Slashdot Mirror
PC World 's Best 100 Products of 2007
javipas writes "The popular PC World magazine has published its annual list of the 100 best products of the year, with a few surprises on it. Google Apps Premiere Edition ranks first, with 4 other service products on the list. Apple has six products on it, with Tiger — a two-year old OS — on the ninth position. Microsoft and Dell have four each, and Canon and Nikon, three. Ubuntu 7.04 has made it, and has entered on the 16th position. That makes you think about the kind of ranking process, doesn't it?"
Save it for December already!
If X is the new Y, and Y is "X is the new Y", solve for X.
Less ads:
5 /printable.html
http://www.pcworld.com/printable/article/id,13193
Is something messed up over there at PC World? Vista clocks set wrong?
How can you do a Best of 2007 when we aren't even half way through 2007????? Seriously. 2009 cars coming out next week?
I like compression and all, but moving political primaries up, now this.
It's either on the beat or off the beat, it's that easy.
I moderate therefore I rule!
--
Reads like a who's-who of PC World Advertisers...
Did they rate them by number of ads, or total dollars spent?
Wow ! I realy don't know why this on was there, but, every photographer out there think that a bad camera because the lack of AF-motor and the impossibility to use half the lenses of Nikon !
Ceci n'est pas une Signature !
...annnnd coming around the halfway mark it's McAfee SiteAdvisor edging out Canonical Ubuntu 7.04 by a length with Microsoft Xbox 360 Elite hot on their tail. Pioneer Elite 1080p PRO-FHD1 is neck-and-neck with RIM Blackberry 8800 but wait ... Apple Mac OS X 10.4 "Tiger" is coming up strong on the outside turn passing Adobe Premiere Elements 3.
try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
How about the Samsung u740 cellphone? It's the size of the Motorola razor, but isn't held together by hopes and dreams, and has a handy-dandy keyboard for texting (and of course it flips both up and to the side for calling and texting, respectively). Probably the best mobile phone I've owned, as it's compact but very functional and well-built.
:-P which is why I thought of it, but I do think it deserves a spot if something like the latest GeForce card is there (can it mow my lawn for me yet or it still just for marginally better graphics?).
Yes there was totally an ad for it on this particular Slashdot page just now
I like basketball!!1!
Google's terms of service for Google Apps has some alarming boilerplate about the company not being responsible for lost data.
I think a lot of organizations will have qualms about sensitive files living on some Google server somewhere.
The list is chock-full of piles of shit that have superior competition. It's paid advertising. Nothing to see here, move along.
"You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
Well since Dell have had to continue selling XP after they stopped... Due to public pressure, I can safely assume it wasn't a good product. I haven't used it, but only one person I know who has used it actually likes it, and he moved straight from a Windows 2000 to Vista, everyone I know who had an XP prefers it to Vista.
I'm putting on my sound blocking earplugs and ignoring the rest of the rants...
...just scrolled through the list to make sure vista wasnt there?
If you want to be generous in your interpretation, maybe you could say they included it to make the point that, even at two years old, it's still better than most of what's out there. (Reference: see almost every Vista review out there. Their quip: "Name a good Vista feature that goes beyond what's in Tiger. Yeah, we can't either.") Speaking of Vista, it didn't make the list at all. Not 1st, not 99th, nowhere.
:-)
Craigslist also made the list, and that's what, 10 years old now? I guess the list means "100 best tech products that you can still get this year"--in which case OS X and CL definitely belong. It's "The 100 Best Products of 2007," not "The 100 Best NEW Products of 2007." (CL just gets better and better, though I wish they'd make the jump from plain text to a database so I could RELIABLY find Macintoshes without having to look for Apple and Mac and Macintosh and IMAC (OMG CAPS!!!!!11) They don't have to go all the way and make people specify VRAM and 10/100 vs. gigabit, but mfg-make-model-speed would be nice. It could all be optional, so retards who don't want to mess with dropdowns can just accept that they'll get fewer views.)
More than anything, any "best of" list that includes Adobe Premier is immediately suspect.
If you want to get really picky, you could point out that 2007 is not over yet. You know what it is? I think it's "We Felt Like Making a List of a Bunch of Things We Like." Thank you, Slashdot, for slavishly supplying them with pageviews.
Suggested tag: slownewsday
Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
Not so much. Adding Vista to the list would be like adding Windows ME to the list of the best products for 1999. It's a terrible OS, it hogs resources and there is no innovation.
Software Reviews>
Absent from the lineup is Sonys wonderchild.
I'll believe in corporations having personhood when Texas executes one... - advocate_one
...online porn tops the list.
Have gnu, will travel.
I would've stuck the Core 2 architecture at #1 as it's made such a huge impact this year across all platforms; desktop, laptop and servers.. There are some notable omissions; the MacBook for one. Why is the overpriced MacBook Pro on there when the oh-so-cheap MacBook isn't? OneNote 2007 deserves a mention. I'd also like to think the Momento 70 digital picture frame should be on there - it's wireless and actually works properly with a PC.
Stuff that shouldn't be on there? iTunes (yawn) - yes, it's iTunes and in 2007 it's done nothing different from what it did in 2006. As I'm in the UK I'd also wager Apple TV too. The concept's nice, but until Apple start selling video over here, it's not particularly inspiring sat under my TV. Ditto for Adobe CS3 - until they start selling it an a realistic price in the UK, it's not getting my vote at all. We're paying something like $700 for a Photoshop CS2 > CS3 upgrade for Pete's sake!!
Oh yeah, and why are we doing top 100s in May again?
The awards list reminds of a manure spreader: Not much accuracy but lots of coverage.
That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
Ok this is neither a consumer product (in the sense that it is sold for money) nor is it new for 2007! I suspect many other entries also fail one or both of these tests. So where is the top 100 list of things to smoke when writing for PC World to provide the most outrageous articles possible? Because THATS news I can use...
This would be better done as a Murray Walker impression, complete with totally inaccurate predictions and a pants-on-fire delivery. Or, at least, it would reflect rankings and prognostications in IT better than the athletic commentators who are generally more sober.
It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
I used XP since it came out, and got both Vista for my desktop and a Macbook Pro as a new Laptop at about the same time. Vista, to me, seems to be more.. idiot proof? You can't easily get to the network connections screen anymore, you have to open 2 other screens and find the small text only link to actually view your network connections. With my Mac, I don't know, the UI is beautiful, the apps run nicely, and it does everything I want. I've only got one complaint, and that's not Apple's fault, but there's not many games. Popcap games are fun, but I have to go to Vista to play 'em.
I prefer Vista over XP, but OS X over both.
Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
I'm not saying that it's good or bad; I haven't used Vista at all so I have no basis to judge. I'm just kinda shocked that PCWorld didn't include the latest PC operating system in a top 100 list.
That's a conspicuous silence which speaks volumes about Vista.
With reasonable men I will reason; with humane men I will plead; but to tyrants I will give no quarter. -- William Lloyd
Well I'm not sure about the integrity of the article but there are a couple of things that stand out
Games:
Wii at no 3
XBox 360 elite at 18
PS3 nowhere to be seen.
The 360 has been out for over a year and I'm not sure how much 1080p and a bigger HDD make now, I guess in a couple of years when HD downloads become the norm this will make a difference. 1080p TVs have been quite rare in the UK until recently but I saw a very nice looking 40" Samsung the other day for about £1000 so I might treat myself at the end of the year.
(for the record I've got a 360 premium and a wii, I'll probably end up with a PS3 if FFXIII is exclusive but not before, too expensive at the moment!)
OSX Tiger at 9
Apple TV at 11
80GB iPod at 26
Macbook Pro at 82
No Zune
No Vista
I'm assuming that the HP DV900t 17" laptop runs Windows Media Center
iTunes at 61
WMP 11 at 91
So it looks like Apple "wins" over MS in the home media dept
Strangely on my XP box I use iTunes for music and WMP / VLC for Video. I just don't like Quicktime. No rational reason (now it plays video at full screen) but I just can't get on with it. It seems slow and unresponsive.
Still it looks like Apple were right to drop the computer from their name and go for the media market. I get the impression that they've always had the Pro market and so the move to consumer seems to be quite easy for them. (now if they'd just drop the phone bit from the iPhone and sell me a widescreen touch sensitive iPod I'd be a happy man)
They went from a $4000+ gaming PC which is the epitome of poor value for money to freeware like Firefox and Audacity.
:)
This list is just a bunch of stuff some guy thinks is cool. If I cared about that I would read people's Amazon lists all day instead of Slashdot
4 people modded this up, 3 people posted replies above me, and no one mentions the obvious counterexample: Vista with its $500 million marketing campaign doesn't make the list.
Less ads:
Adblock Plus
What if Gutsy Gibbon turns out to be better than Feisty Fawn, which, btw, will be released in a few months? Also, 7.04 is not an LTS(Long Term Service).
Considering the whole list is one giant opinion, and your only real argument in favor of your position is that you personally disagree, I'd say troll is appropriate.
Slashdot - where whining about luck is the new way to make the world you want.
I'm glad that SightSpeed beat out Skype on this list. The video quality of SightSpeed is far superior. Works better on my mac as well.
<happiness>beer</happiness>
Considering that you clearly don't understand what Troll means, I'd say I hope you never get mod points.
Trolling is making a statement that you do not believe in order to elicit a desired response.
I believed what I said, and therefore I was not trolling.
If you don't understand/agree with this, read the moderation guidelines until you do. They're not very complicated and they're written in fairly understandable English.
"You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
I'd rather look back on the whole year rather than 11/12ths of it. Or are we just saying that December is totally irrelevant?
This ridiculous game of one-upmanship that people play with each other to try to get their annual reviews in ahead of others, etc is just ridiculous. Frankly, it just makes them look stupid.
And while I'm on the subject, why the hell does EA title the annual releases of their sports game for the following years rather than the years that they're published? Are people really stupid enough to think that when they buy Madden 2008 this year that they're somehow getting next year's game in advance?
"Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
What we are waiting for:
What we don't want:
If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
But they did include the latest. Ubuntu is at number 16.
So a whole article of opinion is worthy of the front page, but expressing an opinion on those opinions is troll?
"Trolling" is posting in such a way as to illicit angry responses from people on the forum - getting them to "bite". Whether the poster believes what he's posting is irrelevant. The phrasing and intent are what matters.
"The popular PC World magazine "
As opposed to the tired old rag that I see on the newstand occasionally?
Slightly disreputable, albeit gregarious
Thanks to PC World for not making this a 10-page article with 10 items on each page, with gloriously large ads for each of the 10 products.
While we can argue on the merits of individual items on the list (which, arguably, is part of the reason to post such a list) the presentation format is top notch.
It's too bad Opera 9.x didn't make the list. Maybe they couldn't find the script to make google apps run on it.
Ubuntu is the recentest, "latest" means "most late" and applies to Vista.
One of the best newest features on Slashdot and it's left off the list! Those bastages at PC World!
IANAL, but if you don't RTFM you can STFU. YMMV.
I expected this article in the December 2006 edition! Lazy Lazy Lazy!
Clearly, the products on the list don't actually have to be from this year, or last year. I think Audacity is the bees knees, but it's been out for ... pretty much forever (in internet time), so why is it on that list? Is there anyone out there interested in Audacity who doesn't already know about it? really?
burrocrisy
and that would be what? Ruling by jackasses? Never has a slashdot misspelling been more apropos
Nope, back to "insightful"
Don't feel bad. Jumping to wild conclusions (either when modding or in replies) is the pastime here on slashdot.
It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
Obviously you didn't understand what you read. "This is a prank comment intended to provoke indignant (or just confused) responses." But when I write what I believe (not intended as a prank) and it is not intended to provoke indignant or confused responses, then it is clearly not a troll, and you are clearly still an idiot in addition to being a pusillanimous wimp.
"You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
OK, we all know that this is only May, and that many of these products are well over a year old already, but even so, I'm not sure that there are a hundred products in the last 'while' that are worth being on a list. Well, a good list at any rate.
I've seen very very few products worth raising an approving eyebrow over in the last few years. The wii is one, OSX is one, Solaris 10 is one, and... I'm not sure what else. The iPod, I suppose. Either iTunes or WMP 10, but neither is without faults. Firefox 2.
Video cards? No chance--someone will come out with a significantly newer, faster, better video card every six months or so, but the evolutionary phase is over. Same with printers--nothing new since cheap lasers and reliable photo-quality inkjets. Certain segments of computing are starting to mature, to the point that there isn't any significant gain in new products. (Hence why vendors are forcing obsolescence on their older products more aggressively all the time.)
Then we have the downright bad products that make these lists. The blackberry provides one feature of questionable utility (mobile email--but it's a phone too, and that's already mobile!) and does it badly, dragging down its other functions at the same time. Office 2007, which was created for no reason other than (a) to sell an unneccessary product to people who already have a sufficient product, and (b) to disrupt the converging competitive standards. Google Groups. The list goes on.
So what genuinely new and innovative (and also good!) products are out there? Without an artificial number to reach (10, 20, 100, etc.) I wonder how many have come out in each of the last five years.
"People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban