Slashdot Mirror


Moore's Law for Motherboards

An anonymous reader writes "VIA CEO Wenchi Chen revealed a business card-sized motherboard billed as the 'world's first industry-standard form-factor for PC/phone convergence,' at Computex this week. The mobile-ITX" board measures 3 x 1.8 inches. It's half the size of pico-ITX, which was half the size of nano-ITX, which, in turn, was half-the size of mini-ITX — which was already small. It's not clear whether VIA will make these tiny motherboards available to end users, or if they will only be sold directly to device makers, but generally all of VIA's tiny motherboard formats have spread around to other suppliers and become widely available."

170 comments

  1. I for one... by TheSHAD0W · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...welcome these new business cards. Just go to a trade show, collect business cards, and build a Beowulf cluster out of them!

    1. Re:I for one... by HappyEngineer · · Score: 1

      Do you know that this is the very first time that I've ever smiled at a fucking Beowulf joke?

      Up until now I would have liked to add a comment filter that hides any message with the word Beowulf in it, but then I would have missed this one and I would have been poorer for it.

  2. Is that a motherboard in your pocket... by Ngarrang · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...or are you just happy to see me?

    --
    Bearded Dragon
    1. Re:Is that a motherboard in your pocket... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, I really am happy to see you!

    2. Re:Is that a motherboard in your pocket... by Dogtanian · · Score: 4, Funny

      ...or are you just happy to see me? Personally, I don't want *anything* named "pico" confused with my genitalia.
      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    3. Re:Is that a motherboard in your pocket... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about something that's "half the size of pico..."?

    4. Re:Is that a motherboard in your pocket... by geekoid · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Personally, I don't want *anything* named "pico" confused with my genitalia, again."

      There fixed it for you! With the right help, you might be able to make it 1000 times bigger...

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    5. Re:Is that a motherboard in your pocket... by alx5000 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I sooo prefer 'nano'...

      --
      My 0.02 cents
    6. Re:Is that a motherboard in your pocket... by twistedsymphony · · Score: 1

      "Fun Size"?

    7. Re:Is that a motherboard in your pocket... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Err, if it's really one of these mobile MB's, then that's really not saying much. Gotta be a pico at minimum.

    8. Re:Is that a motherboard in your pocket... by ThePengwin · · Score: 1

      But size dosent determine power these days....

    9. Re:Is that a motherboard in your pocket... by zerblat · · Score: 1

      So, you don't wan't a pico near your pico? Me neither...

      --
      Please alter my pants as fashion dictates.
    10. Re:Is that a motherboard in your pocket... by houghi · · Score: 1

      Ok. How about Micro Soft?

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  3. My favorite caption in a long time by arootbeer · · Score: 5, Funny
    From the first picture of the motherboard:

    Via's mobile-ITX board prototype
    (Click to enlarge)
  4. Yawn!! by Wizworm · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Wake me when they have an equivalent System on a chip.

    --
    I always thought of Creationism as the Raving Right's version of the Loony Left's Anthropogenic Global Warming-brightmal
    1. Re:Yawn!! by sussane · · Score: 0

      Law FOr Motherboards ??? well amazing news.. but kinda weird

      --
      Best Regards, Eliena Andrews
    2. Re:Yawn!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NO U

    3. Re:Yawn!! by jimstapleton · · Score: 1

      Given the state of current media, I'd like to see one the size/shape of a CD, without a hole in the middle.

      Then again, if flash or similar small stuff ends up replacing standard sized optical media, that'll be a waste of time and effort...

      --
      34486853790
      Connection too slow for X forwarding? Try "ssh -CX user@host"
    4. Re:Yawn!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The neat thing is that this tiny package includes the connectors to hook it up. No matter highly integrated the chip becomes, you still need to attach DRAM and cables to the beast. I like it.

    5. Re:Yawn!! by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      Please, give me the motherboard on an atom! That would really deserve the name "pico".
      BTW, did anyone notice they omitted "micro"?

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    6. Re:Yawn!! by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      I don't see why the DRAM couldn't be integrated in the chip as well (except for the limited space on the chip, of course). One could even think of an integrated Flash drive. Of course you'll still need cables.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    7. Re:Yawn!! by Random+Destruction · · Score: 1

      I assume you mean the summary omitted it, as they definitely do exist

      --
      :x
  5. How big? by thesolo · · Score: 4, Informative

    That's 7.62 cm x 4.57 cm, for everyone reading this who isn't American.

    Please put all smart-ass/pro-SAE comments about the metric system below this post, thanks.

    1. Re:How big? by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 1

      What size are business cards in the rest of the world?

      --
      This guy's the limit!
    2. Re:How big? by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 4, Funny

      That's 7.62 cm x 4.57 cm, for everyone reading this who isn't American.
      Wow! that's only 3.48234 × 10^-7 hectares!
      --
      No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
    3. Re:How big? by thesolo · · Score: 2, Informative

      Business cards tends to vary between a few different sizes, usually depending on from which country the card came.

      The international standard size is the same as a credit card, which is 85.6 mm x 53.98 mm. It's defined by ISO 7810, ID-1. Oddly enough, the US uses that sizing standard for its credit cards & drivers licenses, but not for business cards.

      The business cards my Italian relatives have given me from Italy are always in a slightly different format than international size, they're instead 85 mm x 55 mm. Just slightly less wide and a slight bit taller than international size.

    4. Re:How big? by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      Only? That's 3.48234 × 10^25 barn!

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    5. Re:How big? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or 1161600 mbpa (Motherboards per acre)

    6. Re:How big? by mobby_6kl · · Score: 1

      If anyone is still having trouble imagining the size of that thing, think of it as ten AK-47 bullets placed next to each other. HTH.

    7. Re:How big? by vimh42 · · Score: 1

      That's 7.62 cm x 4.57 cm, for everyone reading this who isn't American.

      Wow! that's only 3.48234 × 10^-7 hectares

      For those of you who didn't bother reading the summary or TFA, that's 3 x 1.8 inches.

    8. Re:How big? by Drooling+Iguana · · Score: 1

      How much is that in football fields?

      --
      ... I'm addicted to placebos
    9. Re:How big? by kisielk · · Score: 1

      Yeah. I found it annoying that in order to fit in to my binder I had to trim all of the business cards I had collected in Japan because they were just slightly too tall to fit in the plastic sleeves.

    10. Re:How big? by ThePengwin · · Score: 1

      Never for did i think "How many hectares would that be?" But, now i know, thankyou :D

    11. Re:How big? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      1200 in a line would be exactly 100 yards - strange how its metric and yet that works out with nice round numbers...

      100 yards = 9144 cm | 9144/7.62 = 1200

  6. Cool by KnowledgeKeeper · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I can't wait. Now I can finally make a powerful wearable computer. Now just to find someone who makes LCDs that look like glasses for a reasonable sum of money and I'm off to a wonderland :)

    --
    It is always better to be a first grade version of yourself than a second grade version of someone else.
    1. Re:Cool by DrunkenTerror · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You're never getting laid.

    2. Re:Cool by Ngarrang · · Score: 1

      You're never getting laid. Which explains the need for a wearable computer and LCD-monitor eye glasses. Just add the tactile glove that was advertised a few months ago and voila! Second Life can take on a whole new level of addiction.
      --
      Bearded Dragon
    3. Re:Cool by jimstapleton · · Score: 1

      You said "powerful" about a VIA product...

      Are you feeling well? Maybe you should get some rest, have a doctor take a look at that bump on your head.

      --
      34486853790
      Connection too slow for X forwarding? Try "ssh -CX user@host"
    4. Re:Cool by KnowledgeKeeper · · Score: 1

      Yeah, sure. Girls like only poor dweebs working in a McDonalds. Just keep telling yourself that. :o)

      --
      It is always better to be a first grade version of yourself than a second grade version of someone else.
    5. Re:Cool by KnowledgeKeeper · · Score: 1

      You said "powerful" about a VIA product...

      Are you feeling well? Maybe you should get some rest, have a doctor take a look at that bump on your head.


      I'm all right, thanks for asking. Ever tried making a DIY wearable with PICs and/or ATMELs? Yeah, this is powerful :) I'm not going to use it for FPS or sth :')

      --
      It is always better to be a first grade version of yourself than a second grade version of someone else.
    6. Re:Cool by jimstapleton · · Score: 1

      bah, just have somebody ram soff offsets into your back, and screw on a extended-atx mobo like a real man!

      --
      34486853790
      Connection too slow for X forwarding? Try "ssh -CX user@host"
    7. Re:Cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least poor dweebs working in a McDonalds pick up some social skills working the register or drive-through.

      Before you take that as a dig: I've never worked in food services.

    8. Re:Cool by Zencyde · · Score: 1

      Someone please make note that this was modded "Insightful".

      --
      What day is it? Could you please tell me?
    9. Re:Cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not likely. Working the register or drive through you are mostly just getting orders from customers and not having real conversations.

      From my experience working in a supermarket as a teenager, it was after I moved departments and stopped being a cashier that my social skills improved because I had more opportunity to move around and actually talk to my colleagues, whereas serving customers often hinders this.

  7. I want some... by Stanistani · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Imagine building itty-bitty robots...

    Or digital picture frames...

    Case-modding an Altoids tin...

    1. Re:I want some... by inkedgeek · · Score: 1

      Ok now the Altoids tin mod would rock! But what about modding a tic tac container?

      --
      696e6b6564
    2. Re:I want some... by Stanistani · · Score: 1

      We'll have to wait for Via to make an even eenier board...

      or use the voices in our heads...

    3. Re:I want some... by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      Do strong mints and circuit boards mix?

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    4. Re:I want some... by ThosLives · · Score: 1

      Curiously enough....




      ( Sorry, I couldn't resist :-} )

      --
      "There are a dozen opinions on a matter until you know the truth. Then there is only one." - CS Lewis (paraprhase)
    5. Re:I want some... by bozendoka · · Score: 0

      Curiously, yes.

      --
      "You will soon be more aware of your growing awareness." - My first recursive fortune cookie!
    6. Re:I want some... by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      Ok now the Altoids tin mod would rock!

      Well, you don't need a board that small to do that. They make "The BIG Tin(TM)" at 4" by 7.5" (holds 10 Oz. (283g) of mints). UPC 0-59280-20202-4.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    7. Re:I want some... by JohnnyLocust · · Score: 1

      A pocket XBox perhaps?

    8. Re:I want some... by kv9 · · Score: 1

      A pocket XBox perhaps?

      a pocket for the XBox and a wheelbarrow for the controller?

  8. Strange units by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sure, the pico-ITX measures about one pico-astronomical-unit, but why the hell do they measure motherboard sizes with this unit?

    1. Re:Strange units by jellomizer · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well my Car gets about 5.44356571 Pico-Lightyears/Gallon

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    2. Re:Strange units by johnw · · Score: 1

      Well my Car gets about 5.44356571 Pico-Lightyears/Gallon My car gets about 0.05 square millimetres.

      Think about it.
    3. Re:Strange units by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      Your car is European. If it were American, it would get 20 per square millimeter instead.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  9. Welcome to the technological world by default+luser · · Score: 1

    Where things get smaller and faster every year! Amazing!

    The same technology that allows us to fit hundreds of millions of transistors on a chip allows us to build a tiny botherboard the functionality in a few custom asics and processors. And so it goes.

    The only reason this is "impressive" is because Via is the first company to show it off as if it were sexy. The industry has already been producing small, PCI bus motherboards for years.

    --

    Man is the animal that laughs.
    And occasionally whores for Karma.

    1. Re:Welcome to the technological world by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      Too bad the board connectors will be still have to stay the same size unless you have nanofingers too.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    2. Re:Welcome to the technological world by default+luser · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yup, we're reaching the size limits regarding standardized, interchangable interfaces.

      Thankfully, we're already tossing out electrical connections for low-speed I/O with the introduction of Bluetooth, ad there's the portential for making high-speed I/O wireless with beefy 802.11n and later revisions.

      The big problem is power. Power is going to kill innovation in the wireless devices field unless we can come up with some impressive storage capacity improvements. You can improve the efficiency of the transmitter and receiver, but you can't really reduce transmission power much futher than we've already done. That would require reducing the noise floor, which is impossible.

      I don't expect any of these small concept PCs to pan-out precisely for this reason: many people want flexible interfaces in their devices so they can communicate.

      --

      Man is the animal that laughs.
      And occasionally whores for Karma.

    3. Re:Welcome to the technological world by WhoBeDaPlaya · · Score: 1

      You could always cool the dominant noise source; of course, that would suck up additional power.
      We also do already have noise-shaping techniques (PWM / sigma-delta) to move the noise out of the bandwidth region of interest...

    4. Re:Welcome to the technological world by louisadkins · · Score: 1

      The big problem is power. . . . You reminded me of this article.

    5. Re:Welcome to the technological world by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      The only reason this is "impressive" is because Via is the first company to show it off as if it were sexy. The industry has already been producing small, PCI bus motherboards [pc104plus.com] for years.
      right: 133 mhz maximum processor speed and no mention of price (which i'm guessing means its very expensive) and maximum 256 megs of ram. I can't find a price but i suspect it is not cheap.

      what via did was release smallish (though not tiny at least in the intial generation) boards that could run current versions of windows at acceptable though not outstanding speeds that were availible at prices where hobbyists could afford them.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  10. while it's cool by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

    Where is the power supply? Where is the storage? What is the processor? How much memory ... etc... Small computing already exists. What we need is less shitty small computing.

    Get a processor in the MIPS rating of say a 500MHz AMD K8 processor on a credit card device, with self-contained power, decent memory [say at least 128M], etc. Then we'll chat.

    Until then my Gumstix 400MHz ARM with 64M of ram will do fine for small time computing [albeit slowly...]

    Tom

    --
    Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    1. Re:while it's cool by TheThiefMaster · · Score: 2, Informative

      Where is the power supply? Where is the storage? What is the processor? How much memory ... etc... Small computing already exists. What we need is less shitty small computing.

      Get a processor in the MIPS rating of say a 500MHz AMD K8 processor on a credit card device, with self-contained power, decent memory [say at least 128M], etc. Then we'll chat.

      Until then my Gumstix 400MHz ARM with 64M of ram will do fine for small time computing [albeit slowly...]

      Tom From TFA:

      The mobile-ITX board that Chen demonstrated this morning appears to be based on a 1GHz "C7-S" processor -- apparently a standard Via C7-M shoe-horned into a 9 x 11mm package. The chip had not previously been announced. The mobile-ITX board also apparently uses an "S" (small) version of the CX700 integrated north-/south-bridge chipset. And, it appears to have an on-board DC-DC converter. Additionally, according to Via, the board includes a CDMA baseband processor chip, suggesting that the mobile-ITX board could be used as the basis for x86-compatible smartphones.

      According to a brief item at EpiaCenter, Via's mobile-ITX board will be available with 256MB or 512MB of RAM soldered on-board, and will run Linux or Windows XP Embedded. Even an embedded version of Windows Vista may be too much for the little board, however, a Via spokesperson admits.
    2. Re:while it's cool by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      VIA processors are not known for their serious ALU performance. Granted it's cool that it has ram, but the processor sucks. What about flash storage? And there still isn't power, a battery or AC adapter would add to the size don't you think?

      I mean my computer is no bigger than an a couple inches square. That is if you disregard the mobo, memory, PSU, case, disk drives, etc...

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    3. Re:while it's cool by doombringerltx · · Score: 1

      TFA says it comes with 256MB or 512MB on board. It discribes the processor fairly well too. Its a sized down Via C7-M. The OS is embeded and I imagine what little else will be held in flash memory.

    4. Re:while it's cool by imsabbel · · Score: 1

      Come on, dont act like an asshole.

      In you first post, you mentioned a 500 Mhz k8 to be ok, and 128Mbyte ram to be fine.
      After the GP showed that its a 1 Ghz VIA (they are about compareable to an half speed k8), and 4 times as much ram as you demanded, you suddenly paddal back just to be able to futher nag around.

      And btw, ALL performance is ALU. Where else should it come from. No need to use big words (or acronyms) in show how intelligent you are. You are not going to fool anybody anyway.

      --
      HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
    5. Re:while it's cool by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      VIA processors are not known for their serious ALU performance. Granted it's cool that it has ram, but the processor sucks.

      What the processor doesn't suck is power. Low power consumption FTW!

      What about flash storage?

      It must have some, but they haven't figured out how much. But you're right, if it doesn't have a slot, it's pointless.

      And there still isn't power, a battery or AC adapter would add to the size don't you think?

      Has a DC-DC power supply, so luckily, all it needs is the battery. Batteries are getting pretty small these days.

      I mean my computer is no bigger than an a couple inches square. That is if you disregard the mobo, memory, PSU, case, disk drives, etc...

      This IS the mobo, memory, and psu. It probably has onboard flash, and if it doesn't already, it will almost certainly have some type of SD slot.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    6. Re:while it's cool by tomstdenis · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'd like to point out that a 500MHz AMD K8 is capable of way more MIPS [and FLOPS] than a 1GHz C7 core.

      Clockrate != performance or did Intel's P4 escapades not teach you anything?

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    7. Re:while it's cool by symbolset · · Score: 1

      What about flash storage?

      It must have some, but they haven't figured out how much. But you're right, if it doesn't have a slot, it's pointless.

      I believe this device has USB. I would recommend the KingMax SuperStick 4GB. It's 4 gigs, and it's smaller than a single stick of Dentyne. I have a couple and my VIA systems boot from that just fine. It may require some rework, of course, but you would expect to customize something like this.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    8. Re:while it's cool by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      If they support MiniSD, then you can get 4GB in something the size of a fingernail. MicroSD will let you have 2GB in something half that size (I have a 512MB card in my RAZR, you could sneeze and lose the damned thing if it was on your hand.) If they're making a phone with so much processing power, they will almost certainly include memory expansion. ("They" being either VIA, or whoever actually builds a phone around it.) The whole idea of this thing is that it could go in a range of devices anyway; I could see there being a range of systems built on this, starting with an iPhone-competitor with maybe a SD slot, and running up to a tablet with CF, SD[IO], WiFi, etc. But I'm not all THAT excited until they announce one with GSM support. GSM may be slower than the other popular solutions today, but you need it to move around through the world.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    9. Re:while it's cool by StewedSquirrel · · Score: 1

      And btw, ALL performance is ALU. Where else should it come from. No need to use big words (or acronyms) in show how intelligent you are. You are not going to fool anybody anyway.


      Uhm... perhaps it would come from the cache? Or the FPU? Or from the memory controller? Or from the bus speed?

      The ALU is the "Arithmetic Logic Unit" which performs some of the basic integer mathematics and some parts of memory addressing and simple comparisons, but very little else.

      There is plenty that goes on, such as branch prediction, cache associativity, memory latency, etc - that would likely have a much stronger impact on performance than raw ALU performance.

      However, i guess it does seem a bit silly to claim a poorly performing ALU from the limited number of benchmarks i've seen on that core. it does seem a little slow, but it's likely because it's not a very aggressive CPU in terms of design, utilizing things such as speculative execution, out of order execution, advanced branch prediction (AMD claims 99%, where via claims like 93% accuracy), etc. There are lots of other reasons... than just ALU that could cause a CPU to suck.

      It seems to me that these design tradeoffs were pretty smart, given the state of the art and what is required to make a low power processor. The C7 does not "suck" by any means. It might not beat a Core Duo in any benchmarks, but it does what it was designed to do quite well.

      Stew
      --
      There are 10 kinds of people in the world. Those who understand binary and those who don't.
    10. Re:while it's cool by epine · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You have a peculiar definition of "way more". The claims I'm familiar with is that the C7 performs comparably to a Pentium III at half the clock frequency, except on many cryptographic benchmarks, where the C7 outperforms the Pentium III by more than a factor of ten. My recollection is that the K8 is a highly optimized three-issue design (decode and retirement rate limited to three instructions/clock), whereas the Pentium III is a middle of the road three-issue design (more interlocks and stalls, more unnecessary opcode splitting). The difference could range anywhere from zilch (where the instruction sequence has no liabilities on the P3) to about 50% faster on the K8. I can't recall the last time I said "woo hoo" over 50% some of the time.

      The C3 was appallingly slow at floating point. I've read the C7 is vastly improved, but still far from great. Still, your concept of "way more" seems to better apply to a comparison of a 1GHz C3 to a 500MHz K8. No one would argue there.

    11. Re:while it's cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Open-hardware balloonboard v3 http://www.balloonboard.org/ does the job:

      520Mhz Intel XScale PXA270 (800 MIPS)
      512MB SDRAM
      2GB Flash memory
      Just needs 5V power.
      CF Slot for wireless LAN etc..
      Credit card sized (well, almost - its actually 1.5cm longer by the time you include mounting holes)

    12. Re:while it's cool by chthon · · Score: 1

      Floating point does not matter for low-power tasks.

      What I would like to use these things for is as a small gateway server that can be powered 24/7, and that does routing, fetching of e-mail, POP3 (or something similar) and proxying.

  11. Wasn't Moore's law... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought Moore's Law was:

    Everything is a government plot.

    1. Re:Wasn't Moore's law... by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      I thought Moore's Law was: Everything is a government plot. No, that's Cole's Law.
      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  12. Add Wifi core by jshriverWVU · · Score: 1

    This could be a nice node for building city-wide mesh networks. :)

    1. Re:Add Wifi core by rrohbeck · · Score: 1

      Mmmmh. Add a primitive power supply and seal the whole thing in an AC plug.

    2. Re:Add Wifi core by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      if you could avoid external connections it may not even need to be an isolating power supply......

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    3. Re:Add Wifi core by rrohbeck · · Score: 1

      That's what I meant by "primitive". Like an RC network and a diode.

  13. Revolution in custom cellphones? by rasteri · · Score: 1

    How I hope they make this available to consumers. It opens a very intriguing possibility - making your own linux cellphone.

    Think about it - completely customisable UI, thousands of possible plastic cases (I imagine many 3rd party case manufacturers will spring up), second-to-none music and video support, and the ability to use or port millions of existing linux apps.

    Maybe in a couple of years time you'll be able to buy a bunch of cellphone parts at radio shack, and assemble them into a custom phone as is currently possible with PCs.

    1. Re:Revolution in custom cellphones? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't remember ever seeing computer parts at Radio Shack.
      In fact, I can't remember the last time I actually saw radio parts at Radio Shack.

    2. Re:Revolution in custom cellphones? by Alioth · · Score: 1

      This kind of device is completely unsuitable for a cellphone - it uses far too much power and makes far too much heat. There are already devices out there that would work MUCH better (like small ARM-based devices). You can already buy the chips to do GSM and roll your own cellphone, and you have been able to for some time. The people at Sparkfun Electronics have already done it (and put it inside a rotary dial phone, complete with a proper ringer, and the electronics to turn pulse dialing into the commands to dial up over the GSM network).

    3. Re:Revolution in custom cellphones? by brunascle · · Score: 1

      you might already be able to do that.

      i think you can make your own computer into a cellphone if you get a certain type of adapter, like the ones this comany sells. i think you just need to get a SIM card and plug it in. and you'll need to find/write some software, i'm sure.

      and gumstix makes a variety of very small linux computers.

      now you'll need some type of interface thing. not sure about the hardware, but you could find something that works with qtopia

      granted, $10 says the end-result doesnt fit in your pocket.

    4. Re:Revolution in custom cellphones? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      making your own linux cellphone. ... the ability to use or port millions of existing linux apps

      SMS ... meet ... emacs !

    5. Re:Revolution in custom cellphones? by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 1

      Funny... there is already Linux PCs with completely customisable UI, thousands of PC cases... and unfortunately, second to Windows/Apple in terms of music and video support.

      Somehow I don't see a losing formula on the desktop suddenly becoming viable when you change form factors.

      The iPhone and it's ilk are still going to rule the roost, I think.

  14. Wakeup... by gillbates · · Score: 3, Interesting

    TI already has your system on a chip. It's called the DM6442, DaVinci.

    --
    The society for a thought-free internet welcomes you.
    1. Re:Wakeup... by Mr.+Bad+Example · · Score: 2, Funny

      > It's called the DM6442, DaVinci.

      Unfortunately, it prints everything backwards.

    2. Re:Wakeup... by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      That's just a DSP though. Still, fairly capable x86 compatible systems on chip (or at least in a single package have been around for a while. Here's Intel's latest

    3. Re:Wakeup... by InsaneProcessor · · Score: 1

      This sucks too much power though. The VIA part is much more stingy on power with enough performance to do most anything a system this size needs to do.

      --

      Athiesm is a religion like not collecting stamps is a hobby.
  15. Moore's law misunderstood by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In contrast to the CPU speed (which increases, and therefore Moore's law can be applied), you can't decrease size to all eternity. There WILL be an absolute minimum (see Kelvin as example).

  16. Pico-ITX Review by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is a good Pico-ITX review at http://www.mini-itx.com/reviews/pico-itx/ "As a reminder of just how small this thing is, employees at a Japanese store got hold of an early board and put together this Pico-Gameboy. The system boots XP from a 4GB Compact Flash card, with a VGA output and 12V DC input on one side." Enjoy

  17. miPhone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yahoooo.... looks like I can build miPhone until the price of the other brand drops.

  18. Nothing New by JamesRose · · Score: 1

    Yes, this is the first to not be exclusive to a device. But what does this guy think runs his ipod? Phone? PDA? Despite popular opinion, its not magic, there are motherboards in these machines.

  19. Been around for a while... by gillbates · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The embedded world has had complete computers on "motherboards" this small for quite some time. Check out gumstix sometime.

    The fundamental problem with PC based motherboards has always been heat dissipation and interface connectors. Heck, the back panel of my desktop uses more area for the connectors than exists on this board. There are processor heatsinks bigger than this thing!

    PC's have always been about cheap computing power, not low power dissipation or form factor. I remember a time when the power of your desktop was considered commensurate with the size of the box - we had friends putting regular motherboards into server towers so they could "impress" fellow geeks.

    Not that I would mind x86 in the embedded world, but it seems to me that this is going nowhere fast. The problem isn't technical - it's business. Most embedded systems run some sort of ARM variant, which would mean that code would have to be ported to x86. Furthermore, there's no way this would make it into a cellphone - primarily because of the fact that it is x86, and the carriers are adamantly opposed to the prospect of the consumer being allowed to run unauthorized code on their cellphones.

    Linux already runs on the ARM, and you still aren't seeing a proliferation of ARM-based general purpose computers. While this would be nice for a sub-notebook, the problem is that sub-notebooks, while a personal favorite of mine, typically have not done well in the marketplace. Consider the HP Jornada, which was discontinued after a few short years. And it seems today that that trend is toward larger, not smaller, laptops.

    --
    The society for a thought-free internet welcomes you.
    1. Re:Been around for a while... by Ramble · · Score: 0

      Low power dissipation and a small form factor (process) is directly linked with power per pound (dollar).

      --
      "Oh boy"
    2. Re:Been around for a while... by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Informative

      The fundamental problem with PC based motherboards has always been heat dissipation and interface connectors.

      Various companies like Advantech have long sold expensive PC motherboards (sometimes with soldered cpu, sometimes socketed) that are dramatically smaller than the average. Most of the connectors are on headers, and you can use them or not, as you see fit. For example many people will never need serial or parallel connections - while others will never need USB. Their systems (the only ones I ever researched much) come in sizes ranging from PC/104 (which is to say, same size as a PC/104 card) to 5.25" storage device size (approx. footprint.) And some of them will run on automotive voltages, making a picopsu or similar unnecessary. But they are damned expensive! If VIA brings out a truly teensy motherboard it will fulfill a need I am currently experiencing - the need for a full PC that will fit into an ISO DIN slot. I have the entertainment system part in the car already, now I need the navigation/vehicle monitoring system to finish up, and I don't want to spend the $750+ it would take to get decent horsepower from one of the classic SBC-providing companies.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:Been around for a while... by ClosedSource · · Score: 1

      I think the x86 is more appropriate for "vanity" systems than embedded systems. Vanity systems have about the same form-factor and hardware complement as a PC but with a higher price and the the bragging rights to say "we designed it ourselves".

      Of course, true embedded systems aren't general purpose computers with a smaller form-factor, they're special purpose systems targeted to implement a specific function. In these systems, an X86 doesn't integrate enough hardware to be very useful and some X86 features like virtual memory aren't relevant in some cases.

    4. Re:Been around for a while... by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      Running x86 doesn't automatically make a processor consume more power. How about them out of order execution engines, huge caches, multiple pipelines, etc...

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    5. Re:Been around for a while... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd love to see very small, very quiet Linux computers running on MIPS, ARM or PPC, eg. something like this. Unfortunately most products that exist are hard to get hold of and relatively poorly supported. VIA have all the advantages that come with a market and a popular architecture.

    6. Re:Been around for a while... by smellsofbikes · · Score: 2, Informative

      >The fundamental problem with PC based motherboards has always been heat dissipation and interface connectors.

      And the fundamental problem of things like gumstix is that they're very good for one specific function, the one for which they were designed, but if you want to do something outside that, you run into a wedding-cake-like pile of add-on cards to get the functionality you wanted. Take gumstix. I might be wrong, but my reading of their USB technical specifications says that this is a device intended to hook to a computer as a peripheral, not one capable of hooking to and controlling peripherals. I want to build remote surveillance devices that run on very low power (solar) for an off-the-grid house way up in the mountains, so I know what the weather's going to be like before I drive up. It'd also be really nice if it were small so I could stick it in the enclosure on the roof with the camera, and only have to run a phone line down, or wireless. Any PC-style system can run wireless and a USB webcam, but they're huge and power-hungry. Any small embedded processor device can fit in a tiny enclosure and run on 10W, but I have yet to find one that can run a webcam and send that video data out. So, for me, this sounds like a great bit of progress, although there are other ARM-based and x86-based very small computers that might also work. (and I might get my old Qube to do it, if I keep working at it...)

      --
      Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
    7. Re:Been around for a while... by nonsequitor · · Score: 1

      Most embedded systems run some sort of ARM variant
      You're forgetting embedded PowerPC chips, and entire families of 8 bit and 16 bit chips which are still in widespread use throughout the embedded world. You think it takes a 32 bit chip to drive a discman? What about dumb cellphones, I can garuantee that almost none of those would use a 32 bit chip, the almost is because invariably some products end up over-engineered.

      The word PC is vastly over-used since it used to mean IBM PC Compatible (x86). This ultra mobile ITX board may be a mini computer on a small board, but the fact is that custom motherboards are made for many devices. With this you don't even get to choose what peripherals you get with the system, its common to have many peripherals over an I2C bus, SPI bus, or directly wired to pins for System on a Chip archs. And for the record linux will NOT run on many of these devices, mostly due to memory considerations, but as a form factor embedded motherboard with low power dissipation and many power saving modes you will find that they are MANY MANY more options than just ARM, x86, or PPC.

      Most serious embedded developers wouldn't be looking at these for small tasks, nor for a sub-notebook. This is a handheld board, and could potentially be used in larger devices, but at that point you might as well get the cheaper picoITX board. This is a product with a fairly limited niche, but its definitely cool for what it is, if thats what you need.

      That being said its been a couple years since I worked on an architecture with more than 1 MB of RAM so YMMV.

    8. Re:Been around for a while... by alegrepublic · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Linksys has two systems that can be used as a general-purpose Linux computer: NSLU2 and WRT54GL. I use both on a regular basis for a variety of tasks, such as Webcams, remote voice intercoms, asterix PBX, and, of course, for their original purpose too: file serving and network routing/bridging. The USB port in the NSLU2 is very useful not only for disks but also for all kinds of peripherals. I also use the slightly more expensive WRTSL54GS, which includes a USB port along with 3 network interfaces (two wired and one wireless.) I wish there were more options, but I am happy with those, as all 3 options are under $100.

    9. Re:Been around for a while... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most embedded systems run on some ARM variant, or PowerPC variant, or MIPS variant.
      The ARM variants are more 'visible', but there are PowerPCs all over the place in telecom and automotive.
      MIPS is also quite popular.

      As you mentioned, teeny system boards abound in the embedded word. Part of the solution to teeny X86 is to abandon the legacy ports (serial, parallel, PATA) in favor of just USB and SATA. The problem then becomes that your USB hub ends up being bigger than your PC.

    10. Re:Been around for a while... by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      What about dumb cellphones, I can garuantee that almost none of those would use a 32 bit chip, the almost is because invariably some products end up over-engineered.

      I'm not sure that is true.

      http://www.arm.com/markets/mobile_solutions/armpp/ 835.html

      ARM7TDMI is a tiny macrocell, even on something like a Nokia 5110 it doesn't take up too much space on the ASIC. Thumb code is pretty dense, and an Arm cell has good mips/watt.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    11. Re:Been around for a while... by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      Linux already runs on the ARM
      it does, sort of.

      only one of the major linux distros runs on the arm and even with that its been looking pretty dicy for a while, i'm surprised arm made it into etch. The debian arm port also leaves a lot to be desired. Its floating point performance sucks on most hardware because they compile for a FPU that is not in most arm boxes and use kernel emulation on machines that don't have it. The ABI they are using makes it very hard to switch away from this (some people are doing a port using a new abi called armel and the performance increases are apparently masive but its unofficial and unstable only atm).

      getting stuff to cross compile is a pain as is building stuff on slow low memory machines (most arm machines fit in this category) so without a good distro backing you up the software that is availible to you without a lot of work is going to be pretty limited.

      There are specialist distros of course but i highly doubt any of them build anything like the selection of software that debian or fedora do.

      with x86 linux there is a wide choice of distros for different needs most of which can run quite happilly on a machine like the epia-n or this new pico-itx board (though you may need to slim some of them down depending on the storage device you use). The exact same distros can run on a powerhouse desktop PC allowing you to easilly build binaries at a reasonable speed.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    12. Re:Been around for a while... by couchslug · · Score: 1

      "the problem is that sub-notebooks, while a personal favorite of mine, typically have not done well in the marketplace."

      That might have to do with their being too expensive for most users. Paying more for less is not always popular.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  20. What the fuck is wrong with you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How did a non geek slip in? Government spies, I tell you!

  21. VIA Nanobook looks cool. by eddy · · Score: 1

    Pictures and more info at TR and specs at VIA

    Touchscreen?! I'd prefer a WS in there and do away with the "Dock", and then a PCCARD slot for expansion, but anyhow..

    --
    Belief is the currency of delusion.
    1. Re:VIA Nanobook looks cool. by maubp · · Score: 1

      Does Via's nanobook use this tiny motherboard?

  22. Generic laptop case? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    A tiny processing device is nice, but will someone please make a generic laptop case for putting these things in? I need a box in which to put such off-the-shelf components so I can fix and upgrade when I need to. A DVD-drive-sized bay for removable drives would be nice (but include connectors for a battery for when my power needs exceed my needs for a drive).

    1. Re:Generic laptop case? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can anyone shed some light on why no major hardware players have attempted this yet? While those of us that prefer to build our own computers are obviously in the minority, I'd think that the market would be large enough to make it worth the effort.

      Imagine if laptop-sized parts were as standardized as their desktop counterparts. Standardize 12", 15", 17", and 19" laptop chassis, the motherboard, optical drive, etc... Obviously oversimplified, but you get the idea.

      When, if ever, can we expect the emergence of the DIY laptop market? Are the reasons that this doesn't already exist economic (doubt it, seeing as the DIY desktop market doesn't seem to be eating into prebuilt sales) or technological (also unlikely)?

  23. handheld language translator by Simonetta · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Here's my first suggestion for what to do with this thing. I want a handheld (something the size of an battery-powered face shaver or large cell phone) written language translator. On the out-facing side is a mini-scanner and on the other side is a graphics LCD screen.

        Suppose you are in some place where you can't read the language (it does happen in the age of 500-seat 6000km airliners). You get a newspaper, wave the scanner over the text, and within about three seconds, the scanned writing appears in English on the LCD. You can either pop in small memory cards for different language families or have their programs stored on your laptop for downloading.

        Another feature would be a built-in microphone with a program that has been trained to your voice so that you can speak into this mic and have your words translated into the written form of the local language and displayed on the LCD.

        I'd be willing to pay about $100 US for this device. I'll bet a lot other people would also. Anyone interested in developing it? Would we have to pay royalities on a language? Could such a device be built on this new miniature PC card? Am I just dreaming?

    1. Re:handheld language translator by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      Another feature would be a built-in microphone with a program that has been trained to your voice so that you can speak into this mic and have your words translated into the written form of the local language and displayed on the LCD.

      Great, so now I can have it read, "I really like urinalysis" in Japanese.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    2. Re:handheld language translator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For what you want to do, this is probably WAY overkill. And it certainly will cost more than $100 (the bottom-line mini-itx boards cost $80 - $100 with processor but no RAM or PS - this has all three)

      But you'd do better trying to do OCR scanning and voice dictation with a specialized chip like a DSP anyways. And honestly straight language translation is poor when done by machine, but not necessarily processor intensive.

      If someone came to me and asked how to achieve the goals you ask for $100 - I'd say get a Moto Q (vzw: $100 w/ 2-year contract; sprite: currently free w/ 2-year contract) and start coding... hell just download the compact framework and start coding, it's emulation should be perfect since it's a runtime environment anyways...

    3. Re:handheld language translator by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 1

      Reread your description and price again.

      An iPhone:
      Handheld, large cell phone size
      Out facing camera
      Inside LCD screen

      Take a picture of a newspaper, OCR it, submit it to Google translations or some other website, and within three seconds (assuming a network connection) you get an English translation.

      Has a built in microphone; speak into it, and assuming wifi or cell, you can have a 'live' translator reply via chat in English text.

      Cost? $499.

      You won't see what you are proposing (which requires easily 10x more processing power) for 1/5 the cost.

      If you really want it, you either need to accept trade offs or pay for what you want.

    4. Re:handheld language translator by InakaBoyJoe · · Score: 1

      NEC's mobile phones in Japan have built-in OCR (they call it "Access Reader") and Japanese English dictionaries. Combined, you can snap a picture of some English or Japanese and translate it. And the phone itself costs $0-$200 at carrier subsidized prices.

      In actual use, it's kind of clunky, but it's conceptually what you are asking for. Not to mention, a clever Java MIDP/BREW programmer could go in and access the camera APIs and write a more streamlined solution.

      Incidentally, good OCR is especially important for Japanese and Chinese because it is one of only 3 ways (the others are handwriting recognition, and tedious stroke-based lookup) for looking up a Chinese character whose reading is unknown.

  24. sucky cpus by jcgf · · Score: 1

    I had a via mini-itx 533MHz system for a while. It didn't even perform on the same level as an equivalently clocked p3 despite all the advances made in the intermediate time. While these might be cool for carpcs, they probably won't be good for a small desktop.

  25. Selma? by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

    business card-sized motherboard

    The first order was placed by one Mordecai Sahmbi.

    --
    Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  26. Next iPhone board? by strredwolf · · Score: 1

    Wait a min... it's smaller than a Motorola RAZR? Could this be the next motherboard for the iPhone? Native x86 MacOS X on said phone anyone?

    --

    --
    # Canmephians for a better Linux Kernel
    $Stalag99{"URL"}="http://stalag99.net";
    1. Re:Next iPhone board? by Alioth · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No it couldn't - it uses far too much power and makes far too much heat (the fact it needs a heat spreader is a dead giveaway - a mobile phone device must be efficient enough not to need to dissipate heat at all).

  27. the homebrew market by blhack · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Can anybody even imagine how amazing it would be if cell phone networks became like wifi? You pay a monthly fee for access and you're on. Devices like this motherboard would really really open up the possibility for a homebrew-cellphone market. What would be very interesting to see is cell phone carriers become more like ISPs. You get some bandwidth from them, and you get to use it for pretty much whatever you want.

    --
    NewslilySocial News. No lolcats allowed.
    1. Re:the homebrew market by Alioth · · Score: 1

      This device isn't suitable for a phone - it uses far too much power and makes far too much heat (the heat spreader sort of gives this away). Better suited ARM based devices have existed for some time. You can roll your own cellphone already (with efficient parts). The people at Spark Fun have already done it (making a rotary dial mobile phone) - and you can also get the chips there to make your own phone.

      http://www.sparkfun.com/commerce/categories.php?cP ath=96 - The Port-A-Rotary

  28. Moore's Law for Motherboards? by Zzyzygy · · Score: 1

    I don't think so. Moore's Law deals with the doubling of the number of transistors in IC's every eighteen months. It has nothing to do with motherboard shrinkage. Methinks the headline is a bit misleading.

    -Scott
    --
    My other sig is a Glock
    1. Re:Moore's Law for Motherboards? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      -1: Pedantic Bastard

    2. Re:Moore's Law for Motherboards? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you retarded? It was ment as an analog to a known pattern.

    3. Re:Moore's Law for Motherboards? by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1
      There was shrinkage? Nobody told me about shrinkage!

      Oh, and love your sig...:)

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    4. Re:Moore's Law for Motherboards? by Zzyzygy · · Score: 1

      Time to burn some karma. . . .

      Are you retarded? It was ment as an analog to a known pattern.

      That is most certainly not the case here. In the case of the ever-shrinking motherboards the component count drops , unlike the increased transistor count in IC's as Moore's law predicts.

      And no, I'm not retarded.

      In closing, to be a grammar nazi try this on for size: "It was meant to be analogous to a known pattern."

      -Scott
      --
      My other sig is a Glock
  29. No. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, I'd consider that very unlikely.

  30. Don't think embedded, think home media center by schwaang · · Score: 1

    Not that I would mind x86 in the embedded world, but it seems to me that this is going nowhere fast. The problem isn't technical - it's business. Most embedded systems run some sort of ARM variant, which would mean that code would have to be ported to x86.


    The driver for smaller x86 boards is home media PCs and similar applications. For that, people want small, silent, AND powerful enough to handle video codecs.

    But even without those, a portion of the general public wants small and quiet PCs. Dell, HP, Acer, and Asus have been selling compact PCs for some time. (However, Dell is not yet offering Ubuntu pre-loads on a compact.) There is a trend in that direction.
  31. I want [to reach out and touch someone] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or an asterix server?

  32. Smaller is better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Designing a motherboard is a miserable experience these days because of the memory bus speeds. You almost have to be an RF engineer to understand how to make the bus work at all.

    The shorter the bus, the better. If you can get it short enough (good luck sucker) you can ignore the inductance and capacitance of the traces. Actually, with a 1 GHz bus, you can't ignore any trace longer than about a millimeter. Past that length, you have to treat it as a transmission line.

    The ideal motherboard would be about the size of the cpu plus the board-edge connectors. Never mind putting the memory on long plug in modules. Solder it directly to the opposite side of the board from the cpu. Or maybe you could plug the memory into the same kind of socket the cpu plugs into. The idea is to reduce the distance between the cpu and memory as much as possible.

  33. Appliance computing by redelm · · Score: 1
    Whether for phones or other, a stateless PC is a terminal, now AKA "Thin Client" or "Internet Appliance". Information is stored on a server elsewhere, accessible everywhere.

    I like Xterminals, but I'm a dinosaur and remember the Real Thing: terminals that did X and you could log into the networked machine[s]. Sort of like a VT220 doing graphics. They ran BOOTP (iso DHCP) and TFTP to boot.

    Now you'd want boot from flash and DHCP. The minicomp would be a small box like a SohO router with SVGA out (only 2D required), 10/100baseT or wireless, a wall-wart for power, and USB or PS/2 for kbd/mse. Very tidy, very neat and very cheap. Add monitor, kbd, mouse and network to run. Hardware specs very similar to a SoHo router: 486-class CPU, 64 MB RAM, 64 MB FLASH. Tight Linux SW.

    Onboard SSH would be a must, but a key design decision would be whether to incorporate a browser client to the local X server. Doing so would usually improve performance and always cut X-traffic. But this would jeopardize making the box a stateless appliance. That might depend on whether the box was tethered to a LAN server, or expected to work standalone. Flash cards or USB sticks could hold state.

    With software, you can do much the same thing to much more powerful desktop and laptop machines using something like a Knoppix boot CD.

  34. Freakin' metric system... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He asked for it.

  35. Ultimately... by FridayBob · · Score: 1

    ... we'll have mobile phones that can do almost everything that a desktop machine can, except with different display options. However, this development will not have any real meaning unless broadband flat-rate data connections also become available for them. Unfortunately, whether such a magical future ever comes to be is up to the telecom industry, and knowing them I'm not holding my breath.

  36. It is magic by geekoid · · Score: 1

    or more precisely, Magic Smoke that runs the electronics. I know, I have let a lot of it out in my time.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  37. WATCH YOUR STEP by A+Wise+Guy · · Score: 2, Funny

    Watch your step, I just droped my motherboard!

  38. still impossible for supercomputers by mangu · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I wish we had *any* computer today that could do the things you mention, if it cannot be done in a supercomputer forget about the handheld thingies.


    The problem is that both language translation and voice-to-text need a full understanding of the context. Any spoken language has so many different interpretations that it's useless to try automatic processing without full artificial intelligence. A classic example used in AI courses is "he saw that gasoline can explode". This sentence means either "he realized that it's possible for gasoline to explode" or "he watched a gasoline container as it blew up", one needs further examination of the context to know which meaning was intended.


    A project that has tried to create a solution for this problem is Cyc, but it seems to be very far yet from realizing the original intent. Computers can do amazing things, but they still don't have the common sense of a four year old child.

    1. Re:still impossible for supercomputers by Simonetta · · Score: 1

      This argument is absurd. In the real world, one can use gestures and rephrasing of the sentence to get the intended meaning across. We need a cheap and reasonably reliable communication device for real-world real-time situations, not something that can translate literature or pass academic worse-case situations.
          People who say we need an AI supercomputer to handle basic language translation needs have probably never been in a situation where they have been completely isolated from everyone by the lack of speaking even one word of the local language. This happens all the time in the real world. Especially now when a week's pay and a 24-hour journey will get you to a million places where nobody speaks English or any other language that you took one class in while at college.
          And a week's pay or NGO grant gets anyone who comes from a place where no one speaks or studies English to right to your neighborhood as well.
          There is an overwhelming need for small powerful flexible cheap language translators. And telling people that it can't be done with or without an AI supercomputer doesn't help the situation any.
          Thank you.

    2. Re:still impossible for supercomputers by _Quinn · · Score: 1

      The problem is that gesture recognition is a difficult problem in computer vision to begin with; using it to materially aid the translation process is at least as difficult a problem as spoken-language contextrual translation, and for the same reason. The real hope for cheap/fast/small translators is some sort of interactive device: the classic solution to hard AI problems is to make the human do the work. The device asks about if it recognized the sentence ("Did you write "The bathroom is in the volcano"? Please write "yes," write the sentence down again, or write a different one with the same meaning."), and then does a back-and-forth translation that's as literal as possible, and uses synonyms or definitions to check for figures of speech. ("OK. English isn't as cool as your language, so I'm going to have to say "The restroom is located inside in the lava-filled mountain," instead of what you wrote. Is that about right? (Please write "yes" or a correction.)") And so on.

      You can expect the computer to do a good job looking up translations word-by-word, and recognizing simple grammatical constructs. If you can steer the users into forming simple literal sentences with basic vocabulary, the odds of getting a good translation should improve dramatically. It won't suffice for having a conversation, but live translators barely do.

      --
      Reality Maintenance Group, Silver City Construction Co., Ltd.
  39. powers of 1000, not 2 by Russ+Nelson · · Score: 4, Interesting

    They're going to run out of prefixes pretty quickly, since they're usually applied to powers of 1,000 rather than 2. And whatever happened to micro? milli (okay, mini), micro, nano, pico, femto, atto. I don't think there's anything past atto.

    --
    Don't piss off The Angry Economist
    1. Re:powers of 1000, not 2 by dcsmith · · Score: 1
      micro, nano, pico, femto, atto. I don't think there's anything past atto.

      zepto- and yocto-.

      No, really.
      I mean it.

      --
      This has been a test. If this had been an actual Sig, you would have been amused.
    2. Re:powers of 1000, not 2 by M8e · · Score: 1

      zepto, yocto.

    3. Re:powers of 1000, not 2 by JoeD · · Score: 3, Informative

      atto = 10^-18

      zepto = 10^-21

      yocto = 10^-24

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SI_prefix

    4. Re:powers of 1000, not 2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually there isn't anything past atto because saying "you get a zeptoboy for doing such a great job" sounds stupid.

    5. Re:powers of 1000, not 2 by dcsmith · · Score: 1
      Actually there isn't anything past atto because saying "you get a zeptoboy for doing such a great job" sounds stupid.


      I think I'd rather get a zeptoboy than a femtoboy.

      --
      This has been a test. If this had been an actual Sig, you would have been amused.
    6. Re:powers of 1000, not 2 by ffflala · · Score: 1

      milli (okay, mini), micro, nano, pico, femto, atto. I don't think there's anything past atto.

      After atto comes, venti, grande, then tall.

    7. Re:powers of 1000, not 2 by TheThiefMaster · · Score: 1

      Micro was used by the ATX line: Micro-ATX.

    8. Re:powers of 1000, not 2 by stefanb · · Score: 1

      I don't think there's anything past atto.
      At least zepto and yocto.
  40. Heat dissipation by Alain+Williams · · Score: 1

    that makes how many watts per square inch ?

  41. How is this different.... by WhoBeDaPlaya · · Score: 1

    ... than just soldering on a bunch of SMT components?

  42. FPS by icebones · · Score: 1

    I'm not going to use it for FPS or sth :')

    I'm sure it could handle Quake II

    --
    Life is pain. Anyone who says differently is selling something.
  43. arrogant? by StewedSquirrel · · Score: 2, Interesting

    OK.... lets look at your claims and your gripes.

    1) The C7 core runs a full speed in-order ALU and FPU. Unlike the C3, where design constraints required a half-speed FPU, this one has it at full speed. The ALU has a full 24 cycles to complete simply 32 bit operations (should only require 4 cycles, at best). Let's not even mention the 64KB 4-way associative L1 cache with only 3 cycle latency. Even at 1Ghz, this would indicate to me that the clock speed is not, in fact, ALU bound, but more likely FPU or L1 cache bound. Where did you get your ALU claim? It sounds made up to me.

    2) The C7 core benchmarks show it to be about 40% slower, clock-for-clock than the new Celeron M. Presumably the ULV version may be a hair slower, leaving it at half the performance clock-for-clock. Considering that today's Celeron M is far better per clock than the original K8, it would lead me to believe that this chip would be roughly equivalent to a 500Mhz K8 processor, but using only about 1/10th of power.

    This chip uses a 90nm SOI process, and VIA's process is up there with the best in the world. I'm not exactly sure what the basis for your gripe is...... except it sounds hollow.

    Also, the (as you put it) "P4 escapades" are only one of many examples where clockspeed != performance. Take the old Intel 386SX or the AMD 486DX4-120 or the old AMD K6-2, which were all total dogs "per clock" compared to the much more efficient (at the time) 386DX, Pentium and Pentium 2.

    Stew

    --
    There are 10 kinds of people in the world. Those who understand binary and those who don't.
    1. Re:arrogant? by StewedSquirrel · · Score: 1

      erm... ok well #1, I misread.

      seemed to think i read that you claimed the clockspeed was limited because of their ALU and then... meh

      still, #2 is worth pointing out. The performance of the chips has stepped up since the core was originally dubbed "C3".

      that's all.

      --
      There are 10 kinds of people in the world. Those who understand binary and those who don't.
  44. Design flaw by UNFAIRMAN · · Score: 1

    All the connectors (power, USB, etc) are on the side. This works for traditional motherboards where the size of the connector is relatively insignificant, but in this case it seriously restricts the form factor. It looks small in the picture next to the phone, but imagine the wires attached. 3"x1.8" fits into a standard wall box, but not with the wires on the side. I think they need to stack the connectors on the surface of the MB to make this size viable as a standard.

  45. MicroSD: 8GB by symbolset · · Score: 1

    MicroSD will let you have 2GB

    Soon eight. No kidding.

    Wow. Ain't progress fabulous?

    With a read speed of 16 Megabytes (MBs) per second and a write speed of 6MB/s, Samsung's 8GB microSD card well exceeds the Speed Class 4 SDHC (Secure Digital High Capacity) standard

    Darn, that's for mid-2008 production according to engadget.

    Verizon and Samsung jointly announced a 4GB MicroSDHC for May 1 2007 release, but I can't find it.

    Anyway, performance on these systems will be more than sufficient for regular office work on Linux or as a thin client, and they'll support video up to 1080p (with add-on lvds daughter card of course). I believe the chipset supports SATA, though they don't show a connector on the device. Watts are ridiculously low (system: 14W Idle, 16W running Memtest!) It will be interesting to see what people do with them.

    I'll have to buy a few to play with when they're available. I could have fun with this.

    Gumstix is cute, but I'll take that x86 instruction set for ready applications and standard interfaces for readily available attachable goodies by preference.

    --
    Help stamp out iliturcy.
  46. Re:Murphy's Law for motherboards by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

    You're just like a dumbass Woodrow Wilson.

    --
    Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
  47. on the issue of availibility by petermgreen · · Score: 0

    It's not clear whether VIA will make these tiny motherboards available to end users, or if they will only be sold directly to device makers
    mini-itx.com are already taking pre-orders so presumablly via have said they are prepared to sell to them.

    --
    note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    1. Re:on the issue of availibility by loserMcloser · · Score: 2, Informative

      mini-itx.com is taking pre-orders for the pico-ITX -- I don't see anywhere on the site where they are taking pre-orders for the mobile-ITX that the article is actually about.

  48. Google translate isn't perfect... by PRMan · · Score: 1

    Hey, Google translate isn't perfect, but it's better than nothing. While the translation is usually a bit rough, it's a whole lot better than the French or German or Japanese I was looking at. And it doesn't take a supercomputer.

    I agree with the grandparent post. Hearing a voice, figuring out the words and writing the translation on a screen would be a great application, even if it only got every third word right. How do I know this? Because in Spanish, I only get about every third word but I "get the gist" of the conversation. Surely a device like this could get above 33% pretty quickly.

    --
    Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
  49. Great! by TransEurope · · Score: 1

    Give me such a thing with 3 or 4 SATA-connectors (for a good or better RAID-array), 1 CF-disk-connector, 1 10/100/(1000) MBit ethernet port and optionally 1 serial port ans it would be my mini fileserver/NAS base of choice. A GHz and 512 Megs of RAM would be more than enough for an FTP-server and on or two p2p-clients and lot's of disk cache.

  50. Just wanted to make sure... by v4vijayakumar · · Score: 1

    Is is water cooled?

  51. Im trying not to troll here by jon287 · · Score: 0

    but my 5 year old sony vaio picturebook is smaller than their "mini laptop". Its strange little 600 Mhz transmeta x86 cpu gave suprisingly good performance and it was a very power stingy notebook with a very small battery considering its runtime. It also weighs only 1.2 pounds... half a pound less.

    I've tried via boards over the years and have been dissapointed by instablities in the DMA on the mini-itx's (causing random lockups), rediculously overpriced nano-itx, currently with pico-itx it seems impossible to find anyone who has any to sell even at the super high prices... It seems to take forever for VIA to release anything in quantity.

    VIA just has a lot to prove to me this time around. In the mean time, if you want a tiny little form factor for your car pc or whatever, ebay a picturebook or 2. The last one I bought was cheaper than a bare nano-itx!

    --
    To boldly use to and too two times and get it right too! They're not gonna believe their eyes when they see it there!
  52. Huge by taff^2 · · Score: 1

    Tech 1: Is that your new graphics card?
    Tech 2: Pretty sweet huh?
    Tech 1: It's Huge!!
    tech 2: Well it needs to be, it's got 4 Cell processors and 4G of RAM on it, plus integrated Freon cooling system so I can keep it cool while overclocking it by up to 50 times.
    Tech 1: Nice! Quake's gonna rock on that thing. What that little bit sticking out of the end?
    Tech 2: Oh, that's my new motherboard.

    --
    Karma: Bad. (As in Good?)
  53. How many PCI slots does it have? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How many PCI slots does it have?