons 1+5 were awful.. and the entire series had HORRIBLE dialogue and acting! The plot etc was badass, but I still *shudder* thinking of some of the acting+humor moments etc.

  18. Re:Good, now just go back to blowin shit up, dammi by Opportunist · · Score: 3, Funny

    Not to mention that they find out about 20 episodes later that he isn't really dead through a dream of a crew member and they start looking for him (5 episodes), find him in some unprobable place (2 episodes), free him from the cylon prison (1 episode) only to find out that he's a cylon imposter (1 episode) and spend a bit of time trying to hunt him all over the ships (5 episodes), until they corner him and he claims he's a traitor and wants to aid humanity (1 episode), leads them to some fuel depots (2 episodes)...

    I think I should ask them if they hire new writers.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  19. Re:I'm sure this will upset people but please end by Allicorn · · Score: 1

    I realise this appears to be an emotive issue for you but "I mean please I've seen better scripting on daytime soapies."... really now... this strikes of hyperbole to me.

    Specifically which daytime soapies are we talking about here? If they're that much better than BSG then perhaps some of us would fancy taking a look at them.

    Alli

    --
    OMG!!! Ponies!!!
  20. Rome was good,....Deadwood = Awesome by LibertineR · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    HBO is doing really good stuff these days (minus Sopranos), but Rome wasnt the best, Deadwood was just insanely great. But, like with Rome, the lavish sets caused them to run out of money for lack of viewers. Its a crime to kill off shows like this, when they could have benefitted from better marketing. Most people have never seen Rome, Deadwood, The Wire, or other great HBO productions. Deadwood had better T&A too, though some of it was on the chunky side.

    1. Re:Rome was good,....Deadwood = Awesome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rome was a co-production with the BBC, who is known for only running shows for a season or two, specifically to avoid the problem of shows that meander aimlessly and jump the shark.

    2. Re:Rome was good,....Deadwood = Awesome by bogjobber · · Score: 1

      I agree. Rome was a good show, but how could it not be? If you spend $100 million trying to tell one of the greatest stories in the history of the world it better at least be watchable. Hopefully HBO steps up and brings in some new blood because losing Deadwood, Rome, The Sopranos, and The Wire in two years would end my subscription without some new shows to fill the void.

    3. Re:Rome was good,....Deadwood = Awesome by MBraynard · · Score: 1

      Did you miss 'Are you Being Served?' and 'Yes (Prime) Minister'?

    4. Re:Rome was good,....Deadwood = Awesome by MBraynard · · Score: 1

      AND Eastenders?

  21. Re:Good, now just go back to blowin shit up, dammi by Ash+Vince · · Score: 3, Funny

    I think I should ask them if they hire new writers.

    Sounds like you write for them already.

    --
    I dont read /. to RTFA, I read /. to offend people in ignorance.
  22. Did Ron Morre kill your dog? by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 5, Informative

    Look, I loved Babylon 5. I even liked season 5, and consider the hate it gets to be typical mobthink (notice how other fans always append "except season five" like a mantra). I also know that this is all a matter of personal taste, but your review here is filled with hyperbole. Porn? A handful of sexually charged scenes is not porn. What are you, an evangelical? The camera work lends a nice feel to the space shots. I dunno, man, it's called artistry and creativity. Should BG be a static 3 camera set piece like a sitcom? And "better scripting on daytime soaps" is where you completely lose it. Seriously, something else has to be at the core of your hate here. Are you a big fan of the original series? Are you a Cylon? What?

    1. Re:Did Ron Morre kill your dog? by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      Look, I loved Babylon 5. I even liked season 5, and consider the hate it gets to be typical mobthink (notice how other fans always append "except season five" like a mantra). I can assure you that I was quite capable of being disappointed by the fifth season without anyone else's input.

      It suffered because JMS was forced to move the main story-arc's endings to season four, leaving season five feeling like it had been tacked on. I appreciate that some storylines/hanging threads were left for season five as originally intended, but the main story was over, and the impetus was no longer there.
      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    2. Re:Did Ron Morre kill your dog? by thepotoo · · Score: 2, Informative
      Actually that's only part of the reason: season 5 sucked because JMS didn't show the Telepath War.
      Part of it was Ivanova leaving the show: JMS had spent the last 4 seasons dropping hints about her latent telepathy and hatred of the Psi Core, and then, when she left, one of the major players in the Telepath War wasn't there, and couldn't figure out how to tell the story without her.

      I'm hoping the Lost Tales will wrap up a few pieces of that storyline somewhere.

      --
      Obligatory Soundbite Catchphrase
    3. Re:Did Ron Morre kill your dog? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, he kick my dog and now I am going to fuck him.

    4. Re:Did Ron Morre kill your dog? by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      It bugs me when actors get impatient like that. It's not even greed, 'cause when they leave the thing that made them famous, the coolest thing they're ever going to do they invariably end up behind a lunch counter with a washed-out former bartender turned doctor. Sometimes the shows are ok, and would be the coolest thing some other actor would ever do, but they seem to enjoy killing a really cool thing to avoid being typecast or some such as if that's the end of the world.

      I suppose you don't see this thing in other industries because it's not as critical; one man usually can't kill an entire project just by moving to another project, but imagine someone being a key player in the next space shuttle design team and then just up and leaving one day as if it was all just a resume point to get the job s/he really wanted: model air plane design team member.

      I guess I just don't think that the idea of being thought of as a "one-trick pony" is really so bad if the "one-trick" is cool enough.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    5. Re:Did Ron Morre kill your dog? by coaxial · · Score: 1

      The only thing that gets more mobhate is DS9. That was good show, especially the multiseason war arc. Sure the ending sucked, but as I understand it, they though they had another season until they had like 3 episodes left to shoot, so I'll let it pass. The whole "yeah, well they only started a war after b5 had a war," is bullshit. I hate to tell you fanboys something, but it doens't work that way. The powers that be, just don't care about the other shows. How is there competition, when they're not even in the same timeslot? No. It's all in your mind.

      New BSG is a great show. Old BSG sucked. It sucked like the worst original Star Trek episodes. Apollo has to fight cylon on cowboy world? An evil magician on C-deck? Please! That's just as bad as having Spock and Kirk forced to fight Ghengis Kahn and Abraham Lincoln at the OK Corrale by the Roman god Apollo.[*] The dumbest thing I've heard from the old BSG fanboys has been, "They should have made a sequel to the original BSG." They did. It was called Galactica 1980, AND IT SUCKED. Super Scouts my ass.

      [*] What's going to motivate the flamers more? The fact that I just dissed trek, or that I've conflated three different episodes?

    6. Re:Did Ron Morre kill your dog? by steelfood · · Score: 1

      Actors are only human, and there are real-life considerations for them too. For example, Richard Dean Anderson quit Stargate to spend more time with his daughter. Sometimes, things happen, and people have to leave. Sometimes, people grow tired, or get burnt out. They might even die in the middle of a project. Again, despite the fact that we might glorify them, actors are only human.

      It's really the biggest challenge to telling a lengthy story through such a medium. Even animated films rely on actors for character voices, though an actor leaving isn't nearly as bad when only the voice matters (think Jim Henson). That's why those daytime soap operas are constantly killing off old characters and introducing new ones. And why the best movies are the short ones that tell short stories (think of the short films that accompany every pixar flick). On the other hand, storytelling through a written medium can go on forever, in some cases even after the storyteller from whom the story originated is dead. Comics come to mind, but even with something like Star Wars, the story can be extended indefinitely in novel form. Good luck trying to get Harrison Ford to play Han Solo again though.

      Five years is a long time. Ten is even longer. The larger the main cast, the less likely it is for the whole cast to be able to commit to something for so much time.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    7. Re:Did Ron Morre kill your dog? by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      RDA did 9 years on Stargate. And he left for family reasons, not professional ones. It's completely different from bailing 3 years into a 5 year series to pursue a long string of crappy films. That's more like playing Richard III and quitting halfway through the third act to be in Showboat.

      Five years may be a long time to play the same character, but try telling that to the lifetime GM employee or the cast of a long-running Broadway show or all the waiters trying to break into Hollywood or Hugh Grant. If you get to do something as cool as a main character on BSG, or the most popular comic-book hero ever, etc, then be grateful for the role and milk it for all it's worth.

      At the very least, be honest about your fickleness before taking on a role in a project that's obviously going to be long-term if it does well. I mean, it worked for Eccleston.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    8. Re:Did Ron Morre kill your dog? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please remember Richard Dean had a metric fuck load of money BEFORE Stargate!
      He had McGuyver money. He had already hit the jackpot once. He didn't need SG1. Him leaving SG1 wasn't a big deal.

    9. Re:Did Ron Morre kill your dog? by Snaller · · Score: 1

      "Porn? A handful of sexually charged scenes is not porn. What are you, an evangelical? "

      Perhaps he's an adult who is annoyed that all tv has to be filled with unclad people to try and snare the permanently horny teenagers.

      "The camera work lends a nice feel to the space shots. I dunno, man, it's called artistry and creativity."

      Its called seasickness inducing.

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
    10. Re:Did Ron Morre kill your dog? by syousef · · Score: 1

      It's garbage. The story line's not plausible and lacks continuity and direction. The characters you can't relate to, the writing and directing and acting are all just rubbish. I find it unwatchable. I think I'd HAVE to be a robot to like it. I'll go as far as saying it makes season 5 of bab 5 (which wasn't brilliant but wasn't bad either) look like Shakespeare, and I'd even rather re-watch Crusade which made me fall asleep more than once than watch Battle Star Gal-actica. My gripe is that there's so little new sci-fi now that if a series that is shit becomes popular, that's all you're ever likely to see.

      As for your dig about me being an evangelical, gimme a break and re-read what I wrote. No evangelical is going to suggest you get your porn elsewhere.

      How ironic that your banter about mobthink sees you modded up as high as you can go FOR falling into line with mobthink.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
  23. Doomed to mediocrity by suv4x4 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    They did something great in the pilot episodes and first season, but now we'll have to see yet another great show die a slow and painful death.

    I wish they'd wrap up the show and stop it when they've run out of material and said what they want to say. But even the best show is doomed to drag on our screens, while the rating brings in ad money. It's so sad.

    It was especially harsh and sad in Prison Break, originally an amazing 14 episode mini-series. Then in the last moment extended to a full season ("oh shit they changed the pipes, well all we did for 14 episodes now doesn't make a damn sense, does it"), and then to a second season ("don't move or I'll use my tattoo against you! i'm not afraid to!").

    1. Re:Doomed to mediocrity by Alaria+Phrozen · · Score: 1

      Funny how the only positive post regarding the extension was from a guy who liked Enterprise.

      Seinfeld died right. Somebday, may other shows learn from its wisdom.

    2. Re:Doomed to mediocrity by dyslexicbunny · · Score: 1

      I wish they'd wrap up the show and stop it when they've run out of material and said what they want to say. But even the best show is doomed to drag on our screens, while the rating brings in ad money. It's so sad. Funny... you should listen to the podcasts. Ron Moore says that many times. He has two last things he wants to tell. Either they were going with 2 13 episode seasons or 1 22 episode season. They don't want to milk it either but they want to end it correctly. Next season is the last season from what the podcasts have said.

      With falling viewership (biased against tivo users) and the foolish move to Sunday night, I can't see them extending the show to a fifth season. But with all this recent news, fans may do some ridiculous things resulting in something ridiculous happening at scifi.
    3. Re:Doomed to mediocrity by Yusaku+Godai · · Score: 1

      And now a THIRD season. It's ridiculous. When they started on the second season I couldn't imagine how they could stretch it out for more than another half-season.

      I mean, I'm still enjoying it enough to keep watching. But it feels kinda ridiculous every time the next big plan fails and everything has to start over again from scratch. I was especially annoyed in I think it was episode 20 when they actually tried to pull another relevant detail out of his tattoo. I'm like, "No way. They are waaaaaay beyond any plan that ever had anything to do with that tattoo."

  24. Re:Good, now just go back to blowin shit up, dammi by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Good, now just go back to blowin shit up, dammit!

    Maybe this was a joke, but it exemplifies the problem with a lot of modern genre fandom. "Eeeew! Drama! Eeeew! Humanity and emotional stuff! Eeeeew! Icky girls!" It's this sort of thing that keeps SF and fantasy so marginalized.

    And while season 3 had some weak points, this whole WORST SEASON EVER stuff is so silly. Seriously, a lot of folks here are The Comic Book Guy incarnate.

  25. Re:Good, now just go back to blowin shit up, dammi by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Well, I can see their problem.

    Space fights take lots of money to make. Explosions are expensive, no matter whether they're real or CGI. So they create fillers. The cheapest fillers are those where you can rely solely on props and effects you already have. The first BSG consisted mostly of battle scenes from the 2 first movies, the "new" scenes were almost entirely simple scenary shots, or shots that don't require any new props.

    Now, that doesn't necessarily mean that the show has to suck, plot-wise. I'm pretty sure even the corny layout I posted earlier can be made interesting with some creative scripting, without being expensive. You have to keep it fast paced and most of all (and that's IMO where the current BSG script lacks), you have to know what you have in mind with a certain plot.

    Currently, I have the feeling that they write from episode to episode, find themselves written in a corner and pull some deus ex machina out of the bag to keep it going.

    Compare it to Bab5. JMS had the complete plot for the show down even before filming started. And it shows. Yes, it has twists, yes, it has bents, yes, it has plot arcs that span seasons, but they stay logically connected. The characters have a reason to do what they do. That's IMO one of the most important things in a good plot. No character is just "good" or "evil". Especially, no character is just "evil". They don't do things just to be the villain. What goal would that serve?

    What I'm looking for in a show is to understand the motivations of a character. If they change from episode to episode, I get confused and frustrated.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  26. Re:I'm sure this will upset people but please end by Lumpy · · Score: 1

    - the awful cinematography and camera work. I haven't watched since season 1, but are they still doing that awful backing music and quick zooms etc. to try to build tension. Keep the fucking camera still or smooth it out jackasses!


    I suggest you not watch lost or other TV shows then. All this "amateur" camera work started with the siezure cam used in the Bourne Supremacy and is incredibly "popualr" right now.

    They completely destroyed that movie with the stupid "we cant afford a tripod" film style.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  27. Too Bad. by foo+fighter · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's the unfortunate tension of television that the business side demands an open ended series that can run as long as possible while the artistic side would usually be better served by a finite length and definite ending.

    I am a huge, huge fan of BSG (warts and all) and was actually happy to see the earlier report that the 4th season would be the end. I am one who thinks the writers would be doing a better job if they knew what the hell the point of each episode should be.

    --
    obviously no deficiencies vs. no obvious deficiencies
    1. Re:Too Bad. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with you on this. As I stated in the other posting, part of BSG's present problem is the writing. They've stayed in the same story stream for a long time, and have left out a lot of details about Cylon society, etc. Maybe that will change for this last season.

      Someone commented about bad acting. I have to disagree with you. Using a supermodel for a Cylon, etc., is utility. The seductive nature of the Cylon's need, to be and to understand humanity, to want it, to want them to be wanted. You need to look deeper my friend ;-)

      In the end, I hope BSG doesn't follow the same mothballed fate of Star Trek. Cycle some of the writers, get adventurous... bring in NEW material. Keep your audience on the edge of their seats! This is what keeps viewership.

  28. Tricia Helfer by MrSteveSD · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm really hoping for some experimental episodes where the camera just slowly pans up and down Tricia Helfer's body while she tries on different outfits for 40 minutes.

    1. Re:Tricia Helfer by straponego · · Score: 2, Funny
      That's pathetic. You ought to be ashamed of yourself. You're just confirming the worst stereotypes of loser geeks.

      It should definitely be Grace Park instead. Hubba HUBBA!

    2. Re:Tricia Helfer by RMingin · · Score: 1

      If it follows the Enterprise formula, the next episode will take place in an alternate universe. We'll get to watch Tricia Helfer, Grace Park, and maybe even Xena in scanty clothing, vamping around, at least.

      Funny though, Tricia Helfer was in Playboy, and I found her to be *more* attractive on the show, with her clothes on, albeit skin-tight, than when she was wandering around in panties in PB.

      --
      The preceding comment is my own, and in no way construes an opinon of the Emperor of Mankind.
    3. Re:Tricia Helfer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably because Tricia Helfer has smallish tits and a manish face with sharp angled face and a big honking chin.

    4. Re:Tricia Helfer by bitrex · · Score: 1

      Forget either of them, I demand Nicki Clyne nudies!!

    5. Re:Tricia Helfer by bruce_the_loon · · Score: 1

      Come on people, be realistic about this. It has to be Mary McDonnell.

      --
      Trying to become famous by taking photos. Visit my homepage please.
    6. Re:Tricia Helfer by Killjoy_NL · · Score: 1


      Grace Park indeed

      Yowza :D

      --
      This is the sig that says NI (again)
    7. Re:Tricia Helfer by VShael · · Score: 1

      Right, because geeks geeking out over asian chicks is in NO way a sterotype....

    8. Re:Tricia Helfer by edawstwin · · Score: 1

      I don't know if you were kidding, but I have to agree if you weren't. The "fake" beauty of Helfer or Lucy Lawless just doesn't appeal to me.

      --
      I don't want to achieve immortality through my work. I want to achieve it by not dying. - Woody Allen
  29. Open Ended? by jkiol · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Does that comment seem more like damage control than a reversal of statements?

  30. Inaccurate Story by mriker · · Score: 2, Informative

    David Eick didn't say that the series would not be ending with the fourth season; all he said was that nothing had been officially announced. Also, it has been known that the season will have 22 episodes for quite some time now, and that the 2 of them will actually be the Pegasus "movie."

  31. Kill it by Ramble · · Score: 0

    I think any fan of BSG recognises the show needs a damn end in this season. This is going to become the dog that the son has to take out the back and shoot just to put it out of it's misery.

    --
    "Oh boy"
  32. Milking that cow by dont_run · · Score: 1

    I wish at least once they wouldn't milk the cow until the milk is sour...

    And the worst that could happen is if they "think" it will come back, leave us in a cliffhanger, and then end the series abruptly.

    They should know that DVD sets of unfinished series sell less.

    1. Re:Milking that cow by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      I dunno ... Serenity sold pretty well, and that was about as unfinished as it's possible to get.

      Of course, it was also truly solid material. The fact that the story arc was never completed didn't detract from the essential quality of the production.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  33. Big babies by groovyghoul · · Score: 5, Insightful

    First you want sci-fi, they give it to you... The sci-fi they give you, is the best sci-fi that we have seen on tv... They tell you that they will continue to make said sci-fi... ...and all you do is whine about it. No wonder people make fun of us. -groovyghoul

    1. Re:Big babies by Anorion · · Score: 1

      Have you never heard of Firefly?

      I don't think BSG is anywhere near as good as FF/Serenity.

    2. Re:Big babies by groovyghoul · · Score: 1

      I have adored Firefly since it's inception, but it had the ill-fated luck of being on network tv.

      What is it about FF, that you think makes it better than BSG? I just think they are different. FF was sometimes formulaic (as is BSG sometimes), but I never got the feeling that I should really care about what happens. I was always just waiting for the next shoot-em-up. With BSG, I feel like I'm watching something epic...more of the human condition is being explored.

      It's just that I've been reading about how much Season 3 has sucked, but what it sounds like is that people aren't digging it cause it's not as "action-packed".

      I dunno...

    3. Re:Big babies by be-fan · · Score: 1

      FireFly was great, but BSG is good too. The shows were very different. The sci-fi aspects and dialogue in FireFly were better, while the drama and plots are better in BSG.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    4. Re:Big babies by Meski · · Score: 1

      If it was sci-fi I might agree with you. It's more like space-opera, with a pre-occupation on special effects wrapped around a bad plot. How about some *real* sci-fi for a change. Ringworld might work, if Larry kept control of it.

    5. Re:Big babies by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      Ringworld might work, if Larry kept control of it.

      May I suggest, instead, that we try some non-homosexual science fiction? You know, maybe something NOT written by a mindless hack and idolized by emo pansies?

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    6. Re:Big babies by Meski · · Score: 1

      That's a weird take on Ringworld, considering the main characters in it consisted of a human male and female (Lois and Teela) and 2 aliens (Nessus & Speaker) Interactions there were hetero, so you must be looking at subcharacters. Now I suppose I have to google to find out wtf an emo pansy is.

  34. You missed the obvious one... by raehl · · Score: 1

    The Cylons and Humans end up being the same. You already have a whole bunch of character crossovers, cross-breeding....

    1. Re:You missed the obvious one... by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      They are the same species, as far as we can tell so far. The definition of a species is that members, when bred, produce offspring that is also capable of breeding. Only a really long jump in the timeline could reveal if that part is successful, though.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
  35. Re:I'm sure this will upset people but please end by FinchWorld · · Score: 1

    Thats odd, I could of sworn it was the blair witch project that give no tripod filming a bit of lime light. And to be fair it does work, when used right, not for every other scene.

    --
    "I may be full of crap about this game, and I may be wrong, and that's fine." -Jack Thompson
  36. Re:Good, now just go back to blowin shit up, dammi by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 1

    IMHO a timetravel plot with some mysterious figure narrating the history of mankind is a deus ex machina. I hated the ending. The only plot device which prevented the weird guy from narrating the whole thing at once seemed to be that he had difficulty speaking English. I agree that Babylon 5 was a good series though. One of the best things on television.

  37. Re:Good, now just go back to blowin shit up, dammi by NeuroManson · · Score: 2, Insightful

    IMO, the show could use just a *pinch* of levity. I mean hell, even Children of Men squeezed in a "Pull my finger" joke to keep it from inducing mass suicides in everyone who watched it.

    Meanwhile, BSG has been dark moment after dark moment. You can't tell me that nobody ever does a shaving cream joke on a pilot while he/she's in their rack, that nobody hops into a Viper to find a waiting whoopy cushion, that nobody pranked Tigh by replacing his precious booze with *gasp* water?

    I mean, come ON people, just because 9/11 happened in the real world, doesn't mean we don't have to feel guilty to laughing at fantasy now and then, or for that matter, real life.

    --
    Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
  38. Battlestar Galactica by Thovarain · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Yay, The Young and The Restless in Space is over. This one should go in the 99 cent bin with Battlefield Earth. And while we're on the subject of crass American cinema...28 Weeks Later? Give me a break.

    1. Re:Battlestar Galactica by KarmaMB84 · · Score: 1

      Wasn't that thing produced by the Brits?

    2. Re:Battlestar Galactica by ralewi1 · · Score: 1

      He's a troll, don't feed him. [Per IMDB, it is indeed a UK effort, with a Spanish director]

    3. Re:Battlestar Galactica by Thovarain · · Score: 1

      28 Days Later was a Brit production, 28 Weeks is American.

      http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0463854/

    4. Re:Battlestar Galactica by Thovarain · · Score: 0

      What is a troll? Someone who has an opinion? It's an American production. Check IMDB again.

  39. 2.5x better than Gilligan's Island. by khasim · · Score: 1

    In Gilligan's Island, they had only two outcomes.

    #1. They get off the island.

    #2. They stay on the island.

    CONGRATULATIONS (and I mean that). You have identified the PROBLEM with such stories. They are TRAGEDIES in the old sense. One side will lose. One side is doomed. You are watching the failure because of the past decisions of one side.

    Knowing that, the writers need to understand their material. What is their final statement?

    #1. Man will always win over machines because machines lack (love, souls, emotions, whatever).

    #2. Man's technology will eventually destroy man.

    If they haven't made that choice, their material will eventually suck as they have to contradict past continuity or pull bullshit plot devices out of their asses. No matter how good the initial material, it needs that fundamental story arc.

  40. I hear you... by Belial6 · · Score: 1

    I gave up any expectation of BSG being any good when they had Starbuck punch out a guy twice her size to show that she was a 'tough' woman, and they resorted to stealing characters from Voyager.

    1. Re:I hear you... by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      Nah, they did that to show that's she's a violent, slightly unstable, and somewhat self-loathing woman. The President, on the other hand, is a 'tough' woman. Boomer is a 'tough' woman. Dee is a 'tough' woman. Cally is a 'tough' woman.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    2. Re:I hear you... by Maserati · · Score: 1

      Cally is not a "tough" woman. She's more the "annoying but quietly enduring" type.

      --
      Veteran, Bermuda Triangle Expeditionary Force, 1992-1951
    3. Re:I hear you... by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      Well, she's certainly not the 'traditional' shrinking wallflower, 'oh, hay-lp, I need a MY-AN to protect poor lil' ole me!' sort. Sure, she's not in-your-face or anything, but still.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    4. Re:I hear you... by Baron_Yam · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I'm getting awfully tired of tiny chicks kicking ass. Seriously, I'm in lousy shape (not fat or anything, but I sit on my ass for a living and it shows) and I'm pretty sure I could give a beat down to more than half the 'tough chicks' on screen.

      Skill only does so much, and no 100lb woman can take a solid whack to the head or stomach as well as a 180lb man. Not only that, but a 180lb man will likely have a lot more muscle behind his 'solid whack' than the 100lb woman.

    5. Re:I hear you... by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 1

      At a guess, Katee Sackhoff is closer to 140 lbs. than 100 lbs., most of it muscle. And if you're a 180-lb. guy who sits on his ass all day, I'll bet she could kick said ass into next week.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    6. Re:I hear you... by JebusIsLord · · Score: 1

      Well, i noticed they had her slim down a bit. Probably gave in to pressure. in season one she was pretty fucking tough looking for a leading lady. Not "real world" large, but large for hollywood.

      --
      Jeremy
    7. Re:I hear you... by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      The guys point still stands. I'm not buying the 140 pounds. At 5'6", she would need a lot more mass than I've ever seen her with to be at 140. Combine that with the fact that she was supposed to be punching out a guy that stands 6 feet tall, who isn't a waif himself. The fact is, this whole, lets take little attractive women, and pretend that they are the athletic match of men much larger than them. I have no problem with the premise that Buffy the Vampire slayer can kick ass. The premise of the show is that she has magic powers. BSG on the other hand has never implied that Starbuck is imbued with supernatural strength. They are trying to play it off like she is just tough.

      Don't forget that they also tried to pull off an episode where she could beat a professional athlete at his own game. Even if you forget that in virtually every sport, the best women can't compete with the best men, this was an attempt pass off an ameture competing against a professional. The entire character is a crappy attempt at writing.

  41. Wrong Again by R3s0lut3 · · Score: 2, Informative

    For the second story in a row, Slashdot gets it wrong. David Eick said merely that he and Ronald D. Moore "had not decided yet" about the future of the show past season 4, not that there was certainly going to be a season 5.

  42. ...and they have a plan by r3b00tm0nk3y · · Score: 1

    1. Infiltrate key positions on BSG
    2. Occasionally let BSG inflict tremendous damage for no real reason (Resurrection Ship, Base Star, etc.)
    3. Infiltrate even more key positions on ship and acquire nuclear weapons
    4. Establish almost complete information asymmetry
    5. ?????
    6. Profit (the producers of course)

    --
    This sig is alpha and shouldn't be viewed on production machines
  43. Moore's Podcast? Anyone? by keith_nt4 · · Score: 5, Informative

    I guess no body listens to the podcasts. The producer/writer, Ronald D. Moore, mentioned this a month ago on a podcast. The network made him sweat it out with that "12 episodes" thing but finally said ok to a twenty-something deal. He also said the show has TWO seasons left. He hasn't signed two seasons, he just thinks the story arc has two seasons left. I highly recommend the podcasts by the way...

    --
    "UNIX is very simple, it just needs a genius to understand its simplicity." -Dennis Ritchie
  44. BSG doesn't know how to get to its 'ending'. by Nim82 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    BSG is a story based show with a definitive ending, it just doesn't seem to know how to get there.

    The last two seasons, particularly the 3rd, have left me hugely frustrated. The show had so much promise at the start, good cast, gorgeous effects, an interesting plot etc. But it seems to me they just don't know what to do with it all, they have their 'ending' worked out, no doubt, but they just don't seem to know how to flesh out the bit known as the middle.

    They should have planned this out episodically before filming ever began (like JMS did with B5). Not only would it have ensured consistency throughout (read less filler), but it would also have given them an exact number of seasons to aim for and enable them to better budget themselves as well. As I recall Bab5 was consistently *under* budget as a result of the excellent planning which no doubt ensured that it got it's intended 5 seasons, despite some doubts around Season4. Given how exec's like axing sci-fi, being prudent would be a top priority to me.

    I really feel there will be a truckload more filler next season if it isn't the finale. I would rather they just let Zoic create a whole batch of 45 minute space combat sequences, if they can't come up with anything better than love triangles etc - But that would destroy the budget... so no doubt were going to be subjected to more 'Whose in Lee's bed tonight' episodes. At least they blew up the Pegasus, or no doubt they'd go through half a dozen new captains for her as well.

    1. Re:BSG doesn't know how to get to its 'ending'. by coaxial · · Score: 1

      And season 5 of B5 was so great.

      GOTHS....IN....SPAAAAAAAAAACE!

      *yawn*

    2. Re:BSG doesn't know how to get to its 'ending'. by FFFish · · Score: 1

      Pray tell, when should a new BSG watcher stop watching it? I'm six episodes in. I want to know when to jump out.

      --

      --
      Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
    3. Re:BSG doesn't know how to get to its 'ending'. by Nim82 · · Score: 1

      The first season is fine, the second season is largely 'ok' (the filler episodes are actually tolerable, for the most part).

      It is season 3 where you may feel the need to skip out a large chunk (the middle). Id suggest looking at an episode guide and check out the ratings per episode. A good guide is here: http://www.gateworld.net/galactica/s3/index.shtml - All the ones with **'s are totally skipable, the few significant events that occur within them are summarised later on in intros anyway, so you don't really miss a thing. Out of the 20 S3 episodes, half are utter pish sadly. It does end on a high though.

    4. Re:BSG doesn't know how to get to its 'ending'. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It does end on a high though.
      The Hell is did. Complete Dreck.

    5. Re:BSG doesn't know how to get to its 'ending'. by tm2b · · Score: 1

      Ignore the naysayers, who equate "character development" with "filler." As far as they're concerned, you only have drama if you have big explosions.

      Watch them all. They all rock in their own ways.

      --
      "It is our blasphemy which has made us great, and will sustain us, and which the gods secretly admire in us." - Zelazny
  45. Re:Good, now just go back to blowin shit up, dammi by Skreems · · Score: 1

    Amen. The writers and actors for the show are great, and part of being good at that job is that you can pull off the slower, more personal dramatic stories as well as the large space battles and galaxy-spanning intrigue. It's good to get to see them try something different, and not have every episode be the exact same tone as all the others.

    --
    Slashdot needs a "-1, Wrong" moderation option.
    The Urban Hippie
  46. Is magic cylon juice more powerful than by arcite · · Score: 1

    Borg nano-probes?

  47. Impressive swing by Cappy+Red · · Score: 1

    Interesting how in the comments about season four being the last, the tide was against the Sci-Fi Channel -- about how sorry people were to see it go -- and in the comments on this story, the tide is against the writers for "milking it" -- how sorry people are to see it stay. Different people I trust(and hope), but interesting none the less.

    (So far as where I sit -- even with the rather agonizing romantic detour the show took this season, I'm enjoying it. I still trust that the show runners know more or less what they're doing, and that they will, as Ron Moore said, end it when it reaches its ending)

    --
    This is my sig. It's prescription, I swear. I need it for reading things... on the other side of things
  48. At least get to Earth.... by PhrstBrn · · Score: 2, Informative

    ... by the end of the 4th season. The current story is pretty dead end at this point, and they need to finish it soon, otherwise they're going to be left with nothing but filler episodes. If they want make season 5, fast forward 5 years or so, make a second battlestar, and start a new adventure. (The humans finally go after the Cylons, maybe?) If Earth is just an inhabitable wasteland, I'm going to be severely pissed off...

  49. The Cylons have a Plan! by wiredog · · Score: 0

    And someday they're gonna share it with the writers! I promise!

    1. Re:The Cylons have a Plan! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "And someday they're gonna share it with the writers! I promise!"

      http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=234365&cid=190 84845

      I knew I read that somewhere recently...

  50. Re:I'm sure this will upset people but please end by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've never seen a full episode of NYPD Blue, but doesn't it have similar camera effects?

  51. MOD PARENT UP by dyslexicbunny · · Score: 1

    Agreed. This is really old news.

    I also strongly encourage listening to the podcasts. You'll get a lot of insight with what RDM and the writers were thinking. He talks about all sorts of interesting things. Plus, there are often smokes and whisky (or whiskey) involved and it's always interesting to hear what's in the glass.

  52. It's just not, like, a good show by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    [eom]

  53. Holy zombie jesus, batman by ichigo+2.0 · · Score: 1

    We all saw what happened to Stargate. We don't want BSG to suffer the same fate. I'd rather have BSG die in peace than have the corpse paraded around for 4 more seasons, and after BSG is gone there will be demand for a new, fresh sci-fi series.

    1. Re:Holy zombie jesus, batman by groovyghoul · · Score: 1

      But that's just it, people keep saying that BSG is dying, but nobody is really saying why they think this. BSG's worst episode was still better than SG's best...haha...that'll set somebody off.

      If they could keep Galactica at the same level of entertainment that it has been providing, I will watch it until I'm 90.

    2. Re:Holy zombie jesus, batman by ichigo+2.0 · · Score: 1

      Personally I'd like the main plot to start going somewhere. It seems like most of the plot happened in the beginning and end of season 3, with the middle consisting of pointless filler. I don't care if it's action-packed or not, I only care if it's relevant. That is also the same reason I have pretty much hated all the Star Trek series I have gotten my hands on (that, and the fact that everyone behaves like some kind of holy automatons instead of human beings. Somehow I doubt mankind would expand to space peacefully). BSG needs to find Earth and have some kind of conclusion, cylon-of-the-week and resource-XYZ-is-running-out-let's-find-more is starting to get repetitive IMHO.

      Personally I liked Stargate for the four or so first seasons. It was refreshing to see a series where mankind was technologically inferior, but still managed to punch other races in the face. Especially in places where their allies and the enemy pretty much laughed them in the face ("Buah, pitiful humans and their projectile weapons"), and then proceeds to get themselves killed ("don't underestimate humans, bitches!"). Reminded me a bit of X-com. :)
      After humans started getting tech, the enemies had to get stronger to keep the same dynamic intact, but that just wasn't possible. They tried to fix it by spinning of Atlantis, but it will fail for the same reasons. They should just have let Stargate die somewhere in season 4-6, and made a completely different kind of sci-fi series. They could even have set it in the same universe if they wanted.

  54. Just Don't Make It *Too* Long by MSTCrow5429 · · Score: 1

    I get nervous when great shows turn into open-ended properties. Babylon 5 was able to sustain itself for the most part because of a pre-imagined story arc, that was designed from the beginning for 5 seasons only. DS9, after the first season, seemed to get into gear for the Dominion story arc, which lasted 6 seasons, although only getting into high gear on the latter half. I don't want to see the mostly tight story of BSG turn into the equivalent of spaghetti code for overextending its possibilities.

    --
    Slashdot: Playing Favorites Since 1997
  55. Re:Good, now just go back to blowin shit up, dammi by _xeno_ · · Score: 1

    What are you talking about? They writers constantly keep in mind the overall darkness and pull back a little to make the show lighter.

    Like in the first episode, they didn't show any people on the Olympic Carrier like they originally intended, because they thought it would be just a little too dark to actually show Apollo and Starbuck killing thousands of humans in the first episode.

    And there are other examples just like that!

    (Really. They explain it on the DVD commentary.)

    --
    You are in a maze of twisty little relative jumps, all alike.
  56. Re:Good, now just go back to blowin shit up, dammi by JFMulder · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Well, to be fair, the show used to have that, back when Baltar was half crazy. The scenes with him being distracted by Number 6 while talking to other Galactica members was pretty much priceless.

    I also remember one scene I really like. I think it was Laura, Lee and his father cleaning the dishes after an eating with Tigh and his wife and I think Laura said something like "I think this one is not right for him. She makes him drink all the time and is miserable. I think he'd be better off without her." And then everybody stops cleaning the dishes for a few seconds, realizing he was exactly like that before he got back with her. And then resumed. That was laugh out loud funny.

    I can't recall exactly when the show stopped being funny. I think it's around the time they when they went in a cave on a earth-like planet that Roslin guided them to and saw the earth's sky, confirming the prophecy.

  57. Battlestar 80 by decipher_saint · · Score: 1

    This is going to be like Battlestar 80 all over again, isn't it...

    --
    crazy dynamite monkey
  58. Remember Sliders? by EtherC · · Score: 1

    Anyone remember "Sliders"? You just had to love that show... until they completely ruined it by dragging it out and jumping the shark with unoriginal stories. Based on the show's limited structure I'm wondering what BSG's equivalent to the Cromag is going to end up being...

  59. Re:Good, now just go back to blowin shit up, dammi by Edward+Teach · · Score: 1

    The Cylons can't win if the BSG keeps running away! j/k

    --

    Setting his threshold to 5, Sparky eliminated most of the trolls on /.

  60. Sour Grapes by Esion+Modnar · · Score: 1

    And I was just getting to like them! (Yay...?)

    --

    They say the first thing to go is your penis. Well, it's either that or your brain. I forget which...
  61. All in how you look at it by slapout · · Score: 1

    "rather than the reported 13 episode order."

    So maybe the first 13 will be called "Season 4" and the last 9 will be dubbed "Season 5" and then it will end.

    --
    Coder's Stone: The programming language quick ref for iPad
  62. Re:I'm sure this will upset people but please end by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ignore them. Since the new BSG started a lot of geeks have been whinging about it. If you read their criticisms you will find that they are nothing to do with the quality of the show but complaints that the production team have not done with the show what they wanted them to do.

    Their is a repugnant seam of entitlism that runs through the Science Fiction community. Read any thread about Star Wars to see a long list of people who really believe they own Star Wars because they enjoyed it when they were 10 years old. Juvenile rubbish about George Lucas raping their childhood. The same is true about Firefly, Star Trek, BSG and a host of others films and TV shows. It is truly pathetic. Is it any wonder that Science fiction geeks are still sidelined while comic-book, gamer, computer, electronics and RPG geeks have been drawn into the mainstream. The media even uses the term "speculative fiction" in order to distance itself from them they are that bad. The whole community needs to take a good long look at itself and grow the fuck up!

  63. FreeBSD! by fireylord · · Score: 0

    sigh, they shoulda used FreeBSD of course

  64. Re:I'm sure this will upset people but please end by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yep ... and Bochco started that in 1981 with Hill Street Blues.

  65. Re:Good, now just go back to blowin shit up, dammi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I think they've cut down on the humor a bit for two reasons:
    • They didn't do it that well - the episode with that scene an attempt at comedy, and was (overall) one of the weakest of the season. They probably don't want to try whole comedic episodes any more.
    • Time - every episode is overcrowded, and tons of stuff ends up on the cutting room floor. Humorous bits get sliced in favor of story bits.
  66. Re:Good, now just go back to blowin shit up, dammi by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

    Starbuck: Hey Lee, whaddaya got for me?

    Lee Adama: The usual... Angst.

    Starbuck: ...

    Starbuck: Oh geez, somebody just frakkin' kill me now and get it over with...

    Lee: What's the point?? This is SCI FI - you'll just get resurrected again! :P

    --
    .
    == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
  67. Re:Good, now just go back to blowin shit up, dammi by Anivair · · Score: 1

    I don't mind the soap opera garbage, though I agree the unending sexual tension with Adama and rosalin is getting to be very who's the boss. The constant off and on respect/hate that he and Lee have is starting to make them both look stupid. Last season he thought his son was ready to command his own battlestar forever, now he has no integrity and shoudln't be in a viper? For a smart guy, he's got the memory of a goldfish. I agree that the Cylons needs ot win more. they look stupid. they have better technology, better weapons, and they can't bear the crap that BSG can throw at them occasionally? how about the cylons develop a weapon that delays a jump by like two seconds, so that their huge armada would actually get to touch BSG just once. How many times can you jump out at the last nanosecond? I love BSG and I have high hopes for this season, but it's got a lot of flaws that they need to patch.

  68. Re:I'm sure this will upset people but please end by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All this "amateur" camera work started with the siezure cam used in the Bourne Supremacy and is incredibly "popualr" right now.
    Sorry, the BSG mini-series pre-dates The Bourne Supremacy.

    Furthermore, the cinéma vérité style has been around for more than fifty years. As far as American audiences are concerned, the most prominent examples prior to the 21st century are Hill Street Blues, NYPD Blue, and The Blair Witch Project. And in the last six years, the number of mainstream productions has skyrocketted.
  69. another ending option by flushingmemos · · Score: 1

    Has anyone seen Neon Genesis Evangelion? That's how BSG should end. NGE went into a very philosophical and trippy space, it continued the characters but dissolved the narrative, and BSG definately has the potential to pull something like that off. So in this scheme finding Earth would be a sort of apocalyptic, reality-shattering event, and one or two of the characters would be left on a black stage working through their philosophical backstory, they talk, one walks off into blackness and another comes, they talk, one walks off into the blackness and another comes, they talk, and so on, and the ideas and meaning build and build. It would work, it would be fitting, they should do it.

    It would also make the "I'm a cylon, you're a cylon" bullshit comprehensible.

    1. Re:another ending option by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Grief NGE sucked. It might have been a good story except of most of the characters, and the storyline and the faux Christian mythology connection. The only character I didn't want to see get nailed to a cross halfway through the series was Misato. It had some cute cheesecake art, but that's about it. Other than that there were some interesting and original concepts.

  70. Which means absolutely nothing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Eick goes on to say that the fourth season would actually be 22 episodes (2 more than prior seasons) rather than the reported 13 episode order.

    Based on previous seasons, it'll run something like this:

    Two episodes.

    Break for a couple of weeks.

    Three more episodes.

    Ends for three months with a "Battlestar Galactica will return after [Christmas/Shrove Tuesday/President's Day]"

    Triumphant return for two whole episodes.

    Moves to a different night.

    Three more episodes.

    Break for a couple of weeks.

    Two episodes that feel like a season finale but we're assured on the podcasts that they were really just ending the current arc and are supposed to be the mid point of a larger season.

    "Battlestar Galactica will return"

    Rumors circulate that it's cancelled. Edward James Olmos appears to have been correct.

    And then, in the way of other such shows, the final dozen episodes get made as a straight to DVD series, implying Eick was correct. As for the two season claim, that last one will turn up as a Babylon 5-esque feature length DVD showing them reaching earth, a big fight with the Cylons, the end.

    Jaded? The only way I've managed to actually follow where they dick episodes around to is by having a DVR catch their apparently random appearance for me.

    Here's a show that the producers openly admit broke off mid season and tried pretending different halves were two seasons; that has repeatedly broken off mid storyline to wait for new year etc.; that has bounced from Fridays to Sundays; that will often wander off for a week or two.

    And Edward James Olmos wonders why they don't get the viewership a show like it deserves?

    1. Re:Which means absolutely nothing... by be-fan · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the midseason breaks are full of stupid. Sci-Fi Friday was awesome (two hours of StarGate, then BSG), but they kept dicking with the formula (long haituses) before breaking it up entirely.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
  71. Give a guy a break by ClosedSource · · Score: 1

    I had no way of knowing where you came from and I didn't lecture you. I was merely trying to express an understanding of your position.

    I'm sorry that you saw less than 10% of the material but that doesn't mean I'm going to limit the discussion to that 10%.

    1. Re:Give a guy a break by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      I had no way of knowing where you came from and I didn't lecture you. I was merely trying to express an understanding of your position. FWIW, the original point (which I should have made somewhat more clearly) was that American society's reaction to and mentality towards terrorism is still specifically theirs. Your circumstances and psychology towards your country and attacks on it are both different to (e.g.) the UK; partly due to history and partly due to the different cultures. Even when there is a shared experience, reactions and perspective will vary.

      I took offence because you jumped to (IMHO) an unwarranted conclusion. The implicit assumption seemd to be that anyone in a country affected by terrorism would/should react in the same way as the US did, and if they didn't it was because they hadn't experienced it themselves. Yes, I probably reacted a bit strongly, but things often come across differently in cold, hard text.
      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    2. Re:Give a guy a break by ClosedSource · · Score: 1

      I think you just jumped to a conclusion about what I was trying to say. In reality, there is no "American society's reaction" or "UK reaction", but rather individual reactions. In the case of the US, you don't need to look any further than the Iraq war to see that there is no consensus reaction to terrorism here.

    3. Re:Give a guy a break by Dogtanian · · Score: 1
      Yes, but what someone means (or wants) to say isn't always what they actually say, or what comes across; such are the things diplomatic rows are made of :-)

      Of course, there are frequently disagreements across societies, and I didn't mean to overstate the homogeneity of US opinion. Nevertheless, being a single country with some notable collective values, and a shared history means that general opinion and concerns *will* coalesce around a different point. The militaristic feel and terrorist paranoia of Battlestar Galactica did strike me as very reflective of what I had been led to believe- and had deducted- were US concerns and perspective.

      In the case of the US, you don't need to look any further than the Iraq war to see that there is no consensus reaction to terrorism here. Specifically, I had the reaction to terrorist attacks on US citizens on US soil in mind; Iraq is a different situation altogether (and despite the large number of attacks on US/allied soldiers, most terrorist attacks are aimed at other Iraqis).
      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    4. Re:Give a guy a break by ClosedSource · · Score: 1

      I agree that the situation in Iraq is a different situation, but my point is that as recently as the last presidential election, nearly 1/2 of the voters believed that Iraq was related to terrorist attacks.

  72. Re:Good, now just go back to blowin shit up, dammi by PyroMosh · · Score: 1

    I haven't listened to the DVD commentary, so I Can't explain why this disagrees with that, or if one of us heard wrong, but this is how I understand it:

    On the podcast, RDM explained that they fought tooth and nail to show people on the Olympic Carrier, but lost to the network, who wouldn't allow it.

    for the record he said, there *were* people on the Olympic Carrier, but all you ever saw were little silhouettes just as it was being destroyed. They had to sneak that in.

  73. Re:Good, now just go back to blowin shit up, dammi by PyroMosh · · Score: 1

    You want Levity? Careful what you wish for.

    Interesting bit form the podcast: The writers were complaining to RDM about the darkness of the show. "Can't we have a party or something? A birthday party, maybe? Some kind of celebration to show some kind of high point to the existance these people have?"

    So he gave them one. You remember the episode "Act of Contrition"? Season 1, episode 5. Flat Top has his thousandth landing. This is a big deal for a flying unit. An excuse to celebrate an artificial milestone for a pilot. Sort of a turning point.

    They put Flat Top on a wagon and run him around the hanger deck, about a dozen pilots celebrating and cheering.

    Then it happens. A probe falls off of it's rack due to a faulty fastener. It's rocket motor ignites, and it fires across the hanger deck, killing half a dozen pilots and landing a dozen more pilots and deck hands in the sick bay.

    That's what happens when you ask RDM for levity.

  74. Re:Good, now just go back to blowin shit up, dammi by rossifer · · Score: 1

    Space fights take lots of money to make. Explosions are expensive, no matter whether they're real or CGI. So they create fillers. The cheapest fillers are those where you can rely solely on props and effects you already have.
    FYI, what you're referring to are called Bottle Episodes in the industry. You are absolutely correct in that they're a necessity so that you can have the occasional show with blockbuster special effects and otherwise expensive filming without a completely insane overall budget.

    Regards,
    Ross
  75. Re:Good, now just go back to blowin shit up, dammi by be-fan · · Score: 1

    I agree with this one to an extent. This season of BSG has been a little slow, but I just watched the second half of season 3 on iTunes, and it was quite good. They explore a lot of themes that I haven't really seen explored in a mainstream sci-fi show (eg: the union thing), and most of it is genuinely interesting.

    --
    A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
  76. Prattlestar Dramatica by autophile · · Score: 2, Informative

    Battlestar started off very well. It was fascinating. It was science fiction, emphasis on the science. Then apparently some network dickhead told the writers that they needed to, I don't know, attract more girls, or go more mainstream, or "be more like that Scrubs program". All of a sudden whole segments of the show turned from space opera to soap opera.

    After that, I stopped watching. Call me too much of a male geek, but I don't watch SF for stories about relationships that take place in a futuristic setting.

    --Rob

    --
    Towards the Singularity.
  77. When BSG will end. by Kaenneth · · Score: 1

    Battlestar Galactic, being partly commentary on the War in Iraq, will end when that war does.

    I'm looking forward to season 12.

    Or maybe EJO's character is getting killed off in the 13th episode of the 4th season; so as far as he knows, the show ends then.

  78. Re:Good, now just go back to blowin shit up, dammi by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 1

    Can we have an a fucking men here? I don't care about adamn and his fucked up son father son bullshit. I give less than a rats ass about said son/jackass's death wish. Kill the fucker off and lets get on with it. If tigh wants to drink himself into a stooper more power to him, just do it off screen.

    I give so little a fuck about the characters personl problems. Blow more fucking shit up, find more shit, and get on the fucking road to earth. The rest is just bullshit!

    --

    Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

  79. Re:Good, now just go back to blowin shit up, dammi by ozbird · · Score: 1

    You ARE aware that a Cylon winning a dogfight would lead to at least 10 episodes of mourning, griefing and goth-like navel contemplation, yes?

    Emo, not goth.

  80. Re:Good, now just go back to blowin shit up, dammi by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Emo, right.

    Well, if they start cutting it might maybe bring some fresh blood into the show.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  81. Re:Good, now just go back to blowin shit up, dammi by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    True. But sadly, in BSG they usually got more of fillers.

    There have actually been quite a few shows that can make a very interesting shows, even one that drives character development or develops new plots, with bottle episodes. I remember quite a few ST:NG or Outer Limits episodes that had a lot of a bottler and were still incredibly intense (often just BECAUSE of the reduced setting, so the actor had to shine or it would show that he can't act). Frame of mind would be one such episode.

    A bottle episode doesn't have to be boring or pointless. But hey, let's be happy that they didn't resort to clip shows yet. At least, if they have, I missed it, fortunately.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  82. Welll there goes Admiral Adama.. by wilec · · Score: 1

    Something tells me that he might not make it to the fifth season. This would be a shame as Edward James Olmos has been my favorite actor in this series with both his acting and the writing making Admiral Adama the most interesting character, for me anyway. As for the future length of the series, well I can think of several spins on this. Many posters have noted that this story is limited by the goals of the respective elements, ie: humans and cylons. I see several interesting things that have already been introduced into the story and more that could be. For one the angst of the cylons about their god, place and purpose. Another cylon issue is their interest in hybrids, perhaps related to a genetic cloning disease, something similar to inbreeding in humans. Remember the obsession with what was it the last seven cylons. As for the humans, what kind of earth will they find? Just who populates it? A post holocaust civilization in ruin, a world with Star Trek level technology, is it populated with humans, cylons or how about hybrids? I can even see several valid spin offs that could easily be better than the average fare on TV.

    As for the soap opera type twists and the relation to current events of a controversial nature, well these can both be over done and in my view have been somewhat. However such is what allows for people to feel a connection with the story. All the best stories be they TV, novels, short stories or what ever use this basic method of connecting the everyday lives of the audience with the drama of the story. This requires very extensive and well executed character development and the very best do it very well. The best, like say Hemingway or Blair, I have known do it in such an understated manner that it is almost subliminal. The danger for the writers then is in being to up front and obvious in their approach to using this method. This rule also applies to the acting trade as well, and in my view E.J.Olmos is in the same league as Anthony Hopkins and both are to the acting world what Papa Hemingway or Eric Blair are the world of literature. In whole and especially in the best episodes the writers and actors have done well by this rule. Occasionally both have strayed a bit and come off as being a bit too obvious and thus, well corny.

    I do think they have done a pretty good job at staying idealistically neutral on the politically charged topics, mainly by exposing the multiple viewpoints even if the format only allows for shallow explorations. At least they attempt to address these in an intelligent and interesting manner. I find such interesting, I like the shootem up special effect stuff too but there is only so much I can take before I get bored with it. And they have done a pretty decent job with the SF conceptual stuff like the cylons angst and viral like mental transpostions and the humans devolution of networking technology as a defense. Overall I still give the series an A, and hope for several more seasons at a quality equal to those so far.

    Wabi-Sabi
    Matthew

    1. Re:Welll there goes Admiral Adama.. by tsstahl · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up.

      Kudos for seeing the 'relationship crap' as an expose of the human condition. Showing how the characters deal with situations that people normally avoid like the plague inspires a certain amount of self examination.

      In the real world infidelity usually dissolves relationships. Stuck in a tin can where you can name the inhabitants of your universe, the 'laws' have to change out of necessity. But those laws did not exist before zero hour on Caprica. Exploring questions like this is a very valid place for BSG to go. I don't think they should go there for 9 of 13 episodes in a season, though.

  83. Re:Good, now just go back to blowin shit up, dammi by tm2b · · Score: 1

    Oh, come on. There have been some fall-down funny moments. IE:

    [In Adama's quarters, Tigh is going over the list of people healthy enough, after the food shortages, to help harvest the algae. The algae isn't exactly what folks had imagined, though. The processing of the food will take some time and everyone is complaining about it.]
    Adama: I hear they're still eating paper. Is that true?
    Tigh: No.
    (wait a beat)
    Tigh: Paper shortage.
    (Both of them totally lose it, RotFL.)

    Dark, and conveying a lot of information about how stressed out they are, but also funny as hell.

    --
    "It is our blasphemy which has made us great, and will sustain us, and which the gods secretly admire in us." - Zelazny
  84. BSG sucks. by master_p · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Personal opinion, no need to get high on it or somethin. BSG sucks big time. I stopped after the 5th episode. The constant shouting, the overdramatization, the cliche lines ("hey mr president, we have terrorists; oh my God, our way of life is in danger"), the use of rifles and pistols instead of lazers, people wearing 3 piece suits, even with ties, the constant references to religion, the sucky music, and many other elements, are enough to put off any reasonably thinking person with an IQ better than a pea.

    The original was magical: it had captivating characters, an optimistic mood, it was futuristic (ok, silly at times, but in a nice way), Cylons were not humans (why should aliens be humans?), very nice and captivating music, ties to ancient history of Egyptians/Mayans/Toltecs, and great battles, at original Star Wars levels. It wasn't much of science, but it was many times more entertaining than this modern piece of shit.

    And, as any self respecting televised sci-fi fan would say, Star Trek is miles ahead from the best of BSG, even in its uglier form (i.e. Enterprise).

  85. Fantasy and Sci-Fi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All I know is...

    BSG: You got fantasy in my sci-fi!!! (without the visions, the cylons would be chasing them on the wrong side of the galaxy)

    Star Wars: You science in my fantasy! (the force is parasites? Can you get a vaccine?)

    Sucks.

  86. Except... by Snaller · · Score: 1

    Its not good scifi - its ridiculous religious nonsense.

    --
    If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
    1. Re:Except... by groovyghoul · · Score: 1

      And what good sci-fi hasn't had religious or political overtones?

    2. Re:Except... by Snaller · · Score: 1

      I didn't say politics.

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
  87. That's not what TFA said by Snaller · · Score: 1

    It doesn't say that BSG will continue, its what Ben Bradlee would call "a non denial denial" - Eick says he and Moore will decide the future. Which is of course true - right uptil Scifi tells them to decide its over.

    --
    If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
  88. Re:I'm sure this will upset people but please end by Let's+Kiosk · · Score: 1

    The documentary-style shaky camera thing goes back decades but got its first big exposure in prime time TV via "Hill Street Blues," more than 25 years ago. Interestingly, the producers of BSG have said they consciously sought to imitate the look and feel of Hill Street. IMO, it heightens the realism.

    The coolest shot in the entire series might have been when the nuclear bomb went off on the Cloud 9 during Baltar's inauguration. One of the pieces of debris flew through space and hit the camera, spinning it around cracking the lens. It was a subtle effect but kind of brilliant -- it sent the message "yes, we really film this series in space."

  89. Re:Good, now just go back to blowin shit up, dammi by Yusaku+Godai · · Score: 1

    OMG yeah, character development is for PUSSIES ANYWAYS!!!

  90. Re:Good, now just go back to blowin shit up, dammi by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 1

    There is nothing wrong with character developement. There is something wrong with useless and irrevelent character developement. There is also something wrong with character development that doesn't advance the plot line or over developing characters.

    The ideal behind the show is lost tribe, ass kicked by cylon, off to find earth. Not drunk ass tigh under a cot, father and son bullshit that takes up more than 15 mins a season that is not important to the plot. Seeing Starbuck want to get into apollo's pants, cute, for 5 mins once. After that nobody gives a shit.

    --

    Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

  91. You liar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why don't you watch the fucking show instead of making shit up? Have you ever watched even one episode of the "current series"? No, otherwise you would know Starbuck is a woman. Yeah the hair is short like a man's but those are in fact tits. And anyone who is presuming her dead must have slept through the last few episodes of season 3 (series 3 as you Brits call it). Get your shit together and next time you won't look like a moron in public.